Science Vs - How to Smell like a Dog, with Ed Yong
Episode Date: September 25, 2025Ever wonder why your dog just loves to sniff your junk? Well, it turns out it’s because other animals perceive the world in wild ways that we’re just beginning to understand. So today, we’re imm...ersing ourselves in their world, talking about the cutting-edge science of how animals perceive with Pulitzer Prize-winning science writer Ed Yong. He’s spinning yarns from his latest book: “An Immense World: How Animal Senses Reveal the Hidden Realms Around Us.” After this journey, you'll look at your dog in a totally different light, you'll appreciate how eyes have literally painted the world — and you might even feel sorry for the humble cockroach. Video available on Spotify. Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVs_EdYong In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Ed Yong’s amazing book on animal perception (03:58) Magnificent sniffers (11:20) Every possible degree of eye (18:15) Hearing in different ways (25:11) Touch and vibrations (33:05) Science under threat in the U.S. (41:10) Oddball questions This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang, Meryl Horn, Ekedi Fausther-Keeys, and Rose Rimler. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Video editing and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Emma Munger, So Wylie, Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka and Bobby Lord. Thanks to Skyline Studios and Stupid Old Studios. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I did get hit by a mantis shrimp, which has the most powerful punch in nature.
This was a very, very small mantis shrimp, and it's still hurt.
Do-do, science chats with our favorite nerds.
Yeah.
Hi, I'm Wendy Zuckerman, and you're listening to Science Verses.
Today on the show, the amazing superpowers.
of animals.
Some animals can see things that we can't see,
they can hear things that we can't hear,
touch things that we will never feel.
And so today on the show,
we are diving into their world
to talk about the groundbreaking science
of how animals perceive.
And to go on this journey,
we'll be chatting to Ed Yong.
He's a Pulitzer Prize-winning science writer,
and we'll be talking about his book,
an immense world, how animal senses reveal the hidden realms around us.
And I think you're going to love this chat.
You are going to look at your dog in a totally different light by the end of this chat.
You're going to appreciate how eyes have literally painted the world.
And you may even feel sorry for the humble cockroach.
If you are listening to this on Spotify, you can also be watching it because it's on video.
Hello.
My interview with Ed Young is coming up just after the break.
During the Volvo Fall Experience event,
discover exceptional offers and thoughtful design
that leaves plenty of room for autumn adventures.
And see for yourself how Volvo's legendary safety
brings peace of mind to every crisp morning commute.
This September, Lisa 2026 X-E-90 plug-in hybrid
from $599 bi-weekly at 3.99% during the Volvo Fall Experience event.
Conditions supply, visit your local Volvo retailer or go to explorevolvo.com.
With the RBC Avion Visa, you can book any airline, any flight, any time.
So start ticking off your travel list.
Grand Canyon? Grand. Great barrier reef?
Great. Galapagos?
Galapago? Switch and get up to 55,000 avion.
points that never expire.
Your idea of never missing out happens here.
Conditions apply.
Visit rbc.com slash avion.
Welcome back today on the show.
The wonderful Ed Young.
Hi, Ed.
Welcome to the show.
Hello.
Yeah.
Thanks for having me.
In your book, you say that sort of regardless of our
technology or intellect, we are really perceiving only a thin fraction of all there is to
perceive. Our sense of the world is an illusion.
Yes.
So tell me more about that.
Every creature has its own particular ways of sensing the world, its own set of sights
and sounds and smells and textures that it has access to.
So we're all tracked in our own little sensory bubbles.
And there is a wonderful word for such a bubble that we're.
word is umwelt um it's just german for environment but it has a very special meaning in this
context and it's one of my favorite um ideas in all of biology because it tells us that
no matter where we are um and no matter which kind of living thing we are we really are
only experiencing a tiny fraction of all there is to experience.
It's such a lovely idea as we're walking around in the world to think about what else is
there?
What else could I be seeing or perceiving if I was a different animal?
Yeah, I agree.
I think it means that there's so much wonder to be had everywhere.
If you, you know, dive into water, depending on the part of the world.
world you're in. You might be surrounded by the electric fields generated by fish that can make
their own electricity. You'll be surrounded by turbulent currents that are left behind by swimming
animals that you won't be able to feel. You'll be suffused by the magnetic field of the earth
itself, which you won't be able to detect. There's all of this stuff, all these signals
around us that we don't perceive and that other animals do. Electric fish.
can detect each other's signals, seals can detect the tracks left behind by swimming fish,
sea turtles can detect the magnetic field of the earth itself.
Yeah.
And now I want to move through some of the senses.
And one of the things that perhaps we get wrong about ourselves, which is the sense of smell.
I think we have this idea that humans don't have a great sense of smell.
I think this sort of evolutionary chit-chat that you hear.
This sort of story, I guess I've heard since primary school, is like,
now we are visual creatures and we don't really use our smell.
It's been thrown off to the side.
But is that entirely true?
How bad is a human sense of smell?
Yeah, it's actually all right.
You know, I'm not going to tell you that our sense of smell is as, you know, good as, say,
an elephants or a dog.
They have hardware that we don't have.
Humans really aren't too bad at it.
We have decent noses.
We can smell a lot of different kinds of chemicals.
We can detect some of them at concentrations
that rival championships sniffers like dogs.
And in your book, you did a fun experiment involving getting on all fours.
Tell me about it.
Yes.
So I went to see a woman named Alexandra Horowitz, who studies dogs, dog cognition, a dog's sense of smell.
She got a length of string that had been scented with chocolate, and she laid it on the floor, and my task was to, with a blindfold on, follow the path of the string.
So I got down in all fours, and I sniffed at the string.
And I did basically what a dog does, which is to swing your head left and right while you're sniffing.
And by doing this, you can follow the path of the strip.
And I did.
But two things.
First, it took a long time.
And second, I was hyperventilating as I was doing it.
Because I am not, like, we are not used to just going.
Right.
Because the way our noses work, every time you blow, every time you exhale,
you lose that perception of whatever you're smelling.
So you have to just...
Repeatedly, if you're doing that many times in a row, you start...
It's not good.
I don't know.
Why doesn't that happen to dogs?
Why could dogs keep going?
So dogs can do it for a bunch of different reasons.
And Alexandra's dog Finn did the same task, followed the string, much more accurately, much more quickly.
It was doing in fractions of a second, what took me many minutes.
and with no effort.
He does that for a couple of reasons.
So when a dog breathes in, that air stream is cleaved into two by structures inside its skull.
So there's a large stream that goes down into the lungs and is for breathing.
And then there is another smaller stream that goes to a chamber in the back of a snout
that is dedicated for smell and smell alone.
So there's this constant influx of like scented air into the part of the dog's
head that is responsible for processing smell.
That's not what happens in us.
The dog, it's just getting this constant conveyor belt of scented air going into its nose,
whether it's on the inhale or the exhale.
And again, that means that its experience of smell is not this strobing, flickering thing
that I am having to fight against.
It's continuous.
I like to think of it as closer to our experience of vision, where we have
even though we're blinking all the time,
we don't, you know,
our view of the world doesn't black out.
It's smooth.
It's continuous.
And why do they love the smell of a human crutch?
What?
I think, so I think that is also related to how dogs interact with each other, right?
So what happens when two dogs meet?
They sniff each other.
And they sniff each other, usually in the groin.
They'll do that, like, that, like, cool yin-yang thing where they're both sniffing each other's
groins.
That's because all animals, to various degree, are just leaking sacks of chemicals, right?
We are just, like, spewing molecules into the world around us all the time, whether we like
it or not.
And we do it especially, you know, from, like, more.
moist membranes more than other places.
So, like, our breath, our groins, armpits.
And these, and, you know, for us, as we've said, we don't go around sniffing each other
in any of these areas.
Dogs do, because to them, smell provides many clues about the other, the individual
that they're meeting, right?
Smell provides clues about identity, but also about things like.
like age, health, diet.
Now tell me about this remarkable chemical that gives a sea smell,
like the smell of the sea.
Yeah, so this chemical is called dynethyl sulfide or DMS.
It smells kind of seaweedy, a little oystery.
It's the smell of the sea.
We've talked about how there's been this long-standing myth
that human sense of smell is terrible.
Equally, there has been this very long-standing myth
that birds do not smell at all.
It's a lie.
Birds do smell.
Many of them smell very, very well.
And seabirds like arbatrosses are some of them.
DMS is one of the things that they are paying attention to.
So when there's a ton of creole munching down on a ton of plankton under the surface of the water,
when there's just a lot of life out there, that releases a ton of DMS.
It's so cool.
It's like an oven with cookies baking.
Yes, exactly like that. Exactly like that. And to a bird with the right nose, like an albatross, the scent of DMS reveals the parts of the ocean that are richest in life and so richest in food. What I love about this is that the ocean seems completely featureless to us. The open ocean is just this flat landscape. It's two-dimensional.
it looks kind of boring
to that is what it looks like to our eyes
but to the nose of an albatross
foraging over the ocean
it's very three-dimensional
it has these mountains
and valleys of DMS
and other scents
that give the bird an idea
of what's going on beneath the surface of the water
it's not flat it's not featureless
and it only
is that way to our umwelt, but not those of a bird like an albatross.
From smell to sight, so the amazingness of the human eye is often used by
creationists to say that God must have created the world, because evolution can't create
such a complex structure. And as you write in the book, Darwin himself wasn't sure how
complicated human eyes could have evolved and writing in the origin of species that to suppose
the eye had been formed, quote, by natural selection seems, I freely confess, absurd in the
highest possible degree. But he did say as well that if we could find other versions of the
eye, like sort of crappier gradations, like if we could see the sort of beginnings of the human
eye and then in other animals, maybe that would suggest it was evolution, which is sort of
funny because that's how the pyramids are. People see the beautiful pyramids of Giza, but there's
crappier ones down the road. They see the pyramids and they're like, aliens must have done
it. And it's like, well, it's because you didn't see the crappier ones that they went, you know,
before they'd perfect in it. That's right. All right, like the beta test pyramid, people we landed on
this, like, deluxe model. Yeah. Right. So, um, when you look through the animal,
Queendom, do you see
variations of what
might become the human eye?
Yeah, you absolutely do.
And, you know,
Darwin can relax.
We have it sorted.
So, yeah,
there are actually
animals with every possible
degree of eye.
The simplest eye, really,
is just a single
photoreceptors. It's a single cell
that is sensitive to light.
where light triggers a chemical change in the cell
which leads to an electrical signal being sent
and that cell can detect the presence of light.
Once you're sensitive to light, once you can detect it,
then you can add things like a little bit of pigment.
If you have pigment on one side, it creates shade
and now you can not only detect light
but work out where it's coming from.
When you have lots of those clustered together,
then not only can you detect where light is coming,
from, but you now start to have the very rudimentary image, with very few pixels, but an image
nonetheless. Then you can add an element on top of that, a lens that helps to focus the light
to give you extra acuity. The point is that you can actually very easily see how an eye can
build up over time from something that is really unlike an eye at all. That doesn't take a lot
the generations to actually happen, and we have organisms that have every possible step along
the way.
And I think it also actually, animals get the kinds of sense organs they need, and eyes that
are, you know, quote, unquote, worse than ours exists because their owners don't need
to do anything fancier.
You know, an eagle has an incredible eye because an eagle is soaring at great heights and trying to detect rabbits at large distances.
A starfish has a considerably worse eye because a starfish is not doing that.
All the starfish needs to do is to find the shady shelter of a reef and, you know, scuttle into some crevice somewhere.
I don't want to fall into that trap to say that we are at the top of some evolutionary pinnacle.
It's all just a beautiful rainbow.
Sure, yeah.
And then when we, just to really land the point that, you know, humans are not at the pinnacle of the eye evolutionary story.
When we think of color, humans can, you know, most humans can see the colors of the rainbow,
but lots of animals can see an ultraviolet light, so beyond the purple or violet.
Right.
Can you help us imagine the world of ultraviolet light, whether it's how our world would look different from birds and flowers?
Yeah, so flowers are a great place to start.
So many flowers have evolved to attract animals like bees and hummingbirds and other pollinators, almost all of which can see ultraviolet.
And if you can see ultraviolet, you can see ultraviolet, you can see.
many signals on flowers that human eyes miss.
So sunflowers, for example, just look yellow to us,
but they have this beautiful ultraviolet halo in the middle of them.
Many other flowers have things like this,
these like bull's eyes and like landing strips,
I think of them as signs that attract pollinators to the flower.
Birds also, you know, all birds can see ultraviolet to a different extent.
And if you can see ultraviolet,
you can see patterns on the feathers of birds that, again, our eyes miss.
Here in the US, the American Robin has a famously red breast.
Males and females both have red breasts.
The sexes are a little bit hard to tell apart in this bird.
But to us, the birds have no problem because the male's breast blazes with ultraviolet as well as red.
The females does not.
So robins can easily tell them apart, tell each other apart.
And then that's just, you know, ultraviolet as color in and of itself.
You can also blend ultraviolet with other colors.
So our, most people have eyes with three kinds of color sensing cells, let's call them.
They're called cone cells.
They're the ones responsible for our color vision.
And my dog has only two.
so his rainbow
is much more limited than mine
birds have four
so their rainbows are
just so much more expansive
a typical bird
can probably see about a hundred times more
colors than what we can
perceive
which is just stunning to me
because so many birds are already
just shockingly colorful and beautiful
like take the most
colorful bird that you can
imagine. And now try and imagine that that bird has, you know, maybe a hundred times more
colours on it to another bird than what you are currently seeing. It's amazing. It's like, stop
it. At that point, you're like, stop it, you know. I know, right. Like, enough, please. Yeah. Did you
have to wear that to the Met Gala? Like, did you? You know. So, now let's look at sounds
and hearing.
In the 1960s, researchers got hold of this amazing recording of an animal that ultimately
became this huge cultural phenomenon, inspiring a Star Trek movie, also an entire animal
rights movement.
Can you tell me about this?
Yeah, so we're talking about whales, and Wales, the...
And we're talking about the really big whales, too.
So things like blue whales, fin whales, the largest animals that exist and have ever existed.
They communicate with each other with infrasound.
So that's sound that's too low for the human ear to detect and sounds that travels over very, very, very large distances.
In the ocean, a blue whale's call could conceivably traverse the entire space.
span of, say, the Atlantic.
Which is crazy, crazy to think about.
It is, it is absolutely crazy.
So there were definitely, there were definitely cases where you could have a whale calling off
the coast of Europe and detect that call with a hydrophone, an underwater microphone,
off the coast of the US.
When the Navy first picked up these kinds of sounds, they were, you know, they didn't know
what to make of them.
And eventually, they tracked the sounds to their sources,
which were very large whales, like blue and thin whales.
I think it's still an open question of whether whales are really communicating
over those kinds of distances, right?
So, you know, is a whale off the coast of Europe having a chat with a whale off the coast
of the U.S.?
It seems like implausible, right?
Those messages would take maybe half an hour or so.
to move across that distance, but maybe.
Another animal superpower that you talk about is echolocation,
which is this amazing ability of bats and dolphins to use echo to find their way and their prey.
But in the book, you met a person who can echolocate.
Tell us about that.
Yeah, so his name is Daniel Kish.
He is one of several human echolocating.
So he is blind, and he has been blind since very close to his first birthday.
And he navigates through the world with a cane, as many blind people do,
but also by making these very loud clicks with his tongue.
So if I try to click with my tongue, the noise is kind of pathetic and wet and muffled.
His is like much closer to me snapping with my fingers.
it's sharp, it's loud, produces a very strong echo.
He does this as he moves about his neighborhood, and I went on a walk with him,
and Daniel is incredibly independent.
The cane helps, of course, but with his echolocation,
he can tell when we're walking past a house, a car, a lawn,
you know, whether there's a fence next to us.
How would he, just from, it sounds a little different.
The texture of the grass is different from the texture of,
of concrete or texture of pavement.
He can tell, you know, when there's a tree, a branch blocking his path, you know, a fence.
He can tell whether it's like chain link or slatted.
Were you walking with him and testing him?
No, no, he just narrating.
Like, you know, I'm just walking along.
He's narrating.
At some point, there's a branch across our path and I duck and I forget to say,
hey, Daniel, there's a branch and he gets it, like he knows.
The word echolocation was actually defined in a paper that was about bats and humans.
And everyone kind of forgot the human bits and the human bit.
And a lot of people know that bats can do this.
So what bats are doing is that they are releasing very, very high-pitched ultrasonic calls, too high for us to hear.
They're doing it at often incredible speeds up to a couple of hundred times a second.
and they're listening for those echoes bouncing off objects in the world around them.
And by timing how long it takes for the sound to go out and to return,
the bat can translate that time into distance.
Amazing.
Daniel is basically doing exactly the same thing.
His clicks are not ultrasonic like those of a bat.
So they provide a little less information to him.
But it's basically the same thing.
He is using the timing of rebounding sound to map the world around him.
How did it feel to be walking with him?
So it felt amazing.
It is very easy to watch Daniel and to think of this as some kind of superpower.
But like every way of sensing the world, it has some strengths and it has drawbacks too.
it's really bad for anything that involves a small thing
against a large thing
so if I wanted to hide from Daniel
I would stand right up against a wall
and the thing is bats also suffer from this problem
bats really can easily detect a moth in air
but if the moth is sitting on a leaf
most bats will really struggle to find it
so one of my favorite stories that Daniel told me
is that he was once asked to try and tell the difference between two objects that to him
sounded exactly the same.
One was a stuffed bear, like a teddy bear, and the other was a champagne bottle.
And those obviously look different to us, but they both distort and muffle echoes in different
ways.
So the champagne bottle has all these curves to it, which send the sound bouncing off in random
directions. The teddy bear is very soft and fluffy, so it's absorbing and, like, doing the
same kinds of things to the sound. So both of those are returning very bad, uninformative echoes.
Interesting. So they basically sound kind of the same. After the break, how an impeccable
sense of touch can help turn a cockroach into a zombie.
Long-Bandie Twizzlers candy keeps the fun going.
Keep the fun going.
Welcome back.
I'm here with Pulitzer Prize winning science writer Ed Yong.
Then on to touch.
So animals use touch and by
vibrations in all sorts of exciting ways, but I think one of my favorites from your book
was the Emerald Jewel Wasp, which when I saw a picture of it, it's a gorgeous wasp.
Oh, it's stunning, yeah.
Right inch long, metallic turquoise body.
It looks like it's wearing orange bike shorts, kind of.
Yes, yes, it does.
Yeah, I mean, the metallic green and orange combo is really working for it.
I also want.
I want that combo.
It's a combo I'm not sure I could get away with, but it's, yeah.
No, right.
So tell us how she uses touch.
The Emerald Cockroach Wasp is a parasite that lays eggs inside the bodies of still living cockroaches.
The young wasp hatches from those eggs and then basically eats the cockroach alive.
So, nom-am-nom, nom, it turns into an adult wasp, it bursts out, it flies away, it finds its own cockroach.
the horrible cycle repeats.
It's a special kind of parasite
because it also manipulates the mind
and the behavior of its host.
So the wasps sting
not only lays an egg,
but it also delivers venom
to the cockroach's brain
that changes its behavior.
It makes it very docile.
And, you know,
we all know when cockroaches
are threatened they run away very easily.
But once stung,
the cockroach becomes very, very amenable.
So the wasp actually grabs it by Tentani
and leads it to its nest like a person walking a dog.
It really does.
We actually have a video and it really does look like it's just walking this cockroach
is a lot bigger than the wasp like a dog.
It's crazy.
It's wild.
It really does.
Now, where touch comes in is how do you, how does,
the wasp know
where to
inject venom, right?
So it's got,
it's,
it's stung the cockroach.
The tip of the sting
is full of
touch sensors.
So the sting,
not only is an egg laying tube
and a drill,
but it's also,
and it's kind of like a hand,
right?
It's an organ of touch.
And the wasp
can detect
the texture,
the shape maybe,
of a cockroach
brain, and uses that as a cue.
So it'll go in, like, it sees the head, goes from in, in, through the carapus.
That's right, yeah.
But then it has to feel for the little brain, right?
Because it has to sting the brain.
Yeah, yeah.
You know, and there have been some great experiments showing that it's doing this by
replacing the cockroach brain with, like, stuff that feels very different,
stuff that feels like a fake brain and seeing what the wasps do.
So, yeah, the wasp is absolutely using its sense of touch
to feel for the distinctive feel of a cockroach brain.
And then one of the last senses I want to look at
is pain that you talk about in your book
and you sort of asking this question of whether all other animals feel pain.
writing caterpillars will continue munching on a leaf
while parasitic wasp larvae eat them from the inside out
suggesting that perhaps they're not bothered by what's going on.
What have you come to conclude here?
Do you think that all animals in the Queendom feel some semblance of pain?
Yeah, I think it's a really, really tough question.
You know, pain is unusual in that it's a kind of, it's like the unwanted sense, right?
It's the thing, it's the thing that we definitely don't want to feel.
It is helpful, though, because it does stop us from watching, you know, Star Wars Revenge of the Sith the second time.
That's right.
That's more of a kind of emotional pain than the more sensory pain that I'm talking about.
But sure, I agree.
Um, the, the, um, um, now I'm thinking about that fucking movie, so, um, I'm reliving the pain now. Why? Okay. Um, much of the discussion around animal pain has, um, has revolved around a very, very simple question, which is, can this group of animals feel it? Yes or no. Um, there have been, uh, you know, there was a time when some people believe that no other animals besides humans could,
feel pain. And then that ability was extended to things that are very similar to us, other mammals,
birds maybe. And then there were a lot of these edge cases, right? So there's been for a long
time, this idea that fish don't feel pain. I think that that has been refuted by a number of
very good studies, showing that they very much do. But here's the thing. I think that there are probably
many different kinds of ways of feeling and experiencing pain.
So we might look to the cephalopods, so octopuses and squid, which are very distant from us,
clearly very intelligent animals, do they have the ability to feel pain?
So if you damage the arm of a squid, like if you just cut off the tip of a squid, like if you just cut off the tip of
arm. This is something that happens very often in nature.
The animal does react as if it's in pain, and it's some of the indicators, but
crucially, it doesn't seem to behave as if, it doesn't seem to, like, act as if
this arm is, has been injured, right? The whole body becomes hypersensitive to stimuli.
It's as if, like, I stubbed my toe and suddenly, like, my elbow feels sore or, like,
my neck kind of hurts.
And it sort of makes sense with the biology of a squid, right?
Here is an animal that the arms are actually relatively short and cannot explore most of the body.
So, you know, maybe it's useful for the squid to just behave as if the whole, you know, something is wrong, right?
Octopuses behave in a very different way.
Octopuses have very dexterous long arms that can reach all around the body, including inside themselves.
And if you damage the arm of an octopus, it very much knows that, like, this arm is hurt.
Like, it will cradle that injury.
It will kind of groom it in the way that I would if, like, my hand was cut or broken.
So, you know, octopuses very much can feel pain.
So here are two animals from the same broad group that have, I think, radically different experiences of,
pain. And I think the same is going to be true across the animal kingdom. So I said earlier that
we have the kind of eyes that we need. And I think the same is true for other animals. They have
the kind of sensations of pain that would be useful to them, given their needs, their ecology,
their evolutionary history. So I guess we're in a time.
when some folks, particularly in the U.S. government, are questioning the value of scientific
research, of many different branches of scientific research. And a lot of the research we've talked
about today is driven by this wonderful curiosity of wanting to know our planet. And I know
you mentioned at the beginning of your book. You're like, yeah, there's practical implications.
But for the moment, I don't care. Like, let's just have fun in this space. I'm paraphrasing.
No, that's, I accept that.
Okay.
I'll sign off on that.
But, as you do mention, there have been practical implications of what probably started as a scientist
just being incredibly curious about how a lobster can see, and then it ended up having
these wider implications in industry and whatnot.
So I think my favorite example that you mentioned in the book is the oil.
company that started tracking leaks in pipelines by adding Ethelma Captain, which is a gas
that smells, as you say, of farts and decay, but turkey vultures would also be spotted around
it.
And so then you could see, oh, the turkey vultures are around.
We know there's a leak there.
I can give examples where learning about the senses of other animals has led to technological
advances has changed our understanding of our cells. So, you know, studying the sense of electric
fish has been foundational for neuroscience. But I also don't want to. And I don't want to because I think
it's actually really important to understand that the main thing we get out of this and the main
reason for knowing about any of it is that the lives of animals have value in their own right.
But I also don't think that making that specific case, that basic research into the lives of other
creatures and what they're capable of, the idea that that will lead to economic or medical
benefits, I don't think that's at all related to the kinds of events that are currently happening
in this country.
I don't think that making that case is going to save the National Science Foundation or any
of the other sources of funding that it fuel the kind of research that I've talked about
in this book.
Because it's not true that what is happening is happening because people don't have a
sufficiently good understanding of the value of scientific research.
And, you know, it's also not true that if we just communicate to the value of that research better, whether it's economic or whatever, that we will save science in this country.
What is happening in this country is happening because science is bad for tyrants and always has been.
Like a populace that has a better understanding of the world around it is a populace that is much harder to rule by fear.
and that is why the scientific infrastructure of this country
is currently being sledgehammer to death.
There's no amount of making a better case
that is going to revert that.
You've got to stop the tyranny,
not try and make a better case for why science should exist.
Yeah.
You don't think bringing up examples like how military sonar
has been honed by dolphin sonar.
I really don't
I really really don't
I don't think it's going to make a blind jotted difference
you know I think that's
I think that's
I think that's playing the wrong
game I think that is
misdiagnosing the threat
and the solution
and while we are in the world of threats
it's not just tyrants
throughout
sort of these decades that scientists have been understanding animal senses,
there are threats to those senses.
We have light pollution and noise pollution and even smell pollution,
which I learned from your book,
that sort of getting in the way of how these animals are perceiving the world.
Can you tell us what's going on with DMS here?
We talked about earlier that gives oceans that smell of the sea
and allows albatrosses to find food.
Yeah, so it turns out, unfortunately,
that plastics in the ocean are also a source of DMS,
inconveniently, which might be one reason why albatrosses often end up ingesting large chunks of the stuff.
You know, many other sea animals are also drawn towards DMS, like CETA,
So this might be, you know, one reason why plastic pollution is so harmful to other animals,
aside from the fact that it's just everywhere.
Like reading that part of your book to find out that, oh my gosh, plastics are also emitting
DMS.
What are the chances that we've done this and that this is this beacon for birds to find
their food?
And gosh, we've really screwed this up, you know.
Yeah.
This is one example about many, and you've touched on other senses too.
We are filling the darkness with light.
We are filling the quiet with noise.
And all of these extra stimuli that we've added to the world,
I don't think we naturally think of them as pollutants,
but they are.
They are things that we have put in the world at times and
places where they don't belong, and that are harmful to the other creatures that we share the
planet with.
I think probably for us directly, one of the most insidious consequences of pollution is that
it severs our relationship with the natural world.
So light at night stops us from seeing the stars and the darkness, noise pollution stops us
from hearing the calls of birds and other animals around us, and it makes the natural world
seem more impoverished, smaller, and just more distant from our everyday lives.
So just to cap us off then, how do you feel you look at the world differently since writing this
book? I've heard you describe it as a salve, actually, to your feelings.
You know, I wrote to large chunks of this book concurrently with reporting on the COVID-19 pandemic.
And it really helped my mental health to be spending a lot of my time thinking about all of these wondrous things that other animals are doing and experiencing all around us.
Thinking about the umwelt of another creature is a lot like going on and is it looked like an act of travel, you know, going to an alien world, traveling to a parallel dimension or from the comfort of your own.
home. And it really has been that for me. I would almost call it escapism, but it's not. It's actually
the opposite of that. It's, it's an immersion in the true and full reality that we're always
in and that we miss. All right. Oddball questions. That's how we're going to finish off
this interview, a bunch of silly lightning round questions.
Let's go.
Maybe there'll be a jingle
by the time this comes out.
We'd put it on here.
Ed, what's the most dangerous thing you've done for a book?
I did get hit by a mantis shrimp,
which has the most powerful punch in nature.
This was a very, very small mantis shrimp.
And it still hurt.
Even a large mantis shrimp.
shrimp isn't a big animal.
Oh, right, right.
Like a large mantis shrimp is probably like the length of, you know, close to the length of my
forearm, probably.
So it's like substantial.
You definitely don't want to get a hip by one.
This one was like, you know, about the size of my pinky.
And to like clarify, it's still hurt.
You know, it didn't not hurt.
So there was that.
I also got shocked by an electric catfish.
What was the sound that came out of your mouth just to give us a sense of the pain level?
You know, I don't remember.
I can't possibly recreated for you.
But yeah, that was a literally shocking thing that I did for the book.
What was your favourite title to a paper that you read while researching this book?
I think blue tits are ultraviolet ticks is a great.
It's pretty good.
It's just, you know, very simple.
At least he won't researching great tips.
That would have been...
Exactly.
That would have been too potent to resist.
Exactly.
Finish this sentence,
now that I know blank,
I'll never look at my blank the same way again.
Now that I know about how dogs smell the world,
I'll never look at my dog in the same way again.
And, you know, I wrote this book before I got my dog.
His name is Typo.
And it completely changed the...
It completely influenced how I thought about his behavior.
how I think about dogs in general.
You know, I'm really glad that there wasn't a time in my life when I had a dog,
when I was interacting with dogs, before I knew about how they smell the world.
So now when you go on walks, you'll just let typo smell whatever he wants to smell.
Yeah, we often take him on like sniff walks where we let him dictate the pace, the route,
the agenda, as it were.
Funest objects sitting in your house.
Oh.
A friend of mine sent me a stuffed cicada, like a cicada plushy during the pandemic.
No, no, not like a taxidermine cicada.
No, like a cicada plushy.
It sort of zips open.
It's like a cicada nymphs zips open and the adult cicada comes out.
That's pretty cool.
Would that supposed to make you feel better during this time?
I don't know.
Maybe like some symbolism of metamorphosis.
emerging from like many years underground into the light.
Final question.
Tell us about a time when you thought you were just talking about science,
but somehow the dinner party was ruined.
Okay, I have a very boring answer to this question,
which is I don't have, I don't have that story for you
because I choose my friends really, really carefully.
so I throw the kinds of dinner parties
where I can talk about
Emerald Cockroach Wasps
and Umbalt.
Ed Young, thank you so much for your time
and thanks for joining us on the show.
Yeah, no worries.
Thanks for having me.
That was Science Writer Ed Young.
His newest book is called An Immense World.
I'm Wendy Zuckerman
and I'll back to you next time.
We're going to be able to be.
