Right About Now with Ryan Alford - The Future of PR: Earned Media, AI in Journalism & Visibility Strategies with Brett Farmiloe
Episode Date: September 19, 2025Right About Now with Ryan Alford Join media personality and marketing expert Ryan Alford as he dives into dynamic conversations with top entrepreneurs, marketers, and influencers.... "Right About Now" brings you actionable insights on business, marketing, and personal branding, helping you stay ahead in today's fast-paced digital world. Whether it's exploring how character and charisma can make millions or unveiling the strategies behind viral success, Ryan delivers a fresh perspective with every episode. Perfect for anyone looking to elevate their business game and unlock their full potential. Resources: Right About Now Newsletter | Free Podcast Monetization Course | Join The Network |Follow Us On Instagram | Subscribe To Our Youtube Channel | Vibe Science Media SUMMARY In this episode of "Right About Now," host Ryan Alford interviews Brett Farmiloe, CEO of Featured.com, about the evolving world of earned media and public relations in the age of AI. Brett explains how platforms like Featured.com and HARO connect experts with journalists, enabling organic media exposure without paid ads. They discuss the impact of AI on media visibility, the importance of authentic expertise, and practical tips for leveraging these platforms to boost brand credibility and reach. The conversation highlights the enduring value of earned media in modern marketing strategies. TAKEAWAYS Definition and significance of earned media versus paid media.Challenges and misconceptions in public relations (PR) and measuring its return on investment (ROI). The influence of AI and large language models (LLMs) on media visibility and expert sourcing. The role of platforms like Featured.com and HARO in connecting experts with journalists. The relevance of earned media in the current marketing landscape. The intersection of PR, SEO, and AI in shaping customer discovery and brand visibility. Common misconceptions about the effectiveness and measurement of PR efforts. The evolving marketing funnel due to AI and LLMs affecting customer decision-making. The importance of human expertise in content creation and journalism amidst AI advancements. Strategies for businesses to leverage platforms for media exposure and authentic content creation.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hey guys, on today's episode of right about now, talk to Brett Armolo.
He is the CEO of Featured.com.
We talked about everything earned media, PR, everything they're doing with Harrow,
help a reporter out.
Brett is an incredible knowledge base for everything you need to know about getting
the word out there in earned media.
What does that mean?
You're an expert.
You've got all kinds of knowledge.
But people don't want you selling to them.
They want you informing them.
Brett talks about how featured and Harrow allow you to do this in an organic, transparent way.
Also, quickly, meeting the needs of the journalists so that you get featured like you want to.
You can talk about your expertise.
This is what PR looks like in 2025, all that and more.
Today, I'm right about now.
PR is just so hit and miss.
Sometimes it's about the timing of the placement.
Sometimes it's about the outlet itself.
And PRs do a great job of helping clients understand that ROI and helping quantify the impact of that.
But that's probably the biggest misconception is that, hey, I got featured in Fast Company.
This is going to move my business dramatically forward.
It might, it might not.
And the key with going back to the AI visibility piece of where we're at today is you've got to experiment.
It's sometimes a quantity and quality game where it's something that's a persistent thing.
You go to the gym and you're not going to see results just like in one workout.
It's a consistent effort that ultimately moves things forward.
This is right about now with Ryan Alford, a Radcast Network production.
We are the number one business show.
on the planet with over one million downloads a month.
Taking the BS out of business for over six years and over 400 episodes.
You ready to start snapping next and cash and checks?
Well, it starts right about now.
What's up guys?
Welcome to Write About Now.
We're always talking about how you can get your marketing and your business right now.
It's not about last week.
It's not about two years ago.
It's about the future it's about the here and the now.
And that's why.
Hey, it's the topic I like.
I've got my notebook out, people, because I'm going to be taking notes because I like to get featured.
We got the CEO of Feature.com. It is. Brett, Armolo. What's up, Brett? What's up?
Ryan, what's happening? Just ready to talk some good old-fashioned public relations. Am I allowed to call it that? Is that not sexy enough now?
Sounds great to me. Earned media is what I would call it. Brett, I think we'll do a little lesson for the audience first.
You got paid media. You got earned media. And most people probably that listen to this show, probably know the difference. But I'm going to lighten them a bit.
Paid media, expensive, and paid.
Earn media means you did the work.
You earned the right to get the coverage.
Is that a simple enough summary, you think, Brett?
I think so.
I think that's pretty clear.
What got you into earned media, brother?
I ran a marketing agency for 10 years, and we had about 500 small business clients that
we were servicing, and the hardest thing to do was get them featured in the media.
And the thing that they had an abundance of was knowledge to share about their business,
but nowhere to share it.
created a platform that allowed them to answer questions that,
pertain to their expertise. We take those insights, get them placed in articles, and essentially that
platform, which is now featured, took off faster than the agency, sold the agency at the end of
21 and been focused on featured for the last three and a half years. I love it. What is that balance?
I'll put myself in this camp. I thought maybe earned media and was dead three or four years ago.
Here's why. Not because it was physically, but I just thought, can you really get featured again
without running an ad? Is everything pay to play? And where's the line there? And was I just wrong?
Yeah. I mean, the problem to be solved on both sides is on the business side of things, you want to be featured in the media because it creates visibility for yourself and your business in front of customers. The problem on the journalism side of things is that sourcing experts for stories is an infinite problem. There's always some story that's being created where an expert is needed to provide insight for a story to inform the journalists on what to write about and or to back up the claims that's being made in that article. So that's the problem to be solved on that side of things.
I think it's just amplified in terms of the rise of AI, making sourcing even a harder problem for journalists.
And now it's also a more pressing problem on the business side of things because now the more that you're featured in the media, the more that AIs and LLMs are starting to cite different references and recommend your products and services when your customers are querying these AI bots.
It's an interesting time in 2025.
Very interesting.
I'm glad you went there, Brett, smart guy.
Because with the SEO thing slash AI thing, it's so fascinating to me because I've watched all the
performance marketers now go.
And suddenly they're going, yeah, you need to work on brand.
You need to work on PR.
And I've been like, I've been telling you that for 20 years.
The race to the bottom with performance marketing with everything's a deal and an offer,
eventually doesn't work because not everyone's buying today.
But you've got to establish yourself and be in front of people when they're looking for
things, searching AI or whatever. And when you get featured in media to your point when people
ask questions about a topic, then your answers are what you said get cited. That's the key.
Am I hearing you right? Yeah. I mean, look, we're pretty new. We don't even know what to call it yet.
Is it AEO? Is it AEO? What AI visibility? We haven't even defined the category, let alone
what works yet. A lot of people are in an exploratory phase where they're setting up controlled
experiments. They're saying, hey, we're going to give it six months on featured and we're going to get
featured in as many publications as possible. We're going to measure the AI visibility for certain
prompts and queries based off of which questions we're responding to. And we're going to measure it and
see if it does anything for our business. So I think that we're in that research exploratory phase where
it's a pretty exciting time. If you could just imagine way back in the day when an SEO is just
emerging and setting up all these different experiments, it's a more informed version of that. What's the
biggest misconception amongst people with PR? And what's the biggest misconception? It's really hard
to measure in terms of the success of it. I learned this really way back. I helped the actor Hugh Jackman
launch a coffee company. And back in like 2012. And when we first launched, he was on Rachel
Ray. He was on The Chew. And he was on some other TV show. And what's the value of each one of
those appearances? And so I was over here behind the scenes looking at tweet deck on Twitter.
I remember that. I remember that. And I'm looking at Google Analytics. I'm looking at the Shopify
sales and everything like that. And we're on Rachel Ray passing out 200 bags of coffee and seeing
what impact that would have. PR is just so hit and miss. Sometimes it's about the timing of the
placement. Sometimes it's about the outlet itself. And PRs do a great job of helping clients
understand that ROI and helping quantify the impact of that. But that's probably the biggest
misconception is that, hey, I got featured in Fast Company. This is going to move my business.
and it's dramatically forward it might it might not and the key with going back to the
AI visibility piece of where we're at today is you've got to experiment it's sometimes a
quantity and quality game where it's something that's a persistent thing you go to the gym
and you're not going to see results just like in one workout it's a consistent effort that
ultimately moves things forward nailed it brett farmalo he is the CEO of featured dot com brett
kind of like brand it's the same thing like brand marketing you need to keep your brand top of
mind. No matter what people want to say, there's still a purchase funnel. You can call it a
purchase cycle. You can call it whatever you want. You've got to get people at the top of the
funnel. That means they're aware of you so that when they are ready to buy, they have you in the
consideration set. And I think PR, much like brand marketing, is getting you in that awareness
cycle with those people. And that's a hard thing to measure sometimes because you don't know
when 20, 35 percent, whatever it is of those people are going to convert. That's the problem. That's
always been the challenge with brand or PR is because just because you go on Rachel Ray and a million
people watch the show and you hand out three in her bags, it doesn't mean you're going to sell
$3 million worth of coffee that day. Yeah, you know, on the B2B side of things, it's always you're
looking at leads and you're asking them, how did you hear about us and things of that nature.
The unique aspect in terms of the funnel is that, yes, traditionally search was top of funnel
and then you had more competitive keywords for more middle bottom of the funnel type of stuff.
But what we're seeing today with LLMs, it's a dramatic transformation in terms of now people
might start top a funnel and an LLM and gradually work themselves all the way to the bottom
of the funnel and be ready to purchase when they convert from an LOM over to a website.
That's a really interesting space because basically someone's saying, hey, give me the best
PR platforms that are out there and there might be 10 recommendations.
Okay, these three sound interesting.
What's the differences between these three?
Okay, here's my business and my problem, my challenge, my budget.
Which one would you recommend?
And now I've gotten from top of funnel all the way to bottom of funnel without doing any external
research. And that's the most interesting thing that's emerged from these LLMs is the trust
factor that people are willing and able to trust an AI recommendation and take action on it.
Yeah. An LLM. Is it learned language or language learned model?
Large language model. There it is. Everyone listening. Most people probably know that at this
point, our audience. But when you're plugging in those prompts, that's what Brett went through.
It was kind of the prompt of this question.
than that question. And if you aren't prompt, we have to have a prompt engineer on to talk
some more about that. We're in like the 2.3.0 phase of that, as smart as these things to get.
Brett, you've been around. You had your agency. And now you're doing Feature.com. I want to get
to Harrow here shortly. Is it not just blow your mind where we've gotten with freaking LLM and
AI in general? Yeah, it's interesting because you bring a Pupp Reporter out, which we just
acquired just a few months ago. And Harrow is just a three times a day email newsletter that
summarizes journalist queries, puts that into a single newsletter and sends it out to sources and
they can respond directly to the journalist and get in touch to help each other out. And we're talking
about this really advanced technology. And Harrow is a blast from the past. This is 2008 at its
finest where almost nothing has changed in terms of that initial email to where we're at in
2025. And it's because it works. And at the end of the day, there's really complex technologies,
but it's about connection. It's about the value proposition of helping each other out and
solving each other's problems, and that hasn't changed, no matter how far technology is advanced.
Let me just admit, acknowledgeant to what you just said. We make things too complex,
bringing back the simple concept. Email and prompt of like, hey, here's an expert in
XYZ. And that was around you. I was like, I remember it. I literally remember being in the
industry. I remember when I first got out of your team reach outers. I remember that hero name.
And then I think I ran into it. I don't know a few months ago. This was always a great concept.
I don't know why it went away. Sometimes we bury things that are effectiveers. I don't know.
Why did it go away?
There's a variety of reasons and what we've really been focused on since bringing it back is restoring quality and trust at the core of the platforms.
The things that we've done is we run every single pitch through an AI detection and make that transparent for journalists to see if they care about whether or not something's 100% AI generated, they're able to one-click filter out those pitches so that their inbox is spared from just stuff.
We've done profile verification and source verification so that people are who they say they are.
a lot of different things that we've had to invest in over the last few months, simplicity can
sustain. That makes a lot of sense that betting out bad players as people that aren't maybe being
transparent about their credentials, things like that. Is that what I'm hearing? Yeah, the more
simple a solution is, the more exposure it becomes as it becomes more popular. You've got to have
some safeguards behind the technologies so that can continue, the value proposition and the mission
can continue to be effective. That's what ultimately led to end up in our hands is that
this simplicity just wasn't worth investing in. And for us, it's 100% worth investing in because
we think that this is a space that's going to continue to grow. We have AI now. It's making
things easier. It's simplifying certain things. It's allowing more tasks to get done faster from
research to other things. But there's this fine line with journalism and all these other things.
If it's your ideas and you've distilled them through 10 prompts with AI, not just going,
hey, I write an article for me about X.
Okay, that's lazy.
But if you've used it properly and you just steal it,
and it generates something because of your intellect and strategy of prompting or whatever,
what that outputs versus all the AI content.
Where do we fall on this?
Okay, I don't want any AI content.
Okay.
What's the point of these tools then?
I don't know.
We're going to hit this point.
I know where people are like, oh, I don't want any AI content.
But, okay, where do you fall on this?
The expert side of things, the biggest barrier to sharing knowledge,
time. And most of our knowledge is not on the internet because time has prevented us from sharing
that knowledge. And yet people want an outlet to share knowledge in meaningful ways. AI represents
this opportunity to help match and identify certain opportunities and get that initial draft
out so that you're able to take across the finish line. But the human in the loop is what's
most important on that side. Publishers and journalists are still figuring it out. I've talked with
hundreds of journalists, hundreds of publishers about their AI policies, what their approach to AI
is, things of that nature. And there's two different camps. There's a camp that's like,
I don't care. Look, I'm going to get an AI pitch. What matters most to me is that the credentials
check out, that the source is verifiable, that it could support my story. And most journalists will take
100% AI generated response. And it'll just get in touch with that person directly and get what
they actually need to take it across the finish line. And then there's a camp that's like, look,
no matter how much AI prompting that you've done, it's still AI generated. We think that our end
product is going to get penalized for featuring AI generated content. We're cool. We don't want it.
It's just the earliest stages of this where it reminds me of when social media just opened up
for businesses in 2007, 2008, Twitter's just coming about. And I would travel around the country
giving speeches about social media policies. And I remember how terrified people were about
commenting as a brand. What if someone says something negative about me? How do we respond to that? Do we
respond to that. And those are questions that just eventually will get sorted out as people become a
little bit more comfortable with this new area that we're living in. But it definitely reminds me of
when social media emerged and there's different policies and different overreactions and underreactions
to certain things. And it'll just figure itself out. Along those lines, I agree with you. And it is like
the Wild Wild West a little bit. Some people we've run into it, you don't even tell you the size of
the companies like that are, oh, no AI. Give me a break. I get they don't want 100% fake. Doesn't sound right
bot writing, but when these things are getting smart and learning how to take your writing
samples and do things back to time, that will figure yourself out. We live in the world where
if this does adapt, people get more comfortable when we figure out these norms, are we still
going to need experts to comment on it? Or are they AI is just going to be so smart that we take
it all for gospel? Yeah, there's always going to be a need for human feedback. Where I think we're
at today in 2025 is that there's two camps in terms of AI out.
There's pre-training and then there's post-training. The pre-training data is amazing. Essentially, the whole internet has been ingested to go into these different models. And now we're in a phase of post-training. We need to look at these outputs from these different models to keep advancing them. And the only way that's possible is through insights from true experts. You're seeing a lot of that in academia right now to better train these models. You're going to see more of an opportunity in the professional domains. If you go to human resources or technology,
or finance or marketing, how do you grade these outputs and how do you keep improving them?
And for that, humans are always going to be in need of evaluating those outputs and improving
them. We reach ASI, artificial super intelligent. Probably I have no idea when that is, but it's a ways
off and we don't have anything to worry about up until then. Brett, I was going to say, you know,
what you'd recommend to people, but your product kind of is the solution in a lot of ways. So talk to
me about what's the process for working with featured and or hero and the best way for people
to utilize it. Feature.com is a freemium model. Anyone can answer up to three questions a month
at no cost, and then we have paid subscriptions after that, starting at $11 a month. How featured works
is publishers are able to ask questions, better experts are able to answer those questions,
and then those answers get passed along the publisher for consideration. The best thing to do
is to sign up for featured, answer a couple questions, create your profile, and see what happens,
see if you get featured. And if it works, continue to share that knowledge. I always encourage
people to set up alerts that they get notified when there's new questions that pertain to their
expertise. That way, they're not spending an infinite amount of time evaluating these
opportunities and it comes to you. The feature is pretty easy to use in that regard. Also a great
way to receive high quality content written by human experts for your website. If you don't
want to try to get featured in the media, you could also just receive featured content
that's written by human experts. And then Hero, Help Reporter out, you can go to helpreporter.com
input your email address, and then you'll start to receive three times a day emails, morning,
afternoon, and evening editions with different queries from journalists that are looking to get
connected with sources. And you could just reply directly. And is there a cost for Harrow?
Harrow is totally free on both sides. How do we make money, Brett?
It is free for sources. It's free for journalists, fully supported by newsletter ads.
So in every Harrow edition, there's a little text ad up top that advertisers pay.
for it to get distributed out to all of our source lists, and that's how we make money.
We're building a list. That's what we're doing. Is that what I'm hearing? The more people
that are on the list is the modernization. Harrow is the largest expert source place on the
internet. That's the value proposition for a journalist is the diversity of who they're
able to get connected with and how fast. That's the truism that's been around with Harrow forever.
You could literally get connected with anyone in the world. We've heard a journalist that
gotten connected with like Jane Goodall. Jane's not looking at Arrow.
She's not reading these emails, but the magic of it is that someone sees this Harrow query, thinks of someone in their life, forwards it on, and we make it really easy to get connected with that journalist without having to sign up.
I love it. I'm going to go sign up. I need to get on this. I need to get to get some fear. Get back, man, Harrow 2.0 or 3.0 or whatever you want to call it.
I'm getting in there. I'm featured. You actually get early access to Harrow queries. If you're not wanting to sign up for two platforms, you can just go to feature.com. We have early access to Harrow queries on feature.
because the limitation of Harrow
is journalists are often looking for a source fast
and they might request something
and then the next Harrow newsletter goes out
three, four hours from now.
We'll post that immediately on featured
so they can start to get responses
and then use a second wave of Harrow to get connected.
Brett, very insightful.
I love the products.
If you're listening, you need to take advantage.
This is all part of the marketing mix these days.
This is 2025 marketing mix
using earned media, using sources,
being featured. People buy from people and they need to know your expertise and this is the way to
share it without sound sales guide all times. I love it, Brett. We've nailed the dot coms forever,
but social, anything else. Hit anything you want there with how people stay up to date with what
you're up to. Yeah, feature.com, helper reporter.com, and then I can be connected with on LinkedIn
and happy to connect with anyone. The biggest thing that I've learned as an entrepreneur is that great
ideas come from anywhere and it's the founder's job to listen to every idea, especially
from the people who are using the product on both sides.
Be a great filter, prioritize,
and that's how you can keep iterating and innovating on what you're building.
Brett, it was a pleasure meeting you and having you on the show.
Ryan, thank you.
Hey, guys, do you want to find us?
Ryan is right.com.
We'll have links to featured.
We'll have links to Harrow.
And of course, we'll drop LinkedIn for Brett so you can tell them more.
All the features you want to added to the feature.
Features on features.
It's met as it gets.
We appreciate you for making us.
Number one, we'll see you next time and right about now.
This has been right about now with Ryan Alford, a radcast network production.
Visit Ryanisright.com for full audio and video versions of the show or to inquire about sponsorship opportunities.
Thanks for listening.