Rich Habits Podcast - Q&A: Am I Behind Financially?, Robotics Investments, and the “Buy, Borrow, Die” Strategy
Episode Date: July 10, 2026🚀 Invest alongside Robert and Austin inside the Rich Habits Network, click here!---📸 Join us on Friday, July 10 at 12p ET for our AI Agents webinar with Public! https://www.crowdcast....io/c/aiagentsWe're thrilled they're workshopping agents with us, and can't wait to learn from Stephen Sikes. CLICK HERE!---💵 Want to learn more about HEDG? Click here!---🏆 Wall Street Favorites is LIVE! Click here to see what Wall Street is buying before everyone else. ---🧠 Ready to build your own investable index using AI? Generated Assets on Public makes it easy. Click here to try Generated Assets!---🚀 Join 900+ other podcast listeners inside of the Rich Habits Network and invest alongside Robert and Austin, click here!---⚡️ Sign up for the Rich Habits Newsletter and never miss a market-moving headline again, click here!---⭐ Download our FREE Financial Planner – click here⭐ Download our FREE Budgeting Template – click here⭐ Earn 3.8% on your savings with a High-Yield Cash Account – click here⭐ Trade stocks, options, music royalties and crypto on Public – click here---👤 Explore everything Austin does – click here 👤 Explore everything Robert does – click here❓ Ask us questions for our Q&A episodes – @richhabitspodcast on Instagram📬 Inquire about working together – christian@witz.vc---Disclosure: Paid endorsement. Brokerage services provided by Open to the Public Investing Inc, member FINRA & SIPC. Investing involves risk. Not investment advice. Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool by Public Advisors. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. See disclosures at public.com/disclosures/ga. Past performance does not guarantee future results, and investment values may rise or fall. *Rate as of 11/6/25. APY is variable and subject to change.This content is sponsored by NEOS Investments. The creator is compensated by NEOS to discuss NEOS ETFs. This content is for informational purposes only, and is not personalized investment, tax, or legal advice, and does not constitute an offer to buy or sell any security. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Before investing, carefully review the NEOS ETFs prospectus at neosfunds.com.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This episode is brought to you by Accenture.
When your advertising operations fall out of sync, everything else follows.
Spotify and Accenture are working together to reinvent the rhythm of ad sales,
using automation, analytics, and smarter workflows to simplify campaign delivery
and access better data across the business.
The result?
Less time spent on operations, more time connecting brands with the moments and fandoms that matter most.
Learn more at Accenture.com slash Spotify.
Hey, everyone, and welcome back to the Rich Habits podcast question and answer edition on a super special Friday episode.
How exciting is this?
Q&A on a Friday that even rhymes.
I like it.
Hope you guys are excited for this quick little switchup.
We decided to put our Rich Habits Radar episode yesterday on a Thursday, switch it up with the Q&A episode now here on a Friday.
But the format and everything about it is exactly the same.
Still answering your questions, the questions we get via Instagram.
at Rich Habits Podcast or email at Rich Habitspodcast at gmail.com.
And Robert, we've got some really good questions on this episode.
We're going to be talking about tons of different things like close end funds.
We'll be talking about the buy, borrow, die strategy.
We'll be talking about the different high earner tax optimization stuff.
We got some good stuff, Roland.
But yeah, we've got a ton of great questions here, teed up for today's episode.
But Austin, before we get into the questions and the episode, remember today, very special day for
everyone. We have the public AI agent webinar. We've been talking about this thing for two, three weeks.
We've had hundreds and hundreds of people join up, super excited about this. So what does this mean?
We're going to have public Steven Sykes on the webinar with us. We're going to be building these AI agents live just so you guys can see how to do it because we want everyone that follows along with us to really be able to get involved with these AI agents on public.com and understand how to use them for their
benefits. So I'm really, really excited about this one. 100%. We'll also be walking through
public's most compelling pre-built agent strategies, things like repositioning around Fed rate
decisions, smart dividend reinvesting, goals-based trimming of your own portfolio. We'll talk about
what these AI agents can't do for your portfolio, which is like not that many things, but it's good
to understand what they're capable of and what they're not capable of. And finally, as Robert
had mentioned, Stephen Sykes, the chief operating officer at public.com, will be
on with us live where we're going to put Stephen on the spot, call you all up on stage and
figure out how Stephen can legit build one of these AI agents for your portfolio and show
you exactly how to do it for your specific needs. This is less of a webinar, more of a
workshop, Robert. We're just going to be going through the motion, getting it all figured out
with Stephen in public. It's going to be a blast. So be sure to come later today at noon Eastern
time. Link in the show notes below. And if you miss the webinar, that's okay. There's going to be a
completely free replay. You just click the play button, I think it's going to be right on your screen on
Crowdcast. You can watch, read the comment section, see everything right there. So definitely
check it out regardless. If you can join us live or not, it's all going to be right there.
And no excuses. This is a free webinar. Free. You can learn how to build and understand these
AI agents right away in this webinar, free of charge. We're not going to sell you anything. We're just so
excited to do it. That said, got to give a shout out to public.com, the investing platform for those
who take it seriously, because on public, you can build a multi-asset portfolio of stocks, bonds,
options, cryptocurrency, and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an
investable index using AI. And it all starts with your prompt from renewable energy companies
with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year.
You can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens
thousands of stocks builds a one-of-a-kind index and even let you back-tested against the S&P 500,
all with just a few clicks.
Generated assets are like ETFs, but with infinite possibilities.
They're completely customizable.
They're based on your thesis, not someone else's.
So go to public.com slash rich habits and transfer your portfolio.
That's public.com slash rich habits.
Paid for by public investing and full disclosure in the podcast description.
So our first question comes from Jess G via email.
That's rich habits podcast at gmail.com.
She says, my name is Jess.
I'm 28 years old and I'm a huge fan of the show.
Let me tell you, having an emergency fund saved my butt last year.
I was unemployed for two months and my car broke down.
I didn't have to go into any debt because I had that emergency fund.
So thank you so much for drilling that into my head.
Now I have my emergency fund built back up to $5,000 and my only debt is this used car.
I owe about $22,000 on it.
The interest rate is at 8%.
but I will be able to refinance it to about 5.5% very soon. I have $6,000 in a brokerage account,
$14,500 in my Roth IRA, $26,500 in a traditional IRA from an old employer,
plus $1,600 in a new employer 401K. All my stocks are the ones you guys talk about,
the big index funds in ETFs. I'd like to buy a house in the next two to five years and hopefully
house hack, but I feel behind my investing journey. I'd love to be a homeowner eventually, but I'm not sure
if I'm heading in the right direction. I make $55,500 a year and my biggest bills are rent at $13.40 a month
and my car payment at $3.80. Can you please offer me some guidance as to how I can purchase my first home
in the next two to five years starting for my current situation? Robert, we normally don't do these
like, what do you think about my situation type questions? But I think this one is really good
because Jess sounds like the average listener out there.
Hey, I've got this a little bit of an emergency fund.
I've come into some recent tragedy with some unemployment and my car breaking down, right?
Like just turmoil.
Life's a roller coaster, but I'm still chugging along and I'm still making goals and I'm still knocking them out one by one here.
So, Jess, here's what I love about your situation.
You've got a ton of money invested.
You've got $6,000 in a brokerage account, $14,000 in a Roth IRAs, that's $20,000 total.
another 26,000 in a traditional IRAs. Now we're at $46,000 and another $1,600. So call it about
$50,000, depending on what the stock market's doing, invested into these retirement plus
bridge account, which I love. And at 50,000, at 28 years old, is a ton of money to have invested,
considering a lot of people don't start investing until they're 30s. So congratulations on doing so
well here. Robert, what's your take, though, on house hacking and how could Jess begin to set her
current situation up where she's continually investing while also setting money aside over the next
two, three, four, five years? So she'll have a down payment on a duplex, triplex, or quadplex?
Maybe walk through some solutions for that. Well, first, I want to say, Jess, you are not behind on
your journey. You are miles and miles ahead of most people that are 28 years old in the market today.
We spread this message everywhere to get people to invest early and often, and you've already done that.
You've laid the groundwork.
You have the traditional brokerage account.
You have the emergency fund.
You have all of the tools to build wealth and you said house hack.
You're not saying you want to buy the dream home.
You want to get in the real estate game through house hacking.
So here's what I would do.
You're halfway there for building your base.
And you say you want to get a home in the next two, three years.
I think by then your base will be built.
It's up and running.
You've got that $100,000 saved and invested.
But along the way, what I would do is start earmarking money towards that purchase to house hack.
So I would start plugging away and putting aside some money every single month of this money you're investing into a traditional brokerage account on public.com.
Get that.
That's your house fund.
That is your house hacking fund.
You're going to buy that duplex or triplex.
That's what I would do.
And do that for the next two or three years.
so you've got this money building and working towards that house while you sleep.
What would I do for house hacking?
I would research now so you can make sure you cover all the criteria for the Fannie Mae 5% down mortgage.
It's a tremendous product.
You can borrow up to $1.3 million and up to four doors and just read up on it because I think if you get ahead of this,
that would be the move for you to take the least amount out of that $100,000 saved and invested that we always talk about.
to make sure people have their base built.
That is how I would do this, but you are crushing it.
You're so far ahead of the curve.
I would not worry about feeling like you're behind
because you've got all your bases covered.
And look at this.
You went through some hardships
and immediately went right back to the playbook
and built that emergency fund back up
and you have everything else in your favor.
I think it's a great breakdown.
I'm kind of looking at this budget, right?
55,500 a year working in the landscape industry.
Your biggest expenses are that rent at 13.
in your car payment at 380. I would argue that with an honest budget and an extra maybe five to
10 hours a week of side hustle time, so call it an hour to two hours a day here, Monday through
Friday, you could probably boost your monthly earnings by anywhere between $500 and maybe $750.
And that money specifically can then go be invested into these index funds and ETFs we talk about
in your taxable brokerage account on public and do that every month for the next two,
four, five years like Robert's alluding to, and that now turns into tens of thousands of dollars
over the coming years. That money is then that down payment Robert is alluding to. I think it all
comes together very well here. Without sacrificing money, you're already putting into these retirement
accounts. Because again, you've done a really good job of getting about $50,000 invested here at the
age of 28 years old. I think that's incredible work. We don't want to slow that down. More money you can
get in these retirement accounts, more money you can get invested toward your future. The best,
better. So when it comes to finding money for a down payment, I would love to see you, whatever that
side hustle might be. We've got a whole episode dedicated to side hustles. Go figure out how to earn
$300, $400, $400, $600 a month extra by working a couple hours extra maybe every day, maybe doing
some weekend work, whatever's going on. I think it's totally doable, especially Jess, if you're
as hungry as you sound like you are here to go out and house hack and figure out the situation.
And if you do decide to relocate to Florida, make sure you settle on one of those tertiary markets,
if it's just a random market where there is a ton of growth that's happening all around Florida.
And you want to find yourself in a market where there's a ton of opportunities moving forward,
whether you stay in the landscaping industry or not because you just want to be where the money is and the jobs are.
So our next question comes from Sam S. Sam says, hi, rich habits.
I've been listening since the early days.
and I just wanted to say thanks for all the work you put into the podcast.
It's become one of my favorite weekly listens, and I've learned a lot from the both of you.
I was hoping you could spend some time discussing closed-end funds,
specifically the pros and cons of owning them as part of a long-term portfolio.
The reason I ask is I've been researching a closed-end fund called B-O-T,
which provides public investors exposure to several private robotics companies and physical AI companies.
The concept is really interesting to me because it seems like one of the few ways,
is everyday investors can gain access to privately held companies before they go public.
I'd love to hear thoughts on something like BOT.
How do you evaluate a close-end fund like this?
What are the biggest risk or drawbacks that investors should be aware of,
especially when it comes to premiums or discounts to NAV, liquidity in the valuation of private
holdings?
And more broadly, do you think close-in funds deserve a place in a long-term investment portfolio?
Thanks again for everything you do and keep up the great work.
Robert, before we answer this question, I want to make sure everyone's on the same page about something.
In this question, Sam said,
the concept is really interesting to me because it seems like one of the few ways
everyday investors can gain access to privately held companies before they go public.
False.
The Rich Habits Network also allows people to do that.
Every single month, we're investing into privately held companies, and we've actually
invested into four robotics and embodied AI companies privately, directly through the Rich
Habits Network that are held inside of this bot, BOT, ETF.
So if you're looking to gain exposure to privately help,
companies across all different types of sectors, join the Rich Habits Network, make your first
angel investment, learn more about the different opportunities we've had in the past. We're
always introducing new cool opportunities in the future from seed to pre-IPO opportunities.
So go check out the Rich Habits Network. We're still offering a seven-day free trial. You have seven
days to watch the eight hours of video coursework, to join a live stream, to ask some questions,
to review past investment opportunities before you actually make a decision. If you want to stick
around and pay to $77 a month. That said, Robert, let's jump into now answering this question.
So I think the first place to start is kind of defining what closed end funds are and how they're
different from things like ETFs. So the simplest way to think about them is unlike an ETF where
shares can generally be created or what they call redeemed to keep the market price close to the
value of the underlying holdings, a closed end fund has a fixed pool of shares that
trade on the open market. That means the stock price can trade above or below the fund's net asset
value or nav. Net asset value can be thought of as the true, like, intrinsic value of the
underlying holdings. Right. So when closed end funds list on the markets, they have a true,
like, I think for BOT that listed like $9 or $10 a share, like that was like the true intrinsic value
of its holdings compared to the number of shares that were, you know, created upon its inception.
BOT is an interesting example like you kind of were alluding to here because Robo Strategy
describes the fund as a way for public market investors to gain exposure to private and public
robotics and embodied AI companies, which I think is one of the hardest types of secular
growth trends for public investors to gain exposure to.
Again, assuming that they weren't inside the rich habits network when we invested inaptronic
in figure in standard.
and all these other companies years ago.
So the way I would evaluate a closed end fund is I'd ask myself questions like this.
First, what are the actual holdings?
Are they holding public stock in a company like an ETF?
Or are they owning private stock in a privately held company?
Is that an SPV?
Is it a single layer?
Is it a double layer?
Like, understand the intricacies of the actual holdings.
Second, what percentage is private versus public?
Because if a lot of it is private, then it's up to you to figure out what is the true
intrinsic value of that private company. For example, figure AI raised at a $39 billion valuation
a year, year and a half ago, whatever it was. Yeah, but a lot has changed with that company since that
year, year and a half. So is the intrinsic value now with figure 50 billion, 100 billion, 200 billion,
15 billion, right? Who knows? It's up to you as the investor to figure out what is the intrinsic
value of these privately held companies. The opposite of public, when it's a publicly held company
or a company holding that is clearly you can see an investor is going to pay you $22 a share for it,
very different than having to kind of back into your own math there.
Third, and this is probably the most important in Robert's eyes, the fee structure.
How are the fees actually working here with the BOT closed end fund?
I'll let Robert dig into fee structures and how things can be different for closed end funds here soon.
And then, in my opinion, the last thing that I'd really want to dive deep on as a investor is,
is it trading at a premium or a discount to a.
its market net asset value, right? Like, what is that net asset value truly worth right now
whenever you take in the progress of a standard bots or a figure or an optronic or whatever
on the secondary markets and translate that into its holdings? And how does that all come to get? Do
you think it's overvalued? Do you think it's undervalued? I think BOT right now is trading around
35 or 40 bucks a share, which is a lot higher than its original net asset value of like nine or 10
bucks, right? But does that mean its underlying holdings are now, you know, more valuable? Like,
I don't know. It's up to you as the investor to figure that out. So I know that was kind of
long-winded, but I think these are really, really important to understand. So you don't find
yourself piling in to a closed-end fund that might be way over net asset value and you just get
crushed on the back end because you don't know how to evaluate these types of investment instruments.
I think you did a great job. And long-winded in this instance is really important because so many
people, they see the sexy headlines of getting into these closed-end funds and getting in pre-IPO and all of that,
but they don't understand the net asset value, this NAV term we see all the time. And they might not
even understand how much they're paying above that. And so I think it's really important for people
to understand. You need to know what you're paying to get into that investment. Because if you're paying
way too much, and then you have these secondary market commissions, you have the expense ratio. And in these
terms in these closed end funds, sometimes the expense ratio can be 1.5 to 2%. So when you add all of that up,
you might be paying such a huge premium in a closed end fund that you're missing out on any of the
upside that you would have gotten if you just waited for the IPO. So just make sure you understand
all of it. It's like anything else. If there's a lot of these terms you don't understand,
do the research, AI is your friend. So you can understand that you're actually getting a good deal on
this rather than just paying for the sexy headline in a secondary market. And also what you added
Austin is people can join the Rich Habits Network, get access to all of this, and the deals are
flushed out. It's not through all of these person next to a person next to a person because we're
doing this in the Rich Habits Network every single month giving people access to the same companies,
but in a way where they have the knowledge and comfort of knowing we've flushed out what is right
and wrong and what is a good investment? Yeah, I'm just looking at the Robo Strategy portfolio.
And yeah, Robert, we invested into figure, optronics, standard bots, and path robotics. And so did
Robo Strategy. So, you know, you could have invested in these companies directly through us,
or you can buy, you know, an overvalued closed end fund, the BOT, ETF here, which, by the way,
I just looked up the fee structure on it, two and a half percent annual fee structure just to own it.
So it's important. It's important to understand this. Again, it was long-winded, but you all need to understand as these instruments begin to become more available to people. If it's a BOT, if it's a V-C-X, if it's a insert, other closed-end, open-end, whatever fund here, Evergreen Fund, Cashmere Fund, right? There's a ton of different things that exist out there. As they become more and more prevalent, you have to do your homework on them and you have to understand exactly what you're getting involved in. And if you don't understand golden rule number one with investors,
Don't invest in anything that you do not understand entirely front to back, like the back of your hand.
Yeah, great take, Austin.
And I think that's the most important key of why this podcast exists.
We are here to help people from all walks of life, from all levels of financial freedom,
or just getting started as an investor, because we want to break down these terms and these processes in investing to help everyone know that we all have blind spots.
and the more knowledge you have, the better off you're going to be in making solid choices.
Because as soon as people get moving and they get a little bit of money, yes, we want you to use
these tools. Yes, as you get build more wealth, we want you to understand all the advantages
you can get from some of these tools. But we also don't want people to get so fancy
and do these things in a way that it might set them back versus actually help them long term.
We've got a ton of complex stuff, though, and we're happy to answer it. Next question coming from
Russ P.
Russ P says,
Hey, Robert Nosson,
I don't hear you guys talk about
pledged asset lines
or security-backed lines
of credit very often,
but they've been an absolute
game changer for my wealth management.
We always hear about how billionaires
use the buy, borrow,
die strategy to avoid capital gains taxes,
but with modern brokerages
offering highly competitive,
low-cost margin,
and line of credit rates
around 4% right now,
this strategy is completely accessible
to everyday millionaires.
I recently used a pledged asset line
to purchase a vacation home. The closing process took almost no time compared to a traditional
mortgage, and the rate I locked in was more than 200 basis points lower than the standard
mortgage rate. To manage the risk of a market drop or a sudden margin call, I follow a strict
set of personal guardrails. Number one is I never let the loan balance exceed 25% of my non-tax
advantage investable assets, aka bridge account. Number two, I only use the debt for major
physical assets like real estate that I could easily refinance into a traditional loan or sell off
if interest rates spikes or the market corrected. What are your thoughts on using strategic,
low loan-to-value leverage and a taxable portfolio for major purchases instead of traditional
financing? Is this a brilliant way to optimize cash flow and stay fully invested? Or do you think
the downside risk of a market correction makes it too dangerous for us non-billionaires? Robert,
this is a great question for you to answer. I love this for us and you have spelled it out
perfectly. You've covered all the bases in a way where people that are listening and following along
can understand what this buy, borrow dime means, but not get themselves in trouble. So let's go
the bad side. So many people go, wow, I have this portfolio of $200,000 on public.com or e-trade.
I'm going to go borrow against it and do what the billionaires do. But the problem is they go borrow
70, 75 percent. I think most of them are around 70 percent of your portfolio. They borrow all of it.
then there's a market correction of 25, 30%, they get a margin call and they don't have the funds.
But the way you laid this out of keeping that balance at 25% of the total value of the portfolio is magical.
I'd even be okay with going to 50% because you're right.
When you have millions of dollars or even hundreds of thousands of dollars invested and you can
borrow against that without it being a taxable event without selling that equity, it is a magic.
magical way to build wealth as long as you know what you're doing and you stay within those
personal guardrails because again people think margin in these loans and all of this is free money
it is definitely not free money and very dangerous if you don't stick with it and you constantly
it's kind of like when people get a line of credit and they're always maxing it out those are the
same people that generally carry credit card debt so i think as long as you handle it responsibly
and you do this buy, borrow, die strategy with these pledged asset lines of credit, I think it's a
fantastic way to help you build wealth and get liquidity without selling your equities.
Yeah, I just want to double down on your framework here, Russ, as to how smart it is.
If you're using a guardrail, maybe you're someone listening right now and you've got half a
million dollars in a brokerage account.
That's the hard part, Robert, because it's like Russ's framework is very clear.
I only use the debt for major physical assets like real estate.
state that I can easily refinance into a traditional loan or sell off if interest rates spike or the
market corrects. I want to talk about that for a second because this 4% interest rate you're getting
and the way he was able to do this for everyone that's like I still don't understand. Russ probably
has a couple million dollars in a taxable brokerage account. In that couple million dollars,
he can easily borrow against using a margin. So what does that mean? A little bit of debt.
So let's say, you know, Russ has got, I don't know, $4 million sitting in his public account. And you can go borrow
at 4% interest on, you know, up to 70 or 75% of your portfolio's value.
And that interest, you can do interest only, pay it back, whatever that way.
And so what Russ did is Russ goes, okay, I want to go buy a million dollar vacation home.
I've got $4 million over here.
Do I want to sell a million dollars of stock, realize a capital gain, pay taxes on that?
And then from what's left, use that money to go buy my house in cash, or go through a mortgage
process, down payment, still sell it, have to go through closing, all this stuff. No, Russ said, listen,
I've got $4 million. I'm going to go borrow a million of that from my portfolio. So what happens
there is your portfolio custodian, let's say public, is going to say, okay, you want to borrow a
million dollars. We'll hold on to this million dollars of VOO or S&P 500 or Microsoft or whatever
you got going on here. We'll give you a million dollars cash. And so now Russ's loan to value ratio,
1 million of 4 million is 25%.
Never let the loan balance exceed 25% of my non-tax advantage investable assets.
And then he used that million dollars instead of going through the financing of getting a mortgage and having to apply and go through all the clock.
He just took that million of cash at 4% interest instead of a 6.5% interest that probably exists right now for 30-year mortgages.
Use that million dollars of cash to go buy his vacation home.
And yes, he still owes a million dollars, but he owes it to himself at a lower interest rate.
rate than if he went out and got an actual mortgage. The mistake people make, and I want to be
very clear about this, is again, that number two call out you had, Rouse is you only use this debt
for major physical assets that can easily be refinanced in traditional loan, or you can sell if
the interest rate spike. Interest rate spike. What does that mean? These four to four and a half percent
interest rates you'll see right now by borrowing against your portfolio are directly tied to the federal
funds rate. So if the Federal Reserve, like Bank of America, was foolishly,
forecasting by the end of the year is going to raise interest rates by three separate times,
then our friend Russ here, his interest rate on his $1 million margin, hypothetically,
would go up.
He'd have a higher monthly payment because his interest rate is a float.
It moves up and down.
And so that's with all margin debt.
That's with all margin debt.
So it's a variable interest rate.
It's floating.
It moves.
So just know that when it compare, you know, to a mortgage.
It's fixed.
Right.
So just understand some of these intricacies.
And the last thing I'll say,
here. What you want to avoid in this situation is using that million dollars to fund your lifestyle
or any amount of money to fund your lifestyle. This is not for, because what you're doing is
you're essentially saying, I'm going to borrow this money, but the goal of course is to pay it back.
You want that stock in your portfolio. You want that stock in your nest egg. Yeah, you still have
it, but you can't exactly do anything with it until you pay back your loan. And so yes,
the stock's trending up into the right. And yes, like, you still have it. It's still
earning and still paying and doing all that fun stuff. But this is not just like free money. And I think
that's the mistake people make is they're like, oh, Robin Hood or public is offering me 100,000 of
margin against my half a million dollar portfolio. It's going a great vacation. Come on, honey. And let's go
have fun. Like, no, that's not what this is. You have to pay the money back. And if you don't,
the broker sells the stock on your behalf, no matter the price, then uses the collateral of the
stock to pay back the loan. And if that's a taxable event, it is. Or in other cases,
It can be a loss, and that's where people really get in trouble, Roberts.
Maybe explain as we wrap up this question, how people can be over leveraged in these instances,
market corrects, sell for a loss, and now it's a financial disaster.
Yeah, for everyday people, let's say you just pass millionaire status or maybe you're at
$2, $3 million in net worth, and this sounds fun.
It is a great tool to build wealth and help you get this cash freed up to buy other assets.
But the problem is, is you should never borrow so much that if there's a 30 or 40% correction in the markets in your portfolio,
that you have that concentrated collateral that can cause your account to get cooked.
Like Austin said, they can come in, do a margin call, sell it off at any price to get their money back.
So just be careful because if it's under collateralized and this happens to you,
you don't want to be going backwards while trying to get a little bit fancy to go forward.
I do this. I do it all the time. I've done it for many, many years, but you just have to have those guardrails, like Russ said, to keep you in line so you're not borrowing more than you should against your assets.
Now, our next question comes from Lindsay W. Lindsay says, hey Robert Nostin, I love the show. I'm in my mid-50s currently sitting in the highest federal tax bracket. I'm looking for ways to optimize my tax bill. I'm looking into AQR's Delphi Plus Fund, which is highly talked about right now for high earners.
Unlike traditional direct indexing or standard long short funds that harvest losses to offset capital gains,
Delphi Plus aggressively uses swap structures and high gross leverage to manufacture ordinary losses that can supposedly be used to offset W2 and earned business income.
I'm considering allocating a small, tactical piece of my portfolio here, less than 10% of my total net worth.
Given the high fees, typically a hedge fund model of 2% annually with 20% performance,
and the immense structural leverage involved, what are your thoughts on this strategy?
Is the tax alpha worth the complexity, or do you think the aggressive use of derivatives
to offset ordinary income runs too much of a structural gotcha risk with the IRS down the road?
Would love to hear your breakdown on the show.
Wow. Okay. That's intense.
Told you all we were getting into it in this episode.
Yeah.
So what's happening here?
our friend Lindsay is saying, hey, I'm a super high earner, which means I'm in that 37% tax bracket,
which means every dollar I make above X, whatever the number is there in the bracket, is 37 cents on the dollar goes to the federal government, which sucks.
It's like saying you're working four or five months out of the year completely for free, and the other 60% is what you keep.
40% goes to the government. Not a good time. I understand the frustration. And so Lindsay's over here saying, well, I found
some people on Facebook or people online in these forums that are saying that the AQR Delphi
Plus fund might be a way for me to save some money on taxes because if I invest a hundred thousand
or a million dollars into this fund, I will be able to use a portion of that investment to
offset ordinary income as a loss. So I'll have a portion of my investment used to offset my
actual income, saving me that 37 cents on a dollar. Now, I saw reports of AQR's Delphi
Plus suggest that the fund uses the swaps and the notional principal contract structures
to generate those ordinary losses while still trying to produce some positive pre-tax
investment returns. An example of this is in 2023. In a report citing, AQR's presentation,
showed that ordinary losses in 2003 equaled 31% of the invested capital.
plus 4% short-term capital losses while the fund returned about 12% pre-tax.
So what you're saying here is, I invest a million dollars.
I'm Lindsay.
I invest a million dollars, right?
310,000 of that million, I get to offset against my ordinary income.
So I save then 37 cents on the dollar of 310.
So call that about $100,000, $110,000 of tax savings.
But my million dollars is now tied up into this, you know, actual fund. I don't know if I'm ever going to get that money out. The fund, though, hypothetically returned 12% on paper and a little bit of short-term capital losses, where that same million dollars, if invested in the S&P 500 in 2020, would have made you a 26.5% return or about 260,000. And then if, you know, and it's liquid, of course. And then if you kept it in the S&P in 2024, it would have made you another 25% return. So on top of the
of your existing call that another $300,000. So now we're at about 500 grand. And then another
18% on top of that in 2025. So all in, let's call it a 600 or 650,000 return on your million.
Now, again, this is all completely liquid. So I guess what I'm trying to get out here is yes.
You can get crazy complicated and try and use these AQR, Delphi, plus this, that, and the other
and try and get some tax alpha in the tune of tens of thousands or maybe six,
big years of tax savings. But at the cost of what? At the cost of what, Lindsay? Robert, I want you to
talk about your experience with maybe these oil investments you've made over the years. But I think
what's really important here is to really dial in at the cost of liquidity. Now, I don't know
the specifics around AQR, and I'm sure they've got some stuff online. I could have done a deep dive into
this and I could have given you perfect answers here. So this is without everything known for me.
but liquidity with these products are scarce in my experience.
Annual withdraws and only a percentage of your original investment can be taken out.
Yeah, you get some tax alpha,
but you also get a really complicated tax return with different K-1s.
And again, fees, performance, 2 and 10, leverage, counterparty exposure.
Like, there's a lot of weird stuff happening behind the scenes here.
So here's my advice to you.
I think before you do this, I would love to see you,
taxing out your retirement accounts, doing some charitable planning. Maybe you've got a donor
advise fund. You're doing all the business deductions. You're doing your QSBS planning. You're doing
real estate depreciation where appropriate. And you're doing your basic tax loss harvesting right now.
You're doing all of that. And you've completely maxed out and gone all in on the normal stuff that
everyone does. And if you still are just so upset about your tax situation, then yes, go work with a tax
attorney, not a normal CPA, a tax attorney who understands derivatives, that's going to help you
understand the K1 treatment, the liquidity terms, the fee drag, the leverage, all that stuff that
we were just alluding to. They will be able to give you better perspective on this without
knowing all the details here. I certainly can't. But Robert, I want you to take a moment to talk about
your experience working with some of these different funds in the past to try and, you know,
generate some tax alpha. Yeah, I don't think it's worth it. I've learned the hard way in several
instances over the last 20 to 30 years of doing all of these strategies. And you laid it all out
very well. You have high management fees. You have performance fees on top of the management
fees. So they're going to get a big chunk of that performance fee. But then you also have you mentioned
liquidity or lack there of it. These have long lockup periods generally. I don't know on this particular
one without reading all of the fine print. But this long lockup period, which is what I'm going
through right now can be the death of your opportunity cost with this money. For instance,
16 years ago, I did a very similar program into an oil drilling rig company, a very large
organization, and it was supposed to be a five to six year lockup period. So I put in $250,000
into this. I was very well aware of what I was doing. And now here we are a little over 16 years
later and my money is still tied up. So from an opportunity cost perspective, a long
with all the fees along the way, the lockup period and the lack of liquidity is the number one issue.
Because as Austin spelled out and showed you with real numbers, just investing that same money in the S&P 500 for the last 16 years would have far outperformed any such product such as this.
So I don't like these.
I don't like super high fees.
I don't like having these long lockup periods.
So for me, I would not invest in this unless you're really, really involved with a really good.
tax strategist that knows your situation inside and out and you really understand the fine print
because I don't think there is enough tax alpha there to offset everything else.
Last thing I'll add here, this is just more of like my experience figuring out taxes
and everything.
Maybe Rob, you can talk to this too, which is like if you're a high income earner, any earner,
like you are earning money and it shows on your tax return that you made 500, 700, a million dollars
of taxable income in 2020.
2025, right, in your instance here, Lindsay. And then you go put a million dollars or two million
dollars or five million dollars or whatever into one of these AQR Delphi Plus instruments. And now you've
got a offset your taxable income of $500,000. And you only made $500,000. And so you're like,
wow, I pay no taxes. That's great. Yeah, kind of. But now let's say you want to get a loan next year.
And the lender looks at your tax return is like, hey, you didn't make any money last year. I'm kind of
confused. Like you don't, you don't have a history of earning income. I see that you say you earn a lot,
but your tax return says you didn't earn any money last year. You don't earn enough for me and actually
lend to you. And so I think this is a mistake some people make. And again, there's a balance. You can
go figure out all different ways to, you know, get money. And we just talked about, obviously,
portfolio loans and things like that. But whenever you're someone that wants to completely decimate
your taxable income and, oh, I didn't report a profit last year. I didn't make any money. It's like,
okay, that's cool from a tax perspective, I suppose. But like now on your tax return, it says that
you make $20,000 a year. Good luck doing anything on that. Like, that's not great news, in my opinion,
from someone who wants to have access to liquidity and different lines of credit or mortgages or, you know,
things of that nature. I want to be able to report that I'm making hundreds of thousands of dollars a year as a
high earner because then that offers me a ton of flexibility on, you know, accessible loan options
and credit and things like that in the future. If it's, you know, again, mortgage or a business or
something else of that nature. So just keep that in mind is like every dollar that you're saved,
saving, you know, you're using to offset your taxable income is like straight up not income that you can say that you made.
But there's also a million other ways for people to offset this high wage income.
They can invest in opportunity zones.
They can invest in short-term rentals.
They can use the Augusta rule and rent their house out to their business.
They can do bonus depreciation.
There's a lot of other structures where you're not giving away such a big piece of the pie just to save on some taxes.
So do your research. Join the Rich Habits Network if you haven't already and learn more about this.
But really, really enjoy this question. But I just want to say to everyone else, make sure you're not getting too fancy to where the people building these really giant beautiful towers aren't making more money with your money than you are.
So our last question comes from Will on Instagram. Will says, I would love to know, are penny stocks worth investing in?
And if so, what are some of the up-and-coming penny stocks I should be investing in?
18 years old and I've been investing since I was 14. Thanks. Okay. Well, well, that cool, man. I'm glad to hear you're
investing. I'm glad to hear you're interested in owning equity in businesses. I think that's awesome.
I was exactly where you are at your age. The first stock I bought was a penny stock. I think I was like 16
years old. I convinced my parents to open a little brokerage account for me. And me and a bunch of my buddies,
I think I was a junior in high school or something, thought that we had figured out the company that was going to make the
CD screens for the new iPhone. And I thought if they would get that contract, they would make a ton of
money. Stock price would go up like crazy and we're all going to get rich. So I put in 50 bucks or 100 bucks or
whatever it was and I was dead wrong and it essentially went to zero and I lost on my money because
that's how penny stocks work. So let's walk through this, Robert. Unlike the name of a penny stock,
you think penny stocks trade for one, two, three, four, five cents, right? Just a couple pennies. Penny stocks could
trade for several dollars, five, ten,
$10, $15, $20. What makes it a penny stock is the size of the company's market capitalization.
And so what that essentially means is the value of the stock itself multiplied by total stock
outstanding. So you think like, okay, the market cap of a company could be thought of as
the price tag. If someone's super rich like Warren Buffett, he buys companies all the time with
Berkshire Halfway, he wants to come in and buy a company, what's the price tag of the company?
That's the market capitalization we're alluding to.
penny stocks tend to have market capitalizations below a billion, below 500 million, below 250 million.
If you're buying or selling any stock in any company below $10 billion of market capitalization,
general rule of thumb is to be careful.
It's worth less than $10 billion for a reason.
Now, it might not be a bad reason.
The company might be early.
The company, you know, for example, Robert, Monster Energy was one of the best performing
stocks of our generation and it started as a penny stock and it was just a couple of guys making
some energy drinks and then people invested into this penny stock and it turned into monster energy
is today. It was like, you know, big, good, cool companies start as small companies and I'm not taking
that away from that. But what I am saying is a company with a market cap of 200, 400 million dollars,
a billion dollars is much more volatile. They have much less revenue than an Apple or a Microsoft.
Sometimes they're not as transparent when it comes to their earnings calls as maybe a Mark Zuckerberg might be.
So there's a lot of different things that make penny stocks very, very dangerous.
And the reason I say dangerous is because you have to think about the opportunity cost.
For every dollar you might be investing into a penny stock is a dollar that's not compounding over years and decades of your life,
especially at 18 years old in the S&P 500, the Dow Jones or the NASDAQ 100, right?
These are index funds and ETFs that compound at 8, 10, 12% over a long period of time on average.
And so if you have $100 and you want to throw it into a bioscience penny stock because they've claimed that they're going to use AI to cure a rare form of cancer, okay, cool.
Just be careful knowing that this company likely doesn't have any revenue.
I would argue you're not an expert when it comes to biosciences or cancer drugs.
And I'd also argue you're probably better off investing into things you actually understand.
So want to bring it back home here, Robert.
One, invest in stuff you understand.
If you don't understand it, don't invest in it.
Two, opportunity cost is important.
Every dollar not invested in the S&P, the NASDAQ, the Dow Jones is a dollar that you're
losing out on, especially at such a young age, when compounding can really turbocharge
your net worth over a long period of time.
Will, I love your spirit, but penny stock trading is gambling.
And the Rich Habits podcast is not here to teach people.
people gambling. And I'll be honest with you, we love math here. You're more likely if you read
or had notes on basic blackjack strategy, you're more likely to be profitable playing
blackjack at a casino than you are winning at a penny stock trading strategy. I looked up
some numbers for us here today. 78% of frequent penny stock traders lose money and they lose
over 90% of their capital within two years. That's crazy, right?
But that's the real math.
That is why we don't talk about penny stocks.
That's why neither of us trade penny stocks.
But I appreciate the fact that at such a young age, you're investing and you're interested
in learning how to invest.
I look at penny stocks as gambling and not investing.
And that's why everything Austin said is the blueprint for you and everyone else listening
because there's always going to be a tip from Bill at the Barbershop or a friend that's
at a party telling you what to buy.
and usually you have to look at that as gambling and you're probably going to lose your money.
So remember that. 78% of all frequent penny stock traders lose money.
Keep that in mind and just build a portfolio on all the things we talk about and you'll do just fine.
And I think a lot of Will's excitement for penny stocks might come from this notion of like get rich quick.
Right. Will's trying to say, hey, I want to make a lot of money as fast as I can.
Will, I promise you at 18 years old, there are infinite ways to make a time.
ton of money using AI for website development. Fable 5 is I think still out for another couple of days
and then you can buy it more with API stuff. But like there are so many ways, Will, that you can
turn 100, 200, $200, $500 of seed money in a business that you start into thousands or tens of
thousands over the coming years. If it again is a website design agency with AI or maybe there is
something where you want to do home services, you know, pressure washing or pest control,
like door to door sale. Like there's so many other different ways that you can actually say,
I have $100, $100, $400, $600, $600, $800, $600, in a consistent manner with elbow grease,
hard work, and unique skills in perspective. Then I'm going to put $100 bucks into a penny stock
and cross my fingers. That's not a strategy. That's gambling. That's hope. Take that $100 and go
deploy it towards something that actually has a outcome of success that will align with your
get rich quick excitement because I promise there's a ton of different ways out there.
This episode is exactly why the Rich Habits podcast is one of the top financial podcasts in America
because we spell it all out and we help people get on track and understand hope is not a
strategy and gambling is generally something that's going to lose you money and we're here to
teach you solid, tried and true strategies that work decade after decade to help you build wealth
so you can live financially free and go do whatever it is you want in life. And that is why I love
filming these podcasts every single week. So do I, Robert. And another reminder, if you are someone
that wants to invest into pre-IPO companies or series A, B, C, or D, like we're doing all of
the cool investments inside of the Rich Habits Network. I know we talked about the Robo Strategy BOT, E,
ETF, we've got exposure to figure, Apptronic, standard bots, and path robotics, all inside
of the Rich Habits Network, straight up into those companies at their recent valuations and previous
ones. We've got an Apptronic and I think like a billion dollars or something, a billion four maybe,
and now it's five and a half. But regardless, we've done these. We're doing it. We'll continue
to do it, not just with robotics, but with a ton of other different things. We've got a really
interesting nuclear energy company we're doing right now, an open source, open weight, front
tier AI LLM company right now. We've also got a recent aerospace company we're doing. We've got
tons of cool stuff that's just join us, hang out, do a deep dive, do your own research,
kick the tire, understand what's going on, then make a decision seven days later if you want
to stick around or not. But you've got to go check out the Rich Habits Network. There's
going to be a link to join us in the show notes below. Seven day free trial. We'll see you there.
Everyone, thanks so much for bearing with us on this interesting little Friday Q&A episode.
Don't forget, we've got that AI agent webinar coming up in the next couple hours.
Or go watch the replay.
It's going to be linked in the show notes below.
Everyone, we'll see you on Monday.
