Sixteenth Minute (of Fame) - chocolate rain: a political awakening

Episode Date: April 17, 2025

In part two of our Tay Zonday series, Adam Bahner gets into his political awakening, and how it affected his relationship to his family, his creative work, and himself. Wanna get radicalized? Wanna get radicalized AGAIN? This is the episode for you. Follow Tay Zonday here: https://www.instagram.com/tayzonday/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This is an I-Heart podcast. It's Black Business Month, and Black Tech Green Money is tapping in. I'm Will Lucas spotlighting black founders, investors, and innovators, building the future, one idea at a time. Let's talk legacy, tech, and generational wealth. I had the skill and I had the talent. I didn't have the opportunity. Yeah.

We all know, right? Genius is evenly distributed. Opportunity is not. To hear this and more on the power of Black Innovations. to ownership, listen to Black Tech Green Money from the Black Effect Podcast Network on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Hey, I'm Kurt Brown-Oller. And I am Scotty Landis, and we host Bananas, the podcast where we share the weirdest, funniest, real news stories from all around the world. And sometimes from our guest's personal lives, too. Like when Whitney Cummings recently revealed, her origin story on the show. There's no way I don't already have rabies.

This is probably just why my personality is like this. I've been surviving. for the past 20 years. New episodes of bananas drop every Tuesday in the exactly right network. Listen to bananas on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to Pretty Private with Ebeney, the podcast where silence is broken and stories are set free. I'm Ebeney, and every Tuesday I'll be sharing all new anonymous stories that would challenge your perceptions and give you new insight on the people around you.

Every Tuesday, make sure you listen to Pretty Private from the Black Effect Podcast Network. Tune in on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. If you're looking for another heavy podcast about trauma, the saying it, this is for the ones who had to survive and still show up as brilliant, loud, soft, and whole. The unwanted sorority is where black women, femmes, and gender expansive survivors of sexual violence rewrite the rules on healing, support, and support, and what happens after. And I'm your host and co-president of this organization, Dr. Leitra Tate. Listen to the unwanted sorority, new episodes every Thursday on the IHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Cool Zone Media. Make me a start

Let's take it too far Then give me one moment Let's see you at a minute Six minutes of fame Sixteen minute of fame Sixteen minute of faith One more minute of fame Welcome back when you sit me over and know

and what other characters who are you so good I am. Welcome back to 16th Minute, the podcast where we talk to the main characters of the internet, see how their moment in the spotlight affected them, and what that says about us and the internet. And today, we're continuing our series with the one and only,

Hay-Zan Day of Chocolate Rain fame. And if you've been living happily in the, Wi-Fi signal as Woods up until yesterday, maybe you're unfamiliar with Tay and his most famous work, which has been going viral every year or so since 2000 goddamn 7. But you might not know the deep anti-racist roots of that same song, something that was pretty obscured for the first decade or so of Chocolate Rain's history. And for all that, and for Tay Zonday, aka Adam Bonner's origin story, as a young autistic mixed-race guy who started posting on YouTube and unwittingly became an online superstar

just shy of the U.S. recession and in conjunction of then-Senator Barack Obama becoming a national star. For a full look at what Tay's rise to fame looked like in the moment, head back to the first episode of this series, where we cover it in detail, and Tay himself gives us some insight into his early life. But today, for this minisode, I'm going to hand the mic off to the incomparable Tay Zonday, to tell you about his political education specifically. Maybe this sounds a little weird, but go with me here. When we left off in our first episode, Tay had just begun to be educated on the consequences

American systemic racism had well into the present, something his mixed-race family hadn't talked to him about as a kid as he grew up in the 80s and 90s. And when he told his white dad about beginning to learn this with some excitement and enthusiasm, his dad began to cry. I guess I'll just add here that this material, while the kind of conversations that I'm really into, are not necessarily canon to the Tay's on Day story, and it might not be for everybody. However, I was really touched at how Open Tay was with sharing how he reached both the place he was in his political consciousness

and how that formed chocolate rain and how he's grown since. So if you're into that sort of thing, I think he'll really like this episode. If you just want to hear the rest of his story in terms of his linear viral experience, definitely tune in to our concluding part on Tuesday. The following episode is the process that Tay went through to try to get to the root of his father's behavior. And they're still close to this day, but getting to a satisfying conclusion required that TAY go through a thorough history of activism and academia that he was largely unfamiliar with. And that's where we're picking up today.

So if you're in the mood to be radicalized or re-radicalized, gather round. Here's Tays on Day. I'm going to unpack this for almost 30 minutes, but it is a journey that should have familiar scenery for a lot of people. I'll crudely define critical race theory is the idea that historical racial injustice. manifest as present-day racial oppression, even if people in the present day are not deliberately or consciously being racist. I'll crudely define sociological marginalization theory as the idea that race, class, gender, physical ability, religion, all of these are axes of oppression that have favored and less favored groups. So critical race theory would argue that

white supremacy creates unacceptable injustice in a person's life the moment they are conceived. So it says a baby born will die before the sin. Sorry, that was low-hanging fruit. Sociological marginalization theory would argue that if you're white, male, Christian, able-bodied, heterosexual property class, you are conferred in society that you would not be conferred if the playing field was level. Critical race theory and sociological marginalization theory are both what would be called structuralist theories. So what does structuralism mean of which these structuralism mean? structuralist theories are apart. I'll crudely define structuralism as the idea that your theory of how

the world operates in terms of power or knowledge also determines the motivations, morals, and identities of groups of human beings. Famous structuralists include Charles Darwin, the evolution guy, Karl Marx, the communism guy, Milton Friedman, another economist, Betty Friedan, and a lot of second way feminist epistemology. There are many critiques in schools of thought that point out the shortcomings of structuralism, and we call those post-structuralist. We're not done with theory, but real quick, let's check back on this moment with my father where 21-year-old me just excitedly repeated structuralist terminology that Bell Hooks uses white supremacist capital's patriarchy, and my father started to cry. A post-structuralist like Derrida might say that my father was crying and thinking

not me and receiving my structural observation as a very personal accusation because my father believed in the goodness of his heart and the sacredness with which he had lived his life that the structuralist term, white supremacist capitalist patriarchy, did not apply to him and that he had lived his life differently. Or in the post-structuralist critique of Derrida, my father believed that he had repeated the structure differently. A common criticism that post-structuralism has of structuralism is that structuralism confiscates choice from individuals in order to render people as dominoes.

And it's almost like just the words of Bell Hooks without any other context, white supremacist capitalist patriarchy, made my father feel like a domino that I had suddenly started to render in a certain way. And some people are listening to this and thinking, yeah, but Bell Hooks was not making a personal accusation

against your father in using structuralist terminology. And many of you thinking that way will also say, well, the truth is just the truth, and we've got to be able to speak about the truth. And if that's traumatic for some people, then that's work they have to do. That's not on the person speaking the truth. What's interesting is that almost every person I encounter who advances that perspective. And I point four fingers back at me because it's a perspective I have held many waking days in my own life. As soon as I turn the tables and start listing the myriad ways, their life has been enabled by plunder, genocide, oligarchy, etc. They react much as my father did. It's hurtful and makes them defensive. If I point out,

hey, yeah, that iPhone, that you posted all that fire and brimstone ad hominem humanist outrage with online probably contains minerals mined by child slaves in the Democratic Republic of Congo and was probably manufactured under very questionable human rights conditions in Asia. And those things were both partly enabled by technocratic currency manipulation that eugenically devalues African-born and Asian-born bodies relative to your body, using the exact currency that you pay your car note with and bought your lunch with. Nobody likes to be called up like that. Even if the accusations are true, they like to think of themselves as Derrida thinks of the individual. They like to believe they are the exception to the rule.

They are repeating the structure differently, and it does not apply to them. So before anybody is too hard on my father, really think about yourself, because especially if your life is derived from Western civilization, you have never experienced nor acted upon anything from your cradle to your grave that is morally sacrosanct in a structuralist interrogation of power and plunder. And in my experience, when policy discussion gets reduced to personal absolution Olympics, that's almost always mutual assured destruction, which, as I'll get into it a little bit, is kind of the point of today's social media. By the way, I love bell hooks and I love my iPhone, but I can love them and still acknowledge reality. I can love them and still powerfully win policy arguments and powerfully lead a revolution with no invocation of my personal, more. Absolution. We're still unpacking this moment with my father. I told you would be here a while, put another marshmallow on the fire. I don't think my father's sadness and hurt in this moment was simply him believing Bell Hooks had taught me to accuse him of white supremacist capitalist patriarchy. But also he desired for me to feel as though I lived freely in a world where I did not have to be constrained by racial ideas. identity. I think another part of that tearful reaction was part of his realization that I'm not living in that world, that these things are very, very salient concerns for me. And that the post-racial

utopia family life that emerged from his and my mother's dreams did not extend beyond our household. And that I had somehow, almost like Eve bit the apple, I had become corrupted by, Oh, wait, there's this whole other world out here, and ice is now adult son and just like I'm exiting the Matrix and realizing, wait, I feel wet, I feel cold. Nobody told me about these things. I don't feel placated anymore. And so that's how I wrote chocolate rain to find a way to talk about race that didn't make my father cry. No, we're getting way ahead in the story, but recording this is the first time I ever made that connection. silence is broken and stories are set free. I'm Ebeney and every Tuesday I'll be sharing all new anonymous stories that would challenge your perceptions and give you new insight on the people around you. On Pretty Private, we'll explore the untold experiences of women of color who faced it all, childhood trauma, addiction, abuse, incarceration, grief, mental health struggles, and more,

and found the shrimp to make it to the other side. My dad was shot and killed in his house. Yes, he was a drug dealer. Yes, he was a confidential informant, but he wasn't shot on a street corner. He wasn't shot in the middle of a drug deal. He was shot in his house, unarmed. Pretty Private isn't just a podcast. It's your personal guide for turning storylines into lifelines.

Every Tuesday, make sure you listen to Pretty Private from the Black Effect Podcast Network. Tune in on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. What would you do if one bad decision forced you to choose between a maximum security prison or the most brutal boot camp designed to be hell on earth? Unfortunately for Mark Lombardo, this was the choice he faced. He said, you are a number, a New York state number, and we own you. Shock incarceration, also known as boot camps, are short-term, highly regimented correctional

programs that mimic military basic training. These programs aimed to provide a shock of prison life, emphasizing strict discipline, physical training, hard labor, and rehabilitation programs. Mark had one chance to complete this program and had no idea of the hell awaiting him the next six months. The first night was so overwhelming, and you don't know who's next to you. And we didn't know what to expect in the morning. Nobody tells you anything. Listen to shock incarceration on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.

Sometimes it's hard to remember, but... Going through something like that is a traumatic experience, but it's also not the end of their life. That was my dad, reminding me and so many others who need to hear it, that our trauma is not our shame to carry, and that we have big, bold, and beautiful lives to live after what happened to us. I'm your host and co-president of this organization, Dr. Leitra Tate. On my new podcast, The Unwanted Sorority, we weighed through transformation to peel back healing

and reveal what it actually looks like, and sounds like, in real time. Each week, I sit down with people who live through harm, carried silence, and are now reshaping the systems that failed us. We're going to talk about the adultification of black girls, mothering as resistance, and the tools we use for healing. The unwanted sorority is a safe space, not a quiet space, so let's walk in. We're moving towards liberation together. Listen to the unwanted sorority, new episodes every Thursday, on the IHeartRadio app,

Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. Our IHeart Radio Music Festival, presented by Capital One, is coming back to Las Vegas. September 19th and 20th. On your feet. Streaming live only on Hulu. Ladies and gentlemen. Brian Adams. Ed Sheeran.

Fade. Chlorillaurella. Shelley Roll. John Fogarty. Lil Wayne. L.L. Coulche. Mariah Carey. Maroon 5.

Sammy Hagar. Tate McCray. The offspring. Tim McRaw. Tickets are on sale now at A. AXS.com. Get your tickets today. AXS.com. I will say, and this is the mead of why I did that theoretical breakdown that we'll get back to. Revolutionary and resistance dialogue has become a little bit too enamored with structuralist language in 2025.

We're kind of in love with structuralism being the path. to revolution. I have at times been guilty of that, and part of the reason for that is just social media is very, very structuralist in how it organizes our public discourse. You could even go so far as to say that chocolate rain was a post-structuralist piece of content on a post-structuralist Wild Wild West internet. So you had this perfect alignment of stars. Today, the internet is much more regimented. In 2007, you did not have algorithmic feeds monitoring, spying on thousands of pieces of user telemetry to try to predict what would keep the user on the platform as long as possible. YouTube was actually curated by human editors at that time. So, yeah, there's this whole

viral video era from around what I'd say, Diet Coke and Mentos in 2006, all the way through maybe Gongum style in 2011, where these massively viral videos were possible on a post. structuralist internet where eventually companies like Google and Facebook learned they would make more money by imposing more structure. And that's where we get recommendation engines and feeds and these ads and platforms that spy on all of our behavior to try to predict what will addict us. And so a phenomenon like chocolate rain that had vague and flexible meaning that could be widely appropriated, that's not allowed on today's internet. That's profane. Ads can't predict human behavior in that type of eco. system. Today's internet needs content to be what capitalists would call a fixed asset. That also means it must have a fixed meaning and a fixed audience response. The viral video era in which Chocolate Rain went viral was completely different. It was all about reframing, reappropriating, lampooning meaning the top content creators like Venetian princess or barely political on YouTube, they would parody the music videos of gigantic artists like Lady Gaga or Justin Bieber,

and their parodies would get tens of millions, in some cases hundreds of millions of views. And if young people today take away one thing about how the Internet used to be and how it is different than what we have today, it's that it used to be possible to completely reframe the meaning of a mainstream content asset and have your reframe reach a gigantic audience. Not a pre-vetted and partisan audience whose confirmation biases are just validated by the way that you reframe a piece of content. No, you could reach an undecided, undifferentiated majority completely outside of your thought bubble or thought ecosystem with the content you uploaded in the past organically. And this all circles back to my earlier statement that, revolutionary discourse, and you could maybe sometimes call it leftism, bread tube,

it could go by many names, has fallen a bit too much in love with structuralism. Because passionate young activists have grown up in this fake oligarchic information regime, where it is impossible for layered meaning, symbolic meaning, metaphorical meaning, liminal meaning to access undecided eyeballs and grow an audience, they'll sometimes attack positions that introduce complexity as though that complexity is motivated by malice and a rejection of their throughline narrative that they want to reach an audience with. The problem when a passionate revolutionary responds that way is that it is conflating the algorithms act of speech with the individual's active speech.

The late great Michael Brooks was right. We must be ruthless to systems and kind to individuals. Audrey Lord was right. The master's tools will not dismantle the master's house. World history is filled with endless revolutionary actors who introduced complexity. Dadaism introduced complexity as it lampooned and critiqued fascism using the optics that fascism put forth itself. Young people will watch chocolate rain today and be like, I can't believe that people missed what the meaning of this was in 2007. And I'm like, oh, okay, yeah, it's because we operated in an information ecosystem that did not corral us into self-destructive literalism.

Everybody was accustomed to regularly encountering online content that had not been, free-sorted to validate their most vulnerable biases and go to them into a codependent, voracious consumption experience around time-sucking content related to each bias. Some people will ask, well, why didn't you speak out more clearly at that time that you had this vision of Chocolate Rain being a ballot about institutional racism? And it's partly, not entirely, but partly because I knew it could be a Trojan horse. And I knew that people making comedic parodies and saying, oh gosh, it's a fun, silly song that I sing to my kid at bed.

time was part of the penetration phase for that Trojan horse, and it was not time for the soldiers to jump out. And by the way, because we live in extremely estranged and balkanized times now, that Trojan horse approach is one of the only ways to raise the political consciousness of somebody who is a good person, but who is not personally nor spiritually prepared to understand your worldview. The fact that social algorithms banning metaphor and nuance also serves to ban that slow-crawl Trojan horsing, which is literally the anthropological process by which new coalitions and new societies and new cultural meetings evolve, means that today's private sector, search, and social network oligarchies are injurious to

humanity in how they operate. So if you are young and your entire life has been lived with this boot on your neck, this boot of engagement optimized. algorithmic information feeds driven by search engine optimization, metadata, and telemetry, you face an extra challenge in pursuing intellectual and creative liberation. As Ralph Ellison puts it, live in New York, but don't let New York live in you. As Henry Lewis Gates Jr. writes about sophisticated African literary criticism through the signifying monkey and the Yoruba trickster, signification is the performance of metaphor and lampooning established meaning and established power, the same way Noam Chomsky talks about how human

beings themselves are wired for generative grammar and creating a structure whose meaning is not beholden to itself. And we'll be back soon with more from Taysan Day. Welcome to Pretty Private with Ebenei. The podcast where Silence is broken and stories are set free. I'm Ebeney and every Tuesday I'll be sharing all new anonymous stories that would challenge your perceptions and give you new insight

on the people around you. On Pretty Private, we'll explore the untold experiences of women of color who faced it all. Childhood trauma, addiction, abuse, incarceration, grief, mental health struggles, and more and found the shrimp to make it to the other side.

My dad was shot and killed in his house. Yes, he was a drug dealer. Yes, he was a confidential informant, but he wasn't shot on a street corner. He wasn't shot in the middle of a drug deal. He was shot in his house, unarmed. Pretty Private isn't just a podcast. It's your personal guide for turning storylines into lifelines. Every Tuesday, make sure you listen to Pretty Private from the Black Effect Podcast Network.

Tune in on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever. you listen to your favorite shows. What would you do if one bad decision forced you to choose between a maximum security prison or the most brutal boot camp designed to be hell on earth? Unfortunately for Mark Lombardo, this was the choice he faced. He said, you are a number, a New York state number, and we own you. Shock incarceration, also known as boot camps, are short-term, highly regimented correctional programs that mimic military basic training.

These programs aim to provide a shock of prison life, emphasizing strict discipline, physical training, hard labor, and rehabilitation programs. Mark had one chance to complete this program and had no idea of the hell awaiting him the next six months. The first night was so overwhelming and you don't know who's next to you. And we didn't know what to expect in the morning. Nobody tells you anything. Listen to shock incarceration on the eye.

Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Sometimes it's hard to remember, but... Going through something like that is a traumatic experience, but it's also not the end of their life. That was my dad, reminding me and so many others who need to hear it, that our trauma is not our shame to carry, and that we have big, bold, and beautiful lives to live after what happened to us. I'm your host and co-president of this organization, Dr. Leitra Tate.

On my new podcast, The Unwanted Sorority, we weighed through transformation to peel back healing and reveal what it actually looks like, and sounds like in real time. Each week, I sit down with people who live through harm, carried silence, and are now reshaping the systems that failed us. We're going to talk about the adultification of black girls, mothering as resistance, and the tools we use for healing. The Unwanted Sorority is a safe space, not a quiet space, so let's walk in. We're moving towards liberation together. Listen to the unwanted sorority, new episodes every Thursday on the IHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. A foot washed up a shoe with some bones in it. They had no idea who it was. Most everything was burned up pretty good from the fire that not a whole lot was salvageable.

These are the coldest of cold cases, but everything is about to change. Every case that is a cold case that has DNA. Right now in a backlog will be. identified in our lifetime. A small lab in Texas is cracking the code on DNA. Using new scientific tools, they're finding clues in evidence so tiny you might just miss it.

He never thought he was going to get caught and I just looked at my computer screen. I was just like, ah, gotcha. On America's Crime Lab we'll learn about victims and survivors and you'll meet the team behind the scenes at Othrum, the Houston lab that takes on the most hopeless cases

to finally solve the unsolved. Listen to America's Crime Lab on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. weeks ago. Really impressive stuff, you guys. And here's more political theory from Tays on Day. You're just like that song. The Revolution will not be televised. Well, today's Revolution will not be hashtagged. It will not be trending. At least not uncentralized, for-profit, engagement, optimized search and social media. And let's pause a little bit. Let's back off because I just made a bold claim. I said the Revolution is impossible using today's privatized, centralized, oligarchic search and social media.

The easiest counterpoint to that assertion is, what about Occupy Wall Street, what about Black Lives Matter, what about me too? Those are fantastic counterpoints, and I want to go on a bit of a detour, and we are already in a detour, so it's kind of a detour inside of the detour, but this topic of movement's meanings and the structure of algorithmic social media sort of being like a goalie, who intercepts every scoring kick in the effort to start revolution, it's worth exploring with real-world examples. It's important to acknowledge that people have lived many different

and oftentimes heroic stories, and that one perspective does not seek to steal valor nor confiscate well-deserved praise for many different life arcs. I have to put that asterisk out there now before I even suggest that things might have an additional layer of meaning, because internet algorithms mutilate any assertion that is part of an interrogative and misrepresent curiosity and exploration and dialectic as declarative and gospel in order to gaslight and agitate. By the way, a lot of y'all talk about representation as a social justice concept, and rightly so. But I'll just put out there as an aside that syntactic misrepresentation might be the most consequential type of misrepresentation,

determining your future. Because Santactic misrepresentation by Internet algorithms acting on textual metadata is so insidious, and the only way you can inoculate yourself against it is to be so educated that you can argue every position you agree with and disagree with better than its most passionate and educated and devoted acolyte. You've got to intellectually be like Yoda from Star Wars. That's the part of attack of the clones that you missed if you didn't read the novel is that Duke who had studied the dark side for 10 years, and Yoda's like, surprise, motherfucker, I know the dark side better than you do. So say hypothetically, you disagree with a libertarian, you disagree with a neoliberal, you better know the dark side better. So when they throw

Hegel and John Locke and Adam Smith and John Stuart Mill and Iron Rand and Milton Friedman and other astrology in your face, you can say, hey, I have that whole collection of tarot cards. I didn't realize we were having a horoscope battle today, but you are going down. That's the aside. I'm like Olive Garden. Sometimes the sides fill you up more than the main course. So keeping our eye on the ball, I said the revolution will not be hashtagged, it will not be trending. A lot of these terms that trend on social media and become the names of movements are sort of euphemistic.

They are integrationist euphemisms to describe revolutionary causes. To me, integrationist means that justice will be achieved by augmenting, modeling established power, usually without changing its stakeholders. Revolutionary means we've got to reimagine established power in its stakeholders, which is often state power, the power of government. Martin Luther King Jr. is a revolutionary who got backpedaled and celebrated as an integrationist. He was condemned around the time of his death by a lot of persisting media brands that you've engaged with. They call them a traitor and a communist and a washed up relic for talking about oligarchy and militarism.

That's not what you learned in grade school. He learned that he had a dream and did the March on Washington where he dreamed of integrating consumerism and public access and then the curriculum ends until you go to college. That integrationist caricature of Martin Luther King Jr. has other lies that piggyback on it, like the only black revolutionary discourse during the civil rights movement was militants,

Black Panthers, sometimes the black nationalists. I call attention to that false binary because it gets carried forward into the overton window of acceptability of what is allowed to trend on social media. Just replaced Martin Luther King and the Black Panthers with the term Occupy Wall Street and the lyrics of Boots Riley, we've got the guillotine, you better run. I love Occupy Wall Street, I love Boots Riley, but in between them are we questioning meritocracy, are we questioning perpetual growth, are we questioning corporate personhood,

are we questioning fractional reserve banking? And I'm not discounting that Acolytes are, but I'm talking about what trends widely. And many will point out that those more specific critiques and concerns that are kind of implied by Occupy Wall Street are not themselves trending more widely because is there more niche? I would say thank you. That's exactly my point. Do you think Chris Crocker, screaming leave Brittany alone, was not niche when it trended in the summer of 2007? The knowledge ecosystem in which Chalkler Rain trended was one in which niche content and niche concepts were allowed to reach a large, undifferentiated audience. But more than that, Occupy Wall

Street is also quite literal. Its politics are not hidden. It's the syntactic pineapples on pizza, you know it when you see it and you love it or you hate it. Metaphor and having soldiers to jump out of your conceptual Trojan horse once it penetrates, that requires figurative and widely discordant meaning, which is the antithesis of literal meaning. So in summary between the literal and broad trend of Occupy Wall Street and the militant revolutionary literalism of Boots Riley, there is niche and figurative meaning that is not as able to trend on Albuy,

rhythmic social media. Black Lives Matter is a wonderful example of literal meaning as well as important heroic historic accomplishments in public education, policy implementation, and policy discourse. Now, zooming out, speaking about race is always this sort of awkward cohabitation because you are speaking about socioeconomic reality that correlates with biological fiction. I especially think that Black Lives Matter makes a great juxtaposition with Chocolate Rain because they exist on opposite sides of this divide where algorithmic social media took over the world. Chocolate Rain could not have thrived in the social media ecosystem six years later and Black Lives Matter could not have thrived in the social media ecosystem six years before.

Both Chocolate Rain and Black Lives Matter are sort of torchbearing of a very very established discourse and even disagreement about black identity and black activism. I mentioned Ralph Ellison earlier, and I think that conceptualizing chocolate rain as a Trojan horse, as something that was not averse to reframing and appropriation as it spread its message, is very in line with an Ellisonian perspective on racial identity. This perspective is captured in Ralph Ellison's best-known novel, visible man, and we'll come back to that in a minute. In contrast to Chuck Lorraine and Ralph Ellison, Black Lives Matter makes me think of Richard Wright's native son, another legendary, essential

work of American literature. One way that a Black Life matters to Richard Wright, through his protagonist, Bigger Thomas, is to tell a racist society, you need to see a rational actor who is responding intelligently and logically within that which you pathologize, because that is the only way to complete the consciousness journey of seeing yourselves. Richard Wright might even say that pathology satirizes the pathologizer. The way a black life matters to Ralph Ellison is very different because he believes being black gives you one side of an important Hegelian dialectic that exposes the world to you through juxtaposition. Crudely put, a dialectic is arriving at truth through an argument between opposites. The outsiderness of blackness being

the opposite of presumption gets deployed by Ellison as a de Tocqueville-like ethnographic superpower. Ralph Ellison would say that all of these identities that people ascribe to themselves, racial identity, political identity, they're all like imaginary friends. And all of you people who reduce your identity to a monolithic dogma are like children sucking on different flavors of pacifier, and it is intellectually exhausting to be around you. And the only liberation for an enlightened individual is to understand that the human species is like an ongoing aluminum fire between structuralist identities held by passionate, dogmatic, and misinformed individuals.

You can't put out an aluminum fire. All you can do is stay far enough away and maybe get a long pole to make some smorg. Now here's the takeaway. The other thing I'll notice that regardless of what one believes on any topic, they are always going to be able to find individual cases, individual stories that bolster their position and discredit the opposition. That's the case with all three of these. Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter, Me Too, everybody can build or find a feed that Cherry picks truthful content that confirms their biases regardless of proportion. One reason it is so important that revolutionary messaging, that critiques power is not gate-kept from reaching a wide audience,

is that the more characters you put in the story of a critique, for example, everybody, the harder facts are to discredit. Okay, I'm done. That's the button, the theoretical button, on the interaction I had with my father at age 21, and my answer to the question of why did the language of Bell Hook's white supremacist capitalist patriarchy make my father cry in that moment? I think that groundwork helps contextualize a lot of the rest of the story.

Holy moly, I'm looking back. That's like 29 minutes of groundwork for when I was 12 minutes into this. This is why I cannot make friends, because that's exactly who I am on dating apps, and if you get to know me, I am the 4,000-word message, like, I just had a thought or two with citations. They should add that to the matchmaking criteria at sperm banks.

No, he's not six feet tall. No, he's not a millionaire. Yeah, he sends really long text messages that are widely cited, and he does it at the least appropriate times, like during the middle of movies and at birthday parties. I should totally put that in my hinge bio. Now, my biggest problem with the dating apps is that questioning is not a category, asexually romantic is not a category,

and it kind of goes along with being questioning. I've been publicly questioning for all of my public life, and I've had a partner or two, though not really any lasting relationships. I used to think that having a high partner count was somehow this clarifying thing, but I know people who are in the hundreds from all over the human and situational buffet, and they still have no clue what they're into. I'm definitely sapiensexual.

I'm attracted to intellect. Although I'm also not like a lot of career intellectuals. You know that term interdisciplinary? I'm inter-unddisciplinary. I'm supposed to be getting back to the story of my career, aren't I? You can tell when my ADHD medication does like, fuck that fool, we left the bloodstream. He's on his own.

Thank you so much again to Tayzan Day, whose social media you can find in the description, and now that you're fully dialed in. Now that you're well aware, that in the context of Tay, or Adam Bonner's life, that Chocolate Rain was but a chapter in his larger political education. Next week, he's going to share his story up until today. And if you're a person on the internet, which face it, you are,

you too could unwittingly become a main character, and Tay's insight and wisdom on the topic 20 years on is well worth hearing. That's next week on 16th minute. 16th Minute is a production of Cool Zone Media and I Hard Radio. It is written, hosted, and produced by me, Jamie Loftus. Our executive producers are Sophie Lichten and Robert Evans. The Amazing Ian Johnson is our supervising producer and our editor. Our theme song is by Sad 13.

Voice acting is from Grant Crater. And pet shoutouts to our dog producer Anderson, my cats flea and Casper, and my pet rock bird who will outlive us all. Bye It's Black Business Month And Black Tech Green Money is tapping in I'm Will Lucas spotlighting black founders, investors, and innovators Building the future, one idea at a time

Let's talk legacy, tech, and generational wealth I had the skill and I had the talent I didn't have the opportunity Yeah We all know, right? Genius is evenly distributed, opportunity is not. To hear this and more on the power of Black and and ownership, listen to Black Tech Green Money from the Black Effect Podcast Network on the

iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, I'm Kurt Brown-Oller. And I am Scotty Landis, and we host Bananas, the podcast where we share the weirdest, funniest, real news stories from all around the world. And sometimes from our guest's personal lives, too. Like when Whitney Cummings recently revealed, her origin story on the show.

There's no way I don't already have rabies. This is probably just why my personality is like this. I've been surviving. rabies for the past 20 years. New episodes of bananas drop every Tuesday in the exactly right network. Listen to bananas on the iHeart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to Pretty Private with Ebeney, the podcast where silence is broken and stories are set free. I'm Ebeney and every Tuesday I'll be sharing all new anonymous stories that would challenge your perceptions and give you new insight on the people around you.

Every Tuesday, make sure you listen to Pretty Private from the Black Effect Podcast Network. Tune in on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. It's Black Business Month, and Money and Wealth Podcast with John Hope Bryant is tapping in. I'm breaking down how to build wealth, create opportunities, and move from surviving to thriving. It's time to talk about ownership, equity, and everything in between. Black and brown communities have historically been last in life. Let me just say this. AI is moving faster than civil rights legislation ever did.

Listen to Money and Wealth from the Black Effect Podcast Network on IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast. This is an IHeart podcast.