Rich Habits Podcast - Q&A: Living in a Tiny Home, Berkshire Hathaway, and Bitcoin ETFs
Episode Date: February 29, 2024In this episode of the Rich Habits Podcast, Robert Croak and Austin Hankwitz answer your questions!---Public has finally released options trading on their platform! To learn more about all of the prod...uct features Public offers, click here!---⭐ Download our FREE Budgeting Template – click here⭐ Earn 5.1% on your savings with a High-Yield Cash Account – click here⭐ Automatically buy stock where you shop with Grifin – click here⭐ Protect your family with term life insurance from Suriance – click here⭐ Use code “Spotify” for 15% off our 4-module video course – click here⭐ Optimize your portfolio with Seeking Alpha – click here---👤 Explore everything Austin does – click here👤 Explore everything Robert does – click here❓ Ask us questions for our Q&A episodes – @richhabitspodcast on Instagram📬 Inquire about working together – christian@witz.vc---Options are not suitable for all investors and carry significant risk. Certain complex options strategies carry additional risk. Options can be risky and are not suitable for all investors. See the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options to learn more.For each options transaction, Public Investing shares 50% of their order flow revenue as a rebate to help reduce your trading costs. This rebate will be displayed as a negative number in the “Additional Fees” column of your Trade Confirmation Statement and will be immediately reflected in the total dollars paid or received for the transaction. Order flow rebates are only issued for options trades and not for transactions involving other assets, including equities. For more information, refer to the Fee Schedule.All investing involves the risk of loss, including loss of principal. Brokerage services for US-listed, registered securities, options and bonds in a self-directed account are offered by Open to the Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA & SIPC.See public.com/#disclosures-main for more information.Hankwitz Group LLC has an existing business relationship with NEOS Investment Management LLC. The opinions expressed are those of the author, and the author owns several NEOS ETFs.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Amazon presents, Laura versus Fruitflies.
Swarming your fruit and terrorizing your kitchen,
these little freaks multiply at a rate that would make a rabbit say, yo.
Chill.
But Laura shopped on Amazon and saved on cleaning spray, countertop wipes, and fly traps.
Hey, fruit flies, your baby boom ends here.
Save the Everyday with Amazon.
Hey everyone, and welcome back to the Rich Habits podcast, a top five business podcast on Spotify.
Before we jump into this episode, just want to give a general warning that myself, Robert, or the Rich Habits podcast Instagram account or TikTok account, for that matter, will never DM you asking you for cryptocurrency or money in general.
We just had one of our followers, unfortunately, get scammed by a fake account out of hundreds upon hundreds of dollars.
And we feel terrible about it.
We're not the ones doing this and there's nothing we can really do to stop it.
We try to verify all of the accounts here.
But please just do not ever, ever send money to anyone on the internet, pretending to be us.
Just don't send money to people on the internet, right?
Just don't do that.
Yeah, before you do any investments thinking it's me or Austin or anyone else,
the general rule of thumb is always make sure to do a Zoom call or a FaceTime call with them first
before you sign anything and send any money anywhere because at the end of the day, we can't do
anything about it. And so just be careful and always check the username and verify with us.
And one last note there, having that person send you an audio message is not the same thing
as jumping on a Zoom call or a FaceTime with them, right? AI, especially voice AI, is super
powerful and I think that there are definite times that people have almost been scammed by someone
pretending to be Robert or myself because there's so many examples of our voice right now on the
internet. So please just do not send anything to anyone that is never a good idea. With that being
said, you all might know public.com as the all in one investing platform, but now they've launched
options trading. And with it, they're doing something no other brokerage has ever done before.
Public is sharing 50% of their options trading revenue directly with you, the customer.
So whenever you trade options on public, you get something back.
And of course, there are no commissions or per contract fees either.
By sharing 50% of their options revenue, you'll know exactly how much they make from your options trades,
because public is literally giving you half of it.
In other words, it's a more transparent approach to options with no fees,
and you get something back on every single trade.
go to public.com and activate options trading by March 31st to lock in your lifetime rebate.
And of course, this was paid for by public investing. You must activate this options account by
March 31st for that revenue share. And be wary, options are not suitable for all investors and do
carry significant risks. If you want to read the full disclosure, it's in the podcast description
below. And as always, this is for U.S. members only. Now, our first question on this episode of
the Rich Habits podcast question and answer edition comes from Neil.
Neil says, which Bitcoin ETF should we choose?
There are so many to choose from.
Robert, what do you think?
Yeah, I think it's a great question.
And for me, I just always want to own the underlying asset in most cases and especially
with Bitcoin.
So I haven't really done a deep dive on which ones are the best.
You can obviously look at Black Rock and Ark and some of the others.
But for me, I want to own the underlying asset because I don't need the,
the additional layers of costs or management in that asset class.
So that's how I look at it, but I'd love to hear your take.
Yeah, so I think the I-Shares, I-B-I-B-T-E-F, is a pretty good one.
You know, it's sponsored by I-Share's, which is BlackRock.
They've now closed in on, I think, almost $10 billion in assets under management in only
five or six weeks now.
It's listed on the NASDAQ, which means there's ample liquidity and their custodian is
Coinbase, which is, of course, the best of the best.
I think what's interesting about this, though, is you have to think about the management fees that you mentioned there, Robert.
I don't pay management fees to own the underlying asset itself.
I would have to pay, however, management fees to own the Bitcoin ETF.
And the only reason I'd want to own the Bitcoin ETF is if it was inside of some sort of retirement account that I wasn't able to get direct exposure to Bitcoin, right?
I can go to my Coinbase account or public account and just buy Bitcoin straight up.
I couldn't exactly do that inside of like a Roth IRA or a 401k at work, right?
So I think what's also really important to mention, though, Robert, is the momentum that these Bitcoin
ETFs have seen just year to date, right? The new nine, I think is what they're coined. Bitcoin
ETFs now have over 300,000 cumulative Bitcoin under custody as every new dollar invested into these
ETFs need to be deployed one for one into Bitcoin itself, right? So it's like if someone goes out and,
you know, let's say an ETF takes in a billion dollars in AUM assets under management in one day,
That company then, the ETF issuer, has to take that billion and go buy Bitcoin from Coinbase or Fidelity,
whoever their custodian is right then, right there that day to make sure they have that same one-to-one liquidity.
Now, that's 300,000 Bitcoin in only six weeks.
I mean, Robert, that's six weeks.
What's going to happen over the next six months, six years, right?
This stuff is just getting started.
Yeah, I mean, one way to look at this is you look at that from a liquidity standpoint of how much AUM is coming into the markets,
every single day right now. Then you look at the we have the having in under 60 days from now.
So then that puts further constraints on the available Bitcoin that's in the market.
So that's why I think we're going to see over the next, let's call it, four to 18 months,
a tremendous run up on Bitcoin, potentially Ethereum. And then obviously the altcoins will follow.
So it's exciting, exciting times. And I think we can already see a bunch of that, you know,
happening right now. Yesterday was an amazing,
amazing day in cryptocurrency. And I just think that there's so much leading into this hype cycle,
into this bull run. And there's so much good news that it's going to be interesting to see
whose predictions end up winning as far as where one Bitcoin will be from a price perspective.
Let's call it by the end of this bull run or the top of this bull run. So that's going to be fun.
Yeah. And as always, no one can predict the top. They can't predict the bottom. They don't know
when or why or how. But we're all part of it. That's why we only allocate five to 15.
of our total assets inside of this asset class, right? That's about what I think the average person
should have because, you know, you do see a lot of volatility with cryptocurrency, right? It's only
been around for about a decade, whereas the S&P 500 and real estate and things like that have been
around for several decades and continue to show out performance. So really good question by Neil here.
Our next question comes from C.R. Norris. CR says I'm 32 years old and I'm trying to figure out
how to get out of my high interest debt. Right now, my fiance and I, thankfully, are on the
same page that we need to pay this debt off, and we are aiming to do that by October of 2024.
However, you guys talk a lot about a Roth IRA. Should I be investing into my Roth IRA while I
try and use the snowball method to pay off my high interest debt? Robert, what's the answer to this
question? No, no, no. As Austin and I say, every day of every week of every year, you can't out
invest high interest debt. Please, please, please understand the math. You want that podcast. You want that
positive arbitrage going to your favor and opening the Roth and getting all of those wonderful
investments we talk about would not work in your favor because the high interest debt is just too
much to overcome. So I think you're on the right track. It's a great question. And I'm so happy that
you're hitting it head on because you have to get that handled first and foremost so you can get
cash flow positive in your financial journey. And you won't do that with 30% interest. It's just
not going to happen. And just as a reminder here too, right? Like,
You're 32 years old.
You've got 30 more years of investing ahead of you.
And if you make a promise to yourself, a commitment to max out your Roth IRA every single
year, I can say with certainty you will retire a millionaire.
Like, don't even sweat it.
You're probably thinking, oh, my gosh, it's almost March.
I can't touch my Roth until October is what these guys are saying.
What happens over?
I mean, that's probably $5,000.
Like, oh, my gosh, it's so much money invested.
It's like, listen, man, it's so much, so much, so much better of an idea to pay off
the high interest debt.
You mentioned the snowball method, which we really like, right?
Any debt payoff method's great.
We recommend, however, the avalanche method because it focuses on the high interest debt first, right?
It's more mathematically sound.
It saves you more money over your debt payoff period.
However, paying off any debt, especially high interest is a really good idea from our perspective there.
So maybe consider switching to the avalanche method, especially since you have all this high interest debt.
But the end of the day, if you're debt free by October 2024, we are going to be thrilled for you.
Yeah.
And so many people.
crazy in our DMs. You know, they're like, I'm 37 and it's too late and I'm 42 and it's too
late. It's just crazy. It's not too late. You're far from too late. You can do a ton of damage
financially to set yourself up in 10 to 20 years. So stop thinking you're too late. It's all
about making the adjustments as early as you can so you can make up for that lost time, but it's
never too late. Stop worrying about it. Great question, CR. Our next question comes from
DeAngelo. DeAngelo says, quick podcast question for you guys. How do I go about investing in trying to
to buy a house? Should there be a balance or just stick to one objective first? Oh, gosh, what a good
question. So I like to approach this, and I'm just going to ramble here for a second. Robert,
then I'll let you jump in because, you know, I tried to balance it myself, call it four or five years ago.
How I approached it was investing something was always my bedrock, right? And that's something for me was
my Roth IRA. I always want to make sure that I was doing my best to max out my Roth IRA every single
year because I want to make sure that I have a wonderful nest egg in retirement come 65 years old.
So for me, having that $500 or so dollars per month going toward my Roth IRA was awesome. And
then anything on top of that was like, okay, I could use this for saving for a down payment for a
house type money, right? And that was, you know, I think for me it was a two and a half three year
process to save up for a down payment, which by the way was only $10,455.00.
for me at the time. Your boy wasn't ball in by any stretch of the imagination. So I was trying to invest
and say for a down payment, do all these different things. It worked for me. I loved what happened. I
loved the house I was able to purchase. And it was a great investment for me. But I definitely did
the balanced approach where like, I want to make sure I'm investing while also saving for a down payment.
With that being said, I could see where someone says, I'm going to pause investing, not stop completely,
but pause it for maybe two years of a time frame there. So I could then save an extra. I mean, if I had done
that that had been an extra $15,000, right? So I would have gone from $10,000 to $25,000,
which would have been a larger down payment perhaps for a larger house or just to get rid of
PMI. So I could see both sides of the equation. For me personally, I'm always trying to invest
my money. I always want to make sure my money's working for me in the stock markets, in
cryptocurrency, in everything else that we've got in our sort of portfolios now. But that's how
I've approached this in the past and how it has worked out for me. Robert, what's your
perspective on trying to buy a house while also trying to invest. Yeah, I'm going to put a little bit
of a different wrinkle on this. I definitely agree with Austin to do both. I wouldn't do one versus the
other. And certainly, without knowing your age and your overall situation, I wouldn't even be
considering buying a single family primary home right now. What I would do if I were you,
assuming you're 33 years old, we don't know. I would look at house hacking by buying a duplex,
triplex or quadplex, I would look at using the Fannie Mae 5% down mortgage because it's very favorable
and you can keep a lot of that money that you're talking about in your own pocket so you can
invest. So I would do both. I would look to house hack. I would not buy more than I need and really
get that first investment out of the way. So that way when it is time to get that primary home,
you have both. You have your base through your investing and you've had that extra money now because
you only put 5% down rather than 10 or 20%. So that way in two to three years from now,
you're just really set up well. Hopefully if you buy that duplex, triplex or quadplex,
the tenants are paying your mortgage. So that gives you more money every month to put towards
investing. And you're just in a really, really good position. I couldn't agree more with you,
Robert. I think what's just really important here is that DeAngelo's thinking and asking these
questions, right? How do I invest and buy a house and do all these things right?
Congrats, DeAngelo on being an absolute stud. We know you're going to be awesome with your money.
in 2024 and beyond. And if you end up buying the house, let us know. We'll throw you a little house
swimming party. Who knows? All right. Our next question comes from Jalicia. Jalicia says,
Hey, everyone. I'm from Mississippi and I'm 33 years old. My question is, if I want to retire early
and live off of my dividends, which dividend stocks should I be buying to get the best return?
And a quick follow up to that is what brokerage account should I be investing the money through
so I can receive the dividends in the most tax-efficient way? What a really,
really good question here, Robert, from Jalicia. I'll take a first stab at this. So if you want to
retire early, the definition of that means retiring before the traditional retirement age of 65.
But something a lot of people don't know is that you can actually gain access to your 401k Roth
IRA and other retirement specific accounts as early as 59.5. But I'm assuming you want to retire
even before that, which means probably in your 40s, maybe even early 50s. So if you want to
gain access to your money before 59 and a half without paying a big amount of penalties and
fees, that means you have to invest this money through a traditional brokerage account.
Now, what I'm doing myself is I'm investing into three different ETFs that are focused
on dividends. The first one is called SCHD. This ETF essentially focuses on big dividend aristocrat
companies, right, companies who've been paying dividends to their shareholder.
holders now for a couple decades that also have been growing their dividend payments consecutively
year over year, not just paying me a dollar per share this year, but is expected to pay $1.10,
$1.20, $40 per share next year, right? They're growing their dividend payments. Think like Visa
or MasterCard, right? These companies, they pay a small dividend, but the growth on those dividends
year over year is insane. The other two ETFs, which you guys are actually going to be familiar with,
is SPYI and QQQQI. These are two ETFs that help round up my dividend investing portfolio to help me focus
on exposure of the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ 100 while also paying me a very, very high distribution
yield of about 13% when you blend the two of them together. So that's how I approach this exact
same equation. I do it inside of a traditional brokerage account like public. And I also just invest
into those three dividend ETFs. I cash out those monthly dividends and I use it to live my life.
Yeah, I think that's a great way to cover it. And yes, there are individual stocks as well that you can
look at. I would do your research. I like Lowe's, you know, Verizon Wireless, John Deere. And also
one of Austin's favorites and it was a really good call out a couple years ago was ticker symbol,
oh, realty income. That's another good one as well. So there's a lot of ways to do this. But
Jalicia, I really love this question in Austin. I think you nailed it. Not much I can really add to that,
but a great strategy, as long as you're balanced out and you're not specifically just focusing on
dividend investing, I think you'll be great. And it's just a really good question and well thought out.
Totally. And if you do want to be like a psycho like me and just focus on dividend investing so you can retire
super early, nothing wrong with it. But to Robert's point, you're not going to see that capital appreciation, right?
Dividend stocks tend not to go to the moon like we've.
seen Nvidia do lately, right? Like, they just don't see that crazy upside potential via price. So when you are
doing this, Jalicia, just be prepared to see a lot of slow and steady up into the right versus a crazy
rocket ship like you might see with other stocks. Okay, before we jump into our next question, I just want to
remind everyone that public is officially the cheapest way to trade options. That's because they're doing
something no other brokerage has done before. They're sharing 50% of their options revenue
directly with you, the customer. Whenever you trade options on public, you get something back,
minimizing your transaction costs. So go to public.com and activate options trading before March
31st to lock in your lifetime rebate. Public.com, the cheapest way to trade options.
Our next question comes from Caleb. Caleb says, hey guys, I've been binging the episodes recently,
and I'm not sure if you've talked about this one yet. What are your thoughts on manufactured homes?
I want to get into real estate. I live in New York, but it seems impossible.
to buy any real estate here with the household income of only $100,000 a year.
Oh, Caleb. Okay. So my perspective is I only want to be putting money into assets that can
appreciate in value, right? This is why I don't go out and buy boats or jet skis and things like
that. Like, I used to have a jet ski, which is cool. But I guess I'm saying is like, I don't want
us tie up a bunch of my liquid cash asset net worth, right, into something that's going to go down
in value. Cars are a great example of this. That's why I'm thinking like, wait a second, I don't know if I want
to put a lot of my money into a prefabricated home or, you know, a tiny home or a trailer knowing
when I buy it for $80,000, it's going to only be worth $20,000 in seven years, right? It's like,
great, I just lost $60,000 where I could have put $80,000 in the stock market and over that same
seven-year period, it would have doubled to 160,000. So I just always think about the opportunity
cost of putting my money into something that's going down in value. So my answer is no, but I think
Robert has a different answer. I think it's a great question, Caleb, and there's no doubt that there is
a shortage of affordable housing in America today. So I think it's kind of twofold. Austin's probably
correct that there is a chance and there is depreciation in some of these manufactured homes. I think it
depends on what kind, what location, you know, what the setup is. But in my opinion, there is a
great need for affordable housing and manufactured homes generally play into that, whether it's a
tiny home or whatever you want to call it a boxable home. So for me, I think it's a really
interesting investing category right now. And for instance, I am buying back a property that I
used to own in Toledo, Ohio, where I'm from, because of one reason. It has three separate outlots
connected to the primary home and because they're still separated, I can legally put three ADUs,
additional dwelling units on that property, giving me four sources of income, the primary home and the
three ADUs. Now, these ADUs would be considered manufacturer at homes technically, and so I look at
it this way. Maybe the capital appreciation for each individual property isn't as great as a single
family home. I don't know. I think the jury is still out on that, but I look at it from the
income perspective. I have done the research on this particular property that each ADU should rent for
$750 a month. And so for that, it beats the 1% rule. I'm going to have a very low cost to make this
happen because I already own the property and the outlots. So I think it's all dependent,
but this could be a good strategy for you. You just have to do the research and really figure out
is the capital appreciation there? Because in a market like where Austin lives, let's say Nashville
in the surrounding area, you might have capital appreciations on a primary home of 6, 8, 10, 12% a year.
Whereas where I'm from in Toledo, Ohio, you look at if you get capital appreciation of 2 or 3% a
year, you're doing okay. So I think it's all number dependent, location dependent, and really
depends on what you're looking to do in this sector. But I think it's a good thought process.
I'm actually going through the process myself because I'm looking at it that I can get for around
$170,000, I can get three rental incomes from one property. So I think it's just area
dependent and really do your numbers to understand where you're at. Yeah, Caleb. I mean, if you've got
the desire to generate income, then maybe this could be a good idea, like what Robert's doing.
If you have the desire to live in it, then I'm kind of back of like, well, it's probably going
to depreciate in value. So maybe not a good idea. I think honestly, I mean, you live in New York.
See, how I also think about this too, Robert, is like, what's keeping this guy in New York?
$100,000 a year household income is marvelous all around the country except New York.
I mean, think about Toledo, Ohio, dude.
How far would $100,000 a year go in Toledo, Ohio, or any parts of Ohio, right?
Even here in Nashville, Knoxville.
Even here in Florida.
Yeah, dude.
So, like, I just think about like, Caleb, I'm rooting for you, man.
Trust us for both on your team here, dude.
But, like, if there is a world where you can continue to keep a high, call it 70,
90, 100,000 year household income somewhere else in the country and your dream is to buy a house,
you could absolutely move somewhere else, have a great income and own a house that does appreciate
for sure over a longer period of time there versus trying to dabble and figure out modular
homes and manufactured homes and stuff like that. So it's just such a tough question, man.
It's not, again, something I wouldn't do myself, but it seems like Robert would do it
from like an investment perspective, but from like a consumer perspective, maybe just like be weary.
Yeah, I agree. That's a great way to look at it again. It's not a one size fits
all plan and I really like the question because it gets us thinking outside of the box.
And I happen to be just right now going through this exact question with a property in Ohio.
So it's exciting for me to really run the numbers and take all of these elements into
consideration to make sure for myself that it's a good investment long term.
Great question, Caleb.
Our next question, speaking of purchasing houses, comes from Silva.
Silva says, hello, thank you off the eye opening podcast and the awesome content.
it's helped me so much with my financial organizational skills. Here's my question. I'm 31 years old.
How do I define my home price budget? I have an annual income of $100,000. Robert, we've had so many
people in the 30s ask questions today. This is so fun. I love it. I love it. And the questions are so
in depth. That is one of the best parts of the Rich Habits podcast when we think back a year.
When we first started getting questions, I felt like it was so many rudimentary questions.
and now it's like they're getting more and more and more advanced.
And I love this because also like you pointed out,
the ages of these questions,
these advanced questions are getting younger and younger.
If we're making a difference and getting more and more people in their 20s and 30s
thinking like investors and really following through,
we've done our job and I'm going to sleep well every night for the rest of my life
because this is awesome because, you know,
we weren't really taught this in high school or college.
And now people are getting young.
younger and younger and really crushing it financially. So this is awesome. Robert, what do you think about
this question? This is a great question, Silva. And the general rule of thumb that I don't really
agree with is that you should be able to look at your budget as 30% all in ownership cost of your
gross monthly income. 30% of gross monthly income. That's the general rule of thumb. In my opinion,
based on inflation, the cost of everything right now, I think you should shoot lower because so many
people end up house broke. That is a term where you just have too much house for your income. And there's
just too many variables. So I would shoot for 25% if you could and a max maybe of all in cost of
27 or 28%. That would be my opinion. But I'd love to hear Austin's take and make sure you truly
understand what the all in cost is. So many people go, oh, my all in cost is payment, insurance,
PMI, and lawn mowing. And you forget about HOA, this, this, this,
this, all these other things.
So please understand you're all in cost when making this calculation.
So Robert, you use the word gross.
I think gross is very important when we think about like annual income and like stuff like that.
But let's shift away from gross to take home because, you know, with gross, there's like
401K contributions and health insurance, like all these other confusing things.
Let's take that out of the equation for a second and shift to take home pay money that
actually hits your bank account after your employer pays you.
So at $100,000 a year, your take home pay.
is about $7,000 a month or maybe $84, $80,000 to $84,000 a year after taxes and all these other
different things. So of that $7,000 now, if you use the same 30% rule that Robert talked about,
that's a $2,100 or so total allocation you can have to purchase a house, which $2,100 a month
isn't a lot of money to buy a nice house. Don't get me wrong. There's a ton of cool houses
that are out there that I'm sure you could afford, but just that's, that's not that much.
So here's what I would do instead in some considerations.
Having a larger down payment is really going to be your best friend here.
Being able to put down the 10%, the 15%, the 20% down is going to take your borrowing cost
from, call it, $400,000, $300,000, $320, $280, something like that.
And you'll also get rid of PMI, which is going to come out of that monthly payment, saving you
money every month as well. I was able to put 20% down on my house. My monthly mortgage is about $2,200 a
month. It is at a 6.5% interest rate. And I think I borrowed about $320,000 for that. So just keep in mind,
you do have a path to home ownership, Silva. And there's a lot of stuff to be excited about,
but it might come a little bit slower than you think, assuming you don't want to be house broke.
We do not want people to be house broke. We want houses to be an awesome investment, an awesome
experience, a blessing in your life even, right? And by allocating 40, 50, 60% of your take home pay to a
mortgage payment, like, that's not how anyone should be living their life. So I think the $2,100 to
$2,500 a month payment is sort of where you should aim for your all-in cost here. And the way
you're going to be able to achieve that is by putting more money down as the down payment.
Or house hacking. We talk about house hacking all the time. House hacking. That's a great idea.
You look at it this way. $2,100 all-in isn't going to buy much?
but if you're house hacking and it's a duplex or a triplex and maybe you can't buy that amount of
house if it's a single family but you can in a duplex triplex or fourplex then you're going to
have the tenants making up most of the portion of that all in cost that will get you there
financially in the beginning and that's why i'm always preaching i think you start that way
before you buy the single family home so that's one way to look at it because then your
remaining portion of that all in cost would probably fall in line
with that $2,2,100 a month budget.
It probably would.
That's a great idea, Silva.
So look into house hacking.
I know Robert talked about that 5% mortgage all the time.
I feel like he mentions it in every episode at this point.
You must be really excited about it.
I just think it's great for people to get it out of their minds.
I know, you know, you've got that old school tactic and it's great because you own your
primary home.
You love it.
It's great.
But overall, I don't think it's right for everyone.
I think it's better off to get your base built and be a renter.
or it's better off to house hack because you have to remember a lot has changed since three years ago
when you bought your primary home. It's a whole different world of what you can buy for the same
amount of money. So it's getting to a point as you just illustrated, you can't buy much all in
on $21 or $2,200 a month. And that's why so many people are house broke because they just go,
well, this is what I make and this is what it costs. I'm told I should buy a primary home.
I just don't agree with it. That's why I would either house hack,
or I would rent till I get my first 100K invested and save before I buy that primary home in
these conditions. Yeah, I agree. And I think a big mistake people make is thinking or wanting to just
rent forever. Like, don't get me wrong. I think renting is a great stepping stone to your point of like,
if I can rent and, you know, use it as a way for me to get a $100,000 base built or I'm trying to
build a business. I'm trying to do some. So renting is just super easy and convenient for me right now.
even from a location perspective, that makes a ton of sense. But I just, I don't want to be,
you know, the person who rents for 40 years instead of, you know, putting away the same amount of
money as equity to pay off the house that I bought 30 years ago. You know what I'm saying?
Like, knowing that you're, and the thing too about renting, like the rent price always goes up
every single year, whereas your mortgage is like the same for that whole 30 year period. So there's just
a ton of different things to think about there, Silva. But I think what's really important is
you have a goal to becoming someone that owns real estate.
That might be as a house hacker.
That might be as a landlord.
That might be as whatever it is for you.
But owning real estate, I think, is always going to be a really good sort of strategy in
anyone's wealth building journey.
I agree.
See, there's always two sides to the coin, sometimes three sides.
And I think that was a good kind of back and forth of both of our perspectives.
So our last question comes from Meg Hashim.
I hope I said that right.
Meg Hashim says, hi, Austin and Robert, I want to get your opinion on Berkshire Hathaway stock.
It trades like a stock, but it's a portfolio of something like an ETF.
And it's outperformed the S&P 500 significantly over the last several years.
Do you think it's a good investment?
Robert, want to kick this one off?
I think it's a great question.
And for me, yes, it's a good investment.
I don't own it.
I don't follow it.
I know it has outperformed VO over the past five years.
I do know that.
So for me, if it works well for you, the performance is there, the cost basis is there,
then yes, it is a good investment. It all just depends on what your investment thesis is and what
you're looking to accomplish. Whenever I see an investment vehicle that is consistent and is going
up to the right, it's always going to be a good investment. So I like the question. I think you're
on the right track. I do think you should own S&P 500 as well. That's why we talk about VO a lot.
But without knowing all of the information, I think it's a great question. You're on the right
track. I actually do own a lot of Berkshire Hathaway. I've got tens of thousands of dollars inside of it
in my retirement accounts because I treat it like an ETF. Like Mae Hacham was alluding to.
I don't treat it like a single stock because it has a portfolio of a bunch of different names
inside of it, right? That includes Apple and American Express and Geico and like all these other
different names. And, you know, Warren Buffett is arguably the best investor of all time. So I'm cool
with Warren kind of handling, you know, my small allocation of my total retirement in his hands.
So I'm here for it. Now, after Warren dies, God forbid, like Charlie Munger did earlier this year,
then I don't know, right? I'll have to reassess. I'll have to figure things out, right? But at the
moment, Berkshire Hathaway's cool stock to have in my portfolio. Love it. Great question. Again,
thanks, everyone for following along on this wonderful journey with the Rich Habits podcast. We are so,
so grateful for all of you each and every week. We just talked about our birthday. So that was amazing.
Our first year anniversary now. And so we're very excited for everything moving forward. We have a lot
of surprises coming up for you guys. And just thank you so, so much. If you love what we do,
please share it with a friend, share it with a relative and get those five-star reviews for us and
keep us up high in those charts. Thanks, everyone. And have a great rest of your week.
