Radiolab - The Sweetest Thing
Episode Date: September 18, 2026“What is the sweetest thing in the world?” After co-host Latif Nasser’s sons ask him this deceptively simple question, he goes on a quest to find it. Is it a West African Katemfe berry? Or an in...dustrial sugar substitute cooked up in a lab? Or an ingredient hiding in plain sight in all of our pantries? A simple mystery that will make you question what sweetness even is, how our tongues (and other body parts you wouldn’t expect) determine what we like, and how far you would go to taste something sweeter than anyone has ever experienced. Thank you to Latif’s sons for indulging us, to Nicola Twilley and Cynthia Graber at Gastropod, to Anni Laffitte, Nazli Parvizi at Museum of Food and Drink, to food icons Claire Saffitz and Sam Seneveratne who did a live show version of this episode with us at the Tribeca Festival. And thank you to Davy Gardner and his wonderful team of audio folks at the Tribeca Festival.Thank you to Jialin Deng who composed the song that was our ‘sonic seasoning’. And to Laura Rickman and everyone else at Columbia University’s Mortimer B Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute for hosting us. And big thanks to experimental psychologist Charles Spence at Oxford, sweetness chemist Grant DuBois, Danielle Reed at Monell Chemical Senses Center, and nutritional scientist Sarah Berry at King’s College London who all talked to us about their research. And Brian Everett of Honest Organic Farms.And a very special thanks to Sean Oomens, inventor of producer Jess Yung’s favorite candy, nerd gummy clustersEPISODE CREDITS: Reported by - Latif Nasserwith help from - Jessica Yung, Maria Paz Gutierrez, Jessica Yung, Ekedi Fausther-Keeys, and Natalia RamirezProduced by - Jessica Yung with help from - Mona Madgavkar, Maria Paz Gutierrez, Gabby Santas, and Maia Appleby Melamedwith mixing help from - Jeremy BloomFact-checking by - Sophie Samieeand Edited by - Pat WaltersEPISODE CITATIONS:Videos:Youtuber Chemiolis tried to make Luguduname himself (https://zpr.io/MmUbGfwwFrFH) Articles -Race to Redesign Sugar (https://zpr.io/VpsMxfPRbxaz) by Nicola TwilleyThe Search for Sweet (https://zpr.io/JmeDkVhrd2dK) by Burkhard BilgerHow My Trip to Quit Sugar Became A Journey Into Hell (https://zpr.io/ni6xgC38Qmyf) by Caity WeverHow Much of Our Existence Do We Owe to Sugar? (https://zpr.io/M2py48SxnQAT) by Jackie Flynn MogensenScientists Find Sugar In Space (https://zpr.io/e94UtUuhPtbT) by Rebecca DzombakSign up for our newsletter!! It includes short essays, recommendations, and details about other ways to interact with the show. Signup (https://radiolab.org/newsletter)!Radiolab is supported by listeners like you. Support Radiolab by becoming a member of The Lab (https://members.radiolab.org/) today.Follow our show on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook @radiolab, and share your thoughts with us by emailing radiolab@wnyc.org.Leadership support for Radiolab’s science programming is provided by the Simons Foundation and the John Templeton Foundation. Foundational support for Radiolab was provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Wait, you're listening.
Okay.
All right.
Okay.
All right.
You're listening to Radio Lab.
Radio Lab.
From W-N-Y-S.
See?
See?
Yeah.
All right.
So, Latif.
Yeah.
What are we doing today?
We're going to go on a hunt.
All right.
That actually starts in my car.
All right.
I was with my two kids.
I think at that point, my kids are.
were six and three maybe and the U-2 song, The Sweetest Thing comes on. Do you know that song?
Of course.
Da-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-ha.
Yeah, of course. It's a bop.
Yeah, it's my favorite of their songs. And my kids, who have never heard the song before,
they're listening to the song, and they ask, what is the sweetest thing?
Did you try love? Were you like love?
Yeah, no. My kids, they don't care about that. They were just,
just like, no, no, no, but what really is the sweetest thing?
So just, what's the sweetest thing I can get in my mouth?
Yeah, they're kids.
They love sugar.
Yeah, of course.
Right now, they're obsessed with gummy bears, and they just wanted to know, is there some other thing out there we've never had before that's even sweeter?
Hmm.
So I figured, like, I'm a journalist.
I can answer this.
Well, Latif bless your amazing children who I adore.
Do you care about this question?
Yeah.
Yes.
Why?
Because, okay, because it sounds like a dumb, simple question.
Or not a dumb question, but it seems like it has an answer.
And then you're like, son.
I kind of expected it would be that way too.
But then this question turned out to be so much more.
More than just a hunt for like a substance,
it became like this thing where I was trying to get to the edge of human experience.
And sweetness as one of those experiences.
It's this basic familiar thing.
thing that we all know. It's like almost mundane, but I kept finding that, wait a second,
like, no, no, no, the edges even further to these levels of sweetness that I didn't even know
existed in the first place. And there's some mind hacks and brain lasers and space raspberries.
There's a lot of fun stuff along the way. All right. All right. Let's go.
Okay. All right. So the very first thing that I found right off the bat, I found all these scientists.
Check, check, check. Okay.
Hey, okay.
Hello.
Who are out there trying to answer rigorously scientifically this exact kid question.
My name is Eric Walters.
Can I call you Eric?
Please do.
You don't have to doctor me.
Like Eric here, a biochemist who used to work at Nutrisweet where he developed artificial sweeteners.
I spent a lot of my career working on sweeteners, studying sweeteners, and ultimately writing a book about sweeteners.
And what scientists like Eric in the food industry do is they find.
or even make new sweet molecules.
Yeah, yeah.
Tweaking the structure in small ways and seeing,
does it get better or worse?
And then they literally rank them in terms of sweetness.
Yeah.
And they keep like a list of the sweetest things on Earth.
Oh.
And I want to walk you up my top five of the list
using table sugar as our baseline here.
Because that's the most common sugar that we use every day.
Okay, great.
So number five.
Honey. You know honey.
Heard of it.
Honey is about 1.5 times sweeter than sugar.
Which, what does that mean?
It's just, what does that mean?
So typically, in the food industry, people do this with trained taste panels.
These specialized taste testers who are really good at noticing differences in sweetness.
I haven't done it in years, but I used to be very good at it.
And here's what they generally do.
They take a little sugar.
One gram of sugar.
Like a pinch.
Dissolve it in water.
Call it a cup of water.
Taste it.
sip and spit.
Then they mix the same amount of the thing they're testing,
let's say in this case, honey, with the same amount of water.
And again, to see which is sweeter.
Yeah.
Now, to be able to say how much sweeter this thing is than sugar,
what you do is you just add water.
Until it's the same?
Until it's the same.
So like with honey, you would theoretically need to add 1.5 times as much water
for them to taste the same.
then you can say it's 1.5 times as sweet.
Yep, there you go.
Okay, that's a good way to, like, come up with a scale.
Yeah.
Okay.
Okay, so that was honey.
Honey was number five on the list.
Now, one level sweeter.
Number four.
Aspartame.
Aspartame, which is used to sweeten equal.
Sure.
Okay.
It's about 200 times as sweet as sugar.
So it takes 200 times more water.
Wow.
With aspartame to taste the same as a cut.
cup of sugar water.
That's wild.
Yeah.
Next, number three, this one actually comes from nature.
Ooh.
This is a catemfe fruit, which is a little red berry that grows in West African tropical
rainforests.
And it is 2,000 times sweeter than sugar.
Oh, orders of magnitude.
Yeah.
But then, number two, Adventim.
How sweet to just take a guess?
5,000.
Adventame is 20,000 times sweeter than sugar.
Oh my gosh.
That means just a pinch of Adventame could sweeten 500 gallons of water.
That's like a jacuzzi of sugar water.
That's freaky.
Yeah.
Okay.
Number one.
The number one sweetest thing, according to these expert sweetness sippers,
sitting around in their food labs, is lugdenome.
Yeah.
I don't even know how to pronounce it.
Lugdenum.
I always say Lugdename, but I...
Lugdename.
Okay.
This is 300,000 times sweeter than sugar.
Oh.
Yeah, that's what we said.
Oh, my God.
Yeah, that's insane.
Okay, so what is this?
This is a swimming pool.
This is a full swimming pool.
Wow.
What was the mood and the reaction at Nutrisweet to this news?
I was jealous.
Yeah.
Wish I'd thought of that.
Because in his line of work, they're always trying to push this limit a little bit further.
Right.
I discovered a sweetener that was 28,000 times as sweet as sugar.
Interesting.
So I didn't win.
I didn't win the prize on that one.
But the prize goes to this like Frankenstein of a molecule called lugdenum.
Okay, sit down.
The wise man.
You want a very little amount of this one, okay?
You ready?
So I set up a little tasting for my kids.
Yeah, that's a good amount, huh?
Five, oh, too much.
I couldn't actually get my hands on any lugdename
because it turns out it's not FDA approved for human consumption
because apparently if you try it, there's a chance.
It turns your blood the color of chocolate.
What?
But.
Why don't you guys drink some water?
I did give them some advent.
tame, number two on our list.
Okay, ready, guys?
Okay, and...
Oh, okay.
What do you think?
Ugly.
Ugly?
You sat it out all over the floor?
Okay, Huck is now scraping his tongue with his fingers.
What are you doing?
No, don't, no, no, no, don't spin on the couch.
That's gross, man. That's gross.
That's gross.
So the thing that scientists say is 20,000 times sweeter than sugar,
does not actually taste sweet.
Yeah, I got it.
Now, isn't that remarkably dumb?
According to psychologist, Linda Bartoshik,
this whole ranked list is ridiculous.
Like, this is the dumbest way to measure this.
Have you ever heard anybody say that saccharin is 100 times as sweet as sugar?
Yes.
Have you ever tasted saccharin and sugar at the same time?
No.
Well, I assure you, you will not think the saccharin is 100 times as sweet as sugar.
for God's sake.
Well, these sweeteners, they do have some off flavors.
Eric says that the problem with coming up with a perfect sweetener is that there's only
one sweetness receptor.
But on the other hand, humans have, I don't know, 20 or 30 different bitter taste receptors.
So it's like a minefield that you have to kind of tiptoe through to get to the promised land
of the sweet receptor.
Yes, yes.
So it's really hard to develop a compound that,
triggers the sweet receptor, but doesn't trigger any of the bitter receptors as well, which is why
you get those off tastes from so many sweeteners. But the food chemists, when they're ranking
sweeteners, they are just looking at one very specific thing. And that's a value that we refer to as
potency. They just want the thing you can use the smallest amount of to turn on that sweetness
receptor. The weakest thing you can just taste is sweet. Got it. Okay. And that kind of
measurement is very, very helpful if you are a soda company or making chewing gum or something and
you have a giant vat of something. And you want to put in the least amount of a thing to make the
most money. Put in the least amount of that thing, right? Right, right. But that's not what my kids are
asking. That's not what I'm looking for. We're looking for a whole other thing. And that's intensity
of sweetness. How sweet does it actually taste to you? Yeah, I think that's, that's right. Because
we're talking about sweetness and sweetness as a perception.
This is Paul Breslin.
Professor in the Department of Nutritional Sciences at Rutgers University.
And he says, you know, with things like Adventame, right?
You might think that if you just kept adding more and more of it to the water,
it would keep getting sweeter and sweeter and sweeter until it went to the moon.
But it wouldn't.
You'll eventually reach a point where the sweetness intensity sort of reaches a plateau.
The amount of sweetness that you perceive sort of levels off.
The thing is that our sweetness receptor,
it's not just like a regular light switch you turn on or off.
It's more like a dimmer switch.
Okay, sure.
So we can get brighter and brighter.
And these sweeteners, they can only get a certain amount of bright.
Huh.
So what we really want to know is what thing will turn that dimmer switch up the highest?
To the brightest bulk.
To what will get you the bright.
Brightest ball.
Okay.
And according to Eric, by that measure...
Maybe sugar is the sweetest thing there is.
No.
Because it can get you to a higher perceived intensity of sweetness.
He's never heard of or tasted anything sweeter than sugar.
Wait, so is that the answer?
The sweetest thing is sugar?
Which feels like an extremely anti-climactic answer, right?
That's just why...
I mean, we're just back where we started.
We are.
We are back where we started.
But, like, for a kind of profound reason, actually.
Sugar plays a critical role in survival.
Glucose is the best fuel the brain can use.
From the very beginning, Linda says.
The first thing when a baby is born, you want the baby to do is nurse.
And the baby has reflexes that help it begin to nurse, but the sweet taste of mother's milk.
The sugar in the mother's milk is what keeps it nursing.
So sweet taste is an incredibly important.
important cue. Our brains basically evolved this particular sensation, the reward of sweetness,
as a way to get us to want sugar. Yeah. The receptors have evolved specifically to respond to sugar.
Like, it's the thing the lights which was made for. In fact, there have been theorists in the past
who've thought that sweet might be the beginning of our understanding of pleasure. Oh, that's
interesting. And so I started to see sugar and sweetness as almost the same thing. Right.
Sweetness doesn't describe sugar.
It is sugar.
Yeah.
Which is cool and which is revelatory of our basic human nature.
But also, like, I don't know.
I still was craving more.
Like, there's a limit here.
I just want to go beyond it.
And lucky for me, I ended up stumbling into a whole world of things.
that could take us beyond that limit.
Really?
And I'm going to take you into uncharted sweetness territory.
And that's after the break.
This is Radio Lab.
I'm Lulu.
I'm here with Latif Nasser.
Yeah.
Latif is on a quest to discover the sweetest thing in the world, on the planet.
The sweetest thing on Earth.
And where we left off, you were at a potential answer that the sweetest thing is sugar.
Yeah, except maybe not.
Not. Okay, so Lulu, what is sweeter? A strawberry or a blueberry? I think a strawberry.
So a blueberry has technically more sugar. Really? That's right. The blueberry has twice as much sugar in it.
According to Linda Bartoshek.
There are fruit that can make their sugar sweeter. What?
Now, why do fruits care? Because animals that eat the fruits spread their seeds.
So the fruit would really like that sugar to be sweeter.
And maybe the fruit doesn't know how to add more sugar to it.
I'm talking about the fruit's got consciousness.
Of course, it doesn't.
Evolution is doing this.
Right.
But what has happened through evolution is that some fruit are now using volatiles,
which make the smell of the fruit, to increase the sweetness.
Volatiles are just little molecules that float around in the air.
they make things smell.
Huh.
Now, there are two ways you can perceive volatiles.
You probably only know about one of them, and that's you sniff them.
Right.
But what happens when you put food in your mouth that is giving off odors?
You chew it.
You're releasing the odors in your mouth.
And when you swallow, those odors are pumped through a hole in the back, and they go into your nose.
Uh-huh.
And can intensify the sweet signal in the brain.
So the strawberry tastes sweeter than the blueberry because it puts out all of these non-sugar smell molecules
that send smell signals to your brain which overlap with the taste signals and give them a little boost.
Huh.
And according to Paul Breslin, as an ape, our species, our natural proclivity is to mostly want to eat fruit.
Thanks to our long evolutionary history with fruit.
A lot of animals can make their own vitamin C. Humans can't make their own.
and vitamin C, so we have to eat fruit.
Even if something just looks kind of fruity or reminds you of a fruit,
it's like there's an extra little bell ringing in our heads.
So if you play with vision, if you make something very fruity that you associate with sweetness,
you can perceive it as being more sweet.
Or if you color it red, so it looks like a nice ripe fruit, that can actually make
the sweetness perception go up.
No.
So if you were to take the same packet of sugar and dye some of it red, the red would taste sweeter to me.
That's right.
That's hard to believe.
Well, did you bring this stuff I told you to bring?
Yep.
Okay.
You have some honey?
I have some honey.
Okay.
Why don't we first get our sort of baseline?
Take a tiny bite.
Just normal old honey.
Here we go.
Yeah.
Okay.
Very sweet.
Okay.
So number two, I want you to take that honey.
Okay.
Grab some strawberry extract and red food coloring.
Okay.
Mix that all up.
Ew. It looks like almost like cherry cough syrup.
Okay, so to keep that normal honey we just had in mind, now taste the strawberry honey.
Okay.
Tell me if it's sweeter.
And I should like look, I guess.
Oh, significantly.
Right?
Right.
Yeah.
Wow.
It's kind of dramatic, right?
Yeah.
It's interesting.
It's not sweeter in like what I was expecting, like a syrupy sweeter way.
It's almost like I picture all these like flowers.
Like, it's like flowery sweeter.
Okay, now...
There's another thing?
Yeah.
I mean, by this point, I was obsessed with ways to jack up the perception of sweetness.
And I found all these studies that suggest that along with smell and vision, sound actually works for sweet as well.
What?
So there are certain high-pitched tones that you can play and you can enhance sweetness by as much as 5 to 10%.
Wait, why would that be?
What's the evolutionary?
What's the why?
Such a good question.
I looked it up and no one knows for sure.
Okay, fair.
It is a mystery.
Okay.
But they have seen it happen over and over in experiments.
Okay, so like I'm about to play you a song.
This was used in a study at the Science Museum of London.
Here, let's just see if it works for you.
Okay.
Okay, you ready?
I'm ready.
Okay, here it is.
This is like the music you see in like 1950s animations of Canada.
dancing.
Okay.
Eat the red honey again.
Okay.
Wow.
It gives it like more dimension.
It's sparklier.
Crystallier.
When you talk about the crystals, is it because your honey is like kind of hard?
My honey's a little old.
So maybe the crystalli quality is because of the old honey, really, instead of the music.
Okay.
But I do agree.
I think there was a step up.
The strawberry step up was pretty dramatic.
And I feel like the sound step was maybe harder to tell.
Yeah, a little subtler.
So at this point, I was like, okay, cool.
These hacks definitely work.
But also, they're not so dissimilar, like the flavor and the color.
It's not so dissimilar to what candy companies are already doing.
Like, it just felt like I was like, oh, I feel like I'm back to gummy bears here.
Right.
And then I was like, how can we get even sweeter than this?
Uh-huh.
So then I thought, what if we just went to the source of all of this?
Remember, you know, taste ultimately is in your brain.
Which took me to the lab.
Okay, here we are.
We're at Columbia University with all these like brain scans on the wall here.
Of this geneticist and neurobiologist.
Nice to meet you.
Dr. Charles Zooker.
I'll shake the microphone.
He was one of the people, along with other scientists like Danielle Reed,
who discovered the sweetness receptor.
Oh.
And I've dedicated my career to study how detection gets transformed.
into perception.
And since then, he's been following that sweet signal
from the taste receptor into the brain.
So it goes from the tongue to ganglia,
from ganglia to brain stem,
brain stem to a different station in the brain stem,
where it gets further process.
From there and it goes to the thalamus,
and the thalamus goes to the cortex.
Somewhere along the way here,
we know that sight and smell can join up and boost the signal,
but regardless, the cortex.
is where you now say,
ah, this is sweet.
Huh.
I was saying, you know, the typical laboratory, you know,
you have benches and you have desks.
So we actually visited Charles's lab.
And then we have lots of specialty rooms
where he studies this pathway.
To see, okay, what happens if we move this over here?
What happens if we change?
What happens if we block it over here?
Or if we block the train here or something.
So normally the cells have the sweet receptor,
and that's why sweet activates that pathway all the way.
to the brain.
Yeah.
But if instead there, I put, let's say, a bitter receptor.
Mm-hmm.
Now the bitter chemical will activate the same sweet pathway.
Right.
Wow.
To be clear, he is not doing all of this for the reasons that we are to try to find the
sweetest thing or the sweetest sensation.
He is working to understand really how sweetness and taste work in the brain.
And who knows, maybe that knowledge could help us deal with issues like addiction,
obesity, eating disorders, diabetes.
Yeah, sure.
So one of the things he's doing is he takes some mice
and he zeroes in on their sweet taste sensation neurons.
We introduce into only those neurons a little light switch.
Meaning they genetically engineer these neurons
and add genetic sensitivity to light.
And then we put a fiber optic in their head.
And then we turn the laser on.
which triggers the neuron.
And the brain will say, ah, sweet.
Oh, my gosh.
Oh, my gosh.
So, and by beaming in light,
it just, whatever it's tasting will taste sweet.
Yeah, even if it's not tasting anything.
What?
I mean, why are we then even bothering with candy instead?
Why don't we just do that to ourselves?
Very good. Excellent.
Come on.
People go around with pacemakers.
Yeah, sure.
And I could see a future that could be done.
Which I mean in terms of lifestyle, like that could be, just imagine, like that could be revolutionary.
Think about like you could get the perfect sugar hit, no calories, no insulin spike.
You could even pair it with whatever you want, which means like your kids could be eating spinach and it tastes like candy, right?
Yeah, okay, that's kind of me.
Yeah.
But because we're on this mission here for the sweetest thing, I was like, wait a second, but could you use that same thing?
Could you use that same laser light and crank it up to the highest it can go
and just blast that sweetener on and get something that is the sweetest thing that anyone has ever tasted?
Like you could maybe get a sweetness that we have never known.
A sweetness that has just been totally blocked off from us,
just from the physical reality of sugar.
So I asked him.
And Charles was like...
In principle, I could imagine this.
You could potentially create the sweetest sweet.
You could transcend.
The sweetest thing could be light.
Like, could be nothing.
I don't like it.
You don't like it.
I don't like it.
Why not?
I don't know.
It's like let's divorce ourselves from the real world even more.
So that pleasure itself doesn't.
doesn't even have to be found.
Your boys ask this question
about what is there to find in the world.
This just says you can get it from the inside
and aren't we siloed enough?
Yeah, I mean, kind of, but like really it's,
I feel like my takeaway from all this reporting
is like it's kind of all happening in your mind anyway.
It's all a mind game.
Taste.
And for me, like talking to Charles,
I was just like, whoa, we're open.
opening up a whole new world. Like what even is possible here? Like what can we do? What are the,
what are the places we could go? Yeah, but it's like a, the whole new world is just on your couch.
Like at least with a search, you have to get out the door and be surprised. Like if somebody uses
this, what, what incentive do they have to leave, to leave the house? Yeah, I mean, sure, but like,
but if you could definitively know that this experience will be sweeter than anything you could ever experience out in the world, wouldn't you try that?
Maybe.
Okay.
Okay.
I'm sure I like.
Okay.
I get your hankering for wanting to go someplace new.
Let me take you one last place that this mapping of sweetness took me that I did not expect.
Okay.
So last month, a team of researchers at the Center for Astrobiology in Spain were looking at a cloud of interstellar dust and gas here at the center of the Milky Way.
You know, spectroscopy, you know, about that.
I think it's like you detect based on the light waves being emitted, you get clues on what the substances.
That's right.
So cool.
So they did this on this kind of cloud of interstellar dust.
And what they found in that cloud was a huge amount of a molecule called erythralose.
Arithrilose.
Okay.
It's a four-carbon sugar.
This is the first time ever they found a, not only a sugar, a relatively complex sugar in deep space.
And would it taste like sugar to us?
So the crazy thing.
Yes.
Is that this exact sugar, erythralose,
yes?
Happens to be found.
Yes?
In raspberries.
Yeah.
Wait, wait.
Space tastes like raspberries?
No, no, no.
Just this one cloud, but it does, it does make you wonder, right?
Like, if this is just out there as raw material just floating, like maybe that is a big clue for us that there is a big clue for us that there is a,
Space raspberry somewhere.
Whoa.
And do they now think maybe there's sugar like all up in Neptune and burning out of the sun?
There has to be enough of it that you can read it on a mass spec.
The scientists have spectroscopy.
They need taste ozoppy.
The next Hubble telescope.
It's just like a giant tongue that they send out.
You know, you just make a rocket with just tongues.
You're just a...
The James Webb tongue.
Yeah.
The James Webb tongue.
Yeah.
And then, you know, you added microgravity.
Is that going to work like sonic seasoning to even amp the sweetness the more?
Yeah.
Blotif Nasser, who himself scores pretty high on my list of the sweetest things on this planet.
If only my kids liked me as much as they like gummy bears.
Thank you to you, Lulu.
Thanks to my kids.
Thank you to Jalindang, who composed the song that was our sonic seasoning.
Thank you to Laura Rickman and everyone else at Columbia University.
is Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute for hosting us.
And a major thank you to Grant Dubois, to Charles Spence at Oxford University,
and to Danielle Reed at the Monell Chemical Census Center.
They were all extremely helpful in explaining their work and taste in general to us.
We're very grateful for their help.
This episode was reported by Lachif Nasser with help from Jessica Young.
It was produced by Jessica Young with help from Mona McGa Gowker.
Maria Paz Gutierrez, Gabby Santis, and Maya Appleby Melamed.
It was edited by Pat Walters, fact-checking by Sophie Sammy E.
This is Radio Lab. I'm Lulu Miller.
And I'm Latif Naster.
Say sweet, everybody.
This is Lulu here from a couple weeks after we recorded this episode
with a note that I'm passing along from Latif.
He's not reading himself. You'll see why. Here we go.
Okay, so, hey folks, Latif here.
Before we leave you, I just wanted to let you know, possibly TMI,
that I injured my vocal cords.
It's nature's way of telling me I talk too much,
and I'm under doctor's orders to talk as little as possible
for the next couple of months,
so I'm off on medical leave, putting a sock in it, so to speak.
I'll be leaving you and your ears and brains
and the capable hands of the rest of the Radiolab team.
We have fascinating episodes coming up from Matt and Molly
and Annie and Avere, and of course, Lulu,
about everything from grass to sulfur to, well, death.
I'll be back before you know it.
Take care of your throats.
Latif, take care of your throat.
Tea, rest, no talking.
We love you, Latif.
And again, don't worry, friends.
We have so many goodies coming up,
some of which Latif was already in,
so you'll probably be hearing him anyway.
And he will be back in a couple months.
Thanks for listening.
Hi, I'm Eva, and I'm from Brooklyn, New York.
And here are the staff credits.
Radio Lab is hosted by Lulu Miller and Latif Nasser.
Soren Wheeler is our executive editor.
Sarah Sandbach is.
is our executive director.
Our managing editor is Pat Walters.
Dylan Keefe is our director of sound design.
Our staff includes Jeremy Bloom,
W. Harry Fortuna, David Gable,
Maria Paz Gutierrez,
Sindhu Nainasambundum, Matt Kilty,
Mona McGawker, Annie McEwen,
Alex Nissen, Sara Kari,
Natalia Ramirez, Joanna Stroggots,
Anisa Vita, Ariane Wack,
Molly Webster, and Jessica Young.
With help from Gabby Sontas and Maya Appleby-Mal-Amad,
our fact-checkers are,
Nora Belblydia,
Hillary Elkins,
Rachel Gross,
Diane Kelly,
Emily Kreger,
Natalie Middleton,
and Sophie Simaey.
Leadership support for Radio Lab's science programming
is provided by the Simons Foundation
and the John Templeton Foundation.
Foundational support for Radio Lab
was provided by the Alfred P.
Sloan Foundation.
