Real Time with Bill Maher - Overtime - Episode #467: Shrinking GOP, Stormy Setup, Trump Challengers
Episode Date: August 4, 2018Bill and his guests – Malcolm Nance, Nancy MacLean, Kristen Soltis Anderson, Charles Blow, and Steve Schmidt answer viewer questions after the show. (Originally aired 08/03/18) See omnystudio.com/li...stener for privacy information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to an HBO
podcast from the HBO
Late Night series
Real Time with Bill Maugh.
All right.
Now, Malcolm Nance is back.
Great.
Okay, Malcolm Nance,
how would you suggest
the U.S. retaliate
against Russia an attack?
Oh, we asked you that question.
I did.
Steve Schmidt,
since you'll get another one.
I see another one here and here for you.
Don't try not to repeat the questions.
I already asked the guess.
Since Trump's performance in Hell Stinky,
have any of your GOP contacts in Congress
become more inclined to believe,
Well, let me ask a different question.
These are shitty questions today.
I hear that the Republican Party is shrinking.
I hear this all the time,
that because Trump's numbers within the party are so high,
it's because the actual number of Republicans are going down.
It always makes me want to ask you,
how many Steve Schmitz are out there?
How many people in the Republican Party
or who used to be who are now switching?
I think it's a very significant number,
and I think you're going to see college-educated
Republican women in these swing districts
deliver the blue wave for the Democrats,
because I think there are many, many people have left.
But the future of the National Republican Party
looks exactly like the future of the California GOP,
which, for the first time in history of the two parties,
in any state, the Republican Party in this state is now a third party.
It's smaller than the decline of state registrations.
When you look at the anathema
that millennials feel towards the Republican Party.
You look at African Americans, brown people,
you look at just demographically the country,
and you consider that when people imprint on a political party
generationally at 18 years age,
they remain faithful to that party really for their lifetimes,
for decades and decades and decades.
So the Republican Party has a huge, huge, huge problem
demographically, and it's going to continue to shrink.
But as it gets shrinker,
as it shrinks, it gets smaller,
just like the California Republican Party has,
it will become crazier.
But to the point that I made earlier about the media stuff,
this was also not, I mean, Trump was an accelerant.
He has made the situation worse.
But weirdly, if you look at data over time of party registration,
the decline in Republican registration in some ways began much earlier before Trump,
and it was a lot about younger voters,
specifically young women.
If you look at what millennial men's party identification looks like,
You go back to the first time millennials could vote,
which I think was the 2000-2004 era.
Millennial men are just as Republican today as they were then.
But for millennial women, those numbers have fallen to where it's a Democrat plus 50 margin among millennials.
This is a huge problem for the GOP that the party's not paying attention to.
But that shrinking party gets to what you're saying.
I mean, everything that we see now is about a shrinking group of Americans trying their best,
to enshrine power and privilege and prestige.
And so they know that they will come a day
when they won't have the numbers to do it,
but if they can lock in as much unchangeable
or difficult to change mechanisms,
then they will hold onto it for another generation.
They don't have the numbers now.
Well, you do, but they just,
but that is, they cheat.
But that is why they stole that Supreme Court Cee from,
from Barack Obama.
Right.
Because you're trying to lock in something for a generation.
It's not about numbers.
And if we had mandatory voting, they would not get close to winning office.
If everybody who...
Yes.
But we don't have mandatory.
We have voter suppression instead of mandatory.
It's about rules.
They have radically changed the rules.
Wherever they get power, they change the rules some more.
And ultimately, the ultimate rules book is the Constitution.
And they are taking dead aim at our Constitution.
And Brett Kavanaugh is the Koch selected candidate.
If you look at how he came to be, through the Federalist Society.
Leonard Lijon. Koch was investing
seed money as he put in the Federal Society
since the 1970s.
Kavanaugh is their guy. He was selected by
Donald McGahn, who is a Coke person
who is Trump's
White House counsel, who did the vetting
of these candidates. This is the Coke
candidate for the Supreme Court, and that
is a crucial thing that we should be talking about
over the next month. Okay. I was going to
ask about Stormy Daniels.
Wait, wait, wait.
Let me finish. It's serious.
Stormy Daniels got arrested.
Supreme Court's stormy danes?
It doesn't, you don't find this alarming
that we are now arresting private citizens?
Yeah.
It's not that it's stormy days, but it was a trumped-up charge.
It was a police setup.
It was a police setup.
What do you think happened?
What do you think it came...
Who gave that order, or was an order not needed to be given?
No, no order needed to be given.
I mean, you know, it's like the fight between the brown shirts and the black shirts
on the Nazi Germany back then.
You just hint that you want change.
That means rolling up your police.
political enemies, you roll them up.
Whenever you want to create mayhem, it's like
you said, you know, you have Nuremberg and the
Hillbilly Nuremberg, and these people will go
out and they will affect change themselves.
If that means walking into a newsroom and
killing everybody in it, they'll do it.
It's unspoken laws
and unspoken orders that are
given out there. As you said,
these things are long ball games.
They will change the system
to allow these things to be
unpunishable. And Stormy Daniels is a simple.
I think it was politically motivated, but
It's part and parcel with ICE agents, for example,
in a Concord, New Hampshire bus station,
walking down the line, asking people for their papers, please,
to show that you're a citizen.
And so in this country, the only appropriate response
when someone asks you to show your papers
and prove citizenship is to say, go fuck yourself, sir.
Right, right.
Right, right, because this is the United States of America,
and we don't have to show papers before we get on a bus.
Right.
But all of this is alarming.
All of it is radical.
And we shouldn't be used to it.
Okay.
But we got used to it by the current president demanding to see the papers of the previous one.
Yes.
You know, it is him.
It is all him.
It is him signaling and people saying that is fine with me,
and they are kind of falling in line and doing exactly what you.
But Charles, if you said before, this goes way back to 1964,
and the Republican Party deciding to plan its flag in the states of the former Confederacy,
and everything else follows from the former Confederacy,
and everything else follows from the United States.
That's right. It's like in War of the Worlds. The tripods were underground and then they came to the planet and they came out from underground. But they were always under there.
Look at the first law enforcement organization that endorsed Trump, Border Patrol and ICE. They are, you know, I feel sad about this because I love my law enforcement officers. I train them in counterterrorism and counterterrorism intelligence all the time. I engage with them. But there is a block of people right now that think that they are the enforcement officers.
of the Trump administration.
And they are taking these orders literally.
Like you said, New Hampshire bus station,
really? You think that there's going to be illegal immigrants
trying to get on a bus up there?
They want to enforce his orders.
And the head of ICE himself came on television and said,
until the orders are changed, that's going to be the orders.
Locking up kids, no problem.
This is a malfunction that has to be recalibrated.
And when we change, if we change this Congress,
we're going to have to change law.
change laws to where they're going to have to obey the Constitution, not Donald Trump.
Okay. I thought we had those laws, but maybe not. All right. Last question, briefly.
James asks, who in the prospective field of Democratic candidates do you think would be most likely
to beat Donald Trump in 2020? Who's your guy? The essential skill is going to be somebody who can
provoke Trump, have Trump swing at them, and then be smart enough to stand back and not get into a
brawl in the middle of the ring, but to cut Trump with humor, to laugh at him.
Right.
He is a narcissistic bully and a buffoon.
He should be laughed at.
He should be mocked.
Humor is the most potent a weapon against Donald Trump.
And that's why Al Franken would have been a great person in the ring.
So when you...
So isn't it great we got rid of him?
When you stand up there at Robert De Niro with all respect and he says, fuck you Trump, he's playing
Trump's game.
Exactly.
Yeah.
You nuke Godzilla, he just gets stronger, right?
You try to outvile Donald Trump?
Yeah, and also, we're supposed to be the artists and the poets.
That's the best we can do.
Fuck you.
But you didn't name a person.
Well, I like, Seth Moulton, Tim Ryan, the two young congressmen from Ohio,
because I think that there's going to be a lot of energy for new.
And, you know, we talk about that loss of affinity for the Republican Party among women.
I mean, it looks like the commanders meeting from the handmaid's tail
when these guys get together for a Senate hearing.
And so I think that whether it's John Hickenlooper,
whether it's Eric Gorsetti of this city,
it's going to be someone new.
Camilla Harris out of the progressive wing.
But I would add to that,
it is very hard to win the Democratic primary
and not be from the South.
And you have a name named by it from the South.
And I think you have to mix into that group
people like Mayor Landrieu of New Orleans.
And people like that, because the Democratic primary system
swings south so quickly.
This is how Bernie had a problem.
He could have won.
But he did not get into the South quick enough,
did not have message strong enough,
did not connect closely enough with those older black women voters.
And you have a, you know, killer Mike's great guy,
but old black woman says, killer Mike,
what's a killer Mike?
You know?
So it just doesn't work.
Right.
Right, so you, so this idea of like someone from the Midwest or from California, it could work, but it's hard.
But there's going to be at least two credible African American candidates, and there may be three of Governor Patrick runs.
All right. Nobody took me seriously when I asked.
I've got an outside.
Stop.
Briefly give me a name.
I have an outsider.
We're not doing notes.
I just ask for names.
I asked for briefly a name.
We got to go.
Tammy Duckworth.
Tammy Duckworth.
Thank you.
A name.
Thank you very much, everybody.
Catch all new episodes of Real Time with Bill Maher every Friday night at 10,
or watch them anytime on HBO On Demand.
For more information, log on to HBO.com.
