Real Time with Bill Maher - Overtime – Episode #381 (Originally aired 03/18/16)

Episode Date: March 19, 2016

Overtime – Episode #381 (Originally aired 03/18/16) - Bill and his roundtable guests Michael Ware, Esperanza Spalding, Sister Simone Campbell, Barney Frank and Rick Wilson answer fan questions from the latest show. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This episode is brought to you by Nespresso. Hear that, that's your next obsession. Every coffee, a new world. Every sip, a new taste. This is the new Nespresso. One touch, endless possibilities. Iced, flavored, long, short. Because some days call for that espresso kick.

And sometimes, a smooth, silky latte just wins. It's exceptional but effortless. Like actually effortless. Simply press, brew and explore. Nispresso, what else? Keep exploring at nespresso.com. Welcome to an HBO podcast from the HBO

late-night series, Real Time with Bill Mawz. He got fucked up in the knob. Okay. I'm still living in the war, you brick. I know you are. Okay, we're back. Rick Wilson, will there be negative consequences for Republican politicians

like Christy, Chris Christie, who have endorsed Donald Trump? Well, Christy gets to fetch his shine box every day when Donald Trump summons him now. He does look for me. And he is a guy, and I think a lot of these people are going to pay a price for it. And I think that Donald Trump is not a transactional politician. He's all about the bottomless ego need of Donald Trump.

And that's why anybody who's endorsing him, they're thinking, oh, I'm going to get something out of this, I'm going to get an appointment, I'm going to get some favor from Trump. No. When he's done, he's done with them. That moment on the airport tarmac where he said, go get on the plane. That was just the, that was the coldest deaths I've ever seen in politics. Okay. Okay, Bernie, does Bernie Sanders have a realistic proposal for Wall Street reform?

I think he has more rhetoric than reality. Actually, Hillary Clinton has a very specific and detailed proposal to use some of the powers that are there in the bill, as the New York Times editorial said. I do not think that simply saying, break up the bank. Look, I just did a piece. They don't tell us to what low-level. you need to do it. And in fact, we have in the bill powers that have not yet been used. And no, I do not say... You're talking about the Dodd-Frank bill?

Yeah. And you are the Frank in that. I know, but the only... I don't say that. So you know something about it, I would... Yeah, but... The only person in history who could refer to himself in the third person and not seem like a pompous jerk with Charles de Gaulle. So I never refer to myself.

But the point is... What I've seen, I've looked carefully at what Senator Sanders... and by the way, he was there, he voted for the bill. I don't, you know, he was in the Senate when we passed the bill and was very supportive of it. But I have not seen specifics that go beyond what we have done there. Okay.

Esperanza, what can you tell us about your work with Free the Slaves? Oh, well, I didn't know slavery was so prevalent. So that... There is slavery still in the world. A lot of it, actually. Yes, it is amazing and horrific. And in our own backyards and a lot

of the products that we are acclimated. to deusing. It's shocking. So when I heard about that, I said, okay, I want to align myself with these people and folks are listening to me. And what countries are we talking about? Where is it worst? Worse in India and Bangladesh. But it happens almost everywhere. I'm sure it happens everywhere, unfortunately. There's all sorts of forms of slavery, right?

Of course, yeah. Yeah. Saudi Arabia. Yeah. What did you think about Obama criticizing them in the Atlantic? Amazing. It was about time. About time. Talk about it. Right. Yeah. That was a pretty stark, I mean, that was a pretty stark read. That time somebody did in America.

Right. I think we're all, I think there's a bipartisan moment where we're getting past that infatuation. Right. Okay. And not that they need to listen. Michael, what? I mean, you just have no leverage. You have very limited leverage.

With who? Saudi Arabia. But I think we have more leverage than ever because we don't need oil like we used to. We are the leading oil. But they don't need you. But you have proven yourselves impotent in the middle of it. We have? Really?

I mean, yes, we have. Who's more imbidant than Saudi Arabia? It's their own backyard and they won't even send troops to kill ISIS. They're the ones who should be doing it. Why are we doing it? They're paying the bills to kill ISIS. They're fighting the war in Yemen. They're fighting the great religious war in the...

You don't want to get in the middle of this, do you? Trust me, you don't want to. No. You were smartest one I've met all night. It's the right. Look, you know. We've never had... What a great compliment to you.

All night. Oh, Michael. Shut up and get out of the way. And where were you earlier? God damn. Now look, we've never had less influence in the Middle East than we do now. And we are not the worst for it. I do not think that this is America's role.

It's not our need and it's not possible for us to bring peace there. So I am very happy to... Forget energy politics. I'm not talking energy politics. Forget energy politics. I'm talking about trying about... I say go green, go hard, and go now, you know. That's not...

But there are people dying there. How can we stop it, Mike? What can we do to stop it? We can't. Sweet bugger all. What? Virtually nothing. I agree.

Virtually nothing. But you know what? We make it worse when we try. You know, in so many ways, you've contributed so much to this problem, and it's washing up on all our shores. It's a moral responsibility. But what? To do what?

To do what? I would make it worse. I understand. I voted against it. Yes. responsibility to us. I don't see that we can do it. How about a little tough love, right?

It's, the Republicans are always for personal responsibility. What about personal responsibility for all those countries that are surrounding ISIS who say they are enemies of ISIS, but we don't make them fight ISIS? Why are we leading this coalition? They have claims. I know. We sold them to them. In fairness, though, the support of Saudi Arabia has been a bipartisan fact of life in this country for 45 years or so.

It doesn't make a good point. I know, I know. I want to be sure that it's not just on my party's head. Right. No, it falls on us all. That falls on us all. The Bush is the ones who actually held hands with them. But our willful refusal to understand the deeper stories of what's going on in the Middle East, our misconceptions, are thinking that it's just the way we want it to be.

I mean, we should just plain stay out. We have no idea. Right. We only make it worse. Yeah. And, you know, the reason why we don't is because we always have to big our stuff. up that we're the indispensable nation and we're not it's Russia well they're not either I do do Putin just played us all for fools no he didn't he was a master

stroke excuse me but he stepped in you're a Putin fan no I'm a huge Putin fan if you are into global power politics you're totally contradicting yourself you acknowledge that we have no great interest there and then you complain that we didn't do anything there's nothing that we could accomplish and nothing that we could accomplish. At least Putin knows what he's after. Putin is after a secure naval base on the Mediterranean and a new airfield. And what's he'll do with it?

And he's secured it. And he's achieved it and he's got in and he's got out with relatively no cost. We have more bases, excuse me, let me finish. We have more bases in the Middle East than he does. And there are no way. To what effect? How does it help America? And how does it help him to have one?

Neither one of us should be doing it. He still maintains his Mediterranean blue water pool. And we have one, too. That's all he's after. He's a very interesting. He's all, war, that's all you men ever talk about. You give him credit for doing stuff, which you say we do. It's a waste of time and money for both of us.

All the South has is cotton and arrogance. Sister Simone, I can do all have gone with the wind, by the way. Massa, NASA. Lions, Kitty, Scarlet. It's the only thing worth fighting for. Worth fighting for. The kids don't know gone with the way more. I know. Seriously, it's lost on them.

Sister Simone, do you think that the coalition of religious support for Republicans will start to break down if Trump is the nominee? Well, that's a good question. Well, I think the religious support for Republicans has broken down, period, regardless of who the nominee is. Because what's happened is that the fact of the more progressive thought that it's seen more as an integration of all of the questions, not just sexual, questions become the questions that we ask at this time. The issues of income inequality, the issues of the disparities in our cities and towns, the issues of racism are at the heart of religious conversation. And that is changing how America embodies faith and how faith is involved politically. It's broken down, period.

It's an interesting question because a lot of evangelicals who are supporting Donald Trump, who in previous eras would have been absolutely rigidly opposed to gay marriage, absolutely opposed to abortion. They're like, Woo, Donald Trump! So what? We're doing it.

It's all about Trump. And this to me is a sign that the evangelical part of the Republican base has to do some self-assessment and decide if they really believe in the things that they want to be definitional for the party. To defend them for a second, doesn't the Bible say render unto Caesar what is Caesar?

They're saying, look, we're not voting for a preacher. We have a preacher. We're voting for a president. That's a different position. Their historical thing of disqualifying people flat out who believed in gay marriage or who believed in abortion is suddenly completely gone with Donald Trump.

Not completely, but with a large part of the evangelical... There is one correspondence between Donald Trump and much of the Bible and marriage, and that is it's okay for a guy to marry a lot of women. The Bible says that's okay, and Donald Trump says that's okay. The legamy, right? Yeah. One after another.

A couple of time. Yeah. Right. And Saudi Arabia. We love Saudi Arabia and, you know, and the older brides. Bin Laden was the 20th of 55 children. It's always the middle kid.

All right. Thank you very much, everybody. You were a great audience. Catch all new episodes of Real Time with Bill Maher every Friday night at 10. Or watch them anytime on HBO on demand. For more information, log on to HBO.com. It's a lot of