StarTalk Radio - Cosmic Queries: Funding Space Exploration
Episode Date: September 28, 2014How important is it to fund space exploration? Find out when Bill Nye, CEO of the Planetary Society, returns as guest host to answer fan questions, along with Eugene Mirman and NASA astronaut Mike Mas...simino.Read more and Subscribe to SiriusXM Podcasts+ on Apple Podcasts to listen to new episodes ad-free and a whole week early.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to StarTalk, your place in the universe where science and pop culture collide.
StarTalk begins right now.
Welcome to StarTalk Radio. I'm your host, Bill Nye the Science Guy.
And with me today is Eugene Merman.
Hello, Bill. Wait, where's Neil?
Neil?
Yeah.
Neil Tyson, Degrass Tyson.
Yeah, yeah.
He's busy. He's gone. He asked me to sit in, but I'm doing my best to have good posture.
Also with us today, Eugene, is Mike Massimino from NASA.
Unlike many of us us flown in space.
Call him Mass, yeah?
That's good. Call me Mass. Good to be here, Bill. Thanks. How you doing, Eugene?
Good. Good to see you, Mike.
Now, Mike, you're in New York.
I am. I'm at Columbia University. I'm teaching a space-related course, Introduction to Human Spaceflight.
Let me ask you this.
Ask away. This is the introduction to human spaceflight.
That's right.
Is there like 200, 210, 300 level courses?
How many courses do I take in human spaceflight?
This is the introduction.
So we'll start with this and then we'll see how this one goes.
We're taking it one at a time.
If you take that class.
If it goes well, we'll see where we want to go from there.
Is that enough to kind of go in?
Like how much more than your class would I need to go into space?
You would need a lot, Eugene.
But all of us need a lot.
A lot.
But this will give you the basics of what you need to learn.
Say I took your class and had, I don't know, $85 billion.
Would those two things be enough?
With the $85 billion, you don't need my class.
In fact, I would recommend it in that case.
I don't want to waste the money.
No.
In that case, I would say don't waste your time.
If you figured out a way to make $85 million and you want to spend it on a space flight,
I would go straight to that option.
Okay.
Gentlemen.
Yes.
Sorry.
No, it's great.
It couldn't be better.
This is the Cosmic Queries edition of StarTalk Radio.
And we have queries from out there, from the social media. Yes, from Facebook, Twitter, probably photos on Instagram of questions.
The Tumblr, all the things that kids are using, but they're electric computer machines.
Exactly.
College kids.
Yeah, well, we'll see.
So my understanding is Eugene, radio's a visual medium out there.
He's got some papers. Yeah, I have some papers with questions that people wrote in about NASA and planetary science funding, and I'm going to read them.
So let's try one.
Let's do it.
Will Burke asks, what is the biggest stumbling block for NASA to get funding?
Is it stubborn legislators, science illiteracy, or other factors?
What's the best way we can change it mass um i i think that
nasa does it does get funding we always could use more yeah i think is general you know yeah but i
think it's just how we how we value things you know if we would value the science that comes
out of the space program more i think people people would be willing to pay more for it.
Exploration, international.
I think a lot of people don't understand all the things that NASA does.
What are?
Like, let's just take one thing, international cooperation.
You might not think of NASA with international cooperation, but a lot of the science programs
we have, particularly the International Space Station, is international.
It's called the International Space Station.
It might be very hard to make friends with a Russian on this planet,
but if you just go a little into space, everybody's friendly.
Well, look about when I was a kid, we weren't necessarily friends with the Russians.
The Soviet Union and the U.S. were in a Cold War,
and now we fly into space with these people all the time.
We're really good friends with them.
I think that's one benefit that people don't realize.
The other thing, everybody, everybody for me science is important
and i love science i'm the science guy after all but what the space program brings us is this
optimism when you have a space program no matter what country you are you believe your society
believes many people believe that any problem can be solved if you can put a man on the moon we can
make a car that goes over 100 000 miles we. We can do anything. And this is why all these countries you might not think of
of having space programs that you fly with,
South Africa, what have you, Australia,
on the back of the Canadian Brazil.
Brazil has a space program?
Yeah.
You hear the tone of his voice?
He was incredulous.
No, I'm not mad at them.
I'm glad.
No, no. You just didn't believe it it's crazy wow yes because they know the value of having people running
around in your society doing space solving space problems yeah and the thing for me as the executive
director ceo of the planetary society is uh charge yeah well is uh planetary science is where these new problems are being
solved trying to land a car on mars is an extraordinary undertaking and so when you go
to solve problems that have never been solved before you just innovate can't be helped uh so
that's the the value is selling politicians of all sides of the of the executive the judicial and the
and the uh congressional representative on the value of space exploration.
So that's because the last part of that question was what's the best way we can change it?
What are like, say, two or three things?
Vote.
So voting.
Vote on the way that people vote on particular issues.
Vote on the issue of science.
That's right.
Well, especially space science.
Space science.
Yes.
So people say
why are you exploring mars what are you going to find there we don't know that's why we're exploring
we're going to probably find the technology to make even better cell phones that's what people
know that's that's absolutely correct yeah yeah people do have a voice in this for example the
hubble space telescope which was i think a very good combination of human space flight and planetary
science would you agree oh yeah all the smart people that come up with the discoveries.
I mean, it had some problems, so you had to walk in space and fix it.
That's true.
Yeah, well, they had canceled the last servicing mission that I was lucky to be on.
They had canceled it, and then it got brought back mainly because of public outrage
and the politicians listening.
And Bill, I'm sure, is a big part of that.
They wanted Hubble fixed.
The people do have a voice. If we could only trick Al-qaeda into bombing something in outer space we'd be there that
was what started the whole thing was the ultimate high ground we digress yeah so vote person on the
who asked the question and let's change the world okay here's a next question from chris van gundy
shouldn't the rest of the government be begging NASA for money?
Well, this is the old question.
You see, it's not do space exploration or provide clean water for people who don't have it or provide education for girls and women so that they raise a standard of living
and improve the quality of life for all citizens everywhere.
It's not one or the other.
It's not NASA or build a new baseball stadium.
You have to do everything all at once.
Right.
Also, doesn't NASA – investing in NASA then literally has a very good return, right?
Yeah.
In terms of the money the government spends.
And it's not very much.
It's less than one penny of your tax dollar that goes to NASA.
Yeah, 0.4%.
And furthermore, also in addition to continue, the current number is $3.60.
For every dollar that goes into NASA, you get $3.60 back.
That's pretty good.
That's really good.
That's very good.
Some people will argue that highways are slightly larger, but highways in general do not lead to innovation the way space exploration does.
And it's something for the future.
It's about the future.
Innovation is what's going to drive the economy.
So anyway, you guys, pretty soon we've got to take a break.
You sold me on it.
We've got to take a break, but I want you all out there to visit www.startalkradio.net.
Find us on Twitter, at Startalk Radio.
Check out Eugene Merman, at Eugene Merman.
And check out Mike, at Astro underscore Mike.
We'll see you in a moment.
Welcome back to StarTalk Radio.
I'm Bill Nye the Science Guy, guest hosting for my beloved colleague Neil deGrasse Tyson.
I'm here with your favorite, Eugene Merman, and everybody's favorite astronaut, Mike Massimino.
Call him Mass.
And this is the Cosmic Query edition of StarTalk Radio. And we have your queries from the cosmos.
There's very strong evidence that all of these questions are from people within our universe.
Yes.
But maybe not.
We'll find out.
Take one.
Let's go.
William Dyke asks, what are some of the current and future strategies of privatized space travel versus
those of NASA or other government-based space programs?
What is different about their strategies and why?
What types of missions or projects do you see these two sides carrying out 50 or 100
years from now?
That's a lot of questions.
People are terrified of only asking one clear question.
It's of a piece, though.
It's all one thing.
The difference is when people started exploring space at NASA, they weren't trying to make money.
The modern idea is that you could make money in space.
Now, people make a lot of money in space with communication satellites.
I don't want to shock you all, but there's this business of the National Security Agency,
and there's certain spy satellites, and there's a lot of weather satellites,
and those data are sold like crazy.
There's a lot of money in rain.
That's right, there is.
If you're a farmer, yeah, you have great fascination and so on.
With that said, there are extraordinary ideas.
Let's go get an asteroid and pull back the platinum.
Yeah.
But anyway, those people believe they can make money.
But note well, a company like SpaceX or Sierra Nevada Space or XCOR Corporation, these companies take money from the U.S. government to promote or develop their rockets.
It's not a standalone business yet.
Mass, did you get involved in that stuff?
Mass, did you get involved in that stuff?
Yeah, we work in three of the companies that are trying to get us back with people launching to the International Space Station with astronauts.
You mentioned a couple of them.
SpaceX, Sierra Nevada, and Boeing.
Sierra Nevada is not a soda company?
No, it's not.
No, it's nothing to do with beverages.
Okay.
Although hopefully they will provide beverages on their spaceship.
Eventually.
You need water.
Hey, I've got a question.
Sorry.
Yeah.
Do you guys really drink Tang?
We drink what we call orange flavored drink because the name you mentioned- No branding in space.
Right, exactly.
So everything we have, like let's take a chance.
Q-tip, okay?
It's not a Q-tip.
It's a cotton swab assembly.
Oh, it's an assembly.
So is it a CSA?
It's a cotton swab, a CSA, but we want to make sure we know what it is because CSA could also be Canadian Space Agency.
Or a community-supported agriculture.
You know what really gets confusing, though?
What?
Is when you need to take any kind of medicine because it doesn't have the brand names.
Oh, so you don't know.
We don't know what the heck
half this stuff is.
Are you allowed to bring brands into space
and just not say them?
Like if you ever had a candy bar
that's a brand, I don't even know.
That's right.
Well, we have certain candy bars
that we have certain candy.
It's very, very popular
because they're small
and you can float them.
Yeah.
And we call them candy covered chocolates.
You don't call them W-Ws
and just like, oh, wow.
Oh, let's get back to this guy's question.
But everything has its generic name.
Yeah, so what are some private-
So we have a generic name for that product, which is orange-flavored drink.
Orange-flavored drink.
So while you're enjoying your orange-flavored drink, it is to be hoped that soon you will get up into microgravity.
Yes.
By means of rockets not built exclusively by NASA.
Correct.
And NASA has worked with contractors right from the very beginning with some of the big
government contractors, Rockwell International, for example.
The old joke, you got to the moon on the lowest bidder.
That's correct.
Grumman, all these companies all work together to build spaceships funded by the government.
So there is some government funding going into those private companies as well.
So I think it's a good partnership.
I think, as Bill said, they're trying to make money.
And so this could be a very, very exciting time.
And I'm noticing that my position at Columbia with all these young, smart kids, and these kids are a lot smarter than I ever remember being.
They are interested in the space program just as much as we were when we were kids but it's not just nasa it's they're
interested in going to work for one of these companies they see this entrepreneurship
as the future and i think that there's going to be a hopefully if you're optimistic about it
a very good relationship between the companies and nasa in the future well nasa is a sort of
launching pad for a lot of private a launching pad that's brilliant sorry to wow how'd
you get involved let's try another question that's the whole idea yeah uh all right here's another
question from susan minnow but uh people often complain about the nasa budget and claim the
that private industry should take over some of the work that nasa does but they don't do it
already because the of government but they don't they do it already because of government. But don't they do it already because of government contracts?
What percent of the NASA budget goes to private sector contractors?
That's the question.
I don't know.
But it's got to be enormous.
Whenever you buy hardware, you're buying it from companies like Boeing,
like United Launch Alliance, what have you.
Yeah, NASA buys stuff from a lot of companies.
But in the bigger picture.
Yeah, it contracts to work for them.
They only have a certain number of people working in the NASA workforce workforce how much stuff is built there i decided well if you let's
say you have a mars rover hypothetically it's machined the metal is cut at the jet propulsion
lab in pasadena some of it the mirrors are coated somewhere else the lenses are ground somewhere
else and these are all done by companies but the fundamental, if I can read into this question a bit, there's no, right now, there's no business model that takes people to Mars.
There's no business model to find out whether the core of Jupiter has hydrogen that acts like a metal.
There's just no reason for a private company to do that at this time.
Even though I'm very curious?
Well, yes.
That's not a reason. That don't put bread on a table
eugene well you don't know that because you might find something about the hydrogen metal that would
affect the way we make uh semiconductors or microcircuits or something yeah with that said
these things are all built by contractors and the then the crossover right now is the guys the people who want to mine
asteroids and at first it sounds sexy and fabulous and literally a shiny object to go to an asteroid
and get platinum yeah but apparently the big thing they want to get on asteroids is water
so you take water and then it's fuel for your spaceship to keep going so you you have solar
panels on your spaceship your your thing, your spacecraft.
You get out there into the asteroid.
You electrolyze water, make it hydrogen and oxygen,
somehow put it in a tank.
How hard could it be in outer space?
Millions of kilometers from here, yeah.
And then you would have fuel to go on to some other exotic destination,
maybe to your platinum-bearing asteroid, and you'd drag that back to the Earth and get rich.
That's a pretty good plan.
All right.
So here's a question from Twitter from Michael Christian.
He asks, what kind of private donation systems exist to supplement funding NASA projects or other planetary science research?
Well, I'm sure this person is referring
to the Kickstarter program for StarTalk Radio.
Wait.
Or for a shuttle.
Is there a Kickstarter to raise billions of dollars?
The only donation system I know is called taxes.
Really?
I mean, I don't...
Wait, you can't...
But Bill probably...
I mean, as far as NASA goes,
NASA gets its budget based on the tax dollar.
But the way that NPR or various places that are partially public partially private uh get money is there
a thing like that where he could be like you know what i'm going to give seven billion dollars to
nasa uh well there is one that i know of and i'm not an expert on all of them that there might be
but the arkid telescope this is a idea where they're going to make telescopes to look, nominally to look for asteroids,
but the proposal is to have one pointed
at the Earth, and then you, the
user, the online happy person,
can then get that
telescope to point at anything you want.
It sounds very romantic, Mount
Everest, but maybe
your neighbor's yard, what have you.
Check if the lights are on when you're away.
For example.
Anyone can access it?
I don't understand the price structure exactly,
but you give so much money to ARKYD, A-R-K-Y-D,
and they will give you access to the telescope based on some formula.
And I imagine the more money.
Do you hear that, very creepy people?
I don't think I like this idea.
International spy agencies?
Putting a dome over my house.
Yeah.
Well, I don't know what the resolution would be and how much value it would be,
but what do you do when you download Google Earth and get it running on your computer?
What's the first thing you do?
You look at your house.
You look at where all your exes live.
You second.
Eugene, I keep some of that to yourself.
That's a warning to Eugene's's exes right there that was
eugene yeah just anyway how many were you talking about i mean round numbers a 100 to 300 yeah no
normal all right here's another question daniel uh segraves asks since our government doesn't
understand priorities oh yeah i want to contribute to nasa financially or otherwise otherwise i don't
know what he means to send them poems what is the most effective way to do so so that's a similar
question i would claim the most effective way is to vote that you hire people which we call
congressmen and senators to make these decisions and you hire them to figure out where to send
money to what so you write them letters you call them you could for example join the planetary society at planetary.org and we will work to influence congress to ensure what about
lobbyists i mean do people are there lots of people who hire lobbyists yeah well contractors
do yeah contractors your lockheeds your boeings i don't want to drop too many names but we're
going to have to take another break, and I encourage
everyone to check out the podcast
on iTunes. I encourage
you to check out Facebook, your Twitter, your Google,
your Pinterest, all the stuff the kids are into.
www.startalkradio.net
We will talk
to you on the other side of this break. Welcome back to StarTalk Radio.
Bill Nye, the science guy here, guest hosting this week on our Cosmic Queries edition of StarTalk.
Here as always with Eugene Merman and special guest this week, Mike Massimino.
Call him Mass.
He flew in space.
Now, Mass, as we call you, you were following up on this question about how do we participate in space.
Because they asked financially or otherwise.
What are other ways that you can help Mass?
Financially, I'm not a financial guy.
But otherwise, I would suggest for Daniel, who asked the question, and maybe some of his friends, too, if you're interested in the space program and want to contribute, there's ways to contribute with your own interests and your own energy and your own efforts.
If you have a passion for the space program, which I assume he does because he's taking time to write us a question, and whether he's interested in science or math or if he's interested in literature or art or comedy in your case right you never and
you're interested in the space program use your talents to promote the space program to work on
the space program get a job in aerospace get a job become an engineer invent something see what's
going on make a space shuttle or a weapon and there's a hey but there's a lot of resources
out there where you can find out what's going on in different parts of the country, different parts of the world, and see what you can do to make it part of your life.
I think that's the best way for a young person.
I'm assuming maybe he's not a young person.
I don't know.
He has a last name.
He doesn't have a last name, so he's probably of some age.
Get involved and do it, I would say.
He's over five years old.
He's over if he can write, so he's ready to go.
Let me just say about getting involved.
Yeah.
Well, getting involved in space, at least if you live in the U.S.,
it means influencing NASA, yes?
I'm surprised more people don't hire lobbyists to, like, get together,
hire a lobbyist to just generally pressure all Congress people
to have more funding for NASA.
Well, we do at the planetary society you do so give
you guys money and then you'll hire all lobbyists we just need we have one we have one yeah but what
if you had five what if you had there you go yeah i'm really now i'm like let's do this so well
along that line as you may know i uh did a little video an open letter to the president of the United States, encouraging him to ensure that we have funding for this niche.
It's a line item within a line item.
Let's say NASA is a line item.
Planetary science is a line item.
I just want them to fund it at a level high enough to keep the current missions flying.
You know, we have Cassini flying around Saturn.
Messenger went to Mercury.
We got Juno going to Jupiter.
It's crazy.
We got two rovers on Mars.
And those programs, the Curiosity rover, all in, developed over 10 or you could call it 12 years,
cost $1.5 billion.
That's like one cup of coffee per taxpayer for crying out loud.
And let me tell you something That concerns me
Let's stop helping kids
And let's start helping space turtles
Is it a good cup of coffee?
Well, yeah, fancy one
But let me say
It's $1.5 billion
It's on Mars
And it's not even locked
Anybody could just walk up to it
I don't
It's shocking
We should have a message
To steal the rover on Mars.
That's not a bad contest.
Oh, my God.
You'd have to build a thing to go to land on Mars?
Quite an extraordinary undertaking.
Let me ask a question.
The ride doesn't pay, folks.
Unless you can get to Mars.
That's why it doesn't pay.
It's too expensive to get to Mars.
Right.
It's not affordable.
Okay, Gavin Boucher asks.
He's from melbourne
australia he asked do you lament the lack of funding not just for nasa but for science education
in general from a distance the other side of the world it appears that america's school science
programs are not receiving the backing that they should and are under attack from other influences
such as religious and political agendas if i were king of the forest yes we would have more
funding for science but if i may let's not call it channel but speak on behalf of my beloved
colleague neil degrasse tyson who would normally be hosting star talk radio if we had a robust
space program where investment was being made at a higher level than it is now, and we were going to someplace new and cool with people like mass, flying out into space, someplace new and exciting, you wouldn't need to run in circles screaming about science, technology, engineering, and math, which we like to call STEM.
It would just happen.
It would be the real trickle down of science.
That is a real thing.
Well, not just science, but exploration.
Right.
Adventure.
Exactly.
Because there's two things that happen, Mass.
You've been up there.
You've done it.
When you go exploring, two things.
You're going to make discoveries.
You're going to find things you never found before.
The other thing you're going to have, Eugene.
Yeah.
And adventure.
Adventure.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
Of course you'll have an adventure.
Did you guys, when you were in space,
did you discover anything?
Were you like, oh, this is a thing
nobody knows about shoes?
Bad example, but you know what I mean.
Actually, it depends how you look at it.
We were more or less the workers,
the maintenance people for the Hubble Space Telescope.
So we didn't look through the telescope.
Space mechanics.
We fixed it.
But our smart people here on
Earth, all the astronomers, for example, Adam Ries and a group of other astronomers won
a Nobel Prize. The theory of dark energy and dark matter came out of Hubble.
Oh, wow.
Observations.
Out of what you fixed.
Out of what we fixed. So we were more like the repair people. But, you know, the astounding
discoveries that were made.
But didn't you like fly up with like a snake in a box just to see what would happen?
Oh, like our own fun stuff?
Like, did you go like,
yeah, we're going to fix the Hubble,
and while we do this,
here's some snakes and shoes,
and let's see how rabbits act
when you throw them in space.
No, we had sweetest fish,
candies and stuff.
Yeah, we did our own little experiments,
but we played baseball in space.
You didn't publish them.
Yeah.
Did you walk in space and play baseball?
No.
I walked in space,
and I played baseball separately
We played baseball inside the cabin
But we did participate
In some human subject tests
But the big science objectives
For us were to get Hubble fixed
To discover dark matter
To discover some really cool stuff
They throw around the term dark matter, dark energy
Everybody throws it around like it's just
Everybody knows about it
But mass is the guy that.
Nobel Prize winning stuff.
So we got to take another break.
We encourage you all to enjoy your www.startalkradio.net.
Check us out on Pinterest and check us out right after this break. Welcome back.
Bill Nye the Science Guy here, guest hosting StarTalk Radio.
This week, the Cosmic Queries edition, and where we answer your questions.
Eugene.
Yes.
You got another question?
I do, from Andrew Robles.
Here we go.
Scenario.
You're in an elevator with a congressman who has a lot of say over where tax money gets
spent.
You have one minute until the elevator arrives at its destination.
What examples of economic, technological, or any other returns would you use to convince
him that space exploration is worth funding more mass in uh with with a minute ago i would say that it's going to
stimulate the economy uh with uh new technology yeah new developments in the science field uh
coming new new new discoveries and materials and medicines and so on it helps education because it
inspires young people.
And it promotes international cooperation
because we have our International Space Station
and other science programs.
And it gives us something for our future.
It's about exploration in our future.
Yes, by my reckoning, you did it in
56 seconds. Nicely done.
Now onto my floor, and I'm on my way.
But Bill, what would you say?
I'd say space exploration brings out the best in us.
It's inherently optimistic.
It stimulates the economy in the U.S.
at least $3.60 for every dollar that goes in.
And we make discoveries that literally change the world.
Astronomy has changed the world.
We found that the Earth goes around the sun.
That changed everything.
We found the sun's not unique.
The first people were maybe punished for it, but yes. It sounds like it, yeah. But it did around the sun. That changed everything. Yeah. We found the sun's not unique. The first people were maybe punished for it, but yes.
It sounds like it.
Yeah.
But it did change the world.
Yeah.
And now people throw around the expression dark energy, dark matter, like it's a day at the office.
But we all take it for granted that there is such a thing or such things.
And these were not discovered even really 15 years ago.
Who knows what new physics?
Who knows what is over the next horizon?
15 years ago.
Who knows what new physics, who knows what is over the next horizon.
And Congressman, if I may just speak as a guy born in the U.S. and as a patriot, don't you want the U.S. to continue to lead in this thing?
Isn't that what you want, Mr. Congressman?
Yeah.
Ms. Congressman.
All right.
Here's another question from Cameron Nuss.
He wants to know how long, if at all, before a manned mission to Titan, would this be a public or private sector venture?
Yeah.
That's a long old way out there.
Titans, that's a long old way.
How long would it take to get to Titan, first of all?
It depends on your rocket ship.
Yeah, but- You'll say I'm using one I got at Target.
Long time.
How long would that take?
That's a long time.
Cassini took five years, right?
Yeah, that's a long time.
Five years.
And this is, we don't have the technology right now to stay away from all that radiation.
It's not clear how bad that is.
How much radiation?
Enough to kill you, which you probably don't want.
Even to kill a baby that maybe could adapt more?
Yeah, and so on.
That's not how it works.
You'd have a lot of shielding.
You'd try to make it better.
What if we sent babies that grew up and then, no.
No, that's not how we have
the diaper thing down you'd have to have a whole bunch of babies and see which one made it through
they'd have no trouble wearing diapers yeah you could send mass has been there send like a 12
year old a bunch of 12 year olds that will grow up slowly during the mission but what we're a
genius you need to be you need to be talking to that congressman in the elevator mass you how
much trouble did you have with bone loss?
Calcium loss
My trips were two weeks at a time, Bill
But we've got that licked, we think
But we've got it licked through lots of exercise
How much do you lose?
You can lose a very significant amount
If you did nothing in space
If you did not exercise
You would lose a lot
How much do you exercise when you go there?
So right now to counteract that there is some medicine you can take,
and that's, again, a benefit of the space program
because it also applies to osteoporosis to prevent bone loss.
Yeah.
But still, the way we've gotten around that, we don't have bone loss.
It's not an issue anymore.
But what we have to do to counteract it is two hours of exercise,
six days a week.
Oh, wow.
So that's a lot of lost time.
It's a lot of time.
Because you're on the payroll.
You're on the payroll.
How do you exercise in space?
There's machines with resistance.
Yeah, so there's, and it's a good point because you can lift weights all you want and it ain't
going to do you any good in space, right?
Right.
So what we have is we have resistive.
Wait a minute.
Resistive exercise.
That's crazy.
You're like Hercules, Bill.
Yeah.
But it's, we have resistive exercise.
You just have a machine that tries to crush you.
That's right.
More or less.
Like basically like that scene in Star Wars.
That's sometimes the way it's described when it's on the fritz.
Be careful of the thing.
But it works on springs and therabands like you might have seen in rehab medicine.
So it's resistive exercise plus it's also a treadmill is generally a popular way to exercise.
So it's both cardio and it's also resistive exercise.
And it's resistive exercise that keeps your bones in good shape.
And to this questioner, it's a long way.
And who's paying for it?
It's a lot of fuel.
Yeah.
Do we have another question, fearless leader?
We do.
So Justin Foley asks, how do you see CubeSats and other small spacecraft affecting space exploration?
I think these things are great, Bill.
What's the coolest thing?
What's a CubeSat?
It's a CubeSat.
It's a small experiment That can be flown By universities
I think high school
Students have done them
As well
10 centimeters
By 10 centimeters
By 10 centimeters
Oh wow
It's fantastic
It was a great
Opportunity
So there's standards
For science community
And for education
They fit on a standard
Launcher ring
They go off
From a standard
Spring loaded gizmo
And I can't point out
The Planetary Society
Is going to fly
Two solar sails
Stick with us
There are CubeSats That will be deployed in space to see if we can develop technology to fly to other planets without any fuel.
We'll have to talk more about that.
Yes, we will talk more about that on the other side of this break.
Please stay tuned to StarTalk Radio.
Welcome back to StarTalk Radio.
Bill Nye, the science guy here, guest hosting this week on the Cosmic Queries Edition.
Now, Eugene.
Yeah, I wanted to know more about CubeSats. So you were like, yeah, universities can have them.
What is it?
How do you make it?
How much do they cost?
They're 10 centimeters by 10 centimeters by 10 centimeters.
Very small.
Fit in a lunchbox.
And it's a standard that can be launched from a standard system on board a
standard rocket and so you can launch generally seven at a time universities make these things
you can buy the circuit boards and software online can a person launch it or you need a rocket well
these things still cost a million dollars they cost a lot of money but you get a grant i mean
it's a program you can apply for a grant to NASA. And then? And if your grant is accepted and you have funding to do it, then you build your project,
fly it in space, and it's great.
It's a great way to, it's a relatively inexpensive way to explore space.
To put it this way, if your grant's accepted.
Nice.
All right, let's do a lightning round.
Which brings us to the lightning round.
All right, here we go.
A few seconds per question.
Take it.
Here's a question.
Dyer Mayo wants to know,
would it be possible to host a music festival
on a radio satellite for a, quote,
hip promotional event?
Is there a way NASA could start
a nationwide door-to-door survey
to get people to sign a petition
to raise the NASA budget?
That sounds like a two-part question,
and I think if you've got a corporation involved,
excited about your music, that corporation could easily fund such a satellite.
The big problem will be getting a license and saying it's all solvable problems.
Get out there and do it.
Yeah.
All right.
Chagra wants to know, do we really have to choose between Cassini and Curiosity?
I don't want to lose either.
We at the Planetary Society are petitioning
the U.S. government to
not have to make that choice.
There should be enough funding for planetary science,
a line item within the NASA
budget, to fund both missions.
Cassini's out there. You know how much money we've invested
in that time, effort, and energy? For crying
out loud, we've got to keep them both flying.
Okay. Here we go.
Debbie Large wants to know
why isn't there more news coverage of science advancement when i was a kid all networks had
a science correspondent that's true what the hell well now there's a whole channel called the science
channel yeah but why not yeah but that's for people already like science or want to watch
toilets get built and how it works at a factory what about like uh what about major
networks being like this is the weather and this is today's science i guess it doesn't sell well
enough or else they would have it yeah there's other sources for that information mostly online
we recommend planetary.org i just did a fabulous thing with ifls i won't spell that out just go
check it out because they it's the news of science i think it could be i think it's a shame that it's not seen as a more interesting topic or made more entertaining
the three of us will fix it yeah we need to that's what we're trying to do now but i agree
it should be more in the mainstream okay i think it could be i think so uh jimmy class manson wants
to know uh since china is now sending robots to the moon does does the U.S. have any plans of doing the same?
Not right now.
There are congressmen and senators who insist that the U.S. go back to the moon in some fashion.
There are other people that insist that the moon is a big gravity well and that, no, we should go beyond it to start with mass.
Do you have an opinion?
I think we should go with the Chinese if we could.
I think it would be a nice thing to cooperate on.
Yeah.
It would be fun.
Fabulous.
All right. if we could. I think it would be a nice thing to cooperate on. Yeah, it would be fun. Fabulous. All right, here we go.
Andrea Humray wants to know,
what are you most hopeful about
when it comes to humanity's relationship with the Earth?
I'm most hopeful that people will find ways to innovate
and engineer the entire planet.
I think that's the future
as the human population continues to increase
and our scientific literacy
increases worldwide
through education.
I think more people
that get to see the Earth
from space,
particularly artists
and so on
that are hopefully
going to have the opportunity
to explain it better.
I think it increases
your appreciation
of how beautiful
the planet is.
So that's my hope.
Right on.
All right. Daniel Sprouse wants to know,
Bill, why don't you run for office?
Bill Nye the Science POTUS
has a nice ring to it.
Oh, sure. So Neil deGrasse Tyson
and I are working on our cabinet
on who we'd have...
Do you guys want to...
Court Jester.
Why'd you take that?
I would be more fun job. You be the Court Jester. Court jester. No, wait. Why'd you take that? Wait a second.
I would be more fun job.
You be the court jester.
I'll be the engineering advisor.
Advisor.
We're a package team.
All right. So Stephen Stafford wants to know, how do I get the people in my life to see the importance
of space exploration?
I try my best to spread the word and show the wonders of our universe, but no one seems
to care.
Also, i'm a
very poor student and can't afford a membership to the planetary society think you can help me
out mr nye i i don't know why you're having trouble influencing people it sounds like you
are pretty convincing guy stick with it all right here we go Here's a question from Nick Clarity. NASA is sending us back to the moon, quote, for good and also for preparation for Mars., the test pilot on the very first 707 airplane,
who remarked, one test is worth a thousand expert opinions.
Let's go try it.
I think the moon is our playground, and we can learn a tremendous amount by stopping it on our way to Mars.
Yeah.
Yep.
How hard could it be?
And Europe.
This has been a fabulous Cosmic Queries edition of StarTalk Radio.
I want to thank my guests, Mike Massino.
Mass?
Close enough.
Massimoomimama.
We have got a good example of why for my entire life I've been called Mass.
We're out of time.
You guys, we're out of time.
Eugene Merman, spelled just like Mir, the Russian space station.
So join us next time on StarTalk Radio as we work together to, dare I say it, change the world.