Prof G Markets - The Trump Trade & The Vibecession — ft. Kyla Scanlon
Episode Date: July 18, 2024Kyla Scanlon, author of “In this Economy? How Money and the Markets Really Work,” joins the show to discuss how political uncertainty is moving the markets and how to act accordingly as an investo...r. She also shares two investment areas the tech sector needs to focus on, breaks down the comeback story of a top-performing stock, identifies some solutions to America’s trapped housing supply, and shares some tips for staying courageous in the face of criticism. Order "The Algebra of Wealth," out now Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod: Instagram Threads X Reddit Follow Scott on Instagram Follow Ed on Instagram and X Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Support for this show comes from Constant Contact.
If you struggle just to get your customers to notice you,
Constant Contact has what you need to grab their attention.
Constant Contact's award-winning marketing platform
offers all the automation, integration, and reporting tools
that get your marketing running seamlessly,
all backed by their expert live customer support.
It's time to get going and growing with Constant Contact today.
Ready, set, grow.
Go to ConstantContact.ca and start your free trial today.
Go to ConstantContact.ca for your free trial.
ConstantContact.ca
Join Capital Group CEO Mike Gitlin on the Capital Ideas Podcast. Thank you. one of the world's most experienced active investment managers. Invest 30 minutes in an episode today.
Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
Published by Capital Client Group, Inc.
Today's number, $869 billion.
That's the record amount tourists are expected to spend in Europe this year.
Ed, it's been named the Chanel economy.
What does that mean?
If someone lets you have anal sex with them, you owe them a trip to Europe and a Chanel buyout.
That was the worst one so far.
I couldn't even get through it.
Delivery, content.
No?
Shanel economy?
I think that's all it is.
Worst in two years. I think that's all it is. Worst in two years.
I think it's kind of true.
Welcome to Prop G Markets.
Today, we're speaking with Kyla Scanlon, who's becoming a regular on the show.
She's the author of In This Economy.
She joins us from the White House.
She brings the average age of the White House down like 50 years just by her being there.
But first, first here with the news is PropG Media analyst Ed Elson.
Ed, what is a good word?
Give us a little insight into you're becoming a bit of a celebrity hunkasaurus here uh what what is ed elson up to
in the summer months in new york i used to go to the hamptons do young people still go to the
hamptons oh yeah tell us about what young people do what what do you do this past weekend i was in
greenwich connecticut which was interesting huh djing my friend's party that's what i get up to my free time yep oh my god you're you're a podcaster who djs i'm taking off to david solomon oh my gosh dj dj elson
yeah i'm also not following your rules of uh not having a side hustle yeah that's one of your
number ones right you get paid for this shit uh not this not on this occasion but sometimes yeah so this is so by the way this is a charitable
cause our our head of engineering or head of technology here uh drew burrows was a dj
yeah i've talked about it with him extensively wow so is this something is this something um
you want to do given when this whole thing crashes and
burns? I did not know this about you. Yeah. Actually, I'm going to hand my notes in today.
I want to become a DJ full-time. Yeah. Well, it's not going to be easy to replace you.
We can get Carla Scanlon on. Sure, she'll do a better job. There you go. Wow. I had no idea.
But you never have any ideas around music or any of our sound effects or anything like that.
No, because Claire is the guru.
Right?
She's pretty good at this stuff.
I'm not going to interfere with that.
That's a new spin on the Ed Ball.
I didn't know that.
I need to invest more in our relationship.
Learning more every day.
It's funny what happens when you ask a question, right?
Well, that hurt.
That hurt.
Anyways.
Anyways.
Yeah, my kid, the best one was my kid asked me what his birthday was the other day to test me.
And I had to pause and think about it.
That was a good look.
All right, get to the headlines, Ed.
Let's do it.
Now is the time to buy.
I hope you have plenty of the wherewithal.
Google is on the brink of its largest acquisition ever.
Pending approval, the company will acquire cybersecurity startup Wiz for around $23 billion.
Wiz offers security for cloud computing, an area of Google's business that has lagged behind competitors.
Profits at Goldman Sachs rose 150% year over year to $3 billion in the second quarter.
The bank saw better than expected trading revenue, as well as strength in its asset and wealth management businesses. The stock climbed more than 2% to an all-time high.
And finally, a look at how the markets reacted to the assassination attempt on former President
Trump. Shares of Trump Media rose over 30%, the price of Bitcoin rose 4%, gun stocks also climbed
with bullet maker Ammo rising 18%, and energy was the top-performing sector as the major indices rose.
Scott, let's start at the top.
Thoughts on Google acquiring Wiz for $23 billion?
I think this is Google saying we think there's a better than 60% or 70% chance Trump is going to be elected.
And that the scrutiny of this deal will either be obfuscated or just not happen if he gets into office.
I think if they thought Trump was going to be, or excuse me, Biden was going to be a lock on re-election,
I'm not sure they would have had the confidence to close on a 23 or enter into advanced talks on a $23 billion acquisition.
And when they say Google's in advanced talks to acquire, what they're signaling is they want to figure out how much pushback they get.
We should recognize the scale of this 23 billion. If this goes through,
this will be the fifth largest software acquisition in history. It'll be Google's largest acquisition by far. I mean, if you look at like YouTube, for example, inflation adjusted,
they pay two and a half billion dollars for YouTube. This is 23 billion dollars. This deal
is significant. The people for whom this deal is most significant
though are the founders and the early employees of wiz and i just want to point this out this
company was founded in 2020 it's four years old that's incredible it is a child of a company and
they're about to receive not a 23 billion billion valuation, which in itself would have been absurd. This is a $23 billion paycheck. This is $23 billion in cash. This doesn't really happen. And I think that this is sort of, when you look at it from thezier, because I mean, imagine the scenario it would be for an early employee. Imagine it's peak COVID, you recently graduated, you're a software engineer, you're looking for work, they give you, let's call it 0.1% equity, you're now about to receive a check for $23 million. That's just not how
careers are supposed to work. This is how lotteries work. I think this is going to go,
in fact, I know this is going to go one of two ways. Either one, the deal won't go through,
as you've said. We've seen several major acquisitions blocked by the FTC. Or the second
option is that it will go through, but it's going to take between one and two
years because the amount of scrutiny this deal is going to receive, it's going to be
so overwhelming.
There's no chance that this is signed and sealed in less than 12 months.
So the best thing you can do, in my opinion, if you work at Wiz, turn the news off, do
not pay attention to the deal.
I do hope for your sake it works out, but this is incredible.
So I would add on to that. My advice to the employees of Wiz would be to sell the majority
of your shares in the secondary market now, because they'll trade at a discount to the
stated acquisition price. But I would take that uncertainty that you referenced off the table,
and I would sell a bunch of shares in the secondary market and make sure it's a win.
And even with a 100% acquisition premium that Alphabet has offered or looks as if they're
going to offer if they decide to move forward with the deal, $23 billion, I mean, these numbers just
are out of scale now where it's hard to wrap your head around them, but a $23 billion check being cut to the shareholders of Wiz if the deal goes through, that's a 1% dilution for the
$2.3 trillion market cap company Alphabet. So let's go to Goldman. Asset and wealth management
outperformed with revenues increasing 27%. Total revenue increased 17%, and net earnings increased 150%.
They're enjoying a little bit of the secret sauce of tech, and that is they have been pretty
disciplined and cut a lot of costs specifically, which is Latin for fired people over the last
two or three years. So when the cyclical winds returned in investment banking and the reduced exposure to consumer banking, which was a kind
of a drag on the company, it's like a slingshot. A lot of it hits the bottom line. And while
investment banking revenues increased slower than rivals, the CEO, David Solomon, noted that
the bank's investment banking backlog is up significantly this quarter, which is signaling that things are pretty strong.
He also said that from what we're seeing, we're in the early innings of the capital markets and
M&A recovery. In the six years Solomon has sort of capped in the shift, if you will, Goldman has
increased 122% outpacing the S&P 500's 93% rise.
I think Solomon is the kind of the, I don't know,
he's the CEO that everyone likes to, I don't want to say hate,
people don't hate him.
I think that's true, that people do love to hate on him.
There was also a headline in New York Magazine,
which I don't have pulled up right now,
but it was something along the lines of,
is David Solomon too much of a jerk to run Goldman Sachs?
I'm pretty sure that's exactly what it said. Well, who likes CEOs like David Solomon? Shareholders, right? There's all these
articles about dissent among the staff, and obviously the media goes after him for his
DJing. I've never understood that. Do they want the guy to play golf or polo? Is it because an
old white guy is supposed to be drinking Pim's cups and hanging out at Augusta Country Club as opposed to DJing? I've never, I'm really never understood that.
And just to give the context, he was forced to give up DJing a year ago when he was, when the company was struggling.
So this is what you need. You need to run an investment bank and bring DJing back to popular culture.
I agree.
In terms of the Trump bump, firearms and energy stocks were up.
Bitcoin was up because Trump and especially his VP, Pig Vance, are seen as very crypto-friendly.
Bitcoin hit $63,000, a two-week high.
MicroStrategy, which is the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin,
it's almost become sort of an index or an indices tracking or a tracking stock for Bitcoin, increased 17%.
And then the stuff that the Republicans hate, like clean energy stocks, slipped.
The Invesco Solar ETF fell almost 6%, and the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF fell almost 4%, and then Tesla was up 2%.
By the way, there's a new, literally parked outside of my house. I
haven't seen one in Manhattan. That Tesla, what is it? The SUV? The Cybertruck. It looks like
something from a Simpsons episode. It looks like a parody of what a car is supposed to look like.
It's so ridiculous. Anyways, any thoughts on the Trump bump? Well, I just want to bring up something
that Josh Brown said when we had him on a couple weeks ago to discuss the debates.
And he said that he doesn't pay attention to the polls because he doesn't really trust them.
He thinks they're inaccurate.
What he does trust, though, are the predicted markets.
Because with the markets, unlike with the polls, there's money on the line.
So people are actually voting with their feet.
Now, if you agree with Josh, personally, I do, the message from the markets right now
is loud and clear.
And the message is that Trump is going to win.
And, you know, as someone who is very concerned about this individual, and as someone who
believes that we're not really recognizing the gravity of our situation right now, I is very concerned about this individual. And as someone who believes
that we're not really recognizing
the gravity of our situation right now,
I just want to repeat that again.
The markets have spoken.
Trump is going to win.
And if that isn't a strong enough message
to the Democratic Party
that we need a new candidate,
then I don't know what is
because the polls are one thing,
but for the financial markets to unanimously tell us right now who the next president will be
four months before the election, that's unprecedented.
Yeah, I mean, just to be fair, the markets get it wrong all the time, right? The markets,
it isn't a 0% probability that Biden is reelected, but it appears at this point it's getting less and less likely.
It's close. I just want to point out, it's getting close.
You think it's getting pretty close? Yeah. The narrative is just so overwhelming right now. The momentum is just so striking in his favor. But the market's reaction is really interesting. The market believes that, I guess, he'll cut taxes, deregulate. And the market, you know, there's just no getting around it. The market seems to like the prospect of a Trump presidency. And we're a market show. I don't, you know, we're always told whenever we delve into politics, the people who don't agree with our politics say, you know, it's supposed to be a safe place from politics, please stop it. But as I referenced, I was in Germany, and my favorite thing in Berlin
is this thing called Fat Tire Bike Tours, where they take you on bikes around Berlin. And obviously,
Berlin has incredible historic relevance, and they talk about the book burning there, and
you go to Checkpoint Charlie, and they talk about,
this guy did an especially good job of talking about Germany and Prussia's history.
And I don't know if you knew this, I didn't really know it, but Germany's actually,
if you look at the past couple centuries, been one of the most progressive and tolerant
societies in the world, except for this 12-year period where things went really,
really dark. I think people have a certain cold comfort or a dangerous
belief that it can't happen here. It can absolutely happen here. And some of the rhetoric,
especially around this 2025 proposal, and even though the Republicans right now or the administration is trying to
distance themselves from it, any level of diligence shows that a lot of these individuals
will be likely very closely tied and have pretty strong involvement in a Trump administration.
I mean, it is season seven of The Handmaid's Tale. And to think that this couldn't happen here,
regardless of what the markets say or regardless of the momentum, is just to ignore history.
I came, I don't know if this, I'll ask you this as my sample set of one for young people. in the situation and I was angry that Democratic operatives had just fucked up so badly kind of
hiding the situation from us and putting us in this just what feels like an untenable situation
and to the assassination attempt really rattled and rattled me and bummed me out
both in terms of we came inches from just being so destabilized and two, that somehow it's turned into the ultimate booster shot for the Trump
campaign. Amongst you and your friends, does it rattle you or is it just kind of, is it interesting?
Because when I was your age, I was literally sleepwalking through life. I wouldn't have given
a shit. Yeah, that's a good question. I mean, it's just another thing that happened.
We're so used to these events.
I kind of, I see where you're going and I, you know, in the conversations after this event, I'm sort of like, are people really that shocked by this?
Like, is it really that crazy?
It didn't shock me in a lot of ways.
It's just another thing that happened. And I think that's part of the problem is that this should be something that should concern people. I don't know. I guess my lack of shock
at the situation is a point of concern that I should probably be reflecting on.
So as I always do, I want to take your story and insert me into it
because I think it'll be more interesting. But I'm going on, I didn't tell you this,
I'm going on The Daily Show tomorrow night. I heard, actually, yeah.
And I'm pretty sure he's going to ask me about the assassination attempt. And I think we're,
and this is a market show, and I promise folks we will get back to the markets in a moment,
but I think what we're missing here is that I think that this is a simple story
of what is going on in America, and that is this, I knew who this person was,
I knew who the shooter was before I knew who the shooter was.
I knew it was going to be a young man who was socially isolated,
who was lonely, who had few guardrails, wasn't attaching to work, wasn't attaching to school,
wasn't attaching to relationships, and was trying to recapture social status and has access to
weapons of war. And to think that we can have 300 mass shootings year to date and that eventually
we're not going to have a mass shooting at political events is just naive. We don't want to talk about the real issue. And
the real issue is unless we offer young people, and I actually think especially young men,
greater hope, greater attachment to institutions, a greater infrastructure to identify and inject
opportunity and mental health resources, and specifically, don't give these
people during episodes just ready access to AR-15s. We're just going to have more and more of it. And
the problem is these are expensive, hard solutions that involve social programs, economic policy,
and also gun control, which no one, you know, of course, no one jazz hands. The Republicans
will pretend to give a flying fuck about the mental health of young men as any sort of misdirect
away from the real problem. And that is America does not have a monopoly on struggling young men.
It does not have a monopoly on mental illness. It has a monopoly on struggling young men with
mental illness, their access to weapons of war.
We'll be right back with Kyla Scanlon. This is advertiser content from Zelle.
When you picture an online scammer, what do you see?
For the longest time, we have these images of somebody sitting crouched over their computer with a hoodie on, just kind of typing away in the middle of the night.
And honestly, that's not what it is anymore.
That's Ian Mitchell, a banker turned fraud fighter.
These days, online scams look more like crime syndicates
than individual con artists, and they're making bank. Last year, scammers made off with more than
$10 billion. It's mind-blowing to see the kind of infrastructure that's been built to facilitate
scamming at scale. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of scam centers all around the world. These are very
savvy business people. These are organized criminal rings. And so once we understand the
magnitude of this problem, we can protect people better. One challenge that fraud fighters like
Ian face is that scam victims sometimes feel too ashamed to discuss what happened to them.
But Ian says one of our best defenses is simple.
We need to talk to each other. We need to have those awkward conversations around what do you
do if you have text messages you don't recognize? What do you do if you start getting asked to send
information that's more sensitive? Even my own father fell victim to a, thank goodness, a smaller
dollar scam, but he fell victim and we have these conversations all the time. So we are all at risk and we all need to work together to protect each other.
Learn more about how to protect yourself at vox.com slash Zelle. And when using digital
payment platforms, remember to only send money to people you know and trust.
Support for this show comes from Grammarly. 88% of the work week is
spent communicating, typing, talking, and going back and forth on topics until everyone is on
the same page. It's time for a change. It's time for Grammarly. Grammarly's AI ensures your team
gets their points across the first time, eliminating misunderstandings and streamlining collaboration.
It goes beyond basic grammar
to help tailor writing to specific audiences,
whether that means adding an executive summary,
fine-tuning tone, or cutting out jargon in just one click.
Plus, it surfaces relevant information as employees type
so they don't waste time digging through documents.
Four out of five professionals say Grammarly's AI boosts buy-in and moves work forward.
It integrates seamlessly with over 500,000 apps and websites.
It's implemented in just days, and it's IT approved.
Join the 70,000 teams and 30 million people who trust Grammarly to elevate their communication.
Visit grammarly.com slash enterprise to learn more.
Grammarly. Enterprise ready AI.
Thumbtack presents the ins and outs of caring for your home.
Out. Uncertainty. Self-doubt. Stressing about not knowing where to start.
In. Plans and guides that make it easy to get home projects done.
Out. Word art.
Sorry, Live Laugh Lovers.
In. Knowing what to do, when to do it, and who to hire.
Start caring for your home with confidence.
Download Thumbtack today.
Welcome back. Here's our conversation with Kyla Scanlon, financial writer, video creator,
podcaster, and author of In This Economy, How Money and Markets Really Work. Kyla is coming
directly from the White House. What are you doing at the White
House, Kyla? I do a lot of economic policy work. So talking about housing, talking about inflation,
and I get to have the opportunity to interview policymakers to translate their ideas to the
public. So that's what I was doing, was having interviews with the Council of Economic Advisors,
as well as the National Economic Council. Wow. And now you're on the Profit Markets Podcast.
Big upgrade.
Yeah, exactly. Well, let's just get right into it. You're not a political analyst,
but you are something of a financial analyst. And this assassination attempt on Trump is all
we can really talk about. It is having an effect on the markets. What's your reaction to what happened over the weekend and perhaps maybe what happened during
the debates? What's your reaction to how Wall Street is digesting all of this?
Yeah, I mean, definitely the Trump trade is strong. I mean, I think markets are more so
responding to the Federal Reserve right now. So Jerome Powell came out yesterday,
basically hinted at the idea of a rate cut potentially happening in July. And of course, you know, the stock market is extremely
excited about that. You're seeing a rotation away from tech stocks and into small caps
for the first time, seemingly ever. It's a pretty big deal. And so I'd say the market's
more so responding to that. The media cycle moves so quickly that stuff just doesn't stay in the news that long.
The other thing we've been seeing from Trump, we've been discussing a lot of these tariff proposals.
He wants to propose a 10% tariff on all incoming goods into the country, 60% on all goods coming from China.
Most economists are saying this would be a bad thing.
Give us your view.
Would this be a bad thing?
And if so, why?
Oh, yeah. We just don't have enough tariffs, right? So we collect about $2 billion a year
in income tax, and we have $3 billion total in tariffs. So you'd have to have like a 70%
tax on tariffs to even begin to recoup what we collect in an income tax world. Tariffs are also a tax on consumers.
And so this can really be thought of through the lens as a tax on middle America, because that's
who it's going to get passed off to, is people that purchase things overseas. All of a sudden,
you're going to be paying more for that. And so I think, number one, it's just economically
not very feasible. And that's just an objective statement based on the numbers.
And then number two, it's going to hurt people more than it helps them.
It could really disrupt international trade.
You know, there's talk about devaluing the dollar in order to make exports more competitive,
which is also maybe a questionable economic policy just mechanically. And so there's a lot of things to be said about what constitutes good economic policy.
And there's a lot to talk about with reforming tax code.
But, you know, just a blanket tariffs would be pretty catastrophic.
How concerned were those policymakers and economic policy advisors at the White House
about a Trump presidency and the
economic implications of that? I mean, I think tensions are tight everywhere. I think,
you know, you can go out on the street and sort of feel it. Most people are living daily lives.
But, you know, what happened over the weekend with the attempted assassination is terrifying.
And so I think a lot of people are just digesting sort of the uncertainty that we're going to be facing over the next few months. I think for the Federal Reserve specifically,
who I did not speak to today, they're trying to balance when they begin their rate cuts so that
doesn't get politicized. And so it's a time of immense uncertainty with a lot of really important
economic decisions because we haven't really won the inflation fight. And if we slap 10% tariffs
on everything and have tax cuts, both of those are going to be inherently inflationary.
On tech, as you probably know, Google is looking to buy this cybersecurity firm Wiz for $23 billion.
It would be the largest acquisition in Google's history. I was wondering if you have any thoughts
on that deal and what it might mean for the overall tech industry.
Yeah, I mean, I think a focus on cybersecurity is really key.
You know, it's interesting. I think it's the right thing to do with Google.
One of the firms just released a buy rating on Google and a sell rating on Meta because they're saying that Google is going to gain steam again.
And I think this acquisition could be a sign that Google is finally moving in the right direction and thinking about
the long term. So I think the two things that the tech sector is going to have to focus on moving
forward is cybersecurity. AT&T just had a huge breach, a huge data breach. Phone numbers were
released on the dark web. That is catastrophic. It's something that should have never happened. Investing in cybersecurity is the one way to combat that. And so it's good
that Google is doing that now and it's probably going to be a value add long term. But then the
tech companies are going to have to think about investing in energy. So Sam Altman himself,
the CEO of OpenAI, has said that we can't keep on producing these models because they're just
using too much energy.
We're going to have to have something like nuclear fusion in order to keep these things running.
And so I think for tech, just to focus on the real world and then ensuring that the technology
isn't released on the dark web is going to be how they continue to add value moving forward.
Because investors have already placed so much faith and hope in these companies
that they're going to have to show them
that there's a world beyond, you know,
apps and monetizing search.
Do you think investors should be focusing
on energy stocks as well?
I mean, you mentioned this AI demand
will lead to a high demand in energy.
Is that a sector that you're looking at right now?
Yeah, so like nothing I say is impossible advice, obviously.
But yeah.
We relate.
Yeah. But I think energy is something really important. There's a lot of startups in the
hard tech space where they're like, okay, how do we solve these real world problems that we've
kind of ignored over the past few years as we focused on data collection, as we focused on advertising, as we focused on
sort of monetizing apps, right? I think that it's really exciting what's happening in energy. Like,
there's a lot of innovation in hydro, there's a lot of innovation in wind. For the first time ever,
the U.S. is actually an energy producer rather than an energy
importer. So we're exporting more than we import, which is really great. And there's a lot of
government money going towards how do we sort of rotate away from fossil fuels. And so I think
energy is just, you look at the situation in Texas and it's obvious that we have to do something.
Like those people have no electricity and there has to be backups. So I think energy is just very fascinating and it's something that we
should spend a lot more time thinking about. So this podcast could probably be fairly
accurately called the NVIDIA Celebration Hour. We talk about NVIDIA so much, but there has been one
stock that has outperformed NVIDIA, and that is Abercrombie
and Fitch. It's up 350% in the past year. And it really is an incredible case study. Can you walk
us through how Abercrombie has resurrected the brand and pulled off this comeback?
Yeah, Abercrombie has been one of my favorite companies to talk about because I think that
they've done a really great brand turnaround.
And when you're thinking about like a company like NVIDIA, like they sort of have like these
sectoral things that they're benefiting from, but Abercrombie is really just benefiting from
a consumer that they've managed to age with, which is like, you know, the millennial. And so
Abercrombie was once known as this company that was like a little bit scary to go to. Like if you
went to the ball, it was really dark and the music was really loud. And the models, which is what they called their
employees, were oftentimes meant to be intimidating. Like they were not meant to be friendly. They were
meant to kind of scare you away. You can't tell me you never took a photo with one of those guys.
Oh, I never did, but I'm sure people did. That was the thing back in the day i remember my sisters
would go to these abercrombie stores and they'd take selfies with the male models yeah oh wow
but sorry i didn't mean to interrupt you go ahead no that's a that's a fun fact
but but like that that was just not probably uh a great long-term plan and like what i really
love about abercrombie is they have been
around for a long time. So they outfitted Teddy Roosevelt, right? So like they've been sort of
this company that has managed to navigate the waves. But they experienced a lot of backlash.
Like when their former CEO took over, Mike Jeffries, he kind of designed the company into,
you know, a selfie with the model of his
company versus a company that was focused on perhaps producing good clothing. And so Abercrombie
has really benefited from the wave of the 1990s, like sort of this nostalgia core where people want
low-rise baggy jeans. They've really invested abroad too. So they focused on gathering sales overseas. They've
also focused on influencer marketing, which is kind of what you have to do in this day and age,
invested online. Almost 50% of their net sales come from online. And they've also focused on
women. Women are tremendous spenders, and that's in the data. I'm not just saying that. And all of that has really
created a really strong brand strategy where their margins are up, net sales are up,
and they've been able to sell clothes and outperform NVIDIA.
Yeah, it really is an incredible example of kind of running into the fire because,
I mean, there was a non-zero probability Abercrombie was going to
go bankrupt. And so there was real risk investing in this company a few years ago. Does anything
else out there remind you of Abercrombie? I think there's a lot of companies that have
kind of this really good turnaround story. Domino's Pizza is another good example.
They're basically an e-commerce company that sells pizza um and so one of the best
reforming stocks of the last decade and and they've had an incredible turnaround story too
perhaps some of the tobacco companies like they got pretty beat up when nicotine wasn't so popular
now nicotine is a quite popular again so you have these companies that have been able to weather
the winds of time.
And I think those companies tend to get oversold because people are like, oh, they just can't keep on doing it.
And somehow they do.
So what about there's now more and more articles looking at the AI space saying that just the revenue, the expectation of revenues to support the current valuations in the sector are just sort of untenable.
Any thoughts?
Yeah.
No, it makes sense that you all were in NVIDIA.
What did you call it?
Cheer podcast or something?
NVIDIA Celebration Hour.
Because that's kind of what you've had to do for the past couple of months.
Like, oh, yeah, NVIDIA is just what I'm going to pin my hopes and dreams on. But with any bubble, which is what we are in with AI, there is a moment of reality where people are like, oh, you know, what actually is this going
to do for the average consumer or the average business? And with AI, there's like a $500
billion gap between, as I'm sure you all have talked about, between like what they've spent
and what they're expected to make. And so I think it's really good that people are looking
at this and saying like, well, where's all that money going to come from? Like, where's AI going
to get $500 billion? And I think it's going to happen. Like you can look at the patterns of
the tech bubble where there was like an early version of Airbnb that failed because it was
just too early. And so I think with any sort of bubbly scenario,
which AI is, there are going to be applications that are too early and they're going to lose out
on money, but eventually they'll sort of gain steam again. Are you familiar with this Buffett
index where he looks at the ratio of the total market cap of stocks relative to GDP, and right now it's at sort of a historic high, like the same types of ratios we saw in
2007 and 1999. Any thoughts on this ratio and whether that indicates we're in for a correction?
Yeah, maybe. I think numbers have to be taken into context with other numbers, right? And I
think the market has been considered overvalued for quite a long time i was listening
to goldman sachs podcast about markets this morning and the person they were interviewing
was like yeah the market's overvalued but it won't stop going up and i think that's what i
think as well it's like you know for whatever reason it just keeps on um continuing investors
see a lot of hope in the united states obviously they see a lot of hope in the United States, obviously. They see a lot of
excitement in the tech companies and now the small caps. So yeah, I think it's overvalued,
but I don't think that necessarily means that it has to go down. I think in the post-pandemic
stock market economy situation, a lot of our metrics have stopped meaning what we thought
they meant. Same with a yield curve inversion.
Like it doesn't necessarily mean that a recession is coming. It's just something to take into account with other metrics. And I would consider Buffett's metric in a similar light.
You coined this term vibe session, which we love and I think a lot of people love, which
basically describes this disconnect between the actual economy versus our perception
of the economy. And the reality over the past few years is that the economy has actually been quite
strong, but we have perceived it, or the public has perceived it to be weak, unless we have been
in a vibe session. The vibes have been off, not the actual data. I'd love to get your read on the vibes right now. The economy is still
quite strong. The perception of the economy has somewhat recovered according to
sentiment surveys. But, you know, we just had an assassination attempt on the man who appears to be
our next president. What are the vibes like right now? And why do you say that he appears to be? next president um what are the vibes like right now and why do you say that he
appears to be just like out of curiosity based on prediction markets yeah i mean i i think that
so like there's a way to quantify vibes which is the consumer sentiment surveys like umich
umichigan uh releases a consumer sentiment survey and what's really tough about that is that they've changed how they collect data.
So they were doing phone call surveys,
and then they switched to web-based.
And when they switched to web-based surveys,
all of a sudden the answers got a little bit weird.
Really?
Yeah.
People were predicting 15% inflation on the web-based survey.
And so that's a mess.
And so the vibes were improving, but now we have this weird data collection thing
where there's something to talk about within that. Why did it get so weird when we switched to the
web? And that has shown that the vibes are declining. They were going up a little bit,
but people are still feeling quite
worried. Whenever I talk about the vibe session, I always make sure to point out structural
affordability problems. We do have a housing crisis. We do have elder care costs that are
$10,000 a month on average. Child care costs are up 32% since 2019. And so all of those are going
to impact how people feel about their economic circumstances,
and of course, they're going to feel bad. We also have media headlines that are, you know,
trending negative. Of course, people are going to feel bad about that, and as you're saying,
you know, there's an assassination attempt on a former president and a current, you know,
presidential candidate. Yeah, it's hard not to feel bad.
You said the toughest part about investing is holding on.
Can you say more about that and how investors should be thinking about holding on during
this economic and political environment?
Is that essentially, you know, don't time the markets, don't sell?
Yeah.
I mean, what do they say?
Like, time in the market is better than timing the market.
There it is.
And so i think
that's key and i think during times of uncertainty people have a desire to sell um because they're
they're scared and so i think just during times of uncertainty it's important to hold on to
investments that you believe in to continue investing because the stock market does go up 53% of the time
and the stock market is essentially a bet on America continuing to grow. And so if you believe
in those two things, it makes sense to hold your money into stuff that you believe in.
Stay with us. Do you feel like your leads never lead anywhere?
And you're making content that no one sees?
And it takes forever to build a campaign?
Well, that's why we built HubSpot.
It's an AI-powered customer platform that builds campaigns for you,
tells you which leads are worth knowing,
and makes writing blogs, creating videos,
and posting on social a breeze.
So now, it's easier than ever to be a marketer.
Get started at HubSpot.com slash marketers.
Autograph Collection Hotels
offer over 300 independent hotels around the world,
each exactly like nothing else.
Hand-selected for their inherent craft, each hotel tells its own unique story through distinctive
design and immersive experiences, from medieval falconry to volcanic wine tasting. Autograph
Collection is part of the Marriott Bonvoy portfolio of over 30 hotel brands around the world.
Find the unforgettable at AutographCollection.com.
Food insecurity still affects millions of individuals around the globe.
And Nestle, a global leader in nutrition, health, and wellness,
understands the importance of working together to create lasting change.
Nestle's partnerships extend beyond just financial support.
From building urban hoop houses to producing custom seasoning for food banks, Nestle and their
partners actively engage with local communities, listening to their needs and working together to
find innovative solutions. Nestle is committed to helping support thriving, resilient communities
today and for generations to come. Together, we can help to build stronger, healthier communities.
Learn more at Nestle.com.
We're back with Profiteer Markets.
So one of the reasons we started the podcast
was to try and increase or improve financial literacy for young people.
What do you think are the greatest barriers to wealth creation for young people?
It's the idea that you have to own a home, I think.
That's interesting.
Yeah.
So if you look at the distribution of financial assets from the Federal Reserve,
which is a chart that I talk about quite a bit,
you can see that the bottom 50%, and this is more income versus age,
but they have all of their wealth tied up into housing.
They don't have a lot up into housing. They don't
have a lot of equity ownership. They don't have a lot of business ownership. They own homes.
And so I think for young people, there is an expectation that one day you're going to be a
homeowner. You're going to achieve the American dream and everything's going to be perfect and
wonderful. And that's how you're going to build wealth, right? And even when you talk to
policymakers, part of the reason that we focus so much on housing is because that's the way that middle
America builds well. And so the more that I've talked about housing and the more that I've talked
about, you know, economic circumstances for middle America, how can we help people, right? It really
is about having a conversation about investing, which is what you all are doing such a great job
at is like, how do we educate people about the stock market? And so I think that's what young people really struggle with,
is that barrier to entry in the market. There are apps like Robinhood, but that feels like gambling,
right? There are apps like Public, but it's just confusing. Where do you begin?
And so I think it's just sort of getting your foot in the door. How do you take that first
step towards becoming an investor?
I think that just can be quite overwhelming for people.
And there's always tomorrow, right?
Like, it can always start tomorrow.
And so we also don't teach people this in school.
Like, we just send them out in the world and hope they figure it out.
Housing's an interesting one because,
and I'm of two minds of this,
you know, a disproportionate amount of wealth
among baby boomers is in their house, right? And I totally get that if you look at sort of
too many young people fall into the illusion that they have to own a home and they end up being kind
of house poor and it ends up decreasing mobility and almost being kind of an anchor, whereas if
they'd put the money and the maintenance and all the taxes into just an index fund, they would
have been better off. Having said that, it's also, I found at least, I think for a lot of people,
young people, it's a means of forced investing. And that is people have a tendency to make their
mortgage payment. And there's a lot of psychological benefit or psychic impact but it's like buying a stock you
have to you have to look at it opportunistically right buying homes out of foreclosure in miami
in 2011 was just an incredible way to build wealth believing you have to own real estate
no matter what so you lever up and borrow and cash out everything to buy. Spent $3 million on a one bedroom in Brooklyn, probably not a great idea
right now. Isn't it sort of like every other asset class and that it just requires hard work
and discipline around the individual situation? It's so weird to categorize. It's almost like
when we talk about Europe, it's like, well, you're talking about Greece or Ireland. And when we say
housing is a good or a bad investment, aren't we being too reductive? And it's really about the specific asset we're
talking about. Yeah. I think every conversation is usually too reductive. It's real tough. The
economy is so personal and everybody has such a personal experience with it. But I think to your
point about how do we have this conversation and what does it mean? I think to your point about like, you know, how do we have this conversation and like,
what does it mean? I think for a lot of young people, there are times like if you're in Nevada
or where I'm from, Kentucky, like you probably should buy a house. They're not super expensive.
Rates are a little too high right now, but they should be coming down soon,
depending on what the Federal Reserve does. And so there is opportunity to buy a house. But
in a place like SF, which might be on the decline, maybe that's not a good place to buy a house.
So there is specificity to location. There's specificity to circumstances. But I also think
you're right that a lot of the boomer, and this is something you do a great job talking about,
a lot of the older people have tax incentives to stay in their home.
And so there's a lot of supply that's sort of trapped between generations that normally would
have passed on at this point. Like boomers own most of the three and four bedrooms when at this
point it should be probably millennials and Gen X who we always forget to talk about.
Thank you.
I think that's-
I feel the same.
Well, we do. Like we go right to
millennials and it's like Gen X. Yeah, I know. We're obsessed with millennials for some reason.
I don't know if that's their media is better, their music is better. But anyways, you've,
I've seen a couple of, I feel as if I know you because I follow you on all these different video
platforms, but you've talked about the importance of better kind of zoning or breaking down zoning
regulations and subsidies
to encourage development of housing. And I think you even talked specifically about,
is it true that you talked about specifically what Minneapolis is doing well to encourage
housing development? Can you speak more to that? Yeah, no, Minneapolis and Montgomery County,
Maryland. Also Burlington, Vermont has done a good job and Austin, Texas. And so those are four cities that have reformed their zoning.
So Minneapolis was like, okay, we can rethink zoning.
We can probably build more affordable housing in these areas, so we're going to do that.
Burlington, Vermont was like, listen, we can build more of the missing middle of housing, which is duplexes, triplexes, townhomes.
We don't have to have just apartment buildings
and single-family homes.
We can have more dense homes that are being built.
Austin, Texas reformed their zoning.
It just keeps on approving housing across the board.
San Diego has also approved, like, I think, a record high of housing
because of, you know, zoning, because of, you know,
funding from the government, whatever it ends up being.
And so zoning can be really
restrictive towards building new homes because, for example, I think it's 90% of Los Angeles
is zoned single family. And so that means you can just build little houses everywhere,
which is great because who doesn't want a little house? But you also have to have apartments. So
you have to have sort of this transitional housing as well, or housing that lasts people their whole lives. Spending a whole life in
an apartment is totally okay, but you have to have choices. And so zoning reform is a way to
achieve that. It's also a way to redesign our cities. And those four cities that I talked about
have done a really good job. Montgomery County, Maryland, the government has begun to intervene in the bidding process.
And so developers have to have a 20% margin in order to build because they're developers,
like they have to make a profit and they're not going to build if like they don't see the profits
coming through, which is just a business model. But Montgomery County, Maryland was like, okay,
well, we can help out. Like we can, you know, take these projects, we can bid, and then we can
sort of help the developers get to the finish line. And so they've built, I think, 800 units of housing
for people just sort of intervening in the bidding process.
I want to shift to career advice as we wrap up. You're the youngest guest we've had on this show.
Oh, cool.
You're 26, 27?
I just turned 27, yeah.
Just turned 27, okay.
So, Ed, you're younger than Kyla, right?
I am younger, yeah.
Yeah, so I get this, acting like, yeah, this is just incredible.
We'd have someone, we'd make the incredibly dumb decision to allow someone this young on the podcast.
You've been featured in Bloomberg.
You've been featured in the New York Times.
You've been featured in the Financial Times.
You have written a massively successful book. I'd love to get your view as a fellow, very young person. What do you think it
takes to succeed professionally in 2024? Guts. I think you have to be brave. Yeah.
I think that's like something I've had a hard time with is like, how do you balance bravery? And like, what does bravery look like in this context? And so for me, like, you know, I produce specific to like being online so i'll producing content
online for people um and i can talk like broader as well but how we talk a lot about problems and
we don't oftentimes talk about opportunities and when you talk about opportunities there's opinion
that is involved because some people will disagree on whatever solution that you're proposing or
backing and so you kind of have to be brave about like advocating for certain policy positions, for certain things that you think should be implemented. Like I'm a big
advocate for housing. A lot of people disagree with that. And so you kind of have to be brave
in what you're saying. And then of course, have data to back up whatever your opinion is. But I
think broadly in order to succeed in 2024, you have to tune out the noise. There's a lot of stuff going on. And it's
really easy to get wrapped up in it and to lose focus and to let fear kind of dictate whatever
path you're going on. And so it's important to listen to people that you believe and to also
consume outside of that, but know what is true and what isn't and to know where your beliefs lie.
I'm surprised to hear you say that because the majority of the comments in my social media feed are just so thoughtful and kind.
People are just so really loving and really supportive.
Me too.
I'll bet her comment section looks a lot different.
Just a last question here.
What do you think?
A lot of times when we talk about how things are just financially, quantitatively, that the data is just crystal clear that young people are facing headwinds for the first time that previous generations haven't faced. And what I get back a lot is,
Scott, all this wealth that you're claiming is prevalent among older people, that eventually
these young people are going to get it. So it's really their money and you shouldn't be this
worried. What are your thoughts on this argument? Maybe. Sure. I mean, I think that that is a very
long-term view. And normally I am such an advocate for the long-term. I think long-term thinking is key. But I think that there's immediate solutions to some of the problems that we're facing. And I would say that, yes, the wealth will get passed down eventually. But what we're about to see is the greatest wealth transfer in history. And it's going towards people's children.
Rich people's children.
Rich people's children.
Really rich people.
And so it's going to create more wealth inequality because we don't really have an inheritance tax that works.
And so for people like me,
who I'm not going to inherit much of anything,
that is going to exacerbate inequality in a really big way.
And so, yes, like the boomers will pass on the wealth eventually.
Perhaps they'll pass on the torch of power one day.
We'll see.
But I would say that just thinking that it'll happen and we shouldn't worry about it
is not the best way to think about it
because it's just going to exacerbate the inequality that we already have.
So you don't think it's healthy for young people to not focus on their careers
and to give up and just wait for their parents to die?
No, I don't think so.
And I think a lot of people are kind of trapped in that right now.
Yeah. And the problem is they're not dying soon enough.
That's what I'm saying.
That's right. Ed can relate. All right. Read us out, Ed.
Kyla Scanlon is the founder of a financial education company, Bread, and a creator. She
writes a weekly newsletter, makes YouTube videos, hosts the Let's Appreciate podcast,
and posts almost daily short-form videos about the economy and markets. Her first book,
In This Economy, How Money and Markets Really Work, is available now. Kyla,
thank you for coming on.
Thanks for having me.
We love Kyla Scanlon.
Oh, thank you.
Algebra of Wealth. Scott, we talked with Kyla about the importance of being brave in your career.
In your book, The Algebra of Wealth, you said, quote, courage is cheaper than Chanel and it works better.
Can you talk about a moment when being brave has helped you in your career?
After I left Morgan Stanley, I didn't know what to do.
I moved back in with my mother.
I was thinking about graduate school, but I didn't think I had the grades to get in. So I started something called Stress Busters Video.
I went and bought $6,000 of VHS tapes from a video store
that had been discovered was engaged in money laundering. So I got to buy these tapes for like
two or three bucks a pop. So I bought a thousand tapes, put them in this Rubbermaid cart, and I
started going around each of the offices in Century City and the kind of the Twin Towers there and offering
people rentals. That was my first business. And so I got from Morgan Stanley where I was wearing
Hermes ties and flying business class. And I would have to sneak past or pay off the security guard
to get in with my cart in the elevator. And I remember walking into a law firm and this woman, this receptionist stood up and said, get the hell out of here and started screaming at me. And I turned around and I'm sitting in the lobby or the elevator bank with one hand nearly broken, living at home with a fucking laundry cart of VHS tapes.
And that's the kind of risk and public humiliation you have to be willing to take if you want to be really successful.
And the reality is 99% of people aren't willing to take those risks. People talk a big game about
being entrepreneurs. And the first thing I ask them is, are you willing to go to work
and as a reward for working 60 hours a week at the end of the month, you get to sign the
front of a check, not the back of a check.
When I started L2, for the first 14 months, I would have to go home at the end of the
month, and my mother of my two babies would complain that I wasn't home enough, and she
was right.
And then I would have to say, well, okay, also, just FYI, I need to put $70,000 into the business. That is not fun. And it's ugly, it's scary. So I don't know what you want to call it, risk public humiliation, risk losing really hard-earned money. You're not going
to punch above your weight class and you're not cut out to be an entrepreneur. And I think what
Kyla was saying is that to put yourself out there and talk about economics and the markets in a
public format, you're risking public humiliation. A, you might be wrong. And even if you're not
wrong, people are going to try and shame you. People are going to say rude things about you. So there's just no getting around it.
Now, let me move to what has helped me. I've developed thick skin early on. I think I've
told you I ran for every office in high school and lost every election, and I was fine. And
I developed a lot of calluses, which was actually quite helpful for me. But also,
atheism, in the sense that
I know how fast time is going
and everyone I'm worried about,
what they think of me and being embarrassed in front of,
they're all going to be dead soon as am I.
And I find it's actually quite liberating
and gives me a lot of confidence.
But 100%, if you want to score above your weight class,
you're going to have to get comfortable
taking uncomfortable risks.
This episode was produced by Claire Miller and engineered by Benjamin Spencer.
Our associate producer is Alison Weiss. Our executive producers are Jason Stavis and
Catherine Dillon. Mia Silverio is our research lead and Drew Burrows is our technical director.
Thank you for listening to Prof G Markets from the Vox Media Podcast Network.
We'll be back with a fresh take on more kits on Monday.
As the world turns and the dove flies in love, love, love, love.