Stock Talk - V-Bottom Recovery: Month 6 – What to Buy. Stock Market Update, Friday Sept 26, 2025
Episode Date: September 26, 2025In this week’s market update, I walk through the lessons from the sharp April selloff, why our team viewed it as a classic “V-bottom” recovery, and how history may guide what comes next. I compa...re today’s AI-driven market cycle with the Dotcom buildout of the late 1990s, highlighting which sectors have led year-to-date and what that might mean for investors as we head into year-end repositioning season. From technology and semiconductors to alternative energy and materials, I share perspective on the groups showing strength, and why institutional tax calendars can create opportunities for active investors to watch. About Chris Perras, CFA®, CLU®, ChFC®, Chief Investment Officer: As CIO, Chris is the lead investment strategist and director of research at Oak Harvest Financial Group. Chris develops the firm's core market outlook, putting his decades of experience and expertise to work for our clients. He hosts Oak Harvest's podcast, "Stock Talk," available on the website with new episodes each week. He completed his undergraduate studies at Georgia Tech, and went on to obtain an MBA from the Harvard Business School. Driven by a desire to maximize his knowledge and skill set, he acquired financial planning and investment management qualifications, becoming a Chartered Life Underwriter (CLU®), a Chartered Financial Consultant (ChFC®), and a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA®). Stock Talk is a weekly vlog/podcast dedicated to discussing the Oak Harvest Financial Group Investment Team's perspective on what's happening in the market. Hosted by Chief Investment Officer Chris Perras, each episode brings you our views on stocks, the market, and the economy — with a little education thrown in for good measure. Listen each week and help stay connected to your money! Do you need a retirement plan that goes beyond allocating funds to truly fit your needs? We can help you create a retirement life plan customized for your retirement vision and legacy. Call us at 877-896-0040 or fill out this form for a free consultation: https://click2retire.com/lets-connect Important disclosures: Content of Oak Harvest podcasts expresses the views of the speaker and is for informational purposes only. Oak Harvest believes that any data, articles, or information cited are reliable at the time of creation, but does not warrant any information contained herein to be correct, complete, accurate, or timely. References to third-party analysts should not be seen as an endorsement of their views or recommendations, and you should do your own research before investing. The views and opinions expressed herein may change without notice. Strategies and ideas discussed may not be right for you, and nothing in this podcast constitutes personalized investment, tax or legal advice, or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities. Indexes such as the S&P 500 are not available for direct investment and your investment results may differ when compared to an index. Any specific portfolio actions or strategies discussed will not apply to all client portfolios. Investing involves the risk of loss, and past performance is not indicative of future results.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hey everyone, it's Chris with O Carvis with another stock talk in our new format, so bear with me.
Investors, if you waited on the Fed, you missed on about 14% year-to-date gain in the S&P 500
and almost 30% gain off the V-bottom low on April 8.
The O'Carvis investment team has discussed for months, but it was our belief that we are in a V-bottom recovery,
and in general, no one would get in at prices they really wanted.
We messaged that a retest of those April lows was unlikely to come, and investors' time was better served studying the history of V-bottom recoveries and their paths.
I know.
Now the question is, where do we go from here and what should an investor buy if the V-bottom path continues to play out as we expect?
First, here's my trusty overlay of the S&P 500 during the dot-com Internet buildout in 1997 through 2000, first our current AI buildout.
which started around the second half of 2023.
As frequent followers note, it's been my belief that the October 1998 will owe during the long-term capital event,
down 21% on the S&P 500, lined up almost exactly with our April 8th, 2025 event-driven tariff tantrum.
Yes, that Liberation Day triggered sell-off amounted to almost the exact same minus 21% high to low move.
investors after such a strong rally, many people are asking us, what should you buy if you're still positive in stocks?
Do you buy the leaders year to date and the ones leading since April lows?
Or should you hunt out amongst the laggers year to date?
History would say that it's best to stay with the winning sectors and groups and single stocks.
However, we are near that time of the year where bottom fishing and lagging single stocks in the right sector should be on your radar.
Historically, you want to stick with high or rising relative strength sectors and groups
and those just breaking relative strength downts, but you can start to look beyond the top few
names in these groups. Why? Because it's that time of the year where big institutional selling
and lagging names is at or near its peak. Unlike many individuals who are on a calendar year
closure, many institutional shareholders have fiscal tax years ending in September,
and October. Why is it so early and not near year-end? Because it used to take months for their
accounting and tax departments to reconcile fund financials for year-end distributions to their shareholders.
And those shareholders themselves had tax years ending on December 31st. Think about those mutual fund
net realized gains distributions or mastered limited partnership K-1 statements going out to
limited partners. Year-to-date investors, technology, communication services, financials, international
equities, and many speculative and emerging thematic groups have led the S&P 500 higher. The AI CAPEX
build-out cycle has lifted many names in the industrial sector, technology and semiconductor sectors,
and many alternative energy sectors. Here's the broad year-to-dette sector performance.
Investors recall back after President Trump was elected in November, many strategists,
in the media were calling alternative and clean energy and China markets, that dreaded word,
which should draw investors' interests toward, not away from it. What's that word? That word is
uninvestable. And behold, while the traditional energy sector has been a laggard here to date,
these more speculative names in the solar, uranium, and nuclear sub-industries are some of the
highest returning groups and sectors here to date. Here's a list of the top 20 names in the SMP 500
year-to-date. The top names, broadly, all have similar characteristics. Most outside of a few,
like Palantir, started the year with lower PE valuations than the S&P 500. Names of the
disc-drive industry, like Seagate or DRAM companies like Micron, started the year with
valuations under 10 times earnings, just as their businesses accelerated and turned up with
AI orders and demand. Investors, those are the winners in the S&P 500 year-to-date, and here
are the losers, the bottom 30 stocks so far. Many of these names are thought to be AI losers or
companies whose unit growth has slowed or declined due to tariffs or a slowdown in demand
while the economy is mid-year. There are a lot of consumer names on the bottom performing list
here today. A lot of restaurant stocks or fashion-oriented mid-to-lower-end consumer names
hit by deportations or a slowdown in hiring. B-bottom moves and seasonal history says the
rally in technology stocks isn't over. We've covered the data the last few months on this.
Go check out our prior videos on this topic. Since we continue to mirror the same pattern back
during dot com, almost to the day and week in the S&P 500, I'm going to go back once again
to the dot com AI cycles overlay and look at sector performance in the second quarter of 99
through the first quarter of 2000. Recall mapping out a similar move since the V bottom low in April
would project an S.P 500 target near 7200 in the first quarter of 2026 and 73 to 7400 in the second half at 26.
Looking back to the month's 6 through 18 post the long-term capital October low,
to the second quarter of 99, the first quarter of 2000, what were the leading sectors for those who weren't investing, trading, or even alive back then?
Investors back then, as it is now, technology-driven sectors and industries led the market,
Here's the overlay of the Tech Heavy NASDAQ composite index during the two cycles.
You'll notice that it wasn't over until almost a year after the October 1998 long-term capital
management low that technology stocks went parabolic for five months to end.
What would become known is the dot-com bubble blow off and crash.
This analogy and overlay would say that a gently upward slope in trend would be most likely
after a choppy end to September during October through the first quarter of 2006 in tech stocks.
Investors within both the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ composite, some of the best performing stocks
were in technology subsectors, including semiconductors and related equipment.
Back then, these companies produced the essential components for computers and the internet buildout,
driving the new economy.
Back then, it was Qualcomm, whose share surged by 26.
600% in 1999. Yes, investors, Nvidia back then was a recently IPOed company on the back of its
graphics controllers for gaming systems. There were internet and software companies back then.
Many internet companies as well as established software companies saw their stock prices
skyrocket during this period on the back of an acceleration and their unit growth and still early
mobile phone adoption. Another leading group was communications and networking companies such as Cisco,
lucent technology, and Newbridge networks, experiencing huge gains on a boom and early orders for
digital communication infrastructure. Other notable sectors performed well for most conservative investors
as the market seemed to anticipate the other side of spending and a slowdown in the economy
post the Y2K spending. What group was that? The energy stock saw a strong year in the second half
of 99, driven by a spike in oil prices as the economy started to strengthen. This sector's
performance was a barbell between speculative names like plug power and ballard power, as well as good
performance in larger, slower growth names like Chevron and others. Other areas that were
surprisingly strong real estate investment trusts and small cap stocks. Both groups had strong
1999 moves with small cap stocks being underowned and undervalued versus their larger cap names.
Small caps were helped back then by less regulation by the federal government and talk of a pickup in
mergers. I know that all sounds very familiar to today. Another group was materials. Finally,
a bit surprising to many. Materially saw a strong returns in 1999. Back then, it was just the
beginning of eight years of ramped up China spending on infrastructure for the 2008 Summer Olympic
Games. Kind of it was their coming out party for their country to the Western world or so it was
sold as. Think of it. That's all pretty crazy. The names have changed. And it was a general
generation ago. But we continue to mirror that period in investor history. Back then, technology
led on the internet build. Back then, speculative energy had its day. Back then, material
stocks were big outperformers. Investors, today the AI felt out is leading. Today, speculative energy
in nuclear and alt energy is having its day. Today, uranium and gold stocks are ripping
and leading the material sector higher. These high relative strength groups will likely,
continue to work in the months ahead.
Throw in some down and out software names who've been beaten up,
but whose numbers have been beating,
whose values have been cut in half by AI fear,
throw in some semi-equipment names
who've also been out of favor on the back of Intel order cutbacks
and China restrictions from the U.S. and others on leading-edge technology sales.
They were latecomers that turned into leaders
in the second half of the dot-com buildout.
Why not again this time? Most tech cycles don't end until the semi-equipment stocks become market
leaders for at least nine to 12 months. Investors, why not be prepared in advance of the fourth quarter
2025 to hear about the chase for performance into year-end before it takes place? Investors,
the V-bottom pattern continues its historical past, which I expect, expect some weakness into
the September month end on repositioning and institutional tax.
selling and maybe the first few days of October, which should be bought. V-bottoms historically
do not end or do not have deep pullbacks on a percentage terms until after the 10th or 11th month
as you approach a year-holding period for those investors who bought at or near the lows.
For those of you who stuck with your financial plan amongst the tariff uncertainty in April,
congratulations.
Know that regardless of the path
of the economy and the financial markets
over the next few months,
the investment team at Oak Harvest will be
here, manning the ship,
adjusting our models, and our
long, short, hedged equity fund
where we can.
Until next week, have a blessed
weekend, and know the Oak Harvest
team is doing what we can to
plan for you and your family's future
regardless of what stage
you're at in your career or in
your retirement. All content contained with an Oak Harvest podcast expresses the views of the
speaker and is for informational purposes only. It is based on information believed to be
reliable when created, but any cited data, indicators, statistics, or other sources are not
guaranteed. The views and opinions expressed herein may change without notice. Strategies and ideas
discussed may not be right for you and nothing in this podcast should be considered as
personalized investment, tax or
legal advice, or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities.
Indexes such as the S&P 500 are not available for direct investment, and your investment
results may differ when compared to an index.
Specific portfolio actions or strategies discussed will not apply to all client portfolios.
Investing involves the risk of loss, and past performance is not indicative of future results.
