School of War - Ep 107: John Orloff on Masters of the Air
Episode Date: January 23, 2024John Orloff, creator, writer and co-executive producer of Apple TV+’s Masters of the Air, joins Aaron to talk about the new show highlighting the WWII experiences of the men of the 100th Bomb Group,... a part of the 8th Air Force’s strategic bombing campaign over Europe. Masters of the Air streams January 26th only on Apple TV+. ▪️ Times 02:25 Introduction 03:00 Getting started 05:45 Band of Brothers 12:56 Finding the story 19:44 Masters of the Air 24:37 Core characters 30:12 Group level 32:11 Influences 37:38 Production challenges 40:25 Procedure as drama 43:50 Unique trauma 48:20 Casting Follow along on Instagram Find a transcript of today’s episode on our School of War Substack
Transcript
Discussion (0)
All right, we've been waiting a long time for this one.
This Friday, January 26th, sees the premiere on Apple TV of Masters of the Air.
It's made by the same people who made Band of Brothers in the Pacific.
And if you, like me, are fanatically devoted to those shows.
This new production, which focuses on a bomber group that was part of the 8th Air Force,
doing strategic bombing over Europe, is a big deal.
Here at School of War, we are marking the occasion with two interviews I'm very excited about.
Today we have the writer and co-executive producer of Masters of the Air joining us.
His name is John Orloff.
Among many other credits, Orloff also wrote the D-Day and the Holocaust episodes of Band of Brothers.
So he was basically already a hero of mine long before I knew his name.
We will talk about how this new series came to be, what it was like to write and produce it,
and of course the history behind the show.
And then next week, we have the author of the original book, Masters of the Air,
itself a fascinating, extremely well-written document, well worth your time.
Don Miller, joining us as a guest for a truly fascinating discussion of the show, the book,
and also of the history of strategic bombing over Europe.
It's been a real treat for me to record these, so please enjoy and enjoy the show.
I'll definitely be watching this Friday.
It is a prescription for war, this Iraqi invasion of Kuwait.
December 7, 1941, a date which was a date which will be a date which will be a day, which will be a description,
live in infamy.
The bloody experience of Vietnam
is to end in a stale.
We continue to face a grave
situation in Iran.
We shall fight on the beaches,
we'll fight on the landing grounds,
we shall fight in the fields
and in the streets.
We shall never surrender.
For maps, videos, and images,
follow us on Instagram,
and also feel free to follow me on Twitter
at Aaron B. McLean.
Hi, I'm Aaron McLean.
Thanks for joining School of War.
I am absolutely delighted to be joined today by John Orloff.
He is the writer and co-executive producer of Masters of the Air.
He's got many other credits to his name before that.
Most relevantly to this discussion, and most meaningfully to me, personal, as an enormous fan of this production, he is also the writer.
I believe two episodes of Band of Brothers.
Is that correct?
Yeah, that's correct.
Two and nine.
John, thank you so much for joining us today.
And, you know, I think what would – you're the first pure artist we've had on the show.
as opposed to, you know, writers who are writing about military history for, you know, for a part of their career.
Though, I suppose one of the things you might say is actually that that does characterize you.
You're certainly the first filmmaker of any kind we've had on the show.
I'm really excited about this, just as I'm excited about Masters of the Air itself.
Maybe start by just telling us how you got into this line of work, whether it's writing and filmmaking broadly,
and then more specifically, you know, this vein of World War II that you've been tapping for some time now.
Sure.
I mean, I'll get to the World War II stuff as quickly as.
I can because this is not about showbiz.
But I grew up in an entertainment family.
My father was a director.
My grandfather was a director.
My great-grandfather was a radio performer.
So that's where I started, but I was always obsessed with history.
And I am of a generation that loved World War II movies, you know, patent.
Guns of Navarone, these really classic 1960s, 1970s, World War II movies.
Hoban's Heroes was like a television show that was on every day in reruns growing up.
So I was really into the war.
And I, very early in my career, I was really lucky to meet Tom Hanks.
And he, over the course of a couple of meetings, ended up asking me if I would write an episode
of Band of Brothers, which was the second episode, The Dubevents.
D-Day episode, and he was really happy with my work on that. So he asked me to write another one,
which was the episode where they stumbled across the concentration camp. And then, you know,
then I got a phone call about 10 years ago to write a couple of episodes of the next one, Master of the
air. And that turned into a really long odyssey of trying to get it made.
culminating in us getting to make it, and it's really terrific.
There's so many ways into this.
And if you don't mind, can we linger on Band of Brothers for just a couple of minutes before coming up to Masters of the Air?
I expect probably most of our listeners will see it.
We'll have seen it.
And if you have it, by the way, you should.
Colin will back me up here.
I actually don't say this kind of thing to most guests.
But the two episodes that you cite, the second episode, which covers D-Day itself and then why we fight, are just two outstanding episodes.
an already outstanding series.
Incredibly, they were meaningful to me.
My father participated as a young man in the liberation of Daqau.
So the YWy Fight, I felt like I was watching my own family.
This was a sister camp.
This was an affiliated camp of Daqau.
So what your, wow, I'm getting like, so I'm getting a little emotional.
So he would have experienced something very, very similar.
And so let me, just a big picture question about Band of Brothers,
and then the whole subgenre that it spawned.
How did that start?
You know, we, which, and by it, I mean, the revival of big mini-series.
Because, you know, in the 80s, you had-
It was bad.
Yeah, yeah, why?
What happened was, go ahead.
You know, Tom Hanks is incredibly passionate about American history,
very knowledgeable about American history,
and he had done Apollo 13.
and after he made Apollo 13, he felt that the story could be a little deeper or broader and tell more about the Apollo mission.
And so he made from Earth to the Moon, which was a eight part, I think.
I didn't work on it.
I think it was eight parts.
It might have been ten parts.
Forgive me.
And it met with a lot of success.
And he, for HBO, and then he made sometime around the same time he was making saving private.
And when he was making that film, which is mostly fiction, I mean, it's very loosely based on a kind of real story, but not really.
And in his research, he read Band of Brothers, the Stephen Ambrose book and really thought, well, maybe he could do with that book what he did with the Apollo missions.
And so he got Stephen Spielberg to read it.
They agreed they should make it together.
They took it to HBO.
And HBO took an enormous gamble with Band of Brothers.
It was incredibly expensive for the time and uncompromising in Tom's vision.
And we had the incredible fortune.
to have had Dick Winter's blessing.
And we all had to meet Dick and be approved in some way,
which then allowed the other guys the freedom to talk to us.
And that doesn't happen ever.
You know, I mean, it was a really incredibly unique experience.
And that led to episode two.
which was a really interesting experience because I, for a short time, was the world expert on BrayCorps Manor.
I mean, I really was because Ambrose got stuff wrong.
And the reason I know that is the first thing I did after I was hired was myself,
and I think it was Bruce McKenna was on that one, maybe not yet.
We, one of the other writers, we traveled to one of the famous 101st,
Air, well, actually just easy company reunions.
This would have been in 98 or 99.
And they were amazing.
That's a whole other episode to talk about that.
But the important part was I sat down every single person who was alive, who was at Braycor
Manor, and I interviewed each of them for an hour or two and just took copious notes.
And I'm not saying Ambrose didn't do that.
I don't know, maybe, I don't know, whatever, but he got stuff wrong.
And I knew what, you know, it was slightly, stories didn't always gel 100%, but why would they?
You know, and I'm immensely proud of that episode because, yes, it's condensed.
You know, it was a six-hour battle, not a 30-minute one, but, you know, it is as realistic.
as as it could have been and stands the test of time and have the Dick Winter's stamp of approval,
not an easy thing to get.
Well, let me ask you a question about something you just said,
because I think it will get us into some themes that touch on both Banda Brothers
and then your work on a Masters of the Air.
So you interview all these veterans about their experiences in that battle amongst other things,
that action.
And you get stories that conflict.
In my own experience, I mean, it's hardly shocking.
You would actually be shocked if you discovered,
the reverse. If you just discovered that everyone had exactly the same account, you might start to
suspect that something odd was afoot. Because it's just the nature of combat, isn't it,
that it's so chaotic and so fast moving that no one is real, and then your own memory plays tricks
on you. And then you start telling the story and the story sort of solidifies, you know,
and especially this is now in 98, it's 45 years later, you know, so, you know, I could, I would
start to hear the same pattern if you ask somebody, well, tell me more about, well, they couldn't
tell me more. They could just kind of tell me what they just told me again, because that's the story
that they've been telling, you know. I think it's Tim O'Brien who writes the Vietnam book,
Things They Carried, who I think he takes this point to a really radical extreme where he makes
some assertion to the effect of there really is no one story of combat. I mean, I don't know if on
some sort of metaphysical level, I accept that, but as a purely narrative or, you know, epistem...
Yeah, I mean, I think yes and no, right? I think what you just said, you're right.
Metaphysically, he's absolutely right, because there are singular experiences, right?
But the totality of those singular experiences is its own experience.
And so, okay, so this is all wind up for my actual question, which is, all right, here you are.
You've got, you've got this Ambrose book.
You've presumably got other written materials.
Other stuff will have been written about it.
You've got your interviews.
No, no.
No other written material.
Oh, really?
Okay.
What you're talking about?
Nobody knew who the fuck Breakor Manor was in 1998.
I live in a position by your work.
So I've been to Breaker Manor.
I've stood on that.
But were you there before 1998?
Of course not.
Of course not.
No, no.
And there was no internet, basically.
Yeah.
In 1998.
Yeah.
So, you know, like, for example, we take a lot of shit in band for getting the Blythe story wrong.
Right?
Blythe did not die of his wounds, as our like, end thing says.
Blithe actually had a really interesting post-war career continuing in the Army, really honorably.
So the problem was you couldn't just type up Albert Blythe and get a bio on Wikipedia.
Those things didn't exist.
So the only way we would hear the stories was from the guys.
and the guys all said he died.
And what are you going to do?
You're going to believe them, right?
Yeah.
So here you are, whether the question is in the 90s and you're dealing with episode
two in break or manner or just on a bigger scale.
Now here you are with the task of doing masses of the air.
As the information starts to roll in, how do you manage it?
How do you decide what the story is?
Like what is your not only your writing process, but I guess I don't have a name for it.
You're historical.
your analytic process.
Yeah.
To the facts.
And then from there to the story.
Well, that's what I try to do, actually, is really understand what the truth of the situation is, right?
And then try to find the drama in that already existing truth, as opposed to taking a true story and turning it into some other thing that is more dramatically.
convenient. And what I mean by that is it really, if you're going to tell a true story,
it's really important that you choose to tell the right true story. And what I mean by that
is, let's take episode two of day of days in Band of Brunas, as everybody knows, it's a great
reference point. So I didn't, we didn't have to have episode two to only be Dick Winters on that
day. There were a lot of other guys doing other things that day. This was about easy company. It was not
about Dick Winters, you know, and I made the decision to say, no, no, let's just stick with this guy
from, you know, that moment in the plane to the end of D-Day. And let's just tell that 24-hour story.
Because as I said, when I was sort of saying, this is my idea, I say, listen, if we as
professionals can't make an interesting story out of a man who jumps out of an airplane in the
middle of the night and in Nazi occupied Germany and lands with nothing but a trench knife.
But by the end of the day, he is captured and destroyed four German 105s or 88s shooting on Utah Beach.
and we can't make that interesting,
then we're not going to be very good at our jobs.
And so in the best way possible, it was don't screw it up.
That's the story.
Don't screw it up.
And in the process of that episode being made,
there were some people who wanted to over-dramatize certain things
or add elements.
And those were tried and ultimately removed, you know, from the episode.
So because it was enough, you know.
And equally, you know, in Masters of the Air, you know, Tom and Stephen read,
part of, you know, Red Masters of the Air, and part of Masters of the Air, about 60 pages of it,
is about this one bomber group called the bloody hundreds, the hundredth bomber group.
And like the 101st Airborne, this 100th bomber group had a really unique experience in a world of
unique experiences. You know, I can't underscore this enough that, you know, band of brothers
is about more than easy company.
You know, it's about all of the companies that were in the ETO
and have their own great moments like Dick Winters going down on D-Day.
You know, and just this particular group, easy company,
happen to have this really perfect way to tell a story,
which is the story we all know of them.
They were some of the best of the best.
They were volunteers.
They had this unique experience of D-Day to Berk to Scotland, you know, and a concentration.
They had these key, they experienced key moments as one unit that not all units did.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So that was why they were a really great group.
I mean, there were many reasons why.
But it became, don't get in the way of telling what these guys went through.
And if I may, and I talked with Don Miller a little bit about this, but I don't think I'm going to offend you.
I may offend folks that your colleagues with, but why I think Bannett Brothers was so successful
narratively and as a work of art and why I hope, obviously, Masters of the Air is the same way.
I haven't seen it yet.
And in my opinion, it breaks my heart as a Marine to say this, why the Pacific was a little less successful,
although I enjoyed it and I own it and I've seen it multiple times,
was in the Pacific, it seems like that decision was dodged on some level.
And there's an, I know that at a high level,
I know the history of the different Marine regiments in the,
to some extent, the famous ones, you know, John Bazelom,
I know all these people are.
And even I am sort of struggling watching the episodes
to try to figure out where I am and what's going on.
And so if that's me, I can imagine that there are others who are significantly more confused.
I didn't work on the Pacific.
I obviously know a lot of the guys who did and women.
I love it and admire it.
And it's just a different animal.
It has that narrative.
It made a narrative decision that makes it more complicated and difficult.
But also, you know, they were trying to show a broader story, you know,
and really hit the important things that people needed to know.
you know well if if if you i'm going to make a brief pitch and then we'll get to masters of the
air but if the marine corps still needs it's it's really crusher killer miniseries historical miniseries
in my pitch not that i want to do it but my pitch that somebody who does these things should do
is the korean war and the story of the first marine division or at least some subset of the
first marine division the invasion of the north the chosen reservoir and back to the scene
a couple of great treatments of that many great treatments of that in writing but that would make as
you're a man who does these sorts of things.
You know, if there's somebody...
They're so hard.
They're so hard.
And you have no idea how hard it was to get bashes of the air made.
Even with Tom Hanks and Steven Spielberg, it took 10 years.
It took 10 years to get it made.
I mean, I've spent 10 years on one season of television, you know.
So let's get into it.
So the decision had...
From what you've just said, I have the impression that Hanks already
knows that the 100th is his focus. And then how do you come into the story? So about 10 years ago,
I got a phone call from Tom Hanks asking me if I would write a couple more episodes for the new one.
Just a couple of episodes. And yeah, I said, sure, that would be great. That would be great. I had
read Masters of the Air and I thought it would be really exciting to do an Air Force show. And I don't know,
six months a year goes by and I get another film call from him and said,
you know, we have to start over for whatever reasons and we need somebody to write a whole Bible
and just figure the whole show out. Are you up for that? And I was like, okay. And that was kind of a
big task because Don's book is not about one unit like Band of Brothers was. So you read Band of Brothers,
you go, oh, yeah, this is about these people.
You read Don's book, and it's all over the place.
It's about fighter squadrons.
It's about the birth of the entire idea of strategic bombing
and Italy and interwar years.
But it's also he follows a couple different units,
and one of them is the 100 bomber group,
which arrived in May of 43 with 36 airplanes.
by October 10th, 34 had been shot down.
And the thing was the book didn't follow the 100th.
They just followed a couple of events
that the 100th experienced.
But that's not a mini-series, right?
That's not what the Tom Hanks-Hanks-Stefielberg miniseries are,
that those are we follow these certain men through the war.
So I had to figure out what else these guys did.
in the war besides a couple of missions that are mentioned in this book.
So that turned into a year of doing exhaustive research about these four guys that we decided
to make the show centered around three pilots and a navigator and map their missions.
And then that opened a whole other thing, which was combat, aerial combat.
And that's what this show is about.
It's about aerial combat.
Strategic bombing, daylight bombing.
And what these men went through at 25,000 feet with an unpressurized cabin where it's 30, 40 degrees below Fahrenheit zero.
Oh, yeah, and people are shooting at them.
And one of the things I decided really, well, as soon as I got the.
job and knowing everything that that had worked in the process of making band of brothers,
that I had to make a document, a Bible that was really specific and really clear.
So when we show a battle, great thing about the Air Force is they took copious after mission
reports.
And the internet now exists as it didn't when we did ban, but it does now.
And so all those after mission reports are online.
So I could read them.
So I could then, when you watch Masters of the Air and you see a combat sequence and there's a lot of them, you most of the time, not all the time, but almost all of the time, if you see an airplane hit by a rocket on its right wing, well, that's because that's how that ship got hit on that mission.
If you see even in the background a ship going down because its number one engine is going down,
it's probably because its number one engine went down.
We know the name of that plane, and during all the special effects,
they would color code the planes and keep track of, oh, that's our baby.
Oh, and that one's Rosie's Riveters.
And it's not like it's that plane to the left blows up, you know.
It's all, you know, there are.
exceptions. Don't get me wrong. It is a television show, but we really tried hard to get that kind of
stuff right because, as I said to people, people went down on these planes. They're not Star Wars
things. And we owe it to them to get it as right as we can get it, you know, and that meant a lot
to me. Talk about this core group of characters. In addition to the story of the hundred,
or what was so compelling about them.
And, you know, I'm not sure if spoiler alerts make sense.
No, no, I think you can do any of this online.
And you would instantly, it's kind of out there.
So we start with two pilots, two young, well, not that young, mid-late 20s when we meet them.
But they joined the U.S. Army Air Corps at the same time in May of 1940.
So a full 18 months before America's entered the war.
And they do that because they want to fly airplanes.
They're not joining the Army.
They're joining the Army Air Corps.
And they get however many weeks of basic training.
And then they're right into pilot cadet school.
That's why they're there.
And they become best friends.
They're kind of unlikely guys.
One is from Wyoming.
This guy, Gail Cleven.
nicknamed Buck in our show.
Well, it's his nickname in life.
And then his best friend, this other guy that joined at the same time, John Egan,
Bucky is his name.
So they were Buck and Bucky.
And they were real old school cocked hats, 50 mission crush,
toothpick in their mouth, scarves, that very first generation.
And so they ended up going through flight training, become pilots,
I can't remember off the top of my head.
I can't remember how they get into bombers as opposed to fighters.
They end up in the same bomber group, the 100th bomber group.
After Pearl Harbor, their major's by that point,
they become squadron leaders, each with a squadron of eight ships in 1941, 42,
when this group is formed.
and then they go over to England, as I said, in May of 43,
each one leading one of four squadrons in the 100th bomber group.
So this show, I think people will be surprised.
This show is not about one bomber crew going through the war.
It's about friends who served on a lot of different planes, actually,
as a bomber squadron commander, if you went on a mission, you often were the co-pilot of whatever ship you're on.
And then you're the lead pilot for all of your squadron.
So you changed ships, right?
So we're focusing on Buck and Bucky, these two guys, best friends.
They end up at the same air base, obviously.
go on a lot of missions in these early days.
And then this is not a spoiler, but it is.
They both get shot down within a couple days of each other.
Both end up at the same POW camp in the same,
and it's not made up, in the same bunk room at Stahlad Lift 3.
And, you know, continue to go through the war as best friends
at one point, Cleven, the Austin Butler character.
Well, now I'm not going to, that's as far as I'm going to tell you now.
But then also, so they're the sort of spine of the show,
but a navigator, a guy called Harry Crosby,
who starts as the worst navigator in the group,
but ends up as the group navigator by the end of the war.
And he's the only guy of those first.
36 ships. He's the only air flight crewman to still be at their air base by the end of the war.
Everybody else has been shut down or POWs or done their tour of duty. And so he's the one
person that's on the air base, the whole show. And then finally, we have one of the most amazing
men I've ever written about it, a guy called Robert Rosenthal, who was a replacement pilot.
And his story is just phenomenal. He flies three missions in three days. His first three missions,
three days, they lose 25 planes on those three missions, each one with 10, 10 guys. So they lose
almost twice the amount of people
that were in easy company in three days.
And on that third mission,
they go up, I mean, this is all famous.
They go up with 13 ships
and Rosie's is the only one to come home.
He ends up doing his 25
and he re-ups.
He gets shot down, I think, three times.
No, shot down twice.
No, three times, three times.
Somehow manages, no, I'm not going to say.
Maybe he lives, maybe he doesn't.
You know, it strikes me that the title, Masters of the Air, and this happens sometimes in film treatments of books, but it almost from everything you just outlined in the way in which you focus on the kind of vulnerability and youth of these characters, the title takes on a bit of an ironic tinge for the filmed production that maybe it doesn't have in the book.
You know, they're Masters of the Air in one sense and in another sense, I mean, it's in the book, too.
I mean, the idea is, I mean, it was a.
culmination of getting there. You know, the masters of the era, the Luftwaffe, you know,
for until 1944, basically, you know, without a doubt. And that's one of the things we show.
You know, as I said to you before, this show is not about one plane. It's on the group level.
And the group is 36. Well, it depends on when in the war and how,
the mission is, but a group is 36 planes.
So we start with early 43, where, you know, an all-hands effort was two, maybe three groups,
which would be around 70 airplanes on a single mission.
That's in June, July of 43.
By, you know, October of 43, we're already getting to 250 to 300 airplanes on a mission.
by, you know, close to D-Day, we're up to 600 planes, 700 planes a mission.
And then by, you know, the bombing of Berlin, you know, we're spending a thousand bombers up on a mission for one mission.
You know, it would take hours for them to go overhead if you were the target.
Hours.
They'd be under bombardment for three, four hours because it was just plane after, plane after, plane after.
plane after plane. And that's part of our story. The industrial, the human and industrial cost was
enormous. We've spent a lot of time talking about how you use, you know, the historical record
to tell this story. What are your major influences in terms of other film treatments of World War II?
You're obviously raised and steeped and all of that. Was any of that influence?
Yeah. I mean, it's interesting. It is band.
of brothers. And the reason I say that is because it was actually my first, it's my first job as a
paid screenwriter. And band was always a different animal. You know, it was unlike anything that
had really ever been made before. And because of its authenticity and that the men were such a
part of the process of us telling the story and because we have these production values that
Tom and Steve and HBO would give to it, it was this just other thing. And even Great World War II
movies that existed before it and after it that are fantastic. They're not that. And so,
Masters of the Air and the Pacific, you know, again, the Pacific is also is different. And Masters is
different. I can't, you know, we can talk about that in the second. It's not band of brothers in the
air. Yeah. You know, and the Pacific is not banned of brothers in the Pacific, nor is matches of the
air, the Pacific in the air. You know, it's its own thing. And, but, but what is common is this
real obligation to the real men who did this stuff, you know, in a way that not a lot of other
production, certainly before, had ever done. Yeah, yeah, I mean, yeah, there's the Addy Murphy
story and, you know, there are true quote unquote movies about World War II that exist before
band, and I'm sure I'll think of something tomorrow that comes to mind. But right now,
that's what drove every decision I made in Masters of the Air was based on the stuff that we
learned and did and were committed to and banded brothers.
Well, the one I was sort of in the back of my mind, I was curious to know if you were going to
raise it was a 12 o'clock high.
12 o'clock high is a great film.
Yeah.
Fantastic film.
It is my, it is, it is, my two favorite films that have anything to do with this are
are Stalach, 17 and 12 o'clock high.
You know, 12 o'clock high has an actual connection to the 100th bomber group because
Saul Levit, right? Isn't it Saul Levit? Who wrote the book, 12 o'clock high? I'm pretty sure.
Got it here. I can find it in a minute as you keep talking. Yeah. Is it who wrote the book?
I've got it right here. So I know I'll look it up as you as you talk. So, so, but he was, he, he, he was in the
hundredth. Right. And the Gregory Peck character is sort of a, a pastiche of a couple of
different commanding officers of the 100th.
And so it's very much part of the story of the 100th.
I mean, the first two commanding officers in theater of the 100th, both were relieved
of duty because of they couldn't handle the stress.
They both had ulcers and gallblown.
I mean, they just, they broke down, you know, sending these guys.
I mean, it was horrible.
It was horrible.
And that's a fantastic film, but it's not true.
It is inspired by it.
And very well, I mean, it is emotionally true, right?
It is absolutely emotionally true.
Those were the experiences.
But it's not the same as Band of Brothers or Masters
because these exact things happen to these exact things happen
to these exact guys.
And that is a different animal as a writer.
Yeah.
You know.
Well, and interestingly, and by the way, Colin here,
it says it's Cy Bartlett.
Cy Bartlett is.
Right, right, right, right.
That's right, right, Bartlett.
Right.
He also wrote a, yeah, he has a lot to do with the 100th.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So all of that wrote, wrote the,
who's also in the 100th,
ended up leaving and writing for Yank magazine
and Saturday Evening Post.
So in 12 o'clock,
of course, they don't even really go into the air.
It's all focused on psychological dimensions of the war.
And you were sort of, you have to do both in the way that you've done.
Yeah.
And if anything, we did less of what you just said, of what 12 o'clock high did.
This really wanted to be about air combat.
You know, that's something we haven't seen before.
You know, trust me, I love Memphis Bell.
It is a...
I've raised on Memphis Bell.
Yeah, no.
Fantastic.
Fantastic.
Fantastic film.
But we're just on, we're trying to give you a different experience.
You know, I mean, I'm not joking when I say a thousand airplanes.
Like, you're going to see a thousand airplanes.
So say more about that and about the production of this.
What were the challenges and what were you?
You've talked a little bit about what you were trying to achieve, which is, but how,
but how?
You know, what were the problems you had to solve and actually...
It was a really challenging shoot, not the least of which, because of it was COVID.
We made it smack in the middle of COVID.
And it was just a massive scale.
You know, we built two B-17s that could taxi.
You know, you can't, there's only a couple of...
There's, I don't know, the numbered windles by the month, how many B-17s can actually fly.
The last I saw was eight, I think.
And you would never want to use them in a production like this, you know.
And so we had to build them.
We then had to build interior B-17s because we were going to shoot so much in B-17s.
And then we built the volume.
Have you seen like how they make the new Star Wars movies with all these like LED screens?
And it was super complicated.
It was a very ambitious project, you know.
I mean, quite frankly, nothing like it has ever been attempted.
You know?
I mean, for example, like one of the things I like to share is the guy who is doing our special effects,
our special effects supervisor, this brilliant man called Stephen Rosenbaum.
And he did the effects for the first Avatar movie.
And he says this is way more complicated than Avatar.
And of course, when you kind of start to think about it, you go, oh, right, nobody knows what a dragon
really looks like, do they?
Nobody knows how a dragon reacts when it gets hit by something, do they?
Oh, but these B-17s better fucking look like B-17s, and the wings better move the right way,
and the flaps better do the flaps and the chin and the this and that, you know,
And it's a very different universe when you're trying to reproduce real things.
And it's, I don't know exactly how to phrase this question,
but it strikes me that the elements of success in certainly that like the Hanks universe of film productions about World War II
or maybe just about the American, you know, sort of enterprise.
So you could put all of the 15 in there.
It's about, it's about, there's something in the.
writing that's it's very much about procedure it's a bad i think um grayhound very oh you you have
hit one of tom hanks's favorite words i'm serious i might be stealing this but but you could do it in a way
that it's you could do you could just write procedure and it would be terribly boring right so how do
how do you get it right and focus on procedure without squeezing all the life out of something you know
That becomes magic, and it has a lot to do with an actor and a director.
You know, one of the things that I will always think about Apollo 13 and even more castaway is
there's not a lot of people that you would watch by themselves in a space this big for two and a half hours.
I guess he's not by himself in Apollo 13.
but he's by himself and castaway.
You know, that is, it's, you know,
you have to be a really great actor to pull some of that stuff off.
That said, you know, with a great director,
and, you know, if the procedure has been written in a context
where the character is actually thinking something during this procedure,
right, it's not a procedure for no reason,
But like getting into this airplane, for example, when the Buck Cleven character goes down first on a mission.
And his best friend, Bucky Egan, volunteers to lead the group on the very next mission to avenge his friend.
We spent some time with him pushing buttons because that procedure has weight because he can't wait to get up into the air.
and avenge his friend.
So it is revealing character that procedure.
Second better example, actually,
Rosie, the procedure of getting into an airplane as a pilot.
So imagine the average lifespan at mid-1943 was 11 missions.
So if you were on Mission 12,
if you were on borrowed time. If you're on mission 13, you're on borrowed time, 14, 15, 16,
all the way to 25. And everybody knew it. But it had to get back in that plane again.
And so you can make that dramatic by, let's say you've had a traumatic experience. And now
you're a pilot. And you've got to do your pre-flight check going around the plane,
checking the wings and the tires and the guns and the before you get into the plane knowing you're probably going to die.
You're not going to come out of that plane.
So it's procedure and it's more than procedure.
Yeah.
And then so for the for the actors, we talk about this.
I mean, the, the, the, the, the, I hate the word trauma gets used in abuse.
But in this case, I mean, it's hard to think of any other word that can describe how you would respond to the experiences that your project is about.
74% casualties.
Yeah.
Overall, that's including the end of the war when there aren't many.
And also, just there's this dimension to it that is alien to me as somebody whose background is in the infantry of, and would make it worse, is that you get to go home, as it were, each night.
Exactly right.
reach your English girlfriend and, you know, go to the bar.
And then in the morning you got to get up and do, I mean, that to me sounds absolutely
horrifying.
And we don't, we show almost none of this, but there was a lot of uppers and downers,
a lot of pill popping for precisely that reason.
It was brutal on them physically, psychologically.
It was brutal on the English, you know, because these guys.
wanted to they were having such existential experiences you know when they went out on the town they
went out on the town you know and when they they wanted to be with a woman they you know granted
there were a lot of women that you know but it was it was intense you know there was there was a lot of
extremeness happening all around all the time. And it is a unique experience these guys had.
You know, the submariners had it really, really hard, and they were, and they're the only
casualty rates higher than the U.S. Air Force, Air Corps, whatever you want to call it. But,
but at least they were gone, you know, they had a tour of duty and they came home, you know,
This tour of duty was just, as you said, you get up in the morning.
You didn't go on a mission every day.
You know, they would rotate crews and planes.
But, you know, you'd wake up in the morning, fly to Munster, see 30 of your friends go down, get back, have weekend passes to London, go to London for three days.
and you have to come home and get back into that plane on Tuesday
and just do it all over again.
You know, it was unique,
and that's why they created the flak houses.
You know, these houses,
they didn't know quite what PTSD was yet,
but they were seeing it in these flyers,
in particular, these bomber crews very, very quickly
for exactly that reason.
They called them the Fock Wolf jitters.
and the flak, which was the AA guns, the anti-aircraft guns, they called them the flack house.
Because if you imagine going through 10, 11 minutes of flak, you can't imagine it actually.
You're going to in my show.
But just that was a horrible experience, you know, because these planes were not allowed to deviate course.
Right?
So you just go, go, go.
Doesn't matter what's exploding next to you or how close they're exploding.
You just stay in a straight line.
And remember, there's only one pilot.
So the other nine guys are just looking outside going,
holy fuck, holy fuck.
Excuse my language.
But that's what they were saying.
And, you know, then they get home.
So they would have PTSD after just a few missions.
And so they would send these crews inland to sort of country manners,
English country manners for seven days of total R&R, you weren't allowed to wear your uniform,
you could talk whatever you wanted to talk about.
But they wanted you to just detox basically, you know.
Well, and also for the submarine crews, presumably, I'm not an expert here,
but you know, you're out operating in the Philippine Sea or whatever, you know, finding your targets.
And then for the most part, I imagine, is when on your way back to Pearl or wherever,
there's probably a couple days where the threat is not as elevated.
And so you have decompression time built into the mission itself,
whereas here the whiplash is just intense.
I mean, it's just hours either way.
It was brutal.
And you will experience that at masses of the air.
I mean, that is one of the things we do really, really explore,
because that was what was unique, you know.
One last question for you here is I want to be respectful of your time,
but just everything we've just discussed in the,
sort of the burdens of showing the effect on humans of all this.
What was the production looking for in the actors that you found?
You're looking at younger actors who are at the front end of their careers.
What is the through line?
What are you hunting for?
You mean looking for an actor?
Yeah.
What about an actor gets them the role?
Well, luckily that's not my department.
I just sort of say, yeah, you're right.
I like that guy once they show me because I think you're going to defer to Tom Hanks and
Steven Spielberg on that kind of stuff.
And in this case, with Masters, I mean, I could tell you,
but the story with Damien too, but with Masters,
Austin Butler, who stars as Gail Clezen,
had worked with Tom Hanks on Elvis.
And Elvis, he plays Elvis, and Elvis hadn't come,
hadn't even finished rapping.
They were still shooting it when Tom said,
you know, this guy is amazing.
he would be an amazing clever and of course he was right you know we had a great cast and there's actual jobs
casting directors they're called lucy bevin and and olivia grant were our casting directors and
they did an amazing job filling out the other guys i mean really spectacular and i think in particular
are our four guys, those four guys that we follow the whole time,
Crosby, who's played by this Brit named Anthony Boyle.
And he's actually going to play, he's in Manhunt,
which is about the Lincoln assassination.
And I think he plays John Wilkes Booth.
And then this guy, Callum Turner, who plays John Egan,
he's right now in Boys in the Boat.
So he sort of stayed in period anti-Nazi stuff.
And he's also spectacular.
And then Nate Mann, who plays Rosie, Rosenthal,
I think he's the least known and will become as big as them all.
Yeah.
Well, I said that was the last question, but you...
Go ahead.
It's fine.
It's fine.
Tell me the Damien Lewis story, the Dick Winner's story.
So another brilliant casting director, Meg Lieberman,
was the woman's name.
And I can't remember whether she had seen Damien,
but Spielberg, Stephen Spielberg saw Damien playing Larotis
in a production of Hamlet and had him read for it off of that.
And which is not how you expect to get, you know,
Dick Winters, one of the now iconic American figures, you know.
Yeah, and it was just brilliant.
And I remember being one of the people was like, what?
We're hiring a Shakespearean Brit to play Dick Winners?
Okay.
It's wild when you think about it, too, because to be found on the stage for, I mean, obviously
stage and screen are different in terms of what they call for from an actor.
But then the winter's performance itself is so restrained.
I mean, it's just a study and restraint.
Clearly, as we now know, Damien is a genius.
And, you know, and he was then too.
and he was so committed to the show and to Dick.
And he spent a lot of time talking to Dick.
And I think Dick was very happy with the performance.
John Orloff, writer and co-executive producer of Masters of the Air.
This has been a totally fascinating conversation.
And I'm sure all listeners are looking forward to this show.
And thank you so much.
Thank you so much for joining us.
It has been a total pleasure for me.
Thank you so much.
This is a nebulous media production.
Find us wherever you get your podcasts.
