Real Time with Bill Maher - Overtime – Episode #638: Andrew Cuomo, Scott Galloway, Melissa DeRosa

Episode Date: October 28, 2023

Bill Maher and his guests answer viewer questions after the show. (Originally aired 10/27/23) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices...

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 It's something else here now. Something new. From exclusively on Paramount Plus. It's the series Stephen King calls Scary as Hell. Everything here is impossible, but it's also real. Sci-fi vision calls it the best show streaming right now. We're running out of time and we still don't know the rules. Don't miss what the movie blog calls something you need to watch.
Starting point is 00:00:22 Saving those children is how we all go home. From binge all episodes exclusively on Paramount Plus. Welcome to an HBO podcast from the HBO late-month series, Real Time with Bill Maher. Okay, welcome over time. We have Professor of Marketing at NYU's Strum School of Business. Scott Galloway, former Governor Andrew Cuomo's top aide, Melissa DeRosa, former governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo. Okay, first question is for you.
Starting point is 00:00:52 Is Trump right to think that the cases that Alvin Bragg and Tish James brought against him are politically... Okay, well, there's a reversal. Right, because the same people, right. Alvin Bragg, that's the one about the touch money to Stormy Daniels, right? And Tish James is the one about his business dealings. Apparently, he's a crook. Is Trump right to think those cases are politically motivated? First, Trump is never right in my book. Just as to start this off. Was there ever a time when you were friends? I mean, he goes way back and he was. He goes way back. We're both from Queens, New York. Our families knew each other.
Starting point is 00:01:39 I dealt with him extensively through COVID, literally on a daily basis. No, we were never friends. Okay. What is interesting about the question is there was actually a poll. Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan District Attorney, brought the first case against Trump. This is before Mara Lago before January 6th, which were, in my opinion, frankly, more serious cases. they did a poll after Alvin Bragg brought the case, 76% of Americans said it was politically influenced.
Starting point is 00:02:13 76%. 76% of Americans don't agree on the color of the flag, right? But 76% said it was politically influenced. And I think that is telling, Bill, because if we don't trust government, we don't trust the media, et cetera, if this country believes that the justice system itself is then politically tainted, then we have real trouble. Because then you're on the precipice of anarchy.
Starting point is 00:02:42 But that's what I found telling about that. It was more the public opinion was so high that politics is influencing the justice system. And, I mean, Trump is the kind of guy. The more he goes to jail, the more popular he becomes. It's like street credit. He's like a rapper. But it's true.
Starting point is 00:03:00 True. It's absolutely true. And also, I never thought they should have brought the Stormy Daniels one. And the fact that there's four, one, it just, to the people who don't follow it closely, you know, they should have just had one, one, he's generally a piece of shit trial. About one omnibus piece of shit. D.P.O.S. Yeah. And the Stormy Daniels case, the Stormy Daniels case, it's like you're asking America to the,
Starting point is 00:03:30 and think of this former porn star as a hero. And Michael Cohen, who's a known liar and fixer as a hero. And it was really a books and records case that was upcharged to beat the statute of limitation. So, yeah, it made it really easy to roll your eyes on the other ones that were more serious. The fear is that hush money or inflating your assets, it does reduce the veracity of much more serious crimes, including nuclear secrets and trying to overturn the peaceful transfer of power. I think it was just a tactical error to go after the first two. Okay.
Starting point is 00:03:58 Yeah. Melissa, is there a way to make politics less about personal vendettas and more about governing? Yeah, again, that's what I said at the beginning. I see why you two are pissed because, like, I mean, Democrats at their best, I think, are wanks. And I mean that as a great compliment. It's the one thing that Republicans, you don't usually find Republican wanks. They're Reagan. Give me it on one page.
Starting point is 00:04:22 Bush, give me it on one page. You know, they're one-pagers. And government is complicated. And I know you two put in the time. Government is complicated, and sometimes it requires sharp elbows, and sometimes it requires you'd have to be tough in order to be effective. But the thing I find so funny about it is the reaction to my book, some of it is people saying, oh, this is, you know,
Starting point is 00:04:44 she wants to go out and attack people that attacked them. And I'm like, okay, well, there was a point when you were comparing me to Hitler's enabler, but now we're like, whoa, whoa, whoa, don't criticize anybody. Don't, you know, don't call this out. And really what I find interesting is nobody wants to talk about the facts of what happened. Because when you look at the facts of what happened, it's so damning. So it's easy to make it about personalities and about vendettas and about everything else. Well, I feel like those things carry the day.
Starting point is 00:05:08 To answer that question, I asked you at the beginning, you know, why would a liberal state with a liberal paper go after a liberal governor? Because I'm sorry to make it all about generations, but a lot of the younger generation who was raised on the phone, which makes you shady and passive aggressive, and mean and fake. I'm sorry, it just does. I don't think,
Starting point is 00:05:28 you think they care about policy, first and foremost? I don't. I think they take glee in this kind of shit. They like taking, especially that nest of vipers, that's Albany. Yeah, no, they love it.
Starting point is 00:05:38 It's sport. It's sports. It's like, he's on my same team. That's, who gives a shit? Who's team? You know what? I'm on my team. Now, again, I don't know what happened
Starting point is 00:05:49 and I don't know who's at fault. But, And now there's two sides. Okay. Scott, how can we prevent China from using AI to sow chaos and disrupt our elections? Well, we can't. It's too late. You're about to see an AI misinformation lalapalooza in Q1 and Q2 as Putin recognizes the fastest blue line path between him and victory in Ukraine is the re-election of Donald Trump.
Starting point is 00:06:22 So if you're spending $70 billion and 100,000 lives a year fighting a losing war in Ukraine, wouldn't you be stupid not to spend $5 or $10 billion on Albanian troll farms, AB-tested information, and then an amoral management team in social media who will feel really bad about the misinformation the day after the election when all the checks have cleared? We are about to see the weaponization of media platforms that have no fidelity to the Commonwealth and the GRU and AI deposition Biden and Harris. We're going to see the first real externality of this of AI and Q1 and Q2 of next year in terms of misinformation around the election.
Starting point is 00:07:03 But OZMPIC still more important. I still don't have the answer to that question. Governor Cuomo, knowing what you know now, is there anything you would have changed about the way you had administration handled COVID. Okay, that's the question we didn't get to. And I was going to read you the pro-Publica statement, which they basically said New York was the only state. Now, of course, the scandal, the issue involved,
Starting point is 00:07:31 that people don't remember, is that, you know, obviously this is at the beginning of the pandemic. Everything was chaotic. We didn't know what was going on. But we did know this. It mostly affected the elderly people, like most pathogens do. They were the most vulnerable.
Starting point is 00:07:47 So you allowed people who had been in the hospital, older people, from a nursing home, now they go to the hospital, to go back into the nursing home without testing them. That, ProPublica says you were the only state to do it without testing them when they went back into the nursing home. And that's what caused such death in the nursing home. Is that true? No. Short answer is no. Also, remember, you say, what we knew. first this is Monday morning quarterbacking by which I could make the New York Jets champion right if we could do this
Starting point is 00:08:18 the when COVID started it was all the disinformation was amazing right it was coming from China wet markets autropic virus it was going to California and state of Washington so we banned travel to China from China it turned out that China had already spread it to Europe. All the European flights were coming to New York, JFK. So it had been here for months, and it was astronomical. When we first found that about it, and Scott can appreciate this, they were projecting we would need 150,000 hospital beds to deal with the number of infected. We only had 50,000 in the entire state of New York. So we were- You did it to free up bed. We were afraid of losing hospital beds, but people who were
Starting point is 00:09:12 were in hospitals, who were considered medically stable, who were tested, were sent to nursing homes if the nursing home said they could treat that person in a way that protects the other people in the nursing home. And that was a way to make sure we had a... But it didn't, did it? I mean, they also, I mean, the same organization, Probublica says, you counted the number who died differently. In other words, you only counted the ones who died in the nursing home, whereas many people came from the nursing home and died in the hospital, and you didn't count those. You only counted if they died in the nursing home, which they felt was deliberate. Well, let me not get weedsy with you. We got, every day I did a briefing, and every
Starting point is 00:09:55 day we collected information from hospitals and from nursing homes, and we printed two numbers on the screen every day. This is a number of people who died in the hospital, this is the number of people who died in a nursing home, which means you had to go back every day to 1,000 hospitals, nursing homes to collect this data. and this is how many died in the hospital, does how many died in a nursing home? They then raised the question and said, well, how many died in a hospital
Starting point is 00:10:19 who were originally in a nursing home before they went to the hospital? That's a different question. And that actually took the state controller a year to figure out and go back and do the audit. But we said, there's how many died in a nursing home, there's how many died in a hospital,
Starting point is 00:10:41 different question, how many died in hospitals who were originally in nursing homes, you then have to go back in forensic. So you wouldn't do anything differently? I mean, is it fair? I would run that number now, which nobody asked me for until months later. But it would have been, you know,
Starting point is 00:11:03 this is in the middle of COVID, and you're asking all these people to do accounting. But if that's a number that people would have wound up wanting, which they didn't say for months, bill, I would have put that number up front in the beginning. People died in a lot of nursing homes simply because the people who take care of the people in the nursing homes are poor. And the poor people get COVID.
Starting point is 00:11:24 And it goes back to incentives. We have social media algorithms that get more engagement and more Nissan ads. If they call out people and really make them look as stupid and as mean as possible. I was on the board of my kids' school during COVID. I wanted a harsher lockdown policy. And in retrospect, I was wrong. The damage to kids of keeping them out of school longer was greater than the risk. But here's the bottom line.
Starting point is 00:11:49 Myself are great people to CDC. I'd like to think the governor. We were all operating with imperfect information and we were doing our best. So let's learn from it. Let's learn from it. Let's learn from it. Let's hold each other accountable. But let's bring a little bit of grace and forgiveness in the
Starting point is 00:12:13 The shit show the West COVID. Yeah. But other states didn't do it differently. Yeah. I mean, I read Florida asked for two negative COVID tests before you can get back into the North Carolina. Look,
Starting point is 00:12:27 if you want to, first on Scott's point, he's exactly right. All the early information was wrong, as a matter of fact. A lot of it now. Not just from President Trump. Dr. Fauci, who I have great respect for, early on, said this is not going to be a problem.
Starting point is 00:12:41 They said it was, you could con. contracted from touching a surface. We sprayed all the subways. I remember washing the mail. And we had, yeah, I still do, by the way. But we had no idea how infection it was for seniors versus children early on. We had no idea. We didn't know if it was airborne, if it was by touch. So this is, when I say it's all hindsight now, now you know. And the way, Scott's exactly right. You know how we got into the nursing homes? It got in months before we
Starting point is 00:13:16 knew it was here. The staff walked it into the nursing. I said the poor people. That's a lot of what it is. And also, I mean, it's a war. In war, people die and generals, it's not like they're trying to kill them. But generals have to make decisions.
Starting point is 00:13:34 Not all decisions are the right decisions. You don't know until after. And to that point, I mean, when you ask the question, would you do things differently? I would do everything different. Literally, everything. There's nothing. I agree. I never understand these people that interviews when they go, do you have any regrets
Starting point is 00:13:48 in life? No, I don't. Like, what? And that's why we have to tell the story and we have to understand it because there will be another pandemic and we've got to learn from this one so we do it better the next time. All right. This is this is the last one. This is for our
Starting point is 00:14:05 two New Yorkers here. What do you New Yorkers think of how Mayor Eric Adams and Governor Kathy Hokel? Yes, yes, he pronounced it right. I take it you're a big fan. Have handled the city's migrant crisis. I saw today they're offering any of these migrants.
Starting point is 00:14:27 This sounds like a game show. A plane trip to anywhere in the world. There's policy. You don't have to go home, but you can't stay here. You know, Ed Koch started that in the 80s to help solve the homeless crisis in New York City. He was giving out one-way bus tickets to the homeless population. This is not new.
Starting point is 00:14:47 See, California is what they did. They did, really. We did. It's true. So what do you think about how they handled the migrant crisis? You know, I just want to say something in defense of Mayor Adams. Immigration, this migrant crisis, is by definition a federal crisis. It is.
Starting point is 00:15:06 This happened because of decisions made by the Biden administration, and they basically made them unilaterally, and then they didn't manage any of it. And so people started showing up. The governor's not stepping in. The president's not stepping in. And so Eric Adams is doing everything he can to try to manage this influx of people, the likes of which we haven't seen since World War II in New York City. He doesn't have the money to do it. He doesn't have the human resources to do it.
Starting point is 00:15:29 Or the space. The space. New York's crowded to begin with. Yeah. And then it's like we have to turn around and say, thank you because the president's offering to let us lease Floyd Bennett field where we can put people. It's like, what? You caused this problem.
Starting point is 00:15:42 And we're supposed to say thank you because you're freeing up a field for us to build migrant beds. It's the craziest thing in the world. So, I mean, my heart goes out to Eric Adams because he really was put in a terrible position and nobody else is definitely. But didn't some of these places sort of deserve it? I'll ask you this. By saying, we're a sanctuary city, like how these terrible racist border states. And then when they called their bluff and sent the migrants to them, they were like, suddenly they weren't quite. quite so liberal.
Starting point is 00:16:13 They're what I call liberal in theory people. A lot of people are liberal in theory. And when the migrants arrived, they were like, oh, what the fuck? That's a... Sanctuary City was used during Trump when we were talking about illegals.
Starting point is 00:16:33 New York City said it was a sanctuary city. New York State said it was a sanctuary state many other cities did also. This is nothing to do with sanctuary. These people are here legally. That's what we want to forget. They're asylum seekers. They are here legally under the law.
Starting point is 00:16:47 So it's not about sanctuary. But for the federal government to abrogate its responsibility where we get to a point where the Texas governor is really deciding where migrants go. We'll send this to LA. We'll send this. New York City winds up with $130,000.
Starting point is 00:17:04 And there's no federal oversight or management. And you give it to the one level of local government that is least able to deal with it, which is a city administration, and then the state says, you know, you're on your own. It's crazy. That's why I'm for Dean Phillips for president. All right. Thank you, everybody. Appreciate it. Watch all new episodes of Real Time with Bill Maher every Friday night at 10 or watch them anytime on
Starting point is 00:17:31 HBO on demand. For more information, log on to HBO.com.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.