Real Time with Bill Maher - Overtime - Episode #472: Steve Ballmer, S.E. Cupp, Mark Leibovich, Richard Clarke

Episode Date: September 15, 2018

Bill and his guests – John Kerry, Steve Ballmer, Richard Clarke, S.E. Cupp, and Mark Leibovich. answer viewer questions after the show. (Originally aired 09/14/18) See omnystudio.com/listener for pr...ivacy information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Welcome to an HBO podcast from the HBO Late Night series, Real Time with Bill Maugh. Steve, have you found that your philanthropy is more effective when done independent of government programs? I think most of the philanthropy
Starting point is 00:00:20 needs to be focused on getting government programs to actually work better, to stimulate better ideas. Great point. Yes. The bulk of the money comes from government. We got to make sure it gets used really well. Some things.
Starting point is 00:00:34 you know, only government could win World War II, and I think only government can solve the environmental crisis. I just don't think that's something... What do you think about your fellow billionaires who want to go to Mars? That's so fucking stupid. It's stupid. Man, I don't waste all my time in that rocket chip.
Starting point is 00:00:56 I got too much to do here. I do them 62. When am I going to be out there in outer space dying? No, I'm not going to do it. You got to do this thing when you talk about. He's got to do that. He's got to do that. And the river.
Starting point is 00:01:08 All right, yeah. That's right, right. Okay, let's see. Will anyone in this administration ever be held accountable for the separation of immigrant children and the abuse they are enduring? Well, accountability is a tough thing to come by lately,
Starting point is 00:01:23 but I hope so. Probably not. No, and it's appalling. It's appalling. And that it is suddenly politically courageous. to come up and say that that's a bad thing. Babies in cages, yeah.
Starting point is 00:01:39 It's really, really disappointing. Glad we're all in agreeance on that. What's your advice, Richard Clark, to the next president on how to respond to Russia's ongoing attacks if you had your old job? So there's a building in St. Petersburg called the Internet Research Agency, which is, in fact, a front for the Russian intelligence service. That's where all their trolls are? That's where all their trolls.
Starting point is 00:02:00 Not all of them, but a lot of them are, and they're still doing it every day. I would fry every computer in that building. We have the capability. Really? Yeah. We could do that just with a push of a button. Tomorrow. We could.
Starting point is 00:02:12 So why don't we do it? So why don't we do it? Because, you know, well, they'd replace them the next day. Maybe, but I'd feel better. No, but wouldn't they do it to... Wouldn't they do it to us? They're already doing pretty much everything they could do to us. They're in our power grid.
Starting point is 00:02:28 They're in the pipeline control systems. Well, if they're in our power grid, couldn't they freeze our computers, too? Yeah, they can. Is that include porn hub? I'm asking for a friend. But we can't do... Torch him then! All their computers, how do.
Starting point is 00:02:50 We can't be self- deterred. What do you know about computers? Oh, that's right. $43 billion. You're a cruel man. I get that. Okay. You recently held a shareholder meeting, Steve, for American taxpayers.
Starting point is 00:03:04 Do you think the government should run like a corporation? That's interesting because when people elected Trump, they were like, yeah, we need a businessman as president. This is more than much the kind of the business man. I think we should have as president. What I think we need is we need somebody who's got that discipline in thinking things through, in knowing numbers, in using data. We're not trying to maximize profit or, you know, exact.
Starting point is 00:03:29 I believe in balancing the budget. But it's not all about that. It's about the outcomes. and using numbers and being systematic. And, you know, with USA FACs, we welcome anybody in the country to use our data. I mean, politicians, when they run for office, they always write a dumb book. You know, oh, this is, and that's my platform. It seems like USA Facts data is a much better platform than a dumb book if, say, you wanted to run.
Starting point is 00:03:56 You could say, this is, I've already done the work. I already know what to do to fix America. And I'll tell you something. We just finished something we call the state of the facts poll. We go out and pull on this stuff. Americans want the facts. Look, you even got that, you got that down. Facts are more important.
Starting point is 00:04:13 Facts are more important. Once you do that. Even people's values, they want to, they'll say, we want to start. But you're not, you don't want to be a politician. No. So here's the, I want to stay married and I like, I like, I like where I am. You want to stay married? Yeah, my wife doesn't think the idea of politician.
Starting point is 00:04:32 Let's just put it this way. I think I could probably do more and stay married to my very lovely wife. See, here's what I'm thinking when you're saying this, other than the fact that I need to start talking louder, because I think it would work for me. I mean, I don't want to be the quiet bald guy at the table. I'll do softer.
Starting point is 00:04:48 No, no, you're great. I wouldn't change the thing. No, but what happens when you have these objective politifact-like things is that whenever something comes out that one side disagrees with, i.e., you know, Republicans think that, like, political fact, all these fact-checking things or the Congressional Budget Office
Starting point is 00:05:05 are like, oh, it's partisan. What do you say when the inevitable, oh, that thing's partisan because they don't like the numbers comes up? We don't make forecasts. Forecasts are partisan. What happened? Happened. What happened? We know how many people are covered by health care?
Starting point is 00:05:20 I won't predict what goes forward. We know how many people died and at what age last year? We won't make forecasts. Forecasts can be partisan. The history. Geez, we can't even look back and objectively say that is what happened, accept it. Well, we need to.
Starting point is 00:05:35 As Moynihan said, you can have your own opinions, but you can't have your own facts, and we know what happened, and I think it is disgusting when people just ignore the numbers. No forecast. You mean like Justin Porter-R-Ga? How the Clipper's going to do this year? We're going to win a lot of games.
Starting point is 00:05:53 That's a forecast. Go flip! Every week. Final question. S.E. Cup, do you regret your right-in vote? for Paul Ryan in 2016. Ooh. Um...
Starting point is 00:06:09 Oh. Tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick. Dick, tick. I don't regret not voting for my party's nominee. I don't regret that. And I'm challenged on that all the time. And yeah, of course.
Starting point is 00:06:27 Um, but I don't regret that with every day I am proven, I think, right in that vote for me. It was not for me. But it didn't really help. No, it did. But it was for me. There's only two parties, only two people running. It seems like...
Starting point is 00:06:45 I couldn't vote for either, but I can tell my son in 20 years that I didn't vote for either of these people. Oh, yeah. Hillary was going to be anywhere near as bad as Trump was? Well, I can't forecast. But she was a terrible, terrible candidate. Candidate, yes. Not president.
Starting point is 00:07:01 Would she have been a terrible president? She would have been a great president. Based on past... Close to how terrible Trump is? Well, that's a high bar. Okay. But mature people make assessments, and one thing is always better than the other.
Starting point is 00:07:15 Isn't it your responsibility to pick that out, hold your nose, and do the right thing? I did not think one thing was better than the other. Do you now? Not sure. Really? You've seen Trump for almost two years, and you think Hillary could have possibly been this bad?
Starting point is 00:07:31 In different ways? Yeah, I think she could have. Like what ways? Like, what would she have done? That would be the magnitude of... Relax. I didn't vote for either of us. I know, and that's the problem. You're right, I'm the problem.
Starting point is 00:07:44 No, no. My vote was the problem. Part of it. Part of it. Hey, you know what? When I voted for Nader, I copped to it. I said, I was wrong. You believed that.
Starting point is 00:07:52 I don't believe I was. Sorry. Okay. No, I'm just asking you, what would Hillary... What could Hillary have possibly done that would be as bad as Trump has been? I think that she's... deceptive and unaccountable in ways that people don't completely acknowledge.
Starting point is 00:08:09 Don't completely... No, we have that now. It's awful. But not really as deceptive. Okay, I mean, you can judge. As the person who is told 5,000 lies. I don't regret not voting for Hillary Crum. Okay. To answer that question. Not a bit. You have stood up to my withering category five question.
Starting point is 00:08:25 Thank you, everybody. It's time. Catch all new episodes of Real Time with Bill Maher every Friday night at 10. Or watch them anytime on HBO on demand. For more information, log on to HBO.com.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.