Science Friday - FDA approves a well-known sunscreen ingredient—finally

Episode Date: June 22, 2026

The FDA recently approved a sunscreen ingredient called bemotrizinol, or BEMT, that’s been used in Europe and Asia for years. This is the first new sunscreen ingredient approved in the United States in over two decades. Meanwhile, skin cancer has become the most common cancer in the U.S.  Flora discusses the chemistry of sunblock with a sunscreen chemist AJ Addae, and the regulatory process that led to this approval with health journalist Michael Scaturro.  Guests: Michael Scaturro is a health journalist based in New York City.  AJ Addae is a chemistry PhD student at UCLA and founder of SULA Labs. Other episodes you may enjoy:  Understanding Sunscreen Ingredients And Which Ones You Need Transcripts for each episode are available within 1-3 days at sciencefriday.com. Subscribe to this podcast. Follow our show on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and Bluesky @scifri and sign up for our newsletters. Got a science question that’s keeping you up at night? Call us: 877-472-4374 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Hey, it's Flora and you're listening to Science Friday. The FDA recently approved a sunscreen ingredient that's been used in Europe and Asia for years. It's called Bema-Trizin-all, also known as BEMT. And this is a big deal because it's the first new sunscreen ingredient approved in the U.S. In over two decades. Meanwhile, skin cancer has become the most common cancer in the U.S. Here to get into the chemistry of Sunblock is A.J. Aday, a chemistry PhD, studying sunscreen at UCLA. She's also the founder of Sula Labs, which tests sunscreen and other

cosmetics formulations. Hey, Jay, welcome to Science Friday. Thank you for having me. I'm excited to chat. Me too. Is this approval big news in your world? Oh, for sure. I think over two decades, as you said, has been the last time that there's been a UV filter approval in the United States. So this fundamentally changes the landscape a bit. Well, how has Bema-TriZanil different from other sunscreen ingredients? Yeah, so BEMT is actually the first UV filter that has been approved that is an organic UV filter that is generally recognized as safe and effective. So I say organic very intentionally because there are two UV filter classes that are allowed in the United States in organic UV filters. So that would be zinc oxide and titanium dioxide. And then there are

organic UV filters, and those are ones like homosolate, octisillate, oxybenzo, and eva benzone. So BEMT would fall under the organic class, and it would be the first and only one that contains this generally recognize a safe and effective status. Does this new ingredient feel different, look different, go on differently? So it definitely has an advantage over zinc oxide and titanium dioxide in that it goes on the skin a little bit more transparently than you would expect from inorganic filters. So that's a great advantage, but I would say the biggest advantage is actually in how efficiently it protects the skin from harmful UV damage. Say more. Yeah, so there are a lot of UV filters already allowed in the United States, but a lot of them really skewed towards UVB protection,

which is useful because sun protection factor really narrowly measures the ability for a sunscreen to protect you from UVB rays. What's great about BEMT is that it actually very efficiently absorbs both UVB and UVA rays, which would make it more of a broad spectrum filter. And it's exciting because typically you have to combine several different UV filters and sunscreens to get a broad spectrum claim, whereas with BEMT, you can do so a little bit more efficiently without taking up so much of the sunscreen's real estate. Now, the only other UV filter that does absorb broad spectrum is ABABenzone, allowed in the United States. But the thing about ABABenzone is that it does require other UV filters to stabilize it.

So this is really the most efficient UV filter as far as that. And what's the difference between UVA and UVB light? So UVB light, particularly I think we associate more with, sunburn, whereas UVA light, we associate more with photo aging, skin darkening, more of those cosmetic concerns that you see. You know, there's some concern about the chemicals in sunscreen. Is BEMT any safer or is its chemistry any different? Yeah. To pass any UV filter in the United States, it requires a lot of toxicological evidence and it requires evidence of understanding how a filter could interact with human biology. What's great about BEMT is that it's actually a lot larger of

a molecule than other UV filters that we've seen. And so it's well beyond a limit that one would be concerned for, you know, extreme biological absorption profiles or exposure that could be harmful to the human skin or human body. So that's also a really great advantage because the, you know, toxicity risk profile is significantly lower than you would be. than one would expect. You mentioned that BEMT doesn't leave as much of that white cast on the skin. What gives sunscreen that white color? So, you know, that can be kind of a deterrent for a lot of people for wearing sunscreens.

It all comes down to light scattering. Any color that we can see is a consequence of something reflecting visible light. And so what's really great about zinc oxide and titanium dioxide is that they can absorb UV, but they also scatter light in such a way that we can see the color white. And that also can be caused by aggregation and agglomerates of these zinc oxide and titanium dioxide minerals, particles, and such a way that larger aggregates scatter more visible light. Those are inherently pigments as well. that's why we see zinc oxide and titanium dioxide also in paints and coatings. And they just so happen to also absorb UV really well. I love your gusto for this subject.

Yeah, I mean, like you said, I'm a PhD candidate. And this is my field of work. So thank you. This is your actual thesis. Yeah, quite literally. Sunscreen, white cast, biological interactions. Like, this is, I could go on forever. It's really fascinating. Thank you, AJ.

No problem. Thank you for having me. AJ, a day, a chemistry PhD candidate studying sunscreen at UCLA. Given the benefits of BEMT and that it's been used across the world for many, many years, why didn't the FDA approve it sooner? And what does this sunscreen tale tell us about FDA approvals and how our system for regulating drugs works? Here with some answers is health journalist Michael Skaturo, who's been following sunscreen formulations and regulation for years and most recently wrote about it for KFF News. Michael, thanks for being here.

Thanks, John of me. So why did it take so long to get this ingredient approved? I think the main reason is that it's expensive to bring a new drug through the FDA, because in the United States, sunscreen chemicals are considered over-the-counter drugs in France. or in Korea or in many places around the world, sunscreens and sunscreen chemicals are considered cosmetics. And so they don't really have to be subjected to animal tests. But in the U.S., the FDA defines sunscreen as an OTC and over-the-counter drug,

which is kind of like aspirin or cough syrup or anything that you might buy, like a Walgreens or a CVS. And those are things that have to go through traditionally an animal testing process. So DSM, the company that manufactures this chemical, had to submit that data. And so that's hard, right? Because it's very expensive. It costs them about $18 million to bring this new chemical through the FDA. And Congress has tried in like two laws now to sort of nudge the FDA in the direction of alternative testing methods.

And they're not quite convinced because for this new, new-ish, right, this new for us in the U.S. but widely used globally. This EMT was still subjected to animal tests. Why is sunscreen regulated like a drug? That's a good question. I think it's because the FDA is concerned about the potential toxicity of a product that people use every day.

People are putting a lot of this on their bodies, and I think their position would be that they have to really be certain that some of these drugs don't cause reproduction. or that they have a low level of toxicity in the body. I mean, we put a lot of things on our body every day, like lotion and cosmetics. So does the rationale go beyond that? Well, so in writing about this over the last two years, I kept hearing that the FDA is very

proud of its record in the 1960s of having been one of the only regulators globally to have prevented phyotamide from being sold in the U.S. That's the drug that caused egregious harm to fetuses in many countries and led to people being born with birth defects. And so they have always been very, very overcautious. And I think that in this case, they might be overcorrecting. At the same time, I mean, there is this sort of anti-susscreen movement in the U.S. right now. with their skepticism around the safety of sunscreen.

How does this story fit in with that? I think the sunscreen controversy kind of started in 2019 around then because the FDA did tests on several sunscreen ingredients that have been sold for a while, have them considered to be safe to be in sunscreens. But they basically found that in some certain chemicals were appearing in very, very small, in the human bloodstream.

And I think they reclassified these drugs as, and it's very complicated, not grasse, so that's like not generally recognize as safe and effective for use in sunscreens. So it's a really complicated way of saying that they needed more data to know whether these chemicals were safe. They were not necessarily saying they're not safe. They were just saying we would like more data

because we don't really know. And it may be, people really wonder, like, well, can they trust these things? So there were about 12 chemicals that were in this, that were moved into this not cross-A, so not generally recognized as safe and effective for use in sunscreen category. But the industry has begun to, has over the last few years phased out those chemicals, but essentially four are still widely used in sunscreen. So it's just to say it's very complicated.

The FDA, they've led these chemicals exist in a kind of gray area, because they said, again, they're not generally recognized as safe and effective for use in sunscreens, but you can still use them. Okay. That's what I needed. And that's very confusing. It is a gray area. Right. And I'll say this. Like if you look at like this, I'm in Germany right now and I purchased the sunscreen,

and on the front of the packaging of this sunscreen says, like, it says this is free of microplastic, it's free of octinacate. It doesn't have homoic satellite because it's no longer used. in Europe. So the European companies are starting to market the fact that they no longer use some of these chemicals that in the U.S. are considered not grassy. But I think everyone kind of agrees that BEMT, the new chemical, is very safe. It's the most vetted sunscreen ingredients. It has more safety data than zinc oxide or than titanium dioxide, so it's a very safe ingredient. When will we see the first BEMT sunscreens on the shelves here?

So DSM, the company that manufactures this chemical, says that we can expect these drugs to be on store shelves and maybe the latest October. Latest October. Okay. Michael, thank you so much for joining me today. Thank you so much. Michael Scutero is a health journalist based in New York City. This episode was produced by Shoshana Bucksbaum with help from Charles Berkwist. If you can't get enough of Science Friday, check out our newsletter, sciencepriday.com slash newsletters. I'm Flor Lixman. We'll catch you next time.