SERIALously - 302: Evil Mastermind or Complete Moron? Brian Walshe & Ana Walshe
Episode Date: July 28, 2025Was Brian Walshe a criminal mastermind with a sinister endgame or just a reckless idiot who thought he could cover his tracks with Google and charm? In this explosive new update to a case Annie has co...vered before, shocking new details have surfaced: a connection to stolen Andy Warhol paintings, as well as Michael Proctor, the former Massachusetts State Police trooper who served as lead investigator in the Karen Read trial. From suspicious searches to bizarre behavior and chilling evidence, we’re diving back into the twisted saga of Brian and Ana Walshe. And this time, Brian’s defense team is coming out swinging… 🔎Join Our True Crime Club & Get Exclusive Content & Perks 🔎 Join The Club: https://www.patreon.com/annieelise 🎧 Need More to Binge? Listen to EXTRA deep dive episodes every week on Apple! https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/serialously-with-annie-elise/id1519456164 🚩Announcements🚩 Want to Catch Annie LIVE on Tour? 🎤 🎟Grab your tickets now for a city near you: https://annieelise.com/pages/tour 🌸 SPRING MERCH IS OFFICIALLY HERE! 🌸 Shop now at https://annieelise.com/collections/shop-all Don't miss out before your faves sell out! 🛒🌷 Follow Annie on Socials 📸 🩷Instagram: @ _annieelise, https://www.instagram.com/_annieelise/?hl=en 💜TikTok: @_annieelise, https://www.tiktok.com/@_annieelise?lang=en 🗞️ Substack: @annieelise, https://substack.com/@annieelise 💙Facebook: @10tolife, https://www.facebook.com/10toLIFE ⭐️Sponsors ⭐️ Function Health: Visit http://www.functionhealth.com/AE or use gift code AE100 at sign-up to own your own health. Quince: go to http://Quince.com/ae to get free shipping and 365-day returns on your next order. RoBody: Head to http://Ro.co/AE to check your coverage for free. Shop Annie’s Closet & Must-Haves! 👗 Poshmark: https://posh.mk/Tdbki6Ae0Rb ShopMY: https://shopmy.us/annieelise Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/shop/10tolife?ref_=cm_sw_r_apin_aipsfshop_BKN1ZMCMEZHACVFQ2R75&language=en_US Disclaimer ‣ Some links may be affiliate links, they do not cost you anything, but I make a small percentage from the sale. Thank you so much for watching and supporting me. 🎙️ Follow the podcast for FREE on all podcast platforms! Apple:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/serialously-with-annie-elise/id1519456164 Spotify:https://open.spotify.com/show/6HdheEH8WeMTHoe5da34qU All Other Platforms: https://audioboom.com/channels/5100770-serialously-with-annie-elise Get Involved or Recommend the Case 💬 About Annie: https://annieelise.com/ For Business Inquiries: 10toLife@WMEAgency.com Episode Sources 🔗 Law & Crime NBC10 Boston NBC News Yahoo News WBUR Boston.com WCVB Channel 5 Boston CBS News AP News WHDH CNN CBS Boston *Sources used to collect this information include various public news sites, interviews, court documents, FB groups dedicated to the case, and various news channel segments. When quoting statements made by others, they are strictly alleged until confirmed otherwise. Please remember my videos are my independent opinion and to always do your own research. •••••••••••••••••• Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this video are personal and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any other agency, organization, employer, or company. Assumptions made in the analysis are not reflective of the position of any entity other than the creator(s). These views are subject to change, revision, and rethinking at any time and are not to be held in perpetuity. We make no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, correctness, suitability, or validity of any information on this video and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis. It is the reader’s responsibility to verify their own facts.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hey guys, I am so excited because we are finally going back out on tour and this is going to be our biggest tour yet.
We are hitting a lot of cities coming to a city near you and this tour is going to be unlike the last tour and unlike any episode or case that we have ever presented.
It's going to be an all new exclusive case, an entirely new approach, interactive with you guys, And it is just gonna be so great.
I am so excited to connect with all of you guys.
I am very eager for you to hear this case
and it's just going to be an unforgettable night.
So tickets are on sale now,
but grab yours now before they're gone.
You can get all of the information at annieelyse.com.
I will also link it in the show notes
and I'm really excited to see you there.
So head to annieelyse.com, grab your tickets and I'll be seeing you soon.
Anna Walsh, three young kids at home.
Where did she go?
We know that there was evidence that she once was threatened by her husband then did not
cooperate with authorities in the investigation.
At 4.55 a.m. on January 1st,
he searched how long before a body starts to smell.
At 4.58 a.m., how to stop a body from decomposing.
At 5.20 a.m., he searched how to unfound a body.
On January 4th of 2023,
she was officially reported missing
after she didn't show up to work.
Brian also reported his wife missing and told authorities Anna left their home
for a flight to D.C.
It is such an intimate, violent crime.
And the parties had children who were in the home.
Hey, true crime besties.
Welcome back to an all new episode of Serialistly with me, Annie Elise.
And we have a massive case that we need to talk about today.
It's one that I have talked about in the past, starting years ago, but there have been a
lot of updates and I feel as though this case is now
kind of rediscovering a whole new interest and people are finding it because
everybody was glued obviously to the Karen Reed case, right and
this case has a lot of the same players cough cough Michael Proctor and
It is just on the surface when you don't even include all of that. It is just such a wild case. It is like the dumbest murderer on the face of the earth is involved in this case.
And you know, I say it all the time.
I love to see criminals big, dumb and stupid.
And this guy is like a grade A freaking moron.
His Google history says it all.
He is so freaking beyond shady.
He looks like who's that guy from Family Guy?
Is it quagmire?
Like the guy with the big rectangle head?
Literally, he looks like that.
And I usually don't come for people's looks.
But if you're a murderer, it's kind of like gloves are off.
I can do whatever I want.
And this guy is just a freaking moron.
And we love to see it though, because it's like,
we love when idiots think they can get away with murder
and you end up getting caught
because you're such a moron that you Google literal things
of like how to dismember, how to cover up, how to do this,
what hacksaw is the best.
Like you're an idiot and like you know we just we love to
see it. So anyway, in today's episode I'm going to be going
over some of the updates of the case. I'm also going to be
stitching together some of the pieces from the previous
episodes where I've covered this case because it's been years
and years and years and I just want it all in one easy place so that you can learn about the case, start to finish, and hear everything that you need to hear. And if
you haven't guessed by now, it is the case of Brian Walsh and Anna Walsh and it is
very deeply upsetting and deeply disturbing. And as we go, I think you too
are also going to be kind of like who the hell is this guy?
Like did he really think he was gonna get away with this? What's going on?
Which let me just throw it out there. Everything that is in this episode is
alleged. He has not been convicted and found guilty at the time of this
recording. So innocent until proven guilty. Insert big eye roll here. No
seriously though this case is deeply haunting and very upsetting
and it just deserves to have a bigger spotlight on it
and a lot of people, like I said,
they are curious about this case,
especially coming off the heels of everything
that went down with Karen Reed
and Michael Proctor's involvement.
So I'm gonna break down everything
and I'm also gonna be, like I said,
putting updates along the way
so that you just have the full, you know,
most up-to-date version of this case.
But let me start by just asking you this simple question,
okay, what if the person that you built a life with
turned out to be hiding something extremely dark,
something extremely dangerous?
Because that is what's happening in this case.
It really does have it all.
It has betrayal, a missing mom of Three, Google searches that are literally straight out of a freaking horror movie,
and even fake Warhol paintings. Andy Warhol, the famous artist, okay? So like I said, this is the
case of Anna and Brian Walsh, and we are going to get right into it. Anna Walsh is a 37-year-old
mother of three
from Cohasset, Massachusetts.
She's a very beautiful woman standing at 5'2'
and around 115 pounds.
She has brown hair, brown eyes, with an olive complexion.
Those who knew Ana say that she speaks
with an Eastern European accent.
She is a native of Serbia
and came to the United States in 2005.
Before coming to the States,
Ana was commuting back and forth between Serbia and Washington, DC,
on summertime work visas.
She is a very career-driven woman
who was just full of all kinds of levels of intelligence.
Ana is multilingual and able to speak not only English and Serbian,
but also French, Spanish, and Croatian.
She graduated with her bachelor's degree at the University of Belgrade in Belgrade,
Serbia, and then obtained her master's from Ivy League Cornell University in New York.
Anna went on to work many hospitality jobs before her most recent job with Tischman Spire
as their regional general manager in Washington, DC and the Baltimore
area. She commuted during the week to Washington, DC for this job and stayed in a townhouse in the
area that she had purchased back in March of 2022 for $1.3 million. According to friends and court
records, Ana and her husband Brian married in 2015. Ana is also a mother of three small children
between the ages of two and six years old.
So now let's change gears for a second
and talk about Ana's husband, Brian Walsh.
Well, it's a little harder to find out information on him
because unlike Ana, who is a very much active person
on social media, Brian is the complete opposite. Brian is 47 years old and
is the co-founder and CFO at LETS, which means Leadership and Effective Teamwork Strategies,
which actually seems to be shut down as there is virtually no information on this company at all.
The couple has been featured in Boston Magazine and Brian has also been featured in the Boston Globe as a Boston-based international art dealer. However, with all
of this and this fancy looking life and this facade that one might believe when reading
the paper, Brian does have prior legal issues and therefore is actually currently on home
confinement and wearing an ankle monitor. See, in November of 2016, a buyer found two Andy Warhol
paintings for sale on eBay.
The paintings were two of Warhol's shadows,
which is a series of untitled abstract canvas paintings
from 1978.
The original listing price for the paintings was $100,000.
In the advertisement, the eBay seller was Brian,
and he included a picture of an invoice
for the two Warhol shadow paintings with Warhol foundation numbers and a purchase price of
$240,000.
Now, this buyer on eBay believed that the paintings were authentic because it had the
Warhol foundation numbers, it had that invoice, by all accounts, these were authentic pieces. So between November 3rd and November 5th,
2016, the buyer arranged with Brian to purchase the artwork outside of eBay for $80,000.
This is something that oftentimes happens on these websites, whether it's Facebook,
Marketplace, eBay, any of these sales websites. And you always have to be extremely careful
because a lot of the time people will try to skirt around the fees and they'll try to bribe the seller saying,
hey, if we go off site, go offline, I'll pay you less, but eBay won't take the fees.
So essentially you may actually be making equal or more.
Is that okay with you?
But what happens when you do that is you don't know who you're buying or selling to.
And if it's off site, you don't get a lot of the protections
that come with those websites and the guarantees
and the security of where your money is being transferred
and sent to.
But in any event, that's the deal that these two made
outside of eBay.
So Brian and the buyer signed a contract
which specified that the buyer had three days
to terminate the contract and get a full refund
if the buyer did not accept
the artwork. On November 7, 2016, the buyer's assistant flew to Boston and met Brian in
person to retrieve the paintings and provided him with the cashier's check for $80,000.
According to bank records, the cashier's check was deposited that same day into an
account that Brian controlled and $33,400
of it was subsequently withdrawn in the following two weeks.
The day after purchasing these paintings and retrieving them, the buyer, of course, wanted
to take a look at them, wanted to look at the authenticity of them and wanted to check
them out, knowing that that window was closing for this three-day guarantee or refunds policy
that Brian put forth.
So on November 16th,
the buyer removed the paintings from the frames
and found no Warhol Foundation authentication stamps
and noticed that the canvases and staples looked new.
So when he compared the paintings to the photographs
from the eBay listing, they did not look identical.
The buyer concluded that the
paintings he purchased from Brian were not authentic. The buyer then repeatedly attempted
to contact Brian, who initially did not respond, and then was making excuses for the delay in
refunding the buyer's money. The buyer was Ron Rivlin, the owner of Revolver Gallery in California,
the largest Andy Warhol gallery in the world.
Ron said that he's bought in thousands of Warhols
and this is the only purchase that got him.
He was so familiar with the art,
but this guy had somehow tricked him into this.
He said he was good.
He had a clever playbook and an Oscar-worthy performance.
He also stated that when he first met Brian,
Brian came off as charismatic, articulate, and professional.
However, according to Ron,
Brian's demeanor completely changed
when he was caught lying about the fake paintings,
and he was very tactful in how he played the legal system.
He also said that Brian has a masterful ability
to coerce and deceive people.
With this crime, Brian was facing up to 50 years in prison
and a fine of up to $1 million combined.
But the government was set to agree to a sentence that included no jail time at all.
However, after Brian allegedly embezzled funds from his late father's estate while out on bail
in the Warhol case, they are now seeking a sentence currently of 30 months in federal prison.
That's right, just when you thought he couldn't get any scummier or scamier,
he went and caught another charge in federal court
when he plundered his deceased father's estate
after finding out that he had kept him out of the will.
Now, let me just tell you about this for a minute.
His father had the ultimate mic drop moment in the will,
saying, and I quote,
"'My best wishes, but nothing else.
Well, that would catch anybody off guard.
I don't wanna say anybody, but anybody who's expecting
to receive something from a will.
So according to court filings, Brian illegally helped
himself to more than $100,000 in cash,
paintings by Miro and Dali, pottery, art glasses,
and even a car belonging to his father's
estate, which he then sold off. Now, when this case went to federal court, the rightful managers
of Brian's estate had the opportunity to send letters to the judge talking about how the
embezzlement truly affected them. And honestly, they did not hold back a single bit. Dr. Fred
Pescatore, the longtime best friend of Tom Walsh,
Brian's dad, said he and another man, Jeffrey Olmstein,
who were Tom's dearest and closest friends
for almost three decades, had quite a bit to say.
He said, Tom openly discussed Brian
and his grandchildren with me often.
Tom had mentioned that another grandson was on the way,
and he outright stated that like his son
and his prior grandson,
he wanted nothing to do with the new offspring.
Tom told me that Brian had been in contact
about the new offspring.
Tom stated that Brian was looking for money again,
and that it made him quite uncomfortable.
Tom indicated that he kept the conversations with Brian
as short as possible.
Tom was always clear that he did not want his son Brian
to inherit anything from him. Going on to say,
I had no individual animosity towards Brian.
So Tom felt open to discuss how he felt about Brian
and the pain and disappointment that Brian had caused him,
stemming from the time Brian had stolen
a significant amount of money from Tom.
I personally spoke with Dr. Martin Samuels
and he was not interested in being involved in the estate as he wanted absolutely nothing to do with Brian. Marty stated that
Brian is an evil person and capable of just about anything and I want nothing to do with
this so please do not involve me. And Marty was a work buddy of Tom's. It is clear in
our communication that he had heard what all of us had heard from Tom regarding Brian's
lack of honesty and integrity.
Brian and Tom's estrangement had everything to do with money.
Brian stole money from Tom and swindled him out of almost $1 million. Brian basically did to his
father what he is accused of doing in Boston in federal court. Their estrangement had nothing to
do with Tom's alternative lifestyle, but rather all to do with Brian being a sociopath who could
never stay in one school as a child.
I even went on a trip to China with Brian, Tom, and my partner at the time.
I witnessed firsthand what Brian was capable of.
I saw Brian attempt to smuggle out antiquities from China.
When Brian was confronted, he picked up a Stansion and literally attempted to kill four or five guards that had
come to talk to him about his crime. Brian is not only a sociopath, but also a very angry and
physically violent person. I want nothing to do with him, but I will stand up for my friend Tom's
rights and I will not let his memory be on the pack of lies from Brian. Wow, like a pretty bold letter and statement.
But get this, Brian's legal troubles
and his all around scum bagginess,
it went even further back,
even before he and Ana were ever married.
Okay, you guys know I am all about
taking charge of my own health, right? I feel like all of us should.
And that's why I chose Function Health.
I've talked to you about it before, but it's honestly the only health platform that I have
found that gives you the access to real data about your body, stuff that you normally never
get to see.
We're talking over 160 biomarkers, everything from heart and hormone levels to toxins,
inflammation, even stress.
And the coolest part of it,
you can add on MRIs and CT scans,
all tracked in one secure place
so that you can actually understand
what's going on inside your body.
Think about it, our normal annual labs,
they're usually just to check 20 basic markers,
no hormones, no real insight.
You're told, you know, you're fine even when you don't feel fine.
Function flips all of that.
They give you the real picture, like how well your thyroid is working,
or your vitamin D levels, or even advanced markers for heart health.
I genuinely believe that this is the new normal in healthcare.
And right now, if you use my link, the first 1,000 people
get a $100 credit toward membership. Just go to
functionhealth.com slash AE and use my code AE100 when you sign
up, take control of your health and actually see what's going
on inside your body. You'll thank yourself later. Trust me.
In 2014, Anna reported to the police that her then boyfriend, Brian, threatened to kill her and her friends.
There aren't many other details other than Brian threatened her over the phone because
Anna later refused to cooperate with police and an investigation, so it never progressed
or went forward.
So we know that Brian is a walking red flag, right?
I mean, he has stolen art,
he has embezzled from his father, from the grave.
He even allegedly threatened to kill Ana.
However, does that necessarily mean
that he would take it a step further and really hurt her?
Or was that just an idle threat?
And that's pretty much what Ana's friends and family
were left wondering when she went radio silent on January 1, 2023.
Then three days later, on January 4, police received a phone call simultaneously from
Ana's husband Brian and her employer Tishman Speyer.
Ana was missing and had not shown up to work in three days, which according to her employer,
this was extremely unlike
her. However, we later learn that the employer is the one who made the initial missing persons
report for Ana. So just keep that in mind that Brian did not report his wife missing
for three days.
Ana was last seen at her home in Cohasset, Massachusetts between 4 a.m. and 5 a.m. on New Year's Day.
Bryan stated that Anna was taking a ride share from her home to Boston Logan International Airport in attempt to catch an early flight to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport on January 1st
due to there being an emergency with one of the properties that she was in charge of in Washington,
D.C. However, after further investigation, there was no ride share
scheduled for the morning of January 1st.
Officer Gregory Lowrentz was the first to interact with Walsh and updated the court
on how the investigation even got started.
Who did you meet there at that residence?
Brian Walsh.
Can you explain to me what happened when you got to the house that day?
I exited my cruiser and he met me at the doorway and said that he wanted to report his wife
missing and file a police report with the Quasar police.
And what was his name like when you saw him at the doorway?
Very calm.
Now, this initial interaction with Mr. Walsh, was it recorded?
No, it was not.
Why was it recorded?
The Quasar police did not have body worn cameras at that time.
And so what had he told you he had done to try and locate his wife at this point in time?
He told me that he had tried texting her and he did contact her employer.
And what did he tell you as far as the last time he had seen his wife?
It would be Sunday morning, January 1st, 2023, between the hours of 6 a.m. and 7 a.m.
Did he say where she was going after that point?
She had a work emergency and had to go back to Washington, D.C.
Did he say how she was going to leave the home that day?
She was going to take an Uber or a Lyft.
And head to where, sir?
Logan Airport.
In addition, it was also determined that her cell phone pinged in the area of the home
on the 1st and the 2nd, which was after Brian said she had left, indicating that Anna was
not in Washington, D.C.
In addition, investigators were able to confirm with all of the airlines that Anna was not in Washington, D.C. In addition, investigators were able to confirm with all of the airlines that Anna did not
board a plane at all during this time frame.
Meanwhile, officers from the Metropolitan Police Department in D.C. searched the townhouse
but found no sign of Anna there anywhere.
Investigators stated that Anna's cell phone has been off since January 1st and that her
credit card and debit cards have also been inactive since New Year's Day as well.
Brian told police that on January 1st, he had three hours allocated to take his mother
home from a surgery that she had, but that his mother had recovered from the surgery
quicker than expected and had driven herself home.
However, he still used that time that he had approved and allocated to go visit her and
run errands for her.
So Brian says in that time,
he left the couple's home without his phone,
got lost on the way to his mother's house,
and then later went to both Whole Foods and CVS.
But when police pulled surveillance video
from those stores, Brian was nowhere to be found.
But you know where they did see Brian?
At Home Depot.
And on surveillance,
he was seen with a cart full of cleaning supplies, including cleaning products such as mops,
brushes, tape, tarps, a Tyvek suit with boot covers, buckets, goggles, baking soda, and
a hatchet. At Home Depot, he was wearing a face mask and rubber gloves, and the total was around $450 for this supplies,
and Brian paid in cash.
At 5.32 p.m., he was seen on a street camera
removing his gloves and masks.
The next day, on January 3rd at 4.27 p.m.,
Brian drove to an apartment complex.
Surveillance showed Brian's Volvo pull up to a dumpster
carrying a garbage bag.
He leaned, and whatever it is in the bag
appears to be heavy because of the way
that he was carrying it.
He walked over to the dumpster
and left the garbage bag there.
At 4.48 p.m., he went to another apartment complex.
Then at 5.10 p.m., he went to a third apartment complex.
And video surveillance showed Brian and his Volvo
throwing things away at that dumpster.
The following day, on January 4th, he went to TJ Maxx and Home Goods and purchased towels,
bath mats, and men's clothing.
January 4th was that same day of the wellness check.
When police came to the house, the officer saw Brian's Volvo with the back seats laying
down and plastic liner laid out on top of the seats.
But at this point, they were just doing a wellness check and he was saying, no, I haven't
seen her.
She got on her flight.
She was going to DC.
I don't know.
So the next day on January 5th, the back seats of his Volvo were still down and the carpet
seemed to have fresh vacuum streaks on it.
The police asked Brian about the liner and he said that he threw it away.
Once the car was analyzed, there was still some blood in it.
What car did you look at? There's a Volvo XC90. And did you get any permission to look at that
footcar? Yes. And who'd you get the permission from? Mr. Walsh. And what did you notice about the Volvo?
In the trunk, there was the trunk was lined with like plastic sheeting. And so you're able to open it at this point in time?
Yes.
Okay.
Now, sir, fast forwarding to January 5th,
which was a Thursday,
what did you do to try and locate Ms. Walsh that day?
I did a lot that day.
Let me just go back for a second.
I apologize.
There was a, I'll do this from time to time,
there was a plastic sheet,
you said lining the rear area.
Yes.
Is that a trunk or is it more like a open area
in the rear of an SUV?
The trunk area is a SUV with a hatch.
So the trunk area, not the seating area.
Okay, thanks.
So not like a sedan though,
which would have a separate distinct trunk, it has access to the seats.
Correct. The seats would fold down, you could go from the trunk into the back row.
Okay.
So I'll call it a traditional SUV configuration?
Yes, yes, your honor.
And we learned that during a later visit to the home, police searched the attic, but they didn't find anything suspicious.
Investigators also said that the plastic liner that was originally noted as being in the
rear of the SUV, that was now gone.
Sergeant Schmidt told the court that investigators questioned Brian Walsh about whether Ana might
have taken her own life or abandoned the family.
During that interview, what did he say that his normal contact would be with his wife Ana Walsh while she was working in Washington? or abandon the family. She wouldn't do that. What if anything did you say she was unhappy about?
Stress from work and distance.
And was he asked about extramarital affairs on either side?
Yes.
What did he say?
Neither of them had extramarital affairs.
Did you ask or was he asked on whether or not, if they had had an argument the morning
she left January 1?
Yes.
What was his response?
There wouldn't have been enough time that morning.
What do you say the biggest argument they had had recently was?
She had a two-week vacation scheduled and instead of coming home. She was in Belgrade visiting her mother
Now did he say what was causing stress in their relationship at this point in time? Yes
What was causing stress the distance being away from the children and in addition to the distance were there any other stressors in their relationship?
prior legal
Issues so he told you that he had another criminal matter going on?
Yes.
So at this point, things just are not looking good.
Ana hasn't been heard from since New Year's, and Brian's alibi does not check out at all.
He's also been caught on video making all sorts of suspicious purchases.
But that's not all. Buckle up, because things are about to get even worse
when the investigators get a hold of Brian's search history.
And like we say, the Google history will get you every time.
Brian used his son's iPad to do the following
Google searches and the following activities.
January 1st, at 4.55 a.m., he searched
how long before a body starts
to smell. Three minutes later at 4 58 a.m. how to stop a body from decomposing.
A little over 20 minutes later at 5 20 a.m. he searched how to embalm a body. A
little over 25 minutes after that at 5 47 a.m., he googled 10 ways to dispose of a dead body if you really need to.
Then at 625 a.m., how long for someone to be missing to inherit? At 634 a.m., can you throw away
body parts? At 929 a.m., what does formaldehyde do? At 934 a.m., long does DNA last? At 9.59am, can identification be made on
partial remains? At 11.34am, dismemberment and the best ways to dispose of a body? At 11.44am,
how to clean blood from a wood floor? At 11.56am Luminol to detect blood.
Then he pauses for a little bit
and comes back to Google at 108 p.m.
and he searches what happens
when you put body parts in ammonia.
Searches again at 121 p.m.
Is it better to throw crime scene clothes away or wash them?
On what planet do these criminals actually become
stupid enough to Google search all of these things
that are very incriminating,
then to have their spouse mysteriously go missing
either days later or in this case,
potentially days before or the day of?
I mean, you are literally asking to get caught.
Go to an internet cafe, do anything.
You're using your own family's tech devices to make these searches.
On what planet do you think you're not going to get caught?
It blows my mind.
It really truly does.
And this wasn't all of it.
Because the next day on January 2nd, the searches continued.
First he went to HomeGoods, where he purchased three rugs.
And then he began his Google searches again.
At 12.45pm, H hack saw best tool to dismember. At 1.02pm, what happens to hair on a dead
body? At 1.10pm, can you be charged for murder without the body? At 1.13pm, what is the rate
of decomposition in a body found in a plastic bag compared to a body
left on the surface in the woods?
Pretty specific, my guy.
At 1.14pm, he searched, can you identify a body with broken teeth?
Which to me, this indicates the teeth were already broken or he was planning to break
them to make it so she was difficult to identify.
And then he Googles at 1.20pm, can baking soda mask or make a body smell
good? And unfortunately, these searches were not all that the investigators found that
was painting a really grim picture of what truly happened to Anna. Police and crime scene
investigators searched Anna and Brian's home. They found blood in the basement, along with
a damaged knife and some blood on it. They also found a second knife in the basement, along with a damaged knife and some blood on it.
They also found a second knife in the basement.
There was also a large tarp on the ground that Brian had purchased from Home Depot.
Police tried to locate some of the things that Brian threw away when he first went to
those three apartment complex dumpsters.
The bags were already picked up though, and taken to a location for shredding and incineration.
By the time police figured all of this out, some of the bags and the contents of the bags were already destroyed.
However, they did secure and search the dumpsters from Brian's mom's apartment complex. That
was the search at the big trash station in Peabody. Investigators found 10 trash bags,
and inside the trash bags, many items had a lot of blood all over them. The
items included towels, rags, slippers, tape, gloves, cleaning supplies, a carpet, a dress,
a black jacket, hunter boots, a Prada purse, and a vaccination card with Ana's name on
it. And lastly, a hatchet.
Portions of the carpet rugs that they recovered had huge blood stains all over them, as well as some baking soda. They also found a portion of a necklace that Anna wore frequently,
and had a lot of photos wearing it as well. The state crime lab performed an analysis of the blood
found on the items and sent them for DNA testing. The slippers had both Anna and Brian's DNA on them,
and on the Tyvek suit, there was Anna and Brian's DNA on the inside cuffs of
the sleeves. On the outside of the sleeves, Anna's DNA was found. On the left pant leg of the Tyvek
suit, Anna's DNA was also there. There were also tissues that had Anna's DNA on them.
So all of that together, the Google searches, the lying about his alibi, the hatchet, the blood,
the lying about his alibi, the hatchet, the blood. All of that ultimately was enough to finally arrest Brian on January 8th,
just a week after Ana went missing.
Okay, let me be real with you guys.
Every summer I get this itch to just like refresh my closet,
but I hate wasting money on pieces
that I know I'm only gonna wear once
or that won't last past the summer season.
And that's why I'm obsessed with quints.
Not only for their sheets, their homewares,
their throw blankets, but their clothes.
I've done so many quints hauls.
My friends have gotten hooked on it.
They just have such good stuff
because their clothing, it's timeless.
And their stuff looks and feels luxurious.
But honestly too, I worked in the fashion industry
for like 15 years, and the quality is just way beyond
what you would expect for the price.
It just makes sense.
It's kind of like a wardrobe upgrade that just clicks.
Think 100% European linen tops starting at just $30.
Beautiful, washable silk dresses, cotton sweaters,
stuff that I can throw on all summer
long and know that I will feel put together. And here's the best part of it all. Everything at
Quince is literally half the price of similar luxury brands. Plus, they work directly with
top artisans and skip the middleman, so you're getting the luxury feel without the insane
markup that comes with it. And I also love that they are committed to safe, ethical, and responsible manufacturing.
So give your summer closet an upgrade with Quince.
Go to quince.com slash AE for free shipping and 365 day returns.
That's Q-U-I-N-C-E dot com slash AE.
Trust me, you will thank me when you feel how good these pieces are and like these quiet
luxury staples in your wardrobe, it is the best.
Brian Walsh was charged with misleading an investigation and intimidating a witness, and the judge set the bail at $500,000 cash and set the next hearing for February 9th.
A not guilty plea was entered on Brian's behalf
and he appeared in court in a long sleeve gray shirt
and spoke only briefly to say that he understood the charge.
Then on January 18th, 2023,
the charges were upgraded to first degree murder
and for transferring a body without authority.
They were incredibly disturbing revelations as Brian Walsh stood motionless in court.
Up until now, he has only been charged with misleading investigators.
But today, prosecutors laid out detailed internet searches and DNA evidence they say links them
to his wife's murder, even though her body has never been found. Do you understand what the charges are for Walsh?
I do.
The only words spoken by Brian Walsh
at his arraignment for charges of murdering
and disinterring or improperly transporting
the remains of his wife, Anna Walsh,
the prosecutors say was killed and dismembered
the morning of January 1st.
Rather than divorce, it is believed that Brian Walsh
dismembered Anna Walsh and discarded her body.
Surveillance shows the defendant's Volvo, as well as a male fitting the defendant's
appearance, exit a car near the dumpster. He walks to the dumpster carrying a garbage
bag. He's leaning and it appears to be heavy as he has to heft it into the dumpster. Towels,
rags, slippers, tape, Tyvek suit. Prosecutors also say Walsh and
his wife's DNA were found on several items he allegedly placed in a dumpster near his mother's
Swampskut home, including on slippers, a Tyvek suit he was allegedly wearing. Also found her purse,
a portion of a necklace, and Anna Walsh's COVID vaccination card.
Friends say Anna never revealed any trouble at home.
The difficult part about all of this is that it's completely out of everybody's hands.
Nobody saw it coming.
And I think that's the most terrifying and scariest thing about all of this.
Now, it was Anna Walsh's Washington co-workers who first reported her missing January 4th
and prosecutors say that's the first day Brian Walsh told Cohasset police he hadn't
spoken with his wife since New Year's Day.
He's now being held without bail.
But what we still don't know is the why of it all.
Brian had it all with Anna.
She was successful.
She mothered his three children and from the outside looking in they seemed happy and I get it
Not everything always appears as it does from the outside
But they did seem to have a happy and loving life together
So why would he do something this heinous to his wife to the mother of his children?
Well one answer might come from Brian's Google searches
Which what is it with this guy and his Google searches?
Does he think that it's like chat GBT?
Does he think it's gonna give him the answers to everything?
On December 27th, prior to Ana going missing,
Brian Google searched,
what's the best state for divorce for a man?
So Brian seemed to think that he and Ana
could be headed for divorce.
So with that, the question is, did he snap?
Did he think that rather than getting divorced, you know, let me kill her instead, I don't want a divorce. If I can't
have her, no one can. That kind of thing. Plus, besides divorce, it seemed like maybe
Brian could have had a financial motive as well. See, Ana reportedly had a $2.7 million
life insurance policy. And sure enough, Brian was listed as the sole beneficiary.
And that seems to go right along with his Google search
of how long for someone to be missing to inherit.
It seems like this was financially motivated as well.
So Ana is presumed dead.
And since police have not been able to recover her body,
some investigators believe it's possible
that she was in those trash bags
that were unfortunately incinerated.
It's horrifying to even think about that.
Now even though Anna Walsh's body still hasn't been found two years after she's vanished,
this case hasn't exactly gone quiet.
If anything, it's actually only gotten more chaotic as Brian Walsh is now heading toward
trial.
Back in December of 2023,
Brian's original high-priced attorney
suddenly stepped away from the case,
and then a court-appointed lawyer took over.
Now that kind of switch-up doesn't always scream trouble
or a red flag, but in this case,
it definitely did raise some eyebrows,
because when somebody ditches their legal team
halfway through, it's usually because either A,
they ran out of money, or B, they have decided
to completely shift gears in terms of their defense strategy.
So which was it?
Then in February of 2024, Brian got hit
with an entire separate wave of legal drama.
This time it was tied to those Andy Warhol paintings,
the ones that he had tried to sell online,
which remember we had talked about that before and we also talked about it at the top of this episode.
All of that finally caught up to him, and he was sentenced to more than three years in federal prison.
He was also ordered to pay almost half a million dollars in restitution.
And while that case isn't technically tied to Ana's disappearance, prosecutors will likely
use it to show pattern, painting him as a fraud, as a manipulator, and generally
just not a trustworthy guy, a scammer, a grifter. Especially loop in the whole
life insurance policy of it all with Ana, right? I mean, this guy clearly had
financial motivation to commit crimes in the past, so who's to say he wouldn't do
it again?
Our NBC 10's Eli Rosenberg joining us live outside
federal court with today's sentencing details, Eli.
For so important to note, this is totally unrelated
to that murder charge.
Federal prosecutors calling this a multi-year
art fraud scheme that really did span the globe.
In the end, in a hearing this afternoon,
a judge sentencing Brian Walsh
to three years and one month in prison.
You saw him in court today for the one of the first time.
So what was that like to see him?
Brian Walsh's mother with nothing to say
as she left federal court.
Her son, Brian Walsh appearing in court,
not in connection with the murder of his wife
for which he is charged. Rather to be sentenced for his involvement in a multi-year arced fraud.
It is a bit unusual to be facing both federal and state charges and have those federal charges
or the state charges go to sentencing.
Walsh learning his fate after pleading guilty to crimes centered around two Andy Warhol
paintings.
Walsh is accused of convincing a friend in South Korea
to let him sell the friend's two Warhol paintings.
The art valued at hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Walsh, though, accused of selling two fake versions
of Warhol's shadows for $80,000.
That prompted an FBI investigation into Walsh,
a guilty plea on this and ultimately
Tuesday sentencing of three years and one month in prison.
It gives the court, now this is a federal court, but it gives the government the chance
to hold him in the event that there are problems with respect to the prosecution for the murder
of his wife.
And things this afternoon just a little different considering this murder charge. First of all, as soon as the hearing wrapped up, Walsh was returned to state custody and his judge did say
that Walsh will serve the 37 months concurrently or at the same time as any prison time he gets
on that state murder charge. So things were just continuously coming out,
like a slow drip.
Every few months there was new information.
But then things got really messy in the summer of 2024.
And that was thanks to none other than Michael Proctor.
Now, if you have followed the Karen Reed trial at all,
you definitely know the name, right?
He was the lead investigator in Karen Reed's case.
He was also the lead investigator in Anna's case,
but he had made headlines at this point in summer of 2024
for all the wrong reasons.
Everything related to the Karen Reed case,
his offensive text messages, his biased text messages,
all of this stuff was just exposed, just put on full display.
And it became crystal clear that he was anything but impartial,
so much so that he ended up getting fired because of his work on the Karen Reed case.
So all of that scandal ended up spilling over into the Walsh case.
And Brian's legal team, they of course were going to jump all over it.
They demanded that Michael Proctor's phone data be turned over.
They argued that he compromised the entire investigation just as he had done with Karen
Reed.
I mean, it was basically a defense team's dream come true, right?
You have a lead investigator on this case who has already been put in the exposed and
put in the public light for his mishandlings on that case, ultimately ended up being fired.
He was also the lead investigator on your case. I mean, what could be better, right?
What could cast more doubt? So they jumped all over it.
This is 23 CR 9, one of the colorless versus Brian Walsh.
More than a year and a half after Brian Walsh was charged with killing and dismembering
his wife, Anna, he's now trying to find out if the police who investigated him
had an ax to grind.
The lead investigator on Walsh's case
was Massachusetts state trooper Michael Proctor,
who also investigated Karen Reed
for the death of her boyfriend, John O'Keefe,
and who, while doing so,
wrote insulting text messages about Reed.
My emotions got the best of me based on, you know,
the fact that Ms. Reed hit Mr. O'Keefe with her vehicle
and left him to die on the side of the road.
In court documents, Walsh's attorney writes, quote,
Proctor demonstrated bias against a person
accused of murder.
So now the defense wants to see if Proctor said
anything similar about Walsh.
They're demanding prosecutors turn over everything
they have on Proctor, including his cell phone data,
his internet account, and more than 3000 pages from an
ongoing federal investigation
into the death of John O'Keefe.
Walsh's attorney also says the recent
arrests of a Stoughton police officer
for the death of Sandra Burchmore
also raises questions about
possible misconduct. And I was
going to explain why we file such
a detailed minimum of law,
but I don't. I don't think I need to waste the court's time with that.
At today's hearing, Walsh's attorney says
he's already received from prosecutors
some of what he's asked for and expects to receive more.
Prosecutors say they can't share everything Walsh wants
because some of it might include sensitive information
about ongoing investigations.
Now, both sides have agreed to share what they can for now and then to come back before the
judge one month from now about what they still disagree on.
But then there was a plot twist.
The DA's office dropped Proctor completely and they said that now other investigators
would now take over.
But let's be real, the lead investigator had basically become like radioactive.
There was no way around it.
There was no way that you could just like hush hush make this kind of slip under the
rug.
Now he won't be involved in another high profile murder trial, which he was also lead
investigator.
He was a complete disaster in the Cameron Reed case that would follow him around at
any other trial.
According to this recent court filing, the district attorney not planning on
calling Proctor in the Brian Walsh trial. Brian, did you kill your wife?
Walsh is charged with killing his wife and dismembering her body
in early January 2023. The baggage he comes with,
it costs more to call him than not to. Now the defendant will likely call him,
that's their right.
But it won't come off as badly for the government.
Proctor was the subject of controversy when during the Reed trial, texts he sent to colleagues
and friends were made public.
And soon after the trial, state police suspended him.
Legal experts say Proctor had faced the same line of questioning in Walsh's trial.
The Walsh case is very different from Reed.
You know, it's always a little more difficult to prove murder without a body. And then, sure enough,
in November of 2024, two more bombshells hit. First, Judge Beverly Canone, which, yes, was the
same judge who got major heat over her role in the Karen Reed trial as well.
She also was removed for Brian's case, and she was replaced with a new judge.
And the second bombshell was that the owner of the Walsh's family home filed a lawsuit.
Not against Brian, but rather against his mom, Diana.
They claim that the alleged murder destroyed the property value.
So for that, he is suing for $400,000.
We all know that Ozempic, Wegovi, all these GLP-1s are all the rage right now, right?
And if you've ever been curious about GLP-1 medications or wondered if they might be right for you,
the first step is finding out if you qualify.
And that is where Ro's Free Insurance Checker comes in.
It's a super easy tool that tells you
which GLP-1 medications are covered by your insurance.
No paperwork, no sitting on hold, no guessing,
they do it all for you.
You just submit your insurance info
and within a few days, you'll get a clear report
showing what's covered
and whether prior authorization is needed.
That's it, no hassle.
The reality is, insurance can be ultra confusing,
but Roe makes it simple to understand your options
so that you can make this next step with confidence.
Over 500,000 people have already trusted Roe
to check their coverage for free.
So if you've been thinking about it or you just want to see if you qualify, go to ro.co.ae.
That's R-O-C-O-A-E to check your coverage for free.
Go to ro.co.ae for black box warning and full safety information about GLP-1 medications.
on medications. Then in December of 2024, we finally got a trial date, October 20th, 2025.
And at that same hearing, Brian's team doubled down on all of the Michael Proctor of it all,
all of that drama.
They wanted access to his text messages, his phone
records, even thousands of sealed pages from the Karen Reed case. They wanted all of it.
Which you might be asking, okay, well why? That's not their case. Well, it's because they're claiming
that Michael Proctor was already under federal investigation while he was leading the Walsh case,
which that's a major red flag.
And honestly, with Proctor, every single thing
is a red flag, so I'm really not even that surprised,
but the defense team was surely going to use this.
And apparently the Massachusetts state police agreed,
because in March of 2025, they fired him,
fired Michael Proctor, got rid of him,
and that opened the door for Michael's team
to challenge pretty much every single thing that Michael Proctor ever touched.
Interviews, warrants, evidence, you name it.
It was fair game now.
And as if that wasn't enough, Brian's attorneys are now trying to get some of the most damning evidence thrown out entirely, including those infamous Google searches, the ones that
were such huge red flags and so indicative of what was going on in Brian's mind during
those few days.
They're arguing that the investigators accessed all of that data before they had a valid warrant,
which if that's true, that is a major f*** up.
And if that is what makes this case fall apart, I mean, where is the justice for Ana?
Where is the justice for her family?
I just hope that Michael Proctor didn't completely screw this whole thing up, just like he did
so epically with the Karen Reed case.
Law enforcement in Cohasset, Massachusetts says Walsh's own internet search history could
put him behind bars for a very long time.
But now Walsh's defense team is trying to have that evidence tossed out before Walsh
goes to trial in front of a jury.
And when the state called Lieutenant John Fanning to the stand, he testified about what
a forensic examiner found in the internet search history on one of Walsh's devices.
He said I found something in the search history and that's interesting I said well what was it
and it was numerous searches about dismembering a body, how to embalm a body, how to get rid of a
body, numerous searches related to that, another search related to divorce.
And so after he notified you of that,
did he communicate to you and other troopers
what he had found?
Yes.
How so?
He sent an email.
And as far as analyzing the iPad Mini, what was your understanding as further analyst,
further analyzation of the iPad Mini at this point in time?
We were going to stop.
And what was going to be done as far as the iPad Mini after stopping?
The data we're talking about.
Yes, we had stopped and we were going to obtain a search warrant to seize that device.
So the defense is arguing that this incriminating search history was discovered without a warrant,
right? There's a constitutional violation. And investigators took eight devices from the
Walsh home, including iPhones, iPads. According to the warrant, the forensic searches of those devices
had to be limited to communications
between December 25th, 2022 and January 6th, 2023,
a key time period.
And communications, not searches for other online activity.
That's the key here.
And the defense, they questioned the lieutenant
about the issue of consent to search.
You are familiar with Massachusetts State Police consent to search forms, correct?
Yes.
And you didn't use one or try to use one or attempt to fill one out before you took the
items, the devices for Mr. Walsh that day on January 6th, did you?
No, we were working together cooperatively to find Anna Walsh.
I was happy that we were working together cooperatively to find Anna Walsh. And I was happy that we were working together.
You know, but I understand your answer that you didn't use a consent decision.
There was already an agreement.
So I think it would have been, it wouldn't have made sense after just talking to Attorney
Minor, talking to Sergeant Buchanek, an agreement in writing to then show up with a consent
form. I think that, I think Attorney minor would have had a problem with that.
Well, you think that my question is simple.
You use those consent to search forms.
You did not use one in this case.
That's correct.
And those consent to search forms without the labor of point, they're used to make
sure that what you do when it's looked at later on,
that there's evidence that there was, in fact,
a voluntary consent and that whatever parameters
of any search that was conducted would be followed
and that the person giving consent understood that.
Yes, that's all I have, thank you.
And trooper Nicholas Guarino, the forensic investigator
that the lieutenant was talking about, explained what he collected.
So you said a search warrant for the home.
Were you present for a search warrant of the Walsh home in Cohasset?
Yes I was.
And when was that sir?
Sunday January 8th in the morning.
And what was seized from the home as far as devices that morning? There was
three MacBooks, the iPhone 13 mini, the iPhone, that should be the iPad 6 mini, the iPad 6
with the cracked screen, another iPad that I don't remember the exact model number of, and an iPhone SE.
And Trooper Guarino confirmed that he knew the date range in which he could search, but
said that communications could include things like web chats that use a browser.
During his examination of those details in the extraction, he realized that some of the
items in the search history were suspicious. So once it opened in Cellbrite, I would have looked at the timeline view.
So I loaded timeline and filtered by the date range that was given.
Now, why do you use the timeline view?
Multiple reasons. It's the easiest way to pair down the data by date range.
And it gives a comprehensive list of how the device has interacted from the 25th to the 6th, as told.
And what did you begin to notice while you were going through this data and timeline range?
So it has every device interaction, what's been done with it.
Started seeing searches on the 27th of December for best place to get divorced, worst place to get divorced, best dates for divorce.
worst place to get divorced, best states for divorce. And after the 27th, did you notice anything further
that caught your attention when you were analyzing
the data for this device?
Yes.
The morning of the first, approximately about 4.50,
4.55 a.m., began seeing searches of how to dispose of a body.
And how, after starting to see these searches,
what did you do?
So I went through the information, the data,
probably up to about the second,
and I saw numerous searches about body disposal,
removal of smell,
the glass at dump, cadaver dogs at the dump,
and I contacted, well I went downstairs and
contacted Trooper Keefe to tell him what I had found search-wise.
Now to be clear, at the time of this recording, the judge hasn't made a ruling yet on whether
those internet searches will come into trial, which for now is currently scheduled to start
October 20th.
But I'll tell you this much, yes, Brian Walsh is innocent until proven guilty, but for his
defense's sake, they need to make sure the jury never sees those searches because you
and I both know for criminal defendants, when those searches come into trial, not great.
So yeah, that's where we're at right now.
Brian is still set to go to trial this October, yet he continues to claim that he's innocent
despite the bloody knife, the hatchet, the mountain of digital
evidence. He still is just saying, I'm innocent, I'm innocent, this was not me. The hearing this
morning began with a defense motion to dismiss, arguing that the prosecution did not present to
the grand jury sufficient evidence to indict Walsh for first degree murder on the theories of
premeditation or cruelty. And bear in mind that in Massachusetts, the first degree murder on the theories of premeditation or cruelty. And bear in mind that in Massachusetts,
the first degree murder statute mandates
that prosecutors must prove either premeditation
or extreme atrocity.
The judge is taking the motion to dismiss under advisement.
As of now, Walsh's trial is scheduled to begin in October.
It may be some evidence of motive,
but it is not evidence of premeditation.
It is not evidence of malice, according to the case law. And there's nothing in these...
Well, but the evidence of malice that they're going to rely on that was before the grand
jury is certainly contained in those searches.
If the searches happened before.
That's their theory.
That is their theory, but...
One of their theories, anyway.
But their evidence presented to the grand jury doesn't establish that and it requires the grand jury to speculate and pile inference on inference and say, well, maybe it could have maybe.
I don't know what the grand jury was thinking.
So you can't just throw it.
Forgive me, but you can't just throw things against the wall and see what sticks and walk away and say the grand jury heard sufficient evidence.
And because that is the probable cause to arrest him.
They don't need Thomas Walsh's, excuse me, they don't need the minors' statement to
establish probable cause.
They can go at it alone with Mr. Walsh's statement, she left at 6 6 30 and the fact that those six searches are done before
then isn't that sufficient maybe the Commoth will make our job easier it looks like they've made
our job easier for felony murder they didn't even brief it right well we gotta start i mean
october tick tock it's coming so figure out what your theory is going to be and let's argue about the things that really matter, right? Well, these really matter to us. I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I feel like this guy is still in so deep. I still think there is plenty of evidence against him, but curious to know what you
guys think.
So anyway, I'm going to be keeping a very close eye on this case as I have been for
the last two years, and I will definitely keep you posted as everything unfolds.
So let me know what your thoughts are on this case in the review section on Apple, in the
Q&A section on Spotify, or in the comment section over on YouTube.
I just want to know what you think because this case, it just keeps getting messier and
messier.
And if the trial does happen as scheduled in October, we certainly will be covering
it.
So make sure to check back for updates and for all of that trial coverage.
And let's just hope that Ana gets the justice that she deserves,
that she deserves, that her children deserve, that her family deserves, and let's just hope to
that this quagmire looking douche canoe idiot moron freaking dweeb is thrown behind bars for
the rest of his life where he belongs. Only time will tell, right? Allegedly. But alright guys, I will be back with you
on Thursday for Headline Highlights where we are going through everything happening
this week in the true crime world. And of course, I am with you every single Monday
for deep dives into new cases. And if you guys feel like you need even more content
to binge, you want more access, you can check out Patreon, patreon.com slash Annie Elise.
I have exclusive episodes over there. Right now, if you sign up, you can unlock over a hundred exclusive bonus episodes. We do members only live streams
over there. We have a private group chat where we're talking about all of these cases night
and day. We have giveaways. We have annual gifts. All sorts of stuff. So go check it
out. It's patreon.com slash Annie Elise. Don't be left out. Come hang out with all your besties over there. All right guys, thank you for tuning in. Let
me know what you guys think about this case and until the next one, be nice. Don't kill
people. Don't Google anything questionable and don't be a greedy little slimebag. Okay.
All right. Talk to you soon. Bye.