Prof G Markets - Will Trump Fire Powell? ASML Sinks on Tariff Fears & An Interview with Windsurf CEO Jeff Wang

Episode Date: July 17, 2025

Ed and Scott break down how markets responded to the latest tensions between Trump and Jerome Powell. Then, Ed explains why ASML’s stock tumbled following its second-quarter earnings. Finally, Windsurf CEO Jeff Wang joins the show to unpack the drama surrounding his company. Check out our latest Prof G Markets newsletter Order "The Algebra of Wealth" out now Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice Follow Prof G Markets on Instagram Follow Ed on Instagram and X Follow Scott on Instagram Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The support for the show comes from Attio. Attio is an AI native CRM built for the next era of companies. Its powerful data structure adapts to your business model, sinks in all of your contacts and minutes, and enriches your business with actionable data. Attio also allows you to create email sequences, real-time reports, and powerful automations, all to help you build what matters, your company. Join industry leaders including Flatfile, Replicate, Modal, and more. You can go to attio.com slash propg and you'll get 15% off your first year. That's attio.com slash prop G.

There's regular cold. And then there's the mountains are blue cold. Mountain cold refreshment. Coors light. The chill choice. Celebrate Responsibly. Must be Legal Drinking Age. Stop. Do you know how fast you were going? I'm going to have to write you a ticket to my new movie, The Naked Gun. Liam Neeson. Buy your tickets now and get a free chili dog. Chili dog not included. The Naked Gun. Tickets on sale now, August 1st. Today's number? 211. That's how many Republicans voted not to release the Epstein files. According to Representative Virginia Foxx,

most people believe the president will release the files when it's, quote, time to release them. We weren't so sure of that claim. However, we retract our doubts as the statement was later fact checked and verified by the Center for Little St. James. Money markets mad. If money is evil, then that building is hell. The show goes on!

Welcome to ProfG Markets. I'm Ed Elson. It is July 17th. Let's check in on yesterday's market vitals. The major indices whipsawed as Trump's beef with Powell roiled the markets. We'll talk more about that in a second. Still, the NASDAQ managed to hit its third straight record close. Meanwhile, the dollar failed to recover from the drama, ending the day lower and giving

up its four-day winning streak. Johnson & Johnson's stock rose 6% after the company posted better than expected second quarter earnings and tempered its outlook for tariff impacts. And finally, Bitcoin climbed on renewed optimism for the crypto legislation we've been following, even as the bill stalled again in the House. Okay, what else is happening? Trump to fire Jerome Powell. Or will he? That is the question that seesawed the markets yesterday. Late Wednesday morning, news broke that Trump had drafted a letter to fire Jerome Powell

and had shown it off to lawmakers. Meanwhile, a White House official said Jerome Powell was likely to get fired. Markets fell very sharply on that news until right after that, Trump held a press conference where he told reporters, no, he wouldn't fire Jerome Powell. The president said, quote, we're not planning on doing anything. I don't rule out anything, but I think it's highly unlikely.

Markets immediately rebounded after Trump denied those firing rumors. So, more drama between Jerome Powell and the President. More drama that, unfortunately, we have to cover because of the implications it has on the markets. This is lowbrow, tabloid, daily-mail gossip-type news. However, it is happening inside of the White House and it involves the chair of the Federal Reserve and the president of the United States.

So yeah, we have to talk about it. Even if it is in essence, not really any different from beef between Drake and Kendrick or name your celebrity gossip drama. This is just the world we live in. So we're going to bring in Scott, because we want to see what he makes of this news. Scott, where are you? I am in Colorado, which is my self-conscious way of saying Aspen.

I'm in Colorado. My boys. You're out West. I'm out West. My boys, you're out west. I'm out west. My boys of course are walking ahead of me because they want nothing to do with me. It says I, according to them, the lamest person in the world and substantially erode their ribs in the town of Aspen. They're expecting to be kind of little players here.

Not sure it's working. Anyways, they're walking about 20 feet ahead of me. I want to get your take on this beef between Jerome Powell and Donald Trump. What are your initial reactions? Okay. So first off, we need to stop referring to Jerome Powell's chairman Powell. He's Jerome Epstein, he's chairman Epstein because this is nothing but a sophomoric yet effective attempt to get people to look away from the

Epstein drama of Trump and magazine making. This is ridiculous. He does not have the authority to remove Sherman Powell. He does not have the legal standing to take away someone's citizenship because he doesn't like them. But what you're gonna see is every day he's going to come up with something more and more ridiculous that grabs headlines, whether it's declaring economic war on Canada, but every day, just wait for it tomorrow. It'll be something else because he wants something that the media, which they will do, will take the bait and not talk about, see above the Epstein files.

I was watching CNBC while I was working out this morning. And of course it was the taco trade again with Powell, the markets dipped. Then they realized he couldn't fire Jerome Powell. He got a two for the next day. He backtracked, which made more news. But again, every time he makes news, they have something to shove aside the real news here. And that is he has spent the last seven years convincing his cult to worship the sun, which is that the deep state was involved in some sort of pedophile ring on

an island that would implicate a bunch of Democrats. He's encouraged these acolytes to worship the sun. And then all of a sudden I said, put on sunglasses and never look at the sun again and they're not having it. But this is nothing but pure distraction, Ed. So does this bring more meaning to TACO then? I mean, it sounds like there is even more incentive now to create stupid, headline worthy executive orders or threaten to make those executive orders, cause a lot of frenzying, get the news hopped up. And it's all basically just to distract us from the real issue, which is

his involvement with pedophile. Um, I mean, is this, is this, is this going to be, is this mean more taco? Well, a hundred percent. And what's interesting is the market continues to fall for it, but with less volatility. So again, yesterday the markets dipped when the prospect of the president trying to remove chairman Powell, who has been a steady hand. And then what do you know? He backtracked because he got another chance to distract us the next day.

This is, this is the equivalent of a magician sawing a woman in half and then yelling out Benghazi trying to focus on the fact that he's not actually sawing her in half. Or if we were at the Nuremberg trials and somebody whipped out and started playing a kazoo. This is so ridiculous. Rosie, I mean, I'm going to revoke the citizenship of someone I hate. Oh good. CNBC and CNN and Fox all fall for it and go there.

This is a tactic from the magicians and the GRU, flood the zone with bullshit, get them talking about anything else other than the following. If the president had gone down to an island of a wealthy man who loved to have parties and surrounded himself with famous people and three great parties and Trump partied and he said, I was an air and judgment I shouldn't have gone down, but he did not engage in the rape of children. America and his acolytes would accept that he has done a lot worse. People have forgiven him for, for, you know, things that are much worse than that. For rape of adults. Yeah. That's right. Fair point. They forgave him for the rape of an adult,

convicted for the rape of an adult. The line is children. So chances are, if he was just down there parting and an air of judgment, like a lot of very famous people have owned up to the market and the media and his, his cult would have moved on. But the fact that he has clearly instructed his AG to not let this list out. It reeks of something much more, much more nefarious, much more mendacious, much more serious. So he has handled this really poorly. He is creating so much smoke around this fire.

He's, it It's just staggering. And my favorite is when he, going back to Jerome Powell, when he threatened to replace Jerome Powell with Mike Lindell, it's like trying to defuse a bomb by duct taping it to your ex-wife. I mean, it's just, that's good Ed. You like that one. You'll get it. You'll get it. It'll have more meaning if you finally put a ring on it and then it doesn't work out seven or 10 years later. You'll get that joke. This is again, America, keep your eyes on the prize here.

This is Rosie Epstein. This is Chairman Jerome Epstein. You are being played. And my prediction here, you can bet in the next 24 hours, there's going to be another stupid, insane headline grabbing. He has a comms group right now and the instruction is simple. Come up with a headline every day that crowds out the word Epstein. Full stop.

That is entirely what this administration is focused on right now. Announce a 200% para up against my Animar. Say that you're going to ban David Hasselhoff from all future TV shows, whatever it is, it can be ridiculous. It can be stupid. Just make sure it doesn't have the word Epstein and all of media just follows it like the fucking idiots they are. Too much Ed? Too much?

No, I think that's some point. We're going to have to change the name of this podcast to the Epstein podcast. We need to really keep our eyes on the prize. We need to get focused. The Epstein files with Ed Elson. I love it. Okay Scott, enjoy your walk. Thanks for calling in. Cheers brother. Okay, Scott, enjoy your walk. Thanks for calling in. Cheers, brother. Asml shares plunged yesterday after the chip infrastructure company reported second quarter

earnings. The quarter showed a strong beat on both the top and the bottom lines. The dark spot, however, was the company's growth forecast for 2026, which according to the CEO could not be confirmed because of quote, increasing uncertainty driven by macroeconomic and geopolitical developments, end quote. As the call went on, it became clear that those macro concerns were indeed the tariffs and that is why they couldn't give a growth forecast. Shares in ASML fell nearly 10%. Okay, so ASML, one of the biggest AI companies in the world, has shed a tenth of its value in one day, one of the biggest drops of the week. And not because of the earnings, the earnings were

actually pretty great, but because of the CEO's concerns about the future, or more specifically, the macro environment, the geopolitics, the tariffs. Now, as a reminder, ASML is a Dutch company. They make the machines that make the chips that make AI, so they are in a way ground zero for the AI ecosystem, a great place to be right now. But as a Dutch company, it also leaves them quite exposed to the tariffs. And as you know, Trump just threatened a 30% tariff on Europe this week, which would have major implications for ASML. America makes up a significant share of their revenue, almost 20%. So if you slap a 30% tariff on Europe,

you're going to see a huge drop off in demand for those ASML machines that are indeed built in Europe. And so that is why yesterday on the earnings call, the CEO issued this warning. He is very worried about the tariffs and what those tariffs might do to the business. And that is also why we saw this huge sell off, because Wall Street saw his concern and that made them concerned too. And you know, fair enough, 30% tariffs would be terrible for this company. But there's also something missing here. And you might see where I'm headed with this. There is an elephant in the room that Wall Street seems to be ignoring on this news.

And that is the taco trade. The belief that these tariffs are just threats and that ultimately they're not actually going to happen. In fact, that is exactly what the market told us when Trump first made those tariff threats on Europe. We barely saw a reaction from the market, both in America and in Europe. Investors said, no, we've seen this movie before. We don't believe you.

So why is it that when Trump talked about tariffs, the market shrugged, but when the CEO of this Dutch lithography company talks about tariffs, suddenly the markets buy it? How could that be? Well, to be honest, we don't have an answer here. The market appears to be contradicting itself. On the one hand, it's saying Tarko, and then on the other hand, it's saying actually no, we believe it. The tariffs are real, but only for ASML. And so our conclusion here is that we might have some dislocation on our hands.

And as a result, we think this is probably a buying opportunity. Because if you believe that those EU tariffs will not hold as the markets have expressed, then there is no reason you should reverse that belief just because some executive in the Netherlands got freaked out. That's just not enough evidence to change your thesis. And in fact, if you look at ASML's earnings history, this is actually a company with a long track record of under promising and over delivering. They are frequently quite concerned about the future.

They are often expressing doubts about the macro environment. And at the same time, their earnings continue to impress every quarter. And that's exactly what we saw this quarter too. A major beat across every relevant metric from sales to margins to income. It was an excellent quarter for ASML. The only problem was that the CEO got spooked out by Trump's threats. So non-investment advice, blah blah blah. But if you are a believer in taco, then our thesis is that ASML just got put up for sale. As of market close on

Wednesday July 16th yesterday it is 8% off on ASML and for no other reason other than the CEO is buying into the tariff drama while the rest of America isn't. And that to us spells buying opportunity. After the break, what's really going on behind the scenes at the AI company, Windsurf. Stay with us. It's today explained what's going on, my boys, and in some cases, gals. Recently, one of you emailed us with this request.

You've got mail. Hello, I'm an avid listener, and I strongly believe you should cover the story of Curtis Yarvin. It's important to explore who he is and how he has influenced the MAGA and the Tech Bros movement. Curtis Yarvin is a very online far right philosopher whose ideas include the fascinating, the esoteric, the absurd, the racist and so on. Six months into the Trump administration, there's evidence that he is influencing the MAGA movement, and even President Trump.

JD Vance knows him and likes him. Elon consulted him about this third-party idea. Yarvin can take some credit for inspiring Doge. And as you'll hear ahead, one of Trump's most controversial, doesn't even begin to cover it, ideas may have come from Yarvin or someone who reads his sub stack. I can almost guarantee you that Trump does not. Everything's computer. Today Explained, weekday afternoons. Support for the show comes from public.com. You might already use AI tools to refine your emails and streamline your workflow. So why not see if it can optimize your investing

as well? For that, you can check out Public.com. Public.com is the investing platform that takes your money as seriously as you do. With Public, you can build a multi-asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, and more. You can also access industry-leading yields, including the 4.1% APY you can earn on your cash with no fees or minimums. What sets Public apart? AI isn't just a feature, it's woven into the entire experience. From portfolio insights to earnings call recaps, Public gives

you smarter context at every touchpoint. And the best part? You can earn up to $10,000 when you transfer your existing portfolio over to Public. Go to public.com slash ProvG to fund your account in five minutes. That's public.com slash ProvG. Paid for by Public Investing. All investing involves Hey, this is Peter Kafka, the host of Channels, a show about media and tech and what happens when they collide. And this may be hard to remember, but not very long ago, magazines were a really big deal. And the most important magazines were owned by Conde Nast, the glitzy publishing empire that's the focus of a new book by New York Times reporter Michael Grinbaum.

The way Conde Nast elevated its editors, the way they paid for their mortgages so they could live in beautiful homes, there was a logic to it, which was that Conde Nast itself became seen as this kind of enchanted land. You can hear the rest of our chat on channels, wherever you listen to your favorite media podcast. We're back with ProfG Markets. On Tuesday, we discussed the latest acquihire in Silicon Valley, Google's two and a half billion dollar deal to license the technology of an AI company called Windsurf and also take many of their top researchers

as well as their CEO. It was a highly dramatic event in the world of technology. For one, the company had just been acquired by OpenAI, though apparently that fell through. But also, it mirrored this theme that we keep seeing in AI, and that is the ever-growing overreach of Big Tech. From inflection to scale and now to Windsurf, Big Tech is paying billions to capture talent from the AI startup world,

to reorganize their structures, and in many cases, shut them down, all under the guise of investment. Now, there was another piece to this story that we didn't fully unpack on Tuesday. And that is, right after the Google deal was announced, Windsurf was suddenly scooped up and acquired by a separate company called Cognition. And although the price was not disclosed, Cognition bought everything that was left of Windsurf, the product, the IP, the remaining employees, and the brand as a whole.

A crazy twist in this already crazy story. And so we wanted to find out what happened here. Why was this AI company passed around from OpenAI to Google and now to Cognition? And what does all of this say about the future of AI? Well, joining us now to answer those questions is Jeff Wang, the CEO of Windsurf. Jeff Wang, thank you so much for joining me on ProfG Markets.

Thanks for having me back. Yeah, it's great to have you on. It's been an insane week for you, I'm sure. And I'm sure that there is a lot that you can't say, which I also want to be, I want to acknowledge. But to the best of your ability, Jeff, just give us the rundown. What happened this week? Yeah, I would say I walked into the office Tuesday last week, so about a week ago from filming. I was told, hey, you're running the company now.

And there's a lot of people that are also going to leave the company. And good luck. And on Friday, we have to tell everybody, right? So I had to kind of find the right people that were remaining to like continue running the company. And then Friday comes, we have to tell like 250 people the situation with the acquisition from Google. And you know, it was really tough. I mean, there was a lot of people that probably thought it was just all over. And I had to give like a very achievable kind of goal, right?

And a lot of people honestly didn't believe it. Uh, I had a lot of phone calls. In fact, I was on the phone like 24 hours after the all hands, just trying to find options, um, and then afterwards, uh, we talked to Scott Wu from a cognition, uh, as one of the options and, uh, he, it seemed like a perfect fit and we can get into that in a bit, um, but after that was a lot of just getting this done before Monday. Because time was our enemy here. Customers were already confused.

A lot of reps were panicking. Recruiters were reaching out to everybody in the company. So we can go into a little more detail, but on Monday, we announced that Cognition had acquired Windsurf. And we literally signed the paper 30 minutes before the all hands. Like we were just at the last minute and got the definitive agreement and I'm pleased to say that today it is officially all done.

Yeah, let me just tell you like the way that we see it, this whole, all the events that have unfolded. We kind of see it as there is this power struggle among big tech basically to capture the best AI startups and do that without triggering antitrust enforcement. And our view is that you guys, Windsurf, you were the object of that power struggle this week. From OpenAI trying to acquire you and then OpenAI disagreeing with Microsoft about the rights to your IP,

and then Google coming in, paying $2.5 billion to essentially take a bunch of your people. And it was all this sort of Shakespearean drama between the big tech giants to capture AI, not be scrutinized by the FTC. And then it ended with this kind of rabbit out of the hat masterstroke agreement that you appear to have brokered, which has allowed Windsurf to find a real home and a real backer in cognition.

That's sort of the way we've seen this. So is there anything in there that you would disagree with, that you would maybe amend or anything in there that you would want to comment on? I think one way to look at it is if you look at a startup, how valuable kind of the components are, right? And if you over index on the founders, maybe the founders are the most valuable piece of the startup. And if you look at VCs that that's certainly what they index on.

Um, then you can imagine a lot of big tech is going to go after the founders. Um, but I think people forget that the other components are also very valuable too. And if you have a team that is this good at what they do and the product is actually still there, we own everything still, we own the trademark, the IP and everything, the customer base, Um, it's still there. It's still very valuable. And then now you've kind of taken away all the investors and the founders off the cap table.

Actually, it's a very interesting like case study of like every, this is like now an employee owned company. And you could even think about like, okay, if the, if the investors or big tech over indexes on the founders, even the remainder of the company, everybody can be very happy, right? Even if there's a smaller valuation than when the founders left. So I think there's like two ways of looking at it. One is like, yeah, big tech is getting some really good talent, but they're not getting

everything there because everything that's still there is very valuable. Yes. But it is, it sounds like it is a war for talent that they have perhaps not executed to perfection because as you say, there's still a ton of talent that remains that they didn't get their hands on. They got their hands on a few people and perhaps that was an attempt to, in my view, it looks like they're trying to kind of get rid of the competition. But perhaps it didn't work out on this one. But I just want to pose another question to you. We've seen so many deals in AI that have told a very similar story to what's happened here.

We had Meta, investing in scale and then taking the CEO. We had Microsoft doing the same thing with Inflection and then the CEO of Inflection becomes the CEO of Microsoft AI. Google licensing, Character AI's business. This business of investing or licensing and then hiring a bunch of staff is becoming so common. I'm wondering if you think that that is sort of the future of deal-making in Silicon Valley.

Is this something that can, that we can learn from in terms of what acquisitions look like in tech moving forward? I think it's possible. I mean, as CEO, my duty was to maximize the value of the shareholders. And it just so happens that everybody at the company, you know, all the employees were the shareholders, right? So I think in some of the other cases, I don't know what their new CEO was thinking in their plan. Like maybe it is to just run a just normal business. You don't have to go 10x because

there's no VCs forcing you to. But for me, like my job is to find as many options as possible, talk to a lot of other companies that were actually interested, talk to some companies that wanted to just liquidate everything. But I think the whole like talking to Scott Wu and joining with Cognition and using Devin as part of the product, I think was just so obvious after speaking with them. And I think that's not going to be so obvious for a lot of other companies that this happens to. Right.

So I think it does depend on, I guess, what is left after the founders leave. Right. Um, if, if this secondary outcome can be achieved. Yeah. It almost feels like the AI startup world needs to join forces like you've done to take on big tech, that big tech is running around in a lot of ways, pillaging a lot of the value and a lot of the talent that lies in so many of these AI startups. And it kind of the only way to fight back

is for the AI startups to rally together and then compete with big tech. Is that an accurate depiction of what's happening here? It might be, but like the one barrier there is there are VCs involved in a lot of these startups and there are founders, right? And then if you join courses, the question is like who owns what, who's making the decisions. And I think in this case, it was just a very clear cut merger here in acquisition. But it might not always be the case if there's kind of two very famous AI startups that have very kind of like very well-known founders, uh, joining together. I think that's, that is an interesting, uh, kind of thing though. Yeah.

Well, you've, you've certainly almost pulled it off. Final question for me. Um, any big learnings from this insane experience you've gone through, um, what are you taking with you moving forward? I think, uh, just being relentless on finding the best solution is the main learning and sometimes that means you don't sleep for 72 hours. And that, that means like you, uh, you work together with the, you know, me and the cognition team, uh, and, and my team, of course, worked together in the offices

all weekend, uh, nonstop with each other and with the lawyers and, um, just having that drive to get to a solution and having a date. And when Scott Wu puts a date on something, that is going to happen. I will tell you that as him as a founder. I think the learning there is just, you have to be relentless at finding the best solution and you do everything in your power for what's right and for what's good for the employees. And I do think that this has been like a moment in history where maybe this may be the model going

forward. I certainly hope not, but I do understand like the situation like before and after, and I understand like the incentives. And then the question is like, will it always work out the way it did with how it did with us? Right. And it might not be the same for other companies in the future. Yeah. Well, we appreciate that. And I will let you know, Jeff, you look well rested today. So I'm glad you've gotten your sleep. Um, we really appreciate your time. Thanks for joining us on the show. Thanks for having me.

That was Jeff Wang, CEO of Windsor. Before we go, we'd like to play a clip from my other show, First Time Founders, where I interviewed both Jeff and his co-founder Varun Mohan almost a year ago. And I asked them in that interview how their company, then known as Kodium, could compete against Big Tech. You know, I try to think about what Harvard Business School would say 10 years from now for us as a company. And I tell people this, it's like, you know, we fail.

And what they write is, in a world in which technology was changing, Microsoft had all the distribution in the world. They had this property called GitHub. It was inevitable that they would win. Because of that, they won. They won the entire space. And all of these startups, it was a fool's errand. Why did they even try? And then the world in which we win, they were going to write. And all of these startups, it was a fool's errand. Why did they even try?

And then the world in which we win, they were going to write, in a world in which the technology was getting disrupted so materially, there were a set of companies, and one of which was Kodium, that had such a technological advantage that there was no way a slow moving gorilla like Microsoft could even compete.

So what I think is very hard. Yeah, exactly. They will write whatever the future looks like and the history will be written by the victor. And no one will know exactly what the pages of the book look like. Right. And I think the hardest part about a startup is you do need to be irrationally optimistic to believe that you can win. Because by default, if you don't, you will definitely lose. Well, late last week, it seemed like one of those versions of history was right.

Not with Microsoft, but with Google. Google was the victor. Google was writing the history. But perhaps not. Perhaps there is another version of history. Perhaps the startups actually can win. Fingers crossed. Okay, that's it for today.

Thank you for listening to Profgy Markets from the Vox Media Podcast Network. I'm Ed Elson. Join us tomorrow for our conversation with Monica DeBoe. You helped me in kind reunion.