Sex Talks With Emma-Louise Boynton - Sex, Power, Money with comedian, Sara Pascoe
Episode Date: March 21, 2024In this episode, Emma sits down with award-winning comedian and best-selling author, Sara Pascoe, to discuss the topic of her recent book, 'Sex, Power, Money'. Together they explore how capitali...sm shows up in the bedroom, how money shapes modern day relationship dynamics... and why some women still want men to buy them dinner; why there remains so much stigma around those who work in the sex industry and why Sara is still is still afraid of men. Did writing the book help her overcome her own sexism towards men? Listen to find out. Book tickets to the next live recording of the Sex Talks podcast here. And subscribe to the Sex Talks Substack here.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hello and welcome to a live recording of the Sex Talks podcast with me, your host, Emma Louise Boynton.
Sex Talks is dedicated to engendering more open and honest conversations around typically taboo topics,
specifically sex, relationships and the future of intimacy.
Today's episode has been recorded at the London Edition Hotel.
If you'd like to attend a live event in the future, please do head on over to the Eventbrite link in the show notes,
as we have lots of exciting events coming up. Okay, I hope you enjoy the show.
Everyone at the back.
That's my sister, actually.
So you've got to be well-behaved.
First of all, happy International Women's Day.
Thank you all so much for coming this evening.
This is going to be a fascinating conversation.
How could not?
We're talking about sex, money and power.
I am, of course, joined today by Sunday Times best-selling author,
podcast, host, actor, broadcaster, and of course,
award-winning comedian Sarah Pascow as we turn our attention to the issues that truly
mattered to us as humans, sex, power and money. Welcome, Sarah. Hello, welcome to me. Thank you so
much for having me. Hello, hello, hello. Welcome to you. Welcome to me. So Sarah, let's get
started. Let's get these people excited to buy your book or steal it, whichever one they choose to do.
I want to start out by asking, so speaking specifically about sex, power, money. This isn't actually
the book you set out
to write, is it? Because you
wanted to write one on porn from quite
a kind of classical, is that right?
No, that looks wrong. No, it is.
So, I had written Anna Moore, and
that had been
a lot of sort of autobiography
and sort of, I guess, personal
experience, personal responses to things,
but I had started researching
the evolution of the female body,
and I tried to exclude
men from that as much as possible
because it was a book about women. And then I'd
said to my publishers when they had asked
or do you want to write another book
and I had this joke that I would then write
Manimal which was going to be about how the male body
evolved and how the male body was treated in culture
and the idea I sort of pitched was that I was going to
understand male sexuality
I and they
thought I was going to write a book
which was essentially men are disgusting
you know
their arousal or the way they get aroused
by things that have resulted in
things like pornography
which treat women terribly and teach men to treat women terribly the end, you know.
And when I started researching the studies on pornography or studies on male arousal,
I realized that I and a lot of the feminism I had read didn't understand at all and was also
being quite damaging to women in terms of the women who chose to make sexually explicit materials
or sell their bodies.
and then I became much more interested in like the history of pornography
or a lot of the grey areas of transactional sex
and I guess like the patriarchal history of marriage
and then it became that I didn't know what my book was about at all
and my poor editor at one point she got on the floor
and she'd printed out everything I'd ever emailed her
and she was like, can you put it in an order?
Can you put it in an order for me? Where is the book?
Because I just kept saying to it, it's too complicated.
There's like there's this but there's also this on the other side
and also this.
And she was like, oh, for a book, you sort of need an argument.
You need to sort of say, you need to say, this is what I mean, and here's how I prove it.
And I was like, no.
The point is, I think it's really, really, really complicated and lots of things can be true at the same time.
And that's my conclusion.
And so that's what the book became.
And also, I could have researched that topic forever.
And it's very difficult because you do have to sort of at some point stop.
Or your publishers can sue you.
They can sue you for their money back.
Oh, yeah.
Does that happen?
It must do.
Maybe they just put the fear of God into you.
You'll be the first.
You don't want to be the first.
Exactly.
Shamed, publicly shamed.
God, also probably spent the money by that point.
I would have done personally.
So why then did you choose to focus in specifically on the interrelation between sex, power and money?
Because the three seemed to be so interrelated.
So, for instance, if we stick with pornography, a lot of the pornography,
pornography stories the tropes involve disparities of power it seemed like so a very and I'm sure this could be
disproved but there would never was never equals what do I mean by equals it was never two people who are both
university lecturers having sex on a desk it it was so it's always like teacher student you know
stepmom stepson and then I went to this I went to a school in peasant and
to watch workshops they were doing with quite young children, sort of 11-12.
And these workshops were amazing because what they did is they,
because it's very difficult as an adult to talk to children about explicit sex materials,
even though you know that they will have watched them or other students might have shown them things.
Do you mean it's like legally hard?
Or do you mean it's like embarrassing?
I think it's hard because, I think it's hard for parents to find out like, they said what?
So what they did in these groups?
They did lots of talking.
you know, and they asked them
any questions they had,
but they essentially got them to storyboard
their own pornographies.
So the kids were writing their own porn
and then we were talking as a group
about what we thought about the ethics.
So the example I'll give you is that
so these boys are 11
and they had a story about Milakounis
and she was in super drug shoplifting
and the police caught her
and then they had sex in the police car.
So there's lots to discuss
there. And it all comes along to a power dynamic, sort of with 11-year-olds. The story's in porn
that they had already absorbed so many of us. They absolutely understood authority and
powerlessness. Maybe romantically grow up thinking certain things about sex and where it gets
really complicated, but also very interesting is where money and power intersect. Money for such a long
time was why women had to get married. I mean, historically, if you didn't have your own money,
if you couldn't make your own money, if you didn't have choices,
you had to marry someone who did to survive.
And, you know, I know everyone knows this,
but the whole thing of like your father walking you down the aisle
because you were his and now he's giving you away.
You just mentioned there about the power dynamics
and how money is always, kind of money and power
are always kind of intersecting in some way, shape or form
when it comes to sex.
And you gave that example of the young boys
creating this fictional porn scene in which they had Milakunis get married.
Oh dear, a fraudian slip.
I mean they could just get arrested
and have sex
not that different perhaps
than marriage as you describe it. Can you just
tell us a little bit more about what those boys
how they saw that situation
and whether they did see that
as consent? The reason this group was
amazing and they don't exist anymore unfortunately
because it's very, very difficult to get funding
for grown men to go into schools to talk to children
about sex
even though it's absolutely
vital. What's that?
Fundamental. Yeah. I mean...
Always the geography teacher.
Or it's the responsibility is on the parents.
And actually lots of young people want to know about things
but don't necessarily want to hear it from their parents.
And also parents don't feel qualified.
Or are naive that don't actually know what's on the internet or all of it
or what their children might have access to.
So it's really tricky.
It really does need to be handled so that young people are really informed.
So what they did with these kids, so they've written their thing
and they would ask them questions.
They didn't say to them,
Oh, like, here's a power dynamic.
This is unfair.
This is naturally, what we term, enthusiastic consent.
This is coercion.
They said, oh, do you think she wants to do this?
And even that question itself was massive for them and a discussion.
And then they started talking about certain sex acts
and whether they hurt and whether they were supposed to hurt.
And the reason this school in particular had been visited
was because some of the girls in the sixth form
had written an open letter to the head teacher saying,
you have to talk to the boys about porn
because they're asking us to do stuff
and they don't understand
but they think it's the norm
because boys were talking to each other
and you know
I guess like when I was at school
way back in the 90s
boys might have still legged each other on
you know like who's had a blow job
I mean I'm imagining what boys talked about
but you know that kind of thing
but they were
egging each other
other one to do things that you know you'd go to you can go to hospital if you have like an
anal injury there are serious ramifications of it because of people haven't even had a drink
um it's very aware that some people are like unwillingly um unwillingly sober going anal injuries
come on yeah everyone who knows an anal fisher is it's a sex talk i know i know but it still feels a little
early um but essentially that's why it's the education the talking is really important
It's not because it's all about morals
and telling people they shouldn't do things
or to wait until they're married
is actually to make sure that if you know something exists
that it's something you might want to try,
you know about lubrication,
you know about trying things slowly,
you know about seeing what your body is enjoying
or not enjoying, probably not a geography teacher
or a parent you're going to want to have that conversation with.
So go back to your point,
they didn't tell these kids what was wrong with the pornography.
I was sitting there thinking, oh my God,
they just asked them questions, do you think she wants to do this?
So why do she has to do it
Do you think the police are allowed to do things like this in real life?
What would be the problem?
How would you feel?
How would we feel if police asked us if we'd rather go to prison or to have sex in a car?
And their discussion was the point.
It was getting them to think about something while also understanding that porn is fiction.
In the course of then writing this book, I know you said before the kind of your attitude going into writing it initially,
although now I'm kind of seeing this flaw of emails.
and maybe there were many different few points before going to it.
But was one that, I know you spoke about this before,
was kind of rooted in your feminism and thus saw porn as inherently wrong
and as something that was exploitative and objectifying for women.
In the course of writing this book, did your stance change?
Yeah, but immediately it did, because that stance was because I had never watched any porn.
I'd never spoken to anyone who made porn,
and it had been a very easy assumption of its negative and it's negative
and that it's also that it's only used by men.
So it was a very, very black and white, and that's not true.
So the very first thing, like, you could say to someone who has that opinion is,
well, what about the women who choose to make porn?
And they will either diminish those women with some kind of, like,
I mean, there are things that people say, I don't agree with, but they'll say,
brainwashed or damaged or the people say all kinds of certain things that are very very
unfeminist and art respecting so if your bottom line is women should have autonomy and choice
and the next thing is well what if they choose to do something that you don't agree with the
autonomy comes first doesn't it and then in terms of the effects of pornography I thought that
I was going to find all of these studies that prove that teenage boys who watch it have a higher
incidence of becoming rapists I had read a lot in feminism was that men consuming pornography
makes them think of women just as sexual objects.
And so you think you're going to find studies so
that men who watch 100 hours of porn a week
don't think women should be bosses or politicians.
And none of the studies, and they've tried,
none of the studies show that.
If there one day is a really, really good study that does,
and this is the thing about a complex issue,
then I'm wrong, and I'm out of date,
and I'm prepared to be wrong on these things.
But the studies where they've interviewed hundreds
and hundreds and hundreds of men
about what they consumed in terms of pornography,
when they started consuming it, and then they would ask them things
in terms of how they felt about women
and the indicators that a man would be misogynist
He's drunk
were much more likely they would be misogynist
if they were older, white, living rurally and right wing.
They were the people going, I don't think women are good bosses
and there were people who were sort of almost like
you know, addicted to pornography
who didn't have those views, or didn't
say that they had those views.
As you say, it's such a
complex terrain because
as you say, the kind of the feminist argument
for so long has been, or kind of as we know, back
in the, like, kind of 60s, you had a real
kind of stronghold of feminist movement that was saying
that porn was, as I said before,
inherently a bad thing, that porn and
sex work were both just objectifying
women and kind of feeding into quite a misogynistic culture
and thus were so inherently bound up
the patriarchy. And as you say, I think as our
views have progressed and we've been able to recognise the importance of autonomy.
Well, also those views really stigmatised the women involved.
So it becomes that kind of reverse sexism in a way of women then targeting other women.
Yes, attacking other women, publicly making them responsible for male behaviour.
And I think it's Linda Lovelace, who was, she was very briefly anti-porn and she spoke with
feminists. And then afterwards, she said that the feminism industry had treated her a lot
worse than pornography. There was this hard line, an attempt to police female behaviour and any woman,
and this still happens now, you know, there'll be a pop star who wants to dance in a certain
outfit and there'll be other women in the public eye who say, you're objectifying yourself,
you're making men think that this, that and the other, that kind of judgment does still happen,
I think, quite toxicly. I think it's that internalised misogyny that is so rife that I think
we all kind of have to have to recognise. Now, I was listening to something you did earlier in which
She said, as someone who, I think you're 42 now on your early 40s.
About to be 43.
I had to say it so I get used to the idea.
It sounds like a great age to me.
Almost 50.
Almost.
As a woman who's out almost 50.
Yeah, thank you.
No, no, no.
It's good to get used to it.
Who remains close to 40 but can see 50 on the horizon and quite a far off when they're wearing glasses and had kind of long vision.
You kind of the last, kind of swayed people, last generation to grow up, not having access to,
porn in the way that we have it
now. Yeah, well definitely and then
the people around we didn't have it.
So there was, so that impact, that kind of ripple effect
of pornography. How then is someone who
I guess has seen what has been
a really rapid
evolution in the porn industry
as been facilitated
by technology. I mean technology has just changed the way we do
to state the obvious everything
in such a historically short amount of time.
What impact do you think it's
had on our broader sex culture?
I don't think sex changes.
I think it's elastic.
I think it is, it can be moulded.
I don't think it's static in a human being,
but I think human beings in general,
I think they have always been perverts.
I think they've always been serial masturbators.
They have always definitely been criminals, transgressors.
The spectrum of human behaviour,
they've always been necrophiliacs,
there have always been...
Sexuality is...
For human beings,
is an evolved thing that,
leads to, you know, lots of people having children.
And it's a really, really, really strong drive
because having children is so, like, difficult for our species
and looking after them is even worse and birth in them.
Human beings had to really like and want sex in general.
I know that everything's got a caveat in sex.
I know that there are asexual people
and they're obviously homosexuality, which doesn't result in children.
Unless you choose to have children, which you can now.
Everything has a caveat, and I'm so sorry,
because in talking in broad strokes means that you do,
Get it wrong.
And one thing actually of your book is you do loads of footnotes at the end of every page is a footnote.
But by the way, of course, everything in its sense is sort of, once you've said it.
Yeah, there's a caveat because everything is too reductive.
But sexuality is this huge thing in human nature.
So I think they used to say in the 90s that sexuality was leading technology.
You know this?
Like they used to go, oh, it's people's need to want to watch sex in brilliant detail and have a huge variety that led, you know,
The old wives tell about it
It led to the internet.
They led to the internet eventually
But they were like, that's why
The VCR took off and not the JVC
And what was that one?
Beta Max, yes.
Beta Max couldn't do porn
And that's why no one wanted one.
Wow.
No one's dad wanted a beta max
Because you couldn't get dad videos
to watch when the family went to...
So that's the thing they talk about
in the race for technology
that the technology is adapted
very quickly for pornography
were much more popular.
Wow.
So sex has shaped the technological revolution.
But this is the thing about sex.
And obviously, this is why it underlies everything.
It underlies everything.
Even people that you don't have sex with.
I mean, we don't all have sex with each other all the time,
like bonobos do.
But wanting to have sex, finding people attractive,
really sway us as a species.
Has sex always been something you've been really fascinated with?
Yeah.
Do you like having sex, Sarah?
I think it was my complicated feelings about sex.
I knew I wanted to be able to enjoy it very freely.
I knew that that was a sign of a really, I guess, stable human being living their best life, having made good decisions.
I think sex is a really good indicator, actually, of your overall health.
When I went to university, I wanted to go, I was really stupid.
When I was 18, I applied for Cambridge
because I'd seen on the news
that they wanted more working class people.
And I thought that was enough.
Like, I didn't, like, I didn't sort of do any extra reading
or ask the teacher at my sixth form college.
No one from my sixth one college had ever gone to Cambridge.
So I thought, oh, brilliant.
I thought no one else had thought of it.
And I went, and I applied to do philosophy
because I'd read a book by Justin Garda called
Sophie's World and
essentially they have to
interview everyone and I had an interview with probably
the oldest man in the world
and he said
what do you want to do with your life and I said I want to write a book
about sex for my generation
and he said why and I said
it's just really interesting
and I think he would have been prepared for me
to argue and I just didn't have an argument yet
but I did at that point
I did think
probably because technology was sort of changing
the internet had
everyone started getting email addresses and things
I did think that
my generation was suddenly
I think maybe because of just 17 and magazine
more magazine position of the fortnight
I think we
probably like people in the 60s did
I thought we were inventing sex
or reinventing sex
and that it was going to be
that there was a revolution going on
because we weren't prudish like our parents
and I think every
generation of teenagers thinks that
about their parents
There's some children, that's what pornography is because I was doing a gig when I was researching my book
and I asked the audience to come and talk to me in the interval because especially younger people
about when they first found what their first, I guess, interaction with pornography was
and the women your age and slightly older, all of them had been shown two girls one cup
on a phone at school.
Who remembers two girls one cup?
Yeah.
So that's an excerpt from a pornography.
Essentially, boys found it and shared it,
and then we're showing it to girls to make them feel sick,
to upset them, to shock them.
And it is really difficult as a younger person,
and sometimes even as an older person,
you don't have the shelving to store that.
There are so many things you have to know and to understand.
And I often think, I mean, you mentioned to start
that how poor sex education is,
and I mean, I think especially in this country,
really chronically underfunded, under-resourced.
And what that does, and I say it's often at sex talks,
it means that we're not given from a young age a kind of filtering system
with which like which is basically I think kind of a foundational understanding
of what sex is of what consent is of what kind of how to establish your boundaries
how to communicate what the language of sex is and it's not just sex that's a confidence thing
that's about knowing yourself that that education isn't like you know the tropes always
you know put a condom on a banana you know go and get tested if you have unprotected sex
there's a thing about
whatever you
as long as it doesn't hurt other people
whatever you want is right
and getting to know yourself
and what you want is your life's journey
and if ever it makes you feel
uncomfortable or sad, talk to somebody
about it, a professional
or if you're young, an adult
but yeah
the lesson in sex education should be
you can have a really exciting journey
with this through your life, listen to
yourself, you are the person who
will know
and instead it's don't have sex
and if you have sex
you will get chlamydia and you will die
yeah but because because
the adults are so scared on behalf
of the children because they had
incidences like you when you were 12
and they want to protect that
they want to you
I am the reason adults are scared
they're scared or they're scared of people
making decisions or thinking that they
adults know what the world is like
so they want to make sure that a young person
doesn't end up in a situation thinking
they're safe but not being safe or I mean all of those things are terrifying and I think the answer
for such a long time was just we'll tell them to avoid it then for as long as possible and then end up
you don't prepare them properly I mean I have put myself sometimes off having children because I was so
awful and I was so I partied so much and I was exposed to awful things and it makes me sad thinking
about it because then I think I can't bear to have a child knowing that they're out doing those things
although I'd probably have like a really you know maybe like a wonderfully nerdy child who just never went out
and I would like that.
But that I don't have the...
But did you have a lovely time going out?
No, I hated it.
Okay.
No, I really had a lot of anxiety, actually.
Did you?
Yeah, I did.
I don't know why.
I'd be like in thumping clubs, being like...
Not liking it.
Because your friends wanted to go.
My friends were doing it, yeah.
And I know, I am honestly like the poster child of peer pressure.
So this is what parenthood is.
Parenthood is explaining that to your offspring.
And hoping they make better decisions than you.
Yes.
Or at least no.
Oh, yeah, Mom hated this as well.
I didn't want to take all the drugs, but then I took them all.
Did you?
Yeah.
And I didn't want to, but I did it anyway.
I honestly think this is the kind of, this is, that's the kind of chat you can have with your kids.
Yeah, maybe.
If I, if I find someone to, do you know what?
I say, you would really put them off.
If you say, yeah, you can have, you can take some MDMA, but you have to take it with mummy.
And then they'll never, ever want to do it.
That's how you get him to rebel and be like, mom, I want to go to the library.
I was going to be my plan
and my children
so you just said that
and I really resonate that
so sex was something
that they'd been the kind of fascination
with the role that sex plays
in all of our lives
but it plays this kind of unspoken role
so it has such a big impact on all of us
or it kind of shapes so much of our relationship
to ourselves much to other people
our relationship to intimacy relationships
and yet it's still the thing that is like
still laden in taboo
still feels like something we can't talk about openly
there's still that, obviously, with parental relationship,
this embarrassment around this topic.
Take us then to the topics that you explored in the book.
You speak throughout the book about what you described as transactional sex
and explore that in some depth.
Can you describe for us what transactional sex is
and how your own views on it were challenged in the process of writing?
Well, really, I didn't know a lot about sex work at all.
And I think one of the really frustrating things for sex work,
workers is people who are writing books about them to contact them and ask them and then ask
stupid fucking questions because you've got you've got absolutely no ideas so I'm very
very grateful to the people who speak to me and I realized it was just like women in comedy
where people say I've decided to write my dissertation about how women are funny actually
which happens on a daily basis it's like to be a woman and to be funny yeah so and I think
there's a very similar thing with not platforming people to speak about their own experience
and speaking on their behalf, which was the first thing I realised,
which is why I did a podcast interviewing people
so that it wasn't me putting their words into my own words
or, you know, making money off their life experiences, those kind of things.
So, again, incredibly complex.
Lots of caveats.
But transactional sex in general, I realised, was massive
because, yes, the broad strokes are someone paying you to have sex
or you paying someone else for a sexual act.
But then it sort of distills down all the way down to,
a man paying for dinner, man buying drinks, man paying for a certain amount of drinks or a certain
amount of dinner where you feel there is some kind of performative obligation.
Men thinking if they've paid for a certain amount of drinks or dinner, that there will be some
recompense. And that's the really dark thing now, is that those two things might not be aligned
at all. So I became quite obsessed with stories in the paper about online dating going
minorly wrong. So here's an example. A few of the tabloids ran a story about a man who had gone on a
Tinder date, or an equivalent, like an app date with a woman to cost a coffee. And she had ordered
the most expensive coffee, £3.50. And then he'd said, I'm getting a waitrose delivery. Do you want to
come back to my house and meet you dinner? She said, no, thank you. I don't actually think you and I click.
And so he asked her for the £3.50 back. And she had written, maybe she'd posted it online.
first but they were writing this article like look at this skin flint wants his
three pound 50 back but the point wasn't the three pounds 50 the point was he
thought that there was a transaction happening which is you don't say yes to a man
paying for you unless you think you might want to spend some time with them not
necessarily get naked with them even but giving him more of a chance not just
going yeah not you and there were there are lots of stories like that in the
tabloids from the time where I guess updating was new but also there would be
stories like so there's a program called first dates which lots of you will have watched and they're
obsessed with they're obsessed with the bill coming in heterosexual couples and they're obsessed with it
and there's one episode where an older man insists on going halves with the woman and she finds him
I mean she thinks she's talking in her talking heads saying how rudy is how disrespectful he was to
her expecting her to pay half and and and but there are other ones where and and and again
that's got into the press. If either the man says, well, I think it's fair that, you know,
we both ate. We both ate it. Yes. Yeah. And why would you eat it? If you didn't bring your
purse with you. Like, I find, I find it, but I know, but for other people, they were told that
is a mark of respect or that is how someone shows you that they like you. But for me,
it feels worryingly infantilising and you, we are telling men something. We're giving men mixed messages.
if as a society we're saying we are equal to you we can do everything that you can do
we haven't been given enough of a chance please respect us but also i'll have um some carbonara
and large glass of wine and a tiramisu but um but also so so should you always put the bill
well i'm not telling anyone what to do what do you think as kind of the i i think you can talk to
the person you're with about how they feel about money how they feel about money how they feel about
money what it makes them feel about themselves paying for someone's dinner makes you feel
fucking amazing when you like someone and you get to go this is on me or i've had a lovely time
and i i have liked paying for some people's dinners so much so it's not because it's a bit of a
power trip i think it's a treat oh yeah i find it a power but not in like a really cynical way
but i can kind of see like i feel like i've been robbed of that power previously when men have
definitely like assert themselves in pain because it is really like I feel like powerful and in
I'm like no and it's and it's difficult because if you did meet someone who you really liked who
thought you even offering was like how dare you this is a man's job that's quite I feel for both
of you in that situation because he has been told that there's a there's a correct way to be a man
and that you are emasculating him somehow by wanting to pay for yourself wanting to pay for both of you
and so the situation that several of my friends in including
myself is that if you have a long-term relationship with a man where you earn a lot more than them
here's hoping well but but that also then comes with ramifications because they they have been told
by society that there's something wrong with that and and and so there isn't so there's a flip side to
it where um big old caveat that it's really shit for men and it's and i think it's shit for men
in certain jobs i think it's shit for men who like love their work but will never have a massive
pay increase and you said on the phone the other day you were talking about like hashtags about
like marrying rich and certain kind of things that have happened again in every generation there
have been women who want to exchange being good looking for a man's money and if I was a man
I would be so furious I would I understand the men who are furious and see feminists want everything
they want this and then also I'm being told that this is the correct way to be a man I'm actually
just looking at now because I was, I think I was reading that part of your book, in which you
discuss the, um, the economics of dating and then happened to look at TikTok and I fell upon
the hashtag dating up, um, which has got 4.9 million views on TikTok. So define, so what is dating
up? So dating up and hashtag dating rich, she's got 6.8. So that is this trend on TikTok that has
women talking about actively seeking men with money and I agree in seeing that and it feels like there's
this kind of I guess it's like pushback to the feminism and the independence that we have
perhaps grown up with in thinking that no as women our financial independence is such a
important important part of our overall freedom and thus to be to see this conversation
garner so much attention
and warrant kind of, I guess, quite a lot of praise online
of what's often seems kind of a younger generation.
I think what they probably, a lot of people don't understand
who are probably having lots of fun with that kind of hashtag
is that I think they think you could be independent
and have someone else give you their money.
Can you not be independent, have someone give you their money?
I think you have reduced choices.
And the biggest example I use is that if you do cohabit with someone
or you're married and cohabit,
it's a lot more difficult to leave if they're paying your rent
it is a lot more difficult to leave if like they've bought yourself
I mean it's difficult to leave we our lives you know interact in so many ways
that any kind of breakup can be very difficult to extricate yourself from
but imagine not being able to afford to leave and and that's what you wouldn't want for
people go no no I'm unhappy but it's I don't have an option or I'll have to save up
first or or change my life or change my working circumstances I think that
That's the very unromantic side.
But to link to that, I had no idea about things like sugar babies
and there is a male equivalent where, again, it's a much more, I guess,
open transaction.
There are rich people who wants to have fun dates and or sex with good-looking, interesting
people and find it a lot cleaner to just give financial gifts.
then to have to meet people and then explain,
I do have a wife,
but also I would love to see you in a hotel once every six weeks
or all those kind of things that those transactions
can take place and be above board and honest
and both people get what they want.
I actually worked for a sugar daddy once.
Did you?
Not as a sugar baby.
I did not earn enough money.
But I worked as his research.
He was a political, he ran a polster company in New York.
It was the weirdest job I've ever had.
I was researching foreign affairs in Russia for writing this report, but I used to sit in his
home office, and I would just hear from his beleaguered secretary who he would just constantly
shout at, so he was constantly crying in the kitchen, Kendall, and then there was also Ken
who was next to me, who's the other researcher, so it was Emma, Ken, and Kendall. But he was basically,
he had these sugar babies, one in L.A. and one in New York, and he basically, like, from a money
perspective had them signed on as
employees of the company but they didn't have to do anything
and he would just go and visit them whenever he
was in LA whenever he was in it and they would like get
cars and apartments
and everything and one of them like wrote off a car
with him the first week. Not to be a bitch because it's not
all about how you look he's the most hideous man I've ever seen
in my whole entire life and
also hideous inside and out
like a bad bad seed
but these women apparently were like young
attractive 26 years I mean it's hard
to live in America it's like healthcare and
money, and I could kind of understand, but not with him.
Well, this is where the slippery slope comes, because if everyone who's doing transactional
sex absolutely goes, that's worth my money, I would rather, there are people who would say,
I would much rather spend two hours having sex with someone I don't fancy, then have to work
all day long in a job that I don't enjoy, or that makes me feel unhealthy, or that makes me feel
suicidal.
I want to live in a world where people have those choices, but where money becomes involved,
especially when other people have lots of money
and the people selling their sexual behaviours
or sexual actions
don't have a lot of money,
they then becomes this thing of having to
and obligation and financial coercion because of that.
Again, if you have overheads that you need to meet,
suddenly it's not so, I don't feel so...
I don't want to cheerlead that empowerment
because I feel that that's horrible for people.
Because people aren't making the decision to sell sex of their own volition.
It's from economic circumstances.
But then there's a very good counter argument which people do use,
which is like most people don't like their jobs.
And most people then...
And I think that's horrible too.
I hate the idea that people...
I guess a big problem that differentiates that and you articulate this in the book
is that with underpaid, you may hate the job,
but it doesn't come with a social stigma that is attached to a lot of sex work
is still so prevalent. There was a piece of research that it was published last month that found
that one in five people think sex work should be stigmatized. Women were substantially more
like than men to think sex work should be shunned, with 27% saying this, compared to 17% men.
52% of those polls would not be willing to be friends with someone who currently works a porn star,
while 46% would not be friends with someone who works as a sex worker or an escort. And it's worth
noting that 95% of sex workers in the UK are women. So again, it's that real
mum. There's a really, really big overlap with mothers actually as well. And that stigma isn't
just like, oh, people are mean. It has huge ramifications. People have their children taken off
them. They have to keep their life secret. And it includes people who strip and other certain
jobs that are thought of as sexual. And it is awful when it feels like there's a lot of women.
And I do think it's naivety and lack of education on this subject. And not hearing from the people
who do those jobs and why they do them.
When I was growing up, the received wisdom was that these were like women out to get your husband
or like, and all of that kind of, so it was really like women against women.
Like if you don't give it to him at home, he's going to come and go out and buy him.
He's going to come and give me 60 pounds.
And that pit women against each other.
It's that scarcity minds, I think, that is so inherent to patriarchy, that's like divide
and rule.
It's saying there's never enough for you women, so you need to fight one another to get the scraps.
And also that it's a male right to have it no matter what.
And this is where, again, the thing about rich men can buy it,
but what about men who don't have those kind of earnings?
So it's giving them very dangerous messages as well.
And you interviewed, obviously, you interviewed loads of people for the book,
and then you interviewed a whole range of really fascinating people for the podcast.
What did you find were the most kind of common misconceptions and prejudices
that people who worked in the sex business that they faced and what they did?
so the drugs involved the fact that you can take prep now
which means that if you have a lifestyle or a job
or a partner who is HIV positive
you can take medication that means that you won't get HIV
that feels like the most important information in the world
and lots of people don't know that and I didn't know that
so that was a massive piece of education for me
I guess it's that people are
just exactly like you and the people you know,
they just made different life choices.
There's also a massive overlap with people who choose to do sex work
and people who maybe would find an everyday job,
even just an office job difficult for ability reasons.
You know, might have ME or chronic pain.
There are certain things that you don't even consider
that that might narrow someone's choices down.
And they might then think, well, actually, if I'm a dominatrix,
that's going to be a lot easier for me.
and there are a lot of people
I'm so glad I didn't forget this
the most massive thing is that our laws in this country
don't allow sex workers to protect themselves
so the most sensible thing for lots of sex workers
would be if they could choose someone
or a couple of other people and work together
and our laws call any situation
where more than one sex worker is working at a place
we call it a brothel and that's illegal
which means that sex workers are made to work in isolation
which makes them much more dangerous
and, again, not able to make their own decisions.
So that was a really massive thing for me to understand
and then want to want other people to understand
because quite childishly,
you always assume your government
just wants the best for everyone.
And...
Don't have you seen, Rishi Sunak's banned vaping!
We're all going to be so much better off.
Has he banned vaping?
Is that today?
No.
So I'm really out of touch.
Oh, he's got two big...
I thought they were taxing vaping more.
So I think he was banning it now.
No, they're getting rid of vapes.
So we are in an economic crisis.
We're at war.
There's some pretty shit stuff going on.
And there's two things that were really kind of top of policy.
Getting rid of vaping and then cracking down on trans women in NHS wards when there have been zero complaints thus far of trans women in NHS wards.
So there's two kind of hard-hitting policies for the people.
Really pleased about that.
So just moving on, sorry, you mentioned, I think you touched on this very briefly at the beginning when I want to return to
this, that you're, I don't want to put sexism in your mouth, but you said it actually
in the book. It was kind of your inbuilt, kind of reverse sexism against men that actually
was kind of the starting point for the initial concept for the book. Well, it is sexism,
but I'm scared of men. Yes. I think men are scary. And I've been scared since I was a
teenage girl. They are. I'm probably a child. And then when I was a teenager, and that's why
I wanted to study male sexualities, that when I realized, when I felt, and I'm not
saying this in an arrogant way, anyone who's been a teenage girl would feel this.
When I felt adult men changing their behaviour around me as a really young girl,
and especially I started to feel unsafe in certain situations and unsafe in public,
there's a thing where, you know, if you're, I mean, I definitely, definitely didn't look
of age when I was 11 or 12, but I would like, and I think this is true of any teenage girl,
If I was reading a book at a bus stop or a loan,
I had to get a train to school in my school uniform.
And I had men rubbing erections on me.
But even like the constant stuff that's much lower down,
like just men coming up going, what you're reading,
like demanding your time of you,
that there were just things about them that they,
and I also knew the monstrous possibilities,
which I'm not saying that all men perpetrate,
but the potential of that perpetration
meant that all of them to me felt like,
I can't believe we have to share spaces with them
I do actually remember
an ice cream valve when I was 12
me and my friend would always ask
a free ice cream
he said if you flash me
one boob you can get a free ice cream
and I literally just had those like
pointy nipples at that point
and I was like this is just like
The problem of this story isn't your boobs
no no sorry
that's so true
it wasn't that your boobs weren't
good enough for an ice cream
I was so right
my boobs were good enough for an ice cream
but it was a deeply problematic
dynamic it highlights. I understand we were saying that. And I don't think there's anyone who's, I don't think
there's anyone, there's any, like, you know, someone who identified as female and went through
their teenage years as a, as a girl who doesn't have stories like that. And so you, and you say
at the start of the book that kind of you have had this latent fear of male sexuality, which, as you
say, we can, I think a lot of women can relate to, you can understand. But you wanted through the
course of writing this book to challenge that view. Yeah.
Did you successfully challenge your sexism towards men?
Yes and no.
Yes and no.
I think, oh God, if I say like, I love men,
I sound like the kind of man who says,
oh, I love women and they're a misogynist.
So I don't want to say insincerely.
It's not me accusing any individual man of all man's atrocities,
just like I wouldn't accuse any individual woman
of all of the horrible things that women have done
and are capable of.
I think I still find something quite terrifying
about the force and veracity of male sexuality.
And to go really that, war is the example of that.
I think we are animals and have evolved behaviours.
And some things, the beautiful thing is that we have civilisation
on top of it and learn behaviours.
And I love the theory.
this is more positive that we're a self-domesticating species,
that we pick lovers, we pick mates who are good,
you know, in general to humanity.
We don't choose monstrous partners on purpose.
And I really love that that's what's happening to humanity in general.
We are becoming, and it's a horrible time to be saying this,
but we are becoming gentler as a species, at a species level.
And I really, really want to believe that and hope that it's true.
I think that they're, and this is not me saying of every single man,
but the potential in them is different for violence and sexual violence
than women have in general.
That's why I say.
And that does feel sexist to say,
because I am saying they're worse than us.
And I mean, you did write at one point in the book that,
you know, even though your views on sex work had shifted quite dramatically
and had, through the research you'd done the book,
you still hated the men who bought sex.
Yeah, because part of my plan was to interview sex buyers
about their backgrounds and what they wanted
and then after speaking to sex workers,
even people who chose to do it,
they would still talk about boundary pushers,
which is what they talk about people doing things
they've told them that they don't want to do
or are not part of the service, people,
and that's assault.
They call it, I mean, I was told the term boundary pushing,
but it is assault.
And then also how, yeah,
and then I just became very uninterested in the,
sex buyer, actually. I thought
that's not, I'm not fascinated
in, and yeah, I am too
judgmental towards them.
You couldn't go in as an interviewer
and fairly interview someone
who is buying sex because you're... No, because I
just felt so strongly. She doesn't want
to have sex with you, mate.
How is that sexy? She thinks you're disgusting.
Just give her the money. Go home.
It's like that's seen in poor things. Does anyone see in poor
things? I just found it quite a deeply
problematic film and was actually shocked that it
was reviewed so highly.
But there is that scene where this guy comes in and he's just picking it.
He picks her and she's like, he doesn't give a shit that she has no interest because
his money does, in that context, speak louder than...
Here's one of the things that I hadn't quite made sense of until I was researching the
book, which is that female sexuality, as far as I know, and I can't speak for every woman,
but we are aroused by someone finding us arousing.
that's a really big part of it.
I'm definitely turned on when people think I'm hot.
Yeah, they like you, you like them,
that itself is part of the turn-on.
And if someone wasn't aroused by us,
that wouldn't turn us on more.
We wouldn't be turned on
by someone who we actively didn't
want to have sex with us,
whereas men can be.
And sometimes for men,
that's the thing they want.
There are very attractive men
who could have sex and relationships,
and that's not what they want someone
who's not willing.
They want to pay someone
to pretend that it's
the thing where I became very
I can't get fascinated in where that comes from
because that makes me not want to be alive
and that's on a kind of a biological level
there is a difference between men and women in that
I know and I feel horrible saying that
because I don't think there is I think there's a
we're all on spectrums and I'm sure that there are
when I was researching like I couldn't find
female fetishist
fetishists sorry
and so I wanted to write you know
it's men why it's only men who are like
wants to see and pay for pictures of feet and they...
I'm desperate for a man to pay for pictures of my feet.
I think I have quite nice feet.
Go on, Only fans.
You will get people who will give you money now, but...
They'll like it.
They like...
They like... They like... They don't want beautiful feet, is the thing.
There's like, whole account they're obsessed with...
That's because you're the closest view of my...
No, semi-pedicured feet.
So there were certain things where I'd think, oh, it's just a male thing,
but then that was... it felt wrong to the women who I'm sure...
are out there really into feet
that I would say those kind of
sweeping statements and I was trying really hard not to do
that. There's another thing I learned
which I didn't know is like you don't yuck someone else's
yum like everything is
sexy to someone and it's not
for you to go like oh
you get turned on by that because as long as it's not
hurting anyone that's fantastic
with the race of research you did you weren't able to successfully
challenge that I guess that fundamental
fear of male sexuality
and I guess that
I kind of had to sit with that
for a bit because I think particularly now we are in such a tumultuous time when it comes to gender
relations or at least it feels like that and perhaps I think social media is this massive
amplification technology which means I guess we're so hyper aware of like the worst aspects of our
culture and of our society but there was a piece of new research done recently I'm sure some people
saw by kings that found that boys and men from gen z are more likely than older baby boomers
to believe that feminism has done more harm than good and one in four UK males age 16 to 29
believe it's harder to be a man than a woman.
A fifth of those who'd heard of Andrew Take
looked on him really favourably.
Do you think now, kind of I guess,
given the research you've done,
given where you still have that sense of fear,
do you feel like we are living through,
is this a kind of,
are we seeing a bit of a kind of pushback
on the feminism that has progressed our gender relations?
And that's the kind of a natural thing
because if you think of how much change has happened
in quite a short space of time,
there was always going to be that pushback
on the kind of pendulum shift.
Or do you think we're actually seeing something
much more kind of sinister and dangerous ahead of us?
I think that feminism has always had a pushback
and I think some of it is because people don't really understand
what feminism is.
You know, there's some really bad examples of feminists and feminism.
You could just be absorbing those
and then on that questionnaire they're not really explaining
like, why feminism, I mean, you know,
women can leave abusive relationships
and have the power to earn as much as you.
I don't think a quarter of those young men would say no to those kind of things.
It's been kind of a bad branding.
I just think maybe the social media is the thing.
We see a lot of comments on things, you know, as in like underneath.
And I think the negative is really amplified everywhere.
So we all think the world is getting worse.
We all think everyone is, there's an impossibility of being more positive.
And I don't even know how useful I think studies like that are,
because that's it's just fodder for the press to do a headline in a very basic article
and they never tell you oh we asked 18 people they will tell you the statistic of 25% of men under 25 think
25% of 10 people think this yeah and and so sometimes they're not very big studies and they
the way that they're phrased a question is misleading or people aren't answering them very seriously
like if it's like students in a campus bar like quite often it's students that they'll study
study. So there were lots of qualifiers I would have within it. But then of course, yes, you do have
people like Andrew Tate, energizing men, especially young men in different kinds of opinions and
ways of thinking. But I do think that's always happened as well. I think there's always been
that, you know, it's a wave, it goes in, it goes out. We're just more hyper, wherever. And I guess
also now the algorithm also does play a really big role in that we're actually just serving,
and the algorithm does serve up content very specifically. So you're targeting young people,
so you're having this very targeted kind of constant diet.
of Andrew tape type characters
to a specific demographic and also being told
that it's a zero-sum game
being told that if someone else
who was frequently sort of
disenfranchised has more rights
you lose them and I think that's
and that's the dangerous thing about the way
that those stories are reported
online for clicks but newspapers also now
work in the same way
and have become increasingly tabloid
and want to appall people
and shock them and have them commenting
and sharing to say it's terrible. We live in a kind of crisis
a culture of crisis now, it's everything,
as a headline and a kind of breaking news store,
and it's all that kind of trying to grab our attention,
which has become the most valuable commodity.
I'm conscious of not wanting to become an amplification machine
for the more deleterious aspects
or more kind of damaging aspects of our society,
because I know there was a lot of kind of positive stuff
that you discovered in writing the book as well,
and I'd love to draw on those briefly now before we wrap up.
In writing the book and the research you did,
was there anything that,
was a kind of positively surprising for you.
Does anything that kind of changed your mind or kind of shifted,
made you feel, I guess, a little bit more,
I want to say, positive, excited about the future
of where kind of sex, gender dynamics are taking us?
Anything that you felt?
Well, the fact that women do have financial autonomy
in our country and in many, many countries
is a hugely positive thing.
And if you're born into it, you can't really appreciate it
because it seems like the basic,
the basic thing that yeah
if you get marriage you're allowed to leave them
that you are allowed to have a mortgage
and a bank card and apply for jobs
we would consider those things human rights
and absolutely basic but they aren't in other places in the world
and they weren't here several generations ago
in some living people's lifetimes so
I do think that's hugely positive
not that we should go oh we're allowed to vote
let's be quiet but the conversations
that we're having are because we are allowed
to voice our opinions, voice our dissent, voice our unhappiness, say that there's more to do.
And then that conversation, you know, sometimes we don't, often, we aren't all in agreement,
but what we are in agreement about is that the world can be better, our society can be better,
we are so privileged, we are the luckiest people, we have to be as happy as we can be,
and we also have to be intersectional, and we have to understand, we've got these huge lessons
to learn, to be better, but the fact that so many of us want to is really positive, I think.
Every time I come to a event, the fact that anyone leaves the house, actually,
I find astounding, and there's just so much good stuff on TV.
And a lot of the gigs I do, because I do stand-up comedy for my job.
And most of them are, like, for charities or foundations.
And you just realize so many people just want to do whatever they can,
and they're busy, and they've got their own lives to concentrate on,
but they do want the world to be better.
They don't want people to be suffering.
That is really hugely positive.
And actually something that really stood out to me in the book,
because you mentioned at one point
that there's a stat that says
couples in which the woman
out earns the man,
there's a higher rate of divorce.
And people were quite horrified by that
and thought, oh, you know, this isn't a positive thing.
But actually, it's like they have the choice to leave.
Yeah.
And that is...
It was reported in a way of like, see, that's what happens
if you earn more women, you lose your man.
Yeah, bitch.
And I was just read it and thought,
oh, that's because you can go.
Because you can say, oh, I don't love you anymore.
And just finally,
did learning more about, I guess,
the relationship dynamics and how they're shifting as we as women become more economically
independent as our kind of power dynamic shift did that change your perspective on monogamy
and whether you think that is an enduring relationship structure i never thought monogamy was an
enduring relationship structure and history has proved me right but you're a but you're you're
anti-marriage yeah but you're married right how did how how do you know how can
You walk us through this one.
I can, I can, but I don't want my husband to get deported.
He has ADHD.
He didn't apply for his visa in time.
I was basically forced into marrying him.
Now, I do like him very much.
I do like him very much.
He didn't want to get married either, just so you know.
We didn't have a wedding.
And I wanted to write stand up about it, but I was worried that he would get deported.
If I said it, so, and we do, we do, you know, he's my boyfriend and we've had children,
but we wouldn't.
have got married and he had also he'd been married previously and didn't want to get married again
so definite proof on the monogamy thing the trouble is you can love someone so so much and you can
really mean this is forever life is so long and people change so much and making that promise doesn't
mean you should then be miserable because you promised it when you were 24 you were 32 or 55 it's so much
better for everyone and I know that your parents are still together not to out you but and there's
There's something quite, with all of the, and I know for some people it can be very upsetting your parents breaking up and not liking each other and all those kind of things, but it also teaches you, you don't have to be miserable with someone. You are allowed to leave and try to be happier. And that should be the story around divorce. Divorce is really, really, really old-fashioned. It should be celebrated as a... It's really, really old. And it's really fun. I think people have a lot of fun getting married and a lot of fun with weddings, and I'm not trying to take that away.
divorced? I think some people do as well. I think where they then realize it doesn't make,
it's not a, life doesn't end. It wasn't a failure. It's not a failure. Relationships do end.
And for some people, they, they die first. But for other people, hooray, you're still alive.
As someone then who's been a serial monogamous and is now married, but didn't want to get married,
what then is your top piece of advice for anyone in this room who is looking for?
love. I do believe
the cliche that if you are looking
for love
I worry
it's because it's a low
self-esteem. Just a little bit of like
I need to be validated by love
I need to be loved more to be
happy or to think I'm good enough and there are things you can do
yourself, you can't do, you can't choose the moment where
you're going to fall mad in love and fancy someone
but you can choose
and I know this is really hard to like yourself
for a little bit more.
And if that feels really, really hard,
then it's even more important
that you do it, I think.
Well, a very positive note
to end that on.
Huge round of applause, Sarah.
Thank you so much for listening
to this live recording of the Sex Talks podcast
with me, your host, Emma Louise Boynton.
This was recorded at the London Edition Hotel.
If you'd like to attend Sex Talks Live,
head on over to the Eventbrate link in the show notes.
we have lots of exciting live events coming up.
And finally, if you've enjoyed the show, I hope you have,
please don't forget to rate, review and subscribe
on whatever platform you're listening to this on.
So apparently it helps others to find us.
Have a wonderful day.
