StarTalk Radio - Healing the Earth Through Regenerative Farming with Will Harris

Episode Date: January 12, 2024

Is industrial farming bad for us? Neil deGrasse Tyson and co-hosts Chuck Nice and Gary O’Reilly learn about the future of food production, regenerative agriculture, and greenwashing with herdsman, land steward, and author Will Harris. NOTE: StarTalk+ Patrons can listen to this entire episode commercial-free here: https://startalkmedia.com/show/healing-the-earth-through-regenerative-farming-with-will-harris/Thanks to our Patrons Tomasz Paź, Heath Kehoe, Brittni Phillips, Roy Carter, Andrea Cousins, Ben Sellers, Yanko Kaneti, and Noah Jellenik for supporting us this week. Subscribe to SiriusXM Podcasts+ on Apple Podcasts to listen to new episodes ad-free and a whole week early.

Coming up on StarTalk, we're going to look at regenerative farming, where our food comes from, and what its impact will be on climate, as well as our health, and more on StarTalk. Welcome to StarTalk, your place in the universe where science and pop culture collide. StarTalk begins right now. This is StarTalk Special Edition. Neil deGrasse Tyson here, your personal astrophysicist. And with Special Edition, we explore the human condition as it is bolstered or interfered with by emergent technology and who and what we are as a species and our relationship to machines. Man, you made this show sound important.

Man. That was. I didn't even know we were doing all of that. That's nice. Stand-up comedian, actor, still acting like a comedian. Still acting like a comedian. Yeah, all right. And Gary, ex-pro footballer and broadcaster.

Okay, we've got an interesting show today. We do. Gary, you put together a show I didn't even know was possible in our repertoire. Tell us about it. You put together a show I didn't even know was possible in our repertoire. Tell us about it. We found someone who we are going to orbit around who has made this possible. Because about 25 years ago, a farmer, yes, a farmer,

decided that he no longer wanted to be part of industrialized farming. So he threw away the pesticides, threw away the hormones, and started to listen to Mother Nature. He is a soil scientist, a hydrologist, a biologist, a chemist, a nutritionist, a weather expert, and a community leader. Something very, very important. He now operates one of the largest pasture-raised livestock operations in the USA and was the first outfit to sell a pound of grass-fed beef to Whole Foods. to sell a pound of grass-fed beef to Whole Foods. What?

He calls himself radically traditional while his daughters call him an iconic icon. We're just going to be calling him Will Harris. Wait, his daughters call him an iconic icon? Organic. Organic icon. Yeah. That's great. Yeah, that's doubling down on the icon status.

But no, organic. Yeah, yeah. We down on the icon status, but no, organic. Yeah, yeah. We have in the flesh from Georgia coming in one of our old-time farmers, Will Harris. Will, welcome to StarTalk. Thank you very much. I appreciate you having me. It's an honor. Oh, my gosh.

You are a fourth-generation farmer. Will, I can honestly say I can probably count on one hand how many farmers I've ever met in my life. And you've been a farmer for four generations. And how old is your farm that you're working on? My great-grandfather came to this farm in 1866.

And we've been farming it ever since. Wow. Oh, okay. How'd that sound? And the name of your farm, White Oak Pastures. We might have seen that on some food. I shop at Whole Foods. You know, I... Look at you, Mr. Fancy.

Maybe I gave you some of my money. That's okay. That was then, but he's throwing me out now. We got to find out about that. We're going to get into that, find out what happened there. You're the author of Bold Return to Giving a Damn. That's a great title. That's awesome.

And that just came out in the fall of 2023. Yeah. That explores the link between and among food, health, and climate change. Oh, my gosh. Okay, so let me start off by asking food, health, and climate change. Oh, my gosh. Okay, so let me start off by asking you, Will, why would you move away from industrial farming? I presume industrial farming made everybody make much more money faster. And it allows us to grow more food on less land with fewer people than ever before.

So why would you ever walk away from that? Well, the short answer is unintended consequences. Everything that you said is true. More food, less land, probably more profit. But there are unintended consequences. And the unintended consequences have falling on the backs of the animals, the land, the environment, and the rural economy. So these unintended consequences, normally when people say that, that's a bad thing. I mean, because unintended consequences just means something happened that you didn't foresee.

That can be something good. So what is the bad? I meant it deformal, not the law. There's a bad thing. Okay, okay. The bad things would be the impact on the environment.

To operate a modern farm, there are a lot of products you use. The end of the name is CIDE. C-I-D-E. That's Latin for kill. Yeah. Like homicide, suicide. That's what you mean. Homicide, insecticide, pesticide,

herbicide. My father took over the farm in 1946 and turned it into a modern industrial linear farming operation. I followed him and never wanted to do anything except what he did. Went to the University of Georgia when I came to Bage. I graduated in 1976 with a degree in animal science and learned a lot about how to kill pests. And I came home and implemented those teachings successfully, financially.

So these would be insects, but also, I guess, weeds too? These are both of those you don't want on your farm. Anything you don't want. That could be pathogens. It could be insects. It could be weeds. It could be so many things. Whatever you don't want, there's a product out there to many things. Whatever you don't want as a product out there.

So you want a don't want to side. That's what you want. All purpose thing for everything you don't want. That's what you want. You want to side it. Yeah, but that's not the way it works. But yes, you're right. I got to tell you, Neal, if Dow Chemical comes out with don't

want to side, I'll know that they're listening to this show. Okay. So Will, how long did it take once you made the changes? Once you decided, you know what, that's it. Taking the chemicals out, I'm going to let this mother nature project take. How long does it take for a reset for you to now make something positive happen out of this action? When you make the decision to cease to use all those technologies, you take a production hit immediately. And it takes a period of time to overcome it. I would say five years, but I don't know. I don't know if that's exactly right. It's gradual.

The things that you can do to accelerate it. And to be honest, you never get back up to the level of maximum production you had when you were using all the technologies.

You don't create the unintended consequences. You don't kill the flora and fauna in the Gulf of Mexico. There's a lot of favorable things that you don't do. But no one is ever playing, to my knowledge, that you maximize production on the land by giving up the technologies. You don't.

But what you do is you restart the cycles of nature. The cycles of nature yield an abundance. The cycles of nature would be, for instance, the energy cycle, the water cycle, the mineral cycle, on and on. When those cycles are operating optimally, as they do in nature, they produce an abundance. All that oil and coal and gas in the ground is the abundance of nature when it was operating optimally. And we've been using that up since. So what we did is cease to use the sides that end lives and work to generate the abundance that comes from all the cycles operating as optimally as we can make. But that makes you the weird farmer among farmers, right?

Why even go there? What motivated you? Did you watch some documentary one night and said, oh my gosh, I've been wrong? Because it sounds like you were working against your own interests by making this decision. Right, exactly. And did you have like a come to Jesus moment on this one? And you say, I got to change.

You know, the sad truth is I probably came to see the damage I was creating because I was a bit of an abuser. You know, I was a very heavy-headed farmer. And if the labor instruction said to use a pint, I might use a quart. If it said to use two cc's, I might use three cc's. So when you overuse the tools, you see the damage the tools cause. And when I started moving away from it,

I was not moving necessarily to this model that we embrace today. I was just moving away from that one. Interesting. And I'm very pleased that it did. When you say about the health of soil and things like that, had you got to the point where you were kind of getting, is it desertification of the soil, where it just is just dirt and barren? That's a good question.

I think that most of the land that's industrially farmed today is desertifying or has been desertified. And the example I'll give you is organic matter, the carbon percentage of the soil. My land had gotten down to one half of 1% organic matter. After 20 years of farming it in accordance with nature, it's 5% organic model. That's 10x. And let me tell you what that means.

1% of organic model will absorb a one-inch rain event. That's 27,000 gallons of water per acre. So my land at 5% will absorb a five-inch rain event, and we get them in Georgia. Yeah. When it was a half a percent organic model, it was only going to absorb a half an inch of rain. I don't care how much it fell. And organic model is not the only thing that's important. The microbial component, a lot of things are important, but that's just the easiest one to state the case for. What about animal welfare?

Because you raise cattle. You know, you've got a field-to-fork process that we'll get into, I'm sure. So how long did it take for you to see the benefits in the animals themselves? That was much easier. Animal welfare as an industrial cattleman had come to mean you keep them well fed, you keep them well watered, you keep them on a comfortable temperature range,

you don't intentionally inflict pain or suffering. And that's good animal welfare. That is the accepted standard. And I did that, and I thought I was really good at that. I thought my animal welfare was above approach. I came to realize that in addition to those things, good animal welfare also means you give the animal the opportunity to express instinctive behavior.

Cattle were meant to roam and graze. Moths were meant to root and wallow. Chickens were meant to scratch and peck. And the industrial model, the way we do it today industrially, does not allow those instinctive behaviors. So you're going against nature. Yes, sir. You're going against nature.

And, you know, you could going against nature. Yes, sir. You're going against nature. And you know, you could go against nature raising your children. You could lock them in a closet. I do it all the time. That's right. And nobody will abduct them. They won't fall off the bike. They won't get tackled

on the end run. You know, it's a good, safe place to raise them. It's probably not, it's a good, safe place to raise them, but it's probably not the best rearing your children can have. And that's what industrial animal production is, is multicultural confinement production. So let me ask you a question. This is slightly off of where we are right now, but since you brought it up about animal welfare and grazing, I was on a shoot in Dallas. Not Dallas.

It was outside of Dallas, but it was a cattle farm. And the cattle were grazing. They had two parts of this farm. And the gentleman who was my liaison, I was like, oh, look at that. So that's your grass-fed. And he was like, yeah. And I was like, I like that. I like grass-fed. And he went, you know, I'm not a grass-fed person because I feel as though it doesn't give you the same type of fat content that a corn-fed cow would have. And so you end up with a different taste of the beef. I'm a corn-fed person.

Does it really come down to that? Does it make that much of a difference that you're going to get a different product at the very end? If something, and the way he put it, they're worlds apart. Now, I wouldn't know, but. What that gentleman told you was absolutely true and accurate. It's exactly the way it is. But I'll put a little different slant on it for you. Okay. A grain-fed animal that's butchered, typically,

will be about, probably less than two years of age. It'll probably weigh 1,300 or 1,400 pounds. will be about, well, probably less than two years of age. It'll probably weigh 1,300 or 1,400 pounds. It'd probably have at least a half an inch of back fat. And it would be an unnaturally obese creature that would never survive in nature. And if it were left in that environment, that made it so obese, it would not live a normal lifespan.

In fact, it probably wouldn't live, I'm just going to guess, a half a natural lifespan. Now, is the beef from that cow tender and juicy? Yes. Is the weight put on at a very competitive cost? Yes. But I'm of the opinion that eating a creature that is unnaturally obese and dying from the conditions of sedentary lifestyle and obesity probably ain't good for you. lifestyle and obesity probably ain't good for you. You know, when you put it that way, it makes sense. I mean, basically, you're eating the cow that sits on the couch, watches TV, and eats potato chips.

That's what you're doing. With a beer. My cattle are athletes. They simply are athletes. And the life expectancy of a cow, I think is 24 years of age. I think that's what I saw as the normal life expectancy. We don't let them live that long, but I think that's what it is. And I have every reason to believe that my animals would live to be 24 years old if I just left them out there where they are right now. But I'm sure they wouldn't live to be 24 years old

in that environment, that feedlot environment that we just discussed. Hi, I'm Ernie Carducci from Columbus, Ohio. I'm here with my son Ernie because we listen to StarTalk every night and support StarTalk on Patreon. This is StarTalk with Neil deGrasse Tyson. You mentioned the term earlier um linear linear farming the industrialized farming and we've discussed soil well-being water content quality animal welfare but you're based in one of the poorest rural counties in the USA. What impact was linear industrialized farming having on the people, not just the soil and the ecosystems?

Well, moving to the linear model is what has impoverished rural America. rural America. We move, rural America has continued to be where we produce the raw material that most food is made from today. We do not add the value here anymore. We produce the cattle

or pigs or beets or cotton or corn or whatever. And it is moved in a very linear manner to another production sum, to another, to another, where their value is added. And that has impoverished rural America. Because all the value is not earned

where the farm is. Correct. Almost, in fact, a very small percentage. I think that the last number I saw is that something like 15 cents of the food dollar goes to the farmer. So the rest of it goes to someone else. Now, I'm not saying those people are getting money without deserving it. No, of course not. They add value, but it's impoverishing rural America.

So why then, in your opinion, is the food that is produced by big agriculture, big food, if you want to call it and tag it that, why is the food that we're consuming so messed up if there's a way to make it happen differently? Why doesn't everyone do what we'll do? Yeah, more or less. That's what you're asking. It's a great question.

And it's because the consumer has wanted cheaper and cheaper food, aggressively demanded cheaper and cheaper food, at least since World War II. And we provided it. We being the farmer and being all the way up the chain, we provided cheap food. In fact, I would say we provided obscenely cheap food that has become just wastefully abundant. Right, right.

And how much is that related to the explosion of retail eating in this country. So, you know, your McDonald's, your Burger Kings, your this and that, all these restaurants. I mean, when you look at it, the mainstay of all these restaurants is beef. So, I mean, how much does that have to do with it? Well, I think that the retail food business that you referenced was one more step of taking cost out of production, of taking cost out of food provision. The fact is, McDonald's can buy beef and cook it and serve it cheaper than you can buy beef and cook it in your apartment or house.

It's just as simple as that. That tips the scales and there's no going back from that. There may be no going back. I hope we can, to some extent, go back. I think that there is a segment of our population that has figured out that cheap food really isn't that cheap. I won't talk too much about the impact on health. I mean, I believe there is one, but I'm a farmer, not a doctor, not a dietician, and I don't want to get in that bait. But when it comes to the impact on the land, I know that industrially produced food is really, really bad.

When it comes to the impact on the animals, I know that industrially produced food is really, really bad. When it comes to the impact on local rural economies, I know that that industrial food is really, really bad. And I don't know of any reason to do it other than it's cheap. It is really, really cheap. Is it sustainable as a model to continue industrialized farming and just keep making cheap food and piling it high and whether you eat it or it goes to waste? Is it a sustainable model?

I'm convinced that it's not. That is a source of great debate among the people like me versus big food, big tech, big ag. But I don't believe that it is. But you don't believe that megafarming is sustainable? I do not. I do not believe that. I believe that we are exhausting, irreplaceable resources

and that it will end poorly. But suppose, I mean, I'm a fan of science and technology, and every time something turns wrong on it, some innovative, clever person comes up with a solution to it. So if you went down the list of everything that was wrong with Big Farmer and somehow you magically could correct it, then Big Farmer might be okay.

Right? If it were magic, I don't think... Okay. Alright, you've tagged your way of farming as field to fork. Right? And I think we can all visualize exactly how that works, but your way of farming as field to fork, right? And I think we can all visualize exactly how that works.

But what does that entail? Because there's all these, this has to all now be connected as opposed to these individual silos that industrial farming has where someone takes hold of this and someone takes hold of that and someone takes hold of the other. So how does that entail, filter fork for you? And that's where it becomes most difficult. When we, my dad's generation and later mine, turned food production into something very linear,

they set it up for scale, to have huge plants and factories producing food, huge plants and factories producing food, taking raw materials in at a very minimum quality standard and further processing it so it became a marketable product. That simply does not work well in this model that we have. It is not linear, therefore it doesn't blow up as well as escalating in terms of numbers, but it does replicate in terms of numbers. We believe that there should be food production in every county, every agricultural county in the

country. And a benefit we haven't talked about with that is during the pandemic, when the food was gone off the food shelves and the big meat plants. Not only that, the underwear and the water, I mean, the toilet paper, the toilet paper and the water went off the shelves just as fast. Bicycles, you couldn't get a bicycle. Toilet paper. The toilet paper in the border went off the shelves just as fast. There were bicycles. You couldn't get a bicycle. If you're rating those, you know, the food is pretty close to the top with the toilet paper. I mean, it's pretty close.

Very closely related. But during that time, meat plants ceased to operate. And, of course, I lived in fear that that mine would too. We never missed a day. We never missed a day operating our red meat plant and our poultry plant here on this farm. That's because our model is not nearly as scalable, but it is far more replicatable and durable. Okay. You've been in the farming business for quite some time. You've established that. You're historic, traditional.

All right, climate change. Does it affect you and how you farm? Or is it, you know what, they're cattle, they'll eat grass, I'll let them, they can wander around, be happy. Or are you actually changing? It works both ways. Does heat affect climate change?

And does climate change affect you, Matt? Both. I think that what we do impacts climate change. farming industrially and buying thousands of tons of chemical nitrogen per year and releasing it and oxidizing God knows how much carbon in the soil. I was contributing to climate change. I know that what I'm doing now is a benefit to mitigate against climate change. I mentioned the fact that the organic matter in the soil. So I think it works both ways.

Yeah. Not to mention, in addition to climate change, from an environmental standpoint, you know, big agro farming, just the runoff alone because of the chemicals that are used is extremely deleterious to surrounding communities, leads to health problems, damages waterways, contaminates groundwater in some instances. As Carl Sagan said, air molecules and water molecules don't carry passports. That's right. That's right across borders. They don't. That's right.

My farm, where I'm sitting right now, is about 80 miles north of the Gulf of Mexico. And there is a dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico that's about the same size as Massachusetts. And when I was a kid, the orsterman literally brought oysters to Lakely, Georgia, 10 miles that way. Once a week, we had fresh oysters. They banned oystering in the Gulf of Mexico now except for some cultured stuff they do. So the impact that industrial agriculture has had on the environment is not arguable.

It's not arguable. There is a study on my website, whiteoakpastures.com, called an LCA, Life Cycle Assessment. It was an $80-something study that a customer paid to have done on my farm by a third-party environmental engineering firm from Chicago, I think. And they came here to see what we were doing. And the expectation was that we were contributing to carbon depletion in the soil and all those other things.

But what they found is that our cattle operation actually sequesters three and a half pounds. Listen to me. Three and a half pounds of carbon every pound of beef we produce. And that's not magic. No, it's not magic. It's nature. It's nature. You know, I could argue that nature's a little bit magic, but it's nature.

We talk about nature, and I said earlier on in the show that you started to listen to Mother Nature. And if I remember rightly, you say that Mother Nature will provide everything you need to be successful in farming. Now, that's easy to say, but how do you get to a conclusion like that? Well, it's nature. There's a lot of poisonous stuff that'll kill you outright in nature, right? So nature doesn't always equal good, and non-nature doesn't always equal bad. So do you tread that line? I'm not sure that nature doesn't always equal good. It doesn't always equal life.

Yes, there's stuff out there that will kill you, and there's stuff out there that will make you strong. You should eat what makes you strong. You should not there that will kill you. And there's stuff out there that will make you strong. You should eat what makes you strong. You should not eat what will kill you. One way or the other, you'll figure it out. Or not. I was going to say, hopefully somebody will figure it out for you. That's the tester. When the guy beside you eats that green thing and falls over,

you don't need to eat that green thing. There you go. So, Will, tell me about this book you just released, A Bold Return to Giving a Damn. And it's, the future matters to us all in so many ways. And everyone thinks they have the answer. And people are fighting over who has the best answer or who's moving fast enough or not fast at all. Where does your book land in this? Where are you taking the reader in your attempt to show the world through

the lens that you have so hard earned in your life? So the book is about my 25 years of returning this farm from a very industrial, monocultural cattle production operation to what I believe is a very perpetual sort of farming operation that feeds us and does so in a way that is humane to the animals and improves, not degrades the landscape. So agriculture 2.0 is what you're talking about here. This is a new mindset. Or maybe 3.0, because 1.0 was farmers before there was technology. Then there was technology, and now you're kind of going back to roots here. I think it's 3.0.

Yeah, okay. You know, my family has been on this farm for 160 or whatever years, and we farmed in a model that's similar to what I farm today. But we have forgotten it. Let me say this. I am not anti-technology. You know, we've got, I'm on my fourth drone. Okay.

Would you lose them? Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Will, are you telling me that you're bombing other farmers? No, no. Stop. Stop. Stop.

A drone is just a flying thing that has cameras and other stuff. It doesn't have to be dangerous. We've got a lot of technology here, and I embrace it, and I use it, and I'm glad we've got it. So you're not anti-science and technology, you just got questions over the application. I'm trying to use it in a model that does not detract from the natural flow of things. Because if nature has a natural flow

and then you try to go against it, what are the consequences? They're bad. I mean, you got to be more specific, but we're doing it right now. Well, no, okay. Almost everything we call civilization has been a pushback against nature, right? We build a city on the water's edge, and then, yeah, a storm comes in every now and then. There's a flood. Nature's fighting back.

But, no, we won that fight. We built a dam to create electricity and fresh water. That's a fight we win against. We've fought a lot of battles against nature and won in the service of civilization. But there's always the consequences of that battle that you're talking about. In that dam, you often end up killing the wildlife that uses that waterway, or you have to make some type of concession. For instance, I'm thinking salmon particularly. You have to make a concession for that particular water wildlife. You know, when it comes to storms, if you don't have marshland surrounding that city, that city will flood, and the storms will destroy the city.

So the fight has to have concessions that allow you to do stuff. Or it has to be intelligently done. Intelligent, right. These are unintended consequences, and the unintended consequences can be devastating. And I don't know, I'm not the guy that's smartest and knows which ones of these ideas are good ideas and which ones are bad ideas.

But I do know, because firsthand I witnessed it on this farm, of the degradation that came from using these technologies to kill something. When I was an industrial cattleman, monoc an industrial cattleman, monocultural industrial cattleman. Every single day, I went to my pasture and looked aggressively for

something to kill. A pathogen, a weed species, an insect. So let me ask you this, because this is fascinating. I can't believe we didn't get to this earlier. What did you replace that with? If you're using something with a side on it, okay, just to stop using it, you still can have

invasive, whether it's a pathogen, whether it's a pest itself, or whether it just is another species of plant that you don't want coming in to your crops. What did you replace that with? You're exactly right. There will be another pest that results from the use of that side. There's a side for it, too. It's the endless, constant use of killing something. My goal when I was an industrial monocultural captain every day was to kill what displeased me. Now my goal is to make these things live because every single species out there has a

role in that natural environment. How do you get rid of the weeds then? How do you get rid of the parasites that are eating the food you're trying to grow and sell? How do you do that without the magic of modern chemicals? Chemicals. It's the same way that it happened for thousands of years. I ceased to have a monoculture of cattle because the weeds were eating me up. And I've got sheep and goats and hogs and poultry, and they handle it. Now, my pastures are not pristine. When I was farming industrially and monoculturally with cattle, my pastures were a monoculture of Tifton 85 Bermuda grass. that was bred by the University of Georgia, and it will assimilate incredible amounts of chemical nitrogen and turn it into forage for cattle.

It's incredible. But the use of that level of nitrate fertilizer literally destroyed the organic model and oxidized the organic model in my soil. And I had the other species would appear and I would spray it, gray zone

PNB herbicide. And the army worms would eat it up, so I would spray that. The list just goes on and on and on. Okay. So if you're successful in the context of your mission statement, has this caught on to other

farming communities, other counties, other I mean, ideally, that's what you'd want. It is what I want. And sadly, it has not caught on. I don't mean I'm the only one doing it. I don't mean that sadly, it has not caught on. I don't mean I'm the only one doing it. I don't mean that. But it has not caught on primarily because of competition from big multinational corporations. Right. Yeah, but consumers are not without power here.

Yeah. So if people wanted to get, you know, they read your book and they say, we are all in on this. What do we do as consumers? Just be very picky about what we buy as an endpoint in the production cycle? You're right. The consumer will determine how this all goes down, how this proceeds forward.

And if they decide to find farmers like me and support them, there will be more farmers like me for them to support and it can grow. Because that's how that goes. So as a consumer, we need to adopt a local farmer. Is this what we're thinking? In the sense of not to give them a home, but to support them by buying their produce.

You're exactly right. And I got to say that because we, when the classes started very early, I'm selling as much product as I want to sell. I'm fine. I'm not trying to grow this business, but I'm selling it in 48 states. And that was not my plan. I can't sell as much product as I need to sell in Bluffington, Georgia, with a population of 120 people. But the multinational food companies have seen the acceptance of some of this messaging that people like me are putting out. And so they greenwash their product.

And greenwash product is the nemesis of this kind of farming. How are they greenwashing? Well, I mentioned earlier, you can bring grass-fed beef in from 30 countries and label it as a product of the USA, legally. That's right. The animal is grown, slaughtered, processed, packaged in Uruguay, New Zealand, Australia, 20-something other countries. But then it legally, and that got changed in 2015.

You couldn't do that. You can label it product of the USA because value was added in this country. And it was a good- Oh, that's how that works. That's how it works. It was a game changer, and it was wrong, and it was done because multinational corporations have so much power. Damn.

Wow. So, I mean, the way around that, direct-to-consumer sales, is that something that needs to really be... And education. I think education is a big thing. Where it is catching on, and we've all seen this, especially here in the New York area, is farm-to-table restaurants,

where the restaurant owners are making the decision to source products from local farms so that they can have a better product on their restaurant table. Farm to table. Farm to table. So, you know, it is catching on in some respects. If the needle is moved on the way we produce food in this country, it's going to have to be done by the consumer. in this country. It's going to have to be done by the consumer. It's not going to happen through land-grant universities or through politicians or through big ag,

big food. I can give you a long list of people or entities that will not include. If it happens, it's going to be because consumers drive it. And sadly, it's got to be the consumers that can afford it. Let me say this, be clear on this. My food is not as cheap as commodity food. It's not. We don't expect it to be.

All those costs that are thrown out of the commodity model of soil in my mouth. I can't grow food the way I grow it and sell it in the commodity market. It's got to go to a consumer that can afford it and will choose to afford it. And I worry about the people that can't afford it.

I worry about that. But I can't solve that problem at the same time. Right. You went to university, studied animal science. Are universities, are colleges teaching this, your kind of farming model,

or is it, you know what, industrial or nothing else? That's a good question. That's a great question. So the answer, for the most part, is it's strongly influenced by the big food companies, big tech companies that donate money to them very strongly. But there are a few. Michigan State University is a savory hub. savory hub. That's kind of a long story we didn't get into, but there's a holistic land management

system, savory, and all that savory food. This guy's name, Alan Savory. That's what I was wondering. All I know is that you don't want to be an unsavory hub. That's a different... Alan Savory is a guy from South Africa that we... I took my holistic training under him in South Africa. All right. Before you go, Will, is this quote attributed to you?

Mother nature knows everything, forgets nothing, and bats last. It absolutely is. It's the truest thing I've ever said. Wow. That's a great, great quote. That's a wonderful quote. Nature knows everything, forgets nothing and bats last. That's badass right there.

That's some serious wisdom going on. If you can look at the world that you operate in in that way, there's a connection. There's a serious connection. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Mission statement and wisdom rolled into one. Yeah. So, guys, we've got to call it quits there.

But, oh, my gosh, I'm delighted to learn from you, Will. Yeah, Will, thank you for providing us with authentic food. We appreciate it. And that you exist in this world. This is an important cog in a wheel that is being built and slowly being turned. And maybe one day we'll look back on this show and say, oh, he was a pioneer. Now everybody does it. You know, that's kind of what maybe is the arc of progress.

I'm very grateful to you all for having me on as your guest. Thank you very much. You're welcome. All right. Well, you can check out Will's book, A Bold Return to Giving a Damn from an Authentic Farmer. So, Gary, Chuck, thanks for being my co-host. Pleasure, Neil.

Always a pleasure. All right. This has been StarTalk Special Edition, all about the future of farming and how to make it sustainable in this world, in this universe. Neil deGrasse Tyson here, as always, bidding you to keep looking up. you