Search Engine - Cocomelon For Adults
Episode Date: October 10, 2025Last week, OpenAI released an app that quickly shot to the #1 spot in Apple's App Store. Sora is like TikTok, except all the videos are AI generated. Is this ... what we're doing now? What's the busin...ess case for a fake AI video platform? Check out Casey Newton's newsletter (Platformer) and podcast (Hard Fork) Support Search Engine! To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hello, search engine listeners.
Before we start the show this week, some news.
We're doing something new, and I need your help.
So basically, I need you, our listeners, to submit questions that you think I would be
unqualified to answer.
So like, stumpers.
Don't ask me how to make a podcast or how we find stories for search engine or where to get
a sandwich in Brooklyn, Federoffs.
Ask me stuff that I probably could not answer.
What's the meaning of life?
How do batteries actually work, technologically speaking?
How do you raise your child, who I've never met?
Everybody wants to look smart online, but in an act of daring and bravery, I'm going to completely and valiantly whiff for an hour and reveal the shallow limits of my own intellect.
Send your questions, if you have them, to PJVote85 at gmail.com.
This is going to be a live event online for our incognito mode listeners.
We're going to do it on October 17th.
As always, you can sign up for incognito mode at search engine.com, but everybody can send questions.
All right, the show after these ads.
This episode of Search Engine is brought to you in part by Square.
Square, the easy way for business owners to take payments, book appointments, manage staff,
and keep everything running in one place.
Whether you're selling lattes, cutting hair, detailing cars, or running a design studio,
Square helps you run your business without running yourself into the ground.
I like seeing Square in action at my local coffee shop.
They use Square for payments, and it just makes everything feel effortless.
Quick checkout, digital receipts, sometimes even loyalty points.
It really enhances the experience and lets the team.
focus on serving great coffee, not fumbling with the register.
Square works wherever your customers are.
You can manage inventory, track sales, and access reports in real time.
With Square, you get all the tools to run your business with none of the contracts or complexity.
And why wait?
Right now, you can get up to $200 off Square hardware at square.com slash go slash engine.
That's S-Q-U-A-R-E-com slash G-O-L-E-Nion.
Run your business smarter.
The Square gets started today.
This episode of Search Engine is brought to you in part by Vanguard.
To all the financial advisors out there whose job is to help your clients keep more of what they earn,
Vanguard is here to help you with that.
Vanguard is slashing fees again, this time for more than 50 of its funds.
That's on top of big fee cuts they gave last year to investors in 87 of their funds.
In an increasingly high-priced world, Vanguard is staying true to excellence without expense.
With Vanguard, your clients get access to sophisticated, active, and index bond funds at industry-leading low costs.
backed by a fixed-income team
that's truly obsessed
with consistent outperformance.
Lower fees don't just mean savings.
They give Vanguard's skilled bond managers
more freedom to maneuver
as they pursue strong results.
And they give you more flexibility
to deliver measurable value to your clients
because top performance
shouldn't come at higher cost.
Go see the record for yourself
at vanguard.com slash impact.
That's vanguard.com slash impact.
All investing is subject to risk,
Vanguard Marketing Corporation Distributor.
Last week, OpenAI launched a very strange new app called SORA.
SORA is actually SORA 2.
There was a SORA before this that fewer people used and which lived inside the paid version of chat GPD.
But SORA 2 lives inside a standalone iPhone app called SORA.
The short version is that it's an app that lets you make very realistic AI videos using your own face.
Plug in a prompt and a little bit later it'll spit out a very real-y-lawful.
realistic-looking video clip.
There's a little uncanny valley effect where you can tell,
particularly if it's a video of someone you know,
that it's been AI-generated,
but it's pretty close to being indiscernible from real.
I think even someone relatively practiced
at spotting fake videos on the internet
should expect going forward to be fooled pretty often.
Sora launched with some safeguards.
Nobody can make a video of you without your permission,
but if you want to, you can choose to give the app permission
for you to use your own face in videos.
for your friends to use your face,
or, if you're nuts, for strangers to use your face.
I got on, and I did the thing you do with these AI toys,
where I started making videos for myself of myself.
A very, very fat PJ shook hands with a very, very skinny PJ.
Whoa, you're meat just thinner.
And you're me plus a few pounds. Good to finally meet.
Likewise.
Manosphere bro podcaster PJ talked about his nutritional supplements
from behind his no neck, huge muscled bod.
I'm running right now, five grams.
creatine monohydrate every day, fish oil, vitamin D, and a little ashwaganda.
That's my baseline.
I would tell you more, but there's this rule of AI, which is that the things we make are like our dreams.
Very interesting to us.
Very boring to everybody else.
Anyway, there was a moment this week where I felt a little nausea about the future of the internet.
AI slop content made by bots that floods the places where humans are trying to talk to each other
has been rising across social platforms.
And convincingly fake video seems like it'll make the internet
worse, not better, at least for me. So I wanted to understand why this is happening. I wanted to both
know how we got here, how a company claiming to want to create machine intelligence is detouring
into the slop business, but also where we might be going. And that's why I'd called Casey.
Casey Newton, welcome back to the Territam. Hi, PJ. Nice to be here. So can you just explain in a way
my dad would understand, like, how do you explain what Sorot II is? SORATU is a,
a text to video generator.
If you compare it to something like chat GPT,
that's text to text, right?
There's a box and I type,
hey, do my high school English homework for me.
And I click enter and it does it perfectly.
Sora lets you say,
hey, make a video of me doing my high school English homework
using my face and then it does that instead.
And it has audio as well.
So it might include a little bit of dialogue in what it produces.
And the way that it gets the audio is that when it,
captures your face, when you sort of let it capture your face, you just speak a couple numbers.
And from that, it is able to kind of create a facsimile of your voice.
Yes, although, as I'm sure you've noticed, it's a pretty bad facsimile.
You're saying at most four or five words to this thing when you're getting started,
which at this point is still not enough data for it to be really good.
So we're talking Thursday, October 2nd.
How long have you been messing with it?
So I was able to get access to SORA earlier this week.
on the day that it launched,
and I have been making videos with it
every day since.
So can you show me one of your stupid videos?
So I thought it'd be fun to imagine myself
trapped in a video game and unable to get out of it,
and so I wanted to see if it would put me in
the original Mortal Kombat arcade game.
That, of course, is also like copyrighted material,
so I also kind of wanted to test
what are the boundaries as far as copyright,
and I found that Sora was quite happy to put me into Mortal Kombat.
Okay, wait, we're watching it now.
Oh, it is a really good recreation.
It's like you're fighting Raiden.
Oh, my God.
Someone's throwing lightning at me.
This isn't fun anymore.
Please don't finish me.
It really looks like you've been put into Mortal Kombat.
Like, I'm sure that if I compare this to an actual Mortal Kombat screen,
there's plenty of details they got wrong.
But relative to my memory of a Mortal Kombat screen, they did a good job.
Yeah, I'm definitely more impressed with what they got right here than what they got wrong.
Like, you might also notice that both Raiden and me have a health bar,
as you would normally see in a fighting game,
and my help bar does just say Casey on it.
So, like, the amount of details that it was able to conjure
over the, let's say, two to three minutes
it took to generate this video did impress me.
So those are the sort of videos that SORA can quickly output from a prompt.
I wanted Casey to also describe the SORA app itself.
The SORA app is different from the existing chatGBT app.
It's a whole separate thing to download.
And once you install it, it's hard not to notice
that it looks a lot like a clone
of an existing, very popular platform.
So the actual app
looks like TikTok full stop.
In their live stream announcing this,
Open AI employees said,
we've designed this to look familiar,
which is a nice way of saying,
we have copied something.
So when you open SORA,
you see a feed of videos
that are all about 10 seconds long.
You swipe up to move to the next video.
You can double-tap
something to like it, you can add a comment, you can share it. And the one sort of interesting thing
about SORA is you can also remix it. So if I see something that is funny, for example, I saw
somebody took a popular meme character and put it into the world of the video game Death Stranding,
and some people hit the remix button, and they said, well, put him in this video game instead,
or instead of this meme character, actually make him Jesus. And you do this. You do this,
that just by typing out a few words and text, and SORA will then generate a video, which then
appears next to the original video. So if you see a video on SORA you really like, you can kind of
swipe to your left and videos appear at the right and show you all the remixes that people have made.
So, okay, so that's the tool. That's you playing with it for a couple days. Talk to me out just
how SORA 2 was announced to the Internet. It was announced via a live stream, which is how
OpenAI likes to announce things. They'll get members of the team who worked on it. They'll go live
on YouTube and they'll kind of walk through. Here is the research that we've done. Here is the new
tool. And then they demonstrate the tool. Welcome back to reality. I'm Bill. I'm the head of SORA.
I'm Rohan. I leave the SORA product team. I'm Thomas. I lead SORA engineering.
Back in February 2024, we introduced SORA 1. We really view that internally. The open AI
My live streams tend to be somewhat casual, I would say.
No one is in a suit.
Everyone is in their sort of San Francisco slightly preppy, hoodie forward uniforms.
When you see the feed, you're going to see all the fun we've been having on the SORAT team.
Some of memes have been emerging as we play with the product.
There's one about ketchup.
I'm drinking ketchup for some reason.
And everyone is in their 30s at seeing.
and they just kind of casually talk through the research they've done,
the thing that they made,
and it's very much presented as,
well, we've made something, we think it's kind of cool,
we hope you like it.
We're training a lot of models that we think the world can have a great deal of fun with
and can bring a lot of joy.
So we're really excited to see what you'll ultimately create on this app.
We'll see you guys on Sora.
They tend not to hype things up too much.
Sometimes they will say, like, you know,
we think this is a big leap forward in this way or that way.
But these aren't sort of iPhone announcements where the CEO is on stage,
like constantly telling you how amazing something is.
The way I, as a sort of like when I pay attention to it kind of tag journalist,
I had not seen the announcement, but what they successfully did that caught my attention
was that later in the day where they announced it, they were just posting lots of stuff on Twitter.
And there was one opening I employee named Gabriel Peters who was posting all these sort of funny and goofy
videos he'd made of Sam Altman.
And Sam Altman had said it so that
you could use his face as much
as he wanted to, which is such a weird
sentence to find myself saying.
But the thing that caught me was, there was one point
where Gabriel Peters has this post,
and he's like, I have the most
liked video in SORA 2 right now.
I will be enjoying the short moment while it lasts.
And it was fake security
cam footage of Sam Altman
stealing GPUs at Target.
Please, I really need this for Sora inference,
This video is too good.
And then being caught and, like, cuffed by a security guard.
And I think he was trying to say, look at the funny thing I made.
And I saw a lot of journalists having the same reaction.
It was like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
This seems like not good technology.
Yeah.
Making realistic videos of people committing crimes that they did not commit can lead to negative outcomes.
What a neutral way to say that.
What did you think when you saw that?
One, I was struck by the fact that Sam had let anyone remix his likeness into anything.
He would later post on X that seeing himself so much in this Sora feed was less strange than he expected it to be.
But I was thinking a lot about, wow, we have another billionaire who has made himself the main character of a social app.
Why does this keep happening to us?
Why do you think it keeps happening to us?
I think at the end of the day, everyone is the same.
They want the most followers and the most likes and the most reposts.
That's what I honestly think.
And that people will compete for attention, even if it's negative attention,
and the people are not willing to do that don't end up in the public sphere in 2025.
Yes, we live in a world where attention is perceived to be power.
Right.
I mean, I saw Sam Altman's face in all sorts of, I saw it in a toilet.
I'm a CEO in a porcelain spa.
Skib-a-do, skip-a-off.
Yes, yes, yes.
That's me.
Running AI from the bathroom.
Can't stop.
Head above water.
Flesh that tune.
Everybody bouncing.
I saw Sam Altman dressed like a teacup
committing acts of musical theater.
Silver towers breathing snow.
Fans revolve in measured time.
Keeping circuits still alive.
I pour my heat.
I saw Sam Altman playing with Telatubbies.
I am going to touch the purple one.
Like I saw so many Sam Altman's this week.
It was weird.
It was like he was putting himself into everybody's dreams.
It was a very strange thing.
Even like the way Elon Musk dominates X.com, it's not the same as just seeing someone in video
clip after video clip after video clip after video clip.
There is a nightmare on Elm Street quality to it where like you're flipping through the
sort of feet of dreams and like Sam Waltman walks into every dream.
Yes.
Watching one of the most famous tech CEOs appear in realistic video after realistic video of
himself in various fake situations, I had that feeling you get when you watch the future
become the present.
It's happened so fast that it feels almost cringy or millennial, are those different words,
to wring my hands about all these deep fakes, they're here.
They're going to keep getting better.
And while OpenAI has put safeguards on SORA,
users will want AI video generation with fewer safeguards,
and companies will compete to give it to them.
We all live here, and I don't have to tell you how it works.
What I did find remarkable was how fast we've arrived at this moment,
how we went from, oh, the robots can draw pictures,
sometimes to, I don't trust political video anymore.
I asked Casey about it.
Can you just kind of help me remember, like,
what the steps along the road that have gotten us here?
Like, where do we start and how do we get here?
Where did we start?
We started with a crazy and dangerous dream to build a machine god.
That most of the people involved said to each other,
This would be a bad idea.
The whole time.
And then one by one, they said to each other, while this is a very bad idea, I do think I can do it in a slightly less bad way than you are going to.
And so I'm going to raise $500 billion and I'm going to do it my way.
That was kind of the start of it.
Yes.
And then from there, the first image thing I remember was Dolly.
But was that actually the first popular one?
I remember, like, there was a moment where Dolly had first launched and people were making these incredible.
incredibly primitive. It was like looking at a three-year-old's drawings, but the three-olds
a computer. It wasn't that they were good, but the novelty of it was exciting, and the
watching a computer try to make images was exciting. I did find it exciting. I even thought
the images were cool. I mean, at least it was cool that I could say, like, make me a picture
of a bulldog on the moon, and like 30 seconds later, I'd be looking at like a really cute bulldog.
So, yeah, Dali was a moment where all of a sudden the idea that you could conjure
not just text, but also an image out of thin air, became real.
So Dolly's 2022, the other thing I remember, when does video start?
Was it like 2024? Do we start to get video?
Yeah. So Sora gets introduced in December of 2024, so last year,
and gets added into paid subscriptions for ChatTPT.
At that time, it did not have audio.
So you could make a very short video clip, but it would not have sound.
And so while Open AI was very interested in exploring what potential applications of this could be,
they start working with Hollywood filmmakers.
It can't really make what you and I think of as video, which is video with sound.
Right.
And at the same time that they're doing this, it's like Open AI, this sort of pattern for this
is Open AI will release something.
They're often ahead.
They'll release something that works pretty good and feels like a sketch of what might
happen next. And they'll have rules in place to prevent abuse. And then usually there are
competitors, like prominent companies, less prominent companies, who will build similar things
with fewer guardrails. So like my memory, and correct me if I'm wrong, but 2024, one of the big
ones people used was called stable diffusion. And stable diffusion was like, you could do a very
similar thing, but you were much less likely to run into the chatbot on the other side,
telling you that it couldn't generate an image you wanted. Yes.
Stable diffusion made models that were small enough that you could download them onto a laptop
and just sort of use them without essentially any guardrails
other than whatever might have been baked into the original model.
And what I recall also from that time is like it's where you see there's this like,
I kind of want to bring it up, the Will Smith video where he's eating spaghetti.
Yeah.
Ah, ha ha.
Oh, that's hot.
That's hot.
Bill, come try this.
Fresh pasta of Bel-A.
Do you want to describe it, Casey?
So this is Will Smith's face, eating spaghetti with his bare hands.
His chin is kind of bobbing all around, almost like detaching from his face.
It's incredibly grotesque.
They are playing the Fresh Prince of Bel Air theme song, though, which brings up warm and nostalgic feelings in me.
This infamous video originally from 2023, before re-watching it with Casey, I forgot how aesthetically disturbing it really is.
A version of Will Smith, whose facial proportions I would describe as wrong and dripping, shoves a mop-like mass of spaghetti near the general vicinity of his grotesque melting mouth.
It was so bad it went viral.
But as new AI video models have appeared, oftentimes people will showcase the new better version of AI with new Will Smith.
eating AI spaghetti. It's one of the informal benchmarks for how the technology is moved forward.
You can watch these spaghetti videos get realer. Underneath that progress, though, I wonder what's
been happening technologically. Casey says probably some of this is from the models being fed more
training data, more video to learn from, and they're using more horsepower, more GPUs, more energy
consumption. But beyond that, it's a little opaque what's driving the rapid progress here.
You know, I tried to get a really good answer that would be accessible to a broad audience on like, why is SORA 2 better than SORA 1?
And the answer proved to be just dauntingly technical.
Like, one thing that's better about Sora 2 is that it can generate videos faster than Sora 1.
And so I know, PJ, you're a smart guy.
You're wondering, like, well, how can it do that?
Yeah, how can I do that?
The answer to that question involves step-reduced solvers, rectified flow variance, and kernel-level optimizations.
So, hopefully that answers your question.
But it's funny because there's been other kinds of technological advancement where there's been jargony explanations for it that I've read you parse.
This feels more jargony and less parts of it.
And I think the reason is because it's relatively easy for me.
me to understand how a single image gets made. You've probably watched this happen. It uses this
process called gradient diffusion where what it's essentially trying to do is find the median in all
of its training data. So if you say something like, make me a picture of a bulldog on the moon,
the model works and it's like, we're going to show you the thing that looks the most like a bulldog,
and we're going to show you the thing that looks the most like a moon, and we're going to show you
the thing that looks the most like the two of them together. And you can just sort of watch that
gradually come into focus. Now you think about a video. You have to do that across hundreds of
frames over 10 seconds. You have to synchronize that with audio. And so there are just a lot more
processes that are running in order to make that happen. And they have simply overwhelmed my
pathetic human brain in this moment. Do you get this into the people building it completely
understand it? What I've learned from my time covering the AI industry, PJ, is that no one who works
there completely understands any of it. So, no, I don't think that they totally understand it. I mean,
when you talk to people who work on the models themselves, they talk about them like they're
growing orchids, right? Where it's sort of like, well, these ones look really good. This one has a
problem. We're going to see if we give it a little more light if maybe the flowers grow a little
better, but we're not exactly sure why it turned out that way.
SORA 2, the SORA app, was released to a limited set of users on September 30th.
By October 3rd, it would be the most popular app in Apple's store.
Setting aside obvious, necessary conversations about copyright or fairness, what was
immediately so clear is just that a lot of people really enjoy SORA.
It's a novelty.
The way that Sora was set up at launch, users could generate videos.
using realistic images of many copyrighted characters and public figures.
Copyright owner's work was fair game by default, unless they'd explicitly opted out.
That meant I saw a Pikachu from Pokemon grilled and filleted.
Pikachu on the grill here.
It's already got a beautiful char, and it smells like somebody plugged in a chicken.
Let's give it a flip.
I'm going to carve it into some thick steaks.
I saw a lot of Stephen Hawking's on a lot of half pipes.
And I watched last weekend in real life as a group of teenagers and 20-somethings played with the tool
and just got totally sucked into it for her.
hours, amusing each other mainly by trying to see how inappropriate they could be.
Watching, I thought, okay, a tech company has created one more tasty brand of junk food,
a new reason to look at our phones a little longer.
It was what I expect from this internet, although not what we've typically seen so far from
OpenAI.
The company talks about superintelligence, about trying to improve the lot of humanity.
And now, they built a tool that let people use Martin Luther King Jr.'s likeness to make
more Epstein jokes.
I have a dream that the Epstein files get released.
To me, this seemed like a pivot.
But was it?
What were opening eyes motives here?
After the ads, some answers.
Owning a home is full of surprises.
Some wonderful.
Some?
Not so much.
And when something breaks,
it can feel like the whole day unravels.
That's why homeserv exists.
For as little as $4.99 a month,
you'll always have someone to call,
a trusted professional ready to help.
bringing peace of mind to 4.5 million homeowners nationwide.
For plans starting at just 499 a month, go to homeserve.com.
That's homeserve.com.
Not available everywhere.
Most plans range between 499 to 1199 a month your first year.
Terms apply on covered repairs.
So good, so good, so good.
Springstiles are at Nordstrom rack stores now, and they're up to 60% off.
Stock up and save on Ragginbone, Made Well, Vince, All Saints, and more of your favorites.
How did I not know rack has Adidas?
Why do we rock?
For the hottest deals.
Just so many good brands.
Join the Nordy Club to unlock exclusive discounts,
shop new arrivals first, and more.
Plus, buy online and pick up at your favorite rack store for free.
Great brands, great prices.
That's why you rack.
You should tell the people who we are and what our new show is.
I'm Robert Smith, and this is Jacob Goldstein,
and we used to host a show called Planet Money.
And now we're back making this new podcast about the best ideas
and people and businesses in history.
And some of the worst people.
horrible ideas and destructive companies in the history of business.
We struggled to come up with a name, decided to call it, business history.
You know why?
Why?
Does this show about the history of business?
Available everywhere.
You get it.
Welcome back to the show.
So our question, what are opening eyes motives here?
We, of course, reached out to Open AI directly to ask them what they think they're up to with SORA.
A spokesperson said, in part, quote,
On the road to general purpose simulation and AI systems that can function in the physical world,
we think people can have a lot of fun with the models we're building along the way.
In keeping with OpenAI's mission, it is important that humanity benefits from these models as they are developed.
We think Sora is going to bring a lot of joy, creativity, and connection to the world.
So that's the company line.
But this is the we're here to help humanity company unveiling junk food,
an AI slop social media feed that is glugging unseemly amounts of electricity.
I wanted to ask Casey about this, since, as far as I could tell,
none of this had been a part of Open AI's lofty mission at its start.
When Open AI gets formed, the idea is to create artificial general intelligence
that benefits all humanity.
It's famously set up as a nonprofit.
It seems like the last thing that they would want to make is a social app that just sort of sucks away your time.
And on Wednesday, October 1st, there's a person on X who posts,
Sam Altman two weeks ago, we need $7 trillion and 10 gigawatts to cure cancer.
Sam Altman today, we are launching AI slot videos marketed as personalized ads.
And he's got a point there, right?
And Altman actually responds and says, I get the vibe here, but we do mostly need the capital for build AI.
I assume he meant for building AI.
that can do science.
And for sure, we are focused on AGI
with almost all of our research effort.
It is also nice to show people
cool new tech slash products along the way,
make them smile,
and hopefully make some money
given all that compute need.
So that was really interesting to me
because it was an acknowledgement
of the fact that this is a money-making enterprise,
and in part, it is a money-making enterprise
that is going to be designed to subsidize
the absolutely enormous cost of running open AI.
So talk to me about that. The idea is you make one more stupid app to make people look at their stupid phones. And if you can do that and it causes people to sign up for the more premium version of chat GPT, that money is just sort of like revenue that opening eye somewhat desperately needs. Yes. The idea is find ways to generate revenue now that help to offset some of your losses across the rest of your business. And here's where we can talk about one of the most interesting,
and under-discussed phenomenon that we've seen at one of these companies recently,
which is what I think of as the Facebookification of Open AI.
Meaning what?
So when Open AI gets started, it really is mostly a research lab.
You have some startup people in there, like Sam Altman,
who used to run by Combinator,
was just sort of deeply enmeshed in the Silicon Valley startup ecosystem.
But it's a lot of sort of big brains who are trying to figure out
how do you build large language models that can do everything ChachyPT does today.
Over time, though, OpenAI, in addition to being this brainy research lab, also becomes one of the hottest startups in Silicon Valley, maybe the hottest one.
And they start to attract a lot of talent from other big companies, including meta.
Recently, OpenAI hired a woman named Fiji Simo to be what they call their CEO of applications.
So in charge of running the various apps that the company has, which now include Chad GBT and SORA, Fiji Simo came from Instacart, where she was,
the CEO, but previously she had spent almost her entire career at what was then called Facebook.
And she worked on systems that helped people spend a lot of time looking at feeds and buying
ads based on what they were seeing in those feeds. And when you look across OpenAI,
according to some research that we talked about on my podcast recently, we think there are about
700 people at OpenAI who used to work at Facebook. So that's not to say that all of them were
Facebook true believers and they want to make chaty BT look exactly like Facebook. But a lot of the
DNA of this company is now people who worked on social feeds that were monetized by advertising.
And as we saw with the launch of SORA, there is part of the company that is now moving full
speed ahead in that direction. And for you, like, I think one of the interesting things about trying
to understand technology in 2025 is that most of the prominent tech reporters in our cohort generation,
or at least maybe those are the ones I pay attention to, there are people who,
who watched the rise of
and were disappointed by the social media internet.
And one of the questions has been,
the AI tech company is like,
how much are they like what came before
and how much are they not?
How do you see Open AI
as at least representing itself
as having a distinct mission?
And what does it mean for it to become Facebookified?
Yeah.
So in terms of OpenAI's mission,
over the past few months,
as there's been more concern
that ChatGEPT can lead to delusions
or even psychosis,
and the people who are using it,
OpenAI puts up a blog post
in which they try to assert their mission.
And what they say is,
we want to help you get stuff done,
and then we want you to stop using chat GPT.
We do not want to trap you in some endless engagement loop
where you're refreshing a feed 100 times a day.
Chad GPT is to help you get stuff done
and to improve your life.
And I just want to say that,
That's very, very different from, that's almost like when I think about why I have positive feelings towards this company.
I mean, I've never felt they need to put screen time limits on my chat GPT use because it's something that I look stuff up on and then I put my phone down.
Right. And I have felt the same way. And then the week before SORA comes out, they put out something called Pulse. What is Pulse?
Pulse is a feed of stories personalized to you. Some of those are news stories. So if you're like me, read a lot of news, it'll be like, hey, here's what's what's.
going on with the TikTok sale. But then it'll also say, hey, you were looking up some stuff about
meditation. Here's a quick meditation you can do in between your meetings today. And, you know,
we know you got a dinner coming up this weekend. Like, here's a side dish that you could make.
And on one hand, this is like good and helpful stuff. I basically like the idea of it. But is it
also a feed I can come back to and check every day? Will they send me a push notification if I let
them letting me know that my pulse is ready? Is this an obvious spot where they could integrate
advertising in the near future, of course.
I see.
And so the question, one of the questions you have watching this right now is,
opening eye says, and let's just like give them the benefit of doubt.
Opening AI believes that they have a mission and the mission is in a real way to improve
humanity.
And like, obviously there's lots of potential downsides, which we can talk about.
There's energy consumption and climate risk and job loss.
But they have this optimistic vision.
and the optimistic vision requires tons of money.
And so one of the ways that they are trying to suck money into that mission
is to be a little bit more like Facebook.
And one of the questions you have to have is, like,
how much do you trust them to be a little bit like Facebook
versus in two years chat CBT is a super optimized product
that gets you to stare at your phone
using all the tools the existing social platforms used
to get you to stare at your phone,
most of which leave you feeling worse off when you're done.
Right.
So unfortunately, I do think the trend is that the Open AI products are starting to look more like social media apps
in that they are asking for more of your time.
They are becoming more explicitly commercial products.
One of the other changes that they've announced the week that we're talking is that
there is now a commerce integration into chat GPT.
And so you can start buying products directly from the chat GPT feed.
Over time, all of this.
adds up to something that could very credibly serve not just as a replacement for Google,
which is where a lot of the attention has focused so far, but possibly for the meta family
of products as well. So on one hand, there is still kind of the big crazy AI story of,
oh gosh, what happens if the machine god does get built and none of us have jobs anymore?
But there's this other much more normal and traditional Silicon Valley story, which is
hot new startup comes along and starts to eat the lunch of the incumbents. And a lot of what we've
seen Open AI do over the past few months has been much more in that direction.
Remember, according to Sam Altman's tweet about all this, his belief is that if Open AI is going to
deliver on its promises to humanity tomorrow, it needs capital today. That's why they've begun to
nibble at the lunches of these existing social media companies. Open AI needs more capital, seemingly always,
because the resources that these AI companies are fighting for are very expensive.
Particularly compute power, which comes from enormous data centers,
which need oceans of electricity to run.
This is the subject, actually, of a couple of stories we're working on that'll be out in the next months.
But that said, for the purposes of this story,
all you need to remember is that Open AI is currently spending enormous amounts of money
to try to stay ahead of its rivals.
Because nobody competing in AI seems particularly interested in second place.
There is a belief within AI world that this is maybe a winner-take-all race,
and if not a winner-take-all race, then probably a winner-take-most race.
That has been the case with many of the big Internet categories, right?
There's more than one search engine, but Google took most of the market share,
unfortunately, for your show.
We keep trying to hire.
You're trying to add on from Google.
There's more than one social network, but for a long time, Facebook had taken most of that market.
So the question is, is AI sort of the same thing, where one company creates the AI that is used by 80-plus percentage of the population?
And if that is the case, you want to be that company.
And right now, the race is still unsettled. Open AI has done a great job so far of cementing itself as the leader in that category.
but there are a lot of challengers nipping at its heels,
and the big incumbents have started to wake up to the fact that,
oh, wow, these guys actually could eat my lunch.
You know, Mark Zuckerberg is browsing that Sora feed,
and he's going to go put the fear of God into his employees
because this is something that he thinks about constantly, right?
It's like, what is the thing that is finally going to dethrone me?
So you're just starting to see all of these very competitive,
very ego-driven executives taking a look at the future
and thinking, it had better be my name that gets written in the history,
history books as the person who builds the machine god and we are going to spend as much money as
fast as we can to get there. And so for this narrow thing this week, like SORA II launched as
basically AI TikTok, do you think it will work? Like asking people to make predictions is kind
of unfair, particularly about something measurable, like the success of an app. Like I understand what
I'm doing is unkind. But like, do you think that opening I will make the money it needs to offer
this thing? Do you think people will use it the way it seems to want people to?
I'll tell you the prediction.
that I have that I am confident about
and that I think I might differ from my peers on.
I think this feature that they're calling cameos,
which is the ability to take your friends' likenesses
and your own likeness and put it into whatever situation
you can dream up that the content guidelines will allow.
I think that's here to stay.
I think people are really going to like that.
I think it's the sort of thing that enlivens any group chat,
which is where most discussion now takes place.
And I think you can make a lot of fun and funny stuff
that will drive memes and engagement
online. Can OpenAI take that basic creative tool and build an entire social network around it?
That's a much bigger challenge and it is impossible to judge on the first week whether a social
network has any staying power. By default, every social network dies. There have only been a handful
that have managed to last a decade and the ones that have done that successfully have essentially
found some kind of influential community
that had a reason to be there
and liked being there. And they just kind of stuck around
and they drew more and more people to them over time
and the creative tools evolve. And maybe the people who are
creating things there find ways they can make money.
These are some of the ways that these networks can take off.
And it just remains to be seen whether SORA
is going to be one of those things. But we have
reporting that OpenAI has thought for a long time,
not just about creating a TikTok clone,
but also maybe wanting to go after X,
wanting to replace the Twitter of old with something.
Would that, I don't understand.
What would that, a Twitter where nobody's real?
Well, I think the idea was like there should be a place
where you can share and discuss your creations in Open AI.
So, you know, at the time, we were thinking,
maybe it's the images that you're creating.
Maybe, you know, you want to share some of the conversations
that you're having with Chat Chupit.
I realize none of this sounds like fun or interesting to browse,
But these were some of the discussions that people were having.
Now along comes SORA, and it's like, oh, well, like, maybe that's actually the core of it.
It's like people are sharing these videos, but it would not surprise me at all if this thing starts to gather momentum and Open AI says,
you know what, you can actually share text posts in the feed now as well, if you like, right?
You could use the SORA feed as the basis to create something larger.
So if they feel like they're having some success, they may go for it.
It's funny, you know, I've been a bystander to fight between an adult and a teenager about social platforms.
And, like, there's been an attempt to hold the line against a teenager getting on Instagram.
And what's been hard is that for the teenager, they're like, this is where my friends are.
Like, plans are being made here.
Homework assignments are being shared here.
Not by the teacher, but, like, is communication that they legitimately have a need to have.
and as an adult, you're like,
the platform doesn't care about your relationship with your friends.
The platform is holding that relationship hostage
so that the platform can have a relationship with you.
Yes, correct.
And the fear isn't what your friends are going to say to you on the platform,
the fear is that once you get on the platform,
what your relationship with is going to be.
And there's something very confusing to me about right now
where if Open AI wants you to have a relationship with its platform,
but its platform isn't even kind of about other people.
Like, it wants you to share your funny,
SORA videos so that you see the funny SORA videos and then more people get online and talk to
their chatbots. It's very weird trying to imagine what an AI-mediated social platform is going to look
like, and I do kind of have faith in their ability to draw people into it. Yeah, I basically
do too. You know, one of the dimensions of this conversation that we haven't discussed yet is that I
I think a lot of folks who are around our age have a powerful disdain for what they would call
AI slop, and they're in disbelief that companies keep creating tools to make and share it.
And I'm sympathetic to that view.
It's weird for me to go on Facebook and see Shrimp Jesus and obviously a fake woman who says
that she just turned 101 today and made a birthday cake, but there's no one here to celebrate,
and it has like 800,000 likes and comments from people wishing her happy birthday.
It's weird to me that that's like so much of our reality,
and it's easy to get from there to, this is all going to burn itself out.
Like, this is obviously stupid.
But I do think that this is one of the lessons of the Internet over the past year
is that you can say on one hand, I don't like AI slop, it makes me uncomfortable.
I can't imagine spending much time looking at it.
And then on the other hand, digging into it a bit and finding out this stuff is crazy popular.
You read the comments of these things, and people seem to have an awareness that their brains are being cooked as they're watching it.
They're just sort of being hypnotized into a stupor by the series of images.
We haven't talked yet about Meta's vibes app, which Meta had rushed out the week before SORA launched,
and is a kind of just worse version of it.
Your friends and family aren't in it.
It's just sort of random AI-generated video.
and as I'm flipping through this thing,
I'm thinking, this is cocoa melon for adults.
This is just raw, visual stimulation
designed to keep me hypnotically scrolling
as long as I can.
And on one hand, that might not seem very different
than TikTok today.
But on the other hand, it's like,
well, at least a person made a TikTok,
like, at least that girl is dancing, you know?
And now it's like, I'm going to get into my bed,
but my bed is made out of cookies.
And I'm going to fold the cookies over me.
And there's no real point to it, but God, it looks weird, and I kind of want to share it with my friend.
And, like, this is the sort of cuckoo town direction that everything's going in.
Are we just going to end up looking at colors and shapes?
We're so close.
We're so close to colors and shapes.
Underneath all this conversation, maybe it's just some anxiety that I think everybody who covers tech has right now,
the invention of social media was so expensive for society that tech journalists.
that tech journalists like Casey Newton
are now trained to spend way more time
anticipating when new technology shows up
what it might break
instead of what problems it could solve.
There's this hope that if we can see the danger ahead of time,
maybe we can somehow be useful.
Is that true at all?
I don't know.
I remember trying to impress a grade school history teacher
quoting that line about how we have to know history
so we're not doomed to repeat it.
He asked me,
when has knowing history ever stopped anybody?
from repeating it.
Me, I continue to use our decaying internet.
I continue to play with these new AI tools,
and I try to stay curious,
which means for me I try to ask myself a lot these days,
what do I think this technology is doing to me right now?
And do I like it?
And so what do you think,
just like as a person who needs to,
like not having high screen time,
it's not really an option for you with your work,
like you need to look at and make sense of an internet
that is becoming both less,
and less human-driven.
How do you prepare for the next season?
So to try to inject a little optimism here...
Yes, please.
I do think that there are these avenues
where you see people really hungry for a human connection.
I think podcasts are a big part of that.
Like, I look at these AI-generated podcasts
that people are now making,
and I may have some blinders on here,
because it would be in my interest for this to be true.
But I just think, I don't know,
in the next two or three years at least,
I can't imagine wanting to listen to an AI podcast,
weigh in on events in the same way that I want to listen to
all of the podcasts that I listen to
investigate all of the subjects of their interests.
I think podcasts give us a connection to real people
who we like thinking through difficult problems
over long periods of time.
and I think that's one reason why podcasts are so popular, right?
I also think that you see this in the rise of newsletters and other kind of niche publications, right?
There really has been a boom in blogging that I sort of thought we wouldn't see again.
I thought it was like kind of one and done.
But now I feel like almost everybody I know has a substack that they send out once or twice a year.
And I think it's because people want those authentic connections.
they want to be able to tell you what they actually care about and how they're thinking about things.
So I don't think it's as if everyone is giving up on human connection and deep thinking at the same time.
I do think there are more and more powerful distractions being injected into the bloodstream of the information economy.
And they are kind of sniping people one by one, and it is worse.
I think it's genuinely scary,
but I think you're right
that it's worth remembering
that as some parts of the internet
get more senseless,
people express a strong demand
for sense making
and that like sense making
is still happening.
The solution to all this
is clearly podcasts.
The solution is podcasts.
I bet listeners weren't prepared
for that point,
but we got that.
Casey, thank you for being part
of the solution here.
My pleasure.
Casey Newton.
You can find him on his podcast
Hard Fork
and at his newslet
letter platformer. I recommend both.
Study and play. Come together on a Windows 11 PC.
And for a limited time, college students get
the best of both worlds.
Get the Unreal College deal, everything you need to study and play with
select Windows 11 PCs. Eligible students get a year of Microsoft 365
premium and a year of Xbox GamePass Ultimate with a custom color Xbox
wireless controller. Learn more at Windows.com slash student offer.
While supplies last, ends June 30th, terms at AKA.m.m.S. slash college PC.
Hey, business owners, the NFL season is a big revenue driver.
Now there's a smarter way to get ready.
Everpass is the only authorized commercial platform for NFL Sunday ticket,
delivering every live out-of-market-market-season Sunday afternoon game.
Locking the best offer now with up to 40% off saving up to $2,500.
For the first time, you can pay over nine months.
Get up to six free devices and a free bar kit.
Sign up by April 27th.
Visit everpass.com.
Limited time offer, terms apply.
This episode is brought to you by Indeed.
Stop waiting around for the perfect candidate.
Instead, use Indeed-sponsored jobs to find the right people with the right skills fast.
It's a simple way to make sure your listing is the first candidate C.
According to Indeed data, sponsored jobs have four times more applicants than non-sponsored jobs.
So go build your dream team today with Indeed.
Get a $75-sponsored job credit at Indeed.com slash podcast.
Terms and Conditions apply.
Search Engine is a presentation of Odyssey.
It's created by me, PJ Vote, and Truthy Pinnam and Annie.
Garrett Graham is our senior producer.
This episode was fact-checked by Mary Mathis,
theme, original composition, and mixing by Armand Bizarion.
Our executive producer is Leah Reese Dennis.
And thanks to the rest of the team at Odyssey.
Rob Morandi, Craig Cox, Eric Donnelly, Colin Gaynor,
Maura Curran, Josephina Francis, Kirk Courtney, and Hilary Schoff.
Our agent is Orrin Rosenbaum at UTA.
If you'd like to support our show and get ad-free episodes,
zero reruns, and even extra interviews,
please consider signing up for Incognito mode.
You can join Incognito mode at search engine.com.
Follow and listen to Search Engine, wherever you get your podcasts.
Thank you for listening. We'll see you next week.
Ambition comes in all shapes and sizes.
At First Citizens Bank,
We roll with your goals because we're built for what you're building.
Fit for your ambition.
For citizens back.
