Radiolab - Fertility Cliff
Episode Date: December 26, 2025As she -- and her friends — approached the age of 35, senior correspondent Molly Webster kept hearing a phrase over and over: “fertility cliff.” It was a short-hand term to describe what she was... told would happen to her fertility after she turned 35 — that is, it would drop off. Suddenly, sharply, dramatically. And this was well before she was supposed to hit menopause. Intrigued, Molly decided to look into it — what was the truth behind this so-called cliff, and when, if so, would she topple? This story first premiered in “Thirty Something,” a 2018 Radiolab live show that was part of, Gonads, (https://radiolab.org/series/radiolab-presents-gonads)a six-episode audio and live event series all about reproduction and the parts of us that make more of us. The live event was produced by Rachael Cusick and edited by Pat Walters.Special thanks to epidemiologist Lauren Wise, at Boston University. Plus, Emily, Chloe, and Bianca. And of course, Jad Abumrad.If you’re more of a visual person, here are the graphs we explain in the episode, we also include links to the corresponding papers in our Episode Citations Section, below!LINK TO GRAPHS:https://media.wnyc.org/i/1860/1046/c/80/2025/12/FERTILITY_AGE_GRAPHS_1-4.jpgEPISODE CREDITS: Reported by - Molly WebsterProduced by - Arianne WackFact-checking by - Diane A. KellyEPISODE CITATIONS:Audio:Gonads (https://radiolab.org/series/radiolab-presents-gonads/)A six-part audio series on reproduction and the parts of us that make more of usThe Menopause Mystery (https://radiolab.org/podcast/the-menopause-mystery)One of Radiolab’s most listened-to episodes of 2025! Videos:“Radiolab Presents: Thirty Something”https://youtu.be/LOJVAaSwags?si=czCBraHf1JEqmAQiResearch Articles:Graph 1: Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment (https://zpr.io/ft6dqdbkJnTd) Graph 2: Ovarian aging: mechanisms and clinical consequences (https://zpr.io/GrPLebynpvxV) , Brookmans, et al.BUT, the graph was borrowed and actually comes from this 1991 paper, Delaying childbearing: effect of age on fecundity and outcome of pregnancy” (https://zpr.io/whWg2UAZsb6h) Graph 3 and 4: Age and fecundability in a North American preconception cohort study, (https://zpr.io/Rmqry4Kd67hY) Wise et al; Dutch fertility researchFurther reading: Predicting Fertility, (https://zpr.io/YEdfiYT29rUh): Magazine article on Lauren Wise’s research, Sign up for our newsletter!! It includes short essays, recommendations, and details about other ways to interact with the show. Signup (https://radiolab.org/newsletter)!Radiolab is supported by listeners like you. Support Radiolab by becoming a member of The Lab (https://members.radiolab.org/) today.Follow our show on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook @radiolab, and share your thoughts with us by emailing radiolab@wnyc.org.Leadership support for Radiolab’s science programming is provided by the Simons Foundation and the John Templeton Foundation. Foundational support for Radiolab was provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Oh, wait, you're listening.
Okay.
All right.
Okay.
All right.
You're listening to Radio Lab.
Radio Lab.
From W-N-Y-S.
See?
See?
Yep.
Hey, it's Molly.
And Lathith.
And this is Radio Lab's last episode of the year.
Molly Rapid Fire, what was your favorite episode that you did not work on?
this year. Voice, Annie McEwen, Matt Kilty, on the mic. Those two, they should get their own show,
but I don't want them to, because I want them to stay here. You, go. I think it was, it had to be
probably Lulu's profile of that quantum physicist, Kossum, in Palestine. In Palestine, yeah. And just because
you feel it, you're right there with him, waiting in line for bread or whatever it is. And all he's
thinking about is quantum physics and you're just like what it's just a kind of a portal into a man's
mind that you never would have gotten any other way yeah that was amazing because it's like
lulu you know wasn't in palestine but being on the phone it was like there was so much
sound to hear of like you felt like you were there you felt like you were right there yeah and i think
the thing is like especially this year how much all of these types of stories
the ones you've worked on, I've worked on, the ones we just highlighted.
Truly, none of that would be possible without our listeners and our sustaining members.
And so thank you, thank you, thank you for like giving us.
Yeah, giving us the year we've had.
I mean, because, let's have it's been a hard year, right?
Right.
Because earlier this year, Congress eliminated all federal funding for public media and our home station, WNYC, we lost $3 million in,
regular dependable annual funding.
So it sort of goes with saying,
I think we should definitely say it,
that financial support from listeners
is truly critical right now.
And, you know, we're at the end of December.
So time to support Radio Lab in 2025 is running out.
So this is like an ask to say,
please consider making a year-end donation,
get us kickstarted for 2026.
And if you do,
we have some really killer new,
gift options. Yeah. Just think about it like you're buying yourself a holiday gift and the thing
you get out of it is that we got a new puzzle. I love the puzzle. It's made of like episode art
from your episode. Yeah, yeah, yeah. One of my favorites of the year. The one about the Lulu calls
them hot worms, but they're really a bacteria. It just like had this magical extremophile property
where it could plug into this whole other process to read DNA and it like completely revolutionized
All kinds of different fields.
And we've got, so we've got a puzzle, we've got t-shirt, we've got a bumper sticker
that you can, you know, put on water bottles or cars.
Laptop sticker.
It could be on anything.
Laptops, exactly.
So if you want to provide ongoing support, you can join the lab, which comes with perks like
sponsor-free listening, bonus content, and more.
Or you can make a one-time year-end donation at radiolab.org slash donate.
Go to radiolab.org slash donate.
And so to round out the year, you know, we look back at all our most listened to episodes.
And the number one most listened to Radio Lab episode of 2025, thank you, for that keyboard drum roll, was our menopause episode, which Mali hosted and which our contributing reporter had the Radkei brought the story to us.
And it was so good.
And we figured maybe people want to hear more.
Honestly, I think they do because we heard back from so many people about this episode that we decided, okay, we can give you more reporting on this topic.
And in fact, I did a story about the moments leading up to menopause and this thing that my friends and I kept hearing about called the fertility cliff.
That sounds very dramatic.
Yeah.
It was so dramatic.
It was so dramatic that I decided, okay, I'm going to dig into this.
I want to understand what this phrase is and what it actually means.
And we did this story for the first time as part of a live event in 2018.
And so I'm just going to play part of that live event for you here.
And then we're going to have updates at the end.
Now here we go.
Hello, hello.
How's everybody doing?
All right.
We're so excited that you guys are here tonight.
My name is Jad.
I host Radio Lab and We're Perfect.
And I will now introduce a rising star at Radio Lab and in podcasting and at WNYC and on planet Earth.
Welcome Molly Webster.
planet earth might have been a bit bold i will just say um thank you for coming this is amazing
hi everyone okay so why are we all here when i started reporting on the series one of the first
things i did was i just jumped on the phone with a lot of people people like everyone in this room
i was like trying to hit like different age groups i wanted 18 year olds i wanted like 80 year olds i was
calling all my friends back in the Midwest, like, hey, I haven't visited in a while, but if you
could just tell me your thoughts on reproduction, like, what's it like in the Midwest? And then
I was very, you know, I was like, oh, someone's, you know, 20 and married in Colorado? Yes,
I'll call you too. And I was basically just calling and saying, when I say the word reproduction,
like, what do you do? Like, what do you think? Are you like, oh, God, or, you know, interested,
not interested, babies, anything more than babies? One guy talked to me about his.
pop? And I was like, I could go that way. Probably won't. And so there were a lot of like very
random conversations. And one of the things that came up in those conversations, um, was a number.
The number was 35. It took me a while to sort of notice the pattern. But I realized that
everyone was bringing it up in different ways. It was like, oh, I don't know if there's not that
much time left. Or, you know, women would be like, I'm drying up with my bio. My bio.
Logical clock. It's ticking. There was this idea that just kept coming up over and over again.
The idea that at the age of 35, your fertility vanishes if you're a woman. It just goes up and smoke.
Like in every relationship that I'm in, I feel like it's like this countdown clock in the back of my mind, you know?
And so I feel like I experience time differently.
And Bianca, the young woman on the phone here, she wasn't the only one who told us about this feeling.
It came up in another conversation that we had with this woman named Chloe.
She said she really, really wanted to have kids.
She was in a relationship.
She and her partner got along great.
Partner wasn't sure she wanted to have kids.
And so on her 30th birthday, Chloe's dad sent her an email where he basically said, like, get on it.
The biological clock keeps ticking, especially if you want to have several kids.
You don't want to split up with your partner because they've done nothing long, but the biological clock dot, dot, dot.
Thanks, Dad.
It's very helpful on my birthday.
And to add flame to the fire, I talked to another woman who saw 35 as such a deadline.
She decided that she was going to have a kid by herself when she was 34.
She wasn't going to wait.
And she told me that the doctors categorized her in a way that really surprised her.
At you're 35, you're considered a geriatric mother.
It's a condition that is written on my birth chart because I was due two weeks after turning 35.
And so I kept thinking, as I was like hearing all the stuff, I was like, I'm not freaking out about this stuff, but like, should I be freaking out about this stuff?
And then last October, I was on the phone with this sort of big wig doctor in St. Louis.
And the minute we got on the phone, the first thing he asked me was how old I was.
I said I was 34.
And he said, you need to get on a plane and fly out here.
And we need to freeze those eggs.
And then I thought, fuck off.
And then I thought, maybe when the series.
is done.
And then I thought, you know, maybe I should be taking this all a little bit more seriously
and actually look into this whole like reproductive cliff thing.
So started reading a lot of scientific articles, watching YouTube, and I pretty quickly
found what seemed to be the culprit of the cliff.
So the X-axis is age.
Okay, so I need you to put on sort of your visualization cap because we're going to go through
a few graphs in this story.
And for this one, it is a line graph.
It goes 20 to 45.
And the Y, the vertical line, is something called fecundability, which is the chance a couple
will get pregnant after one month of trying.
And this is what the graph look like.
The shape of the graph is a line that goes pretty straight up from puberty.
It stays flat until the age of 33.
and then it turns and goes pretty steeply down until it hits zero.
Here's me describing it on stage as an animation of it unfolded.
He goes,
and then there's like a fireball at the ends.
So this is from a journal called Human Reproduction.
It was published in 2004, and that is a cliff, if I've ever seen one.
and I think another thing that I wanted to note
is that on this graph
33 is the age where you actually should start freaking out
35, you're already done
but
there's one tiny caveat
and that is that the data behind this graph
is crap
yeah this data is based
on French peasants
from the 1700s
and you may ask, why them out of everybody?
And the idea is that when they're doing fertility studies,
they want, ideally, they say,
populations of humans that have never used birth control.
So people that are like pure from artificial hormones.
And their idea was that these French peasants were the way to go.
And so this came up, it got, you might have seen this,
it got written about in like a lot of different magazines.
And it was the data being used to terrify women.
And then so I just say, you know what?
Like, I reject this cliff because I'm done with it.
And so at this point, I thought maybe I should stop watching YouTube and actually, like, call someone on the phone.
And so I called an epidemiologist from Boston.
Her name is Lauren Wise, and she studies fertility.
I know where the cliff came from.
There was a very pivotal.
You do?
Oh, yeah.
Oh, my God.
Tell me about the cliff.
So the cliff, I'm pretty sure, came from this.
review paper written by Brokman's.
Who is this Brochman guy?
And why does he get to draw a cliff on my fertility?
He's a very famous reproductive endocrinologist.
So after we got off the call, Lauren sent me the paper she was thinking about.
This one is a study of recent people, and it has the same, same, like, axes.
It's 20 to 40 is age on the bottom.
And then on the side is your chance of pregnancy.
And it goes...
And so this line graph, it starts high, and as it moves right, it continues just flat and unchanging.
And then at some point, that line turns downward, and it arcs to the bottom of the graph, kind of like a skateboard ramp.
And then it's like a little like a water slide at the end.
And I thought, oh, that looks like, it's kind of like a mesa.
That's like a version of a cliff.
And so then I thought, well, you know, maybe this graph.
I'm reacting pretty, pretty emotionally to it.
So I was like, okay, this one.
And so what you see on stage is I highlight that the downward turn on the graph
happens at the age of 31.
31, my friends.
We should have had this event four years ago.
But Lauren says it's not really based on great data either.
Is it based on more peasants? No, I'm glad you asked. It is based on recent people,
but it's all people that were at fertility clinics for fertility issues. So one could say
it's a bit of a compromised data set. It's not really representative of everyone. So back to
where we started, begs the question, what happens if you actually look at an entire population
or like a good cross-section of the population? And Lauren, the scientist who I was talking to,
did actually do that. So in 2007,
she launched a study with almost 3,000 Danish women who were trying to get pregnant.
We follow them forward in time for 12 months or until they get pregnant, whichever comes first.
And when you look at their data, this is what you see.
So this graph looks basically like a gently sloped hill.
The line starts halfway up.
It goes up, actually, a little bit more.
And then it curves gently down, arcing to the bottom.
Oh, there we go.
There with that.
Fertility doesn't look like a cliff at all.
I feel good about that.
Does anybody else?
All right.
On this one, your fertility goes up for a little while.
Right?
30.
It goes up till you're 30.
and then when you're 35, you're actually just below the fertility you had when you were 20,
which seems like that seems great.
So I thought, all right, I'm reacting very emotionally.
Tell me some numbers.
And so they said for 20 to 24-year-olds, after one year of trying and having regular sex,
which is actually like a technical term, so take that as you will,
but I won't judge you.
The chance of being pregnant.
78%.
Okay.
And if you're age 35 to 40, that percentage is 72%.
That feels like, oh, I'll take those odds.
Yeah.
So if you're in the 35 to 40-year-old age group here, as I am, that means you have a three out of four chance of getting pregnant.
And you have to keep in mind, these are rough estimates.
So obviously fertility is affected by age.
not the only thing that's affected by age.
Miscarriage rates go up as you get older.
Down syndrome rates also go up.
So treat these like ballpark figures for now.
But just in your mind, remember, 72% for 35 to 40-year-olds.
And so to me, this graph, it's like less cliff, more like English countryside.
Like, I will go get a pint on my way to pregnancy.
And this one actually made me want to call all those people.
we heard earlier on the phone and be like,
pst, send this to your dad, right?
But...
Now, I should say that our latest research
from the North American study
shows stronger effects.
Not so fast, Webster.
Not so fast.
What fertility looks like in North America?
That's coming up after the break.
I'm Molly Webster.
This is Radio Lab.
And we are jumping right back in to what a fertility cliff looks like in North America.
After the Denmark study, Lauren and her team were like,
Well, you know, Denmark is cool, but what about other countries?
So they start the same study in U.S. and Canada.
Now, this graph, as it unfolded on stage, was a real humsinger.
It started high on the left, and then it immediately begins to descend.
it slopes down gently.
There's a bit of a bump
where it regains some height
and then it turns downward
this time just more steeply dropping
to the bottom.
That's a tricky one.
He expected something else.
This one,
I felt sadder when I looked at it.
I felt like this is more,
like this is like less English countryside
more like a mountain biking championship
sponsored by Red Bull was kind of my feeling on this one.
And this is what Lauren said.
It is steep.
It's something you wouldn't want to take your kid on for a walk.
You would want to wear a helmet and some protective equipment.
And do you think the different results is different parts of the globe?
So they're both truly representative of the area they're in or like that one is wrong and it's really a line and not an uphill and then a downhill?
Oh, that is such a good question, Molly, and I don't know the answer to it.
It could be differences in diet and the environment and smoking.
It could be just all that bike riding in Denmark.
We all just need to go to Denmark.
Honestly, it seems like I should have been having sex in Denmark when I was 30.
Exactly.
That is the take-home message of our study.
Or I should not have been.
And it was very good that I was in North America, depending on what you want your outcome to be.
Exactly.
So the Danish study, I think, is a happier, cheerier study.
And it's true.
If you look at the numbers for the North American study, they are lower.
So if you're in the 37 to 39-year-old age range and you have sex, again, regularly, for one year, you have a 67% chance at conception.
Past 40, it drops 255.
So there are three things I took away from talking to Lauren.
First, it's pretty obvious that there is no cliff.
As another biologist I spoke with said, like nothing in biology is a cliff, right?
It's all just like a gradual change.
It's like a gradual decline with age.
And in a way, there's something about it being gradual.
It kind of lets you choose to freak out where you want to freak out.
The second thing I thought about with Lauren was that, you know, obviously it's different for everybody.
and these are just really big studies, and it's just averages, right?
And the third thing was, like, even in the North American study at, like, 40, 42, you still land at 50%.
So it's not zero, which to me I was like, hey, 50-50, that's not bad, right?
But there was one part of the conversation with Lauren that made me think about 35 in kind of a different way.
It started when she reminded me that there is, as much as I was happy, about the 50-50,
actually a biological deadline.
What is the actual end?
Oh, the average age of menopause is 50 in the United States.
And so maybe the thing that's going on for a lot of people is it's not so much a cliff at 35,
rather 35 is an age where sort of the end comes into focus.
And as I was thinking more and more about the phone.
conversations I was having, I realized, like, oh, this was playing out for everybody.
Like, this is biology, but the people who are, like, wondering about their careers and their
homes and their parents, like, they were all sort of having the same, like, moment where they're
like, oh, there's something happening here where, where I feel something in front of me, like,
in the way I never had before.
It's like there's like this like little sliver of possibility before you all come back here in five years when you're 40 and we do this again.
Thank you so much.
So this event, which was called 30 something, happened live on stage in 2018.
So it felt like it was time to maybe update the number.
So I called Lauren back a few weeks ago.
And she said to me that based on sort of a larger.
data pool, now what they're seeing is just kind of minor adjustments, but if you're in the 37 to
39-year-old range and you have sex regularly for one year, you have a 66% chance at conception,
and after 40, it drops to 51%. Now, this is unpublished data, but if you look at this mapped
on a graph, it doesn't really change the original shape of the graph, as you heard me describe it
in the episode. Also, the term geriatric pregnancy, you may now hear it as advanced maternal age. And
they picked 35 as a cutoff because it was linked to an evidence of decline in fertility and also
concern in increased risks for genetic abnormalities. So it doesn't all have to do with the
fertility cliff, but it's often linked in conversation. The other thing was that Lauren looked into
male data so
I would like to hear about that
yeah if you notice like in our
episode we didn't we didn't dig into
that right but the male data
it's actually it honestly
surprised me it also
has a shift
downward
into you know less
fecundability around 35
and it so it does
decline though it does it at slightly
later ages than for
females yeah one thing Lauren
did say is that it took 12 years to get enough data to be able to say anything about older men
with any precision because there just aren't that many men in their late 40s or early 50s
trying to have a baby. But it sounds like it's, so it's more like a, it's like a fertility
gentle slope as opposed to a fertility cliff. Yeah, yeah. The decline starts happening at more
advanced ages and it's less of a steep slope.
And since we did that piece in 2018, there's all sorts of data that, you know, sperm does start to decrease in quality over time and so you can get more genetic abnormalities.
Like there's greater chances of that.
Right.
Well, you know, talking about sperm makes me think of donations.
Oh, okay.
We're going there.
Talking about donations makes me think.
Of our listeners?
Of our listeners.
And how grateful we are for all of them.
We're so grateful, truly.
And we, part of the reason we're so grateful.
is because we, like, we know what we're working on
and we're really excited about it,
and we can't wait to get it to you.
I feel like if listeners smash that donate button now,
which is really just radialab.org slash donate,
then it will help fund some of the stuff we have coming up in 2026,
which for me, hoping it's about snail sex.
And for you.
Okay.
For me, I'm working on brain balls.
Brain balls.
Yeah.
How New Year's Eve appropriate.
Yeah, yeah.
Just picture a strike of midnight on New Year's when we're watching the ball drop.
Just imagine it's a brain ball dropping.
All right.
Well, how could you not donate to that?
After that, after that, grotesque image.
Thank you, Latif.
Thank you, Diane Kelly for fact-checking this episode and Lauren Wise at Boston University for all the data crunching.
And thank you, everyone, for listening.
for being here for 2025.
Yeah.
Don't drink too much eggnog
and have a great holiday season
and we can't wait to connect with you again
in the new year.
Bye.
I'm Valerie Chin and I'm from Brooklyn, New York.
And here are the staff credits.
Radio Lab is hosted by Lulu Miller and Latif Nasser.
Soren Wheeler is our executive editor.
Sarah Sandbach is our executive director.
Our managing editor is Pat Walters.
Dylan Keefe is our director of sound design.
Our staff includes
Jeremy Bloom,
W. Harry Fortuna, David Gable,
Maria Paz Gutierrez,
Sindu Nianasambundum,
Matt Kielty,
Mona MadGovkar,
Annie McEwen,
Alex Neeson,
Sara Carey,
Anisa Vizza,
Ariane Wack,
Molly Webster,
and Jessica Young,
with help,
help from Rebecca Rand.
Our fact checkers are Diane Kelly, Emily Krieger, Anna Pujol Mazini, and Natalie Middleton.
Hi, I'm Edina.
I'm calling from Greensburg.
Leadership support for Radio Lab science programming is provided by the Simons Foundation
and the John Templeton Foundation.
Foundational support for Radio Lab was provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
station.
