Screaming in the Cloud - Cloud Therapy with Bobby Allen
Episode Date: May 4, 2021About BobbyBobby Allen serves as VP of Strategic Alliances for Turbonomic. Bobby is a veteran of Intel, Bank of America, TIAA and multiple startups including one that was successfully acquire...d by the former CSC (now DXC). He went into corporate America after being an Intel fellow at the University of Michigan (MS in Computer Science and Engineering) and a Meyerhoff scholar at UMBC (BS in Computer Science). Bobby has been involved in cloud computing startups since 2012. He frequently advises CXO’s on cloud strategy and logical equivalents in cloud technology. His goal is to provide data-driven output to move decision-makers from information to clarity to insight. Bobby has been a featured speaker in various events and digital formats including VMworld, AWS re:Invent, theCube, crowdchat, The CTOAdvisor and Gigaom’s Voices in the cloud. He’s equally skilled talking to analysts or technical teams but most enjoys helping customers separate fact from fiction.Bobby also serves as Stewardship Pastor of Wellspring Church – a Gospel centered, multi-ethnic community in Charlotte, NC. Bobby is a member of the preaching team at Wellspring and is responsible for technology, finances and facilities. He’s grateful to be part of the team that helped complete a multi-year building purchase and remodeling project. Wellspring moved into their new home in December 2019. Links:turbonomic.com: https://turbonomic.combobbyjallen.me: https://bobbyjallen.me@ballen_clt: https://twitter.com/ballen_clt
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hello, and welcome to Screaming in the Cloud, with your host, Chief Cloud Economist at the
Duckbill Group, Corey Quinn.
This weekly show features conversations with people doing interesting work in the world
of cloud, thoughtful commentary on the state of the technical world, and ridiculous titles
for which Corey refuses to apologize.
This is Screaming in the Cloud.
This episode is sponsored in part by LaunchDarkly.
Take a look at what it takes to get your code into production.
I'm going to just guess that it's awful because it's always awful.
No one loves their deployment process.
What if launching new features didn't require you to do a full-on code and possibly infrastructure
deploy?
What if you could test on a small subset of users and then roll it back immediately if
results aren't what you expect?
LaunchDarkly does exactly this.
To learn more, visit launchdarkly.com and tell them Corey sent you and watch for the
wince.
This episode is sponsored in part by Turbonomic, currently being
acquired by IBM. Congratulations to them. The Apps on Cloud Summit hosted by Turbonomic is a new
action-packed, not really a conference, happening online May 11th through the 13th. It's for
everyone who makes applications in the cloud run, from IT leaders to DevOps pros
to, you know, whatever the heck you want to call me. Take a break from screaming into the cloudy
void to learn from some of the best, like Kelsey Hightower, John Meyer, and also, for some reason,
me. Register now at turbonomic.com slash screaming. There's a swag box ready to ship for the first 2,000 registrants, so be sure not to miss it.
My thanks to Turbonomic, now an IBM company, for sponsoring this episode.
Welcome to Screaming in the Cloud. I'm Corey Quinn.
My promoted guest today works for Turbonomic.
Now, Bobby Allen is the VP of Strategic Alliances, but on LinkedIn, he's something else
entirely, a cloud therapist. As someone who called himself a cloud economist once upon a time,
because I figured no one would know what that means, great, that appealed to me. And I like
the idea of someone calling themselves what appears to basically be unique in the
universe, a cloud therapist.
Bobby, welcome to the show.
And what is a cloud therapist?
Yeah, thank you, Corey.
Thank you for having me on the program.
First of all, love the format and all the great guests you've had.
And I kind of took a page from you, Corey.
I kind of made up my own title and some of my own job description.
So I call myself a cloud therapist on LinkedIn.
Hang on. While I'm sitting here, I'm going to do a search. And as it turns out, if LinkedIn
cooperates, yeah, there are, ooh, there is a second person calling themselves a cloud therapist.
Interesting.
Well, someone at AWS, which is good. I had the same problem as well, because when I was a cloud
economist, someone was calling themselves that as well at AWS.
And, well, I can let that skate because AWS inherently is terrible at naming things and job titles.
Presumably, you're going to fall into the same bucket.
It'll be great.
But I'm curious, what is a cloud therapist?
How does that work?
So a cloud therapist, I mean, Corey, is really about listening.
Because the reality is there are a lot of things that happened before I got there.
A lot of them, honestly, they went very badly. And I've noticed that a lot of people have almost a level of PTSD, especially from big
transformation projects.
So cloud therapy to me is really two things.
One, I'm focused more on how I can help you than what I can sell you.
And number two, I'm there to tell you what you need to know, not what you want to hear.
A somewhat similar line that I've been using for the cloud economics side of the world has been that I largely view myself as a marriage counselor between engineering and finance, because that does seem to less about being able to prove things with technical correctness. It's not about the technology. It's not about the tools. It always goes back to the people. And if I were to start my business over again four years ago, I would almost certainly align it more directly with that ethos in mind. Corey, I couldn't agree more. I think you and I are so aligned on that.
Part of my personal mantra for last year and this year has been the short version is that tech is
the easy part. The longer version is that tech is the easy part. People are the best part. Behavior
is the hard part, and humility is the worst part. We don't like raising our hand to admit that we
need help. No, and part of the problem too is is that on some level, we live in a society that winds up penalizing people when they raise their hand and say,
I don't know something. For better or worse, I figured, well, I have no technical credibility
to speak of, so why not admit when I don't understand something? It sort of snowballed
from there where other people started speaking up too. Yeah, I don't get it either. And oh,
good. I see it to wait for someone to speak up, but all right. It became an interesting story. And I'm starting to realize now that there's more psychologyinkering with things? Why are we playing around with new stuff? It's got to come back to, are we solving a problem for a person or an organization
to make life better for someone? And I think, you know, when I kind of step back at some of the
conversations I have with executives, this is one thing I'll throw out for the audience.
I'm a big believer that everything new isn't good and everything old isn't bad.
Wisdom is about knowing which new things to embrace and which old things to retain.
I call that mastering the remix. And if you're not willing to ask for help and you're overwhelmed,
that mix of old and new is probably crushing you right now.
That's a really astute way of framing it. I want to come back to that. But before we do,
this is a promoted guest episode by your employer, Turbonomic.
Yes. My question for you is,
why Turbonomic? That isn't just a, what does Turbonomic do? We'll get there in a moment.
But you have an interesting and storied history as far as things you've done. You were at Cloud Genera for a long time, and you wound up doing a bit of a tease as far as, oh, where am I going
to go next at the beginning of this year? And the answer was Turbonomic.
Where were you and what made you decide that this was the next thing for you to do?
Yeah, that's a great, great question, Corey.
We'll hopefully get into automation a little bit more in the topic.
I've got a different take on automation maybe than many have.
But I used to be a person, Corey, that talked about folks would say I'm drowning in information.
And I would say, no, no, what you really need is to move from information to clarity to insight. And I think
the revelation I had within the past year or so is the gap, Corey, is not from information to
insight. It's really from intent to execution. Even if I tell you what you need to do, do you
have the time and the attention to do it, or do you really need me to do it for you?
So the automation that Turbo does kind of helps free you up to go focus on the next thing. I have a somewhat conflicted relationship with
an awful lot of the cloud cost optimization tooling. And generally speaking, we don't have
a whole lot of them on the show. We don't have a whole lot of them sponsoring our stuff because of
a really strange divide that we found over the years. Either I wind up
actively insulting the tool or product, which is not a great look when people sponsor things,
so that's a problem. Or the other is I wind up saying great things about it. It's perceived as
a full-throated endorsement. And that's impossible for me to do in this space, just because, as we've
discussed already, I don't think that it is inherently a tooling problem nearly so much as it is a people problem. That said, one of the things I do appreciate about
Turbonomic when I took a whirlwind tour through it was that in many cases it is hands-off. You
configure it to do certain things and then you don't have to mess with it anymore. It just works.
And it disappears into the background offering. And that is, in many respects, exactly what people need around a lot of the things that
Turbonomic does.
So I agree, Corey.
I think the other part is Turbonomic can kind of meet you halfway because sometimes the
things you want to automate still need to be routed through something like a service
now to get people to bless it.
So I think that part is really cool.
But I'll give this analogy to the audience, Corey.
So Turbonomic is not a cost optimization company.
We're really a performance company,
focused on applications.
And so here's the difference, right?
I'll use a gym analogy.
There's a healthy way to lose weight
and there's an unhealthy way to lose weight.
So the way for a layman,
the way I would sum up Turbonomic
is we are optimization without unintended consequences.
We're not the diet pill you take to drop 50 pounds
and your kidneys fail. Think of us as a combination of the nutritionist and the trainer so that you lose
weight and add muscle in a healthy way so that your body has the nutrition and the physical
makeup that it needs for you to be sustainable and successful. It's effectively teaching people
the long-lasting approaches rather than the quick fix of come in and, all right, flip that button
there. Hit that button there,
hit that switch there. No, you flip that switch incorrectly. Do it more like this. Thank you,
pay me, and then you vanish and you haven't really fixed anything. You've just caused a
minor inflection and made people feel good, but it isn't building the lasting muscle that you need
in these spaces to ultimately fix the root of the problem, which comes down to having communications effectively cross-functionally.
Corey, you've said it well in other formats. Cost is a proxy for value, but cost is a symptom of
typically something that's a lot deeper, right? A bad cloud bill is poor communication, is
over-provisioning because you don't know what the applications need. There are other symptomatic
things. And I think, again, back to being a cloud therapist, if you listen to people, they'll tell you what's wrong. They won't necessarily be
able to tell you why. And you've got to listen to the bigger point of what's happening. And so
sometimes, you know, I'm screaming about the bill, but there's really a bigger issue. I don't know
what resources my apps need. I don't know where to draw the line. I don't know what I should be
doing. I need some coaching and I need some automation so that that package can help me operate my environment better.
I think your framing of the question started out down the right path. Oh, you get a bad cloud bill.
Well, hang on a second. Why is it bad? I mean, theoretically, you can drop the cloud bill to
zero by turning everything off, but that is surprisingly unappealing for most companies.
It comes down to, is it too high?
Is it really that it's high? Because people accept when they run businesses that there's a cost
to providing their services or goods, and that's natural order of things. But what they don't
understand in many cases is that when finance is complaining about the bill, it's not that it's
too much, it's that it doesn't align with projections. So what is it that's really
driving that question? Was it that it wasn't predictable, that it wasn't planned for
or budgeted for? Or in many cases, is it the fact that you just hired a data science team and now
the bill's in the stratosphere while it's very hard to articulate the value they're providing
for you so far? I think that's the key, Corey, is that, you know, I'll use another analogy.
When grandma's transmission goes out in her car and I'm weighing whether I put a $10,000
repair around that vehicle, I'm not going to do that if she's going to stop driving
next year.
So like I said, cost is a proxy for value.
In the end, the real issue that we're struggling with is what is the value of that application?
Because applications are the bridge between technology and people, right?
That's how we're delivering something to make someone else's life better.
And we're struggling because the bill may be going up, but the value to our customers and
our users isn't necessarily going up and we're not aligned, right? If a Netflix cost goes up
or Disney Plus goes up, that cost going up means they're adding more value and they've
got more customers. They're not complaining about that as much. Right. You look at these things and
like, oh, wow, Netflix or
Lyft or whoever it is that discloses cloud spend in a variety of different ways through their
public filings. It's easy to look at that and, oh, what are they spending all that money on?
It's the rest of the S1, the business fundamentals that mean that they have successfully gone from
harebrained idea to something that is viable in the public markets.
That's also invariably second place at best case compared to the cost of payroll. In some cases,
you're also going to see office real estate trumps that as well. But let's be realistic,
in a post-COVID time, that one's a bit of a question mark in a lot of places.
Exactly. You know, Corey, just to kind of segue,
communication and people is, you know, kind of a common theme I hope the audience is hearing.
And I tell customers all the time, you know, missed expectations sink more projects than bad code or broken APIs. We have all this tech, but we've gotten lazy in terms of having the
right conversations. You know, we went to the cloud or we did this app this way to make things
better. What does better actually mean to us? Is it cheaper? Is it faster? Is it bigger? I'll be
specific about that for a second, Corey. When we talk about making something better, do I need to
do a good thing faster or make a mediocre thing better? Because a bad recipe of scale is still
nasty. I really, really wish that you could have said that story to some of the institutional kitchens I was at and a bunch of my early educational processes.
Oh, my stars.
Yeah, could you fix the recipe first before you scale it?
But there's also this misguided belief that every company holds, every engineering department has, specifically with the idea that after this next sprint completes, then, then,
Bobby, we're going to start making good decisions and pay off all of our technical debt and start
doing the right thing all the time. And we, of course, will agree on what the right thing is.
It's a ludicrous fantasy that everyone holds on some level.
And you're right again, Corey, that I feel like I'm saying that a lot today because we're probably
agreeing more than we usually do, but that's cool.
In grad school, I had a professor who talked a lot about verification and validation.
The first question is, did we do it right?
But the more important question is, did we do the right thing?
We are not asking that question enough, Corey.
We're building two-story houses for people that are in wheelchairs.
And then we look back and we wonder why people are upset. It goes back to expectations, communication, the technology, all the stuff
that we can do, Corey, is making us fall in love with the science for a project and not tying it
back to, is this what this person or this firm needed me to actually do for them? And then we
get upset because we spent a lot of time and effort on things that really weren't relevant
to meet the need. So I want to take a bit of a detour as well,
where I normally would call this a side project,
but that in this case would be a horrific insult,
and that is not at all my intention.
You're very upfront about not just being a cloud therapist,
you are also a pastor.
And I want to be clear, not a cloud pastor,
an actual legitimate pastor.
Tell me first about, I guess,
trying to balance those two worlds, and secondly, how they inform each other.
Thank you for the question, Corey. One, I know that's maybe different territory for your audience,
so let me try to sum it up. Well, let's be clear here. It's also different territory for me. I'm
a somewhat secular Jew, and the whole pastor, religious services, faith thing is an area that I always
felt like a bit of an outsider in American Christian culture. And if I do, I know other
people feel much more so. So it's time to start normalizing some of these things and say, yeah,
I don't know what I don't know. Please continue. Oh, thank you. So Corey, I serve as one of the
pastors at a multicultural church in the South. I live in Charlotte, which I like to call Silicon
South,
to let people know we're not just country bumpkins sitting on tractors.
And so my church is about half and half black and white.
We have three black pastors and two white pastors.
And I honestly, Corey, feel like my life is better
because I get to do life with such a diverse group of people.
We have white families, for example,
that have adopted black children.
We get to process things together.
We get to talk about, is this racist or is this ignorant? I'm struggling to find the words that
have this conversation. We get to do a lot of those things. And I think that's why for me,
the pastor part of me wants to make sure that I listen for how people are hurting. I listen for,
again, what happened before I got there. And I think about how to apply.
Here's the key, I think, for the audience, too.
A lot of times your passion projects can teach you skills that you can transfer to the enterprise
and vice versa.
Let me tell you what I mean about that.
One of the biggest projects I've done, probably hardest thing in my life short of somebody
dying, was managing a building renovation project.
About the only thing harder than doing building stuff for a church is getting a loan for a
church.
No bank will foreclose on a church, so they don't want to lend any money to you.
Managing that project definitely tapped into skills that I acquired doing things like the
Bank of America Maryland's data conversion, managing schedule resources, budgets.
So when that came down the line on the pastor side, I said, I'm built for this.
Bank of America trained me for this.
Cloud General Service must train me for this.
And it also goes the other way, right?
When I'm managing volunteers at church who don't owe me their allegiance, I've got to
lead them and motivate them.
That applies to influencing people in the enterprise.
So I think they're very complementary to each other is the way I'd sum it up. It's fascinating watching folks,
at least from my perspective, who have this multi-dimensional aspect to them. I mean,
we all have it to some extent. I spend a lot of time in my off hours, such as they are,
being a parent or indulging myself in cooking and whatnot. But they're very different than
the activities I pursue in my professional slash public life.
And it always is, frankly, more than aspirational to find someone who's, I guess, non-public, non-professional aspect of what they do is also devoted towards, I guess, either transformation or, in this case, helping people.
Let's call it explicitly what it is. It's helping uplift people, which is something I've threaded through what I do professionally. At least I try to, but in your case, it's an explicit calling
to my understanding. It is a, in many ways, relatively thankless task that is never done.
Is that an unfair characterization? No, that's fair, Corey. You're not a pastor for the
compensation package. You're in it because you care about people. Careful. How loudly you say
that. I'm sure some VC is going to hear that and their ears are going to go on point. You're in it because you care about people. Careful, how loudly you say that, I'm sure some VC is going to hear that and their ears
are going to go on point.
You're in it because you want to help people.
And I would sum it up this way, being a pastor shows me how I'm a beautiful mess.
I am flawed, I am mistaken.
I've also learned a lot parenthetically, I think what goes right along with being a pastor
is being a husband of 21 and a half years now.
I've learned a lot of things from my wife, and humility has taught me. One of the biggest things
that we as men do often too, Corey, is we don't listen to our wives enough. I've said on social
media before, listening to your wife doesn't make you less of a man, but not listening to your wife
may make you a less successful man. And being a pastor and seeing how many times I've been wrong
about things, how many times my wife has been right about things has kind of humbled me to understand that.
You know, my wife has been my test audience.
I've also said that before many guys say something deep, we did something dumb.
So we need to thank the spouses, partners, and mentors who gave us grace while we figured stuff out.
My wife definitely falls into that category.
I'm in the same boat.
I always feel a little, I guess, category. I'm in the same boat.
I always feel a little, I guess, ashamed. Let's be honest, ashamed that so much of what I do and who I am is only possible because my wife has a job as a corporate attorney. And yeah, when I was
starting this place out and figuring out how it was going to work, I didn't have to support the
family as I was going through that. That gave me certain amounts of latitude. There's also the aspect
of the constant emotional support, the ability to help pitch in and put the girls to bed when
I have a late night event that goes late. There's a lot in there, and it's one of those areas where
if I did it as the husband, I would be lauded for these things to help support my wife.
But when my wife does that for me, culturally, that's very much a, well, that's what wives do.
It's a double standard and it's terrible.
And I'm ashamed of the fact that I don't do a good enough job of calling that out frequently enough.
It's a balance core.
I think the other thing that we've got to look at is even when we deal with challenges on the corporate side, it's still informed by people, right? Sometimes people are frustrated with their jobs because they're frustrated at home. It is really tough to like your job when your spouse can't stay in your job. And sometimes that happens because you've been, sometimes Corey will say, Corey, people will say you're being a rock star at work. And my wife has said to me before,
I feel like your company's getting rock star, but I'm not getting rock star at home.
And before I get offended, I remember what another one of my pastor friends said,
you need to sit down and ask your wife, how often do you have my undivided attention and be quiet
and listen to whatever she has to say? Don't be defensive, suck it up and realize there's
some truth there in that feedback that you probably need to process.
This episode is sponsored in part by VMware.
Because let's face it,
the past year hasn't been kind to our AWS bills
or honestly any cloud bills.
The pandemic had a bunch of impacts.
It forced us to move workloads to the cloud
sooner than we would have otherwise.
We saw strange patterns such as user traffic drops off, but infrastructure spend doesn't. What do you do about it? Well, the Cloud
Live 2021 virtual conference is your chance to connect with people wrestling with the same type
of thing. Be they practitioners, vendors in the space, leaders of thought, ahem, ahem. And get
some behind-the-scenes look into various ways different companies are handling this.
Hosted by CloudHealth by VMware on May 20th,
the CloudLive 2021 conference will be 100% virtual and 100% free to attend.
So you really have no excuses for missing out on this opportunity
to deal with people who care about cloud bills.
Visit cloudlive.com slash Corey
to learn more and save your virtual seat today.
That's cloudlive.com slash Corey.
C-O-R-E-Y.
Drop the E.
We're all in trouble.
My thanks to VMware for sponsoring this ridiculous episode.
You have to sit with that for a while.
It's easy to wind up pointing out specific times
and specific weeks, for example. During re-invent, for as far as my family is concerned, I am
basically calling in dead. And that at least becomes something that is time-bound. The more
pernicious, the more dangerous aspect is when it slowly starts to become everything. Because,
oh, it's just, we're on a tough sprint right now. I'm going to go ahead and focus on that instead. Or, well, right now it's a big deal I'm working on. So once this is
done, then I'll go back and have time to make it up to the family. And then you turn around and
you're retired and elderly on some level, assuming we're all fortunate to live that long. And you
realize you never made time for the things that matter. And you missed watching your children
grow up and you missed being there to support the people who matter. And frankly, one of the reasons I started this place
that I have to continually remind myself to keep in mind is that I did it because I didn't want
to continue working startup hours in the hopes that someday things pay off. And in fact, most
of the people who work here work what amounts to a 40 hour a week-ish schedule. And I say ish, that's not at a floor, it's at a ceiling in many cases,
and that's fine. The reason I do it is because I don't want to do that grind. I don't want to
play those games. And I don't want to wind up having these awful scenarios of having to figure
out what it is that we're doing and promising people and stringing them
along and burning them out. I want this to be sustainable. I want, I want to build a place where
I can enjoy my life and my job doesn't consume me unless I want it to, but also for other people as
well. And I'll admit there are times that becomes very challenging, but that's the beauty of doing
things in a bootstrapped way where we're supported by
the magic of revenue and profitability.
We don't have to sprint to hit runway targets before we're out of business in the same way.
Yeah, that's why I say we're beautiful messes, Corey, especially as husbands and fathers
were working on a plane that were flying at the same time.
And my kids are a little bit older than yours.
I've got a 12 and a 14 year old.
I'll give this piece of advice to your audience that may have younger children.
I used to think that the kids were going to need me the most when they were younger, right?
Because babies and toddlers want to talk, but don't have a lot to say.
Teenagers, on the other hand, have a lot to say, but don't want to talk.
They need you more as they're older, where you have to watch body language and what they're
not saying.
And again, the way this all comes together, Corey, is being a pastor, being a husband, being a father make me better
at my job, not the other way around. We think that they're detriments, but learning how to read
people, how to connect with them, and how to watch for what they really need, not just what they're
saying, will serve you in any aspect of your career. I think that there's an awful lot that needs to be aligned and built in a way that we start looking at people through the context of whole career.
We don't though. Everything is short term. Everything is, oh, just at this company,
work like nuts for a few years, and then it's going to pay off and we'll hit that equity point.
It's a lie. It's always a lie. Look at how engineering works. We talk about sprints,
a two-week sprint.
And then what do you do at the end of the sprint?
That's right.
You do another sprint.
It's not a sprint.
It's a marathon.
If you're running all the time, you burn out.
It always bugged me back when I first learned how Agile was supposed to work.
And I don't think I've ever quite gotten over it.
So, Corey, if I kind of build on that, but connect kind of life and technology,
because I feel like a lot of technology lessons are really life lessons or vice versa.
One thing that I've been wrestling with, I feel like in tech and in life, Corey, we're struggling with how to evaluate better versus different.
Do I need a faster horse or do I need a car?
And the challenge is in a world of overwhelming options, watch this, how you choose is more important than what you choose.
And most of us are overwhelmed, I find, because we're focusing on a choice, not a plan. Because
without a plan, you're one more option away from being overwhelmed to starting over again
prematurely. We need things, Corey, that are going to free up our minds to go focus on the next
problem. And so tying this back to my firm for a second, Turbonomic is not a choice. Turbonomic is the way you choose.
We need to pursue things in life that free us up to focus on family, to focus on spending
time with people, to focus on solving the next challenge.
Because other than that, our minds are still occupied spinning on things that we can't
resolve.
We spend so much time doing those things.
You're right.
One of the things I like about what Turbonomic does, as well as a number of other tools, is it almost takes the big reserved instance or about the math. Well, yeah, it's pretty
mathematically straightforward, especially in a world of savings plans to go in and say, yeah,
you should spend about $20 million on that savings plan. That makes sense. Everyone can agree. Okay.
Well, what if XX and X and all right, fine. We'll make it 18 or 17 or whatever it is.
Fine. That gets agreed upon. Okay. You just click the button in the console, add it to your cart,
and now click purchase. And no one does, because it turns out that clicking the buy button
on a cart item that is more than you are likely to make in your career is a gut check moment.
And people sit around for nine months because they're scared to click the button, and it's
great. Okay, having tooling do that is helpful. The way we approach it is we're consultants,
and we're sitting there next to them and hold their hands in some ways through it and okay if you're still
on the fence cut it in half buy that now and then we'll reevaluate in a month and go from there but
you're going to spend the money anyway may as well do it at a discount and that's the psychology
piece of it i like your approach to taking that out of the critical decision path where people in
some cases need to take a strong drink before clicking that button.
Right.
It's surreal.
I've clicked that button before.
And every time I quadruple check it, I used to take the weasel's way out back when I was
running ops teams for those big purchases.
I would go ahead and make my Amazon account rep do it on the back end because if they
mess it up and spoiler, sometimes they did, it's on them,
and they can unwind it with an apology rather than me begging on my knees to please, please,
please don't get me fired and sued here. It's a different dynamic there. And I really wish that
there were more effective ways to do it. One thing that GCP gets right in this case is the idea of
sustained use discounts. Use something for at least X hours a month, and you automatically qualify for a discounted rate on that thing. Awesome. All I have to do
is not do anything. Well, I'm great at that. That's a very under-marketed part of their
offering. I agree 100%. I think a lot of people don't know enough about that.
I do want to go back to something you talked about, Corey, with when we look at automation
in general, and this may be a little controversial,
right?
And to freeing up your mind, freeing up your time is a big thing for me.
Automation doesn't mean that you can stop thinking.
It means that you can start thinking about the next thing.
And so I believe personally, automation was really meant to enable thoughtfulness, not
push us towards laziness.
And that's how some of us are using it, right?
The key is that you automate. We talked using it, right? The key is that you
automate. We talked about better versus different. The key is that you automate better so you can
think about different. So you can't automate everything in the world. That's the other place
some people get stuck, right? It's hitting the buy button, but then it's thinking, okay, if we're
going to automate, let's automate everything. You can't automate everything yet. Automate the stuff
that's better. Focus on the stuff that's different. And that's part of the challenge too. I see this industry-wide where people are approaching
everything through a lens of SaaS and well, great, can we turn this into something that can only be
solved with software where maybe we have a pro services engagement from time to time,
but it's going to be software for that recurring revenue approach. When I talked about starting
the Duckbill Group with a bunch of people who were kind enough to sit down and give me their
unvarnished opinion, most people were positive on that, but one person who wasn't was a successfully
exited founder who had done very well. And their response was, yeah, this doesn't seem like a great
business to me because yeah, I can see you making 10 million bucks a year out of this place, but I
don't see a path to a half billion dollar exit. And I'm sitting there going, well, I appreciate
your feedback first.
Thanks. Feedback is a gift. Thank you. Secondly, exactly how much money do you think I need?
But the thing is, they were right on some level. If I want to become a celebrity force who's basically famous for being able to buy that fame and have an insulting number of commas in my net
worth, I'm in the wrong business and I'm approaching this very differently than I
should. That's an intentional choice. It's not that, oh, well, Corey couldn't find a way to
succeed at being a billionaire. Well, first, probably right. But secondly, I was never
interested in trying just because it's, I want prosperity insofar as it is a successful outcome
for my family, where they never wonder if the roof over their head is going to be there tomorrow, whether food on the table is going to be assured and have a nice life.
And beyond that, I'm not sitting here thinking, you know what I really want? Nesting doll yachts.
Right. Right. Right. Well, Corey, you hit a good point though, because the reality is we need
advice, but we don't like paying for advice. And I think the dilemma is, you know, when we tie that back to cloud and applications and the way that we look at technology today, cloud, in my opinion,
is the best of teenagers that just learn how to drive. It still needs adult supervision. It still
needs boundaries. And that's what you do via consulting. That's what my company does by
software. But cloud is at a dangerous point, Corey, because the capabilities go beyond
the ability to comprehend consequences. Help is needed. And I think that there are some people,
I've heard this from executives, some people only want to pay for advice. Other people don't want
to pay for advice and only want to pay for products. I think there's a market for both.
There absolutely is. And I'm not sitting here suggesting there's only one right answer here.
I want to be very clear on that. There are multiple paths to success. And I've always said that there is room
for many more duck bills group in the world. And that is fine. I have no argument there.
I'm just a believer of things that make it easier for people to improve their situation.
And one depressing but fortunate for my business aspect of cloud finance is that the AWS bill
never gets smaller on its own.
When I reach out to someone like, oh no, we're set with our bill, our response is always,
great, we'll talk to you in a few months, because it gets bigger inherently on its own.
And I don't like that aspect of it, because it seems to not make people super happy.
But there is the counter argument as well
of it does make for a somewhat sustainable and ever-growing total addressable market.
It definitely does.
I would give it up if I had the option to and could wave a wand. I absolutely would. There
are other problems I would like to tackle, but now I'm worried that I will retire without this
problem ever being solved in a meaningful global way.
Well, I mean, that's part of the total addressable market, as you talked about. I think Duckbill can have plenty of other little
ducks and spinoff companies and ducklings or whatever, because there are going to be other
adjacent problems that I think are going to crop up too. People are going to need help.
They're going to start to embrace humility more, in my opinion, that I can't do this on my own.
I've talked about this in other forums, Corey. There's a difference between self-help and self-service. One is, can I do it on my own?
The other is, can I be effective on my own? And again, if cloud is the best of teenagers that
just learn how to drive, I probably can't be effective on my own. I need to raise my hand
and bring in people like the Duckbill Group or Turbonomic to help me figure this thing out.
I also want to be clear that from many people's perspective
of how this stuff works, it's natural to conclude,
oh, you're a consultant, but Turbonomic is a product,
so obviously you're competitors.
No, of course that's not true.
It turns out that virtually every customer we talk to
has some software thing somewhere that is, in many cases,
vendor-provided that handles aspects of this.
We are not ever going to be an automated tool that solves these problems. We explored that with our
DuckTools experiment. It turns out that what we think the industry needs and what the industry
wants to buy are two different things. So we shuttered the thing because, frankly, I don't
have the stomach to sit here first educating people about the problem before then selling
them a thing that fixes the problem I just taught them about. It doesn't work, and that is too much swimming uphill.
It is very hard. I mean, again, you've got a very successful pocket core. I think people trust that
you have their best interest at heart and that you're using real-world experience and customer
exposure to help them not hit all the potholes. The thing that I think you do a great
job of, and I talk to executives about this a lot, you want me to tell you what you didn't ask that
you should have. You don't want to hit every landmine that the people did before you. They
bring you in partially, Corey, because they don't want to hit every landmine on their own.
They want to hear your story so you can coach them on how to fix it ahead of time.
If we can delve into tech for a minute, there are
more services than anyone can shake a stick at when it comes to cloud provider offerings. How do
you help companies figure out which ones they should use, which ones they should avoid?
Yeah, great question, Corey. Without going into the weeds, I'll give you this analogy. I call
this chicken in the cloud. And it's all about what do you want to be known for? So think about there being kind of five ways that you can engage with chicken.
So you can grow it from a baby chicken.
You can pluck a dead chicken.
You can cut up a chicken that you bought at the store.
You can cook a chicken that you bought in a pack, or you can use a rotisserie chicken
that's already done.
And the reality, Corey, is I believe that a lot of people are not going to properly
say, I groomed that little VM from when it was a baby chicken and learn how to walk and chirp. The reality is cooking and creating are not the
same thing. And the question we've got to ask ourselves is, are we putting time and effort
into things that really don't matter? At the end of the day, when that plate goes on the table,
the person doesn't care if I grew that chicken or if I started with a rotisserie chicken. They
want to know the recipe and the dish is solid. They don't care where I started from. So think about what you want to be known for
and let that guide your decision around what you choose to engage with.
Bobby, thank you so much for taking the time to speak with me. If people want to learn more about
you, about Turbonomic, about anything we've talked about, where can they find you?
So my company is at turbonomic.com. You can check us out there. There's all sorts of information.
You can find me at BobbyJAllen.me.
I'm also on Twitter.
Think Ballin and Charlotte.
B-Allen underscore CLT to represent Charlotte.
And Corey, I want to thank you.
I want to leave your audience with this.
This is kind of one of my personal mantras.
Greatness is about what everybody sees.
Excellence is about what anyone sees.
Faithfulness is about what no one sees. Seek
being faithful over being famous, and everything is going to work out. And that's a great point
to leave it on. Thank you so much for your time, and of course, your insight, as always.
Thank you, Corey. Bobby Allen, VP of Strategic Alliances slash Cloud Therapist at Turbonomic.
I'm cloud economist Corey Quinn, and this is Screaming in the Cloud.
If you've enjoyed this podcast, please leave a five-star review on your podcast platform of
choice. Whereas if you've hated this podcast, please leave a five-star review on your podcast
platform of choice, along with a comment including your pitch deck for pastor as a service that I'm
certain is moments away from being funded as I speak. If your AWS bill keeps rising
and your blood pressure is doing the same,
then you need the Duck Bill Group.
We help companies fix their AWS bill
by making it smaller and less horrifying.
The Duck Bill Group works for you, not AWS.
We tailor recommendations to your business and we get to the point.
Visit duckbillgroup.com to get started.
This has been a humble pod production
stay humble