Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - Ep 954 | ‘Disease X’ & the End of American Sovereignty
Episode Date: February 20, 2024Today we're talking about the mysterious "Disease X," a hypothetical future pandemic that is projected by "experts" to be 20 times worse than COVID. We explain how the concept of Disease X was born an...d what the World Health Organization and its director general, Tedros Ghebreyesus, have to do with it. We look at the many warnings from these "experts" claiming that Disease X is a matter of "when, not if" and that the proposed treaty they are attempting to get passed is definitely, absolutely not a ploy for power and control. We take a look at the WHO's history of terrible "guidance" during COVID and explain why we should be skeptical of any organization and treaty calling to prioritize "equity." We explain China's role in this and why it matters whom we elect when it comes to potential disasters like this. --- Timecodes: (00:50) Introduction & thoughts on filters (10:05) Disease X origins (13:25) Tedros Ghebreyesus & warnings (22:00) The truth about the WHO (30:35) Pandemic treaty issues (39:36) China's role in this (44:00) Disease X bill / commentary (52:30) Encouragement --- Today's Sponsors: Carly Jean Los Angeles — use promo code RELATABLE25 for $25 off an order of $125 or more, or RELATABLE50 for $50 off an order of $200 or more at CarlyJeanLosAngeles.com! My Patriot Supply — prepare yourself for anything with long-term emergency food storage. Get your new, lower-price 4-Week Emergency Food Kit at PrepareWithAllie.com. Jase Medical — get up to a year’s worth of many of your prescription medications delivered in advance. Go to JaseMedical.com today and use promo code “ALLIE". Good Ranchers — claim over $900 in free bacon before the leap year sale ends! Go to GoodRanchers.com and use code 'ALLIE' when you subscribe. --- Links: Daily Mail: "Experts reveal which virus is most likely to cause the next pandemic - and where it will come from" https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12749605/Experts-reveal-virus-likely-cause-pandemic-come-from.html New York Post: "Chinese lab crafts mutant COVID strain with 100% kill rate in ‘humanized’ mice: ‘Surprisingly’ rapid death" https://nypost.com/2024/01/16/news/covid-19-strain-kills-100-of-infected-mice-in-chinese-lab-study/ --- Relevant Episodes: Ep 953 | Andrew Tate Is Wrong About Marriage | Guest: Dr. Brad Wilcox https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-953-andrew-tate-is-wrong-about-marriage-guest-dr/id1359249098?i=1000645909138 Ep 940 | WEF vs. the West: The Latest in Davos’ Global Takeover | Guest: Justin Haskins https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-940-wef-vs-the-west-the-latest-in-davos/id1359249098?i=1000642956352 Ep 239 | Who Is WHO? https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-239-who-is-who/id1359249098?i=1000471761238 Ep 566 | The Data Is In: Mask & Vaccine Mandates Don't Work | Guest: Ian Miller https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-566-the-data-is-in-mask-vaccine-mandates-dont-work/id1359249098?i=1000551427637 --- Buy Allie's book, You're Not Enough (& That's Okay): Escaping the Toxic Culture of Self-Love: https://alliebethstuckey.com/book Relatable merchandise – use promo code 'ALLIE10' for a discount: https://shop.blazemedia.com/collections/allie-stuckey
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hey, this is Steve Day.
If you're listening to Allie, you already understand that the biggest issues facing our country
aren't just political.
They're moral, spiritual, and rooted in what we believe is true about God, humanity, and reality
itself.
On the Steve Day show, we take the news of the day and tested against first principles,
faith, truth, and objective reality.
We don't just chase narratives and we don't offer false comfort.
We ask the hard questions and follow the answers wherever they leave, even when it's unpopular.
This is a show for people who want honesty over hype and clarity over chaos.
If you're looking for commentary grounded in conviction and unwilling to lie to you about where we are or where we're headed, you can watch this D-Day show right here on Blaze TV or listen wherever you get podcasts.
I hope you'll join us.
The WHO is a warning about disease X and they're urging countries to sign a pandemic treaty.
Well, what is disease X and what exactly is in this treaty?
We will be discussing that and much more today.
This episode is brought to you by our friends at Good Ranchers.
They've got an awesome deal right now.
They've got a special on free bacon if you order and subscribe today.
So go to Good Ranchers.com.
Use Code Alley.
Check out that's good ranchers.com code alley.
Hey guys, welcome to relatable.
Happy Tuesday.
Hope everyone is having a wonderful week so far.
If you haven't listened to yesterday's episode about why marriage is awesome,
not just for individuals, but also for society in general.
Then go listen to that.
All the Red Pill Bros.
And Andrew Tate and all the naysayers about marriage on Twitter are all wrong.
They're wrong.
And Christian marriage in particular stands apart.
It stands apart from the rest of the marriage statistics and the doom and gloom stories that you hear about marriage.
Christian marriage is where it's at.
Christian marriage offers not just the utmost stability.
for the people involved, but also for nations as a whole.
So listen to that, lots of statistics, lots of insight from a UVA professor on yesterday's episode.
All right, a few things before we get started and talking about disease X.
An announcement, we've got a restock on Alleymerch.com, y'all's favorite t-shirts ever are back in stock.
We've got our do the next right thing and faith with excellence and for the glory of God.
We've got lots of cute colors on that, even Related Bro friendly colors.
We've also got our raise a respectful ruckus shirts that are back in action for y'all.
And I love these shirts.
I wear these shirts all the time and my sweatshirt with Do the Next Right Thing on there as well.
So go to Alliemerch.com and you can check those out there now restocked just for you.
And a couple other things.
I just wanted to touch on. Sometimes I like to reiterate something that I talked about on
Instagram because you guys had such a reaction and a response to it that I just want to reiterate
it on the show and then we can just discuss it on Instagram. We can discuss it in the comments
of YouTube. But a couple observations, just random. They don't go together at all. They don't have
anything to do with the rest of what we're talking about today. But because I've just been thinking
about them. I wanted to put it out there and see if I was the only one. And no, I'm not talking about
the grease stains that I talked about on Instagram. A lot of you guys did relate to that about how I just
get these like random spots on my clothes that look like they're water spots, but they're not water
spots. There are some kind of grease or something. And I don't know what causes them. There's a lot of
different theories out there. I don't use fabric softener. I don't use liquid detergent. So that was
some, that was one theory, but I did use some dondish soap and some dissolve it and some
oxyclean and I'm going to see what works best. But that's not what I'm talking about. But those are
some solutions if you guys are struggling with the same thing. We've got a lot of laundry woes in
the relatable family. The thing I was going to say, one, here's one message to those of you, and this is
in particular women and maybe some influencers on here who are using Instagram and you use filters on
your face or on your videos. So there are some filters out there that just change the color or whatever.
And I think that's fine. I'm not really talking about those. I'm talking about the filters on
Instagram, maybe on Snapchat too. I don't know. I'm not on Snapchat. Maybe on TikTok. I'm not on
TikTok. That change the shape of your face. So if you don't know, there are filters out there that
that change like what your mouth looks like. It basically like erases your nose. I don't know if you guys
have noticed that, but filters on Instagram basically make it look like the person talking doesn't
have a nose. It changes their eyebrows and their eye shape. It makes their face thinner. And I really
think that some people who use these filters, they get addicted to it. They get addicted to what they
look like with that filter. And it makes them really embarrassed of what their image actually
looks like in real life. And you know, there was a time when these filters were new where I was
using some of those filters and I thought it was cool and it makes you look so pretty. But then,
you get discombobulated when you see yourself in the mirror or when the filter goes away and you're like,
oh.
Okay, here's my challenge to all of us.
Let's be filter free in 2024.
Maybe filler free too, but that's a whole different story.
Filter free in 2024 because here's the thing.
There is nothing good about those kinds of filters that change what your face actually looks like.
Because really, you're lying.
You're lying not just to other people.
people about how you look. I mean, who wants to be seen in person? And then the reaction is,
oh, wow, you look totally different than the person that I saw on Instagram. But also,
you're lying to yourself. And I think this is the bigger issue. And this is something,
I'm saying this is someone who went through this myself, okay, a few years ago,
realizing that I was disappointed when I looked in the mirror because I didn't look how I looked
with those filters. It does nothing to help foster the contentment.
that we're called to as Christians and the gratitude that we are called to as Christians.
And I think it makes us very discontent, very dissatisfied, and probably can pave the path for
eventually injecting things in our face and spending a lot of money trying to reverse the aging
process when in reality scripture tells us that aging is a blessing. And look, I know it's difficult
being someone who is in front of the camera all the time and who I follow a lot of, you know,
beautiful commentators, people in the news and things like that. And it's so easy to compare yourself.
I just turned 32 over the weekend. And I am certainly seeing lines on my face that I didn't see when I was 25 or even 28.
And it is so tempting to want to erase those things or to try to, you know, I don't know, inject something in your face.
However, Botox and fillers work to make yourself look different than you are.
And I think filters, even though they're not permanent and they don't last as long, they kind of serve the same function as trying to erase the natural process of aging.
And I just think that all of us probably need to check our hearts a little bit.
And to one, examine our motives behind those things, but also just ensure that we are doing everything that we can to foster contentment.
I'm not against taking care of ourselves using sunscreen and using skincare that works.
well for us. But I do just get worried and maybe it's because I'm a mom of daughters now
and I just worry so much about them entering into this world in which what you actually
look like is never good enough and what it does to a person's heart and mind and soul.
I worry about that. Not just individually when it comes to myself or my friends or my kids,
but also what it does to an entire generation, like what it does to a nation.
And I know maybe you're thinking I'm thinking too much about that, but that's part of why I have
this podcast.
I think too much about things and then I talk about them.
So that's my challenge.
Let's do no filter 2024.
That's what I am trying to do.
That is what I am doing.
And that's what I encourage you to do too.
And let us foster contentment and gratitude about the face that God has given us.
Okay, that's one little thought.
Hey, this is Steve Day.
If you're listening to Allie, you already understand that the biggest issues facing our country aren't just political.
They're moral, spiritual, and rooted in what we believe is true about God, humanity, and reality itself.
On the Steve Day show, we take the news of the day and tested against first principles, faith, truth, and objective reality.
We don't just chase narratives and we don't offer false comfort.
We ask the hard questions and follow the answers wherever they leave, even when it's unpopular.
This is a show for people who want honesty over hype and clarity over chaos.
If you're looking for commentary grounded in conviction and unwilling to lie to you about where we are or where we're headed, you can watch this D-Day show right here on Blaze TV or listen wherever you get podcasts.
I hope you'll join us.
Okay, never mind.
I don't have time to share the other thought that I shared on Instagram about like about privacy and having to basically sign over our privacy when we participate in society.
I'll save that for another day.
Maybe I'll save that for Thursday.
We really just have to get into the main subject of today's episode, which is disease X.
This is a subject that you guys have been asking me to talk about for a long time now.
And honestly, I've been hesitant to do so just because it's such a big topic.
There are so many different aspects of it.
And I want to make sure that I cover it as accurately as I possibly can.
And we probably won't get into every nook and cranny today.
There will probably be things that if you've been studying this or looking at this,
reading about this for a while, you'll wonder,
Wait, why didn't she talk about that? Why didn't she go down that trail? And it's probably just because
I didn't have time or I just didn't have the capacity to put that all together in a research
document. So I'm going to do the best that I can to give you an overview of what disease X is.
And if you haven't heard of it, you are about to have at least a really good basic understanding
of what I'm talking about and why we need to care about it. The last thing that I want to do is
make us paranoid, but we do want to be prepared, right? So not paranoid, but prepared. And in order
to be prepared and to make sure that our family is taking care of the best way that we can,
these people that God has given us to steward and protect, we have to know what's going on.
We have to know what's being talked about at places like the WHO. Now, the WHO, the World Health
Organization, pre-2020, most people never thought about the WHO. We didn't care who was the head of the
WHO. We didn't care what was going on there. Maybe we should have. But on,
honestly, we only have the capacity to care about so much. And usually that's the stuff right in front
of us. We don't have the time or the energy to think about what's going on at the UN. What's going on?
The WHO. But now COVID has taught us that we have to actually care about that. And the things that they say
will eventually come to fulfillment unless the people who have now woken up do something about it.
So that's why we have to know what disease acts is all about. So the World Health Organization,
first use the term disease acts in 2018 to warn countries about the danger of unknown viruses
and urge them to prepare for potential future pandemics. It was discussed at, again, at the
January 2024 World Economic Forum meetings in Davos. If you haven't listened to my episode
with Justin Haskins about that, you should go and listen to it, really all my episodes with him,
but particularly this last one, to hear about what was actually discussed at the
WEF this year. So it was discussed in January and experts were warning that a future unknown disease
could be 20 times more fatal than COVID-19, which is pretty significant. I mean, even if you're
looking at the most conservative numbers, that there was like a 0.1% fatality when it came to
COVID 20 times. That is still significant. There was a session titled preparing for disease
ex-ed Davos this year. It included the director of the World Health Organization, which people
typically, they just refer to him as Tedros. He's the director general, and he is from Ethiopia.
Now, just to pause, I did this episode back in 2020. I did a deep dive into Tedros, and he is a very
corrupt figure himself when he was the leader of healthcare. I forget the specific title. I forget the
specific title of what he was in Ethiopia, I guess like the, what would be here, like the head of
our HHS, he covered up a cholera outbreak there. And he didn't prepare for a well-known disease
in Ethiopia. And he probably cost thousands of lives because of his lack of preparedness and
corruption. Of course, when you are on the left and you're a part of this kind of regime,
you fail upwards, just like Fauci did. You get rewarded.
for your failure if you're willing to do the things that corrupt entities want you to do. And so
he's the head of the WHO. While he was the head of the WHO back in 2017, he tried to tap a Zimbabwe
dictator, murderous dictator, Marxist dictator, Robert Mugabe as the Goodwill ambassador. And that
caused such a stir. People were so mad about that. He got so much backlash because, I mean, it was
too obvious. Okay, you are going to tap another corrupt African leader who was responsible for
thousands and thousands of murders and the complete destruction of the Zimbabwe economy and their
healthcare system. You're going to tap that guy to be in a leadership position in the WHO. And so
that actually ended up falling through. Thankfully, but Tedros is not a good guy. And this is who we have
at the helm.
That means, though, that we really need to listen up when he is warning about things, when he's
talking about things, because unfortunately, to our great dismay, that will probably
come into fruition.
So he emphasized at the government summit in Dubai last week that it is a matter of if not
when our world faces another pandemic.
As WHO emphasizes the inevitable danger of disease acts, they are also pushing for countries
to sign their pandemic.
Parenthoodness Treaty. And this is what a lot of people have been warning about for several
months, which critics believe is a push for the WHO to have centralized power over critical
controversial issues like quote unquote misinformation in the international supply chain.
Quite frightening. This is, this was really the focus. This misinformation piece,
so-called was really the focus of Davos this year and how the powers that be can try to
clamp down on what they call misinformation, which of,
of course, is just opinions that progressives don't like. It's just facts that progressives
don't like. It is counter narratives to the official approved narrative of people like George Soros
at all. So disease X was trending over the weekend. At the world government summit in Dubai,
the World Health Organization told global leaders that a new pathogen and pandemic will strike
sometime soon. Just a reminder also that Tedros is not a medical doctor. He's not a medical
doctor, but he used the opportunity to emphasize the need for a global pandemic treaty and to
dismiss suspicions, suspicions of it being a WHO power grab. So here he is saying that in Dubai.
History teaches us that the next pandemic is a matter of when, not if. It may be caused by an influenza
a virus or a new coronavirus or it may be caused by a new pathogen we don't even know about yet
or what we call disease X.
Okay, so that's frightening.
He says although some progress has been made like improvements in surveillance,
improvements in surveillance, hmm, the pandemic fund, building capacities in vaccine production,
the world is not prepared for a pandemic.
The painful lessons we learned are in danger of being forgotten as attention turns to the many other crises confronting
our world. We will pay dearly next time and there will be a next time. He said in preparation for the next
outbreak that they have to sign a treaty. So the nations have to come together. They have to sign this
international agreement on pandemic preparedness. This is what people are very concerned about.
with just 15 weeks left on the timeline that was agreed upon in 2021.
Of course, this is happening in an election year.
Tedro said that the treaty, which the Biden administration, has been involved in negotiating,
is a set of commitments by countries to strengthen the world's defense with a one health approach.
So they're not quite on the nose saying one world government,
because they know that's the center of many conspiracies, a one health approach.
And I know our friend Justin Haskins, who knows more about the WHO and the W.H.O.
And the W.E.F. and the U.N. than probably anyone else out there.
He tells us that this is not, they're not pushing communism, which of course is true.
But it is still this kind of collectivist mentality, this kind of progressive Marxist idea that there is no real thing as human nature and innate differences.
and different kinds of people that if the right people take power,
then they can put everyone under one regulation in one set of rules.
This is also the ideal behind borderlessness.
We can just mush everyone together.
These oligarchs on top can just take control,
distribute power and resources at rights as they see fit
and everything will be fine.
That's true whether it comes to one world,
bank or whether it is talking about one health. The fact of the matter is is that the world
is extremely diverse in a lot of ways. There is such thing as human nature. People groups are
different. Cultures are different. Not every different kind of person can mush together.
Borders exist for our protection. Languages exist for distinctive reasons and trying to mush everyone
together and put them under one regime is a recipe for absolute and total evil disaster and has a very,
I'd say, in-timesy feel.
But he said, look, we need this treaty.
It's going to absolutely keep people safe, that we need a consensus from all of these governments,
that they're going to do everything that they need to be prepared for this next pandemic.
So he said, here are some reasons why it hasn't been signed yet.
And time is of the essence, he's saying.
He says, nations have some differences.
However, he was confident that they could be worked through.
Number two, the second major barrier is the litany of lies and conspiracy theories about the agreement.
Of course, people talking about their concerns with are lots of sovereignty as a nation.
And that's what critics are saying.
They're just fearmongers.
They're just liars and conspiracy theorists.
He said that it's a power grab by the WHO, that it was.
will seed sovereignty to the WHO, that it will give WHO the power to impose lockdowns or vaccine
mandates on countries, that it's an attack on freedom. The WHO will not allow people to travel,
and the WHO wants to control people's lives. These are the lies that are being spread.
If they weren't so dangerous, these lies would be funny. But they put the health of the people
at risk, and that is no laughing matter. Let me be clear. The WHO did not impose anything on anyone
during the COVID-19 pandemic, not lockdowns, not masks,
mandates, not vaccine mandates. We don't have the power to do that. We don't want it.
And we are not trying to get it. Now, I hope that that is true. I hope that it is not raw
being in America or any country of its sovereignty. I hope that it is not given itself the power
to impose these kinds of lockdowns. But that's certainly what critics believe is exactly
what's going to happen.
So we're going to talk about why people are afraid of that.
So here's the deal.
While the WHO doesn't technically have authority right now
to impose lockdowns on countries,
they can't legally come in as it is
and arrest people for not wearing a mask.
However, they were seen as the authority during the pandemic,
during the height of COVID.
Dr. Fauci, Dr. Birx, really the entirety of the administrative state, even local officials,
commentators would all cite the WHO as the reason for imposing or advocating for imposing
vaccine mandates and lockdowns and mask mandates. And really, even I would say the WHO was more
if conservative, if you want to use that word, or less stringent when it came to mask,
mask mandates and vaccine mandates than a lot of the Democrats were here.
I mean, they didn't recommend masking.
I think it was kids under 10, the WHO.
And yet Democrats here, of course, said, well, if you're two years old, you can't
even fly without wearing a mask.
A child abuse.
Child abuse is insane.
But the WHO and their suggestions absolutely played a huge role in implementing the policies here in the United States and elsewhere that robbed people of their freedom, of their rights and of their livelihoods.
Absolutely.
In March 7th, 2020, the WHO said that we should use China as a model.
Now, remember, China was locking people in their homes.
People were starving to death in China because they literally had their doors welded shut by.
the dictatorial regime in China. And of course, mask mandates and all of that. Now, they flip-flopped a lot
the WHO did on masks. They first said there's no evidence that wearing a mask will help. And you heard
Dr. Fauci saying that. And then in June of 2020, and I remember this switch. I really do. I remember we
went on vacation to Florida. And I saw a few people wearing a mask inside. And at that point, people
weren't wearing masks. This was June of 2020. We got to.
at home and all these celebrities and all these commentators were saying, oh, if you're not wearing a
mask, you're killing Grandma. I remember that switch. I remember March of 2020, Fauci giving that
interview saying, ah, mask isn't going to help and rolling his eyes at it. And then June of 2020,
it was like, if you don't wear a mask, you are basically Ted Bundy. The WHO has updated its
guidance. They said to advise that to prevent COVID-19 transmission effectively in areas of
community transmission, governments should encourage the general public to wear masks.
The guidance for religious leaders on avoiding large group gatherings, the WHO encouraged churches
to not meet as they typically did.
Sermons and messages can build on factual information provided by the WHO.
So they encourage religious leaders if they were giving sermons to make sure that they
are repeating the lines given to them by the WHO, which is just very, very frightening when you
think about it. They gave guidance to schools. They did say children under five should not be
required to wear a mask. Children six through 11, though, said that they should. Again, we had
absolutely no data whatsoever to support this idea of mask mandates in schools, really of mask
mandates in general, but specifically for children that led to a loss of learning and development
and social skills and a rise in anxiety and paranoia. We had lots and lots of
research showing us that for these influenza type and respiratory illness type diseases,
sicknesses, that these masks were not helpful at all and could actually be counterproductive.
I don't blog, but I wrote a whole blog post that put all of this information and all of these
peer-reviewed studies together from the past 20-plus years showing that masks really don't help.
And it was crazy.
It was like a religion for some people.
they looked to like the WHO as God.
So even though Tedros is technically right that they did not impose all of these regulations on these countries,
they absolutely knew that they held a position of authority and that local and national health officials would take their cues from the WHO and make their policy decisions based on that.
So we do have the WHO at least in part to blame.
when it comes to this, not to mention, not to mention that this outbreak shouldn't have happened
in the first place if the WHO had been doing its job.
If it wasn't so scared, if it hadn't been so scared of China, the UN and the WHO always
count out to China, this corrupt dictatorial communist regime, and refused to actually
research what went on and how this happened at the Wuhan Lab.
and if it actually originated in the Wuhan lab,
the whole lie that spread that it was from bat soup.
Oh my gosh, can you even believe that people believed that at one point?
That it was from bat soup.
The WHO helped fan the flames of that propaganda.
The WHO may have also covered up the beginnings of this outbreak,
which was probably toward the end of 2019,
when people started reporting this kind of pneumonia-like illness happening in certain areas of China.
And so that's why I actually brought up the corruption of Tedros that we've seen going back several years because it is very likely that he is still corrupt to this day and that he is also probably in bed with the Chinese Communist Party.
We know that the Chinese Communist Party also wants to see the demise of the West and wants to see the weakening of the U.S. dollar, wants to see.
the division of and the weakening of the United States in general wants to see a weaker American
economy and knows that the less that we rely on ourselves to supply the things that we need,
the more we'll rely on China. So I promise if the WHO takes over the supply chain for whatever
reason, that is going to benefit China. Really, the WEF in general, all these entities
are very supportive of China, which is interesting because they are one of the
greatest perpetrators of human rights abuses on earth. So that just shows you the priorities of
where everyone is. All right. So is it true? Is Tedros right? These are all just conspiracy theories
that you've been hearing about this treaty and that it's not really seeding sovereignty,
that we have nothing to worry about. It's just a one health approach. Anytime I hear one,
anything, again, I'm going to be very skeptical. Or are our,
the critics right? Are the people trying to sound the alarm about this? I've seen Michelle
Bachman, for example, give several interviews where she's been trying to sound the alarm about
what's going on. Well, let's see. Let's see what the treaty actually says. So conservative critics
here in the United States have said that the agreement does indeed seed sovereignty in some ways
to the WHO. And what that means is that if we sign this treaty, critics are saying that America will not
have the ability to be autonomous if a pandemic should come. We won't have the ability to make
our own laws based on the will of the people. Obviously, if we saw COVID last time, those
policies were also not made based on the will of the people, but this will be completely detached
from any kind of democratic support whatsoever. And it will just be dictated by the whims of the WHO.
Representative Tim Burchett, Republican from Tennessee, said at a May press conference last year that the World Health Organization pandemic treaty is very vague.
It affects our sovereignty and it could be exploited to tell Americans what kind of health care they need in the event of a global pandemic.
The nonprofit advocacy group founded by former Vice President Mike Pence, advancing American Freedom, published a letter blasting the WHO pandemic treaty while also questioning the United States' continued membership in the international.
body. You'll remember Trump's, Trump's position, which was to get out of the WHO and to no longer fund
the WHO, just a reminder that Bill Gates is an incredibly large funder of the WHO, which tells you
a lot. So here are the concerns that people have expressed when it comes to what the treaty
actually says. Number one, there's a focus on equity. There's another propagandist.
euphemism right there. So the AAF, that's that non-profit that was started by Mike Pence,
points out that the treaty ostensibly intended to save lives through an international
prioritization of the best medical practices emphasizes race and quote-unquote equity before
every other value in its general principles and approaches. What that means is that you would
deprioritize white people. We already actually saw that in the United States, a focus on equity,
which was ensuring that black and brown Americans got their vaccines before white Americans did.
So that, just to decode that for you, that's exactly what it means.
Okay, so here is what the treaty says.
Equity is at the center of pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, both at the national
level within states and at the international level between states.
It requires specific measures to protect persons in vulnerable situations, fair, equitable,
and timely access to safe, effective quality and affordable pandemic-related products and services.
The whole of Chapter 2 in the treaty is titled the World Together Equitably, Achieving Equity in
for and Through Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response.
Each party shall continue to strengthen its health system with a view to the progressive
realization of universal health coverage.
Okay.
So this is political.
This is a political position.
This is a progressive political position.
That's what they want.
That's what the left has always wanted.
And the left always finds a way to ran through their policy positions without the support of the people.
And yet they say they're the guardians of democracy.
Of course, the exact opposite is true.
Everything the accused Republicans of when it comes to tyranny and fascism and control and vying for power is actually true of progressives.
It's actually true of the Democratic Party.
It's always been true of progressives.
It's always been true of socialist and communists.
since the inception of their ideologies, they will find a way to push universal health care.
It looks like this treaty is a part of that.
And of course, equity, which again is the idea, it's based on this idea that black and brown people are all oppressed, that white people are all privileged.
And so in order to make sure that everyone ends up in the same place, you have to push back white people in a variety of ways economically when it comes to health care, when it comes to education, and you have to hoist up black and brown people. So everyone ends up in the same place. The problem is that's not it's not a true dichotomy. It starts on a false premise. Black and brown people are not automatically oppressed because of their skin color. And that is the actually, the
opposite of what real equity is. Equity, according to God's word, is treating everyone the same.
Showing no partiality. This form of progressive equity is showing partiality in order to try to get people
to show or to end up at the same place, which of course is possible. It's what Thomas Soul
calls cosmic justice. And it is wicked. So this is another concern. Here's another concern
that the AAF outlines when it comes to this treaty.
It threatens the freedom of expression under the guise of misinformation.
The AAF also warned about one article in the treaty specifically calling on signing nations
to combat false misleading misinformation or disinformation, including through effective
international collaboration and cooperation.
So this is what people are talking about when they say it loses, we're losing our
sovereignty.
It seems like it's a collaboration of progressive,
elites at a variety of countries coming together and deciding how they are going to trample upon the free speech rights of their people in the name of combating misinformation and saving lives.
I don't think I even have to explain to you what that looks like because we saw that so clearly during COVID.
I mean, people getting censored left and right for just suggesting what is actually true about COVID, about the death rate, about the policies that could actually mitigate disease and prevent death.
The parties shall strengthen science, public health, and pandemic literacy in the population.
I mean, this is so dystopian and so big brother, it is wild.
As well as access to information on pandemics and their effects in drivers and combat false misleading misinformation, disinformation,
through effective international collaboration.
We know what that means.
They use these euphemisms to try to make it sound palatable or innocuous.
And they're not.
We know what this is.
We know what this is.
All right.
another concern that the AAF has.
It says that the proposed treaty would also give the WHO control of international supply chains
in the event of another pandemic event intended to allow more efficient manipulation of resources under the guise of equity.
So this is from the treaty in partnership in collaboration with relevant international, regional, and other organizations to be guided by equity.
and public health needs paying particular attention to the needs of developing country party.
So again, that's what they mean by equity.
They're prioritizing who gets, I guess, the most resources based on what they consider a more
developed or a more developing country.
Now, I'm not saying that those countries don't need more help.
perhaps they do need more resources.
But the collaboration of a one health approach to distribute resources based on the
subjective whims of a corrupt organization that, again, is very interested in the rise to power,
the continued rise to power and prominence of the Chinese Communist Party and other evil actors,
I'm not so sure.
I'm not so sure.
I want to trust them with that distribution.
So more on disease acts, this has been reported on several times.
Just a few months ago, the Daily Mail was reporting on this, reporting on what some of the, quote, unquote, experts are saying that, again, this outbreak might be even worse.
And I just want to note one thing that they said, China is the most likely place the new avian virus would first appear.
He said, because the country often records cases of human with, human infection with avian.
influence it. And of course, we don't think that that's why there are all of these labs there,
not just in China, but doing very dangerous research, developing these kinds of diseases.
They say it's to, you know, be able to prepare us and to protect us in the future. But apparently,
as we saw with the Wuhan lab, the right protections and regulations are not in place. Now,
maybe you say that that's intentional. Maybe it was accidental. But, okay, even if it's not,
not that, even if it really is just disease. So let's go with the bat soup theory and that there's
just avian flutes that happen in China. Stop. Stop being gross. Why does that need to happen?
Why does it have to be China? Change fundamentally how you act, if that is the case.
If the case is that all of these flus and all of these diseases are organically happening,
because of how the animals are eaten and treated there,
you're doing a disservice to the people of China
and you're doing a disservice to the world
and you need to fundamentally change the practices
that are leading to that kind of spread of disease
that's killing millions of people around the world?
Like, don't you think the WHO, like, let's all sign a treaty
that tells China to change and to stop spreading those diseases,
if that's really the case.
I don't even think that's the case.
But if the WHO were worth its salt, it would say, hey, China, can you, like, can you stop eating
the bats?
The good news, so they say, the experts interviewed say rapid advances in vaccine technology
and antivirals demonstrate the pharmaceutical industry would be able to rapidly roll out treatments
against a pandemic disease when the next arises.
You know, the pharmaceutical industry, they're just, they're the best.
They're so sweet.
and they're so generous and kind.
And the great thing is, is that they do it all just out of the goodness of their heart.
And they certainly have no interest in another pandemic and another disease so they can develop more vaccines and medications.
I mean, yes, okay, it could be.
I mean, if you like just want to go there and theorize that it might be the billions and billions and billions.
billions of dollars that they're making, but it's probably not that. It's probably just the
pharmaceutical companies that they're just little sweeties, and they just want to help us out.
So thank you so much to Pfizer, which leads me to the next sponsor. Just kidding. Just
kidding. I scare you all for a second. Not sponsored by Pfizer. Okay, this is according to the New York
Post, and this was reported just a couple weeks ago. Chinese lab crafts mutant COVID-19.
strain with 100% kill rate
in humanized mice. This is exciting.
This is good.
Surprisingly, rapid death,
they say. The study is
the first of its kind to report 100% mortality
rate in mice infected by the COVID-19
related virus. Far surpassing previously
reported results from another
study, the researchers
wrote.
Francois
Ballou, an epidemiology
expert at University College
London's Genetics Institute, slammed
the research though. So this is better, as terrible and scientifically totally pointless.
So he said this. I had to look at the preprint. It's a terrible study. Scientifically
totally pointless. I can see nothing to vague interests that could be learned from force
infecting a weird breed of humanized mice with a random virus. Conversely, I could see how much
stuff might go wrong. Right. So great news. They are injecting humanized mice with a disease that
no one wants and no one needs that is killing them and could probably leak to everyone else
and kill us all too. So good news on your Tuesday afternoon. Disease X bill in Congress,
apparently that's something that's happening. HR 3832, also known as Disease X Act of
2023, was introduced in the House on June 5th, 2023 and referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
The status has not changed since then, but the bill's purpose is to establish a program at the biomedical, advanced research and development authority for developing medical countermeasures for viral threats with pandemic potential.
Ted Dros also posted a tweet just the other day on my birthday.
This, I mean, this is what you see when you enter into the gates of hell.
Is this picture right here.
Thank you, Secretary Hillary Clinton, for a great discussion on global health challenges, including pandemic preparedness for the hashtag pandemic accord.
Well, that's, that's again, very scary.
Outkick writer Ian Miller.
We've had Ian Miller on this podcast before, and he was like the foremost data gather when it came to masks and mask mandates and showing just through statistics that mask mandates do not work at all.
he wrote this in response to that very scary, very scary picture that could be the new cover for the latest edition of Dante's Inferno.
He said, outstanding could not have written, could not have scripted it any better.
The World Health Organization is a joke.
So of course, Hillary Clinton is full steam ahead on giving them even more control with the pandemic accord after they repeatedly lied and spread harmful information when it came to.
the pandemic. Okay, so that's what's going on with disease X. We've got a corrupt organization
run by a corrupt man who is not a medical doctor who is pushing for an international treaty
that countries would sign saying in the event of a pandemic, we promise to police speech
to try to hamper so-called misinformation and disinformation
and to spread the resources of health equitably, of course, based, I am sure,
on racial quotas, in an effort to bring the world into a one health future for universal
health care coverage. And so when he says, when Tedros says this has nothing to do with national
sovereignty, this is not going to, this is not going to hurt your rights in any way. All right,
then he's going to be okay with some edits that we want to make to it. I don't see any reason
at all for any treaty. There's no good reason for it. Zero good reason. Every nation has to do
what is best for their people.
And every policy decision is a difficult decision to make.
It's a push and pull decision.
It is not, well, this is going to save the most amount of lives.
So it's just as easy as that.
And so we just keep everyone inside and we, you know, put masks on two-year-olds.
No, there are a lot of things to weigh when it comes to policies.
Yes, even when it comes to pandemic policy, you have to wear.
way people's livelihoods. You have to weigh people's ability to socialize. You have to weigh in people's
ability to get an education. You have to weigh in people's freedoms. They're constitutional rights.
But our constitutional rights in many ways were suspended for this pandemic. And in my view,
this treaty just ensures and enshrines that suspension should the next pandemic come.
And I hope they're wrong. I hope that it doesn't. But gosh, here's one thing I will say
is that I do not want Joe Biden or any Democrat in office when that next pandemic hits.
I pray that it does it.
But that is for sure.
Man, who we elect in November is going to have a huge and perhaps extremely imminent effect on our freedoms and on our rights.
Now, it's true that Trump really didn't demonstrate that much, that much of a desire to protect our freedoms.
I mean, he didn't fire Fauci.
And he chastised, for example, Brian Kemp, the governor of Georgia, when he opened back up and ended his lockdowns.
He chastised him at a press conference.
I just remember watching that and being like, seriously.
So hopefully if Trump wins that he has learned his lesson, but I'm telling you anyone is better than a Democrat in office this November because something like this is on the line.
And we've already seen the blueprint of what they want to do and how they want to drastically change your life and take over all power of every government in order to ensure that you comply.
Why? It's very important to all their plans. And it sounds like a grand conspiracy, except they basically just say this stuff at Davos every year. And they hope that people don't pay attention. But even if people do pay attention, they don't really care. And so I know it sounds like a black pill. I know it sounds, oh my gosh, what are we going to do? But it really matters who we elect locally, who we elect on a state level, and who we elect nationally. As long as our elections,
still truly have consequences? As long as we have elections, they absolutely matter.
Like America still has a place of strength and has a place of prominence and influence on the
world stage. And we can make or break something like this. Unfortunately, the Democrats here,
I mean, they're in the pocket of the CCP too. Of course they are. And so they're not going to be
any help. They've already completely sold us out to the highest,
better. But people who love America, who happen to be almost all of them in their Republican Party
right now, there are a lot of people in the Republican Party that hate America too, though. But as far as
people who love America, almost all of them happen to also be Republicans. It can really make a
difference. So who we vote for? Statewide, local elections, national. It really, really, really
make a difference. All right. That's all we got time for today. Let's just try.
remember guys because I know when we talk about something big like that, whenever we talk about
the WHO or the UN or the W.E.F or all the different acronyms, whatever we talk about these things,
it makes you feel very small and very powerless. And while it's important for us to know about
these things and to be prepared to make sure our elected officials know about these things and that
they're prepared to push back and to stand up for our freedom, the fact of the matter is, is that
we only have control over so much. We have control over very little. And really, we have been given
a relatively tiny plot of earth to steward and to make better, to maximize, to beautify.
We do not have the capacity to care about everything all at once. You can't be panicked about
everything. You can't fear everything. You can't even have compassion for everything. I know that
we're told today that you have to have empathy for everyone and everything all I once. God did not
make you to do that. He didn't make you to have the ability to do that. Only God can see everything,
can know everything, can carry everything. Only he has the ability to do that because he's infinite.
We are finite. We can't carry the weight of the world on our shoulders. And so I do my best to balance,
not just on the show, but in my own life, like knowing about something, making sure I know about an issue,
but not allowing it to consume me and not allowing it to, you know, make me live in fear or
in a state of existential dread. And so, gosh, we have to balance not just our preparedness,
but just like our knowledge of what's going on with prayer, with trusting God's sovereignty,
and then refocusing on what's right in front of us. So you listen to this podcast, okay, you've got
some knowledge. Maybe for one of you, this is something that sets you off on, like a long research
project and you really dig into it and you do something about it. And that's great. I mean, there are
always those kinds of subjects out there for different people. But maybe it's just something that you
put in your back pocket and then you trust God with it because I can't tell you how many times
a week I hear something like, oh, we're about to get nuked by Iran. Oh, we're about to get
hit with 100% mortality rate disease called disease X and they're going to take our sovereignty.
Oh, the W.EF is and Black Rock are teaming together to take all of our property and our finances.
Oh, the border is wide open. Oh, judges and prosecutors don't care about crime anymore and they're just
allowing murders to go out in the street. And I'm like, well, there's nothing I can do about it right now.
there's nothing I can do about it.
A lot of times there are.
I mean, as I said, getting involved in local elections and things like that, obviously that's
a big deal.
Maybe God is calling you to run for one of those offices.
But the truth is we can only do what is right in front of us at any given moment.
I always think about that CS Lewis quote, and I'll have to paraphrase it.
That's basically like, look, all of us were ordained to die.
Before we were born, we were all ordained to die.
And many of us were ordained to die in very grotesque ways and in painful ways.
And the introduction of a new pathogen or a new threat of nuclear attack or a new threat of invasion,
whatever it is, it doesn't change that.
All of us were already going to die.
And we are still going to die.
And our calling as Christians remains the same, just as it has to be.
just as it has been since the inception of the church,
which is to glorify God and to love our neighbor
and to raise our families well and to disciple our kids
and to work hard, heartily for the Lord and not for man
and to trust that God is not only in control,
but he is really good and that he is coming back
and that victory is his and that gives us our joy and faith and hope.
While still, yes, caring about the material, we do.
We're not Gnostics.
we care about the body we care about people we care about the economy we care about national
security we care about borders god has given us all these things we occupy a physical space and a physical
material context and god has given us that purposely and providentially we have to care about those things
and cultivate those things with our eyes towards heaven it's a very interesting tension and it will
only be on the other side of eternity that that tension releases but we are not in a
unique place in history and that the history of humanity has been characterized mostly by
suffering and tyranny. And we have lived in this beautiful respite of American history where we have
had rights. And I hope that that lasts for a very, very long time. But it will not last without
our grace-driven effort towards that, which starts in your home. And by doing this,
the next right thing in faith with excellence and for the glory of God.
All right, relatable.
We will be back here tomorrow.
Hey, this is Steve Day.
If you're listening to Allie, you already understand that the biggest issues facing our country
aren't just political.
They're moral, spiritual, and rooted in what we believe is true about God, humanity, and
reality itself.
On the Steve Day show, we take the news of the day and tested against first principles,
faith, truth, and objective reality.
We don't just chase narratives and we don't offer false comfort.
We ask the hard questions and follow the answers.
wherever they leave, even when it's unpopular.
This is a show for people who want honesty over hype and clarity over chaos.
If you're looking for commentary grounded in conviction and unwilling to lie to you about where we are or where we're headed,
you can watch this D-Day show right here on Blaze TV or listen wherever you get podcasts.
I hope you'll join us.
