Predictive History - The Story of "Civilization", "Secret History", "Game Theory" and more - Game Theory 8: Communist Specter

Episode Date: February 6, 2026

Game Theory 8: Communist Specter

Today we discuss communism, Marxism. We'll discuss what it is, where did it come from, and why did it succeed. Now, the 20th century had the Cold War, and so that was an ideological struggle between capitalism and communism. And for the longest time,

we believe that capitalism and communism were polar opposites, a dialectic, okay, a black and white. But if that is a case, then how do we explain China? Because for the longest time, China was a communist country, and then in the 1980s, it started to reform, and now China is very much a capitalist country. In fact, if you think about it, this transition has been seamless.

There hasn't been much conflict because of this transition. And this is not true historically where transitions have been very violent. So think of the transition from feudalism to capitalism. That was a very violent process. Think of the process from Catholic Europe into Protestant Europe. That was also a very violent process. But in China, communism transitioned into capitalism pretty easily, pretty quickly, and extremely successfully.

Okay? And in fact, you could say that today, China is very much a capitalist country with some common elements, but it's very much capitalistic. So the question then is, if these two ideologies, capitalism, communism are such polar opposite, if it's a dialectic, then how this happened in China. And what I want to show you today is that actually this is a false dialectic, okay? Meaning that communism and capitalism are actually more similar than they are different. In fact, what I will show you is that in many ways, communism is a creation of capitalism.

As a weapon, destroy capitalists' major enemies. So communism is not really the enemy of capitalism. The real enemies of capitalism are different ideologies, okay? So these ideologies include monarchy. The idea of monarchy is that rather than power in the hands of the capitalist, power is in the hand of the king. And what a king often does is redistribute capital in a way that is more than the king is more. fear. So for example, when a king first comes into power, what a king often does is cancel

all debts and redistribute the land. And that's why he's so popular, okay? So capitalists are afraid of kings. They don't want kings because the king will often reach you with property. Another great enemy of capitalism is religion or theocracy. The idea here is that all religions teach you that money is evil, right? God doesn't want you to make money. God wants you to be kind to others, to love your children, to be a nice person, okay?

So that's why in Catholic Europe, they were so poor because people were more focused on redemption and salvation than they were on making money. Okay? So Theocracy is also a major enemy of capitalism. Then you also have nationalism. Nationalism is the idea of loyalty to your people, loyalty to your nation. For capitalism, that's a problem, okay?

Because capitalism wants to be loyal to capital. And it wants capital to flow across borders. So I see an investment opportunity in China, I want to take my money from America and put it into China. I don't want to worry about, oh, China's my enemy. China's my enemy. China is not my people. Okay?

So nationalism is also a major problem. And then you also have another problem, okay? Call it democracy. So believe it or not, capitalists hate democracy. Why do they hate democracy? Because if you think about it, if people have power, the workers at power, they would all get together and vote to redistribute wealth, right? to make the rich pay more taxes.

We call this socialism. Okay? So you think about it, the enemy of capitalism is not communism. It's these four other things. You actually think about it, okay? Communism is working with capitalism to destroy all four of these things, right?

So let's look at this. Monarchy. Communism does not allow for monarchs to rise. it allows for a party to arise, right? What is a party? Party is an oligarchy, all right, which is a capitalist system. Now, Theocracy. What does Marx say?

Mark says is that religion is the opiate of the people. Religion is to be evil of the world. Religion creates false consciousness. Therefore, we must destroy all religion. Right? And if religion is destroyed, what is left? The only thing that is left is money. Okay?

Now, nationalism. Communism is international, right? Workers of the world unite. So nationalism is also bad. We want to unite as a world. All workers unite. The class conscience is more important than national identity. Right?

Now, democracy. No, no, no. It's bad too, right? Because workers cannot defend their rights. Workers have false consciousness. Workers have been brainwashed by the capitalists in school, in the media, by the internet, by Hollywood, okay? Therefore, a vanguard, the party, must lead the people into socialism.

All right? So this is really convenient how capitalism and communism have similar enemies and communism helps destroy all four enemies in a way that capitalism cannot. Right? So you can also make the argument that maybe communism was a weapon or a virus created by capitalism in order to conquer the world, in order to destroy the world so that capitalism can spread throughout the world.

And China is an example of this, right? Think of think about the cultural revolution that destroyed religion, that destroy tradition, that destroy cultural identity. And what happened after the culture revolution? China became capitalist, and it became hyper-capitalistic.

China had the fastest growth rate, I get my growth rate in the world. How did that happen? Okay? So I'm not saying this is true. I'm saying like, this is something for us to think about. All right?

All right. So let us now think about this. Again, this is all just speculation on my part, okay? I don't really know. I'm saying like, you know, why is this happening? Why is this the correlation? Right?

All right. So an example is Car Marx. And Car Marks, of course, is the founder of, of communism. And the history of Karl Marx is like really, really strange. So for example, he isn't German citizen, but he spent all his time in Britain. He was exiled from Germany because he advocated for a world revolution.

So he went to Britain. But Britain is also a capitalistic country. So why is it that he's allowed to do whatever? he wants in Britain. He wrote most of his works in the British Library, in the British Museum. So why did the British authorities allow him to do that? That's a question for us, right? Britain is the most capitalist country in the world at this time in 19th century, and Britain basically allow Marx to live there and do whatever he wants. Okay, that's strange. Number two is Karl Marx, where did he get his money from?

So, Carl Marx, actually, his wife is a German aristocrat. So she's used to luxury. But Karl Marx never made any money in his life, right? If he writes these works to a Communist Manifesto, that's capital, no one's going to read them. They don't sell, right? So he's not a wealthy person. But we know for a fact that he actually lived a very good life.

He wasn't an aristocrat. He wasn't wealthy, but he was middle class. His kids went to private school, they had a nice house in Britain. So the question is, where did he get his money from? Well, what they say is he got his money from his partner, Frederick Engels. And where did Frederick Engels get his money from? Well, his father was a capitalist and industrialist. So there's a question for you.

Why would his father, who is a very wealthy person, like give angles a lot of money to give to Marx? And Marx is calling for a world revolution to destroy the capitalist. Why would they do that? Okay, that's kind of strange. And the third thing is that at this time, socialism was the most dominant ideology for many reasons. Okay, and the idea of socialism is that it will evolve naturally. Okay? But Marx says, no, no, no, we cannot allow it to evolve naturally.

It will not evolve naturally. We need a revolution. Okay? We need a world revolution. All right? So that's a question for us. Why would he say this? Okay.

So let's look at what socialism is. Let's look at what communism is, okay? Let's look at socialism. All right, the idea of socialism is pretty simple. All right, so before you had a feudal society, and then it became industrial. Because it becomes industrial, you have lots and lots of workers, okay?

And you have capitalists. The problem, though, is that capitalism exploits labor. It makes people very unhappy. Okay, so the workers want change. Then you have the industrialists, the capitalists. The problem is that capital is capital consolidates, okay? So maybe you have a thousand capitalists to start, but then maybe 10 will take over all the money, okay, all the means of production, the factories.

Then maybe one, okay? Because that's how capitalism works. It consolidates, which means that eventually the capitalist will churn against capitalism as well, okay? And because of democracy, because people can vote, they can then together affect political change. And this will lead to socialism. And what is socialism? Socialism is a redistribution of wealth, okay? A redistribution of wealth. Now, for the sake of simplicity, say there are three classes, okay? You have the rich, you have the middle class, and you have the poor. Okay? Redistribution is doing is taking the money from the rich and giving it to the poor.

You understand? But because of this, what happens is the middle class improves in status and power. Okay? So if you look at the system, you would think, okay, look, the poor want this system because have more money, get more equality, but also the people who really want the system are the middle class. because it means that over time they have more power and status than the rich right and this is a pretty powerful coalition that's why socialists believe that over time this is a natural evolution and this is true for most of human history right so after World War II Europe didn't become communist it didn't become capitalist it became socialist it had a very strong welfare system okay so just the natural

course of human history socialism will become inevitable. It doesn't make sense to you guys, because this is the majority of people. But Marx has problems with this, okay? Marx says, okay, all right, the major problem with this is class, sorry, false consciousness. Okay?

You think that this is a natural process, but capitalists, the ruling elite, have a lot of tricks up their sleeves, For example, they can brainwash the workers. So for this to work out, you need to create true consciousness. So you need to destroy religion. You need to revamp the education system. You need to control the media, okay?

Otherwise, the capitalist will use the schools, the media, religion to brainwash the workers. And also, these workers need to unite together across the world to have true power, okay? Why? Because the real struggle is one of class, okay? Consciousness.

And for socialism to arise, we need to destroy class, okay? So the idea of the middle class, updating power, that's bad. What we should have is just everyone the same, okay? Equality. And that's the idea of Marxism,

to destroy all people. property, okay? That's the main difference between socialism and communism. Socialism is the redistribution of property. Cottalism is a destruction of property. But if you do it this way, what happens is that the middle class now lose status, right? And so it's both the rich and criminal class that suffer under communism and therefore they will probably unite together against the poor you understand so it sounds similar socialism and communism but it's night and day socialism seems like the natural evolution of things okay and so it sounds right so why is Marx screwing around this okay he also says

that, okay, you also need a party. You also need a vanguard, an elite, to destroy the false consciousness, unite the workers, and create a common society. And when they do that, when system is completely communist, then the party will give up power and you will have a socialist paradise. But the other question then is, why do the party give up power? Right? So if the the party's capable of creating consciousness, why don't they just switch to a different false consciousness? Okay? So the problem Marx is that it's working on socialism and making it more extreme.

It's also making it more confusing. And why would he do that? Okay? It's very confusing now. All right? And my argument to you is that when this happens, when the night of the night, you, it's a lot The idea becomes more extreme, the intention is to discredit it, to make it illegitimate, destroy the idea.

So if you think about it, according to game theory, the people responsible for communism is that Marx. The people responsible for communism are the capitalists, the ruling elite. Because they want to destroy the idea of socialism, right? They don't want this unity between the minimum. class and the workers they want the middle class to remain with the nobility and the oligarchy does that make sense all right so let me show how this works all right so in a feudal economy you have the monarch and the nobility okay the monarch and nobility have power through through mechanisms first of all they control all the land they control the military

and they control the religion, okay? So this is the status quo. And then the peasants are the people who work the land. And this is true for most of Catholic Europe. But then with the rise of industrialism, you have new people come into power, okay? So, for example, you have the bourgeoisie. For the bourgeois Z,

bourgeois Z are just the capitalist, the factory owners, okay? And because of the bourgeoisie, you now have the workers. And then because of this industrial economy, you have the middle class. Okay? The middle class are just like lawyers, teachers, accountants, journalists, people who support the industrial economy. All right. Now, when this happens, when you have a new groups of people emerge, you now have tension

of violence, okay? And this is ultimately what led to the French Revolution. where the new order, okay, these people worked together to try to overthrow the old order. And this led to the Napoleonic wars. Seven wars fought between France and everyone else, okay? And that led to the deaths of millions, tens of millions of people in Europe. It was a deadly war. And after Napoleon was defeated, all the leaders, the nobility of Europe got together and decided that.

From now on, we will no longer fight war. Okay? The great something called the Concert of Europe. The Concert of Europe is basically these different monarchies agreeing to resolve the differences over negotiations rather than on the battlefield. So think of it as the United Nations, okay? And it worked really, really well. The problem is that it worked too well because you're not resolving this problem, okay?

You're not resolving this conflict between a new order and the old order. Right? These people want to maintain the status quo. But these people, the industrial economy, wants a new state, a new order that allows for democracy. Liberalism. So, socialism. So a more redistribution to do you should.

more redistribution of wealth, greater participation in the political system, and the limitations of the religion, okay? So basically the French Revolution. All right now, so this system was created to avoid the French Revolution, but because of peace, the ingredients for the French Revolution are increasing,

Okay? And this led to something called the 1848 revolutions. 18888 revolutions. And this happened throughout the entirety of Europe, where each place there was an uprising, a combination of these people, the border-s regime, middle class, and workers who called for changes in government, okay? Some places were violent, some places were peaceful. Some places focused more on democracy.

Some place focus more on liberalism, someplace focus more on socialism, okay? All right. So does that make sense? After 1848, what the leaders of Europe recognize is that, you know what? If we don't do anything about the situation, eventually the new order is going to consume us. The new order of the bourgeoisie, middle class and workers, this alliance, is going to destroy us. So what can we do about it? Their solution is we have to divide them, okay?

We have to divide them. So before the conflicts were about status, religion, okay? So the first idea is, let's create the idea that the real conflict is class, okay? So the real enemy is not between nobility and the bourgeoisie, okay? The real enemy is between the bourgeoisie, and the workers.

This is the real conflict. Right? Second is that we have to discredit these people and make this movement seem extreme, fanatical, zealous, okay? And you do that by saying, okay, no property. What we want is not a more fair society. What you want is a completely equal society where no one has any money, no one has any rights, no one has any freedom. Communism, okay?

And the third way you delegitize it is say that this is a international conspiracy. Hey guys, Jews. These communists are a secret society who want to take over the entire world. So it's not that, oh, these workers. just want more rights. No, no, no. These workers are tools in the actual conspiracy

to conquer the entire world. They are funded by Jews, by capitalists, by the British. Who cares, okay? But they're not Germans. They're not French. They're not us.

Do you understand? So if you think about it, communism was a Syop. Okay? A tool used by the elite, by the ability to make the movement of democracy, socialism, and liberalism, illegitimate. This is his propaganda. Okay?

Doesn't make sense, guys. All right, so let's look at the evidence for this. All right, so this is the 1848 revolutions. So what happened was that because of peace, you have overpopulation, you have economic growth, that led to inequality, that led to corruption, that led to conflict between the bourgeoisie, the new rising powers and the nobility, the status quo powers, okay? And that's why you have these revolutions throughout Europe, okay? So look at France, okay?

This is a French, you look at like all these places, this happening all at the same time, Okay, everywhere. And again, different systems will respond differently. The only place in Europe that's where he speared these revolutions is England. And the reason why is that England has colonies where if you're not happy, you can go somewhere else like Canada or the United States or Australia, New Zealand, okay? But you can leave. But everyone else is stuck where they are and they are fighting for moral rights.

And again, this puts the fear of God. into the European nobility. For the longest time, they go along, they maintain peace, but now the bourgeoisie, the industrialists, the capitalist, want to overflow the regime. So what they do now is they sponsor creation of communism to divide the capitalists, the middle class,

and the workers against each other, to create the idea of class conflict. All right? Okay, so Carmar, and Frederick Engels, all right? They write something called a Communist Manifesto. And this comes after the 1848 revolutions. Because after the 1848 revolutions,

they were absolutely convinced that Europe is in, is ready for a global revolution, okay? And this is their agenda. And this is also a secret document, because at this time, the communists are a secret society all around Europe. Okay? And I would argue that,

This is probably being funded by the nobility. Okay? Okay, so it calls for all abolition of property. All right? No more property. That's pretty extreme. So because again, remember, the middle class wants to support socialism, but it cannot support communism.

Socialism is just a redistribution of wealth. Commonism is the abolition of wealth. Two different things, all right? All abolition of inheritance. Okay, again, you're middle class. You're like, I worked really hard to make this money. I want to give to my children. Now I can't anymore, okay?

This is pretty awful. All right. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, okay? By means of a national bank. Okay, and you think, okay, this is, this sounds pretty extreme. But you know what? They already do this in capitalism. It's called the Bank of England, right?

All right? So there are already some, a lot similar to being capital. communism, communism. Remember, the Bank of England is where all wealth around the world is stored, right? So a centralized bank in communist system, it's the same thing, right? Centralization of the means of communication, right? A party. Well, this is just the capitalist class, an oligarchy. Like, does it really matter if it's an oligarchy or a party? It's the same thing, really. Right? Extendial factories,

instruments are produced owned by the state, equal liability of our work, commonings of agriculture or manufacturing industries. All right, so this is the idea of creating a politariat, all right, or manufacturing. And this is what capitalists are white guys, okay?

So for at this time, most of the world is agricultural, feudal, and this calls for the creation of a manufacturing industrial economy. That's what capitalists want, right? Because that way they can better exploit people. Free education for all children. And you're like, oh, well, that's great, man.

Free schooling. No, it's not. Because now you can brainwash them, right? This is brainwashing. So, you know, you're like, okay, well, this agenda is communist. Well, if I'm a capitalist, I'm okay with this agenda, right? I'm happy with this agenda. What's wrong with this agenda?

Right? When the course development, class convictions have disappeared and all production has been country in the hands of the vast association of the whole nation, the public power will lose its political character. Political power, probably so-called, is merely the organized power of one class for oppressing another. The Politerate during its contest where the bourgeoisie is compelled by the force of circumstances to organize itself of its class.

It by means of a revolution, it makes itself the ruling class, and as that swoops away by force, the old conditions of production, then it will along these conditions. have stuck away the conditions for the existence of the class antagonism of class generally, and will thereby have abolished its own supremacy as a class. Okay, all right, so this sounds very complex, but it's not, okay? First of all, it establishes the Politarian and the Barclosities are the real enemies. Not between the capitalist and the monarchy between capitalism and religion. The real conflict is class between the Barclosier and the Politariat.

Okay? And for the Politian to win, they need a party. Okay, they need a vanguard party. But, hey, once this vanguard party establishes itself and destroys class, it will go away. Okay, you understand? It will feel power voluntarily. It will choose to not exist anymore. This has never happened an issue before, but trust us on this one, okay?

This time will be different. All right. All right. So, this is interesting. In the Congress manifesto, it says, okay, Switzerland, we support the radicals. In Poland, we support the Agrid Revolution. In Germany, we support the bourgeoisie, sorry, yeah, the Politariat, okay? So in different places, they have different concerns, they have different needs, right?

And what these people are saying is that we're not part of the natural conspiracy. All we want is a more fair, just society. That's all we want. We're not part of a secret society bet on world domination. What the Communist Benefesto says is, yes you are, yeah, we're all part of this great conspiracy to conquer the world

and establish communism. Right? So why would they do that? That's really strange, guys. Right? Why would they admit we are a national conspiracy, we're a six society. This is a secret document that we read

amongst ourselves. But it's also possible for you to steal and show that yes, there is a secret society, an actual conspiracy of Jews who are trying to destroy the world. Okay? Really interesting. Okay. So now I want to talk about 1917. What happens to 1917 is this? World War I is breaking out, okay? And the Russians are losing the war, the Tsar, Nicholas Second, he abdiccates, and now you have a democratic government in Russia. But then the Bolsheviks, the Bolsheviks are an extreme communist faction, okay?

That's an October revolution. So basically they seize power for themselves. And then they have an election. As you can see from this election, the Bolsheviks, even though they have ceased power, They're not as popular, okay, as the socialists. Okay, the socialists are gonna argue for more gradual change. The Bolsheviks want radical change.

So you can see 17 million people voted for the socialists, only 10 million people voted for the Bolsheviks, even though the Bolsheviks controlled the government, okay? And also look, look at this. At the end of the day, they only got 23% of the popular vote. Okay? So they are not a popular faction.

They're a minority. Okay. And so this launches the Civil War. Okay. And as you can see at this time in history, yes, the communists have control over the major cities of Russia, but they don't really control

control most of Russia. In fact, they have lots and lots of enemies. They have the whites to deal with. The whites is basically the nobility. Okay. And they have also ally armies who come in. They have the greens who are the peasants. Okay? They have lots and lots of enemies. And at this time in history, you cannot possibly expect that the Bolsheviks would win this battle. Okay? But they do. All right, here's something interesting. This is the Romanovs, okay? The Romanovs. The Romanovs.

The Romanovs have been in power in Russia before 100 years, okay? And the Romanovs are beloved by the peasants. And they themselves are part of the Orthodox tradition. They're also relatives of the nobility of... of Europe, okay? So England and Germany.

So this is the Tsar, Nicholas II. The Tsar here is Nicholas II. Okay? And these are all his relatives. This is the Romanov dynasty. Now, when the revolution broke out, you would think that they would just run away to Europe, right, where their relatives are.

They didn't do that, they just stuck around. So the question then is, why would they just stick around? The answer is they never believed they were in danger. Okay? First of all, they could not expect the Bolsheviks to

win out, but also they're beloved by the peasants. They're part of the Orthodox church tradition, and they have relatives who are the most powerful people in Europe, including in England,

including in Germany, right, the Kaiser. So they thought they were fine. But they, something strange happens. The bull snakes decides to kill every one of them. Okay? They wipe out the Romanov family. Between 17 and 18 of members of the Romanov family were assassinated and you're like that makes no sense. Why would they do that? By doing that, first of all, you present out the peasants right. You turn the peasants against you,

because the peasants love the royal family. You now get the families of Europe pissed off at you because you kill their relative, but also you come across as fanatical then on World Revolution. Okay? And then you piss off the Orthodox as well. So these communists are fanatics.

But let's assume they're not fanatics. Let's assume that, in fact, they're a good reason to do this. Why would they do that? Okay. And the answer is this. The Romanov's had billions and billions of dollars in foreign banks. Okay? In the city of London on Wall Street.

A lot of their wealth, billions and billions of dollars, is stored overseas. What happens if they die? What happens if they all die? Right? Guess what? these billions now belong to the foreign banks. That's a lot of money, man. And in fact, this is exactly what happened

where they all died and the foreign banks just took control over this money. And this is one of the great controversies of the 20th century. The government of Russia has been trying for a long time to get this money back. And the foreign bank's like, well, you don't own this money. It's a Romanovs.

who owned this money. Okay? So this is evidence that the communists and the capitalists actually are friends. They're working together. Okay? Does that make sense, guys? All right.

Let's continue. All right, another thing is that, again, the Bolsheviks are not that popular. Okay? The peasants are pissed off at them because they just killed the noble family. There aren't that many workers. So how can they fight this war?

Well, they fight this war using mercenaries, okay? From Latvia, from China, from the Hungarians, okay? So there's over 200,000 of these mercenaries. And you're like, wait a minute here. How did these guys get paid? The Postings don't have any money? How are they getting paid? And the answer is, well, Wall Street, guys.

Wall Street and the city of London gave the Bolsheviks money to pay these mercenaries. It was Wall Street who paid for these mercenaries. You're like, what would they do that? And the answer is because the Bolsheviks to pay Wall Street back created the Red Terror. Okay? The Red Terror is when the Bolsheviks

basically went to all the rich people in Russia. The nobility says, you either give me all your money or I will rip your daughter. I will kill your wife. I will kill you. And guess what? By doing that, they made a lot of money. And that money went to pay Wall Street for the foreign mercenaries. Again, capitalist and communists work well together.

Okay? Then you have the allies. So Britain, America, France, Japan set these huge arms. Japan sent these huge armies to Russia and everyone thought, okay, it should destroy communism because these are capitalists, they're afraid of the communists. But in fact, that's how it happened, okay? They went to collect debt. So Russia owe these countries money, the Bolshev, paid off this debt, so then the allies

left and attacked the whites, okay? All right. So the Allies helped the Bolsheviks and Wall Street gave money to the Bolsheviks for mercenaries. And that's how the Bolsheviks won the war. Does that make sense? So capitalist and communists work well together because they have a similar worldview. All right. So this is a passage from a book called Wall Street and the Russian Revolution by Richard Spence.

Okay? And Richard Spence is a historian and he had lots of documentation where Wall Street is actually financing the Bolsheviks. And he explains what does this happen? He says that Wall Street wants to destroy the Russian economy, okay? Destroy the Russian economy because Russia is a threat, okay? And then it wants to steal the riches and the resources from the Russian economy. the Russians, okay?

That's the purpose of financing the Bolsheviks. To destroy the Russian economy and to steal the wealth of Russia. All right, from 1918 until 1921, the Bolsheviks reduced Russia to an economy based on barter and robber, okay? So the Bolshevich basically stole everything from the rich, the middle class, and the poor to finance their war. Besides the opposition of private trade and the destruction of the monetary system,

the Red Regime embarked on a massive looting campaign, ransacking palaces, bank vaults, churches, and museums. Okay, we call this acid stripping. So basically, the Bolsheviks destroyed their own society in order to get the money to finance this war, in order to pay off Wall Street, okay? They expropriate every valuable they could get their hands on and stashed on a new state treasury

by the close of 1921, estimated $40,000,000 in valuables have been sequestered there with more to come. Much of its' defense abroad for a faction of its value in capitalist hard currency. So basically, the Bolsheviks stole everything in order to finance the war. And in the process, by destroying their tradition, by destroying their wealth, by destroying their religion, by destroying the nobility, it made the Soviet Union now much, more amendable to capitalism. That's what happened when the Soviet Union failed, it became capital capitalists, okay? So that shows us, it shows us is that capitalism communism are not

enemies, they're partners in world conquest and that's what the 12th century is about. All right, any questions? So I think for China when the China is officially recognized as a country, Mao Zodong said that we need to pursue communism and abandon capitalism, but there is, like, they followed Marx's thinking. And, like, currently there's a special term, which is, I think, I don't know the English name, but it's called Chinese Unique Socialism. I don't know, like, is that a way that the leaders deal with when the country is, you know, actually pursuing capitalist, or is, actually pursuing capitalists as the communism goal is just professed. Okay, so China is an interesting example. Because when Marx was examining the world,

the two places he didn't really consider are Russian China, okay? So Marx, Russian China. Okay, why? The answer is because both are agricultural agrarian, or what he calls feudal. So for this perspective, Russian China have not reached a state development, which is right for World Revolution, okay? For him, the focus is on Germany. And this makes sense because remember, Marx is being supported by Britain, right?

And Britain is the great enemy of Germany. So that's why Britain would support Marx, because he wants, because Marx is trying to create a revolution in Germany, which is a great enemy of Britain, okay? That makes sense. So for Marx, he thinks that China and Russia don't really matter because they're backward, they're agricultural, they have monarchies, okay? So it doesn't really fit into his model. But then Lenin, okay, came and said, no, you can speed up the revolution, okay?

You know, even though peasants, peasants became workers if you have a party to process. Okay? So that was Lenin's contribution and Mao is like, no, you don't even need workers, okay? You're going to have a movement entirely on peasants. And then once you have won the revolution, then you can create an industrial revolution. So really, if you think about it,

Mao wasn't really leading a communist revolution. It was, you know, it had the facade of communism, but it's really a peasant uprising. Okay, so Mao was not a great common spiritician like Marx or Lenin. Mao was a military commander. Okay, so he's no different from other peasant leaders in the past. People like Zhugean Zhang, of the main dynasty, these people. But in order to create legitimacy, in order to,

to have support from the Soviet Union, from Russia, they had the communist facade. And also, communism provided a framework in order to industrialize very quickly. So what's important to understand is that at the time of history, Mao was trying to actually work with the United States as well. He's trying to work with both the Soviet Union

and the United States. The United States wanted to support Zhang Jetsha, Chang'an Shep. So when Mao won, basically the United States shut off China, embargo China, which forced Mao to fully embrace communism, okay? But for Mao, communism was not that important. What's important is to industrialize very quickly, industrialization.

So for him, what's important is industrialization. The other idea is the idea of national sovereignty. So he didn't really want to control by the Soviet Union. If China was fully communist, then Soviet Union would say, well, you're our, you're our little brother. But for now, what was important is national sovereignty, and that's what ultimately led to the Sino-Soviet split in 1957, okay?

Does that make sense? All right. Okay. So can we understand that capitalists equals to communism or capitalism equals to communism or communism is a weapon of capitalism capitalism, but like if we try to pursue communism at the end, we will finally achieve capitalism. Okay. All right.

So capitalism is the belief that you can structure society around capital. And this is a direct threat to the old order, okay? the old order, which focus on religion, the king, the military. Okay? So the capital is like, no, let's get away with all this complexity. Let's just make capital the basis of society, okay?

Now, what happened is that as these two systems came into conflict, all right? the workers wanted socialism, okay? Social democracy. So capitalism, from capitalism, you had social democracy. Social democracy is just easy, okay? Yes, yes, we believe in capitalism, but we believe in restraints on capitalism.

We believe on a fair distribution of capital. All right, and that makes sense because, well, um, you can't just have a few people with all the money, okay? All right? But what happened was social democracy was both a threat to the old order as a threat to communism as well, right? So the old order of capitalism, what they did was they would mutate social democracy into communism in order to delegitimize, okay, delegitimize social democracy, to make this into a threat

against everyone. Okay? sense. So to summarize, capitalism is just a natural outgrowth of history, but this comes in conflict with the old order and capitalism will give birth to social democracy, all right? Which is a natural response to capitalism. Social democracy becomes a threat to both the old order and as well as capitalism. Capitalism and the order are also in conflict with each other, so what they do is they conspire

to create communism, okay? So in the early days, communism is being supported by both the nobility and the capitalists, but for different reasons. All right? And then what happens is that

because of this support, communism becomes much more extreme, which leads to Bolshevism. Okay? Or revolution. Okay? Doesn't make sense how,

system worked out. So we can't say okay well they all have this plan out. No, it's actually much more organic much more confusing than that. At first they had communism just as a side-up okay. You don't actually believe that oh my God from communism you have Bolshevism okay because Bolivism is just crazy okay but at first if our communism was crazy but then it became much more mainstream and that led to the birth of Bolshevism which became, which was really crazy at that time, but over time it also became more extreme, sorry, became much more mainstream,

which led to the rise of communism everywhere, including China. Okay? So, 1917, 1917, the October Revolution was a wild gamble, and it worked because

of the greed of capitalists. Okay? But once it worked out, once communism was established, and Soviet Union, then it changed the way people saw the world and they thought that now communism is possible anywhere, including in China. Okay? Does that make sense? All right. Any more questions, guys?

Okay, great. All right, so we go on break for a month and then we come back from a break. What we're going to do is we're going to take all that we've learned, okay, all this history, all this game theory, and apply it to the modern world. So we look at specific current events. So during the break, I want you guys to focus on current events, reading news, right? So America is about to attack Iran soon. America is going to take over Greenland, Canada. Trump is visiting China in April.

There's going to be a lot of news for us to cover, okay? So during the break, please focus on keeping up with current events. All right, okay, guys. All right. See you after break.