QAA Podcast - Episode 136: Heroes of QAnon: Where Are They Now?

Episode Date: March 31, 2021

Michael Flynn, Sidney Powell, Mike Lindell, the broader QAnon community and even our GEOTUS Donald Trump — what's happening with all of our problematic faves? Plus we talk about the HBO documentary. ↓↓↓↓ SUBSCRIBE FOR $5 A MONTH SO YOU DON'T MISS THE SECOND WEEKLY EPISODE ↓↓↓↓ https://www.patreon.com/QAnonAnonymous QAA Merch / Join the Discord Community / Find the Lost Episodes / Etc: https://qanonanonymous.com Episode music by Max Weber (http://doomchakratapes.bandcamp.com)

What's up QAA listeners? The fun games have begun. I found a way to connect to the internet. I'm sorry, boy. Welcome listener to Chapter 136 of the Q&ONANANANANANANAS podcast. The Heroes of Q&ONONAN, Where Are They Now, episode. As always, we are your host, Jake Rockatansky, Julian Field, and Travis Vue. Q's white hats have been fighting valiantly since two,

2017 to defeat the elite adrenachrome vampires. But lately, things just don't feel the same. Not only did the guy on TV change, but he rarely even makes public appearances anymore. The failure to take the capital was deeply embarrassing. Toy faves are being canceled, and everyone around them seems to be bending to the tyrannical rule of Bill Gates-style paper masks and vaccinations. What's more, QAnon is censored on all the major mainstream media platforms. The shaman is in jail, and Q stopped posting in December of last year.

That's why this week is the perfect time to check in on the Patriots who are still trying to save the Republic and see how they're faring under the Satanic Biden administration. First we'll chat about HBO's ongoing documentary series Q into the storm, which puts eight coon operators, Ron and Jim Watkins, under the microscope. Then we'll check in on Donald Trump, General Flynn and his family, QAnon lawyer, Sidney Powell, and My Pillow CEO, Mike Lindell. Finally, we'll cover the rank-in-file QAnon followers who are still out there on the alt-internet, baking crumbs.

One last thing. Travis View is dead. Long live Travis View. We'll ask the man why he decided to reveal his real name. Jake and I have been observing him closely as of late, attempting to suss out whether it's still cool to call him Trav. So far, so good. Yes, Travis is fine.

Thank God. That would be too difficult for us. I mean, you know, following the Q, the QAnon movement is one thing, but changing names of our friend and colleague that we've grown used to for the last two and a half, potentially three years, I think is more than I could handle. Yeah, there was a point where we basically, we knew his name, but we kept calling him Travis by mistake, kind of, and we were like, well, is it fine if we just do that and not even,

just basically ignore that you have another name? And by the way, are we going to find that out on the episode right now? Yeah, we will talk about it. I assumed everyone just knew it was a fake name, but an assumption proved to be incorrect, as we'll discuss today. Perfect. Let's get right into it by talking about Colin Hoback's six-part documentary series, Q Into the Storm, of which we've seen the four episodes that have aired.

Yes. This was a documentary that has been three years in the making. It really got incredible access to the main people responsible for platforming and promoting QAnon. That includes Ron and Jim Watkins, Paul Ferber, who ran the, Calm Before the Stormboard on 4chan that Q originally posted to. Cullen also spoke to QAnon promoters like Liz Croken, Justin Form Talk, and Justin Nemost. They also spoke to Radix and Pamphletanon from the original QAnon live stream show, Patriots Soapbox. In the first episode of that documentary series, Radix curses my name, which leads to Colin

introducing me as the opposition to QAnon. And then there were all these other weird people that come out of nowhere, this Travis, you guys, where their whole, like, persona is just, like, attacking anybody that covers the Q posts. Like in any good game, Q&ONs have opposition. People who are just as obsessed with Q, only they devote their time to debunking it. When I created my account, I thought I was going to use it to make snarky comments occasionally. Just sort of do it with the safety of anonymity as I've done for, years and years and years. I've always been sort of an anonymous shit poster through the count since I

was like 14. I was just sort of like irritated with Q and on and I started making these screenshots about what they are doing and what they're up to because it's pissing me off that they were operating in the shadows and they're believing these crazy things and no one was talking about it. And so I wanted to show people. Wow, what a handsome fellow. I was contacted by Colin in like early October, like of 2018, actually around the same time you guys reached out to me. So this was before I was doing much media at all. He was one of the very first people who ever reached out to me

about what I was doing. And you could see I had about like 6,000 followers at the time. Yeah. So not a whole lot. You had seven when we contacted you. Yeah. So yeah, he contacted me before you guys even did. Wow.

He came over to my place and then we talked for hours about, Q and on in different places and then what he got out of that was I was an anonymous shit poster like yes that's true he he was like listen the only point of having this guy in the documentary is to get him in trouble with the Washington Post that segment leads to a segment that introduces our podcast which includes a shot of Jake's feet correct yes that's now I we didn't plan now I want to explain this once and for all to everybody because I've been getting a lot of questions about it. Probably more questions about that than

any of the content, let alone my prophecy where I say two years ago that if QAnon disappeared tomorrow, it wouldn't matter. So you see yourself as a prophet. Which has turned out to be true. So we just, we're asking you why you showed feet and now you're saying you're also a prophet. I'm trying to look.

The full question is, why did you show feet but not eyes? Because you had on dark sunglasses but bare toesies. Well, that's because Travis feet or not the window to the soul. Jake doesn't want his soul to be stolen by the camera. So the glasses are protective measure.

First of all, the glasses in the hat, look, this was two years ago. We didn't understand the Q&ONN community the way we do now. I was incredibly worried about... Don't say we, okay? Let's stick with the I statements. I, fine. I had two concerns. One was that, one was that, you know, some, you know, a crazy, you know, QAnonon

follower would, I don't know, put myself and my family in danger. That was one concern I had. Number two, you know, at the time I was still working in the entertainment industry. And I was very worried that, you know, a enemy of mine, a rival, you know, what have you. An enemy. Would use, would use the, you know, our podcast to, I don't know, make it look like I was a, you know, I didn't want to get it misconstrued. You know, I didn't want to get it misconstrued. know that I was a QAnon follower or whatever, even though we were clearly against it. You know, so I did, wear a disguise. The best to do is to pretend I'm somebody who would show feet and kick them up even,

who would not be like, hey, I'm barefoot, but like, hey, they should be on the couch. Now, let me, yeah. I mean, look, none of us knew at that time that this was going to become our full-time job. Okay, but even if it's not your full-time job, then, but it's fine to just go over to a friend, a trusted friend's house and put your beautiful feet up like that. This is your fault. You have a no-shoe's policy in your house. It was a baking hot summer day.

I was wearing shorts and flip-flops. You know, my feet get hot. So, you know, I was wearing flip-flops, and I came over, and because of the no-shoes policy, I had to take the flip-flops off, obviously, which, you know, presented my little to-zies. They do look hot, though, like a bit like a, I don't know, like a cauldron of soup that's, like, kind of sweating off the edges, you know?

Now, also, Julian has a very sinky couch. Oh, sinky. Okay, if I had swung my feet around and sat naturally, I would have looked like I was about three feet tall. And so I swung my feet up so that I was even with Julian because, you know, I had a feeling it was going to be, you know, somewhat of a wide shot. I thought, hopefully, you know, three-quarter shot, you know, waist up, potentially. I didn't know that Colin was going to be so wide.

And so now, three years later, I, you know, I respect him. You know, I respect the shot because it did show us just kind of candidly hanging out, which is what he said he was going to do. And look, the feet are unfortunate. Look, I'm happy that they weren't super dirty, that my toenails weren't long and scraggly as they sometimes can be. And I'm fine with it. You know, if the worst thing that comes out for me of this clip is that people think, think that I have beautiful feet and want to see more of them and are asking me to start an

only fans, I'm okay with that. And you're okay with starting an only fans? I haven't yet, but I'm okay with people wanting that for me. End a discussion. That's it. So let's play the clip in which your toes feature so prominently. Welcome listeners to the 56th chapter of the QAnonan Anonymous podcast. As always, we are your host, Jake Rockatansky, Julian Fields, and Travis New.

But before all that, QAnonon News. is we're like a Britta water filter for like all of like the horrible shit on the internet. You know, bad for the world, good for the podcast. Yeah. So we may just be seeing the tip of the iceberg, you know? Yeah, like they know how crazy it sounds. And so they won't actually come out and out themselves that they believe in this shit. But I think when we talk about Q non-believers versus non-believers,

I think that's actually the wrong way to look at it. Because these beliefs have been festering in American consciousness way before. Yeah. Like that's the scary thing is that if A. Chan went down. Q never came back, it would still be just as strong, I think. I want to point out here now, re-listen to the clip, you know, Jim Watkins

who was commenting on this very clip in one of his live streams, he's actually dishonest. He says that we say fuck this and fuck that. I don't hear one single fuck. I say shit twice. No, but when he saw your feet, the word that came into his mind was fuck. Fuck. He wanted to fuck them.

And Jake, also, I have to say, it's true that your toes are actively moving in that first shot. So your little toes They're doing a little dance there I like it I think it's great Yeah I'm just my two little hobbit feet You will remember your young feet You know it's like you got to appreciate with them

While they're you know Later in life they're not going to look as good So you always have HBO As like an archive of how good those feet once looked I guess more broadly having seen the first four episodes What do you guys think of the documentary I know the reviews so far have been mixed But what were your impressions?

I thought it was very good journalism. I can understand the frustration some people who perhaps aren't familiar with Q and on or wanted something a little more compact since we've only had like basically a really bad documentary. So we haven't had that kind of simple one to two hour kind of description of Q and on. This is more of a chase and you know kind of like there's a lot of work put into the process of getting to information, right? And so I can understand why that's frustrating for some people but for me this is very elucidating. It's showing, it's kind of flashing a light in all these like dark crevices

of how we got here. And so I wanted that history to be filled in. So, you know, I mean, I think the work is valuable. And I also think it's, you know, often very thrilling and well shot as well. Yeah, I've been finding it fascinating so far. And like I said, like I said after the first two episodes, I don't think that we've had such a comprehensive sort of breakdown. And you know, like you said, Julian, in about an hour, an hour and a half of exactly where this started, how it got popular, who were the early key players involved? I mean, it really, you know, I think for somebody who is interested in this and doesn't know anything about QAnon, I mean, based on the research that we've seen, I thought it was a very good breakdown of a,

just sort of the roots of how it all got started. And I do, I like that, you know, to me, it's sort of, I mean, we'll see how the last two episodes shake out. But it feels like there are sort of two stories going on here. One is this, is this thread of how Frederick Brennan sort of realized, you know, that his creation was not what he wanted initially and how he was being taken advantage of by the Watkins. And seeing his turn and detachment. and ultimately, you know, we will see him, you know, really have to, you know, escape for his life. That coupled with the investigation into who could be doing the posts, who is in control of the post, how the trip codes changed, who lost control of the account initially.

And for me, there's been a lot of new information in terms of just how much control Ron Watkins did have at the moment that Q went from 4chan to 8chan I think it's I think it's really fascinating and I thought it was really funny that the Bannon debunk came from the fact that he thought Michael Flynn was a quote fuck up yeah that was a really I think really interesting point I mean really kind of uh I guess interaction between Ron Watkins and Colin in which Ron points to some IP addresses that were like around that or allegedly were coming from around Bannon's house from from the Q drops and then Cullen based the reasons like why would Ron be revealing this information and it almost as if Ron is trying to basically frame Bannon or basically

trying to concoct some evidence right it makes it appear like it's Bannon for Cullen and that that was a whole weird bit and then and then Colin really committed to the bit by flying all the way the hell to Italy to try to track down Steve Bannon but yeah that was a really interesting point I mean I'm blown the way by the access. I mean, the fact that there's before this, there was virtually no video of Ron Watkins on the internet. Like this guy was trying to operate kind of like a shadow. Like he had his own personal Twitter account. He had also the, uh, the eight, eight Chan Twitter account that he operated. But he was like this figure who I knew was sort of like pulling strings from

behind this curtain, but I didn't had no idea what he's doing. And so I'm like watching this, this thing. And I'm freaking out. It's like, there he is. And like, I know, these weird unnerving goofballs are the people who are responsible for QAnon, as stupid as it sounds. They're the ones who platformed it. They're the ones who encouraged it. And those are the ones who are, you know, I guess almost certainly are even authoring some of the cue drops. I mean, I have my own, I guess, quibbles with the documentary. But overall, I think it's a great piece of journalism. I think I'm learning a lot. I think it breaks down a love the sort of the little details that explain the evolution of Q&O. Like, for example, how Ron Watkins

kind of stole Q, or at least appeared to steal Q, from Paul Ferber when it made they transfer over to A. Chan. Those like little things that are very technical and sometimes hard to explain, but are essential to kind of like understanding what the hell happened here. I think those were all done very well. I agree. You know, I think that people sometimes say like work is important instead of like good or fun to watch or whatever. And I don't mean that in a moral sense. I think this is important because it maps things out more clearly and like I said, shines a light to give more information to the whole field. So it's valuable. I mean, I'm unequivocal on that.

One thing that I thought was really interesting in the last two episodes, episodes three and four, I can't remember which one it is, but the idea that there are sort of operatives within the sort of standard GOP that are also trying to figure out who QAnon is, or they have their. guests or they claim to know like that, that scene where Omar Navarro was caught on camera saying, you know, I know it's, I know Stone is one of them. Oh, I know Flynn is one of them. Yeah. So it was really interesting to see, even within the GOP, people trying to figure out the origins, which one, you know, are they close to Trump? Are they not? I thought that was really fascinating. I suppose, you know, one of the notes that I had, I think that it could have done better. This is certainly, this is just particular to me, is that I wish that they did a better job of explaining why the cue proofs are bad. I'm glad that it sort of broke down

like all the cube proofs and like why all of the Q&L followers think that they're so convincing. But I, it's not enough to just sort of give sort of like a general sort of explanation of like how cold reading works. When you really dig into this cube proofs, if you just say it out loud, how they work, they sound kind of convincing, but you need to break them down in order to like really, um, you know, understand why they're all bad. For example, the movie, it talks a lot about the, the tippy top cube proof. So this is the one in which Trump says, uh, tippy top at the white house during, uh, during Easter.

Right. And then Trump supposedly does this at the request of an an anon on 8chan. And then the documentary, it cuts to a Q1on follower who said, who was just very, very impressed with this cute proof. We keep it in tip top shape. We call it sometimes tippy top shape. and it's a great, great place. I want somebody to talk me out of why Trump said tippy top.

Right. So you would have liked Cullen to maybe explain not to that guy, maybe, but at least to the viewer? Yeah, I would like, yeah, a little bit better explanation because that tip top request, I mean, specifically asks to Trump to say the tip top at the stay of the union address. And then Trump didn't. And then, but instead Trump said the phrase tip top months later at that Easter celebration at the White house. So didn't even do what Q requested. And then the other thing is that tip top is just a phrase that Trump uses occasionally. For example, much earlier, Trump used the phrase tip top

when talking about the U.S. nuclear arsenal. You want no increase whatsoever. We won't need an increase. But I want modernization and I want total rehabilitation. It's got to be in tip top shape. So I mean, like I get why, you know, Cullen didn't like, you know, just grind the documentary to a stop in order to explain why all of these Q proofs are bad. But I don't know. I think it's like I still think it's very valuable to understand like all of these are are terrible. Like they don't prove anything. In fact, even if we were to like, even if it established that that Trump was listening to the boards or people around Trump was listening to the boards, that wouldn't prove any of the main claims around Q. At best it would prove that, you know, Trump was like paying attention

to what was going on A-chan and then reacting to it in order to pander to. Right. that those people, which I mean, I could believe. It's not a crazy thing. I did think that in the third and fourth episodes, there was a much bigger effort to sort of show in all the ways that Q was wrong. Despite all that, I would say, yeah, it is absolutely worth watching. I think it's riveting personally. And I think it's not just a cool documentary. I think it's going to be a valuable historical document. I agree. When talking about 8chan and QAnon and stuff. Yep. And that brings me to our next story, which is Travis View Unmast. So what consequence of this documentary in which I talk about how I'm anonymous is that I have chosen to docks myself. And this was, I partly pushed along by the fact that the Washington Post, the day after the first two documentary episodes aired, called me up. And they acted surprise that Travis View isn't my real name, which is surprising to me. I don't think I've ever, I've never been shady about this. I've been open about the fact that it's a pseudonym, but the fact that they were, that I was quoted in the Washington Post and really.

columns for the Washington Post as Travis View, which is not my legal name, because they have some policies around anonymity, which they didn't follow in my case. So one of their journalists is writing an article about this, which is dropping the day after we record today. So we'll see how that goes. They're going to cut you loose, dude. You're fucked. I realized that being anonymous would continue causing issues for me. So I decided it just docks myself. Yeah. So my legal name is Logan Strain That's that's that's made up That's a lot of people

That's it Logan Strain That's it Sounds made up Sounds made up Yeah a lot of people said like A lot of people commented That actually sounds more made up

Than my made up name In fact I'm gonna read a lot of comments From on Twitter that I got After I did the big reveal there So Jake could you read the first comment I got about my my unveiling? Sure The Deep States Deep Stote

writes at Travis View Logan Strain sounds like an action hero slash virologist who fights mutants infected by bioengineered viruses in order to gain samples and develop a cure specific, almost fanfic Reve writes

Logan Strain is actually the name of the evil doctor who made Travis View that's good I wonder can people ship Logan Strain with Travis View Lieutenant Colonel Alex Chercheck writes Loken Strain sounds way too cool to be a real name It's like claiming you just happen to be called Jack Ruger

And you're a police detective Nice Get him folks, get him So there's that So hopefully this will put this all behind us I'll still be going by Travis View because that's my working name That's my professional name But yeah, that's by real name

And that's that Heroes of QAnon Where are they now? First, let's check on Michael Flynn, General Michael Flynn, and Flynn is slated to headline a three-day QAnon conference in Dallas, Texas. So he is... Oh, my goodness, it's Cuechella. He is still very much embracing the Q&N community.

He's listed as one of the speakers for a Memorial Day weekend conference called For God and Country Patriot Roundup 2021. Now, the conference features several major Q&on promoters. This includes Jordan Saither, the Kate Awakening, Red Pill 78, and even Inevitable ET, who used to be a regular fixture on Twitter. I don't think he's ever spoken publicly, so this is a big unveiling for him as well, I guess. It goes without saying J.T. Wilde will be providing the entertainment. So here's how the conference builds itself on its website. For three days from the Gilly stage, you will have the opportunity to hear from some of your favorite patriots

and digital soldiers in both keynote speeches and panel forums. You will also have the opportunity to meet and interact with these people, as well as meet fellow patriots from around the country and world. Although this has been a time of uncertainty for many, it is also a time of excitement as we witness political history being made before our eyes. What better time and place to get together to fellowship and celebrate with your Patriot family. We feel it couldn't be a better time, so settle up and join us in beautiful Dallas this Memorial Day weekend.

I mean, it concerns me a little bit that Q&ON events or marches or conferences, they used to be one-day affairs, but now it's three days of Q&O. I don't know if I could take that much in person. That's a lot. Is Biden driving a motorcade through there on that date? All right. What about Flynn's relatives? Because they were all in on Q&ON as well.

Well, apparently, they are trying to distance themselves from Q&ONN because the relatives, of General Flynn are currently suing CNN because CNN claimed accurately that they took a Q&N on oath. So General Flynn's brother, Jack Flynn, and his wife, Leslie, they're suing CNN for $75 million in a defamation lawsuit that was filed on federal court on Thursday. So the lawsuit concerns a video that Michael Flynn uploaded to Twitter on the 4th of July in 2020. That video depicts General Flynn, his two brothers, and their wives in a backer. backyard taking the so-called digital soldier oath. So the oath just consists of the regular oath that U.S. federal officers and agents have to take, but with the phrase, where we go

one, we go all, added at the end. The lawsuit essentially argues that the oath has nothing to do with QAnon, which is absurd because the only reason Flynn and tens of thousands of Q&O followers took the oath was because they were told to by Q. Q. Q. laid out the oath and then and then Q said, take the oath, and then they did. This is a QAnon oath. Here's the really crazy part. The lawsuit makes the false claim that where we go one, we go all is not a Q&N phrase, but, well, this is just directly from the lawsuit.

The phrase, where we go one, we go all, was first engraved on a bell on one of President John F. Kennedy's sailposts. That's not true. That's a Q&F claim. That's another Q made up thing. That is a few fact that it comes from. Into this fucking document. That's right. In the lawsuit.

Yeah, they have baked themselves. They baked on the record, on the fucking judicial record. That's, this is amazing. Oh, my goodness. Acknowledging the unity of mankind. In his video published on July 4th, 2020, General Flynn intended to encourage people to think about being good citizens, to love country and be good patriots. The video had nothing to do with QAnon or recruiting, quote-unquote, digital soldiers for an apocalyptic reckoning. They clearly haven't read his fucking columns or watched his speech where he talks about digital soldiers.

You're right. It is interesting. I mean, this is part of this weird, I guess, gaslighting campaign from Q&N followers generally, where they're trying to claim that they aren't Q&N because there is no QAnon. Also, where we go one, we go all, isn't the Q&N phrase because, and they, But they deny it, you're right, by basically doing the Q-pilled thing of saying it came from JFK, when, of course, in reality, it came from the 1996 film White Squall. Yeah.

No, the average Q follower is now wearing, like, eight pairs of Groucho Marx glasses over each other. What about Sidney Powell? Everyone's favorite Q&on leopard print lawyer. So, Sidney Powell is arguing in a court filing that no reasonable person would believe her. election fraud claims are true. So the background on this story is that Dominion voting systems sued Powell for defamation after she pushed lawsuits and made appearances in conservative media on behalf of then President Trump to so doubt about the 2020 election results. Dominion claims that Powell knew her election fraud accusations were false and hurtful to the company. However, in a new

filing, Powell's attorneys write that she was sharing her opinion. and that the public could reach their own conclusions about whether votes were changed by election machines. They argued Powell's statements should be taken in the context of the highly charged election and that any reasonable person would understand that she wasn't making factual claims, even though that she made her claims in lawsuits in addition to, like, media appearances. Now, this is tough because any reasonable person wouldn't take the claims that she made as fact. This is a very tricky, tricky move by the lawyer. Here are a few lines from that filing.

Notably, one of the focal points of the complaint is the press conference held by Sidney Powell and others on November 19, 2020, at the Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington, D.C. Obviously, any press conference originating from the Republican National Committee is political to its core. Given the highly charged in political context of the statements, it is clear that Powell was describing the facts on which she based the lawsuits she filed in support of President Trump.

Indeed, plaintiffs themselves characterize the statements at issue as, quote, wild accusations and outlandish claims. They are repeatedly labeled, quote, inherently improbable and even impossible. Such characterizations of the allegedly defamatory statements further support defendants' position that reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact, but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process. Right. So she's doing the Alex Jones.

I'm a performance artist. Yeah, basically. Amazing. Yeah, I always like the idea that, well, since the press conference was at the R&C headquarters or whatever, then just saying that the election is fraudulent is just a political statement, right? It's just a thing that you say in order to, you know, gain power. So you can't be taking as like a serious statement of fact. That rocks because she's basically like, listen, I know I'm a lawyer,

but I would like the privilege of politicians to lie my balls off and not have any consequences. I mean, that's basically it because, like, yeah, I mean, like her and like Lynn Wood, they really are more like media lawyers at this point where like their goal is to, you know, with their, you know, their catchy phrases like release the crack in, they get people riled up and it's more about, you know, pumping the media full of this bullshit than it is actually making a coherent claim that could be defended in court. In fact, in the past, lawyers would be known for their statements that worked. Like, you know, if the glove doesn't fit, you have to acquit or some shit like that. In this case, they're going to get famous for the famous phrases they uttered before getting things completely wrong and then falling down the stairs. Someone else we should check on is Mike Lindell or Mike Pillow, as he likes to be called. He loves that. Mike Lindel has announced a new social media platform called Frank.

And he also claims that Trump will be present again in August. Is it named after the racist Italian uncle we all have? I assume yes, yes, yes, it is. One of the innovations of Frank, according Lindell, is that users will automatically follow influencers. I mean, here's Lindell explaining how that's supposed to work. So when this launches, millions are going to come over. And what I'm doing is when the influences come over,

they will now have a platform where all the people down here, follow them instantly that if someone joins prank it's it's reverse engineered they don't have to earn their followers so someone such as yourself eric you'll have millions right away because they need to see your show they need to see hear the word they need to hear free speech well when that happens now what i'm going to do to my influence i'm going to say as soon as you get kicked off of youtube you're getting a bonus because why because then you're actually speaking out free speech and you're not worrying about what Mr. Alphabet and Mr. Google say about us, or suck a buck, or dorky and all these people that try and control us here, and they're all going to prison. They're

all going to prison. I'm telling you, by the time this is done. Oh, my God. Free followers. Free followers. Who, who would fucking miss that amazing business plan? We're going to, auto, just get free. Hey. And if you get banned everywhere else, we give you a reward. So wait a minute So let's say I make a frank account And I sign up It just automatically follows Like all of the biggest

Disinfo pushers all at once That's the deal Yeah you It's compulsory You don't get a choice You'll have to click anything You're automatically follow Mike Lendell So he could talk straight at you

Without any effort Oh my God This is awful Yeah This is bad It is great Yes I love the bonuses For getting kicked off of other social media

That is incredible. We will pay you to get banned. We will pay you to get banned so that then you can only post on ours and you have to rely on us. And you'll be boosted. You'll be boosted. We'll... It's love bombing.

We'll triple the followers and they'll have no choice but to have to listen to whatever you have to say. I love that these motherfuckers complained about bots for so long and they're like, yeah, we're going to auto follow accounts with people like as soon as they join. So you could just create an account and that would create followers for like everybody. So you could just actually create an account. new accounts like pretty much infinitely and yeah we're not going to be looking too much into that this is going to be such an inflated platform like everybody will be like a growth hack

style like fucking piece of shit account and they're probably going to end up writing an algorithm so there's like five people whose shit is still visible one of them will be metaxus and the other one will be this dork uh my pillow motherfucker and by the way he used the same he used the same little nicknames uh suck a buck and dork and dorky for jack Dorsi on the Matrix Groove show, which he did an interview with a couple days ago. So he's also full, like, fully interacting with the Q&on influencers. Lindell also says that he is planning a lawsuit that will make Trump president again by August. What I'm talking about, Steve, is what I have been doing since January night.

All the evidence I have, everything is going to go before the Supreme Court. And the election of 2020 is going by the time. by it. It was an attack by other country. Communism coming in. I don't know what they're going to do with what after they pull it down. But hang on. Hang on a second. Hold on. Donald Trump

will be back in office in August. Hang on. Okay, go ahead. It's like this locomotive is not slowing down. Never mind. So yeah, he is still a true believer. I mean, he is like he has, he is a zealot. I mean, he will really go to his

grave trying to reverse the 2020 the election, I believe. My next update is about Donald Trump himself, since he, too, has been banned from basically all major social media. So he's been basically been whining about the Durham investigation. I think it's a bit worth mentioning that Q is currently in its longest silent period ever. The last time Q posted was December 8th, 2020, and prior to this period, the longest period of inactivity was in 2019 when Cloudflare denied services day. Chan and Q couldn't post it all for a few months. Now, there's a lot of speculation that Q is dead and Q will never post again. Every time I thought that personally, Q wound up posting again,

so I'm not going to go that far. Who knows? But Q is very, very silent. But the second to last Q drop just says Durham, implying that, you know, something significant is going to happen with the Durham investigation. This is the investigation which attorney John Durham was tasked with investigating the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation. And so far, that particular investigation has only led to a single prosecution of a Kevin Kleinsmith, CIA attorney for altering an email. But that was apparently too small of a fish for Donald Trump. He recently issued a brief statement to complain.

And that statement says this. Where's John Durham? Is he a living, breathing human being? Would there ever be a Durham report? Just in his Palm Beach camp. compound, stewing, can't tweet, asks his assistant to send out the message because he knows that, you know, at least news outlets

will pick up on it. I got to say, you know, I, the world is a better place since Twitter just gave him a boot. Oh, way, way more boring. You're totally wrong. Boo, Travis. Boo, boo, boo, boo. And also, it's so funny because he's basically just like,

do we, when is Q going to drop again? Very frustrating to go to Q&N that pub and still see the thing that says Durham that makes me think of Durham. How is he going to retweet QAnon, QAnon propaganda now? I mean, is he just going to put out like a statement on presidential letterhead with a couple, you know, faded, printed out pictures with it? I mean, Jordan Safer is a digital soldier. He's a wonderfully built young lad, one of our best.

What about the Q&ON followers themselves? They are still extremely active on telegram and gulf. And most recently, they've been spinning a lot of conspiracy theories about the Suez Canal, which was blocked by the cargo ship, the ever given, which wound up, you know, halting a lot of international trade because apparently 12% of our ship goods go through that particular canal worldwide. But many Q1 of the followers got the idea that this ship was somehow related to Hillary Clinton and human sex trafficking, right, you know, unsurprisingly. Yeah. So, well, they block the ship for like three. three, four days to have the orgy, like, um, like Blade. Have you ever seen Blade? The blood comes from like the sprinklers. They have like, all the, you know, obviously this, it's a shell

on the outside that looks like a bunch of containers, kind of stacked on each other, very boring. But inside, uh, untold mysteries, untold, it's the new Epstein Island, I hear. Blades was probably predictive programming for, uh, this, this whole ever given situation. Yeah, absolutely. So ever given too. I mean, look at the name. It's, your ever-given BJs and H-Js. It stands for whoever given a fuck about this news story is stupid. I mean, yeah, Q&L's important to say the biggest secret ever-given. Oh, yes.

So they got this idea in part because the Evergiven is owned by the Taiwan-based company Evergreen Marine. And the Secret Service codename for Hillary Clinton was Evergreen. This is true. And the word Evergreen happens to feature in two separate cue drops. In addition to that, the radio call sign for the Evergiven is H3RC, which is dangerously close to just HRC, Hillary, Rodham, Clinton. How many coincidences I ask you. Holy shit.

Okay, so this is all real, right? Because it sounds like. No. Yeah. So they got the idea. It's like, well, the idea was that, well, the ship is like, full of children and it was dislodged purposely to draw media attention straight to it and then what's going to happen is that they're going to unload the cargo and will discover all

the horrors inside and then the world will know the truth and then my family will start talking to me again because it was proven I was right the whole time it was really really bizarre of course the ever given was refloated and unblocked there was no evidence that it was involved in human sex trafficking and it seemed to disappoint QN on followers on telegram who said stuff like this. I'm not jumping ship. I'm just getting tired. I have good days trusting the plan,

and then there's days I'm disappointed. The vaccine issue is getting serious around me, and I'm struggling with it all. I love the idea that what's closing in on people is not COVID-19. It's the vaccine. The vaccine, yeah. It's coming.

Hey, there's a real bad case of vaccine. It's spreading. We got cases all over the state. I mean, also it's very weird that news comes out, at least that there's no worldwide. reports of, you know, of sex trafficking on, on this ship. And then their immediate reaction is disappointment. Oh, bummer. You know, because, you know, they still think that I guess the underlying truth is that, you know, the sex trafficking happens, I guess, through these giant

ships, but now it's just not revealed. Now the world doesn't know the truth. It seems like what happens is that they assume that any sort of worldwide news event is related to their conspiracy theories because of attention is being paid to that thing, that it must be significant to their own particular conception of the world. When they finally pry open the right container or get into the basement under a comet ping pong, they're just going to find Toad and he's going to be like, I'm sorry, Mario, the mole children are in a different castle. I also thought it was especially weird because there was also recently news about actual

real-life elite human sex trafficking. And that came from the fact that Epstein, Madam Galane Maxwell, was charged with trafficking a 14-year-old girl. So federal prosecutors accused Maxwell of grooming a 14-year-old to engage in sex acts with Epstein and then later paying her. The indictment charged that on multiple occasions between 2001 and 2004, the girl provided nude massages to Epstein at his Palm Beach, Florida estate during which he engaged in sex acts with her.

It also said that at one point Epstein and Maxwell invited the girl to travel with Epstein and offered to help her obtain a passport, but she declined. Frequently during the period of sex trafficking, Maxwell and others who were employed by Epstein sent the girl presents, including lingerie. So this is all horrifying, stormic-churning stuff. It is, of course, just one of many

untold cases of abuse that may never see the light of day. So, I mean, this is something that's worth paying attention to. If you're a Q1L unfollow, you want to see the real stuff. And, you know, I got to say, we were denied justice, I think, in the case of Epstein, who died in prison. But surely this wealthy daughter of a Mossad agent will finally have to pay for what she did and not die mysteriously in prison. And if she does, I'm quitting the podcast.

Yeah, I'm quitting, too, if she does. That's, that'll be too much for our little brains to bear. Why would you, why would you like basically agree to destroy the podcast if something that's obviously going to happen happens? I just, I just remember. We're looking for a way out, man. Yeah, right. This is my exit strategy. I'm worried because, like, I remember fretting about Epstein, but on the podcast right before he died.

And then, and then it happens. So, yeah, I'm like, you know. I don't know what to tell. I wouldn't know what to tell people after that. And you're like, oh, well, you know. Yeah, Trave? The details are wrong, but basically, yeah. Yeah, the, yeah, it's directionally correct.

So what you guys are saying is you'd be quitting the podcast because you would both believe QAnon is real. I mean, I wouldn't go that far. I would, I think I would have a tougher time explaining to people why it was false. If, you know, these actual elite human traffickers kept dying mysteriously in prison. Yeah. I mean, if a very well-spoken QAnon follower, you know, challenged Travis and said, well, how can you say none of this is real when both Epstein and Justlane mysteriously committed suicide in jail after being charged with Sefts trafficking? It's a moot point, actually, because even if Justlane were to befall the same fate as her lover, QAnon wouldn't be interested in that. They would use it as a marker to say that, you know, John Podesta is. eating the faces off children, but they wouldn't be so concerned with any real, actual, intelligible, sort of charges of, you know, elite pedophilia and sex trafficking. But, you know, I mean, the way you said it, lover, you know, it's very touching that that would mean that maybe she would be joining, you know, her twin flame up in heaven if she is, you know, let's say, you know, cameras.

I mean, if there is a heaven and a hell, I don't think they're going to the, I don't think they're going to the one that you said. And so, furthermore, if she was killed by, let's say, failing cameras that caused her death, yeah, then they would get to meet up on the, and they would just, I guess, play the loot or whatever they did when they weren't being sex perverts. Yeah, or even better, they would meet up on the old island because neither of them are dead and they're still alive. I'm convinced there's no genitals in heaven. Really? You don't think? Everybody's just sort of talking about it. You just feel like you're coming all the time. Thank you for listening to another episode of the QAnon Anonymous podcast.

Please go to patreon.com slash QAnonanonymous and subscribe for five bucks a month to get a whole second episode every single week, plus access to our entire archive of premium episodes. When you subscribe, you help us stay advertising free and editorially independent. We usually stream twice a week at twitch.tv slash QAnonanonymous. You can also catch Julian Field, spelled F-E-E-L-D, on his own stream where he's doing live documentaries and all sorts of fun baking. And that's twitch.tv slash Julianfield. For everything else, we have QAnonanonanonymous.com, where you'll find a merch, a link to the Discord, access to the lost episodes, and all sorts of other good stuff. Listener, until next week. May the Deep Dish bless you and keep you.

It's not a conspiracy. It's fact. And now, today's AutoCube. I miss you, you boys, so much already. I know, it was weird coming into the studio without you. Yeah, no one was here to offer me coffee or water. It was for it. Yeah, you didn't have to refuse both. It's crazy. I had to buy my own cigarettes beforehand. I mean, I left you a bunch of, like, weed stuff in that little box to the right of the, uh...

Oh, copy that. So all this stuff is there. There's still some tobacco in that pouch. Yeah, you're going to find all of your video game consoles just picked apart by the time you get back. My friends, it's Roger. Mudfossil University. Today we're going to be talking about the Bermuda. Triangle and what was there anything special about that why did they keep saying all these things happen they can't find the things they go down there they're just lost forever there they're essentially gone they have no clue what happened to them well there is some strange things going on there that I have seen and I would like to report on and first of all this there's more than just a Bermuda Triangle about there we're also working with

Florida what is the involvement wow what is going on here well that's not that's not part of the bring you to triangle is it well maybe it is let's find out okay just so you know and everybody does know about the fish and the dragon and the fish is down here and his body comes this way somebody mentioned that this might cut the fish's tail like the fish tail comes straight out there I don't think so because the fish's tail is like this if it's a normal fish unless it had some big long flutie thing but anyway and then you have the dragon above it so this is this is not something that anybody can dispute