Raging Moderates with Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov - What Platner’s Exit Means for the Future of the Democratic Party (ft. Brian Tyler Cohen)

Episode Date: July 9, 2026

Jessica Tarlov is joined by Brian Tyler Cohen, host of No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen, and author of the new book The Day After: How to Wield Power in a Post-Trump World. They start with Graham Platner, who is bowing out of the Maine Senate race following a sexual assault allegation after a scandal-ridden campaign. In his exit video, Platner blamed the Democratic political establishment for taking the nomination away from him. How does the Democratic Party move forward in Maine to field a new candidate?  The U.S. and Iran have renewed aggression, trading strikes for a second consecutive night, with Trump declaring the three-week-old ceasefire officially "over." Jessica and Biran break down what this means for the administration’s foreign policy, and how recent reactions to spiking oil prices reveal some Republican Party hypocrisies.  Then, they discuss the resurgence of ICE operations, which led to the fatal shooting of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, a Mexican national with four young U.S. citizen children. Does this mean we are heading toward another escalation of enforcement violence like what was seen in Minneapolis?  Then, Jessica talks with Brian about his new book, The Day After, and his ideas for the future of the Democratic party. What should “Project 2029” look like? Which parts of the government that Trump has dismantled are the most underappreciated — and where are there opportunities to build something better?  Get your tickets now for our live show at 92NY: https://www.92ny.org/event/scott-galloway-and-jessica-tarlov For ad-free episodes, exclusive livestreams, and to connect with Scott, Jessica, and the Raging Moderates community, join us at ProfG+ on Substack: https://ragingmoderates.profgmedia.com/ Get The Monday Rage newsletter: https://profgmedia.com/s/monday-rage/ Follow Raging Moderates on IG, Tiktok, and Facebook: https://www.instagram.com/ragingmoderatespod/ https://www.tiktok.com/@ragingmoderates https://www.facebook.com/ragingmoderates Follow Jessica Tarlov on Instagram, Substack, and Bluesky: https://instagram.com/jessicatarlov https://substack.com/@jessietarlov https://bsky.app/profile/jessicatarlov.bsky.social Follow Scott on Instagram, Substack, and Bluesky: https://instagram.com/profgalloway https://substack.com/@profgalloway https://bsky.app/profile/profgalloway.com Subscribe to our YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@RagingModerates Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

You're a pro at running your life, at committing to your workout, at showing up every day. At Bombas, we're pros too. Pros at making socks. Our sport assortment has specialized socks for whatever sport you're committed to. Running, hiking, golf, Pilates, and so much more. Made with sweat-wicking yarns, blister fighting details, and targeted art support. Bombas sport is pro-level socks from the pros of socks. For another pro, you.

Go to bombus.com slash audio and use code audio for 20% off your first purchase. That's bombus.com and use code audio. How many third-party vendors does your company use? 20, 200? Thanks to AI, someone on your team probably added three more this week. And your security lead has no idea. Traditional third-party risk management can't keep up. Vanta gives you continuous coverage across every vendor, automatically,

so you actually know what's in your stack and what to do about it. AI on, risk off. Vanta.com slash TPR. How many third-party vendors does your company use? 20, 200? Thanks to AI, someone on your team probably added three more this week. And your security lead has no idea. Traditional third-party risk management can't keep up.

Vanta gives you continuous coverage across every vendor, automatically, so you actually know what's in your stack and what to do about it. AI on, risk off. Vanta.com slash TPS. Welcome to Raging Moderates. I'm Jessica Tarlov. Scott is still on the high seas, but we have an amazing co-pilot for today's episode. Brian Tyler Cohen, progressive YouTuber, political commentator, author of the new book, which is very exciting. I have read it the day after How to Weald Power in a post-Trump world is joining me. Brian, it's so good to see you. So good to see you too. Thanks for

having me. Yeah, absolutely. You've you've raged with me before, but the This is a little bit different. I think this will be our longest rage session and also a chance to talk about what's in your book, which is so applicable to all of the news of the day that we're dealing with and finally gives us a plan for what we're actually going to do when hopefully we take power back. Big dreams in that department. I want to start, though, with what's percolating right now. The biggest story in politics is definitely Graham Platner dropping out of the race to be Senate. or from Maine, I want to add, and I just saw this from an NBC reporter that apparently he hasn't filed the paperwork yet that he needs to to actually drop out. So we're saying he's dropped out. The expectation is that that will be happening by July 13th. But let's listen to a little bit of his 11-minute video that he posted announcing that he was leaving the race. This is all false. The things that have been claimed did not happen. It's not real. There is a reason that this is happening now.

This was the last week to try to get me off of the ballot. Those in power who have the ability to do so are using these allegations as an excuse to take away all of the things that we need to run a campaign. They would rather see Susan Collins win than have me be the next senator from Maine. We did it the right way. We built a campaign.

We engaged in electoral politics. We motivated people. We banded together. We did it the way that we were told we are supposed to make change. And we won. And now they are not going to let us have it. So I was a little bit surprised that there was no conciliatory tone at all in this video. Like, I know he's known for giving these, you know, brash and bold and big speeches and, you know, gets the crowd amped up.

But, like, dude, you just got credibly accused of raping someone, like, and maybe have lost this chance at winning the most crucial Senate flip out there. Apparently, his aides did not want him to take this tone. And it was a condition that he would do this, that he got to say whatever he wanted him rail against the establishment. What did you make of it? I completely agree. I mean, this was not a they did this to me. This was he did something to somebody else. I mean, that's what this is all about.

I understand and sympathize with his arguments writ large against the establishment, and in large part, that is why he was so successful in this campaign. But this isn't the establishment. I mean, there was a credible accusation of rape. And so this is the consequence of that. And I think that certainly rubbed people the wrong way. I mean, I was looking at a lot of the commentary online, and immediately you can see even more pushback to the fact that there wasn't an ounce of a conciliatory tone. It was just

him basically presenting himself as the victim. And so look, I think at this point, he's staying in or not officially withdrawing because he thinks he has some leverage to dictate who the next person is going to be. I think he is wrongly assuming how much leverage he has. I don't think he has any leverage in this situation. And frankly, if I'm not mistaken, there's either going to be a meeting of the 100 folks that are part of main Democrats. There's also the prospect of a caucus, but I think it's going to be the former. And if and when he drops out by the 13th, then there's going to be a process by which there has to be a replacement chosen by the 27th. So I think at this point, you know, this is him overestimating how much leverage he has to dictate

the process moving forward. If he's not out by today, we're looking at tomorrow or the next day because, again, I think that this process has largely left his hands at this point. Well, especially because no members of his team are on his side at this point. I mean, I tend to think once I heard that Bernie Sanders had called him, that that was the final nail in the coffin. And then all of his top strategists, like Morris Katz, came up to his house in Maine to kind of game plan this. I want to say something about how he handled the accusation before I talk about like the specifics of the politics of it, I have never heard someone publicly react to an accusation like that without saying,

I'm so sorry that Jenny felt that way. That's not how I read the situation. We've heard that a lot, right? And that seems like the appropriate thing to do if you believe that you are innocent of any sort of assault allegation to at least recognize the fact that there is a human being who you were in a relationship with, who thinks that you raped her. Yeah. Look, and I think your reaction is not dissimilar or is pretty much identical to the reaction of everybody else who watch this. If there is no willingness to take responsibility or to even

show some human empathy for the situation writ large, I think that's what rubbed a lot of people the wrong way. Look, there are going to be a lot of people who can exhibit, you know, the degree of fight that you want. There are going to be a lot of people who are going to embrace the politics that you want. But I think that this is also indicative of character in large part. And if you can't do the bare minimum in response to these allegations, I think that that is what people view as disqualifying. And what landed us in this position here, where he has been abandoned by not only what I assume will be the vast majority of the electorate, but even his own team. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, It begs the question, and I've been processing this a lot for myself in the last few days of whether I was clear enough about how lacking in character this person was to get a one of 100 job, right?

Like, one of the most important jobs that we have in the country. And I know that our party is going over that how Trumpian, I guess, we got about it, where we said, okay, well, this is what the voters of Maine want. like should it have been the Nazi tattoo? Should it have been the domestic violence accusation? And then, yes, of course, thank God we got to a real line in the sand. Yeah, I mean, look, you could make the argument that any one of those things should be a line in the sand. And I think you're right about the fact that politics started to look a little bit different because you have the Trump phenomenon in effect where it's like, okay, what matters is that this person can win? Moral failings, notwithstanding your history, notwithstanding the things that you've said and done,

notwithstanding, if this person can be a fighter and win an election and be a dynamic charismatic candidate, then forget all of that. At least we've got what we need in our corner for this election. But I think that that mentality, that Trumpian mentality, while it might be really successful on the right, is still coming up against a wall on the left. And we have seen numerous candidates not be able to overcome that hurdle on the left. Swalwell, just a couple of months back is another testament to that. Meanwhile, it's clearly not a hard line on the right. It's not a line in the sand on the right.

And you'll continue to see these candidates not only come forward and get the nomination, but be embraced by the entire party. The same people who are right now trying to jump on the bandwagon and twist the knife against Graham Platner, the people that you see on these cable news shows and these right-wing pundits who are exhibiting this like cognitive dissonance that would be impressive if it wasn't so disgusting, where the Republican Party's Twitter account can come out and continue hammering away at Graham Platner and the Democrats who allowed him to get to this point while that party is led by someone like Donald Trump, while they all embraced Roy Moore and Herschel Walker and

all of these people who have such disgusting histories doing something just as depraved as what Graham Platner was accused of doing. Yep. And Max Miller. Instead of Congress and that we're not even talking about people at work, I say Max Miller and they're like, who? Yeah. I have had this fight many times on cable. It is deeply frustrating and disturbing. But I guess it's really a testament to just how far the pendulum has swung, that there's been almost lobotomies, essentially, on the right about who they support. and the fact that their party is now just cast as this godlike figure at the top, and then everyone falls in line with it. Because the people who don't fall in line now are basically, like,

working at the bulwark or Chris Christie, right? Like, it's not that many folks who haven't at this point. What do you think about the process to find a new nominee? I mean, you mentioned this a little bit. It sounds like there's going to be the 600-person nominating convention with delegates selected from all 16 counties around Maine, I am very fearful of a 2024 redux where voters, especially voters who are very aligned with Platner politically

and also maybe are a bit salty about this and think that he should have stuck it out because there are people out there who think that, right, that the Demo establishment came to get him and he was their guy, he was their hero. So what are you thinking about the process? And do you like anyone who's maybe in contention? Like Troy Jackson, I know is getting thrown around a lot as a top pick.

Yeah, I think right now, like from a very shallow view of things, that would probably be my pick. But yeah, I mean, am I worried? You have to be worried that in the aftermath of 2024, look, a lot of these subsequent elections, you attempt to at least fix some of the immediate problems that you contended with in the previous election. So maybe we don't nominate someone who's 80 years old. Maybe we try to make it as democratic a process as we possibly can. So, of course, if we have a situation where suddenly we have another election where primary voters made their voices heard and then something happens where now we're thrust into a process

where somebody can be chosen, look, it's not a back room, but so to speak, people are going to perceive this as a back room. And so, yeah, of course I'm worried. But at the same time, I think that we're all watching this process play out. I think there is an understanding, even among the most progressive voters, that, like, these were extenuating circumstances and the alternative to choosing somebody by one of these processes that may be viewed as less democratic is to keep in place a candidate who now has a credible rape accusation against him.

And so I think there's this understanding that, like, look, is it ideal? Absolutely not. But the alternative is way too risky. and so we have to just engage in this process that frankly nobody wants to engage in. Luckily, there is another progressive candidate that you just named. And so I think that now we'll dig into him in his past and make sure that he's perhaps more palatable. Clean enough. Yeah, perhaps more palatable than Grand Platner was. But look, of course, this situation sucks.

There's no doubt about it. I don't think anybody is glad that this is happening. But, you know, hopefully, hopefully we can just suck it up and get somebody who is dynamic and charismatic and has a progressive agenda on the ballot and rely on the fact that this is going to be an environment where Democrats are going to overperform. And hopefully that's enough to get us over the finish line. Susan Collins is a formidable opponent. You know, Sarah Gideon had all the money in the world in 2020 against her. and the polling was looking so favorable for Sarah Gideon. She was out-polling Susan Collins by like 10 points on average.

And of course, Susan Collins was able to pull that one off. But I do think this is even more of a favorable environment for Democrats. And Susan Collins has some extra baggage, like the fact that she voted for and does not regret voting for Brett Kavanaugh, even as abortion rights have been gutted, which is especially popular in Maine. So, you know, there are certainly some things that are. hurting Democrats in this cycle, but there are also going to be things that are going to be hurting Susan Collins. Yeah, I think so. I mean, a D plus 14 environment, which I think is what it is in

Maine right now, is a big help. And I believe it was Politico reported this morning that the Collins team is not happy about having a ringer candidate, that they had an expectation that they would get to run against a very vulnerable candidate in Graham Platner the entire time. And they had all this Apo ready to go. Well, apparently so did everybody else. I think Apo against Grand Platner was in no short supply. No, it was all over the internet. We haven't seen all the tattoos of what of who are the Democrat who takes

Grant Platner's place is going to be. Yeah, I think a low-level chance that Troy Jackson has a swastika tattoo hiding under there. I wanted to note about him, which I think is really interesting, is he has all these progressive bona fides and our revolution, Bernie's organization. It's backing him. but he was also president of the main Senate for a decade. So he has a lot of establishment experience or institutional experience, I should say,

which I think is a good thing. I want to move on to the war, but what do you think the status of the, you know, mainstream Democratic Party versus the DSA or progressive left is now? Because this is obviously a big knock against them, and certainly the qualifications for vetting candidates, like that Dan Morath, Leanne Fan, and Morris, cats. I mean, apparently there was a dossier. They hired a research firm to do research on Platner. They didn't find the Reddit posts about the Totenkov about his tattoo, and they

didn't do exhaustive interviews with him either. So I would find it very hard to take these people seriously the next candidate they get behind. Yeah. Look, I can't say one way or the other. I think obviously the vetting was lazy here. I do think we're going to be in a position as we have candidates who are younger where they have way more vulnerabilities and there's going to be way more of a digital footprint to, you know, figure out what they've done. I mean, like, I remember when I was, when I was in college, I remember how bummed I was my last year because people started getting smartphones, Instagram started blowing up. There was dating apps. And I was like, man, I'm going to miss out on all of this. What a bummer. We didn't even have, we didn't even have cameras in our

cell phones. And then I left college and I'm like, oh, every part of your life is online and you're no longer able to do anything in anonymity. You're not able to have fun with your friends. Every picture, everything you do is basically going to be memorialized forever and how lucky I was, in effect, that we didn't have just, you know, everything plastered online that we could just have fun. And I think that as, you know, as candidates get younger, certainly as we have Gen Z candidates, we're going to be dealing with stuff like this a lot more. Now, obviously, when you have accusations of sexual assault or rape, that's an entirely different story. But I think that there's going to be, politics is going to change in terms of what is disqualifying and what is

just normal stuff that, that, you know, is going to be embarrassing or whatever it may be. In terms of, you know, the broader DSA versus establishment, I think that we've got candidates on both sides who have done very stupid shit or who've done stuff that's outright disgusting and illegal or criminal. And so I don't know that there's necessarily some divide between, okay, you have more, you know, you have a candidate here because they are of a certain political persuasion or somewhere on the ideological spectrum that they're a bigger risk because, you know, you can point to any number of establishment candidates who have had assault allegations leveled against them in very much the same way Grand Platner has. But I do think that there will be a lot

more of this kind of thing coming out because now everybody's lives are entirely online. There's major digital footprints. I think the firm has to do some deep introspection here that this stuff existed and that all of it was missed. And thank God it was found at this point where we still have all of a week to have him off the ballot. But obviously this is going to be a a recurring seam, I think, moving forward. Support for the show comes from Thrive Market. Grocery shopping can be surprisingly exhausting. Actually, it's not a surprise.

It is so exhausting. Comparing ingredients, weighing brands, checking prices, it's a lot to keep track of. What if you could shop at a grocery store stock specifically for your tastes and preferences? That's where Thrive Market comes in. Thrive Market is a membership-based online grocery store. For just $5 a month, you get access to a curated selection

of organic and non-GMO brands that you can easily filter by diet. You can also get access to weekly sales, free gifts, and the peace of mind knowing that the foods and ingredients you're getting are right for you. I do Thrive Market myself. I've told you about this before. I think it's awesome. I have my whole situation curated. I know the quality of the products is great. It is so, so good if you have kids. Also, we're all spending our money constantly on very expensive kids snacks. It is nice when it all comes from one place. They know what you like. Big fan of Thrive Market. One membership covers the whole family. even when everyone eats differently. No more decision fatigue. Your filtered results only show what

fits your household. Are you ready to build your ultimate summer cart? Join Thrive Market with my link, thrivemarket.com slash moderates for $20 off your first three orders plus a free gift. Support for this show comes from Vetch Pet Insurance. Do you have a pet? Every six seconds, a pet owner in the U.S. gets hit with a vet bill of over $1,000. And it's almost always an unwelcome surprise. That's where Fetch Pet Insurance comes in. Fetch is the most complete pet insurance. Get paid back up to 90% of vet bills. You can use any vet in the U.S. and Canada.

All vets are in network. Go to fetchpet.com slash save. Right now for your free quote. That's fetchpet.com slash save. Hey, it's Ryan Reynolds here for MintMobil. Now, I was looking for fun ways to tell you that Mint's offer of unlimited premium wireless for $15 a month is back.

So I thought it would be fun if we made $15 bills. But it turns out that's very illegal. So there goes my big idea for the commercial. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. Upbound payment of $45 for three months, $90 for six months or $180 for 12-month plan required.

$15 per month equivalent. Taxes and fees extra. Initial plan term only greater than 50 gigabytes to be slow when network is busy. See terms. I want to shift gears. We're back at war, second consecutive night of attack.

being traded between the U.S. and Iran. They came in the midst of Trump saying that the three-week-old ceasefire is over. I have argued the ceasefire never exist, but that's just me. Apparently, the U.S. is preparing for a multi-day or even multi-week exchange of fire with Iran over the Strait of Hormuz, says the U.S. official. We're going to slap them a bit so they understand we're not fucking around. I thought we had obliterated everything, so I think we're a bit past that. Also saw some reporting that the Defense Department, which gets funded at a trillion

is almost out of cash and they're going to be coming hat in hand for some more appropriations. I think there's $350 billion extra. Yeah, just some pocket change. Like I found a five in my jeans pocket, so it's like, you know, same same for the DOD. What do you think the most likely outcome of this is? Man, I can't say what the most likely outcome other than, I think, a continuation of Trump's inability to actually negotiate anything. I think the reality is Iran knows that they have a lot more leverage than I think Trump does. First of all, this is very much like when Putin thought he was going to level Kiev in like five minutes.

And here we are several years later. this is all, the fact that this is all still going on when we have, you know, like a major military advantage over Iran, I think is a huge embarrassment, a huge black eye for this administration. But I think more broadly, we have elections in the same way that Iran doesn't have. And so the Ayatollah can outlast Donald Trump because what do they have coming up? What does he have to contend with? some midterm elections. I mean, he is in power in perpetuity. But Donald Trump knows that there

are elections coming up and that this war is increasingly unpopular. And so I think if you consider the fact that the war itself was something that Trump promised would never happen and yet is happening, if you look at the costs that Americans are contending with right now as the result of this war, we have higher prices, we have higher inflation, we have higher gas costs, all of that stuff is bearing down. And not just Trump, but the rest of the GOP is on the ballot come November. And so there's going to be a lot of pressure on them to shit or get off the pot. And as of right now, nothing seems to be changing. And so I think it's only going to get worse. Yeah. I think that you are right about all of that. And especially, you know, the long game that

Iran gets to play. And, you know, when Trump says, President Xi, he's so lucky, like, he never has to deal in an election. You know, there's a reason that he's jealous of these guys. And I saw as well that there's reporting that Tehran is deliberately holding back its full military firepower as they tighten control over the Strait of Hormuz because they know that we don't have time and we also don't have the oil. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve is now just 19 million barrels over minimum operating level. Which I thought was a big flashpoint issue for Republicans when they were using the exact same thing against Biden. Like newsflash, they're a bunch of liars.

But that killed me. I was like, we had to talk about this over and over again, that Biden, you know, misplayed the strategic petroleum reserve, et cetera. And then you didn't think day one, maybe you should fill it up? Well, and it's not just that. I mean, the principal contention that Republicans had against Biden was that was that inflation was surging. Joe Biden left office with inflation at 3%.

Now it's at 4.2% or 4.1%. So it's 33% higher than when public enemy number one, Joe Biden left office, not to mention the cost of everything else, the cost of groceries. I mean, Trump spent so much time talking about the price of an egg. And now eggs are even more expensive. Housing is more expensive. Republicans handed Donald Trump a housing bill on a silver platter, which would be a huge win. All he had to do was sign it. And he couldn't even take that win.

And so I think on issue after issue, it's becoming clear that all of the things that these people had complained about when, came to the 2024 election and the Democratic Party, they've not only failed to fix those things, but they've all been exacerbated. Costs are higher. Inflation is higher. Health care is less accessible. Food assistance has been gutted. You know, this idea of endless wars in the Middle East, there are more wars now. And of course, the Epstein files, which was one of the biggest issues that they ran on, has not only not been released, but Republicans are engaged in a government-wide cover-up right now. So, I mean, it's just like it puts the hypocrisy on full display. actually haven't thought about the Epstein files in a while. And I'm, I'm sure that there are millions of

Americans who are still sitting there saying, like, you told us that this was going to come out. I mean, look, Todd Blanche is going to be testifying for Congress in just a few days, I believe, on Tuesday of next week. He is in that position because he's willing to be Donald Trump's errand boy when it comes to the continued suppression of these files. I mean, we still don't even know why Galane Maxwell after her meeting with Todd Blanche was moved from. the prison that she was in in Florida to a low security prison in Texas. We just never got any of those answers. And they tried to play off the departure of Pam Bondi as if all of the Epstein issues left with her. There are still three to three and a half million files that haven't been

released and we're just supposed to accept the fact that even though the Epstein Files Transparency Act was signed into law in November of 2025 and the deadline to release all of the files was December 19th, that we're just never going to get those files and somehow that's okay. Yeah, it's a, it's a tough pill to swallow, but there's just so much, I mean, this has always been the theory of the case, right? And what Steve Bannon said, like, if we just throw enough stuff at the wall, they won't be able to pay attention to anything. And if you're in a Middle Eastern war and if you have elections coming up, that you're not

going to be able to follow each of these plot lines. And I very much feel as well that what's going on with immigration enforcement in this country has fallen into that bucket, too, where we don't talk about it as much. And obviously, Mark Wayne Mullen is not Christyneau. You know, he doesn't draw attention in the same way. And Tom Holman, who came in after Alex Prattie and Renee Goodwood were killed, is a calmer force than a Greg Bovino, for instance. But just in the last few days, there have been two ice-involved shootings, including one in Houston on July 7th, where an ice agent fatally shot a Mexican national without legal status.

It feels like this is going to be ramping up again and that it's probably by Stephen Miller design. Yeah, I mean, look, you would know better than anybody about the whole issue of taking immigration and making it a central theme as we have an election incoming. I mean, how many times did Fox talk about migrant caravans in the lead up to some election?

You know, come September or October, it was migrant caravans, migrant caravans, migrant caravans, because that is an animating issue for the right. And so, you know, I think in terms of Tom Holman taking over and Mark Wayne Mullin taking over for Greg Bovino and Christy Noem, Christy Noem and Greg Bovino didn't dictate this policy in a vacuum. Like they are, they are guided by the person at the top. And that was always Trump and that continues to be Trump. And so the cruelty of this policy doesn't change with Noem or Bovino's departure, it just has a different phase. And maybe a little bit more subtle,

maybe a little less flashy. Certainly it's not easy, it's not difficult to be less flashy than with Christy Noem in office as she tries out all of her different Barbie personas. But I think, I think the reality is like you, the fish rots from the head. And so when you have somebody like Trump in charge or by association Stephen Miller, who's dictating all of these policies, you can, you know, put in place different people beneath you, but they're still going to espouse the same cruel policy. And so I'm not surprised that this is ramping up again. But look, I think even in the aftermath of Renee Good and Alex Pready being killed, we saw how aggressively unpopular this was, even among Republicans. And so I think that they, it may be some degree of like group think

or, or, you know, maybe even just Stephen Miller recognizing, hey, I'd rather at least be talking about immigration crackdowns, brutal immigration crackdowns than the Iran war, which Trump promised he would never engage in and the subsequent high prices, which Trump promised he would solve. So maybe they're just trying to figure out something that's better than that. And frankly, anything is better than that. But I think that if they think these ice killings are going to be more favorable terrain for them, they're probably barking up the wrong tree here. I agree on the way ice is behaving. I have an addendum. And I'm curious, I don't think we've actually ever spoken about this. And this is a facet of the disconnect.

between the left and the right and how they talk about immigration and certainly how they shape policy around it. And that's the role of angel moms and these, you know, flashing, you know, red light cases like Lake and Riley, what just happened with Sheridan Gorman in Chicago. And I was particularly disturbed watching Jessica Gorman, whose daughter Sheridan, was killed by someone who's here illegally, who had a rap sheet. She was testifying on Congress, and Representative Jayapal said basically that I'm bored, right? Like, this is the fourth hearing that we've had about this. And looking at the face of a mom whose kids should be here, right?

Like, there is no justification on any planet for anyone murdering anyone, let alone someone who's here illegally. And, you know, the immigration issue used to be his best. now he's underwater on it. But moments like that, I keep people in the Republican camp on an issue like immigration because it still doesn't feel like Democrats totally get it.

Right? And that you have to say, like, sanctuary cities need to turn over the criminals who are here illegally. Like, to my mind, there's no question on that. Like, you give them to Tom Holman at this point. Yeah, I agree on that point. And I think that that is, I think that's completely appropriate.

I don't think that we should be in the business of protecting violent criminals, whether they are foreign-born or American. Look, I think that the difficult part is you can get in there and explain that foreign-born citizens or permanent residents, whatever it may be, are actually safer. Their communities are safer than communities with Native-born Americans. You can do all of this explaining. I think the onus is on us. to make those points over and over and over again.

That's not to say that these arguments, like the Lake and Riley argument, aren't still persuasive, but I guess my pushback is it is a tragedy when that happens. It's a tragedy when it happens at the hands of anybody. I don't want to give a pass to a murderer because that person is a white American born here in the United States but committed some violent crime. It's not worse when it happens at the hands of an immigrant. it is just as tragic every time and we should be working to stop that whenever we can in all of those situations. So I think that like, you know, it's just the onus is on us to make that argument that,

you know, all of the data bears out this point that immigrant communities are actually safer than American-born communities. Yeah, I mean, I'm with you. You know how I love a good data dump. Right. And so I'm curious, like, in your experience, what has been most effective at pushing back against these emotional arguments that do, like in my mind, they do weirdly seem to give a pass to white murderers, like, by only focusing on brown murders and as if their immigration status is what makes the violent crime unacceptable. Well, it's tied to usually a set of policies that allowed that person to remain in the country even after they committed a crime on American

soil. So not just the crime of crossing the border, which is just a civil infraction, but people with rap sheets here, right, who are known to the police and in many cases where ICE has not gotten cooperation from Blue City governors, governance, I should say, not the governor, but the mayor or the prisons, for instance, to take those folks out. That's what happened with Kate Steinley, which was, you know, the big case. And there's a Kate Steinley law. There's Lake and Riley law. And I'm sure there will be something for Sheridan-Gorman.

So I find what's most effective. And I see this really as one of those 80-20 issues where Democrats just got to say, like, a transgender woman has a biological advantage if she has gone through puberty before starting hormone therapy or having gender-affirming care in competitive sports. I see this similarly, where you say the cities have to cooperate because then you get to the policy that we all agreed on, which is we should deport people who are not a net positive to our communities. And then you make the mass deportation people look like the evil folks that they are, right? The ones who say, no, keep going to Home Depot and pick up people in churches and have screaming kids by the side of the road as they take away their mom who's worked as a house. housekeeper or a home health aid for 30 years.

Like that is to my mind and from what I've noticed in making these arguments with my colleagues, that's what's most resonant, where you just say this is the easy stuff. And then we get, you will be shown for who you truly are. You will either be someone that agrees that these people who come here for a better life and work hard, who often have American kids serve this country in a lot of cases, like the guy who worked at the car wash in L.A. who had three sons that all serve. like it's much more effective to be able to call them out when you just give that little bit that we all agree on anyway. Like who the guy who killed Sharon and Gorman, I don't want him here.

Like, he's not one of the good ones. Yeah. No, I completely agree. I think that would be a smart way to take away to kind of neuter their biggest talking point against what's happening. We're trying to neuter and spay all Republicans. That's right. Yeah. Support for this show comes from Hart.

Harvey AI. The future of law is agentic, not just tools that assist, but AI agents that navigate complex matters. That's why Harvey created agents that can do the work from end to end. They build a plan, pull from secure data sources, run subagents in parallel, and draft the work product ready for your review. So you delegate the work and on the judgment. Trusted by more than 60% of the AMLaw 100 and leading Fortune 500 legal teams, Harvey is the AI operating system designed specifically for legal work. Harvey, AI, tailored for law. Learn more at harvey.aI.

This show is supported by Atio, the AI CRM. Atio is the AI CRM that turns every customer signal into context you can act on. Connect your email, calendar, and product data, and Atio instantly builds your CRM with enriched data and a complete picture of every deal. Then you can ask Atio anything. Spot a deal at risk,

draft outreach, uncover new prospects, so you can spend less time in your CRM and more time-building relationships. Ask more from your CRM. Ask Atio. You can go to atio.com slash Vox, and you'll get 15% off your first year. That's A-T-I-O.com slash Vox. We all have to drink water, and staying hydrated is one of the simplest ways to feel your best. But come on. How is your relationship with water really? Are you getting enough from it? Is it satisfying you?

Or is drinking it becoming a chore? Here's a tip to spice things up. Hint water. With delectable flavors like watermelon, Georgia peach, even lemon zest freeze. Hint is water that will make you desire water. No sugar, no sweeteners, no calories. It just goes to show. Sometimes the right hydration partner changes everything.

Try Hint. Available at drinkhind.com and in stores nationwide. We are forward thinking about what happens next for the party and our governance. And that's what your book is all about. Again, it's the day after I had a wield power in a post-Trump world. It comes out next Tuesday on the 14th. there's a lot being batted around about a potential project 2029, right? They had a full roadmap.

We seemingly have some bullet points I've heard. We haven't gotten to see them yet, let alone the 900 pages. How are you thinking about our approach to governance once Trump is gone and the spotlight is on us? I think Trump has been really instructive in showing that a lot of the, barriers, processes, institutions, norms are not as sacrosanct as we once were led to believe they are. Now, he's barreled through a lot of those obstacles for his own personal benefit, for his own enrichment.

I mean, the fact that he can just bulldoze the east wing of the White House showed that maybe what Democrats would view as like, you know, a commission and all of this stuff that would, you know, probably take years and Trump can do it in five minutes had showed that, like, has shown that perhaps we are a little bit too deferential to norms and processes and procedures. But I think we have to do it in a virtuous way, which look, I don't think there's anybody on the left who is looking to barrel through these institutions so that they can also gain billions of dollars and build a shrine to themselves on the other side of the White House. So I don't think that's going to be a problem

anyway. But just being in government, not to protect the institutions of government, but to deliver outcomes for people, I think has to be our North Star. And so whether it's on combating climate change, whether it's on expanding health care so that everybody has health care in this country, whether it's on expanding voting rights or everybody has the right to vote, even as that right seems to be shrinking right now, or even on delivering some accountability for the blatant corruption that we're seeing on a daily basis right now. My argument here is that Democrats have to finally learn to wield power in a way that we haven't before. Because we've seen Republicans abuse it, and we've seen Democrats shy away from it. And so that asymmetry is so vast that it

puts us in a position where Merrick Garland doesn't get an appointment on the Supreme Court because they've changed the rules for a year, only up until the point that Amy Coney-Barritt gets appointed the Supreme Court while votes are being cast. And so we need people who are willing to actually exercise power, not be so deferential to institutions that, in effect, we just entrenched the same status quo that so many people showed up to vote against. in these last few elections. Yeah, I mean, it's a perfect timing to be talking about how we wield power

as we all wonder what is going on with Mitch McConnell, right? Who is an incredible example of ruthlessness in politics? I'm curious, like Trump's done a lot of damage, obviously, to our institutions. I mean, you talk about the ballroom. That is institutional, also cosmetic.

But what are the areas that you think he's damaged the most and maybe something that you feel is underappreciated that has actually been destroyed or at least, you know, severely damaged in the Trump era? Yeah. So I think I think the biggest thing is the extent to which he has used the federal government to enrich himself. I think that is what denigrates trust or erodes trust the most in our institutions and in the ability for the government to serve its people. I mean, is basically using our taxpayer dollars and the U.S. government to curry favor in negotiations with other countries like UAE and Qatar and any other country that's going to invest in

World Liberty Financial or buy his crypto or meme coins or stable coins or open up Trump golf courses on their properties. And so contending with that is going to be the most important thing so that people don't just lose trust entirely in the government's ability to serve its own constituents. I mean, right now, I have zero doubt that Trump is not acting in the best interest of this country, that he's acting in the best interest of his own finances, because there's been nothing done to quell like this windfall of money that he gets by, again, using us as his negotiating tactic to get what he needs. So I think that is going to be something that we have to really focus on. In terms of the second part of your question, though, what is

something underappreciated that he's taken like a cudgel to? I think just the idea of what the DOJ, like what he's done with the DOJ, I don't know that everybody's really fully grasped what it looks like to have a fully weaponized Department of Justice that does not go after anybody who is politically aligned with this president or his political party. And instead, you have all of the resources of the federal government going toward destroying the infrastructure of the left, making, you know, turning any democratic officials or just democratic aligned figures into warnings for what could come for the next person. They're using them as a way to chill free speech.

I mean, we have the FCC that's being wielded against anybody who expresses some dissenting views or opinions on this administration. And so that stuff, that's like the, that's the plotting bureaucracy of our law enforcement agency that's going to have such deep impacts. It's already having deep impacts. But I think that is the kind of thing that's going to take a lot of time to unwind if we're even able to unwind it at all. I mean, we're seeing the consolidation of the media. that's kind of like a similar aspect of this. You really can't unwind what's happened to CBS. You can't unwind what's going to happen to CNN.

And so this is the kind of thing that I think is going to have a really long tail and may not be as sexy as like war in Iran or ice agents shooting and killing somebody in the street, but it's going to have long-term ramifications. Yeah, I mean, another helpful plug for independent media, right? though obviously there's been weaponization against independent media as well. I mean, you've been on the receiving end of that too. Yeah, if you go to whitehouse.gov, I'm on their media offenders list. So Trump basically put together an enemy's list and slapped a YouTuber's name on it.

I mean, if that is both an indictment of this administration and their quote unquote free speech stance, their anti-censorship stance. But it's also a testament to the fact that independent media is effective enough that they have a need or feel a need to do this in the first place. And how obsessed they are with ratings. Yeah. Right. I mean, you're not just any YouTuber. You have many millions of subscribers.

Last day, I mean, there were so many aspects of the book that I wanted to get at. And because you were on the DOJ track, I'm curious about how you see lawfare in the post-Trump era. Because I think that there were going to be, you know, there was accusations that we did all the lawfare. it's pretty clear now that they are doing unprecedented levels of lawfare, right, skipping grand juries if they can and just continuing to hammer, right? Like Mike Johnson's going for something like to ban pregnant women from entering the country that will wind its way through the courts, all of that. Do you think that there's any chance that the left having lived through a decade of Trump like this and kind of seeing what results you can get? if you abuse systems is going to take on some of it. Because, I mean, a central argument is like it can't be.

Like it's going to have like a Trumpian feel? Yeah, I mean, I don't. That sounds too evil, frankly. But that, you know, and you say it. And it's a central premise of the book, right? That like, we can't just, we don't want to go back to business as usual. Like the Biden argument in 2020 would not work now, right? It didn't even work in 2024, though it was like half Biden and half comma.

That's a whole, you know, a whole other episode. But there are going to be people who say, like, have we learned nothing, right, about what to do? And we have very good lawyers. Like, Mark Elias wrote the foreword to your book. You know, go ahead. Yeah. No, I think we have, like, look, there are lessons about, again, not being so precious about our institutions that we have to take into account as we move into 2026 and

28, especially as we move into 2028 and beyond. But I think more broadly, yes, like if we rely on just entrenching the same status quo that people voted against, we're going to be doomed to repeat the same thing, the same failures that we had during the Biden era. I mean, Merrick Garland's whole thing was he wants to act to prevent the optics of politicization. And in effect, I mean, he actually did politicize the DOJ more than not because he basically said if you have an arnext to your name, you get a free pass because we don't want to give the optics of politicization. But I think that you need to do this. I mean, if there is no deterrent effect for this criminality and corruption, it's only going to happen more. Trump 2.0 is a response to the Biden administration's inability, their unwillingness

to actually hold these people to account. And so I think you absolutely need to engage with this stuff. Of course, you're going to have people that say, oh, you're doing the same thing that Trump did. And you can't do that. I mean, there is enough legitimate corruption that we're seeing right now that you don't have to engage in the same bullshit that Donald Trump is engaging in right now where he just tries to indict anyone and everyone because they have a D-next to their name or because they've been overtly critical of him. But I firmly believe that if we don't engage with some of this corruption, if we don't take this out, if we don't prosecute, investigate any of this stuff, it's only going to continue. I mean, again, the fact that it's happening right now is a direct.

direct response to our collective unwillingness to hold these people to account when we had the opportunity to do so. Yeah, I have a lot of feelings about Merrick Garland and slow walking some things, especially seeing Jack Smith emerge for his first big interview. Brian, this was fantastic. Make sure to follow Brian everywhere at Brian Tyler Cohen, new book the day after, had a wield power in the post-Trump world out July 14th. It was so good to have you. So good being here. Thanks, Jess. Yeah, of course.

Support for this show comes from Wix. You can make a great-looking website with Wix, and you can do it your way. Whether you want AI to jump in or prefer to do things yourself. Get a custom ready-to-use website in minutes with Wix's AI website builder, or choose from more than 2,000 templates. Get built-in solutions tailored to your business and enjoy easy, fuss-free domain registration. Web posting included. Wix powers more than 280 million businesses around the world because with Wix, you can own your individuality, create freely, and scale fearlessly. Ready to create your website, go to Wix.com. That's Wix.com. Support for the show comes from KPMG. In any organization, disruption is inevitable, but struggling through it doesn't have to be.

The KPMG Adaptability Index is your blueprint for building capabilities to handle what comes next. It uses real data to look at how your culture, strategy, and partnerships all work together to help your business thrive. Stop reacting and start adapting. Visit KPMG.com slash US slash Adaptability to explore the Adaptability Index and Pulse Surveys today. Support for this show comes from FetchPet Insurance. Do you have a pet? Every six seconds, a pet owner in the U.S. gets hit with a vet bill of over $1,000. And it's almost always an unwelcome surprise.

That's where Fetch Pet Insurance comes in. Fetch is the most complete pet insurance. Get paid back up to 90% of vet bills. You can use any vet in the U.S. and Canada. All vets are in network. Go to fetchpet.com slash save right now for your free quote. That's fetchpet.com slash save.