Real Time with Bill Maher - Ep. #493: Adam Schiff, Bob Costas
Episode Date: April 27, 2019Bill’s guests are Adam Schiff, Bob Costas, John Avlon, Zerlina Maxwell, and Grover Norquist. (Originally aired 4/26/19) See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information. Learn more about your ad ...choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to an HBO podcast from the HBO late-night series, Real Time with Bill Maugh.
We'll start the clock.
Please, I don't...
Let's suck. Get ourselves. I know why you're excited tonight.
Biden is in.
I know. Finally, a fresh face.
And this brings the number of Democrats running for president to everybody.
Joe made the announcement on his social media platform, Western Union.
You know what?
I am going to do old jokes
because I do everything kind of jokes.
It doesn't mean
that I don't think he should be president
just because he's 76.
That's ageism, which is a form of bigotry like the others.
Okay, but having said that,
he does have hair plugs that are older than Pete Buttigieg.
And two things can be true.
And I strongly disagree with those people who say
Joe Biden doesn't have a vision.
he doesn't have night vision
but no it's obvious
the woke left is not excited about this
they're like oh great another white guy in the race
so today Joe announced he is transitioning
and
the woke people love that
but then he fucked up his own gender pronoun
now they hate him again
now of course the other complaint about Joe Biden
and his rollout was that it's a little light
on policy, which is true.
You know, he didn't offer anything like free college.
But if you are stressed out
about your student loans, he'll give you a shoulder.
But, no, he was...
Hey, he's brave.
He went on the view today.
All those huggable ladies?
It's like sending a drug addict to Burning Man.
I mean, it was...
But...
But I like Joe's message.
His message is different than the other candidate so far, which is there is only one issue.
That's what he is saying.
Donald Trump must be removed.
This kind of resonates with me because just as he was saying it, this was what was going on.
Yeah, those two.
Imagine what Trump thinks when he sees this?
It's like being at a party seeing your wife talking to your mistress.
But I can tell that Trump is a little worried about Biden because he already got to
nickname, Sleepy Joe.
He's attacking
Biden for being old and
unfit. Donald Trump,
who was built like a melting
porta potty.
This guy,
he is
he's got to give it to Trump.
He's an unbelievable politician
that he can be that an attack.
He said today, I swear to God,
these are Trump's exact words, I just
feel like a young man. I'm so
young.
I can't believe it.
I'm the youngest person.
I am a young, vibrant man.
He can talk himself into anything.
Well, we'll see how vibrant he is tonight
because it's Melania's birthday.
Well, the Trump's do birthdays a little different.
She looks like a stripper, and he jumps in the cake.
No, it was lovely.
She made a wish and blew out the candles,
but he was still there.
Thanks for that, Robert Mueller.
That's the big thing.
We were off last week for Easter,
and that was the big news
that we weren't here for.
The Mueller report, the full one came out,
and if you haven't read it,
spoiler alert,
hope dies in the end.
It was like all the president's men
meet Al Capone's vault.
What the fuck?
I'm going to talk about it at the end,
but I did not feel good about this Mueller report.
I mean, I feel different about everything around.
I learned a lot.
Two weeks ago,
I thought laws were almost like rules.
Now I know if an idiot does it, it's not illegal.
Yeah, there was no prosecuting from the prosecutor.
But he left breadcrumbs,
because that worked out so well for Hansel and Gretel.
Anyway, we got a great show.
John Avlon is here, Zalina Maxwell and Grover Northquist.
And a little later, I'll be speaking with my old friend,
Bob Costas is backstage.
But first up, he is the U.S. representative for California's 28th District and the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.
You know him, you love him.
Adam Schiff is over here.
Well, a lot of people get standing o's, but I must say you deserve that standing O for your not okay speech.
Thank you very much.
When you made your...
Thank you.
But...
And you delivered it great?
I got to ask.
Maybe it's impolite.
Was that an ad-lib, that whole speech?
Did you have that ready to go?
Well, I knew the points I wanted to make,
but I didn't write it out because...
Really?
I wasn't sure what they had in mind.
But look, you know, this has been reaffirmed now
by Giuliani and the rest of the crowd.
They think it's perfectly fine
to take help from a hostile foreign power,
to welcome it, to build it into their communications plan.
They don't view that as collusion.
They view that as just smart politics.
I think it's unpatriotic.
I think it's, I think it's scummy and wrong.
I think most of the people do.
But, I mean, the Mala report is at the end of the day, you know, that firecracker that goes up and then the one that fizzles.
You know, oh, look, nothing.
Do you think you guys relied too much on that?
Look, I was always of the opinion, number one, that the Office of Legal Counsel opinion that you can't.
can't indict a sitting president was wrong.
Oh, good.
That, in fact, you can indict a sitting president.
I think there are prudential reasons not to try someone who's the president of the president of
the risk of the statute of limitations running.
If the president commits a crime, they should be indicted.
And you should stay prosecution.
So, but frankly, I had no expectation that that would be the course Mueller would take,
even if the evidence supported it,
because he is fundamentally conservative,
and I don't mean left-right conservative,
but he was going to follow the established policy.
He was not going to make new ground.
So I didn't think it was realistic to expect
that he would indict the president.
And those that did, I think, were unrealistic in their expectations.
But I do think he laid out what we needed to see,
which is that the Russians were engaged in a systemic effort
to interfere in our election,
that the Trump campaign welcomed it, embraced it,
built it into their plan, made full use of it,
lied about it, covered it up,
and then obstructed the investigation into it.
And if we had any doubt before
about this president's fitness for office,
there is no doubt remaining.
He is unfit from the presidency.
Well, but this was our big gun.
Now it just looks like you're stalking him.
I think in the eyes of the people who don't follow it that closely,
which is most of the country,
here's the thing about Bob Mueller.
He's like the last person, made the last thing in America
that left and right agreed on.
Left and right basically agreed.
This is a guy of honor.
This is an honest guy.
This is an honest broker.
Whatever he says goes.
Americans are not into details.
Don't read it to me, Bob.
Just give me a thumbs up and thumbs down.
The fact that he was like,
I don't, if you couldn't impeach before,
how you can impeach after or should you?
Well, were you on that?
Yeah.
I'm not there yet on impeachment.
I may get there.
He may get me there.
But here's the awful dilemma that we face.
If we don't impeach him,
that sends a message that this kind of conduct,
this obstruction of justice,
this kind of willing use of,
the help of a foreign adversary, all the lies in cover-up, that this is non-impeachable.
At the same time, if we do impeach him and he is acquitted as he would likely be acquitted,
then the message is those are not impeachable offenses.
At the end of the day, Bill, there's only one way to deal with this problem, whether we impeach him or not,
and that is to vote his ass out of office.
I do think that I also think there's one thing that the country,
is united on, at least the majority of Americans,
even if it's not Bob Mueller or in the report,
and was summed up by my 91-year-old father,
who said that if it walks like a duck,
and it quacks like a duck, he's probably a crook.
I think people recognize whether he could be indicted or not
that his conduct is unethical,
probably criminal in terms of at least the obstruction of justice.
And we have in our power, even if we don't have it legislatively
because the GOP in the Congress will do nothing to stand up to this man.
There is no patriotism left in Trump's GOP.
But we have it within our power.
We have it within our numbers to turn out and vote him out of office.
And we showed the power.
We showed the power of that in the midterms,
and the bigger the repudiation of him at the ballot box,
the more it says to ourselves.
Well, okay, so as the only Democrat not running for president.
Yes.
Well, what time is it?
I still have time.
Well, you're talking about you.
No, no.
You would do well.
I mean, you'd jump close to the head of the pack.
But so what is your advice?
because all week what I heard was basically two ideas,
that especially after Joe Biden said what he said yesterday.
Now, Joe Biden's view is Trump is the issue.
The other ones are like, let's stop talking about Trump.
We talk about him too much.
We want to tell people what we're going to do for them.
Healthcare, environment, those kind of kind of issues.
For example, you, I've seen you on TV a lot in the last couple of years.
I know everything you know or that you tell us about the Russian situation.
I don't know a clue what you think about health care.
I've never heard it.
I don't know whether you're for Medicare for all or improve Obamacare or get a chicken.
I don't know what.
I don't know what.
Here's what I was telling my colleagues,
and particularly these wonderful candidates we had running in the midterms,
don't talk about Russia.
You're not going to persuade people to vote Democrat or Republican based on Russia.
But what about Trump?
No, I get asked about it because,
You know, our investigation for the last two years was the only investigation into what Russia did.
And people ask me about it.
But what I urge the candidates and what I urge our nominees to talk about is, how are you going to help American people put bread on the table?
How are you going to help them provide for a secure retirement in an environment which people don't stay in the same job their whole life,
in a job with globalization and automation?
How do people get health care?
How do they keep health care when they go from job to job?
How do we help young people Ford College?
Those are the things we need to be talking about.
We are in the midst of two revolutions right now,
either one of which would be phenomenally disruptive.
The two put together are just producing this cataclyism
of xenophobic populism around the world,
and it's the revolution in the global economy
through globalization and automation,
when millions are losing their jobs,
through no fault of their own.
And it's the revolution in communication,
which is every bit as significant
as the invention of the printing press,
but it happened overnight, where lies travel faster than truths,
where hate goes viral, and you put those two things together,
and it is a combustible mix.
And addressing those challenges, talking about how in this environment,
we're going to put people to work,
we're going to deal with this yawning gap between rich and poor,
we're going to make sure that whether you have one job in the morning
and you drive an Uber at night,
that you have health care at the end of the day
and a retirement at the end of your career,
that's, I think, what we need to be talking about.
And I'll tell you who I'm behind in 2020,
and I'm behind them heart and soul,
any living adult 2020.
Anyone who gets the nomination,
we all need to get behind,
whether we were for them or not for them.
And I'll let you go, but I see you going on Fox News.
Well, I had some good encouragement from someone very,
Everybody's going on Fox News now.
All right.
Love it.
Adam Schiff, it's okay.
It's okay when you're here.
All right.
Thank you, everybody.
Let's meet our panel.
Hey, how you doing?
Hey, Robert.
All right.
Here they are.
He's a CNN senior political analyst
and author of Washington's Farewell,
the founding father's warning to future generations.
John Avlon's over here, John.
She is the director of progressive programming
for Sirius X-M and co-host of Signal Boost on Sirius Zerlina Maxwell
for first time.
And he's the President of Americans for Tax Reform.
Your credit never changes.
Year after year, Grover Norquist,
the President of Americans for Tax Reform.
He's just a message.
All right, don't forget to send us your questions
for tonight's overtime, so we're going to answer me after the show.
On YouTube, I want to ask that same question.
I asked Congressman Schiff about Joe Biden's taking a different tack.
He is taking the tack.
Trump is an existential issue to our country.
And let's talk about that.
I think that's the right issue,
because it is the same as what are you going to do for people.
Get rid of Trump is what you're going to do for people.
I don't see how that's a different issue.
What do you think?
Look, that is the big issue, and he's saying,
look, you go values first.
He believes Donald Trump is disfiguring our democracy.
You need to stand for return for decency.
And then you can get into policies later,
where I think folks get in trouble,
folks on the far left are starting to play into Donald Trump's re-election playbook.
You know, who can out radical out-socialist the other guy,
and that's a recipe for getting Donald Trump reelected.
So I think it is the right way to approach an opening bit.
I think there's an argument to be made that strategically,
the big picture, it's not a good strategy long term.
But in the short term, it is, because he baited Donald Trump.
And today Donald Trump came out and defended saying Nazis were very fine people.
And so I think, in retrospect, Joe Biden did the smart.
thing by leading with Charlottesville and essentially baiting the president into doubling
down on the fact that Nazis were good people. Whose mind has changed by that? We knew he said that
years ago. Sure, it may not change the people in his basis mind, but the midterm elections are a
reflection of the fact that the American people, the majority of us, are not okay with the president.
Well, he did win the Senate in the midterms. In red states. Okay. Well, we have to win some of them
to win the election. Sure. But I would say that if you, if you were a person who is trying to get
racist to vote for you, then that could be your
strategy, and maybe Donald Trump is the
person for you. But I would say the vast majority
of the country, and certainly people that are
not white, do not think that's a great
idea. I think they're already in the camp.
Hillary ran on
not Trump, and it didn't turn out as well
as she might have hoped. If
Biden has two choices, either to say,
vote for me, I can win,
or to move steadily to the
left to compete with everybody else,
it's better to go with the, I can win.
The challenge is whether
the Democratic base is willing to hear that,
whether he just gets pushed further and further
into gasoline taxes and middle class taxes
and other things that he'd rather not do.
It's always terrified by that prospect.
It's always about the guy.
It's on, mess with.
But, so let me ask about the women issue.
You know, it was a lot about Anita Hill
in the news the last couple of days
because, and you know, I'm a guy who is always saying
that the Democrats apologize too much,
because mostly they do.
The Anita Hill one, I think, is the exception.
that lady deserves a real apology.
Oh, yeah, and he took him 28 years.
And he didn't do it.
Right.
Until he's about corrupt.
Why?
Why don't get it over?
Because it's going to happen.
They're going to torture it out of you.
They always do.
I think it may have been pride in this instance.
Maybe he just didn't want to go there.
And I think it is a bad look that right before he announces, he calls her.
So why aren't the women in the race doing better?
I mean, I looked at some of these polling results.
I mean, Joe Biden has twice the support from women, 37% in Iowa, I think, than all the women combined.
Yeah, I mean, he's also leading in the African-American vote with two African-Americans running in the race.
Look, I think it has less to do with sexism, the fact that Bernie and Biden have run for president before.
They've got established bases in the party.
And, you know, you've got, you know, Elizabeth Warren's running, I think, energetic campaign focused on policy,
but she's not even popular in her home state when it comes to running for president.
I think Kamala Harris is in a very strong position down the field.
I think she's in the top tier of the candidates,
but she came out of the gate really strong,
and she's faltered a little bit.
She's the retail politician of it.
I think, you know, this is going to be worked out,
but I don't think it's simply can be written off to sexism.
I think it's about, you know.
It's name ID right now.
I mean, Biden's up there, as you said,
and Saunders has run before.
Even what the kids, the millennials like for Joe.
That's what I'm saying.
What is he got?
I mean, I want him to beat Trump if he's the,
guy, but I don't feel this fuzzy
toward him. I think people, you know,
think of him nostalgically because he was Uncle
Joe in the sunglasses, you know, the sidekick
to the cool president, Barack
Obama. So there's a little
bit of that, but I would say that
while it's not true that it's only
sexism, I think there is a lot of sexism
at play, because there's no reason
why Pete put a judge, as great as he is,
should be ahead of
qualified senators who are putting out
policies and actually are energetic.
I think that the narrative
that the women are not exciting on the stump
and they don't have charisma.
That is sexist as well
because only men have one for president.
We only have one example of what that looks like.
Why is Pete great?
I'm just asking.
He said as great as he is.
Well, I think he's authentic.
I think that people really are resonating
with some of the things he's saying.
I think he's taking it to the Christian right
in a way that we haven't seen
from the Democrats before,
and I think that's refreshing.
But he doesn't have the experience
to be the president of the United States.
Let's just be real about that.
I agree.
Little young.
Typically, Mayor of the Fourth Largerson in Indiana, not going to be surging in the polls.
But look, he has authenticity.
He also scrambles a lot of the definitions.
And it's important, right?
He is a pioneering candidate to the extent he's, you know, the first openly gay, married candidate running.
But he's not running as a gay candidate for president.
You know, he's running as a veteran.
So far, it's a lot about that.
Right.
Well, but I think that's actually a lot of people projecting on him.
He's more likely to talk about service in Afghanistan.
And I think that speaks to a real unmet need in the country to bridge a lot of the divides.
Right.
Because right now we do have a parties who are divided by religious.
and race and region, and that's really dangerous for republic.
So we got to heal those divides.
So Bernie Sanders got booed.
He went to the She the People Forum.
Okay?
And they asked him about demagoguery in the Trump administration.
He said, I will do everything I can to help lead this country in a direction that ends all forms of discrimination.
Boo.
Really, not good enough.
Then he said, I was actually at the march in Washington with Dr.
Dr. King back in 1963.
Boo.
As somebody who actively supported
Jesse Jackson's campaign in 88
as one of the few elected white
people who did.
Bo. Only fucking Democrats do this.
I swear to God.
I'm going to push back against it a bit.
Really?
The women in the audience wanted to hear specifics
and Bernie Sanders did not answer the question.
That's what the booze were for.
When does a politician ever answer a question?
But he was at the forum.
The other candidates.
Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris.
All of them, you know, came out with specifics of here's what I'm going to do to solve that problem.
When he was asked specifically what he was going to do for black women, he couldn't answer specifically.
He was like, I'm going to be great for black women.
It'll be great.
But how, Sway, how are you going to do it?
And he never gets to that point in the answer.
I think he needs to talk about specifics.
Like what?
What was the right answer?
Let's talk about pay equity.
Let's talk about discrimination.
Let's talk about making sure that families, no matter where they are, no matter what color,
have quality education, access to affordable health care,
all the other issues that Democrats talk about and tailor it.
Do everything I can to help constituency your talk about.
Lead this country in a direction that ends all forms of discrimination,
gender, discrimination based on sexual orientation.
It sounds like you're demanding he say the exact words that are in your head.
No, I'm demanding that he speak in more than platitudes.
But his point was the reaction from the crowd.
Look, if you build a political party based on identity politics,
then you've got to manage that.
Yeah, but no, I'm going to put that.
Because I believe identity politics too.
Identity politics are essentially civil rights.
Except you get shouted down if you don't say it right.
The political system in this country has been the default.
What do white men think?
What do white working class men think?
And now that we have more representation and the electorate,
we're going to be a majority minority country in 2046,
and so now we actually have to have representation that reflect the electorate
and talk about the issues and how they impact people of color.
You're assuming people vote based on the color of their skin?
That's rather odd.
No, I'm saying that people vote based on the policies
that will specifically target the issues in their communities.
And so issues affect different rates of people differently.
Yeah, but...
That's the way.
Donald Trump didn't win because of economics.
I like jobs.
I like growth.
So the black people, the point of unemployment is double white unemployment,
even under Donald Trump.
Donald Trump, why is that? What policy could we do to fix that?
Donald Trump, Donald Trump actually rallied around because he actually played a white identity
politics card. He actually is in some ways that move on the right. And look, in terms of
the larger issue of the Democratic Party, even LBJ, back in the day used to say, you know,
the difference between liberals and cannibals is that liberals, cannibals don't eat their friends and family members.
There are deep divides here. Okay. Yeah. Well, Obama said a couple weeks ago.
Circular fire squad, yeah. So, let me,
Let me ask you this, Mr. Tacks.
Yes.
There's 20 Democrats running,
same as the Avengers.
You know.
And, of course, we're still at the, you know,
American Idol stage where they're just interviewing all the people
and just singing 30 seconds for the judges,
so you don't really know who's for real.
But they all seem to have, you know,
I hate to say, because it's the thing around the Democrats,
like a lot of taxing and spending.
Yep.
Now, I personally think we have a need in this country
to completely realign how we spend money.
Like, I would cut the military budget in half.
I think we would still...
You could cut that in half
and still have the most ridiculous rock
with your cock-out mass murder machine
in the history of the world.
And that would free up, what, $400 billion or something like that?
But short of that, the only idea that Democrats seem to have,
is tax the rich.
Now, of course, the rich do pay two little taxes, don't you think?
Because we had this big tax cut, and we have the biggest deficit ever.
Yeah.
A couple of thoughts here.
One is the Democrats are not just talking about taxing the rich.
That's what they said they were going to do when Obama and Biden ran.
They promised they would never raise taxes on anyone who earned less than $250,000 a year,
not a penny.
That was Biden's promise in the district.
debate. They turned around. They put a $700 tax on every American who wouldn't buy
Obamacare. They put a $2,000 tax on every family of four that wouldn't do it. Those were
repealed by the Republicans. But seven, those taxes...
There wasn't really a tax. It was a penalty. Tax penalty. Oh, I'm sorry. Big difference to a
family that's struggling. Come on, Bill. Well, a family that's struggling... How are they
affording health care? I don't understand this argument. That's not the best example.
That's not the best example. Okay. Well, they also put taxes on health care.
people's flexible savings accounts.
They raise a series of tax.
Now they're talking about a tax, a gasoline tax
for roads and a carbon tax on all energy.
These are taxes that hit the broad middle class.
All right.
Some people don't like the broad middle class.
Look, what we really learned right now
as a result of all this
is that just official.
Republicans only care about deficits
when there's a Democrat in the White House.
That's right.
And I mean,
you guys, come on.
He's right.
You guys, when Obama whispered
that you're wearing the colonial outfits
with the tea bags in your face.
What happened to that?
Where are the tea bags?
Now the deficit is bigger than ever.
Okay, and when the Democrats are in charge,
the deficit's not a challenge to them.
And the reason is that the difference
is not about the deficit.
The difference is on spending.
The Democrats want to spend more.
What's changed in America over the last 20, 30 years
is not the amount of money
that the government takes out of the economy.
That runs at about 18%.
What's changed is spending has drifted up.
The question is, do you want more spending or less spending?
And I would argue...
Well, Trump wants more spending, but no raising taxes, which is why...
What are you spending the money on?
Right?
And that's the question.
Well, right now we're spending it on entitlements, which we don't have any of the votes on.
I don't call them entitlements.
Well, look, we're in such a deep poll, and the military is the biggest entitlement.
They're the biggest welfare.
But the vote's going to come there.
And the next downturn's going to be a bloodbath.
And Republicans are going to say, now's the time to cut spending.
And Democrats are going to say no, because we've got to find a way to invest and strengthen the middle class again.
The problem is, is the intergenerational mission we have to unfuck America is being more complicated
because of the fiscal hole we're in, because of the political hole we're in,
and because of the cultural divides we've got to deal.
I love that phrase.
Unfuck America.
All right.
Come down for a second.
I just want to say, we were off last week, so I did Coachella.
Oh, not the actual festival.
I just followed it on Instagram.
And it made me realize, you know, Instagram, all social, but especially Instagram, it just pisses me off because it's always just people.
We have some pictures from Coachella.
There, you know, it's just always people trying to show that they're having a better time than you.
And, you know, when I'm having a bad day, I don't want to see people having a better time than me.
It's always beautiful people eating dinner at a fancy restaurant.
Fuck that.
I want to see two fat people eat crackers they found in the cap.
That's what I want to see.
And Instagram, like everybody is always under a waterfall.
Fuck you.
Show me a woman hosing dog crap off the patio.
That's what I want to see.
And all these buff, shirtless post-workout selfies,
here's what I saw yesterday when my water heater broke.
And Instagram people are always at places,
like Joshua Tree.
How about I like a picture of you at the
Dollar Tree?
I don't want to see people getting lucky at the palms
if I'm home, only getting lucky with my
Pum. On Instagram, of course,
there's always a lot of those. I woke up
like this.
Fucking life is a lot of... I fell asleep
like this. And of course,
my least... An Instagram... Every meal
is fabulous.
Especially brunch. Really?
Here's the brunch I remember in my
20s.
All right. Let's bring out Bob. He is a 28-time Emmy winner, an inductee into the broadcaster's wing in the baseball hall of flame who calls games for the MLB Network and host Studio 42 with Bob Costas.
Bob Costas, ladies and gentlemen. So great to have you here.
Thank you, thank you.
So great, by the way, to hear you do play-by-play. I have a baseball game.
There is no pleasure. I love more than that.
Thank you. Nobody does it like you.
You texted me the other night. I was at the field for the Dodgers and Cuffs.
I listened to it because it's like, I don't know.
Jack Parr announcing a game.
It's witty. It's elegant.
There's jokes that your broadcast partner doesn't get.
Yeah.
I long ago decided that if you and my friends and people kind of in my sort of orbit,
yeah, if they get it and they laugh or they appreciate it, that's good enough for me.
Well, there's a lot of downtime in a game.
It calls for it.
Yeah.
So you are in the Baseball Hall of Fame.
So great.
I got to ask you, though.
Do you feel bad that Pete Rose is not in, but you are?
That seems wrong, Bob.
You know, they messed that up at the beginning.
He should have been banned from baseball,
but he should have been on the ballot for the Hall of Fame.
That's simple enough.
But subsequently, while that debate went on,
he did so many things that made it difficult to support him.
Yeah.
So many things that were unseemly.
Because he's Pete Rose.
Yeah, of course.
You can tell by the haircut.
When you find out that he was dallying with an underage,
you know, come on.
It's hard to defend.
It's not going to do with all the base ends, but none, nonetheless.
Exactly.
But look, whatever I have you on, I was like, oh, good,
because especially a week like this, I was so depressed because of the Mueller thing.
And I was like, good, but they're Bob's and you can just talk about sports.
Except, you know what?
Sports, it always goes to politics.
Sometimes it leads politics.
You know, Jackie Robinson, Muhammad Ali, Robert Kraft, Robert Kraft,
making the happy ending an issue
as it finally should be in America.
And Robert Kraft being in the same sentence
with Jackie Robinson is rather disturbing, actually.
Well, no one defends Robert Kraft
and I feel like I should.
I don't like his...
Somebody has to take up the lost causes.
I don't like his politics, but, you know,
he lost his wife of like many decades.
So he's getting a little love at the place,
and, you know, we have to...
Anyway.
Go with that bill.
So you see anybody like today who's in that league
with Ali and Arthur Ash and, you know,
people who really changed culture, Kurt Flood?
LeBron James has tried to step up.
Malcolm Jenkins with the Philadelphia Eagles,
Doug Baldwin,
they've been articulate and well-informed.
Colin Kaepernick, certainly...
Yeah, Colin Kaepernick...
Hey, that one got applause.
Colin Kaepernick called attention to a very important issue.
And paid for it.
And paid for it.
Like Ali.
He did it with grace.
The reason I wouldn't elevate him to the level of an Ali or an Arthur Ash or Kareem who continues to be a public intellectual or Kurt Flood, whom you mentioned, is that every time he speaks, which is rarely, he says something that doesn't necessarily.
Oh, yeah.
You know, when he says, I don't vote because the oppressor will never allow you to vote your way out of your oppression.
I guess it doesn't matter to him that when he first took a knee, Obama was president.
Right.
And when he was blackballed from the league, Trump is president.
He was not helpful in the election because he said, I remember tearing him a new asshole about it.
He was like, oh, Hillary, she's a racist, Trump's a racist, what is it doing?
That's, okay, so we'll talk to him.
Yeah, I mean, he did a good thing.
He's young.
He did a good thing.
But I think others can carry it forward more effectively.
So football. Now, you've talked about, I mean, you were one of the first brave ones to talk about the fact that, okay, this is really organized brain damage that's going on here, and we love the game. And look, I'm a libertarian on stuff like that. These players know the cost. So if they find joy and are willing to sacrifice, we all do stupid things when we're young. I'm sure I'm paying for some of them now. But, you know, the answer, of course, always is, well, this was allowed to have biggest football is just the ultimate.
cash cow, right?
Yeah. Why is that? Why
of the sport, why do we love football
so much more than the other sports?
Because we're violent? We're of violent
people, you think? It's once a week,
all right, so every game feels like a big deal.
It's Monday? Sunday?
Thursday. But your team plays once a week.
Your team plays once a week.
But we watch them all. Yeah, it's ideal for gambling.
Then you have your fantasy teams
and it becomes an obsession. Look,
When the NFL draft becomes a big deal,
like it's some sort of quasi-national holiday,
when more people watch the NFL draft
than watch really exciting NBA playoff games
on the same night or NHL Stanley Cup playoff games,
something's warped.
But there is something about the violence.
I felt like if you are an athlete or a coach
and you are interviewed,
I notice there is one word that comes up every time
over and over again.
And if I...
Well, pretend you're an athlete.
Yep.
If I ask you, like, what can you do to get back in the game?
What do you have to do? What have you been doing?
Taking them one at a time?
Aggressive.
Oh, aggressive.
That's at every single...
That's all they talk. We've got to be more aggressive.
Aggressive. Aggressive. Aggressive.
It's just...
The new head coach at the University of Colorado
made a big deal about
the way I grew up with the game
it's all about hitting, it's all about aggression, blah, blah, blah,
and two of the trustees said they could not vote in favor of his hiring.
They could not, even though they knew they'd be outvoted,
they weren't down with that.
They couldn't any longer justify the amount of money being poured into football
when this is supposed to be an academic institution
and maybe the values of football, they're no longer aligned
with what should be the values of an academic institution.
All right, so,
I mean, here's a sports question
that is a...
Well, everybody can answer this one
because it's really about the whole country.
Kate Smith, how many don't
know who Kate Smith is? I don't blame
you. I barely remember
when I was a kid, she was this old bag
on TV. I think I
thought she was Ethel Merman.
Do we have a picture?
I probably...
Right, okay. So I remember
like Ed Sullivan, she'd be armed. Like,
who's this corny old bag on the...
Bring on Gary Puckett and the Union Gap.
What is... You know, she...
Nice reference.
In their Civil War
Uniform. At least it was the Union.
You never know back then.
But, you know, but Kate Smith, God bless America.
Okay, so it's her turn in the barrel
because they found out that
besides singing God Bless America, which they play at Yankee Games,
she sang a horrible racist song in the 30s.
Two of them.
Two of them. Okay.
But I don't think Kate Smith was leading the charge
to oppress black people.
I think she was doing what every
person did back then. Rather than write her out of history
posthumously, maybe it should be the proverbial teaching moment
where you say, look, this was not, from what we can
determine, an overtly hateful person, but it's reflective of how insidious
these attitudes were that someone who didn't think or didn't mean
any harm thought this was perfectly okay, and so did millions
of other Americans. That's what I'm saying. There's a Marx Brothers
routine. Are we going to stop watching Marks Brothers?
There's movies.
Marks Brothers a teen that is punctuated by, and that's why Darkies were born.
Well, that's the song, she said.
Yes, that's right.
Right.
But it was everybody.
And, of course, we look at it now, and we cringe as we should.
But I think people object when the attitude seems to be, if I was back then, I wouldn't have been acting that way.
Yes, you would.
Well, not everybody, but a lot of people.
Almost everybody.
I think we make the mistake of assuming that our cultural moment represents,
some kind of endgame of sensitivity and awareness.
And the truth is that those wagging a finger today,
if things keep going the way they are with extreme political correctness
or extreme identity politics progressing at warp speed,
then those wagging a finger today may be on the other end of it tomorrow.
It's more than that, though, right?
I mean, look, look back and think we were monsters or idiots
for something. That's inevitable.
Right.
And I think that's why you've got to be real careful about projecting our values
on the past while still keeping a sense of moral clarity and teaching.
Like, I happen to think that she does a lousy version of God bless America.
But I think the impulse to excise artists for any manner of sins gets a little Orwellian.
It gets a little bit writing them out of history.
We've got to confront our history, the good, the bad, and the ugly, especially the ugly.
But disappearing it seems really dangerous.
Great when people realize the mistakes they've made and apologize for them.
I actually, that's a apology.
No, so obviously in this example, it's not a good one in that case.
But I do think that political correctness essentially is just don't be an asshole.
That's all we're asking.
That's the best.
That's the simple rule.
That's how it used to be.
That's how it used to be.
I'm not saying that some people don't go too far.
But that's the fundamental thing.
There are things you shouldn't say because that would make you an asshole and you don't want to be that.
But they, I mean, they took her statue down, which I don't care.
Again, I don't give a shit about Kate Smith or if you sing the song, I'm going to get a hot
because I don't even think they should be singing the song.
They used to sing, take me out to the ball game,
and then after 9-11 we had to do that.
Can we give that arrest? Okay.
But they took the statue down,
and I think that
Ralph Cram... I've said this before,
Ralph Cramden's statue. How long is that
going to stay up? Because they get... There it is, in front
of the bus station. Yeah. He every week...
New York Court Authority. Yeah. Yeah. Every week,
he used to threaten to punch his wife
in the face if she kept annoying him.
Yeah.
I actually...
Tick-tuck, Ralph Cramden.
Maybe soon, hopefully soon.
Hopefully, you think they should take that to him?
Look, I think that, you know...
Oh, come on. Ralph Crampton, he's not even a real person.
Well, what I'm saying is that we should review, you know, our history
and these historical figures that we put up on pedestals like, you know,
Robert E. Lee, who today the president said was a great guy, and we don't...
We know that's not true.
I think we should take the soldiers.
But Robert E. Lee and Ralph Crampton are kind of a different category.
Sure, sure. Of course. Of course.
I think we should take the soldiers off.
Just leave the whole.
horse. Okay. Because the horse has never
done. Lamous.
All right. So, I want
to, before we run out of time, I want
to ask about paying for college, because
this is one of Elizabeth Warrens and Bernie
Sanders. A few of them have the proposal.
College should be free.
A bachelor, if you...
If you...
Okay, wait a second.
Let me test your liberalism.
If you have a bachelor degree,
you, on average,
earn 65% more than someone who
doesn't have one. If you have a master's degree, 100% more over the course of your lifetime.
So nothing is free, like a free lunch, no. Neither is college. Somebody will be paying for this free
college, and it will be taxpayers. So are we really saying that someone who didn't go to college
should be subsidizing the people who went and got the benefit from going to college and made
more money? Is that really a liberal thing? And that's an incredible transfer from lower income people
to higher income people. If you look at the beneficiaries of that proposal, it is a huge,
subsidy to higher income people and if you're out buying votes you go with the people you
think are gonna vote that's what you call that the sugar the sugar lobby is out there too you
feed it all I mean that's that's hopefully what we so that's get away from but
unfortunately that's our version of just funneling the money to the rich people
we've had we've massive increase in the cost of college debt has become
crippling for a lot of folks people profiting off that stuff you is it right to
try to make it a little easier sure but what I'd rather see is it was actually expansion
the GI Bill and incentivize
a broader vision of national service. It's not just
the military, but parks, teach for
America, and then you get a
reduction in your loan
forgiveness or your college tuition.
That's a kind of broader policy that can unite the nation.
Folks are on that rather than a free lunch.
But I'm just asking, it doesn't seem
like something liberals should be for. They should
be for the poorest people. Same thing with the
mortgage deduction. That hurts
renters. Poor people rent.
And yet, we're
subsidizing the people who own the home.
In terms of the distinctions between the plans, like, I don't like free college as a message
because it makes it seem like everybody gets it. And we know that when we say free and everyone,
that means black people. And so usually those kinds of plans die on the vine. Seriously. And so I
think that, you know, when we're talking about these college plans, it's more about the debt-free
college piece of it. You know, what are you going to do? What taxes can you raise on the wealthy
to pay for these things? Because you have kids making a decision at 18 years old to take up two
hundred thousand plus dollars in debt.
And basically, you can never own a house, ever, if you have that much debt.
You're going to be renting forever and ever.
That's why millennials, older millennials, like myself, we have different plans than some of the
older generation, and they don't understand why we won't have kids.
We're not getting married.
We're not, because we have so much debt.
Right.
And I'm not saying that you shouldn't, you're not taking that on when you enroll in an
institution of higher education.
But I did have a decision between going to a state school.
and going to a Tufts University, which was a better school,
and I chose the one I wanted to go to,
but somebody probably should have directed me towards a school
giving me a scholarship.
And if you paid off...
And if you spent 18 years or whatever,
paying off your college debt,
and then they turn around and make it free for the next guy,
you'll be okay with that?
Well, look, I think that what I...
You know, if I choose to have kids or family...
Well, I wouldn't be pissed,
because I don't necessarily look at it as like,
well, I didn't get that benefit,
so the people coming behind me should not.
I don't think any of us, as true progressives,
feel that way.
We're for changing things.
things to make it a little bit better.
Final question.
This came up this week.
Bernie Sanders was asked if people with felony
record should be allowed to vote in prison.
This is not after they're out, which, of course,
I think all right-thinking people think they
should be able to vote. This is in prison.
That somebody even brought up the example of the Boston
Marathon, Vommer, and Bernie,
he got to love Bernie.
He doesn't wilt. He said, I think
the right to vote is inherent to our
democracy. Yes, even for terrible
people. I assume terrible.
people means terrorist
and this is not...
You don't want to run against that attack at, but
what do you think about it? You're
setting up the attack ad. This is the problem
with sort of running
into Donald Trump's playbook
about Democrats as
radical socialists who think
the white working class are deemably racist.
When he gets that question
and he says, yes, we just got
felony voting passed in Florida. We just passed a criminal
justice for form. Actually, you know,
the Trump administration deserves credit for help and push that
That is so far field
You're doing the Donald Trump's work for him.
Full stop.
It's a simple distinction.
You pay your debt to society.
You should be able to vote.
While you're still paying your debt to society,
it's ridiculous to assert that you should be able to vote.
Except there are a lot of people in prison who don't belong there.
Right.
And most of the prisons are in rural communities.
Not the Boston Marathon bomber.
In rural communities and I think there's a big shit.
You're talking about violent felons?
No, I'm not.
What I'm arguing is for nonviolent felons, having that right.
And we shouldn't be counting them in all white communities
so that those people can get all of the funding
and the apportionment and the gerrymandering
when the people who are from communities
like inner cities like Chicago are not getting
those resources. That is what's wrong
here and that's why this is conversation.
Saunders' idea
that Bernie Sanders idea that
Bernie Sanders idea that
anybody who's in prison, including
murderous, should be let out
and then he actually... Not let out.
Be allowed to vote. You're allowed to vote.
He's a normally good.
He's not. He's not.
I'm from Massachusetts.
We used to do that.
We pulled that back.
Actually, people in Massachusetts, the felons,
used to vote in Massachusetts.
Hurry, I've got to go.
The point is, when Martin Richards,
the eight-year-old, that guy killed,
gets to vote, then he can vote.
He took away that kid's right to vote for the rest
of his life. And I don't think
that the person who killed him. Here, here.
And one other person... New rules, everybody.
New rules. Thank you, panel.
Okay. New rule. Joe Biden needs a lot.
logo that's more I have a dream and less
off-brand footwear.
This makes me think of sneakers
alone. Only nurses
wear. Joe, your whole appeal is out of date but
fun, nostalgic and little goofy.
Like Tickle, the woman's deodorant
from the 70s with the long shaft and the
extra wide ball. Ask her aunt about Tickle.
Joe Biden and Tickle. You don't
have to masturbate with it, but you totally
could. New Rule, these beekeepers in the Gaza Strip have to tell us which they find more
irritating. Having to work with bees all day when you put on the outfit and your wife says,
how do you like it? New Rule, you don't salute the bunny.
New Rule, Kim Jong-un doesn't have to resume rocket test like he did last week to scare Donald
Trump. He just has to throw his hat.
New Rule, the Michigan
mom, who won a $78,000
lottery jackpot
by mistake. After
playing her kid's birth dates
and ages, but getting the
younger ones age wrong,
mustn't beat herself up about it.
The important thing is that now you can buy
a new home for your older daughter
and also what's her face.
And finally, new rule, just because you have a stone face
doesn't mean you belong on Mount Rushmore.
For over two years, America's had a crazy person in the White House,
and for over two years, the Democrats have done fuck all about it
because they were waiting for Mueller.
We all sat around waiting for prosecutor Jesus to turn in his big report.
And he came back with Ask Someone Else.
We needed Superman, and we got Clark Kant.
Trump calls the Mueller report the crazy Mueller report,
and in a way, he's right,
because it's over 400 pages detailing terrible crimes by a corrupt president,
yet Mueller does not prosecute.
If Dostoevsky had written the report,
it would be called crime and no punishment.
Mueller's report is full of butts.
Don Jr. met with the Russians, but...
Manafort gave internal polling data to a Russian,
but Trump obstructed justice,
every day, but
Robert Mueller,
he loves big butts
and he cannot lie.
Pete Barrara
was on real time
the week
the bar summary came out
and I had one burning question.
Could a different prosecutor
have reached a completely
different conclusion?
And he said,
yeah.
That's all I need to know.
I get it.
Mueller's a Boy Scout, a straight arrow, he played it by the book.
But you may have noticed for the past three years were kind of been off book.
And greatness sometimes means not doing everything by the book.
Thomas Jefferson made the Louisiana purchase in 1803,
doubling the size of the United States without any authority to do so.
But history called his name, and it said, take the shot, Mav.
That's what Spielberg's movie Lincoln,
is about. Even after the Emancipation Proclamation,
black people were not free. That required a constitutional amendment
initiated in Congress. And to make that happen, while he had
a window to make it happen, Lincoln lied,
bribed, freed prisoners, even fast-tracked an entire
new state into the union. None of which Mueller would have
had to do. All he had to do is what people in the justice system
do every day, use the law. Use the law.
law to come to justice, not be so restricted by technicalities that the bad guys win.
This is why Clint Eastwood never made a movie called Clean Harry.
Sometimes it comes down to you.
The Attorney General is corrupt.
The Congress is dysfunctional.
What good is leaving a roadmap for impeachment if you know a tribal party before country Republican Senate
will never remove the president?
Bob, your trail of breadcrumbs isn't good enough.
We're not that smart anymore.
America is an aging shortstop.
You have to hit it right at us.
That was for you, Bob.
That reference, Bill.
Nice reference, Bill.
To me, this report is summed up in the words
Donald Trump Jr. declined to be voluntarily interviewed.
So make him.
Was he too busy?
You couldn't work around his tweeting schedule?
And you, tough guy, couldn't get the president's taxes?
You didn't follow the money?
You didn't interview Trump, we're told,
because he couldn't possibly testify under oath
without perjuring himself.
And that's our problem?
It's one feckless punt after another.
Thank you.
Rudy Giuliani said this week,
there's nothing wrong with taking information from Russians.
That's where we are now.
I lay that on Mueller.
From now on, you can meet with foreign governments,
invite them to hack your opponents,
break campaign finance laws,
as long as it's by reason of, duh,
I'm plausibly too done to know what I was doing.
For a guy who didn't want to break president
by indicting a president,
Mueller sure created a lot of new precedents
because that's what law is, new precedents.
It's always evolving.
You can't indict a sitting president.
It's not in the Constitution.
It's not even a law.
It's a guideline, like drinking white wine with fish
or not fucking your cousin.
It's a fucking memo.
In Watergate, the special prosecutor,
Jaworski, faced a very similar guideline,
but he understood the big picture
and his role in history,
and he sued a sitting president anyway.
Mueller could have done that,
and the headline the next day would have been
Mueller breaks with precedent, indicts Trump,
and then that would be our new reality.
And it would have been a better reality,
because now Trump goes into the election
as a vindicated martyr,
and hell hath no fury like a whiny little bitch scorned.
Maybe we should have brought back Ken Starr as prosecutor.
At least he knows.
how to go after a dick in the Oval Office.
All right, that's our show.
I'll be at the Grand Theater in Foxwoods,
Massachusetts, May 25th, at the Fox in Detroit,
June 22nd at DeVos,
performing hall in Grand Rapids on the 23rd.
I want to thank John Adeline,
Zerina Maxwell, Grover Norquist, Bob Costas, and Adam Schiff.
Stay tuned for overtime. Thank you.
Catch all new episodes of Real Time with Bill Maher
every Friday night at 10,
or watch them anytime on HBO on demand.
For more information,
log on to hbo.com
