Shaun Newman Podcast - #272 - Cal Washington

Episode Date: May 30, 2022

Co-Founder & CEO of InPower which aims to give people authority over their body & home. He spent 6 months in jail, Swat called to his house & speaks openly that the Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms has never come into effect.  Let me know what you think Text me 587-217-8500  Support here:⁠ https://www.patreon.com/ShaunNewmanPodcast⁠

This is Zubi. This is Brett Wilson. This is Brian Pectford. This is Keith Morrison. This is Tim McAlloff of Sportsnet. This is Dr. Peter McCullough. This is Daryl Sutter and welcome to the Sean Newman podcast. Welcome to the podcast, folks.

Happy Monday. Hope everybody's had a great weekend. This episode is from back in September. I was scrolling through all the recordings I had and I stumbled across this one and I'm like, when did that get released? and somehow I didn't release it. So I thought, what better time than a year later? Not quite.

You get the point. I hope you enjoy it. But before we get there, let's get to today's episode sponsors. Canadians for Truth are a nonprofit organization consisting of Canadians who believe in honest integrity and principal leadership and government as well as the Canadian Bill of Rights, Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Rule of Just Laws. Their core values, of course, the sovereignty of Canada, the truth in journalism. I hold that one up high.

the truth in medical ethics, the truth in government, protecting our children in their future, and the 1947 Nuremberg Code. If these things stick out to you, head over to Canadiansforthr.net, 4-spelt, f-O-R.net, Canadiansfor-truth.net to find out more. The team over at Prophet River, Clay Smiley, they're specialized in importing firearms from the United States of America and pride themselves in making the process as easily as humanly possible for you, the customer. They do all the appropriate paperwork on both sides of the border to legally get the firearm into Canada and into your hands. All you got to do is go to Profitriver.com to find out more or stop into their new location here in Lloydminster, and they will get you hooked up.

They are the major retailer of firearms, optics, and accessories serving all of Canada. Tyson and Tracy Mitchell, well, spray season is upon us. They are the Michko Environmental, of course. They're family-owned operation providing professional vegetation management services for both Alberta and Saskatchewan and the oil field and industrial sector since 1998. They're always hiring, so if you're interested in getting a job, I keep pushing on all you summer students. Give them a call 780-214,000 for this guy included once upon a time, sprayed oil leases. And I tell you what, you want to work some hours, you want to get some money, head over to MitchcoCorp.com.

or once again give them a call 780214, 4,004, and they will get you hooked up and away are off to the races. Gartner Management is Lloydminster-based company specialized in all types of rental properties to help meet your needs. Whether you're looking for a small office or a larger commercial space, give Wade a call 7808085025, and if you're heading into any of these businesses, make sure you let them know you heard about them from the podcast, right? Now, onto that ram truck rundown brought to you by auto-clearing Jeep and Ram,

the Prairie's trusted source for Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Ramp, Fiat, and all things automotive for over 110 years. He's the founder and CEO of the in power movement. I'm talking about Cal Washington. So buckle up. Here we go. Welcome to the Sean Newman podcast. Today, I'm joined by Mr. Cal Washington.

So first off, sir, thanks for hopping on. Oh, thanks for having me, Sean. I'm excited to be here and it should be fun. Fun is what this is all about. I love learning new things. and I've heard off and on about, you know, universal law, common law, all these different things. I've heard, like, I'd never heard about it until this year. And now I'm starting to hear more about it coming from different sources, different spots.

And I had a video sent of yours to me. And I started watching it. And I was just like, I'm just fascinated. But I literally know zilts about it. So I can't even sit here and talk like I'm going to, I don't know. I guess I just want you to tell your story and hopefully I know it will spur on questions and we'll just see kind of where it goes. So maybe you could tell the listener a little bit about your journey and where it's led you. Okay.

Well, it started with a divorce and I was compelled and I mean compelled to appear in court over and over and over. and I had a I had a preconceived idea of what court was. You know, my idea was from TV or whatever, wherever I got it from, but that it was about justice and finding the truth and, you know, coming to a point of justice and truth in the rulings. And what I found was that was not what was going on in there. It was very one-sided and very aggressive. And they weren't even listening to me or my ex-wife.

The lawyers had it at first because we had lawyers. And it was just a dog and pony show. And I was like, what's going on in here? Like, what is happening? And, you know, my lawyer and my ex-wife's lawyer were working together. against both of us. And it's just like, what, what is this? And so I just started asking a question. Yeah, go ahead. So I guess when you say they were working together and weren't listening to you, could you provide like what you mean by that? It's, it was nothing I could put my finger on,

but it was it was more the posture of the court and the judges. They didn't seem to care about, like, actual facts. Like, it just didn't. matter. It was more like, yeah, I got to listen to this because I got to get to this other thing. It was really noticeable to me that that was the case. They were just like, okay, whatever, whatever, okay, yeah, oh, yeah, whatever. Okay, yeah, yeah. Oh, yeah, you lied. Okay, yeah. So what? Can we move on? Like, we got to get to, we got to get through this to get to, to get to something. And I was like, what's happening in here? So once the lawyers got our house, they, dropped both of us and we were now self-litigant.

Just, that's just how it went. And, you know, orders weren't written up to sell the house even. And like, it was just left, we were just left high and dry once they got all the money that they could perceive that they could get. It was, that was it. Like, don't care anymore. Like, it doesn't matter. Good luck. And, but the court kept going on. It turned turned into a child support thing. And I don't want to get into, you know, the whole divorce thing. but it was the catalyst because I saw something was wrong in there or something was something else

was going on in there that I couldn't quite put my finger on it. It took a while to to understand what it was, but it was just that. I kept asking questions about like what's happening here. Like, why are you asking me that question? Why did you say that? I would talk to the judge just like that, right? And a couple of judges spurred me on. and I didn't even understand that.

What did they, when you say there was a couple things, I'm always curious, is there something back then when you think back on it that was said that you're just like, that literally makes no sense, but you can't understand it. Like I get that feeling. I think a lot of people get that feeling right now. I mean, the world we're living in, everybody's got either trust or gut or doesn't,

but your gut kind of like, huh, I don't know what that's about. When you look back at that, was there something that was said in the, courtroom that you just went, that doesn't make any sense. Yeah. And one, one of them was, a judge said, you seem, you seem very sophisticated, Mr. Washington, keep going. And I went, what do you mean keep going? What, what am I doing? Like, I'm just asking questions because I'm a little puzzled here. But she said, keep going. In other words, I guess the questions I was asking

were going to lead to something. And she knew it. I didn't know it. But she said, keep going. I'm like, what? Like, what does that mean? I don't even know what you're talking about. And so, and I can remember that I'm telling me I had to declare bankruptcy. And I'm going, where am I? I said, what country am I in that you're sitting up there telling me I have to go bankrupt? Like, where are we?

What, what's happening here? Like, I don't have to go bankrupt. And I didn't. But it was just a lot of weird things. Like they just didn't care about either me or my wife or my kids. It was, you know, when I look back, I can see what it was now. They wanted that order. They want the child support order.

And the reason why they want that is because it's, it is a bill of exchange. Now, I didn't know that at the time. I know it now. So it falls under the definition of a bill of exchange. and a bill of exchange has to have a date. Somebody owes somebody a certain, some certain, so there has to be like a monetary thing in there. So those two things, this party owes that party,

X amount of dollars, and a signature. In Canada, and actually in the world, under law merchant, that is money. The piece of paper is money. And I know that sounds really odd, and it is odd, but that's the fact of the matter. So you can look up the definition of a bill of exchange, and it'll tell you what that is. And a child support order is a bill of exchange. So the piece of paper is the money for all the child support paid by a father to the mother.

There's the two parties, X amount of dollars per month until the children are 19. The whole amount is that's the piece of paper. it has that value. And, you know, it has a different market value. Like people will buy those types of pieces of paper at a discounted rate. But regardless, they're creating money in there off child support. And so this is what I was seeing, but I didn't know that I was seeing it. I was just like, what are you, you guys got something else going on like that you're just

trying to get to. And now I see what it is. So it's that bill of exchange. And if for those in Canada, it's really easy to see because I grew up in Canada, you can look up section 30 of the Bills of Exchange Act. And then you can look up the definitions in the Financial Administration Act. And you can see that a bill of exchange is defined as money. So you look up the definition of money in the financial administration act. It says bill of exchange.

There it is. And so the whole banking system is based on that. All the credit cards are based on bills of exchange. So we're creating money on the spot every time we do something like that. When you get a mortgage, that debt document is money to the bank. They put it in their asset thing because you owe it. So it just goes as an asset and then they can lend out against that. you know, 10 or 100 times.

And that's the whole, the whole system is based on this. It's all off this old, merchant law system of bills of exchange, where the merchants were writing these, these kind of pieces of paper, and everybody believed that they had the value that they said there, they were,

because these guys were noble or they looked rich or whatever, right? Whether they had the money or not, was not even thought of. But they could write a bill of exchange, put it out in the marketplace, and then I would go, yeah, okay, that's good. I know that guy, I recognize him. He must have the money. And then I would take that piece of paper and go and buy something else with it. And the next guy would go, oh, yeah,

you got this debt from there, yeah. But nobody would ever go and get the debt. So these paper would just float around. And if you understand that, then you can start to see what, you know, the fee of dollars are. They're just pieces of paper that are floating around that we all believe that have some kind of value. But it's just a bill of exchange. change. And if everybody went at all at the same time and said, what do I get for this? They wouldn't have it. They don't have it. Like it's just, it's fictitious. And so that's the whole system. So that's what I was seeing, you know, back in the beginning, but I didn't know what it was. I could just tell that there was something else. There was another agenda going on in that

court. And so once I learned all that, and I learned more, I started to be able to use that against them. Because if they, if they're saying that my child support order or any other pieces of paper that I sign is money, therefore I can start to write my own pieces of paper to my own benefit, not to get something, but to use against the court.

That's, that, that was my, my, my whole motivation. So that's how my story, he started and then there was years of this, you know, battling back and forth and eventually they left me alone because I got them in a huge debt. You're hurting my brain right now. I know.

Can we talk? I'd listen. When you talk about this being in court and starting to like be like something's off here. I'd heard you say they sent SWAT to your house at some point. Yes. What happened there? Well, initially, you know, because I started to learn some of the things that you talked about earlier, about the birth certificate and the capitalized name, because I didn't know any of that stuff.

I don't know any of that stuff. And if you want to talk about it, Cal, I suggest you do, because I guarantee a lot of people listening are going to go, what does he talk about now? Okay. Well, let's just stick to the first question. So I, I started to challenge the jurisdiction, challenge the court. I stopped coming and I started doing pieces of paper saying, you can't make me come and I'm not that name on the birth certificate and all that stuff. It was what I call the name game. And so I got arrested numerous times because I wasn't showing up the court. And early on, I had one of the.

the gurus from here, he went to represent me in court on my first, the first time I actually was going to do an appearance. And he got arrested. And the judge ended up being slightly embarrassed by it. Like he had to, you know, let him out and apologize and all that. So within a few days, there was a SWAT team at my house. And my brother happened to be visiting. And they thought he was me and they beat him almost to death. And so, yeah, it was serious what I was in. Like it was not, it was no game. It wasn't like these people were aggressive. And, and they have the whole society on their side because of this deadbeat dad idea, right? So anybody that's challenging child support or anything like that, you're instantly put into that, you're a deadbeat dad. So it was not easy to

stand up to this thing because you had the whole society looking at you in a in a negative way because you're just you're just a dead big dad and but i wasn't and um not not even close it just was financially impossible mathematically impossible to make these payments and and have have all my children come come and visit me it just it just didn't add up like there's there's no way it can be done So it was doomed to fail. And so that's what happened with the SWAT team. My brother fought the RCMP, which is our national police force here. It took seven years, but they finally gave them a settlement on it.

But they lied and all kinds of things. Seven years to get a settlement. Where are you right now? I'm in Vancouver, Canada. Is this where this happens? Yeah. This happened in Canada. Yeah.

So it wasn't, we don't call it SWAT here. We call it ERT emergency response team, but it's the same thing. It's more of a militarized part of the police force. They come in, you know, all dressed in black. I'm coming. I'm coming from Alberta, right? Oh, okay. I'm right on the border.

Yeah, I'm right on the border. Yeah, I should have started off with that. Yeah, absolutely. I didn't realize you were sitting in Vancouver. That's just to kind of give it. some grounds to the people listening here in Canada, right? Like where this happened. Carry on. Sorry to interrupt. Yeah. So the RCMP, ERT team came. They knocked, like, it was bad, like teeth dislodged, broken ribs, broken sternum, concussion. Like, it was bad. And so- Are you shitting bricks at

this point? Yeah. Like I said, this was this, what I, I was up against something very aggressive. This was no joke. And, you know, they were very organized. Like as far as lawyers go, way more organized than the tax people. Because I've done lots of tax stuff as well. And it was aggressive.

And it all had to do with these child support orders, and they need those pieces of paper. The court is selling them. I have no proof of it, but it looks to me like there's a company in the United States that runs all of the child support things for all of North America, every state, every province in Canada. And it makes sense that they are buying these instruments, these bills of exchange, from the courts, and then going out and aggressively going after the payer, which is usually the dad.

It's like almost, well, 99% of the time it's a dad. So that's what's going on. And it's an industry. The lawyers are involved. The court is involved. This thing called Themis is involved that does the FMEP or MEP, it's called in Alberta. But it's all the same company called Themis. It's out of the United States.

I'm trying to wrap my head around. all of this. I just can't imagine seeing what you've seen and how you continue to proceed, knowing like that must have been question your inner self type of moment. Like maybe I should just make the payments or no. Well, I always tried to give what I could. Like I was not trying not to pay. Like that wasn't my motivation.

My motivation, the reason why I was able to. to get through there was my kids. I was not going to, you know, get a bachelor suite, never see my kids and make my payments. And that's how it's designed. It's by design to get the fathers away from their kids. And I know I'm going way out of the limb on that, but there are some people who have done studies on it. If you were to just go away from your kids, you could make the payments. If you try to have a second home and have your kids over, you will fail for most guys. Like if you're in the upper income range, no, it doesn't count. But most working guys, they cannot make it.

My situation, I had five kids, so it exacerbated that situation. It put a spotlight, like a landing aircraft landing light on it because I had. five kids, it made it so that it was like really obvious that this was not going to work. So I even wrote to the attorney general and I got a response back and which I still have. And he said that I was the problem, you know, dealing with my brother and what happened there. And this led to, you know, to something else. And he said the court has authority to make orders and the police have the authority to carry out those orders. And it's you. meaning me, that is the problem because you're not obeying these orders.

I wrote them back and asked, where does the court get the authority from? So these are the questions you've got to get to, which nobody asks. We all assume the court has authority. Everybody thinks so, yeah, a court order is a court order. Why? Who said, where does that come from? He didn't have an answer for that. And then he got his underling to answer back after a couple of months, and he said it was from the Constitution Act, 1982.

And that is a whole other story because that has not come into force and effect yet due to Queen Elizabeth's proclamation on that day in 1982. There's a subject on it, and that subject has not been fulfilled. And the subject is that Quebec needs to sign off on a language issue that parents can have their children taught in the language of their choice. And Quebec will never sign off on that. So the whole constitution, including the charter that everybody talks about, is not in effect yet. So the court does not have the authority to make orders and the police do not have the authority to carry them out. And that's the thing that they, it's the hidden thing. It's the, you know, opening up the curtain for the Wizard of Oz.

And you people are just faking. You've been faking for a long time, but still faking. And so that's, that's, that was sort of, you know, halfway through my journey. And then I started driving without insurance because as I, as I learned more about what's really going on, I went, well, this whole insurance thing is another scam that they got. running. And so I read the act numerous times and was able to put one of these instruments in because, again, according to the Bills of Exchange Act, my signature on a piece of paper is money and therefore here you go. And it used to be in the act that I could do this so I could give an instrument to the finance minister and it would be considered taking financial responsibility

for my driving. Well, they didn't want to. it. And, you know, there was the ensuing battles for two years being pulled over and police, some police laughing at me and others going, okay, you know, I see what you're doing. And even the odd one, probably two or three police officers said, keep going, just like that judge did. And I know what you're doing, keep going. And so I got encouragement from the other side, you know, only when they were with me privately, but it, I was poking at the things that needed to be poked at. And, you know, one thing just led to another. And I ended up getting arrested without bail because I kept doing, you know, paperwork to get myself out of jail and then not appearing.

And there's nothing they could do about it. So they held me without bail. And that took 60 days to get through. what should have been a one day trial. And I was held in jail for 60 days. At the end of it, they ended up owing me $300 million US. Yeah. Because I learned how this whole commercial system works.

And from then on, they have left me alone. Oh, man. Okay. I think my brain is about to explode. I gotta, we're gonna go back to vehicle insurance driving without vehicle insurance nice and easy here okay what happens if you get in an accident my instrument covers it what is your instrument it's a piece of paper i mean i'm just speaking very simply it's a piece of paper with my signature on it that has that says x amount of guy will pay for to x person this amount to cover any um claims against uh

you know, as far as driving goes, it has a date on it and my signature on it. According to the Financial Administration Act, and I want, you know, because you're in Canada, look it up. It's just in the definition section right at the beginning. You'll see the definitions for this act. Money is one of the definitions. Bill of exchange or any similar instrument. or what it says is commercial instruments. And then the next negotiable instruments, and the next definition is negotiable instruments

because M, money, and then N. Negotiable instruments is a bill of exchange. So a bill of exchange is money. And if you look at the Bills of Exchange Act, section 30, a blank piece of paper, this is how simple it can get, a blank piece of paper with a signature,

on it can be turned into a bill of exchange for any purpose. So they've got, they're monetizing our signature, left, right and center. Once you understand this, if you can monetize my signature, it's my signature that's creating the money. Therefore, I can do it with intent, my own intent. And then inside your act, it says that I can do this. They repealed all that. But when I was doing this, they had that in there.

could send an instrument to the finance minister and for to take care of any accidents or whatever that I that I had in driving. And it was called taking financial responsibility. And I see BZ, which is the insurance company, was supposed to give me a sticker for my windshield and a card. It was right in the act. They refused. So there I was. I had I just kept driving anyway. Well, I've done what I was supposed to do just because they don't give me the sticker doesn't mean that it's not real because it's according to the act. And so I would get pulled over because I had no plates on the, you know, they took my plates eventually.

I had my own plates and they took those. So I drove around with no plates for two, over two years. So I would get pulled over about once a month on average and for two years and have different, all kinds of different interactions with the police. you know, they would sometimes come with, you know, eight cars and, you know, they're all putting their gloves on. Like this is, you know, and I'm like, whatever, you know, I just have my hands on the steering wheel and just kind of laugh at them. This is, this is why this topic is so intriguing to me. Because I go, in order to get to where you've gone, you had to have the personal conviction to

go through what you've been through, which is a lot. Like 60 days in jail, what were you thinking? And I didn't know what's going to be 60 days in jail when I'm in jail. There's no end to it. I can say that now because it was 60 days. But when I was in it, there was no, oh yeah, at 60 days, you're going to get out. It was like, I could be here for a long time. And there was guys in remand that I met in different things who had been there for years in that state. So remand. is generally for people who are pending court. It's not a, you're not sentenced yet. So you're not in an actual penitentiary.

You're in a remand situation where you're held because you can't get bail. And, and they, so they hold you and until your court thing is done. There was guys in there for years in that state. And I didn't ask, you know, questions, but, because you just don't do that in there. But I, but I realized, you know, this. could go on for a long time because I wasn't backing down and they weren't backing down or not appearing to back down so they tried it they tried all kinds of tricks to try and you know get jurisdiction and move the case forward but it took 60 days and I would kept catching them and

all their stuff and then they'd send me back to remand and try again try something new I've got to be honest like you don't come across and this is what I liked about your videos is you don't come across as I don't know bizarre or um whatever word, Cal, that we want to associate with like, because this is like, this is like a bizarre out in left field. You don't hear anyone talk about this. Like I don't, I don't hear anyone talk about this. I don't know of anyone who went to jail for 60 days and then gets awarded. What did you say? 300 million? I didn't get awarded that. Like the judge did not go, yes, I owe it. She got caught because she gave me 59 days credit. A credit is a commercial

term. And my friends had put in a promissory note, which is one of these commercial instruments, to get me out. They said, here, here's a whole pile of money. Let our guy go. Well, they took the money, but they didn't let me go. She tried to let me go on a piece of paper in, in, like, back, as if she'd let me go on day two. She's giving me 59 days credit. on a piece of paper. So she let me go 59 days ago, even though I did 60 days. So they're trying to, she was trying to get a piece of paper to balance the, the agreement. But, you know, God gave me the words to say. And I said, well, if you're giving me credit, then it has to equal the instrument. These two pieces of paper have to balance in commerce. So you're trying to balance that.

And she tried to pretend like she didn't know it was there. And I, and I, you know, That wasn't going to work. I just kept repeating until she had to admit it was there. And then I said, so the 59 days credit you just offered me has to equal that. You owe me $300 million. And she was just, you know, dumbfounded. And that's how that went. So she did not award it. I don't want to misconstrue this. But they did end up owing it to me. And then once we went after it, they ignored a couple of processes we did. And then we found something that we modified. And I got the U.S. consulate because I'm a dual citizen to notarize it.

And then they put it in the newspaper. They panicked. And they put it in the newspaper that they owed 300 million. They didn't say who they owed it to, but it was the exact amount that I had sent in. So I sent the paper on a Thursday and on Monday in the newspaper, they said that the province owed $300 million. They lost, actually what it said is they lost $300 million in one day. Then what happens?

Then it was, I just kept going after it, you know, starting with the court, and then I moved it to the province, then I moved it to Ottawa, to the Fed. So I went, I followed the biblical principle going to your neighbor in private, you know, to your brother in private, then two witnesses. This is an on and on and on. In that whole process, at least three people left on the day they got paper, and there was probably two more that left about a month later, like quit their job. So that's one of the things that happened.

Then once I got everybody into a full default, I was led to go after the queen. And so I stopped going after the money and go after the queen. So I did that. And once I had made that decision, I realized that all the things that all this paperwork that I had done for the past almost two years was exactly what I needed to be able to approach the queen because you have to default each all these, you know, layers that she has around her, you know, one by one in the correct order. So I had already done that.

I didn't realize that I was really going after the queen, and I thought I was going after the money. So I did a writ, Rit of Mandamus, which is an order from an old prerogative writ from the common law, which is an order from a higher court to a lower court. I had 12 people come as a jury. I read the whole document out loud over the water. I know this all sounds really bizarre, but this is what I did, and then I sent it to the queen and defaulted her oath. Since then, the whole thing has started to come apart, and we are at the stage now worldwide where they are desperately trying to get a handle on things, and it's coming apart faster than they can put it together.

So this whole coronavirus, all of that is their last hurrah, like a chicken with its head cut off, running around just crazy, thinking they're going to stay alive, but it's already dead. I'm struggling for what to say to you. Honestly, I don't get, it's just, this is why I reached out because I sit and listen to the videos. I just don't understand all this. Like this is, it's hard to wrap your brain around what you're actually talking about. It's, it's fundamentals that make up our society, right? Like, to me, it's, it's what the stories we've been told about everything. Yes, that's the key to this.

So one of the stories is that there's this thing called the parliament. And there's this thing called the legislature in Alberta. And there's this stuff called money. And there's this, we'll just start with those. Are those real? You see, we assume that they somehow got this authority. Like, why is the queen the queen?

Nobody asked that. Oh, because her ancestors were. Well, how did the first one become the king, based on who said what? These are all illusions, and that's why you're having trouble with it. So there is no parliament. There is no legislature. All those things stem from this document called the British North America Act.

And that act got unenacted in 1893 by Victoria. Trudeau tried to fix that situation. He somehow figured it out or knew about it. Tried to fix it in 1982, the old Trudeau. That got stymied by the Queen because she put a subject on it. If you've ever bought a house or sold a house, there's when you make an offer on a house you go I'm going to offer you this amount subject to me getting financing or subject to me getting my household that stalls it until those things are done so all the subjects have to be removed you need to fix the furnace you need to fix the roof and then the deal can go through that's what she did on that whole thing in 1982 she put a subject on it that subject has to be removed Section 59. And in Section 59, it says, once this has been satisfied, because it goes back to 23 or 24, which is the whole thing in Quebec on the language, once that's satisfied, then Section 59 has to be removed from the Constitution Act. And there has to be another proclamation. Neither of those things have happened. So we're still in the, yeah, this deal will go through.

once you do this. Well, that's, that's gone on for almost 50 years. I've asked this question of a lot of people because as we're going through everything we're going through right now, right? I've been talking to different doctors, a lawyer on, an ethics professor, et cetera, et cetera. I've been trying to figure out why your inner voice, your, whatever, you know, there's different names for everything else. but why this all seems like something's up or like what are my rights right and it's it's so hard to define like it is really hard to define like what are our actual rights right right now we're seeing you know you've seen it living in this country uh our prime minister come out and is is campaigning on the fact that if he wins the unvaccinated will have consequences and he'll ensure that And you go, but it's my body. It's my right to not inject things into it if I don't want to. At least that's what I've always believed, right?

Like it's, that's a freedom. That's a right. But as this goes along further and further, the question that a guy starts asking now is, well, what is our rights? What are our freedoms? What is that? And is there actually something,

like everybody points to the charter rights and freedoms? Yeah. Well, it doesn't exist. I can guarantee you Trudeau knows that. They're just not saying it. From my perspective, it all makes sense to me. That's the thing. So where did you start in your journey then?

You know, it must have been interesting for you to go down this road. I'm sure you had self-doubt along the way. And then to have judges and cops and everybody else at times go, keep asking questions, keep going. That had to have been alarming and treat. intriguing, like, you're doing something that, I mean, I'm sure there's lots of people doing it. I'm sure you know the network of people doing it. But in the grand scheme of things, you are so far less than a percent of the population doing this. Like, it must have been this, while still to this day, like this weird ride.

It was, and it is. And, you know, a lot of people may think I'm crazy or whatever, but I'm not a crazy person. I'm not a unbalanced person. I'm very balanced. I'm very logical. I'm also intuitive, but I'm more on the logic side of things. And I logically look this stuff up. I spent a lot of time reading Acts.

I thought Axe was the way to go. And I even had really good arguments, like the way a lawyer would, using acts. And they just ignored them. And I was like, what? I just beat you. I just, that document, and I can see it on the judge's face, like, whoa. But they would still rule against me. And so like, what's happening here?

What is this? I just kept digging and digging and then doors would open. I would, you know, learn something new. I would try that. I tried everything. And after a point in time, I learned commerce. And we went to a seminar. And the light bulbs were going off for me about every 15 minutes.

Because I'd already been through it. And I had all these questions. And then I was like, oh, oh, oh, of course. Now it makes sense. Boom. Oh, there it is. It was just like, they're operating in commerce. And I thought they were operating in this other thing, but they weren't.

There's this whole other game going on. There's a whole other jurisdiction that I couldn't see. I could see what was happening, but it didn't make any sense to me because I didn't have the point of view to understand it. Once I understood what was going on, I went, okay, now I'm going to use, I'm going to play the game at the same level as you. boom, here's some, I'm going to start writing large amounts of money and sticking in in the court. Well, that starts to make the whole thing teeter-totter. And the judges are running out of the room, not coming in the room, trying to get off the cases. All kinds of weird, weird behavior.

Like, it was just overwhelming. Like, it's not just sort of a one coincidental thing. It was every judge that I ever came up across in my cases and anybody that I helped had some kind of, nervous behavior. What do you mean judges ran out of the courtroom? The very first time that we, when I came back from the seminar

and I wrote my first, it's called a bond, which is a commercial instrument, the judge ran out of the room when my name was called. And we were sitting outside in the hallway because we didn't want to do all the bowing stuff and the sheriffs were getting very aggressive with all that.

And so we would just wait. And so we didn't have to have the sheriff's yanking on us and throwing us out and all that stuff because we weren't bowing to the judge or standing up. And so we would wait until either the judge was in the room or just wait until my name was called because they always called my name last. So sitting there for hours on end was like pointless. So they called my name inside the courtroom because that's what they do. We're calling case number, blah, blah, blah, whatever it is, number and then the name. And then when nobody came forward, then they page outside in the hallway. So what it happened, that's just, I mean, I've seen it over and over.

That's how they do it. So I heard my case being called outside in the hallway. And as I'm walking in the door with my, I think it was just one friend with me that time, the judge ran off the room, ran off the bench. and we're just at the door of the court. We're not sitting down or anything, just coming through the door, he runs off the thing and out his side door.

And everybody's looking at each other in there, like the sheriffs and the clerks are like, like everybody's kind of like, what's happening? And then the judge is already gone. And then the sheriff goes, all rise. And it was more like a question. And like he was like, you could see, he was like, what's going on? Like, so he go, all rise?

And everybody stood up and, you know, that was, that was the first instrument. The judge ran out of the room with no, there was no break called, is what I'm trying to get at, because they just called my case. If they were going to take a break, they would have taken a break. They just called the case inside the courtroom, so they're ready to proceed. They page it outside. doors open, he runs off. So that was the first one.

And we didn't know that it was because of that. It was only after the fact you go, I wonder if he ran off because of that thing we put in. Because again, we were just trying stuff. And went, wow, that's what happened there. So again, we just kept doing that. And I saw all kinds of behavior like that, like just over and over and over and over. Like every time.

So it was not a coincidence, because I'm logically. I think in terms of, well, that might have been a coincidence. That's my first default. But after you see it three times, okay, coincidence is starting to become not feasible, like mathematically. And after you get, you know, 12, 13 times, it's like, no, this is happening. This is an actual thing. We do this. They do that.

Or something, you know. So it's not a, it's not theoretical to me. It's not a theory that I'm putting. on the internet and this is the stuff that I've seen. I've watched it. I've just seen so much. And the videos only touched, you know, the tip of the iceberg of everything that I saw. I'm more than convinced of what I learned and what happened there. And it doesn't make me better than anybody. I was just like you keep saying over and over. I was just the guy that kind of stood in there and took a lot of hits. You took a lot of hits, right?

I just take a step back and I'm trying to process everything you're saying and I'm going, in order for people to go down your road, you've got to be willing to basically be publicly humiliated, possibly have the cops sent on them, and then on top of that, go even further down it, be arrested. Like, did you have a job through all this? Yeah. What did your work say? Or are you self-employed?

Well, I was like a contractor. I did sales and I did some, I went back between, back and forth between sales and construction, like installing. So I did sunrooms and glass structures and sort of complex, you know, glass roofs and that kind of stuff. So, you know, and I lost some jobs. You know, I was pretty well known in the city for, as an installer. and even as a sales guy.

So, you know, I could, because I'd been doing it so long, I had, I had a lot of, I had a lot of contacts. Everybody kind of knew me. I, you know, it was, I was that sort of that guy that, you know, could get the job done and do it right and not have a bunch of problems. And so, so I did lose jobs because of this whole FMEP thing. They would throw up a garnishee at, you know, I'd go and get a job. up and then Gar-she and then it's hit me down.

Wow, we got this darn she, Cal, and you know, my hands are tired. I've got to have to do this. I'm going to have to leave then. So, you know, it was kind of like that. So I did go in between different working for different companies doing the same thing. So I kept myself employed, but, you know, it was, I had to kind of move around a bit. and the whole thing was just to have my kids and I had to have a three-bedroom house to rent we lost our actual home that we owned very early and so our family unit had to have two

at least three-bedroom homes to to have kids go back and forth you just start to do the math and it's it's astronomical like you know and I A few judges said, there's just not enough money. No, there's not. Because we had five kids. And so we were off their charts, you know, because 1.2 kids or whatever it is is the average. We're at five. So it really exposed the inherent fraud of what was going on.

Curious, what did your kids think of all this? There was times where one didn't like having to go in the back of police cars. Because I would make the police, if they pulled me over and, you know, were going to tow my van, I would make them, okay, well, as a common law officer, you can't leave these children here on the side of the road. You need to take them to where I want you to take them. And they would, no way. Oh, yeah.

So I had the police actually drive my kids a couple of times. So they didn't like that. One of them didn't like that. But by and large, my kids all respected what happened. And after the 60 days, my kids were kind of in high school by then. And they were all their friends and et cetera thought I was like a folk hero. But it was a positive thing. And it was talked about amongst their peers, you know, what their dad did and all that.

And so it was not a negative for the most part. And now my children stand up. They're not children anymore. They're adults. Like the oldest one's now 30. But there's one living in Las Vegas. and she's standing up to the mask thing with an employer. I'm not wearing a mask this time around.

She wore it the first time around when they reinstituted. I'm not wearing it. I'm not getting the backs pass. I'm not getting vaccinated. I'm not telling you anything. I don't have to. So these are now my children. They stand up to the tyranny, commercial police.

And they're not aggressive. They just are, you know, they'll phone me up and say, what do I need to do here? And they do it. So it's been a, you know, these are strong ladies. They're all girls. And they saw what I went through and they saw what happened. And they know what I know.

They don't know everything I know, but they know that dad knows what's going on. You mentioned police officers are governed by common law. Do you mind sharing a little bit about that? A common law specifically. It doesn't have to be police officers. you can just be common law. Well, a police officer can act, and almost anybody can act in different capacities.

So the police can be policy enforcers, which goes into the Hudson Bay Charter. I just open up another can of worms. But they're, they can enforce the acts, like the statutes. That's the policy of a company. But they are also peace officers. in the common law and they have to swear allegiance to queen elizabeth which puts them in the common law that puts them under her oath and so they they can act in in different capacities so once they

once they're done their policy of you know i was driving without insurance now i'm saying okay well now you've enforced your policy and there's little pieces of paper tickets and a tow truck here now you've just left miners on the side of the road well you can get you know and some of them well you can go with the tow truck driver, not enough seatbelts according to your policy. So you need to drive my kids. I'll call you a cab. I don't have any money. Okay, get the kids in the car. They can't leave my kids there. They can't assume that I have the money for it. So their policy enforcing caused that my kids to be standing on the side of the road without a vehicle. Now me, that's different, but minors, they can't do it. So I would just have them,

drive my kids. What happens if, let's say, the population all enacted what you're talking about? Does society fall apart? No. And that's another assumption that without these people in power that we would have anarchy. No, we wouldn't. It's like the marijuana laws. Did more people start smoking pot after they legalized it?

No. they didn't. They weren't going to smoke it anyway, whether it's legal or illegal. Same thing with, you know, is what stops your neighbor from cromac crossing the fence and stealing your lawnmower because there's a law against it? No, I just wouldn't do it. And this is 99% of the population. Yeah, there are criminals.

But again, did the law stop the criminals? No. So why do we need this? Because we've been told we need it, but it's not necessarily true. These are fundamental things. Like, why do we need money? Well, the obvious, we're born here. Huh?

Well, I'm just, I'm going to, why do we need money to buy things? Why don't the deer need money and the Canada goose and the, and the wolf and the bear and bacteria? All other living beings in this planet don't pay to live here. Everything's provided in an amazing balance. We got to pay to live here. Said who? These are the fundamental things that are,

we just don't go to those levels of thinking and questioning. Who said there was going to be money and when and why and, and, you know, when you start to get into the history of it, you'll start to see that the descendants of those that created all this are the ones who have all the money. So you think we we go around toiling in order to buy apples that grow on trees. And the apple has seeds in it, not only to grow another apple, to grow another tree of apples. It's abundant. We were put here to tend the garden, like keep it from the old.

overgrowing and we're told it's scarce you need to go and get money in order to have an apple. Hmm. This has been thought provoking to say the least. You know, I've heard multiple people. I was raised in my going to church and everything else and I as a kid you don't I guess you don't fully understand maybe the importance of what they're talking about right and when it comes religion, just like anything, people can make a bad name for anything, right? And so religion has taken a beating in, I don't know, my lifetime, I would say. And yet, I find as I go along and understand more about, talk about Christianity, talk about the Bible, there's a lot of wisdom in that book. But I don't think it gets tied up in some of the bad things that.

have happened in Christianity. Yes. And that's why I tell people, pick up the book, remove all your preconceived ideas, just like money, just like countries, all that stuff. Like you've got to look at it for what it is to you, not what you think it is or what you've been told it is, and not what this institution that grew around it. We think the institution created the thing, but it's actually the opposite way. they built this thing around that book and tried to control it and say this is what it says and

and you know in the name of God we're going to kill all these people all this stuff it it it wasn't it's backwards the bible stands by itself without the religious organizations around it it's just a book i don't mean that in a in a frivolous way it's it's a book of wisdom and we should actually look at it objectively look at it without all that religious stuff on it and all the all the stuff that's happened from those institutions because we're we're we're equating the book with the institution and it's not necessarily um that way again that's one of these thoughts they put in our head did you pick up the bible after you started going through this or had you always looked at the Bible that way? No, I had I had gone I had gone to church, et cetera, not as a as a young,

like my family didn't go, but I came, I became a Christian when I was in my late teens. And then I kind of went away from it and looked at other things because I just wanted to be objective. And but I always, you know, always kind of still had the Bible as a, you know, reference point, but it looked at other things as well to see, you know, how other other belief systems work. And it came down to, I went back to the, to the Bible, because it made sense. It worked with all of the puzzle pieces that I could see. And now it's, you know, in my life, it's the foundation of what I believe, like my cognitive bias is from that. And it's, it's, fits. That's why I can see things in quite clearly. Like there's nothing that surprises me. Nothing.

I get it because I have that foundation that gives me that perspective that is that is seemingly correct. And if it's not correct at any point in time, I'm going to have to go, okay, that's not totally the whole thing. There needs to be something else that because this other thing is happening. But I have not come across that yet. Everything fits. And that's the thing about a cognitive bias. your cognitive bias has to fit what you're seeing. Don't hold to your cognitive bias. Like it's, you know, I got a hold to this thing. If something is coming, you know, that you're experiencing or seeing doesn't fit with it.

You have to, it has to fit with it. Otherwise your cognitive bias is incorrect or incomplete, as I say. So when I was looking at the country, there's so many anomalies like, why aren't they signing the acts? why aren't things getting royal assent why all these strange things with the government it's because they don't exist and once you see that everything starts

to go oh yeah that's why they're saying these things in the news that's why the native people can just shut down a pipeline because it's all commerce they know it some of them know it and right now this is just a corporation and because you have agreed to work for that corporation

they have rules. That's how they're getting away with it. It's just policy, corporate policy. And we think it's government by the people for the people. It's not. They don't have that. They have a corporation, which and the charter they have is from 1670 called the Hudson Bay Charter. That's what they're operating under.

Until that, until Quebec signs off. off on a language thing, then all that stuff from 1982 will come into effect. And it will be backdated to 1982. But they're never going to sign on that. They've tried twice to remove that subject. That was Meach Lake Accord and Charlottetown Accord. Both failed. When the queen pass away, will it change? No, because it's a, it's a proclamation. I'd heard an interesting thing that for me makes a lot of sense that Canadians look at their rights as though government gave them to them. And so we're very, I don't know, what's the word I'm looking for? Agreeable. We're just like, yep, government says this, yep, it's all good. Yeah, okay, yeah, whatever.

Whereas Americans, by fighting for their independence, look at it like they earned their rights, or God gave them their rights. And so no government can stand in between them and what their rights are. Does that make sense? It does to a degree. Now, the Americans have been watered down. There's still lots of, you know, strong patriots, but they have slowly tried to get us more like, try to get them more like us in Canada.

And so there are people who, you know, think the government is the be all and all. And the Constitution definitely says that's not the case. And but it's very clear there at least. You can read the Constitution. And even though it's old language, it's still pretty clear what the intent was and what the wording says. You can change the government. You can literally over, like get rid of it if it becomes tyrannical. And that's in the Constitution.

And they said, arm yourself for, that reason. And all the constitutions that I've seen, you know, working with different countries, there is no constitution like the United States one. Not one is even close. It is definitely unique. And so that's why the United States is under such attack. You know, they want to get rid of that constitution because it says you can literally overthrow your government legally. It's not prison. Well, I'm going to leave it there because I'm trying to, I have these interviews that have been happening over and over again where it just, it literally is hurting my brain. And I think it's a good thing, right? A good thing to spur on thoughts and people's thoughts. But to try and act like I'm

going to, you know, take in any more of what you're saying. What you're talking about is so off to one side that I've never heard before, that it's hard to take it in. You know, it's almost like taking a fire hose to the face of information kind of thing, right? Like, it's like who can even remotely stand to that, right? Especially for the first time. And I've heard multiple people talk lightly about what you're talking about. But I do want to get to the crewmaster final five. Just a few questions at the end, long or short as you want to go, Cal.

And we'll try and keep it. Well, we'll see where you take it. The first one I always ask is, you know, I get to sit down with a ton of people and take them on the journey of the guest, so to speak, and try and learn some things, that type of thing. If you could sit in my chair and bring one guest on, who would you want to sit and pick the brain up? Oh, I don't know. Dan Larimer comes to mind, possibly Russell Gould, but he's way out there. So just I've never had a conversation with him

I'd like to but I mean if I could had, you know, if I had a choice of anybody in the world, I'd probably want to talk to Donald Trump. What question would you ask Donald Trump? What would be your first most burning question?

I don't know. I would start the conversation off and just try and, you know, read body language and just see exactly what's going on with him. I'm like if he could be truthful or, you know, But, you know, where he has been in all of his life, he has a lot of knowledge and about how things really work. And then being in that, you know, position of the president is got to be eye-opening. And so he has a lot of, you know, observations and knowledge.

He may not know everything because they probably were trying to keep him in the dark, you know, to some degree. But he's a pretty smart guy. And depending on what he was told and what he could figure out, he would be a guy to talk to similar to JFK. If they could be truthful. like if they could actually tell you what actually they saw. Yeah. Yeah. What's your guy who enjoys reading, obviously?

What's one book that you've read or think people should read that has been very influential? The Bible. And, you know, the books in the Bible, Genesis, Exodus, Revelation, Daniel, Job, and Romans. That would be the, those are my go-to books for trying to understand what's going on and how it relates to, like, they relate more to how it actually works than the other books. In my opinion, you know, their books have, There's lots in all of it, but those are the ones that I gravitate towards.

They have a lot of knowledge. Here's your final one then. I'm always curious who people are following right now, like who you think people should be exposed to. Like if there's somebody that you fall along with what they're doing in the world kind of thing. Is there somebody that you fall along with and go, this is an interesting person that not enough people know about? or maybe tons of people know about them. Anna von Reetz. I haven't read all everything she has said because it's overwhelming.

But a lot of people follow her. And anything that I have seen has not been sound from my perspective. I've never gone on. That's way off and left field. She's always pretty, it may seem often left field to most, but not to, you know, from my perspective. she's pretty sound um you know i don't want to blow my own horn but you know in power is is how can people find in power if they're interested inpower movement dot com because i'm teaching

everything that i know um and i don't know everything but i do know quite a bit because i've been through a lot and and and seeing it and tried stuff and and know what works and what doesn't and what stuff, you know, may work. But there's certain things that just do work. And there are certain things that just don't work. And then they're all in between. So you will learn a lot there about how things actually work. And we've got lots of people who, you know, write in and say, you know,

my life is changing, like literally personal life. their reality is changing. And other things like that. So there is something happening there. And it's not because of something I thought of or intended. It's just that's the feedback we're getting that what they're learning there is changing all aspects of their life, like they're literally. So they see the value in that.

So we, you know, I just put it out there that that's what's happening there. I'm not trying to take credit for it or anything like that. It's just that's what's going on. So, you know, I got to put our thing, you know, I got to be honest. It may sound like self-promoting, but it's not. It's like literally, yeah. If people want to find more out about you, it's easy to, you know, like it's self-promotion for sure. But if people are like, holy man, I want to find out more about this.

And you've got a way for them to do that in power.com. now they know where to find you. It's as simple as that. Regardless, I've really enjoyed it. This has been, I always enjoy a conversation that really challenges the way we all think and maybe expands a little bit on some things. You've given myself, I'm sure every listener here is going, oh, that was not only entertaining, right?

But like really hard to digest in that there's a lot of big questions in there that you raise that I think I have to sit back and think about because I don't fully understand. But that's good. That's exactly what I look for when I'm going after podcast guests is something that makes your brain go, now I have to think about this. So I really appreciate you giving me some time this morning and doing this with me. It's been really enjoyable. Yeah, I'm glad to be here.