Scott Horton Show - Just the Interviews - 2/18/22 Ben Freeman on the Army of Ukraine Lobbyists in DC

Episode Date: February 21, 2022

Ben Freeman joined Scott on Antiwar Radio yesterday to discuss some analysis he recently published that looks at the Ukrainian Government’s lobbying efforts in Washington DC. Freeman combed over rec...ords and uncovered over 13,000 political activities that Ukraine reported carrying out in the U.S. during 2021. Among those activities were 2,000 contacts with American media and over 8,000 contacts with Congress. Freeman points out that, although he studies how foreign governments work to influence American politics, this effort by Ukraine is on a whole other level.  Discussed on the show: “Army of Ukraine lobbyists behind unprecedented Washington blitz” (Responsible Statecraft) Support KPFK Ben Freeman is director of the Foreign Influence Transparency Initiative with the Center for International Policy. Read his work at AntiWar.com and follow him on Twitter @BenFreemanDC. This episode of the Scott Horton Show is sponsored by: The War State and Why The Vietnam War?, by Mike Swanson; Tom Woods’ Liberty Classroom; ExpandDesigns.com/Scott; EasyShip; Free Range Feeder; Thc Hemp Spot; Green Mill Supercritical; Bug-A-Salt and Listen and Think Audio. Shop Libertarian Institute merch or donate to the show through Patreon, PayPal or Bitcoin: 1DZBZNJrxUhQhEzgDh7k8JXHXRjYu5tZiG. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Searchlight Pictures presents The Roses, only in theaters August 29th. From the director of Meet the Parents and the writer of Poor Things comes The Roses starring Academy Award winner Olivia Coleman, Academy Award nominee Benedict Cumberbatch, Andy Samburg, Kate McKinnon, and Alison Janney. A hilarious new comedy filled with drama, excitement, and a little bit of hatred, proving that marriage isn't always a bed of roses. See The Roses, only in theaters August 29th. Get tickets now. For Pacifica Radio, February 20th, 2022, I'm Scott Horton. This is Anti-War Radio. All right, so welcome the show. It is Anti-War Radio. I'm your host, Scott Horton, editorial director of anti-war.com, and author of Enough Already, time to end the war on terrorism.
Starting point is 00:00:59 You can find my full interview archive or the 5,600 interviews now going back to 2003 at Scott Horton.org and at YouTube.com slash Scott Horton Show. And you can follow me on Twitter at Scott Horton Show. And we're going to be doing some fundraising for KPFK this morning, too. All right, you all, on the line, I have got Ben Freeman again. He is a research fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, and he has a book called The Foreign Policy Policy. the auction. I didn't know that. What a great name, too. Previously, he was director of the
Starting point is 00:01:34 Foreign Influence Transparency Initiative at the Center for International Policy. Welcome back to this show. Ben, how you doing? I'm good, Scott. Thank you for having me back on. Very happy to have you here. And if that wasn't clear, the point of your work is keeping track of foreign governments who lobby the U.S. government to have their way. And as we've discussed repeatedly. Countries like Israel and Saudi Arabia seem to have far more influence than the American people when it comes to American foreign policy. And boy, oh boy, I mean, I guess I kind of already knew this, but I also learned a lot about the Ukraine lobby as it has matured in the last few years in Washington, D.C. This piece is at responsiblestakecraft.org army of Ukraine lobbyists
Starting point is 00:02:23 behind unprecedented Washington Blitz. So give us the bad news here, bud. I feel like I only had bad news when I talk to you, Scott. But in this case, it's another example of a foreign powers, lobbyists, PR folks, that are really helping to drive the narrative for U.S. foreign policy here in the U.S. So if you're reading the newspaper right now or turning on the news, you're seeing everything about what's going on in Ukraine, the Russian tensions over there. And if you followed my work at all in the past, you know what I'm probably going to tell you next
Starting point is 00:03:03 that a lot of that narrative is being driven by lobbyists that are working for the folks behind that fight. So what we've dug into at the Quincy Institute is taking a hard look at everything that the Ukraine lobby has done surrounding this conflict and other issues too, including the Nord Stream pipeline, which we can talk some more about as well. And frankly, what we found, Scott, was an unprecedented campaign. I've been looking at foreign governments influence operations for 15 years now. I've never seen anything like what Ukraine has done in this past year. What?
Starting point is 00:03:40 Wait a minute. Really? Yeah. I mean, compared to APEC, which rules D.C. with an iron fist? Yeah, I think what separates Ukraine from something like APEC. let's say, is that APEC doesn't actually have to do as much. You know, it's sort of like having. They've already laid the groundwork there, haven't they?
Starting point is 00:04:03 That's right. That's right. You know, it's almost like somebody who has that really big bodyguard, you know, standing right behind him. They don't have to say as much because they got this big scary guy behind him. For Ukraine, it's a different story, though. The Ukraine lobby has really had to work that, you know, they've had to roll up their sleeves and put in the time to try and Steve.
Starting point is 00:04:22 or U.S. foreign policy in their direction. And so what they've done in terms of the activity, it blows everybody else out of the water, whether it's APEC, you know, the Saudi lobby, the Emirates, whoever it is, they're doing multiples of time more work than any government that I've ever looked at. All right. So give us some details there to illustrate what you're talking about. Yeah. So what we found, we took a look at all their foreign agents registration act, their fair
Starting point is 00:04:52 filings in 2021 to try and put this all in perspective. And so what we found was actually more than 13,000 reported political activities, which is just nuts. And that was split down, kind of three big avenues of influence that they were working on. It was Congress and that was the media and it was think tanks. The vast majority of that work was directed at Congress. More than 8,000 times that Ukraine's lobbyists. reached out to folks in Congress, 8,000 times. So a majority of all House and Senate offices
Starting point is 00:05:28 were contacted by these folks. Some offices that we looked at, like Ron Johnson, for example, who has been a real kind of Russia hot, folks at his office were contacted almost every other day by Ukraine's lobbyists. So it's been a literal full court press from Ukraine's lobbyists. And let me stop you right there too, because, I mean, am I right that 8,000 is just kind of camouflaged for all the times that they didn't self-report or all the times they hired a lawyer to do their lobbying for them or whatever kind of loopholes to or how's that work yeah yeah yeah no no that's exactly right scott this is just what we know that they've done this is just what they have self-reported and as we know from lobbying activity and uh from what we've seen in the past what they've report
Starting point is 00:06:16 is often just a fraction of what's actually going on so what i i always like to say we know but they've done at least 8,000 of these contacts with Congress. There's all the unreported activity we don't know about, and there's probably some folks out there that are doing, you know, lobbying type work that should be registered under the proper disclosure statutes, but they're not. So I'm sorry on the, I was sorry to interrupt your training thought, but you're so smart. You'll pick it right back up again. But on the thing about the lawyers there, you had taught us before,
Starting point is 00:06:46 I forget now who it was that I had hired the lawyers, if it was Raytheon or if it was the Saudis themselves or who it was, who would, I forget if they just hired a lawyer first or they hired a PR firm to hire a lawyer or they hired a lawyer to hire a PR firm, but to give $3,000 to a senator to buy his vote. So that was a pretty major loophole there using a lawyer instead of a K Street lobbyist, right? Right. This is what we call the legal exemption under FARA. And the way it's supposed to work is that, you know, if somebody's just your lawyer, they're They're representing a foreign government just in a courtroom and doing that type of stuff. They don't have to register under Farah.
Starting point is 00:07:25 But what we know very, very often happens is that you might hire a lawyer, ostensibly for a court case, but then that lawyer goes on CNN. They go on Fox News. You know, they've got an NPR story coming out, and they're effectively serving as a PR person for you. And so this loophole then gets exploited all the time, you know, Saudis, Emirates, you name it, a lot of foreign governments are exploiting this to have people who are on their payroll, but not registered under Farah, still doing ostensibly PR work on their behalf. Yeah. All right. So I'm sorry. Back to the influence on the senators, the congressmen,
Starting point is 00:08:07 their staff, et cetera, wherever you were there. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's really crazy, Scott. We documented over 8,000 different times Congress gets contacted. A majority of all members of Congress are contacted. They even have sit-down meetings with some key members of Congress. So, you know, for example, Ted Cruz, he's really been driving this anti-Russia hawk narrative. And, you know, once the sanction folks connected to the North Stream 2 pipeline, these Ukraine's lobbyists have actually met with Ted Cruz himself. And in fact, one of Ukraine's biggest lobbyist right now, who heads a firm known as Yorktown Solutions,
Starting point is 00:08:49 he's actually a former Cruz staffer. This guy directly worked for Ted Cruz. So he's got a direct line of communication directly to Cruz, who is really the champion for all things anti-Russia in Congress right now. Amazing. And hey, did you see where Rand Paul was throwing some shade at his friend, too? And they republished it at the American conservative. But it was a statement that Rand had put out where he said, hey, listen, it's no coincidence. In fact, he called it mercantilism.
Starting point is 00:09:18 I love it. Yeah. Yeah, it was a great piece. It's no coincidence that the senators pushing for this happen to be from the states that have an interest in exporting natural gas. This is just straight cronialism. And that's same free market capitalism, man. This is corruption. Right, right.
Starting point is 00:09:35 And I would say Rand's points on all of this have been very good, too, to, you know, he's asking all the right question. about what is the U.S. doing in Ukraine? What are the U.S. interests there? Like, independent of what Ukraine's interests are, what's the U.S. interest in going into World War III with Russia? Yeah, you'd think that's a pretty good question, but it takes the son of a Paul to even bring it up. Like, hey, wait a minute, we're willing to risk literally everything.
Starting point is 00:10:06 For what again? Right, right. And I think that's why it's so alarming, too, to see, you know, all of the, like the Washington consensus. The blob is in overdrive right now. And it just seems to be itching for war. And, you know, whether it's think tanks or it's the media, it just seems like everybody is kind of pushing this narrative, pushing us towards war. But you really don't hear from the folks that are, could potentially be on the front lines of that. You know, the U.S. soldiers who've been activated to go over there. not to mention the over 70,000 DoD personnel that are already stationed in Europe.
Starting point is 00:10:45 I think if you ask those folks, they're not very keen on going to war with Russia over some issues in Ukraine. Yeah. All right. Hang on a second there, Ben. You guys, it's fun drive time at KPFK 90.7 FM in L.A. Unlike the American foreign policy establishment, we are not funded by arms manufacturers and foreign despotisms.
Starting point is 00:11:07 We rely on you, our listeners. And we know the truth matters enough to you that you will, in fact, dig deep and do what it takes to help keep us on the air. At 110,000 watts, KPFK is the most powerful FM transmitter west of the Mississippi River, sending out this message of non-intervention to all of Southern California. In the past, the management here would just play extra Alan Watts during the fun drive. But the new bosses want to see if this audience will come through and support KPFK in the name of anti-war radio. So go to KPFK.org or call 818-985-5735. That's 818985-5735.
Starting point is 00:11:49 And when you pledge, let them know you support in part because of this show. Anyone who pledges $75 or more will get a copy of my new book. Enough already. Time to end the war on terrorism as a token of our appreciation. Look, we know times are tough out there, but for those who can't afford it, please do your part to keep KPFK an anti-war radio on the air in Los Angeles. And thank you. Again, that's KPFK.org or 818985-5735. Now let's get back to anti-war radio talking with Ben Freeman from the Quincy Institute.
Starting point is 00:12:26 And look, I can report to you that regular people have been, again, very successfully influenced by the TV to believe that Putin is Hitler. If we don't stop him at Ukraine, he's going to end up conquering all of Europe. It's going to be just like Hitler all over again and all these narratives. And they get it from not just CNN crazies, but from the news hour on PBS too. This is what everybody apparently is paid to believe and then go on TV and say. And when they all agree, then geez, they must know what's going on or what are they so afraid of, you know? Right. And I'm going to say, too, from our research, this dives right into a.
Starting point is 00:13:07 another aspect of what we've been looking at with Ukraine's influence, and that's on the media. I don't think it's any accident that the narrative that we're getting from the media about this is so hawkish, because in some senses, that's by design. Ukraine's lobbyist contacted media outlets more than 2,000 times last year. They had meetings with key officials from, you know, CNN, Fox News, you name it, CNBC. you go down the list of outlets and chances are they've either had a face-to-face meeting with Ukraine's lobbyists or they've been on the phone with them are received literally hundreds of emails in some cases. And the lobbyists too are going very directly to influence in some cases.
Starting point is 00:13:52 They're planning op-eds. They're helping to shape all of these narratives that we're hearing. so it's really no accident that the media seems very hawkish on this issue right now yeah well and who's sticking up for the other side of the story there russia must have some kind of you know lobbying they obviously work very hard at pushing r t out there and that kind of thing did they do anything else do they have lawyers in k street lobbyists that go up to the hill and tell their side of the story yeah they do a couple issues going on here. Number one, they do have their own side of this lobbying and influence operation. Frankly, Russian state media is not really good at convincing Americans to change their tune.
Starting point is 00:14:40 But the real influential side of this for the Russians are the pro-Russian pipeline interest. And principally, this Nord Stream 2 pipeline being built by the Russian energy company. gas prom. And gas prom has a bunch of lobbying firms working for it and other folks working on the pipeline too. But unfortunately, all of these folks are registered under what's called the Lobbying Disclosure Act, which is really just supposed to be for foreign businesses, not for foreign governments. And so unfortunately, we don't really know a lot about what they're up to. I can't really provide to your listeners any detailed account of what the Russian lobby is doing because they're not registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, they're registered under
Starting point is 00:15:30 the Lobbying Disclosure Act. And I don't think they should be, frankly, because, you know, we know Gazprom who's building this pipeline. This is a Russian state-owned company. And because they're a Russian-state-owned company, they should be registered under Farah. So there's really an uneven playing field when it comes to the transparency behind the lobbying fight. Yeah. Hang on just one second. Hey, y'all, they've got great deals on weed at thehempspot.com. The hemp spot specializes in Delta 8 tetrahydro-canabinol instead of Delta 9, so they can send it straight to you anywhere in America. Recently, a friend moved and didn't have a guy in his new town. But then he heard about the hempspot.com on my show and was saved, figuratively, and literally.
Starting point is 00:16:15 Because if you use the promo code, Scott, you get 15% off every order. And free shipping on any order over $100. Legal jams, bud, gummies, and the rest, in your state. The Hempspot.com. Spell V. T-H-C. You guys, my friend Mike Swanson has written such a great revisionist take on the early history of the post-World War II National Security State and Military Industrial Complex in the Truman Eisenhower and Kennedy years.
Starting point is 00:16:45 It's called the war state. I have to say, it's the most convincing case I've read that Kennedy had truly decided to end the war. the Cold War before he was killed. In any case, I know you'll love it. The War State by Mike Swanson. Some of y'all have a problem. You've got
Starting point is 00:17:03 chickens, but you don't want to stand around throwing food at them all day because of all the important stuff you have to do. Well, the solution of that is to get the free range feeder from free rangefeeder.com. The free range feeder has been developed to satisfy the needs of the poultry chicken hobbyist and the homesteader.
Starting point is 00:17:19 The convertible design allows for four different mounting methods. Go to freerangefeeder.com slash Scott or use promo code Scott to get 15% off and get the free ebook. Subscribe to their newsletter to immediately receive your free copy of getting started with backyard chickens. That's free rangefeeder.com slash Scott. Well, okay, but beyond, you know, direct disclosures and all that, are you under the impression that they lobby on the hill very much? Or they just deal with the State Department anyway? or do you think if you could compare their activity on the hill to Ukraine or to Saudi or whatever,
Starting point is 00:17:57 where would you rank it, do you think? Oh, I don't think on the hill that they have anywhere near the sway of the Ukrainians are certainly not. Nobody wants to be seen with them at this point anyway, right? So they just deal with the State Department. They're toxic. I mean, they're toxic. If you're a lobbyist for Russia, you know, you're a salmon swimming upstream. and there's just bears everywhere trying to eat you.
Starting point is 00:18:22 Hey, Senator Sessions, a conservative Republican, long time, you know, I don't know how many terms he served, but many served. I hate that, but, you know, that's what they call it. Anyway, he was accused of high treason for meeting with the, uh, Ukraine, with, pardon me, with the Russian ambassador in his Senate office in front of his staff who were all retired army officers. And, and this was supposedly part of, you know, yeah, yeah. Yeah, anyway. Toxic kind of association. You don't want to have much to do with their point made. Yeah, yeah, exactly. I mean, Russia is just such a scarlet letter right now on the hill that it's just so hard for their lobby as the folks on their side to get anything done there. See, here's the thing, man, right? Like when you're young, you think that adults know everything. And then when you're a regular guy, you think that congressmen know things. But then when you pay much attention to this stuff for very long, you realize that. they're too busy to really know things that's what their staff is for telling them what they know and whatever and then their staff are young people who don't really know much except that what they just heard from the lobbyist who drop by and it's a very kind of enclosed sort of a bubble of a ecosystem of a you know echo chamber kind of a thing there where thank god the quakers are here right if without the FCNL who's going to come to the hill and say well actually you know that's not entirely right there's another
Starting point is 00:19:50 side of the story here you guys should know about. And it's really that easy, right? Just buy some lobbyists, create a narrative, and stick it in the brain of Pelosi and her people, and you rule the day. That's it. Right. Right. I think it's the dirty little secret of Washington that the nation's laws are being written by 24-year-old kids. Oops. And it's true. Everything you're saying. Still has the A-PAC trademark at the bottom of the thing. Right. And we see this with foreign lobbying, too, because, you know, people's bandwidth is so small. And so you see members of Congress reading speeches that were written by foreign lobbyists, you know, a congressman named Ed Royce did this a few years ago. He was literally
Starting point is 00:20:38 reading Saudi talking points verbatim on the House floor. And so you're like, what, like, is this just laziness? And I think that's part of it, you know, because these folks, you know, there's a little bit of laziness, then they don't have enough time on their hand. So when a lobbyist comes in and says, oh, don't worry about it. You know, I'll make your job really easy. You know, here are the talking points. Or in some cases, lobbyists will literally write pieces of legislation for members of Congress. And that's not an exaggeration at all. We've seen this happen on many occasions before. And so, but when that happens, you know, you as the average voter have to say, what the heck am I doing here? You know, why is, why am I even voting? Because
Starting point is 00:21:19 my vote even matter if these people are just introducing legislation that's literally written by lobbyists. Yeah, crazy. All right. Sorry. Hang on just one second for me there, Ben Freeman. You guys, it's fun drive time at KPFK, 90.7 FM in L.A. Now, you hear me say it in the intro to this show every week that I've done more than
Starting point is 00:21:40 5,600 interviews since 2003. And it's true. They're all in the archives for you there at Scott Horton.org. I started on pirate radio in Austin. in 1998, and I've had shows on a national radio network, internet radio stations of every description, and of course the ongoing interviews podcast. But I've always considered every moment of time on the air on 90.7 FM in L.A. to be priceless. That's why you don't hear partisanship on this show. That's why you don't hear coverage of news cycle headlines. My job is bringing
Starting point is 00:22:13 you the truth so that you won't support the war. It's no accident I've interviewed Gareth Porter 326 times so far. Anyway, point is, if you value what you hear on anti-war radio on Sunday mornings here on KPFK, then you've got to do something about it. Go to KPFK.org or call 818985-5735. That's 818985, 5735. And when you pledge, let them know you support in part because of this show.
Starting point is 00:22:44 Anyone who pledges $75 or more will get a copy of my new book. enough already. Time to end the war on terrorism as a token of our appreciation. Thank you all. Again, it's kpfk.org or 818985-5735. Now let's get back to our interview with the great Ben Freeman. All right, so now I talk to us about the think tanks too. You know, some reason when I was reading your article, I was reminded the first time I ever heard that term think tank. It's a think tank. Nobody told me that, well, it's the arms manufacturers. They're good at engineering, but they're not that good of writers so they got to hire some eggheads to write some studies to be the excuse for why the military needs to buy weapons from them is essentially all it is right but then
Starting point is 00:23:28 i guess this kind of goes unremarked upon unnoticed and maybe i think you've told me before that you think this is kind of a new phenomenon in the last generation or so where you really have the think tanks also directly sponsored by foreign governments to incredible degrees here where there's no disclaimer when you hear from an expert from the Atlantic Council that this guy's paid by the Germans and the Qataris or whoever it is to tell you this point of view here, you know? So can you, first of all, describe a little bit of that think tank world from your point of view, if you could, and then where it intersects with our story here with the Ukrainian lobbyists.
Starting point is 00:24:10 Yeah, yeah, it's a great question. It's one of my favorite topics. I think when we're talking about think tanks, think tanks in theory, or, you know, designed to be something of a bridge between the ivory tower, between academia, and those heads on that side and their fancy, you know, research, and connecting that to actual government policies. So in other words, to say, you know, we've got all this, you know, fancy scientific research out there, how do we actually translate that into good policies for the U.S. government? That's ostensibly what think tanks are supposed to do in theory.
Starting point is 00:24:49 In practice, think tanks sometimes do that, but more often than not lately, they kind of serve a function as de facto lobbyists in many cases where the funders of think tanks are asking for specific types of research. In some cases, very specific individual reports and even articles to be written. And so there's a growing pay-to-play component to the work that think tanks are doing now. And that may or may not be problematic to an individual person if they're okay with who those funders are. But I think it gets into some very interesting questions when those think tanks are being funded by foreign governments, particularly authoritarian foreign governments. And this is what I found in my research is that foreign money is just pouring in the think tank. a federal report for the Center for International Policy, where we tracked over $170 million going to the nation's top think tanks.
Starting point is 00:25:49 And one of the biggest contributors to think tanks is actually the United Arab Emirates. And we know from multiple different examples that the UAE isn't just handing over these millions of dollars and walking away. The UAE is asking for very specific things, arm sales, for folks to turn a blind eye to the situation. in Yemen. And in some cases, too, they're looking to get specific U.S. weapon systems sold to them, like U.S. military drones, which they've recently been authorized to buy from the U.S. too. The other thing on think tanks, I think, is worth noting, too, is that they can serve as what I like to call holding tanks, where people go and join a think tank that might lean a little to one side of the aisle or the other. And they just kind of hang out there until their party gets back
Starting point is 00:26:43 in the White House. And so then, then they can leave the think tank and go back into the next Republican or Democratic administration. So in this way, there's, you coined that phrase? No, I'm sure somebody else, much smarter said it before I did. But no, I like that. So for example, the Center for a New American Security during the last years of W. Bush, when they were gearing up to take over the Obama government and launch the surge in Afghanistan. Exactly right. I think CNAS is a perfect example. And, you know, you look down the roster of CNAS now and you look at Biden administration
Starting point is 00:27:19 folks. The Biden administration is now filled with former CNAS people. And these are folks who under the Trump presidency, they just sort of went to CNAS. In many cases, we're just sort of holding out there and inviting their time until they could get back in. And so Biden wins the presidency. and then swoop, it's right back into the executive branch. And I expect it to happen again for CNAS and other things like it.
Starting point is 00:27:43 You know, when there's a Republican back in the White House, they'll once again, you know, leave the administration and just jump right back into these Democratic holdings that tanks and just wait there for a few years until they can jump right back in again. So can you tell us about the Atlantic Council? Sounds nice. We like the Atlantic Ocean. That's a nice place full of fish for us to eat and things.
Starting point is 00:28:06 like that. So what could possibly go wrong? I don't know. Yeah, yeah. That's a great question. I live down in Florida now and so I'm right by the Atlantic Ocean and I love it. But the Atlanta council. What a great name for a council. I don't know. Right. Wonderful. Wonderful. The Atlantic Council is a favorite topic of mine, frankly, in that the Atlanta Council has, what I think is the notorious title of getting money from a more diverse set of foreign governments than any other think tank in D.C. By my calculations that they've, in the last five years, they've received contributions from more than two dozen foreign powers. And this includes, in the current circumstance, getting sizable contributions from Ukraine. In fact, the second wealthiest man in Ukraine is not only a big donor to the Atlanta
Starting point is 00:29:00 Council. He sits on the International Advisory Board of the Atlantic Council. And on top of all that, he's conducting surveys about the current crisis, which the Atlanta Council is then featuring prominently in the work of its scholars and other folks on its website. And then on top of that, Scott, what's going on in the back end is that behind the scenes, which folks aren't seeing, is that Ukraine's lobbyists are meeting with the Atlantic Council like crazy. In fact, just in 2021, Ukraine lobbyists met with, met with emailed or had phone calls with Atlantic Council scholars almost 600 times. This includes meetings with key Atlantic Council scholars who are pushing for really heavily
Starting point is 00:29:47 militarized U.S. responses to the crisis there and folks who are pushing for the U.S. to provide sanctions on the Nord Stream 2 crisis. So the Atlanta Council, to me, at least in the current crisis, is really a think tank that epitomizes this interaction that we can have between foreign governments' lobbying efforts and the work that things that think tanks are doing to promote the interests of those foreign powers. Right.
Starting point is 00:30:17 All right. Well, that's something else. And I guess it explains a lot of what's going on right now on TV. and in D.C. So I really appreciate your insight here today, man. Great stuff. You bet, Scott. One of these times I got to come on here with good news, you know, say something like, you know, foreign lobbying's over. You know, we figured it out. Americans back in control. You know, we got the lobbyist out of the way. Yeah, APEC forced to register as foreign agents. Right, right. Yeah. We'll get them one day, Scott. Exactly. All right. Well, thank you again, man. Really appreciate it, Ben.
Starting point is 00:30:49 Thank you, Scott. Always a pleasure. All right you guys. That is Ben Freeman. over at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. ResponsibleStatecraft.org is their website and this important piece. It's called Army of Ukraine Lobbyists behind unprecedented Washington Blitz. And that has been Anti-War Radio for this morning. Again, I'm your host, Scott Horton, editorial director of anti-war.com, and author of enough already. Time to end the war on terrorism. Find my full interview archive at Scotthorton.org and at YouTube.com slash Scott Horton. and show and support KPFK at KPFK.org or call 818985 5735.
Starting point is 00:31:32 That's 8189-85 KPFK. And I am here every Sunday morning from 830 to 9 on KPFK 90.7 FM in L.A. See you next week.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.