StarTalk Radio - Born to Run with Chris McDougall and Herman Pontzer
Episode Date: May 7, 2021Ever seen a chimpanzee go for a jog? On this episode, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Gary O’Reilly, and Chuck Nice discover how humans came to run with journalist and author of Born to Run, Chris McDougall, a...nd evolutionary anthropologist, Herman Pontzer. NOTE: StarTalk+ Patrons can watch or listen to this entire episode commercial-free here: https://www.startalkradio.net/show/born-to-run-with-chris-mcdougall-and-herman-pontzer/ Thanks to our Patrons Alex Ornelas, Albert Holk, Andrew, Vic Chohda, Nina Barton, Jeff Crain, BigYay Theory (Yancey), eric pihl, Roman Prekop for supporting us this week. Photo Credit: Gregory Wilson, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commonshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 Subscribe to SiriusXM Podcasts+ on Apple Podcasts to listen to new episodes ad-free and a whole week early.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to StarTalk, your place in the universe where science and pop culture collide.
StarTalk begins right now.
This is StarTalk Sports Edition.
We're titling this one Born to Run.
We're titling this one Born to Run, because we're going to get to the bottom of what's going on evolutionarily, biophysically, when the human body decides to run away from things or toward things.
We're a running people right here.
And I got as my co-host, Gary, Gary O'Reilly.
Hey, Neil.
Good to be here again.
Giving authenticity to this program, being a former professional athlete.
And occasionally runner.
Okay. And also you turned sportscaster before we got a hold of you.
And so great to have you on Sports Edition.
And Chuck Nice, our stand-up comedian.
Hey, Neil. Good to be here.
Can't wait for our show on Pink Cadillac since we're doing a show on Born to Run.
Oh.
Yay.
You guys would have jumped on that if I wasn't black. You would have jumped right on it.
Totally, completely.
That's correct.
Or it was just a failed joke.
One of those two.
You can say that.
I'm just out of that conversation.
You can say that.
I'm just out of that conversation.
In this show, we're featuring my interview with Chris McDougall,
who is the author of the book Born to Run.
And we'll be jumping into some clips because we had some private time with him to tell us what he was about and what his research has been
on what it is to go barefoot in this world,
whether or not you're running or walking.
So that's kind of interesting.
But as always, we bring in some academic expertise into the mix.
And so let me just introduce for you Dr. Herman Ponser.
Herman, welcome to StarTalk.
I'm tickled to be here.
Very excellent.
So you are an associate professor of evolutionary anthropology at Duke,
and you think about what it is to be human, which I love. Yeah, how did we get to be this way,
this crazy way we are, and what does it mean for today? And you wrote a book, and I think for those
who see this in video, that might be on your back shelf. What a coincidence. Who put it there? That's surprising.
Burn. I love single word title books. Burn.
In the economics of life, calories are the currency. So we did
a whole explainer video on calories, by the way. So that'll dovetail nicely
with this episode. So let's just get straight into this.
So Herman, you got your PhD back in 2006.
And do you remember the title of your thesis? Oh, God. Locomotor Energetics and Economy
and Evolution in Homo Erectus. So I was all about how changes in the skeleton,
which we can document. Humans have been split from chimps in bonobos for about 7 million years.
And so there's a big change that happens around 2 million years with the evolution of our genus, genus homo.
Wait, wait, wait.
I have to correct you because I'm the one out there fixing it when people don't understand it.
It's not that that's when we split from chimps.
It's that when we and chimps split from each other.
Ah, I was being too simple, Neil.
You're right.
And in fact, we didn't split from them.
I'm going to be up in your face.
That's fine.
Our two lineages split.
The last time chimpanzees and us all here
shared a grandparent.
There you go.
Was 7 million years ago.
And then for 4 million years or so,
4 or 5 million years,
we're kind of just these bipedal apes walking around,
walking around on two legs,
but basically like Ewok style. And then around 2 million years ago we're kind of just these bipedal apes walking around, walking around on two legs, but basically like Ewok style.
And then around 2 million years ago,
you see these changes that happen that,
that are the anatomy changes enough.
Brain changes enough that we say,
Oh,
that's,
that's us.
That's more like us than animals.
That's genus Homo.
And along with that comes these changes in our legs and our pelvis.
And so I was very curious as a,
as a young PhD student,
what that meant for how many calories it takes to walk.
So we populated the entire earth upon exiting Africa.
And so that seems to me a lot of walking and running.
At what point did we have this, if not ability, certainly the urge to do so?
Yeah, I think it's the ability to do it is the key thing. And here's what's interesting.
People often say that that has to do with running, and it might in a kind of tangential way,
because the way we run, the way we're able to explore our landscape, changes the way that we
can eat, right? It changes the menu for us. And all of a sudden, our menu works worldwide.
But it isn't like we, I mean, we did walk into Eurasia, and eventually we walked into North
America. But it isn't like we went there straight away, 100 kilometers a day kind of thing.
It's more of a population expansion. So, you know, it's the same way that tree species expand their range
is kind of the way that we expanded our range, I think.
But that was possible.
Of course, the trees didn't walk.
But neither did we in the sense that...
Neither did we, that's my point.
So you change the way you eat your food, you get more and more...
Okay, I had not fully appreciated that.
It wasn't one single nomadic tribe going thousands of miles.
No, that's right.
And this is what really separates us from the other apes, right?
Because chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, orangs,
the reason they are getting decimated with climate change
and forests getting cut down is that they can't live anywhere else.
Right.
They can't go anywhere.
They're done.
You cut down our forests and we're like,
I guess we're going to live in this place now.
And Chuck, I like the way Herman is on a first name basis with
the orangutan. We call them the orang.
The rest of us, we have to use
the full name, orangutan. I mean, once you've
handled as much orang urine as I've
handled, I feel like
there's a familiarity there.
And the cool
thing is that you can brag about it.
Now I need
to know if that was intentionally handled.
Oh, good. They just pee on you.
I paid a lot of money for that orangutan urine.
It's
a little too much information there.
Doc, time to go to our first clip.
Please!
Please don't tell me that this
happened in a hotel in Russia.
That's all I'm saying.
That is the sign
that we should go to our first clip. So again, we're featuring my interview with Chris McDougall.
He's a journalist who studied anthropological tribes and their running habits, and he learned
quite a bit. And so let's pick up on some of what you wanted to share with us about our transition from, what was it, Homo erectus to Homo sapiens.
And is there anything that we still have that other animals don't?
Because I feel pretty vulnerable when I'm out there in the wild.
Check it out.
There is a professor, Dr. Dennis Bramble,
who is kind of curious about the same thing.
As a morphologist, he's wondering,
why do we give up strength and speed?
Because when you're on all fours, you're stronger and faster.
And just to be clear, a morphologist is a person who doesn't study the genetics as much as sort of what you look like
and your general form for how you then function.
Is that a fair definition of a morphologist? just so we're on the same page there?
He's basically taking apart the tinker toys and looking at the raw parts.
And so what he's looking at is the human body as an element of engineering.
We have all these raw parts.
How do we assemble it?
And what he was perplexed by is creatures that are on all fours are stronger and faster.
And at some point in our evolutionary history, we decided, hey, rather than being strong and fast, we'd rather be like skinny and weak.
So why do we make –
That's the ticket.
Yeah.
That'll help us dominate the planet.
Let's get skinny and weaker.
Skinny, weak, and slow.
Slow.
So he's like, this makes no sense.
Why don't we stay on all fours when we could climb trees and we could compete and fight with a lower center of balance?
And what he discovered was the second we went upright, a lot of other component factors came into place.
And when we came upright, we became these hairless mammals full of springy tendons that could vent heat by perspiration as opposed to respiration.
And at that moment in our lives, we made an evolutionary shift from being strong,
speedy animals into being slower, but slower animals with greater stamina and endurance.
And along with that came this whole other grab bag sort of engineering features,
such as like the nuchal ligaments.
And what he thought was really cool was at the moment the fossil evidence went from
Australopithecus into Homo erectus, you see something showing up in the back of the skull,
which is this little hollow groove.
And that hollow groove is there to sustain a thing called the nuchal ligament.
And the nuchal ligament only does one purpose.
It stops your head from bobbing around when you run.
And so at that moment in our lives, in our history,
we went from being walkers into runners.
And along with that became this whole new ability
we never had before.
So doctor, I have to ask,
why did we give up strength and speed?
This doesn't seem to be the wisest move
any species could make
because if you're out there in the wild, you're going to need both of those to survive.
Weren't we happy with strength and speed? What gives here?
No, the problem is that if you're an ape, right, and you live in a world full of food in these
rainforests, you don't have to go very far to get it. And so you can go ahead and specialize in
strength and be good at getting up in the trees and bolting from a leopard if it chases you. But it doesn't give
you the endurance you need to be able to cover all the ground you need to cover if you're going
to move into more barren habitats like savannas, or for that matter, if you're going to hunt and
gathering. Because as soon as you start hunting, there's a lot less food on the landscape for you
than there is if you just eat plants, because there's just fewer animals and plants around.
So you've got to cover more ground.
That means you need endurance.
That means something's got to give.
So it was survival.
Well, it was food, right?
So it's survival and reproduction.
I would count that as survival.
The energy that you're getting, though, yeah, you need to survive.
But the reason you need those calories is to reproduce.
That's what evolution really cares about, right?
It cares about making babies.
So it's both.
It's both sides of the coin.
When we are getting smarter,
isn't that like
the biggest thing? You don't need to
be big and strong
when you're smart, as evidenced
by nerds running the world
today, okay?
You just
don't need it. I mean,
let's be honest. I mean, Batman versus Superman. Batman wins. Why?
Because he's smarter than Superman. You know, that's basically the deal.
Doc, before we get to that bit of the brain kicking in, and I'm sure we're going to do that
later in the show, nuchal ligaments are one thing, but having a ligament in my neck that's
stronger and keeps my head stable doesn't really enable me to run, does it?
So what happened between the great apes and our ancestors for us to be able to become these 50, 100-mile runners?
What goes on?
What springy tendons, what bits and bobs do we acquire?
Yeah, yeah.
So legs get longer, okay?
The pelvis gets a bit narrower.
Yeah. Yeah. So legs get longer. Okay. The pelvis gets a bit narrower. And so all of that is helping keep the forces that come up through the, you know, as your, as your foot hits the ground,
bam, there's an equal and opposite force, right? As we all know, that comes back up through your
skeleton and keeping those, keeping your pelvis narrow helps you do, helps you handle those
forces. And having a longer legs means you're covering more ground per stride, which means if
you, this is a fun one.
If you have a, when you buy a cup of coffee, that's, you know, wherever you buy your cups
of coffee to go, you get a top on that coffee.
Why?
Because if you don't, you slosh it around as you're walking, even though you don't notice
that because everything seems still to you, your body's going up and down, up and down,
up and down with every step.
If you have longer legs, there's less of that roller coaster up and down, up and down, which means less energy because every time you go up and down,
there's energy loss there. And so longer legs save you calories when you walk and run. So longer
legs, narrower pelvis, bigger joint surfaces to handle the loads of all this stuff. All these
things are changing. And then he talks about, here we go. There's a phrase I've just learned from this interview. Ventilation through perspiration is better than through respiration. So I sweat
through my skin rather than pant like a dog or something like that. Is that where we are?
Yes. That's another big one. We get hairless, right? And we get, humans are the sweatiest
animals on the planet. 10 times more sweat glands per unit of area of your skin than any other
primate for sure. And I think they're not the other mammal. But horses can sweat up a storm.
They can sweat. They've got a little short hair to help them do better at that. But they still
don't sweat as well or as much per surface area as we do. And people say you sweat like a pig,
but actually pigs don't sweat. Wow. So we're some funky folks. Pigs don't have pores.
We're some funky folks.
And that's what that gets to, actually, is that it isn't just the frame that changes, right?
It's also this engine.
And so one of the things that we've been looking at in my lab is how metabolic rate changes
and how you can burn energy faster and higher and longer, right?
We can rev our engines for longer than the other apes can, too.
So that's a whole other thing that changes, not just the frame, but also the engine. Well, let me get back to my
interview with McDougall. And I've had to ask him, what did our ancestors do with those anatomical
changes? It's one thing to have the changes, but is there something, can you do anything
interesting with it? Let's check it out. How did the human brain get so big so fast?
Because, you know, humans arrived on the planet,
Homo erectus, about 2 million years ago.
The first projectile weapons arrived about 10,000 years ago.
Just to be clear, a projectile weapon, you don't mean cannon.
You mean throwing.
You mean the ability to throw.
Or like a bow and arrow, a spear, things like that.
Things you're throwing.
And so the problem is this. You have humans
with a brain developing very quickly, getting really big and fat
really fast. That kind of brain requires a lot of caloric energy.
Yet the first bow and arrow only shows up about 10,000 years ago.
So you have more than a million years where we're eating a lot of stuff to sustain
this energy-sucking brain,
yet we don't really have the weaponry to bring down big game. So the question becomes,
how the heck are humans eating calorically dense proteins when they don't have the weapons to kill
them? And the theory becomes it was our ability to run long distances, to do what's known as
persistence hunting, to go out there on a savannah as a group, run long distances,
and chase our prey into heat exhaustion. And here's the fascinating part about this is,
they've actually done this in Africa and watched indigenous groups chase antelope and kudu into
submission. And it takes exactly as long to run an antelope into heat exhaustion as it takes the
average marathoner to run a marathon.
Yeah, so it's interesting that we sort of recreationalize this survival behavior that maybe we've evolved to do, which is to run down animals to exhaustion, which is probably
an important piece of how Homo erectus made its living.
Wait a minute. So they can improve the marathon by having them chase an antelope.
They've got to run into the bulls the wrong way around.
So tell me about this high-density food because you're Mr. Calorie Man.
If I don't have weapons yet to take down an animal,
I still need the high calories to sustain my brain.
Where am I getting the calories from?
So you're getting it from, if you're a hominin like us,
you're getting it from two things that other apes don't have.
You're getting it from a fair amount of meat, which, you know, hunter-gatherers kind of balance about half their calories from meat, half their calories from plants.
And you're getting it.
So that's how we got the meat from wearing them out.
Well, from wearing them out.
But also, so here's the other thing.
We also cook our food, which Kristen doesn't get into there.
But cooking is also a really big deal because it helps you digest your food sort of externally.
And you get a lot more bang for your buck that way.
And then also, don't forget, you've still got a lot of the group that's out getting plant foods.
And so that's helping to fund the whole thing too, because even if you're really good at running,
it's still a pretty risky endeavor to kind of go spend your day trying to run something down.
You come home empty-handed, you're done.
But if you can share with people, hunt and gather,
now you've got something that's a winning strategy.
So, Doug, are we now migrating with herds, major herds?
We've all watched David Attenborough on TV show us these thousands and thousands of beasts traversing continents and countries and things.
Are we now following them, or are we just like, go out, hunt, come back to base?
Probably the second one.
Wait, wait, wait, Gary, when you said now, you mean back then?
Back then, now.
Okay.
Now, because I know I'm not doing that.
Right, yeah.
Get in your car.
But I did once follow the Grateful Dead.
Does that count?
Oh, there.
No.
I don't know. Were you feeding along with them? Were you eating the Grateful Dead as you went count? Oh, no. I don't know. Were you feeding along with
them? Were you eating the Grateful Dead as you went? I mean, that would be the same. No, just
binging on Jerry Garcia, Ben and Jerry's, yeah. So that's an interesting question. We don't know
for sure, but probably not migrating with them because, again, it's hunting and gathering,
right? And so the way that that works is we agree where we're going to end up at the end of the day,
right? So we're coming home at the end of the day, right?
So you have, we're coming home at the end of the day to the same place.
And maybe that place moves week to week
or even month to month or something like that.
So you can kind of migrate over time,
but you're probably not following herds.
The way you can figure this out, this is interesting.
You can actually get the isotopes
in the fossilized teeth, right?
Because there's a different isotopic signature
in the rainwater and in the surface water of oxygen isotopes as you move from north to south because of the gradient of temperature and evaporation.
And so and there's also there's other isotopes you could use also to track location.
And we could do that. Right. We could find out is does somebody end up with a tooth isotope signature that's hundreds, maybe thousands of kilometers away from where we find them.
And that would be the way to find out.
But nobody's shown that yet.
So that's out there waiting to be demonstrated.
Okay, so I grow my tooth earlier in my life.
That's right.
Later in my life, I'm now a thousand miles from where that happened.
And so that tells you a lot.
Yeah, exactly.
In fact, they use it to track wildlife finds and all this kind of stuff.
You can do it.
Anyway, that's exactly what you would do.
Okay, so just to be clear
and correct me if I'm wrong, Herman,
I'm going to show off my little bit
of knowledge here. So the water molecule
H2O has
two hydrogens and one oxygen
and native oxygen
has 16 particles
in its nucleus. But isotopic
oxygen has
18 in its nucleus. It's got two extra neutrons.
If you have water with oxygen 18 in it
mixed together with water with oxygen 16, oxygen 16
is going to evaporate slightly more preferentially
to the one with the oxygen 18 because it's lighter.
If you were in more climates closer to the one with the oxygen-18 because it's lighter. And so if you were in more,
the climate's closer to the equator,
your groundwater supply will have more oxygen-18 relative to oxygen-16.
Did I get that right, Herman?
That's it.
That's it, in a nutshell, exactly how it works.
I want a gold star for that.
Points for you.
Okay.
I didn't know we were getting gold stars handed out.
This is a new thing. Neil's already won a bunch getting gold stars handed out. This is a new thing.
Neil's already won a bunch of gold stars.
It looks like.
Okay, but Herman, what it means is you can't detect this
if they only go east-west, only if they go north-north.
You would have to use other things.
So there are other isotopes and landscapes.
For example, strontium isotopes can vary depending on the ground,
on the rock in the ground and how that seeps into the water.
Okay, so you've got many tools.
There's a menu of isotopes you can use.
Okay, cool.
Very cool.
Yeah, all right.
We're going to take a break,
but any fast questions on this before we go to a break?
Gary, go ahead.
Is this, I mean, all right, Doctor, quickly.
Is persistence herding,
if I am running 55 miles to hunt down this beast,
I'm doing a lot of running.
Is it worth it?
Because the calories I expend as to the calories I get back.
And are you going to haul the thing back to the tribe?
Exactly.
That doesn't sound like it makes sense.
If it's big enough, you probably move camp.
Yeah.
So the hunter-gatherers I work with,
it's a community called the Hods in northern Tanzania.
If they get something really, really big,
they might move camp for a few days.
But even a zebra, which is pretty dang big,
they'll haul back to camp.
In pieces, not all at once.
Maybe they capture it and not
kill it, then they can walk it back.
Excellent idea!
Better yet, let's just ride it back.
Make it do the work.
Brilliant.
Chuck, that is completely brilliant.
If they were only domesticatable.
All right, let's take a quick break.
When we come back, more of my interview with Chris McDougall.
And we have in studio today Professor Herman Ponser,
who thinks all about the evolution of what it is to be human.
We're back, talk sports edition we're talking about running walking how these became things that humans do and i've got professor herman poncer associate professor of evolutionary
anthropology duke university and that's north carolina if i remember correctly uh is that right Herman Ponser, Associate Professor of Evolutionary Anthropology at Duke University.
And that's North Carolina, if I remember correctly.
Is that right?
Yeah.
And Chris McDougall, who's a journalist who's written about this.
So we've got the journalist and the scientist together, which is a brilliant and deadly combination of knowledge and insight and life experience that we're bringing to the page here. And I want to start off first thinking about our brains and about our ingenuity
outstripping evolution. Is that a thing that can happen?
And let's go straight to our next clip with Chris McDougal
and get to the bottom of it. Check it out.
It's one of those kind of mysteries of the evolutionary trail.
The best kind of scenario you can come up with is that as the planet was warming, there was
a new genetic offspring, a new adaptation. A homo erectus baby was born that was more comfortable
standing upright. And that person was able to run. And it became those homo erecti who
were able to run long distances that began to thrive on the planet. So, and as they were able
to thrive, they had the protein energy, which fueled the expansion of this brain.
What intrigues me is eventually our brain has other sort of smarts going for it. And then we
perfect projectile weapons, right? So as you said, the bow and arrow,
ultimately the gun. So we don't have to chase a damn thing, okay? You could stand 100 meters away
and take down your protein for the next week. And so this talent, let me call it that, this skill
set, this genetic skill set that we have as humans,
would lose the need to continue to be honed once we develop tools of killing.
Is that a fair claim to make?
That's exactly right.
You know, once again, our ingenuity has outstripped our evolution.
And it would be kind of a fun experiment to do right now,
whereas it takes three hours to catch a kudu,
how long would it take for you to hit a button on your phone and have a burrito show up at your door?
That's right.
So it's not only how long,
it is what is your investment of calories to obtain those calories?
To obtain calories required more calories than what you earned,
you're a dead species quickly.
You will go extinct fast.
So you need, so it's got to cost you fewer calories to get it than to eat it.
So yeah, that's a whole nother another there.
You're absolutely right.
We get a lot more calories per hour of work now than we used to.
So your average blue-collar worker in the United States today with an hour's
worth of wages can go to the store and easily buy 20,000 kilocalories of food. So that's enough for
like, you know, a week. If you're a Hadza man or woman, like community I work with, hunter gatherers,
an hour's worth of work gets you somewhere between 1,000 and 2,000 calories of food. So that's 10 times less, an order of magnitude less
than you can get, you know, than you or I can get
just kind of in our daily lives.
It's a huge change.
So absolutely, you know, and then we can talk about
how that contributes to obesity
and all these kinds of issues that we have now.
Absolutely.
Yeah.
The one other thing I'd add is this.
Go ahead.
Weirdly, you talked about, well, you know, a species can't exist if it burns more calories to get the food than it gets in the food that it acquires.
True.
But do you know, but because we use fossil fuel energy to produce our food, we burn eight kilocalories of energy to produce one kilocalorie of food.
Wow.
of energy to produce one kilocalorie of food. We're circling the drain here. So we got to figure that one out. That's a whole separate question. One of the things that we can do, not for that,
what you just said, but in terms of the obesity aspect, because it makes sense from an evolutionary
standpoint that our bodies are kind of designed to work for food. So maybe we should have the
evolutionary diet where all your food is just on a little cart that you got to chase around for a few hours before you get to eat.
I like it.
I like it.
Well, you know, the supermarket, all the food's under two feet of dirt.
You got to get it out with a digging stick.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah.
This is not going to catch on.
Just saying right now,
I'm not digging full food.
Instead of whole foods, it's whole food.
Dig a whole food.
Dig a whole food.
I'll tell you what, too. When you dig for two hours to get
the carcass, because all the
sauce has to be a carcass and not like a little chop,
you're going to eat the zebra testicles.
You're going to eat the spleen.
You're going to be like, dang it, I worked for it.
It's going to change everybody's mentality about what's what's good food
i'm gonna tell you the truth i'm doing that anyway
put an insight into the nice household
nice daddy what's for dinner? Zebra testicles.
Whatever I can dig up.
You're going to eat every bit of your zebra testicles, damn it.
So, I mean, Doc, if our brain is developing, right,
at what rate is it developing in terms of our anatomy?
Because we really haven't changed in about 2 million or so years,
but have our brains changed at a greater rate?
Yeah.
So I guess I'd push back on Chris a little bit there because the anatomy,
the running anatomy shows up, you know, 2 million years,
1.5 million years ago.
Brains don't really get big like this big until, you know,
maybe half a million years ago.
Even our species doesn't show up until 300,000. 600,000 years ago.
Well, 300,000 years ago for Homo sapiens, right?
And our brains are super expensive.
Your brains run the equivalent of running a 5K. A full college education is like $400,000.
It's expensive.
What's that in calories?
Elite college education here
but go on
unless your parents are Hollywood
elites in which case
they're all in jail now
is that a case of ingenuity getting ahead
of where you're supposed to be
I'm not sure
so once we get this
brain development doc
do we then start to think well I'll hit the speed dial for the burrito. I won't have to go dig myself and chase myself my protein. I mean, what sort of point are we when we no longer need? Have we gone through this running phase to find our food?
Yeah, our body is designed for something that our brain has just completely rendered obsolete.
body is designed for something that our brain has just completely rendered obsolete.
Yeah, that's true.
I would say I'd push it back further than the speed dial for your pizza.
I'd push it back to farming.
I was about to say, domestication and farming would have to be, because at that point, your food, you're growing your food and you're growing your meat.
And your food comes to you.
Right.
Yeah, that's right.
And we change our foods.
We breed them so that they produce more
calories. An animal, a domesticated
livestock has twice as many
fat calories on it than a wild
animal does.
So we're changing their metabolism. And even what you feed it.
Even what you feed it. Like there's
grass fed and then there's corn fed.
And the difference is one is
fattier and one's more sinewy.
You know, one Thanksgiving, I said, you know, I'm going to get a wild turkey this Thanksgiving.
I cooked that wild turkey.
Did one a damn bit of meat.
I said, give me my Purdue chicken back.
That's a classic thing.
You should drink your wild turkey.
Don't eat it.
So, I mean, at what point are we finding ourselves going from coming out of forests and woodland into savannah to then finding ourselves herding, farming, and settlements?
What sort of timeline is that between? That's a long time.
Because we're moving into savannahs and hunting and gathering two and a half to two million years ago, let's say.
And you're not farming until 12,000 years ago.
a half to two million years ago, let's say, and you're not farming until 12,000 years ago.
So if you thought about the whole, you know, the history of the genus Homo, 95, 98% of it,
you can do the math quickly, is hunting and gathering. And it's just this last blink of an eye.
Okay, so this is a tiny bit off topic. So with respect to that whole brain thing and us getting our food, when do we see these communities dotting the earth in such a way that they stay by water and then they're fishing communities?
It's a transition from the plains living to coastal living.
Coastal living.
So what's amazing about genus Homo is it isn't just on the savannas.
They are everywhere.
And as soon as we find them, they're everywhere.
Like, poof, right?
Every landscape.
And so we see them on coastal areas.
We see them in the mountains.
We see them in the savannas.
That hunting and gathering strategy is a world beater.
And they're just absolutely everywhere.
And you're going to see pockets everywhere doing different foods kind of things,
depending on what's around.
Okay, so in spite of Uber Eats on speed dial,
the fact is there's still cultures out there
where running is the kind of running you do
to chase down an antelope.
They're still doing it just for fun.
And Chris McDougall studies just that.
Just check it out.
If I'd say, hey, Neil, there's one thing I can give you,
a little pill that's going to blow out obesity
and diabetes and depression and suicidal fixations. It will basically cure every leading cause of death
in the United States, minus one or two. Would you take the pill? Yeah. Okay. What if I told you the
pill is for free? You don't have to spend any money. Go out your door and you can get it in 45
minutes. Yeah, I know. Okay. I see what you're doing there. Okay.
All right.
So they have a level of health sustained just by this habit that they have that puts them in a very special place, especially relative to the rest of the Western world. So here's a fascinating thing, too.
Another series of components, either coincidence or correlation.
But the Tadomata are nonviolent.
They are very communal.
They are not capitalistic. They don't accumulate a bunch of stuff. Their cancer rates are believed to be
very low. Their depression rates seem to be very low, very low incidences of cardiovascular disease.
Basically, anything that would win you multiple Nobel Prizes today, they've had for 10,000 years.
And so maybe the question is, why do they why, you know, why do they run?
The question is, why don't we?
Wait, so were they all hiding under a rock?
How is it that you in this, the 21st century, end up discovering them?
How come this, all this wasn't out 100 years ago or 200 years ago
when anthropologists are running amok,
or European anthropologists are running amok all around the world,
writing up every culture that's even a little bit different from their own.
I think for two reasons.
One is the question that you looked at.
We don't want to run.
It's not fun.
The thing about it is the supposition is that running is this kind of unpleasant thing, and if people do it, they're kind of weird.
And where that comes from is the fact that you know evolutionarily we develop two things at once
you know a body designed for movement and a brain designed to save calories at all costs and so what
we're always trying to do is avoid emergencies where we're going to deplete our caloric reserves
and so for most of our evolutionary history it made a ton of sense for us to not run only run
when you have to. But the difficulty is
we basically removed all the emergencies from our lives as soon as we got vehicular transportation.
Up until about 100 years ago, everything was human powered. And then suddenly,
nothing is human powered anymore. And so the difficulty is our brain is still telling us,
dude, stay on the sofa. You never know when a saber-toothed tiger is going to come after you.
But the tigers are now gone.
And the reason why anthropologists and others haven't really focused on the Tarahumara
is I think that they were sort of written off as this own special little oddball group
doing its own special thing, that there wasn't a universal transferable skill.
And I think that's what we're starting to rediscover today.
Interesting.
Very interesting. So this is kind of like an anthropological bias.
So the Tahiramara
is a tribe in Mexico that he studied and he hung out with
them and wrote about them. And I'm still amazed that they were
mostly unknown to the rest of the Western world that completely surrounds them
north and south and to the left and right of them.
So I'm intrigued by that.
And so, Herman, would you say that this skill that they have of just loving to run,
running great distances over great amounts of time,
that this is just left over from this period of time where we evolved that to chase down our
envelope.
Yeah, I think it's left over.
I think it speaks to this capacity that humans have to run that we don't always use, but
that some cultures have really taken advantage of economically to run down prey.
Some just do because it's fun, like the Tarahumara.
I push back a little bit on what Chris was saying there.
I don't think it's that people have ignored running in other cultures.
I think it's very specific to where you live, right?
So the Hadza who I work with, they don't run.
And in fact, we-
And where are they based?
They're based where?
They're in Northern Tanzania, Savannah,
classic Savannah landscape, exactly where you'd expect.
And they might run and they don't.
And we know this because we have them wear little wearable GPS when they go
out. So we have like 2000 people days of speed and location and we can tell they never run.
And they're still as healthy as a Tarahumara. They have low blood pressure, no cardiovascular
disease, all that stuff. So you have to be active to be that healthy, but you don't have to run
specifically.
And I think it's like any other capacity that humans have that not all cultures express the same degree.
The Tarahumara like to run, but not everybody does.
Plus you left out the fact that there's no Krispy Kreme vendors.
I know. It's diet and exercise, of course, but yeah, sadly.
And every time you kill a zebra, it's just still testicles.
There's no Krispy Kreme in there either.
I still want to do what Chuck says. You don't kill them.
You ride them back and then let them do the work.
Ride them back and snack on them on the way.
That's brilliant.
I mean, that's what dairy cattle would do, right?
That's basically what that is.
Okay, so let's leave the zebra testicles behind for the
moment hopefully forever is it a fact that through our evolution humans are kind of born to do
anything high energy is it is that kind of thing we've got going on here yeah i think that that's
that's where we're coming down now and that's actually a lot of the work that chris has talked
about a lot of the stuff that he you know motivated our field to look into more deeply is, okay, well, humans can run.
Absolutely, that's true.
Let's follow that up and see, does everybody run all the time, where, when?
And it's been really fun to kind of see how that plays out.
So like I said, we don't see the HODs running as much, but absolutely, groups do.
And what it seems to be is that humans are evolved to be high energy apes, basically.
We have these engines that run hot.
We have these high metabolic rates.
We are able to do endurance stuff that other apes cannot do at all, including running if we want.
We also can walk a lot.
We can cover a lot of ground that way, too.
So it's kind of running as one piece of this overall endurance ape.
Herman, so if a gorilla is chasing you, can you outrun it?
If you can make the first 50 feet, you're probably
alright. Oh, very good to know.
Good to know.
I was going to say, the problem is
25 feet in, he's on top of you.
Damn, halfway!
Halfway!
Halfway!
Good thing is, though though gorillas are not very violent so that's that's a good thing you know is that true is that true herman no if they feel that you're a threat no i mean i mean
in terms of approaching uh you know being a threat they're not like if you're threatening them
you're in trouble but But they don't go...
A gorilla is like this. Hey, look, man.
I'm not looking for any trouble.
That's a gorilla in a nutshell.
But if you bring me trouble, you're going to get it.
I'm not looking for any trouble.
But if you want some...
Chuck, I'm going to write a paper with you on this.
On gorilla behavioral ecology
that's it, that's the paper, I love it
guys, we've got to take a quick break, but when we come back
we'll have more of my featured interview with journalist
and anthropology seeker, Chris McDougall
and we have in studio
Dr. Panzer, Herman Panzer
because he's telling us all about how we became human and what mattered for having done so.
And we're going to look into Dr. Ponser's new book, Burn, when we return.
Hey, it's time to give a Patreon shout-out to the following Patreon patrons.
Alex Ornelas and Albert Hulk.
Guys, thank you so much for all that you do to make this show happen.
Without you, we couldn't make it.
And for anybody else who would like their very own Patreon shout-out, please go to patreon.com slash startalkradio and support us.
We're back.
Sports edition.
Startalk.
We're talking about human evolution for running and walking,
featuring my interview with Chris McDougall.
He's a journalist and a sort of amateur anthropologist
who studied the Mexican Tarahumara tribe.
And all they do is run all day and night.
And they never sleep, apparently.
When they're not running, when they're not doing anything else, they're running.
Okay?
And we're trying to get to the bottom of that.
But Chuck, nice.
You tweet at Chuck Nice Comics.
Thank you, sir.
Yes, I do.
Yeah.
And Gary, you tweet at My Three Left Feet.
Yes, I do, sir.
We need to get an anthropologist to look into that.
Please do.
If we can.
All right.
And let's go straight to that first clip, just to get to the bottom of who the Tarahumara actually are.
Check it out.
You know, Neil, every time I would go to a doctor and ask them about why I was injured, I got the same answer, which is running is bad for the body.
And I believe that thing, that bias, has really affected how we look at the Tarahumara.
bias has really affected how we look at the Tarahumara.
Now, about them as a tribe, how mixed are they with the Spanish influence on the Americas going back, I guess now, 400, 500 years?
Or they have a sort of a more pure lineage from those who were first peoples in the Americas?
From a social standpoint, they are very reclusive.
You know, when the conquistadors
arrived, the Mayans and the Aztecs fought back and were decimated. The Tarahumara retreated and
hid. And that's why they're in the Copper Canyons. They have deliberately isolated themselves.
Physiologically, have they mixed with other peoples? Absolutely. So it's not like we're
talking about some kind of like thoroughbred bloodline. That's not what the trail is here. The trail is that they maintain the same practices.
It's not that their bloodline has remained separate. It's that their behavior has remained
the same. Do we know of any other cultures or tribes in the world that carry on this way?
Yeah. You know, and that's what's so cool about it is,
first of all, when you look at sort of mythology and folklore,
every group has a story about people running animals to death.
It's universal.
Every culture in the world, from Mongolia to Ohio,
there are folklore about people running animals to death.
So there is sort of an evidentiary trail that's going on.
As far as today,
you know, the San people, you know, the Kalahari Bushmen to this day still run animals to death.
So that's kind of the cool thing about it is you have these myths. So it had to come from somewhere.
And in those few pockets where people still live by persistence hunting, they still practice the
same tradition today. And it is interesting to me that you can run them to death and this requires no weapons at all.
So Herman, so in that brief exchange, we touched on some earlier topics as well.
I'm just wondering, is this ability to run, we've sort of preserved in our sports, I guess.
I guess that was an urge because we can.
Does your line of anthropological research come into modern times?
Or are you just back when, before there was the Olympics?
Yeah, well, I'm interested in how the body got to be the way it is,
you know, physiologically and anatomically.
And all of that change, you know, that changes so slowly
that that kind of, that story gets boring about 10,000 years ago.
And you have all these really recent changes that happened with farming and being sedentary,
but those aren't evolutionary changes so much as lifestyle changes in our bodies.
We use the same way.
Are you saying all of civilization is such of a blip on your timeline you're not even interested in it?
Yes.
Yeah.
People get boring.
The only thing that's interesting
is that we change the way we do our,
you know, that we get energy.
We start getting energy more explicitly
from the things we farm
and then from fossil fuels,
which is its own story.
Is there a bias?
Because for medical doctors to say you're running too much,
running is bad.
You'll hurt your knees.
You're the musculoskeletal system.
It cannot handle as much running as you're doing.
Even training for marathons.
You don't want to run too many marathons because the one you're training for,
you'll be.
And so I've,
I've read and I've heard about all this.
Meanwhile,
we have the,
this tribe in Mexico.
That's the opposite of this. So, so have this tribe in Mexico that's the opposite of this.
So is this a bias? What's going on here? Oh, absolutely. I mean, I think, you know,
you have a Western medical world that sees, you know, Americans, your typical American off the street, typically white Americans, by the way, typically males, as that's what normal humans are,
by the way, typically males as that's what normal humans are, right? And so if that's your blindered view of what normal is, then you've got a really strange idea about what the body can
handle. Because it's true that if you are completely out of shape and you start running,
training for a marathon, yeah, you might hurt yourself, right? If you grow up in it,
that's a level of training right there. And then if you just be careful about how you start,
anybody can start.
But yeah, absolutely.
I mean, I always enjoy my trips to the doctor because it's funny.
It's the anthropologist meets the MD, and we have different perspectives on how the body ought to work.
You just head into a fight the whole time, right?
And wouldn't it be true that, I mean, if you look at these other indigenous people, they were never running on pavement.
Well, that's another big thing.
Absolutely.
Yeah, that's right.
That's right.
And also they have low levels of inflammation, right?
So arthritis is as much as anything
an inflammation disease.
And we have high levels of chronic inflammation,
which is your immune system just kicking away,
being active without any reason.
Here in the States and in the industrialized world, you got low levels of background inflammation
in places where people are active all the time.
Would you say the Olympics is a way to try to remember these routes that you study?
Yeah, I like it.
I mean, you know, I'm not sure if like curling really gets us back to our roots.
Or synchronized swimming.
You know, when I go to the Hadza, I don't see a lot of... Synchronized swimming, not a big thing that the Hadza do.
They're missing out, Doc, really.
The beauty of synchronized swimming.
You've got to love that.
I'll bring some pictures next time and try to engender that kind of appreciation.
Oh, man.
We had a sports court here in our sports edition one time,
and the question is, should certain activities be turned into Olympic sports?
And one of the questions was, should, what was it, Gary, gaming?
Oh, there was eSports versus breakdancing.
And your decision, sir.
I forgot I was the judge.
Yes, I was.
Of course you were.
So your decision was based on the
fact, would it have
appeared on the side of a Greek urn?
And therefore, esports
had nowhere to plug in.
So it didn't get... I can imagine
breakdancing on the side of a Grecian urn.
Let me tell you, I've seen a few Grecian urns
where it looked like they were breakdancing.
There you go.
But none of them hunched over a computer.
But I think, Neil, you've made a great point there.
With the Olympics,
and we've always seen it as the pursuit of excellence,
I think there's another thing behind it
where we retain the ability to jump distance,
jump over something,
run further, run fastest.
Stuff that basically, Doctor,
you will have studied in the natural environment.
So the anthropology games.
I love it.
That's what we should have.
There you go.
I got some great ideas for us, guys.
Or you pull out a subset of the Olympics
that come closest to what we evolutionarily developed
out of what you studied for us.
Yes.
And then that becomes the anthropology games.
I love it.
Javelin stays, for sure.
Javelin stays.
Javelin stays.
Wrestling definitely stays.
So the discus, what would that be like a dinner plate?
You just get to throw as many dinner plates towards the trust people.
Someone says, pass the fried chicken.
I'm not getting up. Here, I'll fling it to you. That's right. Don't jump us out, towards the tribe's people. Someone says, pass the fried chicken. I'm not getting up.
Here, I'll fling it to you.
That's right.
Don't jump us out, though.
That's ridiculous.
Come on.
I mean, what kind of...
Oh, maybe that's going
across the river.
You skip across the stones
across the river.
Yeah.
So it's all going to have
a natural element to it.
Well, here.
Okay, my next clip
with Chris McDougall
is about what happens
if you actually have this Mexican tribe compete against anyone else who is sort of training as a runner in the traditional ways.
Let's see what happens out of that.
Check it out.
You know, part and parcel with the Tarahumara's ability to run long distances is the fact that they're not necessarily interested in what we're interested in.
You know, we sort of glorify a gold medal and a Nike sponsorship, and that means nothing to them.
And so in the past, a couple of times they have brought double amount of runners to the
Olympic Games and 26 miles, and they would finish the 26 miles kind of middle of the
pack, unimpressed by the whole spectacle.
I mean, 26 miles, dude, that's the warmup.
When's the race start?
That's right.
Yeah, bring in the 50-mile race.
There you go.
Which is exactly what happened.
So in the mid-1990s, there was a race,
the Leadville Trail 100,
which was the premier ultramarathon
in the United States at the time.
And a group of Tarahumara runners
were brought up from the Copper Canyons to compete in Leadville, and they just at the time. And a group of Tarahumara runners were brought up from the Copper Canyons
to compete in Leadville,
and they just devastated the field.
It was like nine of the top 10 runners
were Tarahumara,
and the 10th guy had to stop to tie his shoe,
otherwise it would have been a clean sweep.
Wait, wait, so this is a 100-mile race.
I didn't even know such a race existed.
Yeah.
It actually began as a horse race.
It was a horse race. It was
a horse race in California. And then one guy thought, well, my horse is sick. Maybe I'll
just run it myself. And he discovered that he was capable of running 100 miles. And so in the
mid-1990s, this began in Colorado at 12,000 feet. And when the Tarahumara, who had never trained,
didn't really know about the race, were brought to the starting line, it just took off and
devastated the American runners.
So Reebok actually sponsored the trip because they wanted to have a commercial with these
indigenous tribe runners in their shoes.
And instead, right before their race, they went to the town dump, got some old tires,
cut out a sole and then strapped on a pair of old car tires and threw away the Reeboks
and competed in the race in homemade sandals from the dump they made that morning.
So Herman, the tribes you studied in Tanzania, what kind of similarities do you see between
them and the Tahereh Mara?
Yeah, well, so they're both really active all day.
They're both getting, you know, as much physical activity in a day that, you know, as you and
I get in a week.
So they're super physically active.
The difference is that, you know,
the folks I work with don't run
to accumulate all that activity.
They're mostly walking or climbing trees to get honey
or digging the ground to get tubers, that kind of thing.
Wow.
Well, so tell me, how does this play out in calories?
Because your book, Burn, is all about that.
And it seems to me if i'm running
all day i'll be burning more calories than if i'm not running all day and so what what gives here
what's yeah you know when we think of calories we think of exercise but of course we burn a lot
of calories just to stay warm-blooded right that's right yeah i mean your brain brain burns 300
calories kilo calories a day uh your liver does the same. I mean, you know, your immune system's up and down all through the day
and your stress reactivity. So, you're burning calories on everything. You got 37 trillion cells
are all burning calories. You're burning calories, pay or play, you're burning calories.
That's right. That's right. And so, actually, some of the earliest work that we did with the
Hadza group was to go out and measure how many calories they burn every day.
So we use this cool isotope tracking technique that allows us to figure out how much carbon dioxide the body's expelling every day.
And if you expire carbon dioxide, it has to be calories.
And so it's this really precise way to get calories per day with these men and women in the Hadza community.
And even though they're really physically active, five times more than Americans, they burn the same number of calories every day
as men and women in the US and Europe
and other industrialized countries.
So their activity isn't changing the number of calories,
it's changing the way those calories are spent.
Wow.
So pressing the button on the remote is real exercise then.
That's what you're saying.
Now, here's the problem, Neil.
It's not.
And so your body's going to find a way to burn that energy.
So it's sort of like, it isn't sort of like, how do they spend so few calories?
It's like, well, how do we spend so many?
And the answer is, we've got sky-high inflammation levels.
And we react to stress too much.
We have higher cortisol and adrenaline levels.
So our bodies are doing all this overactivity stuff.
That's really bad for you.
So we burn our calories through worrying.
Yes. It's true.
It's true, absolutely.
And it's bad for you
to not spend those calories on exercise.
You spend them on exercise.
That's what we're evolved to do.
If you spend them clicking your remote,
that's it.
So tell me,
what is the main point in your burn book?
If we're going to make this a bestseller,
what are people going to get most out of it? They are going to find out how diet and exercise
actually affect your body, right? How the calories in that we take away the diet, how your body burns
all that off and all the things it does every day and how things like exercise and activity
actually affect the way that your body works. You got to do both. But this book tells you how,
and it gets away from all the fad BS stuff.
Because as somebody who actually does research on this,
it pains me to see the diet books and the fad,
you know, metabolic code and all this stuff.
And it's like, come on, man.
Yeah, Herman, I have to share that sentiment.
I had a task that I needed to do,
which would take me 30 hours.
And so, but it's a mindless task.
So I said, why don't I binge every single Netflix documentary on nutrition and food?
And so I watched, you know, 20, you know, 20 or so documentaries.
And not only did most of them contradict each other, They were just, it was sad.
What kind of sort of mixture,
I don't want to quite call it full-up pseudoscience,
but it was what people wanted to be true
or felt like should be true
or was consistent with their new age philosophies.
And I was very disappointed in it.
And this is what people are paying attention to.
Yeah, so hopefully this book is a corrective to that.
I mean, there's nobody, there's so few real voices of real scientists out there in the
diet and nutrition spaces.
There's plenty of books.
There's plenty of people with MD after their name.
But, you know, so hopefully this is a corrective to that.
And people get excited.
We talk about the HOSA.
We talk about some other fun field stuff.
People get excited about the science of metabolism and don't have to make stuff up.
So I want you to grade a tweet that I once posted, okay?
I'll tell it to you.
Give me A, B, C, D, E, or F.
Okay, here's the tweet.
If physicists,
if a physicist wrote a diet book,
it would contain one sentence,
burn calories at a higher rate than you consume them.
Yeah.
Yep.
That's it.
That's it.
How do you get there?
Yeah, the problem is you're not going to make any money with that.
No.
No, you know, so it's been fun watching the reaction to my book.
And one of the reactions I've got was, this book sucks.
There's no simple diet strategy. where's my fad diet where's the cure-all diet this one food you eat that
makes the pounds melt away right right yeah everybody wants that yeah but that's why it's
a multi-billion dollar industry because it's not about health it's about psychological manipulation, you know, which can sometimes lead to health.
If somebody, you know, if somebody believes in it enough and sticks to whatever the prescription is,
they might end up losing weight and looking like they won, but it's because they ended up doing
what you both just said. Yeah. And then they become an evangelist. That's the other side of
this. Somebody finally finds what works for them to lose weight,
and all of a sudden that's the only thing that works.
That's what everybody has to do.
And everybody else has to do it too.
Well, I'm delighted that in this show we have two sort of remarkable books
that we're talking, you know, McDougall's book, Born to Run,
and Herman, your book, Burn.
You can't argue with that title.
Burn, baby, burn.
It seems to me that some combination of those two books would do us all well
to heed the insights and advice gleaned within them.
So Herman, take us out with some reflective final thoughts.
Well, energy is really at the core of it all, right?
You've got to turn energy into babies if you want to be a successful species.
And humans are really good at that, which is why we are all over the planet, the most
dominant species.
And the task for the next generation is to get responsible, not just good at getting
energy out of our environments and turning it into babies, but responsible about it and
do it in a way that doesn't crash us out. Because forever is a long time and there's no guarantee we'll be
here in a million years. Well, that's a very important point. What's the average life expectancy
of a mammal species? It is about a million years or so. So we are only, we're in the first third
here of our time. First third. Will our brain make that shorter for us or longer?
Isn't that interesting?
I mean, in one way, it specializes us towards this way of living that could kill us because we were able to invent nuclear weapons.
On the other hand, it gives us this adaptability to be able to figure it out.
So which wins?
I don't know.
You tell me.
I'm asking.
You're the damn anthropologist.
That's why I'm asking you.
We only look backwards. Nice. Okay. Oh, you got it. I don't know. You tell me. I'm asking you to damn anthropologist. That's why I'm asking you. We only look backwards.
Nice.
Okay.
Oh, you got it.
I see.
Okay.
All right.
So you're not going to go in the crystal ball.
I will say trauma and stress breeds wisdom and innovation.
And I'd like to think that we will outlive our own weaknesses and to see another day.
This has been StarTalk Sports Edition.
Gary O'Reilly, always good to have you and Chuck there as my co-host.
I want to thank Mr. McDougall, who shared with us his wisdom and insights, being a journalist
reporting on anthropological tribes in Mexico.
And Professor Herman Poncer, and Professor Herman Ponser.
Always good to talk to you.
We've known each other before we recorded Star Talks,
and it's good to have you.
And you're into some really good, interesting stuff,
and let this not be your last time on our show.
That'd be great.
All right, excellent.
I'm Neil deGrasse Tyson, your personal astrophysicist.
As always, keep looking up.