Raging Moderates with Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov - Elon Musk’s Federal Government Takeover

Episode Date: February 11, 2025

Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov break down Elon Musk’s growing influence in the government and the legal battles piling up against him and DOGE. They dive into Trump’s latest federal worker buyout plan, his controversial comments on Gaza, and the Democrats’ strategy to push back.  Follow Jessica Tarlov, @JessicaTarlov.  Follow Prof G, @profgalloway. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Support for this show comes from Indeed. Indeed-sponsored jobs can help you stand out and hire fast. Your post even jumps to the top of the page for relevant candidates to make sure you're getting seen. There's no need to wait any longer. Speed up your hiring right now with Indeed. And listeners of this show will get a $100 sponsored job credit. To get your jobs more visibility, at indeed.com slash vox ca.

Just go to indeed.com slash Vox CA right now and support the show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. Indeed.com slash Vox CA. Terms and conditions apply. Hiring Indeed is all you need. TD Direct Investing offers live support. So whether you're a newbie or a seasoned pro,

you can make your investing steps count. And if you're like me and think a TFSA stands for total fund savings adventure, maybe reach out to TD Direct Investing. Welcome to Raging Moderates. I'm Scott Galloway. And I'm Jessica Tarlov. Jess, did you watch the Super Bowl? I did. It was so boring. Yeah, it was. It wasn't a good one. We would do for a bad one.

Did you stay up? You know, I wasn't planning to. I'm not into sports, and it started at 1130 p.m. And I made this big to-do about... I was basically this axis of evil between shitty fatty food and then the diabetes industrial complex and that the game is boring and CET. And then, of course, my 14-year-old said, and CET. And then of course my 14 year old said,

dad, you wanna watch Super Bowl? I'm like, yep, let's do it. And so I stayed awake until the halftime show, which I thought was awful by the way. And I get I'm not Kendrick Lamar's audience, but I thought the whole thing was just a giant snooze. What did you think? The game itself, I wasn't much interested in.

I'm not the biggest NFL enthusiast. I was like the side stories. So, you know, I want as much Taylor and Travis as possible. I thought that, you know, Trump was the first sitting president to attend a Super Bowl, which kind of surprised me. I'm not sure why that hasn't happened before. So, you know, there were side stories going on that were kind of interesting, but the game, not so good.

The halftime show, I wasn't wild about. It wasn't Bruno Mars for me was such a good halftime show, which I'm sure is a very lame pick in all of this, or Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake. Actually, a friend who was over was at that show and got to see The Nipple. So we talked about that for a while, but overall not great. We had a lot of little kids in the house. We cooked a lot.

My husband made a great pasta carbonara, rigatoni carbonara, or no, limaki carbonara. I'm trying to get my noodles straight. All in all, whatever, I guess, but rah rah America. There was one fantastic moment when of course, Taylor Swift got booed. That made me happy.

Why is that? Is that wrong? Yeah. Is that wrong? I thought that was hilarious. Why? I thought that, I don't know. It's like the Roman Coliseum, except lions,

we have Taylor Swift. So occasionally I think he'd boo against the lions. I don't know, I found the whole thing. It's like America where we sell boner pills and opioid induced constipation medication while giving young men CT, you know, America. I just find the whole thing, I don't know. I'm too cynical.

So when are you moving home? I'm not sure, 17 months, three weeks and four days is what is on my calendar. Not that I'm thinking about it, but I'm looking forward to getting back to the States. Cause you know, things are going so well. Totally. Yeah. I would be desperate to come back at this particular moment.

Though I think about moving back to London. And then I think I'll definitely want to, if we do, that I'll want to come back to America as well. So it's like- I don't think anything makes you feel more- The abusive relationship you can't quit, right? Well, I mean, the reality is, if you didn't know what was going on,

I think the reality for most Americans, unless you're a veteran or a beneficiary of SNAP or Head Start, which is a lot of Americans, but quite frankly, if you're in our economic weight class, you can shield yourself from this nonsense. And I would argue you're probably a beneficiary of it and not in a good way. But what I recognize moving to London,

which is in my opinion, the second best city in the world, is it is really hard to beat America. And that is if you like opportunity, if you like a crush and a collision of culture, grit, creativity, there's just nothing like America. And my reductive analysis after I say this and it triggers some people molesting the earth for the last 30 years is that America is still the best

place to make money and Europe's the best place to spend it. So when you're going into your spending years, absolutely spend time in Europe and go to Madrid and get a great bottle of wine for 10 bucks, not 80. Yeah. Check out Munich, which is an amazing city, Milan, go to PSV game in Paris. But if you're looking to advance your career, your influence,

your impact on the world professionally, everything here, I would argue, is a kind of medium or second gear. It just can't get out of second gear, but I gotta be honest, I can't wait to get back. I can't wait to get back to America. Yeah, well, we'll be thrilled to have you. God!

No, I'm done with that part, but I did notice that when I was in grad school, that all of the top performers in my PhD class, all desperate for American positions. I couldn't wait to be able to do it, even with all of the problems with academia. Yeah, well, that's the joke about Scotland, that some of the finest minds in the world and they all have the same thing in common, they left. Anyways, all right, enough of that.

Today we're discussing Elon Musk's increasing government influence. I don't know if you've heard, he's this very wealthy individual who puts rockets into space but doesn't live with any of his children. He's this former South African slash Canadian slash naturalized American. Anyways, interesting cat, we're going to talk about him. Reminds me of this very popular guy in the middle of the last century who some people really loved. We're coming in hot, I guess, right? You're going for it? But most people, you know, most people over time

found that, well, it's interesting. They have the same hand gesture. It appears that they have the same body language. Anyways, we're gonna talk about Elon Musk increasing government influence, Trump's buyout offer to federal workers, and the latest Democrats' effort to fight back. All right, let's get into it, Jess.

I think we're already in, so go. When? Go, yeah. I've already dived in the shallow in head first. You gave away the game already. We've already talked about 1930s, so yep. Elon Musk's grip on the executive branch keeps tightening. His Doja crew has been popping up at federal agencies,

snooping around sensitive systems. And until last week, when a federal judge blocked his team from accessing the Treasury Department's payment system, my understanding is every time they run up against a judge, they get blocked. Trump defended Musk's efforts, calling it part of his plan to cut wasteful spending and praise Musk for his work.

But the AFL-CIO and the Department of Justice are hitting back with multiple lawsuits. And Elon got also a new provocative Time Magazine cover that puts him behind Trump's desk. Interestingly, Republican support from us for all in the Trump administration is cooling off. An Economist YouGov poll shows only 26% now want him to have a significant influence.

That's down from earlier numbers, Jess. Musk also tweeted at me and Kara, funny, barely noticed my pivot co-host over the weekend accusing us of threatening his engineers just for calling out the harm they're causing. So, look, before, I'm not gonna, I don't wanna get into a back and forth here. What I would say is that the comments made

were made by me, not by Kara. And I find it sort of telling that he puts Kara's name first and goes after Kara instead of just going after the person who he has or should have a grievance with and that's me. And anyways, I'll let you go first. Any thoughts on what's going on with Elon, Jess? Well, I have a lot of thoughts on what's going on with Elon. I assumed that Kara came first in that because she has long covered him.

And last week, she had a big interview with Ezra Klein, which I thought was very impressive, talking about her years of covering him and being close to him. So that was my assumption as to why that happened. But yes, I have a lot of thoughts. I don't want to steal. If you have things to say about the tweet stuff, or maybe you're saving for pivot

when you two can talk about it more in depth. But I don't want to cut you off if you've got more on that, because mine is not about the tweets necessarily. You know, I don't have a lot. At first, I started, this is what happens whenever Elon tweets at me or gets angry at me, and that is my phone starts blowing up with, are you okay, is everything okay?

And I'm like, I'm not on Twitter, so I'm shielded from most of the toxicity. And someone sent me a screenshot of the tweet and that it had 11,000 comments. I'm like, well, I bet those comments aren't fun to read. But I mean, essentially, I start to get worried and I start to get panicked and I start to, you know, I start to get anxious.

And then I realize, okay, whatever you say about Kara and me is we live with our children. We don't sleep with a loaded gun next to us. We're not severely addicted to a dissociative substance. We're not making Nazi gestures. And he's acting like these engineers are in quantanimal bay when the reality is that probably the most serious thing they're doing other than denying children and veterans their payments, trying to figure out if the meme for Doge should be wearing sunglasses.

And just this notion of these billionaire tiers where he can't decide if it's his struggling engineers or just proper grammar. Like, pick a struggle boss. It's like, well, you don't have auto-correct. I just, I start to read this thing, I start to get upset, I start to think about responding. And then I think, I don't want to create a sideshow. I want to focus on what I think is important. And that is highlighting that we have somebody who was not cleared or approved by government or Congress, who is basically hacking into our federal systems.

If China did this, it would be an act of war without the permission of Congress and shutting off funds to veterans and children and the neediest. And I think that's where we have to remain our focus. So Musk saying mean things about me, that's a sideshow and it really doesn't matter. It's not important. And I'm not going to, other than I want to stay focused on, you know,

when you go into an emergency room, there's a saying called stop the bleeding. And that is if someone comes in with a gunshot and they are hemorrhaging blood, they don't take their PSA or their cholesterol level. So my ego and me being butthurt or responding or getting into it with him on Twitter, that's a distraction. We need to stay focused on the fact that we are now in a position where we've created a series of incentives where when we convict the president of being a felon and he gets reelected, he has learned

that the American public, as long as they control all three branches of government, will not hold him accountable for trespassing or hacking into our most sensitive federal systems. Now, if it gets to a judge, it gets pushed back, but they're kind of in this blitzkrieg moment of let's ask for forgiveness as opposed to permission. That's what I want to stay focused on. So I'm trying as hard as I can, and this isn't easy for me as you know, Jess, to put my ego aside and focus what limited audience and bandwidth I have on stopping the bleeding, if you will. Your thoughts. I applaud your maturity. It wasn't what I expected.

I had a daunting walk down here this morning. I was like, how do I avoid whatever's gonna happen in the conversation about the tweet? I don't, you know, I don't wanna get involved. That's, it's your bag, but I like this attitude. And I think it's honestly where the American public is going to be best served, A, because podcasts are the most important thing in the entire world and we can save them all,

but B, because the American electorate has basically told us that they're not interested in a lot of the sideshows, right? They voted kind of singularly focused either on the economy or on immigration, and, you know, that's what they deserve to have in their conversations. That's what they deserve to have delivered for them in terms of policy. None of those things have happened thus far in the first, I can't, I said only three weeks. That's what's so crazy that this has only been three weeks since Trump was inaugurated. But I think that's a very mature outlook on this.

And I look forward to listening to Pivot where I'm sure you two devolve into the immaturity. I'm just gonna unshame Kara. Just let her loose. Well, she's better at counterpunching than me. She does have good insults. Yeah, she's fearless. And I did. I mean, it's interesting. I'm thinking a lot about men and masculinity. It is interesting

that the Doge team is all young men. Yeah. And I do think that at the end of the day, the people responsible for this are the president and Elon Musk. And I think these, I'm gonna call them kids, but these young men, young men are more risk aggressive. Biologically, the prefrontal cortex doesn't catch up until they're the age of 25 to a woman's. It is interesting that there are no women as part of this group.

But isn't this what you predicted to some degree in talking about how disenfranchised and out of kind of mainstream society, young men were being pushed. So they're looking for community, they're looking for fun and adventure, and that high wherever they can find it. And they've spent a lot of time on their computers

and they're really fucking good, right? They're the ones who are gonna be able to hack into our system. So it does seem, I think calling them hackers is probably wrong. Hackers in a past life, and some of them have even been fired from past internships or jobs for hacking or working at places where convicted hackers have been employed. I mean, this is a motley crew in terms of resumes. And there are a lot of FBI agents, former FBI agents who have been speaking out saying, these are not people

that could pass a conventional clearance, which seems like a problem to me when you're talking about the Treasury payment system. But I do think that what we're seeing in the Doge team is very much linked to the world that you have been talking about for the last few years, and will be the subject of your forthcoming book, if you would like to plug that. Thanks for that. So I think they should be held accountable if a law has been broken here and that anyone who goes after the president or Musk for laws broken, which I believe they're trespassing. I believe that they have purposely circumvented Congress.

We're in uncharted territory, because you don't know if that is a civil or a criminal offense when the president approves of it. I think that's for courts to decide. But I do think it's a sideshow, to a certain extent, to focus on these young men. To be clear, the people accountable for this, the people who are orchestrating this,

are the president and Elon Musk. And to a certain clear, the people accountable for this, the people who are orchestrating this, are the president and Elon Musk. And to a certain extent, the Democrats, I don't want to say who are enabling it, but have been caught flat-footed and have to figure out a way to strike back. And we're going to talk about that later in the show. But it is interesting. And just to be real here about these young men,

I was thinking about it. I've said a lot. If I was born in 1920 Germany, I'd probably be wearing a Nazi uniform and probably would have died on a Russian field somewhere thinking that I was serving the fatherland. You are a function of where you grew up and in what time. And you can see with a lot of young men,

these are really talented young men with a lot of opportunities. So I don't feel comfortable grouping them into the bigger swath of young men in America who have a lack of on-ramps to a good living, a lack of financial security, a lack of prospects, a lack of an ability to meet a potential mate and start a family.

These guys are all incredibly talented and have a lot of opportunities. The only lesson someone called me, a radio show called me, I didn't go on, I said, what would your advice be to these young men? And I'm like, again, it's a sideshow, but what I would tell any young man is that we're in a high pressure situation,

do what I didn't do. And that is assemble a kitchen cabinet of people to advise you, say, this is what's going on, do you have any thoughts for me? Whether it's your parents, whether it's your parents' friends, whether it's just friends. whether it's your parents' friends, whether it's just friends? Because I saw being a young man, trying to express my manhood,

is quickly assessing the situation and then making a snap decision and trying to talk everybody into me being right, whatever that decision was. It is very hard to read the label, especially as a young man, when you're more risk aggressive and quite frankly don't have incredibly good judgment or reason, you're not that thoughtful, you're not that measured yet,

it is really hard, if not impossible, to read the label from inside of the bottle. So the larger learning I would want to communicate to all young men is do what I didn't do. I would have saved myself a lot of heartache, a lot of professional missteps, a lot of broken relationships, had I just reached out to people and said, this is the situation, do you have any thoughts or advice for me? And you might decide not to change your mind about what you're doing,

but this is, you know, when you find yourself in kind of uncharted territory, it's just a really good idea to check in with people from different backgrounds and say, this is what's going on. It's pretty intense. Do you have any thoughts? And I didn't learn that until I was much older. And I think men have a much more difficult time because we conflate strength and masculinity with being decisive as opposed to being thoughtful and listening.

Yeah, I agree with that. And I think that Democrats really suffered from a very effective smear campaign of us being the feminine party because we were talking about issues that, God forbid, affected women. And men by extension, like when someone is pregnant and there's someone who got her pregnant and is sticking around, then it affects you too. So I totally agree with that. And I didn't mean to paint with such a broad brush, but I do think that there's the widest group

of young men that you were talking about who are lacking in opportunity and lacking in mobility and the chance to make meaningful relationships and to live a full and loving and beautiful life that we all want. But then there is also a large contingent of these bro types who feel, even though they have been afforded tons of opportunities,

have had the best education and probably aren't facing any student debt at the end of this, getting internships at places like Palantir at 19 years old, who still feel aggrieved. And a lot of that is rooted in the fact that they don't see a ramp to the level of success that their boomer parents or late Gen X boomer parents had by their age.

I mean, thinking back to how enormous it felt if you could, as a parent, could earn a million dollars in a year, and then how stifled people who see themselves as upwardly mobile and are living in these big cities and maybe are at a big law firm or in banking, when you say, oh, earn a million dollars a year, I'm not gonna have anywhere close to the life my parents had.

My kids are not gonna go to private school, which is now, you know, 55 to $65,000 a year versus the 25,000 when I was growing up as an elder millennial. So I wanted to add that. But something I've been thinking a lot about, and this is shifting gears a little bit, but still about what's going on with Musk and co. is how much this moment feels to me like it did when Trump and the array of lawyers that were fanned out across the

country after the 2020 election were getting to work to essentially poison pill as big of a swath of the population as they possibly could to not believe that Joe Biden had won a free and fair election. They did it with vaccine skepticism. Their power is strongest when their supporters are separated from the rest of society. And I feel like we're seeing that moment again. And JD Vance tweeted over the weekend after the judge ruled about the Treasury payments. Not that Scott Besson couldn't access the Treasury payment system, but that you couldn't

have individuals that weren't fully vetted having access. And we'll see what happens. I think today there'll be an addendum to that. But he's tweeting saying that they're trying to control the executives quote unquote legitimate power. And a lot of that is a reference back to the Supreme Court case where they basically gave Trump immunity

from anything or future presidents, but it was really about Trump. And then you had, I don't know if you saw Christy Noem, the Homeland Security Secretary was on with Dana Bash this weekend and Dana- People don't trust the government. Right, and then Dana says to her, sorry I shouldn't have said Dana, it's Dana,

says to her, well you are the governor. You are the governor, that was the best line of the way. And then she spews drivel for 58 seconds after that and shows she doesn't really know what she's talking about. But she actually did say the important part out loud, which is they are creating an environment and have fostered for years now an environment in which people don't feel that they can trust the government. And one of the first things Trump said when he started running for president was, I alone can fix it. And now it's I alone plus Elon and JD and whoever is on board for all of this. And I'm

scared to see society perhaps even further breaking apart along these new lines of who thinks that the government does anything good for me and who thinks that there is absolutely nothing of positive note that the government delivers. And that's hugely dangerous. And I don't know, that's been the most disturbing part for me that I feel like I'm back in November and December of 2020, and I worry we're not going to get these people back. Well, this is a serious issue, and I want to apologize for my Nazi references because they're not funny, although it is clear that Musk and Trump

have made a hard Reich turn. And also the, I don't know if you've driven the new model SS from Tesla. And I saw on Twitter the- Are you coming up with these on the fly or do you have a list of Musk Nazi jokes that you like to make? Well, you know, he's changed his pronouns

to he and Himmler. But anyways, there's a lot in there. And I think that essentially you have, unfortunately, everything reverse engineers to one key statistic in my view. And if we don't fix it, we're going to have some form of revolution, famine or war. And that happens in every society. And it's the following. The ultimate social compact is that my kids will do better than me. If I work hard, I play by compact is that my kids will do better than me. If I work hard, I play by the rules, my kids will do better than me.

The definition, I used to think the definition of love was caring more about someone than you care about yourself. And I've broadened that to, you give witness and notice to people's lives. But the people who you irrational like love are your children. There, you know, I always say to my sons,

you're the only people in the world that don't want to be more successful than me. And I'm embarrassed to say that, but it's true. And when your kids aren't doing as well as you were at 30 for the first time in the nation's history, it's just a breakdown in the social compact. And people want chaos. There's also, because we've had what I would argue is the best functioning organization, and let me go, I think the most impressive organization

in history is the wing of the US government and that's our military. And I think in the top five is the US government. And Mel Robbins, who I think is gonna probably displace Joe Rogan if Stephen Bartlett doesn't, has this new book out called Let Them. And I'm sort of at the point right now where the people who are under the illusion that Trump represents them, the genius of the Republican Party is they

represent the top 1% and corporations. And they've convinced the bottom 99 that you should endorse us because once you get into the top 1%, you're going to love it here and you have more of a chance with us. once you get into the top 1%, you're gonna love it here and you have more of a chance with us. And when Democrats keep spewing out this elitist dribble and we continue to move towards a 30 year old not doing as well as his or her parents,

then the parents and the people under the age of 30 just want chaos. And what I say around some of this stuff, I'm at the point now where it's like, let them. The states that went for Trump are the states that are the biggest takers of federal assistance. So just see what happens when Veterans Affairs benefits, when we disrupt and shut down those people you can't trust. Okay, let's see what happens to you and dad and your neighbors and what happens in these rural dark red communities when there is no headstart.

See what happens when you shut down DEI and there is no job opportunity for veterans. Like I'm at the point where it's like, you know what? You broke it, you own it. You're gonna get to find out just how quote unquote incompetent government is. You're gonna find out that government is a lot more competent than you had originally thought and you're gonna get a very ugly awakening in my view.

And I'm sort of at the point of, all right, it's time. You really wanna see what life is like in these red states, the people who are most rabidly for Trump, who tend to be in rural areas, tend to be quite frankly have a larger body mass index, are more dependent upon Medicare, are more dependent on government services. The biggest takers from a state perspective are the ones that went hardest towards Trump,

which means when these payments and these programs get shut down, this isn't going to hurt us, Jess. I mean, we're upset about this because I'd like to think we have some fidelity to America and the Constitution and want to pay back based on the prosperity we've recognized because of this incredible system and rule of law and democracy. But quite frankly, this isn't going to really hurt you or me. Our kids aren't in SNAP. We're not getting veterans' affair payments.

We're not getting social security payments, right? We're not dying of malaria in Malawi or wherever, right? This won't affect us. It's just fascinating, though, that the people who I think are about to get the biggest dose of like, wow, be careful what you ask for, are the ones that are most rabidly pro Trump. So my sense is at this point, you know, as Mel Robbins would say, let them have at it.

You asked for it, you got it. Toyota. That's definitely the big debate, I think, amongst people who voted the way that we did, that balance between wanting to live in a society that uplifts everybody, which I feel like is so core to the Democratic Party, and then thinking we are never going to have a reversal of these kinds of electoral outcomes unless there is real suffering. And that feels like a terrible place to be. I don't want to be someone that wishes a bad economic outcome on anyone.

I would love a world in which everyone can succeed to the utmost level. But it does seem like there has already been a bit of this. I don't want to go as far as saying buyer's remorse, but you're seeing these videos coming up on TikTok. I don't know. There's a farmer who relies on this cost sharing program that gets funded through the Inflation Reduction Act that has been frozen and gone away. And he's talking about potentially losing his farm.

He was someone who voted for Trump. Katie Britt, the senator from Alabama, is out there talking about how we can't have the NIH go away. The new policy of getting indirect costs down to 15%, which will basically mean that we have to shutter labs that are saving us from every disease under the sun and our huge economic boom for the country. I was astounded to see that for every dollar that we put into society from the NIH that we get $2.46 back, and it generates nearly $93 billion in economic activity

in the U.S. And also is what keeps us the leader of the pack, our competitiveness. It's so funny to hear Republicans bemoaning how far we're falling behind all the time, and then they're like, you know what we'll do? We'll slash NIH funding. That'll be the way that we'll really show the rest of the world. But in a more personal level, I talked about two or three months ago to a college student from the Midwest.

He reached out, he watches The Five, is thinking about a career in politics, really interested in political communication. We got on the phone and he emailed me last week, and he said that I could share this. I've really appreciated hearing what you have had to say the past week on The Five and your podcast with Scott.

So yeah, Scott. You've really opened my mind on certain things that are currently going on as someone who voted for Trump. And you have been communicating a lot of frustrations I've been feeling alongside some family and friends who didn't expect all the chaos." And then he puts in parentheses, not to mention the tariffs as our family owns a small business where all our products are made in China. So this is a 20-year-old bro, right, from the middle of the country. Comes from a conservative family. They love Trump. And it only took that, I got this a week ago. So it only took two weeks of this level of chaos for him to feel strongly enough

that he would write that down, right? That's not a casual comment. And he told me that I could talk about it, that I could put that out on air. So it's obviously something that's very emblematic of not only what's going on in his life, but what's going on in his orbit. Elon Musk's popularity has gone from in 2016, it was plus 29 when he was the SpaceX guy,

down to negative 11. So something is happening. There is pushback out there and the realization that, yeah, maybe there are cuts we should be making, but this wholesale approach to just move fast and break things is not something that works for the public sector Well, you're already starting to see it and it kind of goes to I'll talk about this in a bit potential solutions But basically sales of Tesla cars are diving in the EU electric vehicle market declined by 6% overall in January, so there is a structural decline,

but sales of Tesla are down 63% in France, 44% in Sweden, 38% in Norway, 42% in the Netherlands, and 12% in the UK. And as someone who has worked with automobile companies, they measure share in sales and basis points. And that is if year on year, you're down a half a percent, the person running that country is sweating. I mean, these are, I mean, these literally are kind of

implosions of sales. So it does appear that finally what, you know, everyone's been outraged at the lack of outrage on the left. It does appear that people that the bloom is off the rose here people no longer seem as a you know kind of this provocateur and innovator but is someone who is a threat and that they just don't need to own his car. I'm curious with all of these lawsuits and the DOJ investigation piling up how serious do you think the legal threat is

to Musk and Doge and what could the long-term fallout be other than obviously his popularity is going down? But I'll put forward a thesis. When you send, when you tell someone you can be a convicted felon and then reelect them, he's essentially decided the incentives and disincentives no longer apply to me, that I can break the law with impunity.

Do you think there is a bridge too far here around these court cases? Well, so far, like you mentioned earlier on, the courts have gone against them in all of these instances. But the problem is, is that the courts move slower than 20-year-old kids that are in the Treasury payment system, to some degree, right? It's already disrupted people's lives. Funding has been cut off even if it is then getting reinstated. There are all these lawsuits with harrowing testimony from people who work for USAID and are stationed abroad and are saying, you're sending me back to America. I haven't lived there in 15 years.

We have no infrastructure. We have no family. We have kids with special needs. And if there is a disruption in their care, I have notes from their doctors about the long-term suffering that they will endure. Nobody in the government seems to care at all about that. So the courts are great.

And we're going to have Mark Elias on the podcast in a few weeks. And I'm really interested to talk to him about the legal approach to all of this. But they're moving, some degree too quickly. And I think on the fundamental level, what's most disturbing about all of this is that they are going for a two branch approach to government. I think they don't care at all about Congress because appropriated money means nothing to

them. And we should note as well that the government is only funded through March 14th. So they're offering buyouts to people. They have no cash to pay them for the next eight months. So Democrats actually have a lot of power in that respect. And some of them are already talking about shutting down the government to be able to shut down Elon Musk. So I think that they are looking at a world of essentially one and a half branches of

government. So they want the most powerful presidency or executive that you've ever seen in your life. And then they want about half of the judiciary. They want the good judges, right? Which is always how Trump talks about things. Says, well, of course we want immigration. We just want the good immigrants, right? And of course we want this, we just want the good ones.

So he wants the judges probably that he picks. So he wants Eileen probably that he picks. So he wants Eileen Cannon and the Supreme Court. And the rest of it can kind of go to hell. And that's really new territory for us, looking at a world in which the executive has no interest in having checks and balances with the Congress and who may openly flout these judicial decisions.

We'll have to wait and see in terms of how they approach it. Even this week will be an interesting incubator for that. But I think that they are so far emboldened, even from where they were in 2020 when they were getting bad rulings, that we could see something completely unprecedented. Michael O'Reilly Bill O'Reilly recently said that he doesn't believe Musk has as much power as we think. And then Time Magazine in the same week puts him on the cover behind the president's desk.

Do you think we're overestimating Musk's influence or underestimating it? I'm not sure. Listen, Time Magazine wants a good cover. It was a good cover. It definitely pissed Trump off, even though he said like, oh, are they still in business?

Who reads that anymore? But he definitely, when he got Time Person of the Year just a month ago, was super psyched about Time Magazine. I'm sure the answer is somewhere in the middle. I think you don't want to be the person that went out there and took a big swing like Elon Musk actually doesn't have that much power. You can even see from the level of disruption that we've had that he has that power and also that he swayed the election like this. You know, $290 million, whatever algorithmic changes to social media that will probably never understand the true impact of

that or the gravity of that impact when, I mean, you're not on Twitter anymore. I still am. I need to be there for work. It's A, a cesspool. But B, I can barely find content that I need to be able to do my job. Reporters that I follow are not showing up even in the, you know, the for you column. It pales in comparison to what it used to be, which was, I thought, the best news gathering site. You could always find what you needed right away when you logged onto Twitter. And it's not like that anymore at all. So I'm in the middle on it. What do you think? Are you a Bill O'Reilly or a Time magazine?

I don't know. I know that the staff in the White House is more worried about trying to calm Trump down when he's angry because he doesn't drink or do drugs, whereas with Musk, you just give him a ketamine infused juice box. There goes the bigger man. That bigger man part of the show is over. He's back. That's right. Anyways, with that, let's take a quick break. Stay with us. Support for this show comes from Indeed. You just realized your business needed to hire somebody yesterday. How can you find amazing candidates fast? Easy. Just use Indeed. With Indeed Sponsored Jobs, your post jumps to the top of the page for relevant candidates.

And you're able to reach the people you want faster. And it makes a huge difference. According to Indeed data worldwide, sponsored jobs posted directly on Indeed have 45% more applications than non-sponsored jobs. Plus, with Indeed sponsored jobs, there are no monthly subscriptions, no long-term contracts, and you only pay for results. There's no need to wait any longer. Speed up your hiring right now with Indeed.

And listeners to this show will get a $100 sponsored job credit to get your job's more visibility at indeed.com slash vox ca. Just go to indeed.com slash vox ca right now and support this show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. Indeed.com slash vox ca. Terms and conditions apply. Hiring? Indeed is all you need.

Are you crushing your bills? Defeating your monthly payments? all you need. Hey, this is Peter Kafka. I'm the host of Channels, a podcast about technology and media. And maybe you've noticed that a lot of people are investing a lot of money trying to encourage you to bet on sports. Right now, right from your phone. That is a huge change, and it's happened so fast that most of us haven't spent much time thinking about what it means and if it's a good thing. But Michael Lewis, that's the guy who wrote Moneyball and the Big Short and Liar's Poker, has been thinking a lot about it.

And he tells me that he's pretty worried. I mean, there was never a delivery mechanism for cigarettes as efficient as the phone is for delivering the gambling apps. It's like the world has created less and less friction for the behavior when what it needs is more and more. You can hear my chat with Michael Lewis right now on channels, wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome back. Over the weekend, Trump made history as the first sitting US president to attend the Super Bowl. He also said he planned on announcing a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports into the United States. Meanwhile, Trump raised eyebrows last

week by suggesting he could turn Gaza into the Riviera of the Middle East. During a press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, he floated the idea of US owning Gaza and hit it at relocating 2 million Palestinians before walking back comments about deploying U.S. troops. And back home, a federal judge temporarily blocked Trump's federal workers bio plan, delaying a decision for the 2 million eligible employees. Sixty-five thousand have opted in so far.

Trump's recent comments about the U.S. taking over Gaza have sparked a so far. Trump's recent comments about the US taking over Gaza have sparked a media backlash. I would argue, Jess, that this is another just weapon of mass distraction, and that it's just so ridiculous. I don't know. It's just sucking oxygen out of the room of the real issue, which is this digital coup, if you will. But how might this negatively affect the ongoing, in your view, ceasefire

between Hamas and Israel? Or does it have any impact on the conflict or the tension in the Middle East? Well, the thing that it does in the immediate term, even if he says it's not something that he was completely serious about, and you saw that Caroline Levitt, the press secretary, had to walk back his openness to boots on the ground the next day in the briefing because that was something that freaked even the biggest warmongers out there. They were like, no, actually, we are not putting boots on the ground in the Middle East. But this helps Bibi in the immediate term ensuring up his right flank, which he definitely

needs if he's going to be able to stay in power. And Trump always just has that side door available to him where he says, you know, well, it was a negotiating tactic, right? You know, we just needed to see what Egypt and Jordan are really made of. The former deputy prime minister of Jordan said that this was a declaration of war on the Arab people. That doesn't sound good. Even if that is the place that you are starting at, that you can even think of a world in which you're going to move two million people

out of the place that they live. And this is not about defending Hamas, staying in charge or anything of that sort. But just Egypt and Jordan have been very clear about this. Saudi got involved and said, we're not doing this either. The Arab world has not been open to taking Palestinians for a very long time, which is one of the endemic problems with this conflict.

And I don't know what the solution is. We all wish that there was going to be able to be a two-state solution with a neat bow, and we can't get there. There are people who have dedicated their lives to it, like Tony Blair, for instance, and we have not been able to get there. But I think that it's a little too easy to just say

that it's a distraction or it's a sideshow because it is forcing people to have to deal with it, first of all, which makes a big difference. Like Marco Rubio is gonna have to say something about it, and people like Tom Cotton are gonna have to say something about it. The administration is going to have Pete Hegseth over at defense. People are going to have to prepare themselves for the fact that his mercurial or herky-jerky approach to foreign

policy might not go your way all the time. And we did talk about it as maybe it's one of the advantages that our enemies have no idea what he's actually going to do. But there are real implications for this and his words matter. As much as we'd like to pretend that they don't and he says a lot of shit and he throws stuff against the wall and sees whether it sticks or not. You cannot with a serious face say at this point that Trump is not interested in being a modern day imperialist, at least to some degree. The amount of times that he's talked about Greenland, he's talking about the Panama Canal, now he's talking about whatever he wants to do in the Middle East, which is

Jared Kushner's vision. Jared Kushner said there's a lot of waterfront property that be available. And it's interesting, my colleague on the five, Jesse Watter, said something about, well, Albania has said that they'll take people and a couple weeks ago There was a story in the New York Times about how Albania gave the go-ahead for a 1.4 billion dollar luxury hotel investment For Jared Kushner, so it always comes back to money It always comes back to business prospects in all of this and I. And I don't think this is something that's going to happen, but I don't think it behooves us to just kind of push it

under the carpet or the rug and just say, oh, it's a complete impossibility. So to your point, the premise, it starts from what I think is a legitimate premise, and that is the path we're on now. Like, OK, the way I would see right now, the Middle East or the problem in Gaza is there's no moral clarity. And that is when World War II ended,

we had the Nuremberg trials, and we basically said this was genocide, and we're shaming you and punishing you, and the world came to some sort of moral clarity. We don't have that coming out of this conflict. And it feels as if all we're doing is just setting up the exact same thing to happen again in two, five, or 10 years.

That Hamas will rearm, there'll be people sympathetic, they will use aid and their popularity with their domestic population who are feel, you know, understandably aggrieved and the same thing is gonna happen. So the notion that we need to be creative around doing something different, that the status quo, the wash, rinse and repeat, we are going to see the mother of all shampoo effect here. It's just gonna happen again.

That what, the current construct just does not work. Now, but this notion of a two state solution where the two states are either Egypt or Jordan, neither, I mean, here's the problem of relocating these 2 million residents, whether you wanna call it ethnic cleansing or some sort of a part, whatever you wanna term you or relocation

or condo development or a creative solution. The problem is these 2 million people don't want to leave and even more, nobody wants to take them. Albania, what's the population of Albania? I don't, look at the border. You want to see a fortified border? Look at the border. You want to see a fortified border? Look at the border between Egypt and Gaza. Albania is 2.7 million.

And we're talking about 2 million people who need to go somewhere. What Egypt and Jordan have decided is that the elements of this population that they cannot risk incorporating is chaos and violence. So this just doesn't seem like what I'd call a viable solution for anybody.

So until we have, do we need to be creative? Yes, but I find this, most of this just sort of kind of ridiculous that, okay, you're gonna relocate two million people and then put up a bunch of residence inns and Trump towers and Weston hotels and then invite the rich ones back? It's like, okay, walk me through how this logistically actually makes any sense. So I don't see any viable path here.

What do you think is the significance of the judge blocking Trump's federal worker buyout plan? And how could this play out in the coming weeks? Well, I think it's significant, and I already mentioned this, that I know this is Elon's playbook, and he does it all the time. He did it with Twitter in 2022 as well. But the cash isn't there to do it. So it is pretty significant.

I think there is a pretty strong case for saying, you're not even talking about money that's been appropriated. Are you paying out of pocket? He's a very rich guy, richest man on the planet. Maybe that's what he intends to do. But going out to people and saying, you can go on that trip you've always wanted to take. I don't know, actually, you have no salary to be able to do that is pretty duplicitous. The big question is, able to do that is pretty duplicitous. The big question is what orders are they going to abide by? And what orders, frankly, are they going to be using the younger dogeys to get around?

What will be authorized? What will the actions from the top level that look pretty normal post rulings be? And then what are 20-year-old kids that can hack into anything able to actually do? And I know that it's not necessarily to turn us into a technocratic state. Maybe that is for some people's vision who are involved in this. But I think that because Trump is a lame duck, we have four years essentially

to break as much as possible that they will be looking to push boundaries in ways we haven't seen before. So while they might have abided by some of these rulings before, they're going to push the envelope even further, is my feeling. I mean, I guess the question is, their attitude is, it doesn't matter if it's legal or illegal. If we make an offer and people accept it, then it's done. So before you can get caught robbing the bank, just spend the money and enjoy yourself. And then if you get caught, okay, we'll give the money back.

There is definitely a kind of like a move fast and break things kind of element here and have no regard for institutions or process, just see if you can get away with it. Whenever I see Republicans, I feel like they're sort of like, I can't believe we're getting away with this shit. Totally. And it's like tickling their sensors.

Isn't this amazing? And I even, I don't know if I'm imagining this, but I'm wondering if they're even getting a little bit nervous, like, Jesus Christ, I didn't realize it would be this easy. But they are getting upset about things that matter to them. Like, I already mentioned Senator Katie Britt, Jerry Moran,

Senator Wicker, who are big proponents of USAID programs, had to go to Rubio and plead with him. Rubio was a fan. Rubio was a fan last year. He was pushing Biden to allocate more money. And that links to the problem. And I know we're going to talk about the Democrats next. Well, let's do that.

But first we have to take one more quick break. Stay with us. The Republicans have been saying lots of things. Just yesterday, their leader said he wants to own Gaza? The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip and we will do a job with it too. We'll own it. On Monday, the Secretary of State said an entire federal agency was insubordinate. USAID in particular, they refuse to tell us anything. We won't tell you what the money's going to, where the money's for, who has it. Over the weekend, Vice President Elon Musk,

the richest man on earth, tweeted about the same agency that, you know, gives money to the poorest people on earth. We spent the weekend feeding USAID into the wood chipper. Could gone to some great parties. Did that instead. But what have the Democrats been saying? People are aroused. I haven't seen people so aroused in a very, very long time.

Huh. That's a weird way to put it, Senator. We're going to ask what exactly is the Democrats' strategy to push back on Republicans on Today Explained? All right. So here's the deal. Take a former world number one. That's me, Andy Roddick.

Add in the journalist who knows everything about tennis and a producer who's still figuring out how to spell tennis. You get served with Andy Roddick, a weekly podcast where we break down the game we all love. We cover the biggest stories, talk to the sport's biggest stars, and highlight the people changing tennis in ways you might not even realize. Whether it's grand slam predictions, coaching changes, off-court drama, or the moves shaping

the future of the sport, we've got it all. This podcast is about having fun, sharing insights, and giving fans a real look at what makes tennis so great. Catch Serve with Andy Roddick on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, wherever you listen, or watch us on YouTube. Like, subscribe, follow, all that good stuff. Let's get started. Welcome back. Before we wrap, Democrats are stepping up their strategy. Rallies are gaining momentum. Schumer is calling for opposition to every Trump nominee, and Jeffries is making his

stance clear in negotiation letters. Jess, do you think this is the right approach? Do you think it'll be effective? No. Have you seen these rallies? It's horrible. So you have, John Stewart did a great impression of Schumer of them, where, you know,

you have a guy in his seventies, who's not the most charismatic, I'm being generous here, screaming, we will win after we just lost everything. And then you have Congressman Al Green shaking his cane in the front of the frame. So it's just Schumer's face with a cane going back and forth. Or Maxine Waters, you know, trying to barge into the Department of Education.

And I've noticed that all of the key speakers at these rallies are safe seat Democrats, and that's really the wrong approach to all of this. I almost want to see exclusively people who have run tight competitive races out there talking about what they think is the right thing for us to do. Because it's all well and good and people are great communicators and you be on your social feeds and everyone should be amplifying as much of the bad shit that Republicans are doing as possible. But I feel like it just sends the message that we haven't learned that much from the

election and that frankly, we're proliferating more hysteria than the average voter is interested in hearing at this point. So it has to be so much more targeted. I know Hakeem Jeffries put out a 10-point communications plan, but everyone has to see what their constituents are interested in and what their temperature is in terms of Trump versus Elon. There seems to be a big dichotomy there. Jared Golden, who is a Democratic congressman who won in a competitive district, a Trump very rural

district in Maine, said that all the calls that he's getting to his office are about Musk. People aren't upset about Trump. They're upset about Musk. And that's what he's leaning into. And people have to find kind of their North Star for all of this. But the thing that was driving me crazy in terms of the messaging is, I don't know if you watched after the election, Tony Fabrizio, who was Trump's pollster, and Chris LaCivita, who was one of his campaign managers, participated in a panel with the Democratic campaign managers as well. And they were talking about what worked, what didn't work.

And they said that Project 2025 was destroying them up until a couple months before the election. So it had a 57% negative approval rating and that we were doing a great job hammering it. That all of those, even if we kind of had rolled our eyes at it, it had been hugely effective that every time we said, well, this is the Trump 2025 playbook. This is what they want. This is what they're going to do. And that has disappeared even as people who wrote Project 2025 are in charge of OMB, Brendan Carr at the FCC. And I want that messaging back en masse. I want everyone talking about this to say Time Magazine did an analysis.

Two thirds of the executive orders that Trump has already implemented are out of Project 2025 already. I mean, I was happy to see those Democratic congresspeople walk over. I think at least I think they need to be seen doing anything. But the optics here, I agree with you. It felt like a senior's home when they found out water aerobics were canceled or Jell-O-Night had been switched to Thursday. I mean, it just felt, oh, God, that's how we're going to win this fight. That's the

army we're sending in. You know, as we try and process this, there's, I want to move to like, okay, what do we do? And there's, I would argue, and I want to put forward some potential ideas and have you respond to them. There's short term and there's long term. And the first thing you got to do in any sort of strategy is you got to determine where's the soft tissue, what's the leverage, what are our assets, what can be exploited. And Hicking Jeffries, I thought, was actually quite eloquent and honest when he said,

they control all three branches of government. There's just not a lot we can do from kind of a legislative level. And when the stuff gets to judges, it gets pushed back, but they're, you know, they're moving at this blitzkrieg speed. And my view is, okay, I think you go after the money, like what they're doing by hacking and turning off these payment systems or intervening. I don't know what the right term would be.

And I think you go after, I think you go after Musk's financial interests. So it's already happening in Europe, as I previously mentioned, Tesla sales are going down. I think that our congressional representatives and people who think what's going on here is a total subversion of our democracy, to make it known that you probably shouldn't sign up for T-Mobile right now. Because T-Mobile has just struck a deal with Starlink. You probably shouldn't be thinking about any advertiser on Twitter. That's an obvious one. You should be thinking about, okay, United Airlines has just announced a big deal with Starlink. How do you go after the pocketbook? I think that's

really what Musk cares about. It's already happening with Tesla. I don't see any reason. Should the department, should veterans groups be doing anything around Tesla, Starlink, any of his economic interests? I think you go after the purse because that's what I think these people care about. Over the medium and the long term, I think you draft resolutions and say, okay, if this unelected group of people can go in and start turning off payments, we're gonna propose turning off payments or anything related to Starling. Starling, I mean, Musk, to a certain extent,

is a huge beneficiary, and I even wrote a post titled Welfare Queen. The notion that he's trying to cut off payments and claim the government is too big and then it's large S is wasted. Meanwhile, he's one of the biggest beneficiaries from this large S. Should we be thinking about one,

how do we go after the economic interests of Elon Musk to say we're not down with this and you circumventing democratic channels to implement what you think is right and we're going to punish you and your companies. And there's nothing illegal. You don't have to sign up for T-Mobile that's introducing Starlink. You don't have to fly United Airlines, which has signed a contract with Starlink. And then over the medium

and long term, I think you just have to tell Republicans, okay, you realize that if you can do this, then we can shut off Starlink. We have our own programmers, and we'll find out if a judge thinks that's legal or not. I do think, though, the nuclear option is now on the table, and that is I believe that the Democrats should credibly threaten to get in the way of blocking the extension on our debt ceiling such that the next Treasury auction fails. Because at the end of the day, the reason why the tariffs were rolled back is the leverage in the people that Trump listens to are corporations and shareholders.

And they called him around these ridiculous Canadian and Mexican tariffs and said, do not do this. This will have an immediate impact on the stock market. The adult in the room is the stock market and the 10-year bond. And he basically got these kind of non, I mean, these illusory symbolic concessions and then walked them back. And I think if the Democrats say, okay, you wanna play Russian roulette, we're gonna load the chamber around the upcoming treasury auction.

And if you wanna call all your buddies and tell them that interest rates are about to spike, which will take the stock market down, and I'm still trying to figure out if that hurts the 1%, but 1% of America's population, that's 90% of the stocks. So I think that the real leverage here is around money and is around, you know, you

want to shut down the economy, you don't believe in a democratic process, fine. We're going to shut down the economy and you're not going to be able to make the interest, the upcoming interest payments. And you're going to be the president who the first time was so offensive, was so non-democratic that we felt we had no choice but to get in the way that you're about to be the first president where a treasury auction, where America did not pay its debts, and let's see what happens, boss.

But I'm trying to think of where we have leverage, and those are the only places I can think of because per what Hakeem Jeffries said, us just screaming outrage and waving our cane in front of a federal building, that's not working, right? We need to go after the money and we need to say, you're going to be the president that takes the stock market down, you know,

eight or 10% on the opening bell next Wednesday after a failed treasury auction. Your thoughts. I love that idea. And I'm sure they're considering that alongside the negotiations that are going to come up in March because the Republicans had these high hopes for one massive bill, which seems like a really stupid way to be funding the government anyway. But if you put those two things together, that'd be very difficult for Trump to weather. And he will be

the person in charge if we fail at auction or if the government shuts down in general. Though it seems like he does want to furlough employees anyway. But I have an idea that maybe could be used as a compliment to this. And I'm hoping that Democrats, I'm loosely calling this the Democratic disruption plan because everyone loves this term disruption. It's become very chic right and that's what the Republicans have run on that we're just trying to disrupt things. You got to shake it up because there's all of this waste in there that we can cut and I think that we need to counter program with our own doge and you can go back to the 90s and the Clinton administration

did this. They called it the National Performance Review. I didn't realize it was as successful as it was. It made 426,000 cuts to the federal workforce, going agency by agency. And they did it with a lot of precision. They said, are there offices that can be closed, regulations that we can cut?

Are there programs that actually don't need to be funded within USAID of the 44 billion that goes out there? I'm sure there are cuts that we can make, but we should be the ones to propose them. So just take all the crap that they've been spewing and throw it back in their faces. And I think that that would be really effective and show to the American public that we are serious about governing, that we do know that there is a huge waste fraud and abuse problem, but that 66% of US spending is untouchable. And that's the most important part, that we have to be the party out there saying,

they're lying to you about cuts that they can make. The stuff that they're talking about are tiny. They're trimming like a dollar off of the budget, but we will never let them touch your Social Security, your Medicare, your Medicaid. And I think that that is a place where we can run and win. And I want to say as well on the Department of Education front, I don't know if you saw this, you know, the national report card test results came out. a congressional report card test results came out. And it breaks your heart to see stuff like this. And I just-

So just reference all time low for eighth grade reading levels, is that right? Well, since testing began, so 1992. And when the Republicans come out and they say, I want to abolish the Department of Education, which by the way is in Project 2025, and you look at those test results, you understand how average

American parents who don't have optionality to go to a fancy private school alternative are being denied vouchers to maybe take a few thousand dollars and put their kids in religious schools, which in general have been performing better than the average public school, that they say, you know what? Yeah, burn it all down. Trump had a great line where he said about Linda McMahon, you know, I don't want you to have a job for that long because I want you to destroy the Department of Education. And what they want in the end is for private equity to own our education system. That's what's already happening.

They have been making tons of money off of these schools, specifically in the charter school space. But if we are going to have public schools under attack at this level and believe strongly in making them better than they are certainly, and hopefully taking them into some sort of golden age, we have to play ball on the education front. And we have to say, abolishing the Department of Education isn't the answer necessarily, but these are our real reform policies. And that includes going after the teachers unions and saying to Randy Weingarten, no, this all isn't perfect. You know, we haven't certainly recovered from the lows of

the COVID era and all the damage that was done to those kids, not only as academic learners, but as social emotional beings. But that Democrats aren't going to be afraid to touch that third rail anymore. Someone like Josh Shapiro has done that. He said before that he's for school vouchers. Wouldn't you rather live in a world where we have better public schools and some kids have the optionality to go to religious schools or private schools with the help of the government so that we can save the public school education system? So a lot there.

I've felt that, I got into it a little bit on that. Is it Ronit Weinberg, the head of the National Teachers Union? Randi Weingarten. I got that one close. Yeah. Randi Weingarten. You were in the Jewish realm. Something.

I was near, I was circling the Jewish realm. Something. I was near, I was circling the white fish. Anyways, I said that I thought that the union she represented was using the kids as drug meals. During COVID. I'm sure she loved that. Well, during COVID, she decided that we have to protect the teachers. And she was basically saying, you've got to pay us more

and give us a ton of time off. And the reality was that the population of teachers in America is the least vulnerable. It was the least vulnerable to COVID. They were young, primarily female, primarily thin. These were the least at risk people in America. And she was using basically kids and their mental health, which we found were severely impacted

by being out of school, such that she could try and find a moment of leverage to get more money for her dues paying members. I think teachers unions, and I'm casting a broad brush here across all of them, but we have a tendency to sanctify all of them, not recognize them. And some of these unions are just bottom line corrupt

and really don't seem to care that much about kids despite their hush grand motherly tones. Where I would depart a little bit with you and it sounds like also Governor Shapiro is I am very wary of vouchers because I think effectively what vouchers do is like everything else in our society, the kind of the narrative of let's shut down the Department of Education and let's take money and just give people choice and give them vouchers. I think theoretically it makes a lot of sense. There are instances where someone would say

I'd rather take the money, put them in a religious school or I want more choice. I get it, but effectively on the ground, I think what happens is what always happens in our government the last 40 or 50 years. It is nothing but a naked transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich. Because the reality is the majority of rural areas

or poor areas don't have a private school option where they could use the voucher. The only reason they have a school is because of federal mandated legislation that they have to have transportation and they have to have a school and the school has to be funded. And all you are doing when you give, say,

people a $10,000 voucher, and I'll use, I was on the board of my kid's school, there would be probably some people who are middle class who would rather have the choice. We charge 22,000, they come up with the 12,000, it would provide access to a private school, it'd be good for them. But really what it would be is a $2 million giveaway

to the other 200 families that can't afford it, and it would just take income and desperately needed resources out of the public schools in that area. So I get it theoretically, but I think on the ground all vouchers end up doing is to get again, transfer money from the poorest people in the districts that need mandated Head Start and schools

and transportation and food programs to wealthy people who would just get, that would be, you know what that would be, Jess? You have two kids, that would be a $40,000 gift to you and me. My guess is, I don't know if you sent, do you send your kids to private or public? One isn't in school and one is in a private pre-K.

She doesn't, there isn't public school for her yet. So this is what a voucher program would be. It'd be a $30,000 gift from government to you and me. I totally understand what you're saying and I, maybe I got a little ahead of my, ahead of my skis or I didn't mean to say that I want to turn into the party of vouchers. What I wanted to say is that if we continue to look so detached from reality that we can we are telling people that these scores are okay with

us and we're gonna do nothing about it which is essentially what we're doing without having our own reform policies that we're going to lose people forever because there's nothing that is more valued in Society than our children we have governor Glenn Youngton in Virginia because Terry McCall have got up there and said You know the kids the kids aren't yours, right? They they belong to the teachers when they go so I just want to have the conversation about it I think it can be perhaps done in some sort of targeted way, but we look so I think it can be perhaps done in some sort of targeted way, but we look so silly if we just keep saying,

we're gonna do it the same way. We're just gonna keep going down this path. That's what I meant. But I would like to see, you wanna talk about a way to save government tens, if not hundreds of billions of dollars over the next 30 or 50 years? Do what Japan does.

America has a 40% of its population is obese. That is an enormous strain on the wellbeing, the mental health and our financial system. And one of the reasons healthcare costs $13,000 a year here per person at 6,500 in Japan. You know what, we have 40%, 70% of America's obese are overweight, 40% obese. Do you know what the percentage of obese,

the population in Japan is obese? 12. 4. Does it? And here's where it starts. If you wanted to increase the well-being of children in America, you would do what Japan does. And that is you'd find the extra money to have a chef at every school and the chef has

one mandate. Everything has to be fresh. There are absolutely no processed foods allowed in school because this is what we do. We give these kids shitty, sugary, cheap food. They get obese because the deal is, okay, we can get them addicted to the food industrial complex. We basically ran every fucking ad last night on the Super Bowl

and then hand them over to the diabetes pharmaceutical complex. And that's the axis of evil. North Korea and Iran are nothing compared to the food industrial and the diabetes industrial complex in this nation. And in Japan they say we're gonna spend the money. Have you seen those interviews with the kids coming out of school? What's your favorite food? Broccoli. Yeah. Right? And they say your job at three in the morning these chefs get up at every school, not hugely paid, but a lot of them do it, former chefs.

They go to the fresh fish market, they go to fresh, and they have to find fresh food every goddamn day. And these kids grow up with a different sense of nutrition. I love the idea of thinking out of the box and thinking long-term, but corporate interests get involved. And again, this is our school system and our children. What I have found is that America is nothing

but a platform to transfer money to companies and shareholders who trade in traffic and addiction. Addiction to food, addiction to opiates, addiction to sex, addiction to dopa. And we use the kids as basically body bags or dopa bags. I have gotten so far off track, Jess. No. Bring me back, reel me track, Jess. Bring me back. Reel me back, Jess.

Reel us back in. I would just reel you back by saying, as we are on the precipice of probably an RFK Jr. Health and Human Services Secretary, that the case that you just made is why they should have carved out a role for him at USDA and had somebody who believes in vaccines. He's great on this.

Yeah. He's great on this. Yeah. He's great on this. Yeah, I agree. Did I bring you back? I don't know. Read us out. We gotta go. Thank you.

Thank you very much. Let's leave it there. That's it for the episode. Thank you for listening to Raging Moderates. Our producers are David Toledo and Shinane Onike. Our technical director is Drew Burrows. You can find Raging Moderates on its own feed every Tuesday. That's right.

Raging Moderates on its own feed. If you want us to keep making this pasta of a podcast, please hit subscribe right now on YouTube or on our distinct Raging Moderates feed. Please follow us wherever you get your podcasts without fear or favor. That's right, that's right. The hit of the show, The One on Fox,

that's what's coming next. And who is The One? That's right, it hit of the show, The One on Fox, that's what's coming next. And who is The One? That's right, it's just Harloff. We are immune, we are super power fucking fearless from tweets from the wealthiest man in the world. I'm not gonna read any of those 11,000 comments. I'm not.

You've definitely read them all. I have not. I'm not on Twitter, I'm not on X. I'm still calling it Twitter. Anyways, and by the way, who sold this Tesla two years ago and before he sold it took a big fat fucking dump in the passenger seat? That's right. That's your man. Hit subscribe now. Jess, have a great rest of the week. You too.