Predictive History - The Story of "Civilization", "Secret History", "Game Theory" and more - Civilization #38 - Twilight of the Middle Kingdom
Episode Date: October 7, 2025Civilization #38 - Twilight of the Middle Kingdom ...
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Okay, good morning. Today we do China.
Obviously, we are in China and we know a lot of Chinese history, so I will go fairly quickly and deeply.
This is an opportunity for us to look back on the theories we've developed over the course of this year
and really think about how they apply to the Chinese context.
It's a chance for us to see if our models work.
If they do work, then they would be true in the Western context and also in the Chinese context.
It's also a chance for us to deeply interrogate our theories and see where flaws might arise.
So I'll be going through some Chinese history, but I will do so by applying the theories we've learned so far, mainly the ocean
currents of history. All right, so let's get started. Today we're going to look at a question
that is fundamental to China, which is we know that for the longest time China really was the
civilization poor excellence in the world. It gave us all the great inventions that would
make modernity possible, including the compass, paper, printmaking, gunpowder.
Okay, but after Song Dynasty, which is about the year 1200, China stopped being creative.
And so why did this happen? And that is the question that will frame our discussion this morning.
All right. Let's go over some quick Chinese history. So Chinese civilization, as you know,
developed along the Yellow River. The Yellow River is perfect for it.
agriculture and as a result population expanded very quickly when that happens
conflict and war will ensue and that's what will give rise to settlements and
fortified cities that will drive the development of the state and civilization and
technology okay the hallmark of China civilization civilization is what we call
the warring states period
Jun Chiu, and at this time, the foundations of Chinese civilization will come into being.
At this time, you will have something called the 100 schools of thought.
Confuciism will develop as will Taoism and legalism.
And these ideas will form the foundation of Chinese civilization.
And as you can see in this period, all these hundred schools of thought developed because of a process we call open cooperative competition,
which as we have discussed is the main driver of innovation in human civilization.
Openness means that there is no centralized authority.
Cooperation means that even though there's no centralized authority, the different states are trading,
communicating with each other and they are intermarrying into each other and
competition means that there is a lot of conflict between them they're
warring against each other for dominance in their region okay and in this
process this will give rise to the ideas the technology the values the
culture that will underpin China civilization for the next 2,000 years
Confucius is obviously who is best remembered from this era, but you also have Laoze, who is the founder of Daoism,
as well as Zhang Z and Mo Tsui.
Sun Z will at this time write his book The Art of War.
So, in a process that is open cooperative competition, eventually one state will emerge
to conquer the rest.
And as we discussed, why the state emerges is because of three things.
Energy, they're much more energetic, they're much more ambitious.
Second is openness.
They're much more willing to adopt innovation in the ruthless pursuit of military conquest.
and they are opportunistic, meaning that they will do whatever it takes to win.
So in this period, the state that will eventually conquer all China and create the first empire is the Qing.
And again, if you think about it, in the year 500 BCE, we could not possibly predict that the Qing would conquer and unite all of China.
Because of all these states, the Qing was the porous.
It was situated in the mountains, whereas the other states are situated in these fertile valleys.
Its culture was not as developed as the rest, and its population was smaller.
So we couldn't predict that the Qing would eventually unite all of China.
But at the same time, near 500, we cannot have predicted that.
Rome would unite the Mediterranean, and we cannot have predicted that Macedonia would have
united the Greek world.
So let's discuss very quickly why the Qing was able to succeed.
Even though this is the warring states period, and there's a lot of warfare going on, what
we need to remember is that this warfare is heavily regulated.
in this period, it's almost like an aristocratic, erostocratic game.
Okay, so there are stories where this general was laying siege to a city,
and the people inside were starving to death, which is what you do in a siege, right?
You starve the population to death.
But the general felt tremendous regret and guilt for putting the population under such misery.
So he retreated and withdrew to give time for the population.
population to recover. And that was considered what was gentlemanly, okay? That was what was
considered chivalrous, civilized back then. Another story is that an army was crossing
the river, which is a great time to attack them. But the opposing army let them cross
the river because that is what is civilized, what is gentlemanly. So this period was
heavily regulated by a gentleman's code of conduct and then you ask yourself
why is that the case and the answer is that remember this is a open cooperative
competition environment in which even though these states are at war they
still a lot of intermarriage between them there's still a lot of trade a lot of
communication so these states are not trying to use warfare to overturn the
social order because they benefit
from the status quo. They're using warfare as a means to maintain the social order, and that's why
warfare is extremely heavily regulated. Okay? And so let's think about the Pelopetian war between
Athens and Sparta. When we looked at the war, we know that the Persian Pelopon War was extremely
bloody, it was extremely deadly, but at the same time, it was extremely regulated. And a lot of their
strategies didn't really make any sense if it was really about defeating the enemy.
So for example, we know that in Sparta there are people called the Hellots who are basically
slaves to the Spartan people.
The Hellots outnumber the Spartans 10 to 1.
So all Athens had to do was say the Helots, if you fight for us, if you revolt against
your masters, we will grant you freedom.
That's all Athens had to do.
But Athens never did that because by doing that, you would
disrupt the social order from which Athens benefited and you unleash a revolution that could
possibly engulf the entire Greek world. Also, even though Sparta and Athens were enemies,
they were united by intermarriage among their elites. They had a similar culture and they
historically were allies, especially against the Persians. So warfare at this time was about maintaining
the status quo rather than overturning the status quo.
And this presents an opportunity for the Qing Dynasty, which is in the margins of the
status quo.
So the Qing Dynasty starts to invent warfare in a way that opportunistically took advantage
of the status quo situation.
And they commit themselves to total warfare, meaning their entire society,
was engineered in a way to allow them to win against your enemies.
Okay?
So certain characteristics about the Qing Dynasty at this time,
first is the idea of legalism, right?
Drakonian laws that force a population to behave in a certain way.
Something that is very fundamental, the idea of legalism,
is collective responsibility.
What that means is that if you commit a crime, you'll be punished,
But so will your entire family, okay?
The idea of collective responsibility is pioneering at this time
in order to maintain a very strict society that can be purpose for war.
Okay, so that's the first thing.
Legalism.
Second thing is the idea of centralization, meaning that you have a bureaucracy,
you have centralization, okay?
And this allows you to actually expand.
very quickly. It allows you to expand and govern new territories that you conquer.
And the third, of course, is total war, meaning like you devote all your resources to warfare
in order to conquer your enemies. The Qing Dynasty was also known for its openness.
So if you were a man of talent and you could contribute to the military and the bureaucracy, they would welcome you.
So think of the Qing as a revolutionary system that sought to overturn the status quo.
And the other states like Wei, Zhao, Han, and Chu, especially two, they were trying to maintain
a status quo, and therefore they were not that well equipped to deal with the challenge
from the Qing.
Now we know that the Qing would unite all of China, but because they're...
system was so draconian, eventually the other states would rebel against them.
And this would eventually lead to the Han Dynasty.
Now the Han Dynasty is actually, well, even though the Han dynasty, disparages the Qing, right?
So our ver-conception of the Qing comes from Han historians who tell us that the Qing buried scholars and they burned books.
And that's extreme, and that in our eyes is barbaric, right?
We don't know that's true.
We know that the Qing practice heavy censorship.
So those hundred schools of thought, a lot of these books were censored and destroyed during this period.
But we don't know for the fact that they buried scholars, okay?
But this is what, so the Han dynasty is trying to disparage, trying to refute the Qing dynasty.
That said, the Han dynasty continues the system first introduced by
the Qing, okay? The Han is really at this point the height of Chinese civilization.
There's a confidence, there's an arrogance to the Han. And one of the top priorities
for the Han is now that they've united China, they have to deal with the northern
steppspeople. Okay? Remember that throughout history, the steps people have
proven to be the most daunting challenge for civilization.
They are extremely, they're ferocious warriors and the step people will eventually give rise to the Mongols.
At this point, the main adversary of the Han are called the Shong Nu people.
And the Han dynasty is committed to a policy of eradication against the Shong Nu.
Okay, and this policy of eradication will force the Shu Nu to migrate westwards.
And eventually they will, these people will,
start to even threaten Rome itself.
The Han, the Han people, are descendants of the Shongnu.
But over time, because of this conflict between the Han and the northern step people,
this will create a tremendous strain on the Han.
And eventually, the policy will evolve to one of cooperation and dependency.
And so what will happen is there will be a lot of trade,
there'll be a lot of intermarriage,
and the step people will be hired as mercenaries
for internal conflicts within China.
Okay?
So open competition now switches from the Han,
which has become a centralized power, to the step people.
So within these people, and there's quite a lot of different tribes,
there will be now tremendous competition.
And one group, one tribe that will eventually triumph,
is called the Shenbei.
And the Shenbei will give rise to which dynasty.
Do you guys know?
Okay, but Shenbei will give rise to which major Chinese dynasty.
You guys should know this.
What comes after the Han?
The Tang Dynasty.
So this is one thing that is misunderstood.
The Han Dynasty is really the last Chinese dynasty.
It is the last ethnically Chinese dynasty committed to the protection and propagation of Chinese culture.
The Tang Dynasty, the founders, the Lee family, they're actually of the Shandai tribe.
And as a result, they will switch China into a universal multicultural empire.
The Tang Dynasty is famous for being extremely open, tolerant, and inclusive.
All right.
So this is the Tang Dynasty, which is considered the height of power, a height of Chinese power
in the world.
The Tang Dynasty will try to expand Westwoods into Central Asia, and it will start the Silk
Road and trade networks around the world.
Buddhism at this point will come into China, and it will become, at some kind, at some
certain points of state religion.
Okay?
But there are many problems with the Tang Dynasty.
So there's a heavy reliance on generals to fight wars.
And this will eventually lead to the An Lushan Rebellion, okay?
Which lasts for almost 10 years.
An Lushan is the top general of the Tang Dynasty
and because he's given too much power,
too much power and he has too much independence he's much too trusted by the emperor
eventually rebels and 60 thrown for himself okay this rebellion will kill
anywhere between a third to half of the tongue population okay 60 million to
30 million people and this is this is devastating and traumatic for the
Tong dynasty okay but somehow it recovers
But then you will have another rebellion called a Huang Chao rebellion, which will end the Tang Dynasty.
I'll talk about the Huang Chao later on.
The Tang Dynasty will give rise to the Song Dynasty, and the Song Dynasty will adopt a policy of diplomacy
to build assimilation with the northern tribes.
They're trying to avoid the trap of the Tang.
where you give too much power to a general
and the general will rebel.
So a lot of power in the Song Dynasty,
at the time of the Sun Dynasty,
a lot of power will be invested in the imperial bureaucracy.
Okay, that's a song.
Eventually a Song Empire will be carved up and conquered.
Eventually, the ultimate winners of this war
will be the Mongols, who in the year 1279
conquers the entire of the Song Empire.
and unite China.
But the Mungos are considered a foreign dynasty.
So I mentioned that the Tang Dynasty is actually non-Chinese.
But the Mongols understood themselves to be non-Chinese,
and as a result, they discriminated against Chinese people,
which ultimately led to rebellion that will establish the Ming and
and eventually the Ming empire will give way to the Qing Empire.
The Manchu's are just another iteration of the Mongol people.
They will rule China until 1911 when the empire is overthrown.
A republic is established and this gives way to, of course,
the people's Republic of China.
So the big question, again, what we're looking at is,
why is it that the Song Dynasty is the last creative dynasty?
dynasty, all right?
And if we use the idea of open cooperative competition, then we know the answer, all right?
And the answer is this.
Previous dynasties were not able to exert national control.
They were always competing against other states within China proper, okay?
So you look at the Han Dynasty.
Well, the Han Dynasty would give way to dozens of other states.
other states that would compete against each other.
Okay?
So in theory, the Qing and the Han united China, but not for long.
All right.
And the same is true for the tongue as well.
China, for the longest time, was just too large, too diverse, to be unified centrally.
And as a result, the idea of open cooperative competition would still
give rise to innovation.
But starting at the time of the Song,
we see a radical change.
Look at the Song, okay?
The Song is pretty united.
And the UN is extremely united.
So the UN dynasty is able to unite all of China.
And then after the UN dynasty,
the Ming is also pretty united,
and the Qing is extremely united.
So in other words, the answer is this.
After the Song and starting the UN, China became nationally unified.
And it was able, the senator was able to exert control of provinces in a way that was not true before in Chinese history.
So the idea of open competitive competition died with the Song dynasty.
And that's why, after the Song, China stopped being creative.
Okay, so that's the answer.
But then this gives rise to another question, which is how was China able to create national unity?
All right.
So to answer this question, I want to refer to the work of Professor Wang Yu Hua.
He is a professor of Chinese history at Harvard.
And he wrote a new book called The Rise and Fall of Imperial China.
And it's a wonderful book.
If you're interested in Chinese history, I strongly recommend that you look at this book.
All right.
So he begins the book by asking a central question.
And the central question is this.
We know that the Tong Dynasty was really the height of Chinese power.
It had about a quarter of the world's GDP.
And it was, and it influenced the culture.
of Korea, Japan, and it's extremely diverse, inclusive, multicultural empire that introduced
Buddhism to China.
But the problem with the Tongue is their emperors didn't really live that long.
Five emperors, at least five emperors during the Tang Dynasty were deposed by the elite.
The aristocracy got together and were through the emperor, usually by killing him.
So this is a Tang Dynasty.
But when we look at the Qing,
Qing only had 5% of the world's GDP.
And it was wrapped by internal rebellions,
like the Taiping rebellion.
And it was far behind in terms of science technology
to Europe.
But the emperors, like Tianlong,
they could rule for 60 years peacefully.
Okay?
They transitioned into a throne peacefully,
and they died peacefully.
So the Qing, even though it marked a low point
in Chinese prosperity, the emperors lived for a long time,
which meant that the bureaucracy, the center,
was really stable.
This is a paradox.
Why is it that when China is wealthy, the emperor is weak,
but when the emperor is strong, China is poor.
That's a paradox that Professor Wang Yu Hua is trying to answer in his book.
Okay, so he, he, he used a lot of social science analysis and research for his book.
So first of all, what he does is he analyzes the probability as an emperor that you're deposed
by the elite, okay?
And it turns out like the tongue was really the height.
But then when you get to the song, it probably decreases significantly.
But at the same time, what we need to understand is, even though the emperor lived longer,
the state's ability to collect taxes, to control the economy, decreased over time.
So you can see that starting the year zero, all the way down, there's a downward slope.
Now, this is not straight down, okay?
There are peaks, right?
So you go down, then you go up, you go down.
The up is when a new dynasty starts.
And so at this time, the new dynasty is run by a very strong leader.
Like for example, Zhu Yuan Zhang of the Ming Dynasty, the founder of the Ming Dynasty.
These are extremely capable leaders, and they are supported by really talented bureaucrats.
And at this point, they're able to
collect a lot of taxes, which strengthens the center.
But over time, the trend is fairly clear.
Starting at the time of the Song, you see a steep decline in the state's ability to collect taxes.
The only exceptions are around the year 1600 when the Ming transitions to the Qing.
And so what Professor Wangi Hua has discovered is the reason why you have this transition
is the emperor starting around the time of the song, he's actually figured out a way to
divide and conquer the elite.
So the elite, when they are united, they're able to promote strong centralized policies
that promote national growth.
But the centralized elite can always threaten the emperor,
who is dependent on the elite for their support in the military and in government.
Starting around the Song, the centralized elite is now broken down into localized elite.
So the trick that China has discovered,
in maintaining a strong center is by localizing the elites okay so the idea is
you localize the elites when you localize the elites you can implement a policy we
call divide and conquer okay so you get the elites in this province to fight
amongst themselves if too busy funding and find amongst themselves they're not
going to ever rebel against you and they're not going to build alliances with
other provinces to ever challenge you okay and their priorities and
focus is in the provinces and they really don't care what you guys do in the capital.
So that's the thesis.
All right.
And what Professor Wang Yu Hua says is the main mechanism that the emperor used in order
to achieve this radical cultural shift is the Kheju.
The Kheju is a civil service examination that promoted
bureaucrats into positions of power, okay?
The Khaju, the civil service examination.
And so the history of the Khaju is that it was introduced briefly
in a sway and then the Tang Dynasty started to use it.
But it was really the Song Dynasty that really systemized and promoted it, okay?
Basically the Song Dynasty institutionalized the Kheju, okay?
And before the Kodzou, it was really an aerosocratic system where you have to be of noble birth in order to become a high official in government, which is true for most cultures.
So that's what he argues.
All right. So he looks at times of major rebellions.
And what he shows is that whenever there's massive climate change, you have violence.
erupt okay because when you have a centralized system what often happens is that the nobility
engage in rent-seeking behavior basically they they exploit the peasants and that's fine if the
weather is good when the weather is bad and peasants don't have enough to eat they often rebel okay
and in the tongue this would culminate in something called the Huang Chao rebellion which would last
for 10 years when a soap merchant in Huang Chao
a salt merchant named Huang Chao,
he would lead an uprising that would overwhelm and destroy
the Tang Dynasty.
The thing that's important for us to remember is that
he would go all the to Chang'an.
And Chang'an is where all the elite live.
There are about 200 aristocratic families
in the Tang Dynasty, and they were all killed in this rebellion.
When you remove the aristocracy,
this gives the Song Dynasty
room to implement a new policy and ensure that an ability cannot arise again.
So that is the significance of the Huangchal rebellion.
It eliminated the idea of aristocracy in China.
Okay.
So Professor Wang Yu Hua, he looks, what he does is he shows you how networks work in China.
So during the Tang Dynasty, as you can see, there,
are centers which then moved to the provinces, okay?
So these families are all interconnected together,
because there's only 200 aristocratic families.
If you are a wealthy family in a province,
what you want to do is intermarry into one of these
aristocratic families, because that's the best way
to ensure your advantage and privilege in life.
Okay, so this is during the Tang Dynasty
when families are united nationally.
But when you get to the to the Song Dynasty, what you will see is that the center has been localized, meaning it's been spread out.
And what you will also see is that these networks are localized.
They're not connected together now nationally.
All right.
And this, again, allows now the emperor to divide and conquer.
All right.
So let's just do a comparison of the tongue and the song.
As you can see, what's really important is, look at this guys, the networks become more and more localized over time.
It is the deliberate policy of the imperial bureaucracy to localize elite networks so that they can never unite and challenge the center.
Okay, so these networks are becoming much more fractured and localized over time.
All right.
Okay, so the main benefit of the system is, of course, national unity.
So again, during the Han, you have all these different provinces that form their own dynasties
and which challenge the center, okay?
So China was in a constant process of war.
The Tang dynasty was a bit better, but when you get to the Song, the UN, the Ming, and the Qing,
it's all pretty unified nationally.
Okay? By localizing elites, you ensure the center can be challenged, and as a result, you give a semblance of national unity.
But the problem with this, as we know, is it comes at the cost of innovation, which will make China insular,
poor, and divided in the long term. And it's not really a sustainable system, okay? But that's a system.
that China has chosen to adopt for the past thousand years.
A divided and conquer policy against the local elites.
All right, so let's look at another example of how China became insular,
poor and divided over time.
So this is a map of the top 30 cities by population
throughout Chinese history.
As you can see, during the Western Han,
in the Western Han, during the Han Dynasty,
most of these cities are centered
around the Huangho, the Yellow River, okay?
That makes sense because that's where Chinese civilization began.
But starting by the tongue,
they're starting to spread out more.
And by the time of the Song,
they're actually congregating to the coast, right?
So why is this happening?
It's happening because of maritime trade
initiated by,
the Abbasic Caliphate.
Remember our last class, we learned about the standard golden age
and how the Abbas of Caliphate became so wealthy
that established trade networks all around the world.
And these trade networks are so powerful
that they could influence the national economic development of China.
Okay?
And we can expect that because of maritime trade,
over time, all the major cities of China
would all shift to the coast.
the coast and that's why when Zhu Yuan Jiang came into power he initiated a policy
of close borders he shut down maritime trade because he was afraid that if
this continued then all the set all the power would be located in the coastal
areas and therefore the north the west the south will become much poorer and
and therefore they are much more incentivized to rebel.
Also, the coastal areas would have so much power
that they could ultimately depose him.
And that's why Zhugean Zhang would impose a policy
of maritime trade ban.
And this would make China much more insular and weak
and poor.
So again, remember back to the Islamic Golden Age
when the Islamic world, you know all the entire world,
and trying to pull China into its system.
But because of that, it was causing wealth inequality in China,
and that's why the Ming Dynasty will shut down this trade network.
Not completely, but mostly, okay?
That's why you have this massive Chinese immigration
to South East Asia,
because they want to maintain these trade networks.
And there's a trade ban enforced in the Ming dynasty.
And the Qing Dynasty will continue this policy as well.
For China, the priority is internal, internal stability rather than wealth and prosperity.
Okay?
All right.
So that's a quick introduction.
Any questions about this so far?
Are you guys clear?
Any questions?
You're clear, right?
Okay.
So that is Professor Wang Yu Hua's argument, and as you can see, he backs up with a lot of data, okay?
I'm just presenting to you his argument.
Okay, so now I want to talk more about the idea of the imperial bureaucracy, because this will inform and help us better understand world history as we move along.
So to better understand the rise of the imperial bureaucracy, let's first we examine the history of Rome.
Okay, so in the year 500 BC, okay, Rome became a republic, and Rome, the republic will become the model for the British Empire as well as the American Republic.
So it's very important that you fully understand the Rome idea of Republic.
So a republic is again a society governed by laws, tradition, and history.
Okay?
And these three things are manifested in the nobility.
What the Romans call patricians.
patricians and the patricians will exercise power for something called the Senate and
it's this very idea that Rome is ultimately a culture of republic governed by
law tradition and history is what will allow it to expand very quickly until
it dominate the entire Mediterranean these patricians are the ones who will
establish these international
networks that will make the Roman Republic coherent okay and they will do so
through the idea of a patron client relationship okay so the idea is you have a
patriarch and then the patriarch has clients and this will expand across the entire
Mediterranean so in other words the emperor is just
one among equals. The emperor has his empire, but these patriarchs have their own empires within the empire.
Okay, and this gives Rome, even though it's very spread out, a
coherence and a unity that most empires don't have. And again, this is important for us because the British will copy this model when they build their empire,
okay? As well as the Americans.
The problem with this system, though, is that if the Patriarchs don't like the Emperor,
the Patriarchs can get together and depose the Emperor,
which has happened a lot of times throughout the history of the Roman Republic.
So think of Julius Caesar, right?
Julius Caesar wanted more power for himself,
and so the patriarchs got together and killed him.
But Julius Caesar was just one of many.
There was also Caligula, Nero,
and a lot more emperors.
So because of this, new emperors,
but especially people like Diochlechian,
Diochlechian was a military general who won the Roman Civil War
and so became emperor.
They have to fix this problem, okay?
Because obviously your emperor, your biggest problem
is how do you stay alive?
And in the Roman Republic,
the chances of you staying alive aren't very high.
So starting with Diocletian, it starts to develop an imperial bureaucracy to counter the power of the nobility.
The problem, though, is that the nobility solves three problems for you.
Like, the bureaucracy cannot solve.
The first is a problem of the will to fight.
The second is unity.
The third is culture.
Okay, so the world of fight means like in a war,
the nobility are those who are the most to lose
and therefore they're the most willing to die.
So think about the year 216 when Hannibal invaded the Italian peninsula
and it destroyed all the urban armies.
At this point, Rome should have surrendered,
but nobility refused to surrender because if it's a little bit,
they surrendered then Hannibal would have instituted changes to their culture that
would have destroyed the prestige power and wealth of nobility that's why the
nobility refused to surrender they fought to the very bitter end and eventually
they were able to triumph over Carthage okay so the will to fight the mobility
gives a society the will to fight second of course is unity okay national
unity the third is culture so the people who
who wrote the history of Rome were actually the nobility, the senators, the aristocrats.
So when you get rid of nobility, you lose these three things. You lose the idea of a national
unity, a national identity, you lose culture, you lose the will to fight, okay? And that's why,
for the longest time, the system stayed in place. Because to reject the nobility, to kill all
would be to destroy the tradition, culture, and history of Rome.
All right?
But Diocletian would try to solve this problem by implementing imperial bureaucracy.
But the imperial bureaucracy could not challenge the authority, power, and legitimacy of nobility.
That's why Konstantin would in 330 move the capital to Byzantium.
Byzantium and create the Byzantine Empire.
And as we discussed previously, the Byzantine Empire
folk had in proprocracy and it was the dominant power.
And so the Byzantine Empire is not a continuation of the Roman Empire,
it is a rejection of the Roman Republic, okay?
So does that make sense?
The history of Rome.
Okay, this is important for us because the same thing will happen in China.
Okay, the same thing will happen in China.
After the Tang Dynasty, the Song Dynasty will look at the mistakes of the Tang Dynasty,
and they will start to implement the Khaju system and create an imperial bureaucracy
that will rule China for the next thousand years.
Okay?
All right.
So the Khaju.
There is a great misconception in China.
that the Qudu is a meritocracy.
But it is not a meritocracy.
It was never designed to be a meritocracy.
I know that in school you are taught that they have the Qudu
in order for the emperor to select the best and brightest
in China, and because of the best and brightest,
they will rule China virtuously.
That's what you've been taught in school.
That is not correct.
That's not what the Qudu is designed for.
The Qudu is designed for the emperor to localize the elite,
and to divide and conquer them okay so let me explain why it's not a meritocracy
first thing first thing about other kudji that's important for us is that
there's a quota system in place okay so if it was just a meritocracy then the
very best and brightest would win out right but think about the gao cow cow okay if
it was just a meritocracy then who would get get into like the top universe in
China I assure you that nine percent of
of all the top students would come from two cities right Beijing and Shanghai right but
that's not how the system works there is a quarter system in place there's geographic
distribution only certain of students from Beijing and Shanghai can get into
Beijing and Qinghua the rest come from the provinces okay and the Khudju is the same
system so let's look at it very quickly you at the center everyone's trying to get
into the center let's say you have province A B C and D and all the
same you have 10 wealthy families okay you have 10,000 poor families okay peasants how
the system works is a will send two D will send to B will send to C will send two
okay and when you do it this way this creates competition among the local
elites right to win these positions and therefore they will fight amongst
themselves does that make sense if you don't do it this way
If it's just the best and brightest, then what will happen is like A, B, C, D, and will compete
amongst themselves.
Eventually one of the provinces, like maybe B, will develop the innovation in order for their
children to always finish first or place a top in the culture.
Okay?
Does that make sense, guys?
So it's not meritocracy, it's a quota system.
That's the first thing.
Second thing you need to understand is that it is unfair.
Why is it unfair?
Well, because in order to do out on the khaju, remember the khaju is testing your knowledge
of something called Wen Yan, okay, or classical Chinese, classical literary Chinese.
This is a very hard skill to learn.
It will take you decades.
You will need product tutoring.
Your family needs to have a lot of money.
You need to spend decades on this project, which means that you have a lot of leisure time.
You don't have to work.
So in other words, only the elite families of China can compete in the system, and that's the point.
The point is to concentrate the ambition and energy of the elite families into the Khaju.
Otherwise they might come up with ideas like rebellion, okay?
They also might come up with new inventions and amazing literature, but they'll also probably
think of ways to rebel.
That's why you want to concentrate their energies on the Khudju.
Does that make sense?
The third thing that's really important for us to remember is that this system is discretionary.
What does that mean?
It means that just because you finish first on the Khudu does not mean you become a government official.
Okay, did you guys understand?
Success on the could you does not translate
into success in politics.
It is discretionary, meaning the emperor
gets to decide who becomes an official
and who gets promoted, only the emperor.
And often what will happen is the emperor
will start to promote maybe someone from the poor families,
okay?
So not poor, but lower nobility.
And the reason why you wanna do that
is to create a,
precarious situation in the provinces where no family feel secure enough to feel as
so they're the nobility okay you want to create conflict and precariousness in
the provinces to run and conquer and therefore you can exert greater control
over the provinces but by doing that you limit economic growth you limit
cultural innovation okay does that make sense guys all right
So what this means is the bureaucracy is able to control China because of its monopoly, it has monopoly, over three aspects.
All right.
The first is status.
So if you want to be admired, if you want to be respected in China, you do well and could you, and you become an official.
That's a dream of every family in China, right?
It's still true today, right?
Where the dream of every Chinese family is for you guys to get into an Ivy League school or
take the Gao Khao and go to Beijing or Qing War, okay?
The idea of status is still associated with the Khaju, even though we know that success
on the Khaju and success on the Gao Kau does not necessarily translate into success in
school or in life.
That's the first thing.
The second is the monopoly over literacy.
The monopoly over literacy.
What I mean by that is this.
In most cultures, your goal is to make literacy more widespread.
Because when you do that, you allow for faster economic development.
So throughout history, all cultures have, try to figure out how to make
literacy more widespread more prevalent so let's look at look at example of Egypt
okay Egypt Egypt has been around for as long as China and over centuries they
would make their language a lot easier to understand so in the beginning it
they had hieroglyphics okay so maybe the Sun this will represent Sun this is
moon okay so that's the first stage they have pictograms to
represent ideas okay then what they would do is make these symbols shorter okay so
that's it's easier remember and then what they would do is they would make
these symbols phonological meaning they don't they don't represent ideas they
represent sounds okay so this now becomes the English word monsoon right does
that makes sense and then what they would do is they would take the sound sorry
take take the the word and make it into just one consonant okay so this week so
this would become as this would become m and therefore you now have the word
English word sum okay and that's how and that's where we have the alphabet because
of this evolution of language in Egypt it was the Egyptians who developed the
system and then the Greeks stole it through the Phoenicians okay all right so
most cultures follow this pattern because that and because now it's easier for
people to become literate which just drives economic growth okay China is the
only culture in human history that has made literacy more difficult over time all
Right?
China took the pictograms and made them even more complex and added these very complex
grammatical rules to the language and created something called literary Chinese.
Okay?
Literary Chinese, but that's a nice, that's a euphemism.
That's a nice way of saying it.
It really, what it is is bureaucratis.
Okay?
Baratis is a language that only bureaucrats can understand.
So think of contracts, right?
When you look at legal contracts, you can't read it.
Why?
Because the language, the grammar, it's designed so that only as a specialized lawyer could
you understand the contract.
And this is what we call rent-seeking behavior.
You create something that only you can use and people have to pay rent in order to access
your knowledge.
So literacy, the problem of literacy, will keep China back.
from developing.
And the third is culture.
Okay, culture.
And when I mean culture, I really mean Confucianism.
So Confucianism is really a bureaucratic philosophy system designed to maintain the status quo,
to control how people think about the world.
So remember in the Confucian religion, what really matters first,
and foremost is balance harmony.
There's also a concept called ancestor worship.
So you can't leave your village.
Because if you leave your village,
you can no longer worship your ancestors.
You can't clean their graves.
And so people are just stuck in place,
not limit trade and innovation in China, okay?
So the Kudju, sorry, the bureaucracy,
the impariprocy was able to maintain this monopoly
over status, literacy, and culture.
through three mechanisms that Ku-ju, weng-yan, literary Chinese, and confusionism.
Okay, and that's stop the development of
That stopped the cultural and economic development of China.
Okay, so let's better understand this idea. Okay, in a society, there are different ways to seek success and status
All right, so you have the bureaucracy.
of course and that's the that's the way people do it in China but you also have the
military you also have nobility right joining nobility you also have church
religion right by becoming a priest by becoming a spiritual leader you also
have merchants right commerce you can also do it through artistic in Denver
So these are the main ways people achieve status in society.
And in most societies, you have these different systems in place.
What is unique about China is the dominance of the bureaucracy.
So the nobility was wiped out.
And for the Khudju, the Khudu ensures that no nobility can arise again in China.
Okay? Church religion was outlawed for most of Chinese history. Okay? The merchant and the artistic
people are low status in China. So go back to the confusion system, the scholarfish is at the
top, then you have the farmers, then you have the merchants and you have the artists, right?
So the confusion religion puts the merchants and the artist at the very bottom. And this is intentional,
because the artists, okay, they can promote new ideas,
but the merchants are even more problematic
because they trade, okay, and they can accumulate wealth.
And that wealth can challenge the authority of the empire.
All right, so the merchants are a problem.
The military, as we know, was heavily suppressed
throughout Chinese history, okay?
So the Song Dynasty, there was,
these massive conflicts between the military and the bureaucracy the military want to go
fight and defend song territory the bureaucracy wanted to just bribe everyone
okay all right okay so and because you have too much power within the
bureaucracy this was stunt development in China all right let's look at one
more example okay we know like by the time the song China had four
major inventions okay these four major inventions of course are paper print
making compass and gunpowder all right and these four inventions guys will
revolutionize the world all right so if you look at paper it will give rise to
back notes okay so the stone had back notes and this will give rise to
capitalism in
the West. Printmaking is important because remember in the 15th century
Gutenberg created something called the printing press in Europe and because of the
printing press you're now able to manufacture books at scale and when you do that
what happens is that people become more literate okay so the very idea of the
printing press made available all this all these books all this knowledge that
wasn't available before and now people could just learn how to read and write
Okay, so this will give rise to literacy and when you give rise to literacy you will give rise to things like the Renaissance
the Protestant Reformation the Zion Revolution the Enlightenment the French Revolution okay
So this marked a revolution in European affairs
The compass right will allow for the age of exploration
So these Europeans are able to discover new lands and conquer and colonize them right? So North America South America
will eventually all become colonized by the Europeans using the compass.
Gun power is important because it is the revolution in warfare.
From gun power you will have things like the cannon and also eventually the musket.
The musket is just an individual gun and this marks a revolution not only in warfare but also in human affairs
because when you have the musket, now,
now individual soldiers do matter okay before it was a knight who was a main weapon in
the warfare but we have a musket you can now equal the playing field okay it's
more important to have more soldiers than you have knights and this will allow
for things like the American Revolution right when you have these farmers with
muskets they were able to overthrow the British Empire it will give rise to the
French Revolution when you have citizens who are not professional soldiers they
will take these muskets and defend their country against a European invasion
all these are major revolutions that will give rise to modernity okay and
again China by the Song Dynasty 1200 CE had all four inventions but because of
the culture in place because of the bureaucratic culture in place neither not any of these
inventions had an impact on China's trans society so they did nothing whatsoever
with all four inventions all right so the key lesson here guys and this is
really important technology does not matter you can steal the technology what
matters is the culture all right another example of course is the UN dynasty when
During the UN dynasty, China was importing a lot of foreign experts, a lot of foreign
bureaucrats, Christians, Muslims, Jews, they were importing a lot of foreign technology.
And then when the Ming power came into place, they got rid of all this stuff, okay?
They got rid of the foreigners, they got rid of technology, China became much more insular
and backward.
Okay.
So that explains why.
why after Song Dynasty China did not innovate anymore because the empire did not want
innovate innovation is a threat to the status quo okay and what's important is to
maintain the status quo even though by doing so ultimately you make China
poor weak and divided all right good any question
Does it make sense to you guys?
Does this conform to your understanding of Chinese history?
Yeah.
Okay, so the question is, is Confucian a religion or a culture?
So, no one thinks Confucian is a religion.
At most, people will say that Confucian is a civic religion, okay, or philosophy.
All right.
So I would say that Confucianism, ultimately, what it is,
is, is bureaucratism.
I can't even spell barracism anymore.
Barocritism, okay?
What I mean by that is that it is something that's designed
to make everyone believe that a barricoracic society is the best society.
It is one that is the most sophisticated,
and it's designed in order to maintain a status quo
where bureaucrats are at the top, okay?
That's what Confuciusism really is.
So the example is that if you read Chinese history, the most virtuous people are always bureaucrats, scholar officials.
And this propaganda is so effective that eventually Europeans will stop, what will start to mimic this propaganda.
So Voltaire, the French Enlightenment thinker, says that Chinese have the best system because they allow only educated to war.
not soldiers, not priests, but scholar officials,
Mandarin's.
So this is, so the idea of Confucianism is that it's bureaucratism.
It's designed to legitimize and give authority to the bureaucratic elite.
So, so thank you.
Does that make sense to you?
Okay.
Any more questions?
Okay.
So I'm going to end the class.
a story, okay?
And the story has to do with the first emperor
of the Ming Dynasty, Zhugean Jiang.
So Zhugean Zhang, he is now emperor,
and he reinstitutes the Qaju, okay?
The Mongols got rid of the Qudu
because they had the nobility,
but Zhuan Zhang, he restores the Qudu,
and everyone is excited, okay?
So everyone comes and takes the examination.
When the results come out,
what happens is that,
the test takers from the south do a lot better from the north.
So these northern test takers feel there must be corruption in place.
So they filed petition to the emperor.
The emperor looks at the petition and he agrees there must be corruption.
How is that no northerner was able to pass the Kudju?
So he calls in his chief minister and he says,
this is a huge scandal, I want you to resolve this issue, okay?
this issue okay figure out who is responsible for this corruption and kill them all right
so let's call so the chief minister he really wants to impress the emperor so he spends
months painstakingly rigorously examining the issue investigating the issue he has
commission he has hundreds of staff he personally looks at every single could you
and then he writes his report he presents to the emperor okay and he says to the emperor
your majesty I personally have done this investigation and we have written like
thousands of pages of report directly to you I can guarantee you they could you
when implemented was a fear open and transparent process the fact of the matter
is that people in the South they're more civilized they're more culture they're
more educated and therefore they just did better on the the better than the
northerners and I'm really sorry this happened but I guarantee you that could
you is a fair open and transparent process you have nothing to worry about it's
all been taking care of so what do you think the emperor did what do you think the
emperor did have you guys heard of the story he killed them all he killed the
high official he killed the high officials commissioners
He killed the test makers.
He killed those who got the very best scores on the kudu.
The reason why is the emperor does not want a fair, open, and transparent system.
He wants a system in which the localities will not rebel against the center.
Okay?
And that's what the kudu is.
All right.
So that is it.
We will do Genghis Khan next class.
