Shawn Ryan Show - #174 Joshua Mast - U.S. Marine's Message to President Donald Trump

Episode Date: February 21, 2025

Major Joshua Mast, a U.S. Marine Corps officer, gained attention for his efforts to adopt an Afghan war orphan. Mast initiated adoption proceedings for a baby girl found on an Afghan battlefield in 2019. His actions, motivated by a desire to ensure the child's safety, led to a complex legal battle involving the Department of Justice, the State Department, and Afghan relatives. In October 2024, a military board substantiated misconduct allegations against Mast but declined to separate him from service. The board found that while Mast acted in a way “unbecoming an officer”, his actions did not warrant dismissal from the Marine Corps. Mast, now 41 and living in Hampstead, North Carolina with his wife Stephanie, continues to advocate for the child's well-being. Shawn Ryan Show Sponsors: http://helixsleep.com/srs http://amac.us/srs http://meetfabric.com/srs http://preparewithshawn.com This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. Give online therapy a try at betterhelp.com/srs and get on your way to being your best self. Please leave us a review on Apple & Spotify Podcasts. Vigilance Elite/Shawn Ryan Links: Website | Patreon | TikTok | Instagram | Download Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Joshua and Stephanie Mast, welcome to the show. It's good to be here. Yeah, Sean, we really appreciate you having us. Man, you guys have one hell of a story here and very complicated. Doing the best I can. We're going to cover all of it. It's probably going to be a long show, but you know, even though nobody knows what we're about to talk about just yet, I just want to say like, man, you guys are like such honorable, doing what you're doing. And I'm really excited to do this

and to get this out into the world. So thank you guys for what you're doing and thank you for being here. We really appreciate it. I mean, honestly, we feel blessed to have been a part of this. Like we're very proud of it. So, and we'd like to put the spotlight on some people

who've made it happen along the way. Regular Americans doing their thing at the ground level and it's really about them. Awesome, awesome. Well, everybody gets an introduction. So, Major Joshua and Stephanie Mast. Major Joshua Mast, you're a United States Marine Judge Advocate General with a law degree from Liberty University and currently assigned as the Assistant Operations Officer You're a United States Marine Judge Advocate General with a law degree from Liberty University and currently assigned as the Assistant Operations Officer, Marine Raider Support Group, Marine Special Forces Operation Command. You've served as a Civil Law Attorney,

Trial Counsel, and Prosecutor. You deployed to Afghanistan in 2019 and worked in the You deployed to Afghanistan in 2019 and worked in the Resolute Support Headquarters Office of the Staff Judge Advocate where your portfolio responsibilities included targeting, collateral damage estimation, and civilian casualty response. You are married to Stephanie, who is a graduate of Thomas Edison State University and his master's degrees from Liberty University and the Academy of Art University, San Francisco, California. Most importantly, you invest your time raising your five children, ages 13, 10, six, five, and four.

And I think you guys said downstairs you've been married for 18 years. Yes. Congratulations. And it's because of the love you have for one of your children that you're here with us today. So before we move on, couple caveats and disclaimers. Before we begin, we need to make

some important clarifications. Josh, can I call you Josh or do you prefer Joshua? You're an active duty Marine Corps officer. You can clarify call you Josh or do you prefer Joshua? Sorry. You're an active duty Marine Corps officer. You can clarify if you are speaking on, can you please clarify if you're speaking on behalf of the Marine Corps Special Operations Command SOCOM or the Department of Defense? No, obviously this is just my personal opinion,

our perspective on what's happened in the last few years in our life. And then normally I wouldn't even associate with Marsauk, but they've recently acknowledged that I'm a member of the command. So that's allows us to be here and be able to acknowledge that today. Okay.

What are the limitations on what you both can say in this interview due to classification, operational security and or ongoing legal matters. Okay, so obviously we can't go into classified information. A lot of what we're going to talk about has been declassified and authorized for release into the public domain. So we will talk about that portion of it.

And then as far as ongoing legal matters, the only thing we're not going to do is some of the Afghans we've been in other litigation with, we're not going to do is some of the Afghans we've been in other litigation with, we're not allowed to identify those people to third parties or where they're from or where their families are from. And so we're not going to do that. It's really not even the focus of today. And then there's a restriction from coming on some of the state court proceedings, so we're not going to talk about what's happened in the state court.

But what we are going to focus on today is there was a recent board of inquiry at Marsauk that I went through in October. And then for the first time that was actually a blessing in disguise for us because for the first time we had some due process rights to information that we've been asking for for years. And it could be discretionary denied before if it was in a civil case. But in this case, because they was putting your career on the line, they had to give you at least some of that information.

And so a lot of this is going to focus on the Board of Inquiry and then a little bit on some government misconduct. Okay. And I think you just answered this, but I just, I don't want to miss anything. So can you comment on any of the ongoing legal cases? No, we're not going to. We're working with the Board of Inquiry, and like I said, some government misconduct along the way.

Perfect. All right. So I just want to give the audience, this is super complicated what's going on here, so I want to give a quick snapshot on what we're about to cover. So basically there was an al-Qaeda raid conducted by the Rangers. A hundred plus enemy killed in action There was a baby found on target with fractured with a fractured skull fractured left femur and

Second degree burns on her face and neck from her mother blowing herself up running at a Ranger Partner force tried to murder the baby because of her foreign origin The Rangers brought the baby back to the camp. That means back to base where they were. The Ranger who saved her killed Amir Omar, the AQIS Amir on the next mission, took a bullet to the neck and ended up being treated next to her in the hospital.

And now we'll hear about the long story and still incomplete journey. Basically, you guys have adopted her and there seems to be a lot of custody issues going on in the courts. And that's what we're here to talk about today. So once again, thank you guys for being here. A couple of things before we get into the weeds here. I have a Patreon account. There are top supporters turned into quite the community

and they've been here with me since the beginning. They're why I'm here and also why you guys are here. So one of the things I do is I offer them the opportunity to ask each and every guest a question. And so this is from Eric Algar. Major Mast, beyond the legal and ethical questions, this case has likely put immense strain on your personal life, your marriage

and your career in the military. What has this battle cost you personally in ways that aren't in the headlines and how have you reconciled those sacrifices with your sense of duty and faith? That's a great question. It's pretty deep. I appreciate it. I think I'm gonna reverse that. So I'm gonna answer it in reverse. So the way I've justified the sacrifice is as an American, you're a constitutional officer, you're sworn up to hold certain values. And then we put it on that uniform,

we go down range to represent American values. And so to me, when you're acting in accordance with those values, the cost is not relevant, at least not. And this was a very easy, like a very easy call in the moment. The follow through has been very difficult, but I mean, from the Rangers on objective to the medical

staff who raised her and like really put their career on the line to advocate for her and to make sure she had a long term safe solution to us, we're the public face of that now. But it was dozens, if not hundreds of Americans who sacrificed along the way their peace. But none of them did that selfishly. I guess the best analogy I can articulate is if you see a car wreck and a car burning on the long side of the road and you go and help that person get them out, you're not thinking about you. You're showing, I guess you're showing sacrificial love in the moment. And then whatever the follow through is, that's just part of the decision making process. to me, it has been hard.

It has been straining our marriage or stress, constant work, because as an attorney, I'm thankful it was us because of the skillset I have that I can work as many hours as I can into the night. And then I'm grateful, one of my best friends, Hanum Wright, was a reservist in the Marine Corps and heard about this and he volunteered his time and he's fought with us

like every step of the way, when for a long time it was just us and him fighting against some mega law firms and some of this litigation. And seeing those people willing to sacrifice their time and money to basically put their name on the line and stand in the gap with us, it's just so humbling. So like there's, there are low points, but the people that come along during that journey

have been just such incredible people. It's been an encouragement. It's honestly been an honor. Like it's been a fight, and I don't say that lightly, a literal fight for her life, but the people we've gotten to meet along the way have just been incredible. Even like this, sitting here and talking to you and being able to speak directly to Americans, regular people,

without the filter of some of this legacy media folks or spins or agenda, you can just say, hey, this is what happened, this is who we're about, this is why we did what we did, and we do it again. I think that would be the most surprising thing to people. It's like, we are extremely proud of all of the decision making we've made. And I mean, it is absolutely worth it, I guess, to see her flourish and safe and home and loved and have a family and a life. We're very grateful for that. I don't know if I answered all of his prompts, but... Do you have anything to add to that?

I would say, I would acknowledge. I think there was a period of time just because we were in a fight, we were like, we're okay, we're okay, we're strong, we've got this, we've got this. And as the fight has drug on for almost five years now, like the whole process. It has, I mean, I've realized, we've kind of realized that we can acknowledge that it has been hard or challenging and that it has put stress

on our family life and just as we were average Americans, raising young children, just trying to keep up, juggle normal life and then this on the side, this is as well. And so it certainly has been a challenge, but I think it has made all of us, including our children, grow through this whole process and strengthen us in ways that, I mean, if I were honest, life is uncomfortable at times, it's challenging at times, but

it is making us rise to, I think, a different level of working together and trusting each other that had we not gone through it, I don't think we would be as strong as we are or we're becoming. And I would add one other thing to that is one benefit that's come from this is when you're faced with a lot of criticism and you know it's unjust, but over time what you do is you look internally like,

hey, did I make that decision right? Was I operating, is any of this stuff true? And having to do that soul searching and being like, it's just a nature of the beast of getting criticized for the first time really in a public way. And going internal, I'm like, okay, this is my worldview, these are my beliefs, these are the facts. And especially in this board, when you actually get to go back, that's the first time I've

actually gone back and looked at some of the stuff in five years. And you're like, holy cow, absolutely we made the right call. We did the right thing and so did these regular Americans. And it's just interesting, you're almost getting gas-lit on history of what actually happened. And going back and having to go in granular details, it's honestly, it's difficult because there's so much trauma when you have to go back and think through things. Especially with the fall, like I cry like a baby

every time I think about that period of my life. And I wasn't even there, but you know, you're connected with these people on the ground and you're trying to get vulnerable people out and you're trying to get your little girl out, like last chance before the Taliban takeover. And so like a lot of that stuff, reflecting on it is difficult, but it is absolutely reinforced like the paradigm that we made these decisions in.

And I'm excited to kind of talk through what those were. Yeah. You know, as far as the faith aspect of the question there, I mean, I know you both have a lot of fear that this might not turn out, you know, in you or your daughter's favor, but, you know, the conversation we had right before the camera started rolling is that you both realize there is a bigger picture and then a lot of the stuff, a lot of the positive stuff would not even happen. It's in God's hands. And so it doesn't, so kind of what I'm getting at here is it doesn't sound like it's really, maybe it's strengthened your faith.

Absolutely. It absolutely has. Yeah. So I think that's. I would 100% say it is. When you get to see deliverance and the faithfulness of God over time, it encourages you to just trust Him for the future.

And like, she should have been dead so many times over, and we should have been crushed by the weight of this so many times over, and then it's always been just enough. And so we're confident, however that comes, it will come and she'll be safe forever. I would say we absolutely put our faith to the test. And before, you know, before this period in our lives, we were cruising right along and things were kind of going the way we expected it to go.

And this has brought us to the very end of ourselves where, I mean, like... Way beyond us. Yeah, beyond us, like our personal capacity. And both of us are pretty hard workers and determined. And so, for the most part, we're able to accomplish whatever we put our minds to. But this process has been so much bigger than that, that it's made us more reliant on our faith.

And because we realize that we are not capable of doing it. And to ask others for help, like we've learned that. Like we've never asked for help ever. But when it's so far beyond you and you can't do it yourself Like that's a bit like that's one of my first things in life where it's like you can't between the two of us I'll figure it out. Yeah, pull it off or afford it or like those types of things But then when you have so many good people come along and help you through those Just totally unexpected a lot of the times and this is gained momentum now where it's more of a national news story

But at the beginning People without any recognition were coming in and stepping in and helping us and they have literally saved our lives in her life Wow, we're thankful for that Wow and then and then before we move on I just I want to make a couple things clear At the very beginning and so this is a custody battle between You guys and who well um so in reality I think that the Taliban yes I think so this is a custody battle between I don't over complicate anything yet don't go all attorney on me no absolutely easy to do but this is this is this is a custody battle between you

guys in the Taliban, a terrorist organization. And so I just want to set the tone here, the weight of this interview, that way it's right off the bat, people understand the importance of it. And so we'll go from there. Yeah. And I think that for people to understand, it's essentially a Taliban-Ileana Gonzalez situation. That's how we've kind of boiled it down into a one-sentence thing because we're not really litigating it These these Afghans that we've been in in litigation with because they wouldn't actually be in control of this child

If she if she was ever in their custody There would be someone above them that would be calling the shots and and I believe that's the Taliban someone above them that would be calling the shots and I believe that's the talent. If you take your health as seriously as I do, you know how important hydration is. That's why I want to tell you about Hoist. Hoist is made in the USA and has three times the electrolytes and half the sugar compared to other sports drinks with no artificial dyes or preservatives. Hoist is on military bases globally serving war fighters in operations and training. I wish I had had hoist as an option for hydration during my military career, especially the brand new flavor they just released, five star punch.

Through December 31st, 2025, hoist is donating a minimum of $10,000 to Folds of Honor, a nonprofit organization that provides educational scholarships to family members of fallen service members or first responders. Hoist is now available in all Publix locations. You can use the store locator on their website to find a store near you, or you can purchase directly from drinkhoist.com where you can use my code SRS to save 15% on their website. Go check out their website, that's drinkhoist.com, and use my code SRS to save 15%.

You guys know my wife and I are always looking for ways to improve our sleep. We just started using Cozy Earth's bamboo sheets and they're already making a difference. Between work, travel, the kids, and everything life throws at us, knowing we'll have a comfortable bed to come home to is a huge relief. If you're looking to make your home and escape from the outside world's demands, surprise your love with Cozy Earth. Cozy Earth's sheets would make a great gift. Guys, listen up.

I'm not joking. My wife loves these sheets. She's been raving about them for months now. Visit CozyEarth.com slash SRS to get up to 40% off. Cozy Earth prides itself on the responsible production of all products. Plus, Cozy Earth's bedding products have a 100 night sleep trial and a 10 year warranty.

So there's no reason not to try them. Skip the candy, surprise your wife or your girlfriend with Cozy Earth. They deserve it. Head to CozyEarth.com slash SRS now to get up to 40% off. That's CozyEarth.com slash SRS. And don't forget, if you're asked in a post purchase survey, let them know you heard about Cozy Earth right here on the Sean Ryan show. Once again, your ladies are gonna love it. And then, well real quick, this will be the only light part of the interview I'm sure, but everybody gets a gift. All right. Gummy bears. The John Sillit gummy bears made in the US. Just candy.

There's no funny business in that. Okay. Don't worry about the analysis. Okay. Don't worry. You're going to pass your drug test. Well, our kids would probably confiscate them. Well, Sean, we actually, I saw this, watched a couple episodes and saw the gummy bears,

so we actually got a gift for you to kind of reciprocate. This was made by one of our community resource coordinator at Marsauk. Her husband does these for the Marines. He does a really great job. This is a K bar. So I have a tradition at the end of employment to find someone that's impacted me and give my knife. And so I got this for you. And the quote says, live for an audience of one. And it's a site, 2nd Corinthians 510. And that was on my email SIG block back in the day.

And it's more of a reminder to just do the right thing for the right reasons. And with someone like you has such an audience, it's a good quote. Wow. Maybe it'll make the cut for the Man Cave, hopefully. It's definitely going to make the cut. Live for an audience of one. Man, that is fitting. That's awesome.

Thank you. Yeah, this is going to look awesome. We're actually building a new studio. OK, good. Yeah, it's going to be. Good timing. Yeah, this will be perfect in there. But we really do appreciate you

giving us the opportunity. And thank you. This means a lot. Thank you. All right, so here we go. So tell me a little bit, just tell me a little bit about both of your guys' backgrounds. Yeah, let's start with you. So tell me a little bit, just tell me a little bit

about both of your guys' backgrounds. golf course when he was a child. That's how he got into golf. And so golf was kind of our family business. One of my brothers is a golf pro. I played D1 in college. I even played on the mini tours for a little bit out of college. But raising a very traditional family and I always wanted to go on the Marine Corps if I didn't do golf. And so we were actually married before I decided

to go on the Marine Corps. I was working, I was playing some golf in the mini tours and in Florida and decided to go into the Marine Corps. I was working, I was playing some golf in the mini tours and in Florida and decided to try to go into the Marine Corps. So I was- It was one conversation, we were driving a road trip somewhere and you were talking about the risk and. Yeah, so basically like,

hey, you wanna have a life that matters, you wanna have a life that you can be a positive influence on opportunity to lead and be led. And so the Marine Corps seemed like a good fit for that. And I was thinking of either doing law school or the Marine Corps, most of the Marine Corps. And so I talked to her officer selection officer for the first time on a Tuesday,

and they're like, go back next year. Like, our slots are full. And I was like, no, I want to go in this year. And so they're like, and then I mentioned I had LSAT score and they're like, oh, the Marine Corps needs lawyers but the deadline's Friday. And so it was Tuesday. Like, you got any tattoos?

I'm like, nope. And they say you got any medical issues? Like, I don't think so. So like, okay, we'll show up at Mepsimora at five and then come run your PFT and then we'll see if we can get your application in. And oh, by the way, you have to be accepted to law school. So I actually applied and was accepted to the Marine Corps

and law school in that four day period. And then I shipped six weeks later to OCS and I knew nothing about the Marine Corps and I just kind of just did what they told me to do and stayed in the lane and I was fit enough from professional athletics. What year is this? This was 2010 is when I went in the Marine Corps.

2010. Yep. So it was a break from that. But golf has been great. Professional athletics. the champion sewers at Caddy, so hiking with a pack was no problem. I've done that my whole life. So it was a really great time, though, the way to grow up with my dad and traveling and different parts of the world and different parts of the country. So it's been helpful with my Marines to be able to identify, like a lot of times I've been to their state or their hometown or wherever. And so it's been a big, I guess, icebreaker throughout my career. So it's not average. Very interesting. big, I guess, icebreaker throughout my career.

So it's not average. Very interesting. Did you grow up in Florida? Yeah, I was born in recent Orlando, Florida, because of the weather mostly, because it was year-round golf. And then I have five brothers, so I'm one of six boys, I'm number two.

And so we grew up traveling 20-plus weeks out of the year with my father on the tour. And so we had a traveling 20 plus weeks out of the year with my father on the tour. And so we had a big RV and Toyota car and like Seda National Parks growing up and all the battlefields and museums. And it was a great way to grow up. Like learning history by seeing the places. So, and my mom, because we couldn't be at home in school,

she homeschooled us, most of her, are like from probably third grade on. So I'll blame it all on homeschooled us, most of her, from probably third grade on. I'll blame it all on homeschooling. Interesting, interesting. Did you guys grow up together? We did. I was 11, I met him when I was 11, and he was 12, and just grew up together,

family, friends, and eventually high school sweethearts. But yeah, so we've pretty much known each other our whole life. You guys have known each other since you were 11? Yeah, she's the only girl I ever dated and I slapped the table pretty early and it took her a little while to like me. No, she's the only girl I ever dated. We've been blessed, honestly.

We grew up in church together. Part of the same youth group was a really close-knit group. Community and just best friends. Wow. We've been best friends for a long time. Yeah. And she's put up with me, so I don't know if, she should probably get looked at for that.

So you a golfer too? You know what, I have the head knowledge. I used to go to all his golf lessons when we were dating, but I cannot play golf to save my life. So I joined when he's gone in CrossFit, I joined him in CrossFit, so I had another way to keep up with him, but the golf course was not it. So I was the cheerleader.

I would ride along and watch him play. Right on, right on. So what did you guys decide to get married? So I was finishing up my last year of college and she was in grad school. So 2006. That's when we got married. Yeah, so we both went to Liberty.

She worked for the Golf Channel. She worked for the Golf Channel when we first got married and we traveled a year with my dad just so she could kind of see the tour and we went to 38 states or something. Wow. In driving. Wow. Yeah, we got to really know each other at that point, right? When you've been driving on I-40 for, I don't know, 1200 miles. Yeah. Going coast to coast. What are your master's degrees in?

Communications and mass media and photography. Oh nice. Nice. Perfect. Which she was finishing up during my deployment to Afghanistan in 2019. So I don't recommend doing master's degrees. Yeah, deployments and thesis projects. Reasons to care to them. And so what is the home life like now with five kids? Five kids. Four boys, one girl. It's as crazy as you can imagine.

It's loud and very... You're a stay at home mom. Yes, I am. I am. So full time, full time stay at home mom and there's never a dull moment. We have no wall flowers in our house. So they are all very big personalities and very confident. We joke that's the mass confidence that they just, they're all very confident and determined and I mean, wonderful kids, but definitely they keep me on my toes. Are they, what are they, what are they like doing?

Are they in sports? Are they involved? Are they homeschooled? They are. Now they are. Now they're all homeschooled? Yes. Well, originally they were going to private school,

but with all of the travel that was required with the litigation, it was either, we couldn't take them out of school that much. And also just for security concerns and everything, we decided to take them out of school that much and also just for security concerns and everything, we decided to take them home three years ago. And so I never envisioned myself being a homeschool parent, but here we are. And it's been good. It's made us stronger as a family.

And come, I mean, you have to live with each other, you're around each other all day. So it's great conflict resolution and learning how to get along. And it's been a good process. Do they like homeschool? They do. I was surprised they do. They probably because they know that once they get through their school,

then they have more free time. So that's a pretty good motivation, but they're older to play lacrosse and then the younger three play soccer. Oh, wow. Pretty strong church community too. And then in our neighborhood there's a lot of marine families. So like there's always neighborhood kids.

There's like eight or ten kids in my backyard every day. Yeah. We have a house loaded with Nerf guns. So we're like the cool boy house. Nice. The trampoline and the swings in the backyard. So the kids will come and congregate. So it's very loud at our home.

It is. Cool. Yes. That's awesome. So you're the hangout. Yes. You guys are the hangout. Yes.

I think every parent strives, we saw the good ones, strive to be the hangout. They want to be the hangout. Yeah. We try to keep it in the backyard as much as possible, but there's a Lego room upstairs and it's just, there's a lot of children. Yeah. We're thinking about, we we're gonna do the home school thing. We talk about it all the time We don't know what we're getting into but if you guys can do it with five then we could do it with two Absolutely go so what could go wrong? Yeah

bright Right, I think you're along with it. Yeah. Yeah. Do you guys do the co-op thing at all? Is that we haven't yet? I mean we thought about it again because of traveling, we haven't been able to commit to like that type of a routine yet. But we're, you know, I think everybody evolves through the process. Like, hey, I can do it better this year and try to incorporate new things. And we've done that. Sports have been great with the boys and the little ones. My four-year-old is starting soccer this year. So we're really excited about that. The other two have played a couple of seasons, but he is ready to go.

Like, he's got the cleats, he's enthusiastic. How long have you guys been homeschooling? This is our third year. So, and we do it in an online format, so I don't have to do the grading or the lesson planning. It's all done for me. So I really, because we literally, I mean, life was happening so fast at that time

between the traveling that we were doing for the litigation and we moved and then started homeschooling all within a couple month period. So we needed something that was very, just open it and go. And so that's what we've been doing and the kids like it. So what is the most challenging thing about homeschooling?

Well, I'm a very structured person by nature. So for me personally, it was because they were going to school beforehand. So the school, that was the structure. So all of a sudden for that to be put on me, I mean, I pretty much adopted the same rhythm as a school, but me setting the structure, that was a learning process for me. And then also just juggling, bouncing back and forth between eighth grade science and

then kindergarten reading and phonics. Like that can bend your... It can be a little bit challenging switching back and forth in between different grades and modes at times and answering questions. But I'm getting the hang of it still. She's good. Right on. Are you involved with this too?

Eight grade math is his. Yes, I do math in the mornings before I go to work with my oldest, and then I do PE very well. I'm an excellent PE teacher when I get home. Right on. But I'm a cheerleader. I'm humbled by how much work she puts into that. Wow.

For moms out there who are home, that is the hardest job that I could possibly imagine. Yeah. My hat's off to her and other mothers out there. And so how much are you guys traveling for the litigation? It slowed down a little bit, but as far as the traveling goes, but as far as for this

recent board of inquiry, that was a grind for months in a breath. It's like having a second and third job outside of like you do your normal job and then you stay up late or get up early. Well, the nature of your work that you don't have your devices. Yeah, and we're in an open storage environment, so we don't have cell phones or personal computers, so it really, all your phone calls or whatever, you have to go outside, or you have to do it outside of work hours, if you're meeting with attorneys or meeting with, you know,

advocates or folks trying to help you, it's all outside of work hours. So it kind of takes up, it sucks up your bandwidth for family and other extracurriculars. And so we're looking forward to getting through this on the other side, to be able to have like a little bit of peace. Yeah. Normal.

Yeah, yeah. And how long has this been dragging on? It's been since the fall of Afghanistan. So since 2021. Wow. So four years. And really it started in 2019. So for me, it feels like I'm about to finish up my deployment to Afghanistan

It's been a five-year one. So we're so this this all kicked off in September of 2019 So till today and you had mentioned you had mentioned you brought him into home school because of security concerns What kind of security concerns are you guys facing? Well that because of the this kind of false information operation campaign in the media that's out there, the Taliban called us out by name, put us up on their website, made a little video about it. Yeah, it's unique to see some terrorist spokesman like da-da-da in your name on national television. Oh yeah, we've seen it. I had to hire a whole security team because of this shit, because of the withdraw thing, you know what I mean?

Or not the withdraw thing, sorry, the funding. The US, I don't know, they decided to fund the Taliban 40, $87 million a week. Yeah, I saw all those episodes with Sarah Adams and it's just unbelievable. I can't believe that Americans would even think, like, how does that even cross your mind? Yeah.

After what these people have done for 20 years and oppressing their own people even. Not to mention, oh, by the way, we've been fighting them for 20 years. Yeah. Do you guys have any protection? We sold our first... So when our first... our address became publicly available through some of this litigation, we moved, talked to the...

Actually, I remember this because I talked to our NCS rep and I was like, hey, this is a child from a named objective raid and this person who brought her to the US was talking to the Taliban shadow governor and then he said he had Taliban in his phone before we brought him into US lines at the airport for evacuation and then I watched him flag on the watch list and I've got some security concerns and so our force protection officer, this is what he told me, he's like, well you should dial 911 if you feel threatened.

And so I was thinking I would get a little more from that at a, you know, like how many other people in the command have gotten their name put on the internet by the Taliban. So I was expecting a little more there, didn't get it. So we decided to move. We sold our home, which is great because it helped pay for a lot of the early litigation. And then we, our second home address got leaked,

but we're in a pretty, we're in a cul-de-sac where we got good visibility everywhere. So we're very vigilant with our kids. We put up a fence. I'm a Marine, we have guns, you know. It's just, I mean, you basically, self-help has been our, we are on, like with the local law enforcement, they know if we call 911 from our house,

they're not going to send a regular unit, they're going to send a SWAT team. So like we've taken the precautions that we're able to with our current financial situation as much as we can. But yes, are there people that drive by and take pictures of our house? Yes. Fed reporters show up at our house and announce. Do reporters come knock on the door?

Yes. Do crazy people know, you know, can know where we live? Yes. So all of those concerns and obviously I think with the veteran community they could understand. Yeah, I would be concerned about that. Yeah let's move into So let's move into your what were you doing as a as an attorney in the Marine Corps? Okay mentioned targeting in your yeah, so I Like every judge advocate in the Marine Corps, we start out and you build MOS,

or Military Occupation Specialty Credibility, by doing a trial bill. And so I had done my time in the trial shop about two years. And I had done, while I was doing that, I had as much as possible tried to be involved in operational law, which is where my interest lied, which is advising commanders in like the law of war, and rules of engagement, and targeting.

And so I got the opportunity to be the Marine Corps representative at the Army JAG school in Charlottesville, Virginia. And so there's a section there called CLAMA, which stands for the Center for Law and Military Operations. And what they do is they're kind of like the after action reports and lessons learned across the spectrum of operational law.

So there's domestic operational law for disaster relief and such. There's noncombatant evacuation ops, targeting. And so the Marines' portfolio in that section is the joint targeting process, collateral damage estimation, and civilian casualty response. And so when you get there, you go through all the training in those disciplines to understand those and then you're dealing with your, your fighting Marines have deployed with the MU or deployed to Afghanistan or deployed to Iraq or Syria. And as they come back, you're capturing those lessons learned and then you're publishing

and disseminating them. And one of the things I did, I was an editor for what they call the, now they call it the National Security Law Quarterly, where we collect all that knowledge and spread it across DOD in the different judge advocate communities so that you learn from those experiences. And that's actually what I was doing in Afghanistan in 2019 when I deployed. I did a very short trip in 2018

to sit with, like, Camp Alpha and Camp Vance and watch some of the targeting going on live and talk to them about like, hey, what are you seeing? But, and then the other thing I would do is I would instruct at the schoolhouse during operational law courses, or sometimes they'd have other legal communities ask you to come in and speak on operational law.

So explaining to, for lack of a better term, baby, you know, what is what is the joint targeting process? What is collateral damage estimation so that they have credibility when they go in front of a commander and get in an operational law billet? Wow interesting and so what what what unit were you attached with in Afghanistan? Okay, so So the the in 2019 when I deployed I was attached to the Resolute Support US Forces Afghanistan Judge Advocates Office, so it's the senior attorney for all of Afghanistan Okay, Colonel sitting on top of probably 10 or 12 attorneys But he's responsible for all of the attorneys in Afghanistan. Okay, okay and the incident is Operation Starfish, correct? So, that's not the actual name, but the op,

but that was a code name we had had for her amongst the medical staff and the Americans trying to help get a safe outcome for her. They called it Operation Starfish. Okay. Okay. All right. Let's move into the operation, your attachment to it.

Let's start right there. So I guess you should probably back up and talk about what happened earlier in that year with the deployment was supposed to be earlier in the year. Yeah, so it was fall of 2019. We knew that the deployment was coming up. It was gonna be short, but still just, you know, with kids and family life,

we were anticipating trying to gear up for it. And then it happened earlier than anticipated. So I was in my final semester of grad school, working on my thesis project, and you found out that you were going to go. So personal, we had like on the personal side, it was not the best timing in the world. So I felt like I was scrambling, trying to get ready to, you know, hold down the fort

with three young children and be ready for you to go. So, that was an intense time. Yeah, she was finishing her master's degree. So, it happened off cycle for us. Like, it was a short deployment, 90 days, so not a big deal. But I landed on the ground in Bagram on September 6th, 2019, which I learned that out the course of, but that is exactly like down at the hour

when she was getting lifted off the X by the Rangers. And when I learned that two months in, I had goosebumps because it's like, wow, like what are the odds that you land at the same time? So September 6th, 2019 sticks in my head because that's when I got to Afghanistan the second time at about two in the morning when we landed from Kuwait. Wow.

Yeah. So how did you get attached to this raid? So what was it that you were doing that got involved? So I I can tell you exactly where I was so we were as an office we had a we would go and and and have dinner together at the dining facility and I will never forget we're walking to chow and my colonel's like with probably eight or ten attorneys and my colonel the senior attorney in Afghanistan is like what the

hell are we gonna do with this baby and I was like that was very odd you know like I'm the new guy right I just got there you're like what baby exactly I was like what baby sir he's like oh well some special operators hit an al-qaeda training camp and it was really bad and they recovered a baby and we're supposed to figure out what to do with it. And I was like, jeesh. And they're like, uh. Does that happen often?

I mean, did they just kill everybody on target? Well, I mean, it depends. Like I guess. We went through it. It was a hundred plus dead. They, they had, they did a very good job of making sure that no Al Qaeda leaders left those structures. It's not a hit on them.

I'm not saying it was bad. Oh, no, no. I'm just telling you they were very thorough. And so it was kind of just by the by that we'd first heard about it. And I remember at the time, because I was worried my wife would be upset, I was like, well, sir, what's the concern?

And they're like, oh, well, it's foreign child. We've talked to some of the NGOs like ICRC and such. And they're saying that the situation in the Afghan system at the time wasn't safe for foreign children. And so we got to figure out something like a safe outcome. So I was like, sir, like, if there's nothing else to be done,

like as a last resort, like we'd volunteer, like, oh, I've got two kids, like, what's one more? Like, don't leave a child here if there was an option. And he was like, oh, sure, we'll see. Like, you know, it was more just like a gut reaction. And what I came to find out was everybody had that reaction from the Rangers on the objective to like the medical at the forward surgical team that treated them all

when they first got off the golden hour, all the wounded and her. One of those guys had volunteered. One of the civil affairs officers had volunteered. There was a list of Americans like, hey, we'll step in and take care of this child if there's no other option. How old is the baby?

So we didn't know. We just were told, we didn't know the gender, nothing. Like it was just baby, bad mission. Months. We came to find out that she was between six weeks and two months old, like somewhere in there. She was malnourished, so it was hard to say the exact age. They said about 45 days old.

So she had a medically estimated birthday in July of 2019. I actually, we had to come up with some day. And so in the office when we were doing this for her birth certificate, we were like, hey, who's got a birthday in July? And somebody's like, mine's the 24th. So hers, her birthday is July 24th because of that, that Marine who says like,

so he knows who he is out there. He's an uncle, honorary. Wow. Wow. So did you run this by your wife at all? I was actually concerned about that. So his- Wait a minute. So how did you run this by your wife at all? I was actually concerned about that. So, um, his... Wait a minute, so how did they pick you?

It just kind of happened, and I can go into it, but, so I called her off cycle. Do you want to tell that part? Yeah, so he calls me, and it was the afternoon, my time, and that was not a normal time for him to call. And so, immediately, just, you know, your mind is racing, why is he calling me in the middle of the day? Something happened.

And so I picked up the phone urgently and like, are you okay? Is everything good? And I'll never forget the first thing he said was he's like, honey, he's like, there's this baby. And I remember I was in the kitchen, I just stopped. And I was like, and I could tell by his tone that something, this was significant, there was something.

So he proceeded to tell me that there was a baby recovered off an objective, parents were killed, and they don't know what they're gonna do with this baby. And so I had a similar reaction to him, and I was like, well, we'll volunteer, we can do it, we'll help and take the baby, if there's nothing we can do, there's nothing can be done if she doesn't,

at that time we didn't know if it was a boy or girl, but like, you can't leave a baby there. And so he's like, well, he's like, slow down, he's like, I'm glad you said that, because I already volunteered. And he's like, I'm glad to know we're on the same page. He's like, but, you know, they're gonna do a family trace and there's a long, it's a long shot,

we're just, you know, we'll see how it plays out, but good to know that we're on the same page. And so that's pretty much where we left at that first conversation. So, so what happened was, um, we came to find out through these daily stand-up briefs. So our, our Colonel Briefs the General, the 4-Star, in charge of all of Afghanistan every evening. And so in order to prep himself for that, we do a stand-up in the mornings with each of our disciplines saying hey sir this what's going on and and you give him a two-minute spiel on what's going on in your section and

So we would get updates of course as an office like a bunch of Americans in in a shop anywhere If there's something interesting you're you're queuing into that and so the guy handling this was originally an Air Force judge advocate and his specialty was not operational law and My handling this was originally an Air Force judge advocate. And his specialty was not operational law. And he had advised the commander, like, hey, it's an Afghan decision, we're gonna tell them and whatever they say. And so I had heard indications and warnings in the shop

like that they thought she was foreign and that it was injured in a hospital. And then we found out that it was actually a little girl several weeks in. And when I'm listening to these briefs and hearing the legal advice, for context, there's a little bit of a disparity amongst lawyers about what the appropriate

role of a legal advisor is. And what I've been taught in the Marine Corps is that our job is to give a commander legal maneuver space. So we give him his left and right laterals on a decision. Here's your range of options that are legally supportable. Based on my, based on the situation, I recommend X. And then you stand by and you salute smartly when he makes his decision and he can accept risk anywhere on that spectrum Depending on what his objectives are and what he believes will support the mission and I think that's the proper role of a legal advisor But I think sometimes with inexperienced or people with it with more of an ego into it

Will paint commanders into a corner and say, hey sir, like the only legal support of a COA is X because that's what they think. And I think that's a mistake. I think it's really up to the commander to take on that risk and take on the appropriate level risk based on your briefing in his space. And I really think that's what happened here is this guy had said this was the option. And when I'm sitting here like as a curious young Marine captain, like, well, why do they say she's foreign?

I don't know. You know, why is she in the hospital? I don't know. How old is it? Like basic questions that you would think you'd need because a lot of times your legal advice depends on the facts. And so I kind of stepped in and was like, hey, sir, can I help you? Because he outranked me at the time. Can I help you with this?

And so I really got involved by trying to get information, like factual information to make a better legal advice for a commander so he can make a safe decision. Because it really wasn't just, you know, let's see what the Afghans say. Because we wouldn't do that, like for example in Syria. You would never ask, like if you had a German or French or British foreign fighters child,

you would not be like, hey, let's leave them in an orphanage in Syria, right? You would try to repatriate them. We do that, especially with ISIS, from so many different backgrounds. And so it was trying to get facts for decision makers. And so I got sucked in like that. So I had reached out to one of the other Marines in this joint environment, because it's not

very many Marines, was the civilian casualty coordinator for US forces in Afghanistan. And so we had met once or twice and, you know, because of the Marine Corps thing, we at least knew who each other were. I was like, hey, man, what do you got on this baby? And so he sends me a con op from the Joint Task Force operating under Task Force 20 to stay up in the clear. And so I had worked with them a little bit on my previous tour at Ascentcom for targeting, watch them do targeting.

And so I was like, holy cow. So it's a very developed con op with all of the basic intel that supported this strike. And it was very clear that this were foreign fighters and exactly where they were from. And at the time that was all classified. Where were they from? So the intel that we had was they were from Turkmenistan

and that this specific 10 digit grid compound was a repeat, sending foreign fighters of different nationalities and they were feeding them into the Haqqani network and Taliban victory units or Taliban Red units to work, you know, fight against us. And so they were, this particular group happened to be from Turkmenistan

and we had that high fidelity. It was the, one of the senior leaders in this group. It's called the Turkestan Islamic Party. And we all had that properly declassified through the Foreign Disclosure Officer of US 4A at some point in this process to help inform decision makers about the fidelity of where exactly these people came from. And since then, we've actually had numerous conversations with the Rangers who recovered off objective.

And like, there is literally nothing to contradict that in US government possession. Wow. It's unbelievable that we're even having this conversation and have to say like, where is she from? Because to me, you have in Afghanistan in 2019, you're what, 19 years into the war? You have developed Humit, you have developed SIGINT,

you have all sorts of assets for the JTF. Like it's getting to be winter time, so the fighting season is winding down, so they're chopping most of the assets to the JTF to use, right, because they're still hunting terrorists, because they have a counter-terrorism combat mission, right? They're there to kill Al-Qaeda, Haqqani, and senior Taliban.

And at that time, interestingly, the president, I think the next day, I think September 7th, the president had canceled the peace negotiations with the Taliban because they did an attack in the Green Zone that killed an American Green Beret staff sergeant and a Romanian NATO SOF. And he was so appropriately incensed that they would do these sorts of attacks when we're in good faith negotiating a reduction in violence to try to get to a solution for Afghanistan that he canceled their flight and turned them around. They were going to meet at Camp David that weekend and announce the peace deal. And he shut that down and turned it around.

And I distinctly remember that because in the opposite intelligence brief for the four star, there was a, we were trying to believe them back in the negotiating table. And so like they were just, the body count went significantly up after the president put pressure on them to punish them for that bad faith. And it was a very distinct shift in the op tempo and task force was really doing a good job at that. I did a joint casualty assessment team, I think on September 11th, we went out to the West in Herat and we picked up an ODA team and pushed them out West,

and they already had a SEAL team out that way. They were just going after people. It was impressive. Wow. So did you, what do we call your daughter? Americans have a lot of pressure on them these days with inflation, prices rising, bills going up, and a lot of people are carrying really high credit card balances that charge 20% or more each and every month. Now's the time to get rid of those.

Homeowners. If you've been waiting to figure out how to get your finances in order, you need to call the team at American Financing today. American Financing's salary-based mortgage consultants are helping homeowners just like you tap into their home's equity to get out of high interest debt. They're saving their customers an average of $800 a month. Saving that kind of money every month should make the decision really easy for you. All it takes is a 10-minute no-cost obligation phone call to find out how much you can save. And if you start today, you may be able to delay two mortgage payments. Call American Financing today, 866-781-8900. That's 866-781-8900 or americanfinancing.net. 8900 or americanfinancing.net slash srs.

As many of you know, life can be extremely unpredictable, which is why taking care of my family financially is the number one priority on my list. Fabric by Gerber Life is term life insurance you can get done right from your couch, all online and on your schedule. You could be covered in under 10 minutes with no health exam required. Fabric has flexible, high quality policies that fit your family in your budget, like a million dollars in coverage for less than a dollar a day. There's a 30-day money back guarantee and you can cancel it anytime so there's no risk.

Fabric is more than life insurance. Free digital wills, access to investment accounts to invest for your kid's future and more and manage it all right from your phone. Join the thousands of parents who trust Fabric to help protect their family. Apply today in just minutes at meetfabric.com slash Sean. That's meetfabric.com slash Sean. That's meatfabric.com slash Sean.

M-E-E-T, fabric.com slash Sean. Policies issued by Western Southern Life Assurance Company, not available in certain states, prices subject to underwriting and health questions. So what we decided for this is to, we had called her Sparrow because it was a, we didn't know the gender at the time, so why don't you tell that. So a couple weeks in, like he mentioned, we get our very first photo and it's, we call it now, we call it the baby in the box. But, and that was the first time we learned

that she was a girl and got to see her for the first time. But up until that point, when I got that initial call and I debated whether or not, I mean, the boys were early, they were pretty young at the time, I wasn't going to really tell them that much, but I was so impressed that there's just like, there's this child out there that is in limbo. Its future, its fate is in limbo.

And so I remember one night, it was a Wednesday night, and I was putting the boys to bed, and I mentioned to them this baby. And I said, we need to pray for this baby. And I didn't know, of course, the name or anything. So it's like, there's a song, like an old hymn, that says, eyes on the sparrow. And so we decided to call it Baby Sparrow.

And so we would just, you know, when I'd tuck the boys in bed at night, we'd pray for Baby Sparrow. And it was a good shift for myself because I, and the early part of that deployment being that I was trying to wrap up my degree and everything, I was kind of like, oh, how am I going to do this? And I was focused on myself.

And then all of a sudden when I heard about this baby, and just really because Joshua would call when he would call me, he described just what was going, what he was seeing with other children when he'd go out outside the gate. And it was eye opening that, you know, here I am safe at home with my children and that there are millions of children in other parts of the world that are not guaranteed safety or a roof over their head or food.

And so Baby Sparrow was something it gave us, it instantly shifted my perspective off of myself. And there was this innocent child that, and that, you know, his whole future was at risk. And so, that's where Sparrow came from, was not having a name or knowing anything about it. And then a few weeks later, when we saw the photo, we realized she was a girl.

And was this the, is this the photo of her wrapped up in a box? Home Depot box. Home Depot box. Because they didn't have any baby, like we're at a combat trauma center, right? And so these young Americans who serve in those positions, the medical staff there, they cobbled together as much as they could to make her as comfortable as she could. She was in a huge amount of discomfort with her fractured skull and she had a fractured femur where they had actually put a rod in to repair it

and like burns on her. And she's like 45 days old? Exactly. We're putting this photo up on screen right now, by the way, so if you're listening, you can see it. So you can kinda, it's blurred out, but you can kinda see her left skull is swollen there. That was one of the reasons why we were trying

to get her back to the states quickly, is we were trying to get one of those little cranium skulls that you could kind of reshape it. And you couldn't tell now because of her hair, but like there was, you know, and then our experience with PTSD and like a TBI from, you know, Marines and soldiers going down range and getting IEDs. You know, I have a lot of experience as a judge advocate, like working through that, like making sure

people are checked out for that stuff when they get back from deployment and does that have any play in their misconduct? Those are things that commanders just consider and that we advise on. So I'm very familiar with the long-term concerns for TBI. And so, I mean, all of those things are present. And then we're kind of gathering information. Like I mentioned earlier, we got the concept of operations from the Ranger companies that went out for that mission,

and we were also able to get the tactical interrogation report from the detainee that they picked up off objective. And there's actually one off of this objective, and then some Raiders had done a simultaneous mission on the same network to kill the same night. And so they had also picked up some detainees. And so we were able to get a lot of like

captioning material with al-Qaeda fighters, Chinese looking with flags, very consistent with what they were trying to target that night. And they even captured a video from a terrorist device in this building of the deputy emir and they even captured a video from a terrorist device in this building of the deputy emir of that al-Qaeda group. Like he's, and he's currently in Afghanistan, it was in Afghanistan in 2022 and 2023 timeframe.

So like, as far as the fidelity of what, who was occupying this structure, you know, they had brutal close combat for over an hour and a half, room by room clearing. And I'll kind of go into the story of what we have learned about what happened that night in a minute. But basically- So in these interrogations,

did they get the information that they were from Turkmenistan? Yeah, so I had worked with the Regional Exploitation Center at Parwan Prison with some projects for General Miller. We were working on detainee prosecutions and how to speed that up. So we had to study from intake on the objective with Associated Withs or ASWs that were picked up with an objective from a task force mission.

What are ASWs? Like Associated Withs, so like people on the objective, like military-age males on the objective with targets. And so they put their puck around their neck and where they caught them and take a picture of it, and I think that's a person under control or place of capture, I can't remember what the acronym stands for.

But there's a little bag that goes around their neck where they take a picture of it and what they found with them. And then when they put them in the bird and take them to Parwan Prison. Because that was the terrorist holding facility at the time. And there was more than 5,000 terrorists in Parwan Prison when I visited that in the fall of 2019.

It was about when the Haqqani III were there, because we toured it and we're studying soup to nuts, how do they bag and tag these guys? How do they prosecute them under the counterterrorism laws that we had helped the Afghans put in place? We met with the judges, we sat with Task Force 20 and like, hey, we need this type of information when you're able to successfully prosecute these and speed up that process because they're basically clogging the prison with so many people that they were getting.

So because of that project I had just done, we were able to reach out very easily and get those tactical interrogation reports. And this detainee is like, yeah, I brought these people, like he identified the photos that we'd captured on objective as the people occupying this structure. And it was the 10 series. So like it's the primary target

where they expect the detainee to be, or the objective to be rather. And so the mission was to kill or capture three named objectives which were senior leadership in this al-Qaeda group. And there was a leadership compound which was the 10 series and then about up an elevation to about maybe 80 meters away there was a larger compounds that were conjoined

and had fighters in them. And so they were expecting more kinetic up there and it actually was very kinetic But I can get into the story I guess if we want to well, you know, so how long was the baby girl? Sitting in a Home Depot box wrapped up Well, so they started so that one of the issues was a fiscal law issues Is can we can we spend US taxpayer dollars and buy baby stuff? Not really, we don't have a lot of authorities for that. So a lot of the medical personnel started to volunteer

and purchased stuff off Amazon, and purchased stuff off the local economy, and we were able to spend, I mean even that, when I was there, it would take a month to get something from Amazon. It was, and so they were just cobbling stuff together and just doing whatever they could to take care of her. What were they feeding her? Were they even sell baby formula in Afghanistan?

They did, yeah. They were able to get some stuff off the local economy around Kandahar Airfield. And that was some of the issues that we were working as a shop and that's why it kept filtering up in the stand-up briefs. That's where you got those Kandahar Airfield? So she was originally picked up, she was golden hour flighted to Tarancot and the I think eight or nine guys that required surgery off the objective and her were operated on to stabilize them and then they were evacuated to the nearest Roll 3 in Kandahar.

And so she was there for about a month. And then they, because there was, it was clear indications that she was foreign and because no one had come forward to claim her. And they decided to move her to the joint theater hospital at Bog Run, which had a larger footprint and be able to determine what was gonna be her long-term outcome. But there was talks about putting her in the French hospital. There's a French hospital in, I believe it's in Kabul.

It may be in Kandahar, I can't remember exactly. But there was talks about putting her in a civilian hospital, basically. But that would require funding, and we didn't have a mechanism to pay for that. There was different NGO-run orphanages, or I think there was a few state-run orphanages that were talking about putting her in and

It kept boiling back down to well If this is a foreign child it would be better for her to repatriate her To her country of origin if we can get fidelity on what that is And so that's really what drove this like fact-gathering mission that we did But once we got the tactical interrogation report and the guys said, yeah, I brought these people here from Turkmenistan. These were the documents of the compounds and you're looking at Al Qaeda flags and PKMs and AKs and you're looking at all this captured enemy material from the objective.

And then we had even gotten a few like 5Ws emails. So I think I provided that for the audience to look at. There's an email that they declassified for our board of inquiry that is the joint task force assessment that says she's very likely not, or is very likely foreign. We'll put that up on screen right now. And it says the father was throwing grenades and shooting at the assault force. The mother was killed in a barricaded shooter incident. And that the family and most of the village had moved to Afghanistan solely to wage violent

jihad. And that was the paradigm, like that was the baseline for US forces on the military side of the house. Like no one even questioned that. They would refer to her as like the Uyghur baby or the Al-Qaeda baby because it was just not even a question. That's why there wasn't even a, normally in these types of things with anything in the military, you do an investigation,

like how did this happen? And you get fidelity on these things. It was such strong intelligence. they didn't even do that because like task force told us where they came from. And we even had, I don't know if it's in the materials that you all have that were released yet, but there was, I distinctly remember the task force SGA saying, hey, if you need more than this, we have more on yellow, on TS. And we never had to because it was so clear in the stuff that we had declassified. And so now looking back, it was actually an even more kinetic fight than we'd even realized

once we talked to the Rangers and got them to testify. I mean, have you ever heard of this happening? Have you ever heard of... No, like this is... I've never heard of a unit bringing back a baby. Yeah, well, and I think that speaks to the, in extremis, like how bad it was on the subject. Yeah, yeah. Because, I mean, you think...

It was just such a unique situation is what I'm saying. Like I've never, I've never, I've never, I've never brought a baby back. I've never heard, I've tons of friends've never, I've never brought a baby back. I've never, I've tons of friends. Yeah, and so like this is a- Tier one, tier two units, never brought a baby back. Never heard of this. Well, and I think that as the audience, like here's what actually happened,

they'll understand why these guys did what they didn't. Honestly, it was heroic. So, and so, but hold on, before I just, we'll get into that. I just want to get clear my, Sure. Clear out my questions. Yeah.

So, so how do you, how were you the one? I mean, you said all these people had volunteered. You talked to Stephanie about it. When did it be like, when did it, when did it get narrowed down to you're the one? Okay. So you're the one? You're the one that's going to take care of it? Not for a while, actually.

So September 6th, 2019 is when this mission goes. It takes a couple weeks. We thought that she had gotten turned over or the baby had been turned over, and then we found out, no, it wasn't. There was back and forth because the Afghans kept saying, we don't have capability, which is not uncommon. It's an injured infant.

That's nothing to be ashamed of, it's just the facts, right? And we'd done that with other like types of logistical support for the Afghans before, you know, from munitions to strikes, you know, you provide that support to enable those partner forces. But for a baby, we're trying to make sure that they have a safe outcome.

And so again, I had told you, like, we get updates with these standups and asking basic questions, and then providing those informations to decision makers and it became more and more clear that this is a foreign child and that wasn't the only legal, legally permissible COA. And so I went back to this Air Force major and I was like, hey sir, like we need to go back and brief the two star like what we now, because we had a significant amount of information that we did not have before. And their attitude was kind of like,

oh, well, I already kind of made a big stink about having to tell the Afghans because they weren't going to tell them in the first place, we're just going to do the right thing and take care of the child. And he had made a big stink about telling them. And then they were like, we can't, we don't have capability.

And he didn't want to go back and brief this two-star. And I was like, why? I don't know, this is not judging. I'm just saying, that's what happened. I don't know why, I think he felt like he had already made a big deal about having to tell the Afghans in the first place. And then when we had fidelity on that she was not Afghan,

he didn't want to go back and correct that brief to the commander. And so what ended up happening was I started to look at research, okay, well what are the risk factors? You know, again, like you make legal advice based on facts. So if the commander executes and gives this infant with a fractured skull and a fractured femur to an Afghan institution in 2019 Afghanistan?

What does that look like? That's what I wanted to know. And I didn't know. Like I was new in country. I hadn't really studied the environment like for children in Afghanistan. But as I'm researching on the embassy's website and the State Department's got a lot of like

formal reports to Congress over these types of things like trafficking in persons or the risk factors in Afghanistan. So I'm pulling like agency level study reports to Congress and it's scaring the bejesus out of me. It's saying that there's systemic child sexual abuse in every province in Afghanistan. There's even a, if your audience is familiar with Bachi Bazi, there's a practice dating back thousands of years in that region of dressing, and this is somewhat graphic if there's children listening, but dressing up male children as females,

and they dance, and they sexually molest these children. And that was happening systemically. And to be honest, I had been trained, like hey, there's child, there's child molestation is part of the culture. It is how it is there. It is how it is there. And I'm not saying that to all the Afghans,

I've got one of my best friends is an Afghan, and I've got so many friends that we've gotten out through the evacuation that- It's very common. It is. There's good and bad people everywhere on earth. But in this particular location, there's some evil people. And one of the things that bothered me

is that we were advised by state department, like, oh, that's not illegal here. Like, it's just, you know, gotta make deal with it. And for a decade, you have American service members who have put, you know, some of these people in power and having to allow child rape on our installations and saying, it's just part of their thing. Like, you can't do anything about it.

And like that mentality to me is just the antithesis of what we should be about as Americans because that's wrong everywhere on the globe. And we came downrange to represent this uniform. And if we're enabling child rape on our basis, that's not a hard call to say, hey, this is wrong. We're going to lose moral high ground. How are we going to have the moral high ground to intervene as a country on good causes if

we permit evil when we get there? And so in 2019, after that, however long we've been in Afghanistan, finally, through our influence, we changed the law in Afghanistan and it became illegal. And do you know how many people they prosecuted that year? Three. And in our office, we did the Leahy vetting. So if there was allegations of gross violations

of human rights, we would defund that, or defund a percentage to that Afghan unit, right? And so we were getting these reports at the operational headquarters of Afghanistan from all over the country about some checkpoint that was killing another checkpoint over who, I mean, who would rape the T-boys that weekend? Like that's the type of conversations

we're having in the office. So when we're talking about foreign girl, baby, right? And then researching these reports, talking about that even some of the orphanages traffic children. And then I think Stephanie touched on this earlier, I did nothing dangerous in Afghanistan. Like don't, the only thing that we did outside the wire

was we would go outside of our compound and we would process claims. So if we had a ground movement and they damaged a jingle truck or they ran over some livestock, they would do a message in a bottle and throw it out the window to whoever property they damaged. They wouldn't stop because it could be a target. And that message would say, go to this gate at RS headquarters at this time and on this day and you can present a claim against the

US government and we'll reimburse you for the damage. And so we would process those claims. So we take our turps, we go outside the checkpoint, and we would interact with local Afghans that had some sort of damage done by US military operations. And so I was very, you can be very familiar with the culture and like, hey, this is a $20,000 cow and like, I don't think so. And so I had to negotiate down to a reasonable outcome. But one of the interesting things about that

is you would interact with the local street children as you go outside the gate. Until the first time you go out, you're buying their little bracelet or whatever trinket they're selling, and you're trying to help them out as much as you can and be friendly. And so I distinctly remember this one boy, he was exactly my son's age, he was like seven.

And like really like a handsome little boy, like kind of like my kid, different complexion, but just like filthy dirty and like in this environment. So this particular kid, I tried, he was you know, asking for money, so I gave him like a buck. And I watched him go over to his owner and like give him that dollar, like the guy who owned the kids for begging. And I realized like there is nothing you can do to help this kid. And so like after that, we would just get him

disposable like food or stuff from back home, like give him a lollipop or something, just something they could consume right then and no one could take from them. Because if it was anything else, they would take it from them. And they would particularly get kids with like scoliosis or like kids that were more sympathetic to bag

as we did that stuff. And so that's kind of the context of like evaluating the safety concerns for in a tribal society. I mean, they use these kids to kill people too. I mean, when I was there, they would fill up their bicycle tires with explosives and have them ride up to the gate or ride up to a convoy or ride up to personnel. And then they would, the kid doesn't even know that the bicycle tires have explosives

in them. And then they'd blow the kid up just to kill an American. So that's who we're dealing with here. That's- Absolutely. This is who you're in a custody battle with. Absolutely. And then that's the-

I mean, not to mention, you know, there's videos of this stuff during the Afghanistan withdrawal when that fiasco happened. We had mothers who were trying to throw their babies over razor wire. Babies are getting hung up, caught in razor wire, dangling because they didn't make it over the razor wire.

You have babies being killed right outside the walls of the airport where US controls it. US didn't do shit about it. You know what I mean? in these people are trying to they're they're hanging on the side of an airplane as it's taking off I mean because of Taliban control because they know what's coming and no no mother is going to Throw her baby Over try to throw a baby over, try to throw her baby over razor wire.

I mean, there was babies everywhere just hanging from razor wire that didn't make it over. I mean, that's who we're dealing with. That's who you're in. So I want everybody to know that's who you're in a custody battle with. Oh, absolutely. That the mega law firms are interfering with who want your daughter to go back to that. That's who we're dealing with Well, I think there's they've done a very good job at twisting the narrative because I think by and large the larger American public We don't they're not aware of the atrocities like what you know service members have seen on the ground

What life is like actually on the ground in Afghanistan? Most of the American public doesn't know that. And so it sounds very judgmental or it sounds like, oh, you can't say that or no, surely that can't be true. But the reality is there's a very big difference in the value of children. Like they have a very different perspective. Well, I mean, but they do now because that shit hit national news

I mean Tyler Andrew Vargas painted a very good picture of what that looked like during the Afghan withdrawal and in the footage is everywhere We'll roll it right here I mean just so everybody can see can see what what that was like well what I would add though is that the attorneys that we've dealt with, they make it sound like we're, what would you say? Like we're almost like we're making it up. Like it's a conspiracy.

And I feel bad for them, even the opposing attorneys, because they have no idea the reality of what they're doing. Like for a real little girl. Like what's been such a struggle through all of this? Who the fuck fights this shit? Like who are these attorneys? Spineless fucks. Well I think that they- Like seriously dude? You're going to take a fucking five year old girl and send her back to that shit for your fucking paycheck

Well fuck you I think in their mind that they're gonna keep this what they're gonna get They justify it to themselves because I think they think that she's gonna stay here They think that she's gonna have this nice little picket fence life with these Afghans here And what she they don't realize is these people are proxies are our puppets of the Taliban that have their family in Afghanistan Do you really think that they put Marines families on national news and then don't know who these people are or how to touch them? Like, absolutely not. Like, this is—that's why we're saying it's really a Taliban-y Lingezawa situation, because she's not going to stay here in the United States

if we lose custody of her and these people do. They're going to put a gun to their family's head and make them go home. And then whatever the Taliban says is what's going to happen to her. And she'll, you know, she's not going to go to college or marry who she wants or grow up to be who she wants to be. And you know, that is, I don't know. If they don't kill her. Over my dead body.

Like that is basically like we have, from day one, we have said based on everything in US government possession, all of our intel, our billion dollar intelligence gathering apparatus in Afghanistan says X, we sent helicopters full of special operators to kill these terrorists. But the US government can't figure out where she's from? Like give me a break. Like you have this information, we've had it all along. And you've had people like us, just regular Americans at the ground level saying, look at the information.

If you watch this video, these Rangers in combat with these terrorists, they're heroic. They're doing what we task them as American people to do, kick down doors and eliminate these terrorists from the face of the earth. And they were doing that. And I cannot express how much appreciation we have for that. Like, you know, you're raised in America, you're patriotic, you care about service members, like thank you for your service, that type of thing.

But when you read what these guys have done, or you hear, like when it gets out from behind, because there's a lot of non-disclosure agreements, there's a lot of stuff that you don't get to talk about, especially with the special mission units. And when you actually dive into that and you get to see some of these experiences they've had, unbelievable, like heroic.

It's humbling to be able to read some of this stuff and talk to these guys. And so, when did you, we got a little side track there, I'm angry, but I just, I'll never, I just, attorneys, man, sorry, but I just, I just cannot imagine what it's like on the others. How the fuck do they sleep at night? I just don't, I don't get it. But so at what point did you find out she's going to be in your care?

Okay, so probably fast forward a couple months. She's been under US care at Bagram. Doctors and nurses love her, obviously, trying to make sure she's safe and recovering and all that. We're trying to get more information for decision makers. And then there was a real problem with classification. So we have some NATO folks who don't have a US secret clearance. And we're working with NGOs and some folks at the embassy that it's not easy to share

how much we know. And so at one point I sat through a meeting where they were going to use our generals' influence to make the Afghans take her. Like end of story. Like here, your problem. Like kind of like an operational, like it's a distraction from operations, Afghan problem. Let's just make them take her. And so that was going to happen. And I was like, I went to my colonel, I was like, sir, I was like, I don't think I can sleep at night. If we like close our eyes and say that she's not going to get like, at best case scenario that she's not gonna get like at best case

Scenario, she's gonna die of neglect because you know, you're talking about Kabul, which is like Denver. It's a mile-high city. It's a it's fall So it's gonna be cold. There's no heat in the orphanages. There's no running water electricity and some of the like there's a few nice presentation Facilities in the capital that they showed all the NGOs to get people to donate to the system, but in reality, in most places, there's nothing. You know, there's very little infrastructure. There's no medical care.

And like, and this is a kid with a fractured skull. Like, holy cow. How do we ignore, as Americans, like the big US, us, how do we ignore what's actually going to happen? And I have no problem with killing terrorists. Like, our parents died in combat with our guys. No problem with that. But we're about protecting innocence.

Like, we believe, like, even our worst enemy, it's not that child's fault that their parents were terrorists in a foreign country or brought them there to wage jihad. And so it was about getting that information to the right decision maker. But I got off track. Your question was, how did we get involved?

Is we appealed. I went to my authority, I was like, hey sir, can I try to create a legal path to the US for this child? And he was like, oh sure, knock yourself out. You know, like I appreciate where you're coming from. And so I got authorization. So he didn't take you seriously? He wasn't not serious.

It was just such a crazy, like Gordian knot of a problem set. Like, you know, there was just like, he didn't mind someone trying to take a crack at it. And so I went back to my CHU and I call, or my housing unit and I called Stephanie and we were just talking about this, like, how are we going to advocate to change the US policy towards the kid and not just ignore her? Because at that time, we ran a lot of important things in Afghanistan,

so the airspace, the borders, the infrastructure, security, we provided those things. And so if it was important enough, we would execute. And so our goal was to make her life that important. And so... So was this the initial conversation? I know this was the initial. This is the second big conversation.

I'll never forget because it was once again the afternoon, odd time. And I think I was doing a school part, I was like photographing or something. And he was talking back for like, how do we elevate this? Like, how do we, we're going to, we have to get, you know, enough attention on this for a decision to be made. And that's when you said it.

Well, I was like, we're going to have to get this to the president. Like, it's a policy decision, ultimately. It's does the United States value this child's life over operational convenience and and so in order to Change the four-star you'd have to are I mean like nominally the four-star his staff You'd have to get the US policy to change and we're like who can we? In like it's been so funny that we've been portrayed in the media is like politically connected

I am regular. I'm a captain of the Marine Corps. We are very by the book for the most part. I'm a judge advocate. I'm very by the book. And so, how do we change US policy? And we had a time hack, because I believe it was a Thursday, and they had a meeting scheduled on the next Monday. And they're going to dump her with the Afghans, who'd already said we don't have the capability.

And so... You said, I just remember that line, you're like, we're going to have to get hold of the president. And I was like, you know, I was crying. I was like, okay. How do we do that? And... And so I did two things. We... I was kind of on the phone Googling, like,

who's got children in the military? What politicians or whoever, like somebody who might have influence. And I just so happened to see the vice president, someone was a Marine and he was a captain. I'm a captain. And so I just drafted up an email saying like, basically like, hey dude, I'm down range. I need an assist on this.

I think it's, you know, here's the situation, here's the five W's. I think it's wrong that we're doing this. Like I made the moral and principled argument that this child's life was at risk by our actions that were basically based on a policy decision. And so we shouldn't do things when there's other options that could hurt kids. And I would say that's true across the board. It was particularly true in her instance because I think all of the evidence shows that she

was a foreign al-Qaeda fighter's child. And so we had options. So you got this to Katie Vance? Well, no, it was Pence at the time. Oh, it was Pence. So it was Pence's son. And honestly, to his credit, like, he was like, hey, I'll help.

So he got that to his dad through his, I believe through his mother. Katie Vance was a Marine. Yeah, absolutely. And there is a bond with Marines. He got that to his dad through his, I believe through his mother. Katie Vance was a Marine. Yeah, absolutely. And there is a bond with Marines. Like, you know, it's just like, if you're in some of these special mission units and other services, there's a bond there.

And he absolutely came through for protecting us alive. And, you know, we're forever grateful for that. He got that through and it was like a bolt of lightning. The vice presidents reached out, directed US forces Afghanistan to make every effort to bring her to the states and act on the child's best interests and that was testimony from a colonel in my board of inquiry that that happened,

that he was directed by the four star who had been communicating with the office of vice president. And so we changed US policy. And so we thought that's all it would take. I thought done, safe, she's safe. Now we're gonna start working towards a good outcome. And honestly, it'd be kind of unique, or it'd be a great opportunity to be able

to be the one who got to take care of her. But there were so many other people, I didn't even think that was going to happen. I just thought she was going to get to the States. She's going to be fine. Yeah, she's going to be, I remember asking you, I was like, what do you think the odds are that you know? She was 10% and yeah, it was smaller than I think you're like 1%

You said something really small that we would actually be able to but we're happy that that she was safe Yeah, because them because the the US policy changed distinctly and I got yelled at a little bit, but not too bad My colonel was like, I'm flexible. We'll row the ship in the other direction. And he was a good person about it. He actually signed a birthday card saying like, congratulations on your new baby. You know, and he signed it like the Vice President or something. This is my end of tour award from Afghanistan.

And they put it, the Colonel put it on the back and said, don't make me call the VP again. And so it's kind of funny how bureaucrats like to paint reality, you know, like, oh, you made your mess, you went and hid and like nobody knew and if only the US government known they'd have shut this down. That's just a lie.

Like we were talking directly with the Vice President's staff and with the Director of US Citizenship and immigration services, the head of the humanitarian affairs branch. Once the vice president and US policy changed, our office worked as a shop to accomplish that directive. And I was a part of that. And we use that information declassified to inform our Afghan partners and some of these NGOs, like here, like trust us, here's the pictures.

Like we showed them the math a little bit about what we knew about the fidelity of her origin. And so from there, we thought it was, we're golden. Like she's going to be safe, we'll see what happens, but nothing like, oh yeah, we get to adopt a little girl from Afghanistan, nothing like that. It was a child and innocent life. I'd have done it for any, like we didn't know sight and

seed, I thought it was blown up child, like no idea. What the condition was, expecting it was going to be handy. Yeah, a child with special needs, absolutely. We were prepared. And so what really changed that was the embassy. And like we talked about heroes and villains in this story. Our first villain, and I'm not necessarily trying to judge her, but I have a very distinct disagreement with her worldview and her practice.

The deputy chief of mission at the embassy, I was on the email chain from a senior state department official back in the states who was working with the vice president's office and working with some of the president's staff to accomplish this. I said, well, we're going to need to coordinate with the embassy, right? Because we're right next door in Kabul. And so she cold emailed Ambassador Bass, informed him of the situation. And he said, okay, we're going to sign this deputy, I think she was the acting deputy chief of mission at the time, the number two at the embassy, to handle it.

And so we're like, great. Like, and then there was a meeting set up for two days after that. And so that was October 23rd, 2019, is when that meeting occurred. And what's so funny is I've been accused of fraud for knowing there was known family in this meeting that we had with the embassy.

And the reality was, is that we were supposed to brief the embassy on the intelligence that DOD had. And I stayed up to like three in the morning, gathering all the stuff and calling it out and making sure it was like chopped down to like the bare essentials to know like, what's the name of the guy in this building? Who's this guy in this photo that we got off the objective?

Who was the target like where does he fit in this al-qaeda network and like what is the fidelity we have and so I had two binders in my hand one for the deputy chief of mission and one for our two-star action or operations officer and we were gonna brief the embassy on what we knew so we show up at this meeting and For lack of a better word, they ambushed us. So there are Afghans in this meeting where I'm supposed to talk about US classified documents and to explain to them how we know where she's from and that she is a foreign child and with all the concomitant risks associated with that in the Afghan system at that time. And not the first words out of her mouth,

but very close to the first words out of this deputy chief of mission south is, now that she's medically complete, how soon can you take her to the Afghans? So this is two days after the vice presidents of the United States sets US policy. After the four stars like, yep, act in the child's best interest and try to get her back to the States.

Like US forces Afghanistan and DOD is stepping out smartly on the child's best interest and try to get her back to the states. Like, US forces Afghanistan and DOD is stepping out smartly on the administration's policy. Like, I admit that we advocated for that, like totally. As a captain, like we were just, we were trying to inform decision makers, but that was US policy. Like, absolutely. And they were directly insubordinate

to what the administration told them to do. They were trying to make it a fait accompli, like she was already gone out of US custody, before it got traction and they had oversight. And so they never ever... Why? Why? Well, we eventually found out why in the Board of Enquiries.

Oh, that's true. Five years after the time. And he went and just like tried to make things nice for the embassy after this meeting. Cause I basically was like, are you tracking that this child has a fractured skull? Like, and so the Afghans like, we cannot take a child of these capabilities.

And there was some chatter about like, oh, the red cross might have been able to, might have located some family. And what actually happened was because of the classification levels, the NATO representative was a Dutch civilian, and she helped deal with children caught in conflict. She was an advisor on that. And she had said, oh, we might have found an uncle at Parwan. And I was thinking, that's odd odd because Parwan's like 100 miles away

from where this actually went on. And I was like, can you send me that traffic? And so she sends me email traffic of a name and a alphanumeric code that I recognize as a detainee number. And so I actually had pulled that number and was going to brief them that no, that was not an uncle. This guy said that was not an uncle.

This guy said that these were foreign fighters. He actually described his disgust for their features, like had mimicked throwing up in his interrogations, like these people are disgusting. And so the fidelity, it was so crossed wires for these folks without a clearance that that's why we went and declassified in the first place. So it took us about a week after that. So now I realize why, yeah, now I realize it's going to take a minute to get to

when you found the moment. The moment. Well that was the moment that I was- So I don't want to brush anything. Well that was the moment I was like, oh, they don't care about facts. I didn't realize that it wasn't about this child or the truth, it was about whatever political convenience

there was, and I think that centered a lot around the peace deal. Geez. Let's take a quick break, and when we get back, we'll talk about the on target, the managers on target, and what Sparrow went through. I know everybody out there has to be just as frustrated as I am when it comes to the BS

and the rhetoric that the mainstream media continuously tries to force feed us. And I also know how frustrating it can be to try to find some type of a reliable news source. It's getting really hard to find the truth and what's going on in the country and in the world. And so one thing we've done here at Sean Ryan Show is we are developing our newsletter. And the first contributor to the newsletter that we have

is a woman, former CIA targeter. Some of you may know her as Sarah Adams, call sign super bad. She's made two different appearances here on the Sean Ryan show. And some of the stuff that she has uncovered and broke on this show is just absolutely mind blowing. And so I've asked her if she would contribute to the newsletter and give us a weekly intelligence brief. So it's gonna be all things terrorists, how terrorists are coming up through the southern border,

how they're entering the country, how they're traveling, what these different terrorist organizations throughout the world are up to. And here's the best part, the newsletter is actually free. We're not going to spam you. It's about one newsletter a week, maybe two if we release two shows. The only other thing that's going to be in there besides the intel brief is if we have a new product or something like that. But like I said, it's a free CIA intelligence brief. Sign up. Links in the description or in the comments. We'll see you in the newsletter. All right, Josh, Stephanie, we're back from the break and so we want to talk about

the actions on the objective, the night of the raid, the night of 5 September 2019, we already know there was 100 plus Al-Qaeda killed that night, the Rangers did the hit. Pick it up. Well, I think that it's important for folks to understand the both the medical concerns we have, this story, what should stick in the audience's mind is, this is why we were concerned about her long-term medical care

and also why we were concerned about who exactly was going to come forward and claim her at any point. Because we're talking about Intel that's saying hundreds of these foreign fighters come back from Syria and settling in Afghanistan. And task forces are actually hunting and killing them. And that's the preludelude that's the context to what this mission was and so our concern was if we don't properly vet whoever

comes forward she could be back on the X on the next objective and not make it she barely made out of this one which you're about to hear but so I think it's also important before we go into the stories how we know this so we had the Alpha Team leader and the multi-purpose K9 handler come and testify. Their testimony is in evidence at our Board of Inquiry. We also had the Colonel from, that was the action officer in the Pentagon on Lily's visa

or on her visa come and testify as well at the Board of Inquiry. So a lot of this stuff is eyewitness sworn testimony. But just for ease, I'm gonna kinda talk you through like the story of what happened. So it's period of darkness, five to six September when we operate. We own the night, right?

And task force goes out on a mission to capture or kill three named objectives. They are Uighur slash Turkestani, there's different names for that kind of ethnic group, that are an al-Qaeda branch. And one of their boutique specialties for al-Qaeda is they run some child training camps in Syria and Afghanistan and Pakistan,

that's all open source. And they had been part of this group that had left Syria and come back into Afghanistan. There's a UN report publicly available that I provided so they can see that of where these people were and what they were doing. So Rangers get tasked with doing this and it's a pretty large hit. There's two company size elements of Rangers on the objective. And so the primary compound of interest is what they call the 10 series,

that's the priority target. And then the other companies hitting this other target, or I'm sorry, not company, I meant platoons. There are two platoon size elements are hitting this other compound. So you execute undercover darkness, they infiltrate with one train feature away outside of earshot.

They execute a march in to surround the compounds and isolate them and they succeeded that. Like it's quiet on the objective. They maintain the light noise discipline, they surprise them. So the first thing they do is call out, surrender or die. They go through their escalation of force, TTPs. Nobody responds. And I mean, I think the best assumption, you know,

in retrospect was that they were arming up and putting on their vests and getting ready to go. So they continue to escalate force because there's no response from the 10 series. And they breach one of the compound walls to allow them to kind of gain situational awareness And they breach one of the compound walls to allow them to kind of gain situational awareness of what's going on in the compound. There's some other ways they have

of having situational awareness that we've been asked not to disclose. But they start getting voices and seeing movement inside. And so the first glimpse, the multi-purpose clean-on handler sees her, is her dad has her and he's using her as a human shield. And he's got an AK and he's engaging the Rangers at the compound entrance.

And he's trying not to shoot this baby while he's killing this terrorist. And he's shooting. And this is Sparrow? This is Sparrow. So she was the first? One of the first things they saw. So it was about an hour and a half into the fight that they actually recovered her, but

in the first initial stages is when they saw her. So they exchanged grenades. So the Ranger vividly described a grenade rolling out and he sees it at his feet and it was like soul notion for him. It was like a homemade explosive. It was just unique. And he covers his dog and yells grenade because they're all stacked up at the top.

So did they kill the guy? They don't know what he was using at this time. They killed everybody eventually. Yeah. But they don't know if he was. They don't know. So he sees a grenade, yells grenade grenade, covers his dog, and it goes off. And he's the closest to the grenade, but he isn't hit.

His buddies are. So I think they picked up three or four casualties initially from fragmentation. And one of the things that they said saved their life was it was mostly homemade explosives. And so some of them only partially detonated. He said he wouldn't be here if he stepped on a tow popper and going around the building with his dog. What I meant was the guy that was holding Sparrow was a human shield. Did they kill him right off the bat? No, not right off the bat. So they roll grenades back in at him and he re-emerges without her

throwing grenades out. And so they have an exchange of grenades and there's some sympathetic secondary explosions inside the structure. And we're talking about a small, like family-sized compound, not like a huge open space. So it's pretty contained and they have it isolated with machine guns. And it's pretty open terrain with a little ravine where they had approached the target through for cover, like a river. And so they have both of these structures pretty isolated with good visibility. And so they continue to, room by room, clear this. And so they're

breaching these people, people are fighting to death, even with their family members present. They told me that there were detonated grenades with their children present as they're clearing these structures room by room. They have an Afghan partner force with them that is helping it to some extent, but it's mostly the Rangers, room by room by room, clearing these structures. And so as they're in the first or second room in these structures, it goes really kinetic up the hill at the other compound. And there's, if you can envision, there's actually a map tip of this

they put up on the screen, it might help. But the North compound in the 2030 and 40 series, which has been declassified and released properly, they were breaching the center structure. And the breach, as they were stacked up, set off an HME cache and it went sky high. I had multiple, like Rangers, they've been on five or six deployments to the Middle East and it's the largest explosion I've ever heard.

And they described the chemical taste. It immediately just flooded the area. They thought it was like a booby trap where they actually had to test it to make sure they weren't contaminated and could return to base, but they thought they were dead. The Alpha Team leader, a lot of them have lung damage from breathing that stuff in. It was that pervasive across the target.

So there's a gunfight down here that's pretty kinetic. Up the hill, it's getting really kinetic and the bullets are going over their head into the trees and like you're hearing it whizzing. They're both using Carl Gustavs to breach and to engage different targets within the structures. But when that HME, their homemade explosive cache went off with some Monatom nitrate, they had multiple rangers buried because the compound wall collapsed on them

as they were stacked up. And so the dog handler and the platoon sergeant and whoever was available that could be least engaged down at the 10 series, ran up the hill to dig out their buddies under fire to get them out. They actually had two guys partially paralyzed from that incident. And so they're already getting US casualties.

Ultimately, they had, I believe, nearly a dozen US Rangers casualties and about the same amount of partner force casualties. Geez. So we're talking about a super kinetic event to the point where they're calling for fire from some assets they had available to suppress and to kill squatters and that type of situation and So the multi-purpose canine handleers a more senior Ranger and he had a little bit of freedom of movement because he's you know Make sure there's no booby traps Etc and the breaches are clear

for the ragers to engage and breach these compounds. So they're doing their room clearing, and they're experiencing barricaded shooters where they're shooting at the guys entering the room, throwing grenades, setting off vests, over and over again through this compound. So I think they had about four or five barricaded shooters in the compound

of interest where they thought the objective was going to be. And we're talking about human pointing to that, SIGINT pointing to that, lots of SOAK with ISR assets over the last couple of weeks. And it's been a structure historically used for years as a waypoint for out kind of, or foreign fighters flowing into the area of operations. So as they're working their way through this combat, they're into the last room where they think this guy's gonna be. Or they're getting down to the last couple rooms left,

hour and a half of room clearing, and it's still going kinetic up to the north. So they actually ran out of breaching explosives. And so they used the Carl Gustav gun up on an elevated position to do the last breach because they were assuming that all the entrances were fouled because they kept running into IEDs, like implanted in the walls or tow poppers in the ground.

And so the Rangers took shelter on the far side of the structure while the Carl Gustav gunner, and for your audience who doesn't know what a Carl Gustav, they call it a goose gun, but it's like a bazooka or an RPG for lack of a better descriptor. So they blow a hole in the compound, hole portion of the compound where the last room is, and they're getting RPK fire from this compound. And that blast kills that guy that they believe was her biological father and blows his body into the compound. And the dog handler vividly describes like, making sure he was dead, you know, peeking

in, making sure he wasn't moving, making sure he was dead, and that he had like his little like man jams and a like AK bandolier on his chest and like distinctly Asian facial features look like the target is what he described under oath. And then he, the first time he sees what was her biological mother is he describes her running from the room screaming bloody murder and he and he is obliquing off the corner to kind of get an angle at the new breach they just made in the wall.

And he said that she got about 15 feet away from him and then partially detonated. And... So she had a vest on. She had a vest on. And the Alpha Team leader described it as maybe also kind of like cooking off almost, like the maybe fire had started to set it off,

but he said it partially exploded as she was running at him. And so she didn't die immediately. She had, he described over pressure wounds. So almost like a pop without the frag. And so he said she was mangled, but he dragged her behind a berm because they're still getting fire from the surrounding structures.

Because the two compounds were kinetic, but're still getting fire from the surrounding structures because the two compounds were kinetic But they were getting fire from surrounding buildings from other fighter contingents in those buildings And that was confirmed later by the detainee that who was like a lot of those Village buildings were housing Arab and other nationalities So he drags her behind a berm and the first thing he does is like his training. He strips her down to make sure, you know, see where she's bleeding, see if they can plug the bleeding first, then tries to create an airway. And it's just pretty graphic of her coughing up blood and bleeding out, basically.

There's nothing they could do. She died in like two minutes. But he strips her down, straddles her. So they tried to save her after she had a suicide vest on? Mm-hmm. She's just still alive. And what he noticed was, because they have to strip them down,

that's standard practice to make sure there's no bleeding. He noticed that she had the signs of giving birth. She had an enlarged breast and a displaced stomach. And so in his nods, he's like, he does this and he saw her for the first time moving, Sparrow. And he said that there was some fire on the structure from the KG round. And so it was pretty well illuminated in his nods.

And he saw something move and it caught his eye and he found her. And so mom expires pretty quickly. He gets the baby. And at the same time, the Afghan partner force is clearing the last room in that structure and they get engaged by another female with an RPK. And one of their guys gets shot and they just exfil

and they leave their guy in there. And so he's like, get back in there and get your guy. And like kicking them back into the structure to get their guy. So they kill that other female fighter, get their guy and come out and he's got the baby. And so the Afghan platoon sergeant from the KKA, Warner Force, he's mad.

They're like, don't bring this baby, like fucking throw it in the river. Like, let me shoot it in the head. Like, we don't want her to go up to be a foreign terrorist in our country. And like, and he's coming back as they exfil off the objective. And they had to do that with call for fire

because they're getting effective fire. So these Afghans on the objective, they know she's foreign. They don't want her to go up in their country and they're mad at our guys. Can you imagine having your own guys bleeding? You got two paralyzed dudes at this point on stretchers and you're walking wounded in a casualty collection point. You've got a baby that's like she was this big, like so tiny when I met her and that was weeks afterwards that I met her.

But they have the moral courage, not even a question, like we're not doing that, like ignoring them, resisting them. And they even had, I believe they'd handed her off to their female engagement team, or whatever Socom's version of that is, but they had to take them back and have positive control because they were so aggressive and wanting to dispatch this little girl on objective.

And like, that's the part I don't think that, you know, regular Americans know about this brutal civil war, is that there's a lot of bad things that happen. And, you know, they kind of, they were kind of very, the Rangers were very sensitive about telling us these things initially, like, hey, how much do you really want to know about this?

But we felt like obligated to at least be able to pass that knowledge on at some point of what happened. And you know, and it's such a contrast between what's actually these lies on the media. Like this was not an innocent farmer. Our guys got blown up, shot, and had brutal close combat with committed terrorists who were totally fine with killing their own families as long as it meant obtaining their ultimate objective of fighting us.

And these guys kept pressing on even with wounded. Talk about a textbook soft raid. like with the, even with casualties, pushing on through the objective. And then one of the underscored documents that I got released was, it says that structure was destroyed in accordance with JTFROE. That's like the understatement of the century. Like they deliberately made sure that no Al-Qaeda operatives were walking out of that structure

when they rolled off the objective. And so I am very confident based on like the ordinance and the assets they were dropping on that thing that no one was alive when they left. So they literally saved her life. Well, also add what he testified, the dog handler testified. Oh, so he said, he was asked at one point in all this, like, what makes you remember that night?

And he said, I think that's the first time I was able to put a face to what evil looks like, seeing what he saw that night. And that just struck me because he didn't find out that Sparrow got out and was safe in America until years into this. Wow. And it was actually with a Google photo drive

that some of the doctors and nurses put up of all her photos from her time in the hospital with the American forces. And he commented and he said, I have always wondered what happened to that baby. He goes, I am so happy that she got out. And so it's just been such an honor to be able to share her life with these people

whose decisions were probably instinct, but to honor that instinct for our guys, because how rare is it that someone would bother? No one would have said boo if they left her. No one would have said boo if they let the Afghans do what they wanted to do, kill her. But even in a gunfight with their blood up and their guys, in the heat of the moment

with their guys on stretchers, they still had the instinct to protect innocent life. And I mean, that is just, it's what it's all about for Americans, to be able to have that, a warrior who can still live out our values, like that's rare. And they displayed that that night.

They pushed through the objective, they achieved their mission. It's honestly heroic stuff. But I guess they actually got a little bit of flack for bringing her back, because they're like, what are you doing, right? But when they explained the situation, like they got authorized to pull her off objective

and she gets out. And so we didn't know a lot of the details until years later. But at the time, at the operational headquarters level, we were getting like indications of warnings, like, hey, trust us, this is really bad. And so that was one of the reasons why we're digging into, from a SJ's perspective of like, what happened here?

This sounds bad. And in trying to inform decision makers to make a better decision of a safer outcome. But I actually did a lot of research at the time with this specific al-Qaeda group, like where do they come from? What are they about? What do we know about them? And there's a lot of open source out there.

Bill Rosio with the Long War Journal, with the Foundation for Defense of Democracy, he has a lot of articles about this specific group. And what was so interesting is, as time went on, is there started to be like this incident happened on September 6th, right? And I told you the president had canceled the peace deal. Well, then there were some more reports about these Turkestani foreign fighters in Afghanistan, to the point where the Taliban in early December formally said that those reports are false.

They're like, there are no Turkestani foreign mujahideen in Afghanistan. So they specifically disclaimed this group that she was living proof was operating in Afghanistan in December of 2019. So all that in the backdrop of trying to get them back in the negotiating table and trying to get the peace deal back on track That's a strategic there this child's existence this group's existence in afghanistan at that time was proof that the taliban were not abiding with their You know commitment to not let al-qaeda operate out of afghanistan I think we all know that now like i've seen so many shows with with sarah adams and, experts talking about Al-Qaeda running free in Afghanistan,

but I think there's a lot of evidence they never stopped. Geez. So she was probably, what, four weeks old? Yeah, I think they said six weeks to two months, like somewhere in there. She was very small. She was very undernourished at the time. And so they stabilized her, and like I said,

they moved her to the main theater hospital. And she stayed there for five months. How many injuries did she have? I mean, just going through all those blasts alone. Well, that was what we didn't know at the time. And we had found from the hospital when I reached out and asked, like, hey, what do we know about the injuries for this child? Because we were trying to build a picture for a commander to decide,

like, what are the risks for her? And so, you know, obviously, with a fractured skull, your TBI injuries and was there any software damage in there? And will that impact her development? And then with her leg, it still impacts her walk. And so the question was, as she develops, how will that, does it hurt the growth plate? Will she be able to walk normally?

Would surgery help with that? Those are kind of the concerns that we were worried about. And then also just cosmetically trying to make sure that that got reshaped while her skull was still soft enough to mold it. Those were some of the things that, the questions we were asking both professionally and then as we got to be like the person on the seat who had to volunteer to get a visa to the

U.S. for her. Those are the questions that we are arranging medical care in the U.S. for like specifically to evaluate and treat those concerns. I mean, how is she now? She's five and a half now. Is she did any of those blast injuries so so Fortunately, it looks like her brain is fine That was our biggest concern. We had

We'll get into this a little bit later. But when she was in you know, when she was outside of US protection There were reports that she was shaking her her eyes were twitching, she was shaking, and we were very concerned that those were seizures. Sounded like that's what it was describing. She's been hospitalized several times in the US to the point where they took them a couple days to stabilize her for, she has some severe allergies to a variety of things, but especially almonds and peanuts,

where she has like anaphylactic reaction to it. And she also is very asthmatic. So we, you know, she has an inhaler for daily use and for emergency use. And like I said, she's been hospitalized, I think two or three times for exposure to something. We don't know necessarily what triggers it all every time, but she gets hospitalized for it.

And she'll get a reaction where she's almost like drowning because she can't expel the air from her lungs. So it sounds like she's puffing and she can't. From the... I have no idea. It could be from, I guess that's possible. You mentioned some kind of toxic. Yeah, from the ammonium nitrate.

That's actually, I never even considered that. But the Rangers have had lung problems from that, so that makes perfect sense. I never even put two and two together. But regardless, I think if you reflect on how many times her life was this close to death, it's just staggering. Because she's got a leg wound here from shrapnelnel and she's got some more shrapnel down her leg But I mean six inches higher on a baby. That's only yeah, that's this far and you bleed out

She's got a skull fracture that if it's any deeper. She's dead I mean, she's got you know a little bit to the left with a kg round and you're done Even with the Afghan partner force like like if these guys weren't committed to protecting innocents, she'd be dead. Like honestly, if she didn't get, I am not confident if she had gone through some of the medical emergencies had in the United States,

that she'd have survived if she'd remained in Afghanistan. And then, I mean, I think the elephant in the room is with the Taliban and can charge after 2021, what type of life is that for a little girl? You don't go to school, you don't go outside, you know, you get to marry who you want, then none of those things can happen for her. So we're so thankful for the Americans who have saved her life at those points and for the ones who got her out of Afghanistan. And we'll get into that a little later in the story.

But how does she interact today? and for the ones who got her out of Afghanistan. We'll get into that a little later in the story, but. How does she interact today? Well, I was case in point the other day, a woman that I knew at church actually, she put two and two together finally that, you know, like she's my daughter and kind of hearing about the situation, she's like, that's her? Because our kids played soccer together.

And she's like, I would have never known. And unless you see her in a swimsuit or in a shorter pair of shorts, you, the scar is telling, the scar is distinct, but you would never know. She speaks perfect English, she's a typical five-year-old little girl. And I mean, there's moments even for me,

even though we've lived this out and I know the story through and through, there's just moments where it really strikes you when you look at her and she's like, for instance, when I'm teaching her how to read, how to write, just how amazing it is that she's actually here in person alive. And just for her, it's just normal.

But she's just a walking testament to just how miraculous a sequence of events has kept her alive. And most people see would never even just think that she's American. I've been told that she looks like me because she has brown hair and brown eyes. But she's normal. And I think that a lot of GWAD vets could close their eyes right now and see a face

of a kid or a person, a vulnerable person, and caught up in a crazy circumstance of war that they wanted to help, tried to help, couldn't help. Or maybe some of them did. But I've had so many grown colonels crying in my office like when I'm telling this story, and that reminds me of, and telling stories about their experience For instance, I had a colonel with it

There's a there's a news article the kids of Camp Eagers and there was a suicide bombing ISIS child but he was he was trying to seek guardianship of an orphan that would come and beg at their camp and You know trying to do it. There's a lot of red tape and he said he was and beg at their camp. And trying to do it, but there's a lot of red tape, and he said he was introducing new lieutenants, and like, hey, indicators of something off in your pattern of life. He was like, all these jingle trucks, that one's brand new. Why is that? You should watch for things like that.

And the next day, that jingle truck, driven by a 14-year-old ISIS suicide bomber, blew up all those kids and killed this little girl. And so he wanted the help and couldn't. And then he says, I don't think I've ever told anybody that story before. And I had another, like, these are hardened, soft, like, kernels. Another one in 2007, Fallujah, he said he had a team that was, took IDF, mortar rounds, and they missed. And they hit the compound, family compound next to them,

and a little four-year-old girl took shrapnel to the abdomen, and they wouldn't send a medical bird, because it wasn't in conformance with the medical ROE. And he's like screaming at them on the radio, like, send this, you know, if you don't send this, I will go over blackball and take her to the hospital, ground it back. So this colonel said, like, it was his twin,

he had two twin little girls at home, there were four at the time-ish. And he said it was about the same age. And so he asked for volunteers and he got like some mass certain and him and they got in a Humvee and went over Fallujah blacktop roads as fast as they could, risking all the IEDs and she bled out like halfway there.

And so like these are the memories our guys that have the same values as these rangers demonstrated. I bet you that is so common in the war that it's not even funny. Because I probably had, there's more I could talk about, like the medical staff, one of the reasons they were so worried about her was because of their experience with other soft bringbacks

where they'd had to shoot through children that are being used as human shields to kill these terrorists and then treat them and then return them to the Taliban. And there was one that stood out in my mind. There was a 12-year-old girl that had lost her hand in a, I think a farming implement of some sort. And so the medical staff nursed her back to hell for like a month. And then they had some uncle of some sort come to the gate and, you know, to claim her. And 10 minutes after the guy left, they got a call,

hey, come pick up the body, a body at the gate. And this guy had shot this little girl because she had no value as an amputee as far as like marrying her out. And so these nurses and doctors who nursed this little girl back to health and like prepared her arm and made sure she was as set up as she could,

like had to come get her from the ECP because they'd shot her. And so like, like in their story after story of from these medical personnel of like just like child abuse injuries they had to treat, but it was a local leader. And so they couldn't do anything about it. They couldn't, there was no criminal prosecution, like to the point where they're they're putting a titanium skull in a four-year-old because he got his head beat in by by Some of these practices and again, that's not saying it's across the board But it happens and it was happening irregular enough where these people were very concerned. And so when

Back in time when I reached down to the hospitals like hey hey, we're looking at trying to get a legal path to the US, they were like, we are all in to find a safe outcome for her. Like we believe we're morally and ethically obligated to try to find a long-term safe outcome. And that's kind of how we got it. So our code name for her was Sparrow, but the medical staff, it was Starfish,

and it was starfish. And it was based on a poem or a book where there's a little boy walking along the ocean, and he's bending down, he's picking up a starfish, and he's throwing it back into the ocean. And he keeps doing it over and over, and an adult comes over and says, why are you doing this?

Can't you see the beach is filled with starfish? You can't possibly make a difference. And the boy bends down, picks up another starfish and throws it into the ocean. And he says, well, it made a difference for that one. And so she, they called her starfish because she was the unique one that they could help. And this war and all of the terrible things

that they were seeing come through the doors, she was the one with the unique set of circumstances that they could actually help this one. And so, I mean, we've had dozens of medical staff come after they found out that she got out safely, tell us stories. I mean, I've recorded some of the phone calls just because I want her to hear it one day of how loved she was by hundreds of people, not just us, I mean, hundreds of people.

One man, he was crying on the phone. He's like, I can't believe she made it out. And he's like, I used to hold her at night because I guess the female nurses were stressed by her crying so much because of her injuries and early on she cried a lot. And so he said, I never took care of babies, never changed a diaper in my life and I was like, I'll hold her.

And so he would hold her because he had the night shift and he would hold her and watch movies or do his college classes and just hold her in his arms the whole time. And so he's like, and like Joshua mentioned, there's so many people, like, I've always wondered what happened to that baby and like her in particular. And so like Joshua said, it's, you know, all of a sudden we're getting the attention, but it was, it was across the board, everyone that heard about her. They, they were motivated to do whatever they could to help give her a better future and a safe outcome. And she is loved by hundreds of people.

And like I said, we are so proud of our participation in her story, but it's not really us. It's really all these unsung people that contributed to our life and safety at that moment in time. And I mean, honestly, we felt obligated to honor that and keep moving that forward. And so, what that looked like at the operational headquarters level was, okay, to get a person to a country, you have to have a visa, right? So, after we talked about the US policy change and the administration said, you know, act in a child's best interest, that's a no brainer, right?

Try to get her back to the States. The US forces of Afghanistan move forward smartly and did that. And I talked to you about the embassy initially trying to ambush us and destroy that effort early on, make it a fait accompli. Did you ever find out why? So my deputy SJA is a Navy commander and he is in a, he was a reservist on a year deployment to Afghanistan.

And he had a intelligence background, worked for the house intelligence committee as an attorney in his civilian job. And so he was actually involved in the negotiations with the Taliban in the room, like describing how this is going with the Taliban, what they want and how they're reacting. And he's like briefing us tonight. So we have like a front row seat of what's happening in Doha, like on a regular basis. He happened to be back, you know, because there's there's multiple rounds of these negotiations. So he tried to go and like make peace with the embassy, like what is the deal?

Because it was very difficult for just Understand like why they're on a different wavelength than we were and so he's like ma'am like so he met with her again He's like ma'am like I said some hostility in the last meeting like what's going on and he personally told me this he's like she said we really didn't appreciate you going over heads to the administration and so we're like Sorry, we were trying to take care of the child's like, you know, safety, you know, that type of thing.

And so they basically left it as, we're not going to help you. The embassy's perspective was, we're not going to help you, but we won't get in your way. And so DOD was lead for months after that. And we were working to get a visa. So now, before we were advocating for her, when it became, here's the task from

the administration to make a long-term safe outcome for this child, we did that. And the first thing was a visa. And so what do you do if you need a visa? You talk to US Citizenship and Immigration Services and they can issue a advanced parole visa. And so it's ironically, it's what she entered the country on with 120,000 other Afghans or however many actually came to the States. They were all paroled into the United States under humanitarian parole. Well, there's an advanced humanitarian parole and that's what we were seeking to get. But there's some basic requirements.

And this is where it was pretty miraculous that we were able to be involved because we had the skill set to track down all these administrative requirements. So to get a humanitarian parole visa for medical care, to get into the United States, you have to have certain things. First is a financial sponsor. Under federal immigration law, you can't be a burden on the government.

The tax dollars can't pay for you to be here. So you have to have someone that signs on the dotted line and says, I will pay for this person. I will cover their costs. And so we volunteered, like that's easy. We'll cover the costs. For medical care, you actually have to have a doctor have it scheduled and paid for.

So we're like, how are we going to do this? Like it's a Jane Doe baby off of objective. And I'm talking to USCIS like, hey, crazy situation. You know, you, this is me, this is what we got. We've got a Jane Doe al-Qaeda infant with a fractured skull. It's not safe here in Afghanistan for child trafficking purposes and lack of medical care. And there's often a prejudice for foreigners in this country. And so they're all like, well, like you basically get a list

of bureaucratic requirements. And we were just knocking off those lists. Like go to your authority, ask them what we need to do. They tell us what you do and then you go work it. And so I'm literally on the phone with the head of the humanitarian affairs branch, great guy, like really compassionate for refugees and does a lot of great work.

But he's like, well, you need a name for the visa. Like, how am I going to get a name for this little girl? And I'm just figuring it out, right? This is our office's task. We're all working it there. So the larger office is negotiating with the Afghans to be like, yeah, that's fine, send her to the US. It happens before with other kids from other strikes.

It's not like uncommon, but kind of more of like a face saving thing, not a actual requirement. It's just like managing good relations, but we're giving your country away to the Taliban anyway. So, you know, it's kind of in that context. So how do we get a name? So we had had another American attorney, Kim Motley, who is by the way, an American hero.

I'll get into her a little bit later with what she did in the fall of Afghanistan, but she literally saved hundreds of lives. She should be getting the Presidential Medal of Freedom, to be honest with you. But Kim Motley had volunteered, based on her experience in the Afghan legal system, to act as a guardian ad litem, which is, for folks who don't know, that's a court-appointed representative to look at the child's best interests and no one else's. Now they don't have that same concept in Afghanistan, so it was like a voluntary, like self-appointed,

but our office was working with her to get a safe outcome. She had tried to get documents for her, asked the Afghan government, no response, right? Nobody wants to take on the risk, they viewed as a foreign child, and like it's kind of terrorism-y, so they don't want to touch it. So we're like, how else do we get a name?

And then in addition to that is how do I arrange for medical care for a minor child in the United States? I don't have any authority to act for, the government doesn't. Like who can authorize surgery on a child? Who can authorize an MRI? And so like I'm going through my wheelhouse, right? I don't know the answer, but I'm a lawyer and I'm going to research it and find out. And so, it has to be a guardian. She has to have a name.

Well, a court can appoint a name, right? There aren't any courts in this area of Afghanistan that's controlled by the Taliban for most of the war, right? I mean, if you go up there, you're going to get a gunfight. So with the operational realities on the ground, we're like, okay, well, let's see if we can get emergency legal custody. And she's not Afghan. We have high strength intelligence that she's not Afghan.

This group is kind of nomadic Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Western China, like they're from that region, right? A lot of them fighting in Syria and Iraq. We don't know exactly where she was born. Maybe in Afghanistan, maybe in Pakistan, or maybe in Turkmenistan before they cross the border. We don't know. So the best argument was, she's known foreign. Afghanistan doesn't have birthright citizenship.

Most countries don't. So you're not automatically a citizen. And statelessness is a huge problem in Afghanistan because of all the IDPs and such that people don't have documentation citizenship or they don't have citizenship. So we're like, okay, well, the best category for her that she fits into is stateless. And she's in the custody of the United States. And like, terrorist detainees in Gitmo have basic rights. So let's advocate, let's make the argument that she's a stateless minor in the custody of the United States. And so we were authorized to declassify this stuff

and use it in the court system, and we did. And the next day, so we argue that she is a stateless minor in US government custody, she's a victim of terrorism, like in this crazy situation, and then no other state would have jurisdiction over her. And based on the evidence, the judge, like the evidence that they were moving every 30 days, they were known to go over multi-jurisdictional boundaries,

like over national borders, the judge agreed with that assessment. They found these facts in a ruling. So we were then her guardians, right? So now I can arrange an appointment at the University of Virginia Medical Center, and they have a world renowned pediatric ward. So we set her up like the whole nine yards,

a treatment plan, her doctor, we gave her doctor her medical record from DOD, we got everything set up for her to come back and like it's looking like she's coming back. Like to the point where we bought a crib and we were ready to go and I was considering dropping out of my final semester to be ready to take on a child with what we were assuming was special needs that she'd have needing ongoing medical care. And so I'm updating my commander, my colonel, every time like the day after this is granted,

we update the colonel. I say, I'm going to get her registered as a DOD dependent now, because there's a guardian you can add them as your dependent. I'm talking to Headquarters Marine Corps on the phone, like I'm in Afghanistan at three in the morning my time, talking to Headquarters Marine Corps dependency branch,

and they formally grant her, I have the documents downstairs, like they formally add her as my dependent. And in the meantime, we also got her a certificate of foreign birth, because in Virginia, they had contemplated that foreign children being adopted in Virginia might need a birth certificate because sometimes from third world countries, you don't have that documentation.

And so there's a way where you can apply for that. And so we did. And we got it. And so we have a name that says unknown birthplace, unknown parents, or those unknown birthplace, citizenship unknown, and then us as her parents. And so we provided her that documentation and the court order to the Marine Corps Dependency Branch, which is the authorized agency official to make those determinations, fully knowing we're in Afghanistan. My wife was on the phone with him. I'm calling from Kabul. And they add her as our dependent.

So that provided a way to guarantee payment, right? Now she sells her for TRICARE. So I have the legal authority to arrange healthcare. We do that, and it's literally just to get the visa, right? Somebody had to do it. We were in the seat, we had a short timeframe. So we did that. And then ironically, and this is the crazy part,

is when we were going to get our birth certificate, we had a guardianship order. We were legal guardians of US law. Stephie goes to the... Vital statistics. Vital statistics office in Richmond, Virginia. And they say, we don't agree with the judge's interpretation of this statute.

We're not going to issue you this birth certificate. And we're like, we have to have this birth certificate because they said it's a requirement for the visa. We have a name from the court order. We have a birth certificate as an identity document to apply for this humanitarian parole visa. And they're like, well, you know, we don't agree with his interpretation.

We don't think it fits the statute. And so my brother is an attorney, not a family law attorney, but is an attorney. And so he's engaging with them. And the legal advisor for the Vital Statistics Office is the Virginia Attorney General's Office. And so he's talking to the Attorney General's Office like, really? Like you're not going to issue, like, here's why we need this. We need this for a visa.

We need a name and an identity know identity document and she has none and they're like well We would prefer if the judge issues an adoption order because we think that complies with the statute So we're like So you want us to apply to adopt this child and the judge to do it? They're like yes So we did like it wasn't even our idea Like, honestly, I didn't even contemplate that. So we filed for adoption, the attorney general of Virginia recommends the judge grant it under the circumstances because there's a lot of background that she's stateless

and these were terrorists, et cetera, et cetera. And so they issue this stuff, and I provide it to my command. Like, just, I am doing it by the book for a crazy situation, right? Because I think my personal philosophy is I will always try to be administrative correct and morally right, but if it's gonna come down

between the two of them, I'm gonna be morally right. And we'll try to make this fit, because rules, or administrative rules often can't contemplate the crazy situations in life. And so that's why we are a principle-based institution in the military. We operate on principles of like, you know, life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, constitution protects those things, we live out those values, and then we have all these rules to help us do that.

But sometimes those conflict in a crazy situation, and this was one of those things. It was But sometimes those conflict in a crazy situation and this was one of those things it was Unprecedented to have this happen and and here's the linchpin of the whole thing if the US military's 19 year old multi-billion dollar intelligence gathering apparatus is correct There's no case to be talking about right now She is a stateless child. She is, her origin was an al-Qaeda foreign fighter. Like, there's, I've never seen evidence in five years to even suggest that that wasn't the case.

And so I think the reality is that we're facing is the embassy, and we'll talk about how they did it, but they literally gave this child after she'd been recognized as our daughter by DOD, after she'd been added as a dependent and issued an ID card, after she had insurance and a full ride to the US like set up with no one and nothing before that, claiming her, they handed her over to what's turned out to be non-relative terrorist affiliated folks. And I think that that is kryptonite for these bureaucrats because they never thought that some low-level officer would be able to still get her out of Afghanistan at some point. And I didn't think that either.

Like, that was an absolute miracle that she got out and got safe during the evacuation. But I don't think they ever thought they'd be held accountable for what they did to this little girl. But for us, 18 months before Afghanistan fell, we had a little microcosm of the little value they placed on human life over whatever bureaucratic policy they're working at that time. And their worldview keeps bumping into reality

in very painful ways for real people on the ground. And we saw that with people falling off C-17s in Afghanistan. We've seen that in people, you know, at best, if they're lucky, wasting away in lily pad countries trying to get to the states. And people who've gone to war with us, people who've gone to combat with us, people are in danger because of our commitments to them.

And I think we saw a microcosm of that really early. Like I never thought that she would get turned over in the way she did. And it ended up being two days before the PCO was announced. She got dumped to what I think was Taliban proxies coming forward to falsely claim it. And the reason I think that is, in my board of inquiry, a colonel testified. And we had asked for this colonel authorization to testify for three years and were denied.

And he testified that they had six to eight false claimants come forward and they DNA tested them negative testing for all of them. So they These were non family members coming forward out of the boonies to claim a child and the question is why? Why would six to eight people who are not relatives of the child come forward? And I think the best answer that is What was the Taliban strategic? that is what was the Taliban's strategic, what was their number one priority right then in Afghanistan in September to March of 2019, 2020, what was their goal?

Is to get the US to leave, right? And what the conditions on the peace deal was that the soil of Afghanistan would not be used by al-Qaeda. And she's living proof that they're violating that. And then I think if you also think strategically from the embassy's perspective, President Trump had made a decision that this was a bad deal and he canceled it.

And he said, he tweeted, how many more decades you want to fight? I was sitting in the chow hall when that went on the news and I was like, huh, that's awesome, right? Because I saw this car bombing, this is a guy with kids at home, he got shredded by ball bearings for no strategic purpose, it was just a middle finger from the Taliban.

And I think the president rightly said, this is a bad deal and killed it. And then both the embassy and the Taliban want to get this done, right? And I don't think with history as in retrospect, it was a bad deal. Does anybody think that that went well? Like, does anybody think that made our country safe?

Does anybody think that that made Afghanistan stable and not a safe haven for the Taliban? And I'm not saying stay there forever, and I'm not advocating for forever wars, but I'm saying that wasn't the abandoning, the total abandonment of Afghanistan was not the plan in 2019 they were gonna leave task force behind and they were to do a counterterrorism mission and mow the grass Because I was sent to study that withdrawal. That was my mission is how do we transfer all these assets to the Afghans? How do we make this stable and?

Really wasn't till how do we make this stable? And really it wasn't till the spring of 2021. And I happened to talk to our JSOC liaison. They're like, no, man, they're pulling everybody. I'm like, what? Like you're pulling everybody? Like they're pulling task force? Because I was sitting in the new camp Vance

that they were building adjacent to Kabul airport for the SOF to operate out of till the cows come home and kill Al-Qaeda. And so I think that, you that, looping this back, both the embassy and the Taliban were dealing with a president who doesn't get pushed around. And they were both peddling a bad deal. Like the embassy was doing it for the American people

and the Taliban was doing it to get us out of Afghanistan. And I think if the, who knows, but a living proof that this al-Qaeda group is still operating in Afghanistan. And I think if the, you know, who knows, but a living proof that this al-Qaeda group is still operating in Afghanistan. And here's an interesting fact for your audience. The Taliban was in these, on this objective the next morning, filming a propaganda video. And they released it a couple days later. It's on Twitter. You can go find it. And they're, you know, accusing, the typical like, accusing of war crimes, you only killed women and children, et cetera,

and they show some bodies and it's sad, right? Like, the human cost of war is sad. But they have Chinese looking bodies, like little kids, they look Asian distinctly. You have guys wearing Arabic scarves, like red check scarves, like very looks like Syria to me. Like that's not the Afghan scarf, check pattern, right? They have black flags.

But what the message these propagandabities are saying is the Americans have bombed local people, farmers, local people. And you're in the middle of nowhere Afghanistan. Why would you feel the need to emphasize that these are local people and farmers in like literally the dead center of southern Afghanistan? And I think that messaging, and then a month later,

they say there are no Turkestani foreign mujahideen in Afghanistan. And like they are very keyed into the fact that this deal just got blown up and they wanna get back to the negotiating table. And that was the directive for SOF at the time was bleed them back to the negotiating table. And we were doing it.

They wanted to get back and negotiate with us. So I guess all that I think that was that was she the leading, you know, thought in their mind? No, but she was an inconvenient truth for both sides, both the embassy and the Taliban. When did you first meet her? Was it in the? Oh, probably mid-October I got to go down on a rotator to Bagram and spend a couple days down there on some other project.

I can't remember what it was. Oh, I think it might have been visiting Parwan. But yeah, I got to hold her for the first time. And it makes all the difference because seeing a case in paper, like just read about it in emails, like when you're holding this little life, and you're like, what is gonna happen? Like we're leaving Afghanistan, this is gonna go south. Like I'm thinking, you know,

not even with the hindsight of history, but at the time going like, what's gonna happen when we leave, right? There's gonna be a civil war at a minimum. And, you know, just a, you know, borderline genocide, this would end up happening, but holding her like that, just, her so vulnerable. Like you felt obligated to protect if you could.

And so, I mean, the commander of task force, Medical Afghanistan, I named my four son after him because he was the model of empathy and he risked his career advocating, like, hey, we can't, we're morally obligated to DNA test and terrorist vet for this child. You cannot, I have as a doctor, can't abide by this. To the point he was getting warned he's gonna get fired

from a two-star who thought it was a distraction. And he would hold the hands of dying service members, made sure that none of our guys died alone. That's the caliber of person this man is. Physically fit, just everything you want in a leader. And that's not always the case in the medical corps, but this guy, I so admire him. Who brought her home?

That's a long, so she was, despite all of that, despite Senator Cruz advocating for her, different folks trying to get her home, the embassy reported falsely that the Afghans didn't want to do a DNA test and that they had confirmed that there was family. That's what they reported. They just came up with this? Yeah, well, so actually, they didn't just come up with this. That's what they reported came out of a meeting on December 31st, 2019.

They said they met with this senior child protection specialist who's a low-level-like decision-maker in an Afghan ministry at the time. We worked for two years to get that guy out of a lily-pad country. And you know when he got in the country? Three days before my board of inquiry.

That's when he arrived in America. And that was the only time he felt safe to share the other side of the story. And so in our board of inquiry, he testified that at that meeting, he asked the embassy to do a DNA test because they had nothing, no corroboration. It was just a bare claim. This guy said he was an uncle. And he's like, we didn't even have a test gear out, their national ID card, like their birth certificate. He goes, we didn't have, we had nothing. The only thing we have have is DNA And the embassy declined to do it We had committed like I've got the emails downstairs saying we will we will DNA test like DOD will DNA test

Any claimants any potential family to confirm a DNA match because like that's basic safety And then if there was a match there the plan was to explain her medical needs and offer to send her to the US for medical care. That was the plan. Because we knew she had no immediate family members alive because they were dead. But the embassy reporting out of that meeting that the NA testing wasn't part of the Afghan process and they had confirmed family. And in fact, they had no evidence this claim was related at all.

And it turns out he wasn't. In documentary evidence, this guy said he was related to someone he claimed was the father. It was an elderly, I say Taliban elder because he's got a big black turban and he looks like a Taliban elder. I've got a picture of him. And when I saw that photo, we found her outside of the government later. But when I saw this guy, I was like,

they gave her to the Taliban. It just screams it. We'll get a little bit more into some government misconduct, but this same embassy person in all of our litigation has filed statements saying that, oh, like trying to make it look like they had processes like the right way or that the Red Cross was involved. Like I've got an email downstairs with your people

from the Red Cross to this Afghan child protection specialist like three days before she was supposed to get turned over to them. And they're like, hey, could you please identify who this person is? The Red Cross had no idea who she was going to. And they have, the Department of Justice under the previous administration has filed like filings and lawsuits saying the Red Cross was involved. It's like, well, if that's true, how come they're asking for her identity, like two days before you're supposed to put her out of US custody with no vetting at all? And then this guy, we acquired his phone number at some point.

And then, you know, you plug in a, if you plug in, like a lot of vets know, like WhatsApp and Signal, you know, we all use those things. It has a profile picture that pops up. Guess what's on this guy's profile picture? Well, it's a little Taliban flag, and it's a little placard bragging that the Taliban is coming to hear his grandson or something in their home village three miles from the objective.

Recite the Quran, which, whatever, it's your culture, fine, but if you got a flag of the Taliban flag over a map of Afghanistan on your profile picture, I kind of think that you're probably sympathetic that way. Yeah. And there's a whole series of indicators that we'll get into a little bit later

as we go to how she got out of Afghanistan, because that's literally like the second half of the story. We're probably finishing with how she got turned over. But basically, because of the State Department's position was, we don't want to impact the peace deal. A colonel testified that the Taliban negotiators had mentioned the situation. I don't know if that's true. I don't have firsthand knowledge of that. And so it was this series of, what, half-truths that they were able to I.O. campaign the administration

to be like, oh, well, like nobody wants to, like, take her away from family. That's safe. And, oh, maybe we're just wrong. But the embassy had never looked at this classified intel. And we weren't able to—the colon Colonel from the Pentagon I mentioned earlier that came and testified at our board of inquiry He said they independently corroborated everything we had declassified sent them They went and talked to Ranger Regiment and verified all that with their targeting system of the Pentagon He said yeah

We knew where they were from in Turkmenistan where they're moving him from like high fidelity Who these people were and where they came from and so he mentioned to me He said he struck it, he said, I will go to my grave thinking that these were al-Qaeda terrorists that were moving through the region from Turkmenistan because there's nothing that would suggest otherwise. And but at the same time, and this is a big picture,

at the same time we have the previous administration's Department of Justice filing court filing saying her parents were an innocent farmer killed in a crossfire with zero evidence like the eyewitnesses say she blew herself up and you know her suicide vest was partially detonated. We have the DOJ saying the ICRC was involved. And we have, like, I can give you 50 examples, but I've got a couple for your team where they're redacting what we knew at the time from the traffic, because what they'd rather do

is they'd go after a junior officer, like a fairly low level officer, and attack your credibility, and say, no, no, the embassy was doing safe and there was nothing to see here, basically. And I don't think they thought they'd ever be in a position where I can prove in court that you were lying and that you did this to this little girl. But they're in that position now.

And so that's why they've sought to gag you and to shut you up and over classify things so that the truth of what actually happened and how dangerous it was and how, it's child abuse what they did to this little girl. And she has become our daughter, we've had her for years, she has no idea any of this ever happened. But it's not right from a national perspective that this should have happened. No one should have to go through what she's gone through and what we've had to go through

as a result. Like we were telling the truth on day one, we're telling the truth now. And if they release that intelligence, if they release the video footage of this combat, like our guys aren't war criminals on objective. They're not fighting innocent farmers. Do civilians die in war? Yes, they do. But that's the result of terrorists who bring their families along on jihad to come fight us. Like that's a sad reality of war, but that's not our guys. So I do, I will

circle back at some point and then talk about like the period from when she was dumped before the peace deal to how she got out of Afghanistan, because that was this incredible story. But I think it's very important to focus on what the embassy knew and why they did that. Like, well, I guess a better question is, why didn't they know this intel? Why didn't they DNA test? Like a DNA test, it's the most biometrically enrolled

society on earth. Like we have a lab set up that does it in four days. I have her DNA swab, the DOD did in December of 2019, I have it downstairs. Like we had her DNA, we tested six or eight other people, why was this person DNA tested? And what's my real concern is, did they know it was a negative test when they dumped her? Like I'd like to know that like did

Did state know these people were not family when they handed her off or just assume that risk? Because what happened next was we found out that they were gonna To not vet whoever she should be turned over to. And so we actually, as a captain, we sued in federal court to try to prevent that from happening, saying you cannot do this in an objectively dangerous manner based on everything we know. She's a foreign fighter's child and that you're likely turning over to non-relative terrorist affiliated. Like, you can go look up the court case.

Like, it says that. And it said all the risk factors. It said who the Turkestan Islamic Party was and some of these pictures of children in their training camps. Like we were, we filed it under seal because we didn't want to put any Americans at risk because we were still had troops on the ground.

But it was just basically what the presumption was from DoD's perspective that this was a foreign child the whole time. And there was literally nothing to contradict that. Some rando claiming a familial relationship. And with children having value as chattel, essentially, like, hey, does anyone want a baby? And trolling around in rural Afghanistan, I bet you get people claiming just offering a child

because they're valuable. And we were getting reports at the time in Kabul of the conditions on the ground. Like we're getting reports they were eating cats and dogs, that they were selling some of their younger children to pay for food through the winter for the others. So like the conditions in Afghanistan at that time were really bad. Like I'm having the docs telling me this stuff and I'm going and researching it to corroborate it. I'm like, holy cow.

And so like then as you become, I guess once we volunteered and a judge says, hey, you're responsible for this child, like it was totally a good Samaritan like volunteer, like regular American, do the right thing type of thing. But once the judge says, you're responsible, I mean, we are not, it's like your oath. Like, you know, it's like when I raise my hand

and I swear to uphold the constitution and I say it's against all enemies, foreign, domestic, I mean that with every fiber of my being. And when a judge says, you're responsible with this child, you're their protector, your guardian, your parent. Like, we, that's not a light thing to us. Like, it's just like any other 05 I've ever taken in my life. To my marriage, to my country,

like, we're going to go after that with everything we got. And that's why we sued the Secretary of Defense. Like, do you think that's a comfortable moment? I mean, we were terrified, right? I'm thinking this is a career suicide, but I can't sleep at night if she's put in a harm's way again. Yeah.

And like, who knows? Like, if this is some, and we believe that they were totally anonymous to the US government, like they didn't even know who they were. I think they may have had a name. They didn't have an ID. But our understanding was she was being basically laundered

through the Red Cross so that they maintain combatant immunity and that she was just taken laundered through the Red Cross so that they maintain combatant immunity and that she was just taken to southern Afghanistan. Jeez. And here, let me tell you what that meant to people who raised her. So this flag was flown on, I think it was 28th February, let me get the right date so I don't mess this up.

Because this is important for your audience to understand. So this is an American flag certificate and it says flown on 28th 20, 2020 in honor of, and I won't, don't zoom in too much because I'm not supposed to talk about her name, but it says, let it be known that the flag accompanying this certificate was flown in the face of the enemy and bears witness to the removal of terrorist forces

threatening the freedom of the United States of America. It was flown with great honor and pride over the Airmen and Sold soldiers of Craig Joint Theater Hospital, Bogger, Mayorfield, and Afghanistan during Operation Freedom Sentinel and North Atlantic Treaty Organization's Resolute Support Mission, where each day Americans fought the global war on terrorism

in remembrance of all who have lost their lives. And it says, you will never be forgotten because they thought she was dead. And then every single of the two different iterations on deployment of medical personnel, the ones that were still there, every one of them signed the back of this thing. Oh wow.

And they drafted this poem, basically saying, thanks for trying, to us and I got this after she got dumped with like a fishing the sea gone, anonymously in Afghanistan in a war zone. And the Colonel at the board testified that it was, and that's what we've come up against is that it was almost like we are just these

long rangers acting outside of the US. Yeah, that's the narrative that has been put out there. But the reality is, is he said that it was duty policy until it wasn't. And all of a sudden there was a stark, there was a very distinct shift and Also, it was shut down and he said in the meeting with the general that basically decided that she was going to be turned over That it was the most unprofessional dress down if you want to say that

Yeah That was the testimony is that he'd never observed such an unprofessional meeting where they basically got shut down called racist for believing basic such an unprofessional meeting where they basically got shut down, called racist for believing basic intelligence that everybody had believed the whole time, saying like, we have some serious credibility questions about anyone coming forward and claiming this particular child. Plus, it was in a city a hundred miles away from the objective to, so I can talk about this because it's declassified. There was a civil affairs officer at the time on the joint staff at Resolute Support.

And she came and testified against us in court. And it was so fascinating to watch because she had her little prepared portion of her testimony. And then my attorneys were able to question her. And you know what she testified to? She said that they did DNA on our daughter. And that I think she described Uzbek and a couple other tribes in the Northern Stans,

like the countries north of Afghanistan, consistent with that. And that just blew my mind because they gave her to Pashtun-speaking Pashtuns. And they have her, like she testified that they had done their DNA. And then we had declassified the language that we were picking up in Sighet. Like it's Turkmen, right? Like she testified that they had done their DNA. And then we had declassified the language

that we were picking up in Sagan. Like it's Turkmen, right? Like it's a very distinct non-native language. Like we got them declassified for a purpose, right? So they gave them to a different race of people who speak a different language. And maybe after they DNA tested them negatively. And so like, it's just mind boggling to me.

And then the one thing I wanted to ask the civil affairs officer is like, hey, did you ever read the declassified mission summary? Did you ever read the classified underlying intelligence? And she's like, no, the Afghans didn't ask for that so we didn't look at it. And I'm thinking like she she actually came across as angry at these regular Americans for caring enough

to ask the question, like, why are we doing this? What's gonna happen to this baby? It was some sort of distraction. Well, at the board, she testified, she was one of the first people to testify, and I was one of the, I guess one of the last. And what was surprising in her testimony is she referred to our daughter as an Afghan issue,

or I think at one point she even said problem. And it was, the attitude was, it was like, this is a distraction. And I thought she was maybe mad at us for what we did to advocate for her, but really it was across the duty footprint, like the medical footprint. She and some other bad actors found it disturbing that people were becoming emotionally attached

or they actually cared about her. And so enough to get baby supplies and do everything that they did to basically love on this little child while she was in their care. And so she saw it as a distraction and it'd be something to be done away with. And so when it became, it was my turn to testify, I was sure, that was for the first time, because I've always wondered,

why couldn't people see where we were coming from? Like to me, it was just a natural choice to advocate for an innocent child. But it was at the board that I saw that it was a fundamental difference in philosophy or if you want to say worldview, is that we believed that life, innocent life, should be protected and advocated for if you can.

And they were coming from the perspective that it was an inconvenience or a distraction just to do away with it, it was another issue. And that was the clash, that was the conflict, was there's one side of the camp that was saying, hey, this child deserves our protection. And then the other side is saying, no, this child doesn't really, it's meaningless.

It doesn't have anything that affects us, so just do away with it. And what I testified, they asked if perhaps, our motives were ethnocentric or why were we doing what we're doing? And I said, well, I said, as Americans, we believe in life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And we believe that every human being deserves that.

And so we were operating and every, all of our actions up till this very day has been to advance that for her. And if there's people that out there that disagree with that, then I can agree to disagree because I know what we did and we can go to bed at night with a clear conscience before God and man because we did what was right. And the certificate and everything, it was not just us. It was many people.

And this is what the Colonel wrote in that certificate. He said, the enclosed flag was flown over Craig Joint Theater Hospital on 20th February, 2020, the darkest day of my one-year deployment to Afghanistan. My intent was to fly the American flag in celebration of her day of rescue. Instead, the flag was flown to help us remember a baby that had profound positive impact on every member

of my trauma hospital, a true butterfly effect. And then he told us that they had grief counselors there because so many people were so shook up about this, and they actually had the personal security detail of one of the two stars coming Down to ensure they didn't physically resist Turning her over to these people and so the question is if this was a good to who? So the ICRC physically flew her to the location But they didn't actually involved in vetting whoever she's being turned over to it was a bear bear claim like hey

I'm an uncle that was the level of detail they had. And they had some local people saying, you know, Joe is who Joe says he is, like as a pseudonym. But there was no corroboration of the claim. And it actually turns out to have been false from the get go. It was a lie. But the question is, is what we've, if it was okay, that's what was when I heard this colonel that testified at the board of inquiry, when I heard like how he described her turnover, it was like if they were doing the right thing and they had found family and they knew

that she was going to have a safe outcome or she was going to be okay, why would they bring down armed guards and basically tell everybody, stand down, you're not going to do anything, this is what's going to happen. Why would they be concerned about a resistance among service members if what they were doing

was on the up and up and right? And in reality, they threatened them, told them to stand down and told them, this is what's going to happen, and then had grief counselors on the back end. And like we said, we've had so many people come out of the woodwork saying, I was so devastated and I've always wondered

what would happen to her to the point where they hoped that she would have died because they knew that her life, that she was just destined to a miserable life. And there's some just tragic text messages I have for your team from the general while this is happening saying like, we have DNA, we're morally and ethically obligated to do this, why aren't we doing this?

And I agree with him. I would like to know that question is, if the Afghans asked the embassy to do DNA, why didn't we do it? Like, and if not, like, who made that decision? Was it the deputy chief of mission? Because that person should get fired. And when all this broke in America three years later, she was up for a ambassadorship

and she was being vetted for that. And so, get this, this is just, this will show you where this person is coming from. During all of this, she's filing affidavits against the court saying like, this was all by the book, you know, essentially, nothing to see here. At that time, this senior child protection specialist, this Afghan, was in a third country not safe, in danger of being deported.

He reaches out to the deputy chief of mission and he says, an attorney has reached out and asked me to participate in this case, in her case, what should I do? So what do you think the deputy chief of mission tells him? She says, I wouldn't respond if they're really an attorney. She advises him not to participate. He's the only person on earth who can say, no, that didn't happen in that meeting and he did in my board.

But he is the only person on earth who can contradict what this person represented to her own agency and to the Trump administration about confirmed family and the Afghans. You know, it wasn't, I think the half truth or the lie was it wasn't part of the Afghan process. Well, that's because they're asking you to do it. They're asking you personally to DNA test his child.

And we have an ACME lab at Bagram that does it in three days and we already have a HIRSWA. And they had actually sent one of these people out of the woodwork in Afghanistan to get DNA tested. So like, that's what he told them. I've got an email downstairs where he's asking the embassy, like this person that says that there's a surviving sibling we now want to do the DNA test.

And then there's this nondescript response from the embassy and then they get them in person and they say, don't talk to the DOD anymore. Are you serious? Yeah, they get an order from the two-star that no one in US 4A will advocate for this child. I've got the order, it's a draft, it hasn't been, it wasn't signed, it was a verbal order, they never signed.

But it was, you will not advocate for this child. All questions of this will go to the embassy. And so, something else happened that's very important for you to understand. When we threatened to sue, there was a hold by the secretary of defense on her movement. Like they were gonna move her from February 11th, 2020, and they ended up not moving her to the 27th.

And so we thought, okay, we've succeeded. They're going to do a DNA test. They're going to vet these people, right? To make sure that this is a safe outcome. And so we thought we'd succeeded. We didn't end up filing that lawsuit until we found out they were ignoring it and just going to

go forward with it. But that was because the Afghan, quote, government, and I air quote that for a reason, sent two demand letters in perfect English to the embassy and US forces Afghanistan. And it was the intent of those letters was to rush the administration's decision making cycle and guess who you think, who do you think drafted those emails or those letters? We came through this Afghan that we've now got to the US safely. He's like, oh yeah, the embassy drafted this and sent it to us on WhatsApp so that we could send back to them.

So you've got this embassy drafting letters reportedly in the name of the Afghan government during a discussion about what's the right thing to do here to rush the decision making cycle of their own government. I've got the drafts. Holy shit. Yeah. And so then they're filing affidavits in court saying, oh, well, the Afghan government demanded this to happen. And it's bogus, deep state, ridiculous, I don't know, it makes me angry as an American.

Manipulation. The people at the embassy have the after actions reports from the operation? No, they left that meeting where I was supposed to brief them. They left that meeting without it and they were like, yeah, their philosophy, DOD was lead for months. They said, we're not gonna get in your way, but we're not gonna help. And then they got in our way and killed it.

And it was totally bogus. And to the point where- I just don't, I don't understand why, why, why were they, why would they not allow you to take custody? What was the, what was the big, or what is the big, what's the, why? I can understand. What the fuck? I understand what the administration, because they were believing the embassy when they

said that there was, you know, they didn't want to do the intents. Yeah, but what, I'm not talking to the embassy. Like, what is, honestly, they're't want to do the... I'm not talking to the embassy. Like, what is... Honestly, I feel bad. They were pissed that you went over their head? To an extent that we've heard that. And then the other thing, like I said, with the woman that testified at the board,

they didn't like that service members were getting attached or that they were caring enough for about this. Like, that's not the mission. This is a distraction. Do away with it. Like, literally, it was like like, that's not the mission. This is a distraction. Do away with it. Like, literally, it was like it, the problem, the issue. It was just- It was a problem.

Yeah, it was just very wipe our hands, wipe our hands with it and walk away. But I mean, why would we expect differently? They did the same thing with child rape on our basis for a decade. Yeah. Like, why would we expect different? Like, that's the paradigm where, like, you've got a,

you know, it's kind of been a struggle for the heart and soul of the Department of Defense and the armed forces is like, are we going to live out our values or are we going to be like, jackbooted thugs or robots who do these, you know, whatever you're told like these bureaucrats would fit seamlessly in like the Third Reich and doing whatever they're told to do. And I think as constitutional officers, as service members who support and defend the Constitution, we're obligated to live out our values down range. And when we don't,

I think that really has strategic implications. We're supposed to be a city on a hill. We're supposed to be an example of how you should do it. And that definitely wasn't it. I don't have an answer as to all the whys. I can't judge your heart, I don't know. It might be something as simple as, went overhead or ran into inconvenience.

I don't know. But there's a lot of questions that I have as an American that I'd like answered. Did they actually DNA, was this a negative DNA test? I had always given them the benefit of the doubt and said, oh, they couldn't have known they weren't family. I could see where they were just trying to get rid of it

and rush the process and not do basic safety precautions. I was kind of giving them a bit of the doubt. But when the colonel came and said they did it, they tested six to eight people and they're all negative, that sent alarm bells off in my head. It's like, wait a minute, did they know they weren't DNA tested? Because it wouldn't make sense to me

that the State Department wouldn't initially DNA test. But I think once they started getting several negative tests back, either they didn't do it at all or they did it anyway. And I don't know the answer to that either. So at a minimum, it's not the standard of care for children that we should exhibit downrange. And leading up to that, like Joshua says, naively, at the beginning, you thought that just got to get the facts in front of the right people and they'll make the right decision.

And so that was, you know, your motive was just get the facts in front of the decision makers and they will see it and you'd act on her best interest. I'm a prosecutor and an op-law attorney targeting. So I know how to pull the information and build a case. And we did. And I'm telling you what, the reason why there's so much restrictions through the chain of command and so much restriction of the information in this case

is because if people knew the truth, they'd be livid. When did they hand off the baby to the... Talib elder? Yeah. Two days before the peace deal. So the peace deal was announced on February 29th, 2020. She was handed off on the 27th. And she was gone, like impossible to find.

And we were scrambling up to the very end to try and get ahold of Trump. Did anyone, any decision maker, try and just show it? Not just at the end. Like, he, so the president visited Bagram for Thanksgiving. And we were waking people up in Afghanistan, like, go to the chao hall, find the president, have a meter.

There were literally people running around banks trying to find him. It was 100 yards, 100 yards from the hospital. Like, go get him, go tell him. Because we had gotten, you know, basically to see the life, you know what I mean? And because we had, it was a political face saving thing from... I mean, the Afghans, I have the email where the Afghans recommended she be sent to the US, to the Afghan president. The deputy chief of mission personally met with Afghan,

or Ghani, that's what she told the FBI in her statement, that she personally met with him to get that shut down. So like they went out of their way to stop that from happening. So the minister, Afghan minister of defense, Afghan minister of labor, both recommended the president approve US forces Afghanistan formal request to send

her to a guardian in the US. And that specific email chain I got from this Afghan, this Afghan child protection specialist. After three years, I've asked for that document in all of these cases for three years and ignored, denied, never gotten it. I didn't even get it from my board of inquiry where they're trying to say, I went against US foreign policy. Well, I've got the US foreign policy email

because this guy that we got out after two years gave it to us. He was too scared to do it before because he thought he'd get shut down and deported back to Afghanistan because he was in a third country while his visa for the US is processing and it had to be renewed every six months.

And so he's worried about his wife and two little kids. But you know what he did for us? I'll never forget this. This Afghan who was really supposed to protect her, she ended up, her life ended up saving his family. But he told me, he gave me the email, the DNA test request that I'd also asked for. Cause I'd been told this happened, but I couldn't prove it.

And we really needed it at a time. And he wasn't safe yet. And so he said, take care of my wife and kids if they deport me back to Afghanistan for doing this. And he sent us that email. And that was right before he actually got safely to the US. But he took, he risked everything to make sure that that truth got out.

And that made all the difference at the board. Because here you are having the government recycling these arguments we've already proved false in court over and over again. But they read it, they did the verbatim at this board of inquiry. These same mega law firms that have been representing these lit verbatim at this board of inquiry. These same medical law firms that have been representing these litigants were in the board of inquiry, like working with the prosecutor to try to get us kicked out of the Marine Corps, which was just amazing

in and of itself. But when you have the eyewitness testimony, the only other guy in that room saying, the State Department, we asked them to do DNA tests, and then you provide the emails that the government never released It's pretty damning to be honest with you Let's take a let's take a quick break

I'd like to invite you to gain access to an exclusive experience on vigilance elite patreon our patrons are the driving force behind the success of this show and their support allows us to keep doing what we do. Depending on the tier you choose, you'll get access to benefits like behind-the-scenes footage before each interview, early access to episodes, end-of-the-month live Zoom calls with me, exclusive merch and more. Join us and become a patron starting at just five dollars a month by visiting patreon.com slash vigilance lead. That's patreon.com slash vigilance lead.

All right, we're back from the break. We just covered that. The baby got turned over to a posh two man. And so, just if we covered this, forgive me, but how did she get turned over to somebody without a DNA test? Well, that's been our question to this day. But ultimately, what the decision was made from State Department's concern that it would interfere with the peace deal and that these were confirmed family, which I believe was

a false report, like we already talked about, functionally, they just signed her over to an ICRC representative and they flew her to southern Afghanistan and then she was gone. Like a fish in the sea, needle in a haystack, all those acts, like she was gone. So what did they, just pick some random guy off the street and go, hey, here's an infant? They picked the sixth or ninth random guy off the street and with zero bedding. And then that's one of the things why I think

a lot of the restrictions on information on this case in particular is because we have the homework to show that that's exactly what they did. And I think they're very concerned for their own careers or their own reputation that doesn't come out. But I mean, this is... You don't have to take our word for it, it's documented. I mean, how did that feel? You guys... We just spoke downstairs, you had a crib at the house,

you guys were preparing for another baby to enter the family. It was, it wasn't a matter of if, it was when, because as we had mentioned before, DOD policy all the way up to that point was make every effort to bring her home. And so we were, like for me, just like you would prepare for any other child, just being ready to have all the supplies

be ready to go. For us, receive a child that potentially had medical, ongoing medical needs. So just trying to adjust my expectations of what life was going to look like at that time. And I would say for the most part, we were ready as much as you could be. But when it looked like they were going to forcefully just turn her over at the last minute,

I think we still, as Americans, just held out hope, if we get it in front of the right people, they'll do the right thing. And so I think even though that fear was very real, there was a side that was just like, it's gonna come through, it's gotta come through. It's a baby, they're gonna see the innocence and they're gonna protect this baby.

And I remember that night, it was like one of the worst nights of my life that it was, I don't know what time it was, but I was in bed and like we did everything we could possibly do. And now we were just hoping that for some reason it was going to stop. It was gonna be stopped. And Joshua walked in and the room was dark

and I just remember your voice and you're like, she's gone. I didn't even say anything, I was so shocked. It felt like a kick in the gut, like I can't believe it. And that moment, if you feel like a failure, because here you are, I mean, we were excited about what we were doing. We were proud of what we were doing.

And there was like a full court press of everybody working together for this one child. And so it felt just like a failure. And I'll never forget what you said. You said, I don't know why. I have no reason to think this, but it's gonna be okay. And I was, and of all things for him to say, it was probably the best thing, it was comforting,

but I was just like, really? Like, I don't, I can't see how there, any good can come from this. How did you find out she was gone? So one of the medical staff had told us, they were all like out of their minds, worried about it. And like trying to Advocate to congressmen and what did they say?

they basically said that they're gonna be handed over to an anonymous person through the Red Cross at this time and date and We're just letting us know that that was happening so we could try to stop it And so we filed it was called a temporary restraining order try to get one and that's a it's a high bar to get that Against the government you already had adoption to get one, and it's a high bar to get that against the government. And you already had adoption papers. Yeah, we did. So they're just, they're giving your child. That's exactly what the judge said. A way to an anonymous person in Kandahar.

I'm not supposed to talk about exactly where it was. Whatever, in Afghanistan. Yes, not anywhere near where she was recovered recovered and to someone who spoke a different language it was a different race and To me Knowing what I know now, I'm even more upset than I was then because then it was on that fucking kidnapping That's how I that's how we viewed it is. So this is the US government, this is the fucking US government Kidnapping your child and handing it to some random fucking person in Afghanistan.

After formally recognizing. Or if you want to say a little bit more politically, they ignored our legal parental rights and basically said yeah, that's that's you But we're gonna do this. It's a future. It was official US determination and policy and But again, I think with the administration, it was a crazy situation. How the fuck do they do that? How the fuck do they take, they give you adoption papers and then take your fucking kid and give it to some fucking stranger on the streets of Afghanistan. Are you fucking hearing this people?

Like this is your government. This is your fucking government. And that's exactly how we felt because we had gone to the authorities, we'd appealed, we'd informed them about like what we knew about on the ground, on the ground facts that are corroborated to this day. And they had recognized this authority

and I think they ended up citing like a technicality, like, oh, you didn't formally notify the Department of Justice about this proceeding. And I've got the email traffic where I give it to my colonel the next day, four months before all this went down. So they basically cited technicalities, like, oh, you didn't do this bureaucratic thing correctly. But like, as far as like, knowing,

like the US government knowing this, like we were emailing the White House Chief of Staff We were talking to Senator Cruz's office. They were phenomenal. They were advocating like hey, this is insane we can't turn a child over without vetting and And so the state the embassy was representing that the Afghans didn't want to do a DNA test Well, I've got the email where they requesting it I've got the testimony we have an email where they're requesting a DNA test. Absolutely. The embassy is saying They don't do it in the email because they're smart

They did in the meeting on December 31st and then they iced this guy and by God's grace We got him out of a dangerous place and to America now he's here today because of Of that of her ordeal and getting turned over this guy who was supposed to protect her ended up getting saved by her. And that's the case for a lot of the folks we helped in the withdrawal, because I told Siffy, I don't know why,

but I feel like it's going to be okay. And what we've come to learn from our experience is that that was providential, because I wouldn't have had visa experience. I wouldn't know what USCIS was. I wouldn't know what a humanitarian parole was. And we used all of those skill sets to save as many Afghan interpreters and their families

as we could. Marine Corps, folks who did war with us, based on other Marines vouching, like this guy was with me in Sangen, this guy was with me in Marja, he was great. And during the evacuation, when we're just working our turps, if I wasn't connected with Afghanistan and the unit that I was at, there was 30, 30 plus people that would not have

gotten out but for her getting handed off. So I know these people meant it for whatever their intent was, but it was part of the plan because it saved lives in the end. Her life affected a lot more Afghan allies in the evacuation and since even, because we got that other guy out with his wife and two kids. How long was she MIA?

Almost 18 months. She was gone for 18 months? Exactly, and we were dying every minute of it. And that kind of segues pretty nicely into the next portion of the story is she's gone. So like a 45 day old. Well she was five months old at that point. Okay, a five month old baby was gone for a year and a half.

A five-month-old baby is gone for a year and a half. And so... To some random man. Older guy, I believe... That wished to remain anonymous. That wanted to remain anonymous because we had offered to DNA test them. And there's email traffic with them saying, well, we understand that they want to remain anonymous, and we'll keep them anonymous, but we need to DNA test them. Because that's what DOD was saying.

Because that's a reasonable, sane policy, right? Is that you DNA test people coming out of the woodwork in a country that traffics children? Like that's not a hard call, right? It was no question in our minds that that was our requirement from DOD but that got dropped by state and then reported up the chain as The Afghans didn't want to do it or it wasn't part of their process. I think was the white lie they used How high does this go? It was run on state. I think it just went up to the embassy was the one generating bad information

for the administration. I believe that that got passed on because the main lies was the DNA testing wasn't part of the Afghan process, which is technically true, but they're asking you to do it. So is it true? Not from this guy's, where I sit. If the United States lead agency, which was DOD,

said we commit to DNA testing any potential family members in the best interest of the child. And you're in a train, advise, assist mission where you're supposed to train them how to run a country, how to provide security, stability, that type of thing. We're trying to train, advise, assist them to do the right thing. And DOD did that. We're like to train, advise, assist them to do the right thing. And DOD did that.

We were like, hey, the best interest of the child, you got a DNA test, we'll terrorist vet and let them know of her medical concerns and offer free medical care in the US. That was DOD's policy for months. And we were fine with that policy because it's rational. Where we differed from the US government was when they're like,

oh, we don't want to interrupt the peace deal, so we're not going to require these things. Or we cannot, like what the State Department will do is like, if they want to do something, they'll say, you know, they'll come up with justification. But if they don't, they'll just cite international law and kind of hand wave it. The peace deal between us and the Taliban,

is that what you're talking about? Mm-hmm. Why does the Taliban give a shit about a baby? You know, most of the Afghans were totally on board with sending her to the US They're not they're not so how would this interrupt the peace deal? I agree but it doesn't I mean she was living proof it was it was not worth the paper was written on but Outside of her, you know being proof that the conditions weren't being met, you know that to allow al-qaeda to use Afghan soil. I mean if the conditions weren't being met, to allow al-Qaeda to use Afghan soil. I mean, there wasn't.

This was a manufactured crisis by the embassy. And I want to hit on something. You said, how did she get turned over? She got turned over by a series of letters that the embassy, quote, received. And they had factual statements in them that were drafted by the embassy that were not true. It said that the Afghans had that the Afghans had confirmed there's family and that they didn't want to do the detest and that they're demanding her back.

And so we actually had the man who signed those letters, his testimony is in evidence in our board of inquiry. The minister who was in a third country when he testified, but that was provided by the government in our board of inquiry, his testimony. And this guy can't read, write or speak English. Okay? He signed this document.

In his testimony, he contradicts, he said, well, the baby's really little. We can't determine where it's from or who it's, if it's an Afghan citizen or. We can't determine where it's from or who it's, if it's an Afghan citizen or not. But the letter says it's an Afghan citizen. And he says, my ministry can't grant guardianship to anybody. Like that's a court's job.

But the letter says they granted custody. Like everything that the embassy needed to say, they just put in there and had this guy who can't read English sign it and send it to us. And then when we threatened to sue, there was a demand letter that came from this same guy who doesn't speak English and perfect English.

And it uses terms like next of kin, which is not an Afghan saying, right? And it's literally a demand letter saying, why was the transfer delayed last week? And like, it was trying to rush the American decision-making cycle. And this child protection specialist that we got to America, he said that that was drafted by US Citizens Services, an employee in that department, sent by WhatsApp for them to send

back to the embassy to pretend like it was an arms-like transaction and it was an Afghan demand. So the Afghans were doing whatever the American in charge was having them do. And this was a U.S. embassy decision, and they did a fake crisis for the benefit of the administration to deceive them. And I mean, I've got the email traffic, it's got the word doc of who drafted at the embassy. I don't have the demand letter. who drafted it It was the guy in American Citizen Services

He was a you want to throw his name out there Oh, I don't think he was I think he was doing it at the direction of the dead who gives a shit Deputy Chief of Mission. Well, he's an Afghan. He was it. I don't want to put him at risk But I have the perfect English. Yeah, he does speak perfect English and and and like I said I think he's following orders because but here's the fun. I hate that excuse. I hate it too. I think that's like the Nazi excuse No following orders Absolutely, but here's here's a kicker This deputy chief of mission

She came and did a deposition. And we were not allowed- Where does the following orders end? You know what I mean? Well, I think he was doing it the direction, oh yeah. Wait, following orders, what the fuck does that mean? No, I agree with that. I think that you're obligated to follow the lawful orders

of the President of the United States and his delegated authority. But I still think that we have an obligation to uphold American values as we're doing that. We have to do it in the most conscientious way possible. But I think that an important fact the listeners would be interested to know, talk about government misconduct before. It's not just an interfering back then. It's been for three years through all of these cases, they've tried to file statements and

withhold information from the American public and the courts that is the responsibility of the previous administration's Department of Justice. You can't lie to courts. You can't file statements that say, oh, we received this letter and it was an Arms Lakes transaction when it's not true. And we've been raising the Red Star cluster, if you will, for lack of a better term, all along. So this deputy chief of mission, while she was up there in her ambassadorship, provided

sworn statements and testimony. Get this. The Department of Justice would not let us ask questions in what's called cross-examination. She could only testify about what they wanted her to testify about, what the DOJ wanted them to say, which is that there's nothing to see here, and these letters were Arms Lakes transactions,

the ones her office drafted. They were trying to force those on the courts and say, for the truth of what was in the letters, which was a lie lie that they drafted, and we weren't allowed to cross examine them. Can you imagine the government coming in and saying, and this is focused on government conduct here, not the courts, state courts.

Can you imagine the government coming in and saying something you know is a lie, and you've asked for the document, and they won't give it to you, and you can you know is a lie, and you've asked for the document, and they won't give it to you, and you can't ask them questions like, hey, was that true? What was written? Who drafted that?

Did anyone in your office draft it? You can't even ask those questions. They're trying to put this facade of actual due diligence in what they did, and it's a lie. And then on top of it, that same witness, witness air quotes, is telling the Afghan, the only person on earth who can contradict her story,

not to participate. Like I've got the email traffic, where he reaches out and asks her for help, and she's like, I can't help you. And then he's like, should I participate? And she's like, oh, I wouldn't. And like, who does that? Was this woman's name her name is Donna Walton?

She was the deputy. She's an ambassador. She is an ambassador now. Yeah, it's something to what I think was team Morelest if that's how you say it right at the time. I don't know if she still is or not I haven't followed her career or life or anything, but um Like I said they they meant it for evil or for whatever their purpose was, not American values, but it ended up being for good for many people. And so we're honestly thankful that happened. But I mean, we should probably circle back to,

where was she for 18 months? How did she get here? Because that's really- I mean, the government has, we were talking about earlier, you're familiar with the Blackwater case They deleted the drone footage that proved their innocence. Yeah, like a five-minute segment of drone footage Well, that's what we've been saying made it out to something like they killed a bunch of people in the sewer square back in

2007 oh guess what this has to do with a fucking peace deal or not a peace deal the status of forces agreement that They kept us in Iraq. Wow. Deleted the fucking drone footage. It's like a five minute segment. You see the thing roll up, then the gunfight happens, they delete that five minute segment,

and they're like, oh, we routinely delete this because we need to save memory. It's like everything before that and everything after. Like if you were saving memory, then you would have just kept the actual gunfight, which is the important part, and deleted all the other shit. But the- But in- I fucking hate our government, man.

Because that's so- I hate them. I love our people and our government needs to reflect the people. But I think that we have so many documented instances in our case of over-classification of clearly unclassified material. I'll give you like specific examples.

Redactions under pretext to hide that we were communicating with, like that we were fully authorized at every level of government to hide that we were communicating with, like that we were fully authorized at every level of government to do what we did. Cause they tried to portray that this was major mass, like making this up and hiding it and like going in the background. Like we were broadcasting from the rooftops

advocating for this little girl. And it was a righteous cause. And everything since then has been orders changing. Like I had full authorization to testify in my own case. And guess what? This mega law firm asked their former partner who worked in the SECDEF's legal advisors for assistance, and they got revoked the night before one of our hearings.

And so like, again, this is focused on government misconduct, not the state court stuff. But who does that? Like, how does the military chain of command authorize you to testify about what you know, and then revoke it the night before what was supposed to be the only hearing where we would, like, last one?

And so it was intended to prevent us from putting on a case at all. Like, even me telling you what I knew about Afghanistan or what I knew about the intel. I have a list over here of this is a This right here is a letter saying what we can and can't talk about from the Department of Justice and oh by the way The same attorney who defended the government's decision to turn her over to the Taliban in the first place is the gatekeeper of government information So she gets to decide ultimately what gets released and what doesn't.

And do you think that she wants to be proven wrong that they helped hand a child over to a non-relative terrorist? Or do you think she doesn't want that to come out? Who's this woman? Her name is Kathy Weier. She's a senior Civil Division State or Department of Justice attorney. She represented the government in the temporary restraining order hearing, where we're like, hey, all the intel

is you're turning this over to non-relative terrorists. She was the attorney on that. And then she got tasked to this case years later. Is she still involved? Oh yeah, they're very much involved. So they're the ones orchestrating. So instead of us getting witnesses and being able to cross examine them and ask them questions,

what they'll do is they'll submit a declaration and a statement of interest of the United States. And it's really just this one person in DOJ who's pretty high up and is friends with the mega attorney, mega law firm attorneys, and they'll write the court, like they literally help write whatever the witness is going to say. And we had this during COVID where they would just draft witness statements and they adopt it. And that's the statement, you can't question it. It's written by an attorney. It's just signed off by some person with the right background and the witness statements and they adopt it. And that's the statement, you can't question it. It's written by an attorney.

It's just signed off by some person with the right background and the right name to do it. And so here's, I think this is the clearest way to show what the government has done in this case, like to put their thumb on the scales of justice. It's what we can't talk about. So this says, notwithstanding the responses and authorizations identified above, the following categories of information have not been authorized and should be excluded,

and that's all caps, from any testimony, evidence, or filings in this proceeding. And so this is discussing what's called TUI authorization, which is a law that says, if you learn something in your government duties, it's official information, and you have to have permission to testify. And the duty policy is that information like that

should be made reasonably available to courts, because they're like a disclosure type of disposition, unless it's classified or restricted for some reason that's justifiable. So in this case, I've had my orders change three different times. We've asked for multiple witnesses gotten denied, right? And what they've used this as a shield and a gag

to prevent what actually happened from coming out. And here's a perfect illustration. So quote, I can't talk about in court, like they can't restrict your first member rights outside of that, that's why I'm telling you. But quote, information prepared by the Department of Defense for the International Committee of the Red Cross and Afghan social worker.

So I've been told that I cannot tell them that my colonel signed a very similar memorandum for the Afghan citizen NGOs and released it to them five years ago, which I had from civil discovery, I was told I can't mention that in court. And do you know why? Because they filed affidavits saying that Major Mast

helped draft this declassified mission summary, and so it's not reliable. So they said I could talk about what I had drafted, and then they attacked me and said that I had made this stuff up, but they told me I couldn't use my colonel's memo that he signed in the proceeding. So we got it from the Afghans. It'll be up on your website. And people can go see exactly what the government didn't want you to know.

And it's really not, when I say government, it's very loose. Like I understand they represent the United States, but it's like a couple attorneys that work in civil division DOJ that have a lot of discretion and they've abused it. And they coordinated with, like I said, a former 15-year partner in one of these medical law firms who was working in the SECDF's office. I've got email traffic with them asking them to do these things. Like, you don't get your orders revoked from on high, you know, by accident. That doesn't happen.

That does not happen. And I've got about three or four times back and forth in my command. And I don't blame my command at all. My commanders are phenomenal warriors. They're like Marsauk is for real, good people. But it's so high up in the bureaucracy and it's coming from other agencies. So it sounds like this to your commander,

oh, there's interagency interest in major math. And what that really means is an attorney at this mega law firm has been a partner with this other person for 15 years who happens to be working in the previous administration's legal advisor to a service secretary or the SEC DEF's office. And so they have a revolving door with partners that do that.

And that's how they use power and get favors from the government. And I'm not even saying it's not illegal. It's just when they use it for purposes like this, it can be abused and it has significantly. And so here's the next thing I'm not allowed to talk about. Information submitted to the U.S. Citizenship and Integration Services by another office in DOD.

And that's a really, really bland way of saying, here is the Deputy Assistant Sec. Defs. It's the Deputy Assistant Sec. DEF's agency-initiated parole visa request. So this is a DASD level saying, our little girl is a stateless minor, the mass have received guardianship because of unique circumstances, she's a DOD dependent, basically formally recognizing this and making a request to USCIS to send her to the US and give her a visa. And we asked for this document for like three years. And it came out, they delayed its release until it couldn't impact the proceedings

at all. Because, you know, when you're trying to say that Major Mass won't be behind everyone's back, well, how do you have a memo signed by the Deputy Assistant Sec. Def.? And then they said, oh, well, it was Major Mass talking to, or Captain Mass at the time, talking directly to his office. And then they denied the Colonel, who was his action officer, who went and verified all this because they're professionals.

They don't go and go off with what some captain says. They go verify it with range regiment and look at the sensitive site exploitation material that they pulled off objective. And the colonel who helped draft this for the Deputy Assistant Sec. Def. testified at our board. And he's personally told me that there is pictures of the dead biological mother, young, strong Asian facial features.

And in contrast with that, it's supposed to be like a 40-year-old Pashtun female mother. So like not the same person, right? Those two things can't be true at the same time. And so do you want to trust the photograph and the intelligence that task force created, that ranger regiment verified? Or do you want to trust these bureaucrats who are self-servingly saying,

oh, this is an innocent farmer, and by implication calling our rangers and war criminals. That's just unacceptable. And I can go down the list, I've got six more. So what I will do is I'll provide this for, these are open release by FOIA or by TUI or by due process rights for my board. And so I can share this information

and these are all in our whistleblower complaint to Congress, like in detail outlining exactly where it's it's been lied but um I i'll belabor the point for one more one more point Um This says oh this this memo that I told you about from my current Right now this this document here was sent by a Dutch NATO female, a Dutch NATO worker to the Afghans and the ICRC, right?

Right now, because of over-classification, in an NCS investigation, in my case, they have marked this secret no foreign. This document that we got in litigation, it was sent to a Gmail account, right, to cover this up because originally they were saying, oh, you're not authorized to talk about it. Well, then we got it from outside the government source because this only applies to information the government provided you.

So then we got ahold of it. And then they overclassified it as secret, no foreign. Like by definition, when you provide things to foreign governments, it is not secret, no foreign. When it goes from a NATO member to multiple people outside of the government's control, it's not secret, no foreign. And so like, that's just, it's blatant abuse of our processes

to weaponize the system. And it's to cover up what this says, because they don't want the American people to see it, because it makes them look bad. And this is, you they don't want the American people to see it, because it makes them look bad. And this is the senior attorney for all of Afghanistan signing off on the declassified intel. Like our office helped draft the declassified missions summary and we routed that up through the FDL process.

But our colonel used substance of that data for specific targeted memorandums for to protect this child and you know five years after the fact they're saying nobody can see this And that's just scratching the surface I don't even want to get into like the terror watch list stuff and all that because I've been so attacked for even having witnessed them flying on the terror watch list that it's it's a We joke about it. We've had lots of kids at home. So we say, we don't talk about Bruno.

So we don't talk about Dulles is kind of the joke in our household because they have, these Megalaw firms have successfully gotten some terrorism records scrubbed off the Terror Watch List. And... Babe, what? gotten some terrorism records scrubbed off the terror watch list. And they have gotten some terrorism records related to this scrubbed off the watch list. And I don't know how they did that. But we had marked unclassified FOUO documents that I've been told were now been retroactively classified as secret, no foreign, so they could not be used in this case And we've heard this shit before today

It's just like it's exactly what you said with these blackwater guys Yeah, it's like why are the five minutes that prove you're innocent gone, you know, why not the rest of it? And that's kind of shit happens all the time. It's just how our government works Well, I think that's changing. I think there hope it's changing. I think this is how it works This this shit said it happened And so circling back We talked about her being gone for 18 months and what happened in that time period and I think a lot of Americans would

like to know that because it It explains the narrative that's been pushed in the media. So, that night she's gone. There's no way to find her. Like to an anonymous person, we don't know where they're gonna be, told they might be Pakistani.

So this Kim Motley is a phenomenal human rights attorney. She finds her, she had had some experience with trafficked children in Afghanistan, where like someone marries a Western wife and then they split and they take the kids and they go back to Afghanistan. So she had to negotiate with that and then some other like actual child trafficking cases.

And so she finds her in like a few days and she sent us some proof of life photos and that's when we saw this this this talib I think. That's my base on my training and like his appearance. And we're told that she's in a slum. Yeah, we were told she was in a slum that was so dangerous the ICRC wouldn't send people back that she had started shaking and they had taken her back to the hospital and they said, you know, we don't have the capability to treat her in Afghanistan.

And that, and then some time starts going by, it's COVID, right? Everything shut down. And so Kim's goal was simply to get her evaluated, Sparrow evaluated in Kabul at a Western hospital that was a private hospital that she helped represent. And so we had gotten authorization from this older man to have her checked out, to explain like in your own language what's wrong with child and what the long-term concerns were.

And we were told that he had hired, like literally a text message in evidence at our board says, I've hired a woman to care for her and I pay her a salary. And it was this like 16 year old, 17 year old girl. And so this old guy had pondered off already with an unmarried girl. And we have come to find out over the last few years, she was living in like a group setting, like with 23 other people with extended family members

and such, and in what I believe were dangerous situations, I'm hesitant to, I should probably say one thing before I go into it, but this Pashtun guy that we've been in this conflict with, the first thing he told me was that she doesn't live with him, that his dad was responsible to the Taliban for her and that she lives with some other people

that are like parents to her. That's what this guy tells me. And I have an audio clip of this that your guys can provide to the audience to show that. And it's been disguised to protect his identity and all those things to meet those requirements but that's in evidence at our board. Hi Ahmad I hope your son's doing better today I was wondering if you could at some point if you have a minute send him a voice message about asking just asking how he was doing or if she she's okay with

explosions going off or whatever I kind kinda like to figure out where she is and I'd also like to know how she's doing, but if you have time, just at some point, thanks. Walaikum assalam, shukra to you. Alhamdulillah, khayri to you too. I'm sorry, I'm sorry. I'm sorry for the bad news. I'm sorry for the bad news.

I'm sorry for the bad news. I'm sorry for the bad news. I'm sorry for if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it.

I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it.

I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it said she was not living with him ever, like it, for any portion of the time. And when she got to the states, one of the things that concerned was, is I'm a special victims trial counsel certified, which means I have special training to deal with child victims and victims of sexual assault. And her as a two-year-old.

and her as a two-year-old. The sensitive way to say is she was exited, she was demonstrating signs of trauma. The girl, the baby at Bagram was no longer there. Like that was the bright eyes, big smile, just open face, typical baby. When we finally saw her after that 18 month span, she was closed off. It was to the point where I, for a split second,

I wondered if it was the same child because she was so distinctly different. Her eyes were guarded, her face was closed off, she was like very defensive. And it wasn't until I saw the scar on her leg, which is very distinct. I was like, that's her. Like I was like kind of looking at her face,

like just looking for those glimpses that from all the photos from the hospital, like looking for that little girl. And she was, to say that she was traumatized, it would be an understatement. And the FBI has investigated all these allegations to the media, and the day they came to talk to us, we had just returned from the Carousel Center,

which is a child sexual forensic facility in Wilmington. And so we had, based on her behavior and her physical characteristics of her female parts, we were very concerned she was exhibiting all the signs of sexual abuse. And I don't think this guy did it because he told me he didn't live with him. I think it happened when you're living

with 23 other random people in your house or however the communal living, and you have people going to high school and finishing high school and not having like a specific person watching her and in a, and you have people going to high school and finishing high school and not having like a specific person watching her and in a society where you have a lot of that type of abuse going on, I 100% believe that she was sexually abused. I don't think this guy in America now did it because he told me she didn't live with him. But we didn't even try to use that in court because I believe him when he said she wasn't living with me.

He had no reason to lie at that time. He has a reason to lie now, but She was Traumatized by her experience there. She was malnourished like way behind on her growth and weight. She was Like she had she was Her stool she had worms She had she was infested with lice all of us got lice like my whole family had to deal with that for like a week She was, her stool, she had worms, she was infested with lice, all of us got lice. My whole family had to deal with that for a week

because it's very full grown lice. She's got an allergy to German cockroaches, which is an acquired allergy from being around that type of insect, I guess. And it was, we're so thankful she got out. Like, and I think she was young enough where that's not gonna affect her. But she still carries the baggage from that.

And like everything we're warning about in our lawsuit saying like sexual abuse, malnourishment, lack of access to medical care, it took her three years to get an MRI. Like that picture of her skull fracture. When people are like, oh, she's medically complete, to get an MRI, like that picture of her skull fracture. When people are like, oh, she's medically complete, she'll be fine, like that's the embassy's perspective. Like if you look at that skull fracture,

and imagine that's on a two-year-old. What did it look like as an infant? It's a larger area of her head, like she looks like a cracked egg. Like there was legitimate safety concerns. Do these fucking people know this? Who's that? These attorneys, these mega law firms?

I think they've done everything they can to shut that down. Satanic? I have no idea what they're- What is this shit? I think they just believe the lie. What do they want to happen? I think in their minds, they think that she's going to have a little white picket fence life

with these Afghans here in the States. And I don't think they realize the real players in this story, because it's really not between us and them. I don't, they don't have legal authority under their own legal system for this child. They were, they told us half a dozen times they were responsible to other people. And what blows my mind is this is what happened

in the Board of Inquiry The FBI interviews these Afghans like close to day one like in the country in the Evacuation camps and you know what they tell the FBI That This is a quote Her two uncles uncles are the authority for a life not them This is a quote. Her two uncles are the authority for a life. Not them.

They cite the two other people as authority for life. And the Taliban commander said she couldn't come to America. So that's what they tell the FBI. Do you know what the DOJ, under the previous administration, has filed in our statement of interest to the United States? They've said that these people are her legal guardians and parents.

They told them they weren't. They've had that information for three years and they're hiding that from the court. How do you as an attorney for the United States government go tell the court, these people are parents, when you have statements that are felonies, if they're not true, saying the opposite. How do you do that?

Like it's these legal positions that the United States, air quotes the United States with the Civil Division have taken, are based on things they know are lies. They actually have rips of their phones from, and this guy told me before he came to American Lines, he told my Terp, hey, I've got many Taliban militants in my phone. Will that be a problem when I come to US forces? Because he brought her to get evacuated. And so they've got their phone ribs sitting there on their front desk. Like if I'm Kash Patel, I'd be like,

let's see if there's any terrorism contacts on there. Because he also flagged on the watch list, and they also said they were responsible to the Taliban governor for her. And they told the FBI they were obligated to the Taliban to go talk to them, they said no and so like we during the evacuation

We risked everything to make sure they got out. Okay, like I've got email traffic saying I don't want two Taliban murders in my head because I knew the risk my commander said You're gonna have to choose between Sparrow and them because the assets were gonna use to collect to collect them don't give a fuck about Afghans. And that's a quote. They're going to probably put a gun in their face and take them. And so what I like to say to the American people is if we were trying to take a child from her quote parents, from quote family, that would have been a pretty good time to

do it. Instead, we delayed the mission from a national mission force that ultimately rescued them from behind Taliban lines for over 24 hours and tried to get a volunteer group to go get them. Like some of these great Americans who are like going behind Taliban lines to get them out, like Chad Robichaud's folks and like other groups. We had them lined up with seats paid for on the aircraft from the Mercury One funding. We had a group of five, three kids plus Sparrow and these two postunes and she was like eight months pregnant. So like we delayed everything,

risk them all to get them out safely. And so like, I guess that's the level of fidelity we had on this. The first time I ever spoke to this postune guy was in July of 2021, a couple months before, like five weeks before the evacuation ended. Day one, I explained who I am, why I care, like that I worked at the hospital, that my job in Afghanistan, or worked for the hospital to try to get a safe outcome for her, that my job in Afghanistan was to make sure only bad people got hurt in our strikes,

you know, kind of explaining like at the grassroots level what a targeting attorney does in Afghanistan. We explained that we were told she was foreign, that we had sought legal responsibility in the U.S., that she had a complete U.S. identity, and from day one it was send her to fly out before the Taliban takeover. Like that's what the pitch was. And the first thing this guy asked me, what do you think he asked for? He's like, could I get a visa for me and my brother-in-law

to come to America? Because everybody wants to come to America. I don't even blame him for that. But that is the first thing on this person's mind. And I think that the best way to explain that to the audience who's not deployed is to say like it's a very day-to-day survival, like hand-to-mouth environment. It's not even their fault, right?

If you're not wealthy there, if you're not making money off the Americans being there, like you're dirt poor. And so a lot of it, they're not planning what they're going to do next month. They're not planning on like their five year goal. It's how do I survive today? And it was very clear from the get go that this guy was trying to survive and get whatever he could out of this.

And I'm not even blaming him for that. I'm really, I blame the Americans who enable these lies and abuses of our systems. But like as God is my witness from day one in detail, and that's exactly what our interpreter testified to, and that's in evidence at our BOI, that's what, there is no evidence to contradict that ever because it's what we did.

I mean, how do you, she ultimately got rescued by a national mission force from behind Taliban lines. How do you explain to someone, bearded men with guns are going to come in helicopters and get this child, and we're going to bring you two. How do you explain that that's going to happen to someone, to an Afghan, a posthumed male from southern Afghanistan?

What did you tell him? They used her military ID to identify her to US forces. Like he told my interpreter, like, don't tell Joshua, that's what he called me. But I have many Taliban militants on my phone, will this be a problem when I come to US lines? And I had a JSOC colonel come and testify at our board of inquiry that corroborated all the,

not the allegations, the derogatory information, if that makes sense. But I've got the Department of Justice filing in front of our court saying, oh, it was never any derogatory, not affiliated with terrorism. I mean, I've got a guy who said, my dad's responsible to the Taliban shadow governor,

not where he lives, where she was recovered from, the guy responsible for those camps. He said that, and that guy said no. I mean, and they're describing this in detail over conversations for like six weeks, because it took a couple of weeks to trek up there. In the, and if you think about what's going on is, the Taliban started with the Northern Alliance areas

this time, and then they swept down into their natural strongholds in the South. And so, Sparrow and these two Pashtuns, they spent like several, like a week and a half in their huddling in their homes while there's like urban combat in some of these Southern Afghan cities. And his biggest concern was,

I'm worried the artillery concussion is gonna hurt my unborn child because his wife was pregnant. She was like 19 and eight months old. And so that was his concern. And like, I'm having conversations through an interpreter, but with this guy. And what come to find out the language this interpreter is using is the very strongest

language in Pashto for guardian, legally responsible. He's using words, Wali, which is an Arabic term, but it's used in Islamic legal, like writings and such. And it means like the responsible person or the and then Masuliyat which is another word for like responsibility or the one in charge and then I mess this one up a lot so my Afghan friends will make fun of me later but it's Sarprost which is like the responsible person and so he's using the strongest words in this guy's native language to explain this to him. And then I have, I'm on video saying I will try to

fly to Kabul and bring her documents, all her original documents. And so essentially what happened was this guy tells me she doesn't live with him. She lives with some other family. She doesn't live with his dad. She lives with some other family. He said my dad's gone to speak to the shadow governor. And then like two weeks go by and it's getting to be about August 14th or 15th, right before the Taliban take off. He comes back and he says, the Taliban said no. And so we're like, whew, what do you do? And no, so then the evacuation starts. And so before there was no way to get all of them out.

They're like, the Taliban will kill us if we bring her. And he told me, like, oh, sir, you're so kind, thank you. I think she should go live with you in America. Can she go to college? They're asking questions like that. My dad wants to know this, my dad wants to know that. He's always saying his father was the one in charge or had questions. And so like, let me talk to your dad.

Let me talk to the Taliban shadow governor. Like, you know what I mean? I'm pulling out all stops, because I know it's ending. Because at the unit I was at, we had intel reports of how bad it was. And so, two days after the evacuation started, I had had the privilege of helping another Marine friend of mine.

I saw a plea on Facebook, a friend of a friend, and this Marine was at the War College and he was trying to get his turp out and he was stuck outside the gates. And he'd been there for like three days with a bunch of little kids. And so I was like, hey man, send me that stuff. I can send it on a red line. And I had reached out to the Soxcent LNO to ask, hey, what is the process for requesting they evacuate people?

And they're like, man, there is no process. We're building this plane and flying it. And so I was like, holy cow. So I scrounged around and I got a secret red line to HKIA where I could talk to the SJA, who was a friend of mine, who I knew. And I talked to him at the early stages and he's like, I am an 04 SGA in the Marine Corps and I just laid

C-Wire, concertina wire, and cleared an airport with like 250 Marines, that's what I did today. He's like, this is unbelievable. And like never seen anything worse. And I mean, a major lens concertina wire, a judge advocate, like they were like overrun. And as I'm communicating with them, they're saying things like, the situation's not good.

The State Department people are leaving, we have no guidance, it's changing. They were afraid they were going to get overrun again. It was bad. And so, that first group that I got out, or I helped get out, like that major was really plugged in with, it was called the Zocchi family, and they're in the States, they're safe, thank God.

But they got out. And so he got flooded with a bunch of other requests from other Marines, like, hey, my turf's outside of this gate, and they're that gate. And so he started filtering those to me, because I was able to assist with that original one. And so I got sucked in and like for the next two weeks, like totally ad hoc, didn't have to just do what every other like people who had connections tried to do and help get our

allies out, like guys who'd gone to war with us. And if a Marine vouched from, we would get a Marine to go find them and pull them in. It was unbelievable. So like, like all these groups like, you know, Consilium, No One Left Behind, Pineapple Express, you know, Mighty Oaks folks. It was, it was probably the worst two weeks that I personally experienced just with the huge highs and huge lows of getting people out and knowing there had no hope. But in the midst of that, we experienced a miracle with my command authorizing me to try to go to Afghanistan

during all of that craziness. And then ultimately with the National Mission Force getting her. But... How did they get her? So as soon as I got word, they were, well, so he came back and said to the Taliban said no, they'll kill us. We can't go. I was like, yes, we'll be the Taliban.

The president just got on the TV and said anyone at risk or anyone who's helped US forces can try to get out. And so I said if you bring a, she's viewed as a US person by US forces, if you bring her to US forces that's helping the United States. And I will do everything I can to get you out. And then I went downstairs and I talked to my colonel. I was like, sir, crazy story. We've been doing, the State Department dumped

our little girl two years ago. We've been working to get her out. You know, she has medical concerns. They've reported like shaking and such. She's coming with a postion male and a pregnant female. And then, oh, by the way, the interpreter that I'm using to speak to him, he's like, hey, sir, my 15-year-old sister lives

in the Northern Alliance areas in the North. And they just passed, the Taliban just made an edict that they have to provide lists of the 15 to 45-year-old unmarried women. And the Taliban fighter's gonna marry them and then take them back to Waziristan when they're done with their campaign. And he's like, I really like my sister-in-law

to have to marry a Taliban fighter and go to Waziristan. And I was like, he's like, can we try to get her out? And so I was working with Kim Motley at the time and we were helping each other with different connections in Afghanistan and she got hundreds of women, like at-risk women out, and we were helping each other because I could get people over the wall and she could hundreds of women, like at-risk women out, and we were helping each other because I could get people over the wall

and she could get them feats out. But she seemed like the Afghan female robotics team, like a lot of the staff, I believe it was the New York Times and some of the media agencies, they got them out, and she was almost single-handedly responsible for hundreds of lives, and she helped us too. And so we, so this is what we did. We moved my interpreter's 15 year old sister,

his like seven or eight year old brother, and he had a teenage brother as well, three kids, 180 miles south through Taliban lines. These two posh students came 280 miles north and we rented an Airbnb of all things in Kabul, Afghanistan during the fall about a mile and a half west of the airport and we used it as a safe house and I go talk to my colonel's like permission to take emergency leave and fly into Kabul commercial through India because there's still a few flights

Because that's how the American volunteers were getting in and then going behind Taliban lines and getting people out. It was unbelievable And And so like we got sucked into that cycle of just trying to get as many like allies out. And in that process, several instances where we were interacting with the Marines at Abbey Gate right before it got blown up. So you flew in? I did not. So, no, I'm sorry, I should clarify. I was authorized to fly in.

And then my colonel's like, because he's a phenomenal human being and like just a special operations warrior. He was like, that's what I'd do if I was a parent permission granted. And then he was like, well, I should probably tell the general. And so then they routed up to CENTCOM

and they're like, heck no, you're not taking emergency leave in Kabul, Afghanistan. So they shut that down and I was told to hold. And, but my colonel was former JSOC liaison for our unit. And he got her added to the targeting list of the National Mission Force and she got elevated. And so that's when we had that conversation about choosing between her safety and their safety. And I have documentation where like, I cannot do that. And I personally spoke to the two

at the National Mission Force and she personally guaranteed like they would take them all because they had no documents and no connection to the US. And they were using her military ID to get her on a bird. And so they went and snatched them behind Taliban lines and snatched them up and flew them into the airport on a helicopter. And so our kids and the pregnant lady didn't have to go

through the huge crowds. Cause we didn't have other groups like crushed her, like pregnant women like giving birth prematurely and losing the child. Like it was, it was horrific conditions. And what these people on the ground were going through, like I'm talking to guys that deployed multiple times in the Middle East saying it's the worst thing

they've ever seen in the G-WAT. And you know, they're throwing their kids at the end, they're like just for the hope of getting out, they're throwing their kids over the walls and they don't know that there's like C-wire on the other side and that kid getting hung up and then they bleed now. And I even had several instances where they would empty out some of the handicapped children's orphanages and use them as like, so the process was they hand up a child that

was very young or handicapped and then they would let them through the gate and they'd link up with them. But a lot of these kids were getting abandoned, right? Because they were being used as a ploy to get into the airport by desperate people. And so there was collection points for these children. And even to the point where, like, they're terminally-ill children that eventually died in the US,

and we were trying to find out if anyone somehow could find out who these, so they'd have someone there when the child died in the United States. Like, I don't think people realize how crazy that was, like that mission set was. And ironically, my replacement, I was the executive officer for Raider Battalion for a while,

or Raider Sport Battalion. And I replaced the previous XO, was the planner who planned the evacuation ad hoc. And he was like, hey man, I plan most of this on my 4G phone and I was briefing the president on a napkin and then all this ad hoc. And basically what we had done, what we had experienced was across DoD,

all these vets of the wars were trying to get their connections to get their people safely out. And such a heroic execution of a terrible mission, like a mission that I think was unnecessary. And based on my just happenstance, I thought at the time, but like bouncing around Afghanistan in my deployments, seeing the strategic difficulties of flying out of an airport where the population center is right built up onto it.

And like it's just the mercy of the Taliban. They're not shooting down our C-17s. And you know, and then listen to some of these other guys on the ground like you mentioned I think earlier, Sergeant Tyler Vargas and his account have like watched them beat people to death if we rejected them. Like all that stuff was common knowledge. Like we were getting reports of other suicide bombers, other attacks, and like it was a ticking time bomb to get these people out. The Marines and Soldiers just executed, just heroically, a really bad mission set.

I still cry like a baby every time I think about it. I watched them. We ended up, Steph and I both ended up going to Ramstein to meet our group because they got through Doha, we had some rangers go find them, and I talked to the tower at Doha, and I'm like, my group just got put on a plane,

where are they going? He's like, sir, we don't have manifests, we have no idea where anybody, we're just packing people on planes, and he listed off like 12 tail numbers and all over the globe like Greece Italy Spain Germany, you know It was like they were going everywhere

And so we guessed like the most planes were going to Ramstein like 60% of them So like the biggest chance was to go to Ramstein to try to meet up with them because we had all of Oliver documents We had vouched for these people disobeying the Taliban. So I was there to advocate like, hey, these people disobeyed the Taliban for us, they brought a US person to US forces, using our military ID. Like we literally shepherded them through the process. And they knew that from day one.

It was an incredible that part. And it was like, it was a chaotic, that wasn't the plan, it was just the plan evolved as all of this was happening. And I took some pictures along the way, which I think I've shared of just, because for me, you know, just I'm a photographer by trade, but it just, it felt like what Joshua was doing

and the stories I was just overhearing of everything that was transpiring, it was just so significant, it was almost historical. And so I took, for whatever reason, we were driving up to Baltimore to fly out to Ramstein, Germany. And Josh was on the phone and he was trying to get a group of 14, I think,

that had visas to Australia. And so he was on the phone with someone on the ground in Kabul. And I just had this urge, I mean, probably not the best idea of driving, but I just picked up my phone and I just hit record. And I started recording him on this phone call, because it's just significant, it's not every day that you're speaking to people

directly on the ground while all this is going on. And it ended up being the Marine that died, I think the very next day at Abigate. And she personally, Joshua was talking to her and he's like, I've got a group, they're visas, or it's been verified, they can get through. And she's like, well, the Australians are not here. And he's like, well, wouldn't it be a shame

if 14 people can't get through because Australians aren't here. And so she, go ahead. Yeah, I think I should, for her, for their family, so these Marines at Abbey Gate, they like selflessly sacrificed for people they didn't even know. And it was, that wasn't a waste.

Like there's real people with real different lives now because of their sacrifice. Tire family units. That particular one was, they had Australian visas. It was a Hazara family and they're Shia Muslims and so they're both racially and religious minority. And she was a female activist, this matriarch, if you will, of this family. And she had been specifically called out by the Taliban. And because of that, the Australians had granted them visas.

And so they've got everything from like a couple month old baby to like 60 year old men and like 14 people in between. And they are stuck in Abbey Gate in the ditch at two in the morning. And a call goes out on the nets like, does anybody know any Australians? And I knew one Australian I deployed with in Afghanistan. And I still had his number. So I reach out and it's like whatever time in the morning in Australia, I'm like, hey sir, remember me?

You know, this is what I'm doing. I'm working these groups, there's Australian visas. I was like, do you know anybody running the Australian response in Kabul? And he's like, oh, well my brother-in-law is actually running the Ops Center in Doha right now. Here's his number. Like, the only Australian on my phone's brother-in-law is doing that. So I'm like, uh-huh. So I called Doha and I talked to this nice Australian and he's like, oh, I'm sorry, our comms are down. We

can't reach them right now. I'm like, what? I'm just called Doha on my cell phone while driving to Dulles to try to fly out over there, right? And so that's not going to be good enough. Like it's not going to be fast enough. And so I'm like, are there any Americans? Can you see any Americans to this lady who speaks broken English? And she's like, there's one.

And so she hands off the phone. I'm like, hey, I made your mask. I've been helping with vet these paperwork of different Afghans to get them through. My guy's not responding for the gate. Can you please pull these people in and find some Australians?" And she's like, sir.

She's like, it's a female voice. And she's like, hello? And I'm explaining my stuff. And she's like, the Australians aren't doing 24-hour ops right now, and it's two in the morning. They don't come on until six. She's like, what do you want me to do? I'm like, I want you to pull these people in and sit them down and wait for Australians.

And she's like, well, I have to hand you off my captain. So she hands me off to the captain, I explain the same story. And this is what he says to me. He's like, sir, I'm looking at 15,000 people trying to get in this gate. And I'm playing God about who gets to go. What do you want me to do? And I was like, like she said, I said, wouldn't it be awful if these people have a seat on an Australian aircraft and tickets?

I verified that with the Australians. I just got off the phone with them. Wouldn't it be awful if they don't get out because the Australians aren't doing 24 hour ops right now? And he's like, yeah, we'll bring them in. And so they sent me a video from Australia. But we were in the air flying to Ramstein to meet our group when Abbey Gate happened and landed.

And it was a ghost town. Everybody stopped work. There was no restaurants open, like the mall, all that stuff. Everybody stopped and they volunteered and they were building a tent city the entire length of Ramstein, like bigger than Kuwait. They were like, they were in been to Ali Asaleem, and seen some of those bases with all those tents, like it looked like that, but on the runway.

And they put 11,000 Afghans the first day we got there, and 17,000 more the next day. And it was building tents as you put people into them. It was craziness. And these people looked traumatized, because a lot of them had spent three, four, five days outside and a couple days to get on an airplane. They crammed them in there without no restrooms,

no moving space. Like, there were fights on the planes and babies and people dying. And then they all got bottlenecked in Doha, for the most part, in un-air-conditioned terminals because we were trying to find our group, and they called us saying, hey, we don't feel well, we don't have water, trying to get them through that process.

So they landed in Germany. And we were sitting in the USO in Ramstein, alone. We're probably the only people in the terminal, maybe three other people. And I started seeing some ambulances pull up, like, what's that? And then you realize, like, it's just these, it was our casualties.

They were taken to Lanchetow Medical Center there and they just got off the plane and there's just so many. Because there was 30 something wounded in addition to the killed. And we just watched them take body after body of our wounded off the aircraft and take them over. And I remember sitting there with them, there was a State Department lead for that basis,

was a reservist, a Marine, a phenomenal person. And he actually got sent home because he was raising the alarm of how dangerous it was with the child safety issues that were happening at Ramstein. He got sent home to the US because he's like, hey, this is dangerous. We need to do better than this. But we're sitting there and just crying our eyes out,

watching these Marines come up, the birds and... I've always wanted to express the gratitude and just having observed what their children went through and knowing that they kept that gate open longer because it meant life or death for a lot of people. And like just the selflessness of that, that decision that those Marines made and you know, the real world cost of that

for people that don't even know. But like just for me, I know for a fact that they saved 14 people's lives and I got their picture from Australia that they got out because of these Marines. And I don't know how many others they saved but I know they saved those people. And they've been so dead and murdered by the Taliban.

And I can't, to know the ground and to know what people were doing and to express the evil of that bombing, of the just senseless violence. It's just a real focal point of the GWAD, I think, is just the senselessness and the evil we're facing, where people think that that is what, you know, God wants them to do is to blow themselves up in innocence together.

I mean, that is an evil ideology that I'm happy to fight. And I'm thankful for their sacrifice. They saved real people. I'm humbled by having observed it. But I think, you know, we're, we view what happened to her as providential. She saved lives in getting people out, including these folks, these Pashtuns with her. But I can guarantee the American people from day one, we told them exactly who we were and what we wanted. And this guy thanked us over and over again, like, oh, I think it's fine.

It'll be, so kind, like the typical, like flowery language stuff. He wanted to come to America, which I don't even blame him for. I think he had some conflict with his spouse at some point. I don't know if, I don't think necessarily culturally they have the same sort of impetus to have be an agreement about something.

So I don't know what he represented to his wife. But at some point she was like, he promised me that if I came with, I told him if he wants to go to America, you go, I'll stay here in Afghanistan. But he promised me if I came that she wouldn't have to leave my side. And so like, I think this guy probably was playing

both sides against the middle, but really what happened to Dulles, we were trying to be sensitive, because it's a horrendous event, right, to have to go through that period. Leaving everything you know, going through that experience. I mean, our particular group got the red carpet, like having the National Mission Force pick you up

is the best way to get out of Afghanistan, just saying. But it was still a traumatic event. And so we were trying to expedite them through the refugee stream because of this lady's pregnancy and because of Sparrow's medical concerns, because we were worried it would trigger seizures, basically. But that ended at Dallas, that we weren't going to... I had different obligations kick in at that point. And that's really the story that hasn't gotten out

and that explains the origin of some of the conflict we've had in the U.S. And that's been deliberately, intentionally hidden because it makes perfect sense. And it totally undermines the narrative that's been out in the media. So where did you guys reunite with Sparrow? We found them at Ramstein.

We found them there. Yeah, we found all of them at Ramstein. We advocated to get them expedited, and then they were. And so we actually were able to We advocated to get them expedited, and then they were. And so we actually were able to get back to the states, like 12 hours before they did. How did you find them, though?

That was a minor miracle as well. So. You were there too, Stephanie? Yeah. We did, yeah, I went with them. That wasn't the plan, like I said, it was just very responsive as to what was going on. Um, I, at the time, my, our youngest son was nine months old.

I was still nursing at the time. So it was when Josh was like, we're going to have to go because we don't know where in the world she's going and we're her adoptive parents. And so we both need to be there to be present. So I literally gave my nine month old baby to my sister and which she's like a second mom to him anyway. So I gave, I handed him over and we drove up to Baltimore to fly out to Ramstein. And I remember asking Joshua, at the point we were like, we didn't know where in the world they were going, like he said. And so he was on the phone with someone at the control tower at Cutter and reading know where in the world they were going, like he said. And so he was on the phone with someone

at the control tower at Qatar, and reading off where all the places were going. And I remember asking him, he was like, if we fly all the way to Germany, and what if they're not there? I mean, like, what's our family, we're going to look like idiots if we fly across the world, and then it's the wrong guess.

And he's like, he says, he's an educated guess, he's like, God's brought us this far. We're just going to go for it and see, you know, basically see what happens. And so we did, we boarded the flight and we flew to Germany and landed within an hour of each other. Yeah, we got a call that they landed too. So like, it was pretty impressive.

I was basically like the national mission force squadron just recovered her from behind Taliban lines. I think we'll be good Yeah, you know so we we pushed with an educated guess and it ended up being right on the money We found him and then what was weird? How did you find her? It was good. There had to be thousands of people there I guess there was 11,000 people there was two in the morning and we're walking 11,000 people thousand people there and So we we get there. It's like two in the morning and we're walking 11,000 people there and so we get there it's like two in the morning we get checked in they look they only let us stay on base because we had family in the room in the stream and we're trying to get them their documents because base was shut down there was no

rental cars available because all the NGOs that come on 50 miles to say that it was so let me let me paint the picture. You've got a mile or so long runway with a bunch of hangers and a bunch of tents, and they don't know who belongs to who. There's no documentation. So do you treat the second or third wife, 13-year-old wife of some guy as his wife,

or do you treat her as an unaccompanied minor? So these are some of the cultural and legal barriers that we're trying to figure out without hurting people. And so they split the women, women and kids, 12 and under went into the hangers, men go into the tents, nobody, such nobody until we figured this out. And like there were significant child safety concerns,

like they had several hundred unaccompanied minors because you had a bunch of orphans from the bombing, like now you're an orphan, what do you do? Or like there was one sibling, I distinctly remember, that they were, the Taliban killed their parents. And they were like, the Taliban just shot our parents, what do we do? And so you had these unaccompanied minors,

and figuring out how to, or there was people so desperate at the end, if you had a visa to America or were getting let in, they're like, here, take my kid. Take him to America with you. And so you've got unaccompanied minors with non-family members all over the place. And then on top of that, I spent like four days

in the cages, like walking around. It was super dangerous. Nobody has any weapons, because you're trying not to make it look like a, like that would be a bad optics, but like you've got 10,000 dudes in a cage, like, and people are getting upset, you know what I'm saying?

Like, it was not safe. I wouldn't let her go outside of the ECP for that stuff, but I watched, like, they're probably DIA or CIA, like, playing close dudes with wanted posters, and like, pulling in the Afghan soft, because they had pieces of their uniform and they carried themselves differently. Like pulling in the commandos or the KKA guys

and like, go find this dude. And they're going and finding bad guys in this refugee stream. And I watched that happen over and over again. Picture 15 guys pull them in, they do a school circle, they brief them, they say, go find them. And like pulling dudes out of the refugee stream,

so I'm like, holy cow. And that kind of, that plus, when they were processing these groups, they had what they were calling pods. And so pod, the first pod was like basic intake, who are you, what documents do you have? What connection to the u.s. And they're they're vetting them a little bit and and so on and so forth So we were concerned because I had gotten them expedited because the medical concerns

There was a medical priority for some of them like pregnant women or people with diseases or or or acute problems and so for both Sparrow and for this pregnant person, we were trying to get them through. And then also with my interpreters, three kids, or three siblings, they didn't have any documents at all, like a birth certificate, and that was it. And they had no connection to this group. So like making sure that they stayed together and they routed together to the states was very important.

And so we, I mean, we were relentless in trying to advocate to get them through through and that succeeded after a few days. But hats off to the staff. And the USO, I mean, they were. The USO was phenomenal. I actually met the deputy commander of base, his wife at two in the morning was volunteering with the USO in there like, you know, getting coloring books

and blankets and and just serving. And it was, these people were so, it was such a traumatic experience. Imagine leaving everything you know and love from the fear of a great evil like the Taliban and then going to some place. Your whole life in a garbage bag. Yeah, your entire life in a garbage bag.

And so we were serving our hearts out to try to get everybody out. Like I was, there was. How did you find her though? I think a phone. I think they had like a wifi signal at some point. Yeah, so it was very slight. But they had it very close.

Yeah, they had a phone and whenever there was wifi, they would connect. They would be able to connect to wifi and then send us a message. So we found them, but then we would lose them when they processed to the next one, so we'd have to find them each day, basically.

You'd have to find them each day? So hold on, I just, I gotta hear some good news. Yeah. What was it like the first time you found her? Oh, that was, it was... Were you guys together? We were together. Yeah, we were.

And they brought her out, and so at that point, we were still in the impression based on what we were told that she may not be able, she couldn't walk. And so they carried her out and I was sitting on a bench and they set her, they were holding her at first and then they set her down so that we could see her. And that was when I first, like I said, she was so turned in where she would barely look out,

she would kind of look up and her eyes, she was really big. We just joked that's like Jasmine, like Princess Jasmine. She has these big eyes, but her eyes were very closed off and she looked like a furrowed brow and to the point where, like I said earlier, I was like, is that her? Because her hair was short and just like straw-like

and she was just like. Too sick as a dog. Yeah, just dark circles under her eyes and very, she's thin and I was shocked. And then when I saw, like when she's sitting on the woman's lap, I saw the scar on her leg and I was like, that's her. And so they set her down beside me

and we took a photo and I have my hand on her back. And the reason why I had my hand on her back is just like any young child where you're afraid like they're tippy or they're gonna fall back. I had my hand on her back to make sure to stabilize her. And then she got down and she walked over. And then that moment I was like, because in my mind we're still operating

from the information we had 18 months prior, medically disabled. So I was shocked, I was like, she's blocking. I kind of looked at Joshua like, because in my mind, we're still operating from the information we had 18 months prior, medically disabled. So I was shocked, I was like, she's walking. I kind of looked at Joshua like, man, she kind of tottered. Yeah, she tottered, but it was such a relief to know that she could even walk at that point because we knew the injuries in her leg. I was just like, wow, she can walk.

And so that first moment, it was like, at first it was disbelief, but then it was just relief to see that she can walk, she's alive, and this is actually her, and we're here. And that was just a culmination of all of these highs and lows. And like Joshua said, even though this is a long interview, there's so much emotion in any good story. There's triumphs and there's failures, there long interview, there's so much emotion in like any good story.

There's triumphs and there's failures, there's heroes, there's villains, and we've, through this experience, have had all of that. And so in that moment, even with meeting them for the first time, there was such joy and relief, and it was just like, we made it to this moment. Yeah, I felt responsible because I didn't want to leave.

I knew the Taliban would kill people if they disobeyed them. I believe that with every five-month being out, they would have. And just that I wasn't responsible for anybody's death was a big relief for me. It was exhilaration. But it was also filled with tragedy because you just saw these kids get blown up

and 170 Afghans and all their surviving orphans and like even some of the National Mission Force families that I believe had tried to adopt some of the orphans because they were right there by Abbey Gate is where the squadrons were operating out of. And so they were some of the first on scene to secure the scene and just scooping up baby, you know, kids that are just recently orphaned

and like bonding with them over the next three or four days before they have to evac out on the, I think the 30th. Cause I believe that, I can't remember the date of the bombing off the top of my head, but it was a couple of days afterwards that they, so you had these kids who were recently orphaned with our guys and protecting them and bonding with them. And so like, we had a lot of...

How long were you guys in Ramstein before you took her home? I think it was four days. She flew home on a rotator with them. With our entire group together. And then we... I think we got her a couple days after that. Because Dulles... Dulles happened. And then it took them a few days to get their act together and get her back to us. So it was within a week of that that it all occurred.

So what was it like coming home with her? It was honestly awesome. Like we were so thankful, like we have some good video of our kids getting to see her because they'd FaceTime with her or they prayed for her, sent videos to her, sent presents to Afghanistan. And so, like, to them, it was, you know,

it was a very distinct person in their lives. She's two years old? Two years old, yeah. She's really tiny. And she was, like, walking like a baby deer, like a barely walk, she couldn't run. It took her quite a while to build the strength, so her physical therapists were like,

this is, like, the most underdeveloped, like, lower body we've seen of a child this age. And so like she was, it took her a long time to get strong. It took her a long time to get to her body weight again. But Stephanie's a pretty good nutritionist and build that up over time. Really we just, we did then what we were planning to do all along.

We just poured everything into her. Yeah, we took it. And so medical, I mean, I don't know how many times I went up to Duke in Raleigh, and medical appointment after medical appointment, like from just a few days in, just went down the line. Everything that we had planned 18 months prior, or what, 18 months or more prior,

we immediately executed and went down the line and just started to just kind of get a gauge of, okay, where is she at physically, emotionally, just across the board and just poured into her. Yeah. How long did it take her to... Smile. To warm up, to smile?

I didn't realize that she didn't smile until a couple weeks in and it was something, and you mentioned, she was like, oh, look, she's smiling. And it took a while for her, like her face is now to today, her face is like her baby photos. It's like any child where when you look at their baby photos, like, oh, I can see like I can see the way they look as a kid. You can see it back then. And so her face is back to the way she was as a baby, where big eyes, open, very expressive when she talks. But it took, it was like layers of an onion, it took time for that child to reemerge.

And it was- Well, and I would say her therapist commented that she's displaying behavior that's consistent with an uncertain environment with violence, she is displaying behavior that's consistent with an uncertain environment with violence because she was quiet and always restricted her, she wouldn't even cry. Like she would turn like this and sit there.

So what they said is that's very common in children with an uncertain environment where there could be like emotional outburst or anger because they've learned to suppress and not... Rock the boat. ... make themselves a target. Yeah. Not rock the boat.

And they also noticed that she had a real aversion to men and then closed spaces. Like if in a therapy session they would shut the door. She'd start to lose it. She didn't want to be alone, and she did not want to be around men specifically. It was, but fortunately, we have a big family. She's got like 13 or 15 cousins. So that much love pouring on her with all sorts of people learning to trust people.

It's safe, it's okay. And she started to slowly peel that back where today like you couldn't even tell like she's the same little girl in the hospital, same bright face like hold me because she grew up with all these nurses and doctors like they would hold her for her naps and like rock her to sleep so she was totally spoiled. And then to go to that deprivation and then coming back from that took some time, but like I said, she was speaking full sentences in two months, like mommy, daddy, like unbelievable. Enough to communicate, yeah, she could communicate

early on, but there was one time early on that really gave me a glimpse of what she must have gone through is we were, I was going to, I was loading the younger kids up into the car to go pick up the older kids from school. And I was carrying her out, so she's kind of at eye level on the hip. And they were building a new community right across the road from us. And there were roofers, and they were going down the line going pop, pop, pop, pop, pop with the nail gun. And I didn't even notice it. And I was just going out to the car and she looks at me,

she goes, oh, and she had this look on her face and she made eye contact with me. And that was very early on where she couldn't talk, but she looked at me and the look said, are we gonna run? It was like danger, are we? And she was looking at my face to see how I was gonna respond, if I was gonna duck and cover, like if I was gonna run. And in that moment I looked at her and I just, it broke my heart that a child that young

had experienced some form of violence to know what that was, that that was a threat. And I was like, it's okay, that's just, they're building houses over there and just try to, you know, lighten it up and like, it's, we're okay, we're just gonna go get the boys from school. And, but just little glimpses of that, it just, you could see little what, like the- What it does. What it does to a person.

And so- And they had, this guy had talked to me in some of our conversations during the battle for their city in southern Afghanistan. And he described being inside for days and gunfire and all that. And he said he came out thinking it was over and a guy next to him got shot in the head

and was a casualty from that experience. So like, this guy's like crying on the phone. Like there's no hope. Like there's no way we're getting them out of Afghanistan. Like no one could predict the historic evacuation at that time, right? So like I'm dying on the inside, like man, I'm sorry, like we'll do whatever we can to help you,

but like you gotta send her before it's too late. Like Afghanistan's falling. I said 40 days has done and it ended up being like 32 days. And it was funny because he came, everything he phrases, questions from his father, who was responsible. And he's like, my father says to the airplane, there's been war here for 40 years and the airplanes have not stopped.

I'm like, they're stopping, man. Like, you need to get her here before this runs out. And I'm so thankful that we did. Honestly, in retrospect, I probably had too much, I should have had a little more caution given the circumstances of a recovery. Like you got a child from a named objective whose guy's talking to the shadow governor,

but I figured, you know, your average military-age male in southern Afghanistan has got to have some connection. You know what I mean? They're familiar with the Taliban, our friends who are. You know, it's a lot of the Pashtun population down that area. So...

Are there any signs of, I mean, is that... Like episodes of fear, is that completely dissipated away now? I would say by and large it has. You could see, like, it's more when you compare it to how a child normally behaves, that's when it becomes more apparent. So I never realized when we first got her, she would stay and still to this day she's still somewhat like the kids will run all over the house and go into this room

in that room and she does now. But when she first came, she would stay in one room, like one area and it was like wherever you put her, she would stay there and not like almost the freedom of movement or freedom of play. It was like she didn't know. She wouldn't go out of sight. Yeah, she would stay close to you and stay in one room. And so I would say it's been even like going to a playground,

going and the kids would go play. She would stay close by or not interact with other kids. So it's been a process. And like, I mean, the best thing that I could say is just, she has blossomed with love. And circling back, because it was one point that I wanted to make, when she was turned over out of US custody, I mean, obviously it was just,

her whole future was at stake, and that was just grieving in and of itself. But what bothered me is that she could go through the rest of her life in Afghanistan and never know how loved she was by hundreds of people that she had a name, that she had an identity, and people that fought and loved her fiercely and advocated that she could go on for the rest of her life and never know that reality. And what has been so satisfying is for it to come full circle

and for her to feel that love and to see it firsthand. And one day she'll realize, you know, we've protected her fiercely from the harshness of her past. And in time, it will tell her age appropriate things, but what we've wanted her to know is that we believe that her life was preserved for a purpose. And it was protected by many people

that cared for her deeply. And so she's blossomed with that love. And I think that we did right by these people. We did what we said we would do. We saved them from what they wanted. They wanted to get away from the Taliban. They wanted out of Afghanistan. And I can't control what lies they say about us.

I can't, you know, I have no idea what exactly their why is that do they want to go back to Afghanistan? Is the Taliban really the people behind this like forcing them to do that? I do know that they don't have control over her if they ever get custody of her, and they are subject to duress. And what I really think it boils down to is this,

this is not about our rights, this is not about their rights, this is about what's the best interest of the child for this little girl. And what I think is so despicable about the government's role in this is they prevented that analysis from even happening. They're trying to, on a technicality based on a lie, short circuit that analysis.

She should win. Whatever that looks like, she should win. She's not chattel, she's not property, right? She's absolutely our daughter in every sense of the word. Like we're mommy and daddy.attel. She's not property, right? Like she's absolutely our daughter in every sense the word like we're mommy and daddy She doesn't know Anything about this, right? She doesn't remember these folks at all. It's that's water under the bridge and But even even that it's it's about her best interest she deserves freedom she deserves to grow up to marry whoever she wants to marry to be whoever she wants to be and

So many Americans have sacrificed to provide that for her It is just an abomination for what a miscarriage of justice what the government's done here to prevent that from happening And it's continuing to it's back to this day like next next week we have a hearing in front of the Supreme Court of Virginia, and the government is appearing and trying to say they had a foreign policy interest in that overrode our parental rights, and that they should just blindly give her,

like pluck her from her family and her brothers, and everything she's been given by the sacrifices of all these Americans because of a foreign policy interest from a dead government or because of negotiating now with the Taliban, are you kidding me? Like they filed these, for lack of a better term, creepy statements from the current charged affairs for Afghanistan, who like personally,

this is a Joshua Masp opinion, totally get fired. But they fired these from the charged affairs, the person responsible running Afghanistan for the US government, basically saying, it's hard to negotiate with the Taliban with your case going on. So, you know, void the Mast family's rights and give her to them.

Like, sight unseen, no evaluation of this, no investigation of whether they ever were proper guardians of her. Like, if she was sexually molested and neglected in Afghanistan, whose fault's that? These people are claiming that she was living with them. I don't know if that's true. I've got a voice message that says, she doesn't live with me or my family, so I don't know what's true.

I don't know how much of the lie is... Can there be any retribution for them just stealing your child and Giving them to the posh tune guy. I Honestly, I mean, I don't know. I don't know if it's a criminal. I don't know if it rise to criminal. It's absolutely like We will absolutely sue these people on the back end of this for what they've done with our family No one should have to go through this stuff like into this for what they've done with our family. No one should have to go through this stuff. Like to be gagged and lied about by the government

is really hard to take, especially by the very bureaucrats who are responsible for getting dumped so dangerously in the first place. They're the ones, you know, protecting government information and covering up what happened. And like we can prove in court with all the evidence that US government has that she was turned over to non-relatives.

Like, and I think I should probably bring that up. There is documentation now. I have this guy's, the person they say is her biological father. I don't even think that's, but they claimed a relationship, biological relation to this guy. That was a lie.

Because after three years of litigation, in the board of litigation, in the board of inquiry, we have the guy's identity card. And so this elderly postulate man she was given to in 2020, right before the peace deal, he said, I'm the older brother of the slain, we'll call him Joe for lack of a better term, Joe got killed.

He was an innocent farmer. Give me his daughter, right? That's his claim. Well now I got Joe's birth certificate. I got this guy's birth certificate. And you know in Afghanistan how they have your father and your father's father? Well they don't have the same dad.

So that's just a lie. He said I'm the older brother of the slain Joe, call him. I've got both their IDs. He's not the older brother. And guess what? The Slain Joe's five years older. So he's lying about being older, and he's lying about being a brother. So how that evolved here in the United States is this posthumous man said,

well, he was a older stepbrother. So he's claiming to be a half first cousin. That's the claim biological relationship, a half first cousin. And that came about when we offered the DNA test. Because like, duh, the first thing you do, I mean, if you're in the audience, and someone is claiming to be a relative of a child you've adopted, what do you do?

You say, I'll pay for the DNA test. And so we did that two and a half, three years ago, three years ago? Right off the bat. I will pay for a DNA test. And so we did that two and a half, three years ago, three years ago? Right off the bat. I will pay for a DNA test to test your claim because I believe you're misinformed or you're lying. That's what we did. And they absolutely blatantly refused to do that. So I'll do it right now, do a DNA test. But I guess what I'd like to, I don't blame these mega firms for trying to represent a client, right?

I have a different ethical standard of how you can do that and what level you can do with courts. I think that they may have crossed that line, but that's up for courts to decide. What I have a real problem with is the Department of Justice parroting verbatim what these mega law firms narrative are with contrary evidence in their possession that they won't release to us. So it's like throwing the game. Like if we've got video of these Rangers in combat, and I've asked three years ago to declassify everything,

like it's a child, it's an old mission, who cares? Like, declassify it, right? War's over. You're surrendered, let's see the footage. But they'd rather let these guys get maligned by these different groups that support, you know, Gitmo detainees and Dad ilk. Like same sort of groups, right?

The people who's filled their pro bono time helping, like terrorist sympathizers. But they're... at Dulles, we had about seven hours it took to process them into the country once they arrived in America. And I was there because I had her original documents and I had to vouch for these people, say like, hey, they disobeyed the Taliban, they risked their lives to help Americans.

That's their connection, that's their eligibility to be paroled here. And I had to make sure my interpreter's kids got to him, right? Like who he was and how he was helping and all that. And so I sat there for seven hours with like teeming masses of humanity, like pouring in, and with these overworked customers and multiple agents trying to process all these applicants. And most of them don't have documents, like it's very rudimentary at all.

And at the end of that period, they're like, okay, you're done processing, you need to go get a COVID test. And it's like midnight. Like a COVID test, like really? Like a lot of these people had tuberculosis, right? So it was, so I'm thinking this is crazy. So we get my guy and about 20, 30 military-age males

and their families and they put us in a scissor truck, like those ones that go back and forth through the terminals and can elevate and stuff for different, And they put us in a scissor truck, like those ones that go back and forth through the terminals and can elevate and stuff for different, and they put us in the scissor truck and they drive us way out on Dulles Airport. And it looked like a Bond movie where they're unveiling a prototype aircraft, like a huge hangar.

And it's got like 500 beds in there. And they got computers set up over here and they got guys kitted up with like flax and ARs. And I'm like, this does not look like COVID test material. And I watched them go hard at my guy. Like, what were you doing in 2014? Like, da, da, da, da, da, like going down the list, just reaming them out and interrogating him.

And before that, he was sitting, and this guy's Pashtun, and a lot of our allies are Dari, speaker of Persian origin, right? It was different tribes that were helping us for the most part. There were some Pashtun and a lot of our allies are Dari speaker or Persian or origin Right. It was different tribes that were helping us for the most part There's some Pashtun tribes that helped like but he had not spoken to a lot of the other refugees because he didn't speak Dari And he was a Pashtun But he's sitting there in this detention facility Like holding hands and chatting because they hold hands with their friends, and he's like chatting away,

and that's the first person I'd seen him talk to this, like for five days in the camps. And I'm like, who's this friend to this person who speaks English? And they're like, oh, this is his friend from his home village, not his home city, his village. Back in the boonies where she had been recovered, because he wasn't from the big city,

just lived there later in life. He was from this village where she was recovered and so he's sitting here in this potential facility Getting reamed up our guys with another guy from his home village And so like I've just got this pattern going a you know child from a capture kill mission al Qaeda Talking to the Taliban shadow governor responsible with those foreign fighter camps says he has Taliban in his phone flags Taliban shadow governor responsible with those foreign fighter camps, says he has Taliban in his phone, flags Adulis. And I go to the CBP agents like, dude, what is this place? Like, I don't know, like I didn't understand. Like I wasn't sure. He's like, oh, this is where the inconclusives are. I'm like, what is that? And he's like, oh, they flagged on the terror watch list and like we're vetting them to see if they're a match. And I'm like,

you know, I feel immediately responsible. Like I'm a Marine Corps officer, I ex-pubed this guy through and I knew all this stuff. Right? But, so what I wanted to do was appropriately flag that because I knew they were looking for- To clarify, you didn't know all that stuff. You didn't know that he had any-

No, no, no, I didn't know that he flagging a watch list. I just figured his folks fought for the other team. Like, everybody wants to go to America, even if your folks fought for the other team, I thought he was more disobeying the Taliban and abandoning that, which I was cool with. But at that point, I felt obligated. Like, as a service member, I can't not say what I know.

And so I immediately flagged that through our NCIS rep and flagged it up to the FBI. And that's how this all got started. through our NCIS rep and flagged it up to the FBI. And that's how this all got started. And so they were detained for like 24 hours-ish. And then I got, boy, they got released. And I was like, what? And so I'm trying to figure out where they're going

and like where, because Lily, or because our little girl was there. And it ended up being really weird because it was like two in the morning, kids are asleep. My interpreter got processed through and he didn't have a car ride. So I had to like go and like take him back to his hotel. And so I got sucked away and I was trying to figure out

where they were to get back when I went back. And so I'm talking to this agent and he's like, dude, this was a really bad dude, but he brought your little girl to US forces and your organization got him in Afghanistan. So we let him through. And I'm like, what? No, sir.

Like I am not, you know, I don't even know this guy. I've talked to him for six weeks. Like here's all the things that I was tracking. And so that's when I realized I'd perhaps misplaced some compassion for some of the refugees and the bombing and all of these emotions that I could have been more vigilant than I was.

And I think I just conflated a little bit of the compassion with that. And I still don't think this guy's Osama bin Laden, but do I think that his family fought for the other side and was directly supporting Al-Qaeda in their home village? Absolutely, 100%. And how is it possible the Department of Justice

is filing filings in court saying, oh, this guy's fine. And JSOC colonels are testifying, now we knew that before we picked him up. Like I can't go into the details of what he shared. But like he testified under oath that the team, the squadron that pulled him out was tracking. So like if I'm going to believe one entity it's probably not going to be the previous administration's Department of Justice and it's definitely not going to be the attorney who helped defend the decision to turn over these people in

the first place. I have a problem with if if this has gotten scrubbed off the watch list which I have reasonably it has been scrubbed, it doesn't exist anymore. I'd like to know why. Was that a valid national interest purpose, or was that a favor to a mega law firm that gets things like this done? I think everybody listening to this

knows exactly what it is. To the point where I couldn't even speak about it. Well, that's a related issue. So they changed my orders where they ordered me not to testify about that and I didn't testify about it. The judge never knew any of that stuff in our own custody case. Like all these warnings and they tried to shut us up because that counteracts the narrative because it makes sense, right? If dude flies on to tear washes and we're like, yep, separate him, we're not, like, whatever, if he's gonna get deported,

we're not gonna deal with this anymore. That's the extent of our grace. And I have an obligation as a constitutional officer to report this and set it up the chain. And I was very concerned with the chaos in the people weren't getting properly vetted. And then as time went on and like these reports coming about of DoD whistleblowers saying they were getting

pressure to scrub people off the watch list. And then there was a report by the DoD inspector general talking about how we weren't, because of agreements with partner nations in the combat zone, we were only DoD could share information that was gleaned by some of these partner nations in the combat zone, we were only DOD could share information that was gleaned by some of these partner nations. And of all the terrorist database information would normally be housed under the terrorist screening center and normally be in all of our databases to share, there was a subset

of combat zone information that was not applied to vetting these Afghans. And so there's a 30 page DOD Inspector General report talking about how they had to give the data sets of who had been led into the country to the National Ground Intelligence Center and they re-vetted them and identified a whole bunch of people that had very concerning derogatory on them that were led into the US.

And most of them, they didn't even know where they were. And so like, that's the context of where we were at as far as like, I'm a Marine Corps officer, you know, America first, like report this stuff up the chain. And then it just, and nobody said boo about it. Like when I reported that stuff up, nobody was like, oh, that's classified. It's marked unclassified.

It says unclassified FOUO. The guy sent me a copy, a screenshot, said, hey, this is what we were worried about, just so you know. And it's marked unclassified FOUO. The guy sent me a copy, a screenshot, said, hey, this is what we were worried about, just so you know. And it's marked unclassified on the document itself. I reported it 10 months before it came back down, and now that is marked secret no foreign in an investigation saying that I mishandled

that information. Like, give me a break. This is an unclassified database. It's in the federal register, it's unclassified. And I'm having to ask this nice NCS agent who's doing exactly what these medical law firms had him do, which was interrogate me. Like, I fully cooperated. I'm a lawyer. I know my rights.

You know, I know my 31 Bravo rights. I know our rights on the Constitution. I voluntarily waived that because I want our country to be safe, and I was trying to figure out what happened with that. And so I talked to him, like, so you're saying this is an unclassified database? He's like, yeah. I was like, well, how in the world is it secret and foreign? He's like, well, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence is determined as the original classification authority.

But I'm an SJA for a SOCOM component, right? I've been around the block. I know what intelligence oversight looks like. I know what classification is. I'm like, dude, did you get that in writing? He's like, no, I was on a phone call. So I was like, you don't even have it in writing that this is secret and no foreign now

and what authority that was and if there was a security classification guide that actually says that? Because you know you can't just like say stuff is secret and no foreign to favor political, like you can't just misclassify information, that's illegal, it violates the executive order. And so he kind of hemmed and hawed a little bit

and went back to his lawyers to try to figure that out. But I've got, there was another document, I'll show you one of other thing. So there was a Different right after this right here. This is the Terrorist identity data mart environment tied. I'm sorry. Let me always so this is the terrorist identity Data mart environment or tied Database fact sheet this is published for the American people publicly on the Office of the Director of National Intelligence website.

Okay, this is their fact sheet basically explaining how we vet terrorists and what we do to keep you safe, right? This document was slammed in front of my face, marked secret no foreign by an agent. Are you kidding me? Saying it's marked right now in my board of inquiry evidence. What law firm is this? I probably shouldn't say I'll get sued, but...

How do you get... It's represented a lot of people on the political left over the time. You can get sued for saying the name of the law firm? You know, you don't want to give them a stick to beat you with. But this document, and here's the kicker. It was marked secret no foreign, and then it said pending classification review, and then they line that out. So post classification review, they're saying a publicly facing website.

And I've got a letter from DOJ saying, I'm not authorized to use this public document in our case because we want to use it as an exhibit as a publicly available. So they own the court? They absolutely. So the mega law firm owns the court. I can't say terrorist in this lawsuit. We never got to say any of that stuff.

I could even testify. The only thing we got to do is use his own recording saying he was scared of the Taliban They disobeyed the Taliban. That's what we're able to use. There's on this public knowledge I mean, isn't this like Look it up who the law firm is If the public appropriate oversight asked for the classified documents from my board Please God go pull that stuff and look at this document secret no foreign and ask yourself How does a counterintelligence special agent

mark a document that's Googleable, it was designed and released for the American public's benefit as Secret No Foreign? It's insane. And there's like a half dozen documents like that. So this document was marked higher classification than the Conop. It was like Fivei, Rel 2.

Like, you know what I mean? So like, you have a Ranger Regiment Conop that is a lower classification than a publicly available ODNI, like, fact sheet for the American people. Give me a break. And so that's the kind of ridiculousness. I'll show you one other example that's just an easy visual. So here is, here is the same document. This is what was released.

See the redactions on it? This is a fact sheet made for Brigadier General Taylor who was working with C-STECA with the Afghan like mentorship program. And this is how it was released for the court, right? This is how it was released from my board. So I've got it. So would you like to know what they redacted

so that the judge never knew? And this is, remember, they were attacking our credibility saying that I made this up and that I was biased in writing this stuff. Well, this is drafted by the SJA shop, not me. And so they redacted the portion that just corroborated everything we said originally in the Declassified Mission summary.

So it says, multiple photos recovered from the scene included pictures of Turkmen Uyghur foreign fighters, weapons and al-Qaeda flags. A detainee captured the night of the operation indicated that the neighboring compounds were occupied by Chinese Uyghur fighters from Turkmenistan and identified the pictures attached as foreign fighters who were residents of the compounds

that engaged the Afghan-led forces. An additional detainee corroborated the compounds of interest struck on 5 to 6 September were occupied by Turkmen foreign fighters and their families." So the very attorneys that let her be turned over, knowing this, redacted this information for release. And only at the board, when my command gave me as much as they had, they actually gave me information.

Man, these people have no souls, man. Well, I think it's like a big law, no holds barred, whatever means necessary to get your outcome. And they pride themselves on achieving that for their clients, and they're very successful and fabulously wealthy. But here's the other question I have is, how do you afford 15 attorneys with a high-power law firm that's $500 plus an hour, and three different law firms? How do you afford that?

And here's the deal. What we've come to find out is that there's been fundraising videos in Afghanistan, like saying the Taliban's helping us, and we need money. So, like, I'd like to know, like, how Taliban's helping us and we need money. So like I'd like to know like how's that being paid for? Is that some like shake in the UAE like funding these this with with dark money? Like is there is the Taliban helping with this? Because they they publicly released two years ago saying they're going to go to American authorities and protest. And then I've got the charge the affairs filing weird affidavits sounded a lot like this is messing up our negotiation with the Taliban. And so I've got a lot

of reasonable questions like are they is the Department of Justice on the previous administration doing this because the Taliban asked them to? Like they filed an affidavit from the charge theFA saying it was interfering with negotiations. What does that mean? Does that mean the Taliban want them to give our kid back to these people who are not relatives and probably on their team? I'd like to know that. I think the American people deserve to know that.

And isn't that quite a bit of a different story than what's publicly out there? And why would they need to change my orders three or four different times? Why wouldn't they release all the information I asked them to declassify and release for a child's custody hearing? Like, would we do that for any child? But this child was picked up off a named objective in brutal close combat, where the eyewitnesses said,

they tried to kill us blowing themselves up in a pitched gunfight, where like a dozen Americans are bleeding. And I'll never forget the platoon sergeant, he told me, sir, whatever you need with this, we'll come forward. Like our guys didn't bleed, so she'd go back to hell. Like it was that bad. They were that strongly about it.

And these guys are being called war criminals by organizations There was an organization that started a letter writing campaign that's how one of the reasons I got awarded is they they sent seven thousand letters to Congress and in those letters they they talk about how they want to promote their narrative and they want major mass held accountable and You know from a child that was recovered and what could have been a war crime anyway. And I'm here to tell you right now, that's defamation. There's no way that this was a war crime,

even if there were civilians killed. Like it's a legitimate strike on an al-Qaeda compound of verified intelligence. So like to say that publicly is like calling people rapists. And I'm honestly tired of folks who don't produce or preserve liberty for others attacking our men. I mean, I think the SecDef owes it to these guys to clear their name.

Like if you've been said, hey, you might be a war criminal and there's a video of it, do you think those guys deserve that? No, man. But they deserve the truth. You know what I'm saying? They're all under non-disclosure agreements, right? They had to get authorization,

and they actually tried to get these rangers not to be able to testify. They almost changed their orders. We got some weird emails saying like, what do you need them for to testify after they were fully approved by USASOC? They're like, what do you need them again? Like, what exactly are they going to testify to?

I'm trying to screw around with the ability of these eyewitnesses to say what happened. And I know for a fact there's footage of this stuff. I know for a fact there's TS and secret level information that corroborates everything we're saying. And that was so rewarding at our Board of Inquiry having the ability to have some due process where the colonels can come and testify. I think we had five colonels testify.

Three of them as witnesses of like what they knew at the time because the Department of Justice in court filings to a court has represented that I made this stuff up and that I misled this deputy assistant sect if as a captain. Like, are you kidding me? Do you don't think his staff and colonels, they testified in our board that they corroborated everything independently with their targeting packages or targeting systems they have in the Pentagon. And so, again, I think I've said this a couple of times.

Law firms can represent their client. We might have some ethical disagreements. The Department of Justice can't parrot lies when they have evidence to the contrary. Like that's criminal. Justice can't parent lies when they have evidence to the contrary. Like that's criminal. You can't do that stuff. And if the Department of Justice through the FBI has contradictory statements, like saying these other people are an authority, the Taliban governor is an authority, if that's what they were told by these people, how do they file saying Taliban governor's an authority. If that's what they were told by these people,

how do they file saying that they're, have legal authority over this child? They told them themselves that they don't. I don't understand how you can lie to a court like that. And so what we've done, Sean, is I have formally whistleblown these actions with just the tip of the iceberg, just enough to pick people's interest in Congress and in oversight. I have formally whistleblown these actions with just the tip of the iceberg,

just enough to pick people's interest in Congress and in oversight. I wrote a whistleblower complaint addressed to the president via Congress in formal neighbor letter format. I'm a lawyer, this is what I do, right? I spent three days in a hole drafting all this stuff and citing the evidence.

There's 30 enclosures, hundreds of pages of evidence, right? And this is just the really obvious stuff, like here's the one redacted document and here's the document unredacted. Why do you think that is? And laying that out for Congress. And what we've been asking is that the president in the United States,

the US government release all this stuff and look at the evidence and if there is a lie in what the previous administration's department of justice has filed, which there is, fix it. It's not rocket science. Get some oversight of these people because these are your typical deep state bureaucrats. They have absolutely weaponized the system. Like this could be like the poster child event of everything that we've all been dealing with at the grassroots level.

Like you said, with the Blackwater guys, like deleting the five minutes that matter in their lives. Right? And we've experienced that to the point where, like I'm a government hack. I'm a prosecutor. Like I carry that mantle, right? But seeing it from the other side,

seeing the system weaponized against like, if they can do this to, to me they can do it to anybody. It just is if they want to. And that's blown my mind. What's hard for me as his wife sitting here, beside him living this, going through this with him, is we've been, you know, known each other

since we were kids. We remember 9-11, watching the Twin Towers fall. And he's as much of a red-blooded patriot, you know, American as you can get. And to see someone that has, throughout his whole life, acted honorably for his reputation, everything, and his morality, everything to be skewed and twisted, to advance a different narrative and to favor another side. It's been hard to sit there and watch it,

knowing the truth, watching him literally fight for his life, his career, everything. Everything for us is at stake, and it has been at stake for a while. And to see a lie seemingly prevail for this long has been difficult. But when we have had the opportunity to share our heart and share our story and share what we've seen,

good people have stepped in and come along and contributed just enough. Well, and that's the point of shutting down debate. And I think that's a real danger to our society. Like we need freedom of speech now more than ever. We need open debate of ideas. We need to be able to talk through these things. And what there's a really pernicious, I guess, undercurrent

where if powerful people don't want you to, they want a certain outcome, they shut down speech. And that's like I told you before with CBS. We gave this interview, like seven-hour interview, two years ago to CBS and they did it in a two-part series and then these medical law firms come in and threaten them and then they change it to some milk toast, you and then these mega law firms come in and threaten them and then they change it some milk toast You know I don't want to say BS, but Something that it that was not down for you. It's like oh they say this and you say that and none of the facts

Right none of the what's actually going on I've got an IG complaint that lays out email traffic between these mega law firms and the SEC def's attorneys And then my orders get changed. When did the CBS thing end? It was in January. That was two years ago? Yeah. Two years ago?

And then, um... Do you think any of this changes now that Biden administration is gone? That's our hope. Like, we are, honestly, morale is high in the military right now, at least in our unit We're ready to go in focusing on war fighting and not some of this ridiculousness. We've had to deal with like Is anything happened since The Trump administration has taken over

Has it been any any good things any bad things with your particular? I think that they're really kind of on ice until this next thing? No, we're trying to get them... So, fortunately, some of the Trump appointees at the Department of Justice have some oversight of these particular attorneys. But right now, the Department of Defense and the Department of State need to evaluate whether they want to continue attacking our family. And I think that there's a really good chance that they will make the decision to

Stop that attacks and release that information and that would end the case So this basically needs to get to pete hexeth and marco rubio. Yeah, and pan bondi We we've already had congress has sent that whistleblower complaint formally through their office of legislative affairs To those authority makers, but what I'd encourage them to do, and anyone to do who's interested in this, is this board of inquiry gathered 14 gigabytes of unclassified data and hundreds and hundreds of pages of original reporting in one place.

Like if you want to know the truth, just pull it. Get somebody to send it to you on SIPR. It's condensed with the MarSocSJA office. It's great. I honestly, it's the best thing thatSocSJA office. It's great. I honestly, it's the best thing that could have happened to us because it gives us an ability to talk about the same facts that nobody can gag us

because we have a due process right to talk about what the government tried to do to us. And it collects like real hard evidence in one place and lays it all out. And so I think we've done the right steps as far as we've tried to, I've tried to be a good Marine Corps officer at every stage and I've never embarrassed the Marine Corps name or my own.

And I would, I'd rather die, take a bullet, than dishonor our institutions. Like that's how strongly I feel about it and I haven't. Now that's not known, but every service member that sat down and looked at this, like buddies of mine or people on the board, like the reason they unsubstantiate everything related to the Afghans is because it's a lie.

And it's so clearly a lie. And then, one of the things my attorney made a great point in the closing argument that won the day. The government got up and they pitched an exact rerun of what these mega law firms already lost two years ago. The judge specifically rejected that stuff. That's in evidence at my board. The government put it in evidence.

But they said the exact same argument again. It's like we're on repeat here. And then the mega law firm attorneys are there assisting the government to try to go after us administratively after they already lost legally. So his most effective, his most effective point was like, members I'm afraid that our system is being weaponized for non-official purposes. And I said, because these allegations were made two years ago, and all he did was read the court's ruling. He read it verbatim. And it says, I reject the kidnapping narrative, and they attack him for his religious beliefs or something like that. He read it verbatim

to the board, and it was exactly what these people had been spewing again in this military board on behalf of these mega law firms. And it shut it down. That's why it was unsubstantiated. And you know what? Senior DOJ and senior department of defense attorneys had this written ruling. It was a 38 page ruling.

They had it for two years. Guess who didn't have that ruling? The FBI investigators, the NCIS investigators, and the board or the recorder, the prosecutor for the government. They never saw this binding ruling against these parties. So this is a binding, a ruling is binding against the parties, right? So between us and the Afghans, here's the law, right? They never gave it to their own investigators. How do you run a military officer with the recycled allegations that were already proven false?

And it's that level of, I don't know the word to describe it. It's not justice, let me put it that way. It's not a scales and equal before the law. It's we favor these people scales and equal before the law. We favor these people and push hard on the gas. And it is a miracle that we have survived this far financially, just emotionally with our family. Is anyone else going to cover this?

I don't know. So we've been asked, Glenn Beck's asked us to come talk on his show. 60 Minutes is going to do something, but they're with CBS and they got scared last time, so I doubt they're going to go into anything. I don't know. I don't know the answer to that. I am thankful. Like, you don't know how thankful we are

to be able to appeal directly to Americans, people who've been deployed in the GWOT, understand the conditions on the ground, understand what classification is, understand what the terror watchlist is. They understand the implications of this and what the political, I don't agree with it, but I understand at least the political interest

in covering up people you import that may not have been vetted. Like I understand where they're coming from, I don't agree with it. Does that make sense? But be able to talk to your audience who are like subject matters in targeting, subject matters on what the Ranger Regiment does

and what the counterterrorism mission was and how much fidelity, like, let's just say the Israelis are not the only people who can thoroughly penetrate terrorist organizations and know exactly what's going on where. We have those capabilities too and we use them. And so to be able to talk to that type of audience and knowing your influence on the political debate

or the debate in the country about what issues are important and what should we elevate and what should we prioritize. But we're really in the 11th hour of potentially her going back to the Taliban again. And that's just unbelievable to me. And it's just, it's not pitched like that in the media, it's covered up.

But like I said, this is a Taliban, Elian Gonzalez situation. And I think the president should intervene and savor from the deep state who lied to his organization or his administration the first time around. And if there is anybody willing to look at the evidence objectively, I don't think you come to a different conclusion than that. And I can give you the phone number of the Rangers And I can give you the phone number of the Rangers, I can give you the phone number of the Colonel at JSOC who can corroborate this guy's got dirt on him.

And like I said, I don't think he's Osama bin Laden. Do I think that they should have accelerated his asylum application? If the first 800 approved, this guy's asylum application was approved because to gain a litigation advantage. Because if he's at risk, he doesn't have a status here, it's kind of hard for a judge to say, yeah, take this child, right?

So over our allies, over the people that went to war with us, this dude I just told you all these derog about got his asylum application approved by the US government. How does that happen? Like, what's the official purpose in that? Like, I mean, the guy that was a Terp, the first Afghan I got out, he got his denied, right? Zaki, like there was a news article, but they wrote a book about him.

His initial application got denied. And this guy got approved. I don't understand how that happens. Like, blows my mind. So, you know, the Tom Homans of the world, like, I really think they should go look at this guy's asylum application and compare it to what JSOC knows.

And did this guy lie on an asylum application? Because fair to middling chance that he said he wasn't affiliated with the Taliban and there's a fair middling chance that he is. So like, you know, I don't think we should tolerate that sort of shenanigans when it comes to national security because if they'll do it just to win a case like whoever was involved in scrubbing this off should actually like

If they didn't do it for an official purpose and they risk national security like you should lose your job For that like you're putting the american people at risk You know, I just I Can live with mean mean words like like I God's made me the type of person I am where I'm gonna do the right thing and I'm not gonna stop until you kill me Like that's just who I am and there's millions of people like me and that's why we volunteer and we go down range And we do the things we do and whatever job or MOS that we're given, right? We're there to further and advance

American principles and ideas. Like that's what, like we don't go down range just to commit violence. It's violence to advance a purpose. That's what makes us different than other militaries. And so I would like, really the Rangers bothers me the most. I want these guys, I mean honestly, they should get awarded to the White House.

They should get accolades for having that moral courage in that heat of the moment to do the right thing and save this little girl. They should get recognized for that. They shouldn't be called war criminals. I think we have a moral obligation to expose that. Well, I'll get this to everybody I know. I appreciate it.

I know a lot of people. I don't know what they'll do with it. Sometimes they do stuff, sometimes they don't. But fuck, man. I just gotta say, man, it's an honor to meet you guys. It's a privilege for us say, man, it's an honor to meet you guys. Like... It's a privilege for us. We appreciate it.

Like, whoa. We wouldn't have believed it if we had not lived it. I keep saying that to myself, because we've seen absolute miracles and absolute heroism and everything in between. I mean, I'm with you, though. I just, um... I don't see you losing this one. Too many things have fallen into place over the years,

just like you had said, and I think God's got a bigger purpose for this than some fucking mega law firm and corrupt DOJ. Hope so. Honestly, we're really looking forward to some light being shown on this. Because I mean, honestly, daylight and truth looking forward to some light being shown on this because I mean honestly daylight and truth That's what that's what the American people deserve. That's what regular people deserve and and that's really what's been held from us

Well earlier in this when it became just litigated it I read a quote and it said that you you can't rewrite someone's opinion of like of yourself You can't change their mind about you. All you're responsible for to do is to tell the truth and share your story. And that was our motivation coming on here was not to sit there and fight down all the arguments and everything that's been thrown at us,

but really just share the story, share what happened. And like as Joshua showed, there's a ton of facts out there that support everything, but ultimately it comes down to a decision that in the moment, just like the Rangers did, just like we did, just like the hospital staff, and all of the DOD personnel, it was a split-second decision to step up and advocate for one child.

And for, I hope, most Americans and most people, they'll understand how easy that is. Like really, there's not some sort of twisted motivation or it's just really, there's an innocent child, there's something that we can do to help it, let's do it. Yeah, it's like someone drowning in a lake and you're walking by and you can do something. Are you obligated to do something?

It's pure instinct. You just step in and you do it. And so, yes, living out the ramifications of that decision has been challenging. I think it's made us grow as people, but I mean, ultimately, what we've ended the Board of Inquiry, if handed it, like if we were asked, would we do this over again? Absolutely, we have no regrets.

And to add a positive note, because in conversation you've talked about, is there anything good in our government? And what I like to counter to that is, yes, there's some really good people at the grassroots level, and we need people volunteering and filling these leadership roles in our government

at such a time as this. And so I'd encourage folks who've been waffling about joining the military, join. You know, be the difference in the military and make it great. We have an opportunity now, we've been kind of unshackled for some of these like non-essential things that have kept us

from being the most efficient war fighting, war winning machine that we can be. And honestly morale is higher than it's been in a long time. Like me, I'm like perking up. I'm probably a terminal major at this point, but I'm like, I'm sticking around, I want to see this. I want to be an action officer on some of these initiatives.

And we have met people at every level of government that have gone out of their way when they didn't have to, to help. Like once you're armed with facts, they've been just warriors for right. And so I would say there's hope. I would say that there is a lot of people out there doing the right thing. Even like the fact that we're here, like after what's been said about us and like all the allegations that you would honor us for the opportunity to speak directly

to the American people and tell the truth,, that's a pretty big miracle for us. You know what I mean? Like, that's something remarkable. And I don't mean that lightly with those K-bars. Like, those are symbolic for us because I really do honor that opportunity. So thank you for having us on here. Thank you for letting us talk directly to people.

And I truly believe that when the truth gets out, that's what's going to win the day. And that's our hope and our prayer. You're welcome. Thank you. Thank you for coming. And I think a lot of people are going to see this. So I wish you guys the best of luck.

And God bless what you're doing, man. Thank you. And, you know, can I thank a couple people really quick? Yeah, absolutely. To the Task Force Medical Afghanistan commander, thank you, sir, for setting the example. I named my son after you for a reason. You are the model leader with compassion and empathy that I hope my son's you for a reason. You are the model leader with compassion and empathy that I hope my son's to be one day.

To the platoon sergeant, all the rangers that sacrificed on that objective, I know that they gave away Afghanistan in a way that I wasn't particularly proud of and didn't feel like it honored our sacrifices over there, but you made a difference with a real little girl that I'll forever be grateful for. We have the privilege of watching her experience,

experiences and freedoms and growing and have a life that she would not have except for your decisions on objective. And I know it was one night and it was, of course we'd do that, but honoring the instinct is important, I think. And I hope you get the recognition you deserve and get recognized for that. I honestly think that that should be at the White House.

Who else should I thank? For everyone who's prayed or given, helped our family along the way. Thank you for that. My brother, Richard, my attorney, Hannah Wright, like all my team at McQuire Woods, that's a law firm that's helped us pro bono, and they provided like hundreds of thousands of dollars of legal services.

We would be drowning if it wasn't for them. Couldn't afford this, because they price you out of the market with some of these big firms how they attack you. So thank you for making a difference. Is there anybody I'm missing? Senator Cruz's staff. Oh, yeah.

Like Senator Cruz and his staff, like you all have, you literally saved her life because you delayed her being turned over to what turns out to be, you know, non-relative terrorist-affiliated people. Like, literally, that was the fight. And the State Department absolutely misled you. And I know that you all would have kept fighting if you had been armed with the facts that we know now.

But you delayed her getting dumped in an orphanage and now been in a black hole, and she'd be dead. And I truly believe those advocacy efforts saved her life, and it delayed her getting turned over to her. She was more stable and older. And so she was able to survive that ordeal. And thank God she survived the war and she survived neglect and she survived abuse. Like we're so thankful. And her life saved so many other people that I absolutely see the providential hand of God in her life. Because if she hadn't gotten dumped like that,

and they made it for evil, but it was used for good in the end. And there's real people alive today that would be living under the Taliban, but for her life. So, I mean, I've got to be thankful. It makes me grateful, and it makes me humbled to have been a part of this. And we're going to keep fighting. We are fighting forward.

You better be willing to put it all on the line if you're going to attack us. Well, then God is on your side. So, I'll be praying for you guys too. We appreciate it. God bless. Thanks. Thank you. ["The Last Supper"]

Mic Drop, hosted by former Navy SEAL Mike Ridland. It's raw. Any single time that you left the wire, you could lose four guys. It's unfiltered. That was the most horrible screaming I'd ever heard. Taking a hit on the chin, you want to pay it back? It's tough talk from the top minds in their field. Would I choose to not do our duty as military fighting men? No, I would not make that decision without question. Mike Drop. Follow and listen on

your favorite platform.