Stuff You Should Know - How Global Warming Works

Episode Date: November 2, 2017

It's a confusing part of climate change when it seems winter is as cold as ever, but as global temperatures creep ever so slightly higher, a cascade of catastrophic events will almost surely follow. The ball is in humanity's court. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On the podcast, Hey Dude, the 90s called, David Lasher and Christine Taylor, stars of the cult classic show, Hey Dude, bring you back to the days of slip dresses and choker necklaces. We're gonna use Hey Dude as our jumping off point, but we are going to unpack and dive back into the decade of the 90s.

We lived it, and now we're calling on all of our friends to come back and relive it. Listen to Hey Dude, the 90s called on the iHeart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, I'm Lance Bass, host of the new iHeart podcast, Frosted Tips with Lance Bass. Do you ever think to yourself, what advice would Lance Bass

and my favorite boy bands give me in this situation? If you do, you've come to the right place because I'm here to help. And a different hot, sexy teen crush boy bander each week to guide you through life. Tell everybody, ya everybody, about my new podcast and make sure to listen so we'll never, ever have to say. Bye, bye, bye.

Listen to Frosted Tips with Lance Bass on the iHeart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. Welcome to Stuff You Should Know from HowStuffWorks.com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark, and there's the chipper, cheery, Charles W. Chuck Bryant.

Howdy. And there's Jerry over there. Say hi, Jerry. No, I don't. How are you doing, man? I'm well, sir. How are you? I'm pretty well myself.

I'm feeling all right, feeling a little fit. Yeah? Yeah, yeah. A little sweaty, as you can tell, but I'm all right. That's gross. It is. I don't smell, do I? No.

Okay, good. So, friends, listeners. Countrymen? You're gonna notice a little something different in this week's feed. Tomorrow, this bears a little explanation. We are dropping episodes one and two of my new movie interview show, Movie Crush.

Do-do-do-do. We're dropping those into the Stuff You Should Know feed. Something we've never done here at the network, but we're gonna, I guess I'm the lab rat on this one. The guinea pig. The guinea pig? Sure. Yeah, I guess either one, right?

The guinea pig doesn't die. The lab rat dies. Yeah, I guess so. But let's go with the guinea pig for sure, then. All right, well, either way, we are dropping those into the Stuff You Should Know feed, and we wanted to alert you, so when you saw all these new things,

you didn't rebel against us like everyone hated U2 when they delivered the world-free album. Right, right, yeah. I mean, this is not just, it's not a U2 album. It's your new show. It's more important than any U2 album. Oh, well. You know?

I appreciate that. Yeah. So yeah, that's why they're there. Episode one is the great Janet Varney with, we talk about the movie Tron, and that's the nature of the show as I talk to people about their favorite movie. And episode two is Tig Nataro.

Wow. Talking about the movie Mask, and that one is a very special episode, and I'll tease it with this. We recorded that interview, or conversation, rather, seconds after she got the call that she was cancer-free at the five-year mark. Oh, wow.

So she started crying at the beginning, and I didn't know what was going on. I gave her some time. I was freaking out, and it turned out to be good news, but, and I explained that at the onset of the episode, but it turned out to be a very special experience. Man, Chuck, you're like Barbara Walters. I didn't get it out of her.

It was just weird timing. Yeah. But anyway, those are in there, and it won't happen every week, but I would love for you to subscribe. Well, yeah, that's the way to get it, right? Yeah, just subscribe anywhere you listen to podcasts. These are a couple of gifts, a little gems.

That's right, and I appreciate your support on it. Yeah. Well, way to go, man. Congratulations. I speak for me and the rest of the world when I say we are looking forward to this. Thanks, dude. And, you know, I'm gonna have you on as a guest.

It's gonna be very strange and awesome. I think it'll be neat. I'll start crying, too. Do you know what your favorite movie is that you would pick? I got a couple I think I could choose from, sure. All right, well, hold on to that, then. Okay. And we'll just pick that up later.

Okay, well, congrats again, man. Thanks, pal. Shall we warm the globe? Yeah. All right. So, Chuck, I don't know if you've heard about this term recently, but it's been in the news lately.

Global warming. Are you familiar? It does ring a bell. Okay. Well, just in case you, for those of people who aren't aware of global warming, global warming is what we're talking about today. And a lot of people confuse it

or use it interchangeably with climate change. And it turns out that's not actually fully accurate. Global warming is a symptom of climate change as a whole. And climate change is a whole bunch of differences to the Earth's climate. We'll get into what climate is in a second. And one of those is global warming. Also, things like extreme weather events,

increased drought, increased temperatures, sea level rises, all these things put together, that's climate change, right? Or the results of climate change. And global warming is one of them. So global warming is climate change, but not all climate change is global warming. Just wanted to make sure we got that out

of the way to begin with. It's like the square rectangle thing, which I can still never keep straight. Well, and I think the what? Like every square is not a rectangle, but every rectangle square or the reverse of that, whichever it is. I've never heard that before.

What? I even ace geometry the second time I took it. Well, it was clearly a class that didn't care about squares. Yeah, I guess not. I mean, they always talked about rectangles, but squares were never brought up. Yeah, I think it's, you know, I'm not gonna dig myself a hole there.

Yeah, that's probably best. So global warming, if you want just a kind of straight up definition is the science community defines it as this and they should know. Yeah. It's a significant increase in the climatic temperature over a short, relatively short period of time as a result of activities of humans.

And by increase in short, we're talking like one degree Celsius in a couple of hundred years is global warming. Right, because the effects of climate are so pronounced on such a, like with just small incremental changes. Oh yeah. That is climate change. Something that if you just look at it on paper,

you're like, that's nothing. Who cares about one degree? Actually, the point of global warming is that when you have this increase in global temperatures, a whole basket of events starts to take place. That's climate change. Like global warming is related to climate change, right? It can trigger other climate changes.

That's right. And you hear a lot of people talk about, you hear a lot of numbskulls talking about weather as if it is climate. Right. Like a very harsh winter might come and they'll say, yeah, yeah, global warming, right. That's a great numbskull.

It's not the same thing. Weather is local, it's short term, climate is long term. It's not even like the weather over a period of a year or even a couple of years. We're talking about predictable, generally predictable average weather conditions in a region over a long, long period of time.

So you can safely say in Green Bay, Wisconsin, it is cold in the winter time. That is the climate of Green Bay and that Midwestern region as a whole. Right, but if it snows in February, February of next year on a Tuesday, then that's just the weather. Yeah, or if it snows in Miami once,

then that's not a reputation of what climate change means. That is a weird anomaly and those happen. Yeah, and this is a grabster and strickling co-joint, by the way, so that's why it popped off the page if you noticed. But one of the things they wisely point out is what you just said, that yeah, some weather anomaly happens like that.

Even if it happened three years in a row, I think a lot of scientists would pay attention to why it snowed in Miami three years in a row. Right. But if it went back to normal or something like that, like that would not necessarily be climate change. That's just a weird occurrence, right? Climate change is this change in predictable changes.

Yeah, and that can take like thousands and 10,000s of years sometimes, often most times. Under natural circumstances, and here is where we come to the current use for global warming, right? Global warming can happen by itself naturally. The Earth basically, in its current present state, swings back and forth between glacial periods

and interglacial periods, so cool periods and warm periods. And for an ice age to occur, the global temperature only needs to drop by about five degrees Celsius on average and all of a sudden we're in an ice age, right? Yeah, that doesn't mean the entire Earth is a big round cube, round cube. Wow.

That's like a square rectangle, but not at all the same. Well, you know, when you go to a fancy cocktail bar and they have those awesome round, I wanna say ice cubes again, ice spheres. Yep. That's not what the Earth looks like necessarily during an ice age. No, no, no, it's just much cooler

and because it's cooler by, say, five degrees Celsius, like a lot of stuff changes. It's the same thing as global warming, but on the opposite end, right? Correct. Like you have changes in migration patterns, you have changes in habitat for animals. Some things go extinct during the transition.

Sea levels change. A lot of stuff happens, right? So this is part of the normal process of the Earth, but the Earth's kind of got it like, hey, hey, I've got this under control. I don't need any help from you humans. Sure. And when I do do this,

this is the Earth talking in first person, when I do change from a glacial period to a warm period, it takes many tens and tens of thousands of years, right? Yeah. You humans here, again, this is still me, the Earth. You humans are really messing with my program here and accelerating the process. And you know what?

I'll even give you a clue as to what you're doing that's making it so bad. Carbon dioxide emissions, bam, said the Earth and dropped its microphone and walked away. Yeah, and then it went back and picked up his mic and said, and maybe stop littering. Yeah, that's enough. And then it dropped the mic again.

Yeah. We should talk a minute about a wonderful group called the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Yes. A lot of very smart people there. Oh man, can I just say, to me, the IPCC is one of the coolest things humanities ever come up with.

Yeah. Because it's the world coming together saying, we got a real problem on our hands, let's get our smartest people together and create a database here of good science. Yeah, and those people are specifically about 2,500, actually more 2,500 scientists from around the world meeting together in places like Paris, because why not, right?

Sure. They did this about 10 years ago and came up with a lot of, well, sort of a lot of distressing observations. We'll just tick through a few of these. As far as temperature goes, and like we said, like one degree Celsius can make a big swing and what kind of changes we see on the planet.

Between 1901 and 2000, the Earth warmed 0.6 degrees. So that's, if you adjust that to 1906 to 2006, it climbs up to 0.74 degrees. So about three quarters of a degree in temperature rise during that 100 year period. Right, and there's a lot. It is a lot. And so a lot of people say, well, you guys just said

the Earth tends to do this on its own. Maybe that's it. Well, actually, no, there's a lot of science that the IPCC has been able to come up with that shows pretty clearly that this is human-caused stuff that's actually creating this increase in temperature. And again, it seems to come back to carbon dioxide. Yeah, should we tick over a few of these other observations?

Yeah, for sure. Let me see, here's a good one. The ocean's temperature has increased to at least depths of almost 10,000 feet down. The ocean's temperature has increased. Yep, not a good thing because that's how, like what glaciers tend to melt is from underneath. That's right.

What else, Chuck? Westerly winds have been growing stronger. Droughts have become more intense, blasted longer, covered bigger swaths of land. What else here? Precipitation has increased in the Eastern Americas, Northern Europe, parts of Asia. But it's decreased elsewhere.

Yeah, and that's, I mean, we'll get into this a little bit. A little bit of global warming can mean longer growing and better growing seasons in some parts of the world, but devastating to other parts of the world. Exactly. I guess I'll let the cat out of the bag there, but we'll go over that again later. And how about this?

The warming trend of the last 50 years is about double of the last 100 years. So what that means is the rate is increasing, the rate of warming is increasing. Yeah, actually. So I think the IPCC has determined that each of the past 40 years has been warmer than the average temperature of the 20th century.

And that 2016 was the hottest year on record. And the 12 warmest years on record have occurred since 1998. Dude, you should see the, we'll get into it. Some of the charts that you can find. And again, like if you're even remotely interested in this, like just go look up the IPCC's stuff and some of it,

like you have to be a climatologist to understand what in the name of God they're talking about. But other stuff, especially if you read like executive summaries of studies and reports and stuff, like that's meant to, for like a non-scientists, specifically often like policy makers to read and understand, right?

So the average person can understand that. And they have some really great stuff that's showing like all of the changes that the world is going through thanks to these increases in the global temperature. And again, some of the charts that they have are just stunning when you see them. Cause it's like going along fine, going along fine,

everything's fine. And they, oh my God, what the hell just happened, basically. And it was the Industrial Revolution. It was, but also one of the things that they found recently, especially in the last like three, four years, I believe, is that I think you were saying the increase in global temperatures,

but also again, the increase in carbon dioxide has really shot up over the last like 50 years. Like from the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, I think they usually start that about 1750 to maybe 1800 at the latest, up to like 1950 or so in 1960. Like there's a pretty surprising increase, but it is just skyrocketed

in the last like 50 or 60 years. So they're seeing like this, the science is bearing out the kind of the general theory of global warming, which we should probably talk about this theory of global warming, right? Because like we said, it's not just a human cause mechanism.

Like basically it's an already existing natural mechanism that basically keeps the earth nice and toasty for life and water. It keeps us from being Mars. But we have started messing with it big time because of our contributions to this normal cycle. Yeah, so should we talk about the greenhouse effect a little bit?

Yeah. The greenhouse effect is literally what keeps us from being Mars. It is a good thing when it occurs naturally, because like you said, it keeps us on, it makes earth habitable and lovely and nice for the most part.

So they strickling in the Gravster, I'm not sure who came up with the car analogy, but it's a pretty good one. I agree. If you go into your car on a hot summer day and you get in your car, it's been sitting out in the sun for a little while. It's a lot hotter than it is outside.

It's kind of a no brainer, but you might not have thought about why that happens. It's not magic. What's happening is the sun that's coming in through your car windows gets absorbed by the interior of your car, whether it's your seats or the dashboard or basically kind of everything in the car,

absorbs that heat and that heat is then eventually emitted back out and radiated out from the seats and things like that. But it's at a different wavelength than that initial sunlight that came in. So some of it might get back out of the window, but most of it stays kind of trapped in that car. So the end result, the net net,

as they would say in a corporate meeting, is that there's less energy going out than coming in. Right. So your car's gonna get hotter. So pretend your car is the planet Earth basically. Which would be great. And the windshield is the atmosphere, right? Yeah.

So that's the greenhouse effect in a nutshell. As it relates to the actual Earth, about 70% of the solar energy that is directed toward Earth, right? Stays on the planet, right? And instead of it being absorbed by car seats and floor mats and stuff like that, it gets absorbed by the ocean or land or plants or you,

right? Right. And so about 30% of that stuff that didn't make it through, it was reflective back by clouds, particles in the atmosphere, a bunch of other stuff, right? But as you're sitting there getting warm by the sun, you actually have the potential to re-emit that heat.

And so that stuff starts to go back through the atmosphere out of space. Some of that stuff makes it out into space, but there are other particles that take that solar energy, usually in the form of heat and absorb it. And when they absorb it, they re-emit heat and then they direct it back down at Earth and the process continues.

And in some of that, some cases, some of the stuff that they re-emit, they end up re-absorbing themselves so that there is more heat that's being trapped and sustained on Earth than is being allowed to escape back into space at any given time. Yeah, just like your car. Right, and again, this is like a positive feedback cycle

that creates the atmosphere. It also sustains the atmosphere. It also keeps water here on Earth because water tends to heat up and rise, but then it will cool off in the atmosphere and fall back down as precipitation. And as long as it can fall back down in the atmosphere and nucleate around some of these particles

that are trapped in the atmosphere, we've got water here on Earth. That's right. So it's all thanks to the wonderful, glorious greenhouse effect. Yeah, so that feels like a good place to pause. Let people, let that soak in a minute, like a hot sun on a black car seat.

Like a warm chutney on your forehead. God, and we'll be back a little bit to talk about these gases in the atmosphere that we're talking about here. So, until we get to the end of this video, we'll see you soon. We love you guys. Bye-bye.

Bye. Bye-bye. Bye-bye. We love you. Bye. Bye-bye. Bye-bye. On the podcast, Hey Dude, the 90s called,

David Lashor and Christine Taylor, stars of the cold classic show, Hey Dude, bring you back to the days of slip dresses and choker necklaces. We're gonna use Hey Dude as our jumping off point, into the decade of the 90s. We lived it, and now we're calling on all of our friends to come back and relive it. It's a podcast packed with interviews, co-stars, friends, and non-stop references to the best

decade ever. Do you remember going to Blockbuster? Do you remember Nintendo 64? Do you remember getting Frosted Tips? Was that a cereal? No, it was hair. Do you remember AOL Instant Messenger and the dial-up sound like poltergeist? So leave a code on your best friend's beeper, because you'll want to be there when the nostalgia

starts flowing. Each episode will rival the feeling of taking out the cartridge from your Game Boy, blowing on it and popping it back in as we take you back to the 90s. Listen to, Hey Dude, the 90s called on the iHeart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, I'm Lance Bass, host of the new iHeart podcast Frosted Tips with Lance Bass. The hardest thing can be knowing who to turn to when questions arise or times get tough, or you're at the end of the road.

Ah, okay, I see what you're doing. Do you ever think to yourself, what advice would Lance Bass and my favorite boy bands give me in this situation? If you do, you've come to the right place because I'm here to help. This I promise you. Oh God. Seriously, I swear. And you won't have to send an SOS because I'll be there for you.

Oh man. And so will my husband, Michael. Um, hey, that's me. Yep, we know that Michael. And a different hot sexy teen crush boy bander each week to guide you through life, step by step. Oh, not another one. Kids, relationships, life in general can get messy.

You may be thinking, this is the story of my life. Just stop now. If so, tell everybody, yeah, everybody about my new podcast and make sure to listen. So we'll never, ever have to say bye, bye, bye. Listen to Frosted Tips with Lance Bass on the iHeart radio app, Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts. All right. So we're back.

I think everyone probably understands the greenhouse effect. If you remember your hot car, yeah, it's kind of a nice, easy way to think about it. So when you were explaining the more like the earth's version of that with, uh, getting absorbed, hitting things in the atmosphere, we're talking largely about three things. Carbon dioxide, methane gas, actually four things, nitrous oxide and water vapor. And there are a lot of others, but as far as like stuff that, that really has the biggest impact on, on global warming, it's these guys. Yeah.

So we'll start with CO2 because that's the one you hear about most often, carbon emissions gets all, all the glory in the headlines these days. A carbon CO2 is colorless, it's gas, it is a, a byproduct of, uh, the combustion of organic stuff. Uh, and it makes up a very small part of the earth's atmosphere, 0.04%. And most of it that's up there was, has been there for a long, long time. It's from, uh, volcanic activity. However, uh, we are pumping lots and lots of CO2, additional CO2, uh, and remember there's

a delicate balance going on as it is. So like you said, mother earth doesn't need us adding to this. And we have been adding CO2, but like it's gangbusters. Yeah. So like that, that you remember when I was talking about how water, water turns into vapor and rises and falls back down, that's the rain cycle. There's also a carbon cycle where carbon molecules just kind of go back and forth between the atmosphere and the earth.

And apparently every year, 230 gigatons of carbon are released into the atmosphere from the earth, from plants, from rocks, from us. And then about the same amount, another 230 gigatons comes back down and is locked into earth from the atmosphere, right? And it's like you said, Chuck, like a pretty, pretty nice balance. Mother earth has got this, please don't mess with it. But when we take carbon and unlock it from these carbon sinks, like, you know, we bust up rocks and mining operations, we burn fossil fuels that have carbon locked into them.

We cut down trees and burn those things as fuel. That releases more carbon and it, it messes up that delicate, um, pretty much even exchange between the atmosphere and the earth. Yeah. That's the problem because carbon has a knack for absorbing infrared radiation. So that energy that escapes the atmosphere, that's the form that it comes in. So all this extra CO2 means basically like your cards, an overall increase in temperature. Right.

And, and so not only does it, um, absorb infrared heat and hang on to it, it, um, it, there's a lot of it. There, we just finally in the first time in the history of the human race, all of humanity, not since the industrial revolution, but ever since humans have been around the earth reached, um, 400 parts per million, meaning that out of every million molecules that you just snatched out of the air and count, you're going to come up with 400 of those as carbon atoms, right? Yeah.

Or carbon dioxide. Yeah. So that's new, that's, that's a big deal. And the problem with that is, is not just that there's a lot of carbon dioxide in there, but it's like you said, the more carbon dioxide there is, the more radiative heat that comes back down to earth that doesn't escape into space and the higher the global temperature gets. Yeah.

And just to put it into perspective, uh, 400 parts per million now, and that's 2017 numbers, I guess. Uh, I think in 2015, we hit 400 and we're up to like 404 now. So that, uh, pre-industrial revolution was about 280 parts per million. So it is swelled by about 124 parts per million since, uh, the industrial revolution, which is pretty staggering. Yeah. And there's apparently a way that you can tell when you're actually measuring the carbon

dioxide molecules themselves, where they came from, and ones that are introduced into the atmosphere from burning fossil fuels have a specific signature that we can detect. And we have seen that as the global temperature has increased and more and more, um, carbon dioxide has been introduced into the atmosphere since the industrial revolution. So too has the concentration of that specific type of carbon dioxide. So there's a strong correlation between the, the fossil fuel burn carbon dioxide that we humans have put in the air with rising global temperatures. All right.

Moving on to nitrous oxide, uh, into a, which we, we did a whole podcast on this, right? Yeah. That was a good one. That was a great one. Uh, mainly because of that tank that we had here in the, in the studio. I know. Like we're method podcasters. That was, that definitely enhanced the whole thing.

So, uh, N2O is another greenhouse gas super important and we are not releasing, like human activity is not releasing nearly as much as we are CO2, but, um, N02 or I'm sorry, N2O absorbs a lot more energy like 270 times as much as CO2. So that makes it, uh, something we really need to pay attention to and we are paying attention to it. It just doesn't get all the headlines. No, it definitely doesn't just because there's so, so much less of it, right? Um, whereas it takes like 10, 10s of thousands of years for, you know, the 20% of any given

carbon dioxide emission to leave the atmosphere, it takes about 114 years for a full emission of, um, nitrous oxide to leave the atmosphere. Yeah. As far as man made, it's, uh, it is also a byproduct of combustion and, um, a lot of fertilizer, nitrogen fertilizer that they use on crops as, as releases the N2O into the atmosphere as well. See, to me, all you have to do is like seed the atmosphere with a bunch of hippies and let them huff all the nitrous oxide right out of it.

Problem solved. That's right. Because you've also gotten rid of... Great fish concert in the sky. Exactly. Uh, what else do we have? Methane? Methane's a big one and this is super overlooked, but I remember hearing about this when people

first started realizing like, oh, that's a really big problem. That's, um, it's, there's very little amount of it, whereas like there's 404 parts per million of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere these days. We can measure about 1.7 parts per million of, um, methane, but it, uh, absorbs and emits thermal energy like gangbusters as well, um, far more than CO2. Um, I think about 20 times more and there's, there's a lot of different places where it comes from, like when we, um, mine coal, it releases methane. When our ample herds of livestock fart, they release methane.

No joke. That's actually a huge contributor of greenhouse gases. Oh yeah. We talked about that like, I feel like years ago in another episode. Surely we have. Yeah. Um, another one, Chuck, was, do you remember our, um, plasma waste incineration episode? Yeah.

Sure. One of the things we talked about was that the average landfill gives off methane, um, and that's a huge problem too. Yeah. So like if you go to a landfill and you see that there's flames around it, they're actually burning that stuff off because the CO2 it releases after it's burned is actually preferable in that case to the methane just being allowed to escape. Yeah.

That's bad news. It is bad news. Um, and there are scientists who have even posited that maybe like, you know, tens and hundreds of thousands of years ago that large scale venting of methane into the atmosphere like if a, if a big, uh, block of ice cracked open and unlocked a big methane, uh, bubble from, from under the ocean, that could have caused like maybe a mass extinction. Right. Like cause it was released so quickly into the atmosphere.

Yeah. Like, like we're doing now basically. Yeah. On a slower basis. I don't think anyone's saying that's going to happen. No. I don't know. I don't know.

I think like that is a concern that as arctic, arctic ice melts that methane bubbles could be released, which would just be a nightmare on top of a catastrophe. That's right. Um, there's another problem with methane too that in the atmosphere, it frequently converts to CO2. So it just not only contributes itself, it also contributes to the CO2 emission problem. Man. I also check another thing, um, called, uh, short-lived climate pollutants, SLCPs.

They don't get a lot of press either, but a lot of people think that if we focused on these, we could really see some real results in the short term. Supposedly SLCPs account for something like 30 to 40% of global warming, but they are, um, particles like black carbon, methane counts as one of them. Um, uh, hydrochlorofluorocarbons. Nice. Um, and they can live in the atmosphere from say like days to tens of years and then they, they go away.

Um, and if we really cut down on some of those emissions, it would, we would see the effects of that very quickly. Wow. Yeah. So speaking of effects, I guess we should kind of talk about what this all could mean and does mean. Yeah. Sure.

Uh, number one, we can talk a little bit about sea level, uh, or sea levels. Um, glaciers and ice shelves are melting all around the world and losing large chunks of ice like this can accelerate this warming because there's less of the sun's energy. You know, we talked earlier about it being reflected by ice sheets and things like that. Right. These reflective surfaces, less reflective surface means less is getting reflected away. So just like the very base level, that's going to be a, uh, an increase in temperature. Yes.

Uh, also depending on where the glacier is, um, it could contribute to, um, to sea level increases too, as we'll talk about. Yeah. I mean, we might as well hit that, huh? Okay. So if, um, one of the things that I learned from this that I just absolutely did not know, it makes total sense is that the Arctic sea ice, if it melts, it will contribute zero to a sea level increase.

Yeah. Interesting. I had no idea, but it makes total sense because it turns out that Arctic sea ice in particular floats on the sea. Yeah. So it's already in the sea and it's already contributed to the sea level rise. If anything, if that stuff, uh, if we went through an ice age and all that stuff frozen to basically a frozen land mass, then you'd see a sea level decrease.

But the way it is right now, there wouldn't be a sea level rise if it melts completely. Um, there are other places around earth where the glaciers and ice caps are basically land masses. And if they did melt, then you would see a sea level rise just from that melted water. Right. Yeah. I mean, we're talking about Antarctica there and the likelihood of Antarctica thawing out is not great, which is good.

Well, not all of it, but there's certainly parts of it could. Yeah, for sure. And then same with Greenland too. Well, yeah, Greenland's a problem because it is much closer to the equator. So temperatures are higher there anyway. It's not like negative 37 degrees on average. Like it is in Antarctica. Right.

So I feel like I have to say that so specifically. Antarctica. Yeah. And the other problem too with, um, with this, this loss of ice, like people might say like, no, it's crazy. Like there's, I see plenty of glaciers there still, but if every season a little more melts off than is replenished by snowfall in the winter, you have a net loss of ice. And then over time, if you look at it on a scale of a decade or two decades or three

decades, that's a substantial amount of lost ice. And that is what increases the sea level, that leads to sea level rise. Yeah. So as far as the IPCC is concerned, they estimate that sea levels rose about a little over six and a half inches in the 20th century. Uh, doesn't sound like much, but it is a lot. Like sea level rise in low lying coastal areas can mean pretty bad flooding at just mere inches.

Right. And I suppose that if things continue to go this way, uh, they could rise by as much as 22 inches, almost two feet by the year of 2100. And brother, if that happens, we're going to have to redraw the world map. That's true. I was looking, I was like, how, how high is Miami beach? Miami beach is apparently just under four feet above sea level. Yeah.

New Orleans is, um, like zero feet. I think it's, it's maybe at two feet basically. Yeah. So a lot of coastal cities, Singapore, um, I think, uh, Copenhagen, they're all, they're all like very, um, very close to sea level or just slightly above sea level. And so yeah, two feet rise. I know the mall deeds as frequently mentioned as like being under real threat from sea level rise, but if, even if you don't necessarily live in a coastal area that's two feet, you

know, just two feet above sea level, consider this. If the sea level rose just six inches, like they were saying, that means that when you have extreme weather events, which go hand in hand with global warming and are part of climate change, where it rains really hard and there's more like more major flooding than before, then it's already working with an extra six inches than any flood that you've been used to before. Right. So the floods are much more extensive and that's a really good example of how interconnected

this, this, the, the global climate system is where if one thing gets messed up a little bit, it has all these other widespread effects around the world on, on regions too. Yeah. Cause I think they found that there are not necessarily more frequent, uh, like tropical storms and hurricanes and things, but they're, they are becoming much more intense and that's, that's the issue at hand. Yeah. And that one in particular has to do with the surface temperature of the oceans increasing

as the temperature of the world increases, because that's where the storms, hurricanes and cyclones get their, their energy from is from the warm surface of the sea. Yeah. So if it's warm, that that's like, you'll see them like hit land and, and like lose steam. And then when they go back over the ocean, they'll start to like re gather their strength. That's because they're over warm water again. And that's where, that's where they get it all from. Yeah.

Plus there is, uh, I don't think we mentioned this yet about the density of water. No, no. I don't want to go anywhere near you. You take this one. Well, very simply, uh, water is most dense at four degrees Celsius. So that's, it's kind of a homeostasis of, of where it needs to be anything above or below that temperature and the density is going to decrease. So the overall temperature of the water is going to increase naturally.

And this is not like human cause. Um, but that will also cause the oceans to rise some and that's just a natural thing. Right. Well said. All right. I'll just leave that one. I'll park it right there. I'm glad you mentioned that though, because you don't see that really ever.

Like no one ever mentions like, Oh yeah, water is just going to expand as it warms. Yeah. I've never thought about that one either. Or cools, I think, right? Yeah. Or cools. It's a weird, weird thing, weird, weird material. So let's take another break and we'll get back to explaining why global warming is a

real pain. Hey, dude, the nineties called David Lasher and Christine Taylor stars of the cult classic show. Hey, dude, bring you back to the days of slip dresses and choker necklaces. We're going to use Hey, dude as our jumping off point, but we are going to unpack and dive back into the decade of the nineties. We lived it and now we're calling on all of our friends to come back and relive it. It's a podcast packed with interviews, co stars, friends and nonstop references to the

best decade ever. Do you remember going to blockbuster? Do you remember Nintendo 64? Do you remember getting frosted tips? Was that a cereal? No, it was hair. Do you remember AOL instant messenger and the dial up sound like poltergeist? You'll leave a code on your best friend's vapor because you'll want to be there when

the nostalgia starts flowing. Each episode will rival the feeling of taking out the cartridge from your Game Boy, blowing on it and popping it back in as we take you back to the nineties. Listen to Hey, dude, the nineties called on the I heart radio app, Apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, I'm Lance Bass host of the new I heart podcast frosted tips with Lance Bass. The hardest thing can be knowing who to turn to when questions arise or times get tough or you're at the end of the road.

Ah, okay. I see what you're doing. Do you ever think to yourself, what advice would Lance Bass and my favorite boy bands give me in this situation? If you do, you've come to the right place because I'm here to help this. I promise you. Oh, God. Seriously, I swear.

And you won't have to send an SOS because I'll be there for you. Oh, man. And so my husband, Michael, um, hey, that's me. Yep. We know that Michael and a different hot sexy teen crush boy band are each week to guide you through life step by step, not another one, kids, relationships, life in general can get messy. You may be thinking this is the story of my life.

Just stop now. If so, tell everybody, yeah, everybody about my new podcast and make sure to listen. So we'll never, ever have to say bye, bye, bye, listen to frosted tips with Lance Bass on the I heart radio app, Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts. All right, Chuck. So we talked about the ice caps melting. We talked about glaciers melting. We talked about sea level rise.

Correct. There's also, I mean, people are out there saying like, that's great, but how does it impact me? Yeah. A human. That's what I want to know about. Well, there's tons of ways because as, as technologically clever as we humans are, we are extraordinarily dependent on the earth.

So as these, this climate change happens due to global warming, um, we're going to see all sorts of problems and we already are starting to see problems. Yeah. So we did mention earlier that, uh, if you live in a temperate area, if you've got like four kind of lovely seasons, like let's say Atlanta, Georgia, for instance, you may have a longer growing season. You might have a bit more rain. Uh, it might be actually good for the crops here in Georgia in some ways, but other parts

of the world, uh, less temperate zones are going to see big temperature increases, uh, way less rain and longer droughts, worse droughts, uh, bigger deserts, uh, it's, it's not going to be so good for those places. No, they apparently have found that every trillion tons of, um, CO2 it contributed to the atmosphere raises the global temperature average by about three quarters of a degree Celsius. Wow. And then they went and correlated that, that, um, each one degree Celsius increase in temperature

equals an evaporative increase of about seven to 15% here on planet earth in the soil, right? So as temperatures increase, there's going to be, um, less water in the soil, which affects crops and leads to things like droughts and even desertification as well. But in man, every time I throw out one of these terms, I'm like, we did an episode on that. We did an episode on that and droughts, um, yeah, we've been dancing around this one for a while. We have.

I'm glad we finally tackle that, man. Agreed. You're doing great. By the way, well, hold on, hold on. So it's, as the, the water evaporates from the soil and goes up and is locked into the atmosphere. Yeah. Um, it, again, it's eventually going to come down.

And when it does, you're going to have a far more severe flooding and precipitation than you would have normally when it was just going up and coming down and going up and coming down like on its normal cycle. Yeah. So that's one way that it can affect you because while it's turning to droughts, you got wildfires. And then when the soil, um, gets degraded and there's suddenly a lot of rain, you've got flooding and people get carried away in their cars because they think it can drive

across a flowing river. Uh, that's not funny at all, by the way, I guess not just the way you put it was. Um, so one of the other devastating effects and this one is, um, kind of tougher to predict because we've don't, haven't really seen what can happen with our living human eyeballs, but ecosystems, um, and I think we did, did we do on ecosystems as a whole or just have we talked about it forever and everything? I think it's just popped up in so many of them. It seems like that.

Yeah. We've definitely covered coral reefs and things like that. We're talking about living ecosystems and we all know they're very delicate and the, the, the delicate balance of the ecosystem is what makes it worse. And we've talked ad nauseam over the past nine years about how little, just little things can happen in an ecosystem that will create this chain reaction. It's all interconnected and we don't know what might happen in terms of global warming in our living ecosystem.

Sure, some animals might adapt, uh, some might move, um, but there would also be, you know, massive amounts of extinction. Right. Um, coral reefs are already dying. We're seeing that with our eyeballs. Yeah. They're dying off and turning to grassland and it's not just like, Oh, well, there they go.

Uh, now we have grassland instead of a forest. Let's make some foolish. Yeah. Uh, again, it's just, it's, it's that, that domino effect that we're going to see. It's just no one knows what it's going to mean in the end. It's really troubling. Yeah. And I was, um, I was, I was like, well, how are ecosystems interconnected?

I know they are, but how? So I looked up a good example and, um, found salmon. So salmon are born in like little streams and they end up like traveling down into bigger streams and eventually rivers and then estuaries and then they actually go and mature out in the ocean, which I hadn't really thought of. And then when it's time for them to go breed, they swim back upstream, back into the rivers, back in, back into the streams themselves. Actually they go back to where they were born to breed and then die.

And as they're doing it, they're basically acting as nutrient transport systems between all these different ecosystems each step of the way. Yeah. It's like a seed being scattered in the wind. Yeah. Very much so. But a seed that can actually come back home and bring all the nutrients that it gathered like out in the ocean back into its home ecosystem where it was born.

Yeah. So it was pretty interesting. And I mean, like, that's just a great example. Let's just salmon, you know? So yeah, the ecosystems are, um, very much connected. So if something happens with one, it's going to have an effect on all the other ones. And like you said, some things will survive, some things won't. But the thing that I think most of us here on Earth are agreeing to agree about is we

should probably do something to stop those extinctions as best we can, even if we'll probably survive, you know? Yeah. And, you know, this is a very USA-centric show for the most part, because that's where we're based. We think outside that box as much as we can. And in the case of global warming, it is the poorest nations of the world are the ones that are going to be hit the hardest.

They're the ones in a lot of times in the less temperate zones that are going to be hit with more devastating crop loss. But crop loss is going to be a big deal all over the world. It already is. There's something called the Carnegie Institution that estimates about $5 billion in crop losses per year due to global warming is already going on right now, and farmers are seeing a decrease of about 40 million metric tons of wheat, barley, corn, other cereal grains every year.

So just one degree Fahrenheit, an average temper of an increase could result in 3-5% drop in crop yields. So it's a global issue. Or some of the poorest nations might be affected earliest and the worst, but it is going to touch every nation. It definitely will. It doesn't necessarily have to be the poorest nations. It can be the poorest people of rich nations.

And it can be people who are very rich who end up living in areas that are hit like Houston, saw a lot of increase in waterborne illnesses because of the flooding from Hurricane Harvey. That's something that they otherwise wouldn't have had to have dealt with. There's like that whole crop loss thing and starvation that it leads to. There's a lot of ways people can be affected. And just like salmon, we're connected to other people as well. Even if they're on the other side of the world and we're not really talking to them or don't really know them personally, we're still connected to them.

So if they suffer a crop loss, it'll affect us all. And if they die of starvation, it ends up affecting us all. Yeah, I really like this computer model thing. Did you see that? Yes. That was pretty cut and dried. You know? Yes.

So the IPCC, they used a computer model. And what they did was they tried to simulate climate change. And what they found was the only models that looked like today's climate that equaled, hey, well, this looks like what's going on today, were models that included the human contribution to global warming. When they did not plug in the human contribution, the answer that it spit out was, no, that climate doesn't look like what's going on right now. So that is basically proof that humans are contributing to this.

Right. Exactly. Yeah. That combined with the signature of the carbon dioxide from fossil fuel burning, all that jazz. Yes. And we should probably get to this part. There's a tendency among naysayers to be like, you know, there's not even scientific consensus.

They're not 100% certain that it's us creating this global warming, right? And so science has really kind of taken it upon itself in the last decade or so to address this and say, yes, that's true. There's basically no such thing as settled science. But there has been so much, like we've made it our business to create and conduct so much research and study all of this so closely over the last like 10, 15, 20 years that we have basically come up with a scientific consensus that basically if you take any scientist on the street, there is pretty close to 100% chance that that person is going to say, yes,

climate change is real, yes, global warming is happening, and yes, humans are causing it. Right? Yeah. Because they use words differently than we use words. And you sit in this great article, certainty versus uncertainty, colon, understanding scientific terms about climate change. You know it's smart when there's a colon.

And for the average Joe or Jane walking around on the street, if you say the word uncertain, that means, well, you just don't know. Because when they use the word uncertain, they mean how well you might know something or not. Right. So that's a big difference. It sounds like word games, but there is no, very rarely, is there absolute certainty in science.

So their job is to research and research and limit that uncertainty as much as possible. No, and that uncertainty and their public broadcasting of that uncertainty has been used against them. They've been used against and used against them to fight doing anything about climate change. Right? So they have started to use, especially if you go through like the IPCC's, like policymaker executive summaries, everything that they're stating, they will put like how confident

they are that what they're saying is true. They have a structure to that now. Right. And most of the stuff that they're releasing in their reports has something like a 90% chance or greater of being correct. So they call it like a very likely outcome or a very high confidence. And I've even seen something called an extremely high confidence, which indicates 95% or greater. And then the come on, which is 99% or greater.

Yeah. So there are five points, which they have quote, very high confidence in quote about or even greater. So at least 90% or greater certainty that the following human induced warming influences physical and biological systems everywhere. Sea levels are rising, glaciers and permafrost are shrinking, oceans are becoming more acidic and ranges of plants and animals are shifting. So that's between 90 and 100% certainty on those things.

Yeah. They also say they're comfortable saying with certainty that the burning of fossil fuels in the clearing of forests release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. They say there is no uncertainty about that. They also say that they've learned that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere trap heat through the greenhouse effect. They say again, there is no uncertainty about this and that the earth is warming because these gases are being released faster than they can be absorbed by natural processes.

And then they say it's very likely greater than 90% probability that human activities are the main reason for the world's temperature increase in the past 50 years in particular. And so they're saying like we are scientists, we're the ones who are studying this. No, we can't say with unequivocal certainty that this is the case. But what really people, what more do you need? Like we have studied this so closely, we are so close to 100% certainty that like what's the problem here? Let's just get on board.

And there was actually a study done in 2007 by this economist. It made the news, made the news cycle. His name was Dr. Peter Cegaris. And he basically said, if you look at the cost of doing something and the cost of doing nothing, statistically speaking, it makes way more sense to take steps to mitigate climate change and be wrong about the fact that it was us humans than it would to take no steps at all and be wrong about it actually know it actually was us humans. Yeah.

I mean, that's where I get, I don't want to get too much on a soapbox, but I get angry that there are people out there that say, well, you're not, there's that 10% or less chance. So let's just gamble humanity, the future of humankind on that 10% or less chance because we don't want to get with the program and get behind green initiatives. Because there's a chance you're not 100% certain. That short sighting is just staggering to me. Well plus also that it's been proven, I've mentioned that book before, The Merchants of Doubt, that think tanks have been set up to basically influence public thought and

point out like scientists aren't 100% certain, scientists aren't 100% certain and they're not looking out for you or the earth or your family. They're looking out for their business interests because it's the fossil fuel industry, they're the ones who benefit the most from not taking steps against climate change. But even if you look at some of these fossil fuel industry companies, they're like, no, we should probably do something, we can figure this out. Yeah. Even some of them are saying this now as of 2014.

Amazing. So Chuck, speaking of 2014, there was something big that happened. The Paris Accords. Yes. And in 2014, I think 195 countries came together and said, you know what, we're going to do something. We're going to do everything we can to keep the global average temperature from increasing two degrees above normal, two degrees Celsius I should say.

Because that was kind of a largely agreed upon tipping point that there would be a lot more extreme weather, sea level rise, we would feel the effects of climate change from a two degrees Celsius increase in global temperature. And so they took this really interesting approach where they said, instead of us coming up with a multi-government group that decrees stuff, we're going to just decentralize the whole thing and how about every country come up with what their country can do on their own to fight global warming. And then we'll bring them all together and everybody will take a pledge and we'll go

do it. And it was hugely successful, like out of 195 countries, 168 have ratified it. And the U.S. had a pretty good plan as well. I think we were going to pledge that we would reduce our climate emissions, something like 26 to 28 percent by 2025, which would be a huge significant contribution to fighting global warming. But we got pulled out of that one, I think in 2017. That's correct.

So now the rest of the world seems to be carrying on without us fighting climate change through their own decentralized plans. But that's where the United States stands right now. We have said we're not going to be taking part in that. That's right, but that's not to say that the citizens of the United States can't do everything they can on their own in their own lives by doing some of the following things. First and foremost, decreasing your carbon footprint. And I'm going to put out a call for us right now to go ahead and do one soonish on carbon

offsets because we're a few years down the road from when carbon offsets first became a thing and it's much more understood now. Didn't we do one on this? I don't think so. We did. We've done them on some. Did we? Oh, I know what it was.

We talked about that kind of cap and trade scheme in the acid rain episode. Right. Yeah, we should do one on carbon offsets though because they're much better understood now. It's pretty clear now like the best ways to go about doing something like that. So we're not going to cover it too much here, but you can buy carbon offsets. Look for future podcasts. But reducing your carbon footprint is the biggest thing. I mean, it's really simple.

The stuff that generates the greenhouse gases, if we create less of it, that's a good thing. So you do in that on a local level can make a big impact if a lot of people are doing that. Using less energy obviously is just a sort of a no-brainer and this is just period in life like just being less wasteful, whether it's water or your lights that you're turning on or riding your bike instead of driving your car, like all of that makes a big difference. But with electricity in particular, one thing we always mention is that even though it seems like your light bulb is fine, it's getting its power most likely from burning coal.

So is that electric car that you bought? That's plug-in for sure. Yeah. An electric car is only as good as the energy that it's where it gets its energy from. And we can, that's a whole rabbit hole into itself, hybrids and electric cars and how green they are, but the research I did today roundly says that in the end, a hybrid and electric car has a much smaller carbon footprint than a combustion engine. And I know about the batteries and I know where they get this stuff.

This is considering all the costs that go into making these cars and what happens these cars over the years, there are a lot of smart people that put this all together and it's still a better option than a combustion gas engine. But I'm not here to say go out and get a hybrid or an electric car that's up to you. Well that raises one of the issues too is it can be expensive to be eco-friendly, which really sucks. Yeah. You can also save money though.

Yeah. In the end, it's just the upfront costs are sometimes greater, which is a problem for people who can't afford a more expensive car. It's the same thing with food. The better your food, the more expensive it is, which sucks too. Yeah, but you can use less energy in your home and pay less of an energy bill. Yeah. No, there's plenty of things you can do.

It doesn't cost anything to recycle. Yeah, exactly. And all this stuff, like recycling, you think, well, I mean, I know that's good because there's no trash, but no trash means it's not going to that landfill and that means it's not releasing bad gases into the atmosphere. So this all affects your carbon footprint, recycling to how long you take a shower because you're using hot water and that water has to be heated somehow. Yep.

And I mean, if this has become an issue for you, then make it one of the things you vote on too, like vote for people who care about this and we'll make sure that regulations are put into place that fight climate change. Yeah. It's a big one. There are politicians out there that care very much about this. Yeah, I remember after we pulled out of the Paris Accord, like a few cities said, and we're still doing this, we're going to stick to it regardless.

Yeah. Yeah. You can do it. Your city can do it. Other people can do it. The rest of the world's doing it. Except for Nicaragua and Syria. If I remember correctly, you remember?

Yeah. If you want to know more about global warming, just step outside. And since I said that, it's time for Listener Mail. I'm going to call this so smart I don't get it. But remember during the Builder Mail podcast, we read a Listener Mail about, we asked why you get sleepy when you read? Yes. Well, we had a chiropractor right in, and he says he has the answer.

And I don't know if this is right or not, but it certainly sounds good to me. So he's a chiropractor, and he studied functional neurology in school. And he said, the answer is that when you're reading, your eyes move laterally as they scan the page. This involves the lateral rectus muscle of the eye, which is innervated by the six cranial nerve, the abduxins. Okay. So the abduxins originates in the pons and the brainstem.

And what happens is that as you activate this nerve through reading, you also activate the pontomadulary reticular formation, or PMRF. One job of the PRMF is to dampen the sympathetic response of the intero-mediolateral cell column in the spinal cord, which activates the sympathetic nervous system. In short, reading dampens the sympathetic response and relaxes you. Nice work. I think that's the takeaway. I hope you find this interesting.

Love your podcast. Use a lot of your knowledge. You teach for Trivia Tuesday that my co-workers and I play at my clinic. And that is from Dr. Michael Hilton in Good Old Washington, D.C., or the district. Thanks Dr. Michael, the chiropractor from D.C. That's right. If you want to get in touch with us, like Dr. Michael did, you can tweet to us at Josh Omklark, or S-Y-S-K podcast, both me and Chuck are on Facebook, and you can go to our official

page at facebook.com slash stuffyoushouldknow. You can send us an email to stuffpodcastathowstuffworks.com. And as always, join us at our home on the web, stuffyoushouldknow.com. For more on this and thousands of other topics, visit howstuffworks.com. On the podcast, Hey Dude, the 90s called, David Lasher and Christine Taylor, stars of the cult classic show, Hey Dude, bring you back to the days of slip dresses and choker necklaces. We're going to use Hey Dude as our jumping off point, but we are going to unpack and

dive back into the decade of the 90s. We lived it, and now we're calling on all of our friends to come back and relive it. Listen to Hey Dude, the 90s called on the iHeart radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, I'm Lance Bass, host of the new iHeart podcast, Frosted Tips with Lance Bass. Do you ever think to yourself, what advice would Lance Bass and my favorite boy bands give me in this situation? If you do, you've come to the right place because I'm here to help and a different hot

sexy teen crush boy bander each week to guide you through life. Tell everybody, everybody about my new podcast and make sure to listen so we'll never ever have to say bye, bye, bye. Listen to Frosted Tips with Lance Bass on the iHeart radio app, Apple podcast, or wherever you listen to podcasts.