StarTalk Radio - Extended Classic: Cosmic Queries: Superheroes
Episode Date: September 2, 2016Neil Tyson and co-host Colin Jost get their geek on answering questions about Thor, Captain America, Batman, Superman, Wolverine, and more. Now extended with 12 minutes of Neil, Bill Nye and Steven So...ter discussing sci-fi movies in the “Cosmic Crib.” Subscribe to SiriusXM Podcasts+ on Apple Podcasts to listen to new episodes ad-free and a whole week early.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to StarTalk, your place in the universe where science and pop culture collide.
StarTalk begins right now.
Welcome to StarTalk Radio. I'm your host, Neil deGrasse Tyson.
I'm an astrophysicist with the American Museum of Natural History in New York City,
where I also serve as the Frederick P. Rose Director of the Hayden Planetarium.
And here we are entering the Cosmic Queries portion of StarTalk Radio.
In the Cosmic Queries section, I don't do that alone.
And the cosmic query section, I don't do that alone.
We get questions that come from every conduit through the internet, from Facebook, from the tweets, on our website.
And I trolled the streets and found Colin Jost walking among them.
That's right.
Colin, welcome.
You know, the last time I had you on, I called you Colin.
Yeah, I know.
I remember.
I'm sorry. I like how little faith you have in my mom. She would name me after like the least appealing part of a body. And you were so polite to not correct me on it.
So certainly Colin Jost and you, you're a lifetime guy in the world of comedy, right? Yeah. I've been
doing it. Yeah. I've been, I've been an SNL and, uh, been doing standup too. And man, but you're not that old. So you've had quite a resume in these years. No, maybe, it, yeah. I've been in SNL and been doing stand-up, too. Man, but you're not that old, so you have quite a resume in these years.
No. Maybe time traveler. I don't know.
You know, I'm old enough to remember the first episodes of Saturday Night Live, back before it was called Saturday Night Live.
This is like 40s?
Exactly. In fact, it was just called Saturday Night, which is why they begin Live from New York is Saturday Night.
And it predates that day of the week, right?
There wasn't even that day of the week.
And then they were like, we should name this whole day Saturday.
The show needs a place to air.
Right.
There you go.
So thanks for joining me for this StarTalk Cosmic Queries.
It's a delight to be here.
So now I don't claim any personal expertise on superheroes, but I do know physics and astrophysics.
So let's see what we can offer the spate of questions that have just arisen.
Absolutely.
So what do you got for me?
Well, here's right off the bat.
Here's one from Google Plus from Nathaniel Dorn.
I'm a big X-Men guy, so I'm very curious about this.
If you were Magneto, what would be the coolest thing you would do with your power over magnetism?
This is really more of a wish fulfillment
question for you rather than a science question.
Oh, wow. Magnetism.
Power of magnets. You know what I would do?
I would clone myself
and put one of each
of me on the
interplanetary voyages of the astronauts
and create a magnetic field
around the spaceship to shield
it from harmful solar
particles.
That presupposes you can also clone
yourself. That's a whole other step
first. Control over
magnetic fields, that's the easy one
to accept, but not the cloning.
No!
What?
I can't give you every power.
Oh, my gosh.
You know, even magic has its limits.
So the big challenge today is when you leave the magnetic blanket of the Earth, the Earth has its magnetosphere, which extends not quite to the moon.
And so if you're in Earth orbit, you're protected from it.
Sorry.
And so if you're in Earth orbit, you're protected from it.
Sorry, you're within the protective blanket of Earth's magnetic field and charged particles from the sun, which would otherwise harm your DNA, get channeled to the poles away from you. And it collides with molecules in Earth's atmosphere and it renders the atmosphere glow becoming the aurora borealis, the The northern lights and the aurora australis, the southern lights.
I didn't know it was called the aurora australis.
Got to call it.
Yeah.
Yeah.
The borealis and the australis.
I would have thought it would have been like Antarctica or something.
Oh, okay.
That would be aurora articus.
Articus.
No, that was a guy from Rome.
I am aurora articus.
You are my subjects.
Yeah.
I am Aurora Articus.
You are my subjects.
Yeah.
So.
Someone brought up, too, that Magneto, as a controller of all things magnetic, could theoretically just tear the universe apart.
Is that accurate?
No.
Next question.
Well, the universe is not magnetic.
I'm sorry. Well, what's the most damage, like, you know, long-term, wide-reaching damage they could do?
Okay.
The way they've written his character in the comic books is that he's controlling metal because metal is the obvious magnetic.
Of course, yeah.
But if I remember my chemistry, if you super cool certain gases down into a liquefied state, you can have liquefied magnetic materials.
So he could combine with Iceman.
Oh, that would be cool i mean that
would be a good oh wow yeah but not only that that might be a good plot line plasma plasma which is
what the sun is made of which is essentially the contents of flame but the sun makes a better
example for what i'm about to describe a plasma is a gas that's so hot that the electrons in the
outer layers of the atoms have escaped and they, and they're roaming free in the gas.
And that means that the gas can respond to magnetic fields.
So the sun has a very powerful magnetic field, and it's plasma. And so here's this gas trying to rotate with the sun, and the magnetic field gets trapped
in the rotating gas and gets wound up on itself, and it busts through the sun's surface every now
and then. In fact, it's on a cycle of 11 years. And you get solar storms and sunspots and solar
flares and prominences. All of this is magnetic activity. So a magneto would not be limited to metal.
Magneto could totally tear a new one in a star because he can interact with the magnetic fields that control where those gases appear and what they do.
I think you just wrote the next 12 issues of magneto for them.
Okay, here's the next question from Twitter, from Jimmy B, at HeyJimmyB.
Could Superman survive the spaghettification of a black hole and the force required to
escape it?
Ah.
So, obviously, he's known to be traveling faster than the speed of light.
Yeah, so, okay.
Well, in Superman 1, what's the one where he went back in time to save Lois Lane?
Oh, where, yeah, he traveled.
Was that Superman 1?
Yeah, it is 1, right?
Yeah, Superman 1.
He, in order to fly around the Earth that fast, he's going faster than light.
So that establishes that.
So it's real.
So it's real.
That makes it legit.
So, yeah, actually, if you can actually travel faster than light, you can just climb out of a black hole.
Nothing will stop you.
However, the journey down to the singularity would, as sure as night follows day, would spaghettify him.
He would be ripped apart head to toe.
Yes, he's made of denser matter and can stop bullets.
And he's, yes.
But if his material is of this universe,
he is not resistant to the power of gravity on that scale.
And you'd have a totally spaghettified Superman.
Wow.
And just to go over what spaghettification is,
oh, we only have 20 seconds left in this segment.
Oh, no, sorry.
So he needs to pair with Wolverine, who has a healing power.
So if he got out of it, he could reunite his particles.
We'll find out when we come back in the next segment on StarTalk Radio, the Cosmic Query section.
We'll see you in a moment.
This is StarTalk Radio.
I'm your host, astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson, and we are in the Cosmic Queries section.
Helping me is Colin Jost.
Colin, welcome to StarTalk Radio.
Thank you very much.
We left off the last segment.
Talking about spaghettification.
Spaghettifying Superman.
Yeah, which is a real, that sounds like a classic Italian dish.
What is spaghettification? It's when you're being sucked in, the particles are being ripped apart.
Yeah. So what happens is as you get closer to the center of a black hole,
the field of gravity at your feet becomes insanely higher than the field of gravity at your head.
This is a feet first dive into the black hole. And the consequence of this is that your feet will accelerate towards the black hole faster than your head will.
And initially, you're just stretching.
It might even feel good. But there's a point where that stretching force is officially the tidal force, the same force that makes the tides on Earth, is what rips you apart as you fall into a black hole.
That tidal force eventually exceeds the binding force of the molecules of your flesh.
At the point—
Which sounds bad.
Because it is bad.
And when that happens, you snap into two pieces on your way down.
And this difference in force continues.
Your upper half and your lower half. And this difference in force continues. Your upper half and your lower half
each feel this difference in force.
And they then rip into a pair of pieces each.
Now you're four segments.
And then eight.
And then 16.
32.
And you run the series down.
There'll be a point
where you will be a stream of atoms
descending impossibly towards
the center of this abyss.
If Superman is made of materials
of this universe, whether or not he is of this earth, if it is of this universe, he is subjected to those same laws of physics and he will be spaghettified just as day follows night.
But then what if he basically took on the powers of a worm who's able to, you know, you could segment them and they would still live different pieces.
Would then there be a bunch of Superman out there?
Here's the problem.
When you cut up a worm, each segment of the worm still has a full genetic code for what the whole worm was.
When you spaghettify, you are just atoms.
Oh, okay.
So it's not even.
Yeah, the hydrogen atom that got yanked off of your DNA molecule does not remember the DNA molecule from which it came.
Huh.
Yeah, you're a host.
And then so what about Mr. Fantastic, the rubber guy? Oh, the rubber dude. Because then how would he go into a black hole? Oh, in the it came. Huh. Yeah, you're a host. And then, so what about Mr. Fantastic, the rubber guy?
Oh, the rubber dude.
Because then, how would he go into a black hole?
Oh, in the Fantastic Four.
Yeah.
Ooh.
Or who's the woman in The Incredibles?
Oh, yeah, right.
Was it Elastic Woman?
Elastic Girl?
Rubber Girl.
Yeah, Elastic.
So, Elastic Girl.
Yeah, anybody who's stretchable, in principle, might be immune to this.
But they have to then travel faster than the speed of light.
Well, to get out.
If they want to get out, they've got to travel faster than light.
We've established that Superman can do that.
So, we would send Superman into a black hole until he was ready to snap into two pieces.
Then he flies his way back out again.
Gotcha.
And that'd be cool.
Or Superman has a baby with this elastic girl, right?
Ooh! Which we
all been fantasizing. Wow!
Have you been fantasizing
about being with Elastigirl or fantasizing
with Superman with Elastigirl? I just want to watch.
I just want to watch Superman a lot.
I don't even know how old Elastigirl is. Maybe that's
inappropriate for me to say.
So this seems, this is the next question.
This is from Jeffrey Williams on Facebook.
And it says, the character of Captain America seems to be the closest to reality.
I don't know what that means, but I guess of the Avengers.
No, Batman is.
Batman.
Yes.
Batman's a regular guy.
He's regular.
But someone that has superhuman powers.
of someone that has superhuman powers.
Do you believe there are currently experiments happening that are trying to increase the capacities of the human genome?
Example, super strength, increased visual acuity,
heightened stamina, et cetera.
And he also wants to know if these experiments are going on,
are they morally correct?
I'm not authorized to comment on that.
Next question.
No, so I can say a couple of things.
First, you can't just take a guy that
has normal looking muscles and make them 10 times stronger. If the muscles are, if it's made of
muscle tissue, because the physics of strength correlates with the cross-sectional area of your
muscles. So in other words, the reason why when you work out, your muscles get bigger is because they're getting stronger, right? It's a direct correspondence between the strength of your muscles. So in other words, the reason why when you work out your muscles get bigger is because they're
getting stronger.
It's a direct correspondence
between the strength
of your muscle
and how big it is.
Mm-hmm.
There's some variation
in there like
are you in good shape
so you can be slender
and still be stronger
than someone else
who's slender
but who's not in shape?
Because aren't there
varying muscle densities
that people have too?
Sure, but not so,
we're all human at the end of the day.
Okay?
We're all human.
And so muscle size correlates with muscle strength.
So you can't have a Captain America who – he had a good body.
You know, he'd turn heads in a fitness center.
Sure.
But the strength of those muscles are not such that he would have the strength exhibited by any genetic manipulation at all.
It's just not – no, unless –
So you couldn't genetically alter the, say, density or efficiency of muscles.
Not and have it still be biological matter.
You'd have to, in fact, just replace the muscle with some other material.
Make it more cyborg-y?
Yeah, just cyborg him out.
Then, oh, yeah, then you're good to go.
Make it more cyborg-y? Yeah, just cyborg them out.
Oh, yeah, then you're good to go.
So to rely on our feeble biology to improve in strength I think is not the right way to go if you want to make a better human.
Not only that, to try to improve your sight, there's a limit to how dim you can see because of the size of the iris in your eyeball.
Right.
Like we were talking about the size of the eyeball.
Back in the telescope show, I had you in the studio for the telescope show.
Bigger telescopes see dimmer things.
Right.
It's that simple.
And so people said, oh, can cats see in the dark?
How big is their eyeball?
Yeah.
All right.
If it's not bigger than your eyeball and we all have retina in the back as detectors,
no, they're not, you know. They might do a little better, but
they're not going to do much better than you.
Unless they had huge
eyeballs. There are no owls.
Right, exactly. Another
question here from Sean Karp on Facebook is
would it be possible to do an embedded
metal skeleton with
optional deployable weapons, a la Wolverine?
Could you do that? Now, here's the problem.
If we replace your bones, which are already pretty strong, with some kind of metal.
Adamantium, for instance.
Adamantium.
Adamantium, yeah.
I forgot about it.
Okay, right.
That's what it was.
So if you replace that with some kind of super alloy metal, you're still susceptible to tissue
damage, right?
What you're describing is the Terminator.
Right.
That's the Terminator.
Right.
You could still stab him and he'd still bleed. So you'd still suffer tissue damage, but you're you're describing is the Terminator. Right. That's the Terminator. Right. You could still stab him and he'd
still bleed. Right. So you still suffer
tissue damage, but you're not knocking him down.
Right. Because he's got that super
alloy metal for bones. Sure, I don't see why
you couldn't work that. Yeah,
but then you still could, you know, if you don't have
a healing factor, the healing power,
then you're... You'll just be this bloody mess at the end of
the day. Yeah. You'll be alive and
bloody. Yeah. Like when he was repairing himself in the hotel room in Terminator.
Exactly.
The guy knocks on the door and he looks for a response.
And he says, go away.
Except a little more colorfully.
Yeah, and he's got flies and stuff.
Yeah, because he's got biological tissue.
Keep in mind that for the human body to work, you'd have to graft the tissue onto the metal.
Our muscles connect to tendons that connect to ligaments that attach to your bones.
So it works biologically.
In order to get foreign material in there, you're going to have to attach it all some other kind of way. And what about, now this is, I've read articles too about the rise of nanotechnology where
theoretically one day we'll have tiny robots in our bloodstream that will just sort of
rebuild cells.
Is there any, do you ever think that's?
That'd be cool.
Yeah.
I mean, a nanobot would be smaller than what a cell would identify as being a hostile invader.
And so it would just be able to do anything it needs to do.
I don't see why we can't
manage that. But I'd rather
do it from the outside. Why get all
Fantastic Voyage on us
and just have some kind of device that beams
through your skin and lands at the tumor
and cures the tumor? I mean, why?
Yeah, fair. Alright, I'll do that.
I'll just do that. But I'm a bot
fan from way back. Good.
So you won't stop me. I won't. Well fan from way back, so... Good. Yeah. So you won't stop
me. I won't. Well, by the way,
Thor, to lift the
nuclear matter that is his
hammer, but he's an alien,
so aliens, you know... It's a whole other
level. It's a whole other thing, right. It's a different...
Do you have, can I ask, do you have a favorite
superhero or one that you're most
impressed by their construction
or what the physics of them are?
No, I like Batman because I can be Batman.
He's a regular Joe.
I can be Batman.
Right.
And who doesn't like the gadgets, all right?
And who doesn't like the car?
So he's got the best car of any of them.
I guess because they can fly, they don't need a car.
But you got to like the car.
Yeah.
Right?
The car's good.
As phallic as it is, nonetheless, he's got cool things that the car can do.
Exactly.
And so the car is an extension of his utility belt in terms of its coolness factor.
So for me, I'd have to be Batman.
But as a kid, I don't know if I told you this directly, I wanted to be Mighty Mouse.
Really?
Yeah.
In a way, just...
Because I wanted to save women who were mean people who were trying to harm them.
Oh, that's fantastic.
And I wanted to sing opera while I was doing it.
Here I come to save the day.
No, I just somehow resonated with that character.
I don't know why.
That is a great combination I would have thought is saving women and singing opera.
Yeah, and he could fly and other things were bigger than him
but he had strength
beyond what you would expect.
So I just felt good about it.
And you wrestled, right?
You were a wrestler?
I used to wrestle
but we'll get back to that
in a minute.
So we're in the
Cosmic Queries part
of StarTalk Radio.
I'm Neil deGrasse Tyson.
Join us again
for our next segment
coming right up.
We're in the Cosmic Queries part of StarTalk Radio.
I'm Neil deGrasse Tyson, your resident astrophysicist, here with Colin Jost, a resident comic.
Colin, welcome.
Yes, thank you for having me.
These are Cosmic Queries on our superhero show.
Yeah, this is kind of an exciting. Yeah, I thought so.
And you, just before the break, one of the questions was what superhero do I most resonate with?
And I said, I think Batman just because he's real.
Right.
And his toys are fantasy-like, but they're in reach.
Yeah.
Curiously, right?
They're justifiable with technology.
Justifiable extrapolations of what we know today.
And I confess that in childhood I totally was digging Mighty Mouse.
Yeah.
And I was asking, is that part of what got you into wrestling?
Was it Mighty Mouse?
Oh, I did wrestle in high school, college, and a little bit of graduate school.
No, because when I'm wrestling, I'm not thinking I'm doing it to win the heart of a woman.
I'm just doing it just to do it.
Yeah.
I mean, it's a very personal thing, actually.
Because if you lose, you just got beat.
Nobody to blame.
There's no team.
No team.
There's no,
and it's not some apparatus.
It's you,
your muscles,
your quickness,
your smarts,
and that's it.
So for me,
it was the purest form
of athletic contest.
So, yeah.
So what other questions?
I got to ask you.
What superhero do you resonate with?
I mean,
Wolverine for me
is my favorite of all time.
Just his style.
And his attitude.
He's so attitudinal.
It's pretty awesome to get shot in the head and then just kind of shake it off and see the bullet come out of your head and just drink a beer and be unshaven.
I'm approximating the look as much as I can with hair and not be shaving.
Is he the only superhero that drinks beer and goes unshaven? I'm approximating the look as much as I can with hair and not with shaving. Is he the only superhero that drinks beer and goes unshaven?
I'm wondering.
I'm sure there are others and binges, but he seems like the most regular.
It's a reliable form of his character.
Yeah.
And I would feel more comfortable riding a motorcycle if I had a healing power and an adamantium skeleton.
Then my mom might allow it.
Rather than be the organ donor that the rest of them are.
Right, exactly.
So this next question from Facebook from Eric Shaw is, if Superman needs the sun's rays for his strength, how does he still have powers at night?
Well, first, I didn't know he needed the sun's rays.
Oh, because he comes nearer to the yellow star.
Exactly.
Of course, the sun is actually white, but that's a separate conversation, in fact, for another show.
Right. The sun is yellow when it's on the a separate conversation, in fact, for another show.
The sun is yellow when it's on the horizon when it's dim enough for you to notice and look at it without protection.
So sunsets are these beautiful yellow-orange colors.
In the middle of the day when the sun is not crawling its way through the muck and mire of the super thick horizon-depth atmosphere, the sun is not yellow. It's white. That's the color of the sun thick horizon depth atmosphere, the sun is not yellow.
It's white.
That's the color of the sun, period.
If the sun were actually yellow,
then white things would look yellow, by the way.
If you put yellow light on a white sheet of paper,
the white sheet of paper is yellow.
So if the sun were yellow, then snow would look yellow.
But that's only near fire hydrants, last I checked. So I don't see why he just doesn't have storage batteries to store up the energy from his daytime in the sun.
Maybe.
Why not?
Maybe.
Maybe he doesn't have powers, but at least the electric car he has, he can still, like, put around in.
Wait, Superman?
Yeah, maybe.
Oh, it's a solar power car.
A little solar power car that he gets.
You don't see him at night.
He just goes.
That's where he recharges.
His Batmobile.
car that he gets, you don't see him at night, he just goes That's where he recharges
his Batmobile. So it means
Superman, if you send him to the Arctic, where there's
six months of darkness, he'd be pretty
ineffective. That's the thing, yeah, and isn't that his
cave that he goes to, isn't that sort of
Oh, that's in the North Pole, oh my gosh!
Seems like the worst place
for it, right? The North Pole, for six
months of the year, has no sunlight.
Seems like, why go there, of all places?
Oh! It should be
an equator cave that he goes to.
Should be an equator cave.
Yes.
So if it's only his proximity to
the sun, whether or not he's receiving sunlight,
then he's still an
earth distance from the sun.
So he's still getting some...
Getting whatever is the magic rays
from the sun, whether or not it's the light.
Okay.
So he's going to be okay.
You think he'll be okay?
We don't have to worry about him.
So this is a question from Stephen King on Facebook, I assume.
I hope.
God, I hope it's the real Stephen King.
Stephen King.
Is what is the likelihood of creating a real world arc reactor like an Iron Man, the kind of artificial arc reactor heart that he has what
if any negative effects would be present if you were to house something like that within the human
chest cavity yeah so i like that question so so that's a huge oh by the way so so i resonate more
with batman than with iron man because the energy source for iron man is is too remote for me to embrace that.
Right.
But energy depends on how you store it.
If it's stored thermally, it would be very, very hot.
Right.
If you store it electromechanically, you'd have a lot of what are effectively wound-up springs.
Mm-hmm.
All right?
There are many ways you can store energy.
You can store it chemically.
That's what you have in the form of gunpowder.
It's sitting there ready to explode, but it's not.
So it's energy built in chemically.
You can think of mechanically.
You can think of thermally.
And so if it was thermally, it would eventually heat him up.
Right.
You wouldn't be able to insulate it perfectly.
Right.
And so that would be bad for him.
That would be bad.
Is there a chemical way that you'd have in the way of a gun powder where you would have a store of it and it would have small gradual reactions and parts of it?
The best way to do that is to have a repository of antimatter.
Keep it separate from the matter with some kind of magnetic bottle.
You can't put it in a regular bottle.
I'm just writing this down so I can do it later.
You're going back to your lab.
Hi, where's the antimatter?
And then you'd leak out little bits of it
to merge with the matter,
and then you'd have energy at your disposal,
and there'd be no bad side effects.
More on antimatter when we come back
to the Cosmic Queries part of StarTalk Radio.
The subject, superheroes.
See you in a moment.
This is StarTalk Radio. I'm your host, Neil deGrasse Tyson, astrophysicist.
Based in New York City, where we do most of our broadcast.
And I'm here in studio with Colin Jost, comedian extraordinaire.
That's the grandiose way of saying it.
Is that on your resume? Comedian extraordinaire? There you go.
Yes, that's very – yeah.
And verifiable too.
Yeah.
Before that, I was a journalist extraordinaire.
And before that, I was a lifeguard extraordinaire.
A lifeguard.
And what did you major in in college?
I majored in the history and literature of Russia and Britain.
So I read some – lived in Russia for a little bit.
You're an erudite.
Not that.
I read some books.
That's about it. Okay. And there's a lot bit. Very erudite. Not that. I read some books. That's about it.
Okay.
And there's a lot of comedic repository in British history.
Yeah.
Russia and Britain are two different ways to go about humor.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
One a lot darker than the other.
And one of our favorite friends of StarTalk is Eugene Merman.
Oh, of course.
Yeah.
Who has total 100% Russian roots.
I know.
That's right.
I got to talk to him in Russian sometime.
I don't know if he's still fluent.
Oh, okay.
Well, we can probably both have two lines and then end the conversation.
So, you've got more questions for me.
So, we've got questions about superheroes right now.
Here's one.
This is from Christian Damaria on Facebook.
And the question is,
would it be possible for a sufficiently advanced race
to develop controlled wormholes as a means of transportation similar to the Rainbow Bridge that Thor uses?
Yes, entirely.
We don't wield enough power over energy in the universe to just create wormholes on a whim.
require, if we harnessed all the energy produced in all the stars, all the several hundred billion stars of the Milky Way galaxy, that'd be enough to kind of do what we want to accomplish.
Which is to what?
To pierce through?
What you do is you use that much energy, because energy and mass are the same thing.
So if you wield that much energy, you can compress energy to smaller volumes than you
can solid matter.
But they both will have the same effect on the fabric of space-time
because mass and energy are the same in relativity and in this universe.
They're the same in terms of their effect on the universe.
And on the gravitational fields of the universe.
So you'd wield this.
You'd pull it out of your pocket.
You'd say, open me a wormhole right here.
And there it opens and you dial up
coordinates in time and in place
and you go through the wormhole, come out the other side
and you can be anywhere in principle in the universe
instantly
one of my favorite scenes in the movie
what's the one where the
Monsters Inc
undiscussed in the reviews of this movie
is that that movie
tapped the fourth dimension.
That movie was all about wormholes.
Those doors were the wormholes.
Yeah.
They would go through the door in the factory and end up in a kid's closet.
No one talked about this.
Just by the way, here's a little extra physics.
A little extra physics there.
This was an awesome feature of Monsters, Inc.
Because you know they didn't come in your front door to get in your closet.
They must have been some other way.
It's a wormhole connecting the factory to everybody's closet.
Awesome.
Yeah.
That's so possible.
You don't even need to be a god like Thor to potentially down the line.
No, Thor wasn't a god.
Thor was a regular guy in his own place.
They just called him a god in Norse legend because he had powers above anybody here on Earth.
Right.
But then in some legends, he's a – right.
I mean, in some things.
No, he's a god on Earth.
Yeah.
But in his hometown, he's just Thor.
Oh, in Asgard.
Yeah.
He's just a normal dude.
He's just a dude.
Yeah.
He's just a, you know, blonde hair and a tan, right?
That's all he is.
So he's just another guy, right?
Yeah.
So.
That's the crazy thing about Avengers is that you're just, the people are operating on all different levels.
There's a guy that people think is a god.
There's a guy made of, you know, an Iron Man.
Captain America is just kind of like stronger.
Right, right.
Hawkeye guy can shoot kind of well.
That's just crazy.
Scarlett Johansson can kick.
Yeah, it's an excellent mixture.
Yeah.
Right.
This question is, could Superman use a large telescope to view Krypton from afar,
seeing his long-lost family and race before the planet was destroyed,
assuming Krypton is further away in light years than Superman is old in human years?
Awesome question.
Right.
I love they did that.
that Superman is old in human years.
Awesome question.
Right.
I love they did that.
And could he then fly to Krypton and armed with his knowledge of Krypton's past,
reverse time like in Superman the movie,
number one,
and therefore prevent Krypton's destruction?
No, but then he would have never come to Earth
to then observe the destruction
to go back and prevent the destruction.
So it would require some sort of being here, but then a time travel element.
No, I'm just saying, if he came here, saw Krypton being destroyed, but didn't want it to be destroyed, and went back in time to prevent it from being destroyed, he would have never been cast adrift to have landed here on Earth.
But then if he goes back and reverses it, would it stop, but then he would have no remembrance of what happened?
Then he would have never come here on Earth to have stopped the explosion.
So it's just, it eats
itself? It's like you can't do it?
Let's
pick that up after the break.
I need a break to figure it out.
There's steam coming out of your ears.
Star Talk Radio, back in a moment.
We are back in the Cosmic Queries part of StarTalk Radio.
I'm your host, Neil deGrasse Tyson.
I'm an astrophysicist, and it's my job each week to bring the universe down to Earth for you.
And helping me accomplish this are people who bring different lenses from their walk of life.
Today, I've got Colin Jost with me, comedian bar none.
And definitely not an astrophysicist. Non-astrophysicist. Okay, I'll call you. I'm Colin Jost, not an astrophysicist. You're reading me these
questions. I've never seen them before, these moments. But they come to us in all of our
media outlets, Facebook. Actually, on Facebook, we are StarTalkRadio, and they come via Twitter.
StarTalkRadio is our Twitter handle.
And what else do they come?
Also on our website, StarTalkRadio.net.
Here's one that's pretty great.
Did I finish answering the other question?
I don't think I did. Oh, no.
So I didn't quite understand it.
Because it's Superman.
He goes back.
He finds out.
He sees through a telescope.
Krypton is being destroyed, you know, in the past, as you know, the traces of it.
Because that light is just coming to reach us now.
Just reaching us now.
So he flies out there, does his time travel whirly gig around the planet, spins it back, saves Krypton.
But then that means he never traveled to Earth.
That's correct.
So what is that?
Where does that leave him physically?
It means it doesn't.
It can't happen.
Right.
Right.
I mean, it's not simply a paradox.
It's a contradiction of what is even possible.
So consider it this way.
Yeah.
With a telescope, he can go look and see Krypton in the past.
Right.
Yes, that's true.
Which is crazy.
However, okay, as he travels to Krypton in the past. Right. Yes, that's true. Which is crazy. However, okay, as he travels to Krypton, Krypton is still advancing into the future.
Right.
While he's traveling.
He'd have to travel faster than light in order to go back in time to then—
But can he do that, right?
Can he?
He's Superman, and we demonstrated earlier he can travel faster than light.
So could he—
We said that already.
Superman won. Right. So he can do that. Okay. So could he. We said that already. Superman won.
Right.
So he can do that.
Okay.
So, all right.
So, yes.
So he sees it destroyed.
Then he travels faster than light, gets there before the star explodes.
But he can't save.
They're all powerful folks back there.
Somebody would have saved the star.
They knew the star was going to die.
And plus, back then, he was a baby.
So, what's he going to do?
I don't know. Don't you think
somebody there would have figured out how to save Krypton
if they could have? Or someone would have done a time travel thing
on their own, the spinning thing. No, but time travel
doesn't stop the star from... Right, right.
They would have figured out a more physical
solution. What they would have done was move to another star.
Right. Just do what
the Hermit... They could send him away. They all got to get out of there. Right, just all. Just hightail out of there. Go find a star. Right. Just do what the hermit crabs. They could send him away.
They all got to get out of there.
Right.
Just all.
Just hightail out of there.
Go find a star.
That's what hermit crabs do.
This became a question for Superman's parents.
What are you doing?
Exactly.
What were you thinking, guys?
But they had to get that Moses thing going, you know, send him for it and save it.
It makes a better story.
It makes a better story.
They were martyrs for the sake of fiction.
This is a question from Google Plus from Stephen
Burkhart, and he asks,
he says, fun questions, so he's already
saying it's fun. We'll be the judge of that.
Very cocky. Great
question here. What element-based
life form other than carbon
would you be most interested in finding?
Silicon, tungsten, potassium,
etc. Silicon, of course.
And why is that the moment?
Well, because if you remember your periodic table of elements from your chemistry class.
You mean SI?
That mysterious chart of boxes on the wall.
You might remember that columns of elements have the same configuration of electrons in their outer shells, which means they combine with the same other elements.
So every way you can make a molecule with carbon, you can make that same molecule with
silicon.
So carbon monoxide, CO, you can make silicon monoxide.
Carbon dioxide, you can make silicon dioxide.
Wherever you find carbon in the human body, you can swap in a silicon atom for it.
So in principle, you can make
life based on silicon. And silicon is kind of abundant, although not as abundant as carbon.
It's plenty of silicon out there. And if you were trying to invent another kind of life
based on the model that we now have, a silicon-based life would be cool. It'd be interesting.
Could we somehow create beings that are, you know,
genetically the same but replacing silicon?
Today we have tools to manipulate atoms.
There would be no reason why we couldn't swap one atom at a time.
Well, it just so happens I have those tools right here.
You've got those nano tools.
So what would be interesting is if you imagine maybe a silicon-based
life-form superhero, that would be kind of interesting.
I wonder what that would be like.
What kind of powers it would have.
But, yes, the molecules are the same, but the properties would be different.
They might have different strengths, different capacity to think, different acuity of vision.
This would be interesting to explore, something I've never done.
The problem is the heavier you get on the periodic table, rapidly they become rarer and rarer.
Right.
So if you want any chance of life happening spontaneously, it's got to be just hanging out doing nothing.
And carbon fits that bill marvelously.
Right, right.
You know, I think we've run out of time.
Oh, really?
Unless you have a really fast question.
Let's see.
Favorite Avengers.
Favorite Avenger.
I'd have to say Thor throwing a hammer.
That's so primal.
Right?
It's low tech.
Yeah.
Everyone gets it.
If you were a baby and that was his rattle, that's what you just, it is so, he is how you feel.
You know?
I don't like you.
And then you smash him.
Everyone's a Thor after 5 p.m.
That's what Bam Bam was in the Flintstones.
Right?
Right.
We got to wrap it up.
This is the end of the superhero show.
This is a dream.
The Cosmic Queries.
Colin, thanks for coming on to StarTalk Radio.
Absolutely.
You've been listening to StarTalk Radio.
I've been your host, Neil deGrasse Tyson.
And as always, I bid you not only farewell, but I compel you to keep looking up.
That was a good Cosmic Query session.
When we come back, I'll have Bill Nye the Science Guy and co-writer of Cosmos, Stephen Soder,
to talk to us more about science fiction, specifically how it's portrayed in the movies.
This is the Cosmic Crib section of StarTalk.
I'm Neil deGrasse Tyson.
With me in my Cosmic Crib, which is really just code for my office at the Hayden Planetarium,
here at the American Museum of Natural History,
I've got Steve Soder, friend and colleague.
He's an associate of the Hayden Planetarium.
I've got Bill Nye, also an associate.
Thanks for just coming to chill, just chew the fat.
I love the crib.
Yeah, what I want to talk about today, because we're just chilling, we're just chilling.
I want to talk about today, because we're just chilling. We're just chilling.
I want to talk about science as represented in movies.
And lately, there was like Interstellar came out,
and I tweeted that the lead five characters are all portraying scientists.
And in it, they have the roles of father or son or mentor or wife or child.
Also physicists who change the world who's a woman.
Yeah, all personal relationships are explored in it.
I thought that was a good thing.
But here we have a movie that fully goes there.
It wants the wormhole and a black hole, time dilation.
It's all in the movie.
All of it.
And then I think of other movies that... Also apocalyptic.
The world's ending
the earth is no longer livable isn't that just the storyline of every
fiction movie just toss it yeah yeah science fiction movie is they go to
space and bad stuff happens that's the science fiction movie that stuff's
happening on earth they got to go into space yeah yeah and that in that
particular case but I think of movies that have thought a lot about the
science that's in them.
Interstellar is one of them.
As an advisor, they had Kip Thorne, who's one of our colleagues at Caltech.
I have one of his books that's sitting around my shelf, Gravitation.
The only book that you ever learn about just by carrying it around.
It's this huge, thick book with the proportions of a New York Yellow Pages.
If anyone is old enough to remember the Yellow Pages. If anyone is young enough, old enough to remember the Yellow Pages.
So by the way, Steve,
I walked up into Space Sciences
at Cornell University campus one day.
As an undergraduate?
As an undergraduate.
And there's Carl Sagan.
And I'm sure you were there.
And Kip Thorne.
Talking about black holes.
Falling into a black hole,
ending up in another part of the universe
at another time.
And that was very compelling. And up in another part of the universe at another time. And that was very compelling.
And so that was part of the idea of Interstellar,
is that you'd end up, you would control where you ended up.
Well, because you had some access to the space-time continuum.
But I think of other films.
Steve, you've obviously seen Contact, the story, the film.
Well, there was a book and a film with it.
I was impressed with not only the science of that film,
but how much attention they gave to public's reaction to the possibility,
the reality in that case, of contact with extraterrestrial intelligence,
not just extraterrestrial life.
Steve, do you think much about science in films?
Do I think much about science in films? Do I think much about science in films?
Yeah.
No?
No, you don't.
You just let the film be whatever it is?
Yes.
Oh, you are so kind.
Oh, that's what's so troubling to me.
Oh, Steve.
Whenever there's, by the way, when there's an airplane disaster movie.
Oh, I mean, if they get something clearly wrong, I think about it, yeah.
Well, that's where we're trying to head here in the cosmic crypt.
But where did they get something wrong in that?
Oh, in content?
Content, yeah.
Yeah, they got something really, really wrong in content.
You didn't know this?
I'd forgotten.
Oh, no.
So I'm sitting next.
So I'm at the premiere.
Minding your own business.
I never got invited to any premiere in my life.
This is 20 years ago.
I got just 18 years ago, right?
And I got invited to a premiere.
There's a New Yorker in L.A. for a movie so I'd say the stupid thing like there's popcorn on
display and I said how much is the popcorn and the guy said oh it's $17 and
then they all started laughing because it's all free it's a premiere yes the
the the movie company pays for everything I didn't know this I was an
idiot okay there I confess and naive equals idiot.
So here's what happened.
So I'm there, I'm sitting next to Frank Drake.
He's a professor of astronomy at Cornell.
Famous for what?
The Drake equation.
The Drake equation.
Bill, recite the Drake equation, or tell us what it is.
You estimate the likelihood, the number of intelligent life forms that would be in your galaxy or the cosmos
based on multiplying a series of what I would call fudge factors.
It's multiplicative. It's algebraic.
You multiply number of stars times likelihood of planets around stars
times likelihood of planets like Earth around stars
times likelihood of planets like Earth that have intelligent life
times likelihood of planets with intelligent life right now.
Right. With technology. Right, right. intelligent life that times likelihood of intelligent plans with intelligent life right now right and you end up technology right right even because
there are if I may billions and billions of stars you end up with a pretty
significant number of intelligent life so watch what happens so Jodie Foster
her character is there next to arrow a le our way is there next to Matthew
McConaughey's characters in both movies. Yeah, and he's Palmer Johns or whatever.
He's a preacher.
He's a failed priest.
Well, he's a medium priest.
Okay.
Some success.
Or some pastor.
Right.
So anyway, so they're there.
That's not even relevant.
They're there, and she is talking about the romance of the night sky.
And he's up there saying, so what do you think about it?
And she says, you know,
if there were 100 billion stars in our galaxy...
That's fine.
100 billion is fine.
To astronomical accuracy, it's fine.
Okay.
If only one in a million had planets,
and only one in a million of those had life,
and only one in a million of those had life. And only one in a million of those
had intelligent life.
That still leaves millions of planets.
And I said,
oh, I'm sitting right next to a freak
and I can't.
Ten to the ninth times ten to the minus six
times ten to the minus six.
You're left with one millionth
of a civilization.
I remember that now.
They blew that.
Yeah, they blew that.
And then I said,
I'm blaming Jodie Foster for that.
Because that was her best take, bro.
She wanted to go home and then change it.
I'm blaming Jodie Foster because last I checked,
like, she went to Yale, right?
You think they have arithmetic at Yale.
Okay.
So she would know to check this number that's coming out of her mouth.
She's playing a character.
And you don't know what happens later
in the screenplay,
Mr. Professional Character
Actor Guy.
You've got to read
the lines that you are given.
Oh,
because maybe
it had to be that.
It's the script writer.
It's the script writer.
No,
but still,
I mean,
yeah.
So,
but that was,
that was a quibble.
I mean,
I thought the movie
was brilliantly conceived,
especially how the public
interacted with it.
Yeah,
but I say this all the time as CEO of the Planetary Society,
as a product of the Frank Drake influence, the Carl Sagan influence,
and the Steve Soder influence.
If we were to discover life on another world,
and the places to look that we could do in my lifetime and listeners' lifetime
is Mars and Europa, the moon of Jupiter.
So far, it's Enceladus, the moon of Saturn.
I was going to throw that in.
Enceladus is a...
Good candidate.
It's good, but it's a whole other...
It's not seawater.
But, Stephen, you lived through this.
In my day, the planets were the great destinations until Voyager, and the Voyager revealed that
the moons were where the action is.
And that you could have a civilization, possibly, on a moon
of a larger planet that might not even
have a rocky surface
to land on. A good-sized moon, though. We're not
messing around. It's got to be good-sized.
Moon-sized moon. Well, there's bigger than
moon-sized moons in our solar system. Yes.
Yeah, Ganymede is a little bigger. And there's Titan, which
has an atmosphere which is a lot denser than the
atmosphere of the Earth. So Titan rocks.
Yeah. Apparently it is rocky with oceans i see i see but it's oceans of liquid methane it has
hydrological cycle it has weather it has rain it has clouds like the earth but the liquid involved
is methane not water so just listen everybody this these are these guys are talking about
if we were life form based on liquid methane we would not even be saying it's cold.
Right.
It's just the natural temperature.
You'd be saying that the Earth is a furnace.
And we come to the Earth, we would combust.
Right.
Right.
Because we have methane.
Dr. T, you're a wife.
Wait, wait, wait.
If I went there and inhaled some methane and then came to Earth where there's oxygen in the atmosphere,
I should not go near any candles.
Isn't that correct?
Yes.
Because the methane will combust on contact with the oxygen.
If there's still enough of it when you exhale, yes.
Yeah.
Right.
Now, your wife's from Fairbanks.
But she's raised in Fairbanks, Alaska.
And it's a big party.
A buddy of mine, a guy I went to high school with,
says it's a big day when it's minus 40,
because they can pour propane on the ground.
It stays a liquid.
It's a big party up here.
My wife's sister, who we visited often, when it gets that cold, their propane tanks liquefy, and so they can't get gas into the stove.
So they've got to go out, heat the propane tank so that it vaporizes so that they can unturn the – this is like life in Alaska.
And it's fun for them.
That aside.
By the way...
No, but why don't we get back to movies?
Here.
So, Bill, what science movie do you think got it the best?
Well, I think Contact.
Contact.
So you agree with me on that?
I'm not just jumping on the bandwagon.
But I really very much enjoyed, until it got too weird, 2001.
Oh, yeah, 2001 got weird.
Yeah, I won't say jumped the shark.
It just went back in time with a stellar baby.
I think 2001, had they known about wormholes and black holes?
They would have used it.
They would have used it.
Sure, who wouldn't?
Right.
Duh.
No, but the whole thing...
Actually, they had a scene that was like going through a wormhole in 2001, if you remember.
No, that's right, but it's not hole-like.
It's very...
We don't know what a wormhole looks like.
One of the insights that you do get from Interstellar...
I know what a wormhole looks like.
Sure you do.
One of the insights that you do get from Interstellar,
despite what else you might not get from it,
is that a black wormhole
is a sphere.
You can come in any direction.
Yeah, yeah.
A hole in space is a sphere.
That's correct.
It's a three-dimensional hole.
There's another movie I think is underappreciated, or underspoken of its science, and that's
Deep Impact.
No, let me tell you what.
Let me tell you what.
It's an asteroid hits Earth.
Yeah, yeah.
That's important. Unlike Armageddon, where the asteroid parts had good aim,
and one hits the Eiffel Tower, one decapitates the Chrysler Building.
Maybe I'm mixing up a couple of movies.
But basically, they aim the asteroids to civilization's icons.
In Deep Impact, they said, look, most of the world is ocean.
Let's just have this sucker hit the ocean. You can still
destroy the coastal cities with a huge tsunami
which they did for New York.
That film, by the way, had very good science consulting
and they took them seriously.
That's my point. So you saw
Deep Impact. Yeah, yeah, yeah. They did it right.
Unlike Armageddon, which
I don't even
criticize Armageddon because it's too over
the top. By the way, listeners, something I'd like you to think about is an asteroid impact
and what we would do about an oncoming impactor.
There is no evidence that the ancient dinosaurs had a space program.
No evidence at all.
They didn't have opposable thumbs and they had that walnut-sized brain.
You don't know.
You don't know what they could have done.
How big was their brain?
It was littler.
It depends on who you're talking with.
The brains might have been bigger than ours but their bodies were so much bigger. But you guys, you can
be dismissive.
When I watch how ants can get organized,
termites can get astonishing
things done, you don't know what the
ancient dinosaurs could have pulled off.
If they had gotten organized. That said,
we're the people,
we're the organisms with the problem
if there is an impact or a coming toward us.
And another thing to think about, science fiction
wise, is maybe the
reason we've never heard from another
civilization is because they did not
pass an asteroid
test. They did not deflect
an oncoming asteroid. So they've all
gone extinct by their own asteroid. Control or delete
out there, yeah. Yeah, yeah.
Guys, we've got to wrap it up. This is
the Cosmic Crib.
Bill, thanks for being, thanks for
coming by the office. Thank you. It's cozy.
Yeah, Steve Soder, thanks for coming by.
Likewise. Alright, this is
Neil deGrasse Tyson signing off from StarTalk
Cosmic Crib. Gantz Tyson signing off from StarTalks. That's me.