Shaun Newman Podcast - #645 - Dr. Chris Shoemaker
Episode Date: May 23, 2024He’s been a general practitioner for 45 years with 25 years in emergency and urgent care in Ontario and British Columbia. He will be one of the doctors speaking at the upcoming An Injection of Truth... Town Hall in Calgary. Let me know what you think. Text me 587-217-8500 Substack:https://open.substack.com/pub/shaunnewmanpodcast E-transfer here: shaunnewmanpodcast@gmail.com Website: https://silvergoldbull.ca/ Email: SNP@silvergoldbull.com Text: (587) 441-9100 – and be sure to let them know you’re an SNP listener. Ticket for Dr. James Lindsay “Parental Rights Tour”: https://brushfire.com/anv
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is Brad 14.
This is Doug Casey.
This is Tom Romago.
This is Alex Kramer.
This is Viva Fry.
You're listening to the Sean Newman podcast.
Welcome to the podcast, folks.
Happy Thursday.
Welcome to the show.
Government deficits running out of control.
Don't think anyone can really argue with that.
This might be the perfect time to diversify some of your hard-earned savings in physical money that can't be printed.
I'm talking gold and silver.
And why not with my favorite silver, with my favorite metals dealer, that is, silver gold bowl.
They're here in Alberta, offering a full suite of services to help you buy, sell, store your precious metals.
The ship remittled discreetly, fully insured, and with tracking straight to you, text or email, Graham, down in the show notes for details.
That's silvergoldbill.com here in Canada, silvergoldbill.com anywhere in the States, they can get you here in North America.
Anywhere you are, they can get you your precious metals.
And I guess I'm going to have that problem today.
James Lindsay is coming back to Alberta.
Yeah, you heard it right.
The Parental Rights Tour featuring James Lindsay is going to be in Bonneville, Friday, June 21st.
Eminton and Red Deer Saturday, June 22nd, Calgary Sunday, June 23rd, Brooks, Monday, June 24th.
I got a link down in the show notes, tickets for tickets.
You can grab your tickets for a chance to engage with Dr. James Lindsay's powerful insights
on countering woke culture and championing parental rights.
I don't know why that sounded.
parental rights.
Come on, Sean.
Spit it out here.
If you haven't heard of Dr. James Lindsay, he has been a guest here on the Sean Numa
podcast.
Of course, maybe one that's a little more prolific, has been, he's been a guest multiple
times on the Joe Rogan experience.
He's American author, has his Ph.D. in mathematics and hosts the new Discourse's podcast.
Get your tickets today.
That should be an insightful night.
And, well, if you've been following with Dr. James, Lindsay, he's been an interesting guy
to follow.
McGowan professional chartered accountants.
That's Kristen and the team.
They're looking for people.
They're offering, well, they're offering the fact that they're some kick-ass ladies.
Who know what's up?
They believe in supporting this show, free speech and starting conversations.
They're looking for somebody who fits the mold, is a CPA.
Would love to grab somebody locally who understands, you know, the area, but they're willing to welcome in somebody that wants to get to work and help grow a business.
They offer accounting, bookkeeping, business consulting, and training, financial planning, and tax planning.
They're wonderful. They're wonderful. They deal with this guy. That's saying a lot.
And for more information, visit them at McGowan, CPA.ca.ca. Okay, let's get on to the tale of the tape.
He's been a general practitioner for 45 years, with 25 years in emergency and urgent care in Ontario and British Columbia.
I'm talking about Dr. Chris Shoemaker.
So buckle up, here we go.
Welcome to the Sean Newman podcast today.
I'm joined by Dr. Chris Shoemaker.
So, sir, thanks for hopping on.
Oh, great.
Nice to be with you, Sean.
Out in Alberta, somewhere near Calgary.
Is that where you are?
Well, I mean, in the, it's about a five-hour drive.
So if you, you know, in some senses, no.
But in Alberta sense, yeah, I'm near Calgary.
That's what I think.
I sit on the border of Alberta, Saskatchewan.
Oh, Alberta, Saskatchewan.
little bit over to the east right on the Saskatchewan border. Terrific. Well, great to be talking to you.
We'll be much closer to you around the middle of June. That's correct. And what you're
alluding to is injection of Truth Town Hall Monday, June 17th, which people can still get tickets
for, I believe. And I'll toss that link in the show notes. Before we get to any of that and you
coming this way, you've never been on the show before, Chris. I wouldn't mind if you just give a little
bit of your background, but you can take it for as long or as short as you want to go.
Okay, well, very good. Well, I'm sorry where people would be winding down their career typically kind of thing, but I'm healthy. I'm wanting to work and was working away as recently as 2022, very vigorously. I was in a COVID health clinic in Ottawa, a pre-hospital clinic that was helping to assess patients before they actually went to the emergency department to determine with the chest pain or breathlessness that they had. Was it a big deal? Was it a small deal?
in certain instances we were referring the patients on to emergency,
and in many instances we were just giving appropriate reassurance to people
and appropriate medications for what they were in for.
And of course, they were all being swab, nasal swabs and the like,
the typical picture of what was going on in 2021 and early 2022 in any city in Canada.
That's the last little bit of my career work.
Before that, and I have been a physician for 45 years,
and I graduated med school in 75.
I was only 23 at the time.
And then two years later, I was a fully licensed doctor ever since 1977,
had worked licensed in British Columbia, licensed in Ontario,
worked as an emergency doctor, worked as a hospitalist.
Later on in my career, I wound down, of course, from doing full-time emergency work,
and I did other things out of an office-based.
But I've always been, what you'd say, a comprehensive physician.
I've worked as a hospitalist, a general doctor, admitted to a,
and discharged patients had small elements of my time when I was assisting other people in their
family practice and locums and the like. But I always like the individual aspect of taking care
of people when they were the sickest in the hospital. You know, you, 45 years, that's a healthy
career. So kudos to you first. I think it's pretty cool to hear somebody that wants to work.
You know, most people are like, can't wait to get on the beach and retire and all these different
things for someone to enjoy their work, I assume, as much as yourself. You know, over 45 years,
I've heard a couple different people around your age range talk who'd been a doctor for as long
as you in our local area, actually. I'm just curious, you know, when you, when you rattle off
everywhere you've been, has there been anything that remotely prepared you for what COVID was
and is and everything they did? Like, was there anything that, you know, you look back through your
career and you're like, you know, actually when we were this, this is where everything got heightened,
where everybody was a little bit nervous or we had to go through special protocols or anything like
that?
Zero times.
Was there anything like the protocols that society has been put through since 2020?
Zero times did that happen from 1977 until 2020?
The world carried on with viruses coming at us and sometimes they took older folks out
if, you know, they had bad lungs to begin with and a certain kind of flu seasonal thing would
affect them and put them into a bacterial sepsis and then their pneumonia was worse and then that
would need antibiotics. And, you know, so, so flus can and would kill people. But the main thing
to help a person with flu was give them antibiotics for the superinfection that would occur from
the bacteria thereafter. Here we were in COVID when the one thing that helps the most, when someone
has a viral pneumonia is careful assessment of their need for perhaps some bronchidilation therapy.
Simply, that doesn't require, by the way, a respirator.
It just requires appropriate puffers and the like.
And some steroids, steroids, intravenous steroids, sometimes were very, very helpful for viral
pneumonia and bacterial secondary bacterial infection treatment.
The last two elements, steroid use banned in the hospital for the COVID-suffering patient.
secondary bacterial treatments often essentially banned.
You just put them on protocols.
You put them on a bit of an IV.
You give them fluids.
There's no official treatment for COVID.
So perhaps take what Dr. Fauci is recommending, the REMDESIVIR,
but that's not a protocol for health care.
That's a protocol for death within seven days.
Remdissevere is a renal harming, kidney harming, kidney toxic medication
and should never have been approved for the use with COVID-19.
It basically medically murdered a variety of people in hospital
who were given REN-Des-Avere.
Their lives were shortened.
Actually, let me just stay on that one topic for a moment.
I've met since then a specific legal scholar out of Pennsylvania.
I'm sorry that I can't quote his name just at the moment,
but there's a gentleman who defended 100 people in U.S. hospitals
who were trying to not take Remdicevere and trying to perhaps,
take ivermectin while in hospital. He had 50 cases where the judge sided for the family.
He had 50 cases where the family succeeded. The hospital was told you can't prevent them from
having these medicines, the ivermectin that they want. You must do it. 50 out of 50 patients survived.
50 out of 50 patients who were allowed to have ivermectin and not have to take remdesivir survived
unless the hospital. A totally separate 50 patients. This is 100 patients spread throughout all of the
United States. This is a very sophisticated lawyer, had multiple clients in various, various places.
And the 50 cases where he lost the case, it was just a discussion between the judge and the lawyer
for the hospital, and he, the lawyer for the plaintiffs, and for the 50 dear plaintiffs who lost
the case with the judge, and the judge would not impose on the hospital that they must allow
what the family wanted, which was ivermectin instead of rem to disappear. And when their dear patients
were not allowed their ivermectin, and only the hospital protocol.
all, 49 out of 50 died.
So how's that a spectrum of groups, 50 people in each group?
Totally random, because the judge was just making a random decision.
And the 50 times that they were allowed Ivermectin, the patient survived 49 times out of 50 when they were not allowed Ivermectin.
Sorry, when they were not allowed Ivermectin, they died.
When they were allowed Ivermectin, they lived.
So that, to meet that lawyer, to talk with him and
Washington, D.C. to hear his anecdotal story of numbers as big as that, what is there to say?
Except that smarter doctors, like myself and Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Paul Alexander and Dr.
Gert Van der Bosch and the dearly departed, Dr. Zelenko, and so many others, we're right.
They're wrong.
Ivermectin keeps you from dying from COVID.
Remdysvere hastens.
your departure from this earth.
Yeah, it's been, you know, in the middle of, uh, um, everything.
You know, um, I think back to when, when, uh, I had McCullough on and everybody was taking
the horse avarmectin and I was kind of like, well, should we be doing that?
Like, does that make sense?
I thought he was going to say no.
Like I literally thought he was going to come on and say no.
And then he's like, oh, yeah, absolutely.
It's, it's safe.
I'm like, oh, boy.
You know, and, and, and you saw how they attacked Joe Rogan and on and on and on.
and, you know, years after.
It's all a sciops.
It's all the sciops by people who aren't doctors.
It's a psychological operation by people who were not physicians
who didn't take an oath to protect individual lives of patients
to use their coherence and their knowledge of science.
These people, these sciop people, they rose to the top.
They rose as, you know, might have been sociologists and the like
who were giving interviews about what's the right medicine
or what's the wrong medicine.
Get out of town.
You never went to medical school.
You know nothing.
Well, the thing that I've tried wrapping my brain around, Chris, is, you know,
you've surrounded yourself, your colleagues, all doctors, as soon as they said,
Ivermectin his horse paste, and they just rammed it that way and said, you can't,
you can't prescribe this.
You just start prescribing it.
You know, you're going to lose your job.
You're going to lose your, you're going to lose everything if you go down this road.
You can't, this isn't effective.
There's no on and on and on it went.
There's no effective trials and all these different things.
What did you like you sitting there on that side?
I assume went, well, this is stupid.
Like this makes zero sense.
But what did the red like,
where are the thousands of doctors all standing up?
Because all the men you just mentioned off have pretty much and yourself for that matter.
And a whole bunch, you know, like this injection of truth town hall.
What the what the people are saying out here, and by people, I mean NDP,
if anyone was paying attention to politics, is they're saying, oh, look at all the doctors they got coming in.
And look at this.
They're not even qualified, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
It's like, well, that's literally because they've been attacked since they came out and talked about it.
And the fact of the matter...
Go ahead.
What's your exact question?
Well, I just, I look at it and I go, over your career of 45 years, you knew Ivermectin wasn't horse-paced.
I mean, there is a veterinary medicine, Ivermectin as well that's done in certain ways.
But how isn't it that that perforated all?
of doctors. Why is it that only so few stood up?
They'd like to not be bankrupt. They'd like to have an actual career. I haven't worked
in two years. My career has been taken from me the first year because I knew it was crucial
to get this information out to people and I wasn't going to risk the lives or the concerns
of individual patients of minds if I was going to be distracted by the fact that I had this
terribly important information I had to give to the world.
So I worked the first year without income by choice.
But at the end of the first year, it was my hope and expectation and it was my plan to return to clinical work and to be helping in one fashion or another patients to make good decisions about what they should do for their health, either if they were COVID injured or COVID infected.
But at exactly that moment, as I was prepared to return and earn a modest living as a physician and help a great number of people directly,
my own college took away my license for saying the things that I had been saying.
But I only said two very simple things, both of which have turned out to be massively true.
Ivermectin is safe, has always been safe for the 40 years that's been in the marketplace.
People don't overdose on ivermectin.
They don't have consequences of the taking of it in normal dosages.
And in fact, they have very few consequences of even if they were to take 10 times as much as they should,
it would you would die by taking 10 times what you should have taken of Tylenol.
You take 10 times what you should have Tylenol for eight days.
You'll die of liver failure.
If you take, you know, and you can get that off the counter.
Sadly, or unfortunately, if someone made a mistake,
they would be dead by taking too much Tylenol.
They would not be deceased by taking too much iburemectin.
But let's not talk about wrong doses of ivermectin.
The right dose is easy to calculate.
The right dose is very, very simple.
the right number of milligrams, heals the patient, reduces the inflammatory component within the body, has an antiviral effect, and the patient is better within four to five days.
So that's what should have happened.
The people when the siops, and it's a big siops, because it has elements of big pharma controlling, they didn't want a generic medication to be effective.
They wanted to look as if there was no treatment available for this.
In fact, in a general sense, there's no true absolute treatment for most viral infections.
There was no ivermectin for your standard flu, because the flu virus doesn't respond to ibermectin.
It's a different structural virus.
But here was the one time you had a virus where there was actually a beautiful clinical response to a specific drug that's been in the marketplace for humans for 40 years.
And it was studied by DARPA, which is the U.S. military group, stating that if there's ever a,
a COVID-type infection that comes to the world again.
They'd studied it between 2003 and 2013.
And in the U.S. military studies of what was the medicine that would be available
if we ever got hit with a SARS-CoV-1 but repeated maybe, a different SARS-CoV virus?
The research had been done.
And they had found that three drugs in particular were helpful.
Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and in a different modality, interferon,
which doctors would understand, but maybe not too much of the general population would have heard of that one.
But the bottom line is those three medications were proven curative, curative medications on paper, in print, in studies, understood by everybody,
that when there's a COVID expression through the world and anything like a SARS-CoB virus going on again,
the medical proof was that ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were the top of the shelf.
They were the best, and this was proven in 2014.
Anybody with a brain knew that in 2014,
and everybody shut their brains off
because of the psychological operation that was put onto society,
beginning in 2019, 2020.
It might sound like hyperbole.
It might sound like I'm a bit too over-genetic,
over-zealous in talking about this.
But I'm not over-zealous.
I'm just sad for the world.
I'm sad for the world that we were poisted,
and what would it cook everybody out of hospital,
nobody having even to go into a general medical ward, let alone ICU,
if they took in either hydroxychloroquine plus zinc protocol
or if they'd taken an ivermectin protocol.
A group, and I'll mention the title,
if you're looking for help,
if you're looking help for either vaccine injury
or just advice about COVID in general,
there's two main places to look.
One is flccc.net.
Letters flccccc.com.
dot net, read their protocols, follow them.
Also the World Council for Health,
world council for health. World Council for Health.org.
They are equally informative as to what the correct things are to do to keep yourself well.
I dearly wish that the world had not been lied to in 2020,
21 and 2022.
Yeah, I share your sentiment when it comes to what happened to the human population.
you know you've you've pointed out very well on when it comes to you know alternative forms of
treatment then you don't get the emergency use authorization that they so desperately wanted and
got and then you know a huge healthy majority of our population got vaccinated and you brought up
when we were just chatting before this and i hope i'm not butchering this the nacahara
study on cardiology.
You know, we've talked about before, but now, you know, the population, a healthy majority of it,
has at least two shots.
What is today talking about?
What is the Nacahara study talking about, Chris, that you think people should hear?
Well, I, sitting here, Dr. Chris Schuemaker, from Toronto, Canada, read a few papers.
In fact, I read about 30 papers a week to understand what's really going on.
And when I came across in, I think it was February, January, February of this year, January, February of 2024,
suddenly I came across a paper that had been published in September of 2023, but it's all pretty reason.
And Dr. Nakahara cooperated out of Tokyo with equally adept physicians at Oxford University,
at the Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, and also at a major medical school hospital in Houston.
And doctors in these four places, very eminent, high-end tertiary care settings for cancer,
they were kind of amazed when they were looking at what's called the pet scans of people
they're following up for cancer, making sure they don't have new locations of cancer or worsening metastases.
They couldn't understand why is the heart looking black with our fluoridated glucose?
There's a fluoridated glucose molecule which goes in and which glows black,
if the tissue is unduly busy.
Typically only the brain looks really busy at a dark black level,
because that's normal for the brain.
The brain uses only sugar from metabolism,
so the brain should look black on a PET scan.
Pretty well everything else should look neutral and gray.
If there's funny spots in your armpit or funny spots in your abdomen that are black all over the place,
that's often the sign.
That's where the metastatic growth, that's where the cancer is growing.
So these doctors are used to seeing the black spots in the cancer aspects of their patients.
But they couldn't understand why are whole bunches of patients showing up with a blackening out of their heart muscle?
The heart muscle doesn't have cancer.
Why is the heart showing black uptake of sugar in a massive, strange way?
And they sussed out.
They did certain things that allowed them to double-blind the study in the end so that the physicians didn't know why they were being asked to look at these pictures or others.
But when they sussed it all out, they found that the truth.
was the 700 of 1,000 patients that had the blackened hearts from high sugar intake,
massively high sugar intake, they were all double-vaxed.
And they'd received their last vacs within the six, seven months of the scan.
The 300 patients, the opposite group that were unvaccinated, they had the normal-looking
hearts. There was no blackening out of their hearts.
There was no black level of sugar showing up in their hearts.
So what it meant and showed, and it was statistically analyzed,
and these are very competent scientists who know how to do research.
And they essentially were having to tell the world in September of 23, Dr. Nakahara,
that not just 2% or 3% of hearts are being harmed, which is the rate for myocarditis,
a horrible rate. There should be one in a million.
Myocarditis rate should be 1 to 4 per million.
The actual myocarditis rates that are showing up in the world now is 20,000.
thousand to 30,000 per million 20,000 to 30,000 rate of myocarditis because of the VACs.
That's still just 2 to 3% of the population only.
But what the study shows is that a million out of million people who have received the VACs have hard harm because 100%, literally 100% of the hearts,
most of these people were feeling fine cardiologically.
They were, after all, just being followed up for cancer, right?
but their hearts showed a 50 to 100% extra effort,
extra sugar uptake,
which only happens if you've got diseased heart cells that are straining to cope with their metabolic needs,
that are no longer able to use triglycerides and other elements for their fuel,
and are having to,
because their mitochondria are damaged internally by the presence of spike,
they're having to use metabolism features that are different,
friend. So what can we say? The help the people who are still feeling half decent after two shots,
which includes me, I got fooled into taking two shots in 2021. All of us had significant ailment in
our heart for at least seven months after our two shots. And if it's there for a while,
I dare say it's there for a long time. And if you did this with a chemical, if you had come up
with a treatment for osteoarthritis, and it was a pill.
And society was finding out two and three years later that, my goodness, it was making
100% of hearts having to work harder for seven months.
Would that pill still be on the market?
No.
Dr. Nakahara, we'll be talking about Dr. Nakahara study when we were out in Calgary.
Pet scans don't lie.
PET scans don't lie.
It picks up nucleide activity, metabolic activity, and there's no two ways around it.
unvaccinated had no change in their heart functionality.
The vaccinated 100 out of 100 had significant change in their heart activity because of the
Vax.
You know, man, that's one of the things that is set out here with the Alberta government is
we're not forcing anyone to get the VACS for the COVID-19 booster, sorry.
It's a choice, personal choice, everything's about choice.
but when I hear you tell that story, not that story, I should say, when I hear you talk about that paper,
I go, it doesn't matter about choice. It's like literally hurting everybody who walks in and gets it.
And then on top of that, that's not, you know, Scott Marzlin, you mentioned FLCCC, you know, one of Pierre Corrie's,
Scott isn't a doctor, he's, forgive me, Scott.
regardless he works with people who've been harmed by the Vax and he has been on here multiple times talking about shedding and how every time you get a person who's been boosted now you're going to have shedding happen and that can be pushed over to the unvaccinated or to the vaccinated who didn't follow up with their shots and so the danger becomes for the entire population isn't this why it doesn't matter about choice this is a toxic a toxic substance
that just needs to be removed.
Isn't this where we should all be getting to, Chris?
If you don't mind for your audience, just so they know who I am,
do you mind saying Dr. Shoemaker each time just because they should know that.
And it's quite all right.
And I thank you.
I thank you for both ways of referring to me to.
No, my apologies, Dr. Schumacher.
I'm coming from Ontario,
and I'm going to be making, along with Dr. Mark Trozy,
who is equally knowledgeable about these things,
Dr. William Maccas from out in your neck of the woods and some significant other
contributors who are going to be speaking.
But one thing we do is speak the truth about it.
Just to return to your exact question that you were wanting me to comment about right now,
just quickly remind me and then we'll carry forward.
Well, Alberta, the government in particular, says there's a choice.
Nobody's being forced to take...
Oh, I know.
You were saying about toxicity.
That was the general topic.
Is there a hidden toxicity?
And that's what I'd be delighted to comment back to you, if I may.
The hidden toxicity is that there's 40,000 billion spike makers that are put into your
shot, into your shoulder with every shot.
Not 80, like there is with polio.
There's only 80 little viral elements that allow your body to become immune to polio.
It's a pretty low, reasonable number, right?
It does the job.
It convinces the body that there's something that they should be a little more adept at getting after.
What the heck did these designers put 40 trillion or 40,000 billion
MRNA within lipid nanoparticles?
That's horrible. It's Frankensteinian in terms of its design.
And you put, there's only 30,000 billion cells in your whole body.
So if you put 40,000 billion MRI in lipids floating in,
that can cross into the blood-brain barrier, that can cross into your ovary barrier,
that can cross into your liver and all of your tissues.
The one thing it does in particular is it puts up a flag.
It says, I'm not human.
I'm not Sean.
I'm not Dr. Chris.
It's not your DNA anymore.
I'm waving a flag to say, these heart cells of yours,
they must be someone else's heart.
That's what your body thinks.
Your immune system is very smart.
And it can tell the difference between your type RNA DNA and something else's
RNA type DNA. And when it believes that the heart cell, which is a factory for these things,
the heart cell is literally factorizing more and more spike within you and even more RNA,
because it's something called reverse transcriptase can have it. It can make more RNA,
and it can even make fresh DNA from the RNA. You've got enzymes on the like in your body
that once you put a foreign protein and a foreign spike of this strength within you, it is possible
for you to continue to make it.
And while you're making it,
here's the crucial thing.
Your body doesn't think it's a poison poison.
It's not detecting it as a poison.
You don't often make antibodies to poisons.
You don't attack the cells that are being poisoned.
But what you do attack is cells that are not your own.
When you get a heart transplant or a kidney transplant,
you have to turn up the immune system.
The immune system has to be given heavy steroids,
heavy types of other drugs to quiet your body.
natural inclination to attack a kidney or a heart that is emanating strange RNA or DNA.
So did we make a mistake by putting stuff or are going to continue to make mistakes?
By putting stuff that is not our RNA or our DNA into our body as factories,
wave flags and invite your entire immune system to send CD4 cells and CD8 cells to attack
the tissues that are holding the spike in them.
And that is what happens.
So if the tissue that's attacked is the aorta, the aorta gets attacked and attacked and attacked,
and five months later, the person collapses of an aortic having literally ripped apart.
And when the real scientists, when the real pathologist out of Germany went in and looked at these suddenly deceased people who were dying in the first year after the COVID shots were being used,
they found this self-attack, this self-immune attack against the spike.
And the aorta ruptured.
Or the kidney got terribly, terribly inflamed.
And the person died with strange attack from their own body against those kidney cells.
Why?
Because the kidney cells were filled with SP2 spike, which SP2 means from the injective spike.
They weren't filled with the spike from infection.
The body doesn't go after that in the same way.
But the spike two, which is put in by the jab, that's what your own body thinks
it's foreign, I'm going to try to kill that kidney.
I'm going to try to kill that heart.
I'm going to try to wipe out that testicle's ability to make sperm, which happens.
I'm going to inflame that ovary and make that little girl infertile, and she's only 14.
These are the things that physically happen.
This is the real genetics.
This is the real truth.
This is the sad, sad truth under the microscope.
And Dr. Burkhart, in Germany, rest his soul, he was telling us the truth all the way from 20 to 2022.
And he saw it under the microscope.
He saw those split apart aorta.
He saw those inflamed ovaries.
He saw those inflamed brains.
The brain inflammation and the brain fog that people are having,
they're calling it long COVID.
Maybe 2% of the time it's long COVID from simple COVID infection.
98% of the time, these people who are vaccinated,
it's from that.
That's what's giving them there.
long, inflamed, tired, sick, nauseated, loss of balance.
And of course, death.
That's what happens when you put someone else's DNA mixed in with your own.
I just want, I'm curious, I guess I hadn't really, I don't know if I've ever had anyone put it to me that way.
So I'm curious, Doc Shoemaker, if you could just lightly explain to this dummy on this side,
when you put in a new kidney and you take down their immune system so that it doesn't fight it off,
when the immune system comes back up, why doesn't it keep attacking it?
Is there something there that they do in order to help with the form body part coming in?
Oh, yeah.
The body gets used to it.
It's a matter of time.
You have to slowly get your own body and immune system to feel and sense that the kidney that came from your cousin,
or the kidney that came from your brother is in fact close enough to being your kidney that we're
going to leave it alone.
We're not going to get frightened that we have to, not frightened, but we're going to have to be reactive
to that.
So it's literally a matter of time.
It's often a couple of years, a couple of years that you have to be taking this immune,
dampening drugs.
But your body does accommodate to it.
And ultimately, you can be on much less of the medication.
The transplant surgeons and transplant doctors understand.
this at a level that's beyond my own.
But I understand it pretty well.
But the crucial thing is you need time to adapt to someone else's heart being in you.
Because otherwise, if you weren't on immune suppression drugs, the transplanted heart,
you'd be dead in 10 days.
You'd be dead in 10 days because your own body would have attacked this transplanted heart
when you hadn't, with drugs, dampened the immune system.
So sadly, we've got so many people, the people who were probably safest to get transatlantic
They were denied transplants because they had healthy immune systems that they didn't want to mess with with a COVID shot.
If you've made your whole body hyperimmune and more wanting to attack yourself by taking the SP2 containing jab,
that's why transplants are failing more so, to be honest. Many people are having transplant failures because their immune system has been jacked up by the response of Spike 2.
being in their bodies, in other words, from being vaccinated.
So the whole world's overall safety net of being very gentle and very careful about what you do to our immune system.
Please be gentle. Please be careful. Do the right things when you need to because when you're having a transplant, you of course need special measures then.
But other than that, leave your immune system alone. Don't be putting highly hyperimmune drugs into you.
And that's what the, that's what the vaccines have done. They've created a hyperimmune.
immune state in your body where you're willing to attack your body's tissues as if they were not
your own and many more eminent scientists than me dr bacti in particular if anybody would look up his
many talks on twitter and other places dr bucharit bacti brilliant scientist out of both
germany and thailand he's alive and well unlike dr burkart has passed on but dr bacti he knows everything
believe him.
I believe him because I know he's speaking the truth.
He was the lead,
biologist, immunologist,
competent doctor,
you know,
being an editor of every scientific magazine
on these topics for the last 25 years.
What?
He's now,
and he's now foolish,
he's now not correct?
No, he's very correct.
And it allows me to be as certain
about what I'm saying as I am.
Appreciate you giving me some time today.
Is there any final thoughts for you, Dr. Shoemaker, before I let you get on with your day?
Well, I certainly enjoyed it.
The time has blown by, and thank you so much for having me on, Sean.
I do look forward to being there in Alberta.
It's time for common sense.
It's time for careful looking at what's safest and what's not.
Medicines that were safe for 40 years.
And by the way, Ivermectin was first a human,
finding of a drug that could be deduced from a root of a plant. And that drug once deduced
was used for at least 10 years in humans before it was ever used in animals. It was used to
prevent the terrible disease of river blindness. Certain parasites were causing river blindness in people
in parts of Africa. And this medication, its first 10 years, was used pretty much only for that.
Eventually, because of its beautiful ability to do what it did, veterinarians noticed, and they said,
well, maybe we could use it for some of the veterinarian parasitic diseases that we have.
And of course, it migrated over and it became legal and appropriate to use it for horses and animals.
But the beauty of this medication Ivermectin, medicines don't have a label on it, says only for parasites.
No, it's only for whatever it truly works for.
And we have learned that the microparasitic action, because a virus, a virus by definition, is essentially a microparasite.
It can't survive without other tissues and fluids around it.
It can't survive out there on a tabletop for three days.
It needs to be fairly quickly hydrated and part of a living organism.
And the ivermectin attacks the ability for either a parasite to replicate or many
of any viruses, how they replicate.
And call it both.
It's an antiviral and an antiparacetic.
It's what it is.
And it's used safely in humans for 40 years.
and it would have saved 85 to 95% of people who took it.
In fact, there were many doctors like myself working in clinics in the States
where they're able to be more vociferous about it,
and they did use the ivermectin with regularity,
and they've had 100% no deaths,
simply by using it early, often and appropriately.
So let's not be afraid of it, ladies and gentlemen.
Dear premiers who are out there, perhaps watching this,
don't be afraid to use a safe medicine that's been used in humans for 40 years.
It just happens to have a beautiful effect to turn the COVID-type virus and the spike-2 type virus into nothing within four days.
But you have to use it.
See you in Alberta.
Thanks again, Dr. Shoemaker.
You're welcome.
Chat anytime.
