Stock Talk - 4Q25 Outlook: "Let's Get it Started" - V-Bottom Month 7. Stock Market Update, Friday October 17, 2025
Episode Date: October 17, 2025Are we seeing the top of the AI boom or just another milestone in a long-term growth story? In this week’s Market Update, I examines whether September 2025 will be remembered as the “top” of the... AI trade, or if comparisons to the late-1990s Dot-com bubble miss the mark. I'll also give you perspective on market leadership, sector rotation, and what investors might expect as we enter the seasonally strong fourth quarter and the first year of a new presidential cycle. About Chris Perras, CFA®, CLU®, ChFC®, Chief Investment Officer: As CIO, Chris is the lead investment strategist and director of research at Oak Harvest Financial Group. Chris develops the firm's core market outlook, putting his decades of experience and expertise to work for our clients. He hosts Oak Harvest's podcast, "Stock Talk," available on the website with new episodes each week. He completed his undergraduate studies at Georgia Tech, and went on to obtain an MBA from the Harvard Business School. Driven by a desire to maximize his knowledge and skill set, he acquired financial planning and investment management qualifications, becoming a Chartered Life Underwriter (CLU®), a Chartered Financial Consultant (ChFC®), and a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA®). Stock Talk is a weekly vlog/podcast dedicated to discussing the Oak Harvest Financial Group Investment Team's perspective on what's happening in the market. Hosted by Chief Investment Officer Chris Perras, each episode brings you our views on stocks, the market, and the economy — with a little education thrown in for good measure. Listen each week and help stay connected to your money! Do you need a retirement plan that goes beyond allocating funds to truly fit your needs? We can help you create a retirement life plan customized for your retirement vision and legacy. Call us at 877-896-0040 or fill out this form for a free consultation: https://click2retire.com/lets-connect Important disclosures: Content of Oak Harvest podcasts expresses the views of the speaker and is for informational purposes only. Oak Harvest believes that any data, articles, or information cited are reliable at the time of creation, but does not warrant any information contained herein to be correct, complete, accurate, or timely. References to third-party analysts should not be seen as an endorsement of their views or recommendations, and you should do your own research before investing. The views and opinions expressed herein may change without notice. Strategies and ideas discussed may not be right for you, and nothing in this podcast constitutes personalized investment, tax or legal advice, or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities. Indexes such as the S&P 500 are not available for direct investment and your investment results may differ when compared to an index. Any specific portfolio actions or strategies discussed will not apply to all client portfolios. Investing involves the risk of loss, and past performance is not indicative of future results.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Okay, investors, maybe five or ten years from now, investors will look back and cry about the 21
trading days in September of 2025 as the top of the AI bubble. By view, as I doubt that will be
the case that we've seen the top. Moreover, I also disagree with the recent calls from the likes
of the legendary trader of Paul Tudor Jones that we are in late 1999, replicating the near end
of the dot-com bubble. Yes, investors, we just got through a near historic third quarter for
stocks, particularly the combined positive returns of August and September, which historically amount
to nothing net over two months, with August most often being up and being negated by a down September.
Here's a chart from Carson showing third quarter returns since 1970. First off, I flat out don't see
the comparison to the third quarters during the 1998 through 2000.com run. Data says otherwise.
The third quarter of each of those years was negative. In fact, Paul Tudor Jonah,
analogy, it's early fourth quarter in 1999. I can't disagree anymore. In the summer of 1999,
the S&P 500 was down minus 6.9%. Not up 7.6%, just like we returned in the third quarter of this year.
Here's the seasonal table for the S&P 500 throughout the dot-com internet buildout for you.
If you want to make your own decision on this, Paul Tudor Jones was one of the world's best
traders in his days. However, I'd argue like most of the retired bill,
and our hedge fund managers I've heard on financial TV for the last five to ten years.
Most of all their advice has been ill-timed or just flat out wrong.
They don't trade the way they did when they were making their fortunes.
I mean, it doesn't take much of a Google or Gemini search to see that Paul Tudor Jones
has been negative for years.
And as recently as May, he said the S&P 500 would fail to rally and take out its April
tariff Teetrum lows regardless of a tariff truce.
The S&P 500 has rallied over 20.
in the five months since that call. Nearly in a straight line with very little volatility.
And now near what looks like a short temp talk in early October, he says you need to get long
and ride the last innings of a bubble up move. Looks like that advice should you ignore it.
Looks to me like advice that most of you should ignore and consult with your advisor to see
where your plan stands with the gains most of you are likely to have in stocks here to date.
You've been following our videos, we've been discussing the dot-com internet build-out first AI build-out
analogy for over a year and increasingly positive on it since the mid-April stock market v-bottom this year.
Others have been trying to scare you about a comparison in a negative way, or it about being a bubble.
This might have been the 10th video I've done on this the last 5 to 6 months.
In our work, if you're making this analogy, are April 2025 tariff loads when the S&P 500 was down,
minus 21% off its highs corresponds to the long-term capital management lows in early October 1998,
with the S&P 500 also down minus 21%. Using this timing overlay, which has accurately and almost
precisely mirrored the dot-com rally, would put you in late March 1999, say, three to four more
months to go in our initial V-bottom rally to more new all-time highs. I mean, would this make sense
now? To me, the answer is yes. No one still gets in. Here's the longer-term overlay and the zoomed-in
version of where we could go if we're to go in the same path in the future. We're heading into the
seasonally strongest period of the year, the fourth quarter. However, I am expecting most of the
net gains of the fourth quarter to come in December. The presidential cycle in the investor's
favor right now in the fourth quarter in the first year of a presidential cycle, leaning very
positive, averaging almost a 3.8% gain with a 77.8% win rate. That kind of return would say we print
7,000 on the S&P sometime in December. As I've discussed since the April V-bottom move and seasonal history
says rally in stocks isn't over. We've covered the date of the last few months on this. Go check out
our prior videos on the topic. Today, the AI buildout is leading. These high relative strength
groups may pause for a little while after their selling.
September's and third quarter performance, but they will likely continue to work in the months ahead.
Throwing some down and out health care and energy and material names who have been beating numbers,
but whose values have been cut in half by the government and economic fears.
What could cause a true parabolic move next year farther out in 2006, like happened during dot com?
Well, I'm just guessing here, but a new, more doveish-fed chair is being appointed by President Trump
next April or May would correspond almost exactly to when the last.
leg up and the dot-com run began. Recall, the dot-com run lasted almost exactly 18 months from the long-term
capital management bottom in October 1998. But Chris, stocks move on both interest rates and earnings,
and in 2006, earnings can't support that kind of move up. That's what I've heard for the last
couple months. Well, if you believe the quarterly earnings estimates that Goldman Sachs has, they can move up
like that. Here's the table for quarterly earnings for the S&P 500, growth rates historically, and going
forward in 2006. Investors, remember that the SP500 historically anticipates economic bottoms by
troughing one to two quarters in advance of the economy. However, this isn't the case at market
tops. Historically, the S&P 500 tops coincident with earnings growth rates. It hasn't historically peaked
in advance in the advance of earnings growth. Investors, why not be prepared in advance of the fourth
quarter of 2025 to hear about the chase for performance into year end before it 10?
takes place. Investors, if the V-bottom pattern continues an historic path, which I expect,
maybe we hit a new all-time high in October, month then, and pullback again in November,
before the year-end rally and sprint begins. V-bottoms historically do not have extended for deep
pullbacks on a percentage term until after the 10th or 11th month as you approach a year-holding
period for those investors who bought at or near the loaves. Think back to the Friday sell-off a week ago.
The market dropped about minus 2.5% and quickly regained its footing early in the next week.
Expect more of that over the next few months, with pullbacks largely being buying opportunities
into mid-next year first quarter. Investors know that regardless of the path through the economy
and the financial markets in the next few months, the investment team at Oak Harvest will be here.
Until next week, have a blessed weekend and know that Oak Harvest team is doing what we can
to plan for you and your family's future, regardless of what stage you're at in your career or in your
retirement. All content contained with an Oak Harvest podcast expresses the views of the speaker
and is for informational purposes only. It is based on information believed to be reliable when
created, but any cited data, indicators, statistics, or other sources are not guaranteed. The views and
opinions expressed herein may change without notice. Strategies and ideas discussed may not be right
for you and nothing in this podcast should be considered as personalized investment, tax or legal,
advice or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities. Indexes such as the S&P 500 are not
available for direct investment and your investment results may differ when compared to an index.
Specific portfolio actions or strategies discussed will not apply to all client portfolios. Investing
involves the risk of loss and past performance is not indicative of future results.
