Something You Should Know - The Purpose and Benefits of Gossip & The Cure for Busyness
Episode Date: August 19, 2021Do you hold hands with your mate? If you don’t, you probably should. This episode begins with a brief discussion on the benefits of holding hands - and I bet you haven’t heard them before. https:/.../www.nytimes.com/2006/10/05/fashion/05hands.html Who doesn’t like a bit of juicy gossip? The fact is everyone gossips and it turns out to be a good thing. Gossip serves a lot of useful functions in our personal and professional lives. Frank McAndrew is one of the leading researchers on gossip and he joins me to explain how gossip works, why some of it is nasty but most of it isn’t - and how to gossip well. Frank is Professor of Psychology at Knox College in Illinois (https://www.frankmcandrew.com/) If you have a busy day, you probably jump from one thing to the next with barely space to breathe. If you do, you could be missing a great opportunity according to Juliet Funt founder and CEO of The Juliet Funt Group (https://www.julietfunt.com/) who advises Fortune 500 companies. Listen as Juliet explains the importance of creating “white space” in between all the things you do and why it is so beneficial. Juliet is author of the book A Minute to Think (https://amzn.to/3mmsXIv). Ever been rejected by someone you loved? It hurts a lot. Why? Listen as we reveal some interesting brain research that explains why romantic rejection can be so devastating and what to do about it if it happens to you. Helen Fisher author of the book Why We Love (https://amzn.to/3g7Ctel) explains. PLEASE SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS! We really enjoy The Jordan Harbinger Show and we think you will as well! Check out https://jordanharbinger.com/start OR search for The Jordan Harbinger Show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you listen to podcasts. Go to https://Backcountry.com/SYSK and enter promo code SYSK to get FIFTEEN PERCENT OFF your first full-priced purchase. Some exclusions apply. Save time, money, and stress with Firstleaf – the wine club designed with you in mind! Join today and you’ll get 6 bottles of wine for $29.95 and free shipping! Just go to https://tryfirstleaf.com/SOMETHING T-Mobile for Business the leader in 5G, #1 in customer satisfaction, and a partner who includes benefits like 5G in every plan. So you get it all. Without trade-offs! Visit https://T-Mobile.com/business Discover matches all the cash back you earn on your credit card at the end of your first year automatically and is accepted at 99% of places in the U.S. that take credit cards! Learn more at https://discover.com/yes Visit https://www.remymartin.com/en-us/ to learn more about their exceptional spirits! https://www.geico.com Bundle your policies and save! It's Geico easy! Leaving a child in a hot vehicle can lead to their death very quickly. Set cellphone reminders or place something you’ll need in the back seat, so you don’t forget your child is in the car. Look before you lock. Paid for by NHTSA Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Bumble knows it's hard to start conversations.
Hey.
No, too basic.
Hi there.
Still no.
What about hello, handsome?
Who knew you could give yourself the ick?
That's why Bumble is changing how you start conversations.
You can now make the first move or not.
With opening moves, you simply choose a question to be automatically sent to your matches.
Then sit back and let your matches start the chat.
Download Bumble and try it for yourself.
Today on Something You Should Know,
if you don't hold hands with your mate, listen and discover why you probably should.
Then gossip.
Yes, it can be nasty, but gossip also serves us well.
We are, in fact, interested in gossip about other people of our same sex that are close to us in age.
We also found that we like dirt about powerful people and rivals, because this is the stuff that we can use to get ahead.
Then, romantic rejection. Why does it hurt so much? And if your workday
is so busy you don't have time to think between tasks, you may want to restructure your day.
How? By doing things like having permission to take a pause. When you pause to recuperate or
think or oxygenate what you're doing, everything that you're touching is amplified in its output.
All this today on Something You Should Know.
Mama, look at me.
I'm going really fast.
I just got my license.
Can I borrow the car, please, Mom?
Kids go from 0 to 18 in no time.
You'll be relieved they have 24-7 roadside assistance with intact insurance.
Mom, can we go to Nana's house
tomorrow? I want to go to Jack's place today.
I'll just take the car. Don't wait up, okay?
Kids go from 0 to 18 in no
time, don't they? At Intact Insurance,
we insure your car so you can enjoy
the ride. Visit Intact.ca or talk to your
broker. Conditions apply.
Something you
should know. Fascinating intel intel the world's top experts
and practical advice you can use in your life today something you should know with mike carothers
hi welcome to something you should know yeah i always like it when I see couples holding hands. It is really one of the few acceptable public displays of affection,
and couples who hold hands may be doing themselves a lot of good in the process.
Research shows that physical intimacy of any kind improves any relationship,
but it also turns out that people in stressful or threatening situations
remain calmer and cope better when they hold hands with their mate.
It also seems to have a beneficial effect on pain and can lower the level of stress hormones that can do damage to your immune system.
Even monkeys know the importance of hand-holding.
Monkeys have been observed holding hands in reconciliation after a fight.
And that is something you should know.
As you know, people gossip.
It's just kind of what people do.
And when you say the word gossip, it does seem to have kind of a negative connotation to it. Gossip is really
talking behind someone else's back. It's tacky. It's not the classy thing to do. And yet we all
gossip to some extent, and it may in fact be a positive thing that offers real benefits.
Frank McAndrew is one of the leading researchers on the topic of gossip, and he is a professor of psychology at Knox College in Illinois.
Hey, Frank, welcome to Something You Should Know.
Thanks, Mike. Happy to be here.
So maybe before we start talking about gossip, we should have like a working definition here. What is it?
Well, it is a word that gets misused a lot. And I'm always entertained by people who
claim that they never gossip. But people who are in the gossip business usually define it in the
following ways. First of all, it's talk about a person. And it has to be an individual that isn't
present at the moment. So if I'm talking to you, I can't really gossip to you about yourself. It wouldn't qualify as gossip.
Thirdly, it's usually information that we can make some kind of judgment about.
We can approve or disapprove of the information that we're talking about.
And finally, by definition, it's fun.
We can't resist it.
Nobody ever says, oh, I've got to go and gossip with my friends now. It's just inherently entertaining. And it does seem that if you get more than one person together,
meaning two or more, gossip will ensue. It seems that like it will almost always happen.
Well, absolutely. The thing that probably matters the most to most of us in our lives are other people. What are other people doing? What are the implications for me? What are these other people thinking or saying about me? So social talk is really the most entertaining and important talk. And some have argued that it's one of the reasons we have language in the first place, so that we can keep up with each other.
Well, when you describe it that way, that we're keeping up with people, it sounds very benign.
But when I think of gossip, there's a nastiness to it.
There's a negative connotation to it that isn't just keeping up with other people.
It's talking about people behind their back, usually not in a very nice way.
Is that fair? Oh, it's very fair. Whenever I talk to people who find out that I'm a gossip researcher
and that they hear that I sometimes say gossip isn't all bad, I get these frowns. And the problem
is I think people define gossip in a very narrow way. They only think of it as negative talk. And
interestingly, they often define it as something that other people do. If they're talking about
somebody, they're expressing concern, you know, Mary, oh, bless her heart, or they're sharing
important information. They don't think of it as gossip. But in fact, most gossip is actually
pretty benign. It serves a very valuable social function.
For example, one of the things that makes you a good citizen is that we know that other people
are monitoring what we're doing and that they're talking to other people about it. So if you're at
work and you're tempted to sort of slack off and let other people pick up your share of the load,
one of the things that makes you be a good citizen is the fear of having your reputation sullied. So in some ways, it's a way
of keeping people in line. And it also creates a bond of trust. If I share some sensitive information
with you, what I'm saying to you is, I trust you with this. I do not think you're going to use this
information in a way that's going to come back to hurt me. And that creates a bond between us. So there are a lot of positive
functions of gossip. And if we're talking about information that's positive, if you and I are
discussing our coworker, Joe, and we're wondering if he's going to get that promotion that just
opened up, that's not negative information about Joe, but we're gossiping. I think what people immediately
do is they go to that dark place where they think of gossip as just your making up information
that's negative for the sole purpose of stabbing somebody in the back so that you can get ahead.
And I'm not denying that gossip can be used that way, but that's not all that it is. Since you're a gossip researcher,
what do you research and what do you find? I mean, what is there new to know about gossip?
Being something of an evolutionary psychologist, when you see something that seems to be universal
and that people do everywhere, you think that you're on to something about human nature. So
if there was
something adaptive about gossip, we ought to be able to make some predictions about what kind of
information we like, what kinds of people we like to hear it about, who we would spread it to. So I
set up some very simple experiments where we basically asked people, we'd give them samples
of different gossip stories and ask them to rate which ones they'd want to read more about, which types of people they'd want to read them about, who they would tell them about. And
to make a long story short, as you might expect, we are in fact interested in gossip about other
people of our same sex that are close to us in age. We also found that we like dirt about powerful people and rivals, because this
is the stuff that we can use to get ahead. On the other hand, we like good information about
allies, friends, relatives, because that's stuff that we can use to get ahead. So we're drawn to
information that we see as being useful to us. And unfortunately that is often dirt.
Yeah. Well, it seems to me, it's interesting that you say that,
because a lot of gossip seems idle.
Like it's just gossip for gossip sake and, Ooh,
did you hear about Betty and, Oh, Bob did this.
And there's no real usefulness to it. It's just, who did you hear?
No, and there may not be any usefulness in the immediate situation. But by engaging in this on
a regular basis with people, you're sort of greasing the skids for other people to trust
you with information that might be more important and useful down the line. So what you're really
doing is setting up the channels and maintaining the relationships that keeps you in the network. And that's one of the reasons why
gossip is just inherently entertaining. It's fun to talk about Bill and Betty, even if you're just
kind of engaging in idle chit-chat, because you never know where that's going to lead next. It's
just a very engaging sort of thing. But isn't there gossip that is basically used as a weapon?
Absolutely. And a lot of damage is done by that. And the whole social media world that we live in
now with Facebook in particular and Twitter are ways of spreading gossip on a scale that we're
just completely unprepared to deal with. I'm talking about gossip so far as if, oh, it's this wonderful thing that keeps society humming. But there's no doubt about it. It can be used as a
weapon. And in fact, the stereotype has more than a grain of truth to it. Females are more likely
than males to use gossip as a weapon, to ostracize their rivals, to destroy their reputations.
It's not that women are nastier
people than men. This just happens to be their style of aggression. Males are much more likely
to come up and punch you in the face or engage in some sort of physical violence. But it's called
relational aggression. Women use this kind of tactic to deal with people that they want out of their social circle.
Is most gossip negative?
No, I think most gossip is positive.
And many studies that have been done on gossip in the last 20 years indicate that most of
the talk that people engage in that can be classified as gossip is harmless or even positive. There is certainly an element of
negativity and it can be used in a disruptive sort of way. But when I see offices or workplaces that
try to set up no gossip rules, I think you might as well ask people to stop breathing as to ask
them to stop gossiping. It's just so much part of who we are. It's kind of a showstopper when it comes to conversation. Right. Because sooner or later, almost, well,
almost any, but many conversations slip into gossip, or at least gossip becomes part of the
conversation. Absolutely, it does. It's hard to imagine a conversation that you're going to have for more than a minute or two where another person doesn't come into the topic as part of the story. And I guess where the meanness of gossip comes is when you talk about someone behind their back because they're not there, and then they hear about it.
And then that's what really causes the pain.
Yes, it does.
And one of the things I've done when I've written about gossip is to describe it as a social skill rather than a character flaw. It's not that it's good or bad necessarily to gossip, but it's bad
to be a bad gossip and it's to your advantage to be a good gossip. A good gossip is actually
usually a popular person. They have a reputation for knowing stuff, but sharing things very
discreetly. They can keep secrets when you need them to. And they're part of the network.
Bad gossips, there's two different types. One is the type who just instantly blabs any new
information that they've gotten indiscriminately. They don't care who's listening and who isn't.
They just come out with it and they can't keep a secret. And then the other kind of bad gossip is
the one that is using it as
a weapon, almost like a dagger that they're keeping hidden under a coat to bring out at a
moment's notice and do damage with it. So you want to establish your reputation as being a good gossip
rather than a bad gossip. And you don't want to get a reputation as the person who's holier than
thou who refuses to be part of the gossip network at work, for example.
Because if you go to work and just announce to people, I'm not going to be part of this,
what you're saying to them is, I don't trust you. I don't want to be part of your network.
And this isn't going to really win you very many friends in your workplace.
My guest is Frank McAndrew. He is a professor of psychology at Knox College in Illinois,
and we are talking about gossip.
This episode is brought to you by Melissa and Doug.
Wooden puzzles and building toys for problem solving
and arts and crafts for creative thinking.
Melissa and Doug makes toys that help kids take on the world
because the way they play today shapes who they become tomorrow.
Melissa and Doug, the play is pretend, the skills are real.
Look for Melissa and Doug wherever you shop for toys.
From the kitchen to the laundry room, your home deserves the best.
Give it the upgrade it deserves at Best Buy's Ultimate Appliance Event.
Save up to $1,000 on two or more major appliances.
Shop now, in-store, or online at BestBuy.ca.
Exclusions apply.
So, Frank, you said it's probably not a great idea to announce in an organization
that you have no interest in the gossip going on in that organization,
but there are some people who are not comfortable with gossip
and who seem to steer clear.
When they hear gossip, they leave.
They just don't want to get down in the dirt
because often it seems that it just does no good,
that no good will come from this, So I'm going to not participate.
That's right. And the key is to distinguish between doing that selectively when it is
negative, nasty, dirty stuff versus just extricating yourself whenever any kind of
lighthearted social conversation comes up. One of them is going to work in your favor. The other one is not.
When people talk about, oh, Betty did this thing, or she wore that thing, or Bob, you know,
had too many drinks and did this thing. I mean, it's, it's hurtful. I mean,
the only, what's the point of bringing it up other than, you know, you and I are going to bond over the fact that this guy's an
idiot? Well, certainly the person who's being talked about as an idiot is never going to think
it's good, but it can serve positive functions for some people. So imagine yourself getting a
new job. You're a young person right out of college. You're starting to work in an office.
There are a lot of things people don't tell you right off when you start a new job. How formally should you dress? Is it okay to
use the boss's first name when you're talking to him or her? When five o'clock comes around,
can you just leave or are you supposed to hang around a little bit longer? So by tuning into
the gossip network and hearing what's being said about people who
engage in behavior A or behavior B, the new person is getting socialized into the rules of the group.
They're learning how to be an employee there. So yes, if Joe's an idiot and we're talking about
what an idiot he is, maybe that's not really doing anything for you or I, and certainly not for Joe,
but it may be serving a positive social function for some of the people involved.
Often you hear when people hear that they are being gossiped about, they will say to the person,
if you have something to say about me, say it to my, have the guts to say it to my face.
Don't go around my back and gossip.
Is that a legitimate request?
Well, it depends upon what the information is.
But a lot of times the gossip is,
you're talking about something the person already knows to be true about themselves.
What you're trying to do is alert other people to the dangers perhaps that this person poses. So if somebody is a cheater
or an undesirable social partner in some way or other, you want to put people on alert about that.
If you're in an office where there's a guy who sexually harasses female employees, going and
saying to his face, you shouldn't be doing this,
probably isn't going to change his behavior, but you at least want to give a heads up
to some of the people who may be potential victims if you have reason to think that they're in danger.
People who are known as gossips, is it because they do it too much or they do it incorrectly?
And how much is too much?
Like, what are the parameters?
What are the rules of gossip?
Yeah, and I think that goes back to the question.
I don't think it's a question of too much or too little as much as a question of doing
it well versus doing it poorly.
So the person who gets labeled with that tag, you're a gossip, is often the
person who's engaged in a lot of mean-spirited backstabbing, or they're just cluelessly going
around saying inappropriate things about people for no good reason. Those are the people that
we would refer to as gossips. The person who's doing it
well stays under the radar and we don't think of them as a gossip. We think of them as a good
social companion, a good team player. And that's where you want to be if you can keep yourself in
that zone. Well, it almost seems like if you want to live by the rule of if you don't have
something nice to say, don't say it at all. You're not much of a gossip then because it does seem
that so much gossip is that stuff under the rug that people don't talk about because it isn't
real nice. That's right. And I don't think it's as important to be the person who spreads gossip,
but you certainly need to be tuned in to the gossip network. When I talk about this as an
evolved human trait, I use the example of the societies that we evolved in through most of
human history. We lived in relatively small groups, maybe 150 people or so. To be successful in this
group, to achieve status, to get mates, to be able to hang on to allies, you had to know what other
people were up to. You had to know who was sleeping with whom. You had to know who had powerful
friends and allies. You had to know who had access to resources. And if you were unconcerned with
those things, if you just didn't care, you didn't do very well. You got left behind.
We're the descendants of busybodies. The people who were fascinated by what was going on behind
the scenes with other people are ones who did well. They knew when there was an opportunity
to exploit. They knew who they could trust and who they couldn't trust.
And people who weren't interested in gossip, people who just were out of the loop, fell
behind.
So I say we're descendants of busybodies because by definition, our ancestors were
successful enough to keep passing those genes on.
And here we are.
I always wonder in any social circle, the person who is considered the gossip, does
that person know that other people think of them as a gossip?
Do people know what they're doing?
And usually when somebody's labeled a gossip, it's not a compliment.
It's somebody who's got their nose in everybody's business and they're talking about it behind
their back.
Do they know they're perceived that way? If they've been bad enough at it that they've
been labeled a gossip, my guess is they probably aren't aware that other people are gossiping about
them for being a gossip because we do use that as a negative label. You never use that as an
adjective for somebody in a complimentary way. Now, I think there are people who are aware
that they're kind of gossipy and they may sort of playfully or self-deprecatingly say about
themselves, oh, I'm a terrible gossip. But I think people who have a really bad reputation
are probably walking around oblivious to the fact that other people think about them this way.
It does seem that there's like two kinds of gossip. There's
gossip about people we know, people we work with, people we work for, but people in our circle. And
then there's celebrity gossip and people seem to be real into like what are celebrities up to.
So what's going on there? What's going on there is our brains are unprepared for mass media
and celebrities. Celebrities didn't exist in the world that we evolved in. If you knew a lot about
somebody, by definition, that was a socially important person. It was somebody that was in
your life, that had an effect on your life, and what they did mattered to you.
Well, in the 21st century, we live in this world of celebrities where we know an awful lot
about these strangers. You probably know a lot more about a great many celebrities than you do
about your next door neighbor. And this tricks our brains. Consciously, we know these people
shouldn't matter to us. But the fact that we know a lot already feeds the beast. It makes us want to
know more. We can't help ourselves. And we develop a one-sided, what's called a parasocial relationship
with these people. They don't know we exist, but we sure know a lot about them.
And so I think this fascination we have with the lives of celebrities is kind of a byproduct or an
accidental side effect. But there is kind of a side effect of that. You and I have never spoken
before today, but I think we could probably go out to lunch together and sit down and talk about
Donald Trump or other politicians or movie stars
or people that we sort of know in common. I guess you can think of them as friends-in-law.
And so they provide a segue into real relationships with real people in your life.
Well, I certainly appreciate the explanation and the depth you went into about gossip,
because I think most people like me think of gossip as
relatively unnecessary, pretty nasty, and something that people probably shouldn't do. But clearly,
there are benefits to gossip, and it's good to hear both sides of the story. Frank McAndrew has
been my guest. He is a leading researcher on the topic of gossip, and he is a professor of psychology at Knox College in Illinois.
Thank you, Frank.
Thanks, Mike. Best part of my day today. Thank you.
Metrolinks and Crosslinks are reminding everyone to be careful as Eglinton Crosstown LRT train testing is in progress.
Please be alert as trains can pass at any time on the tracks. Remember to follow all
traffic signals, be careful along our tracks, and only make left turns where it's safe to do so.
Be alert, be aware, and stay safe. This is an ad for better help. Welcome to the world. Please
read your personal owner's manual thoroughly.
In it, you'll find simple instructions for how to interact with your fellow human beings and how to find happiness and peace of mind. Thank you and have a nice life.
Unfortunately, life doesn't come with an owner's manual. That's why there's BetterHelp Online
Therapy. Connect with a credentialed therapist by phone, video, or online chat.
Visit betterhelp.com to learn more.
That's BetterHelp.com.
On any given day, particularly a work day, it would be difficult to go very long during that
day without somebody telling you how busy they are. Everybody's busy. I'm busy. You're busy. There's a lot of busyness going on.
And we, or many of us, have a tendency to jump from one busy thing to the next without barely
catching our breath in between. And therein lies a missed opportunity. Those times in between things,
according to Juliette Funt.
Juliette is a speaker and advisor to Fortune 500 companies.
She's founder and CEO of the Juliette Funt Group, and she's author of a book called A Minute to Think.
And she believes that those moments in between tasks and meetings and projects, those moments can be golden if you treat them right.
Hi, Juliet.
Welcome to Something You Should Know.
Thanks.
So glad to be here.
So I think people have heard of the concept of white space on a page of text, that text
is easier to read and more likely to be read if there is a lot of white space rather than
cram as many words as you can on a page.
And you take that concept of white space and apply it to time. So explain what you mean.
Sure. The idea would be, let's say you have the Zoomaholic lifestyle that we've all been living
and you have back-to-back meetings. If you look at your physical, your actual calendar, you'll see
colors. You won't see any white. You'll see blocks that come right up against each other.
But if there were white space on that calendar, if there were a five to 10 to 15 minute slice
interlaced in between those meetings, everything that has been stressing us out would be less.
We would have time to think about the meeting proceeding, the meeting that follows.
We might have time to take a humane bio break or have a snack.
And we would be different in the next interaction that we showed up in because we would have
been able to refuel before we dug in again.
And so something as simple as space between meetings or even shorter space before answering
a question, before
walking in the door when you've just driven up and you're rushing in from
work. These little moments interlaced through the day amplify and accelerate
everything that we do. Why? What happens in those little spaces between the
things? What do we know is going on? And it sounds good, but what's really
happening? Sure. Well, we can look at it from a visceral point of view, a neurological point of
view, there's a lot of different sides of it. So from a visceral point of view, if you have every
listener out there, just take a minute and just, they will realize that from a recuperative angle,
they've probably been craving that
at least for the last 18 months, maybe longer, but we're all desperately just in need of permission
to just take a minute. It's like if you're in the gym lifting weights, you do 10 and then you take
a rest and then you do 10. You don't do 150 in a row and then take a break, which is how we work.
So there's the recuperative angle,
which is very important, but there's also the creative and strategic angle where in those
breaks, we're doing what scientists have noticed is disconnecting from the primary task and then
reconnecting to come back to it with more focus and activity in our default neural network. In
fact, you can see this. If you looked at an
MRI scan during a moment when someone was taking a supposed pause, there's all this activity that
has been scientifically linked to insight, to introspection, to memory and creativity,
all in a moment where it kind of seems like we're doing nothing. And the greatest leaders,
I can rattle off stories of people who take this kind of thinking and transition time for granted,
and it amplifies what they do every single day. Well, and the flip side of that, and I think
everyone has experienced this, that when you're working on something, maybe up against a deadline or something, and you're really trying hard to get it done, the harder you work, the worse the work,
that you really need to get away to take a break. And that's where the ideas come.
Right. And it's that there's a very famous writer, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, wrote the book called
Flow, which is about when we get in that creative flow state. And he said the one thing that differentiates people who can easily get into flow is how
much uncommitted time they have left over for novelty to appear in their mind or in
their day.
And as creatives or innovators, this is what we want, certainly.
But that time in between also has a really, really strong impact on the culture of work. And there is no
time in history where it's ever been more important to think specifically about that.
Because this is the most spectacular opportunity for redesign in companies we've ever been in.
All the car engine parts have been taken out. They're on the driveway. We're examining
everything. We're redesigning work. And so we also now can insert this spaciousness, this oxygen into the way that work works all day long.
And maybe we could make work not the most miserable part of people's life.
By doing things like what?
By doing things like having permission to take a pause. When you pause to recuperate or think
or oxygenate what you're doing, everything that you're touching is amplified in its output.
So I'll give you an example of one of the wonderful examples of space is this gentleman
named John. John is a security guard at a company that prides itself on patents. They do a lot of
innovations. They have a lot of patents.
He's a security guard, but he also happens to be the guy who leads the company in the recorded
amount of innovative patents. We talked about how his day is 95% uncommitted time. He is not
hampered by the typical tasks that we call work.
And that liberty, now he's a very creative, smart person, but that liberty brings him to a different level of contribution.
And the punchline of the story is two different times he was promoted from security into innovation
and two different times he went back to security.
Because in innovation, he kept being assigned all this work that was getting in the way
of him being able to think, and he just couldn't produce the same results. He's a security guard
who has more patents than anybody else? Yes, more than anyone else in the innovation department.
It's a Fortune 200 company. It's not a small potatoes organization. He's a brilliant guy,
but could the argument be made that the amount of liberty and open
time that he has to be thoughtful is amplifying that process?
I believe so.
And John is not the only story.
There's all sorts of leaders.
If you look at Phil Knight from Nike, used to have a designated chair in his living room
that was only for daydreaming.
And Jack Welch, who everyone thought of at GE as this driven, hard-driving, workaholic guy, he spent an hour and a half every single day, he called it looking out of the window time.
And he would do that old-fashioned thing that many of us remember, feet up on the desk, staring out a window, concocting, cooking, dreaming.
We have no respect with that thoughtfulness posture anymore. And
it's almost shameful. You have to hide around the corner like a smoker to think these days.
But that tells you a little bit about how much we value thoughtfulness.
But there has to be a balance between that and productivity. You still have to get the work done.
We can't all just look out the window
and daydream all day
because then nothing happens.
Yeah, that's not, that's,
well, that's not the live problem
that I see and empathize with every day at work.
But we do have to understand the difference
between activity and productivity.
And this is a critical delineation.
If you and I sat in a room all day long
in a conference room, let's say,
and we put out Danish and we sat and we thought and we thought and we didn't really do very much,
but eight hours later, one of us had a spectacular idea, that would have been a very productive day,
but it wouldn't have been a very active day. In corporations and companies, even entrepreneurs
who have that busyness gene in them, we're over-indexing on activity and checking off boxes
and moving in action. There's plenty of that. We're never goingindexing on activity and checking off boxes and moving in action. There's
plenty of that. We're never going to have a risk that there's not enough of that. But this other
element must be present. And our dream is to insert it in small, manageable sips throughout
the day, not to have eight hours in a row of ponderous window time, but just to have some, just to be able to
step back and have some objectivity about the work that we're doing. Because you hope what will
happen. Well, I don't hope, I see what happens. We've been doing this work for many years in
corporations. So there's on the level of the plot, if you did kind of plot and subplot, the plot is
that work becomes more efficient
because people think before they act. So we see measurable results in improvements in productivity,
increased strategic thinking time, reduction of stress in the workplace. All sorts of different
things happen when people don't have to be on a maniacal treadmill every minute.
But then the subplot is really what moves me is real people
sitting in real desks who have had their chests compressed for so long can just breathe again.
They can take a minute to think about an idea or maybe remember why they do the work they do and
reaccess that meaning, that vision inside of them. This work was supposed to be fun in a lot of different ways that it isn't for a lot of people.
So when somebody listening to you says, okay, so how do I do this?
Like, do you structure this basically downtime into the day?
And then do you force yourself to do it or do you just let it happen? I mean,
what do I do different? In the course of the day, the training wheels protocol that we teach is
called the wedge. So if you imagine I'm holding my fingers like a triangle going up, the wedge is a
little portion of open time. It could be five seconds, a minute, 10 minutes, a wedge inserted in between two activities
that without it would have been connected.
So think about, we talked about between a meeting and a meeting, a little wedge, between
a fire drill and diving into it, between getting an email that hurts your feelings or worries
you and responding, between being asked a question and answering.
These are all moments where tiny oxygenation opening, opening can occur. And we want to really take those breaks when we're taking the longer wedges, when we maybe are taking our lunch
or where we're really taking some thoughtful time. We want to do it in a way that supports,
for instance, we talk a lot about lot about eating, just eat when you're
eating lunch. If you're not with other people, try to abstain from watching something or listening
to something and just allow that to be recuperative white space time. It doesn't have to be a lot.
This is one of the most important parts is you can start with literally, if we did, I won't waste
your time, but if we did 15 seconds, you'd be shocked at
how long that felt to just let there be some openness. And you're hoping, like, how do you
know it worked? So what's going to be different now? How am I going to feel differently
because I did it right? It's like, like oxygen or like a nutrient that you've been missing.
Consistent use of white space will make you less stressed. It should make you more focused. It will
actually make you more productive because you're using moments to decide what you do next at work
instead of just doing, doing, doing, doing, doing. So you'll get lost in far less rabbit
holes of unnecessary work. In teams, which is how we do a lot of our work, we also see measurable
results in that low value category that I mentioned. We see less emails, we see less
meetings, we see shortened or reduced reporting. These flurries of nonsense activity in the workday largely come because we're just not thoughtful about what we're assigning or choosing or touching.
You slow things down and you add some white space and the way that work is selected becomes different.
And we have lots of data to show those changes in real teams in real time. It seems though that what often happens in an office is like, you know,
let's say you plan out five minutes in between meetings to do your white spacing, if that's
the verb, white spacing. White spacing, yeah, sure. Well, let's go with it. But so after the
first meeting's over, what often happens is Bob comes up and says, hey, Juliet, you got a minute? And then that five minutes gets eaten up with Bob telling you, you know,
what he did on his weekend cruise. And there went your white space.
Well, there definitely will be moments like that. But what most people experience is they don't
have the five minutes in the first place. So when Bob says, do you have a minute?
That means they're just going to be five minutes late to their next meeting and rushing in
and frenzied all the time.
They also, in case they like Bob, would miss the beautiful opportunity to slow down and
have a human moment with Bob.
And to hear, actually hear, did you swim with the dolphins?
And what was the cruise?
And did they have those big platters of food?
And that is part of what fuels us as interpersonal teams is being able to be with each other and not have the, what
is that yolk they put around the oxen where they're just pushing them through the, I'm probably
getting this all wrong, pushing them through the rice field every single second. The beautiful
open time also leads to the ability to be interpersonal with each other, and many find that a benefit.
So you've been doing this because I can imagine people listening thinking, well, this all sounds great, but where's the evidence?
I mean, where's the proof that this really is helping, not just wasting time?
And you have the evidence, yes?
Yeah, there's lots of studies that show, I mean,
we could go into some of the ways. One of my favorite ones is that there's a study that shows
that we experience something in white space called beneficial forgetting, which is a term that I just
love. It means that when you stop a creative pursuit, your brain is allowed to disentangle
itself from the thing that it was doing before
and come back again with a fresh perspective. So many people are working on problems at work.
We can seem to get this product to sell, and we can seem to get this channel to work,
and we can seem to develop this relationship. When they take a moment of time, studies show
that this beneficial forgetting allows them to come back stronger. There's also a wonderful study where they put four different people into groups and
they had them do a repetitive task.
Only one of the four groups had the ability to take very small breaks during the period
of the work.
And they were the only one whose productivity and output was consistent by the end of the
50 minutes that they were working. So in terms of the gray, we say
gray matter likes white space. That's absolutely been proven. But all you have to do is take a
human being. I mean, there's a woman in the book named Mindy. We call her the peanut butter manager
because she works with a jar of peanut butter on her desk all day long because she can't give
herself the liberty of taking lunch. And this is the way she worked for a very long time. She's just one person that
many, many will see a mirror in that just when she gave herself permission to make work not a
grueling marathon all day long, that her headaches disappeared, that her errors in client process
procedures in her team started going down, that things got better. And people just have to try it.
It's like one of those free Costco samples. Once you taste a little space, you'll want more.
Well, this whole conversation, I think, makes you stop and think why we go to work in the first place. It's not to go somewhere and be busy all day. That's, or maybe that is why some people it's a form of an enemy that we do fight in our
work. I'll also say it's something that I've struggled with my entire life. And I think it's
probably why I'm so interested in this work. I was told that when I was seven years old,
I wrote a story called I'm Busy Forever and turned it into a song. And so it's been a very long time.
And my raw state, naturally, if I didn't have these tools, is that I would just keep moving
and probably not be very thoughtful about what I was touching.
And that speed would also detract from my ability to be a mom and human and all sorts
of other things that I care about.
So I'm in the trenches with people.
And my experience, you asked me for proof, is my own personal proof is that when there
is space, that the whole day feels very different.
And you determine the amount of time in your white space.
How?
I mean, how is it?
Sometimes it's a minute.
Sometimes it's five minutes.
Because of what?
So the productivity gang wants to have very prescribed rules. People say, should there be timers and how many times a day? It's a little bit like learning to watch your own hunger and understand the difference between hunger and craving and satiety. I'm going to get that one wrong, but being satiated. The white space time that you should take is as much as you need to feel better.
So for some people, that is 30 seconds once in a while through the day.
For some people, obviously, we have a lot of executives who take an hour because they think that they can't do any thinking time that's deep and rich and valuable and less than that.
And everywhere in between, what we want to be doing is approaching it from two
angles, the intellect and the visceral. From the intellect, you could look at your day. If you
screen shared your calendar right now and I saw your calendar, I could see if there was enough
white. Just looking for the actual white on the calendar. And if there wasn't, I'd be able to
guess with enormous certainty whether your day would be flexible and fluid or whether it would feel pressed and rushed and stressful. That's the
intellectual side. So we look at our calendars and go, oh, I need a couple white slices in here.
And then the visceral side is we're sitting at our desk and we're just having that feeling,
wow, I need an espresso or I need a candy bar. I'm going to check my email to have the dopamine goose me up here.
And instead, often we just need to take a strategic pause.
Well, it does seem to make sense.
I mean, anybody who's had those days where you're just going from one thing to the next
and you don't have time to breathe, you can imagine how that day would go differently if you plan those white space
breaks in between all the events. Juliette Funt has been my guest. She is a speaker and an advisor
to Fortune 500 companies. She's founder and CEO of the Juliette Funt Group, and the name of her
book is A Minute to Think, which, by the way, was nominated for the
Next Big Idea Club, which is curated by Malcolm Gladwell, Adam Grant, Dan Pink, and Susan Cain.
And you will find a link to that book at Amazon in the show notes.
Thank you, Juliet. Thanks for being here. Wonderful. Well, thank you so much for having me.
If you've ever had someone reject you, break up with you, someone you were in love with,
well, you know it can mess with your brain. In a study, researchers looked at brain scans of subjects who had recently been rejected by their partner and who were still in love with the person who rejected them
and hoped that they might return.
What they found is that romantic rejection
stimulated the same parts of the brain as cocaine and other addictions.
In other words, romantic love acts much like an addiction in the brain.
And this helps to explain why behaviors by people who have been rejected,
like stalking, are often difficult to control.
The good news is that time definitely heals the hurt.
After a period of time, the subjects were shown photos of the person who had rejected them,
and those parts of the brain that showed so much activity before had quieted down.
And that is something you should know.
If someone ever asks you to recommend a podcast or ask what podcast you listen to,
I hope you'll tell them something you should know and ask them to give a listen.
I'm Mike Carruthers. Thanks for listening today to Something You Should Know.
Welcome to the small town of Chinook,
where faith runs deep and secrets run deeper.
In this new thriller, religion and crime collide
when a gruesome murder rocks the isolated Montana community.
Everyone is quick to point their fingers at a drug-addicted teenager,
but local deputy Ruth Vogel isn't convinced.
She suspects connections to a powerful religious group.
Enter federal agent V.B. Loro,
who has been investigating a local church
for possible criminal activity.
The pair form an unlikely partnership
to catch the killer,
unearthing secrets that leave Ruth torn
between her duty to the law,
her religious convictions,
and her very own family.
But something more sinister than murder is afoot,
and someone is watching Ruth.
Chinook.
Starring Kelly Marie Tran and Sanaa Lathan.
Listen to Chinook wherever you get your podcasts.
Hi, this is Rob Benedict.
And I am Richard Spate.
We were both on a little show you might know called Supernatural.
It had a pretty good run. 15 seasons, 327 episodes.
And though we have seen, of course, every episode many times,
we figured, hey, now that we're wrapped, let's watch it all again.
And we can't do that alone.
So we're inviting the cast and crew that made the show along for the ride.
We've got writers, producers, composers, directors,
and we'll of course have some actors on as well,
including some certain guys that played some certain pretty iconic brothers.
It was kind of a little bit of a left field choice in the best way possible.
The note from Kripke was, he's great, we love him,
but we're looking for like a really intelligent Duchovny type.
With 15 seasons to explore, it's going to be the road trip of several lifetimes,
so please join us and subscribe to Supernatural then and now.