Science Friday - Is This PTSD Treatment Too Good To Be True?

Episode Date: July 17, 2025

About 7% of veterans experience post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and that number can be closer to 30% for those who have served in a war zone.  But PTSD has been treated pretty much the same way since the disorder was first recognized roughly four decades ago: Patients are instructed to revisit their trauma until the memory no longer creates an emotional response. This process can be so harrowing that over half of veterans are unable to complete the full course of treatment. But what if there was a way for PTSD treatment to be virtually painless?Host Flora Lichtman talks with Yasmin Tayag, staff writer at The Atlantic, who explored a controversial treatment called Reconsolidation of Traumatic Memories, and the challenges of even studying a treatment that bucks conventional wisdom.  Guest: Yasmin Tayag is a staff reporter for The Atlantic.Transcripts for each episode are available within 1-3 days at sciencefriday.com.  Subscribe to this podcast. Plus, to stay updated on all things science, sign up for Science Friday's newsletters.

Hi, this is Floral Lickman and you're listening to Science Friday. Today in the show, can a treatment for PTSD be painless? To claim that you can treat PTSD without having the patient face their fears, it's just sort of anathema to the field. About 7% of veterans experience PTSD, and that number can be as high as about 30% for those who've served in a war zone. And yet PTSD has been treated roughly the same way since the disorder was first recognized roughly four decades ago. Patients are instructed to revisit trauma head on until the memory no longer creates an emotional response.

But this process is so harrowing that over half of veterans are unable to complete the full course of treatment. So what if there was a way for PTSD treatment to be virtually painless? Yasmin Tayag, staff writer at the Atlantic, investigated a controversial treatment called Reconolidation of Traumatic Memories and explored the challenges of even studying a treatment that Bucks conventional wisdom. Yasmin, welcome back to Science Friday.

Thanks so much for having me. So you begin your piece through the lens of a patient, Jeff Turner. Tell us his story and how he ended up trying this alternative therapy. Yeah, so Jeff Turner was an Iraq war veteran. and when he told me about his trauma, he referred to an experience where he was leaving a mess hall. You know, he's having breakfast like any other day. And then, and next thing he knows, the mess hall blows up and there's another explosion right by him.

He kind of panics. He ducks under a mail truck. And next thing he knows, somebody is chasing after him and is saying, Sergeant, you're covered in blood. And, you know, fortunately, his injury was relatively benign. You know, he didn't get hit in the head. He got hit in the wrist and leg. But very soon after the event, the symptoms of PTSD began. And that looked like flashbacks and irritability, memory loss. And they continued for years, even though he was trying all sorts of other treatments, including the gold standard treatment, which is called prolonged exposure. This is like exposure therapy.

And somebody suggested he tried this new therapy called Reconolidation of Traumatic Memories. And at this point, Jeff is like, whatever, sure, let's try it. And after four sessions, he told me his flashbacks just disappeared. And he literally described it like magic. Wow. So how is this treatment different from this standard treatment for PTSD? So for a long time, the go-to treatment has been something called prolonged exposure. Prolonged exposure is a form of talk therapy that essentially involves the patient living through the traumatic memory over and over and over again until it no longer elicits the same kind of fear. So, reconciliation of traumatic memories, it's essentially a painless treatment.

You know, big claim. And, you know, to continue, like, the movie analogy, I think of RTM as similar to inception, where they go into the person's mind to manipulate a memory directly without having the patient experience that trauma over and over again. What are the sessions like? So they're pretty weird. Well, they start off fairly normal. You're in a room with your therapist and, you know, you set the start and end of the memory that you're going to be tackling that day. And then the therapist has you close your eyes and you're told to imagine yourself

in a movie theater where your trauma is playing out on the screen. Only you then become disembodied, float up to the projection booth, and are watching your seated self watching the screen, watching your traumatic memory. Everybody who does this is instructed to imagine themselves in a movie theater and then float out of their body and watch their traumatic experience on the screen. This is part of the protocol. And as you watch your traumatic experience play out on the screen, your therapist is in the room with you watching you. And the moment you show like the tiniest flicker like of discomfort,

they'll have you stop. And so they never want you to experience discomfort. And then your therapist will say, okay, tweak the video so that it's a little easier to watch. Maybe you'll turn it into a black and white film or maybe you'll make everyone a stick figure. And you'll keep repeating this process over and over, tweaking your film until it is easy and kind of boring to watch, no longer eliciting emotion. And that's stage one of this process. And then onto stage two, you return to the movie theater, but you kind of step into the film itself, which is much more vivid than it wasn't the first stage. And the idea is you have to learn to withstand this as well. And finally, when that is easy enough to do, you move.

on to the final stage where the therapist asks you to just reimagine a totally different ending to your trauma. Completely different. It can be anything. And that is the end of the treatment. Is there science underpinning this? Like, do we know if you can rewrite your memories in this way by putting yourself in a movie theater and floating out of your body? So, yes, reconciliation of traumatic memories is based on this theory of reconciliation. And it's This idea in psychology that memories that we might have once thought of as fixed, you know, set in cement, are not actually permanent. You can modify them by reactivating them in certain ways.

RTM is a way of manipulating that process of reactivating that memory, editing it a little bit and then filing it back away into your brain in its altered state. And it's supposed to stay that way in your brain permanently. You know, you talked, you talked to a patient for whom it seemed to work. Have there been clinical trials or studies looking at its effectiveness, this treatment's effectiveness? So there are four clinical trials, all published in peer review journals, but they're all done by the creator of RTM. The outside experts I spoke to about these existing trials generally agree that they were not done very well. Is it being evaluated now? So right now, a very well-respected scientist with the army named Michael Roy has just completed the first large-scale, truly

comparative clinical trial, where he compares people treated with RTM and people treated with the gold standard prolonged exposure. And this study is really exciting because it truly will be the first time that RTM has been studied in a very rigorous, you know, very scientific way. And the results are not out yet, but the early data that he's shared with me all seem to suggest that, you know, RTM is worthwhile. It can work as well as the gold standard treatment. How is RTM viewed by the field? A lot of people just don't know about it, but those who have heard of it, at least the

ones I spoke to, were all kind of skeptical. I think there is resistance in the PTSD research field for two reasons. One is that there just isn't that much data on RTM. But the second is that I think there's a philosophical reason people are pushing back because to claim that you can treat PTSD without having the patient face their fears, it's just sort of anathema to the field. You know, everything that we know about prolonged exposure is based on this idea of you have to face your fears. Like even people outside of the medical field, you know, we have sayings that are like, you have to face your fears, face your demons. Right. It's just

in our culture. So the idea that you don't have to face your face your, your fears in order to get past them seems a little implausible, I think, to a lot of people. You know, you contrast RTM with psychedelics in the piece. You go to a conference and, like, this psychedelics session is the keynote and there's hundreds of people there, whereas the RTM session is like in a tiny ballroom and a few people are there. Yeah. Are psychedelic treatments for PTSD showing promise? Yeah, they really are. But what I will note is that most of the ongoing studies on psychedelics, they combine the psychedelics with talk therapy. Often it's the old prolonged exposure therapy. And so I found that kind of

interesting that, you know, people were so excited about this new treatment paradigm when, in fact, it's not totally new. You know, it's almost like an add-on to something that has already existed for a long time. You spent a year reporting on RTM. You know, it's a little niche. Why did you think it was worth covering? You know, I was aware that there was a real feeling of stuckness in the PTSD treatment world. For years, we've been hearing about the staggering rate of suicides among veterans with PTSD.

and I had known from previous reporting that a lot of the current treatments weren't working. And so when I heard about RTM, you know, I think like most of the people I interviewed for the story, I thought, that seems unlikely. I'm skeptical. But there's always been a part of me, and there is even now, after I've written the story, that thinks, you know, why not try? We've clearly exhausted the existing possibilities. We've shown their limits. And, you know, especially with a treatment like RTM, which doesn't appear to have a downside. Like, even if it doesn't work, it's not like the process is painful or expensive. You know, why not try? But I think regardless of any philosophical qualms, theoretical qualms you might have with a treatment like this, I think you really just have to remember why you're doing this. You know, at the end of the day, does the patient have less severe symptoms? And if the answer is yes, then I think that should be an indication that you keep going.

Well, thank you so much for sharing your reporting with us. Thank you for having me. It's been such a pleasure to talk about it. Yasmin Tayag is a staff writer for The Atlantic based in New York City. Thanks for listening. Don't forget to rate and review us if you like the show. And you can always leave us a comment on this segment on Spotify. We'd love to hear from you. Today's episode was produced by Shoshana Bucksbaum.

I'm Flora Lichtman. Thanks for listening.