StarTalk Radio - Time Travel at the Movies
Episode Date: March 28, 2013Travel back to the future for a discussion of time travel and the movies that depict such excellent adventures. Subscribe to SiriusXM Podcasts+ on Apple Podcasts to listen to new episodes ad-free and ...a whole week early.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to StarTalk, your place in the universe where science and pop culture collide.
StarTalk begins right now.
This is StarTalk. I'm your host, Neil deGrasse Tyson, your personal astrophysicist,
and I also serve as director of New York City's Hayden Planetarium.
Today is the second hour of our sci-fi movie show, and I'm joined by my comedian co-host, Leanne Lord.
I'm also happy to welcome back the bad astronomer, Phil Plait.
The topic today is time travel.
So let's just talk about time travel in the world of science.
So what can you bring to the table?
Well, it depends on what you mean by time travel.
I mean, traveling into the future is –
What do you mean it depends on what you mean?
Well –
Which word did you not understand in that sentence?
Well, there's a positive and negative, right?
We all travel in time.
We're going forward a minute every 60 seconds.
So we're going into the future, like it or not.
You're going to see it.
But you can travel – But we're trapped in the present as we move to the future yeah but when you said that it was
the present but now it's the past oh spooky um you guys really shouldn't do hallmark cards
so but we're traveling into the future and if you wanted to see what it's going to be like a
hundred years from now there are ways to do that and if you wanted to see what it's going to be like 100 years from now, there are ways to do that.
And if you want to see what things were like 100 years in the past, there are kind of ways to do that.
But if you want to see what the Earth was like 100 years ago, we can talk about that too.
So let's do it.
All right.
Well, traveling into the future, if you want to see the distant future, there are ways to do it.
Suspended animation, for example, would work if there were some feasible way of doing it
biologically.
We don't know how to do that.
So we just slow down your bio functions so that you basically age more slowly.
This is a common way in sci-fi movies of decades ago where they go on long trips and they put
you in some kind of suspended animation.
Right. It takes 100 years to get from here to there.
So you freeze the people and they can wake up when they get to their destination.
We don't know how to do that.
You freeze somebody, they're frozen.
I'm told Walt Disney knows how to do it.
Yeah.
I suppose we could send his head to Alpha Centauri and see what happens.
Bad freezer burn, fellas.
That's true.
You've got something on your nose.
Oh, sorry, frostbite over your entire brain.
All right.
But that is, you know, possibly one way.
Another way would be to travel very quickly.
And according to Einstein's, you know, yeah, relativity, somebody who's moving very rapidly
relative to someone on Earth would age more slowly.
And so if you were to get in a spaceship and move very close to the speed of light, you could literally travel across the galaxy and somebody on earth would experience
a hundred thousand years elapsing while you might only experience a few months elapsing.
And that is time travel into the future because if you went to the star,
you poked around, planted your flag, turn around, came back, 200,000 years would have elapsed on
earth and you would have only experienced a short- A couple of months for you. Fraction of that. But by then everyone would have elapsed on Earth, and you would have only experienced a short fraction of that.
But by then, everyone would have forgotten about you.
Well, basically everybody's dead.
So no child support.
Ooh, yeah.
And yeah, no taxes.
There may be some advantages to this.
But the problem with that is we have no clue how to go that fast.
No, I bet everyone who wants to travel to the future wants to be able to come back to
the present.
Yeah.
That's my sense of it.
So really, yeah, the honest definition of time travel is being able to travel backwards
in time.
Or just treat the timeline as an accessible dimension.
Like a road.
Like a road.
You can get off and get back on some other place or go back to where you were as many
times as you want.
Right.
Cloverleaf. Okay. you want. Cloverleaf.
Okay.
A chronological cloverleaf.
Write that down.
I'm going to patent that and make that into a URL.
I don't know how I feel about that.
Traveling backwards in time, the thing is if you go back in time, the usual paradox is I'd make a time machine.
I'd go back in time.
I'd kill my grandfather before he meets my grandmother, and I'm never born.
And I always wonder about that.
And if you're never born, you couldn't have gone back in time to prevent them from meeting each other.
Exactly.
It's a paradox.
So it's impossible to happen.
I always wonder about that.
Why do they always say grandfather?
Why don't I just go back in time and kill my father?
I liked my father.
I wouldn't have any desire to do this.
That's why they don't portray that in film.
Maybe.
Because it's a little more diabolical to kill your parents then oedipus time wrecks plus plus why even kill
them all you have to do is prevent them from meeting that's right that's all if you if they
don't meet at the enchantment under the sea prom dance right then they'll never put them on
different trains and then they don't meet exactly and so uh get one of them bad breath before they
encounter you know and and there there are other paradoxes involved.
That's that's sort of the canonical one, the one that everybody always brings up.
There are there are other ones. I mean, what happens to the atoms that you're made of in the future and you bring them back into the past?
They're the same atoms existing in two different places at the same time.
Oh, because presumably your present still exists in the present.
Yes. So if everybody in the future went back in time, suddenly there's more people, there's more mass
in the universe than there was. At that time.
Yeah, at that time. And so that can't, maybe
averaged over the age of the universe. However, you know, it's been
said that in the future they have
actually invented a time machine, and
the most curious historical event
that has piqued people's interest is the sinking
of the Titanic. Yes. So they all went back to the
Titanic to see it sink, and that's
why it sank, because everybody overloaded the Titanic. This was my idea for a short story, in fact. The reason the Titanic. Yes. So they all went back to the Titanic to see it sink. And that's why it sank. Because everybody overloaded the Titanic.
This was my idea for a short story, in fact.
The reason the Titanic sank is because nobody knew how to steer the ship because they were
all time travelers from the future.
It's like they're all standing there like, oh, there's an iceberg.
We should do something.
And they're like, I don't know how to do something.
All I know is I can pilot a rocket ship, but I don't know how to do a cruise liner.
Right.
And a steamship cruise liner.
Yeah.
And yeah, I always liked that idea.
Right.
Steamship cruise liner, yeah.
Yeah, I always liked that idea.
So maybe actual events that have happened in the past have already been influenced by time travelers.
What do you think of that? Right, and so the other idea is that if you travel backwards in the past, the time is fixed, and it's not like a river flowing.
It's more like a landscape, and you can move from one place to the other, but it's fixed.
If you go back in time and do something, then that happened always.
So you can't go back and kill your grandfather.
All you can do is whatever random things you're doing, but no matter what you do, your grandfather
and grandmother are going to meet.
They're going to have one of your parents, and they're going to have you.
You cannot change the past.
So you're saying there's no way I'm going to change my SAT score.
That's right.
If you go back in time to change your SAT score, whatever you do will ensure that you got the SAT score you did when you were a kid.
Right.
So this is –
21 gigawatts!
I love thinking about this because it's like – it sounds so confusing, but when you think about it, it makes perfect sense.
No matter what you do, what's going to happen is what's going to happen.
Okay, but that's a hypothesis.
What I'm asking you for now is what science do you know that allows backward time travel?
I don't really know of any.
I've heard some theoretical things and some really crazy physics involving infinitely long cylinders that are rotating near the speed of light and all kinds of crazy stuff like that.
And you take a loop around it where you revisit your world line earlier than when you left?
Yeah, it's like doubling back on your own timeline.
Right.
And I don't, I'll be honest, I don't understand that kind of physics.
That's way over my head.
Okay.
Or possibly going around a black hole and there are ways of going through it
and coming back at a different point in space and time.
Space and time are related.
And in a black hole, they kind of sort of swap places.
And in a few months, we'll have lost all capacity to go back into orbit the Earth.
So conversations about orbiting black holes is not only science fiction.
It's like something completely out of reach.
It seems a little far-fetched right now.
All right.
So what you're suggesting is even though there's no real accessible way to go backwards in time,
it doesn't prevent anyone from thinking about the consequences of it.
Sure thing.
And I like thinking about it.
It's a fun mental exercise.
A fun mental exercise.
And, of course, many films have addressed this, which we'll get to later in this hour.
Sure.
But until then, let's talk about going into the future.
Einstein, with his relativity, demonstrates that this is possible.
People freaked out.
They said, no, you can't travel into the future.
I mean, so relativity had some naysayers at the time. We're now talking 100 years ago, 1905, right?
Well, time keeps on slipping, slipping, slipping into the future, I believe.
So fly like an eagle.
Oh, is that what that is? Oh, I'm sorry. I thought that was thorough. Yeah, and sure,
even when Einstein came out with his ideas, people were having a problem with it.
But come on, it's weird that time is fluid.
Like you all know that waiting for a watch pot never boils, and if you're bored, time seems to take longer.
But that's just perception.
Einstein was talking about a physical change
in the way time elapses. And if you're moving very quickly, your time slows down. Relative,
that's where the relativity word comes from, someone who's not moving. Or if you're in a
deep gravity field, your time seems to move slower than somebody outside.
So an important distinction there is, I think earlier on, people were saying, well, if it's
just my perception that time has slowed down, then a watch shouldn't know the difference if it's just my biology.
But in fact, it's everything.
It is the fabric of space and time that is providing this ability or this feature.
That's right.
And when I talk to people about this, and I'm sure as you do as well when you do your public outreach, you really have to say, no, it's not just that you think time is slowing down.
Your watch is physically ticking at a different rate than a different watch.
And so too is your metabolism, the rate your atoms vibrate.
Everything, yes.
Subatomic particles are decaying and doing whatever it is they do on a daily basis when, you know, behind closed doors.
They're doing that at a different rate.
It really is.
But, you know, it can speed up or slow down.
And so, you know, there's probably some Purian interest in this.
But in general, you know, their time is different.
Now, earlier before the show, you were talking about GPS and how that needs relativistic
correction. Tell us about that.
This is something I like. You must get email. I get email. Oddly enough, when you go out
there and try to talk about science and correct people's misunderstandings of science, you get email from people who are like, I have
this theory. And I constantly get people... I'm sorry. I'm very sorry. I have questions.
Okay. Yes. Please stop emailing me, Leanne.
Oh, my God. I'll get people saying, I have a theory that
overthrows relativity. It's like, no, you don't. Okay? You
don't. And relativity is one of the
best tested ideas of all time. And in fact, the one thing I tell people is everybody uses a GPS
these days. It's in your phone, it's in your car, whatever. And GPS has to account for relativity.
The satellites that are orbiting the earth that are used for global positioning are actually high
enough up that
the gravity they feel from the Earth is actually a little bit different than the gravity we
feel here at the surface.
And that makes their clocks tick a little bit faster than ours.
As specified by relativity.
Yes.
And relativity says, bam, this is what it is.
So relativity says if you're deep in a gravity well, as we are down on the surface of the
Earth, gravity will tick more slowly than if you're at a lesser gravity high up.
That's right.
And so these are orbiting high up, so their clocks are ticking at a different rate, yet they're trying to tell you what time it is.
Oh, but wait a moment, Neil, because it gets worse than it.
But wait, there's more.
Wait a moment.
This moment will stretch out relativistically.
In fact, Einstein also said that if you're moving relative to somebody else at a high velocity, your clocks will slow down.
And these satellites are orbiting the Earth at 15 high velocity, your clocks will slow down.
And these satellites are orbiting the Earth at 15,000, 18,000, whatever it is miles an hour.
They're moving very quickly.
So they've got two strikes against them. So their clocks slow down.
So their clocks are faster than ours a little bit because they're experiencing lower gravity.
But they're moving so rapidly, their clocks are actually moving slower than ours.
When you take these two effects into account,
What's the net effect?
The net effect is that their clocks are ticking more slowly.
You have to account for both of these to get it right.
And since global positioning satellites have to know where their position is
and where your position is to figure out the position, the P in GPS,
if you don't account for relativity, and they use clocks to do this.
I like that the P in GPS.
That's right.
It doesn't stand for fill or plate.
It's actually position.
If you don't account for these relativistic effects, your GPS would be off by some large
amount.
It's hundreds of yards or a fraction of a mile every single day.
And that would accumulate, presumably.
Yes, it would.
And so the fact that your GPS can nail you down to a few yards wherever you're standing
means that relativity is correct.
So the people that say relativity is wrong, they just have no – yet they're happy to use their GPS.
Yes, and so they're absolutely wrong.
There's no relative here.
They're wrong.
They're wrong not – right.
Turn right ahead.
Relatively not only works on paper, it works in space.
Yes, and there are other things too.
We see subatomic particles with very short lifetimes that are created at the top of the atmosphere when cosmic rays hit our air.
And these subatomic particles we detect on the ground could not possibly reach the ground in the amount of time.
So we know that they're moving so quickly that their clocks have slowed down and they have the lifetime to make it.
For example.
So it affects obviously not only wristwatches and biological metabolism.
It's affecting the rate at which particles decay.
The very fabric of the universe is relativistic.
They even know about the relativity.
That's exactly right.
That's deep.
That is so deep.
When we come back, we're going to take a tour of all the best time travel movies there are and see how well they do.
This is StarTalk Radio. This is StarTalk Radio.
Welcome back.
So what did you think of Planet of the Apes?
I love that movie.
The original with Charlton Heston.
Yeah, and they had people in suspended animation, as we discussed in the first segment.
Right.
Because they didn't know how long.
You don't want to use up your resources.
And then some of them died, I think, when they landed.
Is that right?
There was a woman on board who dies in suspended animation.
One of his fellow astronauts gets shot, and then another one gets shot and stuffed and put into a museum.
I remember that.
And you see the cotton in his eyes.
Yeah, that was so grim.
Well, that's what they did because they're the damn dirty apes.
So tell me about the time travel in that.
Comment on its accuracy.
What do you think?
It was fine.
They're traveling to a different star, so they're moving very rapidly.
So they must have gone in some loop because they landed back on Earth but didn't know it.
That's not another planet.
Let's make this clear.
This is not some parallel planet that had a different evolutionary track.
This is Earth that he comes back to in the future.
Right.
And what humans evolved back into apes, is that?
Well, yeah.
Leanne, does your data support this, that humans are evolving back to apes?
Back to hairy apes, I think. I'm actually not convinced of what you just said.
How do we know it's not an alternate developmental track?
How do we know that?
Oh, yeah, yeah.
Phil, yeah.
There are some lines in the movie.
So we know it's the Earth in the end because
he's at the Statue of Liberty.
And so there's some other things that indicate it's Earth.
There's some gotcha
lines in it when they're on a raft and they're going
down the river and they're trying to figure out where they are.
One of them looks up at the sun in the sky
and says, it's a little too yellow. Do you think it's
Bellatrix, which is a real star in Orion?
And they're sort of misleading
you, making you think they're on a different planet.
And in the sequels
in Beneath the Planet of the Apes and Battle
of the Planet of the Apes and
Apes of the Planet, I don't know, there was
like five sequels. They actually establish
how
one of the apes comes back
in time, and that's where you have to assume
there's time travel. The ape goes back in time, and that's where you have to assume there's time travel.
The ape goes back in time and becomes the first ape that can talk and then leads the revolution, which becomes the planet of the apes.
Oh, so what you're saying is that the entire premise of that movie required backwards time travel.
I don't think in the first movie it does.
That they thought that through? I don't think so.
And in the original book, it's actually... Wow, you read
the books, too. Yeah, it's actually a decent
book. He's a Renaissance man. Really, yes, I still
read. And this was like
20 years ago when I still read. Now I prefer
to just sleep. But
I believe they go to another
planet, and it's a parallel evolution.
And they come back to Earth, and
the big twist is apes have taken over during
the time they were gone.
Right, right.
Maybe not as much impactful as pounding the sand and screaming at the Statue of Liberty, but still, it's a decent book.
Okay.
And so now how about Groundhog Day?
That's a fun one.
That's the time travel I think we all wish we could be part of because you get to slightly change what happens.
Speak for yourself.
You get to change the past.
He wakes up every morning,
relives the day, but he has a memory of what
happened the last time.
What do you think of that? It's an interesting premise.
It's never really explained.
It's clearly not the groundhog itself
because he kills the groundhog
when he steals a truck and
dives over the edge of a quarry.
And he still wakes up listening to Sonny and Cher.
And, you know, if you want to wake up, I've got you, babe.
You remember this much about the movie.
Oh, yeah.
This is scary, Phil.
It's a good flick.
Phil, this is scary.
Well, you know, his name is Phil in the movie.
And so.
The groundhog or him?
Both.
And so everybody teases him about that.
I thought Phil was his last name.
Punxsutawney.
Punxsutawney Phil.
Yeah.
But his name is Phil.
Okay.
Okay.
We need to.
Okay.
Now is when the experts tweet it.
It doesn't matter.
We got our engineers tweeting there.
But.
I mean, Googling, yes.
It was kind of a cool idea.
And you don't really ever find out how long he was in there.
But he was in there long enough to be able to become an incredible piano player at the end of the movie.
And I think there was an interview.
Was it Robert Zemeckis or John Landis who directed this movie?
Well, whoever.
There was an interview with him saying he was actually trapped in there for years, maybe even hundreds of years.
Long enough to be able to acquire that expertise.
Yeah.
Okay.
And to me, that would be the ultimate torture, to be trapped in one place like that and have to live that over and over again.
It would make me crazy.
How about Superman?
Ugh.
The original Superman, the movie.
Okay.
The one where you will believe man can fly.
Yeah, Christopher Reeve.
Okay, I love this movie.
1970, whatever.
It's still one of John Reeves' best soundtracks.
I just think it's one of the best superhero movies.
It just takes itself exactly the right amount of seriously.
Wait, Superman 2 was a little better, but referring specifically to the time-
The time travel.
The time reversal.
I just want to get that out there that I like this movie.
He flies around the Earth and somehow-
Backwards.
The Earth spins the other way.
He flies around the Earth backwards from the rotation.
And I think there was a little bit of confusion there.
I think that he was supposed to be traveling so close to the speed of light that he was reversing time.
But it looks like he's flying around the Earth
so quickly that the Earth somehow
gets dragged backwards and spins
backwards as if just spinning the Earth backwards
would spin backwards time. Leaving everyone to think
that if you just turn the Earth backwards
that time would reverse. Yeah. And why doesn't he
reverse time a couple of days so he has more time
to fix things? And let me tell you something.
The whole reason this thing happens is because Lex Luthor is shooting two missiles in opposite directions.
Right.
And he promises Miss Tessmacher, and yes, believe me, I know this movie,
that he's going to stop the missile heading towards New Jersey.
Hackensack, where her mother lives.
Where her mother lives.
That's exactly right.
And so he has to stop that one.
He can't stop the one that hits the San Andreas Fault.
That's why Lois Lane gets killed, and he has to make the Earth go backwards.
He can't catch up to a missile, but he can fly around the Earth fast enough the San Andreas Fault. That's why Lois Lane gets killed and he has to make the Earth go backwards. He can't catch up to
a missile, but he can fly around
the Earth fast enough to make it spin backwards.
Hello? Yeah, that's crazy.
Plus, at the time, I had a girlfriend and we saw the
movie together and he starts flying backwards
and reverses time and she turns to me and says,
can he really do that? And I
said, why didn't you ask me earlier
whether a man in blue pantyhose can fly?
Why is this the first issue
that you have with the physics of the film?
We'll have different thresholds. And if you ever watch
a Big Bang Theory on TV, in the first episode
they go through this. I did not see the first episode.
I have to go back to the archives.
They're talking to somebody about this and saying,
can Superman fly or does he just
jump? And
there's this whole thing about, she says,
oh, well, people can't really fly.
And one of the nerds actually says, oh, no, let's assume that.
It's like the first thing that a science nerd would actually say.
And so they actually, they just sweep right past that.
I love that scene.
It's very funny.
Okay.
So you're saying, obviously, he can't do that, but he's Superman.
So why not let him do it?
It's Superman physics.
It's not real physics. Yeah, you know, he can fly. He's invulnerable. Superman physics. It's not real physics.
Yeah, you know, he can fly.
He's invulnerable.
It's not Superman physics.
Is there a degree in this?
Is that what makes it so that when he puts on a pair of glasses,
nobody knows that he's Superman?
Yeah, that's how that works.
Yeah, that's how that's, you know.
So how about Star Trek IV, The Voyage Home?
The Voyage Home with the whales.
That's had some time travel back to our present of the day.
It was Save the Whales.
That was the subtitle for that one.
And Star Trek did this in the series a few times.
And they've done this in the movies.
You know, in the series they established that if you warp around the sun, it'll somehow make you go back in time.
And since moving faster than light, as far as we know, is impossible anyway, and who
knows how this physics works, sure, yes, warping around the sun can make you go back in time.
Wait a minute.
But why not?
But we all know that tachyons, which exist faster than light, do move backwards in time.
Well, we don't know if they're real, though.
But if they did exist, they would move backwards in time.
Because they're moving faster than light.
That's a lot of ifs.
And if Neil is making sense.
No, no, but they're good ifs.
These ifs are better than other ifs.
All right.
I have some butts for your ifs.
And then some thens.
So the point is, in Einstein's equations,
if you put in faster than light velocity,
you get backwards time travel.
So you hypothesize a particle that would do this.
So if you are in a sci-fi story and you go faster than light, as they're doing all the
time with their warp drives, they can, in principle, go backwards in time like the tachyons
can.
I will have to grant that.
I never took a class in general relativity in grad school, so actually I don't know.
So you could be making this up, and I would...
Sure.
Yes, Neil, of course.
I think it's patently obvious to even the most dim-witted observer that, of course,
you're correct.
Doesn't this only work if Scotty is your engineer?
Yes.
Okay.
And only if occasionally the engines can't take it.
Right, yes.
That's right.
So what did you think of the scene where he helps the engineer on his Mac Plus, whatever the computer was at the time.
He helps the engineer invent transparent aluminum.
And then they worry that he affected time in the past, which, of course, the very existence back then is doing this.
All right.
They're affecting events.
And then he said, well, how do you know he's not the guy who invented it?
Right, and then McCoy leans over and says that to Scotty, and he's like, oh.
So, yeah, I mean, if you're going to explain a big time travel paradox,
that's a great way to do it.
You just shuffle it right under the rug.
I thought that was hysterical.
And here's Scotty who's picking up a mouse because he doesn't know that it's not a –
The computer mouse.
Yeah, he's just talking to the mouse.
A microphone to talk to it.
And yet he can seem to program in the Mac OS operating system from 1980, whatever it was.
But that's an ad about how simple it is.
It wasn't Windows.
Oh, there it is.
It just works.
So one of my favorite piece of that film was when McCoy, the doctor, McCoy, is walking through the hospital just healing everybody.
Yeah, that's right.
Diagnosis.
Doctor gave me a pill and I grew a new kidney.
A new kidney.
And I'm thinking, you know, maybe that's kind of cool.
We do some of that today compared with medicine from 200 years ago.
It would look like magic today.
I have to wonder what medicine is going to be like.
And I would assume a lot of it is going to be just even cutting around a lot of the problems we have today.
They won't even have to worry about stuff like that.
So we all look forward to Medicine of the Future for sure.
One of my favorite of the benchmark movies was Time Machine itself, H.G. Wells,
done a few times in film.
What I found most interesting about it was his loved one died,
and his love interest died, the main character's love interest,
and he went back to keep trying to save her,
and everything he tried to do to save her would get her killed.
And so he recognized that that was a fundamental part of the timeline that he could not change.
Oh, so this is in the remake, the recent remake.
The remake, yes, yes.
That was captured.
Although, honestly, he went back once and tried and it didn't work.
And then he's like, oh, well, that's it.
Really?
You can't show at least one other effort?
When we come back, we're going to talk about the Terminator.
We'll see you after the break. We're back on StarTalk Radio with Phil Plait, the bad astronomer, and comedian Leanne Lord.
We're talking about time travel in movies.
And just before the break, we mentioned The Terminator.
But I'm going to save that for a little later.
Let's go into just a campy, fun movie.
Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure.
How could you not love that movie?
I really liked it.
I thought it was quite funny.
I thought it was great.
And any comments about the science of that?
Well, in fact, if you take an umbrella.
I can't believe that sentence actually came out of my mouth.
If you take an umbrella and attach it to a telephone booth and you happen to have George Carl in handy, time travel is in fact possible.
I won't even mention time traveling phone booths may have been done by Doctor Who first.
And wasn't it a phone booth in Time Bandits or not?
Oh my gosh.
I don't remember.
Yeah, I forgot that.
Maybe.
Yeah, I forgot. So is that why they've actually gotten rid of phone booths? Oh my gosh. I don't remember. Yeah, I forgot that. Maybe. I had the map, but I don't remember. Yeah, I forgot.
So is that why they've actually gotten rid of phone booths?
Maybe.
People were moving around in time.
There you go.
And Superman uses it to become Superman?
I mean, phone booths, where would we have been without them in our storytelling?
They're in Harry Potter as well.
Man, they're the Swiss Army knife.
Yes.
That's true.
It's the Swiss Army knife of movie science.
Bring it back.
It's true. It's a Swiss Army knife of movie science.
Bring it back.
So what I liked about Bill and Ted was that they kept the personalities of these characters in the present.
And so Beethoven went into the music shop in the mall.
Right.
Genghis Khan has got the baseball bat.
And Joan of Arc is conducting the aerobics lesson.
Right.
I just thought that it was kind of cool.
It's what you'd want it to be if you could go back and bring historical figures into the present.
There's a crucial scene when they need to get someplace and they need to get a car.
I can't remember the exact details, but they're standing there talking and they're saying,
we need to, you know, we have a time machine.
We could go into the future or go into the past, get the keys to the car and leave them for us here.
Well, where would we leave them?
How about right here behind the sign?
And they walk behind the sign, and there are the keys.
That's right.
It's like, we have to remember to do that later, dude.
And they do.
And it was like, I could not stop laughing in the theater watching. So it was brilliant, actually.
Yeah, it was actually a really, really well-done, tightly scripted movie.
They willed the keys to exist where they would look for them,
but they had to remember to put them there when they went back in time.
That's right, and I love that in movies,
and to mention Doctor Who again as well,
it's a British time travel show,
when they actually use time travel that way,
when they say, I need to remember to go back in time
and do this later.
I just love stuff like that.
It makes me giggle.
So, how about Terminator?
Well, there you go.
That's a tight movie.
I'll be back. That's a tight movie. I'll be back.
That's a tight movie, you gotta admit.
Wait, wait, first, geek off.
Geek alert.
Can you recite every one of Arnold's
lines in that movie? There are only five of them.
Really? Yes.
Your clothes, give them to me.
Good one.
Sarah Connor.
He says that a lot, yes.
Okay. You got another one?
Blank off, blank hole.
How about that? Or beep off, beep hole.
That sounds even worse. That's actually
quite dirty, I think. That's right. Okay.
So how about that?
What is your address there?
Give me your address there.
Give me your address there. Oh, gosh. What else is he address there? Give me your address there. Give me your address there.
Give me your address there.
Okay.
Oh, gosh.
What else is he to say?
I don't remember.
I love the fact that he lands at Griffith Observatory and Planetarium in Los Angeles.
Yeah, that's right.
That's where he lands.
Nice bit of product placement.
Yeah, there you go.
Your clothes can be...
I can't remember anything else.
So is Hasta La Vista Baby not in one?
No.
That's in the second one.
No, no.
Yeah, the young John Connor teaches him to say that.
Just testing you guys on your geek.
And I'll be back when he leans over.
I love that.
And then the cop's just sitting there doing his stuff, and then the car crashes through.
So tell me about some of the, what might be the science of that.
Well, you just have to kind of say, well, they invent time travel.
Actually, the one beef.
Thank you, Phil.
Thank you, yes.
For coming from Colorado to New York to tell me this.
Honestly, thank you and tip your waitress.
In fact, the thing that kills me is we've had this nuclear war.
Humans are on the run.
We're about to be crushed.
And yet somehow we have the wherewithal to invent time
travel. Hey, maybe you should have built
a bomb to blow up, you know,
Skynet or something, but, you know, no, we'll work on
time travel instead. Well, I thought,
no, no, no, I thought the machines had worked on time
travel, and we just sort of stole that because they sent
the Terminator back, and then we sent
Reese back to go after the Terminator.
Is that clear? Because I, well, you,
maybe, because you said because they said the rebellion
captures...
So you're saying the machines invented the time machine?
Yes, because their goal was to go back, because John Connor
was a pain in the butt. So they wanted to go back and kill...
To remove him from the equation.
Exactly. So in order to save
him, then they send Reese back.
You're right. Because Reese even says
the machines were smashed. We had won.
There's that line that Kyle Reese says.
Did I just out-geek you?
Lee and Laura.
In the hat.
Smackdown.
Oh, man.
But you would not hear that sound in space.
I feel terrible.
Now we're going to invent time travel to go back in time and kill you before you say that.
And then I can just say, oh, yes, the machines invented time travel.
Didn't we have somebody else in the studio?
What happened to her?
So there's something else they got right in the movie.
There's the scene where Sarah Connor's actual twin double is shown in the film.
That's in the second movie.
Oh, that's the second movie.
Yeah, at the Ironworks.
Yeah, so she's there at the playground watching the children play.
And a nuclear device goes off over, I guess that's Los Angeles, in the background.
Oh, I know where you're going to go with this.
And so in a nuclear device, the energy that reaches you first is the light from the explosion.
Then the shockwave reaches you.
Okay?
So you get the light, and it is hugely intense and it basically
vaporizes you
it'll melt you, it'll vaporize you
it'll burn you
then the shock wave
which is moving at the speed of sound
rather than the speed of light
follows the light and that's
what comes later and then breaks everything
apart. Then you get the air, the expanding air, which then blows everything into the winds.
All we are is dust in the wind.
Dust.
Yes.
Wind.
So they got that right, the three forces that operate in the aftermath of a nuclear explosion.
So that made you happy.
Well.
You weren't confronting anybody at a dinner party later.
In the face of having to show something that disastrous, yes, they got their physics right. That weren't confronting anybody at a dinner party later. In the face of having
to show something that disastrous, yes, they got their
physics right. That damn scene gave me nightmares for like a month.
Yeah, it's pretty creepy. And Neil's giggling.
Still, the nuclear explosion was accurate.
So is there any physics you can tell me
about
the time travel? Well, they never
really talk about it. I mean, the expanding sphere
and all that, that was pretty cool, but they never
really talk about it. The idea that only living
tissue can go through in time, but that's just a
plot device.
Wait, I even tweeted this. Your hair is dead,
so he would have come back bald.
Yeah, I remember thinking that as well, and like your
fingernails, and basically your outer layer
of skin. Yeah, yeah, so he'd be
like... He'd look like he'd been
lupus.
He'd look like he'd been lupus.
He would be all dermis instead of epidermis but but reese actually says
something about there's something about
the energy field generated by a living
body so maybe that encompasses your hair
now i don't have to worry about that
being relatively hairless myself okay um
but the movie the beauty of it is that
the plot all holds together it's not
just somebody traveling back in time and then doing stuff the the movie, the beauty of it is that the plot all holds together. It's not just somebody traveling back in time and then doing stuff.
The movie, the time travel is part of the movie.
Reese has to go back in time to impregnate Sarah Connor so that she can give birth to John Connor.
And he has, I love it when he has the picture of her.
Yes, I love that.
And he's looking at that picture and he says, I always wondered what she was thinking at that moment when this picture was taken. And at the end of the
movie, she's thinking
of him. I mean, in a movie with
Arnold Schwarzenegger and all this, and I'm like getting choked
up. Come on! That was so cool. Actually, that's
not what I thought she was thinking. I thought she was just terrified
of what was in her future. I wasn't getting all
interpersonal about it.
But she was saying, you know,
you'll never know your father or something.
But she was actually thinking about Kyle.
So just to get the genetics
of this straight, he
is his own
father? He's John Connor's father.
So he's John Connor's
son, but he begat
John Connor. No, no, no.
John Connor is Kyle
Reese's son, but he goes
back in time, gets Sarah Connor pregnant.
She gives birth to John Connor, and then John Connor has to send his father back in time.
To be his father.
So that he could exist.
Yes.
And that's why the movie is so tight.
And in fact, it's probably the only movie in the history of movies where the sex scene is, in fact, integral to the plot.
Huh?
Yeah.
You know, they had to say.
Take that, censors. Sorry, Ms. Hamilton. You gotta do it. You gotta get laid, whatever that plot. Huh? Yeah. You know, they had to say... Take that, censors!
Sorry, Ms. Hamilton.
You gotta do it.
You gotta get laid,
whatever that...
Make it happen.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Okay.
Very cool.
And that line has never worked for me, though.
Come with me if you want to live.
You know,
that doesn't actually work at the bar, sadly.
Now, oh,
was that one of the lines
that you guys missed?
No, actually, Reese says that.
Oh, darn it.
The Terminator says that in the second movie, which is an homage to the first movie.
Yes.
You got it.
You got it.
So any time travel movies I've left out?
I mean, those are good.
Well.
Well, Back to the Future.
Back to the Future.
That's worth its own segment.
I want to save that for the last segment of Star Talk.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. So with all this time travel, so what we're confessing here or recognizing here is that they don't put much physics in the time travel.
They just assert that it can exist and then tell their stories behind it, right?
I think that's pretty close.
How about Somewhere in Time?
Do you remember that?
Once again, Chris Reeve.
I haven't actually seen it.
Oh, is that the one where he falls asleep holding the penny and he's thinking really hard?
So that's time travel, a chick flick time travel. That's what that was. Yeah, which is the one where he falls asleep holding the penny and he's thinking really hard? So that's time travel.
Oh, I love that.
A chick flick time travel.
That's what that was.
Yeah.
Which is probably why I've never seen it.
Wow.
It was romantic.
It was.
It was.
My wife wants me to see that movie.
It's like, I...
Dude, that's major.
Aliens?
No.
Rockets?
No.
No.
Yeah, there's no explosions.
There's no aliens.
There's no tidal waves.
It's the strongest force in the universe.
Love being that which brings you back through time.
What I liked about it was, because I've thought about this often, if I go back through time, I need currency of the period.
I cannot bring a Roosevelt dime back to a pre-Roosevelt era and spend that money and have anyone think
it's real money.
That's right.
You need cash serving the time that you're in.
And they did this in Star Trek because they had a wardrobe.
They say, yeah, wear this and wear that.
And of course, my favorite line back in the Star Trek 4 was when Spock gets on the bus.
Yeah, yeah.
And then he gets off the bus and he's, what is exact change?
And I said, Spock, aren't you smart enough to at least done your homework and figure this out? No, that's not the bus. Yeah, yeah. And then he gets off the bus. And he's, what is exact change? And I said, Spock, aren't you smart enough to at least done your homework and figure
this out?
No, that's not the problem.
He did too much LDS at Berkeley.
Is that what that is?
Well, that's what Kirk said.
We've got to take a quick break, but more StarTalk Radio.
Welcome back.
The most recent time travel movie I can think of is Hot Tub Time Machine.
Yeah.
Did you see that film?
Yes, I did.
I did not. Tell me about the science in that film.
It's actually one of the most scientifically accurate movies I have ever seen.
Yes, this endorsement paid in full by whatever studio made that movie.
Surely something in the interaction of the alcohol and the circuit board could have turned the tub into a tub.
That's what I'm thinking.
The right alcohol content,
the electricity,
the marriage of the two,
it's fantastic.
Whenever I'm in a hot tub
and I spill a lot of alcohol
on the control panel,
I flash back to the 80s.
So I think actually
a factual basis to this.
Well, it can't be any more
or less believable
than a flux capacitor.
Come on now.
That's a better name.
I have a flux capacitor. Come on now. That's a better name. I have a flux capacitor.
Don't you?
I'm not authorized to.
Oh, I see.
I see.
You have an entire planetarium, but not a flux capacitor.
I see.
So let's talk stuff about Back to the Future.
First, it's one of the great time travel movies of all time, I think.
And is there any moments for each of you that rise above the rest in the time travel aspects of the film?
Wow.
That rise above.
Well, yeah, sure.
When at the end of the movie, when he goes back to the future, there are subtle changes that happen.
And I didn't even notice it the first time, in fact.
It wasn't until I went to see the movie again.
Because he actually changed the future by having been in the past.
Right.
Yeah.
Sorry, he changed his present.
Yeah, by replacing his father in the tree, there's a series of events that cascades into the future.
And so when he goes back to the future, things are different.
So give me a list of some of those things that are different.
the future. Things are different.
So give me a list of some of those things that are different. Well, as he's
leaving the barn, after he goes back into the past
in 1955, he runs over
one of the pines. Because he
restarts the DeLorean. Yes.
No, no, no. As he comes back through time,
the DeLorean accidentally drives
over one of the... No, no, no.
Oh, he's coming back out. He comes back in time. He's in the barn.
The farmer comes out
and is going to shoot him.
As farmers always do at night when you go into their barn.
Exactly.
And so Marty gets in.
He starts the DeLorean up, crashes through the door, and runs over one of the pines.
And you hear old man, whatever his name is, say, my pine!
And the estate sign that talked about the
future real estate that would go there
described it as Twin Pines. Twin Pines
Mall is the name of the mall where
he and Doc Brown are testing
out the DeLorean. So we're to believe
surely accurately that
this mall was once this farmland.
Yes. And so when he goes back
to the future... How hard is that to believe?
Yeah, well, you know,
he goes back to the future and you see the sign for the mall
says, I think it was Lone Pine Mall.
Lone Pine Mall.
Yeah.
Instead of Twin Pine Mall.
And I don't remember any.
And they don't make a big deal of it.
The camera just pans by it.
And that's my favorite thing in a movie is where they just sort of toss something in
there and let you figure it out for yourself.
That means you have to pay four times to see the movie.
Yeah, well, yeah, I didn't notice that until the second time I saw the movie.
And I was floored by this when I saw it.
I caught it like the fifth time, so it was a little slower than you.
Really, but really subtle.
Yeah, I caught it.
There is a continuity error that I caught right away.
Really?
Well, Marty writes a note to Doc Brown and leaves it for him.
And when Marty goes back to the future, and again, spoiler alert here,
leaves it for him. And when Marty goes back to the future, and again,
spoiler alert here, and Doc Brown opens up his jacket and there's a bulletproof vest. And Marty says, how did you know? Doc Brown
holds up the note. He taped it back together after tearing it apart.
And the handwriting's different on the note. And I only remember that because Marty
signed it and it went across a crease or something and his signature was in a different place.
And I remember sitting in the theater thinking,
wow, the note's different.
And my second thought was, wow, I'm a giant dork.
Then I noticed that.
Wow.
And were you alone in the theater when you saw the dance?
Okay.
But you know what?
No, script supervisors get fired for that sort of thing.
Uh-oh.
You just cost someone their job.
Oh, man.
Well, it was filmed, what, 25 years ago?
Yeah, probably retired now.
So your point is this...
That kid on the radio is-
You paid close enough attention to the original signature.
Notice that it went across a crease in the paper.
Or something like that.
You'll see that the note is different.
A continuity.
All right.
Anything else you notice?
Fairly trivial error.
Yeah, that is as geeky.
I don't know if I can match that.
I'll try hard.
But go on.
Give me another one.
Oh, I don't know.
No, no.
It's just some more-
You have something in mind?
Well, so any other.
There's no such thing as a flux capacitor.
Really?
That we know of.
That we know of.
I'm not authorized to.
The idea of a DeLorean being unreliable seems fairly accurate.
Now, how about this?
The lawyers are calling.
Have you heard anyone ever pronounce Giga as Jigga?
Oh, yes, of course.
Yeah.
You have?
No, no, no.
I have never. Outside of rap songs? Oh, Jigga. Oh, yes, of course. You have. No, no, no. I have never.
Outside of rap songs?
Oh, Jig.
Get Giga with it, I think, is the...
Get Jiggy with it.
Yeah.
No, and in fact, that really bugged me in the movie.
Yeah, he said...
Jig-a-wat.
Jig-a-wat, yeah.
Yeah, that's unfortunate.
So how about...
Here's something you might not have known.
All right.
Do you remember when Doc Brown is doing his wire tweaking in anticipation of the lightning bolt near the clock, and the cop comes up?
Okay.
And he says, do you have a permit for that?
Yes.
Okay.
And then we just continue.
Well, he pulls his wallet out and says, yeah, let me see if I have one here.
And he's pulling out money.
He's pulling out money.
Oh, I never noticed this.
No, no.
The reason why you didn't notice is because that scene was cut.
It's in the DVD extras.
I remember seeing that in the theater.
No.
It was not in the theaters.
No.
Then I saw it on TV.
I've not seen it on TV.
Well, then you have a widescreen TV in your house is what you're saying.
I, in fact, do.
See?
There you go.
But I never saw it on DVD.
And I know I've seen that scene.
They cut that.
It was originally cut from the movie.
And I was kind of glad it was cut because he's not a bribing kind of guy.
It was actually out of character with him.
But he was very rich.
I thought you were about to say he pulls money out and it's modern money.
Oh, no.
I didn't look.
I was shocked that he's bribing the cop.
And that's how we can continue with this experiment.
Well, I know I've seen that scene.
I just don't know where.
I mean, I've seen this movie for a gazillion times.
You saw it at the Planetarium.
Four gigawatt times. And, yeah, so mean, I've seen this movie for a gazillion times. You saw it at the Planetarium. Four gigawatt times.
And yeah, so I know I've seen
it, but not on DVD. So maybe
some version on television, they showed the DVD
version. And of course, my favorite is
Mr. Fusion at the end there. That's awesome.
That's so good.
Mr. Fusion, that's how in the future, rather
than finding plutonium, which by the way
is an element named after Pluto,
believed at the time it was named to have been a planet, discovered in 1940, 10 years after Pluto itself.
I thought it was named after Plutarch.
So not.
And they saved the element after uranium for the name plutonium.
So after neptunium.
So you have uranium, neptunium, plutonium, three consecutive
elements on the
periodic table.
Pluto got on
the periodic table
on false pretense.
You're just
waiting for
Tisonian,
aren't you?
Tisonium,
yeah.
So we've got
to wrap this up.
This has been
StarTalk Radio.
I want to thank
my guests and
as always,
I want to bid you
to keep looking up