Planetary Radio: Space Exploration, Astronomy and Science - Making space matter: A space journalist’s journey
Episode Date: June 11, 2025What does it take to turn a love of space into a global career in science journalism? Sarah Cruddas has done just that. With a background in astrophysics and a passion for storytelling, she’s be...come a leading voice in space media, covering rocket launches, interviewing astronauts, and writing books that bring the Cosmos down to Earth. In this episode, Sarah shares her path from the U.K. to the front lines of space communication and why she believes storytelling is essential to the future of exploration. She also reflects on the challenges of breaking into the field, the power of listening, and how space can unite people across the globe. Plus, Bruce Betts joins us for What’s Up, where we talk about what makes a great space journalist. Discover more at: https://www.planetary.org/planetary-radio/2025-making-space-matterSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Space journalism, where science meets storytelling.
We meet a leading voice in the field this week on Planetary Radio.
I'm Sarah Elahmed of the Planetary Society, with more of the human adventure across our solar system and beyond.
From reporting live at space shuttle launches to helping shape how we
talk about space in the media, journalist and author Sarah Crutus has built a career sharing
the wonders of the cosmos with the world. Today she's bringing that insight to our show. Then stick
around for What's Up with Bruce Betts where we'll explore what we think makes a good science journalist.
If you love planetary radio and want to stay informed about the latest space discoveries,
make sure you hit that subscribe button on your favorite podcasting platform.
By subscribing, you'll never miss an episode filled with new and awe-inspiring ways to
know the cosmos and our place within it.
We've got a special Planetary Society event coming up on June 25th, and wherever you are
in the world, you're invited.
Our very own Matt Kaplan, our Senior Communications
Advisor at the Planetary Society, is going to be hosting a live discussion with Jim Green,
Rob Manning, and Emily Loctewalla. They're the authors of a beautiful new book called
Mars Photographs from the NASA Archives. If you happen to be near Pasadena, California,
you're welcome to join us in person. But space is limited. You'll find links to RSVP for the
live stream or claim free in-person tickets on this week's Planetary Radio episode page.
Now on to today's guest. Sarah Kredis is a space journalist, an international television host,
an award-winning author, and a longtime friend of the Planetary Society.
With a background in astrophysics and a gift for storytelling,
she's made it her mission to make space accessible and meaningful for everyone.
You may have seen her on BBC, CNN, and the Discovery Channel,
or read one of her many books about space exploration,
including The Space Race, The Journey to the Moon and Beyond,
Look Up, Our Story with the Stars, and Moon Paradise. She's also written
for outlets like the Sunday Times, The Telegraph, Politico, and the Royal Astronautical Society.
She also hosts the podcast Where's My Jet Pack, a show that investigates retrofuturistic
promises and asks whether they're still science fiction or if they're just around the corner.
Over the course of her career, she's reported from rocket launches,
interviewed astronauts, authored books for all ages,
and worked with leaders across the space industry in many different nations.
But her path into science communication wasn't always straightforward,
something I super relate to.
In today's conversation,
Sarah Kredis shares how her childhood dream in the UK
led her to a global career in space journalism
and why telling
these stories matters now more than ever.
Hey, Sarah.
It's nice to see you again.
Hey, nice to see you.
Nice to be back here in Planetary Society HQ as well.
How did you first get involved in coming to the Planetary Society?
I moved to Los Angeles a few years ago and I was connected to some of your team members
via a friend who had set up,
Harriet Bretel is her name, and she now works at Caltech.
And I was kind of her mentor and she'd done some volunteering with the Planetary Society. And then we both ended up living out here.
And yes, she introduced me to you guys.
A shout out to Harriet Bretel, if you're listening.
And I had a lifelong fascination for space and of course, moving to Los Angeles.
It was just something I wanted to be involved with, because when you think of space, and particularly space in the US,
of course you think of NASA, but then there's also the Planetary Society. And yeah, I just
wanted to meet you guys and be involved. And yeah, just an incredible organization, so
privileged to be allowed to be here.
Well, thank you for such kind words. I mean, I didn't expect LA to be such a hub of space
science when I was growing up. And I've had these
conversations recently with people who ended up coming here for space science. You think the glitz and glamour of
the Hollywood and everything, but then you learn about JPL and the observatories and the entire burgeoning commercial
space sector in this area and suddenly you realize this is a wonderful place if you want to be into space, either
engineering or communications.
Yeah, the first time I came to LA, I think I'm allowed to say this as a British person,
I hated it.
Because it's the most un-European city you can imagine.
I love San Francisco.
I was like, you know, I knew I was going to, I'd been working in the US for quite a while.
I knew I was in the process of emigrating.
So I can't, what's LA?
You know, obviously I was working in the media, so it had a lot for me, but just this concrete jungle and these giant freeways, literally three times the size of the freeways in the
United Kingdom.
But then you realize there's all this space here, there's all this culture here, there's
all this communication work, of course, with it being Hollywood and everything.
But yeah, LA is a pretty special place for space.
And obviously, right now we're in Pasadena, also known as Nassadena, because of JPL. So it's just a privilege to be here and to be a tiny part of the US space story
is just an incredible privilege. I do feel very privileged for growing up in the United States
and having that access to so much space content and so many things to look forward to. My dreams
were shaped by the fact that I knew that if I wanted to and if I worked hard enough maybe
someday I could work at NASA, but those opportunities aren't available to everyone.
Do you feel like that's part of why you ended up going into science communication instead of
trying to pursue solid science instead? That's an interesting question. I always wanted to either
be an astronaut or a cosmologist. I ended up studying astrophysics at the University of
Leicester in the UK, which is the leading center for that.
And nothing kind of like, I always knew the US was the place to go.
When I was 16, I won the Young Scientist 2000 Awards and got to go to NASA's International
Space Camp in Huntsville, Alabama, which was just, I grew up in a very small, lower social
economic town in the UK.
And then I was at NASA at Space Camp and it was, it blew my mind.
But I actually fell into science communications by accident.
I had worked in the US just before university on working for a summer camp as camp counselor,
but I always knew I wanted to do science. And then I remember in between my second and third year of university,
so degrees in the UK are only three years long because we start school much earlier, like elementary school, we start at four.
And I remember I traveled around South America really foolish to do as a student, only three years long because we start school much earlier, like elementary school we start at four.
And I remember I traveled around South America really foolish to do as a student, use my
credit card to fly to South America for three months, backpack around.
And I remember just seeing a different side of the world.
I went to most of Brazil, Bolivia, Uruguay, and Argentina and just seeing like, obviously
this was 2004, so there was a lot of poverty in some areas, a lot of wealth
as well, but there was a lot of poverty that I saw and an aside of the world I hadn't
really seen before.
And I kind of came back a changed person and I knew I wanted to tell stories.
I didn't just want to be a scientist.
My plan had been to do my master's and then do a PhD.
And when I got back, I continued with my degree when I started volunteering at the local BBC,
unpaid and eventually I hung around enough they had to like pay me to hand out leaflets and like
working on like a Sunday radio show. I remember in my last year of university getting up at 4am,
which is crazy for a student to like to go and help on the Sunday morning breakfast shows,
answering the phones and stuff like that. And I just kind of fell into storytelling and knew
I could have pursued science, but you know, I hate to say this, be an average scientist. But I knew I found this
new passion for telling stories. So for me it wasn't really driven by geography but more
about kind of having my eyes open to the world and seeing different experiences.
I love that journey because I had a similar thought in that I really liked doing the science,
but I met so many people who were clearly, I'm not going to say more skilled at it,
but they knew exactly what research topic they wanted to go through.
They had this perfect passion for it.
Meanwhile, the thing that I found really exciting was when I got to talk to people in my everyday life
about the stuff that we were learning.
And once I started having those conversations with people and realizing that it was impacting them,
I finally found the part of the science
that not only fulfilled that need to learn more,
but also to share.
And so that made me want to go into science communication
and all these years later, I'm really glad it turned out.
But breaking into science communication
can be a little complicated.
See, I never even wanted to do science.
I wanted to tell stories, but I think I almost like,
I've always loved space my whole life,
but I kind of almost fell out of love with space
for a few years.
So I finished my astrophysics degree, went and worked,
did a post-grad in broadcast journalism,
and then just started working at the BBC,
reporting on human interest stories.
And I developed a passion for foreign stories.
And I was involved in everything from floods to like very unpleasant
stories as well, like murders, deaths, things you don't want to cover, but things that really
open you up to the world. Because I feel like journalism, you get to be a bystander on the
best and the worst of humanity. And throughout my career, I've kept that kind of like non-science
side of journalism going. And it's enabled me to go through some very difficult places
and complex situations, but to really like play a part in telling a story of humanity
and telling a story of the world.
And it was only after I got a job, almost by accident, I screen tested to be a weather
presenter with the BBC.
And obviously I was like, I only have a degree in astrophysics and they hired me because
apparently that helps me forecasting that I, whilst doing the weather, it enabled me
to do more science.
And then I would in my free time, I remember starting to do science stories to sell back
to the BBC.
So I'd work breakfast television shifts.
And then in the afternoons, I'd go off and report on science stories.
I was working in local TV news, but then I'd go off and do like national radio stories
to the BBC.
I remember interviewing the British-American astronaut, Piers Sellers, who had become an
American to follow his dreams
of space.
He was a climate scientist.
He took Bach from Sir Isaac Newton's apple tree into space with him as a NASA astronaut.
So I think he did like six spacewalks, helped build the International Space Station, and
sadly passed away about five, six years ago now.
But he really inspired me interviewing him, made me fall in love with space again, and
made me want to start telling stories about space exploration. And I did have this kind of niche
being a journalist, but also understanding STEM, understanding mathematics and having an astrophysics
background. Yeah, that really ends up helping. People ask me all the time, you know, should I go
into just the communications and learn how to write a really good article? Or is it actually
valuable to take that time to get the degree in the space science?
And I have found that both are very, very helpful,
but you're going to need to know some of the science in order to communicate around it effectively.
So it does super help.
And in journalism, the whole, and I see this now, so one of the things I'm doing now, almost like fast-forwarding to my career,
I'm setting up a company called Get Your Story Straight, which is a communications company, but what I've seen
throughout my career is that there's a STEM and literacy problem across the media and science stories don't get communicated.
And I'm talking all media, everything from social media now, which is a big part of life,
through to like standard news channels and stuff like that.
But like, at least in the UK, we finish our general education at 16.
And then so if you want to become a journalist,
you might not have done STEM since you were 16 years old. But then you're reporting on
science topics and complicated topics. And I think there's, you know, topics where numbers
can bamboozle you. And like, it doesn't mean the story is getting wrong. But I think there's
this STEM illiteracy problem, both from like a PR and marketing and communication side,
but also from the media side, really means we sometimes miss the mark.
And if we want science to be successful,
if we want people to understand
why what we're doing in space
and in the science industry as a whole is so important,
we need to address that STEM literacy problem on both sides.
And it's the job of people within industry
to effectively communicate,
because otherwise your story is gonna get confused.
And it's the job of journalists to address the STEM issue
and to ask more questions about STEM.
I do find that a lot of, because of this issue
around the misunderstanding of science,
when a lot of people try to communicate it,
they can sometimes sensationalize or get things
incorrect.
And that does us a disservice, because I
feel like on our end as science communicators,
we're being very reactionary to the way
that broader media is reporting on these things
and trying to disabuse people of things
that they heard that were incorrect
rather than getting to add on to this beautiful story
that's already been told to them.
Yeah, I think there's a lot that needs to be done.
But one thing I kind of like that we're seeing now,
at least with journalism,
and one of my passions being foreign news reporting as well
and reporting in difficult parts of the world,
is the role of satellite journalism. I always think it's come 360. So we do have this huge
STEM literacy problem within the media, but at the same time, space technology is enabling us.
The biggest problem with journalism right now is trust. The people don't trust the media,
rightly or wrongly. There is terms which have meant that people don't trust what they're told in the news.
But satellite journalism is enabling us to build back trust.
The New York Times won a Pulitzer Prize a few years ago for hospital bombings in Syria
using satellite data because you have irrefutable evidence when you have satellite data.
I'm seeing satellite journalism being used everything from that kind of situation where
you don't have to have a correspondent on the ground literally putting their life
at risk through to, for example, with the Los Angeles fires.
The first rule of rolling news and I worked in rolling news in the UK for quite some time
is that when a story breaks, you throw to a map because you need to show people where
it is and rolling news has to have images.
But now with satellites, we can throw to images.
We saw with the coverage of the Los Angeles fires,
max our satellite images showing us before and after
and enabling us to build up a picture
of how severe a situation is.
So even though we've got this STEM electricity problem,
it's exciting to see that how science, how space,
is actually saving the day and finding us a new way
to tell stories and to communicate
and just show the gravity of a situation
and really takes journalism and storytelling
to that next level.
You really have been all over the world
during your time in journalism.
I even saw it while I was looking up your career online.
You've been to places like North Korea.
How much of that was your adventures
through your pursuing of science communication?
And how much of that has just been your other adventures
as a general journalist?
I think, you know, exploring the earth is the closest many of us can get to space.
And I think it's a terrible cliche because to explore the earth is a privilege, you know,
and it's easy to say I love travel as a hobby, but you've got to have the means and the ways
to do it.
And I feel extraordinarily privileged through my journalism hat on to have been to North Korea, to Tibet, to Uganda,
the Congo, Rwanda, Transnistria, which is this fake state, or not fake state, road state
in between Ukraine and Moldova.
And part of that was in the UK, once I left the BBC, when I realized I've got to take
a risk in life and leave this steady staff presenter job at the BBC to work more in space
and to follow my dreams of telling stories about space.
And it all ties back to that trip on my credit card when I was 20 years old to South America.
But in order to appreciate what we have off this planet, we need to understand what we
have on this planet.
And I think it's important, even for science communicators as well, many of those non-science
communication stories, to look at the world and see more about what's going on in the
world.
And I remember working in Uganda, horrific, interviewing people who had been sexually abused their entire lives
and grew up in abject poverty.
But all of them asked about space because I'd be talking about space and they asked about it because they grew up under the stars.
And you don't realize the appreciation that across the world people have for space and in all the horrors of the world,
understanding more about the world and understanding that we're all the same, makes you a better
science communicator because it's good to get out that bubble and just like see other
perspectives because that makes us better as communicators, better as science communicators
and helps us understand more why people might get frustrated sometimes about space stories
or about STEM stories.
Well, I think it's that general connection to space that makes people want to go into
space science. I didn't do it because I loved the math necessarily, although I love math.
I love math.
But it was because of that feeling you get when you're looking up at the sky and that
connection you feel to the space all around you, but also just the general human experience
of what that means for all of us here on Earth in this small
little space in the cosmos, right?
I like to almost say that my love of space is as much about philosophy as it is about
science because it's asking, and I remember as a kid literally, this is probably a cliché
story, but one of my first memories is of looking up at the moon at the night sky as
a kid and then that sense of wonder.
Some people don't like to say this, but it almost does tie up to religion because it's like, why do we exist?
Where did we come from?
Where are we heading?
It's so profound.
And I think all of us have that innate curiosity and all of us, I don't care whether you're
six or 60, looking up at the night sky inspires you and it inspires you.
It's less about science as it is about wonder and a search for meaning that all of us want. No matter where we come from, we all care about similar things and we all have that same curiosity.
I love that. It's so true though. It's something that unites us and it's part of why this show has such an international audience and why we want to make sure that we can welcome as many people in the space community as possible. Because it can be kind of insular when you're in your little bubble, but when you step out
and you begin talking to people around the world of their experience,
it might not be the story of NASA rovers, it might be just sitting out underneath the stars.
It's the great unifier. All of us, all of us have looked up, and I know a lot of people
as communicators as well, focus on the aspiring children, but I think everyone,
no matter how old you are
or where you're from, you deserve that same passion
and that curiosity that can come from looking up.
And it's like, it's why the observatory in Los Angeles
is such a draw.
I've had friends come to visit from the UK
and I take them there.
People who aren't into space, so to speak,
but there's still that kind of like,
the opportunity to look through a telescope
and see Saturn's rings or something crazy like that. It's just, it is the great
unifier. And I think as science communicators and just to communicate as a whole as a space industry,
we need to talk less. And I say this as someone who talks constantly, but we need to listen because
we can do better as an industry if we listen to society as a whole about how they feel about
space, how they feel about space stories and what they really care about because, you know,
sometimes we miss the mark when we're communicating about topics or we get so insular.
We can get, you know, the space industry likes to scratch itself and everything instead of
listening to why it doesn't resonate with the public or why they don't quite understand.
And even though all of us can't go to space just yet, we can all, most of us can all look
up at the night sky and appreciate
what it is that we're a part of and how we're all citizens on this spaceship Earth.
It sounds though that in order to get into this career in science journalism and space
journalism, you basically had to fight for it. You had to take the initiative to be like,
well, I'm going to record these space-related stories and submit them and hope that they
get through and that they establish
me on this part of my career.
Is that the kind of advice you would give to someone who's trying to break into space
journalism today or do you feel like it's a different kind of atmosphere?
I obviously started my career in the UK.
I started my career at the BBC.
The space didn't rage is what I constantly got told when I was pitching TV shows.
In fact, my first primetime TV show was in the US and Discovery Channel was actually the US who took me first
compared to like, and people in the UK love space,
but TV editors don't as much.
And I, you know, news channels don't because news is normally
to do with the economy, politics and tragedy, unfortunately.
So there's always been a fight there.
And I've failed so many times.
And actually my advice to people who want to start out in
space journalism or communicating science is just to fail, give it a try and fail because
what's the worst that can happen?
And it's better than never trying at all.
So if this is something you're passionate about, oh, yes, you've got to earn money.
Yes, you've got to pay the bills.
But if you can make this work, go for it because like that matters more.
So my advice would be fail and go for it, which might be terrible advice,
but I don't know what is good advice.
I think that too, when people ask me like,
how do I get into space journalism or podcasting?
All I can say is chase your dream and never give up hope,
but I can't tell you that it's necessarily
gonna turn out the way that you planned.
I guess that's true in all of life,
but it can be difficult in that there are limited jobs
in this field.
That being said, I'm seeing a lot of people online who are breaking into their own form
of science communication and journalism just through social media.
Do you feel like that new kind of burgeoning science communication field on social media
is changing the way that the more broad kind of classic forms of journalism are operating
around science?
So I come from traditional media. So I come from, I've written for newspapers and online articles and TV and radio.
So I do social media, but begrudgingly because I always worked in TV from a young age of 22.
And I guess that in itself is a privilege. I think it's great that people are communicating about science and wanting to tell stories. Where I personally feel that there needs to be almost like room for improvement is the
understanding of journalism and storytelling and bias and, you know, legal sides of things.
And if you're a science communicator, not allowing your own bias and passion and anyone
can put a video out on social media and you don't, anyone can be who they want to be online.
I think it's great that everyone follows their dreams.
If that's what you want to do, absolutely go and do it.
But like there also needs to be checks and balances to ensure that the information we're
actually getting is correct because in a newsroom, you would get fat checked.
You would get someone else editing your work, even if it's to make triple check the facts
or but you don't always get that because most social media people are solar preneurs.
They're working on themselves.
So there is something to be thought there in terms about like how to eliminate bias
from the work that you're doing, how to ensure what you're putting out is factually correct.
Some people might, you know, this is how we get so many false stories online and crazy
stuff because a video goes viral and it's because of an algorithm, not because of the
truth.
So some of that frustrates me.
It's almost like you're playing to an algorithm instead of actually playing to the story itself.
But at the same time, social media is here to stay and it is the future.
You know, TV is great, but if you look at, so you know, I'm a news junkie.
I have all news channels on.
I watch across the spectrum because I think that's the best way to get news sources is
to look at different points of views.
But like most people, most people under a certain age get all their news from social
media. So there has to be, I think, a way of also like credible broadcasters and news people to work with
these new platforms to make sure that factory correct information and for planetary society,
which I know you guys do a great job of to make sure that you've got credible people
from credible institutions meeting people where they're at instead of just anyone making
anything up online because it's going to go viral because of an algorithm. Absolutely. I mean, you got to be
careful what you say. And we can get it wrong. Even as people who have studied the science,
sometimes you can still get things wrong, which is why collaborating with others on your work is
always so important because sometimes you need that fact check even if you thought you got
everything right the first time. And science is ever-evolving as well.
So, you know, something that's one of the things I've always loved about science, I
guess, is like the more questions we ask, the more questions we're left with, you know,
in terms of like just how the moon formed and how that's changed over or scientific
questions about like, you know, how planets form or rogue planets.
And every time we discover everything new or get new imagery, we're now left with more
questions and we just don't have the answers. Although most of the time
the answer is not aliens. I do get a lot of people emailing me asking me where the aliens
are and we don't know yet. We could discover life beyond our own solar system tomorrow.
It could be 100 years from now. We don't know, although probably simple life will be in the
next few decades. But I think there's so much evolving and it's a gray area
It's not a black and white
But I think yeah meeting people where they're at but institutions and having that kind of like backup and collaboration and credibility
It's what's really gonna shift kind of like this this new way of consuming media
Well to that point you've worked on some documentary series that address these kinds of more
You know conspiracy theory topics or topics of life out in the universe. How do you balance talking about those
subjects in ways that engage the public while also making sure that you're
factually correct and making sure you give people the skeptical tools they need
to analyze these kinds of thoughts?
I think this goes back to meeting people where they're at. And unfortunately,
those type of science shows rate better, or those type of shows rate better,
so they get commissions. That's where the opportunities come up from.
And, you know, in an ideal world, we'd all have super serious science documentaries.
One of the shows I did in the UK was a comedy show. It was done with, I don't know whether
anyone listening is a fan of Red Wolf. Yeah, you like? So me and Craig Charles, who's one
of the characters, he plays Lister and Red Wolf did this show looking at conspiracy theories and
looking at hunts for aliens.
And then we had to decide whether it was fake or real, SETI was involved with it.
We had Seth Shostak, we had Bill Diamond, who's the CEO.
We had like credible people on board, but also took more of a comedy spin for it.
And then I did Contact with Discovery Channel, which is still addressing that.
Are we alone?
Is there life out there?
Have aliens made contact with humanity?
Unlikely not. But you know, it's about staying true to science
but it's also about using unique opportunities to inspire people about science and there's
You know people see things in the night sky and they immediately
You know it goes back to almost like all of us wanting to have meaning wanting to feel important and wanting to know what else is out there
You see something you don't understand. You go, it's aliens.
It's much easier to say it's aliens than actually to really recognize it's something
maybe we don't understand.
We don't know everything about our own Earth, the stars, or maybe it's just a cloud or
maybe it's an airplane.
But it's about meeting people where they're at.
And it's about saying, look, there's a lot of rough out there, but one day we might get
the diamond in the rough.
And is that diamond in the rough a form of looking at Martian soil samples and saying, to quote Sagan, extraordinary claims require
extraordinary amount of evidence and we haven't got that evidence yet. So it's about addressing
people, addressing their concerns and being like, actually all the credible evidence doesn't lead
to this, but there are still things we don't understand in the universe. There are places
like Europa or Enceladus and then worlds, and then worlds beyond our own that, you know,
anything I guess you can imagine probably exists out there.
So it's about using unique opportunities to hear people out and to listen to how people from a different life
and a different background might view the universe and then using that as an opportunity to educate and hopefully inspire.
Yeah. And to connect with people because the reason they're curious about this,
it's that innate wonder at the universe, whether or not they have all the facts.
That still speaks to the fact that they're curious.
And that's a great place to start when we're beginning to communicate with people.
And I think that's why the planetary society is so popular because people love space.
And then I think most people, you know, like Sarah,
I guess the Sarah's, and you know, it's a privilege
to be involved in the space industry.
It really is.
And I don't care where you come from or who you are,
but just to have that sense of wonder,
everyone deserves it and it's what makes us human.
You've gotten to travel to see all kinds of cool
space launches and people going to outer space.
You've worked with ESA and Ariane and Space for Humanity.
What are some of the coolest launches
you've been able to go to and have interactions
with the people while they're watching?
Oh, that is a good question.
So I've been privileged to be at commercial launches.
I've been privileged to be at, you know,
I think for me, actually, it would have to be
the final Spatial Soil launch.
It's 2011, that's where I was working
a weather presenter at the BBC.
And I took leave, I stayed to pull my vacation. I was in the UK. We get a lot of vacation.
And I used that vacation time to fly out to live in a house with some fellow space nerds
and a friend from the UK and cover, sell the coverage back to the BBC. And just that kind
of like, I knew I could do it. I knew there wasn't that much appetite for space. But at
the same time, I knew there would be when it comes to the launch. And just being
there kind of like, I was suddenly part of a space community. And I remember this was
in the days of big satellite dishes as well. So I had to take this big satellite dish,
which is not very fun to fly with. And to get through customs, I had to be a carna for
it. And then I had to put cones in front of it because I was radio broadcasting. And technologies
moved on a lot, you know lot in the last 14 years.
For me, it was truly special because it was the end of NERA
and I remember being live on BBC Radio
as the space shuttle landed for the final time.
And to be part, I remember sitting up all night
at the landing strip at Kennedy Space Center
in basically a swamp.
I was covered in mosquito bites.
I was burnt because there's a phrase called
mad dogs and Englishmen go out in the midday sun so I don't understand about sun protection
being from a cold country. I do now, I do now. But just the end of an era and suddenly I'd
gone from almost being like a bystander, you know, a bystander watching the space age to being
kind of a little tiny bit part of it. And then it was the end of the era and a lot of people got
laid off after that. And I remember going back to the Cocoa Beach area a few years later and seeing
the negative impacts. But it was also the beginning of an era. And I guess throughout history,
governments have gone first, private industry has followed. And that for me, really opened my
eyes up to the opportunity to come from space exploration and this new space era. And so for me,
it has to be the final shuttle launch.
I don't know how anything's going to be that just because on a personal note, it transformed
my own life and it was a pivot point.
But I've been there for the first Falcon Heavy launch.
I was there for one of the first Blue Origin launches.
But for me, the final space shuttle launch and what it meant for the future and kind
of like tying up that area of space exploration.
Well, it is a really interesting transition right now.
We still obviously have many government funded missions to space.
But the commercial space sector is expanding rapidly.
And I understand, correct me if I'm wrong on this, that you sit on the board for Space
for Humanity.
I recently left.
So last year I was on the board pretty much from the get go.
Space for Humanity was founded by my friend Dylan Taylor.
I was involved in early marketing back in 2018, 2017,
in the very early days of Space for Humanity,
going to SEDS conferences and recording video applications.
And then I sat on the board for five years,
which is crazy, yeah.
But I love this idea of the potential democratization of space.
We're still in this phase where it's still very expensive to send people to space, but
we all long for a future where space is accessible to everyone.
But I do see how difficult it is to communicate these two different kinds of space travel
in this era.
Do you feel like as we have more commercial space, as it becomes
more popular, that the ways that we communicate about space in general are going to change?
Yeah, I think so. And no longer, I know there's a big debate over are you an astronaut or
not if you've paid to go up. And I think we should listen to people and listen to how
the public feel because I think by listening to how people feel about things, it addresses
the coverage. I do think there's a change, particularly with the new commercial space
era. I think I'm going to go ahead and say there's anger sometimes as well.
Why are billionaires doing this when I can't even pay my rent? And we need to listen to people like
this. And we need to, sometimes certain launches get too much coverage, sometimes other launches
or other missions or science don't get enough. So we need to, again, it almost comes back to a
STEM literacy problem and how we should be readdressing
how we listen to people to communicate space effectively. But also at the same time, won't
it be cool when like going to space is just normal when it doesn't get the news coverage
like in the same way that plane flights don't get news coverage like, oh, I took off on
a flight on LAX today. So many other people did as well. Won't it be cool when we get
to that point where we don't have to cover space flights because they are so common?
I'm thinking of like the movie Gattaca. Do you remember that one with Ethan Hall? I think
I might watch it tonight, actually, but I remember like the frequency of those space
launches and we're not there yet. But won't it be cool where they're not covered as much
and maybe watching space flights is akin to like train spotting or plane spotting
or something.
So I think the way we communicate doesn't change because I think there's anger and there's
inequality in the world.
And I think we need to do more to work with communities that might not understand how
space is benefiting them.
The human element about how it benefits people back here on Earth.
And I think one of the things we're really missing, and particularly in this day and
age, is all the planetary science stuff and how we go to space for Earth. And I think one of the things we're really missing, and particularly in this day and age, is all the planetary science stuff and how we go to space for Earth. And I think if we can help
tell stories, all of us, and I know the planetary society does a great job, but just
tell stories about how space is benefiting us here on Earth, I think it works for the industry.
We'll be right back with the rest of my interview with Sarah Kredis after this short break.
Greetings, Bill and I here. The U.S. Congress approves NASA's annual budget, and with your
support, we promote missions to space by keeping every member of Congress and their staff informed
about the benefits of a robust space program. We want Congress to know that space exploration
ensures our nation's goals in workforce technology, international
relations and space science.
Unfortunately, important missions are being delayed, some indefinitely.
That's where you come in.
Join our mission as a space advocate by making a gift today.
Right now when you donate, your gift will be matched up to $75,000 thanks to a generous
Planetary Society member.
With your support, we can make sure every representative
and Senator in DC understands why NASA
is a critical part of US national policy.
With the challenges NASA is facing,
we need to make this investment today.
So make your gift at planetary.org slash take action. Thank you.
What do you think are some of the biggest space exploration stories that aren't getting enough
attention right now? Well, that is a great question. You tricked me up now with my own.
I think it goes back to planetary science missions. I think it goes back to, I'm biased here,
but how organizations such as Maxar and other space imaging companies are disrupting journalism.
I think how we're disrupting disaster relief, how we're responding to disasters, how we're
making the world a better and a safer place because of utilising data from space. And
I know it doesn't get as sexy a headline as Katy Perry goes to space, but it's about utilising
that and being like, hey,
we're able to do better for you. We're able to serve your community better. We're able to look at farming and use less, you know, fertiliser and chemicals and irrigate the land better because of
space technology. So maybe this isn't breaking news stories, but it's longer form stories and
it's taking space into communities. And maybe it's not even putting it on the news or putting it
into a TikTok video or something like that. I don't have TikTok, unfortunately. and maybe it's not even putting it on the news or putting it into a TikTok video or something like that.
I don't have TikTok unfortunately, but maybe it's showing them how their community is benefiting.
I've definitely had those interactions with people. You know, we've done outreach with people in our area and at different conferences,
but before that I actually worked at Griffith Observatory and doing these outreach events, particularly with kids.
And there was so much about the kind of spin-off effects
of NASA programs, but also space exploration
around the world that they weren't aware of.
And I always tried to bring up the camera in your phone.
The reason that even exists is because we needed some way
to digitally take data from telescopes
and then we made it better by going to Pluto.
And that's why you've got this crazy level of megapixels in your phone.
But it impacts so much of our lives in ways that people don't understand.
And once you begin having those conversations, it changes the way that they think about space
more broadly and why we need to be funding these things.
I always like to say, just to pick up on that point, like, imagine a day without space,
and without space technology, even like, I'm from England, so we like a lot of tea, we use these things
called a kettle.
But imagine even turning on your kettle and the electricity get gridded and the banking,
you want to do a bank transfer and we're using satellites in space for that.
We live in the space age.
We live in the best age in terms of technology.
I know it doesn't feel like it, but we live in the best age in terms of technology
and we're living in a space age. We jumped into cyberspace instead of outer space. So people who
were children of Apollo who grew up seeing people walk on the moon, I can understand why they're
down for straight because they didn't get those holidays in space in the way they imagined they
didn't get humans on Mars. Instead, they got your cell phone, you know, you got your iPhone, you got
cyberspace, you got the internet. But it's because of that and because of how space technology is benefiting our life on
Earth right now that we're able to start looking at doing those really cool things.
But really, I'm going to borrow from the late, great Gene Cernan, still the last person to
walk on the moon as the commander of Apollo 17.
I worked with him on a documentary about his life called Last Man on the Moon.
But I always remember him saying, you know, we just got the timing wrong.
All of these things will happen.
We just got the timing wrong.
And we live in a world which is built because of space technology and those, you know, the
astronauts who were the tip of the arrow, so to speak.
And it's all this other stuff that has enabled us to live in this really cool world we do
today.
So we might get the news coverage of people going to space, but it's all the other stuff
behind the scenes that we don't hear about. And yes, it's not. So we might get the news coverage, people going to space, but it's all the other stuff behind the scenes
that we don't hear about.
And yes, it's not sexy to put on the news,
but it's that's what's disrupting all of our lives.
You've gotten to speak with a whole bunch of astronauts.
I am jealous.
I mean, you've also worked with Buzz Aldrin and Tim Peake.
And what are some of the behind the scenes moments
you've had with these people?
And how do they feel about space
after personally experiencing that?
Do you know, the funniest one probably is Tim Peake, who is, for those who don't know,
obviously every single UK listener will know exactly who Tim Peake is.
So Tim Peake is Britain's first official ESA astronaut.
So we had Helen Sharman, who went to space, was going to be part of the UK,
then became part of Roscomos, and she went up on Russian Soyuz rocket in the 90s.
I think she was only 26
as well. She was a chemist with Mars, worked with her, incredible woman. I remember her
being a very nervous public speaker and I'm like, how you've been to space? But incredible,
incredible woman. But Tim Peake is Britain's first official ESA astronaut. So we've also
had Brits who became Americans, such as Piers Sellers, to follow their dreams of space,
but they never got to wear the Union flag
They never got to wear that flag in space
So Tim Peake is a rock star in the United Kingdom
And I remember hosting a night with Tim Peake and his colleague in space Tim Copra at Usher Hall in Edinburgh
Which is the thing is the second biggest hall in Scotland and this hall was packed
Absolutely jam-pack, with people coming
to see Tim Peake. Because suddenly, and I can say this as someone who grew up in the
UK, suddenly we had a piece of space. It wasn't just something the Americans or the Russians
were doing, and occasionally the Europeans. Suddenly there was someone who represented
the UK and represented us. So this hall was packed and Tim Peake had to be snuck out the
back of Usher Hall. And I think the last time they'd done that was with the Rolling Stones or something crazy
like that because people were waiting just to see Tim after having him watch this evening
with myself.
No one was there for me.
Tim Coppola, no one was there for Tim Coppola either, even though he's a phenomenal NASA
astronaut because Tim Peake became a rock star.
And I think that's kind of cool about space becoming more equitable and like more people
from different countries getting to go to space that you suddenly get people inspired by space in the
way they couldn't relate to.
Suddenly you could grow up in the UK and be like, I can be an astronaut now.
I don't have to move to another country.
I can represent this country and stay in my home country.
And yes, so working with Tim Peake, Michael Collins of Apollo 11, he wrote the forward
for my book, Look Up, Our Story with the Stars, which was the honor of my life to have him involved.
I remember proofreading it and being like, I can't have any mistakes.
But like, these people, I tell you what, all the astronauts I've met, NASA astronauts,
Apollo astronauts, commercial ones, the one kind of like unifier with them is they're
humble.
You never saw Michael Collins bragging on social media or, you know, maybe
less so, but they're just so humble. And I think that's one of the great traits of being
an astronaut, I guess, being a NASA astronaut, they just say it's no big deal. They were
just doing their job. And it's incredible how humble these people can be, given the
sacrifice and the risk they've taken in their lives.
But you know, I guess looking down at the earth from the moon or something could really give a person perspective on it.
Yeah, and Michael Collins, he was the loneliest man. That whole time when Neil and Buzz were on the moon, it was Michael on his own, on the dark side.
Can you imagine how terrifying that would be? You're on the dark side of the moon on your own. And I remember him saying, and I'm sure he's done this in many interviews, but all the
stars he could see.
And then it's just a different perspective.
And I know this is said a lot, but those Apollo astronauts are made of something different.
But then also on the flip side, I've spoken to, and this is important to note, they were
dubbed the Mercury 13, but the women astronauts, the women who wanted to be astronauts but couldn't because, A, because they're women,
but B, because you couldn't be a fighter pilot if you're a woman. So it wasn't NASA
saying no, technically, that's the technicality they got them on, but it was more, you don't
qualify because you're not a fighter pilot. So they did some of the medical tests and
obviously, Wally Funk, we know, eventually got to space. I, in my book, Children's Book
the Space Race, I did a whole spread on the Mercury 13 and women who aspired to go to space because it's not fair.
And there were lots of talented people, and even today there's lots of talented people
who don't get that opportunity, not because they're not talented, but just because of
luck.
Half the success in life, most of success in life is luck, who you're born into, which
country you're born into, connections you might have, opportunities you might have.
So I think it's cool to acknowledge the astronauts, but also acknowledge all those other pioneers
who are part of that, who might not have got the accolades in history, but enabled others
to fly after them.
COLLEEN O'BRIEN It's a similar situation to a conversation I was having with Ed Dwight,
who was supposed to be the first African American astronaut.
As part of the documentary that they were working on at National Geographic called The Space Race,
they were talking about this exact loophole here
that they needed someone who was in the Air Force
to go to space, but they couldn't find black astronauts
because the people that they allowed to do
that kind of Air Force stuff were the Tuskegee Airmen.
And they were at that point too old to go to space.
So finding someone like Ed Dwight
that had that specific skill set was very complicated because of these kind of hurdles that they put in the
way. But it wasn't because people weren't skilled enough or deserving enough. So I'm
really glad that we're now in a place where hopefully more people can be represented in
space over time because that's so important.
And Ed Dwight got to go to space. He flew to space. Humanity partially sponsored him. He flew to space. I'm actually internet friends, Instagram friends with his nephew and just like
the pride. And like there's another guy, Livingston Holder. He would go up after the Challenger.
And obviously that didn't happen. But he deserves to go to space. He now works within the space
industry. He was part of the secret kind of like military side of things in the 80s. And there's so many people who just didn't get their chance and like, sometimes the people who
shout the loudest get the most attention, but there's so many people there who don't shout about it,
who have really put in the work who might just have like, through circumstances,
people want their fault might miss the mark. And that's what I, I'm always a journalist at heart,
because I love telling stories about other people and particularly voices that often don't get heard.
Well, you've told stories in so many different fashions, not just in documentaries and on
radio, but you've done podcasts.
You actually started a podcast, Where's My Jetpack?
But you've also written all of these books.
Do the opportunities just kind of appear to you like someone goes, hey, I'm looking for
someone to do this podcast or we need someone to write this book or do you just chase whatever vision of communication
you're feeling in the moment and hope it works?
I remember being told by an old agent who that I would never write a book. So I wrote
five, plus I wrote another one. It's a lot of failure. I think people only see any success
it is with my books. Yeah, I was approached by Darlene Kinsley for my first one,
did this tiny little book about space. Then I did another one with Darlene Kinsley. Then I,
a book agent approached me because she'd seen I'd done a couple of books. I think she'd watched me
on the news channel in the UK. And then that's how I did the space race and then look up our
story with the stars. And then Aseline, Martin Aseline, who runs Aseline, which make these
incredible coffee table books. They approached me to do a, they normally do like Chanel books or Dior books, and they
wanted to do one about the moon.
So they approached me to write this book about the moon, and they did all the art imaging
and I did the words, which is really cool.
And I think it's a mix of both.
And when I did the Contact TV show, I just got a random email in my inbox saying, do
you want to go screen test for the show?
And I remember I was in Los Angeles at the time, flew back to London the next day, and
then three days later got flown out again to LA to screen test.
So I think it's a mix of both, but putting yourself out there always helps.
I worked seven days a week for like 10 years, which was crazy.
I don't recommend doing that.
I used to do a lot flying, a lot of international travel, but the more you put yourself out
there, the more opportunities going to find you. But it's a mix of both.
I don't know whether I even have a plan. I've just always cared about telling stories and
always cared about space and always just been curious. And I think some opportunities have
found me and a lot I've tried to create, which have just never happened. I've met with so
many producers and so many TV channels.
And you know, I once got told I was too blonde
to be a scientist on TV.
Oh my gosh.
And it's like, I know, this was the BBC, I'll say it.
But like I was too blonde to be a scientist
and I had too much eye makeup on.
And it's like, but I have a degree in astrophysics
and it's changed now.
This is like 12 years ago, but I remember being told that
and just like media is hard.
Everyone thinks science is hard, but the media landscape is brutal because it is as much
on how you look and how you appear and how they want to be typecast.
So there's lots of challenges.
But then I got interviewed in Vogue about that very thing that happened to me.
And then I got to talk about it on Vogue.
So things always come full circle.
But like, yeah, opportunities, Sometimes you have to create yourself. Sometimes
you just have to be out there enough for the opportunities to come to you. I'm sure you
find that as well, Sarah. I mean, yeah, I didn't expect to be where I am in life, but
I chase that passion for trying to tell stories and communicate space to people. And what
I found was that as soon as you kind of found your footing in one place, the opportunities
begin to appear, which is kind of unfortunate because it does mean that you have to kind
of find that lucky break and build your name. But then once you have that foundation,
things happen. That being said, it is so important the way you keep saying about the fact that you
are going to fail along the way, because you really do have to prepare yourself for that.
There's going to be a lot of failure that people might not see along the way. And you got to build
up that resilience and just never give up hope in yourself. But, you know, hopefully don't burn yourself out by working seven days
a week either.
That's not good advice. Don't do that. But I also feel it's like never give up, but also
accept that things change. You shouldn't have a fixed thing of what you want to do because
life gets in the way. So just accept. You don't see the behind the scenes of like sat
in sweats pitching book ideas
or the tears when you've been rejected for how you look or how you sound or because they
don't space doesn't rate you.
People don't see that.
And I feel like obviously I use social media, but I'm not, you know, when I recognize its
importance but it only gives like the veneer of someone's life.
It only gives us the parts.
Don't come and we all try and do this, but don't compare yourself because you don't really
know a what the truth is about that person and B what they're going through behind the parts. Don't come and we all try and do this, but don't compare yourself because you don't really know A, what the truth is about that person and B, what they're going through behind the
scenes.
Absolutely.
It's such good advice.
I hope everybody out there who's listening, who's thinking about doing this really though,
don't give up on yourself and be kind to yourself when you hit those hurdles because sometimes
people are going to say some mean things to you.
Yeah.
And find me on Instagram at SarahCrittersTV, but don't compare yourself.
I wanted to use that as a terrible plug.
Well, what's next for you? You've done so much already and, you know, in this moment
in time, there are some troubling times for space exploration. What is next for you?
So I'm in the process of setting up a company called Get Your Story Straight, kind of helping
like space companies, tech companies, science companies tell their story correctly because so often we, especially science companies or tech companies and especially
startups, they get so bogged down in the detail that actually communication is often the killer
of many startups.
So getting your story straight is all about how can you figure out what you are about
and effectively communicate that both to journalists and to investors and three-year-olds because
I've given talks to investors where I've rehashed talks that I've given to children because
we've got to assume we've got to change the way we think about the STEM communication
and STEM literacy.
So next for me is within industry, doing science communication.
And then also, you know, I always say never.
I feel like five and a half books because I co-wrote one is enough.
People say that having books is like writing books is like having children.
I don't have any children, but I can tell you writing a book is exhausting.
I'm sure many parents won't agree with me, but it is kind of like this labor of long
nights and edits and maybe another book, but we'll see.
And maybe looking at some more TV opportunities.
But for right now, I'm focusing on just being a part of the space industry because I came to the US under the extraordinary abilities visa. I
worked my whole life just to have the opportunity to come to the US to start on a level ground
with everyone who's born here because of, don't be wrong, I've been very lucky and
privileged in my life, but the luck of being born in the right country is also huge. For
me, it's about being a part of the space age and using my skills to play a small part in helping the space industry and helping US success in space.
And there's never been a more exciting time to be into space exploration. There's so much to look forward to.
Even with everything at stake right now, there's so much to be grateful for as people who are into space and so much to look forward to in the future. Yeah. Especially if we can continue to communicate about these things
effectively, hopefully we can build
a future that's even more full of awesome space exploration.
I hope so.
I feel like technology always is maybe it's a naive optimism,
but technology, we face a lot of challenges.
We face a lot of challenges on Earth, politically, socially,
but also in terms of our changing climate.
But technology has always found a way. Maybe that's too naive, but also in terms of like, are us changing climate? And but technology has always found a way.
Maybe that's too naive, but I have confidence in the best of humanity that we will overcome
the many challenges we were facing and use the advantages we have to benefit everyone
on Earth.
Well, thank you for joining me here at Planetary Society headquarters and giving us your perspective
and hopefully giving some people some hope that their dreams of being space journalists can come true.
Thank you for having me.
Coming up next, it's What's Up with Dr. Bruce Betts.
We'll talk about what makes a great space journalist and of course, share a new random
space fact.
Hey, Bruce.
Hey, Sarah.
So this week, we're talking with a space journalist who's been to launch sites and space
events all over the world, which sounds like just such a fun time, but also she's been through some
really harrowing experiences doing that, which I very much respect. But as someone who's literally
spent their whole career doing both science and science communication, I wanted to put it to you.
What do you think makes a good space journalist? Curiosity, knowing their boundaries
of what they know and what they don't know.
I mean, that's the same thing that's true for scientists as well.
And then usually it's valued to try to build up a network of people to talk to.
But I think the important thing is that they're really interested in
credibility and making sure that they're really interested in credibility and
making sure that they get this get the story right. And I must say, my experience with most
people who are actually like Sarah A. Space journalists, that they tend to be quite accurate
and do a good job. The fun starts when you talk to the journalist who's never covered space or even thought about it and gets assigned to go interview you and then things can get a little squirrely for better or for worse.
But the actual ones in the field tend to be pretty careful in general, I find, which is nice. It's not true of most fields, I would say, I'm guessing. Danielle Pletka Yeah, reporting on space things when you
don't understand them has got to be a really difficult experience, right?
Pete O'Brien Oh, yeah, I felt very sorry. And again,
they can approach it, and I've had ones who are great. The key to me is knowing where the
boundary of your knowledge is and being careful not to cross it without getting some assistance or some research. And the thing that having almost nothing to do with what makes good journalists.
Hey, could we stop the clickbait titles?
That's usually leads to a bad article.
But occasionally I know the reporters get stuck with the titles that they didn't
create. So yeah, we've definitely had that happen to us in the past where we write a really
solid article and then the news outlet you pitch it to decides it wants to
change the name because I think it'll be more flashy, but then you know, you get
flack for having a bad name on a very solid article and a lot of the times
that's not the reporter's fault, which is something that I didn't understand
for a long time.
So I'm trying to give a little bit more leeway there
and how I judge people when I see that kind of thing.
But it's so important not to over sensationalize.
These things are already so amazing to learn about.
We don't need to make them any more exciting than they are.
But I think that points to something else for me.
It's not just about explaining the actual science of the thing
and the facts, but
also sometimes it's important to contextualize why it matters at all. Because in a lot of cases,
people don't get why these things matter. And especially in a time like this, when
we're looking at major funding cuts potentially to NASA science and other things, I think giving that
reasoning behind why these things are important to our lives is, you know, a useful
thing to do.
No, it's a good point. And then there are a lot of other aspects, obviously, if it's
a written thing, you want them to be a good writer. I mean, they're obvious things. You
know who makes good space journalists? People like you.
Aw. But you too, you spent so much time.
You like the planetary society staff.
We have some really impressive science communicators on our team.
We do.
I've learned so much watching people write.
And our space policy team recently has been absolutely crushing it,
talking about subjects that are so complex.
I learn more and more from all of our coworkers every day,
so I'm really grateful for that.
But you started with so little knowledge that it really, it's not, it's not our, I'm kidding,
kidding very competent astrophysicist type person.
But I think that's something that was really useful for me to learn coming out of school. Like,
you know, you learn all this stuff, you learn how much you don't know, but it was by talking to
science communicators and seeing the way that they interacted with people that I learned more than honestly I ever did in school.
Like I learned the math, I learned the things I wanted to learn there, but the actual way
of expressing it to others, now that, that is an art that I truly respect.
So would you possibly like to continue this into the arena of WRAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN What have we got this week?
We're talking about highly magnetic neutron stars. Yes, that's right. Huge, incredibly
strong magnetic fields of neutron stars, so much so that they needed a cooler name, so
they're called magnetars.
I always thought that sounded like a Pokemon name or something.
Totally. It's like a super villain. Anyway, they are super villains because you have to
be careful because if you get within, according to the Chandra X-ray Observatory website,
if you get your credit card magnetic strip within 150,000 kilometers or about 100,000
miles of one of those, it'll erase it.
Diabolical.
So be careful.
Let's be careful out there.
All right, everybody go out there, look at the night sky and think about a leaf
falling from a tree and gently resting in the green grass below.
Thank you and good night.
We've reached the end of this week's episode of Planetary Radio, but we'll be back next week with more space science and exploration. If you love the show, you can get Planetary Radio t-shirts
at planetary.org slash shop, along with lots of other cool spacey merchandise.
Help others discover the passion, beauty, and joy of space science and exploration by
leaving a review or a rating on platforms like Apple podcasts and Spotify.
Your feedback not only brightens our day, but helps other curious minds find their place
in space through Planetary Radio.
You can also send us your space thoughts, questions, and poetry at our email, planetaryradio at planetary.org.
Or if you're a Planetary Society member,
leave a comment in the Planetary Radio space and our member community app.
Planetary Radio is produced by the Planetary Society in Pasadena, California,
and is made possible by our dedicated members from all around the world.
You can join us as we help
support the science communicators and the people that make the missions happen at planetary.org.
Mark Hilverda and Ray Palletta are our associate producers. Casey Dreier is the host of our monthly
space policy edition. Andrew Lucas is our audio editor. Josh Doyle composed our theme, which is arranged and performed by Peter Schlosser.
And until next week, ad astra.