Pop Culture Happy Hour - “Wuthering Heights” and What’s Making Us Happy

Episode Date: February 13, 2026

In the new film “Wuthering Heights,” Margot Robbie stars as headstrong and horny Cathy, and Jacob Elordi as brooding and horny Heathcliff. Their love on the wild windswept moors is passionate, doo...med and pretty bonkers. From writer and director Emerald Fennell, the film has love, lust, hatred, revenge, and lots of lusty looks in the soaking rain.Follow Pop Culture Happy Hour on Letterboxd at letterboxd.com/nprpopcultureSee pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:04 Writer director Emerald Fennell makes movies that drive the discourse, promising young woman saltburn and now, quote, Wuthering Heights, unquote. Those quotation marks are part of it. This time out she's tackling a beloved classic with a cast led by young Hollywood royalty. Margot Robbie is Kathy, headstrong, impulsive, and horny. Jacob Allorty is Heathcliff, dark, brooding, and horny. Their love on the wild, wind-swept moors is passionate and doomed, and as a dead. adapted by finale, pretty bonkers. I'm Linda Holmes. And I'm Glenn Weldon, and today we're talking about Wuthering Heights on Pop Culture Happy Hour from NPR.
Starting point is 00:00:43 Joining us today is Barry Hardiman. She's a senior editor for NPR's investigations team. Welcome back, Barry. Hi. Great to have you for this. Also with this is Soraya Nadia McDonald. She's a cultural critic journalist and the senior criticism editor for the Rumpus. Hello, Sariah. Hello, hello. All right, let's get into it. This will be a fun one to get into. Emily Bronte's only novel has been adapted many, many times. This time out, read a director Emerald Fennell is steering us into the lush fever dream of it all. Kathy is an impetuous young woman who lives in a decaying manor house. She's played as an adult by Margot Robbie.
Starting point is 00:01:18 One day her father brings home a young brooding urchin whom Kathy adopts as her plaything at first. That's Heathcliff, played as an adult by Jacob and Lourty. Look, you know the plot. The two young people love and hate each other, separated by class and by Kathy's ambitions, and by Heathcliff's seething jealousy. They treat each other horribly until they start treating it each other very, very well in a fun, sexy way,
Starting point is 00:01:39 but society in the form of Kathy's marriage to a wealthy neighbor intervenes. There's love and lust, hatred and revenge, and lots of lusty looks in the soaking rain. The whole factory-installed Gothic bundle, really. Wuthering Heights is in theaters now. Linda, kick us off. Would you make of, quote, Wuthering Heights, unquote?
Starting point is 00:01:59 I tend to be a fan of, Emerald Finale. I really liked promising young woman. And I really liked Saltburn. And I think this is a continuation of what I like about her work. I think that she is somebody who always, and she says this in some of the comments she's made about this film, she's going for a feeling. She's going for, I want you to feel the kinds of passionate feelings that I had when I first read this book. Right. She talks about having read it as a teenager. She loves it dearly. I will say I personally do not have an attachment. to this book. I know it sort of vaguely gothic romance has never really been my thing. And I think
Starting point is 00:02:38 that in this film, you see so many things that I appreciate about her extravagance. In this case, it's things like her love of the color red. And in Saltburn, you see a lot of her love of red. Here you see it, her love of like diaphanous materials, her love of strange rooms, unexpected, not really period materials in Kathy's clothes. It's sort of period stuff, but then you see her in cellophane. They've talked about drawing from different influences. I think the grandiosity of her vision is always something I really appreciate. And I like going in and just kind of seeing what she does with a story that in this case,
Starting point is 00:03:23 you go in and it's sort of like, well, at one point it seems kind of romantic. And then it starts to be like, oh, these people are horrible. And, you know, I enjoyed that evolution. So I had a lot of fun with this. I enjoyed it. Hey, Sarah, where did you come down? Yeah, I think romance perhaps is conceived by the Marquita Sod. I agree with Linda on Emerald Fennell's aesthetic habits, which also tend to draw me in.
Starting point is 00:03:50 There's plenty to focus on, and it's very weird, particularly with, you know, the skin wallpaper with the freckle. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. And the other thing that I appreciate about Emerald and her just, her habit of just going big, regardless of whether or not I think the writing sort of stands up to the grandiosity of the imagery and the cinematography is her fascination with dirt and filth and grossness, the things that are taboo. like her willingness to put things on screen that make your jaw drop. And then at the same time, you know, I think the older that you get,
Starting point is 00:04:34 the more you appreciate how strange human beings can be. I appreciate her willingness to run toward that rather than stuffing it away somewhere in honor of propriety. Okay, cool. All right. So we got really liked. We got appreciate. Barry, do we have a spectrum? We have a spectrum.
Starting point is 00:04:53 What do you think? We have a spectrum. I find myself in the odd position of agreeing mostly with what everybody has said here, but it did not work for me, emphatically. I love the idea of freezing this moment in time, this horny, billowing moment of puberty, essentially. Like, I like that. And I also love the imagery. But for me, it was a series of images that were connected by some speeches that I recognized from a book. and very little else. So for me, I really do need the characters.
Starting point is 00:05:28 I like Wuthering Heights. I'm not a Wuthering Heights obsessive. I'm mentally healthy. There are a lot of retellings of this, modern retellings of Wethering Heights. And those tend to work for me a little bit better because you can kind of support the oddness of the story in a way that Emily Bronte does
Starting point is 00:05:45 sort of in terms of the framing of the story. But one of my favorites is by Alice Hoffman. She wrote a book called Here on Earth. And she said something about Wuthering Heights that really stuck with me, which is that, you know, you love Heathcliff at, you know, 16. You are kind of horrified by Heathcliff at 30. And then you get to 50 and you're like, well, people are weird. You know what I mean? You sort of understand his humanity.
Starting point is 00:06:11 Soraya's point. Yeah. You know, exactly. You're like, okay, I can see how this could be a human, right? The problem is it only worked for me at that first level. You know what I mean? It only gave me. that and didn't pull out enough for me to see his humanity, which I think is important and the reason
Starting point is 00:06:26 the book has lasted for so long. Okay. Interesting. Well, look, this thing is fervid. It's feverish. It's febrile, which is a word I don't get to use much, but it just means fever. So I'd not just say feverish. Farrell.
Starting point is 00:06:41 Ferrell is a good one. It's a swoonie. It's breathless. These are not adjectives that show up in my wheelhouse a lot. I'm letting this movie wash over me. And I'm thinking, look, if you don't got those adjectives, do you? you even got Wuthering Heights? I mean, I don't think you do. It does what it says in the label. Them heights, they got to be Wuthering. And Phinell is making choices here, which is exactly what you want. And anything that's been adapted this many times, you want big choices. It starts with the public hanging that drives the crowd into sexual ecstasy. So she's linking sex and death from the jump. It's not subtle, but I went back to considering the source. And for a long time, I was wondering exactly what those quotation marks in the title were doing. But then I really No, everything in this film is just that bit ridiculous.
Starting point is 00:07:26 The two main sets, Wuthering Heights and Thrush Cross Grange, which is the neighboring manner. You know, they're art directed to the gods. The costumes go hard. When Catherine goes to visit her father at one point, she's who's played by the great British actor Martin Clunes, by the way, with exactly the kind of mustard you want to me. He's great.
Starting point is 00:07:46 She's wearing this gown that is ostensibly silver satin, but it looks like tinfoil. it looks ridiculous. The movie does that thing in period drama where sometimes if they don't get it right, the costumes just look like costumes. They don't look like clothes worn by actual people. But then that's kind of the point. I mean, it's absolutely on purpose. It's exactly it. The Grange feels like a dollhouse because that's what it is. Right. And so that fit for me. That worked for me. I confess I wanted this to be like a notch more bonkers, a bit more arch, a bit more comic. I'm a middle-aged gay man. I'm going to use the word camp. I kind of felt it edging there in the, in the, the scenes in Thrush Cross Grange especially, which is kind of low-key Tim Burton in its silliness, but it didn't go full Crimson Peak. He didn't go full Bram Stoper's Dracula. I felt it wanted to. The scene where she crosses the more to go back to Wuthering Heights and there's an empty doorway in the fog, but then the fog blows away and the doorway isn't empty anymore.
Starting point is 00:08:41 I'm like, that's cinema, baby. All those scenes with a thunderstorm raging outside, that's, I was like, go off pathetic fallacy, do your work. I wanted more of that. I was happy for what I got, though. I was happy for what I got. It was so funny to me because there's a moment where you see Kathy kind of walking into the foggy, misty moors. And it's not just foggy misty.
Starting point is 00:09:04 It's like she instantly vanishes. Yeah, she can see two feet in front of your face. And it's just everything is kind of overclocked. Yeah, exactly. What I find interesting about Emerald Finale is that very often I find people, I'm not talking about this conversation. I'm talking about in the discourse, as we've already mentioned. I find people trying to figure out a way to read kind of a lot of social commentary into what she does. And I think that maybe is because she started out with Promising Young Woman, which is a really, like, angry, meaty piece.
Starting point is 00:09:37 But when you get to Saltburn, and I think when you get to this piece, you more realize that she's a stylist, much more than she is a social commentator. What I would compare her to actually is Quentin Tarantino. I think when you see the kind of the stylishness, kind of pushing everything else, and even to the degree that he likes to play with kind of extant aesthetics and mess around with them the way that she does in this film with how the costumes have some period elements and then some things that are drawn from like 1940s and 50s melodrama. And I think when you see her kind of mixing and matching sort of from these other. elements. I think she's a stylist. And when I read her that way, I don't necessarily think that she goes into this thinking, here's what I think Wuthering Heights is about. Here's what I want it to be about. Here's what I want it to be saying. She's thinking, I want to put you in the body of a young person who is experiencing this story for the first time. And whatever it takes for me to take
Starting point is 00:10:45 that book reading experience and make it something that you, you know, feel in your body, that's what she wants to do. And that's what I think this movie is supposed to do. And it's obviously not going to do that successfully for everyone. But for me, I think that's what I liked about it. Yes. I think Emerald creates vibe cinema. True. Do we know how old Emerald is? 40, I think. A millennial. Okay. Yeah, that makes perfect sense because I was like, if you were a person who watched Mall Flanders on PBS and yet also maybe had crushes on like Jonathan Taylor-
Starting point is 00:11:19 Thomas in Andrew Keegan, this movie will make sense to your 13-year-old self completely. That is what it speaks to. Yeah. When you put it like that, it does, I'm like, oh, this feels like flowers in the attic. You know what I mean? It feels like a kind of a taboo. Again, you know, it did not work for me. But when I look at it as a style rather than an idea, I can appreciate it further.
Starting point is 00:11:45 I think the thing that sort of disappoints me is that I was not like a, particular fan of Saltburn. I liked looking at it. But I kind of wanted to know her ideas, is the thing. Like, I actually wanted something beyond, you know, the hormones. And so partly it's because I think there are interesting things to say still within the style that she's making. I think this movie doesn't actually have a lot of rage. We don't actually get that sense of, like, hatred that's actually horny. There are some things about it that I really would have, like, to see her take a hold of. I think there's so many interesting ways
Starting point is 00:12:23 to remake this. And, you know, one of the interesting ways would have been to have cast an actor of color instead of a Lorty. I understand we are looking at a particular kind of pulp paperback, and, you know, that's okay. But I think for me, I'm just,
Starting point is 00:12:39 it became boring about three quarters of the way through because I thought, oh, there's not going to be another idea other than this, you know? Yeah, and in the production note, There's a bit about how Emerald Fennell wrote this version with El Lourty in mind because you look like the Heathcliff on the cover of the version that she read as a teenager. Go ahead, Linda. I think Barry is so right that you can certainly do the kind of provocative aesthetic work that I'm talking about and also sort of things that stimulate the intellect, so to speak, right?
Starting point is 00:13:12 You're Ryan Pugler's and those kind of folks. Like, if you look at sinners, it has a really similar intensity of aesthetic and. intensity of visceral response. And it also has a lot of. Gierma del Toro. This reminded me in many ways of Frankenstein. Absolutely, Del Toro, too. Although I do think that, like, there are some similarities in the fact that people sometimes
Starting point is 00:13:31 come away from Del Toro also saying, like, I don't necessarily know what this is about, but it, like, looks great, right? But I like a scarlet veil. And I think, like, I guess one of the reasons why I instinctively, like, defend her or want to defend, I guess, more my enjoyment of her work. is that it is so common to see everything is meant to be provocative, right? It's provoking something. You're provoking some kind of a reaction.
Starting point is 00:13:57 No, nobody makes art not wanting to provoke anything. I like the fact that she is really like provoking the gut. I think that's why you get her, she's provoking the body. Lower than the gut in some cases, yes. Absolutely. That's why I was just going to say. That's why you get her interest in lust. And one of the things that we talked about with Saltburn is it's about that
Starting point is 00:14:18 fine line between lust and desire and revulsion, right? I think that's one of her animating things she's interested in. And that's why in this movie you get, I would say, fewer bodily fluids than saltburn. She's eased up on that a little bit. I actually think this movie is arguably restrained for her. It's very tame in a way. For her it is. But you get like Kathy sticking her finger into an aspect, which is so squishy.
Starting point is 00:14:46 and you get this fascination with raw eggs and people putting their hands into raw eggs. And it's all to me about provoking the body. It's like body horror. Yeah. Your yuck response or your lust response. And I like the fact that she's like proudly a provocateur of the body rather than necessarily the intellect. I think that's cool. I think that's cool.
Starting point is 00:15:10 Well, we talked a little bit about some of the changes she made. Let's go through some of them. There's a reason I never like this movie more than when Isabella is on screen. Oh, she's wonderful. Isabella is the Ward of the Man, Kathy Marys. She's played by Alison Oliver from Task. I didn't realize that, but that's Alice and Oliver from Tasks. Oh, and from one of the Sally Rooney adaptations.
Starting point is 00:15:29 Yeah. Oh. Oh, you're right. That character, Isabella, is vibrating at precisely the frequency. I wanted this whole movie to be vibrating at, which is embracing the ridiculousness. I also love the adaptation choice. choice of making her a real character, someone who's a bit more control than she is in the book. I mean, you've got to understand that in the book, Heathcliff does not negotiate consent.
Starting point is 00:15:54 When you say, Soraya, that it felt tame, I think that actually was a little bit of my problem with it. Because by not actually going all the way in terms of the BDSM of it all, in terms of letting Heathcliffs, not just his freak flag, but also his, you know, just awful personality, too. We didn't, it was as though by making Isabella kind of into his particular form of abuse and making it, you know, sort of a consensual thing, you've backed away from the point, which is that Heathcliff is frigging terrible. He is a stalker and a horrifying man. And so you actually backed away from something that is a less tame idea. And even putting in the consent, you know, even though it's a control. But also it's like it's a little bit of a wink to a millennial Gen X audience that does want to also see consent but not see consent.
Starting point is 00:16:59 And so there's a pulling back from the actual edge, which she doesn't do visually. But she does do, I think, in terms of the ideas. And that was the movie I wanted to see, I think. I do agree with you there, Barry. Absolutely. You do realize there are no other ideas. And yet... There's just more dresses.
Starting point is 00:17:20 That scene, I wrote down that line. I think this speaks to why directors flock to Jacob Allorty, whether it be in Euphoria or Frankenstein or Wuthering Heights to be able to pull that off, you know, where he's saying, I don't love you, I will never love you. I will treat you abominably. Do you want me to stop? They are also pulling back from a key Heathcliff character trait, which is his revenge.
Starting point is 00:17:50 By combining Catherine's brother in the book with her father, it also means Heathclips' revenge storyline gets emotionally blunted because the brother in the book is a real antagonist. And by combining him with the father, I think you lose some of that juice. You lose some of that. Yeah, get him. Yeah. Another change. Pumping up the character of Catherine's lady maid companion, whatever, Nelly, you do that because you hire Hong Chow.
Starting point is 00:18:14 But with adaptation, you want to ensure that you're changing something for a real plot reason, not just to do it. And here, I think Nellie's presence alters a very pivotal eavesdropping scene, which I never liked. But it's a very pivotal eavesdropping scene midway through the movie slash book in a way that gives that an extra layer. and I think it makes that scene make more sense. And also Nellie's presence, also later in the book slash movie, like here, it alters Kathy's ultimate fate. I think that that change makes sense to me. Make it about something.
Starting point is 00:18:46 Make it about something. Make it speak to something. Make it alter something in the plot. You know, I think the other thing is that I found myself thinking about is Margot and her attraction to roles where you see women confined. and sort of squeezed into this sort of mean girl role, in part because they are infantilized in such a way and expected to be dolls, right?
Starting point is 00:19:15 Whether you go back to Barbie or this. You see the ways that those restrictions squeeze people into being utterly terrible, right? She's petty, she's mean, she's cruel. And all of those things, if we're going to try to squeeze out an idea, here are dynamics that shape women's behavior when they are dropped into societies where they have few choices and are expected to be decoration more or less. For me, she wasn't mean enough for the choices that she was given, A, and then B, this is where
Starting point is 00:19:54 you could do something really interesting with Heathcliff, who, as a member of a different class. In the book, he is clearly othered in any number of ways. And there has been lots of speculation. Is he Spanish? Is he black? Is this an escaped enslaved boy? Also, it takes away his motivations, too, by not giving him those boundaries. You know what I mean? Like, you know, all he has is a sort of is a sketch of this abusive childhood instead of a series of motivators that you're talking about. No, that's true. Because you're like, do they love each other? Do these people even really know what love is?
Starting point is 00:20:34 Like, is this love or is this just a trauma bond? I think this is just a trauma bond. Well, that's what my husband said to. Sure. Okay. All right. Last question. Did you guys ever wonder watching this movie if Robbie and Elorty actually had chemistry
Starting point is 00:20:47 or if they were just wet? I liked both of these performances. I have seen both of these people do very interesting things with a variety of roles, Obviously, we've seen him be a monster and her be a doll. And in a way, this is a meeting of a monster and a doll in certain ways. I did think they had chemistry. I did think the sexy stuff was pretty sexy. I did think that it was excessive that he's probably wet in about two-thirds of the movie.
Starting point is 00:21:17 And that did strike me as like perhaps the overdoing it that I expect and relish in her films. But no, I thought they had good chemistry. I could totally see someone making a TikTok edit and just calling it pneumonia core. Well, tell us what you think about Wuthering Heights. Find us on Facebook. Find us on letterbox. Let us enter your window. We're so cold.
Starting point is 00:21:40 We'll have a link in our episode description. Up next, what's making us happy this week. Now it is time for our favorite segment of this week. And every week, what's making us happy this week? Barry, what is making you happy this week? So I am a lover of cozy television. obviously. This is the time of year for a PBS cozy moment. And all creatures great and small is back. And if you are a person who has not come upon this lovely drama series, which is just about a country vet. And there's a kind of kindness and but also for comfort TV, sometimes you don't get like too much reality. There's enough dirt. There's enough good Yorkshire dirt in there. Not that Emerald Fidel kind. the actual kind. It's more like manure, if you will. This is kind of the thing that, like, my husband loves it, my 11-year-old loves it. It really does run the gamut. And so if you are feeling in need of comfort, I cannot tell you how much that is making me happy. And I think it might make you as well. Yes, Barry, that is a safe bet. I think among the PCH leadership, thank you so much, Barry. That is all creatures great and small on PBS. Soraya, what is making you happy this week?
Starting point is 00:22:51 You know, it's making me happy. Well, it's sort of an extended happiness. I am still sort of vibrating from just the utter joy and audacity of Bad Bunny's Super Bowl performance. And that kind of led me down a rabbit hole of Latin music through salsa and cumbia and bachata. And eventually I got back to Tejano. And so then I just went on an extended run of Selena's discography. and that has just put such a tremendous smile on my face. That's wonderful.
Starting point is 00:23:27 Okay, so that's the music of Selena. Thank you so much, Soraya. Linda, what is making you happy this week? All right, so we talked about a kind of a bonkers movie. I want to talk about a bonkers book that I have been reading that I'm about halfway through reading, but I want to recommend it anyway. It is called For Human Use, and it is by a woman named Sarah G. Pierce. the setup is somebody invents a dating app that matches you with a dead body.
Starting point is 00:23:56 Really, even though they set it up as a dating app, it's really just buy a dead body and keep it like a pet. And it is a satire of how broken people are in terms of human connection. As this app starts to become popular and more and more people have these dead bodies, you have a cycle of media responses, you have a cycle of political. responses, should a hotel be allowed to bar you from bringing your dead body to the hotel, or is that discriminatory? There is a whole community of young men who feel like they are being super, super feminist by bringing dead women into their lives, referred to, by the way, as women who are dead, because that is more polite than dead women. They bring these dead women into their lives because it's not fair to ask living women to be as subservient to you, essentially,
Starting point is 00:24:50 as they want women to be. This is a book for a really, really impressively strange mind. And I mean that as the most complimentary possible thing I could say about it. Again, it's called For Human Use by Sarah G. Pierce. I cannot stop reading it and I cannot read too much of it at the same time. Well, that's a great wreck. Thank you so much, Linda. That feels like the dating service that Heathcliff really wanted. You know what I mean? That's right.
Starting point is 00:25:20 Yeah, I mean, kind of. Haunt me, Catherine. All right. Thank you very much, Linda. What is making me happy? Book is coming out next Tuesday, February 17th. It is called A Place, both wonderful and strange, colon, the extraordinary untold history of Twin Peaks. It's by film and TV critic Scott Mezlo.
Starting point is 00:25:40 Now, I consider myself a Twin Peaks, UberNers. and I looked at that word untold in the subhead, and I thought, oh, bring it, buddy. And it gets broadened. If you belong to that subset of folks, you read a lot about Twin Peaks, you'll get more interviews with all the people you would expect, the writer's executives and actors and directors. But Meslow does get something new out of each of them. What I love most about this book, I now realize, is what it isn't. It isn't an oral history. Sometimes they're great, right?
Starting point is 00:26:07 But sometimes you want a ringmaster, somebody to hold folks' feet to the fire. brings the context of a good shoe leather reporter. If two people's memories conflict, he calls it out. He digs into it. That's what you want. But he also brings the analysis of a critic, which is hugely useful for a show like Twin Beaks,
Starting point is 00:26:25 anyone with a passing interest in the show and its legacy, because let's remember that Peaks walked so that Lost and Westworld and Severance could run. We'll be interested in this book. It's called A Place, both wonderful and strange, by Scott Meslow, and that is what's making me happy this week.
Starting point is 00:26:42 And if you want links for what we recommended, plus some more recommendations, sign up for our newsletter at npr.org slash pop culture newsletter. That brings us to the end of our show. Soraya, Nadia McDonald, Barry Hardiman, Linda Holmes. Thank you so much for being here. Thanks. Oh, thank you. It's a pleasure, as always. This episode was produced by Liz Metzger, Carly Rubin, and Mike Katzif, and edited by our sure-runner, Jessica Reedy.
Starting point is 00:27:02 And hello come in, provides our theme music. Thank you for listening to Pop Culture Happy Hour from NPR. I'm Glenn Weldon, and we'll see you all next week.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.