StarTalk Radio - Habitable Worlds, Super-Earths, & Evaporating Planets with Anjali Tripathi

Episode Date: October 24, 2023

Is Earth going to evaporate? Neil deGrasse Tyson and comedian Chuck Nice learn about exoplanet discovery, planetary evaporation, biosignatures and technosignatures with astrophysicist Anjali Tripathi.NOTE: StarTalk+ Patrons can listen to this entire episode commercial-free here:https://startalkmedia.com/show/habitable-worlds-super-earths-evaporating-planets-with-anjali-tripathi/Thanks to our Patrons Christopher Stowe, Bo Cribbs, Jennifer Pierce, Sam Gilbert, Steven Glasser, Antonio Garibay, and David Frigoletto for supporting us this week.Photo Credit: ESA/Hubble, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons Subscribe to SiriusXM Podcasts+ on Apple Podcasts to listen to new episodes ad-free and a whole week early.

Coming up on StarTalk, we've got a Cosmic Queries edition all about exoplanets. I've got with me one of the world's experts on that subject, Anjali Tripathi. Welcome to StarTalk. We're going to find out where she came from, where she's been, and where she's going in this world of not only exoplanets, but also as a citizen scientist serving two presidents. Coming up on StarTalk. Welcome to StarTalk. Welcome to StarTalk, your place in the universe where science and pop culture collide. StarTalk begins right now. This is StarTalk. Neil deGrasse Tyson here, your personal astrophysicist. Today is another Cosmic Queries

ever popular format that that is on the subject of exoplanets. Chuck. Yeah. My co-host. How you feeling Chuck? I'm feeling great man. Feeling good about the exoplanets? Exoplanets are always fodder for great thought because now we know that there are millions and millions of them. They're everywhere. I don't know if the catalog has quite hit that yet. We went from four. They're like, maybe there's four. So I know a little bit about exoplanets,

but if we're going to really go in with the cosmic queries, we're bringing the big guns. Yeah. Okay. So we combed the landscape, and we found Anjali Tripathi. Anjali, welcome to StarTalk. Thank you so much. So excited to be here.

Excellent. Excellent. You, in your professional life, not only did original work on exoplanets, you also found yourself, either on purpose or otherwise, at the intersection between science and society. So I want to get to that in just a minute. Right now, you're a research associate at NASA's JPL, which, Chuck, stands for what? I believe Judy Polson Lingerie. That's right.

Judy Polson's Lingerie. It's all the rage. That's usually classified. Why'd you let rage. No. That's usually classified. Why'd you let that one out? That was classified information. Yeah. Now the awesome Jet Propulsion Labs. The Jet Propulsion Labs in Pasadena, California. California. Yes.

And it's not only a branch of NASA. They collaborate and are basically on the campus of Caltech, right? I am a Caltech employee. Right, right. So who signs your checks? Is it Caltech? It is Caltech. Wow.

Okay, there it is. But you still have NASA overlords. I do. I'm pretty sure you do. You know who we had on StarTalk just when she just started

was the director of JPL who is Lori Leshin. Lori Leshin. She and I served on a commission to study the future

of NASA. Wow. We were both appointed by President the future of NASA. Wow. We were both appointed by President George W. Bush. Nice. And she went on to great things. And you, not so much. You got stuck with me. I'm so sorry.

I'm so sorry. What a shame. But you can take the Lori Leshin episode out of our archives. That was fun. Right. I wanted to get to her before NASA got to her. Because, you know, NASA, they want to over-control

the interviews. But she and I go way back. Right. So there was an interval where let's just rock and roll this. Exactly. Just say what you think. Think what you feel.

Yeah. Well, you're not going to be able to do that with Anjali because NASA is still controlling her. Sorry. I have the NASA handcuffs on. It's okay. We'll figure something out here. So at JPL, Because NASA is still controlling her. Sorry. I have the NASA handcuffs on. Okay, no, no.

We'll figure something out here. So, at JPL, what are your primary concerns? I like thinking about what can we see from space, right? So, what can you see when you look up about exoplanets and other worlds? And also looking down here on Earth and how we can improve life here on it. You know, people, when they think of space exploration, they don't always think that from space you can see Earth as a planet. Exactly. And monitor what's going on and how we doing, you know. So, this seems to be a really important feature of what NASA can deliver the public. Yeah. Something folks always get wrong. You ask them, what's our most studied planet at

NASA? And they go, Mars. And you go, wrong. And you think, it's Earth. And nobody realizes that. Exactly. So you still have roots back where you got your PhD? I do, yeah. I'm a research associate at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Okay, all right. So tell me, before we get back into exoplanets,

because that's where we got all the questions are based on those. Yes, they are. Just the science and society part of your life, how did that begin? So being a valley girl, you know, we had an earthquake in the 90s, and I had to move out of my house for a year. And the people who come on TV, for those of you who've had the pleasure of earthquakes, it's a seismologist who comes and tells you what's going to happen. And I thought, scientists can come and tell you what's going to happen next and sort of save things. I want to do that. can come and tell you what's going to happen next and sort of save things. I want to do that.

And then I learned that seismology and geophysics and physics are important, but they don't save the world in the same way. And so thinking about how you can find connections between science and sort of... You know why they don't save the world? Because they only bring the geologists on after the earthquake.

After the earthquake. Not just before the earthquake. After the earthquake. It's true. Okay. After the earthquake. It's true. Okay. They're saving nobody. That's a doggone shame because, like, when do we really need them? We just got some readings in. That's when we need them.

Whereas with the Ashoners, we're like, that eclipse, get ready. It's coming in six months. Okay. This is total predictive powers. Yeah. All right. So now what? So, okay.

So the urge doesn't make the reality. So what happened? I mean, I was lucky enough. I went and served in two administrations. President Obama brought me in as a White House fellow. She was lucky. That was just luck. I was going to say.

That was just luck. I mean, I don't like to talk about the bribes. I served in two administrations. That's funny. I used to serve at Wendy's. I was Wendy's manager. And I served for two tours of duty. Two tours of duty. Thank you for your service.

So who was your first president? I mean, I was born a while ago. Lady doesn't reveal her age, but of the two administrations. We're going to triangulate on that if you give us enough information. President Obama. President Obama. Oh, okay.

And so in what capacity were you serving in the White House? So I came in serving the U.S. Department of Agriculture thinking about climate change. You know, it doesn't matter why your soil is dry. You got to get things to grow. That's right. Is there a relationship between the Department of Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency? I mean, so I was working on food waste, right? Which is something that both care about, right? Big deal.

Because I mean, you know, your apple that you don't eat turns into methane. Methane. Greenhouse gas, right? Yes, without a doubt. So how does the Obama administration connect you to agriculture? What is that pathway?

You know, where else would you put an astrophysicist in government? Wait, what was your title? I was a White House fellow. Oh, you didn't say that. Oh, okay. A White House fellow. And so you have these science fellows at the White House.

So the White House fellows are actually, I was the only scientist. Oh, I didn't know that. Yeah, so it's a group about 16 in my class, right? So one of them is now a congresswoman. We've got all kinds of folks from the military and business and law. The idea is you go and you serve a cabinet secretary as a senior advisor. Because the cabinet reports

to the president. Right. So this is still a White House thing. Exactly. So the secretary of agriculture then became your thing. Exactly, right. Who reports to the president

and you were working with them. So I'm intrigued by the fact that you get a PhD studying exoplanets. So you're thinking about planets, looking at them from afar, and then Earth and agriculture becomes Earth that you're thinking about from afar. So what kind of NASA or astronomical insights can you offer the Department of Agriculture? Well, I mean, I want it to be more down to Earth, let's be honest,

right? And the idea is just that, you know, you can see so much more from satellites than you can with a guy. Walking around with a mule. Right. They offered to send me to estimator school where they said, you're going to walk a certain number of paces in a cornfield, pick the second ear of corn you see, and count the diameter and across. And that's how we estimate the crop yields in America. We still, to this day, don't use satellite technology for the government predictions on crop yields.

Which is green acres? That's crazy. You got Arnold the Pig predicting the weather? Hey, man, so how big is your corn? That's crazy. It's quantitative. You count. But I mean, it's one of those things that it's really useful for all the companies that

come in because then it's calibrated ground truth, right? Okay in a way it makes sense yeah so now but but isn't it much better to look at because you can see from space you can actually see soil conditions you can see the the crop yields themselves there are i mean how it is. How dry you can see, you know, there's so much more information you can get from looking down from above. So what's going on with that? I mean, and so to your question, right? There is tons of NASA data

that looks at the soil moisture. It looks at sort of the different vegetation and that's all publicly available both to the agriculture department and anybody else. And to the person pacing cornfields. Right. Correct. It's available to them.

Right. But maybe they need a job. Exactly. The farmer needs a job. I don't know. So, no, I'm intrigued by this. So, okay. So, that was a tour of duty.

It went across the administrations. That's right. But then you ended up, you told me offline, you ended up at the Office of Science and Technology Policy, which is the executive branch that oversees the budget for science in the United States. Wow. For science, yeah. For science, right. And so what were you doing there? Writing about, hey, what are we investing in? What are the people and the programs? And I figured that we added the word American in front of everything we want to do. So we wanted American health, right want not just health american health that was smart yeah i mean that is brilliant because when you look at the america america you should have made it that

instead of american you gotta spell it right apostrophe m u r i c a they didn't teach me that one in my spelling classes you know okay so that was clever and so now more people across the aisle can take ownership of it. Right. That's right. Yeah, no, I mean, it was, I will say coming in to a new administration,

it's kind of crazy. Your hard drives get wiped. Everything is gone. You're starting fresh a little bit and lots of opportunity to learn. So whether you wanted me to have that opportunity or not, but I think, you know, we did some good stuff. But would you have normally been discarded between administrations?

No. How did you stay on? So White House fellows have a one-year appointment that's fixed. And so started August of 2016 and went to August of 2017. Oh, you started at the end of the Obama administration. Oh, so you crossover. You were a part of the transition. I was, yeah. Okay. Very cool. So at the time, you told me again offline that

you knew I was on a Pentagon board at the time. How did you know about that? Because I go into five-sided buildings. I can handle that, not just four-sided ones. Okay, right on. I mean, me going five-sided. How many five-sided buildings do you know? I don't know, because I work at the Hetzagon.

Okay. That's tough. Why do you think the telescopes have these hexagonal mirrors, right? Yeah, the mirror segments of January 10th are hexagonal. That's right. So that's top secret. Nobody knows about it except for you. There you go.

That's right. You know where we came up with that idea? At the hexagon. Not the pentagon. Okay. What's your most recent published paper was it about climate change yeah we just wrote a paper together about sea level rise and how you can use satellite data to actually do better job of preparing coastal cities excellent right yeah which is only where, like, most everybody lives. Every major city is on a body of water. And so... What can satellites do for you, right?

Okay, but, again, it sounds like the seismologist, it's like, here's what to do when the water knocks at your door. Rather, is there preventative advice in there? No, so this is all about how cities can look at glaciers in Antarctica and Greenland melting now to prepare for what's happening in the future, right? Rather than waiting for the level to actually rise. You have some early warning. Oh, so you can make predictions and anticipate. Got it. That's amazing.

Got it. And plus, I'm not thinking about Antarctica or Greenland when I don't live near them. But their water doesn't carry passports, right? That's right. That water molecule will go wherever it goes. Yes, exactly. Right?

So let's get back to exoplanets. Absolutely. So your work for your PhD was what? Thinking about how planets form and how they evolve over time. Oh, formation of exoplanets. Good. Somebody had to make them. That's right.

They're not just born whole. No, exactly. Okay. Yeah. So Chuck, you got questions for us. We have them right here. Let's do it. You want to jump right into this? Let make them. That's right. They're not just born whole. No, exactly. Okay. Yeah. So, Chuck, you got questions for her. We have them right here. Let's do it. You want to jump right into this?

Let's do it. All right. I love this first one. This is Monchelle Hicks. And Monchelle says, hi, Dr. Tyson. Hi, Anjali. Planets are evaporating? That's it.

That's all that it says. I mean, Monchal's got it down. Planets are evaporating. Right. Right? I mean, we got the Earth. We got exoplanets, right? Because you've got all this gas that we call the atmosphere

that's trying to stick to the planet by gravity. But sometimes you got the heat from that star that's enough that it just pulls it off. Well, we're losing, what, helium and what's the other thing? Hydrogen. Hydrogen and helium on a daily basis. Hourly, minutes, seconds daily basis. Hourly minutes, seconds, yeah.

Okay, but not so fast that I should worry about it and make a thing up. But if there's stars that get brighter or more luminous and they're gas-rich planets, so how about those big Jupiters

that are orbiting close to their post-star? Are they evaporating? Yeah, these planets, right, that we call hot Jupiters because they're so close in. Right. And especially since they've always got one side

often facing the stars, the same side's getting plastered. Because they're tightly locked. Exactly. Like the moon is tightly locked to us. Right. If you get close to a massive source of gravity, it's going to lock you

and only look at one side, just as we did to the moon. The moon is trying to do that to us. Did you know that? Just, yeah, just leave us there on the wrong path. It's just trying to do that to us. Did you know that? Just, yeah, just lead us down the wrong path. It's just trying to... I knew. I knew.

I knew. Yeah, don't value judge the path. Yeah. It's just the orbital mechanics of it. Come on. Then we go over here. Come on. Come on.

It's, it's, I'm just saying. Let's go over here. So the moon is trying to slow us down so we only show the same face to it. Same face to it. Yeah. That's why we throw in leap seconds

every now and then to make up for that. But anyway, so... So wait a minute. With the That's why we throw in leap seconds every now and then to make up for that. But anyway, so. So wait a minute. With the evaporation, because I'm concerned about Earth, to be honest, what's going to happen first? Will our atmosphere, which I understand from Neil, is like thinner than the skin of an apple. Okay. It's thinner than the skin of an apple.

Will that evaporate before the sun expands and kills us all? Or what's going to happen first? All right, Chuck. Don't worry about it. Don't worry about it. There's a lot of things that I'll scare you with. This isn't one of them, right? Okay.

So the idea is that you will have this atmospheric escape is what they call it because your atmosphere is literally escaping the planet, happening more and more in the future as the sun gets brighter, but it's not all going to go away before then. So you're safe. Okay. You're good. We'll be crawling around the surface of the sun gets brighter, but it's not all going to go away before then. So you're safe. Okay. You're good. We'll be crawling around

the surface of the earth trying to breathe. Right. Stay low. Like you're in a fire. Stop, drop, and roll just so you can breathe. Well, I think you're going to want to,

you know, go up towards the poles or something like that. The equator's not going to look so hot. Oh. Or maybe it is going to look so hot. Yeah, that's the problem. Okay. Well, you already got this planned out.

You have to join a Santa Claus. Alright, what else you got, Chad? Alright, here, this is TJ's show, who says, Hi, TJ here from Winnipeg, Canada, eh? He does not have that in there. No, they don't. Okay. They do not.

Okay. Okay. It says, thanks for taking my question. Hello, Dr. Tyson, Dr. Trapathy, and Lord Nice. Long-time listener and new Patreon here. My question is about intelligent life. If there are roughly 10 million unique organisms on Earth, 99% of all species that have ever existed

are extinct, and we are the only intelligent species out of all that. Questionable. Let me say, questionable. Big assumption. Big assumption. Then doesn't that mean that the likelihood of there being intelligent life on a newly discovered habitable world

is about one in a billion. Oh, I like that. Okay, so there you go. Fast back and you have a little math there. A little math there. He says, yeah. And then he goes on, our galaxy might be teeming with life, but intelligent life could be extremely

rare. So let me recast that in another way. If you have all the... So his earth is this one branch of vertebrates coming out of fish that became great apes. Right. Okay. I know some apes, but not all of them are great. Well, no.

Some of them were just not so great apes. So at one thin branch of that are the humans. Anything could have stopped that. Right. The asteroid not taking out the dinosaurs would have disrupted the mammals from ever even, quote, ascending to where we are. Just sheer luck. Exactly. Okay?

Bad luck. So, if this is just one branch out of the tens of millions of life forms, if you have tens of millions of Earths, close your eyes and throw a dart. Really? Most of them will just have life like we got here. Just life. Just life, but it will not be developed. So react to that, please. I'm just saying I'm not smart enough to know what else is out there in the universe and certainly not the numbers of that. So I think, you know, if we're being honest, do we know if there's life out there? I don't know. Do I hope there's life

out there? Heck yeah. Do I hope it's intelligent? Heck yeah. But the number's one in a billion? Let's take the intelligence out. Okay. Now, the fact is... It's already out. Let's factor that out. What is the likelihood of just life? I don't care if it's single-celled life.

I don't care if it's just some type of bacteria, amoebas, whatever. you know, like, you know, some type of bacteria, amoebas, whatever. What is the likelihood of that happening, seeing as how, you know, the same building blocks that we have here are everywhere? Yeah, plus it happened pretty quickly. Yeah, yeah. I mean, we're only 4.5 billion years old, and we got to the life part pretty damn quickly.

I mean, there's planets everywhere, right? Like, every star has planets. And so if you think about it, we've got so many planets, so many balls of rock are probably amongst those planets. Chances are good you had the conditions for life, right? You know, water, some energy. Those things seem like they're out there. So I think the chances are good.

But again, one in a billion? I don't know if it's that slim. Plus, we're not even limited to rocky planets anymore because there's some good moons. There are some great ones. That habitable world, right? Not just the habitable planet. Habitable world's not just planets.

World. Forget planet, non-planet. Yeah, world. World. Okay. And then we get, yeah, yeah, yeah. I mean, like,

even like an ice, well, what would be like an ice world like Enceladus? Yeah, you got that water underneath, right? Yeah, but that could happen, right? Totally happen.

All right, here we go. This is Dylan and Dylan says, greetings, everyone from Flagstaff, right? Yeah. But that can happen, right? Totally happen. All right. All right, here we go. This is Dylan. And Dylan says, greetings, everyone from Flagstaff, Arizona. I'm taking undergraduate astrophysics courses and learning about spectroscopy. Thank you. Spectroscopy. Spectroscopy. I can't.

God, it always gets me. And other amazing methods of how to find and characterize planets. What has been the best method so far to find planets, and what possible new methods are being thought up. So let me focus that down and have you tell us. We're now using spectroscopy to study the atmosphere of these planets. So what's coming out of that? I mean, it's amazing that when you get just the right configuration,

that you've got the star and the planet passes in front of it and you're looking at that, some of the light goes through that atmosphere of that planet from the star and gets to us. And so we can actually see some of those chemicals in that atmosphere. That's amazing. So the chemicals are disrupting, really, the clean path of light from the star and that disruption shows up in the spectrum. They were like putting their fingers on there, getting those fingerprints. So what are you looking for? So we've seen carbon dioxide with the James Webb Space Telescope,

which is pretty cool. First time we've seen that on another exoplanet. All right. Okay, what else? Right, all kinds of other compounds, right? We get water. Okay, sure. Water molecule, yeah.

Right, and you got some good things in there. And so all kinds of configurations of oxygen and carbon and hydrogen that you think about. Methane. Methane is pretty great, right? You get methane there too? Have you seen it yet?

There is methane about on the planets, yeah. Okay. That would be evidence of? Farts. It can be. It can be. All right. Keep going.

That is so cool. This is Cesar. By the way, just to bring closure to that, to say the boring obvious fact, so many of these planets were discovered. Exactly. Were discovered just by their spectra. Right, and by transits, right? That you looked at the light and you saw it blinking,

and that's just because something kept going around at that light of the star. A transit is the planet going in front of the star's light, rocking the star's light. It's just like when we have eclipses where you block out the whole face of the star, but here it's just a fraction of it, right? So we talk about... In fact, solar eclipses where you block out the whole face of the star, but here it's just a fraction of it, right? So we talk about…

In fact, solar eclipses are really transit. Yes. We're talking about the transit of Mercury and Venus? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Mercury transit, Venus transit, it's a moon transit. That's right. And an eclipse technically, astronomically, is just object moving into the shadow of another object.

Okay. So a total solar eclipse, really, we shouldn't use the term eclipse, but we do. All right. Nice. This is Cesar Erno, who says, Hello, Dr. Tyson, Dr. Tripathi. Is the James Webb Space Telescope used to look for exoplanets? Heck yeah.

Okay. So why don't we just zoom in on some exoplanets and get high-fiving? She worked for NASA. She said, heck yes. Heck yeah. Okay. So why don't we just zoom in on some exoplanets and get high- She worked for NASA. She said, heck yes. Heck yeah. Heck. We heard that. No, let me hear it real.

You're in New York City. You're in Manhattan. Say that right. F*** yeah! I'm sorry. I can beat that. I'm so sorry. Chuck wins that.

I'm sorry. Chuck did that. That was just too New York. I couldn't help it. That's a long bleep on that one. Okay. No, I think if I had the t-shirt, instead of I love New York,

it would be I love JWST, right? For the exoplanets. Oh, yeah. James Webb Space Telescope. So I thought it would only be looking closer at exoplanets we've already discovered. Is there a discovery mode? There are discoveries too, yeah.

How does it do that? I mean, it actually captures pictures where you see that there's planets in the frame. Wow. Without knowing that in advance? Yeah, yeah. Oh. So he said, why don't we just zoom in

and get some high quality images? That's what it's doing. I mean, that's exactly what he just said it's doing. Wait, wait, so you see the host star and you see the planet? You get a hint of the planet being there. A hint of the planet. We get a little dip of tea, right?

Dip of planets. But I mean to, you know... Wait, wait. Can JWST block the light of the bright star? So that it's... There is no coronagraph on JWST. Coronagraph. Right?

So a coronagraph is the part that, you know, it's like sunglasses for your telescope to block out the light. Gotcha. But, you know, the question of can we zoom in on planets there? You know, James Webb is looking at different patches of sky. And if there are planets in there, that's great.

But it can't look at just any part of the sky and say, zooming in deeper and deeper, because planets don't give off a lot of light. They're just reflecting their starlight, which is so faint that you don't see it most of the time. Yeah, gotcha. All right. All right, this is Gavin Bamber

who says, hello from North Vancouver where plant life flourishes. And he's not lying. That's a northern Vancouver. Ooh, it's so green up there. Really? Oh, you can go green blind up there.

It's crazy. It's crazy. He says, once we find plant or animal life on other planets, oh, will we be able to eat it? Or can we tell if we're able to eat it? Or for Chuck, will we be able to eat it? Or can we tell if we're able to eat it? Or for Chuck, will we be able to smoke it?

That's a question for you. Yeah. Wait, did he say that? Yes, he did. No, he didn't. Yeah, I swear to God. He said, or for Chuck, will we be able to smoke it? Okay, so let me ask this.

So can we only, I don't know how much biology you know, but can we process organic matter that has a different DNA from us? Like our DNA is right-handed, like it spirals this way, like clockwise looking up. A double human. Yeah, but in principle, you can have DNA doing the other direction. Right. The chemistry shouldn't matter. Right.

Right? Except we don't. And all those people's skin is on the inside of their body. That's how all their organs are on the outside. They are so messy looking. So what is the scholarship on

just the digestibility of life forms that are not native to Earth? A researcher doesn't eat and tell, Neil. A researcher doesn't eat and tell? Yeah. I don't know why that got me. But, I mean, I would say, you know, would you want to, though, right? Because, I mean, there's so many things that you're like, oh, that cheese doesn't look quite right.

I don't know if I want to eat that. Now you're going, I just found this out there. I foraged for some while. Yeah, yeah, yeah. That looks tasty. There's a whole lot of stuff on Earth you know not to eat. Now, are you that desperate to eat aliens? Right, I'm just saying, would you want to?

Hi, I'm Chris Cohen from Hallward, New Jersey, and I support StarTalk on Patreon. Please enjoy this episode of StarTalk Radio with your and my favorite personal astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson. So this is Daniel L. Thompson, who says, Howdy, Dr. Tyson,

Dr. Tripathi, and Sir Nice. That's Lord Nice. Lord is above Sir. Lord, exactly. Lord is totally above sir. Why would you demote me? He goes, I'm Daniel from high school in the AFJROTC, Junior Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps.

Good for you, buddy. Nice. He says, for potential habitable planets, has there been a minimum and maximum size or density to define what would be survivable for humans to live? I like that. Yeah. And P.S. Chuck, you're welcome for the easy name. Well, thank you, Daniel.

But you can't take credit. I'm going to thank your parents for that. But anyway, is there, I mean, I suppose planet sizes, the pressure, atmospheric pressure, gas, planets, whatever. All those things would have a… There's a movie, The Space Between Us, where someone grew up on Mars. An astronaut got pregnant the night before the launch. Yeah. And it takes nine months to get to Mars.

Right. And NASA had to hide that information. So she gave birth on Mars and no one knew about it. And then the kid came back to Earth and was like... That's pretty cool. He had a hard time breathing. Yeah.

And, you know, all the things he was used to on Mars. His muscles couldn't handle it. But he was still alive. It didn't kill him. So do you have any thoughts on survivability

of low or high gravity? I mean, I'm a big fan of Earth, right? So like looking for planets like Earth because, you know, I like being able to jump up and down rather than Jupiter. I don't know. Jump up. Where are you going next, right? So, like looking for planets like Earth, because, you know, I like being able to jump up and down rather than Jupiter. I don't know, jump up, where are you going next, right? Right, right. And, you know, having that nice solid surface. So, you know, something sort of

the size of Earth is nice and cozy. And we seem to do okay. Oh, I see. The point is, if it's much more massive than Earth, it's not a rocky planet. It's gaseous. You're getting gaseous. Because it kept all of its gas. Right, yeah. Okay, so that's out. The upper end of that's out. Upper end's out. I don't know how low we can go, right? Because we've got moons that are possibly good places to live. Well, our moon is one-sixth gravity. Right. Right.

So that's not going to kill you. It's not going to kill you. You're going to get some health. But you don't want to get used to it and then come back to Earth. Yeah, I mean, three generations later, you know, you have the bone density of a marshmallow. But you've got the spacesuit, right? That, you know, it's a souvenir, right? All I got was this lousy space suit,

right, when I came. You're not going to be buying from my souvenir shop anytime soon, are you? It's okay. So, I mean, I think, you know, down on the lower end, it's hard to say how low you can go. It is interesting, though, that when we look out at exoplanets, we find some where there are these little planets

that actually end up just getting evaporated away. So instead of their atmospheres being all that evaporates, you've got just like crumbly planet going off into space. Right? So you've got the wrong conditions there. So it's not just the size of the planet. It's how close it is to the star and everything else it's feeling. It probably feels tidal

forces that will disrupt it structurally too. Okay, but when they say super Earths, we've heard this. That's right. Bigger than Earth. Among exoplanets. Super, how big is super? Bigger than Earth.

Smaller than Neptune, right? It's not like anything we've got in the solar system. So you think like, ah, it's in between. So it might be twice your gravity? Something like that. Could do, right? We talk about it in terms of the radius of it. So how's the size of it?

Because the super Earth, right, it could have a surface. It could be a little bit more puffy. Okay, but so how big a radius compared to Earth if it's a super earth? Depends on your definition, right? It's a few times. A few times, yeah. Okay. A few times. That's pretty big. That's pretty big, right? Normally when people think of, oh, it's twice the size, but

if you can range 10 and 100 times bigger, a factor of 2 is just friendly. Yeah, exactly. I mean, we have a poster that we made of people skydiving on a super earth because they thought, oh, that'd be fun. Right? Yeah. A factor of two is just friendly. Yeah, exactly. I mean, we have a poster that we made of people skydiving on a super earth because they thought, oh, that'd be fun. Yeah. We'd be falling faster. I personally don't think it would be fun. A lot faster.

Yes. But our art team thinks it's great. Yeah. I think that's great. But, you know, there was also the question in there of the density, right? And I definitely want to be on that ball of rock rather than that ball of gas like Jupiter because I like having a surface. You like to want to land somewhere, okay.

Yeah, and so, but what if, or could you tell this, like when we retrieved, you know, part of the asteroid, right? We were able to do so because we put the drill down in a place where we knew it was crumbly rock. So what if we know that it's a super earth, but it's kind of made of that kind of that composition of crumbly rock? I mean, I would love to get to that point, right?

Right now, I'm just like, it weighs this much. It seems this big. Divide some numbers. I don't think that's a real thing. Really? Yeah, because if it's big enough and has a strong enough gravity, it'll impact the fire. Right.

It will condense. The problem with the asteroids gravity, it'll impact the fire. Right. It will condense. The problem with the asteroids, they don't have much gravity. Right. So they're like loosely, they're loose. Plus, it didn't drill. It was a touch and go. It was right. Bang.

And then it sucked up. It grabbed whatever popped up in it. Whatever came up inside of it. Yes. Right. And they were ready for just a couple ounces. They got half a pound. Right.

Half a pound. So they were good. But no, you're right. The gravity makes it, that makes sense. All right. We've got time for like one they got half a pound. Right. Half a pound, so they were good. But no, you're right. The gravity makes it, that makes sense. All right, we've got time for like one and a half more questions. One more. All right, all right, all right, all right. Let me see.

Okay, let's go with Andrew Nisker. And Andrew says, hello from Flesherton, Ontario. Can you please explain the different types of biomarker gases? How will the next generation of telescopes enhance our ability to study exoplanets? Guess that's two separate questions, but hey, I'm always looking up, so I have to ask lots of questions.

Nice! So picking up on the earlier question, you mentioned water molecule, methane, and carbon dioxide. Right. But is there like the greatest hits of what would reveal life on the surface? I mean, there's so many

different ways that we can search for exoplanets with life, right? Those signatures, right? We call them biosignatures or technosignatures. They even want to go

a little further afield. And so the fact that, you know, you could look for pollution on a planet. That'd be a technosignature. That, well, depending on how you count it. Okay, all right.

Right? But I mean, like, you look for chlorofluorocarbons, right, from your, you know Well, depending on how you count it. Okay. Right? But I mean, like, you look for chlorofluorocarbons, right? From your, you know, hairspray on your alien world. Okay. You know, that would be a slam dunk for life,

even though it's not one of the things we've historically always studied. Right. These sorts of things. And so, you know, signatures like methane. Wait, wait. So if they're chlorofluorocarbons,

they're idiots. But they're idiots we can see. Right? No scientific knowledge is like there. Exactly. They're getting rid of their ozone layer. Which is probably what they're idiots. But they're idiots we can see, right? No cyanotoxin like there. Exactly. They're getting rid of their ozone layer. Which is probably what they're saying about us when they actually see the biomarkers from

this planet or the technomarkers from this planet. Right. I mean, it's like, if you were really smart, would you want people to see you and find you? Right, right. So, anymore, what's it? Phosphate was one of them? So, phosphine is something that people have talked about possibly.

No, no, it's all good. It's all good. Being detected possibly in Venus and whether that's a sign of life or something else is probably something else there. But I think there are lots of detections of all of these more complicated molecules, right, where you start putting things together. That would be there only if you have life on the surface. That could be caused by life, right?

Right. You know, like the chlorofluorocarbons would only be caused by life. But methane could be common from something else. Something else. Okay, because you can get naturally occurring methane. Right, yeah. Okay, so what about oxygen? Oxygen could be there.

It can be, I mean, when you look at it. I don't know how you get oxygen unless somebody's making it, like with plants. I mean, like look at the history of the Earth, right? For billions of years we've existed and we didn't have this much oxygen all that whole time, right? Like, go back in time. So you not only need to look at that planet and just see what it is, but at this particular moment in time. Right, because when I saw the original Star Trek, do you remember

that in the original Star Trek, no one ever wore a spacesuit? No. When they went down on the planet? They didn't wear a spacesuit. They never wore a mask. Right, right. You know why? Because they, but they would establish oxygen, nitrogen, atmosphere, Captain. Let's go on down. It's a class M planet. Right, exactly.

It's a breathable atmosphere. So I'm thinking, oh, if you just look hard enough, you find other oxygen-nitrogen planets. And then I realized later that you're only getting the oxygen from living matter on the planet. It's not just some random mixture in the random assortment of planets. Somebody's making the oxygen, and on Earth, it's our plant life. But I mean, we can also, you know, when you form a planet, you got all kinds of chemistry going on in there

and things going into the rocks. And so what goes on in your atmosphere, some of that just happens naturally. Okay. So you're going to have to distinguish those cases. So getting the list is one thing, and then you fight about whether it's biological or not. Exactly.

Yeah, at the conferences. Yeah, that's good. That was a good question. Chuck, time for one half a question. Oh my God. Let's see. Let's go with Captain James Riley who says,

hello everyone, Texas here. Is there a most common atmospheric composition out there among rocky planets? I like that. That's related to that last question. Related to the last question. I love that question.

I think in the last question he asked about the telescopes. And I think the answer is we need more data, right, to answer this. Because we haven't been able to tell the atmosphere. I'm not allowing you to cop out and just say we need more data. No, no. Talk to me. Give me.

But, I mean, I think that's the thing is that so many of these things, because if it's a cloudy day, you can't see what's going on underneath, right? You see clouds. You see, like, water vapor up there, right? So there's so many of these systems where you think like, hey, I need this new telescope. Okay, so of all the planets where we know anything about their atmosphere, is there an emergent common list?

I think it's kind of like the zoo, right? There's some common things, like there's all those things with tails, so there's all those things with oxygen, there's all those things with carbon and methane, right? It's the sort of thing that we haven't seen enough to be able to say, this is the most common thing yet.

So, not yet. So, like the zoo, you have animals with tails, animals with four legs. Things with wings, right? Okay, so the blunt. You can start classifying them. The blunt. You start blunt.

Right. I think what it means is we've got to chat more again in a few years, and then we can do better on this question. Oh, that means you can come back. Come back. Well, very cool. By the way, I understand you have a TED Talk?

I do. Yeah, on? On atmospheric escape. Oh, okay. Okay. Well, very cool. By the way, I understand you have a TED Talk. I do. Yeah, on? On atmospheric escape. Oh, okay. Okay. Well, I'm not watching that. I'm scared to death. But you know how it ends.

You know you're safe, right? You know how it ends. It's a no problem. So you're the first to model the escape of gas from atmospheres. Doing that in 3D for these planets. 3D modeling. Oh, cool. In the old days, computers weren't fast, and we didn't have AI.

And so you do like 1D modeling and 2D modeling just to approximate the 3D modeling because you couldn't calculate it. And then when computers get fast enough, and she comes along, she says, I got this, 3D, boom, all in. There you go. And it's hard because you're modeling gas. Right, you're just watching it flow. Yeah, the flow of gas in a computer model,

that's not it. It's not let it go, it's let it flow, right? Right, okay. Yeah, but I mean, what's funny is like, isn't that like gas is, what's that? Gas moves towards entropy. It's just no chaos, right? Somewhere in between, right?

Because it was starting on the planet in the atmosphere and just blowing off into space. Okay, so that's what you're doing. You're going from where it's very more stable and then to its instability. There you go. Okay. We're good.

All right. Chuck is good until the next time. I'm feeling better. You feel a little better. I'm feeling better. You've got to be feeling totally better. So, Anjali, thanks for coming on the StarCraft. Thanks for having me.

We'll continue to follow your career. Appreciate that. You know, there's still a few more presidents you can work for. Yeah, exactly. You know, don't slouch.

You got to get back in the White House. I mean, I'm the exoplanet ambassador though right now, right? So I got to go visit those exoplanets too eventually. You have an ambassador title. Oh yeah.

No, I'm NASA's exoplanet ambassador. Oh, sweet. Oh my God. That's pretty cool. So do you speak at the UN? I speak for the State Department. The Galactic UN. Oh yeah.

There you go. So when the aliens come, when they say, take me to our leader, I'll say, we have an ambassador. We have an ambassador. Is that good enough?

Oh my God, yeah. No, we say, we ain't taking you earlier. The ambassador is going to be what you're going to meet. Believe me, yes. It will be a scientist or Taylor Swift. The doctor will see you now. All right.

Well, good luck in your continued career and your ambassadorship. And we'll want a full update. All right. Sounds good. As more exoplanets show up and more aliens visit. Okay. You'll be first on the list. All right.

Nice. Thanks. All right. Good. This has been StarTalk. Neil deGrasse Tyson here, your personal astrophysicist. Chuck, thanks for being there. Always a pleasure.

All right. And as always, I bid you to keep looking up.