Real Time with Bill Maher - Overtime - Episode #469: SCOTUS Term Limits, Wave of Women, Wildfires

Episode Date: August 18, 2018

Bill and his guests – Preet Bharara, Adam Conover, Jennifer Granholm, Charlie Sykes, and Jonathan Swan answer viewer questions after the show. (Originally aired 08/17/18) See omnystudio.com/listener... for privacy information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Welcome to an HBO podcast from the HBO Late Night series, Real Time with Bill Maugh. Okay. Here we are back on the internet. We were just making fun of. Preach, should there be 18-year term limits for the Supreme Court?
Starting point is 00:00:18 Yes, some people have mentioned that. I would say yes, because Trump got two picks in a year and a half. Jimmy Carter never got one. Got zero, that's true. Yeah, it's... Nixon got four, Reagan got four. Yes.
Starting point is 00:00:32 Look, so I think there's a reasonable case to be made for it. I think you want to have judicial independence, which the founders thought could be accomplished through having life tenure. But I think they also probably thought that over time, the people in the Supreme Court would sort of match, again, over a long period of time, the ideological proclivities of the party that was appointing them.
Starting point is 00:00:55 But if you look back as a stat that people don't focus on, if you go back to 1968, in the last 50 years, And if you count the new nominee, there will have been 18 people appointed to the Supreme Court. Do you know how many of them were appointed by Republican presidents? 14 of the 18. So it's over 80%. Including four from two presidents who did not win the popular vote. Correct.
Starting point is 00:01:17 So because of the... There should be eight liberals on the court. But the reason why people haven't freaked out more than they might have is because in, you know, yesterday year, there were times when a president like Gerald Ford would appoint someone like John Paul Stevens, who ended up not being as ideologically pure and right-wing as some of the people you have now. That problem has been solved by the right in various ways. But it is interesting to see how lopsided it has been,
Starting point is 00:01:42 even though Democrats have been in office for a much different percentage of the time than the 14 to 18 would suggest. Well, you know where the founders screwed up? They didn't know that we would stop smoking so that they didn't think that people would be living into their 80s and 90s. If we were still a smoking country, we wouldn't have to worry about term.
Starting point is 00:02:01 limits, we wouldn't have a country run by people who were all 88, 89 years old and still gone. So you're saying America was never really that great. Is that what you're saying? They were, they were... They were... They were lousy, too? Oh, boy, this is a rough day for America.
Starting point is 00:02:19 Okay. Charlie, are you going to join other principled conservatives and vote for Democrats in the midterm? I would prefer to vote for sane, rational Republicans. Too late. I can't find them. Right. But let me know. Don't tell me you're gonna write in, you know,
Starting point is 00:02:36 the Pope or, you know, Reagan. That's just a chicken. Well, it definitely won't be the Pope. No, no. You're mad at them now. Yeah, yeah. But no, you're not gonna vote Democratic? You know, I mean, well...
Starting point is 00:02:52 It's only two sides. Well, okay. We've got to pick a side. Race by race. And I do think that America needs to have, like, two not-crazy parties. And I do think that if principal conservatives all abandon the republics, party, you're going to leave it to the swamp lizards and the crackpots and the trumpists.
Starting point is 00:03:09 But as of right now, I don't see any constituency for Republicans who are going to stand up against Donald Trump. And I do think this election is going to be a referendum on constitutional democracy. What about the next presidential election? I mean, John Kasich looks like he's making some moves. I mean, Mitt Romney, if he could find his spine consistently, he could be, you know, Do you think there will be a challenge from the Republican classic wing of the party? Yeah, there will be a challenge and it will fail because the party has basically become,
Starting point is 00:03:41 as Jonathan was saying, has become kind of cultic. We saw this movie. We saw it. Wait a second. It won't fail. No. If it saps enough votes away to elect the Democrat, then it will succeed.
Starting point is 00:03:54 And that's why they should do it. I'm not saying John Kasich will win the election, but if he runs as a third party candidate, Third-party candidate will be interesting, but then again, I mean, don't underestimate that Donald Trump could be re-elected. Oh, I don't. You know, I mean, never underestimate the capacity
Starting point is 00:04:10 of the Democrats to blow this. Oh, I'm the guy who says he's not leaving even if he loses the election. Not really funny, but okay. Jennifer, how important is the election of women to the success of the Democratic Party? Boy, talk about it. You take that card on there.
Starting point is 00:04:25 You'll never get a more softball right down the middle of the plate there. Thank you. Whoever sent that in. It's huge. Let me groove one. It's not important. Give us the one.
Starting point is 00:04:34 Be provocative. About why they're not important. No, and we're going to see, I mean, we have seen these incredible numbers for those of you who have been watching this. Women are killing it. Women are killing it both in winning when they raise their hands and in raising their hands to run, which is great. Just quickly, there's a great stat that comes out of Emily's list where in the midterms last cycle, last time, they had about nine. They had about 900 women who had raised their hands to say they wanted Emily's list help. In this cycle, 40,000 women have raised their hands to say, in some way, shape, or form,
Starting point is 00:05:11 they want to run for an office, you know, which is fantastic. Between Stormy Daniels and Amarosa and Pussy Grabbing tape and women, I think it is women who are going to wind up taking down. We will take care of this country. Just put us in office. Melania. Melania. Melania could be the keto at all. One of the smartest analysts of the elections, particularly in the House, is Dave Wasserman.
Starting point is 00:05:34 Works at Cook Political Report. And he called this year, he's already called it, the year of the angry female college graduate. And that I'll tell you, when you talk to Trump's political advisors, that is the constituency they fear most. Because they already vote in huge numbers, and his approval rating among them is, I think, 26%, something like that. It's truly awful. How many voted for him in 2016? I don't know what the college-educated women. He won white women, and he says, I won women.
Starting point is 00:06:00 He actually means white women. But I don't know what his numbers. They were actually not so bad. They were not so bad in 2016. And now he's underwater, even with white women, just white women without college education. So that's progress. Preach, how has the Trump family gone so many years in New York City
Starting point is 00:06:20 without facing major prosecution? Great question. I would love to know that. She gets the easy one. My bad. Oh, no. No, no. That's all I got, Bill.
Starting point is 00:06:37 Wow. That's not what we've met. That's what I got. You just wrote some headlines there. No, because... Let's watch Jonathan Swan laugh some more. All right. Adam, is it naive to believe that California's wildfires
Starting point is 00:06:52 could be random, or are they truly due to mad-made climate change? That's a softball question for me. They're absolutely due to man-made climate change. But not just that. Not just that. Here's what people don't realize. You would enter differently. You would have ruined you for me.
Starting point is 00:07:08 Here's what people don't realize is that when natural disasters happen and people say, oh, it's an act of God. We really are the ones who make the natural disaster so destructive. In the case of fires, it's because we built. We're doing this on this show coming this year. It's because we build homes so far out in the wilderness that now we extinguish every single fire that happens, right? But those are like, you know, forests need a certain amount of fire.
Starting point is 00:07:30 You know, like small fires, every going to clean out the deadwood. When you extinguish every fire, because, oh, my God, now people are, the suburbs have encroached out into the forest, then the deadwood builds up. And then when the fire does come, it's a real motherfucker. And that's what we're seeing, that's what we're seeing right now. I mean, it's impossible to live in California and not realize that climate change is real and that we live in a man-made landscape that is crumbling under its own weight. It's really astonishing.
Starting point is 00:07:57 Have a nice weekend, everybody. Have a nice weekend, everybody. All right. Thank you very much. All right. Watch all new episodes of Real Time with Bill Marr every Friday night at 10. Or watch them anytime on HBO on demand. For more information, log on to HBO.com.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.