REAL AF with Andy Frisella - 580. Andy, Andrew Bailey & DJ CTI: Missouri AG Sues School Board, Second Republican Debate & First Biden Impeachment Inquiry

Episode Date: September 29, 2023

In today's episode, Andy & DJ are joined in the studio by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey. They discuss Andrew suing a local school board saying members knowingly excluded parents from trans bathroom discussion, the second Republican debate, and the first Biden impeachment inquiry hearing commencing Thursday morning.

What is up guys, it's Andy Purcell and this is the show for the realest say goodbye to the lies, the fakeness, and delusions of modern society. And welcome to Mother Freakin' Reality. Yep. You like that one, don't you? I love it. Today, we have a very special show. We have Andy and DJ. Cruz the Mother Freakin' Internet.

That's right. We can't say the F word anymore. Yeah. Because YouTube, we can, but YouTube doesn't like it. Yeah. We've had people in the comments. We should address that real quick. What do they say?

They're like, man, you guys are censoring yourself. Oh, we're censoring ourselves? Really? Is there another show on the motherfucking planet that says the shit that we say? Really? It's called having a joke, bro. If you don't like it, don't listen. Unsubscribe.

Go listen to someone else telling more truth. Listen, the thing is, we need this message to get out, guys. So if we got to bleep a couple of F-words so the show can get out. Yeah. It's a sacrifice. Well, you're free to go listen to anybody you want that's telling the truth. But I'm pretty sure there's nobody else. So I'll see you tomorrow, bitch.

How about that? All right. So this is called Cruise the Internet. This is where we put topics up on the screen. That's what CTI stands for cruise the internet. Uh, we're going to put up some current event topics. We're going to talk about them. We're going to speculate on what's true on a, what's not true. And then we're gonna talk about how we, the people can be solutions. He's problem going on in the world. All right. Other times we have Q and AF, uh, Q and AF is

where you get to submit questions. We answer them on the show. You can submit your questions. One of a couple of different ways, you guys, the first way is you get to submit questions. We answer them on the show. You can submit your questions one of a couple different ways. Guys, the first way is you can email those questions into askandy at andyfusella.com. Or you can go on YouTube and on the Q&A episodes, you can drop your question in the comment section. We'll pick some from there as well. Other times we have real talk. Real talk is just five to 20 minutes of me giving you some real talk. Sometimes we have full length.

That's where someone comes in and we just have like a regular podcast, pretty much what you're used to seeing. I know I said we were going to stop that, but I lied. And then we also have 75 hard versus, all right? 75 hard versus is where we bring people on who have completed 75 hard and changed their entire lives. And we talk about how they were before, how they are now, and what differences it's made in their life and how it can help you as well. If you're unfamiliar with 75 Hard, I don't know where you've been because it's the most popular mental transformation program that's ever existed in human history. And you can get it for free at episode 208 in the audio feed, okay? 75 Hard is the initial phase of the Live hard program, which is designed for you to

win the war with yourself. It's designed for you to build the essential traits of what it takes to be successful, which are things like discipline, mental toughness, confidence, self-belief, grit, fortitude, perseverance, and basically the ability to follow the plan. Because let's be real. The problem isn't that you don't know what to do. The problem is that you can't do it. And that's what this program addresses and it's free. So episode two,

eight audio feed, there's a book on my website, 75 hard. Uh, you don't have to buy it and get it for free on the podcast here. So, uh, for all this stuff that we give you, we have this thing we call the fee. The fee is basically, uh, if you like the show, please share it. As we just discussed, we get censored everywhere we talk, everywhere we go, and we rely on you guys to get the message out. So please pay the fee. Don't be a hoe. Share the show. All right. So as I mentioned, we have a very special CTI today. Today, we have one of the key figures in what's going on in the world right now, especially when it comes to free speech, especially when it comes to free

speech, especially when it comes to big tech, government collusion and censorship, Missouri's own Attorney General, Mr. Andrew Bailey. What's going on, brother? Hey, man. Thanks for having me on. Yeah. It's amazing to have you here. Appreciate the opportunity. Appreciate you guys spreading the word. Yeah. Yeah. Well, you're doing amazing work. And we figured you're right here in Missouri, so it would be a good stop for you to come in and talk about, I think, the most important issue that's going on in the world right now. Because if we lose the free speech here, everywhere is over, right? Yeah, that's right.

It's Orwellian what's going on right now. For sure. I think George Orwell, on his most creative day, couldn't have contrived the vast censorship enterprise that is permeating big tech today. And it's not permeating big tech organically to big tech. It's at the demand of the federal government. Right. From the very top levels of the White House across a spectrum of bureaucratic agencies. Thank you all for covering this and for continuing to cover this.

This is the most important First Amendment suit in this nation's history. And that's exactly what the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals most recently said. And let's put that in context for just a minute. In 1789, the second president of the United States, John Adams, and the Federalists passed a bill through Congress, the Alien and Sedition Act, designed to imprison anyone that questioned the president's foreign policy. That was bad. But the Fifth Circuit says what's going on here is worse. There is no enabling legislation.

The people's elected representatives had had no say in this vast censorship enterprise, and everyone who uses big tech has suffered. Anyone who was deprived of information is now a victim of the censorship campaign from the federal government. That's crazy. Were you, because I mean, I think that's the biggest key, right? People didn't understand. They think that it's protected, it's okay for these big tech platforms to do this on their own.

If it was on their own, okay, cool. That's their argument, right? That's the argument. It's a private business. But that's not the case. No, that is the case, but that's not what's happening. Right, right, right. And it's been discovered that, like, no, like our own federal government

and actors inside of our own government are controlling these different figures at all of these platforms. Exactly. To silence, to censor, and to prop the narrative however they see fit. And it's dangerous. Yeah. And this isn't just the three of us talking about this and imagining this is happening. We have evidence. I mean, a lawsuit that my predecessor, Eric Schmidt, launched that we pushed forward and continued with. You know, we've scratched the surface. Preliminary discovery to go get a preliminary injunction against the federal government to protect our First Amendment rights. Twenty thousand pages of documents, numerous depositions. We put that evidence on in court on May 26th when we filed our motion for preliminary injunction. And the court believed the evidence. And that's why we were able to get that preliminary injunction on the 4th of July in celebration of this nation's independence.

Now, the DOJ is incensed by this. They want to be able to silence any voice in opposition to the government. Did they file the appeal? Like, isn't that a red flag right there? Right. Like they're committed to the vast censorship enterprise man so then we went up the fifth circuit court of appeals we won there as well at the end of the day we're headed for the highest court in the land united states supreme court i think 100 years from now kids in constitutional law class and law school will crack open the con law book and we'll be reading the case missouri v biden and think about the fight for freedom we made at this at this space at this, in this state. I think we're in a different, I actually agree with that. I think what's happening right now in society, both in the political realm and

the cultural realm, is legitimately one of the most pivotal and historic times that this country will face. And I know people say that, right? They say it every election cycle. And, you know, they said that in the nineties, they said it in the eighties, they said it in the seventies, but I actually think right now is, is really that way. And, um, if we don't bring awareness to what's actually happening, because they've done a really good job at keeping everyone sort of ignorant to, to, to the level of what's actually happening right they have like you were saying dj they have convinced people of this of this uh opinion that you know hey that's a private company they can do whatever they want but they've left out the truth which is that we have three-letter agencies and government officials literally calling and sending emails and meeting

and threatening and saying hey this person needs to be the platform these people need to be censored this is what needs to happen and that's what's been happening since you know i actually think it's and you you would probably know better than me but i i think this has been going on for a very long time and i think where people really started to raise their eyebrows was during the 2020 situation with covid and the censorship and i think people started to raise their eyebrows was during the 2020 situation with covid and the censorship and i think people started to pay attention like oh this is something this is not right yeah because i remember in 2015 uh i made a critical post on facebook about hillary clinton as you should yeah and hillary and i got destroyed by like 10 000 comments in like five minutes. Yeah. And I was like, how?

Because at the time I didn't have a following like I have now. I was like, how did this happen? And what I found out was that these were actually just all fake accounts that that organization, that social media platform owned. And they had put them onto me to silence me. And so the censorship is not just the government reaching out. There's all kinds of different ways that they're doing it. They use bots to prop up narratives that they want.

They use bots to attack people that they don't want speaking. They do things like this, and you hear them say this all the time. It's freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach. So they think that they're justified to cut your traffic if they don't agree with what you're saying, which is the same as any other form of censorship. You know, are we getting that far when we are suing these people with that? Yeah. You know, a couple of points. Number one, I don't think what you're saying is hyperbole because it's actually happening, like you said.

And it goes beyond just targeting specific posts. The example that you gave, which I think is really salient, is that, and this is what the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals found as well. Again, this is in a judicial opinion. This isn't just Andrew Bailey positing this. This has been proven in court. The terms of service on these big tech platforms, the algorithms were manipulated at the demand of the federal government. So when you had that attack from the big tech bots, essentially, that's because the algorithm was changed to satisfy federal officials demands in order to discredit a narrative that they disagree with. That's insane. That's also censorship. Yeah. I would also point out that, and I think you guys established this point at the onset here, the harm is ongoing. It's not like, okay, this one post was taken down or there's this period

in time and we're past it now. That's not true at all because individuals are now self-censoring to avoid the vast censorship enterprise. How many people don't want to talk about Donald Trump? Don't want to talk about election integrity. don't want to talk about election integrity don't want to talk about covid because they're afraid that big tech's going to deep platform de-emphasize or they will be attacked well they do that that's real stuff like people like people are giving dj and i say no you're you're censoring no they have things in the first 30 seconds of youtube where if you say a curse word they automatically turn your page to to yellow and you get no traffic on the episode. So you guys that criticize us, you should ask yourself, would you like the message to

be out there or would you like it not to be out there? Because you only get three strikes. Yeah. And then you're off the platform. Yeah. Yeah. You know, if you don't, if you don't, if you cuss within the first seven, like it's insane. Bro, it's the same thing though.

It's what Andrew's saying. If you talk about COVID, if you talk about about election if you talk about any of these things that are controversial trump right we get we get clicked into yellow or or or put an age restriction immediately yes immediately every single time and and by the way whenever they asked us to come on the platform they guaranteed us that would never happen because we were just an audio show for many, many years. We have a huge, huge, huge audio show and we've just started on YouTube and they told us, oh, we're getting away from that. We're not moving in that direction anymore. You're going to be safe on this platform. And to be completely honest, it's not been that way. Yeah. In fact, it is getting increasingly worse. Yeah. Yeah. Well, I think that if I may, I think the censorship enterprise is actually counterproductive.

People don't trust the government, don't trust the information if they think they're only getting one side. The whole purpose behind the First Amendment rights of free speech is to guarantee a free, fair and open marketplace of ideas where those ideas can compete. And we can invite dissenting voices and come to the conclusion of what is and isn't truthful based on our debate, not based on government censorship. The government censorship is counterproductive to their ultimate aim. Now, it's harming us in the short term. Yeah. But in the long term, it's counterproductive. Fewer people trust what the government's saying.

Fewer people trust what they're hearing and seeing for the very reason that we know we're being censored. It's like a spiral that they're not even aware they're in. You know, it's like, okay, well, they don't trust us, so we got to make sure they don't hear this other stuff, so we censor this stuff. Then they don't trust us some more, so then they censor more, and it just continues to feed the beast, right? Well, that's the thing because they're-

I don't think the trust is coming back for a long time. No, no, no. There's going to be a hard time for our government to regain the trust of its citizens. Well, one, I mean, there's things that's helping improve that, like the work that you're doing, like the work that Eric Schmidt's doing. You know, but the thing is, it's like, you know, what happened to us just being able to be in a room, have disagreements,

have open dialogues and say, you know, if there was a dumb idea that came up, okay, cool, yeah, bro, that's just a dumb idea. Like, no, stop, right? But that's not the world we're living in. What we're living in now, and that's what we talk about on the show all the time, is these people think that they have the birthright to have the authority over what we can say, what we should think, what we should buy, who we should support, what we should believe.

And they genuinely believe that they have that power over us. And I believe their days are coming i mean i think didn't we have a revolution to get away from that i mean what's the whole point of the united states of america was to end authoritarianism yeah and yet we're slouching towards our authoritarianism here's the problem i've got we used to elevate the rules of the game above the players and the outcomes and And yet the left has jettisoned that approach. The rule of law doesn't matter anymore. The constitution apparently doesn't matter to Joe Biden anymore. I mean, he's the one that's directing the vast censorship enterprise. We know that it's grown so fast they had to develop a new bureaucratic structure to manage it. It is

time we build a wall of separation between tech and state to protect our first amendment rights. The first brick of that wall was laid on July 4th when we got that preliminary injunction and we're going to keep fighting to build that wall as we move into an election cycle it's it's more important now more more than ever yeah you're a big believer of states rights absolutely so and i am too so is there a solution here to where like you and and the guys here in miss here in Missouri could create a situation where they have to have an open algorithm here for the users in Missouri? Yeah. Is that something that like you see happening where it starts to go state by state? Texas and Florida have enacted that exact legislation. Really? It's challenged right now. Yeah. I mean, I think the root of the problem,

I think, again, Senator Eric Schmidt very quickly pointed out the accurately pointed out the root of the problem. It's section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. It's been misinterpreted by the courts and misapplied. And that is that is the problem that we've got right now with big tech. And that's why that wall of separation is so important. But but, yeah, Texas and Florida have both enacted state statutes that require some clarity, some publication of the algorithms, some acknowledgement that terms of service, that if you're going, if you're using the product, you it's clearly labeled. So, you know what you're getting, you know, if you're going to be censored and why you would be censored. Now that doesn't completely solve the problem, but at least it

begins to chip away at it unless and until we can get either amendment to section 230 or a proper judicial interpretation of section 230 and i think that eric schmidt's concept is is really good i mean that's good legislation if you can ever get it get it moving i mean they're going to be those in congress who on the left who want to support the vast censorship enterprise because they think that's the only way they're benefiting from it today they're silencing voices in opposition like eric schmidt and so only that when you got you know mark zuckerberg that's dumping half a billion dollars into these left campaigns why would they vote to overturn 230 yeah you know i'm saying he's keeping them elected that's a great point yeah why would he do that it's a cash cow for the monopoly

but also for the politicians to support they. They understand that if they protect him, that he's going to dump money on them. Yeah, it's just recycling our money. Right. It's insane. Yeah. I do want to point out a couple of things, too, though, before we get into the show, Andrew. So your background, right, you're a veteran, born and raised here in Missouri. Grew up here in Missouri, yeah, Columbia, Missouri.

Yeah, so can we talk a little bit about that? Because I got some good pictures of you, man. I would pull a couple of these up here, man. Oh, Columbia, Missouri. Yeah, so can we talk a little bit about that? Because I got some good pictures of you, man. I would pull a couple of these up here, man. Oh, there you are. Yeah, that'd be Kuwait in 2005. Man, was it hot over there? It was warm. It was so warm, yeah.

Now, you were in the tank battalion, right? That is super cool, dude. Yeah, armored cavalry. The last heavy armored cavalry regiment in the United States Army. Wow. Actually, 3rd ACR, it was originally a mounted rifleman. It was formed in Fort Jackson, Missouri, to fight the Frontier Wars, and then it was in the Civil War, World War I.

It's one of the oldest units in the Army. Man. That's super cool. So were you on a tank? Yeah, I was trained on tanks at Fort Knox, Kentucky. What was your job on the tank? I was the tank commander. At tank school, you're trained to be a tank yeah yeah i was trained on tanks at fort knox kentucky what was your job on the tank i was a the tank commander had well at tank school you know you're trained to be a tank commander so you have four tanks you do every job on the tank to kind of learn yeah the jobs i mean shooting

that 120 millimeter main gun and having it going off right at your head and putting 120 millimeter round downrange at a pinpoint accuracy i mean that's pretty exhilarating yeah got to my unit and i was assigned as a scout platoon leader so So I had six Bradley fighting vehicles and 30 soldiers, usually two platoons of Iraqis. The Bradley is designed as an armored personnel carrier. It's got a 25 millimeter chain gun, holds up to six dismounts in the back. I spent equal amount of time in the turret and on the ground, you know, setting up traffic control points, doing cordon and search operations and training Iraqi police and soldiers. That's badass.

That is badass that's badass man bro i got an apc i got i got a v i got a vf 432 when can i come check this yeah let's go we could be we do some youtube content that's what i'm saying teach us how to drive we have no idea yeah yeah for real man we should do something that'd be fun fun. I'm in, man. Yeah, all right, cool. You're going to see Andrew Bailey on the YouTube car series. That's what I'm saying. We're going to run over some stuff with ABC. I think that'd be dope, man.

So what made you take the fight from abroad and bring it back home? I care about the freedoms we enjoy in the United States of America. This country was founded upon some timeless principles of individual liberties and individual responsibilities. Principles that I see around me here, you know, that are part of your culture. And it bothers me that those principles are under attack. They were under attack in the early 2000s by foreign enemies. Yeah. They are now under attack by domestic enemies.

And it's time that folks wake up. You don't have to agree with everything we folks wake up you don't have to agree with everything we're doing you don't have to agree with all of my speech but can't we all get together and agree that free speech is a good thing we used to be able to agree when i say we used to elevate the rules above the players and the outcomes that's what i'm talking about yeah and the left is has jettisoned that approach one wonders if the new york times and the legacy media would be you know as silent as they are now if they were the ones who had suffered censorship, it's viewpoint discrimination. Yeah. Our basic freedoms are under attack and it's going to take courage.

It's going to take discipline. It's going to take sustained effort to defend those freedoms against attack. This nation was founded that our Constitution is in a lot of ways, our national identity. Other countries were founded by homogenous, homogously ethnic groups. But, but United States of America, everybody can come here and have an opportunity to, to grow, to work, to, to achieve. And it takes freedom to do that. And the constitution is the, is the playing field upon which we play the game of democracy. But the structure matters. So fighting for those individual liberties, those individual freedoms, fighting to maintain that structure, the role that states play in our federal democratic republic, that's important. And we can't overlook it.

We can't forget about it. And it's going to take discipline, sustain forward progress. I love that, man. I do, too. One more question real quick uh what were you like were you teaching him the grill he's showing me man okay yeah he's showing me yeah there's an art to that yeah you've got you've got to get the grill marks going the right way dude i just saw i said man that's the burger school you know what i like about this picture here it shows that that that our attorney general here in missouri is a man

for the details yeah i can appreciate that you got some biceps i can appreciate that yeah i need my protein after workout man i love it man well guys let's get into this show uh before we get to our first headline i want to bring up a trending topic right now um that there's a lot of uh it's like a mysterious topic because there's just not a whole lot of info on it but i want to get you guys's initial opinions um so i don't know if you guys have seen this headline but this headline reads arizona governor mysteriously steps down for one day um have you guys seen this i saw that late last night late last night it came out i didn't know if that was real or not it's it's absolutely real yeah so let's dive into this so on wednesday

evening the arizona treasurer announced that she will be serving as acting governor beginning later uh this evening which was wednesday night um until mid-morning tomorrow thursday afternoon amid a mysterious disappearance of Governor Katie Hopps. In a press release on Twitter, Arizona Treasurer Kimberly Yee announced her brief tenure as acting governor. So, acting governor. This is her official statement that was released September 27th. And it reads, quote, I have been notified that I will be serving as acting governor beginning later this evening until mid morning tomorrow. While I am pleased to step into this role, I will refrain from naming directors to the 13 agencies that currently have vacancies and will not call the Arizona legislature into session to confirm them. That being said, I do hope when the governor returns to Arizona, she will promptly name qualified directors to these important state agencies and remove the

legal uncertainty that exists for all of the regulatory cause actions taken by the agencies. I expect to see a swift resolution to this matter so we can get back to getting the work done for Arizona taxpayers. It is just very, very weird very weird right and like even the line of secession in the arizona's constitution was not followed here like they skipped over two people um arizona unlike many states they do not have a lieutenant governor um but it's the the power should have went to the secretary of state um if it wouldn't have went there it would have went to the attorney general then the the state treasurer. It's just weird.

I don't. And like, and here's the thing. Did they say what the deal was? Yeah. So, yay, she refrained to comment. Hobbs did not comment. Nobody's talking about it. All we have to go off of.

So, is she back in now? I have yet to see anything to confirm that. It is super weird. And leave it to, you know. Will they finally arrest her for stealing an election? Listen. I mean, that would be amazing. We're loyal to the foil, but I don't know, man.

Have you seen anything like this? I've never seen anything like that. And I think it undermines the rule of law. Like you said, the order of succession as prescribed in the Arizona Constitution was not followed. No. But there's also a transparency problem. You know, if something that major is going to happen, it's up to the governor and the other officials in state government to explain what's happening and why it's happening. And I think that that level of silence on something that important is bad for our democratic republic.

I agree, dude. Like, it's a complete violation of what this country is about you know we're supposed to be we're supposed to be uh electing people who are acting in our interest who are sharing the truth with us who are saying hey these are the things we're dealing with this is reality this is what's going on and uh things like this just further dilute the trust that we have in the entire system. I think you made a really good point here when you talk about diluting the rule of law, because we consistently see this, right? Like, especially with all the Soros nominated prosecutors and supported prosecutors all through the country.

You know, it's almost like it's almost like if you're part of their it's not almost like that has gotten to this point. If you're part of their team it's not almost like that has gotten to this point. If you're part of their team, the rule is not applicable. And if you're not on their team, the rule is applicable to a harsh extent. You get the whole book. Yeah, dude.

And it's, it's really scary, man, for, for what's happening. And, and I, I personally am very grateful to live in Missouri because of this.

No one benefits from the elimination of the rule of law. No one. Look at what happened in the elimination of the rule of law no one look at what happened in the city of st louis when we had a soros bag prosecutor who was unlawfully refusing to enforce law 500 542 businesses left downtown st louis yeah 96 of crimes reported she wouldn't charge think about that it's crimes reported that's not crimes committed it's something people stop calling the police and the police stop taking police reports because she won't do anything about it. So, yeah, I mean, and who benefited from that? No one is better off for that.

Certainly not any of us. Yeah, when it became a regional statewide issue. I mean, if you were intentionally trying to destroy our country and that was your goal, you'd be benefiting from that. It's like the enemy's in a Trojan horse and is behind the gates. Exactly, bro. Yeah, that's interesting. So, I mean, we'll keep updated on this, man.

I'll see if there's any updates that come out about this Arizona situation. I've been seeing some, like, listen, there's been some very, very interesting commentary coming out of Arizona. Well, I hope they arrest her. That'd be awesome. It'd be cool, but just say that. But, I mean, at the same time, I get it. Well, they're not going to say, hey, they arrested me. Yeah, exactly the same time, I get it. Well, they're not going to say that.

That's what I'm saying. They arrested me. Yeah, exactly. That's why I get it. Notice all the things she said she wasn't going to do. Right. This almost seems a little self-aggrandizing to me. Like, don't worry.

I'm not going to do any of the things that a governor does. Like, I know what the governor does, but you don't have to worry about me doing those things, even though I am the governor right now. It's just weird. Why put that in the press release? It was weird. Super weird. And it came out like 7 o'clock, 8 o'clock last night.

Bro, she stole. Listen, man. She stole the election while everybody was watching to see if she was going to steal the election. And she oversaw that process. Yeah, she oversaw the process. The voting machines were turned off like at 11 o'clock in the morning at half these places where people voted. Like, dude, she stole the election. Like, we all saw it.

Carrie Lake has 20,000 people at every single rally she's doing. This woman didn't even do any rallies. It's the same play they ran with Biden. The same one. Yet another example about how much she doesn't like transparency and accountability. Yeah. Yeah, for sure, man. It's crazy, man.

Well, let's get into this show, man. We're going to have some fun. Guys, remember, if you want to see any of these pictures, articles, links, videos, go to andyfussella.com. You can find them linked there. Or if you're watching on YouTube, check the description below. You can find them linked there as well. So with that being said, headline number one.

Headline number one reads, Missouri AG sues local school board, says members knowingly excluded parents From trans bathroom discussions If only we could have him on I would love to have him on And talk about this Oh there he is I can confirm this one's true

Let's dive into this a little bit Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey Is suing members of a local school board for allegedly violating the state's open meetings law by discussing a policy locker room access for transgender students during two private meetings over the summer. And that's not all. You've done a little bit some more work very, very recently here. This headline reads Missouri AG sues health provider for allegedly not giving mental evaluations before sex reassignments. Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey. He's doing some big

work. That's insane. It's insane. It's insane, yeah. Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey filed a lawsuit against a healthcare company last week after it provided puberty blockers and cross sex hormones to minors without a mental health assessment, as required by state law before sex reassignments were banned.

On August 28th, Missouri's Save Adolescents from Experimentation, or the SAFE Act, was implemented as law in the state. After the law was passed, Bailey's office sent a letter to providers across Missouri warning them to stop providing experimental treatment on treatment immediately. Now, here's the thing, man. I like you. I like you a lot. You're doing some awesome work. So I was like, you know, I just like to see what they have to say about somebody who's doing the good work. Right. And I found one article, okay? And I don't know if you, I'm sure you've seen it. I don't know. But this is what they have to say about the man that's bringing the fight to him.

This headline reads, Missouri's unelected AG has taken aggressive steps to expand power. Has he gone too far? That's what they got to say. That's it. Has he gone too far because he doesn't want parents to be left in the dark about decisions being made about boys being in the bathroom with their young girls or vice versa? You're so irresponsible. What is wrong with you? Yeah.

You know, this is so crazy. I don't think he's gone far enough i'll never apologize for fighting to protect parental rights to know what's going on in their kids schools and to have a voice in that process or to protect kids from dangerous and experimental drugs and procedures when the providers were not providing adequate mental health services pursuant to the evidence that we have in front of us and so this is a a scourge upon our nation and our state. We're fighting to protect kids. And, you know, if I'm the bad guy for that, that's fine. Yeah, sometimes it's good to be the bad guy.

So on these mental health things, you're saying that, you know, these kids were walking into these health care facilities, right, and without any screening, just like, I'm a boy, I want to be a girl. Boom, done, here you go. I think a lot of the evidence we have is it's even worse than that, that these kids come in with gender dysphoria. I mean, these are young, impressionable children, still children, going through tough times in their lives. The hormones are flowing, right? I mean, we all remember that time in our lives.

There's a lot of peer pressure. Society has changed. It's a lot more intense now than it was. So these young boys and girls come into these clinics and are deprived mental health services deprived psychology psychiatry even a mental health assessment even a talk even a talk like what's going on how about we talk through this yeah and instead they're being pushed powerful dangerous drugs that have zero fda approvals for treatment of gender dysphoria and ultimately referred for irreversible surgery so imagine if you've got a 10, 11, 12, 13-year-old daughter who's going through a tough time

and says, well, I think I might want to be a boy, has administered these pills, gets the surgery, and 20 years later wants to have a child themselves and can't. Their life is forever. That's happening every day, brother. It has happened every day. These are victims of a system. We're fighting back against that system. Yeah, this is ridiculous. This whole transgender children stuff that's been happening for the last four or five years,

personally, it's disgusting to me. Okay? Like, we're removing these. The reason these kids are coming into these doctor's offices confused is because they've listened to their teacher talk about it for the last four years about how there's something wrong with them because they're actually just a normal little boy or girl. That's going to confuse a little kid. And the fact that we have grown adults who we are supposed to trust to teach our children basic skills of how to operate in life and be effective in life, and they and instead teaching them their own personal

gender ideology opinions or fetishes right it is a fetish okay and they're pushing this shit on these kids instead of educating them that's a problem in itself and then we have a problem on top of it where people are so afraid to even stand up and point or say anything because these people have been vicious for the last 10 years in attacking a company with the big tech censorship, a company with the big tech supported attacks and the propping up of these narratives to where people don't even want to say anything about it. And now we literally have predators ruining kids' lives. And it's not 20 years down the road. The detransitioner movement

is getting massive. And a lot of these kids have just been, you know, they're 16 or 15 and now they're 20 and they're realizing, holy shit, my life is ruined. And bro, I'm with you, dude. I can't stand around as a grown adult man and not call it what it is. Like it's psychological manipulation. It is predatory. It is lifelong damaging and it's completely wrong and it should be criminal in my opinion. Well, that's my question. Pop quiz here. So, so I'm a parent and I don't homeschool my children.

But if I don't send my kids to school, I get charged with what? Truancy, right? Yeah. There's a crime for that. If I let my kids throw a house party and they're 16, 17 years old and there's alcohol involved, the cops come, I'm going to get in trouble for that, right? There's countless of things that are put into our criminal law, our law abiding citizens must follow when it comes to protecting kids. Is there a path to hold parents accountable who are sending their kids to these facilities who you know because in my opinion

the parents are just as sick as anybody else right like if you think it's okay to take your own child into one of these facilities and remove the genitalia or give them pills that's going to make them sterile right like what is there a legal path to hold parents accountable who are, you know, offering their kids up to these types of treatments? Yeah. I mean, I think if you look at chapter two 11s, a definition of abuse and neglect, but let me say this too, you know, the evidence that we have that is in a lot of these clinics, what's going on is the parents are confused too. And the parents are like, I don't know, because this is a new thing for this generation. And so the parents will take their young children to these clinics and put yourself in the parents shoes and all of a sudden you well they're told they're told the

the stat right they're set they tell them the stat and you know what the stat is 46 percent of these kids that don't get this treatment commit suicide you want a live son or a dead daughter that's right and and then all of a sudden the parents are sitting that's what they say these are medical experts i don't know what to do yeah and i would also point out that at least some of the evidence we have is that the clinics were specifically targeting the parent most likely to acquiesce to coercion and isolating that parent from the other parent that was objecting in order to obtain quote-unquote consent now that doesn't meet the legal definition of consent that's coercion under duress but but yeah i mean this is an enormous problem and and and to to your, you know, some of the evidence we have in the Wentzville school board issue is not only that they unlawfully closed the meeting to adopt a transgender bathroom policy, but that the policy itself was intended to avoid having to tell parents when their children chose to use a bathroom of the opposite gender so we have layer upon layer of at what point did the

education system become okay with like them you know like like we have uh biden coming up and and uh kareem john pierre coming up and saying those are our children they're not the parents children that's some evil shit dude how dare we get in the way yeah missourians don't co-parent with the government not not while i'm aging yeah well i mean dude it's it's it's really scary how far this has gone and how much this sounds like legitimate you know communism from the 1930s and 40s and 50s you know what i mean yeah i like dude it's so crazy to me because i remember like like the state owns our kids right no the fuck it doesn't it comes to like just school choice man it's like

you know what happened to basing the the quality of the school off of their reading math levels right like i thought that used to be the baseline standard of like what made a good school and now it's like well damn like you gotta check the bathroom signs to make sure that this is think about that's insane think about all the stuff that we all did as kids like think about like you know dude we ran around we rode our bikes we play baseball we play with the kids in the neighborhood do stuff for homeless people like we started liking girls and your buddies were like your buddies were like oh you like that girl you're like no i don't yeah right like just normal kid shit now these kids are five years old reading books about sexual acts you know what i'm saying they're getting pressured

by mentally ill deranged teachers who are telling them that they are in the wrong body imagine if you're five six seven eight years old right you You're little. And you have a grown adult who you're told to listen to and respect and trust and all these things. Okay? Teachers have even a more amount of trust than a normal human being would have because the parents are trusting the teacher to take care of these kids. And then we get them in there and they start teaching them all this shit but fucking with them bro this is insane like don't like you say who should be held accountable those teachers should be held accountable yeah i think teachers shouldn't be able to teach this kind of shit in schools to these young kids like that dude they're

stealing their childhood these kids are running around their neighborhood talking about how they're trans now or how they're this or they're that or they're gay or they're like, bro, you're five. You're supposed to be like playing in the dirt, man. Like eating mud pies. Yeah. Right. Whatever. It's not a celebration of diversity to sexualize children.

And to your point, you know, what we see section, I think it's 1700, is the statute that governs how human sexuality is allowed to be taught in schools. And there's really specific guardrails of what can and can't be taught. And it has a parental opt-in or opt-out procedure. And so where we see the problem is that schools are getting around that with, well, it's a transgender bathroom policy. Or this is a book on diversity in the library. Well, you're still exposing our children to sexual behaviors and sexual concepts that may not be consistent with the parents values so that's why we're going to continue to fight for the parents rights to have a say in that process and understand what's going on in the schools do you do you like how old are you 42 okay so we're close to the same age like do you ever

like look around and you're just like what the fuck is going on? Because that's what I think. Like, that's what I think all the time. I'm looking around. It's like, am I just old? Am I old now and I just don't get it? Is this like get off the lawn? Yeah, but it's not that. Yeah, no.

Because when I was a kid and the old men were like old, it wasn't like they were, like, we weren't over here, like, mutilating our genitals or, you know, giving testosterone to six-year-old girls like yeah like dude i'm embarrassed for our generation for allowing this to happen like what's happening here should be an embarrassment to every single person who is above 30 years old like you guys should be embarrassed this is absurd shit it's evil shit and we will be judged as humans based upon what's happening here this is

some of the most evil stuff that's ever happened in the history of humankind we are allowing deranged mentally fucked up people to convince kids to sterilize themselves or cut off and mutilate their genitalia that like and it's like some sort of cool noble thing to do yeah i think those doctors need to have their... Bro, if the rapture happened today, I'd say, yeah, that's a good thing. We needed that. Yeah. You know?

Those doctors need to have their licenses taken. In history, that's what's happened. Yeah. In history, that's what's happened to these doctors who are doing this stuff. They've been held accountable. And in fact, multiple times in history, doctors who have done these things have been put to death later so i'm actually hoping that's where we go that's my personal opinion look at the 1940s and 50s at the time uh the leading medicine and science said that lobotomies were a safe and effective way to treat a mental health disorder yeah we're gonna we're

gonna take part of your brain out right and we And we look back now that that's an abomination. I don't know, man. I think you're pretty good right now. But I mean, it's real, though. Yeah. I mean, I think that bad decisions. We're going to look back. Not everybody needs one.

We're going to look back at this period in time in horror. And, you know, luckily, there's voices like y'all that are standing up and saying this ain't right it's not right and it's important to get that message out there to combat the other side that wants to silence it wants to mischaracterize it that wants to silence the voices in opposition and say that somehow we're hateful for wanting to protect kids yeah all you have to do is spend all you have to do is spend 10 minutes like looking into the detransition movement and listening and hearing and reading what they have to say and you will not any there will be no confusion anymore it's over or if you can actually find some pictures of the actual surgeries of the transgender surgeries most

people have never seen those pictures and they're not easy they're not easy to find if you go on google and try to find them they're very hard to find why is that why is that because if you saw them you would immediately understand how evil this actually is it's real shit man guys jump in on this conversation let us know what your thoughts are uh down in the comments hashtag show me state let me know what you guys think uh before we get to our second headline we got a little special segment here we like to do all the time we are going to cruise the mother freaking comments. This is where we pull a comment up from our YouTube page and we, let's just see what the people have to say.

So this comment is coming from at haters underscore 10 locks 34. After listening almost 350 episodes, I'm slowly getting convinced DJ is secretly racist. You got me. Bro, that's pretty funny. I think he's... Well, you gotta... For you guys listening to the audio, he puts like 10 laughing faces after it. But that's a pretty funny joke.

Hey, listen. Why is comedy so funny? Because it's true. Okay. I'm not racist. I'm not racist, all right? I'm not, I promise. But no, guys, we appreciate you guys commenting. What do you have to say, bro? You got to respond.

I plead the fifth. Oh, okay. I got the AG, I'm going to plead the fifth. I like the username. Yeah, the username's great. I see this person on there quite a bit. I don't know if it's like a guy or a girl bro that's pretty funny

they are a real ass fan you know what the funniest part is what? secretly see I feel like that's a bad mischaracterization yeah you read it wrong bro ain't shit secret you know what I'm saying

I hate black people just kidding I promise ancient secret you know what i'm saying dude fucking i hate oh my god dude that's so funny just kidding i promise uh but yeah guys keep keep logging keep commenting keep keep uh keep supporting us keep being real ass fans uh so let's let's get right back into it we got headline number two secretly headline number two reads uh second republican debate. Here's the biggest winner and the biggest loser. So we have round two of the GOP debates. This is a Fox News article. So let's dive into it now. I shall advise everybody.

This is an opinion article, but we got some pretty cool stuff about this. So article reads, expectations are everything in life, and they certainly were key to the outcome of the second Republican debate held at the Reagan Library in Simi Valley, California. The winner of the evening was Governor Ron DeSantis, for whom expectations were low. The audience was reminded of his achievements and why the Florida governor is running second in the GOP primary polls. Nikki Haley, from whom much was expected, failed to live up to her performance in the first debate but held her own. The vague Ramaswamy was

not as annoying as in the first debate, but he has yet to show he is ready to be president. According to whom? Who's writing this? It's just an opinion. It's an opinion piece. This is Liz Peek. Okay, well, cool. So nobody. Yeah. So nobody's opinion.

Got it. Yeah. But she says that South Carolina Senator Tim Scott was more combative as expected, but probably did move the needle on his changes. As for everybody else, with respect, it is time for Mike Pitts, Chris Christie, and Doug. Put Doug to sleep. Yeah.

To drop out the race. You lived a good life yeah that's it yeah time to sit down now here's an interesting thing so I like Daily Mail I'm not sure if you guys are familiar with their

we put them on here all the time it's a great great source they ran their own poll for who they thought won the second round of the GOP debates

it's a very very interesting winner. So this headline reads, Donald Trump. That's what I was going to say. Yeah, declared winner of second Republican debate in Daily Mail poll, even though he stayed away. He wasn't even there. So this is their poll.

Has Donald Trump at 27% with Vivek at 26%, DeSantis at 17%, and Haley Pence tied for for six goes down and down i don't think that they are doing themselves a service when they are constantly just bringing him up like that's not helping it's not helping trump yeah well i mean look dude they're trying to compete against trump sometimes when you're competing, you got to talk about your competition, but here's the truth. You're only talking about yes. Donald Trump is a branding expert. He is actual literal branding genius. You guys can hate him all you want. The guy's super smart. He's more strategic than anybody that's out there by a lot. He knows exactly what he's doing by not participating in the debate.

And he's creating a vacuum for when he does decide to participate in what he's doing. So I could see exactly what moves he's making very clear. But these people, I tried to watch some of the debate and I caught some of it. And Vivek did well. Real talk, like I like Vivek. A lot of people will say, oh, he's a plant, or he's this or he's that. I've not seen any proof of that. I've seen, he sat right here where Andrew has, giving me an honest conversation.

We've stayed in touch. He treats me good. He seems to, you know, maybe he's made some mistakes in his past life. I don't know, bro. I'm not perfect either, so I don't judge because I'm not perfect. But here's what I'll say. He was the only candidate up there, the only single one, including Donald Trump, who actually went on in public television in front of the whole country and said that transgenderism

in children is a mental disorder that is propagated by the teachers. The exact conversation that we just had that we all agree with he's the only one when Donald Trump was asked the same question Donald Trump balked at it Donald Trump who was it Megyn Kelly yep asked him and he was like well uh bro listen I know you guys down there at Mar-a-Lago listening to the show. He's got to come out and say what Vivek's saying. He's got to. Yeah, because that's the thing.

People are sick of the crazy shit. And I don't think Vivek can win this time. I don't think it's possible. I think it's 100% Trump. But in reality, dude, there are some talking points that he's missing that would drive everybody over the edge that I think he's still hesitating on because of the pushback that he received during his four years in president yeah what's your take on uh on these candidates here you know we're in the debate when donald trump's

not on the stage the other candidates just remind us how much they're not donald trump that's right and that's why donald trump benefits from these other people getting up and debating issues. You know, at the end of the day, he made America great again. There is tangible. I'm all about productivity and accountability. And it is hard to deny. You may disagree with what he's saying or how he's saying it or how he behaves. But you cannot deny that things were better when Donald Trump was the president of the United States.

That the economy was better. Our border was secure. He was fighting violent crime in our cities. There were so many wins. The trade deals were cut. I mean, again, the foreign policy, you didn't have Russia invading Ukraine. You didn't have China threatening Taiwan. You didn't have North Korea saber-rattling because he kept everybody in check. And it is hard to deny the wins. And at the end of the day, tangible productivity, tangible results, tangible wins matter and donald trump delivers yeah i i agree 100 and it is what it is i'm i'm listen i'm gonna tell you right now i'm voting for donald trump real talk you guys can be mad at me all you want you can say whatever you want i don't give a shit because of exactly what

you just said i'm a results driven human all right? You guys don't like him. You don't like his tweets. I don't like half the shit he says either, but I'm going to be real. I like the way that my finances look. I like the way that I could go to dinner without feeling like I'm going to get robbed. I like the way that, like, people were getting along. Like, with a few other changes, had he been a little bit more aggressive in regulating some of the things that you and Eric Schmidt have been working on and kind of like cleaning up some of this corrupt bureaucracy that's been going on, right?

This country actually could be a free country again. And I think he's the only guy out there that has the motivation to do it. With experience to do it. Yeah. motivation to do it with experience to do yeah like i don't think and i i don't think like let's just say any of these other guys got elected pick any of them it doesn't matter none of them have the motivation to go in and truly ruffle the feathers that need to be ruffled to clean up what needs to be cleaned up this man has been persecuted this man has been punished this man has been drugged through the mud over and over and over And by the way, he's been exonerated on all of those things. Like the things where they talk

about the Russia collusion that was made up. Okay. We could go down the list, down the list, down the list. Now they're using a weaponized DOJ to, to persecute this guy because of his political positioning, which is literally the behavior of actual dictators and tyrants over the history of humankind. And so if we are able to get him back in, I really think, honestly, it's the only chance we have to even have the United States of America ever be the United States of America again. And I think it's going to take more than just him. It's going to take someone behind him and someone behind him. And so maybe some of these guys can be behind behind him i doubt it because it's probably going to be me let's be real all right sorry to bust the spoiler dude did you guys see chris christie's uh

chris christie's going to die bro did you bro your motherfucker's got a 70 inch waist dude like like dude how do you walk around like that, bro? Did you see his Donald Duck comment? He looks like Donald Duck. He's built like Donald Duck. Have you seen it? I haven't seen it. Oh, let's watch this real quick. We need to go back in our suburbs.

People are threatened there. We need it in our rural areas. People feel threatened there. And we need it in Washington, D.C. also. And Donald Trump should be here to answer for that, but he's not. And I want to look at that camera right now and tell you, Donald, I know you're watching. You can't help yourself. I know you're you're watching okay and you're not here tonight not because of polls and not because of your indictments you're not here tonight because you're afraid of being on the stage and defending your record you're ducking

these things and let me tell you what's going to happen you keep doing that no one up here is going to call you donald trump anymore we're going to call you donald duck oh bro from a guy how long did he practice that bro no shit and from a from a guy that legitimately looks like humpty dumpty bro okay let me be real i used to be 350 pounds so i have no problem making fun of you if you're big like that same that statement would be taken seriously if if that guy was like taking care of himself and was presenting himself and lived a healthy lifestyle and looked a certain way peep that comment would have came off a completely different way so you guys that give me shit when i tell you and this is off the topic andrew but i tell these guys all the time i'm like look your physical fitness matters to people's perception of you and this

is a perfect example nobody takes chris christie seriously no matter what he thinks because he looks like fucking humpty dumpty it's the truth fair man yeah it's when they're you know i i would say too it it's not believable like to say donald trump's scared of debating how many times has that guy gone on cnn these aren't friendly environments he goes on crushes him he crushes it yeah i mean he's winning hearts and minds and he's reinforcing the message and he's doing it in such a way that, you know, he's going up against competitive adversaries. So I, I also, I just don't believe what governor Christie's saying there.

I think it falls flat. I think it looks really contrived. Yeah. Dude, this guy, he's a joke's not funny. Listen guys, you know, we're real good at jokes over here. Well, I mean, that's debatable. Some of us are good at jokes. Other of us have a long way to go.

Listen, we know a thing or two, all right? But I thought that was the most shocking thing. Pence also tries to do a joke. I don't know if you guys saw his, Mike Pence. He made a sex joke. Now, who wants to hear a 115-year-old man make a sex joke? Well, I mean, I think we should. Nobody. Well, let's go do it anyway. Here we go. This is Mike Pence. Now, who wants to hear a 115-year-old man make a sex joke? Well, I mean, I think we should.

Nobody. Well, let's go do it anyway. Here's Mike Pence. Oh, man, here we go. But I want to answer the question as well, Dana, that you just asked of Burr. Because by way of full disclosure, Chris, you mentioned the president's situation i'm my wife uh isn't a member of the teachers union but i got to admit i've i've been sleeping with a teacher for 38 years and um for full disclosure bro what he doesn't even think it's funny no what what god what people do you have on your team man like you know that's some young intern being like mike listen they don't like you all right you're not funny you

gotta be more funny so i wrote you this joke and mike says like this i'm not saying that he's like look you want to win the polls they say just like they say wear a blue fucking suit and a red tie bro like holy shit you know i've been sleeping with a teacher does authenticity still matter i mean that's my question absolutely that's why trump's popular exactly yeah and i think these two the juxtaposition of those two against donald trump is the perfect evidence that that authenticity does still matter donald trump comes out on CNN. He doesn't know what they're going to ask him. Yeah.

And it's not prepared, scripted lines like that. And stuff like that falls flat because it is so contrived. I think that's where Vivek is filling a gap for these guys. Like a lot of the young people who are not for Donald Trump, who were maybe voted for Biden this last time, they really like Vivek. I hear this all the time. A lot of my friends, I have a really good friend, Hayden, who owns a pretty big company, and he's more of a libertarian. He loves Vivek, and we were talking about it. And it's all because

of the authenticity, dude. Yeah, Vivek does a couple of things he's done have been rehearsed. But after that, when he realized, I think that he messed that up, he's been pretty authentic. You know, I think authenticity is what matters the most. We want real. Yeah. I mean, I think the public wants real. I think we inherently want to know that something's real in this kind of polished, scripted politician. Yeah.

It's like you want to be a politician more than you want to be a leader. Yeah, bro. That's problematic. Yeah. Yeah. Guys, jump in on this conversation. Let us know what you guys think down in the comments. it's like you want to be a politician more than you want to be a leader. That's problematic. Guys, jump in on this conversation. Let us know what you guys think down in the comments. Hashtag round two.

Let us know what you guys think. Let's get on to our third and final headline. Headline number three reads, First Biden impeachment inquiry hearings commences Thursday morning. It's getting started. Oh, they're done with them. Yeah, I think so. I think so. It appears there's still

a little bit of fight in there, but let's dive through this. Check this out. So let's just get through the facts of what's going on right now. So fast facts. This is from Fox News. House Republicans will hold the first impeachment inquiry hearing into President Biden on Thursday at 10 a.m.

Eastern Time. According to the Office of House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer out of Kentucky, the hearing, quote, will examine the value of an impeachment inquiry and will present all evidence to date uncovered by the committee in its investigation into the biden family finances the witnesses who will testify at the hearing include bruce dubinsky a forensic accountant with decades of experience in financial investigations and consulting and who the committee says has testified in over 80 trials including trials that involved financial uh fraud former assistant attorney general can i just say the u.s department of justice tax division those people know how to party. Do they? If you want a good time, that's where you go, the DOJ Tax Division.

I guarantee it. Oh, my gosh. Former assistant attorney general Eileen O'Connor, who served in the United States Department of Justice Tax Division, and law professor Jonathan Turley, who testified in the Clinton and Trump impeachments, will also testify. President Biden has denied any involvement in his son Hunter's business dealings. The White House has dismissed today's hearing as a as an, quote, evidence free probe and a political stunt.

Now, these reports keep coming out. Apparently, the totals up to now, like $50 million has been uncovered and traced back. One of the wires that was sent from China was actually like directly addressed to Biden's home residence. Right. All of these things are still coming out. But here's what I think I found hilarious. Let's check in with CNN. We know how those guys are doing over there. Of course, they're rolling out their fact checks.

Fact check House Republicans first hearing in Biden impeachment inquiry. So they listed out they only have three of them so far. But let's just dive through their fact checks, maybe see if we can pull any BS out of it. So the first one is Republicans have presented no evidence Biden himself received foreign money. And the fact check they're saying is the 20 million dollar figure is roughly accurate for Joe Biden's family and associates, according to the bank records subpoenaed by the committee. But the phrase the Bidens and their associates obscures the fact that there is no public evidence to date that President Joe Biden himself received any of this money. And it's worth noting that the majority of the money went to the associates, quote-unquote, Hunter Biden's business partners, not even Biden's family itself. So, yeah, there's money there. I stole the least amount.

Yeah, well, and conspiracy, like participating in conspiracy, is no longer illegal, I guess. Yeah, and also, you know, I mean, is it legal to just take money for policy decisions when you're an elected official of the United States government? Absolutely not. Yeah. I mean, didn't we used to do something to those people, like, back in the days? Like, you know, like...

Lock them up. Stick their head in, like, this little hole and this thing, like, comes down and, you know, like... Remember that thing? I remember that thing. Yeah. That's what I'm talking about. French engineering french engineering yeah it was like something yeah it started with a g yeah yeah like it's good stanford good times yeah that's what it stands for i've got a question though yeah so we the biden crime family is the basis for the impeachment why not willful knowing continuous constitutional violations

why not take the evidence from missouri v biden because congress has already held hearings on the weaponization of the federal government why is that not also a basis for impeachment the biden crime family is bad enough but we've got a president who took an oath to protect and defend the constitution and is willfully knowingly and dedicated to continuous violations is that not also an impeachable offense i mean i isn't i mean so like so i mean why is that though like is there no communication between the states and federal no what's the senator schmidt has testified in in congress about the uh missouri v biden that held multiple hearings i've testified in Congress about the Missouri v. Biden that held multiple hearings. I've testified in Congress about it.

You know, Representative Jordan has certainly uncovered. So we can show you the ripple in the pond effect. Like I can show you the emails where the White House is targeting censorship on big tech, is demanding censorship on big tech. But what Congressman Jordan can show you is the big tech's response that they knew that they were violating since the First Amendment. They knew that they were censoring at the demand of the federal government. I mean, again, the evidence is now clear. It's beyond a reasonable doubt. There can be no longer be any confusion.

That's why you've seen the legacy media walk away from this idea that there wasn't really coercion and collusion because we can not only show you the direct communication, but then the subsequent internal communications at big tech. I don't know. I think it's worth a conversation. I think that there's ample evidence that President Biden himself was personally involved. We can show you the email where his director of digital communication says that the demand for censorship is coming from the top, and he emphasizes very top levels of the White House. Who is that? Yeah. The big guy. Yeah.

Well, it could be Obama. Well, I think it is both of them. At what point, you know, I talk about this all the time on the show. You know, I talk about the border being left open. I talk about our strategic oil reserves being depleted. I talk about our gas projects and our natural energy products being canceled. I talk about the crime in the big cities. I talk about, you know, them shipping all of our military equipment or leaving it in Afghanistan and then shipping the rest to Ukraine, leaving us over here with a with a problem where we don't have enough equipment.

I talk about like the endless printing of money and I talk about this money that is coming from these countries that would benefit from those actions. At what point is this considered legitimate treason towards this country? Yeah, I mean, clearly, President Biden has no interest in American sovereignty. He's using the government. The government is absent where needed and present where unwanted. So he has no time to secure the southern border from an all out invasion at this point

that's making Missouri communities less safe. Fentanyl, human trafficking, cartels have taken over. He's ceded control of the southern border of the cartels. And yet Chinese spy balloon flies over the state of Missouri, lets it cross

country pause over u.s military installations shoots it down after it's finished its mission and yet he's going to go after your gas stoves the car you drive the fossil fuels you need to heat your home and transport your kids to and from school in a time where americans are hurting because of by dynamics and this the inflation and so yeah mean, it is deplorable. And go back to Donald Trump and accountability, productivity, immigration laws largely unchanged from the 1980s. The same statutes are on the books because they can't get anything through Congress. President Trump used the tools at his disposal to reduce border crossings by more than 90 percent. And yet Biden has abandoned those policies and border crossings are through the roof. So, yeah, it is.

I mean, again, one man has done more damage to this country in less than four years than a foreign attack likely could have in that same amount of time. So so at what point who determines if it's treason? Who determines like is it the people who determines that, you know, that man in office? Well, here's what I would really like to understand. You know, and this may be an uncomfortable topic to bring up, but, you know, our Constitution says that the citizens of this country have a duty to step in when the government is behaving exactly as these people are behaving so you know

at what point in time are we supposed to cross that line and actually handle what's going on you know what i'm saying like like are are we are we waiting for to see what they're going to do this next election or like i think i'm like somebody's like because i feel people i'm not the only one that feels this way bro like there Like there's millions of people out there that are like, when is something going to happen? And in my opinion, I think that there is an intentional agitation to call for, I think they're trying to instigate violence the way I'm describing it. So that they can crush the people who are organizing it or imprison the people that are organizing it as the leaders. And I think the January 6th shit that's been going on is all about scaring people from actually organizing to actually create any sort of change on their

own. And, you know, when our founding fathers who were very smart, they wrote this into our constitution and so like for a reason yeah and we're here and that's what i'm saying like so like i mean like is it like what are we waiting on is it somebody to designate like hey okay yeah like we have enemies within our our country right and like you know we all take an oath i think as a citizen like that oath isn't like you've signed up for not even knowing you've signed up for it. We have to protect this country from all enemies, foreign or domestic. I don't believe there's any chance at all that they allow Donald Trump to win that election.

Yeah, I totally agree. I think so, either. Yeah. And I think the day after that, there's going to be a massive gut check in this country, dude. There are so many of us feel like we've been left behind by a system that ignores our voices, silence our voices, prosecutes our heroes, weaponizes the government against us. The Constitution exists to protect us from the government and the government exists to

protect our rights. But what we see is the Biden administration weaponizing the government against those he disagrees with, like you, like president trump and again going back to the impeachment talk i mean i think that if you've got a president that committed to violating the right to free speech that evidence needs to be put forth in as part of the impeachment inquiry it's just another another accusation that needs to be analyzed by the house of representatives yeah yeah yeah yes i mean and back to the cnn fact check too man like they brought up like they're saying that uh jim jordan falsely claims hunter

biden said he was unqualified for burisma board um it's not true that he said that but it is true that he's not you know what i'm saying like all like bro they play this game of oh it's not true that he said that, but it is true that he's not. You know what I'm saying? Like, bro, they play this game of- Oh, it's a game of controlling the language. That's out of the Communist Manifesto, bro. Like, if you read any of Karl Marx or you read Saul Alinsky or you read Mao's book,

you read any of these things, they talk about the controlling of the language and the manipulation of the language. Like, when these people say, our democracy is at people say our democracy is at stake or our democracy is going to fail they use democracy interchangeably with communism okay so like when these people these progressive left people say our democracy democracy's threatened they they really mean what they mean is is communism from our definition right they're

planned yeah it means they're losing it's never been about truth it's always been about power They really mean what they mean is communism from our definition. Right. They're playing. Yeah. It means they're losing. It's never been about truth. It's always been about power. Yeah. Yeah. Stuff's crazy, man. I mean, guys, let us know what you think, man.

I think this, here's another thing I want to ask you too. I feel like this stuff gets so delayed. I feel like the amount of time that it takes to do these things, like, you know, we are in 2023. Is there no way to, I don't want to say fast track, because you want to make sure you're thorough. I get all of that, right? But, like, why does it, like, why has it taken us to 2023

to get to this point for this, you know, for the small amount of transparency that we do have? Like, are we not able to speed that process up at all man you know i in my mind it's a double-edged sword i mean the separation of powers inherent in the structure of our government is essential to prevent authoritarianism the downside to that is change comes slowly and the problem we've got again is that we've got our opponents who have jettisoned the rule of law they no longer elevate the rules of the game above the players and the outcomes and quite frankly policy rule

statute can't keep pace with the nadir of depravity from the left right transgenders and let's take that as an example most people didn't even know that was going on that children were being raced towards sterilization or that the parents were being lied to and coerced and that the detransitioners were suffering as a result. It took time to realize that this abomination was even occurring. And then we got to get a law passed. I mean, who would have thought if you asked my grandmother, do we need to pass a law to make sure doctors aren't sterilizing kids? You say, well, what are you talking about? We need a law for that. Yeah. I mean, again, the depravity of the left is so far gone that it is tough for us to keep pace from the legal perspective, the policy perspective. Yeah.

Do we really think it's the left that are still common sense people who have been completely abandoned by this like radical progressivism that really is communism that's what we're dealing with and and i feel like a lot of the like i feel like a lot of you guys because we have a lot of these guys listening to the show now you guys are going to have to like say like okay well i don't believe in what these people believe anymore there's this is not what i'm about like i'm not i'm not for it's not what they believe it isn't like it's totally changed yeah and to sit there and still ride that train when you understand where it's going we're entering a phase now where like you're complicit in some very evil shit like it's time to like wake up dude and say hey we're not for this that's real man guys join in on this

conversation uh let us know what you guys think on this final headline. Join us in the comments. Hashtag down goes corn pop. Let us know what you guys think. So that was our third and final headline. We have our final segment of the show. As always, we have thumbs up or dumb as fuck. This is where we bring a headline up.

We talk about it. Typically, it might be like a Florida dude or something, you know, doing something crazy. We like the Florida guys. I like the Florida guys. Yeah. I mean. Florida man good.

They're just Florida man good. Yeah. Yeah. So we bring this article up and then we'll all vote on it whether or not it gets that. So our thumbs up or dumb as fuck headline reads, someone tried to bring an emotional support alligator into the Phillies game. Definitely from Florida. The gator has a social media following?

Oh, a big one, too. Yeah, a big one. Alligator. Yeah. So you've heard of Bark at the Park. Days Celebrating Cats also are a thing. Now let's lose an arm at the park. Days Celebrating Cats are also a thing across Now let's lose an arm at the park. Days celebrating

cats are also a thing across Major League Baseball, but there isn't a Gator Day. In a very Florida man twist, there it is. There we go. There it is. An emotional support alligator reportedly was denied entrance

to Citizens Bank Park on Wednesday night, where the playoff bound Phillies were set to take on the Pittsburgh Pirates. Wally Gator is a working emotional support alligator. This is real. He's owned by Jonestown resident Joey Henney, who can be seen holding Wally's leash in the third photo above. The reptile has a sizable following on Instagram and TikTok. Henny earlier told the Inquirer that Wally helps him battle depression

and that he likes to give hugs. He said last year when Wally was spotted splashing around at Love Park last summer that the gator has never bitten anyone yet. Animals are no stranger to sports team, sports arena. Think rally cat.

Uh, we had rally squirrel here in St. Louis or any number of cameos by squirrels, birds, and other creatures. But at least for today, it looks like Wally will have to cheer on, uh, the fields from home. Now I went to MLB's website, um, and their policy on service animals. And I found this, um, it says guide dog service animals or service animals in training are welcome all other animals are prohibited now i don't know how the letter of the law is written yeah do we have a suit here you know the case okay so this is taking me back

to first year of law school we had a case where it was like which animals qualify as service animals there's if i'm remembering correctly there is some ambiguity in the law and so yeah i mean service gator i mean service gator look he's big too man i have a i have concerns if you've got an alligator with a with two social media accounts and a sizable social media following it doesn't feel like that as a service animal so much as an attention-seeking device and so i kind of question you know are we or is this a stunt to to try to and look it does give hugs that's he looks like he's smiling there yeah i don't know he looks like he's a good guy he looks he looks swell i mean make a great pair of boots or uh you know yeah that's that's a no for me. I'm not doing that. No, no gator? No.

Bro, gators are dinosaurs, bro. Like, this is from millions of years ago. This is left over from, like, the age where we were the food. I'm not trying to be the food. I eat a gator, bro. I'll eat a gator for. Yeah, I've had one, too. So here's what I love about this story, though.

This is the kind of thing that gets the left all knotted up because they want to be for the guy bringing the service animal yeah for sure but they're also against animal abuse yes and so like if you ask somebody on the left they're like their steam's coming to their ears right now because they don't know what to think about this and and like they're so conflicted on this so it actually is a fun story in that regard look at him giving all the hugs man he really likes give some hugs man he does yeah i'll tell you what dude i i highly and this is like by a score of 100 to 0 like animals better than people oh no it's not even close yeah no doubt no doubt like animals are pure except for cats bro those things i just don't dude i get invited to go hunting all the time and do all this stuff by some of the biggest

hunters that do all this. Bro, it's just not for me, man. It's just not for me. Like, we're going to go for people? I'm in, bro. I am in. But I am not. I just can't do it.

They didn't do anything. Yeah, that's true. You know? Like, it's just not. It's just not in me, man. You know that billboard? We've talked about it. Have you seen the billboard where it's like, I think it's just you know that billboard we've talked about you know

have you seen the billboard where it's like i think it was like a pita billboard it was like you know they showed all these animals right it's like you know guinea pig go all the way up to like where's the line it's like where do you draw the line i'm like yeah right about there we draw the line we draw the line at keith's cat that's what i'm saying that's right like i'll fuck it i'll eat a cat bro i ain't got a problem with it. Hey, seasoning? What kind of seasoning? Well, for cat, dude, I mean, I don't know. Like, I think at the little Chinese restaurant by my house,

I think they use, like, teriyaki or some shit. So you're basically saying. Well, I'll tell you this. I'm not putting any seasoning on mine. Yeah, just salt and pepper. Not too much pepper. That's right. Too spicy just salt and pepper. But not too much pepper. You don't want it too spicy. That's right. That's real, man.

So what are we giving this gator? Wally the gator, what do we got? I think it'd be- Is this thumbs up or is this- To me, I like Wally Gator, but I'm disappointed I didn't see him have a selfie with my boy Bryce Harper, bro. Yeah. Bryce Harper, I don't know.

I could see Bryce Harper and Wally Gator getting to hang out. I could see that. Yeah, I'd give it thumbs and Walligator getting to hang out, you know? I could see that. Yeah, I'd give it a thumbs up. Thumbs up? What do we got over here? Yeah, I got to give it a thumbs up. Creative, you know, it's bold. Yeah, I reject the status quo.

Let's reject the status quo. I love it. Let's go. I love it, man. Well, that's a thumbs up, guys. Yay for Florida Man. Florida Man wins again. Florida Man is undefeated on the show, bro.

He is. He is. He absolutely is. Well, guys, Andrew, Andy, that's all I got. Andrew, thanks so much for being on the show. Really appreciate the work you're doing. It's very, very important. If you guys want to follow along with what he's doing, you're fairly active on Instagram.

What's your Instagram handle? Just Andrew Bailey? I think it's AG Andrew Bailey. AG Andrew Bailey. Yeah. Guys, give him a follow. Check out what he's doing. He's one of the most important men in the fight of what's going on for this country.

Really appreciate you making the time to come on, brother. Thanks, guys. Appreciate you being a voice for freedom and rationality in this country. Thank you for everything you do everything that's debatable all right guys don't be a hoe we're from sleeping on the floor now my jewelry box froze fuck a bowl fuck a stove counted millions in the cold bad bitch booted swole got her own bankroll can't fold just a no headshot case closed