Shaun Newman Podcast - #798 - Peter Scholz

Episode Date: February 18, 2025

Peter Scholz from Calgary, Alberta, he is a freelance consultant who has made significant contributions to urban planning, policy development, and community engagement throughout his career. He wrote accepted policies for the UCP that include killing e-tabulators, connecting Alberta to more ports and anti-WEF policies. Cornerstone Forum ‘25https://www.showpass.com/cornerstone25/Get your voice heard: Text Shaun 587-217-8500Substack:https://open.substack.com/pub/shaunnewmanpodcastSilver Gold Bull Links:Website: https://silvergoldbull.ca/Email: [e-mail] Grahame: [phone]Use the code “SNP” on all ordersProphet River Links:Website: store.prophetriver.com/Email: [e-mail]

This is Viva Fry. I'm Dr. Peter McCullough. This is Tom Lomago. This is Chuck Pradnik. This is Alex Krenner. Hey, this is Brad Wall. This is J.P. Sears. Hi, this is Frank Peretti.

This is Tammy Peterson. This is Danielle Smith. This is James Lindsay. Hey, this is Brett Kessel, and you're listening to the Sean Newman podcast. Welcome to the podcast, folks. How's everybody doing today? Did you know that you can hold physical golden silver in your registered accounts? And the deadline is March 3rd.

So, if you're wanting to get on this, March 3rd, that is coming like, right around the corner. It is a couple of weeks away. You can unlock the potential of your RRSP, TFSA, RRIF, or Kids RESP by adding physical gold and silver to your account. Don't understand, want to know more, have questions. The easy thing to do is to text your email Graham down the show notes. He can answer all your questions around investing in precious metals

or for future deals, future silver deals, exclusively for you, the SMP listener. And Silver Gold Bull, of course, is the company I recommend here. in Alberta when it comes to the, you know, anything to do with buying, selling, storing precious metals, they got all their solutions in-house that can help you. And if you're ever on SGB, make sure online at silvergoldbblow.com or dot CA, make sure any purchases you reference the S&P. Did you listen up on Monday?

Profit River. Yes. We got to, you're like, wait, wait a second, it's Tuesday. What's Prophet River doing here? I'll tell you. I tell you what. They're on, they're added a little. special how you doing to all you find folks they got a primary contact for us just kind of like

the sgb hey joel is hopping on board he you can get a hold of them at s np at profit river dot com so we're going to bypass everybody we're going to get right to be joel he is uh their phone and internet sales manager and knows his stuff so when it comes to guns ammunition scopes blah blah blah blah he's not going to say blah blah blah he's going to be the expert uh getting you uh getting you what you need to get. And if you use the code SMP, whether we're online, whether you're in store, whether you're over the phone every month, you're going to be added into a draw for $100 gift card to the

store. Pretty freaking sweet. All you got to do is go down in the show notes. All the details are there. Make sure on any purchases to reference SNP, that's profitriver.com. They are the major major retailers of firearms, optics, and accessories serving all of Canada. And now, folks, they're trying to make it even better. More enticing for all of you.

Just go to Proforriver.com and make sure to reference SNP. It's all down in the show notes. Rec tech power products for over 20 years. They've been committed to excellence in the power sports industry. They as well are getting on board with this. Let's try and find a way to interact with all of you a bit more. We got some details coming very, very, very soon. probably by next week we're going to have it all.

In the meantime, let's talk March 21st to 23rd. Spring and Sports, oh man, the Sport and Leisure Show, the Spring, Sport and Leisure Show. Can I fit that out? Holy Dina. And they're going to be there in attendance. Ryan's going to be hanging out there. They're going to have their Lund boats that we've been talking about, the Cadillac of the fishing boat world, and then Can Ams and a whole bunch of other things.

They also have going till the end of March snow check. So if you pre-order your snowmobiles, I don't know. You get fall delivery. He was talking about all these things. I'm like, you can tell I'm a complete nutter moron. I'm like, snow check? All right. Well, that's going on, folks.

And that's for all you keeners out there that want to get your new snowmobiles for next year. Essentially, you can pre-order your snowmobiles. And finally, they got egg and commercial discounts. Essentially, if you're a business owner, you should reach out to rec tech and see what they can do for you. They got some products with some discounts for anyone in the ag and commercial, which I took to mean if you own a business, reach out to RectTech Power Products because they're going to find a way to work with you. They're open Monday through Saturday.

Make sure if you stop in, you let Ryan know I sent you, and you can go to Rectepower Products.com for everything. PlanetCom. When you're busy running and growing your business, trying to stay on top of ever-changing world of information technology can be overwhelming to say the least yes, and they will take care of that for you, leaving you to do your thing.

For the past 22 years, PlanetCom has been there to boost your productivity by proactively managing every aspect of your IT infrastructure, both in-house and in the cloud. I still don't know what in the cloud means. That's kind of off in La La Land for me. This ensures you are not too tangled up in technology to get anything done.

When it comes to websites, tech, etc, planetcom.ca. Let's get that right. Planetcom. dot CA. There you go. We got the new, well, blue, blue, I guess I'm not going to spit it out right now.

Am I going to figure this out, Sean? The old tongue not working on a Tuesday? Holy moly. We got substack, free to subscribe to, what am I trying to spit out here? Like, it's not, it's there. Value, not value. We can review.

Holy Dina. Tuesday. First day of kids being off school and Sean is already getting run down, I guess. We can review on Substack, free to subscribe to, get caught back up on all things. SMP. I hear you loud and clear. Five episodes a week. Tons, tons of information coming at you. Well, Substack, folks, it breaks it down into about two and a half minutes. You can see the week. You can also be a paid subscriber and support the podcast from there. So, hey, there's some cool stuff going on there. They got the new studio coming here in 2025, looking for skills, labor, materials, money, value for value wall in there, going to be the legacy wall. We want to put your name on it, whether it's your company, your name, shoot me a text, would love to hear from you.

All right. If you're watching on Spotify, Apple, YouTube, Brummel, make sure to subscribe and leave a review. If you're watching on X, retweet this sucker. And folks, if you don't have your tickets for May 10th to the Cornerstone Forum, I don't know what you're doing, but go down on the show notes, click on it. Hope to see you there. going to be a ton of fun. All right, let's get on to that tale of the tape. He's a freelance consultant who successfully wrote accepted policies for the UCP that included

killing e-tabulators, connecting Alberta to more ports and the anti-Wef policies. I'm talking about Peter Schultz, so buckle up, here we go. Welcome to the Sean Newman podcast. Today I'm joined by Peter Schultz. So, sir, thanks for hopping on. Thanks for inviting me. It's great to be on this show, and I'll enjoy it. We'll see how this goes.

I'm looking forward to talking to people. laughing at the keener's who are reading your name and going, Schultz, where is that? And, you know, I had folks, I literally had to put tea in there so that I wouldn't screw it up because I've been doing that lately. And names are like kind of my fancy. I'm like, I want to make sure I get it right. And so Schultz with no tea is a new one. Tell me a little bit about yourself, Peter. Well, Schultz in German is, I mean, I was born and raised in Canada, but my father came out of the Berlin area right before the wall went on.

And Schultz is like in Germany is like Smith in England. So there's five million ways to spell it. And you can sort of tell which region they're from based on how it's spelled. So Schultz is very much a Silesian, Pomeranian, Prussian version of Schultz. Anyway, who am I? As you know, I'm was German, you know that so far. On your father, did I hear that right?

He left before the wall went up? Yes. Did you ever ask him about why he left or like the time in that and being in Germany around that? He told me all the time. He told me old the story about it. He left when he was 19 years old. He left behind a newborn daughter, and he left behind his parents. He was an only child. And he came to Alberta, actually, because he had a distant relative. He were going five zillion apers in southern Alberta, and he ended up working there for about 15 minutes before getting a job on the CPR. No, he left because he participated in the 1950-ish-R.

against the Soviet communist takeover in Berlin. He's from a suburb of Berlin, but the city had been divided between the Soviet and the Western. And his mother said to him, listen, we know what the Soviets are going to do. They were taking pictures while there was protests and riots. They took pictures with the old black and white photos. And they are now going to be going through every single face in every single photo that they took. And it may be in a month, it may be in a year, it may be in 10 years. years, you will get a knock on the door at 2 o'clock in the morning.

And you'll come back one week or two weeks or six months later, and you will be a different person. And you need to leave now. And that's why he came to Canada. Forgive me for, is he still alive? No, he died 25 years ago from an unfortunate accident. Well, I'm sorry to hear that. I was going to ask, I wonder what he would think of Canada these days, because, you know,

not that long ago, well, I met in a pasture out in the middle of nowhere with no phones and no nothing talking about whether we should leave this country. And now fast forward, I'm obviously still here, but I bring different people on and at times I poke the hornets nest over and over again, and I sometimes run into the odd person with a background in law enforcement. And they'll mention, you know, we're starting to resemble East Germany. And I don't know how true that is, but just that when people in different positions start to tell you that, you know, your tail feathers get a little bit like, I don't think we're there yet, but maybe we are. You are absolutely on the right track. And my father told me many, many times when I was a teenager, he died when I was 17. This is how it works. And you have to be aware of these signs. And this is how the media will portray things. And you need to see them coming.

so that you can take appropriate action early enough that you won't end up being that guy that disappears for a week or six months and comes back a different person. Once again, I apologize. You got me fascinated right now in like a very, obviously dark way, folks, but when he said, here's our the signs, here's what media is going to do. What sticks out to you?

Or like, what do you look for when you, you know, when you, you know, you start to remember your father's really like, man, he started talking about this, this, this. He said, it's not that it's not that there are bugs everywhere. It said the walls have ears. He said, when you have the sense that the walls have ears and you're monitoring what you say in certain circumstances and you have a little knot of fear and you're afraid to say things, that is symptomatic of a very serious cancer across society. And like cancer, you know, it can be quite advanced before you actually have exterior symptoms. And he said, you have to, you have to think that way.

And he showed me some photos from McLean's and other things. And he says, you know, you know, this is how it's portraying Trudeau in this circumstance or that circumstance. And, you know, they were, my parents were polite around Trudeau. But they, they were suspicious of him being too far left leaning. And they said Margaret Trudeau is quite way out there in La La Land. And you have to be aware of those kids. So when Justin became prime minister, my little radars immediately went up. And boy, has that proven out.

I'm probably speaking for the entire audience right now, Peter. When they, they go. So at times, I think we all look around, and I'm going to lift it up with this little device sitting here, right? Yeah. And I would say everyone, well, not everyone. I would say everyone listening to this podcast or a good majority of them when you go, when the walls have ears and you're worried about that, it's like, isn't that what we're all worried about right now? It's like, it's like I've literally been approached by off-duty members of a certain police force. And they're like, thanks for the work you do.

But understand these are the things going on in the background. And I'm like, ooh, okay. I get the same messaging. I have a few RCMP friends and other police force friends as well. And I get the exact same messaging. And I think part of the reason that Trudeau is resigned when, or promised to resign when he did, was he reached a point where he's getting messaging

that the police forces and the military forces will not follow him anymore. And he's like, I will actually lose control of the federal security services. And these are the big, tough guys that carry the guns. I suspect that. I have no way to prove it. It's just the tone that I'm hearing from a wide variety of security forces, people that I'm associated with, was shifting. And I'm like, they have, the federal government will have their tone on that. I mean, this is a federal government where, was it freely.

or one of the ministers during the trucker convoy wrote a text message, can we bring in the tanks? They wanted to shoot us. They wanted to drive over us. And if we were in North Korea or a country where our serving people, like the armed forces, were not loyal to us,

you know, we're willing to follow those kinds of laws, I think we would have seen that level of violence in Canada. But we didn't because of the kind of people we have. In the background. in the background, yeah. And the fundamental foundations of our culture. I think that's a good point. Now, I've derailed this, you know, I was going to give you this long,

and then you said something right off the hot, and I've got to pick on that just for a couple seconds. Tell, you know, we started with your background and your name, but, you know, you live here in Alberta. What do you do? Well, I am, I'm basically a freelance consultant. I do regional planning, land use planning, project management for a variety of First Nation, northern clients, municipalities, counties, you know, whatever they ask.

Can you get this done? Can you revise this community plan? Can you do that zoning bylaw? Can you prepare? Can you do a development permit? Nothing that exciting. That's how I earn a living. I live in a small ranch just west of Calgary.

I've got five young children, aged between 10 and 2, happily married. with a very lovely lady who's a nurse who's active in church and hospital. So that's great. And way too many of my hours have been spent pro bono on trying to push forward corridors and linear infrastructure, especially railways through Alberta, and really get Canada back on a track of nation building. And part of what's driven me is it is time. Like our country isn't a funk. And there's a few ways out of that funk and I view redefining ourselves a little bit as a key way to doing that. And part of that is what is Canada going to look like with 80 million people in 50 or 100 years, especially in the North?

So anyway, my educational background, I was thinking about how to answer this because half of my university schooling, I was like, I probably could have a, skip that and just been earning money instead because I didn't actually learn anything. It was just all woke nonsense. They were trying to shove into my brain, for example. When I was at UBC in grad school, they said, write a paper on the source of your ethics. So I wrote about Judeo Christianity. And then I got called into the dean's office and said, you can't use that as a basis of ethics. And I'm like, yeah, I can.

And they said, you'll keep, fair enough, you'll keep it quiet. or you will be kicked out of this graduate program. I'm like, okay, this is 20 years ago. This is UBC 20 years ago. I'm like, and now I find it. When you talk about, actually, I want to get it out of my brain because otherwise I'll sit and stew on it. How many kids did you say you had?

Five. Yeah, you got five. Hats off to you, sir. First off, that is a busy, busy household. And I don't think there's nothing better than being a dad or family on and on. So my hat's off to you because I got three young ones. And I always joke. The wife always laughs at me, but we can't have anymore.

We had complications on the third. And I'm like, I'd have another tomorrow. She's like, no, you wouldn't. I'm like, yeah, I would. I wouldn't be happy about going back into diapers and, you know, the sleepless nights and everything. But at the same time, I don't know, when I get too involved, too wrapped up in the stresses of this world of like the, you know, staring into the void and seeing all the stupidity, hearing that, that 20 years. go by saying where do ethics come from and you point to Christianity and they're like no no you can't do that otherwise you put it I'm like holy crap when you're going the cancer is growing I'm like the

cancer is growing when you can't talk about certain things you can't bring up your your background belief I'm like what we're literally we're literally founded on that folks anyways side notes here yeah my hat's off to you on on being a dad I think that's cool that, you know, my wife's not. She did most of the work, you know, bringing them into the world. It's fair. I just like to me, five kids, you know, I grew up in a family of five. But like today's world, two kids is a lot, right?

Like five kids is exceptional. Yeah. And I actually can't imagine less. I mean, when I've got two kids at home, I'm like, boy, it feels empty. But I always say it's like a bell curve. Like the first one, your life changes forever. The second one increases your workload by about 50% because you already have kind of the infrastructure all set up.

Number three, it's only about 25% more than the first three. Number four, it starts curving down again. That was my experience. Number five is actually a little bit less work than having three because the two older ones are now helping out. Looking out. And that actually is good for me and it's good for them. Number one gives me time to work.

And number two, it's good for them. because it teaches them responsibility and gives them a sense of value to be helping someone smaller and weaker than them and helping teach them. So I'm hoping that'll help them also raise to be better grounded people. I always say after the first, I was like, I'm never having kids again. Like, oh, my God. And then six months went by and maybe even eight. And then we'll know it had to have been sick because we had her second 14 months later. So it wasn't that long. And then we had two and I'm like, I went into the doctor. And I, I, I talk about, I've talked about this a little bit, like don't make decisions under duress. And this comes from a South Africa doctor because I went in. I'm like, I want the snip. Just get me, two kids is enough. This is, this is way too hard. And she's like, how long ago did you have your second?

And she was talking to me. And she said, come see me in six months. I'm like, no, no, no, I want to book this now. She's like, no, well, we'll talk about it. We're pretty busy right now. Come see me in six months. So I was irritated, left. Six months later, I'd forgotten why I even had the appointment.

Walked in. She's like, okay, you're ready? And I'm like, ready for what? She's like, get the snap. Like, oh, no, I don't want that. She's like, oh, and I'm like, oh, yeah, that's what that was about. Huh. That's interesting.

And then by the time I had the third, if we hadn't had complications, I feel like it only took a couple weeks, you know, maybe a month. Maybe I'm romanticizing it. But you're like, I could do this again. Like, I mean, at the end of the day, if I could just take out the pregnancy, or not the pregnancy, the birthing portion, I am a weakling folks when it comes to that. I can like a full house is a lot of fun don't get me wrong at times I'm like why am I so tired

and then I remember I'm like oh right I've been chasing three kids all day long that that has to add into it oh man I've derailed this uh on a ton of sides this is super cool um you mentioned building canada right like we got to get going on this is that even possible when you know you know like you hear Donald Trump the tariffs All summer, Team Canada, and everybody in Alberta's been saying, we're Team Canada now? What happened the last, like, I don't know, two decades, three decades, go wherever you want. Now we're going to be Team Canada, and as soon as it kind of falls away, Quebec comes out and says, no, no pipeline will ever go across our land, blah, blah, blah, blah. You hear there's a way, or you feel there's a way to build and make Canada a nation that's moving forward instead of being stuck in this giant rut.

I do. And I think to move forward, we have to understand better where we come from. And I was in my 40s before I felt I actually understood where Canada come from, came from. And if it's okay, I'll wax nerdy for like two seconds. So American Revolution, the 13 colonies along the coast rebelled. They conquered the southern portion of the province of Quebec, which was then Western Appalachia. and they conquered First Nations territory, which was up to the Mississippi, all under the British crown. That's part of the reason they rebelled is they wanted to settle in those areas.

They were successful at that. And four colonies said, no, we're staying with the crown. And the Americans established a constitution that combined elements from the Roman Republic and elements from, you know, more reasonable. recent economic political theory about freedom and liberty and came with a very, very powerful constitution. What I think they're going through now and what we very narrowly missed was the same thing as happened to the Roman Empire under Julius and Augustus Caesar, which is a series of small scale and middle scale civil wars leading to the republic becoming an imperial empire

with an emperor. And the deep state to me represents American imperialism. It is a non-democratic autocratic, extremely powerful force. And I'm not saying the Roman Empire was all bad. There were some very, very good emperors out there. But I think the Americans with the negotiation of Trump are saying, we do not want to make that transition from Cincinnati to Julius. We want to stay as a republic. And I wholeheartedly support them in that.

The four remaining colonies squabbled as they would, but they remain loyal to a crown. And that is continuing the tradition of the later Roman Empire. When the Roman Republic became an empire, the idea was that emperor is God, and therefore you worship the emperor. And then with the Christian transition of the Roman Empire, it became God. The emperor reports to God and serves God on behalf of the people. So the training it takes to become a good leader is why is the reason you have. you know, you pass it on to your son as it takes a lifetime to teach these people how to lead.

And that sort of thinking transition to the British crown. And we have one of those provinces is what's left of the kingdom of France. The kingdom of France is long dead, but the kingdom of France is still alive in Quebec. And you have three colonies that belong to the kingdom of Britain. And even though Britain basically functions like a republic, those three colonies are are still thinking in terms of that government is benevolent, and we should always trust government unless there's a reason not to. And Canada, to protect itself its independence,

like Americans had their civil war in 1865, then Alaska came, they purchased Alaska, when they purchased Alaska, they said it's the backdoor into Asia, the backdoor into Canada and the finger pointer to Asia. Canada is confederated that year. And if you read the history of Canada, building this Canadian Pacific Railway to the province of British Columbia,

the accession of British Columbia to the Confederation, the establishment of new provinces in the West, was all about keeping the Americans out and keeping our approach, our different approach going. And the reason Canada still exists, the reason Quebec is still part of Canada, is this kind of hidden DNA deep, deep down, of a benevolent government and a certain approach to,

how God reports through combined with a, you know, a parliamentary system. So in some ways, I agree with Pierre Pauley, everyone. He says we have the strongest form of government because I, those are the roots we're coming from. Now, I've gone off the tangent. So how do we build from here? We built the railway. I call it, I call Western Canada 1.0. There's basically two railways in a Winnipeg.

One went to Vancouver. One went to Prince George. The one went to Vancouver was put there to prevent the Americans from moving north. and along the Canadian Pacific, we have all the cities we know about Vancouver, Canloops, Calgary, Regina, etc. That is all Canadian Pacific Railway cities. The second railway went from Winnipeg to Prince Rupert to Prince Rupert, Canadian National Railway, and that was to keep the Americans from Alaska from moving south.

And along that railway, you have other cities that you expect, Prince Rupert, Prince George, Edmonton, Saskatoon, etc. Prince Rupert was intended to be as big as Vancouver. and the man who was busy planning for a giant Prince Rupert, he was going to build bridges to dig the island and the other islands around Prince Rupert to create a metropolis, and he was planning the waterworks and the utilities necessary to make it happen, went down with the Titanic.

And that's why today Prince Rupert is 16,000 people as opposed to, you know, half a million or a million people. What I'm talking about is... You got to hold there for just one second. You can't drop that bomb and then not... sit on that for a second. You're saying the two lines, different, different railways. Yeah. One goes south, keep the Americans from coming up. One goes north, keep the Americans coming down. Okay, nice and simple. And the guy who was planning Prince Rupert, correct? Prince Rupert?

Yes. Yeah. Was planning to build a giant metropolis like Vancouver there. Yes. And he died on the Titanic. Yes. oh man I'm like I don't want to put my tinfoil hat on but but I've been hearing different things about the Titanic and the people that sunk with that I didn't realize there was a guy from Canada

or the British Empire like what would he be considered oh my gosh it was a couple years since I look I don't remember his name but if you type in Titanic Prince Rupert the name will come up and you can look into it it's it's well known I learned it in high school actually actually about that. I was like, well, why don't we just do it anyway? Why don't we extend Highway 16 to Digby Island? It's not that far our bridge. And then we can open up new areas for settlement. And that, you know, just the fact that there's so many jobs there with the port facilities and the opportunities for manufacturing, the city will grow on its own naturally. This is, this is, this is, this is a article. It says, a small coastal town in British Columbia suffered a powerful loss when the Titanic sank to the bottom of the sea, taking hopes and dreams with it.

If anyone from the province happened to find themselves in the coastal city of Prince Rupert in British Columbia, they would have no doubt felt at home. Rupert, as locals called it, in a place to find by links to the sea, fishing, recreation. It wears a badge as the fourth rainiest place on the planet with pride. But who is the guy? I'd have to look it up. Sorry, it's been a couple years since I... Hays?

That sounds about right. Yeah. People have to forgive me. I can't move on from this until I find out the guy's name. I'm like, wait a second. I'll help you look at it out. Prince Rupert, the Grand Trunk Preferred Locations, Too Close to China. Charles Hayes, is that it?

Says, one of the early proponents to make Prince Rupert the preeminent port for the West was Charles Hayes. Hayes was president of the Grand Trunk Railway, and under his leadership, the railway opened and developed many Western towns across the turn of the 20th century. He envisioned Rupert as a made-to-order town. elegantly planned and ready for an influx of new residents. Hayes aggressively forged ahead with plans to build a second railway in Canada connecting Winnipeg to Prince Rupert. He lobbied the Canadian government for subsidies relentlessly courted bankers and finances in New York and London to get on board with his grand dream.

He even had plans drawn up to build a twin hotel of the Empress, the iconic building in BC's capital of Victoria. As a project game steamed, it also lost momentum. workers demanded wages equivalent to their American counterparts and supply chains were getting harder to maintain a more expensive. Hayes himself was relentlessly relentless in demanding the highest standards as he is boundless confidence he could raise whatever capital was necessary to see his plan through. It says, yeah, like I can go on and on. I push everybody to go read that. I got some reading to do.

That's interesting to me. Forgive me for taking us on another side tangent, but I guess this is going to be the morning. No worries. That's all good. So the Canadian system, I actually wish we hadn't abroad in the 19802 constitution under Trudeau. I think we were functioning better under the British North America Act. There's a tendency because the population centrality in eastern Canada to create a bit of a mercantile system where, you know, Central Canada is like, we make things. And then out west, those are, you know, hollers of grain, whores of wood, haulers of water and makers of, you know, of whatever, raw materials. But there's two levels of colonial. That's the first level of colonialism that's formed.

Canada, but a darker side of Canada is formed is an intra-provincial form of colonialism, which exists in all the provinces, but is very prominent in British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec, which is that you have over half the population in one location. So over half the votes, over half the writings are for one particular city. And then they dominate policy. And what ends of happening is that they suck in the money from the rural areas of their provinces, which allows socialism to thrive. Socialism is an ideology to thrive in those cities, Vancouver, Toronto, Ottawa, and Montreal, especially Montreal, because Montreal is also the source of the trans-Canada colonialism because of the whole Quebec thing. And socialism can only survive where there is

subsidization from somebody. So for example, in British Columbia, 10% of the provincial budget comes from the coal mines at Sparwood. If you go to the Coutneys of British Columbia and you think, oh, like a billion dollars a quarter is being sucked out of this of this port, you know, the toe of the Compe province. You look at the highways. You're like, okay, a billion dollars being sucked out, but maybe a few million bucks is coming back. Right. And it's the same thing, Northern Ontario, Southern Ontario. And if you go to Montreal, especially, um, my goodness. I mean, it's this, you know, all the power, everything from rural Quebec is this, it's being sucked through through Montreal. So I feel that we need to think about some

provincial boundary changes at those three provinces to, uh, to decline that level of colonialization. That's another story in terms of the corridors and the infrastructure. What I'm defining as Western Canada 1.0 are those two railways we just talked about. Western Canada 2.0 that I'm calling is two new railways. One railway is what could be called Northwest Passage by rail, which would be from Hudson Bay, Churchill or near Churchill, across to near Prince Rupert. And there are different options. There's Kitamette, there's Stewart, there's a few different rail potential routes through that. And the second link would be Northwest running most likely through Alberta. There is a BCL.

option, but it's most likely through Alberta to Alaska. And I have put more of my attention on the latter than the former, but I'll stop there to see how you, if you want to question more. Why is a railway so important? Like, why not, why not, you know, like I think of Shane Getson being on here talking about economic corridors. And I don't, maybe forgive me, folks, maybe he mentioned a railway. I think of, I want to say power lines and pipelines.

is the two things that stuck out to me about that conversation. Maybe there was a railway there as well, but certainly it was a corridor of, was it a mile wide? I don't, I don't recall the exact details, but essentially allowing for goods and trade to follow a certain corridor and to have, you know, less red tape than certainly can to has across the, you know, across the board. Why is a railway in your mind the right thing instead of, I don't know, energy pipeline that's a great question i i've spoken to shane regularly and i would say i

i 100% share his vision of a corridor network now corridor is a path the word corridor means a path to get from some point a to point b whatever now a right you know there's right of way and then there's easement, which are the actual legal definitions of a corridor. What I have argued is that the corridor should be defined on the, I'll use big words here, topographical limitations of rail. What that means is trains do not big, the big class one railway is, you know, the mile long trains that can carry basically anything from passengers to anything. at some speed.

They don't like turning very much, and they really don't like going up or down because the energy of moving the weight of the train up and the mechanical braking, wear and tear of slowing a train down when it goes back down are very, very high. So the reason to focus on rail, first is because if you're going to define your corridors,

it's best to go to the mode that's the most limited. Now, you ask, Why do we go with, why focus on trains and not power lines or pipelines or roads? It's because trains are the transformative mode. If you build a highway to a place, you don't, I'll explain this way. The best way. Roads tend to cause a concentration of population and roads can't carry the kind of capacity that a train does. but roads can carry almost anything.

When you see a road network built, you tend to see a concentration of population away from rural areas into urban areas. When you see trains built with regular passenger service, you tend to see local communities grow up because they can get from place to place without the stress of driving. With pipelines, they are two to three times more economical

for carrying certain liquids. at volume. And so for fuel stuffs, they are the most economical for getting to the bottom line of a provincial revenue sheet or whatever. But once the resource runs out, the pipeline is irrelevant and the pipeline will either be abandoned or removed for recovery of the metals that are in it. It will not be transformative. And when I transformative, I mean new cities that are lasting new farms, new areas of settlement, new industries, new factories that last for 100 or 200 years. Those are associated with rail. For highways, again, highways do serve an important purpose, but they are far less efficient for carrying big loads a long way. If you ever had to

hire a moving van with the carry 140-foot sea container across the country, it's $7,000. If the Canadian Pacific Rail, we would let you put that CCAN on a train in Montreal. It would be about 500 bucks because of the different cost. Does that answer your question or am I going on a tangent? No, no, not on a tangent whatsoever. I'm wondering then the way you see, or the path forward you see for Canada to get us out of this funk of like going further and further into socialism is by building something that will naturally move us away from that.

it's going to spur on everything you just talked about. And that's rails. Yes. By building on rails, you're going to essentially develop something that's away from this big giant urban center where socialism grabs a foothold because that's naturally what occurs when you put a big population all living on top of one another. Yes. And to that I'll also add that the Americans want to connect their 49th state to the 48,

the lower 48 states. and they need to do that for two primary reasons. Number one is their West Coast ports are essentially full. There's a lot of economy associated with congestion at those ports, not to mention they tend to have strikes and all that thing all the time. And the Canadian ports are getting fairly full as well. I think Prince Rupert and Vancouver won awards for being the worst and second worst ports on the planet two years ago,

if I don't remember. And they're fairly full as well. Prince Rupert could expand its capacity considerably if they built the bridge that we just talked about to the surrounding islands to use the space around those. But any, Prince Rupert's getting full as well. There's tremendous unused port capacity in Alaska. So if Anchorage becomes the, an American port connected by mainline freight to the lower 48, you will be seeing very large numbers of freight traffic generating in Chicago and Memphis going to Anchorage. The Americans want that and need that.

Number two, going a little international here for a second, is whatever your point of view is on Putin and Russia, during the Ukraine war, Russia, Iran, and China moved much closer together militarily. and the game that was behind the scenes over the last five years was them trying to create fortress Asia. And you would see Russian, Chinese, and Iranian emissaries wooing the pinch points, the cracks in that armor, namely Armenia, Kazakhstan, Pakistan, Vietnam, India, you're always hearing about Russian emissary goes here, Chinese emissary goes here, American emissaries. They were wooing because there was a game going on of the Russian, Chinese and Iranians trying to create a anti a non-American fortress Asia and America trying to prevent that that was clearly reported but it was very very clear in the science and if you read the geotechnical

you know geopolitical papers it it becomes quite clear my argument and I think most military people agree with me is mainly the Russians Chinese and Iranians were more successful than the Americans and there is a very large portion of the world now that is outside side of American direct influence. That's Russia, China, Iran, and a few countries in the middle. Values aside, I hate the Chinese Communist Party for many, many reasons. I hate the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. Okay, I'm just, I'm thinking realpolitik here.

The American Empire is not a worldwide empire anymore. It's been kicked out of Asia. A responsible defensive strategy for us over here in North America is, yes, to continue willing way and ending Fortress Asia, but to have a Fortress North America ready to go in case things go sideways. And you can't have Fortress North America unless you have a heavy haul link between the Lower 48 and Alaska, because right now we have a two-lane highway and we have the U.S. Navy.

The U.S. Navy is now vulnerable because of hypersonic missiles. The U.S. Navy is developing laser guns to shoot down the hypersonic missiles, and it's all very Star Wars. But the end of the day, if you need to get, if there was a full-on war, you want to have that railway in position. What I'm arguing for Canada

and more so for Alberta is we have that corridor set and ready to go. We don't even have to have a railway yet. We just have to have the corridor legally ready to go and available for construction. That gives Alberta tremendous leverage.

We can say, to say to the Americans, you want to connect to Alaska, that's great. You're going to go through our territory. Let's negotiate. We don't want tariffs. We don't want, you know, threats. We also want any intelligence you have on corruption inside the government of Canada so that we can address it at a provincial level. To the Canadians, in eastern Canadians, we can say, we have an option. We are on an east-west corridor. Yes, we're tying the country together, but we also have a north-south option. And we want to be treated as a fair and equal member of this country and not as a colony of Montreal. And you need to start thinking that way because the ideology of Laurentian

elite needs to end or this country will fail. And if necessary, we'll pull the plug. Does anything in politics give you the hope that that's actually going to happen? Like the corridors. Like when I listen to Shane, I'm like, man, I'll go back. This was 2021. This is four years ago when he first mentioned to me. I'm like, wow, that's brilliant. Now, I understand politics. It doesn't, nothing goes at the light of speed unless you're Trump in the first hundred days.

So I sit here and I watch things play out. And I'm like, we're four years. And I don't think we're any closer. I don't look at our politicians and see any of them working together. They act like they're working together at times when they're talking about the United States. But what you're talking about is cooperation with the United States. It's like this, I'm like, how? And once again, some of the conversations I have behind the scenes, I hear the different levels of government that aren't the highest levels talking about how there's a lot of people that want to cooperate between the two countries.

But I mean, you're watching on what's playing out in media between our world leaders. The fact Trudeau is still, I think, the leader as of right now. And soon it'll be Carney. I think it'll be Carney. I shouldn't say that. you know, maybe something gets duped in there. But to me, it's like, that's going to be the next. And I'm like, well, that ain't going to help us.

So now you're at least a few months or possibly a year, depending on what happens with our Canadian government. Because the more, as I was telling you before we started, the more I learned, I'm like, oh, man, that can't be possible. Yet it is possible. And I go, like, does anything give Peter the feeling like, well, this can happen? Yeah, I think so. And it actually boils down to the original inhabitants of this land, which are the first nations.

That's the first answer. The second answer, you know, is about that state and province level approach and the regional approach. And the fact of, and the third element is ending the insane level of corruption that has crept into Canada. So with the first nations approach, if you read, the treaties over which most of Canada is founded. They are agreements between the crown and the

nation. And the way it's been described to me is that and I can see it when I read it myself is there's an agreement to share the land under the crown, under the benevolent

crown. Again, back to the word benevolent. And to share in the wealth and growth of the new country. And when you read the history of the agreements, they were signed. Everything was good. And then a new set of people came in and, you know, the natives were, the Indian First Nations were shoved onto reserves for two generations without the ability to leave, right? Effectively put in, you know, open air prisons and shut out from economic life.

Well, Western Canada 1.0 in Canada grew up to what it is now. That was a fundamental error and not not excusable by any stretch. The only thing that occurred that, you know, indicated the benevolence is, you know, we didn't see the Indian wars over here. We didn't see the mass. We didn't see the mass killings like we did in the States. So in that level, we followed the treaty and that we didn't outright massacre people. So the driver.

Forgive me. But what the Canadian government did was kind of the, I don't know, is it, what model is it, folks? I'm just like the non-aggressive manner. They didn't shoot everybody, but they just starved them out. They forced them into different places. They didn't allow them to do a lot of what their culture had done up until the point of being signed in these treaties. and they held food and different lands over their head until they signed them and different things like that.

So while we didn't just line them up and shoot them, we did have our form of non-aggressive ways of forcing them to do what we wanted them to do. You know, as, you know, like I just go to Big Bear in my area. You've read the book, fascinating, heartbreaking story about just, you know, like just imagine wives and children and people just dying, starving to death. in the barren tundra of Alberta, Saskatchewan. And yeah, we weren't aggressive. But I mean, same token.

There's something to be said on that type of warfare as well. Or negotiation, whatever you want to call it. I absolutely agree. You know, you could make an argument that Canada is developed the most vicious forms of violence on Earth. The one you just mentioned, you know, the, oh, we won't kill you. We'll just, you know, let you starve to death in the cold. It's your choice to starve to death. Yeah, exactly.

It's your choice not to do this and not have a job. It's your choice. I didn't force you to take a COVID shot, right? You know, I just fired you and took away your EI and called you a racist and misogynist in front of national public and got the entire society against you and blocked you out of cancellation and, you know, wouldn't let you use a trainer plane for two years. But I never forced you. I never forced you to do anything. Yeah. You know, one of the things, Peter, that I'm beginning to learn, you know,

and it's written the Bible is, right, there's nothing new under the sun. And I wonder about that a lot. I'm like, how far back does this go, right? Like, is it like right from day one this has been going on? There's a story and a conversation for a different time. I'm wrestling with that. Because like when you look at Canada, you go like, we think what COVID was was so unique. But then you read the accounts of the First Nations.

And you go, like, listen, there's things going on today I do not agree with. But when you go back and read the accounts of what happened to them, you're like, oh, my God. Like, it's the playbooks right there. They just, we just can't all get on the same page today to be like, it's those guys. We're going to fight between ourselves. It's like it's literally the government. Oh, my. Sean on a tirade.

Now, you're saying First Nations, I'm going to pull it back here. I'm going to try and keep us on track. You're saying First Nations is the key because they have disagreement sign and they're kind of like, I assume where you're going with this, at least where my brain goes, is a nation within a nation. So they have certain autonomy that other parts of the country don't have. And since there's so many of them is that that would work in our favor is kind of what I'm or am I wrong on that? Sort of. Quick tangent. When Trump talks about an ex in Canada, I'm like you actually legally can't do that because the treaty is between the crown and the nation and the nations.

The treaties are between the crown and the nations. So you'd have to, you can't annex Canada without renegotiating the treaties. But that's why the point. Until, until you just, until like you just don't care about the paper. Yeah. If you get rid of the crown. Yeah. You know, if you just, if you just land some, some planes here with some big missiles, all of a sudden,

we'd all be like, well, the paperwork says this. but I mean, is might, right? You know? Well, that's just it. The Americans did that. They will lose their world empire because the rest of the world will say, oh, you're just the next Britain. And then they will begin the process of separating.

Guess what? Russia has planned for that. Russia is marketing itself in Latin America and Africa as we are the de-Americanizer, de-Americanizer, right? So the Americans don't want to do that because they'll be playing exactly into what Putin wants them to do. because he's playing for Russian hegemony. That's another point.

Let's not go there. With the First Nations, I'm in contact and association with many First Nations. And they're saying, we want to be part of the Canadian economy. We want to be built into the DNA. We want to be respected in our perspectives on land. And I'll do another quick tangent here is on the difference perspectives of land is that people say, well, the First Nations were here first, so it's their land.

That's actually not, I mean, it could be some of their perspectives. I'm not going to speak for all the First Nations, but in general, the way it's been described to me is a different, is again, almost a biblical perspective where it's like the creator made the world and the creator made different people and the creator put different types of peoples in different places. and the creator said those people should steward or take care of they're where they are where they are supposed to be. So if you say the First Nations is the owner, they go, you know, the way the elders who advise me have told me is it's like,

no, the land belongs to the creator, but we're the steward for this area. So it's not we're negotiating as the landowner with the crown is that we're negotiating as the stewards of the land with the crown. So we're trying to negotiate, and it's right behind the treaties. is we're negotiating that we will advise on the best way to move the land forward and develop it so that natures are natures and all those kinds of things are taken care of.

They want to be written in. And my argument and the argument of others, I think most of the Alberta government in that, I think comfortably is, although I don't speak for the Alberta government, is they need to be written into the corridors for these new infrastructure routes that we're going to build. As co-owners or Fee Simple-like elements that are controlled by First Nations managed, what is James Words? First Nations Management Consortium, Corridor Management Consortium. So a professional corporate body that owns the land and the corridor is set up according to the top of graphic

topographical limitations of rail, but is open to whatever linear infrastructure you want. And you do strategic environmental assessments in advance so that they're all investment ready. All modes are ready in all corridors for investment, creating an investment vehicle, which I've heard would be worth anywhere from $100 to $300 billion over short term. And part of the reason for that approach, besides it being the right way, is it's the only way to counter tides. And by tides, I mean the American primarily San Francisco-based eco-terrorist, excuse me, eco-terrorist, eco-activist consortium, who basically oppose everything. Now, how far that rabbit hole goes, I'm not sure. I don't have enough data.

But who benefits from that is American oil companies into some degree the American government. Because if we don't get as much oil out as we want to, the Americans have a reserve right next door in case. Right. It goes south. The only place it's going to south. Yeah, exactly. Number two, I mean, these are the woke crowd who are financed by our monthly subscriptions to Apple Music. and whenever we buy software, the money is going to, you know, Seattle and San Francisco, and that's being transferred to these, these Tides foundations that basically oppose everything.

And they, that is the one thing they, that limits them is if the first nations are involved from before day one, they're involved in project planning and project organization and project management and they're saying okay we reviewed all of our notes and our maps and our indications and we're comfortable with this um it it you know the the the tides foundation in oakland california can can find all the blue hair grannies they want i'm sure i'm offending a bunch of people right now and you know what i'm okay with that because i've you know i've been stung quite a bit so i'm i'm stinging back a bit now like the rest of society against against the woke the woke mob and how it hurts people. You know, they transfer money to these folks. They put up protests. They pretend to be,

you know, representing the community. They're not. They try to divide communities, which is Trudeau's master, master, master skill. So we can't get this done without first. We shouldn't get this done without First Nations involvement. And we can't get it done without First Nations involvement. Now, you'd also ask about, you know, all the nasty rhetoric. The states and provinces, are getting along very, very great. They all agree on this. The adults in the room in the armies, I mean, the U.S. Army has now been purged of its morons. So the U.S. Army is now thinking like grown-ups again. The Canadian Army is still run by princesses, and that will have to be purged. But at the end of the day, we need Fortress in

North America. We need to develop Fortress, North America. And we need it for our expansion. And Canadian population is now 40 million. And I'm arguing also, why does everybody have to move to Calgary, Edmonton, Vancouver, and Toronto? I mean, why can't we have new cities? If people could survive in Edmonton winter, they can survive a high level winter or a Watson Lake winter or a Whitehorse winter. Let's open up new cities. And new cities are growing up around rail again and again and again. It's not building the highway through a town that where that town suddenly becomes a city.

It's when the transcontinental railway... When the key infrastructure is there. Yes, because the transcontinental railway is what opens the ability to carry heavy loads in quantity regularly. Roads don't do that. I hear the plan, but I find myself cynical of the plan. And I don't mean that I don't think what you're talking about is really. I'm like, no, that's honestly, once again, it's like going back to when you're, Shane Getson first said it. I'm like, oh, that's brilliant. Like, let's do that. But then I watch

our government. And I mean, our federal, our provincial, our municipalities, our first nations, like all the red tape, all the freaking red tape. The fact we have a red tape reduction minister in Alberta. You can't make this up. And you go, like, how, like, how do you get enough people on board to even make two steps forward, let alone a railway going from the United States through, I'm going to pick on Alberta. I'm going to say Alberta because it makes the most sense. And I feel like it would be the easiest path with the current government to Alaska. Like I just like I hear it's like a pipeline going across Canada shipping Alberta oil makes

absolute sense. I don't understand why or natural gas you go like, why wouldn't that? that makes sense. No, it makes complete sense. So why don't we do it? Well, we can't get everybody on board in the different provinces have their own thoughts and certainly financial obligations and probably influences and on and on and on and on. And so I go, that's probably the cynical side of Sean sitting there speaking right now because I look at it. I go, I think it's brilliant. Common sense says yes, do it tomorrow. Do it yesterday. But that's not the way this works. I'm going to respond to that by attacking Montreal.

Perfect. And I'm going to tell you why. I read a book called Canada Has a Future from 1970s, 80s. I don't know. Anyway, it was a bunch of demographic projections for Canadian cities well into like 2030. And it had high, medium and low growth scenarios for all cities. Here's a key point. Number one, I look back at that book, which is now 40 years old.

It was on the dot for every single city in the country. Number two, it gave two profiles for Montreal. One profile, the separatism goes away, and another profile as separatism continues. Or anti-business practices continue in Montreal, and it gave a high and a low. Montreal was bang on for the low. Toronto is big because all the big businesses left Montreal. They all the big businesses left Montreal because, all the big businesses left Montreal because of separatism. Now let's dig a little bit deeper. Montreal was the economic part of Canada

when Canada was founded in 1867. It was the primary port, primary manufacturing center, primary financial center. Ottawa was selected simply as a as the capital simply as a concession to the upper Canadians around like Ontario and Lake Erie. Now, Montreal has a dark side and that dark side has gotten much, much worse. And people do not realize the role of Montreal and how dark has gotten. Montreal is now the center of woke. It is now at the center of porn. Porn hub.

And all the companies that control the woke in the video games is out of Montreal. It is also has a very thick underlay of mafia. And if you read into RCMP books, I wish I had some guy with, And then that last name starts with P. I was trying to remember what it was before we had an interview. The Quebec Mafia, once the Northwest Mounted Police headquarters has moved to Ottawa, the Quebec Mafia was all over it to penetrate it. And the Quebec Mafia infiltrated the higher echelons of the RCMP in order to,

as well as in government, number one, to weaken white-collar crime laws and make investigative into white color crime practically impossible. And I don't think I'll have any disagreement with anyone who's listening that Canada is incredibly weak on both. And that is deliberate. And it was deliberately thought out and planned it by the Quebec-based mafia. Thirdly, if you read Montreal-based philosophers, Irwin Kotler, Jack Layton, these guys are the transfer point of Bolshevism into North America.

And if anybody disagrees that Montreal has become a very dark place, I'll give you two names of people that come from Montreal, Camilla Harris and Justin Trudeau. They are products of where they're from. You look at the polls, there's one city that is still solidly red. That is Montreal. Montreal is the Bolshevik capital of North America,

and Montreal Trudeauism almost just took over the United States. That's my response to you, Mr. Trump. When you say, why would Canada not want to join the United States? It's because you came with one centimeter of entering a civil war, right? We're not ready to join that yet, but Camille Harris is a Montreal creation. What do you mean by that? Like she was born there? She's, no, she's just raised there, Montreal, right? So Montreal has become the philosophies of Montreal, I have spread out throughout the world, and we need to address that directly, primarily at the corruption level, but we also need to attack those philosophies of the Laurentian elite, which are based in Montreal.

Oh, I forgot. It's also the center of anti-Semitism in Canada. You want to call for the death of Jews. Go right ahead, walk down the street and call for the death of Jews. I am, by the way, half Jewish with my mother being Montreal Jew. So I take that a little personally when I hear people marching down the street and going, kill all the Jews, you know, from Palestine, freed from the river to the sea. Yeah, that means kill the Jews.

I'm like, yeah, you're just talking about killing my kids. Guess what? I'm getting an emotional reaction here because you're calling for the death of my kids. And that's called a hate crime. And why is it not being enforced? Right? Because Trudeau is from Montreal. And that is okay in Montreal to call for death of Jews.

We can get into the, you know, the different branches of Islam later. But I got to rewind you on the Kamala Harris. thing. Like everything else I'm like, yeah, knew about that, knew about that. Okay, that's interesting. New about the porn. Well, I've had literally one of the ladies, Michaela McAweight. It's Michaway. She's been on, well, she's been all over the place, Jordan Peterson and Theo Vaughn and on and on and on. I'm talking about the human trafficking and abuse that goes on on Pornhub. And and when you know it, it's a guy from Montreal that owns it, as you've pointed out. the one I didn't know was Kamala Harris's history in Montreal. Walk me through this.

Sure. While you're asking, I raised, I typed in Kamala Harris, Montreal, and I got an article from the Montreal Gazette. I'll read two paragraphs from it. Sure. Before she became America's first female, first black and first South Asian vice president elect Harris spent several years in Montreal where she attended Westmount High School from 1978 to 1981.

She moved to the city as a teen, so her mother Shia Malagopalan, probably. butchered that. A breast cancer researcher could work at the Lady Davis Institute of Montreal's Jewish General Hospital. Harrison rolled at Westbound after National Stint at a French language school. I also know that she, I believe she did some university there as well, but she's very tight ties to Montreal. So what I'm saying, my fundamental argument here in response to what, what, excuse me, the fuck is wrong with Canada is we need to extract this dark side of Montreal and a little eliminate its influence in the country. So the country can operate as it is intended to operate,

which is without mafia, without Bolshevism, without, you know, strong influence of porn. And by the way, Satanism, would you believe? This is an article I considered writing or researching, but I never found somebody who's willing to publish it.

It was like, Montreal, from the heart of Canada to the heart of darkness, because Montreal was the heart of Canada for 50 or 100 years, and now it's the heart of darkness. So I type in Heart of Darkness. I find out there actually is a heart of darkness movement by that label in Montreal. And it's basically satanic cults or satanic nightclubs. A string of it is satanic nightclubs in Montreal that do all sorts of weird shit.

So there's something very dark in Montreal and it has metastasized into Ottawa and through our government. And we need to address it. We need to address first of off the mafia element. We need to purge the RCMP of corruption. We need to purge white collar crime, or weak white collar crime laws. They need to be thrown out and burnt. We need to recognize the role of the mafia, address it explicitly. We need to understand also how Qatar and Chinese communist influences have used the Montreal intellectual elite,

plus which the Toronto and Vancouver real estate markets to completely nutsoid this country so that we are basically become a, if you want to launder money from the United States, you do it through Canada, right? And that's something unfortunate truth. And you know what? Beckers would agree with you. If you look at Quebec, the rest of Quebec hates Montreal for good reason. You look at the voting patterns, only Montreal votes liberal. Quebec City votes conservative. Quebec City is not about separatism. The separatism is more of North. Crazy.

Man, a couple things. One, on the mafia side of it. One of the things that we were just talking about, and if folks go back to Vince Lanchi and Nick Moriano's, talking about how we don't have RICO laws and how when the United States set up the RICO laws, then there was a contingent of mafia move up to, basically like what you're outlying,

or laying out is like, well, where are you going to do business in places where you can't go to jail or get harsh treatment for what you're doing? Any thoughts on that? I can't speak on that specifically, but I can mention also that someone from Quebec may put up their hand at this point and say, the security of Quebec was so frustrated with federal inability to persecute the mafia that the province of Quebec set up. up a series of special courts and special prisons to deal with mafia. And they were able to shut down most of the Quebec mafia. I mean, infrastructure, Montreal infrastructure was notorious for being the primary source of mafia funding for 50 or 100 years in Montreal. But I would argue that all those mafia who weren't caught simply just moved over to Ottawa.

I tell you what, folks, I remember sitting in high school thinking Canadian history was so boring and then I started this podcast and it's taken a few years and now I'm like Canada is the most confusing fascinating place on the planet right like I mean it's just it's just it shocks me now you mentioned and now I had Sam Cooper on uh think of a week ago oh yeah he's he's he was a wealth of information right and I heard him the first time well you he got talking about money laundering housing markets um influence from the CCP on and on and on and you just mentioned it again and so i'm like okay what can you share or what do you your thoughts on like the housing markets money laundering

ties to our politicians like it this sounds like it runs crazy deep it does the only thing i can add to it is that i have friends some of whom are people that i would very very happily trust my life to, working in various locations within government or a private sector. And I've said, point blank, is Sam Cooper right? And they said, yes. But that implicates like prime ministers. Yes. When you look at Justin Trudeau, what do you see?

I see a criminal, narcissistic, malignant, aggressive, ruthless. tyrannical oppressor, who if he had the opportunity, would kill his opponents without a second thought and never have a moment of remorse. And who's pulling the strings on him? I believe it's three, I believe it's four sources. Number one is the Canadian Mafia. Number two would be the Democrat Party. Number three would be the CCP and number four would be the Qatari. the Qataris, and I have no idea how those interrelate and what proportion, and my evidence is all circumstantial. So I'm not going to say I know, I'm going to say, I guess. So we've already talked about the mafia element for the Democrat side. Look at it this way. In 2015, if you remember that

election, the three parties were practically neck and neck. And then suddenly the liberals shut up. Do you remember that? 2015? In the polls and then they won the majority? I'm going to say this, folks. No, I don't. And the reason I don't is because what I told Peter before we started is in 2015, I was paying attention to this much politics, right?

Like, none. Shouldn't have done that symbol. Now I'm going to probably have somebody take a picture of it. Like, I just mean, like, I'd done none of it. So no, I don't remember this. I don't remember Daniel Smith walking across the floor. So that's when she came back to the rock. I was like, who is this lady? Why is she hated so much when I listened to her? Now, we're going to focus on liberals for a second because they had a rise in 2015 and you're like, we need to look at this.

Well, Obama liked Trudeau. Obama liked Trudeau a lot. And we can discuss how much Obama really liked Trudeau. But at the end of the day... I feel like you're insinuating something there in the sense of like physical connection. I have no evidence of that whatsoever. But we'll just say that some of Obama, Obama was the master of electoral victory at that period of time. He knew how to run internet. He knew how to run social media. He knew how to motivate voters. Like him or hate him, Obama is a vote magnet or was while he was president.

His advisors came over to Canada. helped the liberals and suddenly the liberals shot up in the polls and they won by a majority and then you had trudeau mania and if you remember well you probably don't remember um right after he won obama had a state dinner for a trudeau like full honor white house the highest honor that can be given to anyone is a white house state dinner all the big actors were there everything and And Obama had been working with Harper for, they were allowed by four years or something, three or four years. And, you know, Harper was, you know, mincemeat because Harper is, you know, he's not a movie star, right? Trudeau's got movie star loans.

Anyway, the first, one of the first things Trudeau did was he changed the Canadian electoral law. Because there was a section of the Canadian electoral law that said, no foreign leader may indicate their preference. for for prime minister during a Canadian election. Obviously, the law had no influence whatsoever because what are you going to do? Putin says, I want to, I want to hire. I want this person to be elected. And Trump says, I want that person to be elected. And what are you going to do?

Send them a ticket for 50 bucks. I mean, yeah, whatever. You can't do anything. But anyway, that was one of the first things Dredo did was take out that section of the electoral act. And I think I sent you the link on that before this meeting. So I could prove it. And to allow foreign leaders to say,

like this prime minister or I want this person to win. Guess what? Obama is like vote for Trudeau in 2019 and vote for Trudeau in 2021. And Canadians love Obama. Does they say Trump? I might have got names next up. Anyway, Canadians love Obama. Well, I can I can firsthand attest the things I recall over the course of before I started

doing this with the podcast was being in Wisconsin at college when Obama was running the first time. And it's the first debate I can say I watch almost in its entirety. And they go out rolled into the classroom. That's how much he was beloved at that time by college students, I would say, you know, like he was just a gifted orator. So when you talk about that, I'm like, oh, yeah, that makes complete sense. Now that's messed up because I didn't realize that. But that shows the level at which people are willing to go to hold on or gain power. Yes, and that is a mark of a sociopath, and when someone is willing to do that to gain power, you have to wonder whether they're deserving of that title.

Now, the other thing, the other evidence is more, again, it's all circumstantial. So, I mean, your listeners may completely disagree with me, and rightly so. But that what I observed for a very long time is that the Democrats, what the Democrats would do and what the liberals would do would be within about 48 hours of sync. Think of straws, paper straws. Think of certain web regulations. Like it was always the same thing. And I'm like, in Canada, we can't even get, you know, two municipalities to agree on whether the road should have two lanes or three lanes.

It takes six months of arguing back and forth to decide on minor things. And somehow, how is it that paper straws are passed in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, United States, Britain, Western Europe, like with all within like two weeks of each other. Like, holy cow. Like paper straws for me was like a rally in Kai. I'd mention the fact that getting the mushy stuff into your mouth when you're trying to drink a drink a soda. But like, holy crap. That is terrifying, that level of power and control.

So you'd see that the Democrats and the liberals acting step in step, right? And you'd see like, you know, there's a certain way the CIA does things that smells CIA. And I was like, boy, this, you know, like the way the Singh is doing things, you know, it's all circumstantial. But I think people can relate to one experience or another over the several years, things I may have heard on the news. That's funny. But it's very consistent patterning. So I think Democrats have a very strong control over the Liberal Party. This was mafia, Democrats.

And we already know that the Democrats are, we now have proven through what's going on with Musk and USA. The Democrats are a deeply corrupt party. And when people say, well, I will never vote Republican, guess what? The Republicans are the Democrats. Trump is a former Democrat. Kennedy is a former Democrat. Tulsi Gabbard's a former Democrat. The Republicans are just the old Democrats.

They are the JFK Democrats. There are no Republicans anymore. The Republicans lost all credibility because they lied to get the Iraq war going. Then the old Democrats took over the Republicans. That's the United States today. You've got corrupt Bolshevik new Democrats and you've got old Democrats. Anyway, that's beside the point. The third thing is Qatari.

That's, again, circumstantial. Trudeau said, well, Trudeau said we don't want, you know, $100 million from Germany and Japan to sell them gas. And then like two weeks later, Qatar signs the law. signs the contracts with companies for the countries for that for these huge gas contracts and then suddenly you know Trudeau's net value goes from like a million to 100 million like how do you how do you earn money like that at a 400,000 dollar your income and I'm told well it's it's he's he's got inheritance huh who the heck is Peter Schultz

like I'm like how are you like I find your mind fascinating from a Canadian standpoint I'm like, you seem to be tied into circles that very few would have access to, I might argue. And your brain, like from a history standpoint, you have very interesting points. The fact you bring up Obama-Trudeau connection, I literally just heard this this week. And I'm like, that's strange. Like, that is strange. And I mean, if you go back, what we're alluding to, just go back and listen to Tucker Carlson, talk about, you know, Obama and a limo. And you're like, that's really messed up.

And then you start to see, you hear that about, about Trudeau. And it's like, why is nobody talking about this? Why is this? Why is this? Anyways, I'm just like, Peter, you're, I'm like, how is it that we've never crossed paths? How is it that nobody knows what Peter Schultz is? I mean, maybe I'm wrong. I'm sitting here looking around the room like there's somebody staring at me, but folks,

we're doing this virtually. And I'm like, the next time we do this, we're doing it in studio. I'm forcing you to drive all the way here. And we're going to sit down and we're going to have a proper in-person conversation. But I'm like, does anybody, like, am I going to get a flood of text because Albertans know exactly who you are? Or like, where have you been? Or why do we not know each other? Because most of my career, I've been a government worker, so I have to keep my mouth shut.

And now I'm freelance and I'm trying to. So I have nothing to lose any more from that. So, and now I'm, I'm, I see a route forward through this mess. And I'm like, okay, now's the time to tell everybody. I think these are the way forward. So when people get in the fight, throw something out here. When people get in the fight, a Pierre is the same thing as the liberals. You're like, there's not a chance.

Obviously, he's saying things and doing things that are, that are happening. but like we're talking about the liberals truly being in bed with the Democrats. Like I mean, we're going to pretty and showing this. When you look at Pierre over, I'm going to say Mark Carney next, like that's going to be the next battle here in Canada, whether that happens this spring, this fall next year. That's going to be the next election. It looks to me.

Carney will be elected by bots. There is no doubt about it whatsoever. If you look at the Liberal Party election system, it is completely going to be elected by Chinese bots. Okay. So you're going to have Carney in the ring against Pierre. Yes. When people are rampaging against Pierre, because he's the same as the liberals.

What do you say to that? Not a chance. You're focusing at the skin level. You're focusing on policy. We're not interested in policy anymore in this country. We have to deal with corruption. And we have to decimate. we have to eliminate the traders to this country

who have sold out everything that we stand for, all of our wealth, all of our values, everything we've worked so hard for every century year, our nation, our culture, everything that defines Canada, everything that makes Canada great, everything that prevents Canada from moving forward and being even better,

has been sold out. And we need to decimate that. And this isn't policy discussion. This is about enforcement. And that has to be the focus of the first term. Is Pierre my first pick for Prime Minister? Honestly, probably not.

But if you had a pick for prime minister. So I will be voting for him. If you can have a pick, because you seem like a guy who's paying attention to this. And if you were like, if I could pick a guy from Canada, my pick would be, well, I got, he's too old now. My first pick would have been Don Cherry. I'm like, that guy doesn't mince words. He may not get it right every time, but he bleeds the, you know, the red and white.

My next would be Steve Eisenman, just because he's calm and cool. And he's, anyways, you get my, where I'm going. I go to a hockey background and I go, like, we're going to need some tough love. We're going to have to deal with some insanity and onwards. Is there a guy sitting there or girl where you're like, oh, I think this could be the right pick. Les and Lewis. Yeah, frig me. Because she's a lawyer.

and like she wrote an article when Trump started with the tariff thing the first thing she did she sent out an article saying I researched the techno something techno Elon Musk's dad from South Africa wrote a paper about how

if the United States controlled all of North America it could be a self-contained country and be completely cut off from the rest of the world because we'd have all the resources you could ever possibly need that was the first thing she researched and I'm like that is a brain and number two she's a lawyer and she's a self you know the fact that she is minority and women great i you know wonderful

but she is sure she's a self-made immigrant um who's gone through hard times and made it and she says and she stands up for canada instead of playing this freaking victim and stood up on the UCP state uh UCP the conservative stage in the leadership debate and yeah they did their like little tic-tacky pro-choice pro pro-life and everyone pro choice, pro choice, pro choice, pro choice, less than most, pro life. Mike, the obvious question to answer is why. And then they just went pro choice, I moved on. And I'm like, that woman has my respect immediately.

She's standing with the group. Absolutely. She's just like, and that's a little thing, folks. I mean, I'm not to get into pro choice, pro life argument debate. Just the fact that a woman running to be the leader of a party says that and then continue to say right things. That's a great choice. Anyways, okay. Yeah.

That's what you. I mean, as people probably can tell, I'm like, I'm fascinated with this conversation. Because you're saying in things that I'm like, I've started to hear little tea leaves there. I've seen, but like, you know, listen, I'm, I'm a hockey player by trade. I've been, I've been doing a crash course at lightning speed. I was joking Project Warp Speed, which is probably a poor choice of projects. But regardless on like Canadian politics. And every time I think I'm beginning to understand the level of holy crap we're in,

it takes a new form and a new level and I'm like, oh man. And this thing about conservatives, the liberals, I guess you're just hammering home. Folks, it needs to be the conservatives. It needs to be this mandate of like end the corruption. Get law enforcement doing law enforcement things again. And let's get this ship turned around if there ever was a chance. otherwise we're destined to have it fail? Basically, yes.

Yeah, there's a notwithstanding clause in the Constitution. And one of the policies I suggested to the UCP was to outlay where appropriate use of the notwithstanding clause is. A notwithstanding clause is when the government can go over a judge's head or go around due to some reasonable cause. And at the end of the day, I'd say well over half of our judges are either incompetent or corrupt. And we need to deal with that because they're appointed by the liberals. They're all insiders. This new border star is another liberal insider. Like it's just from Bonneville, Alberta.

Dude. How wild is it? How is it that the biggest nincompoops on the planet come from Alberta? I don't even get it. Some of the best people. Yeah, well, true, true, very true. But you think, you know, like, Christy Freeland, Alberta. The new borders are.

That's an embarrassment. You're like, you can't make this up. And it isn't Eminton. It's like the fringes. But you go listen to Dr. Jordan B. Peterson talk. And he'll talk about being apart. Is it the NDP folks? It's socialism at the start.

And he talks about how evil it was. And how, but on the surface level when he was a kid, it seemed like a reasonable idea to have everybody equal and on, on and on. And he talks about being, I remember hearing him talk about it years ago. I was like, that's fascinating, right? All these small places out in the middle of nowhere, Alberta have these wild ideas. And some of them, you know, like I mean, Peterson, is there a bigger advocate against for the conservatives and against the liberals than him from a Canadian? perspective right now? Not many, right? He is a large voice. Sorry. I, I really, I, I, I, I, the only thing I can add to that is that I know in some parts of rural Alberta that you have rancher families that have

basically ruled the roost for five or six generations now. And I know that because we have, I have some family connections in some of the more remote, remoter parts of the province. And it tends, They almost, you know, they tend to be difficult with newcomers. And that might contribute to some of what you're talking about. But I haven't really thought about it that much, to be honest. You wrote a policy. I think, actually, I think you wrote an accepted policy that was about killing e-tabulators. Yes.

Thank goodness. Daniel picked that one up and ran with it. So I've had this discussion with people younger than me who are way more tech-sacabulators. heavy than me. And they've been like, that's a terror, like, just use it, like, you should do electronics. Why is it important we don't do electronics? Anything that is electronic can be hacked. And anybody that you talk to, anything can be hacked. I have, as I said, I have friends in secret places who would know. And they say, anything can be hacked. It doesn't take that long. There's apparently a competition about an e-tabulator hacker thing at one point.

And the fastest person took like 30 seconds to break through the security processes and start jigging the numbers. So here in Alberta, we have none of that anymore. Good. Question for you. With all your insiders, right, all the different people you talked to. I got told this story by a policeman talking about East Burland and how underneath the city they had these files on pretty much, I forget it. What was the number? You probably know the number bear me.

Was it one in three residents? or was it one in five residents? We're an employment. That sounds about right. And they started talking about how they started to, you know, map out people of interest. Okay. So, you know, like you take Tamara Leach, let's just say, right? Was she ever on anyone's board at the start?

Probably not. And then as she starts to become more in the spotlight, she gets put in the center of the board. And then from her, you draw lines out, right? Yeah. And I've been wrestling with that. because from where I said, I'm like, oh, man, I'm connected to way too many dissidents, you know? I'm interviewing all these people. So am I just on some big board?

And do you think we're going to get away from that or we're going to get closer to that? When you look at where Canada's heading? I, four years ago, I would have been very much on the negative side of things. Now I'm kind of on the fence. The main thing I'm worried about is the passage. C-69, this online harms bill, where the government, some unnamed bureaucrat can decide what heaped speech is without a definition. And then if they don't like you, they can put you under permanent house arrest without internet access. You're not able to earn money except, I don't

know, by selling lemonade from the sidewalk. That one scares a living crap out of me. Because I did write a lot during COVID. And, you know, in interviews like this. So there's a possibility of a purge, but I also feel like Alberta has become the emergency zone for freedom-loving Canadians that are like feeling any kind of concern. They come here. Because there's a perceived sense that the tentacles of the Laurentian elite are not as not as tight here as they would be in Vancouver or Regina. The other factor is that I have some hopeful is, is become very clear the amount of money that USAID was sending, or USAID. I got some important difference.

I don't know why. We're sending a lot of money to Canada and these influences. So those influences and money flows are ending. In the end of the day, part of the reason I went on that tangent talking about Canadian history is I want the readers to know about that. Because that history, that understanding of our culture is what protects us at the end of the day. Because it's like that is why we have a peaceful, prosperous country. And I'm talking to everybody that might have done bad things in the past, you know, dealing with the CCP, a money laundering or whatever. And I'm like, your behavior is jeopardizing the peace and prosperity that you take for granted.

And you need to change that right now to protect our society, number one, and number one. Number two, when we do get law and order back, which we probably will, and I'm speaking to Mr. Trump right now, if you have information about corruption in Canada, release it from the FBI and give it to the Canadian public, we will deal with it. And our RCMP will handle it appropriately, and judges will be too transparent for the judges to be putting serious criminals back on the street. And we will make sure that the white crawler criminals are arrested, right, and treat it according to. proper law and they will not be not be protected by the elite anymore i'm saying that directly to mr trump or his associates if they happen to be listening um we i'll go back to an analogy you know a rommel general rommel heard him i've heard of them remind me he was the nazi general for the

germans in africa after the germany took over france the germans took over the french colonies in North Africa. And the Germans had tanks running around knocking the living daylights out of the Brits. And he got a very strong reputation. He's also what they call a hesitant Nazi. Like, you know, he's fighting the war for the Nazis because if he doesn't fight, he will be shot. And his family will be shot. Right. Anyway, he said, there's only two peoples in the world that I'm afraid of, the New Zealanders and the Canadians. Everybody else runs. They keep fighting. They keep fighting. Those are the only two countries in the world I'm afraid of. And that's what I know we still have very deep.

Oh, yeah, that's very. And that's the part that I'm calling on with Canadians right now. You need to understand the tyranny that has been attempted to be foisted on. You need to understand the financial control mechanisms that have been systematically built by the Learn Churnit on behalf of the Democrats, the CCP, and possibly the Qataris. I mean, I don't have direct evidence. Sorry, that's my donkey yelling outside my... window, I apologize. I'm wearing like a donkey and my dog is right with me.

There you go. Anyway, the I'm calling on this. We need to get together and fight this. The donkey's calling on us, folks. The donkey's calling us. So, and we need to, we need to fix what's wrong and then we need to look forward. And on a financial basis, um, You know, we are up shit creek.

We have got 300,000 federal employees. We've got red tape up to the yin-yang. We're $60 billion deficit this year on a year that's not a recession year, which works out to some insane number of dollars per person, like a month of my income for every single member in my family deficit in a year. You don't think that freaks me out? Well, okay, it should freak everybody out. Okay, we need to fix this.

This money is not going just into the bureaucracy. It is disappearing into other places that it does not belong. There are yachts being purchased. There is, you know, there is luxury homes being purchased in Malibu with Canadian tax dollars. I'm sure of it. It just needs to be tracked down. Peter, this has been something. I'm going to have to go and sit and stew on a lot of this, as I'm sure a lot of the listeners are.

The next time we do this, we're going to do it in studio. I'm going to promise everybody that because I'm going to have. I'm like, there's going to be a follow up on this after I get my thoughts in order and a whole bunch of things because I feel like there's going to be a ton of questions. Either way, I appreciate you giving me some time today. And I look forward to the next chat. All right. Thank you very much.