Prof G Markets - Warner Bros. Discovery Splits In Two, Apple’s WWDC Flops, & Tesla Gets Downgraded
Episode Date: June 10, 2025Ed takes a look at Warner Bros Discovery’s move to split into two companies, breaks down the highlights from the opening day of Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference, and unpacks why two analyst...s decided to downgrade Tesla’s stock. Subscribe to the Prof G Markets newsletter Order "The Algebra of Wealth" out now Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice Follow Scott on Instagram Follow Ed on Instagram and X Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Support for the show comes from Mercury, the fintech that more than 200,000 entrepreneurs use to simplify their finances.
When banking can do more, your business can do more. With Mercury, you can watch your revenue climb with every invoice you send.
You can stay current with contractors with built-in bill pay. You can unlock the credit you need to scale faster.
Check it out for yourself at mercury.com. Mercury, banking that does more.
Mercury is a financial technology company, not a bank.
Banking services provided by Choice Financial Group, Column N.A., and Evolve Bank and Trust,
members FDIC. The IO card is issued by Patriot Bank, member FDIC, pursuant to a license from MasterCard.
This is Peter Kafka, the host of Channels, the show about what happens when media and
tech collide.
This week I'm talking to Jay Graber, the CEO of Blue Sky.
That's the increasingly popular social network that's also kind of a science experiment.
Blue Sky is really part of this moment where me and other people are all saying, let's
preserve these early principles of the open web and let's bring that back for the next
generation of applications.
That's this week on Channels, wherever you get your favorite podcasts.
We're all looking for signs for what's next in the economy, the underwear index, the lipstick
index and the music charts.
Oh, recession pop is very much a real thing,
and it's completely made up, which is to say that
there was no such thing as Recession Pop
during the recession.
It's a term that was made up only very recently.
Now that's what I call recession music.
That's this week on Explain It To Me,
new episodes every Sunday morning,
wherever you get your podcasts.
New episodes every Sunday morning wherever you get your podcasts.
Today's number, 5,000. That's how many bars of soap Sydney Sweeney will be selling that contain drops of her own bath water. The euphoria actress said, quote,
When fans start asking for your bath water, either ignore it or turn it into a soap.
That is the kind of business-minded thinking that
we love on this podcast. I'm in full support and honestly, Sydney, you've inspired me. We've been
getting a lot of the same requests actually. And so I would like to formally announce today the
launch of ProffG Body Wash straight from the bathtub of Scott Galloway. And if that sounds
creepy to you, well, that is your opinion. I am simply giving the people what they want.
Money markets mad.
If money is evil, then that building is hell.
The show goes on!
The first and the last watch the show, show!
Welcome to Profgy Markets. I'm Ed Elson. It is June 10th, and today it is our very first episode of the Proff G Market's
daily show hosted by me.
Some context on this new format.
We've been getting a lot of feedback from you that the show isn't timely enough, and
we agree.
News is breaking every day, it's all moving very fast, and we want to stay on top of it.
So here's how the new format is going to work.
On Monday, you get your
regular show with me and Scott, and we review everything that happened in the previous week.
On Tuesday, I host, and we review everything that happened the day before, and you'll get
a little bit of Scott, and you'll hear from some analysts too. On Wednesday and Thursday,
we do the same thing. And then on Friday, we finish the week with an interview episode where Scott and I
will interview a special guest.
So that's the new format, one episode every weekday.
We're very excited about it.
As always, keep giving us feedback.
Let us know what you didn't like,
let us know what you liked, and I hope you enjoy it.
And with that, let's check in on yesterday's market vitals.
The S&P and the NASDAQ inched higher
as US-China talks kicked off in London.
The Dow closed the day nearly flat.
The yield on 10-year treasuries dropped
as investors await details on those trade conversations
set to continue this morning.
The dollar dipped.
Bitcoin climbed nearly 4% through the afternoon,
continuing its four-day rally.
And finally, Tesla stock jumped 4.5% after Trump wished Elon well and said the White House would keep using
Starlink. That gain reversed some earlier losses that were triggered by two analyst
downgrades. More on that later.
Ok, what else is happening?
Warner Bros. Discovery is splitting in half. This comes just three years after the merger that combined Warner Media with Discovery Inc.
And now they are unmerging that merger.
The company will be split into two companies.
One for the cable assets such as CNN and TNT and TBS.
That will be run by the current CFO Gunnar Vedenfels.
And then the other company will be for the streaming assets
like HBO Max, and that will be run by the current CEO,
David Zaslav.
Shares jumped as much as 13% yesterday morning,
and then they came back down, they closed the day down 3%.
So WBD has finally thrown in the towel. We've seen several semi admissions this year
from management, admitting that the past three years have been a disaster for the company.
I think the most obvious one, the most famous one, was that rebrand where they went from HBO Max
to Max and now back to HBO Max. But this move, this is essentially the nail in the coffin.
This is David Zasloff saying,
yep, we tried to combine these two companies.
We tried to pretend that cable television
wasn't a dead business, but here we are in 2025.
We recognize our sins, we're sorry,
and we're now going to undo everything
we've been working on for the past three years.
So initially, Wall Street liked it. going to undo everything we've been working on for the past three years.
So initially Wall Street liked it, it rose 13% and then as I said, came crashing back
down, down 3% on the day.
But this is all a little bit irrelevant because when you take a longer perspective view, when
you look back to when this company first merged back in April 2022, it is down around 60% since then.
So still things are not looking great for Warner Brothers Discovery.
Lots to unpack here, but I'm going to throw it over to Scott Galloway
because Scott actually predicted this.
He's been predicting that something like this would happen for a very long time.
And I know he's going to be very excited to talk about this.
So let's give Scott a call.
Scott, how's it going? and I know he's going to be very excited to talk about this. So let's give Scott a call.
Scott, how's it going? It is going very well, Ed. It is going very well.
So just to clarify how this works, I'm recording this after market close,
but Scott's living in London, which means it's 10pm on Scott time.
So the way this works, we're going to have Scott call in from his phone,
and right now it looks like he's pacing around his basement,
but that's how it's going to work.
And this way we get a little bit of Scott.
A little bit of dog, a little bit of salsa for that Edward ship.
That's right. It's 10 o'clock, so the kids are asleep.
And I am post-dinner, pre-edible.
So you're catching me at a good time.
Yeah, excited about this.
Congratulations on going daily.
The world just can't get enough of you
after all you're
boring around with Katie Tuer and MSNBC and whoever else will ask you to come on
cable TV, you promiscuous little bitch.
Jesus Christ.
I have created a monster.
I love it.
That's my market's observation for today.
You've created a monster.
I love the screen.
Give me a little tour of the studio here, better known as my kitchen.
Okay.
These are the beers I drank Ed, those are the beers I drank.
Are you drunk now or was that from a while ago? What's going on?
It's called a Monday night. All right, Ed, get on. What's the question?
We're talking business. We do these, we're in the world of Scott.
Thanks. This is our first one.
Yeah, it's very good. I'm sure you've seen this news from
Warner Brothers Discovery. I'm sure I don't have to remind you what happened.
I first have this prediction that you made back in September of 2023, that we're going
to get your reaction to.
Let's play that clip.
There needs to be recognition that cable TV assets are no longer teenagers that are going
to keep growing, that they're in fact, you know, Nana and Pop-Pop and need to be made
comfortable and they need to be managed for cash flow, not
starved of investment, but stop the hallucination that these things are ever going to reignite
growth again.
So my prediction is you're going to see one or more players shed their assets into a different
hold code to clean up their story and also for consolidation and scale and unmuck or, you know,
unfuck the story that is media companies now
that have growth, but also have declining assets
in the same portfolio.
Okay, before you react to that,
because I know you're gonna be very happy
and brag about that,
I have another prediction that you made
back in last December,
when Warner Brothers split into two units.
It split into its streaming and studio business,
and then also its cable linear television network business.
And this is what you said.
He's setting the table for a spin.
And that is he's creating distinct operating units such
that the spin will be more elegant and easy.
And the fact that the stock is up 15% now today
is basically the market saying, oh, you're flirting with a spin?
Well, come on over here. This means the spin in my
opinion, is going to happen.
Two for two.
Yeah, well, my observation on the first prediction is I'm
awesome. And my, my observation on the second one is I'm
ridiculously fucking awesome. Anyways, I'm very much enjoying
this so far. Okay, so this was an easy one. Yeah. We have, you know, a 24 year old living with a 72 year old.
Um, where I got that.
It's just, I'm with you.
It makes sense.
Yeah.
It's just not a clean story.
It's not a clean story.
So this is a clean story.
It's often referred to as good bank, bad bank.
What was interesting is who gets to take the debt with them.
They have about $34 billion in debt.
And it looks like the bad bank is going to take the asset sort of debt.
Because I mean, I knew that Zaslav was going to get to go with the
fun young party, right?
I got, he was going to get to go and do Warner Brothers, HBO,
cause that's more fun and he's on top.
And any guy that talks shareholders into what was a ridiculously fucking stupid merger to begin with,
is totally focused on his own lifestyle,
not on shareholder values.
The CFO is going to run the declining assets.
Now, the bad bank might be the better buy based on valuation,
because if you can cut costs faster than revenue declines,
you end up increasing EBITDA and these can be good assets. Zaslav will get a higher multiple
FANA assets and get to go to the Vanity Fair Oscars party. But the real winner here has been
this kind of carousel of bankers, lawyers, and management compensation.
Since AT&T acquired Warner Brothers and then sold it again, the bankers and the lawyers
have garnered about a half a billion dollars in fees.
And then you add in a third of a billion in compensation for Zaslav, despite the fact
this company has seen its shareholder value cut in half, you have almost a billion
in Cs to bankers who talk these people into doing this and said, hey, David, you're going
to get to get or justify a massive K increase when you take this thing and merge it.
And shareholders here have been left in the cold.
What do you think was the conversation in the boardroom? Because is this a hard message to put out there to merge these two companies, as we saw in 2022,
Warner Brothers merging with Discovery, and they made a whole pitch about that,
not really acknowledging the fact that the cable assets were in decline.
And this is essentially an admission that they were wrong. They're coming out and saying,
never mind, we're just gonna undo everything we did
three years ago.
What do you think that the pitch was in the boardroom?
How are they justifying that?
Well, they'll come up with all sorts of narratives
for why the market has changed.
This was at Frankenstein.
Warner, it's really interesting.
Time Warner has been at the center
of the worst acquisitions in history.
They agreed to sell themselves when they had real assets
to AOL, which was literally plummeting in value. And then to sell themselves when they had real assets to AOL, which was
literally plummeting in value. And then they pulled an AOL and they sold their assets as
they were about to go into structural decline into AT&T who loved the idea of going vertical
because they just saw, you know, they thought, okay, we need some point of differentiation
and we can capture people and if they buy an AT&T phone, give them Game of Thrones, that never materialized.
And then they got to pull a Time Warner and sell their declining assets at a premium to
Zaslav and his crew who convinced people that it would be worth billions of dollars to let
him move to LA and buy Jack Warner's phone.
So in sum, there's no fiduciaries here.
My guess is Brian Roberts and Comcast to the extent they're allowed to,
they're probably advised on the post-slit structure to make it easy for them to merge with their Comcast assets.
And basically the CFO, who I think is kind of the adult in the room,
is going to spend the next three years consolidating CNN and MSNBC's newsroom.
And basically, unless you're in front of the camera, unless you're Anderson Cooper,
you know, be careful, your job is on the block here.
Cause this is going to be, this entire company strategy is going to be to cut
costs faster than the structural revenue declines they're all experiencing.
And then David Zaslav is going to have to have a story around growth and HVO. I wonder at some point when the investment
market just says to Zaslov, hey buddy, you're full of shit.
It's never going to happen. That's what I think.
Never going to happen.
Okay. Well, thank you for joining us, Scott.
FG Markets daily. Every day.
Every day.
Daddy is the salsa, Ed is the chip. That's right.
See you, man. See you.
Up next, Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference kicks off, and Tesla's stock gets hit with
a couple of downgrades.
Stay with us.
A few weeks ago, Google dropped VO3, Generative AI video, but now with Generative AI sound
to go with it.
This is video from VO3.
What do you think about the idea that we're just a bunch of prompts?
If I'm generated from a prompt, how come I don't have six fingers?
So is this.
About to do the first plunge into an active volcano.
Let's send it.
And this.
Breaking news, the Secretary of Defense,
Pete Hegseth has died after drinking an entire liter
of vodka on a dare by RFK.
But how are the reviews?
A slot monger's dream, says The Verge.
It might actually take my job, says YouTuber Matthew Berman.
The world is not ready says Mashable.
We're so cooked says thousands of people on social media.
But are we?
Maybe not.
That's our take at Today Explained.
I'm Jesse David Fox, editor at Vulture and host of Good One, a show with the best interviews
ever with your favorite comedians.
The other day, like, I stabbed my laptop with my phone and broke the screen.
And it's like, I have to stop doing that.
Bill Burr, Kevin Hart, Nikki Glaser, Bo Burnham, Bo and Yang, they've all been on the show.
And now, Good One has good news.
We are adding video. That's right, starting June
5th, we will be available to watch on YouTube. Check out our first episode with former SNL
head writer and current host of Late Night with Seth Meyers, Seth Meyers. Should we try one last
heist? Is that how we save late night? This season we also have Jason Segal, Michelle Butoh,
Cher Sherman, John C. Reilly, and once again, Bill Burr.
You can watch us every week at youtube.com slash vulture.
New episodes drop on Thursdays.
And for you ears-only listeners, we
are still available wherever you get your podcasts.
But coming out to YouTube, we have
flashy graphics and moody blue lights,
and I wear a different hat every episode,
so you do not want to miss that.
So check us out. See you on YouTube.
We're back with Proctoring Markets.
Apple kicked off its Worldwide Developers Conference yesterday.
This is their annual conference where they announce all of their new products and services.
It's a four-day event, but the opening day is the most important day.
The conference was highly anticipated by Wall Street, and not because investors were necessarily
excited, but more because they were anxious.
Remember, this has been a pretty bad year for Apple.
The iPhone sales are down 2% on the year.
They lost significant market share in the smartphone market.
They also announced Apple Intelligence
at last year's conference.
They tried to launch that and it failed.
And so far this year, year to date, the stock is down 17%.
So this was Apple's moment to prove itself to Wall Street.
This was the time to show investors,
yes, it was a slow year,
but we're still the number one tech company in the world. We're the time to show investors, yes, it was a slow year, but we're still the
number one tech company in the world. We're the ones who made the iPhone. We're the ones
who made the Mac. And look what else we've got in the pipeline today. So what do they
have in the pipeline? What did they announce? Let's just take a look at some of the main
product announcements that Apple gave us. One, real-time AI translated captions for calls and texts.
Two, an Apple Visual Intelligence update which allows users to analyze screenshots with ChatGBT.
Three, a digital ID feature in Apple Wallet.
And four, in the iMessages app, users will now be able to create custom backgrounds and polls in conversations.
That, ladies and gentlemen, is the new Apple.
That is the company that built the iPhone.
If it wasn't clear before, it is very clear to me now.
Apple has lost its edge.
I made this point last year
when they announced Apple Intelligence
at last year's conference, and I said, this really isn't that impressive.
And here we are a year later, and I don't know about you, but I'm thinking the exact
same thing.
And I would also highlight that every single one of those products that I just announced
to you right there, all of them have already been created by a competitor.
You look at the AI translation, for example. Google already did it, so did Samsung.
Google has also already done the visual intelligence.
They've also already done the digital ID feature.
And WhatsApp already did the custom backgrounds
and the polling feature as far back as 2020.
So not only are these features unimpressive,
they're also not new.
I mean, they literally already exist.
So I was, obviously you can tell I was not impressed.
Wall Street was not very impressed either.
The stock dropped one and a half percent
after the announcement, but we wanted another opinion.
So our producer, Claire, spoke with tech analyst, Ray Wong,
who was on the ground at WWDC.
He broke down the market's reaction
and he explained why he's still bullish on the stock.
I mean, we've got basically headwinds that are around tariffs, taxes, and they wanted a big bang AI announcement and Apple wasn't ready to deliver that.
But what we know is it's a good buying opportunity because we've got a distribution channel unmatched.
We've got an ecosystem that's worth $400 billion and growing.
And if you think about it that way, you look at it, well, all AI is
going to move to the edges.
It's going to be on your phones.
It's going to be on the outside.
It's not going to be a centralized LLM or big blob where you go out and
you query, you know, an LLM and a chat bot.
It's going to be better than that.
And so the question you have to ask is, is this going to add to the services number?
Is it going to add to that TAM?
And the short answer, yes, it will.
But all these features don't get released into September.
And of course, there's a lot of announcements, a lot of competition out there.
People are wondering, well, Google come up with something.
Well, OpenAI come up with something.
Well, Facebook come up with something.
But at the end of the day, if you have the data, the devices and the
network, you're going to win.
It feels like the narrative hasn't really changed then. But at the end of the day, if you have the data, the devices, and the network, you're going to win.
It feels like the narrative hasn't really changed then.
I feel like the story we've gotten since they unveiled Apple intelligence is that it's just going to take time.
Like, how long can we afford to be patient with Apple on this?
Well, if you look at the cash on hand and you look at the stock, they can afford to be patient for quite some time.
But I think it's a different issue, right?
It's a consumer brand.
It's about trust.
And if they launch it and it's awful, what would happen?
The market would tank even further.
And so for in their case, they have to get it right.
Almost almost to a level of perfection that nobody else is going to expect.
I mean, this is like the equivalent of any large company.
That's, you know, one to 2% of any index, right?
If they screw up, the entire economy screws up.
That's a huge burden on them.
Well, look, Ray said a lot in there that I do agree with.
This is clearly an incredible company.
He mentioned just the sheer volume that they have in terms of data, in terms of
devices, the fact that it is a $400
billion ecosystem. That's how much money they make in revenue per year. They also generate
$100 billion in profit. They just bought back $100 billion worth of shares. As he says,
Apple has a lot of cash. It's an incredible company. But I don't think that means it's
an incredible innovator. And this is the core of my problem with Apple.
And this is where I disagree with Ray here.
I think this is a mature company that is cosplaying as a young growth company.
And so far, I think it's got Wall Street's number on that front.
It's trading at 32 times earnings, which is a growth valuation.
You compare that to Google, which trades at 19 times earnings.
So I believe this is the beginning of the end
of the growth era for Apple.
And I believe that that multiple, 32 times,
I believe that multiple will come down significantly
this year.
That doesn't mean that it's a bad stock
and it doesn't mean that it's a bad company.
I just think investors need to recognize
sooner rather than later that this is
no longer the tech forward company that it used to be. This is a mature company. Claire and Ray
said it. We have to be patient with this company. We have to wait. And that's fine. It's fine to be
a mature company. And as Aswath Damodaran has told us many times on this podcast, getting old
is a part of life. It's not an issue. But we all have a choice.
We can either run away from getting old or we can embrace it. And at this point, I think it's clear
to all of us. Apple is old. It deserves a mature valuation, not a growth valuation. This isn't a
company that is this young buck that just came in on the scene. This is an open AI. This is an old company that has lost its ability
to innovate in the same way it did 10, 20, 30 years ago.
Apple is old.
Let's stop pretending it isn't.
Our final story.
Tesla stock got hit with two downgrades
from Wall Street yesterday.
Equity research firms August
Research and Baird both cut their Tesla ratings from buy to hold. And that was of course a
reaction to this insane feud that has unfolded last week between Elon Musk and President
Trump, which led to Tesla's largest one day drop ever falling 14%. It had a bit of a rebound
on Friday, rebounded a little bit more yesterday,
but it's still down 11% since all this drama went down.
So clearly Wall Street is pretty spooked about this Trump situation. Clearly investors feel
that something has changed. And I think the question is, or the question that I have,
what exactly has changed? So to answer that question, Claire spoke with question that I have, what exactly has changed?
So to answer that question, Claire spoke with Bill Seleski, senior
research analyst at August Research.
He's one of the analysts who downgraded the stock yesterday.
Yeah, we did it because, and keep in mind, we didn't downgrade it to a sell.
We downgraded it from a buy to a hold.
And basically what we did, we just thought that the riskiness
of the stock basically got amped up with the debate, so to speak, that went on last Thursday
between Elon Musk and the President of the United States. So we saw that situation developing
and it kind of got ugly for a few minutes there. Basically, at its most simplest, you
know, Elon Musk first depressed
it out of the United States. Who's going to win that war?
It seemed like the market loved it when he was finally like, okay, I'm backing out of
Doge, I'm leaving the government, I'm going back to Tesla 24 seven. Do you think the concern
here is that like, he's obviously still thinking about the government and Tesla is not his
priority.
Yeah, it looks to me like, you know, the blow up is starting to slowly dissipate and I hope
and I hope it does, but that there's no guarantee that it couldn't start up again in a hurry.
And if that's the case, you know, then I don't necessarily think that Tesla is in a position to tell a president of the
United States where to go or what to do. They're at the mercy of the president. So I think they
have to play ball with them, play nice, and hopefully everything will work out. For the time
being, we believe it's kind of neutralish. We kind of see the stock trading sideways for a while.
And basically it should pick up once we get some more clarity on how RoboTaxi is doing
and what its plans are for optimist rollout in the future.
So we do think there's value there.
We just think in the meantime, you have to sit tight and kind of get through a couple
of things first.
So here's where I land on this. And obviously this story has been everywhere.
Everyone's talking about it.
To me, this whole drama, when you look at it from both a political
perspective and from a market's perspective, this whole thing is a giant
distraction from the things that actually matter.
I can break it down on the political side.
This is a distraction from all the things that matter, which would include the big,
beautiful bill, which is going to run up trillions of dollars in more deficits and
decimate the economic prospects of my generation of young people.
We've talked about that.
It's a distraction from the tariffs, which are going to reintroduce inflation,
which is going to further harm poor people.
It's a distraction from the fact that we have ruined our reputation as a reliable trading
partner.
It is a distraction from all of the things that actually matter.
This is just a tiff.
It's just a fun story.
Now, where do I land on this from an investment perspective?
I see it as the same thing. The way I see it is Tesla is a car company that is trading even after this dispute at
162 times earnings, and that is over 400% higher than the average PE multiple across
the auto industry.
So the only thing that could justify a valuation that high, irrespective of everything that's happened.
The only thing that justifies it is if Tesla can prove that it can create an additional
significant revenue stream.
And right now, its best bet is the robot taxi.
That's what matters here.
That's what decides if the valuation is somewhat appropriate or completely insane. And the good news is we're going to find out in two days because June 12th is the official launch
date of the robotaxi. That's when we'll see robotaxi in Austin on the streets or at least that's when
they say it'll be out in Austin on the streets. And that's when we'll learn if this thing is legit
and if this valuation is fair game.
But anything that happens in the interim, anything that moves the stock 5, 10, 15%,
whether it's the CEO doing ketamine, or not doing ketamine, or showing up with a black
eye, or getting into a tweet fight with the president, all of that is fluff.
And by the way, as we saw, as soon as Elon or Trump says anything nice, suddenly the
stock comes ripping back up.
It goes up, it goes down, it goes up, it goes down.
You have to focus on what matters.
And what matters for Tesla here isn't a fight with the President.
What matters for Tesla is the robo-taxi.
Specifically, is it going to work?
That is the trillion dollar question.
And we won't have an answer to that question
until June 12th.
So until then, I'm not looking at the stock.
It can go up, it can go down, it can go sideways,
we can get re-ratings.
Personally, I don't really care.
Because if that RoboTaxi doesn't blow us away
in two days on Thursday, if that robo taxi launch
doesn't go as planned, then suddenly all of this price movement, all of this drama,
all of this fighting, it's moot.
It won't matter anymore.
That's it for today.
Thanks for listening to Profitry Markets from the Vox Media Podcast Network.
I'm Ed Elson.
I will see you tomorrow. In kind reunion
As the world turns
And the dove flies
In love, love, love, love