Prof G Markets - Money for Couples — ft. Ramit Sethi
Episode Date: January 9, 2025Scott and Ed open the show by discussing the Surgeon General’s report linking alcohol and cancer, the ongoing ski patrol strike at Park City Resort, and Meta’s new board members. Then Ramit Sethi,... bestselling author of “I Will Teach You to Be Rich” and the brand new book, “Money For Couples,” joins the show to discuss how couples should navigate their finances. He explains what he thinks is the ultimate financial red flag, and why he believes couples should have joint bank accounts. Ramit also breaks down how much couples should spend on weddings – and reveals what he thinks about prenups. Order "The Algebra of Wealth," out now Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod: Instagram Threads X Reddit Follow Scott on Instagram Follow Ed on Instagram and X Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Support for the show comes from the Fundrise Innovation Fund. One thing really matters in venture capital, investing in the best companies.
And that's exactly what the Fundrise Innovation Fund is aiming to do, amassing a $150 million portfolio with some of the biggest names in tech and AI.
Visit fundrise.com slash profg to check out their portfolio and start investing in minutes.
Carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks, charges, and expenses.
This and other information can be found in the Innovation Fund's prospectus
at fundrise.com slash innovation. This is a paid sponsorship.
Today's number, $1.3 million. That's how much a 600 pound tuna sold for on Tokyo's
fish market Sunday morning. Ed, true story. When I was with my ex-wife, we would sit in
bed and I would switch between the porn channel
and the fishing channel, and finally she said,
let's just watch the porn channel.
I said, oh, feeling a little frisky tonight, huh?
She said, no, you already know how to fish.
["Porn Channel"]
Welcome to Prop G Markets in today's episode, which is presented by Funrise. Interesting segue.
We're speaking with Rameed Sethi, bestselling author of I Will Teach You To Be Rich and
the brand new book Money For Couples.
Ed, it's 2025.
You learning to fish?
What's going on, my brother?
What's going on?
I'm doing very well, Scott.
Feeling relaxed, ready to crush 2025.
How was South Africa?
We all need to know.
It was great.
Cape Town's wonderful.
It was time.
I'm in that part of my life where I'm freaking out about my boys potentially leaving the
house.
So that was a lot of games and got my oldest into working out. We
worked out every day, which was a ton of fun. And my youngest is still, you know, a terrorist
assessing the household for weaknesses so he can strike when we're most vulnerable. But he's still
a lot of fun. He's interesting, I'll give him that. And a surprising number of their friends were down
there, which was interesting.
A lot of Brits spend time in Cape Town,
they are from South Africa.
And it's a beautiful country.
And then we went on safari with my sister and her kids,
which is awesome because they're the same age as my kids.
So yeah, all went on really nice.
What did you do for Christmas and New Year's?
I was in, I was back in-
I don't care, let's get right to the news.
Let's get right to the news. No, I'm sorry, go ahead. What'd you do? Right into that trap. I was in, I was back in. I don't care. Let's get right to the news. Let's get right to the news. No, I'm sorry.
Go ahead.
What'd you do?
Right into that trap.
I was in London, uh, saw my family, which was very nice.
Uh, and then I went to Turks and Caicos.
Which was great.
Someone's trying to impress a lady.
Actually, other way around.
I was brought to Turks and Caicos.
So I went with my girlfriend and her family.
Ah, so you're on your, so it was nice,
but you were on your best behavior.
That's right, that's exactly right.
And you get along with her family?
Yeah, yeah.
Oh yeah, I'm lying, I know them in case they listen.
In case they listen.
They're wonderful people.
Yes, yes.
No, I did, I had a really nice time.
It was a lot of fun.
Here's something out a central casting
for like your daughter dating someone.
They, I would bet before they left, they sat her,
or before she went, they sat her down and said,
we're really, we really are supportive of this relationship.
We're really supportive of this relationship.
They are hoping so much that she sticks this out.
That it sticks around.
Ed, get to the headlines.
much that she sticks this out. That it sticks around.
Ed, get to the headlines.
Now is the time to cry.
I hope you have plenty of the well at home.
Alcohol stocks fell after the Surgeon General released a report highlighting a link between
alcohol and cancer.
The Surgeon General also called for warning labels on alcoholic beverages similar to those
found on cigarettes.
A ski patrol strike at Park City Resort has caused long lines and closures as the Union demands an hourly wage increase from $21 to $23.
Shares of the resort's parent company, Veil Resorts, have dropped 7% since the strike started and that has wiped out more than $400 million in market value.
And finally, Meta has appointed UFC President and CEO Dana White to its board of directors.
The company also added a former Microsoft executive and the CEO of a European investment
company Exor to its board.
Scott, your thoughts, starting with this drawdown in alcohol stocks after that pretty insane
report from the Surgeon General about alcohol and cancer risk.
We predicted this.
Diageo, the alcohol guys.
Oh my God.
These stocks, in my opinion, are going to get absolutely hammered.
We could see alcohol really taking on the chin.
So this was, you know, Chris course I didn't act on this,
but we saw this one coming.
This was pretty easy.
I mean, this is just the sum of all fears
for the drinks industry.
It's like, I've always thought momentum
has its own momentum,
and that is when something bad happens,
you get ready for number two or number three bad thing
to happen to you, and then the same on the upside,
when good things happen,
it's like the universe is listening
and more good things happen.
But the drinks industry has just had the perfect storm
of bad things.
And that is, it's not only been shown
to be really unhealthy for you,
it feels like some of those popular podcasters
in the world have declared war on alcohol.
And then you have this trend amongst young people
where the number of people who report not drinking is
inversely correlated to their age and that is the younger you go the less they're drinking and I've noticed this there's both
empirical and anecdotal evidence as when I go out and whenever I'm with young people I'm just struck at how little they drink and and
They still love to get high but they're getting high with different things. And these companies are responding
in terms of non-alcoholic drinks,
but AB Imbeb, Molson Coors, Heineken, and Diageo
have collectively shed over $55 billion
in market capitalization over the past year.
Where I'll wrap up here,
and I'd love to get your thoughts as a young person.
I don't really know much about your drinking habits,
but I've said my most,
I think my most popular TikTok of the year was I said,
I think young people should go out and drink more.
And I'm sincere in that I think young people
are finding too many reasons not to engage with other people
and find friends and find mentors and find potential mates.
And I realized this doesn't reflect well on me,
but it's a true reflection and that is
many or most of my best friendships, professional and romantic relationships, alcohol played a big
role especially in my 20s and 30s and I'm not suggesting that you don't tone down the alcohol
if it's getting in the way of your life but when you're young and you have a liver that can process
alcohol my advice is to get out of the house, drink,
I jokingly said, drink more,
make a series of bad decisions that might pay off
because while Huberman and Atia,
who I love and I listen to both their podcasts
and they've both been on my podcast,
see drunkenness, I see togetherness.
And so this is both interesting culturally, socially,
and also economically in terms of these companies getting just hammered.
But I find with most young people, I would argue, and there's some context here, that the risk is worth it.
Well, let's just go over some of the key numbers in the report.
So first is the most important one.
Alcohol consumption is the cause of 100,000 cases of cancer in
America every year. To put that in context, there are roughly 1.8 million cancer cases
annually in America. So 100,000 is actually really high. That's more than 5% of all cases.
So I think the conclusion with this report is it's not like this is like kind of a minor correlation.
This is like a very clear case of causation.
The more you drink, the more you are at risk you are of procuring cancer.
It's very, it's very bad.
Now, the question for me is, is this going to be the straw that breaks the alcohol industry's back?
Is this sort of the moment of reckoning
for alcohol? I'll use myself as anecdotal evidence. I'm not going to stop drinking.
I don't know about you, but I saw, I've read this and I know it's serious, but the idea, I mean,
alcohol just brings too much joy to my life. It's too important socially and my social life,
I consider to be a massive part of my existence.
I'm super down to not binge drink.
I mean, I didn't really binge drink to begin with,
but this isn't enough for me to cut it out entirely.
And I would argue that that's probably the case
with a lot of people.
I mean, 63%
of Americans still drink today, and that is only slightly lower than where it was 20 years
ago. So, you know, the stocks are down. I think people are correctly asking questions
like, is this the big moment? Is this like the cigarette and tobacco moment? But, I mean,
I throw it back to you. Are you going to stop drinking because of this?
I'm like, I quote Winston Churchill, and that is, I've gotten back to you. Are you going to stop drinking because of this?
I'm like, I quote Winston Churchill.
And that is, I've gotten more out of alcohol
than it's gotten out of me.
And the majority of people know how to regulate
their substance and alcohol intake.
And I think it's important that everybody do a regular audit
of what they should do less of or more of
to enhance their life and their health.
And if you're smoking too much pot
or having too much, you know, processed food,
you should address those things. Or alcohol. Alcohol does ruin people's lives or some people's
lives. The majority of people, I would argue, it is either a neutral or an enhancement.
Now, having said that, I have dramatically reduced my alcohol intake over the last year. It's very context dependent,
but my major takeaway here is that
I think alcohol for young people can add value.
And I'm just not one of these people
who is an anti-alcohol person.
I'm not, I would probably consider myself pro-alcohol,
more as a lubricant for being what I'll call
very pro-social when you're your age,
but also recognizing just as you adjust your spending,
your investing, your workouts, everything as you get older,
you need to adjust your approach to substances,
and I have adjusted dramatically.
Absolutely. Let's move on to this ski patrol strike that's happening in Park City, Utah.
The big number that people are talking about is $900,000 because that is how much it would
have cost Vale Resorts to just meet the wage demands of the ski patrol and just increase
the hourly wages by $2.
Instead they refused and it wiped out $400 million in market value.
It's pretty astounding.
Do you have any thoughts on what's happening in Utah?
Yeah, this is the kind of thing that people should get fired for.
This is just such a tone deaf decision.
I hope this is an opportunity for them.
Crisis is a terrible thing to waste.
They should go out and say, we screwed up here,
and we're giving them a raise
and we're giving people across our other divisions,
the people who work in the restaurant.
Because I've seen, I go to these resorts,
the amount of money they charge is so insane.
I remember I couldn't afford to ski when I was a kid
and I went skiing for the first time.
And I remember I saved, and my mom,
I saved the ski weekend was gonna cost $52 for lift tickets
and the bus up there with my high school,
university high school.
And then I had another $40 for food and everything.
So basically I got to just go skiing at Mammoth Mountain
for the weekend for a total of $93.
Now granted this was 1911, but I mean,
actually it was the late eighties, but anyways, my point is now you got to Aspen
or you got to Vale.
The lift tickets are like 130 or 160 bucks.
Oh no, no, no, more, more than that.
Single day pass for Park City Mountain, which is where the shutdowns have happened is $328.
What?
And that is more than three times the average in Europe. I think what this actually brings up
is a big question about monopoly power and monopoly abuse.
Because the big shift that happened in skiing
in the past decade was the fact that a duopoly has arrived
held by Vale Resorts and its only competitor,
which is this company called Altera Mountain Company.
And those two companies own basically all of the ski mountains in America.
I had no idea that essentially this was a duopoly,
but where I was headed was, you know,
I do remember being that kid and my mom, you know,
after little league practice or we'd win a game
and everyone was headed to Dairy Queen or Farrell's,
like my mom kind of shelling me into the car
because we didn't have the money to kind of blow on
whatever it was, right?
And I remember that feeling.
And I had one of those experiences when I was at Buttermilk,
which is supposed to be kind of more of a kid-friendly place.
And I ski there because it's more kid-friendly
because it's easy,
more it's not as aggressive a mountain.
And I think to myself,
how on earth
would any middle-class family
ever be able to experience gang?
They just, they can't.
It's just, it's been sequestered to wealthy people,
this cool way to spend time with your family and be outdoors.
And I thought, this has gotta be so discouraging
for a family that gets up on the mountain and leaves the mountain,
you know, $1,800 lighter and does the math on the drive home like, Jesus Christ, I got
to work two and a half weeks for one day of skiing.
And waited an hour in the line to get on the lift.
Yeah, it's just so kind of disheartening.
And I'll go to a broader economic message here.
Someone reached out to me from the Democratic Party
around messaging.
And I'm like, it's easy.
Abandon identity politics.
Don't let anyone go there.
Stop talking about special interest groups
and the rights of special interest groups.
Talk about the rights of the American middle class
and how we're going to tame inflation and bring prices down
through antitrust, through more competition,
through strategic invent,
we have to make things less expensive
for middle-class families.
And this is a perfect example.
We use this as a segue to talk about duopoly powering
because you did your homework and did good research here.
But I hope these guys get kicked in the fucking nuts
over this issue because this company fucked up bigly.
Yeah.
Our final headline here is that Mark Zuckerberg has hired three new board
members to the board of Facebook or to the board of Metta.
Uh, the most interesting of which is Dana White, who is the
CEO and president of the UFC.
Any thoughts on this, Scott?
Dana White is probably a talented executive.
He's built an incredible company.
That has nothing to do with why he was put on the sport.
He was put on the sport because he's buddies with Trump.
And we need to stop this bullshit and this false narrative
and this jazz hands of companies pretending
that they care about stakeholders,
not shareholders.
That was the big thing with all this bullshit ESG investing,
which was nothing but marketing to get people
to endure lower returns and higher fees.
And that is they talk about stakeholders
and the environments of stakeholder, the communities.
Jesus Christ, we invest in companies where the CEO
is ruthlessly,
singularly, mendaciously, fuckingly focused on one thing
and that is shareholders and nothing else.
And this guy put someone on the board who was close to Trump.
He's also announced they're no longer fact checking,
which will take their costs down and let misinformation
go crazy on the platform because it's good for shareholders.
And this is, Mark Zuckerberg is a brilliant person
for shareholders who's also probably done more damage
to our country than anyone while making so much money.
And it's our fault because we're not regulating these guys.
But be clear, this has nothing,
this isn't about the UFC or Dana White or business,
this is about, oh, we're kicking out that socialist
from Britain who was running our comms, Nick Clegg,
and we're bringing in this famous Republican,
Joel Kaplan, and we're putting Trump's buddy on the board.
And I guess I'm not as shocked
that Trump has gone full kleptocracy.
I'm surprised how well it's working and that no one has found their testicles here.
I'm waiting for a Mark Benny offer, someone who is a bit, you know, an important executive
just to say, what the fuck?
No, we're not doing this.
Anyways, I'm obviously a bit triggered by all that.
I need a drink. I need a drink.
I need a drink.
We'll be right back after the break with our conversation with Ramit Sethi.
If you're enjoying the show so far and you haven't subscribed, be sure to give Proficy
Market a follow wherever you get your podcasts. Support for the show comes from the Fundrise Innovation Fund.
The investing world seems to be bending towards democratization, but venture capital always
felt like it may be one of the last ivory towers to fall.
It requires a lot of capital, the right relationships, et cetera, et cetera.
That's probably why when the Fundrise Innovation Fund launched promising to democratize venture
capital, there was a lot of skepticism.
But the progress they've made in a few years
is hard to argue with.
The Innovation Fund has now built a $150 million portfolio
of some of the most highly sought-after
private tech companies in the world.
And their minimum investment is just 10 bucks,
which is virtually unheard of for venture capital.
Look, even the best venture funds
should be categorized as high-risk investments.
Venture investing is not for everyone. See above, high risk. But at a minimum, you can
visit fundrise.com slash profg to check out the Innovation Funds portfolio for yourself.
Visit fundrise.com slash profg to check out the Innovation Funds portfolio and start investing
today. Relevant disclaimers can be found at the end of the show and at fundrise.com slash
innovation.
Welcome back.
Here's our conversation with Ramit Sethi, New York Times bestselling author of the personal
finance guide, I Will Teach You To Be Rich and the brand new book Money For Couples,
which actually I have right here because you
sent it to me, Ramit.
So thank you for that.
Great to have you on the show.
Thank you for joining us once again.
Thanks for having me back.
So my first question for you, Ramit, is what is the most common argument you have witnessed
about money among couples today?
How can they spend that much?
How can they?
It's usually something inconsequential like energy drinks
or spending money at Target.
It's often very gendered and it's totally irrelevant.
Your $20 extra purchase at Target is not the reason
that you're stressed out about money.
It almost always tracks back to two expenses
and one big problem.
The two expenses are people overspend on housing,
they overspend on cars.
They have no idea how to calculate affordability.
And the real problem is they just don't have a shared vision
for their rich life.
So it's not about the energy drinks,
it's about those two big things.
Yeah, good to see you, Rameed.
So I see two kind of unhealthy dynamics
with money emerge in the couples I know.
And this is Pulse Marketing.
So, and you have data and I've written a book on it.
So I'm very open to push back.
The first is an unhealthy dynamic emerges.
And that is a lot of my friends made it
because of my generation, the dude works
and the wife has been tasked with handling the household,
the kids, etc., managing their life, if you will.
This dynamic emerges where the dude uses money as a means of control,
and the spouse, and this will be sexist,
I am a sexist, I think the genders are different,
almost views it as a game to see how much she can spend.
Then on the flip side, the other dynamic I see that's also very unhealthy, is the dude
digresses to some fucked up sense of gender roles and won't acknowledge that his partner
is better at that whole money thing, is more educated, more disciplined, more valued in
the workplace, and isn't as supportive of her career, which would create or absolve or relieve a lot of economic
stress realizing, okay, you may have this vision that she should be barefoot and pregnant
and you're the CEO, but she's quite frankly just more professionally adept than you are.
And the dude just can't wrap his masculine head around the notion that he should be more
supportive of the other part of this economic relationship. Those are the two dynamics I see that really get in the way of healthy relationships. Your thoughts?
Pretty interesting. I agree that there are gender differences. I don't think it's sexist to discuss
gender and money. I think that it's sorely needed. I do agree that money and power go hand in hand.
Sometimes that power is real, but that is reality. Then we have men who
see themselves solely defined by the P word, provider. And I ask them, who are you
if you are not a provider? They are stumped. And this happens in particular in
couples where in a heterosexual relationship she's earning more than men.
That's happening more and more often. And I asked them, who are you if you're not a
provider? And again, they are so narrow in their definition,
they think provider only means financial.
There's so many other ways to provide,
but there's very few models for that,
which provides a lot of discord
for couples in relationships.
I mean, isn't a lot of this about alignment?
Yes.
Talk about some of those conversations
that should happen early on in a relationship.
Well, we should remember that most couples
never talk about money.
They actually only have four substantive conversations
about money in their entire relationship.
These happen, number one, if they choose to buy a house.
Number two, if they have children.
Number three, if one of them gets laid off
because they are forced to.
And number four, when they get close to retirement.
That's it.
There are couples who go their entire lives
without actually substantively talking about it.
We should acknowledge that.
That is actually quite normal.
I think it's really weird and highly dysfunctional,
but that is quote normative.
When you first meet somebody, you're dating.
Look, don't pull out your freaking asset allocation
on date one, that's for true nerds.
But-
That's Scott.
Did you do that, Scott?
100%.
Oh God, well-
Is this my portfolio, what's yours?
All right, well listen, a lot of the fire community
who talks about doing that
don't have the social skills you have, Scott.
So it's a little weird when you pull it out of your-
Keep in mind, I lost my virginity at 19,
so I'm not suggesting this.
Okay.
Anyways, go ahead.
When you're dating, third, fourth, fifth date,
you're starting to get curious
about this person you like them.
That's a natural time to start asking questions
about how'd you grow up?
What'd you guys do in summer?
And of course you wanna know who they are,
you're curious, but you're also listening.
Oh, we went to Aspen every winter.
Oh, that's really interesting.
That probably suggests something about that family or not.
Similarly, the best time to talk about money
are these natural pivotal points,
such as the first time you traveled together.
This is what you do.
You go and you say, look,
I wanted to just shine a light on something
I've been thinking about, this trip that's coming up.
I'm super excited.
How are you thinking about the money part of it?
I've got an idea,
but I'd love to hear from you and talk about it.
Now, what we did in just that simple script is
don't give away your power.
Don't simply say, what do you think?
Because that is how you start to let your partner dictate
the financial terms of the relationship.
Don't do that.
You need to know your own numbers. You need to be confident through competence,
but you also need to bring the topic up. That's just a natural time. One partner might say,
of course I'm going to cover it. Or another might say, well, I was thinking of staying in this
Amman hotel and the other's like, I can't afford that. So let's discuss, let's talk about it.
You can work with a lot in a couple.
If one partner has credit card debt,
even if one partner sees money differently
than you or spends it, we can fix all that.
We can get a line.
But if they are not willing to talk about money,
that is the ultimate red flag.
How far into a relationship do you think
people should start having these conversations?
I know you say, you know, it's good to talk about it early,
but I feel like it's also possible to do it too early.
I mean, what if the couple isn't fully down
and then suddenly one person comes in,
it's like, hey, let's talk about our future.
It's like, whoa, slow it down there.
Well, look, I come from,
I was raised with two different cultures, right?
My parents met, seven days later they were married.
And so when you're raised in that culture,
you have to be very pragmatic.
Americans find that extremely uncomfortable.
They're much more likely to think about Disney
as their guideline.
Ooh, we love each other.
That's so great.
We'll figure it out later.
Even the couples who talk about money early,
it actually changes nothing in their relationship.
Almost no couples will break up early on because
they found out one partner has $25,000 of credit card debt. Literally couples
will go, ooh that makes me uncomfortable. Anyway, see you tomorrow. So money itself
is not that determinative when I actually think it really should be a
very important consideration. How early?
Third, fourth date, you're starting to just ask questions
and you're listening.
Again, those pivotal moments when you first
take a trip together, maybe when you go out
to a nice restaurant together,
certainly when you're planning,
if and when you're planning to move in together,
get married, kids, house, all those times are natural times
that you should be having a series of conversations about money.
By the way, I didn't take my own advice.
I messed up.
I waited too long.
My wife was the one who had to bring it up with me.
We were, I think, engaged.
And she basically said,
look, you already know all about my finances,
but I don't know about yours.
That's not fair.
And she was right.
So I gotta admit, I violated my own rules on this and I, I should have done it earlier.
I just want to get into some of the more logistical questions.
You recommend joint bank accounts for couples.
What does that look like and why do you recommend it?
If I asked a couple, do you think you should live together?
They would laugh at me.
Of course I should.
We're a couple.
And yet we don't apply the same principle to our money.
There's good research showing that combining your money
produces better relationship outcomes, fewer fights,
but more importantly, you're just a team.
And truthfully, most couples,
they're not particularly adept
at managing the flows of money.
So they have an orphan 401k here, an old IRA over there, and they're struggling.
And what ends up happening is they do these very peculiar ways of managing money.
So they get together, typically a little bit later in life nowadays, and so they have their
own bank account, checking, savings, whatever.
And what they'll do instead of combining, because it seems like a lot of work,
one person will go, I'll take the rent.
You take the car payment.
And what ends up happening is total misalignment.
Almost always mom will be paying way more for kid stuff,
which is outrageous.
It's totally ridiculous.
There's no reason for that.
Next, if one person starts making more money or less,
they won't adjust their spending. And so you'll end up seeing people way out of whack. A much
better way is to set your accounts up like this. All the money goes into a
joint account. You pay your joint expenses, any investments you have, and
then you each have a certain amount of money go to your own individual accounts.
No questions asked. You want to spend it on golf,
nails, guys trip, girls trip, whatever trip. It's yours. And your partner doesn't even have
access to it. But importantly, it's your account. It's private, but it's not secret.
Each of you knows what's going on and you are unified with your accounts.
And does that apply if there's a massive disparity in income?
Like, how do you split that up?
Good question.
I mean, say one person is earning all of the money and the other person is at 50-50, how
do you do it?
It could be.
I mean, all the money should go jointly first.
It's all there.
It's joint.
And then you can decide for your individual money how you want to apportion that.
Some people do it proportionally for that individual no questions asked money, but there's
a philosophy that I want every couple to remember.
Our future is together.
That's really important.
If you truly internalize that, then you're making decisions together, your accounts are
set up together, and you probably want to be putting more money towards your joint guilt-free spending than your individual guilt-free spending.
It's like when I think about my money with my wife.
I'm an entrepreneur, I make money from my business, so is my wife, she does the same.
And of course, we want to have our own money for our own personal expenditures, but our
future is together.
And when I get excited, I don't think about my individual stuff.
I get excited about us taking trips,
experiences, restaurants together.
I love the philosophy of it,
but just as an example, in my own relationship,
I generate most of the income.
I'll fix that.
I'll fix that.
I'm gonna bring some equivalents to your relationship.
Does your partner listen to this show?
She doesn't usually. We'll see if she listens to this one. It's fine if she does. But one thing
that I enjoy as the person who makes more of the money is getting the check.
Like, you know, we go out for dinner and I feel like it is a rewarding thing to put my card down and be like...
Is that because you're a provider?
Perhaps. Perhaps. But that's something that I feel like I deserve.
If I'm making more of the money, I feel like I deserve the reward of the feeling
of I got the check. But if we were putting it all together and it's sort of just like,
oh, it's a joint thing, then it sort of removes that reward that the quote unquote provider
gets from getting the check and buying things. So I'd love to get your reaction to my personal
grant. I love this. I love this because what this really describes is how money is not just a series
of decimal places and spreadsheets. It's much more like an art form. Okay? So right now here,
the way I'm visualizing it, we have a joint account, you and your partner, you each have your individual accounts.
You earn more, fine.
So when you go out to dinner,
maybe you use the joint credit card and you go,
hey, this is for us.
Or maybe you go out to a super nice place
and you happen to love really high-end restaurants.
So you pay with your individual card
because that's your gift, maybe it's an anniversary.
You can choose, but the important thing is
you have a mental model,
you're not just arbitrarily doing whatever
and then fighting about it six weeks later,
and your partner is aligned.
Remember, the way you set up your accounts matters
because right now, it seems like you're both earning.
Maybe one day she's gonna stop earning for whatever reason.
Maybe you have a family, maybe she gets sick,
maybe whatever reason. How are you gonna handle. Maybe she gets sick. Maybe whatever reason
How are you gonna handle that the way you set your accounts up now such as each of you gets?
Individual guilt-free spending money is important because even if a person doesn't earn a cent
They should still be getting some of that money for themselves
Always you've sold me
Scott I'm talking a little bit of money and mating and continue our theme of Scott as a sexist.
I coach my boys 14 and 17 as they're beginning to have dates
that you should always pay.
That if you're in the company of women and there's anything resembling
a non-platonic friendship, the man always pays.
My general thesis is that it's socially acceptable
for to split the check.
And there's a lot of reasons why you should split the check.
Women are doing really well.
And when you split the check,
you're much less likely to have sex with that woman.
Your thoughts.
First of all, I'm not gonna ruin my career on this show.
Okay, I've come too far, Scott.
20 years in business, you're not gonna do me in.
I'm telling you right now.
Come in, the water's fine. Come in, the water's fine.
Come in, the water's fine, Rameet.
Scott, I saw that CNN thing you had,
and it looked great, and then two days later,
it was canceled, and I said, not for me.
Not for me.
CNN Blue?
Oh, dude, that was the fifth show I've had canceled.
We're gonna need a bigger boat
if we're gonna start all this shit I've been asked from.
Anyways, go ahead.
Listen, I think that what I love about
what you're teaching your sons is to be generous.
To me, that's the frame that I approach,
which is generosity.
And I think everybody needs to be
a little bit more generous with money.
Great way to put it.
Great way to put it.
I do think that there are dynamics.
And I'll tell you, like, they are very hard to change
regardless of earning ability.
I spoke to a couple, they were both in their late 30s.
She was a very successful entrepreneur
making $200,000 per month.
$200,000 per month.
Very successful entrepreneur.
And she had grown up with parents
who taught her about money from the age of five
They talked about compound interest. They talked about investing all of it from age five
her boyfriend was a new entrepreneur
His parents never talked about money never I think he grew up pretty blue-collar and he was making
$2,000 a month. So she said, hey, I would like for you
to pay for me sometimes.
It makes me feel good if you pick up the check.
And you know what he said?
Great, I'd love to.
And yet when they would go out
and he would slide the check across the table
and try to pay, she would slide it back and say, no,
I want you to put that money in your Roth IRA.
So here we have a mix of somebody saying one thing,
doing another, and guess what their resolution was. In this case, I want you to put that money in your Roth IRA. So here we have a mix of somebody saying one thing,
doing another, and guess what their resolution was?
In this case, I thought it was very unconventional,
very creative.
Once in a while before they went out,
she would give him her credit card,
right before they went out.
And so that night at dinner,
he would slide a credit card, which happened to be hers,
across the table, pick up the check,
and she felt taken care of.
Now, is it weird?
Yeah, that's pretty weird.
Do I care?
No, because every couple comes up with their own solution.
As long as it's fair, as long as it's equitable, fine.
She's making a hundred times what he's making per month.
She still wants to feel a certain way.
Come up with your unusual arrangement.
Make it happen.
Stay with us.
Support for the show comes from the Fundrise Innovation Fund.
Think of the five biggest names in AI today.
How many of these companies do you own shares of? Probably not many. Maybe one, maybe two. Why is that?
Because the open AIs and anthropics of the world are still private.
That means unless you're an employee or a VC, you're out of luck.
So it isn't hard to see why venture capital has been one of the most prized asset classes in the world.
But unless you're worth eight or nine figures, you likely don't have access to these funds.
The Fundrise Innovation Fund is different.
It's already raised more than $150 million.
It holds a portfolio of pre-IPO tech companies that are valued at tens or even hundreds of
billions of dollars.
And most importantly, it's open to investors of all sizes.
Visit fundrise.com slash propg to check out the Innovation Fund's portfolio and start
investing today.
Relevant disclaimers can be found at the end of the show and at fundrise.com slash innovation.
We're back with Profit Markets.
Rameet, the average cost of a wedding in America is $35,000.
I read recently, which I just cannot fathom.
How much are you going to pay for yours? Do you know? Come on. $35,000 I read recently, which I just cannot fathom.
How much are you going to pay for yours?
Do you know?
Come on.
That a serious question?
Yeah, tell me.
I really don't know.
And I guess this is why I'm asking this question,
because that seems way over the, I want to go above average.
I'll tell you that much.
I would like to pay more than average for my wedding.
But not because I necessarily want to,
but I think there's a feeling of, like, social pressure
and romantic pressure around weddings
that it's gotta be awesome.
OK.
It seems, um...
It seems like a social...
a social norm that is pretty irresponsible, financially speaking. Yeah.
And you'll notice when people talk about weddings, they always say the exact same thing.
It only comes up once in life.
Well, you know, I'd rather save the money on the wedding and buy a house.
Hmm.
I wonder what a coincidence that the only time in people's
life that they think long term with their money happens to be their wedding and then
they talk about buying a house. Where do you think that came from? It's not just something
that arbitrarily came up. It's the real estate industry that basically conflates growing
up into buying a house. We could talk about why buying a house is not always the best
investment. In fact, often right now it's often terrible.
I'll tell you this, Ed, I wanted to have a huge wedding.
I'm Indian, I love it, I love weddings.
I think they stand for more than just one day.
They're a chance to bring cultures together.
I started saving for a wedding when I was in my 20s,
before I ever met my wife.
I knew that I would have a big wedding.
I was enthusiastic about it.
I set a savings goal, which I think all of us should do
because whether it is a wedding, a car, a house,
trip, whatever, a lot of us often resist reality.
We go, not me, I'm gonna have a simple, small wedding.
Really, are you?
Because the average numbers we know are quite high.
And truthfully, when you start to have a wedding,
you realize things are expensive
and it's not just you, it's your partner,
it's your in-laws, it's so many other things.
So we might as well accept reality
and start to put money aside for it.
Now, you can always choose to have a smaller wedding
or a bigger wedding, that's up to you.
But too many of us pretend as if we're just brand new
to this planet and we don't know what's gonna happen.
Whereas big life events are quite predictable.
I think that if you can afford it,
you should never go into debt for a wedding.
If you can afford it and it is important to you,
I'm all for spending money on a fantastic wedding.
I did it, I could afford it, it was amazing.
Some of the best money that I ever spent.
I do think that when it comes to these big purchases,
I treat it like our first project together.
My wife and I, we actually had a really fun time.
We're like, hey, we have the next year to plan this.
Let's have fun.
We then created a couple of values
because you don't wanna be spending the best on everything.
So it's like, what are our two, three core values?
And then you also need to be realistic
because I have these sort of guidelines
about how much you should add to the budget.
And for weddings, take the number you come up with
and basically double it.
That's your safe bet for how much you're gonna spend.
Take a vacation you're planning, add 50%.
That's about how much you're gonna spend.
Same thing for buying a house,
take the house price, add 50%. That's when you're factoring in phantom costs thing for buying a house. Take the house price, add 50%.
That's when you're factoring in phantom costs.
So if you do all these things and it's important to you,
spend it as long as you can afford it.
Let's just pivot to kids.
What are some of the most common arguments
that couples have when it comes to kids?
Couples, they don't talk about money with kids.
They see money.
Remember how I said Americans have a love-hate relationship
with money? When it comes to their kids. They see money. Remember how I said Americans have a love hate relationship with money?
When it comes to their kids, they think money is evil
and it's something to protect their kids from.
You know, wealthy people don't think like that.
They talk about money all the time.
Just like if you want your kids to build a healthy
relationship with food, you talk about it.
Oh, we're gonna eat tomatoes today
because we ate green peppers yesterday.
Same thing with money.
Oh, we're going to go to the grocery
store. This is how much we have. Can you help me make sure that we are sticking
to the number that we have today? They talk about it all the time. When I speak
to couples on my podcast, I'll ask them, what do you remember your family saying
about money when you were growing up? And there's two answers and that's it. The
first is they never talked about money. This is
socioeconomic, it's also geographic. For example, in the Midwest, people don't talk about money.
It's seen as something for adults. Second, there's a single phrase that many kids grew up with and
that is their family saying, we can't afford it. Now that may have been true, although most people
don't even know how to decide
if they can afford something.
But the fact is if you hear that phrase over and over,
one, 10, a thousand times by the time you turn 18,
you really start to believe that money
is simply a source of restriction.
So I speak to these multimillionaires a lot,
and they still obsess over, can I afford these blueberries?
I'm looking at how much they make
an interest alone
every day.
Of course they can afford any blueberry they want.
But they heard we can't afford it
over and over from their parents.
And so parents, if you're listening,
those have lasting consequences.
A much better approach is to talk about kids
from the time they're young.
Hey, come on over, help me push this button.
Help me pay this bill.
That helps us keep this roof over our head and keeps grapes in the fridge.
Then as they get older, empower them, give them more responsibility, have
them go to the grocery store, have them plan a dinner out for the family.
By the time they're 16, 17, they should have made at least one big
financial decision for the family.
Buying a family car, taking a family trip, whatever it is so that they
understand taxes, trade-offs,
and they're equipped to go out in the world.
Interesting, I feel like Scott,
you kind of went the other way,
because I know your dad at least was very much in the,
we can't afford this, and he was, I mean,
from what you've described,
he was not good about money with you,
but then you kind of whip-sword in the other direction
where you're all out on generosity.
Do you feel like that's what happened with you, Scott?
I mean, it's so much,
I thought it was really interesting for me
what you were saying about your wedding.
It's just so, there's just a lot of context around culture,
the relationship you have with parents,
how much money you have.
You know, it's like a lot of these problems
get solved with a lot of money.
I mean, I hate to say that,
but if you don't, it's easy to be generous when you have money, right?
And my approach with my kids is they get a green light credit card.
I want them to understand, I talk to them very openly about how I make money,
where we spend money.
Because of my situation,
I keep a lot of it private because I don't want them to feel too privileged
or not appreciate money.
But it's, I feel like a lot of it with kids,
I'm curious if you think this for me,
it's like nature versus nurture.
I have one son who is going to boarding school
and before he goes back, I say,
I'm gonna take you out and I wanna buy you clothes.
And we go to Sunspiel, which is this British brand
and I wanna buy him a hoodie and it's 225 bucks.
He's like, no, I'm not buying that.
I'm like, no, you're not buying it.
I'm buying it for you.
And he's like, no, I'm not letting you spend this.
He just won't let me spend money on him.
It's actually frustrating.
And my other, my fourth year old next one was like,
I'll take two. And so whatever we're doing, it's just, I mean, it's kind of they come to you. And
I don't know how those values have emerged, but I think a lot of it's just in the batter.
But I want to, what you said before was really interesting. And that is about the house. There's
kind of a rite of passage. The National Realtors Association has convinced us
that part of the rite of passage to adulthood
is buying a house.
One of the most evil organizations out there,
racist, historically racist, by the way, and corrupt.
They are currently imploding,
which I love watching happen.
Anyone who doesn't know the history of the NAR
should just search for
National Association of Realtors, racism,
and your eyes will be open
to what they have done over generations.
It's interesting, and I do agree with you that,
and I think a lot of people are coming to the realization
that when I bought a home, it was $285,000 in San Francisco.
Now the average home is 2.1 million.
It just, it doesn't make sense for,
not even a lot, but maybe most young people.
But the good news or the good thing about buying a house
in my generation was that it was a means of forced savings
and kind of getting your act together around building wealth
because you had a tendency to make that mortgage payment.
So it was sort of in some ways forced savings
around an asset to that point.
According to the Kay Schiller's index had a decent chance of going up four to six percent a year.
That's no longer the case in many regions, although it's region specific.
What can and should replace the house is a means of starting to build wealth for a new
couple.
Automatic investing in the stock market, the greatest builder of wealth in human history.
Now I will say, I will acknowledge that it's hard to get people to set up investing.
It's not hard to invest.
I spend more time brushing my teeth than I spend fiddling with my investments.
So once you get it set up, you can project how much you're going to have, the exact month and year you will be a millionaire, when you will make more from interest versus your income.
But a lot of people have a lot of beliefs about money and they're subtle. I call them invisible scripts.
They're so deeply embedded in us that they are invisible even to us.
One of them, for example, is when I get married, then I need to buy a house. Another one is that the stock market is gambling. That's not true. In fact, you can often project
much more closely what's going to happen with the overall stock market than one geographically
highly undiversified asset with high holding and transaction costs, aka a house. So, can
you buy a house? You could, I could buy one right now.
I don't, I rent, I rent by choice
and I save a lot of money every single month doing that.
I rent in high cost of living cities.
And what I do, this is important for everybody to know,
especially young people who feel so horrible renting
because another invisible script in America
is that renting is for losers. And you're successful then you buy a house totally
wrong totally incorrect I'm trying to show people that I rent by choice I take
the money that I ordinarily would have spent to own the place and I invest it
and I make way more with a higher quality of living if something is broken I send a text to the landlord it's fixed the next day and I can way more with a higher quality of living. If something is broken, I send a text to the landlord,
it's fixed the next day,
and I can travel and have a flexible lifestyle.
Now that's not for everybody,
but I want people to know you're not a loser if you rent.
You have lots of options
on building incredible amounts of wealth,
but you do need to rethink the American dream
that was sold to you by the corrupt NAR.
And you need to really decide what is our rich life?
What's my rich life and our rich life?
And let's start using our money to live that.
We asked Rameet some of our listeners
questions they'd wanna ask you.
One of the most common requests or common questions
was whether they should get a prenup.
Ooh.
So let's just get the official word from Amit Sethi.
Are prenups good or bad?
They're good for the right people.
Most people do not need a prenup nor should they get one.
If you come into a marriage with a high amount of assets,
whether it be investments, you have a piece of property,
a business, et cetera, then getting a prenup you have a piece of property, a business, et cetera,
then getting a prenup can make a lot of sense.
I have a prenup and it was one of the scariest conversations
I ever had where I talked to a lot of people before
and in my culture, I didn't know any people,
certainly not any Indian people who had a prenup.
And I thought, oh, that's just culturally
not the way it works, wrong.
It turns out that most of my parents, friends, et cetera,
when they got married, it was like most people.
They did not accumulate a bunch of wealth early on in life.
Most people don't.
They accumulate money later in life.
And so there's no reason for a prenup.
In my case, I'd had a business for many, many years
and I'd invested, et cetera.
So I brought it up with my, I think then girlfriend
and I said, look, there's something really important
I wanna discuss.
You know me, you know how I spend my money.
I'm not out there buying sports cars.
Because by virtue of having a business,
a lot of luck and some hard work,
I've managed to build this thing.
And it's important to me that we discuss a prenup.
And she was as receptive as I could have hoped.
She was surprised.
She said, wow, I didn't expect that,
but I'm willing to learn.
And I love that because in America,
we have this belief that a prenup is typically some asshole
in the back of a chauffeured limousine
wearing a top hat saying, fuck you and sign this thing.
That's not how it works.
That's a Richie Rich episode.
So she had her own lawyer.
I had my own lawyer.
We started talking.
It was good until it got really hard.
And like really hard.
We were really not connecting.
I felt resentful.
She didn't feel listened to.
And at one point she suggested we go see a therapist
and talk about it.
And I'm really glad we did.
That opened up a lot of conversations for us.
So ultimately we signed it.
I'll tell you that when people sign a prenup,
they don't wanna talk about it again.
It was tough to go through.
It's one of those things you're like, okay, we did it.
We don't wanna talk about it again.
And I don't think we will ever have to.
That is the best part of it.
But a prenup really is planning at your best
for what in the unlikely case, you're at your worst.
And so for those of you who are in a situation
where you have a disproportionate amount of assets
or something you wanna pre-marital protect,
it's pre-marital, remember that.
It's not what happens during the marriage
is what happened before.
Signing a prenup can make sense.
What were the main confrontations, if you don't mind me asking, among you and your wife?
What caused that stress and anxiety?
Okay, so I had been thinking about money pretty much every day of my life for 15, 20 years.
My business is what I do.
So for me, I was very comfortable talking about these numbers, certainly projecting out,
compounding, all kinds of stuff, distributions.
And my wife had not.
So that was one.
But then we got to the therapist's office,
which by the way, if you're wondering,
how does the guy who wrote,
I will teach you to be rich find a therapist?
I literally went on Yelp at the time and I was like,
therapist near me.
The closest one was three blocks away.
We literally walked there and we just sat down
at the first one we found.
And she was actually great.
She goes, how do you see money?
She looks at me.
I was like, easiest question I ever heard.
I go, growth.
I could see the 4% rule and my allocation.
I could see it all.
And then she turns to my now wife and she says,
how about you?'
And my wife said, "'Safety.'"
I looked at her like, what?
Safe, what's that?
That word had no connection for me with money
because I don't see it that way.
I've been earning money since I was 14 years old.
But it really opened up both of our eyes
to how we were speaking a different language.
And so I was going in there hot talking about spreadsheets and compounding and
this is more money than we've ever talked about together.
But I was what I should have done was really start off by saying,
when you think of money, what comes to mind? What are your greatest hopes or your greatest fears?
If we are really successful together, where will we go? What can we do together?
And then, hey, let's talk about what if things go wrong?
What are some ways things might go wrong?
I might get hit by a bus, we might get separated,
something horrible might happen.
Let's talk about it, let's shine a light on this
instead of letting it lurk in the shadows.
And then and only then would we have gotten to the numbers.
That same principle applies when you talk about money
with your partner now.
It doesn't have to be a prenup.
When you're planning the rest of your year,
you're starting off with your dreams, your hopes,
what went right, what do you wanna change next year.
When you're looking at your monthly money meeting
and you're using the script in my book,
the actual agenda that my wife and I use,
you're not starting with the numbers,
you're always starting with a compliment.
So we're starting with feelings.
I know a lot of guys especially listening to this,
oh my God, feelings,
only feeling I need is the V lookup
that I use in my spreadsheet.
Get a life.
Feelings first, then numbers.
Trust me, your life will be a lot better
and you will be more connected over money
when you are starting with how you both feel about it.
Rameed Sethi is the New York Times bestselling author
of the Personal Finance Guide, I Will Teach You to Be Rich.
He also hosts a podcast by the same name,
as well as a Netflix show, How to Get Rich.
His latest book, Money for Couples, is available now.
Rameed, we love, I think this is the second time
we've had you on, we love having you on.
We always learn a lot.
Appreciate your time and good luck with the book tour.
Thanks Rameed.
Thanks guys
Algebra of wealth US stock market is closed today in observance of a national day of mourning for president Jimmy Carter
So for this episode we wanted to highlight his
1979 speech where he identified what he called,
quote, a crisis of confidence.
In a nation that was proud of hard work, strong families, close-knit communities,
and our faith in God, too many of us now tend to worship self-indulgence and consumption.
tend to worship self-indulgence and consumption.
Human identity is no longer defined by what one does,
but by what one owns. Feels truer than ever.
What are your thoughts on that speech, Scott,
and the legacy of Jimmy Carter?
Well, incredibly appreciative.
He identified what we call the idolatry of money.
He basically saw it happening.
And just moving to his legacy, I think one of the reasons he's gotten so much attention
is just the contrast in one president leaving this earth and one president reemerging in
the White House and the contrast between the values of those two people.
And Jimmy Carter was not a great president. He redefined what it meant to be a great ex-president, but he wasn't an
effective president. He had some good values, but what I love about Jimmy Carter or President Carter
is the role model he is for young men. And that is, I can't imagine, you know, when your career is just
upward and to the right like that, and then you lose, you're not reelected,
that's a pretty devastating disappointment, right?
And that could kind of mark the rest of your life
and you could be pretty depressed.
And he decided, no, I'm gonna start building homes
for low-income people.
I'm gonna teach Sunday school.
I mean, he just, he showed that after, you know,
even after a disappointing loss, you know,
that commitment to public service,
that commitment to generosity,
that commitment to others is still so important.
And, you know, we're writing this book on masculinity.
People constantly ask, what are some role models?
And I think of James Earl Carter as a fantastic role model for young men.
He was born into, you know, fairly middle-class life,
decided to serve his country, was a, uh,
submariner on a nuclear submarine, did graduate work in nuclear physics,
ran for governor. Uh, one was an won, ran as an outsider,
obviously became president,
was married for 77 years to
his college sweetheart or high school sweetheart Roslyn.
Taught Sunday school, was an entrepreneur,
took over his father's peanut farm.
Just a very decent man and a nice role model in terms of patriotism, fidelity
to his wife, service, character.
A really nice role model for young men and stands in stark contrast, I believe, to what
are not great role models for young men in our, you know, among some of our key elected
representatives.
So, you know, rest in peace, James Earl Carter, dead at the age of 100.
That's a, that is a life well lived.
This episode was produced by Claire Miller and engineered by Benjamin Spencer.
Our associate producer is Alison Weiss, Mia Silveri is our research lead,
Jessica Lange is our research associate, Drew Burrows is our technical director,
and Catherine Dillon is our executive producer.
Thank you for listening to ProfG Markets from the Vox Media Podcast Network.
If you liked what you heard, give us a follow and join us for a fresh take on markets on
Monday. You held me in kind reunion
As the world turns And the dark eyes, in love alone.
Support for the show comes from the Fundrise Innovation Fund.
You've heard me talk about the Fundrise Innovation Fund before, so I'll keep this short.
Venture Capital was, and to a certain extent is, still an old boys club.
You had either to be filthy rich or an insider to get access.
The Innovation Fund is trying to change that, building a blue chip portfolio, making it
available to everyone.
And with $150 million raised from tens of thousands of investors, it's just getting
started.
Carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks,
charges, and expenses.
This and other information can be found in the Innovation Funds prospectus at fundrise.com slash innovation.
This is a paid sponsorship.