QAA Podcast - Episode 113: The Second QAnon Purge: Mutation feat Marc-André Argentino

Episode Date: October 13, 2020

On the ground at a soft-QAnon rally and in the ether of digital space, QAnon is mutating before our eyes. In light of intensifying mainstream media attention and a sweeping ban of QAnon content on Fac...ebook and other platforms, we traveled to a "Save the Children" rally to speak to QAnon followers. A media circus ensued around our old friend and "Save the Children" organizer Scotty The Kid. We also spoke to disinformation researcher Marc-André Argentino about how the bans will continue to change QAnon in the near future. ↓↓↓↓ SUBSCRIBE FOR $5 A MONTH SO YOU DON'T MISS THE SECOND WEEKLY EPISODE ↓↓↓↓ https://www.patreon.com/QAnonAnonymous Follow Marc-André: https://twitter.com/_MAArgentino QAA Merch / Join the Discord Community / Find the Lost Episodes / Etc: https://qanonanonymous.com Episode music by Doom Chakra Tapes (https://doomchakratapes.bandcamp.com) and Nick Sena (https://nicksenamusic.com)

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 What's up QAA listeners? The fun games have begun. I found a way to connect to the internet. I'm sorry, boy. Welcome listener to Chapter 113 of the QAnon Anonymous podcast, the great QAnon Purge of 2020 episode. As always, we are your host, Jake Rakatansky, Julian Field, and Travis Vue. This week we are attempting to answer the question.
Starting point is 00:00:30 happens when you ban a conspiracy theory like QAnon on major social networks. We traveled both out into the world to our recent Save the Children's soft Q&N rally in Los Angeles and down the rabbit hole to find out how our Q&N friends were balancing their new responsibilities in light of their entrance into the mainstream. This is a tricky one for them. On one hand, they must continue to spread the word about the child eating cabal, but on the other they've been given clear instructions by Q to obscure the origin of their beliefs, which of course is Q&ONON.
Starting point is 00:00:58 more, these Q followers have now participated in multiple cycles of social media censorship and media attention. They are changing, adapting, and attempting to preempt what they see as mainstream media's unfair portrayal of them. Our guest this week is Mark Andre Argentino. He's a radicalization researcher and a PhD candidate at Concordia. But before all that, QAnon News. First up, I have Q-pilled Customs and Border Protection Officer busted for violent threats. One of the worst types of people to become pill. Absolutely.
Starting point is 00:01:33 This was first reported by Justin Rolich for The Daily Beast. According to charges filed in New Jersey, CBP officer Alberto Almeida was arrested after allegedly threatening an agency higher up over a litany of imaginary crimes. Honestly, accusing the boss is pretty funny and great. Yeah, right? I'm with this guy, you know. Almeida accused CBP assistant port director Ed Fox
Starting point is 00:01:58 of being involved in both the Epstein Ring and 9-11 which got to say that is quite a criminal if you're involved in all of that. It seems like you'd want to bring one up first and then just keep the other one for down the line or something. Yeah, this guy is like basically the shredder operating all major crimes. One post on Almeda's Facebook page towards Fox
Starting point is 00:02:16 is reminiscent of the classic Navy SEAL copy pasta. On September 28th, Almeida posted this. time I come to Newark Airport, I am bringing Donald Trump and the U.S. military down on your fucking head for your involvement in Hillary slash Maxwell slash Epstein's child trafficking ring and 9-11. You fucking treasonous pedophile. Trump takes down Hillary, JFK Jr., U.S. military, takes down the Mossad, and I take you down, bitch.
Starting point is 00:02:44 That's how this worked. TikTok. Hashtag, where we go one, we go all. Wow, that is some furious posting. Yeah. Intense. Now, there are two things I think they're very notable here. First of all, we have talked about Q and on cops before, but this is the first report I've seen of a federal officer who is deeply pilled. Yeah, I mean, we all agree that CBP assistants are, and I quote, treasonous pedophiles, but this is, you know, I mean, feels like the pot calling the kettle black. And the second thing is that apparently this guy is a JFK Jr. lives guy who thinks JFK Jr. is in charge of the military.
Starting point is 00:03:19 That rules. I mean, I always thought that the JFK Jr. lives, QN on people. They were, like, horny grandmods. They were mostly harmless, right? I like the JFK Jr. A guy who spent his whole life doing, like, fashion magazines and, like, hanging out on yachts. Yeah. They're just like, this guy can't wait for fucking military executions.
Starting point is 00:03:35 He wants to put it all in place. He's actually an opportunity. Right after he has, like, you know, 30 to 35 years of gala's and just mostly just has fun with hot women everywhere. For my next story, Citigroup fires tech executive who ran QMap. pub. So Citigroup announced that it had fired Jason Galinas, the developer responsible for the QDrop aggregator site, QMAP.Pub. The site, which is where most QAnon followers research QDrops, was taken offline after a report from Logically.aI revealed the identity of Galinas. A spokesperson for Citigroup said, quote, as outlined in our code of conduct, employees are required to disclose and obtain approvals for outside business activities. A recent investigative report from Bloomberg Business Week revealed that Gleinas wasn't always a conspiracy cuck.
Starting point is 00:04:23 Yeah, he used to be a heartless banking piece of shit. Yeah, just an amoral banker. CUNN softened him up. Yeah, which is great. And actually, they're their job creators, so we got to kiss him. Apparently, he was a senior vice president at Citigroup in the company's technology department where he led an AI project and oversaw a team of software developers. So this is really interesting. Apparently, he's a sharp guy, and he's ambitious, and he's probably really well off, but he still got crazy cue-pilled.
Starting point is 00:04:52 He was a registered Democrat in the run-up to the 2008 election, but apparently something happened to him after Obama's election. Galinas would become agitated when the topic of Obama came up, sometimes referring to the then-president as the Antichrist. He started consuming right-wing conspiracy theories, and this led him to swelwing Pisa Gate and then QAnon. So just the... The election of Obama just fully radicalized him. Yeah, like many. And if it didn't by the beginning, if you're a lefty, it did by the end. For my next story, actress Kirstie Alley appears to support QAnon in a series of tweets.
Starting point is 00:05:28 Some of the worst pen tweets I've seen on the internet. Oh, yeah, she's a maniac. Just terrible at writing on top of it all. Now, for our younger listeners, Kirstie Halley was pretty famous in the 80s and 90s. She was starred in the sitcom Cheers And then also lots of movies Like look who's talking Yes, look who's talking
Starting point is 00:05:47 Yes, look who's talking Is a series of films Where babies are voiced By I believe Bruce Willis Voices is one of the babies That sounds right Well, I think it's just one baby in the first And then he gets a sister in the second movie
Starting point is 00:06:02 And then the third one is look who's talking now And this is the dogs begin to talk So this is I want to cage you both I want to cage you, and I want to cage you. I want you both locked. In one tweet, she posted, where we go one, we go all, American flag emoji. I like it.
Starting point is 00:06:21 I mean, just incomprehensible. Does she like America? Does she like QAnon? Not clear. Does she like just the phrase? Now, in subsequent posts, she claimed to be unaware of Q&on, claiming at one point that she had only posted the motto because she thought, quote, it sounded like something the Marines would say. despite that she continued to share positive comments regarding the conspiracy theory she also claimed that cue haters were acting hideous in her comments
Starting point is 00:06:49 oh babe were they saying you were going to be hung in gitmo because that's what the other side's doing now christie alley famously became a member of the church of scientology in 1979 so it seems like she was already pretty softened up for this kind of ideology she's already down the rabbit hole this is just a sort of a side step for her But she is really late to the party. I mean, Roseanne, she was the OG. Yeah, as far as celebrity endorsements go. I mean, this one seems just as weird and bumbling where you're like, how do they end up?
Starting point is 00:07:18 Why did you get this information? Why do you care now? It's like someone they're having wine with that night. After posting the Q content, Allie followed up with a string of tweets in which she claimed that, quote, a vote for Biden as a vote for socialism and accused Nancy Pelosi of being evil and a witch, which was misspelled. She spelled it with an extra E at the end. Draw the line, QAnon Rally in Hollywood.
Starting point is 00:07:42 I found myself at 9.30 a.m. in the passenger seat of Travis's car, heading west once more to cover a rally. To be clear, L.A. now seems to have a revolving schedule of events, launched by a variety of groups like Child Lives Matter and Stop Kid, the newly founded company of one Scotty the Kid, who, if you remember, was the central organizer of the July 30th, 2020 worldwide Q&ONRallies. Scottie had gone dormant after a period of fighting a two-front war against both people in his old circles worried about his Q beliefs,
Starting point is 00:08:11 and QAnon influencers who were not keen to allow him into their club, due to his many pizza tattoos, among other things, mostly just bullshit cloud stuff. But truthfully, Scotty was only reloading. Because this time, his team of volunteers were entirely decked out in yellow shirts with a stop kidding logo, which is his fucking company logo. So he's now branding, it's no longer like Save the Children, it's like my organization's logo is now on the T-shirt.
Starting point is 00:08:34 No, he's launching a Q&N franchise. Exactly, something like that. And it was a large group of people in yellow that we spotted as we first got off the highway and found parking near the Netflix building, which was the rallying point for participants that day. Free stop kidding t-shirts were being handed out to anyone who'd wear one, and there was a merch stand with embroidered caps that said, save the children. I bought one for Travis and I thinking it might be a memento to hang in the foam palace, but after donning it and milling around, I realized I had inadvertently gone undercover again.
Starting point is 00:09:04 That's how easy it is, baby. The crowd was chatty, friendly, and almost entirely maskless. We were in N95, so that somebody, people were respectful. They never brought it up. Across the street, another merch table had been set up to sell Trump and MAGA hats. The crowd was very diverse, as usual, with overwhelming Hispanic representation, including a young boy who was destined to become a star that day. Since things were barely getting started and I was feeling a little loose,
Starting point is 00:09:28 I just kind of went straight up to Scotty the kid and started talking to him. Are you Scottie the kid, by the way? Yeah, what's up, man? I'm so glad to meet you, man. Nice to meet you, man. How are you? I'm good. I'm good. Just showing up, man. It's like a few of these. I didn't know if you were going to put any on. There were that other group that was doing some, too. I got censored this last two weeks.
Starting point is 00:09:44 Yeah, yeah. Yeah, yeah. We all did. Yeah. So we all got censored. So, you know, it's almost like unpredictable based on what's going to happen. Because usually there's like, you know, we'll see, there was like hundreds and over a thousand at the last one. Clearly, I was in. Scotty did not consider me media at all. He would be speaking to me. me and around me as if I were an ally for the rest of the event. And he was excited to tell me stuff too. I asked him to explain the name of his event, draw the line, but he quickly veered into his content creation goals for the day and his fantastic relationship with the cops.
Starting point is 00:10:20 Do you want to tell me a bit about drawing the line? Yeah, so for drawing the line basically is, you know, it's the, it's the motto that's always like, hey, when enough is enough, it's time to draw the line and let people know that this is wrong or whatever. Obviously, that's a very common motto. And so we're thinking we could figuratively and literally draw the line on Netflix, on mainstream media, CNN, stuff like that. So what we're doing is we're all out here. We're going to collect in a group.
Starting point is 00:10:49 We're going to draw a line in front of Netflix. Hold it, hit the drone, show us in front of Netflix in a single file line standing there like, yo, this is enough. Then we're going to march down to CNN. Then we're going to group there again, get in a straight line, take the drone shot. We're talking about media. We're talking about the implementation of pedophilia through media, through Netflix, all of that. So basically, I have people in yellow shirts or volunteers. I know.
Starting point is 00:11:16 They're really all organized when we came. It was all yellow. Yes, yeah. So I'm just, we're trying to get as many people, obviously, as much awareness as possible. The captain of the Hollywood Police Division came and spoke to me directly. Ryan S. Bixler. What a name. Yeah, right?
Starting point is 00:11:31 And he came down. He said that they're sending out a service. squad to protect us in our First Amendment and really good energy, good people. The cops are great. They've been protecting us and we'll continue. And he was saying how, you know, he was like thankful that we were all kind of as peaceful as we are. He's like, we've never heard anything bad from you guys. And we're, and you know, we have all the right to do this and we're here to let you know that we got you. I was like, awesome. If he's not lying, that's so fucked up. Um, he, he may be lying about what exactly the cop said, but the reason that I knew the
Starting point is 00:12:07 cop's name before him in that clip is because he was holding his business card out to me. Yes, that's why you not so subtly just decided to say his full name out loud for the record. That's right, because I didn't know if I was going to see it again and I wasn't taking a photo of it. So I just said it right there and then, and nothing fucking happened. I love it. So anyways, uh, don't look into him. That would be wrong.
Starting point is 00:12:29 He did stay in constant contact with a. group of bike police that followed us around everywhere to the delight of all Q&O followers who fucking love the cops. Scotty was being asked for by one of his volunteers at that point, and I could see him kind of inching away from me. I quickly asked him about the bulletproof vest he was wearing. One last thing, or is that a bulletproof vest? Yeah.
Starting point is 00:12:49 Are you in danger? No, I'm not, but I'm also a warrior for the children. And so in a sense, that's mainly what it's for. I have had a couple of people on the internet threatened me, but I'm also not I'm not scared of somebody who prays on kids. Yeah, of course. So he was just as boltproof vass as aesthetic
Starting point is 00:13:11 because I'm like a warrior. He's a warrior. He's what they wear. Yeah. Also, some people have threatened me online, you know, but they're pedophile, so I'm not scared of them. He probably just saw Kanye wear the, you know, the flack jacket at that one thing was like,
Starting point is 00:13:22 oh, that's cool, man, I want that. I think it's a fashion thing for sure. And now I've got something real special for you, boys. feeling that he was escaping my grasp. I went for broke. Would you just say hello to the listener? Yes. Scottie the Kid,
Starting point is 00:13:35 QAA listener. What is your called? QAAA. Yeah, QAAA. QAA is that the name of your show? CUNN on America. QAA. We have like a small YouTube channel.
Starting point is 00:13:45 We're still going on it. Okay. Okay. What's up, you guys? This is Scottie the Kid and you're listening to QAAA. Thanks, man. We got to appreciate it. The content gods have a good life. have parted their clouds
Starting point is 00:13:59 for yee. I can't believe it, man. He's seen me at every single one, but still I guess is not put together who I am. I hope he doesn't ever He also must not have like a Google alert search for his name. Scottie smokes a lot of weed, I think. I don't know if he stopped, but
Starting point is 00:14:15 he used to smoke a lot of weed. Maybe he's just, you know, nothing wrong with that. Comfortably baked, baby. Yeah, I encourage that. Looking back, I'm glad I had an intimate moment with Scottie early because the entire vibe was about to get really fucked. The sky was over forecast and cars were zooming by or idling at the crosslight. The messages on the signs and t-shirts started jangling my thoughts.
Starting point is 00:14:36 Fags for Trump, one man, were proudly on his chest. BLM said another guy's sign, spelling it out as Biden loves minors. Two pasty white, strange-looking men in their 20s were decked out in disturbing images for their homemade movie called Hurtcore. They would later explain to the media that it was a short film about a family of pedophiles who make child pornography, to the confusion of most of the other acute-on-fall. Nonetheless, they partook joyfully and all the Q&on chants and stuff, while also promoting their incredibly weird movie.
Starting point is 00:15:04 I looked up Hurtcore later, and apparently it's a real term used for what is essentially the most extreme child pornography out there, involving torture and even murder. I did not know that before, and I really wish I had known that before I entered it into Google. But, oh well, a woman was holding a large sign out to passing cars that just said, honk if you're not a pedophile. That seems like a trap bet. Yeah, it doesn't.
Starting point is 00:15:27 And then, just like that, the scene descended into a hellish game of capture countercapture. A CNN crew, an undercover documentary maker, multiple reporters, a Twitch streamer, and a major YouTuber all started swooping through the small crowd, grabbing interviews where they could. I estimate there were about 100 honest participants and perhaps 25 rubber-necking liars like Travis and I. This 4-to-1 ratio of believers to impostors made the event feel like a surreal piece. of community theater. Interrupting the multiple simultaneous interviews were two separate individuals emitting long trumpeting sounds from a conch and a kudu horn, which did not help keep my mind tethered to reality at all. But that's what you can hear in all those recordings. It's not honking. There's actually also a
Starting point is 00:16:12 conch and a kudu horn. It's just great stuff. As I beheld the scene, it became clear to me that the QAnon followers had become more versed in a crude form of counterintelligence. I watched their faces grow concentrated as they engaged in long, winding answers, or challenge the interviewer's framing. And leaning into them, the breathless content crews attempting to pump them for the wildest possible answers. The whole thing was fucking tawdry. My brain detached and started floating above the scene in the choked gray sky. What the fuck were we doing here? What unholy packed had humanity signed to gather these 125 people to do this exact thing on this exact Saturday in history right beside one of the biggest highways in Los Angeles? I felt
Starting point is 00:16:53 fucking nauseous. To understand the situation properly, I realized I would have to find the cracks in the crowd, where I might temporarily become one with them and capture what they were speaking about among themselves when they felt no mainstream media was watching. But I also reasoned that I was going to have to take a step back and observe the entire circus at work, impostors included, to understand the dynamics at play. Earlier you heard Scotty explain that the media was there. He was referring to the broader group, but especially important among them was the CNN
Starting point is 00:17:20 crew, which included disinformation reporter Donio Sullivan. A camera guy, and two relatively subtle security guards. As they made their way through the crowd interviewing people, you could feel pockets of upheaval directed at them. At one point, a woman stepped between O'Sullivan and his security guard, and she was physically blocked from doing so. This led to a small crowd chasing CNN down the block towards me. You can hear them getting riled up.
Starting point is 00:17:42 Nobody talks to these people. They're getting physical. Right here. Don't talk to them. They'll talk to them. Nobody talked to them. They're talking about it. I mean...
Starting point is 00:17:54 Get out of here! Get out of here! Get out! Get out! Get out! Get out! Go! Go!
Starting point is 00:18:12 Go! I thought it was my boyfriend, but he brought, no. It's a big man. The United is a propaganda news network. They need to get lost. They worked for the Clinton News Network. Communist News Network. We'll be at your bathing.
Starting point is 00:18:36 Oh, there. It's a middle later. So you can feel just the pure madness. Wow. That was the louder chase, but they had a few mini chases like that where everyone kind of shuffled down the block with each other, screaming. No one really wanted to fight. The mob eventually chilled out.
Starting point is 00:18:52 CNN resumed interviews, but they would be hounded a few more times in that style. After an extremely weird speech in which Scotty explained to people that Netflix and the California school system's sexual education classes were molesting children's minds and causing 10-year-olds, and this is in his words, to want to give head to older men. Just... What? I urged my mind to not dwell on this argument too long, lest I lose it entirely. That's when I saw the child with the megaphone.
Starting point is 00:19:19 He looked about seven years old. And this was the moment that would turn him into the de facto leader of Scotty's march. Save our children. Save our children. Save our children. Save our children. Save our children. Save our children.
Starting point is 00:19:43 Save our children. Save our children. So what bizarre hell world have we entered into. Scottie spotted the kid and immediately was like, you're going to be the leader of this. And so they were kind of like leading the rally together and doing the chance. And then there was a moment where they were doing it
Starting point is 00:19:59 into each other's faces with megaphones, which was interesting. They had strapped the kid with a megaphone. So good stuff, good stuff, normal stuff. Meanwhile, CNN had been chased around a bit more, called fake news and finally landed an interview with Scotty, who quickly found himself flanked by two supporters with signs. One said, if we start hanging pedophiles in the street now,
Starting point is 00:20:18 they will make great Halloween decorations. The other was a compendium of images including supposed child victims of John Pedesta, a claim that Monsters Inc. is about child trafficking and adrenochrome harvesting, a giant cue, and an overweight Cholo Pepe wearing a cross, pointing a pistol at the head of an adult baby version of WoJack, sitting in a puddle of urine and labeled Petto, which was one of the weirder fucking images that I saw. They took a sort of a lower tier 8-chan meme and just printed it out and then put it on a poster board.
Starting point is 00:20:49 Donie O'Sullivan, the CNN reporter, used the word debunked about something Scotty brought up, and that really stirred him up and his entire entourage. Soon there was a debate about reality going on between O'Sullivan and Scotty, the kid. Facts are facts. Journalism is a part of the American spirit. People are researching for themselves. And again, we're talking about the reference of information that you're going off from being like, oh, that's debunked.
Starting point is 00:21:13 That's controlled, manipulated information anyway. In all is. It all is. I mean, come on, my Instagram said Biden's not. wearing a wire and it said I can see the wire popping out and it says specifically so it's like the fact checkers are so we're all complicit the fact checker just yesterday because he's here in LA who did that for which company there's label right you know he said he did it on a super zoom that was a crease in the shirt right sure you don't believe that no not even a little
Starting point is 00:21:43 not a second a crease of a shirt is straight not hurt it's not I'm not an idiot at this point if you think I'm gonna buy Honestly, I don't really care about Biden wearing an earpiece. I just... Right, right, right, right. Of course, no, I understand what you're saying. And like, at the same time, I have my own feelings on that, but we're not talking about that. We're talking about kids. So that's ultimately what I'm just...
Starting point is 00:22:06 I really appreciate your time. Scotty dodged the Q&on stuff, explaining that he represents Save the Children. But there's been a crackdown on that, too. So O'Sullivan asked Scottie what he had to say to the social media platforms censoring his movement. his movement oh you can you can try to silence us with the more you silence us is the more proof that we are doing something that is right that is helping because why would you silence people trying to help children literally why think about that for one day why would you try to silence somebody that is trying to save a child what do you have to say to that that's the classic
Starting point is 00:22:36 q and on line yeah over the target basically yeah yeah right first of all is playing dumb is playing dumb about the connection between save the children in qanon and then saying that by censoring me you are okay, we're over the target, we're on the right path, and also you are pro-petophile. It's, I hate it because it's so sticky, because it feels like I have to re-educate them over and over again. No, Save the Children is clearly a Q-Anon thing. They were chanting where we go one,
Starting point is 00:23:01 we go all at one point during the rally. I mean, there was one woman there who's wearing a Q-Non shirt and then leggings that said Q-C-U-E on one leg and then 17 on the other leg. Yeah. This was a Q-N-on rally. A giant Blackhammer showed up that had, We-R-Q on the front of it, and the Great Awakening on the side.
Starting point is 00:23:19 Yeah, it's like, it's like, the idea is like, is real frustrating gaslighting where they pretend like, oh, this isn't a QAnon thing. We just welcome everyone. Shut the fuck up. Speaking of which, O'Sullivan comments on Scotty's discipline in staying away from QAnon references as he promotes it subtly.
Starting point is 00:23:35 Scottie pivots to their supposed fondness for Biden supporters. You are very much sticking to the issue. But I'm saying, though, sometimes it devolves so quickly. Again, Biden's crew could come down here and support us. Open arms. Open arms. Open arms.
Starting point is 00:23:49 Open arms. Yeah. It's about the kids. There is no hate in this. That's the most beautiful part about this movement. What is the hate in wanting to help a child? None. How can you have any hate when you're trying to...
Starting point is 00:24:01 We're here to help children. We're happy, sharing, love, enjoying each other. Trump's words, finance words, whatever. These conversations really reveal the metagame being played by Q&On promoters and the media, both adapting to each other in this unending joust. But I've got something even more interesting on tape. I've got Scottie the kid talking to to his sign-carrying friends directly after the CNN interview.
Starting point is 00:24:21 And I think the conversation makes it pretty clear what's going on. You know, I'm with you. You know, I'm with you, but that's why I let y'all do that. I have to be the front run. You did the right thing. Oh, thank you. I don't trust them. I won't interview with them, but I'm just behind you going.
Starting point is 00:24:37 Exactly. So, Trump, let's mind you. You said the right thing. Because that's the movement. Like, it's about the kids. Right, right. And then her being like, you can make up your mind about this. Exactly.
Starting point is 00:24:45 I said, maybe she's on something. Maybe she's not. It's up. It's up to you to go find out. Well, how are they going to edit? How are they going to cut it? That's a question. I don't know.
Starting point is 00:24:52 I'm kind of scared now. I know. I told him like, every time you're like, I don't care for Biden support. I don't care for Biden. Just come down here and support the stuff. I think someone do sometimes. How many times you had to say that? I'm like, they wanted to be about Tom's.
Starting point is 00:25:03 So fucking bad. And we pulled it on them. And we pulled it on them. Yeah. It's really clever. Like how much of their hatred for the mainstream media is totally performative because really they see the mainstream media as an opportunity to spread their message. so they're welcome to have the cameras pointed at them.
Starting point is 00:25:19 It seemed very important for everyone there to pretend Trump wasn't part and parcel of their movement's belief system. Here's another guy who was politely harassing the CNN reporter for a bit. He explained that CNN was trying to push a specific narrative to me afterwards. And their narrative is that this is a Trump rally.
Starting point is 00:25:34 It is not a Trump rally. There was one gentleman out of the whole crowd that had a MAGA hat. Only one person. But people were selling MAGA hats at the beginning and then all the people rolled by and then people cheered. The whole MAGA convoy.
Starting point is 00:25:46 The people were cheering because the people were honking their horns. I'll be confronting him along the way, and it's really quite funny. You'll see. But, yeah, he's, this one had been thinking about this a lot, and he knew all the different words he wanted to use or whatever. So I had to be a bit, I was like on his side, but I was also pushing him a bit, like, oh, what about that? Like some dumbass who just looks up and sees a contradiction and goes, well, oh, I guess you
Starting point is 00:26:10 want to address that, sir. But he was quite friendly overall. He did really harass the CNN guy, like the same thing. security stepped in. I asked him if he'd experienced the recent banhammer. He claimed to me that a DM of his, a meme about FBI child trafficking statistics, had been flagged and deleted by Instagram because it contained misleading information. Then I brought up Q's recent instruction to go stealth. And so Q recently said that we should all go kind of, I guess, kind of stealth, stop mentioning Q and Q and on and just focus more on the issues themselves. Have you been
Starting point is 00:26:40 respecting that online or do you think it's like whatever, you know? Again, I'm not, adherent to Trump, to Q, to Black Lives Matter, to any political organization. QAnon is actually not a political organization. No, no, no. But it's a guy who sends the messages, right? Or an organization of probably military operation. As far as QNon goes, that's not in my wheelhouse. I know a lot about Q&N, but I don't have a position on it.
Starting point is 00:27:12 And the reason I'm not a position on it is because I'm focused entirely on child trafficking and saving children. I don't care. I don't care where your background is from. I don't care your politics. If you are for saving children, then I welcome you into the movement and to help support it. Are you from here in L.A.? Yes, I am. Now QAnon does talk extensively about the child trafficking issue. Right. So people would say that the Q&A movement is an ally. Be that as it may, a lot of people with a lot of people who wear blue jeans happen to care about saving children. A lot of people with 10 fingers and 10 toes care about saving children. Does that mean that this is somehow a 10 finger movement, you know?
Starting point is 00:28:04 Just because a certain group happens to have an idea. ideology that coincides, what we're doing, does not mean that we are the same. And CNN is trying to do that. They're trying to conflate Trump movement. They're trying to conflate the Q&A movement. They're trying to conflate anything they can to smear the child saving movement. Right. Why are they trying to smear the child's, the child protection? Why are they trying to silence us about sex trafficking? Why? That's a good question. That's what I'd like to know. My theory? My theory? Now, this is just my theory. I'm not asserting this as fact. But the oligarchs, the people in charge, the puppet masters, if you will, whatever you want to call them.
Starting point is 00:28:49 They indirectly control all media, either through friendships with the board members or direct ownership. So that is the most euphemized version of Q&ON, and he goes back and forth. I know a lot about it. It's not in my wheelhouse. Yeah, he sounds like he is. he is deeply immersed in the Qaeda stuff, but it seems like he decided the best way that
Starting point is 00:29:14 Qadon has too much baggage, and he decided that like this sort of, this pipeline into his ideology is best expressed, just save the children. Just focus on that. Then we had a somewhat amusing back and forth about CNN and the Trump supporter issue. CNN is here today, and I'm shocked.
Starting point is 00:29:30 They sent somebody, but what I feel is going on is damage control. Oh, okay. Because they can't stop this. They thought would go away right we've only gotten bigger and now and now they they let's see he's talking with him yeah now they did they what they want to do is they want to control the narrative they want to move the overton window and that's what that guy was doing so he talks to people he talks to one person out of like 100 who's a trump guy and then he says oh this is a trump
Starting point is 00:29:58 movement he paints his trump movement so then they're going to go on the news tonight and they're going to say trump trump uh instigators i mean i see trump saving babies from hillory on this yeah well i see a guy of blue you jeans. Is this a blue jeans movement? I see a guy with short hair. Is this a short hair people's movement? It's a false equivalency. It's on the sign. Right, but it doesn't matter. So the guy supports Trump. What does that have to do with anything? He thinks Trump's saving the children from the pedos. That's what he thinks. But so that's connected, right? No, it's not. I mean, that's what his opinion. I mean, I have an opinion
Starting point is 00:30:28 and I could, I can think that, um, I could think that CNN is complicit in trying to and trying to keep this information suppressed. Does that mean that I'm right? No. Does that mean that this is a CNN, is a suppressor evil guy movement? No. Just because I believe that
Starting point is 00:30:49 does not define this movement. This movement is defined by these words, Child Lives Matter, Save Our Children. That's what defines this movement. It is not, you've got people from all walks of life here. Young, old? Is this a young people's movement? No.
Starting point is 00:31:03 Is this an old people's movement? No. is this a people from L.A. movement? No. Yes, you have people from all walks of life, all Gio drop the regions. Those do not make what we are. So if you have a guy with
Starting point is 00:31:16 Trump supporter, that's a side issue that does not define us. And that's what I've been trying to say. Thank you, dude. Thank you for speaking to me. God bless. Man, he sounds really on the verge of tears at the thought of being misunderstood about what he's about. Yeah. To me, he kind of sounds like a guilty Trump supporter.
Starting point is 00:31:33 I mean, he's 100% of Trump supporter. reporter yeah everybody there was yeah of course of course everybody was obfuscation this was an entire dance that he was doing with words to even even when it came time to say elites he took that back and said uh and then he stopped he pulled it back and he said like the puppet masters of sorts like he's using just even if the words themselves are clearly conspiracy words he just doesn't want to use the exact words that the QAnon followers are using because he knows you've been reading the profiles about it on CNN or whatever that say that's what the movement does and And sounds like an intelligent enough guy that he knows, he knows that if he's associated with Q and on, that that's a net negative for maybe his image or, you know, could potentially affect future work.
Starting point is 00:32:18 Yeah, exactly. And I think, yeah, Travis's frustration is palpable, you know, because this is the new breed. They're going to know where you're going to come at them from. And they're going to just make you tired, basically, through their arguments. No, I mean, obviously, they're, they're learning how to hide their power level. more aggressively under increasingly large number of layers of obfuscation. It was kind of hard to fully grasp how the Q people felt about the CNN crew's presence. So I asked Scotty directly.
Starting point is 00:32:47 So are you guys broadly happy that CNN showed up or would you rather have not? We'll see how they edit it. Yeah. We'll see how they edited it. Yeah. You know, we'll see if they kept it real. Let's see, has this been doing? It seemed to be going well. Thank you.
Starting point is 00:32:58 And of course, we all know. What's up? That could be like twisted. And that's what I tried my best. That's why I tried to. So he says, we all know. What's up? So they know they're talking about it right behind the people's backs right after they do
Starting point is 00:33:10 their dances. You know, they're like, how did you get out? Like, how was your media appearance, you know? Yeah. So even though they're doing it clumsily and many people were just openly supporting Q, you can sense that a portion of the population is turning to these new tactics. I also spoke to a blonde woman who appeared to be in her late 30s, early 40s, who would come with her gray Mercedes SUV and a sign explaining that, quote,
Starting point is 00:33:31 pedophilia will bring down the royal family, the CIA, the deep state, the Vatican, in Hollywood. She was among Scotty's entourage when they spoke to CNN, and the reporter eventually asked her a few questions directly. I asked her how she thought it had gone afterwards. Well, we'll see when the edit come, when the chop job comes up. I don't know, but we'll see. I think it went pretty well. You think Scottie did a good job representing the movement? Oh, him? Yeah, I love Scotty. But I hate it to interject, but I feel like I needed to, because there's points there that needed to be said that could help, you know, solidify his message. So, yeah.
Starting point is 00:34:05 But you don't trust the CNN guy? Fuck. I'm kidding me? I caught the CNN guy taking a picture at the very back of the march, and I ran up to him, and I go, hey, hey, hey, if you want a real picture, go to the front of the march and take the picture. Why are you getting a picture of the back? I think it's interesting. You're going to do, this is why we don't believe you, and this is why you guys are a hack job.
Starting point is 00:34:28 And then I said, I go to him, I said, I go, isn't it funny that we've been shadowed vans, this event this is one of our smallest turnouts the second event that we had for this uh like 1500 people okay this they shadow ban us and then i go isn't an interesting CNN that all of a sudden you show up after we know we've been shadow ban i know because i have instagram and i have i was moving up like this in my following and then all of a sudden i'm not even getting any likes today or yesterday so something's up with an algorithm past few days so yeah i called out CNN and that's i think it's our important. People like me, I don't care what people think about me, really. So I just do me and I try to spread the truth. So you can hear her say 1,500 people. Scotty earlier said
Starting point is 00:35:15 1,000. Definitely no more than 4 or 500 that day. The situation grew more surreal as the Twitch streamer and YouTube guys asked Scottie to rap and he laid down some bars from his latest track, which, as you guessed, is about child trafficking. Day by day, I started to notice the way they used COVID to control us. It started with with a mass that happened fast took away our smiles just like that yeah the awakening is so evident because of all the evidence manipulated rhetoric this is now this is now the end of it baby blood for benefit mass manipulation of our generation starting with our nation no more waiting y'all are getting flagrant buying selling babies raping on our children afterwards you kill
Starting point is 00:35:54 the truth is out and that's a fact the false flags will no longer distract now the cat is out the bag night life on its last media will no longer cover your ass Adrenachrome rap. Fantastic stuff. Adrina rap. Yeah. Scott, he's going in a great direction. One notable moment was when a small march of BLM protesters,
Starting point is 00:36:13 who the Q people had whispered about as Antifa prior to their arrival, so I kept hearing whispers with you. Oh, Antifa's like a block away, blah, blah, blah. And I was like, I can see them. But yeah, finally they arrived and it was just a small march of BLM protesters. And they walked by with real drums and better chanting. And it basically just turned the Q people mute until they were half a block away from them. at which point a single guy desperately yelled,
Starting point is 00:36:35 Child Lives Matter into a bullhorn, and everyone pretended basically nothing had happened at all. So incredibly anticlimactic confrontation with their big evil group, who really didn't even glance at them much. They just walked by, might have been confused by some of the signs they saw, but they had actual business to take care of.
Starting point is 00:36:53 I'm going to put the extended clip of the sound from this, starting with music that's happening at the rally. It's like cranberries, I think, or something like that. It's like a big tune, then you hear BLM arriving and I go towards them. And so I'll put that all of that in the auto queue for you. That's right. Another thing that happened was a very much planned drive-by in support of a young black
Starting point is 00:37:13 mega politician running for governor and of course Donald J. Trump. The honking was fucking out of control. There were flags everywhere. Some cars were playing music as well. And all the media people started hanging out the windows, attempting to get interviews with these sunglasses wearing lunatics, just fucking screaming from their open windows. Besides the march from Netflix to CNN, led by Scottie and someone else's child with bullhorns, there were two video shoots involving a pretty imposing drone,
Starting point is 00:37:40 which the cops totally allowed to, like, have fly around during the whole thing, even though it almost hit a cop in the head once because it was being, like, flown at head level on the sidewalk. And during these video shoots, Scotty was basically just ordering people around with the bullhorn, and the cue believers all lined up next to each other, holding hands all down the block. and then the media started walking up and down the row. Using them as like pez dispensers of QAnon soundbites, as Scotty yelled at them to like stand closer or further apart over the bullhorn. Just must have been a real special moment for all the people involved.
Starting point is 00:38:15 These moments of surreal stage management and confusing crossfire, I think, defined the event for me. QAnon was no longer just itself or even its soft front, save the children. It had become a reaction to a reaction to a reaction. A beam refracted into oblivion, but somehow just as blinding. The great QAnon Purge of 2020. It has been evident for a very long time that QAnon communities on social media platforms cause problems. Boys, perhaps you'll recall that one of the very first episodes that I recorded with you two was titled The Great Reddit Bands of 2018.
Starting point is 00:38:56 So true. Simpler time. Simpler times, smaller platforms. Now, that episode covered how Reddit had banned all Q&On subreddits for posting content that incited violence and harassment. Now, as it turns out, Reddit was ahead of the curve on that one because just this week, Facebook announced that they are banning all Q&on pages and groups, even if they don't promote violence. In addition, Facebook said that they are banning Q&N Instagram accounts. According to our guest today, Mark Andre Argentino, the impact of that announcement was immediate. Before, there were 186 Facebook groups, which was slashed to 18.
Starting point is 00:39:32 There were 253 known Facebook pages, and that was cut down to 96. And there were 269 Instagram QAnon accounts, and that was cut down to 141. So, you know, it's apparently a progressive kind of thing. They're still working on apparently cleaning it up. Yeah, not before the election. Don't want to get ahead of ourselves. This move sent Q&ON influencers scurrying. Q responded in a new Q drop that just,
Starting point is 00:39:57 said this. Information warfare. Nice. Not very helpful, but yeah. QAnon promoter, praying medic said that in reaction to this news, he deleted both his Facebook page and Instagram account. He also says that as a preventative measure, he deleted all of his YouTube videos that mentioned Q.
Starting point is 00:40:15 It looks like he's following through on his promise that he made right after Q gave that instruction. I have unpublished my Facebook page and I have unpublished my Instagram account. it's either i either i take them down or they're going to get taken down that's pretty much the choice that we're left with now some of you who have been wondering why i took down all my q videos on youtube well this is why facebook is starting this or they're going to take down everything related to q on the platform do you think youtube and twitter are going to be next, I suspect they probably will be.
Starting point is 00:40:55 I don't think it'll be long before YouTube cracks down pretty hard on Q-related accounts and then Twitter. But it wasn't just Facebook on Instagram. The online craft market Etsy also reportedly banned all Q&On products. There goes the Q&On Shopping Network, boys. Oh, man. You fucked it all up. Those are great episodes, too, but.
Starting point is 00:41:15 I'm sure it'll spread. No, I'm deleting them. I'm deleting all those episodes on the spite. Merchant tents will pop up somewhere. No, I think our audience should suffer. for this for some reason. In addition to that, Peloton, which is an indoor bicycle that offers virtual exercise classes, also removed hashtags associated with QAnon.
Starting point is 00:41:33 Mm, getting thick thighs for Q&O. Yeah, this is a weird thing. I mean, I think it shows that, I mean, obviously people are sharing Q&O memes through their exercise bike. I don't know, but it seems like it shows how like Q&N is becoming really part of a lifestyle, part of a community, part of your identity, right? So this is like, you like to put some Q&O blitz. in your accounts and maybe your
Starting point is 00:41:54 dating profiles. Yeah. It also appears that Discord, the community-based messaging platform, cracked down on QAnon. So this hasn't been announced yet. It technically hasn't been reported. But several Q&O followers complained that their Discord servers were deleted on 8Koon.
Starting point is 00:42:10 Of course, our own Discord server for the podcast got caught in the crash fire and was knocked offline. Many of our beloved listeners had their Discord accounts deleted, unfortunately. Yeah, mostly the mod team in the server but then the employees got in touch the bottom line is they're helping us out although there's permanent damage we lost all the content we lost a bunch of emojis our
Starting point is 00:42:33 mod team had to work for hours for about a day and a half they're still haven't we still haven't resolved some issues connecting it to patreon or whatever so that sucked but oh and the other thing is that discord would not no discord employee that I was in touch with through this process would admit that this was a crackdown on Q&on or discuss Q&on at all yeah it's very weird I know why they didn't announce it even after the crackdown happened. It seems like everyone else is comfortable. Every other social media platform is comfortable talking about it. But yeah, it totally happened. Breaking news. By the way, thank you to our beloved mod team who has been working tirelessly to write these wrongs. We love you. Yes, we've gotten you banned and in your end up
Starting point is 00:43:12 having to do all the work. Yeah, simply the best. So that basically means that the last major social media networks that permit Q and on on their platforms are Twitter and YouTube. In a recent interview with CNN's Poppy Harlow for The Boss Files podcast, the YouTube CEO stopped short of pledging to ban QAnon followers on the platform. So I guess we'll see what happens with that. But it sounds like this kind of thing happened in 2018 with InfoWars and Alex Jones, where the very first platform to ban Alex Jones was Apple Podcasts. And this was the big one. And then everyone else follows suit from that. you know, YouTube band
Starting point is 00:43:53 Alex Jones, Facebook banned Alex Jones, but these social media networks seems like they all, they're all actually kind of timid and they're looking for some sort of signal that's okay to crack down on this kind of stuff, that there are no like big consequences for doing so and then once the signal is sent, then they feel
Starting point is 00:44:09 a comfortable moving forward. That's how policy should be written. Of course, the big question is what will be the ultimate impact of social media companies banning QAnon? To get a sense of that, we are joined by our guest Mark Andre Argentino. He is a PhD candidate at Concordia University, as well as the co-author of the report, the QAnon Conspirity Theory, A Security Threat
Starting point is 00:44:34 in the Making, which was published in West Point's Combating Terrorism Center. Mark Andre, thanks for returning to the show. Thank you very much for having me again, boys. So before we get into the questions, I want to say congratulations for that report I just mentioned, getting cited by Congress in the House Resolution condemning QAnon. That's quite an achievement. Absolutely insane. What the fuck? Honestly, it's not what we expect and we wrote that piece, but that's pretty awesome.
Starting point is 00:45:01 Now, we're talking today about Facebook's crackdown on Q&N content. Now, this from Facebook is the third announced update to their policy towards Q&N in as many months. Facebook had previously announced less harsh policies that cracked down on Q&N content in September and August. Why do you think Facebook's kind of slow roll their crackdown instead of just banning Q&N groups right off the bat? I think it's important to realize that, you know, when we're talking about the initial ban on Q&N at that time, I guess we could assume that it was not the type of movement
Starting point is 00:45:36 that, you know, would be linked or was as linked to violence in some people's minds. For those of us who've been observing Q&N for a while, you know, we realized what it was. But when you're coming to to tackle this issue, issue from the perspective of the platform, you're not dealing with an organized movement like ISIS or the base or Adam Woffin. There's no real leadership, there's no structure, and there is different levels of adherence to this. And not everyone in the movement is necessarily quote-unquote violent, right? So I think Facebook tried to take a different approach to this
Starting point is 00:46:11 and not necessarily push all the people that would be in Q&Ong groups to more extreme places on the internet by automatically banning them. And I think that was the attempt is to try to make the place inhospitable for those that were highly committed that they would leave the platform and those that were not as convinced by QAnon would simply find something else. I think that was their initial objective and they've realized over the months that, you know, that didn't necessarily work and they realized the tenacity of QAnon. I mean, this ban has been kind of frustrating to me because, I mean, I feel like it's been evidence since 2018 that that QNon is at least potentially a violent movement.
Starting point is 00:46:46 For example, the very first sort of terrorist incident related to Q1 happened all the way back in June of 2018 with Matthew Wright having that standoff on the Hoover Dam Bridge. In addition to that, Reddit banned all Q&N subredits all the way back in September of 2018. So I feel like it's been kind of clear for years that this has been a problem. But to me, it seems like Facebook has been slow to realize that. I think the Reddit ban was quite unique because they did remove those groups for doxing. And that was the main reason why they banned them.
Starting point is 00:47:17 And if there wasn't going to be that type of behavior, Reddit would have kept them. They kept the Donald for the longest time. And let's be honest, the Great Awakening and the Calm Before the Storm was a lot less, quote, toxic to an extent than the Donald was. So if it wasn't for that,
Starting point is 00:47:31 I think we might actually still have those Reddit communities. But again, when Reddit did completely ban them, some went to Twitter. Others ended up on vote. And we could understand that the vote community of QAnon was not the greatest. And I think for Facebook, the challenge was, They only had in their policy one definition, right? It's dangerous individuals and organizations.
Starting point is 00:47:50 So that's for those tied to terrorist activity, organized hate, mass murder, human tracking, trafficking, organized violence and criminal activity. So they had to actually create a special policy not only for QAnon, but other militia movements that are glorifying, promoting, or celebrating violence. And this is where they kind of put QNon, which again makes a lot of sense with the type of content that QNon posts when you're talking about, the storm and the hope for like the destruction of government and the replacing and of their own but again it's not necessarily an organization that's out there to necessarily use violence to achieve this a lot of them is just you know the information war with a sprinkling of violence and i think that's the challenge from the platform is there's no real label of q anon as a dangerous movement outside of that ctc piece i wrote with my colleague amarantha marcingham no one really wrote about qanon as a security threat you know you've talked about it other reporters have talked about who have been on the QNon beat for years, but no one really thought that this would fall within the public safety, national security threat like we are talking about now, especially with the cases that have happened. Yeah, this is kind of the frustrating thing.
Starting point is 00:48:56 Like a lot of like the main line Q&N followers, they always say, oh, Q has never advocated for violence. They only talk about information warfare. They only talk about posting and meming. But I feel like what they don't see is that, you know, I feel like a logical conclusion to sort of the more deranged Q&N beliefs. is violence because it leads people to believe that, you know, they have to take some extreme action, uh, towards some really terribly evil people. I mean, if you really believe that such a, such that, uh, you know, people are like literally killing babies. I feel like it would be rational, uh, even to, uh, to lash out violently. Well, that's the objective, really in the sense that, or that's the big risk. If the information war is not enough or you don't achieve your goal through the information war, because, you know, for QAnon, you think the American military or Q team is going to do.
Starting point is 00:49:43 all the violence and the fighting for you, but the information mechanism that they use and the narratives they have kind of leave the followers no choice that if Q fails, then it's in their hands to take up the mantle and try to bring that, you know, victory against the state. According to your own analysis, there are still dozens of Facebook pages and groups that that were still up after the new policy against Q&L was announced. So why did those ones managed to survive? Most of the groups that I had prior to the takedown are actually all gone. Oh, okay. It took a couple of days for Q&O. for Facebook to take them down
Starting point is 00:50:15 I spent the past few days I've been adding new pages as they appear but all the almost all the last page all the big pages that were there are gone the ones that remained are not necessarily affiliated to Q so it's not
Starting point is 00:50:30 openly branded as a Q&N group but it posts a lot of Q&N content and this is where the policy that Facebook has was going to require some reporting by people to say this needs to be taken and get down or they need to do work on their back end, where you're going to have to look like this community posts a lot of Q stuff.
Starting point is 00:50:48 It's actually pretending to be, I don't know, an alternative news site or personal blog. And this is where the challenge is going to be. It's the same thing that they had mentioned for Instagram, where these Instagram influencers that if they brand themselves as a lifestyle blogger, but they post only Q&N content, right now they're not taking them down. And that's going to require a lot more manpower to do because the platform is really using an automated process. Yeah, I mean, there's a really, I mean, there's a question like how effective these bands are going to be in the long term, because won't they just get like, I mean, better and better at hiding their power levels, so to speak. I mean, like you mentioned before, they might disguise by pretending to be, you know, human trafficking organizations. They might use code words. They might use dog whistles. And they might be so abstracted away from the original sort of Q and on symbols that it would be
Starting point is 00:51:42 hard to tell unless you were genuinely radicalized or you were a deep researcher into the matter that these were Q&N pages. So, I mean, do you think that, you know, Facebook will be able to keep up to all the ways in which Q&N is going to morph and try to avoid these bans? It did take Facebook a lot of time to act, but I think when they do act, they've been pretty good to keep stuff off their platform if you look at other extremist groups that they've removed. Now, it's going to be impossible to completely remove Q&N content in the sense that you're going to always have political or meme groups that are going to say are QAnon stuff. The benefit of this, however, if you've taken the large Q&N group and the large proselytizers
Starting point is 00:52:20 off the platform, if you're not already in the movement, it's going to be a lot harder for people to realize what they're in. So you kind of slow down the radicalization process to an extent, and you're going to take out, I guess, the low-hanging fruits with the easy people to radicalize. I guess any new people coming into the movement will have a lot more difficulty radicalizing very quickly. But again, if Facebook is doing this alone, without the other platforms, it's not really going to be a solution, right? We've seen Twitter try to do a takedown very ineffectively, and the group are still there.
Starting point is 00:52:50 And if YouTube doesn't take down content, it doesn't matter if you have no Q&N groups, you could still share Falcabal from BitShoot or Cloutub or whatever into whatever group that you want that may not be QN affiliated, and you'll still have that impact. So you're not going to have the mass pilling, and I don't see we're going to see the growth that I've seen since the start of the pandemic. but it's not going to necessarily solve the problem until all the platforms get together and start looking at this as an issue that they all need to tackle. And Facebook, I guess, is the first step to maybe make people realize that, you know, okay, well, Facebook did it this way.
Starting point is 00:53:23 Maybe we should follow suit. But again, only time will tell what that'll be. Are you guys concerned at all that as more and more platforms start to ban, you know, ban QAnon? And they do start to shift and start to move away and don't use QAnon, that it actually makes it easier for people to get into it because there's no Q-Anon affiliation. Like, is there some sort of weird catch-22?
Starting point is 00:53:48 I think that, like, as it morphs, it makes it harder to bring on new people because in order to it, you have to understand what the morphing looks like. You know, you have to sort of understand, you know, when they say, you know, save the children, what the, oh, this is really sort of a Q-Non message. You know, you need to be deep into it
Starting point is 00:54:06 in order to understand that. Or if they say C-U-E, I think that even if, you know, it might bring in, like, some new people, but I feel like it makes it harder to bring in, like, newbies. People there will go deeper, too. Yeah, I just mean the people who come in from Save the Children because QAnon got banned, so they switched to Save the Children, and I'm in through Save the Children now. Not to mention the entire, like, media sphere that is still coutowing to their beliefs that are contained in QAnon, but aren't clearly delineated as Q&N, which includes, you know, Fox, the president, you know. Yeah, it's like different dimensions of. pilling because like, I don't think that censorship on social media, which is what we're talking
Starting point is 00:54:42 about here, is some sort of like solution. I mean, we can talk about it positively, but I at the end of the day do not think that we're dealing with a long-term solution. It doesn't change anything about the conditions that Q was born and proliferated it. So we're just saying, hey, use a new name and proliferate in a different way. And I think we're going to see waves of this stuff. I think what's going to happen, though, is we're going to see different forms of Q&ON. I think it comes to what Jake was asking is we're no longer going to be able to talk about Q&A on as this single unit, even though it was quite amorphous and, you know, you had all these like umbrella conspiracies, right?
Starting point is 00:55:15 But I think because you're kicking them off Facebook, it's just the next step for an extremist organization. If you're reaching a certain level, you're going to get kicked off the mainstream platform. But what we're going to see is, you know, Q and on Gab is going to be different than Q&N Parlay, going to be different from Miwi, going to be different to telegram. And within those communities, depending who's present, you're going to, again, have subsets. So we're going to have to find a different way to talk about. QAnon, which is kind of what I'm working on
Starting point is 00:55:40 because you're going to have different communities. We saw this with Save the Children. Testel QAnon was just like the cute name that I gave to describe the Instagram influencers and the women that were there. But it's not new. You guys reported early on in March about in April about the anti-vaxes and the wellness influencers that got into QAnon.
Starting point is 00:55:56 And we saw a huge spike after pandemic of anti-vaxes on Instagram sharing QAnon stuff. In July, when it was Save the Children, we just saw a different segment of the group get into it. And what we're going to see is very different variations. What's scary, though, is when, you know, we're talking about the Michigan militia that wanted to kidnap the governor, one of the individuals was sharing
Starting point is 00:56:17 Save the Children content and like this Q adjacent stuff. And then you're seeing these type of narratives fall into more extreme circles. This is where it's going to get more alarm because by banning them on Facebook, you're automatically pushing a large population that are committed onto platforms where they're going to get more and more radicalized because this is where the groups that were put up, right? And this is what the risk is that we're going to see a more those that are committed might be more dangerous in Q&on in the long run some of them might just fall into other things which whatever it is what it is and that's another problem but I think this is where it's scary now where you're seeing more and more the militia individuals
Starting point is 00:56:54 or like the alt light alt-right type groups that are still extremist absorbing Q&on narratives and this is not to mention MAGA I mean people talk about broad boys and militias and stuff but MAGA has a huge crossover with QAnon, and that movement is a legitimate political movement, a grassroots political movement that is mobilizing to try to affect the vote like right now, this month. And so that's the hard one where it's like,
Starting point is 00:57:19 you can share something as a totally MAGA person that has no Q&N signifiers, and it can be just as insane and extreme, just as bloodthirsty. I see what you guys are saying, though, but that by doing the ban, somebody can't radicalize to QAnon, specifically QAnon, to the storm,
Starting point is 00:57:33 to the hangings at Gitmo right off the back. But I wonder... But don't they just go to duck, duck, go? But I wonder if the slow pill of getting in to save the children and then discovering the cabal and then seeing Plandemic and then is actually more effective in terms of a more like solidifying radicalization as opposed to somebody who goes right to calm before the storm fucking looks through and goes QAnon military thing, like, ah, man, this is like way, this is like way... You're basically, I think you're going to know a little more when you're entering people.
Starting point is 00:58:05 pure QAnon bat country. You know, it's going to see to sign up. There's going to be like a border. That's what's going to result from this. But it's true that you can't control the denizens of bad country. They know no boundaries and no borders. So I believe they will live on in La Resistence against Travis and Mark Andre. But what you need basically is to be more committed.
Starting point is 00:58:24 Like Jake's saying, it's not going to be as easy from watching Falcabal and out of shadows and then going to like eight or nine Facebook groups. You're going to have to end up creating a parlay account and following people that's not interacted. You're going to go on gab with all the other trash that's there or telegram or go straight to vote. There will be, yeah, there will be less Normie love bombing. That is for sure. But what you will have is a more committed core of followers that are more convinced and more radical. So basically the 3.9 million, so the 3.9 million that we saw like as an aggregate number on Facebook, you know, most of those are probably not going to go through
Starting point is 00:59:03 the effort. Because if you go on Parlay, even though, you know, it's been a couple of days with the band, it's not very active in the Q&on community there. You go on Gab. Yeah, Gab looks like to be the winning community right now for Q&N post Facebook band. But even then, it's like, you know, you've had maybe six, seven thousand new members on like some of the larger Gab groups. It's not the same volume you had on Facebook. So it's, I guess now it's going to be like, where are the Normies or like the, you know, the QAnon light going to end up? And what are they going to talk about? Is it still going to be QAnon or is it just you know general conspiracy theories that are still floating around which are i guess acceptable to an extent yeah i feel like another big effect of this is that
Starting point is 00:59:44 relates to the fact that a big part of Qadon is red pilling normies they feel like they are commissioned to spread the word and then turn non-believers into believers and this will help accelerate the great awakening because they feel like the only way it's going to happen is if enough enough people believe as they believe. And if they get pushed on to these platforms where there are no normies or there are fewer normies, then it's just not as fun. It feels more frustrated. It feels like their efforts are futile, you know, on Gab or on Parlor or.
Starting point is 01:00:14 God, I'm thinking of like an old lady from the Midwest just wandering into those toxic spaces. I just feel so bad. I feel like I'm watching her wander out into the desert with no water. Hello. Come back. Come back. You don't know what's out there. Hello.
Starting point is 01:00:28 Meanwhile, you hear the motors revving up in the distance And people shooting guns in the air Dust is rising So, I mean, but this sounds like The basic impacts of this kind of crackdown Will be less growth and of the movement But more volatile at the fringes Yeah, I think that's what we're going to see
Starting point is 01:00:48 Which is expected to an extent Yeah Well, that's, I assume it's better than the alternative. I don't know, I guess we'll find out in the coming months and years. I wouldn't call it ideal. Yeah, we've been doing the alternative, so I guess we'll find out a couple. We'll find out what two alternatives give.
Starting point is 01:01:06 Right. I mean, this really is, I mean, this really is an inflection point for a QAnon. It's like they're going to adapt and change very, very rapidly as a consequence of these actions. Yep. And, I mean, you know, like I said, we can speculate exactly what that adaptation is going to look like, but yeah, we're going to find out. So on Twitter, you see.
Starting point is 01:01:27 said, Mark Andre, that July August, Q and on was a different movement than October Q&O. And now I'm curious, what exactly did you mean by that? So we've kind of talked about it already, but basically what we saw with the initial
Starting point is 01:01:42 ban from Twitter and the follow up with the initial crackdown from Facebook is Q&ONON panicking in an extent and starting to look at how to circumvent the movement and circumvent the bad, and what we're seeing then is, like we talk, We've talked about it already, I guess, online, Travis, who and I, but it's really like to Save the Children and, like, Pastel QNon and, like, the lighter movements that have popped up following this ban.
Starting point is 01:02:07 So, you know, Save the Children was not necessarily a reality prior to the Facebook and Twitter ban. And, you know, the, what I'm calling Pestel QN on are the, or like, the female influencers that are Q&N and Jason and starting to talk about Q&N are not necessarily a thing. It was a very small community. Prior to July and August, I was following. maybe, you know, 30 accounts on Instagram that I thought were influencers, some of them were adjacent. And that was based on the work that you guys had done earlier in the year. And prior to the ban, I was up almost 300 accounts in that space, 3.4 million followers. So what we're seeing is that you saw the initial fragmentation of QAnon entering these new spaces. And reporters were
Starting point is 01:02:49 talking about, you had QAnon light, QAnon adjacent QAnon moms, con spirituality, all this type of stuff we're popping out and you already saw the movement breaking apart and what we end up in October is these various different groups. Now we're seeing, I'm seeing Q&on blend in with like the 3%ers or the proud boys or other militia
Starting point is 01:03:09 group. We're seeing it fragmented into other ideas and this is the impact when you start censoring. Yes, you're going to remove them from the large platforms but they're going to morph and evolve and Q&N now is not what we're saying July and in September and October I was seeing an increase in post-promoting
Starting point is 01:03:25 like vehicle ramming attacks with memes being shared all live splatter we don't care about your protest or black live splatter and they're sharing videos of African Americans at protest getting hit by cars and these are in QAnon group so the escalation of language and violence was not necessarily about seeing in July when we wrote that CTC piece
Starting point is 01:03:42 we were still saying Q&N may be a security threat based on the limited cases I think the platform had to act as well because there was an escalation in the content and the violence that was and it was not manageable for them to just censor the promotion and celebration of violence because that was taking over more and more of the content of being shared by now i usually when talking about uh comparing like q anonon and the militia movement or proud boys this kind of thing i usually say like the the big difference is that is that qanon believes that they can outsource all the violence that they want to do to the military they think that the military is eventually going to swoop in and execute all the people that they hate whereas the militia movement they tend to believe that they want to to do it themselves, right? They think they need to arm up and make the revolutionary changes that they want to happen without relying on anyone else. As a consequence, there wasn't a whole
Starting point is 01:04:34 lot of overlap between these two movements. Now, are you saying that quite recently, that that amount of overlap has been increasing? You know, you're seeing individuals talking about the storm is coming and we need to defeat the deep state. The deep state is not necessarily for some of these militia members, what QAnon talks about. But it's more about how the government is not as honest as one may perceive it to be and they need to take it down in order to restore the constitution as they perceive and they're using QAnon stories and narratives and videos as a way of mobilizing and you know firing each other up in a sense and save the children played a role in this sense that it didn't take long to go from
Starting point is 01:05:11 save the children to kill all pedophiles and when you're taking these narratives to kill all pedophiles there are specific groups that were already you know against this type of actions and they're willing to you know all pedophiles are really to take action and is just a way to bring in these narratives. And I think that the mechanism is not, you know, Q&N on to 3% is, but more like 3% is recruiting Q&M, proud boys recruiting Q&O believers. It's Q&N believers that are not seeing the results they want are going to be easy to recruit the target.
Starting point is 01:05:39 Yeah, I mean, we saw this at the Tampa Rally. Someone shoved a militia recruitment pamphlet in your hand. That's correct. That's correct. So before I let you go, Mark Andre, I have one more question I will ask you that I've been asked a lot recently. So, now, assuming that Trump loses the coming election that we have here in a couple weeks, and he concedes. So it's definitely he's out.
Starting point is 01:06:01 How do you think Q and on will react to that? By the way, if you're listening to this three weeks from now, stop laughing. Shut up. Yeah, we're speculating here. Let us have her fun. So in the possible scenario where it's a Biden win and the Trump loss, I think the most obvious scenario for, like, hardcore Qon believers is a deep state. one, they interfered in the election, and you're going to see them just push out a bunch of propaganda and content to promote the fact that, you know, they were right all along,
Starting point is 01:06:32 the deep state is there and they need to fight harder to, you know, to take down the deep state. And it's not necessarily going to bring them away. What's going to happen, though, is to see what's the sociopolitical environment after the election that may feed or not feed them. And I think that's going to have a huge impact to see whether QN survives or, you know, know metastasize into something else i think that's the first first one the other one is what we kind of been talking about right is just recruitment you're going to have individuals that are just like crap cue was wrong but i still think the government's corrupt and i don't think this was a fair
Starting point is 01:07:06 election you know and it's going to be other groups that'll recruit them and the other version is well kind of like my little research project is kuhna's just going to turn into some form a new religious movement and there's more and more qunan affiliated churches that are talking about these conspiracy theories and everything and you're probably going to have some type of you know a couple of churches organization just continuing to pedal from QAnon into other conspiracy theories those are like what my guesses are basically more more blood liable uh in Pentecostalism yeah or more anti-vax stuff you know as long as the pandemics around the anti-maskers anti-vaxers are all going to have a role to play with
Starting point is 01:07:42 conspiracy theories and that's just going to keep feeding QAnon so in all in all honesty disappearing QAnon is not one of my scenarios the best case is they just stay as keyboard warriors and there's no violence. But again, it's going to really depend on what November and December and January brings to us. In 2020, it's been a year that just keeps on giving, so it's hard to speculate. Yeah. And then there's, you know, the material conditions like, is that stimulus package going to pass? So the question is, yeah, are people hurting as much in January and February?
Starting point is 01:08:11 Like you said, there's a lot of different things that are going to feed into whether radicalization is an interesting alternative for them. Exactly. This is what the pandemic has shown, right? If you're, if there's political instability, economics instability, social instability, or health and securities, it just creates vulnerabilities for individuals to try to find answers. QAnon provides those answers. Conspiracy theories and religion provides those answers. And because Q&ON is now the talk of the town, because they've become so mainstream, it's the easy thing to turn to people that are suffering. As long as people are suffering and as long as we have this global pandemic, I think we're going to be talking about it for a while.
Starting point is 01:08:46 Mark Andre, thanks again for joining us. You always have fantastic insights. Where could someone go and learn more about your work? They could follow me on Twitter at underscore M.A. Argentina. Thanks for listening to another episode of the Q&ONANANANANIS podcast. Please go to patreon.com slash QAnonanonymous and subscribe for five bucks a month to get a whole second episode every week, plus access to our entire archive of premium episodes. When you subscribe, you help us stay advertising free and editorially independent.
Starting point is 01:09:15 We usually stream twice a week at Twitch. slash QAnonanon Anonymous, come hang out. And this week we have a little something special. If you go to Merchandise.cunonanonymous.com, you can find our limited edition t-shirt, which is printed by an independent printer called Byron McCoy that we're working with. It was designed by artist Ruben Gerard,
Starting point is 01:09:36 who's very, very talented. It's essentially a depiction of Sisyphus, pushing a cue, a large, muscular, nude Sisyphus. It's very statue-like, and the design is incredibly beautiful on it. So go take a look, merchandise.cunonanonanonymous.com. And for everything else, we've got a website, QAnonanonymous.com,
Starting point is 01:09:54 where you'll find other things like a link to our community, access to some of the lost episodes 2 to 6, and more. Listener, until next week, may the Deep Dish bless you and keep you. It's not a conspiracy, it's fact. And now, today's AutoCube. down there stand my ground
Starting point is 01:10:21 Let's cut a horse Save our children Oh we're Hey baby there's no easy way Oh Hey
Starting point is 01:10:36 stand my ground Are we won? Nap-down! We want! Back-down! What's the proposal is back! Are you probably
Starting point is 01:10:53 one? We want! Yeah. Uh-oh. Uh-oh. Wow, are you guys, do we get? Come on.
Starting point is 01:11:06 Great E kara wealth rolog. Tell me what punto enough this is what
Starting point is 01:11:15 equality prize white 25 this is right equality equality Melt let's like
Starting point is 01:11:29 This is what solved Tell me what justice is like this is what Just this is white. Oh, wow. This is a lot more. Justice black,
Starting point is 01:11:44 right. Chouin'a. Baby life in life better. Baby life better. Children like better. Children like better. Art four life better. Our future, stand up on the children.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.