Planet Money - How DeepSeek changed the market's mind

Episode Date: February 1, 2025

On Monday, the stock market went into a tizzy over a new AI model from Chinese company DeepSeek. It seemed to be just as powerful as many of its American competitors, but its makers claimed to have made it far more cheaply, using far less computing power than similar AI apps like ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini. In one day, hundreds of billions of dollars were wiped off the valuations of companies related to AI.This week, investors seemed suddenly to change their minds about what our AI future would look like and which companies will (or won't) profit from it. Will we really need all those high-end computer chips, after all? What about power plants to provide electricity for all the energy-hungry AI data centers? On today's show – how DeepSeek might have changed the economics of artificial intelligence forever.This episode was produced by Willa Rubin with an assist from James Sneed. It was edited by Keith Romer and engineered by Neil Tevault. Research help from Sierra Juarez. Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.Always free at these links: Apple Podcasts, Spotify, the NPR app or anywhere you get podcasts.Find more Planet Money: Facebook / Instagram / TikTok / Our weekly Newsletter.Music: Audio Network: "West Green Road," Universal Music Production - "With It" and "Baby Amoroso" Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

This is Eric Glass. In this American life, sometimes we just show up somewhere, turn on our tape recorders, and see what happens. If you can't get seven cars in 12 days, you gotta look yourself in the mirror and say, holy, what are you kidding me? This car dealership trying to sell its monthly quota of cars and it is not going well. I just don't want one balloon to a car. Balloon the whole freaking place so it looks like I'm circus.

Real life stories every week. Just a note, in this episode, we will at some point talk about specific AI and tech companies including Meta, Google, Microsoft, and Anthropic, all of which are current financial supporters of NPR. Here's the show. This is Planet Money from NPR. Imagine us at Planet Money rolling out of bed

late on Monday morning, still in our cozy pajamas. Yeah, we got our Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle slippers on. We got our cup of coffee. Big yawn, turn on the old TV, and oh my, what is happening in the stock market right now? This is moving so fast, it's stunning. I mean, wow. It is shaking this entire industry to its core.

Crushed the Nasdaq, which plunged 3.07%. Uh, yeah. AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH SHI- Single largest loss in a day of market capitalization in history. What was happening? It was apparently some kind of AI apocalypse? Okay, so AI apocalypse, not so sure about that. Okay, fine, whatever.

But without a doubt, this is a monumental shift. Yeah, because on Monday, AI-related stocks started plummeting and TV-related people started grasping for big metaphors. It was an earthquake today in the world of artificial intelligence. The seismic AI event, a new-ish AI model from a company called DeepSeek.

Hello and welcome to Planet Money, I'm Mary Childs. And I'm Kenny Malone. Today on the show, call it an artificial intelligence earthquake, call it an AI apocalypse, but Monday was not just a market freakout. I mean, it was that. Markets lost hundreds of billions of dollars. But it was also a teachable moment. Oh, yes.

Because if we look at the specific companies that got slammed on Monday and the few that benefited, we can see pretty clearly what people with money are betting our AI future looks like. And this week the AI model from Deepsea has them betting on a very different looking future. Or has Jim Cramer so artfully put it? it. Support for this podcast and the following message come from Ameriprise Financial. Chief economist Russell Price shares a key investment principle. Market trends tend to tell us that time is on the side of the investor.

Remaining invested through periods of highs and lows is generally one of the better ways to build wealth over the long term. For more information and important disclosures, visit Ameriprise.com slash advice. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Security is offered by Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC, member FINRA, and SIPC. This message comes from WISE, the app for doing things and other currencies. This week has been a tectonic shift in assumptions about how the world is going to change. This week has been a tectonic shift in assumptions about how the world is going to change. The world is going to change. The world is going to change.

The world is going to change. The world is going to change. The world is going to change. The world is going to change. The world is going to change. The world is going to change. The world TNCs apply. This week has been a tectonic shift in assumptions about how the world is going to look. So let us first discuss how those assumptions became assumed. We shall visit a simpler ancient time. Yes, two years ago, roughly November 2022, this is when the world got its first look at ChatGPT.

You will recall we all lost our minds. ChatGPT could write poetry, it could tell stories, maybe it could take our jobs. We'd never seen anything like it. That AI model was developed by an American company called OpenAI, and their AI model, ChatGPT, had taken a ton of time to develop. OpenAI had spent billions of dollars creating it, and as the model developed, it became clear that running better and better versions of GPT would be so expensive because it required the best semiconductors in the world, lots of them.

The American AI arms race began. Google, Meta, Microsoft all built giant, expensive AI models. And newer companies got more competitive too. Anthropic, perplexity also with gigantic AI models requiring unearthly amounts of compute, as they say, and money, as they also say. They do say that. And what seemed to be true in all these cases was that in order to compete in the AI revolution,

these companies needed unimaginable scale, more and more computing power, more and more investment, billions and billions of dollars. If there was a way to win the AI arms race, it seemed pretty clear you needed the scale of a gargantuan company to do so. And then on Monday, all of those assumptions fell apart, as did the stock market. Was Monday a bummer of a day for you? In the grand scheme of days, how does that shape up?

Yeah, I mean, listen, as far as kind of Monday morning is concerned, it starts off on a sour note. Angelo Zeno is an equities analyst at a company called CFRA Research. Angelo's job in part is to look at the tech world and identify good and bad stocks for investors. And he says on Monday, there were bad signs even before the stock market opened in the United States. I was up at four or 5 a.m. which is when I typically wake up and I already had a number

of inquiries in my inbox from investors out in Europe. So what are those investors like, Angelo, you told us American AI was the future. Yeah. I mean, listen, you know, who are the winners, who are the losers from this? What exactly is happening? Great questions, European investors. What exactly was happening? Well, so, yeah. What exactly was happening?

Well, so, yeah, DeepSeek was happening. Here's the backstory. This Chinese company, a subsidiary of a hedge fund actually, had been developing an AI model just, you know, for fun. For its own hedge fundy uses, I guess. And this was not a secret. Lots of people in the AI tech world knew about this, Angelo included, because the hedge fund had been sort of open sourcing what it was doing. After all, the parent company was not an AI company, it was a hedge fund. Right, so people generally knew that this AI model

was likely more useful than just for hedge fundy things, but what seems to have happened was seems to really have rocked the stocks, were a few key things. Yeah, number one, the DeepSeq AI had been training, getting better and better. And it seems that the newest version released just 11 days ago had got real good. It hit certain benchmarks that showed it was possibly allegedly as good or nearly as good as the gigantic, fancy, expensive AI models being built by the American AI companies. Except, and here's the big thing, number two,

DeepSeek is not a big, fancy, expensive AI model. It was reportedly built for a fraction of the cost and reportedly did not need top-of-the-line chips and semiconductors and processors to run, like the models from the American AI companies need. And then big thing number three, according to Angelo Zeno, news of all of this starts to spread and over the weekend, last weekend, lots of people download a DeepSeek app, presumably to see what this buzzy new AI model is really like.

DeepSeek topped the App Store chart and kind of got ahead of open AI. I think it kind of put the technology right in the eye of the storm for investors out there. And then five hours after Angelo wakes up on Monday, markets open and wham-o, a bunch of stocks start plummeting. I've been thinking about like, should Monday have a name? Like Black Friday had a name, you know? And I've been trying to make this one work.

Yeah. Monday-eye apocalypse. It's not bad. It's not bad. Hey! You know. And so we shall now dissect and make meaning of the Monday-eye apocalypse, starting with Angelo's specialty, the tech sector.

So which tech stocks had an awful Monday? So when you kind of look at some of the names that got hit the most, I mean, essentially chipmakers that are heavily exposed to the data center market. And that would include Broadcom, Marvell, Micron. Is it Marvell? I've been saying Marvel this whole time. No.

Like a nerd who reads comics. OK. Yeah. Whoops. So Marvell, specifically specifically Nvidia was the one that got the most attention out there. Ah yes, Nvidia. Nvidia manufactures top of the line processors

that have become the not very secret sauce that American made AI models need in order to do the unfathomably large amounts of computing required to train and run AI models. If AI is the gold, Nvidia is selling the picks and the shovels. So for a lot of the people who were interested in investing in the brave new AI future, Nvidia seemed like a good place to do it, especially because it has actually been quite hard to invest directly in the AI companies. Like some of the biggest companies developing the models,

OpenAI, Anthropic, they do not have shares you can just go and buy. They're not publicly listed, not yet at least. All of this is why Nvidia, seemingly overnight, has become one of the most valuable companies on the planet. In 2020, you could buy Nvidia stock for like six bucks. Last week, 142 bucks. That is like 23X growth,

basically because the only way the AI revolution can happen is with the fancy AI chips from Nvidia. And in fact, Nvidia was seemingly so important that in 2022, the United States banned Nvidia's most powerful chips from being sent to China to preserve America's AI advantage for national security reasons. You could not overstate NVIDIA's value. And then enter DeepSeek, this Chinese hedge fund apparently building a top-of-the-line

AI model even though they weren't allowed to build it on the very best AI chips from NVIDIA because Chinese companies aren't allowed to buy them. Which the markets seemed to think perhaps meant Nvidia was not quite as important to the AI revolution as they thought. And on Monday, Nvidia's stock price fell so much, nearly 20%. A near double decimation, if you will. The company's value dropped by almost $600 billion, the single biggest one day drop in American history.

Now, historically, had you been bullish on Nvidia? Had you been telling these European investors, like, hey, go long Nvidia? So listen, we went bullish on Nvidia, actually, in March of 2020. Yes, we have continued to pound the bullish on Nvidia actually in March of 2020 Yes, we have you know continue to pound the table on Nvidia as recently as kind of a week or two ago We do think they have the most important intellectual property probably in the world

Right, but if you were a week ago telling people Bullish on Nvidia and then on Monday it plummets. How does that, like what's that like when you're in your chair? It doesn't look good. And it's definitely not an easy conversation to have. It is however, a conversation that many investors needed to have with themselves on Monday because DeepSeek's prevalence suddenly

did seem to undermine the core assumption that in order to build God Tier AI you needed God Tier AI chips but DeepSeek had apparently pulled it off with cheaper chips and fewer of them. Which the markets interpreted as not good for Nvidia and the other chip makers in their future. As for Angelo what did he tell his angry European investors and other investors during the Monday I apocalypse? We didn't say sell your Nvidia shares. We continue to have a buy recommendation on the shares. Okay, so you didn't change

that through the the cliff. Right, especially on that day. I mean, when the stock was down, I believe it was 18 or 19 percent. We did think that was an overreaction. Because, he says, the AI revolution will still need lots and lots of processing power. Just, you know, whose chips and how many and what kind? Well, the markets seem a bit less sure about all of that than they were one week ago. For our next lesson learned from the Monday-eye apocalypse, we turn to Jennifer Hiller of the Wall Street Journal. I'm going to share my screen and I'm just going to explain in one second.

Jennifer has been reporting on the energy industry for over a decade. I just want you to read a headline that you wrote from like about two weeks ago. Yeah, once and one and constellation energy is one of the hottest stocks. Once unwanted, constellation energy is one of the hottest stocks. Once unwanted, Constellation Energy is one of the hottest stocks. It's a story about how investors were pouring money into America's biggest provider of nuclear power. The value had been shooting up and Constellation Energy hit an all-time high stock price just last week.

Well, Jennifer, it seems you know what I'm going to do next, which is two weeks later, I'm just going to pull up a graph of their stock price. It looks like it sort of fell off of a cliff and then bumped along the bottom and then dipped some more. Yeah. I'm obviously a big jinx. You don't want me to write a story about your all time high. But this was not Jennifer's fault.

This was of course Deepseek's fault. Yes, okay. So in case you have not heard this, the AI revolution is gonna require a lot of energy. And this goes back to the market assumption we just discussed about how training AI models and running them requires really high tech processors, which use loads of electricity.

And then AI uses loads of those fancy processors using loads of electricity. And they put them all together, and I guess, in giant big buildings. These really large data centers that are kind of often on the edge of town, great big buildings. Should we imagine it like having the electrical meter outside, and it's just spinning so fast you can't see the hand?

I like that idea. I don't know actually how they're metered, but it must be some very fancy version of that. Jennifer says that people have been talking about needing and building like Manhattan's worth of new power supply. As in enough energy to power Manhattan three, four, seven times over. And for reasons, Jennifer says some of the tech companies have become fixated on nuclear as a great option for the huge AI powered needs. All of these big tech companies have climate commitments and climate targets that they've made. Yeah, nuclear works on that front. It is carbon emission free. AI and data centers need power consistently all the time 24-7. Apparently that is how nuclear power works. Consistent energy 24-7. And sure, you know,

it has a notorious track record, but... I think tech people just also kind of like the technology of nuclear. Nuclear is the tech bro of power. That makes total sense to me. Oh, 100%. But anyway, the point is that we have a similar story here to what we had with Nvidia and other chip makers. People wanted a way to invest in the AI future, and so they were pouring money into nuclear

stocks, including, of course, our nation's biggest nuclear provider, Constellation Energy. Over the last three years, Constellation went from like 40 bucks a share to like $300, because the markets thought our AI future needs all the nuclear energy. And then on Monday, because of DeepSeek, the markets were forced to perhaps rethink that assumption.

You had this high quality AI apparently needing less energy. The market starts selling Constellation off of the cliff. And at one point on Monday, the stock was down 20%. It's brought up this question of how much power does the AI industry really need? Yeah. So that cliff you described, the stock price of Constellation dropping off, that is a market collectively saying, oh crap, maybe the future doesn't require as much electricity

as I was betting on. Right, I think it's pretty safe to say that there's a future where we're using a lot more electricity than we use now, but are we using it at this extremely higher level? And to be clear, nuclear power has been getting lots of headlines, but the markets had also been pouring into really like any company that makes and sells any kind of electricity. And those companies, they got hit on Monday too, including a company called the Texas

Pacific Land Corporation, which is basically just some giant chunks of land in Texas that have oil and natural gas. Even that got whacked by the DeepSeek news on Monday. So yeah, that shows you like how, how the tentacles of this stretch out. The Monday-eye apocalypse was, was not about whether or not there will be an AI revolution. If anything, the introduction of DeepSeq means more AI, lowering the barrier to AI, making it cheaper to use for, I don't know, whatever your AI mind can dream up. All your great ideas. There you go.

Getting into it. And there are two categories that you'll see companies sorted into. AI enablers and AI adopters. Enablers are the companies that are basically the supply chain to make AI models. Chipmakers, power companies, the AI model companies themselves. And then the AI adopters, those are all the companies that stand to benefit from using AI. And really, what this week was about was like a shift away from the enablers

and arguably a bit towards the adopters. Yeah, the shift away from the chip makers and the energy companies was dramatic. You have to look a little bit harder, squint a little bit to see the market moves towards the adopters. But one example people point towards, Salesforce. They have basically made their whole thing, their identity, adopting and using AI. And on Monday, their stock was up 4%.

And I think there is one other huge assumption that was challenged this week. Up until Monday, the market seemed to be confident that American AI companies had a moat around this technology, that the barriers to entry were just so enormous that no one else was going to win this arms race. But that moat, that was maybe the biggest assumption that the markets were scrambling to rethink on Monday. Because if a Chinese hedge fund that doesn't even make AI for a living was able to make DeepSeek as cheaply as they say using fewer and less fancy processors

and if it's even close to as good as these American AI models. Yeah, that probably does change everything. After the break, we sit down with someone actively trying to build DeepSeek from scratch to see how much of all of this is real. And did the world really change on Monday? The indicator from Planet Money is diving into the world of batteries, not the kind you buy at the grocery store. We're talking really big batteries, the kind that can power thousands of homes

This technology came seemingly out of nowhere We're digging deep into the battery industry in three back-to-back episodes listen to the indicator from Planet Money podcast on NPR On NPR's wild card podcast comedian Michelle Butoh says she's glad she ignored the people who told her to lose weight. I'm just going to show you what it looks like to love my body, my double chin, my extra rolls, okay? My buckets of thighs. Sauce on the side, you can't afford it.

I'm Rachel Martin. Michelle Butoh is on the Wild Card podcast, the show where cards control the conversation. Matt Wilson spent years doing rounds at children's hospitals in New York City. I had a clip-on tie. I wore Heelys, size 11. Matt was a medical clown. The whole of a medical clown is to reintroduce the sense of play and joy and hope and light into a space that doesn't normally inhabit. Ideas about navigating uncertainty. That's on the Ted Radio Hour podcast from NPR.

There is a company called Hugging Face. Their logo is like that smiley face emoji that's also giving you a hug with those two big emoji hands, hugging face, you know? I can see that as a very cute logo, but it is a kind of AI company where Leandro Fonvera works. And he describes the basic business model this way. So you can imagine it a little bit like GitHub, if you're familiar with GitHub, where people

share code and everything's free. But there's an enterprise edition that costs money and that's how they make money. But like, the point is, hugging face, cute logo, like an AI sharing platform. They do not build gigantic proprietary AI models to compete with OpenAI or Anthropic or Google or whatever. And the reason we got in touch with Leandro is that he heads up their research team. So we, our job is not to make money, our job is mostly to spend money. To spend money and build things that are very useful. And what's been

useful lately is DeepSeek or you or playing around with DeepSeek's new chatbot that partially freaked the markets out about the future of AI. Because there are really two reasons why the market freaked out. First, that it was made in a way that was cheaper and more efficient than how things like ChatGPT were made. And the other reason was that DeepSeek's model was allegedly really good. So the big question hovering over this entire week has been, is all of that real and true? Or were markets overreacting?

So let's take these one by one. Is DeepSeek actually as good as the fancy American AIs? Well, Landro says we have ways to test this. There are these standardized tests, benchmarks, for AI models. They used to be pretty simple math problems or whatever. But as the models have been trained more and more and have gotten better and better.

We've upped the exams a little bit. So now we're closer to PhD level exams. And we can measure quite well how many, like how many of the questions does a model get right. So is DeepSeek passing PhD level coding, PhD level math? Yeah, so those models are getting like really good at solving certain kinds of questions. So for example, these models can solve some of, for example, math Olympiad questions. And here I will just interject to note we do have on staff one person who has a math

degree and it's Kenny. True, not an Olympiad, but I was excited. Quickly downloaded some math Olympiad questions, pulled them up on my screen for Leandro. This is such a big day for you, I feel like. Oh yeah. This never gets to happen. The first, alright, hold on. Show that for each N, we can find an N digit number with all its digits odd,

which is divisible by five to the Nth power. Yeah. DeepSeq can do that? Sometimes. I mean, I can only sometimes do that. So yeah, all right, fair enough. Exactly. I'm like a physicist by training and it takes exercise to be good at those questions.

Yeah, okay. So that's what we're talking about here, huh? Yeah. Capability-wise, we don't see any benchmarks that show that they have like some gaps in the knowledge. Yeah, no apparent gaps between how DeepSeq's model performs and how the other models perform. Leandro has also checked to make sure DeepSeq is getting its exam answers legitimately. So we test these models on kind of exams. If those exams are already in the training data, naturally the models are much better. Okay, so this is the classic, are they teaching to the test? Like that's...

Exactly. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And we haven't seen any indication of that either. From what he's seeing, DeepSeek does seem to be in the same tier as the fancy American AI models. So, okay, appears to be good. That answers everybody's first question about DeepSeek, whether it was playing at the same

level as other big AI models. But the second question is, do we really think that this thing is more efficient in some way? And to test that, Leandro and his team are in fact, attempting to build this themselves, basically from scratch, to replicate it. When you sit down to like replicate DeepSeq, I don't even know, like, what do you,

you sit down and you open up a computer and you're like, all right, crack your fingers, open up a Microsoft Word document, and you're like, DeepSeek V2, let's go. Yeah, I mean, that's pretty much what we did, so. Now the reason this is even possible is because unlike a lot of the recent American AI models, DeepSeek has been pretty open about their methods.

They actually put out a big report that was kind of a set of instructions for how the model was built. So we're not like reverse engineering in the dark. We're actually more following the recipe and translating their paper to code. And I think we're making good progress. So I think in a few weeks, at the latest, we're going to have a pipeline that works, that people can use. And we're going to see if we get the same numbers. Yeah, so those numbers.

Again, DeepSeq's latest version was reportedly much cheaper to train and much cheaper to run than the big American models. Are the claims that have been made about DeepSeq, the cheapness, the fact that it can run on less powerful processors, do all of these things seem to be checking out? Yeah, so I think that's something that we want to investigate a bit. So far it seems like napkin calculation. It's probably the right order of magnitude. Yeah, in the ballpark, which is notable because there had kind of been some murmurs of skepticism

around the specific numbers DeepSeq was putting out. But Leandro is pretty convinced so far. It really is way cheaper than the existing American models for basically the same thing. And I think one thing that people underappreciate is an open model is kind of a leveling levels the whole field because everybody has access to the same level of knowledge so everybody can immediately build on top of that. I've heard people talk about this moment as a shift towards AI models as a commodity and that is a completely different vision than what markets seem to be betting on before this week. Like

seemingly overnight, we went from an imagined future where a handful of gigantic American companies controlled the most powerful AI models to a future where it seems very powerful AI models can be built and used by maybe anyone, anywhere, someday? That is a lot to process. In one week. In just a few days. The markets for their parts have moved ever so slightly back towards where they were before Monday. Still shocked. But, you know, Nvidia's still one of the most valuable companies in the world. Yeah, investors are of course still betting on a version of the AI revolution, which of course will be excitedly televised. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh uh,

If you want to nerd out more on what an AI future might look like, you can subscribe to our newsletter. Newsletter author Greg Rizaltzi is working on a piece about why the AI community is suddenly obsessed with a 160-year-old paradox, Jevons Paradox. He's got the history of that idea and the latest AI ideas. Subscribe at npr.org slash planet money music. This episode was produced by Willa Rubin with an assist from James Snead. It was edited by Keith Romer and engineered by Neil Teavolt.

Research help from Sierra Juarez. Special thanks this week to Chaim Israel from Bank of America. I'm Kenny Malone. And I'm Mary Childs. This is NPR. Thanks for listening. Technologist Pao Garcia is using AI to create photos of people's most precious memories. How her mother was dressed, the haircut that she remembered. We generated tens of images and then she saw two images that was like, the haircut that she remembered, we generated tens of images and

then she saw two images that was like, that was it. Ideas about the future of memory. That's on the TED Radio Hour podcast from NPR. Are you the greatest musician the world has never heard? Unsigned artists, now's your opportunity to play the Tiny Desk. Enter the 2025 Tiny Desk Contest, our nationwide search for the next undiscovered star. The winner will play a Tiny Desk concert and a US tour.

To learn more, visit npr.org slash tiny desk contest. Usher, Yo-Yo Ma, Boy Genius, Shaka Khan, Billie Eilish, Weird Al, one thing all these big stars have in common – they've all played behind NPR's Tiny Desk. And if you enter NPR's Tiny Desk Contest between now and February 10th, you could be next. Unsigned musicians can find out more and see the official rules at npr.org slash tiny desk

contest.